Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 1st, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errori digitazione Enrichettadallari (talk) 01:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 09:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessarily Arezam (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a personal photo. It was created on accident, while trying to upload a picture for a bio template. Faithgrady (talk) 06:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fabricated depiction, misleading. Jaydayal (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Jaydayal: use {{Fictitious flag}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio(https://m.facebook.com/AmethiaRajput/photos/a.372893083237682/373345026525821/?type=3&source=54&ref=page_internal) Heba Aisha (talk) 01:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Taivo. ---akko (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free promo pic, stolen from multiple sources, such as https://www.cricket.com.au/players/stacy-ann-king/1k9Ys9Mx70y9jzZ-DfGZMA Lugnuts (talk) 14:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Palestine is a hoax, ישראל is the real state. TheGoldenEagleGuy (talk) 06:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

אנא מחק את דגל המדינה השגוי הזה — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoldenEagleGuy (talk • contribs) 06:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

אל לנו לעודד טרוריסטים — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoldenEagleGuy (talk • contribs) 06:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They attack Israel with rockets, do not support a state whose foundation is built on terrorists — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoldenEagleGuy (talk • contribs) 07:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why suffering for Jews ? We never killed or attacked anyone. Crimes against jews must stop. ה 'יברך את ישראל — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoldenEagleGuy (talk • contribs) 07:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian threatened to use long- range rockets to attack Israel. Jews are suffering since ages. Don't anyone remember Shoah(mass murder of jews), we defeat them before second Holocaust takes place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoldenEagleGuy (talk • contribs) 07:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsensical nomination, speedy kept. --jdx Re: 08:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag. 84.241.202.156 14:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use = in scope. "Fake" or not is something that can/should be written in description on file page. --MGA73 (talk) 14:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

m$m$m$jm$ù 197.203.26.70 14:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 15:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

מוות לנרקיסיסטים כהנא צדק 84.241.202.156 14:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fuerdai schoolgirls o nwheels 84.241.202.156 16:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avigdor Lieberman 2017.jpg 84.241.202.156 16:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside project scope Ytoyoda (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and spam by a globally blocked user (Payalsingh0135) Trade (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 22:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non notable, self promotion 89.249.2.54 15:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4): File:Navneet Chauhan.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 22:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why 'no freedom...'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.62.97‎ (talk • contribs) 18:28, 1 December 2020‎  (UTC+8)

@Gorupdebesanez: (perhaps you commented while not logged in) see COM:FOP Italy. Italian copyright law prohibits free publications and reuses of images of copyrighted artworks, as these infringe the economic rights of the painters/sculptors/architects or their heirs. For this to be hosted here, permission from its artist/creator/designer is required. We don't know that one day that artist will request the removal of Commons photos of his artworks licensed under Creative Commons free licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have cropped the image and removed the murals. @Gorupdebesanez: Since the image is still have educational value, it can be kept now. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination (non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gorupdebesanez as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: cropped photo is unuseful, so it's better to delete it
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused; File:Deep Submergence enlisted badge.jpg is much higher res. Ich (talk) 18:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused; File:Deep Submergence Officer badge.jpg is much higher res. Ich (talk) 20:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image ne doit pas être sur ce site Sakida0 (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 10:16, 2 Dezember 2020 UTC: Speedydelete --Krdbot 15:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim that this is Nicholas Alahverdian appears to be false. See here for a verified photo of the subject. ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 23:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another verified picture. And another. ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 23:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per withdrawl by nominator. Norsk81 (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a hoax. Compare this photo to other publicly available photos of the subject [2] [3] [4] [5][6] [7] [8] [9] or even a video [10]. Various Wikimedia sites have been abused by sockpuppetry with regard to Nicholas Alahverdian, read the history here. Simply put, we are being scammed, and this is another attempt. Starship.paint (talk) 04:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody hell. This image is of FP4A advisory board member (#11) Jonathan Finer, scroll down this page [11], and see this Wikipedia page [12]. Someone’s got to indef the uploader. Starship.paint (talk) 12:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should add it to Category:Jonathan Finer. --E4024 (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete there is no point in keeping it as it's not the subject and given the creators claims of it definitely being the subject, it gives me pause about their credibility with regard to copyright. Praxidicae (talk) 18:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted as this appears to be a photo of Jonathan Finer (thanks to E4024 for the link) with the consequence that the uploader does not appear to be trustworthy who has been checkuser-blocked at en:wp in the meantime. This needs to be speedied as apparent copyvio and as this touches the personality rights of the persons involved. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 09:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not convinced that this is "own work". It appears on numerous copyrighted websites around the same time that it was uploaded to Commons (eg: http://www.currentaffairspk.com/complete-biodata-of-lt-gen-raheel-sharif/) and while it is possible that they all took it from Commons, I'd still be dubious about its derivative status: it appears to be a montage of an official portrait with a photoshopped background. Sitush (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this image is from Twitter Account. Link to photo is [pic.twitter.com/102Dze6jNN]. You are requested to read Tweets, Following, Lists and other Public Information at Twitter Privacy. I've changed source of file. --Asad Warraich (talk) 13:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't see any reason why this Twitter image should be freely licensed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This disclaimer from the source site Never mentions a free license even with Attribution. So, it is likely not free. Leoboudv (talk) 23:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:General_Qamar_Javed_Bajwa.jpg if anyone has concerns.Thank You192.142.146.81


Kept: License verified by nom. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from Instagram according to the title. Copyvio. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 11:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as no permission (No permission since) Atsme Talk 📧 16:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • To clarify, images uploaded to Pixabay after 2019-01-09 are not compatible with Commons. Since the uploader did not bother to provide a date other than 2019-11-25 or an image URL that could be used to search for an archive link, I don't see a way to verify the license information. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Ytoyoda - where is the link for the "not compatible" discussion? Here is the link for the English pointer. I fixed the Summary, but can't fix the upload history. It's public domain, so I don't know why it's not compatible with Commons. Atsme Talk 📧 16:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Atsme: Please see the template {{Pixabay}}. You'll see how Pixabay's licensing changed in 2019 and why the original upload date matters. Though it looks like this from 2013 so it's fine. Please make sure to include a working link and the photo date for future uploads. Thanks for providing the link. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedy was declined because the image was "in use", which I took care of. But, beyond that, it had only been used in a declined draft and a user's sandbox which was a "draft of the draft". So I am not really sure that "in use" should apply. Quakewoody (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • May be in scope as the subject was a candidate for Mayor of Ithica.[17] He has several published books, but they may all be self-published. However,  Delete as a possible copyright violation as the image is used in his Amazon author page.[18] Verbcatcher (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know this is a policy issue, not a deletion request issue - Considering that anyone can run for any office, should we really be considering being a "candidate" a legitimate notability claim? I mean, I was almost elected comptroller and treasurer (two different offices) in the same year. I was in a 3 way tie for one, and a 2 way tie with the other. Sadly, my mother didn't vote for me, or else I would have won. I opted not to run in the run-off election.
So, yeah, 3 people had 1 vote. Hence, the 3-way tie. Pretty pathetic that mom didn't vote for me. It would have meant that I had 50% of the total vote. But, the point is, I hardly feel as if this qualifies me for anything. Not even worth mentioning in an article. Quakewoody (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The previously declined draft was amended and resubmitted for consideration. I am still waiting to hear from the team that work new post draft submissions. I did run for mayor in Ithaca, NY as one of the African American men campaigning which made the race historical. I also have a variety of other accomplishments which are worthy of notice in my life which can be viewed on my webpage (https://anthonygallucci.weebly.com/). I have several published books and articles. Some of them are independently published and some are published by a publisher. Out of curiosity, I am wondering how my perceived notability impacts the wiki policy around deleting a picture? Are your concerns with my notability status the reason for deleting the picture? On a more important point; I am glad to hear that you ran for political office and I too wish your Mother had voted for you :)

Thank you for your response. The main issue we are discussing is known in the jargon as 'scope', see Commons:Project scope. Specifically, files on Commons must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. A photograph of person of no particular importance is not normally treated as having an educational purpose. This is similar but distinct from Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Being a mayoral candidate in the circumstances you describe may be sufficient. Your books all appear to be self-published – publication by a mainstream publisher would probably be sufficient. Any photo in use in Wikipedia is accepted as 'in scope' for Commons, but this is not a requirement. The other issue is copyright. Generally, if a photograph was published on another website before it was uploaded to Commmons then we require confirmation of the licence by email to the OTRS system. This picture is on your Amazon author page, but it is unclear if it was there first. Also, is this a selfie? We need evidence of permission from the photographer, not from the subject. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind clarification. The picture is a selfie taken on my porch on my camera. The picture was on the amazon author page and it has since been replaced. The picture was first used online when I submitted it to the wikimedia commons. I was one of the first two African Americans to run for Mayor in Ithaca, NY and the first as an Independent candidate (https://www.ithaca.com/news/looking-back-reflecting-on-ithaca-s-2011/article_6dfdc298-3666-11e1-b0a1-0019bb2963f4.html) and I ran as a 'fringe' candidate to provide strategic support for the election of the first African American mayor in Ithaca, NY. The books are published by an independent publisher. In regards to being a person of importance the discretion in determining that is up to the wiki editors and I humbly submit to, and trust, their judgement. Thank you for your consideration!


Kept: Keeping this for now to let the subject provide permissions to OTRS. If they don't, then we'll proceed. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - text on a picture. Pibwl (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CD cover of uknown notability and copyright, along with its back cover File:ELJay Kenn - Thursday Remixes Cover Art (back).jpg Pibwl (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ошибка, переправил "лезгин" на "аварцев" и создал новую версию LandRussia (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, deletion requested by uploader immediately after upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Если нужно доказательство, вот новая версия - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Расселение_аварцев_на_территории_Азербайджана,_Чечни,_Дагестана,_в_%25.png. Наверно стоило просто обновить старую, но уже сделал как сделал LandRussia (talk) 20:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Он заменён фотографиями Megaekenkas (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, на основании этого требую его удалить! Ssp 1.618 (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, file is unused. --A.Savin 17:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename translates as "File: Functional block diagram of counting on the rising and falling edges of a signal, with a count of 12 (three points of reference), and a filter at the output.jpg" - Not sure what the purpose of the image is or how it's even in SCOPE - image isn't categorised either, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by an admin. –Davey2010Talk 22:32, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, на основании этого требую его удалить! Ssp 1.618 (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep - The noms rationale translates as "I, the copyright holder of this work, on the basis of this demand to remove it! " - The nom chose to upload their files here and they were fully aware of the license etc etc and the image is being used on a few pages too, I have no idea about the subject but the image is in scope and can serve a meaningful purpose here, No valid reason has been presented for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, file is unused. --A.Savin 17:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename translates as "File: Functional block diagram of counting on the rising and falling edges of a signal, counting by 12.jpg" - Not sure what the purpose of the image is or how it's even in SCOPE - image isn't categorised either, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the time of !voting above I assumed there was some scope to this image and didn't really look closer than that. Anyway post-DR the file has been categorised which I'm happy with. –Davey2010Talk 12:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. –Davey2010Talk 22:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no pages using this file. Ssp 1.618 (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Now it's enough. The user uploaded many files, requested many deletions, reuploaded the files and re-requests deletions now ?? The user has a history of harassment, blocks (on own request??) and disruptive editing. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, на основании этого требую его удалить! Ssp 1.618 (talk) 14:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep - The noms rationale translates as "I, the copyright holder of this work, on the basis of this demand to remove it! " - The nom chose to upload their files here and they were fully aware of the license etc etc and the image is being used on a few pages too, I have no idea about the subject but the image is in scope and can serve a meaningful purpose here, No valid reason has been presented for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, file is unused. --A.Savin 17:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File translates as "File: Functional block diagram of edge counting, counting by 10.jpg"- not sure how this could be in scope?, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the time of !voting above I assumed there was some scope to this image and didn't really look closer than that. Anyway post-DR the file has been categorised which I'm happy with. –Davey2010Talk 12:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. –Davey2010Talk 22:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no pages using this file. Ssp 1.618 (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2007 publication, Not seeing why this would PD-US GOV either.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2005 publication, Why would this be PD-US-Gov as claimed on the PDF?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per F10, personal photos by non-contributors. Personal image of user who have no constructive global contributions. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope ; vandalism on fr.wp Gyrostat (talk) 13:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, one of few uploads. Pibwl (talk) 20:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a personal photo, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo of unnamed person, one of 3 uploads. Pibwl (talk) 22:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. Requires permission of the artist (designer). E4024 (talk) 00:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Celf-centered user. No meaningful contributions. E4024 (talk) 00:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Social media size, no camera EXIF, tr code, occasional visitor upload. E4024 (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep None of these are valid reasons for deletion.
It would also appear that these images are of Jennà Romano, a musician, and the subject of a valid draft article at it:Utente:Gaverg/Sandbox. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keeping for now, but asking for permissions since it's watermarked. --Missvain (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not created by the uploader on the date claimed, and no evidence it is uploader's work: present at https://www.entillinois.com/robert-m-meyers-m-d/ at least since April 2018: https://web.archive.org/web/20180406184538/http://www.entillinois.com/our-doctors/robert-m-meyers-m-d/ . Page is copyrighted 2018. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto: Isac Fridlund? E4024 (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a cross-wiki upload from sv.wikipedia. Although the photo credit is unclear, that doesn't mean it's invalid. Did you discuss this with the uploader here, as to who Isac Fridlund is, and was that more obvious with the old copy on sv.wikipedia? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keeping for now but going to ask for permissions. --Missvain (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not know if this person is in scope, but I have my doubts about the own work claim: Small file, no camera EXIF, tr code... E4024 (talk) 00:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook per MD. E4024 (talk) 01:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • "per MD"? You asked a Doctor?
This is yet another of your bogus deletion requests with completely invalid rationales. You think you are "cleaning up", but all you're actually doing is wasting the time of other editors.
Yes, this has probably travelled through Facebook. We don't care, that's not a valid reason for deletion. We might care (just as for Flickr et al) if it was someone else's IP being washed thorugh Facebook, but that's another question. Given the name and subject, this is most likely a user selfie.
You could have nominated this as, "personal selfie, out of scope". We could discuss that, it might be a good reason to delete (although we do always allow some leeway on selfies of editors). But continually nominating under irrelevant and often simply untrue rationales is a time sink for other editors. Writing DRs so badly is its own problem too - if you want to nominate something, it's incumbent upon you to communicate why to other editors, not use some arcane "per MD" code that you've invented. If you don't have time to write a nomination correctly, we certainly don't have time to read it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - feel free to nominate for another reason. --Missvain (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted Yusuf Yasin Kaya is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in tr.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim. Uncropped versions can be found online, like here. ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture without any encyclopedic value. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ahh... do whatever you want with this photo, honestly. I uploaded it so long ago that I didn't even know that it existed. Just because the guy recently died and now you want to delete every image related to him in Wiki Commons doesn't matter to me. I have more important things to do. See ya!--Diablo del Oeste (talk) 04:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Diablo del Oeste: what A1Cafel meant is that there is no freedom of panorama for works of art in Argentina, other than "buildings" (thanks to the opinion of an Argentine lawyer, otherwise even images of modern buildings are not allowed in Argentina, as their copyright law de jure disallows commercial reuses of images of copyrighted artistic works). Since there is no FOP, you must obtain authorization from the artist of this artwork to release your image of this artwork under free and commercial-friendly licensing (so this image can be reused in post cards etc without the need of license from the artist/painter). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License fail: clearly a composite of uncited originals. And not even chemically correct: notice there is another atom buried behind the black–blue bond. DMacks (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of uncited images. Have File:Mesyl-chloride-3D-balls.png as uniform-style properly licensed DMacks (talk) 03:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License fail (composite of uncited originals) and content fail (title substance is not covalent). DMacks (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License fail (composite of uncited originals) and content fail (title substance is not covalent). DMacks (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License fail (composite of uncited originals) and content fail (title substance is not covalent). DMacks (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License fail (composite of uncited originals) and content fail (title substance is not covalent). DMacks (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, it is from https://www.mhp.org.tr/htmldocs/basbug/fotogaleri/mhp/basbug_fotograf_galerisi.html Shadow4dark (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 05:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted film poster. No evidence that this was released under a CC0 1.0 license. The patpmovie.com website just says "© 2020". gobonobo + c 05:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was uploaded and used in a blatantly hoax article of an unverified living person biography (vi:Ngô Đức Anh Tuấn). Out of project scope. Buiquangtu (talk) 05:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned Najwa Ikhwan "Nana" M.. No OTRS given, just a Facebook/Instagram permission. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 06:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo missing Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright holder Sony. Industrial design doesn't usually garner copyright; this isn't quite a car, but it's a long way from simple sculpture. It seems reasonable that the uploader is the copyright holder of the photo, as well. Prosfilaes (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pravishya Ananduv2 (talk) 07:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pravishya Ananduv2 (talk) 07:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is called a selfie, but it does not look like that. Small photo without camera data, maybe not own work, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'm going to keep this to allow the uploader one more week to provide permissions since this image is being used in so many projects. We will delete if they cannot provide permissions. Thank you for understanding and assuming good faith. --Missvain (talk) 01:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan fiction, the source doesn't show any map like this. Beshogur (talk) 09:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced. Beshogur (talk) 09:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map. Beshogur (talk) 09:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the name heidila guru does not match with the picture of heidila guru Pippobuono (talk) 09:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, I have also nominated the target file for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alma Prica.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: raw text only Headlock0225 (talk) 09:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikosmata12111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not notable. Deletion request in Wikidata

Estopedist1 (talk) 10:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfpromo Jan Myšák (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubious "own work", see [19] Oesterreicher12 (talk) 10:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair - the image at shutterstock does have the same photographer indicated. The EXIF also looks ok. Shyamal L. (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Feel free to request permissions. Kepeing for now. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled, double-'s' for inflection is missed, see German Wiktionary: Messiasse, pronunciation file with correct spelling already exists, see , sorry for the inconvenience Jeuwre (talk) 10:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file with tr code, no EXIF, Facebook size. E4024 (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'm going to assume good faith. --Missvain (talk) 01:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work, see e. g. [20], bad exif (photoshop) Oesterreicher12 (talk) 10:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previous nomination/s

No freedom of panorama kn the philippines and no permission from the architect. This architecture started in 2009: https://www.manilatimes.net/2019/10/17/campus-press/st-andrew-kim-taegon-shrine-a-piece-of-korea-in-bulacan/640795/amp/ and https://bluedreamer27.com/shrine-saint-andrew-kim-taegon-lolomboy-bocaue-bulacan/ Take note too the sculptures paintings engravibgs and tables with embedded literary texts not from governmentof the republic of the philippines

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Because the Architect whosoever already surrendered all his rights to the Titular Bishop Oliveros and Bishop Dennis; No Catholic Parish will ever allow any Architect to design a Parish Church without having waive all copyrights, otherwise the Parish cannot be created; besides this Church and Shrine has been erected by Bayanihan physical and financial help by poor and rich parishioners aside from donations from Korean Catholics; Category:Bayanihan Category:Bayanihan and Category:Bayanihan eliminated any Copyright;
Discussion, argument and reasons to Keep the photos
  •  Keep Because the photos are unimportant or at the very least, DE MINIS so to speak, in Philippine Law and Jurisprudence; and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and the Tourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points-to-point angular photos, for the pictures uploaded are for their political advantages in the coming election, being hosted for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Philippine Copyright - Intellectual property Law; No copyright exists in them, and
  • In support of my stance, opposition to the deletion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons administrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Smart One - Nominator of Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:

FOP matter update: Rejoinder

FOP matter update: Rejoinder
Rejoinder II
the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime
* (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
  • Q. What are the elements of the 2012 CybercrIme vis-a-vis Commons Mass Deletions in my Talk page? A. they are: from hacking to attacks online a) using a john or jane doe or anonymous account b) hiding the identity by use of such alternate accounts c) via a habit, scheme or design d) to attempt to delete, erase or in any manner take meta or mass date like photos from any internet site or legitimate forum, device or even media like Commons, Wikipedia, Flickr, phot bucket, Facebook; vide: SECTION 1 (h) Without right refers to either: (i) conduct undertaken without or in excess of authority; or (ii) conduct not covered by established legal defenses, excuses, court orders, justifications, or relevant principles under the law. SEC. 4. Cybercrime Offenses. —(3) Data Interference. — The intentional or reckless alteration, damaging, deletion or deterioration of computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right, including the introduction or transmission of viruses.
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.


  • Finally, I am submitting this proof to Commons Admins that your Deletion Request is not only without basis but a scheme, habit or plan to take off Valid Photos in Commons; the Statues is 18th Century; it took me 2 days to research on this to prove to Commons Administrators that this and most of your Mass Deletions are unlawful and contrary to Philippine Laws;
  • Intellectual Property Mediation and many other innovations to prevent long court litigations does not make law; as I said only the present not past S. C. ruling on FOP will put finis to all of these pros and cons upon FOP including the finer points of law or grey areas of Copy fair use vio etc. At the very least, an IPO or DOJ not declining to issue Replies to any Letters of ours or yours, will suffice for the moment as Basis of Commons community of editors and admins to create a policy on FOP deletions or undelitions; may I repeat and underscore that even the SC of USA and ours often issue Bad Law or highly divided rulings like 5-4 or here 8-7 not beating the greatest Phil case of Javellana vs. Secretary which made infidels and believers stand weeping or even dancing during the Bagong Lipunan; I admit that there are Commons exact rules like on packaging and the like that does not need debate; for me this is the very beauty fo the Philosopy of Commons or its Founders that pros and cons here make this Commons world better that SC court USA and Phil toss coin decisions, specifically in the 9th Circus Court of California as CA Justice William Bedsworth wroth on me the the 3 elves; I am for inclusion ... thus you see my redundancy and duplicates ... but as I said, I am ahead of your times as I told Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. at 6:00 pm of Dec 24, 1999 Xmas my first Suspension Holiday : he scolded me for being off-tangent, off- topic; I told him that I am not of this world itong mundong mapaghuzga; soon, the Supreme Court will steal my Robes, Gavel and Golden Br. 73 Throne with is mine until age 70 or 2023 ... my names which as you said precedes all the SC Justices your nominated who cannot even hold my 87.55% Bar rating 12th Place Bar 1983, where UP Summa Cum Laude Napoleon Poblador now one to the top lawyers, failed to land in top 20 due to very low grade in Taxation which I topped at 86%; my classmate Ramon Caguioa sat beside us as my name made noises in the Ateneo since I could cite Volumes of the SCRA in exams but not the pages which is the only property of Ferdinand Edralin Marcos during the Arturo M. Tolentino debates; his younger brother Benjamin now Senior and candidate for CJ was nobody in the Ateneo; I say and know the Law, and I do not commit mistake; I am primary authority; but I underscore that I am co-equal with any editor here and I am just putting or sharing this input because of the present most difficult Mass Deletions that we experience, moro moro or moral farce so to speak; I have never contested nor objected to Deletions Request since my pictures are the subject and I stay neutral; that is why I created this Template: "Respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of editors and I have no objection to the Deletion ..." But Commons is facing a Signal No. 500 Mass Deletions ... and I still have no time yet as of this moment to finis my Legal Treatise to answer the Long Lines of Mass Deletions that appears in my Talk Page; one side of the coin like a pro or a coin can create here an alternate account and start the Mass Deletions; of course, the Mass Deletions were started since the editor said it, she or he is smart, and then admitted after being blocked to have done a great wrong... but then stated that a professor advised that the idea of Mass Deletions starting from smart notion could .... and I countered that my Fish Vendor and hired trike driver told me not to take photos of the fishes and the food Isusumbong nila ako kay Mayor; It's A Frank ... for gullibles and moro moro players I cannot like Justice William Bedsworth wait for the Next Mass Deletions to be copy pasted in my Talk Page;
  • I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator Never return Adiós Judgefloro (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully

... respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 08:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keeping based on past discussions about this user's contributions. --Missvain (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The entire shrine was incepted in 2009 as per this Manila Times article, and a Korea.net article states this shrine nearing its completion in 2017. As freedom of panorama is not yet provided in the copyright law according to IPOPHL-BCRR, regular rules apply. This means permission and a consent for images' PD-licensing from the architect (a Korean architect according to Korea.net) is required. Nominated images substantially show exterior and interior architecture of the component buildings of the shrine (the grand hall, the tower, etc.).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Urgent and Fervent Appeal to Commons Community to Put On Hold the Mass Deletion Requests Non-Stop and Unlawful under the Strict Provisions of Philippines Criminal (Penal) Law on Cybercrimes-stalking : to Defer possible Mass Deletions - Erasing of Valued Photos of National Interest from the Herein User Deleter, based on Moral grounds and most certain irreparable Damage and Injury to Commons files and contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users, with all Due Respect: I am reproducint herein as part hereof My Legal Treatise for the kindness of the Commons Community to review and to Declare Null and Void Ab Initio all the Mass Deletions by herein Nominator: to wit - Judgefloro (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


CONSOLIDATED REPLY-OBJECTION: SYNOPSIS - The En Masse Nominations Request for Deletion by the herein Nominator in no uncertain terms, falls within the 4 corners of the The Cyberstalking and 2012 Cybercrime Law of the Philippines which provides grave penalties for its Violations of this Act: the Series of Unlawful Mass Deletions now being started by herein Nominator will cause irreparable damage and injury to the Meta Files of Wikimedia Commons: I vehemently object to the deletion on Substantive Legal Grounds, under my Lawyer's and Judge's Oath of Office, and as Authority on Criminal Law Review based on my Ateneo Law School records; I submit to the Commons Community In Seriatim, objectively (and based on USA and Philippine Jurisprudence vis-à-vis Substantive laws both Civil - Copyright law of the Philippines amending the New Civil Code provisions on the Law of Property) and Criminal law 1932 Revised Penal Code as amended by the Penal Provisions of both [ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ Republic Act No. 10175] - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and Copyright Penal Provisions especially [https://acg.pnp.gov.ph/main/2-uncategorised/263-acg-cyber-security-bulletin-no-132-understanding-the-risk-of-cyberstalking Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, group, or organization - monitoring, threats, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass);
Extended content by Judgefloro
Now a) Who can question with Legal Personality to the Special Courts on Copyright and Trademark Infringement - Vide: The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) vis-à-vis the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases; and b) within what period of time based on Civil Law on Extinctive Prescription); here are my legal grounds to dismiss the Nomination or Request for Deletion, to wit:
i) I talked to the former Parish Priest Msgr. Jo Aguilan whom I healed as healing Judge in the Barasoain Convent and in his room, now deceased and b) Parish Priest on 24 August 2014, 18:50:54 Fr. Dario V. Cabral, incumbent Parish Priest of Barasoain Church; he confirmed in our discussion, that the Titular Bishop Oliveros now Dennis Villarojo has acquired all rights and properties, Torrens titles of Barasoain Church including all the Monuments therein; hence, the Creator of the Statues transferred all his rights by virtue of the Strict Provisions of Canon law of the Catholic Church on Parish Creation; and in this case, Saint Andrew the Apostle Church the Titular Bishop of Broderick Pabillo the apostolic administrator of the sede vacante Archdiocese of Manila.


ii) I also talked with the PIO Office of Baliuag including Tourism Office, when I was requesting for photos of the Feb 2 2021 Episcopal Coronation; I was told that Mayor Ferdie Estrella, as SOP, following the Strict LGU DILG guidelines, has a signed written contract between the paid official photographer to have waived all his rights in favor of the Municipal government of Baliuag whoever is the Mayor; under the Local Government Code and DILG Laws, all architects and sculptors cannot retain copyrights without violating the Penal Provisions of these codes and the Anti-Graft Law RA 3019 as amended; Ergo, all LGUs including the herein Malolos City Government ipso facto acquires all moral rights surrendered by alleged and all creators of Copyrights subjects and objects;
ii) I will quote here my past rendition for emphasis: 29 January 2012 [File:Emilio222jf.JPG this file] by virtue of Substantive Philippine law on Extinctive prescription of FOUR YEARS from Commons Uploading, that is, legal public and open publishing in any forum or format, nobody including the alleged creators can now question in any court or forum even by the Creator; [File:FvfMalolos1335 01.JPG this also] 18 April 2014, 15:45:57; This also, [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 15.JPG This also] This also [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 17.JPG This also] 18 April 2014, 15:42:36; assuming Ex Gratia Argumenti or Arguendo, that Flickr Photobucket or any Commons Editor has opined otherwise, even if the IPO Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director now incumbents, would say otherwise, even if possibly reversing the former Learned Verbal Answers to my Personal Query and long discussions with my Ateneo School Mate Director Blancaflor, still, the Laws, I cited hold; it is for the Commons Community to decide between my submitted Legal Treatise any the alleged IPO zooms and others;
At this point, I humbly ask a transcript of the IPO Zooms for the guidance of the Bench and the Bar; I would like to examine Legally the contents thereof for a single purpose: I will try my best if I have time and access due to COVID 19 restrictions to personally talk with the a) Integrated Bar of the Philippines President at Pasig City Main Office and b) the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyrights; if they will maintain wrong legal Opinions, then I reserve my Lawyer's Judge's Right to question them individually with the Ombudsman regarding Gross Ignorance of the Law or possible Disbarment in the IBP Office;
Counter-Argument versus alleged Dicta, sayings, Virtual Answers or even Email correspondence of the Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director: Burden of proof (law) - Rule 131. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS - Burden of Evidence and Preponderance of the evidence  : Judicial Supremacy of the S.C. of the Philippines:


i) FIRST, the Copyright Law cannot be interpreted by them for ONLY the Supreme Court of the Philippines (in a ripe judicial controvery elevated to it either by Petition for Review or Appeal from Special Courts on Copyrights towards Certiorari under Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals) has original and exclusive Jurisdiction expressly GRANTED and mandated by the 1987 Constitution to Say with definiteness what the Law is, that is Stare Decisis or Philippine Specific Jurisprudence on a) who has the copyright or moral rights with legal personality to file in the Special Courts created under the law and S.C. latest Circulars under C.J. Peralta - infringement of copyrights or trademarks b) within 4 years from publication so public in public domain like Commons Uploading in Meta Details, under the New Civil Code law on Extinctive Prescription and Copyright Law; c) any ruling issued on Copyright whether virtual, email or correspondence including Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration FB discussions; d) any ruling or the DOJ Opinion by the Secretary of Justice my classmate; Vide: 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC
ii) SECOND: it is legally absurd to claim that the Burden of Evidence is upon the herein Uploader Editor; in any country including Germany and USA, inter alia, the Burden of Proof vis-a-vis Burden of Evidence are clearly defined by Federal Rules and here the 1989 Rules on Evidence as amended by C.J. Peralta's Watch New Rules of Court - Burden of Proof is fixed: it stays with the a in Criminal cases particulary Penal Provisions of Copyright Law, the Complainant, here, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest, must must must, alleged in the Criminal Information to be filed by the Private Prosecutor under the control of the Fiscal, the ultimate facts, their rights to Copyright or Trademark; the Proof of the Burden is Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, that is Moral Certainty to Convict by Majority Vote of S.C. Justices on Appeal; any Decision whether by the Special Court or IPO or Bureau or DOJ if not elevated and ruled upon by the S.C. are or is not Law or Jurisprudence b) in Civil Cases, the Proof is Preponderance of Evidence resting on the Plaintiff, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; III) the Burden of Evidence shifts from the Proponent, that is, the Plaintiff, or herein Nominator of Deletion Request in Commons, or in Flickr or in any Fora, if he or she has the right emanating by Special Power of Attorney from the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; the Burden of Evidence is shifted by Law on Evidence to the defendant, that is, the alleged Copyright violator, when the Judge rules in the Trial amid objections from the opposing counsel or parties; iv) The IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright Head, can never interpret the Copyright Law; it is only in one case that the Executive Department acquired quasi-judicial powers to rule: in P.D. 1529, the LRA Administrator can say what is the Law on Torrens title upon filing of fees in En Consulta cases versus the Register of Deeds; but but but that is not jurisprudence; the ruling only becomes jurisprudence when elevated to the C.A. and finally to the S.C. issuing a Stare Decisis Decision; this is the same banana with Quasi-Judicial Powers and Rulings of the Executive Agencies, like Immigration, Bureaus of Customs, here Bureau of Copyright (who has no such power); v) The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has jurisdiction to discipline the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if lawyers based even on Anonymous Complaint more frequently under R.A. 6713 which is broader than Sunlights in the Philippines, or R.A. 3019; the IBP has concurrent jurisdiction with the SC Disbarment Office to suspend or dismiss lawyers including IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if they issue comedy of errors or simply put, refusal to reply to my 2 Letters within a fast time required thereat; but the Lawyer under and representing Director Blanclaflor replied to my query: Can I upload any photos falling under FOP in Commons? He replied yes, since if there is no proviso in the Copyright law prohibiting it, then, the Law permits what is not prohibited; I understand that Blancaflor was succeeded by the former and the incumbent IPO Director; YES, they can reply by email and they should under the mandatory provisions of R.A. 6713 "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees" or even via Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration Virtual under COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; but they can never interpret the Copyright Law, only, they should as they had issued Implementing Guidelines or Circulars;
vi) More important Now is the Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice via the NBI's Cybercrime Monitoring Division to assume jurisdiction even upon Anonymous Complaint or NOW by Pandemic Emails against 2 matters that I often repeat and repeat herein as Law and Jurisprudence : a) creation of Anonymous Accounts b) Cyberstalking (which incidentally, I state as my opinion, is part and parcel of the specific provisos of the 2012 Cybercrime Philippine Law, as I did read Wikipedia's edit regarding Congress Bills on the matter; for me that is a surplusage; c) Cybercrime proper : to be specific En Masse (including schemes, habit or trends towards) deletion of Photobucket, Flickr, Instagram or here, Commons Valued Photos of National Interest like Churches, Schools, Monuments and Memorial which are Owned by the Domain here Commons Photos uploaded under Public Domain License, like mine, specifying that My Authorship need not be cited when anybody copies my Commons Photos, permanently transferred to Commons Ownership without anything remaining to me; Vi) In all my archives including my Ramon FVelasquez Photos, I never objected to deletions but most rarely; in Template, I just say submitted to the sound discretion of Commons Community; since 2012, many of my files were deleted under either Speedy Deletion or Regular Deletions filed even by Commons Administrators; Vii) But now, I have a reasonable Ground to fear that there is a "Testing of the Waters", that is a) start or stub deletions by trickles just 1% of 99% edits by a specific editor that apparently is aimed towards b) Domino Deletions or En Masse Deletions as had been done by a) Parent and b) Child anonymous Mass Deleters beginning September 2020 stopping just lately but Nakaabang lang po or just watching for opportune time; On the advice that I should obtain COM:OTRS from the Sculptors, I state with all fairness and legality, that it is a legal absurdity to obtain any permission from the heirs of the Deceased alleged but not proven Copyright holder; Anastacio Caedo (14 August 1907 – 12 May 1990) was a Filipino sculptor; and FYI, the Intestate or Testate Courts would first issue Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed(Letters of Administration by Probate Court Letters Testamentary) only the One Armed with the RTC Probate Orders of Appointment can legally issue the COM:OTRS; and this will take maybe 20 years of protracted litigations;
  • Example of stupidity because of False News: Fr. Ladra said the church’s interior now features a ceiling painting called “Communion of Saints” by Maestro Eladio Santos; I always come to this Church; I witnessed personally how the ceiling was painted; I saw with my 2 eyes the Bayanihan or Communal Donation of Money and Labor; specifically, it is next to impossible for Maestro Eladio Santos to have painted the ceiling; Does he have the legs to climbs thereat look at his age - paid workers, like stonemasons, carpenters, catwalks scaffoldings and painters were paid sorry to say minimum wages and other for free due to Bayanihan; I saw Fr. Labra talking to architects; but I suppose these architects and alleged Maestro Eladio Santos may have suggested the Brand of Oil Paints or sketches; but Why deny these Men at Work in Bulacan the Copyrigthts they waived for this Great Shrine? “Communion of Saints” was not done by Maestro Eladio Santos: PROMISE.
  •  Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or deletes; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
  •  Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objection EVER to the Requested Deletion and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works: images show portraits and copyrighted posters (containing underlying images)

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Urgent and Fervent Appeal to Commons Community to Put On Hold the Mass Deletion Requests Non-Stop and Unlawful under the Strict Provisions of Philippines Criminal (Penal) Law on Cybercrimes-stalking : to Defer possible Mass Deletions - Erasing of Valued Photos of National Interest from the Herein User Deleter, based on Moral grounds and most certain irreparable Damage and Injury to Commons files and contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users, with all Due Respect: I am reproducint herein as part hereof My Legal Treatise for the kindness of the Commons Community to review and to Declare Null and Void Ab Initio all the Mass Deletions by herein Nominator: to wit - Judgefloro (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


CONSOLIDATED REPLY-OBJECTION: SYNOPSIS - The En Masse Nominations Request for Deletion by the herein Nominator in no uncertain terms, falls within the 4 corners of the The Cyberstalking and 2012 Cybercrime Law of the Philippines which provides grave penalties for its Violations of this Act: the Series of Unlawful Mass Deletions now being started by herein Nominator will cause irreparable damage and injury to the Meta Files of Wikimedia Commons: I vehemently object to the deletion on Substantive Legal Grounds, under my Lawyer's and Judge's Oath of Office, and as Authority on Criminal Law Review based on my Ateneo Law School records; I submit to the Commons Community In Seriatim, objectively (and based on USA and Philippine Jurisprudence vis-à-vis Substantive laws both Civil - Copyright law of the Philippines amending the New Civil Code provisions on the Law of Property) and Criminal law 1932 Revised Penal Code as amended by the Penal Provisions of both [ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ Republic Act No. 10175] - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and Copyright Penal Provisions especially [https://acg.pnp.gov.ph/main/2-uncategorised/263-acg-cyber-security-bulletin-no-132-understanding-the-risk-of-cyberstalking Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, group, or organization - monitoring, threats, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass);
Extended content by Judgefloro
Now a) Who can question with Legal Personality to the Special Courts on Copyright and Trademark Infringement - Vide: The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) vis-à-vis the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases; and b) within what period of time based on Civil Law on Extinctive Prescription); here are my legal grounds to dismiss the Nomination or Request for Deletion, to wit:
i) I talked to the former Parish Priest Msgr. Jo Aguilan whom I healed as healing Judge in the Barasoain Convent and in his room, now deceased and b) Parish Priest on 24 August 2014, 18:50:54 Fr. Dario V. Cabral, incumbent Parish Priest of Barasoain Church; he confirmed in our discussion, that the Titular Bishop Oliveros now Dennis Villarojo has acquired all rights and properties, Torrens titles of Barasoain Church including all the Monuments therein; hence, the Creator of the Statues transferred all his rights by virtue of the Strict Provisions of Canon law of the Catholic Church on Parish Creation; and in this case, Saint Andrew the Apostle Church the Titular Bishop of Broderick Pabillo the apostolic administrator of the sede vacante Archdiocese of Manila.


ii) I also talked with the PIO Office of Baliuag including Tourism Office, when I was requesting for photos of the Feb 2 2021 Episcopal Coronation; I was told that Mayor Ferdie Estrella, as SOP, following the Strict LGU DILG guidelines, has a signed written contract between the paid official photographer to have waived all his rights in favor of the Municipal government of Baliuag whoever is the Mayor; under the Local Government Code and DILG Laws, all architects and sculptors cannot retain copyrights without violating the Penal Provisions of these codes and the Anti-Graft Law RA 3019 as amended; Ergo, all LGUs including the herein Malolos City Government ipso facto acquires all moral rights surrendered by alleged and all creators of Copyrights subjects and objects;
ii) I will quote here my past rendition for emphasis: 29 January 2012 [File:Emilio222jf.JPG this file] by virtue of Substantive Philippine law on Extinctive prescription of FOUR YEARS from Commons Uploading, that is, legal public and open publishing in any forum or format, nobody including the alleged creators can now question in any court or forum even by the Creator; [File:FvfMalolos1335 01.JPG this also] 18 April 2014, 15:45:57; This also, [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 15.JPG This also] This also [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 17.JPG This also] 18 April 2014, 15:42:36; assuming Ex Gratia Argumenti or Arguendo, that Flickr Photobucket or any Commons Editor has opined otherwise, even if the IPO Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director now incumbents, would say otherwise, even if possibly reversing the former Learned Verbal Answers to my Personal Query and long discussions with my Ateneo School Mate Director Blancaflor, still, the Laws, I cited hold; it is for the Commons Community to decide between my submitted Legal Treatise any the alleged IPO zooms and others;
At this point, I humbly ask a transcript of the IPO Zooms for the guidance of the Bench and the Bar; I would like to examine Legally the contents thereof for a single purpose: I will try my best if I have time and access due to COVID 19 restrictions to personally talk with the a) Integrated Bar of the Philippines President at Pasig City Main Office and b) the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyrights; if they will maintain wrong legal Opinions, then I reserve my Lawyer's Judge's Right to question them individually with the Ombudsman regarding Gross Ignorance of the Law or possible Disbarment in the IBP Office;
Counter-Argument versus alleged Dicta, sayings, Virtual Answers or even Email correspondence of the Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director: Burden of proof (law) - Rule 131. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS - Burden of Evidence and Preponderance of the evidence  : Judicial Supremacy of the S.C. of the Philippines:


i) FIRST, the Copyright Law cannot be interpreted by them for ONLY the Supreme Court of the Philippines (in a ripe judicial controvery elevated to it either by Petition for Review or Appeal from Special Courts on Copyrights towards Certiorari under Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals) has original and exclusive Jurisdiction expressly GRANTED and mandated by the 1987 Constitution to Say with definiteness what the Law is, that is Stare Decisis or Philippine Specific Jurisprudence on a) who has the copyright or moral rights with legal personality to file in the Special Courts created under the law and S.C. latest Circulars under C.J. Peralta - infringement of copyrights or trademarks b) within 4 years from publication so public in public domain like Commons Uploading in Meta Details, under the New Civil Code law on Extinctive Prescription and Copyright Law; c) any ruling issued on Copyright whether virtual, email or correspondence including Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration FB discussions; d) any ruling or the DOJ Opinion by the Secretary of Justice my classmate; Vide: 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC
ii) SECOND: it is legally absurd to claim that the Burden of Evidence is upon the herein Uploader Editor; in any country including Germany and USA, inter alia, the Burden of Proof vis-a-vis Burden of Evidence are clearly defined by Federal Rules and here the 1989 Rules on Evidence as amended by C.J. Peralta's Watch New Rules of Court - Burden of Proof is fixed: it stays with the a in Criminal cases particulary Penal Provisions of Copyright Law, the Complainant, here, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest, must must must, alleged in the Criminal Information to be filed by the Private Prosecutor under the control of the Fiscal, the ultimate facts, their rights to Copyright or Trademark; the Proof of the Burden is Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, that is Moral Certainty to Convict by Majority Vote of S.C. Justices on Appeal; any Decision whether by the Special Court or IPO or Bureau or DOJ if not elevated and ruled upon by the S.C. are or is not Law or Jurisprudence b) in Civil Cases, the Proof is Preponderance of Evidence resting on the Plaintiff, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; III) the Burden of Evidence shifts from the Proponent, that is, the Plaintiff, or herein Nominator of Deletion Request in Commons, or in Flickr or in any Fora, if he or she has the right emanating by Special Power of Attorney from the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; the Burden of Evidence is shifted by Law on Evidence to the defendant, that is, the alleged Copyright violator, when the Judge rules in the Trial amid objections from the opposing counsel or parties; iv) The IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright Head, can never interpret the Copyright Law; it is only in one case that the Executive Department acquired quasi-judicial powers to rule: in P.D. 1529, the LRA Administrator can say what is the Law on Torrens title upon filing of fees in En Consulta cases versus the Register of Deeds; but but but that is not jurisprudence; the ruling only becomes jurisprudence when elevated to the C.A. and finally to the S.C. issuing a Stare Decisis Decision; this is the same banana with Quasi-Judicial Powers and Rulings of the Executive Agencies, like Immigration, Bureaus of Customs, here Bureau of Copyright (who has no such power); v) The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has jurisdiction to discipline the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if lawyers based even on Anonymous Complaint more frequently under R.A. 6713 which is broader than Sunlights in the Philippines, or R.A. 3019; the IBP has concurrent jurisdiction with the SC Disbarment Office to suspend or dismiss lawyers including IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if they issue comedy of errors or simply put, refusal to reply to my 2 Letters within a fast time required thereat; but the Lawyer under and representing Director Blanclaflor replied to my query: Can I upload any photos falling under FOP in Commons? He replied yes, since if there is no proviso in the Copyright law prohibiting it, then, the Law permits what is not prohibited; I understand that Blancaflor was succeeded by the former and the incumbent IPO Director; YES, they can reply by email and they should under the mandatory provisions of R.A. 6713 "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees" or even via Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration Virtual under COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; but they can never interpret the Copyright Law, only, they should as they had issued Implementing Guidelines or Circulars;
vi) More important Now is the Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice via the NBI's Cybercrime Monitoring Division to assume jurisdiction even upon Anonymous Complaint or NOW by Pandemic Emails against 2 matters that I often repeat and repeat herein as Law and Jurisprudence : a) creation of Anonymous Accounts b) Cyberstalking (which incidentally, I state as my opinion, is part and parcel of the specific provisos of the 2012 Cybercrime Philippine Law, as I did read Wikipedia's edit regarding Congress Bills on the matter; for me that is a surplusage; c) Cybercrime proper : to be specific En Masse (including schemes, habit or trends towards) deletion of Photobucket, Flickr, Instagram or here, Commons Valued Photos of National Interest like Churches, Schools, Monuments and Memorial which are Owned by the Domain here Commons Photos uploaded under Public Domain License, like mine, specifying that My Authorship need not be cited when anybody copies my Commons Photos, permanently transferred to Commons Ownership without anything remaining to me; Vi) In all my archives including my Ramon FVelasquez Photos, I never objected to deletions but most rarely; in Template, I just say submitted to the sound discretion of Commons Community; since 2012, many of my files were deleted under either Speedy Deletion or Regular Deletions filed even by Commons Administrators; Vii) But now, I have a reasonable Ground to fear that there is a "Testing of the Waters", that is a) start or stub deletions by trickles just 1% of 99% edits by a specific editor that apparently is aimed towards b) Domino Deletions or En Masse Deletions as had been done by a) Parent and b) Child anonymous Mass Deleters beginning September 2020 stopping just lately but Nakaabang lang po or just watching for opportune time; On the advice that I should obtain COM:OTRS from the Sculptors, I state with all fairness and legality, that it is a legal absurdity to obtain any permission from the heirs of the Deceased alleged but not proven Copyright holder; Anastacio Caedo (14 August 1907 – 12 May 1990) was a Filipino sculptor; and FYI, the Intestate or Testate Courts would first issue Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed(Letters of Administration by Probate Court Letters Testamentary) only the One Armed with the RTC Probate Orders of Appointment can legally issue the COM:OTRS; and this will take maybe 20 years of protracted litigations;
  • Example of stupidity because of False News: Fr. Ladra said the church’s interior now features a ceiling painting called “Communion of Saints” by Maestro Eladio Santos; I always come to this Church; I witnessed personally how the ceiling was painted; I saw with my 2 eyes the Bayanihan or Communal Donation of Money and Labor; specifically, it is next to impossible for Maestro Eladio Santos to have painted the ceiling; Does he have the legs to climbs thereat look at his age - paid workers, like stonemasons, carpenters, catwalks scaffoldings and painters were paid sorry to say minimum wages and other for free due to Bayanihan; I saw Fr. Labra talking to architects; but I suppose these architects and alleged Maestro Eladio Santos may have suggested the Brand of Oil Paints or sketches; but Why deny these Men at Work in Bulacan the Copyrigthts they waived for this Great Shrine? “Communion of Saints” was not done by Maestro Eladio Santos: PROMISE.
  •  Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or deletes; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
  •  Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objection EVER to the Requested Deletion and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, see Axa de polarizare Timisoara - Arad. Turbojet (talk) 10:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 11:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Since this image is in use in a project, I am keeping to allow User:Ias59 one week to provide permissions. They could be in the band and could have hired the photographer to take the photo (in which they own copyright) or were the photographer. We will proceed accordingly based on the results. Thank you for your understanding and assuming good faith!. --Missvain (talk) 01:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architect: Radu Radoslav (b. 1950, living) [21]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 11:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No value to Commons as very low quality & blurry, no location information. MPF (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built in 2012 [22]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 11:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built in 2012 [23]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 11:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrigjhted eyeinthesky.ro. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly doubt this is own work. There are various variants of the work on Google https://www.google.com/search?q=tamerlane+portrait&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiDx4H-26ztAhUWsyoKHf5-ACoQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=tamerlane+portrait&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzICCAA6BAgjECc6BAgAEBhQqAdYow1g7BFoAHAAeACAAUyIAY8EkgEBOJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=SC7GX4ODOZbmqgH-_YHQAg&bih=969&biw=1920. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran: Seems like this is a photoshopped edition of this, some blogs saying it is in Gur-e Amir.[24][25]. We could use this, with a description of "modern painting in Gur-e Amir."Beshogur (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missspelled, an 'i' is missing in the middle, see German Wiktionary religiöser, Pronunciation example with correct spelling is already produced, see , sorry for the inconvenience Jeuwre (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1943 photos are unlikely own work. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died? Is the photo published before upload into Commons – when and where? Taivo (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built in 2008 [26]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 12:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desidero gestire in autonomia la fruizione di questa immagine MaT12Vi (talk) 12:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false "own work" licencing, this image copied from [27] from an article [28] which refers to the site https://saulet.astana.kz/ . Original image is 13 years old as was a part of masterplan 2007-2030 (Концепция озеленения города Астаны на 2007-2030 годы), this internet site current version does not contain this document Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable person. Privacy? Tekstman (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable band Tekstman (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coverband, so the photo will probably never be used in an article. If that's a reason to delete this photo, is another question, i.m.h.o. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless Susan Wrote This is David Fernandes, the claim of "Own work" is inconsistent with the photo credit. —teb728 t c 12:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This has been an unwanted error when trying to upload the image not finding the way to do it properly. I believe the best is to delete it so I can try to upload it again. I couldn't find the way to link it to the my draft article either. Please advice how should I proceed. Susan Wrote This (talk) 13:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. ƏXPLICIT 12:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valentinas Kabašinskas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos claimed as own work, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from FB per MD, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Going to assume good faith and allow the uploader one week to provide permissions. Perhaps they paid the photographer and own the copyright, or they set the camera up themselves...ya never know. Thanks for understanding!. --Missvain (talk) 01:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Michael Hudson per exif, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pronunciation is incorrect, and so the file is not useful for any educational purpose. The correct pronunciation is at "File:LL-Q1860 (eng)-Vealhurl-virulent.wav"; all uses of this file have been replaced by that file. — SGconlaw (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found here before upload - https://twitter.com/tf1lejt/status/1213896836391612416?lang=en - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted [29]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Bucks Boys Productions was 4 times deleted and place is unidentified. If we do not know even the country, then the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably taken from http://www.alepe.pe.gov.br/parlamentar/clarissa-tercio/ - not own work Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.um.edu.mo/fss/pa/about_us/staff/ShengLi.html - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC) the fss office has approve the use and provide the origin photo, if any question please contact the infomation in the website @Gbawden Gbawden[reply]


Kept: Keeping this to allow the uploader one week to submit OTRS. We will proceed accordingly based on the results. Thanks for understanding!. --Missvain (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built in 2006–2010 [30]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 12:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built in 2006–2010 [31]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 12:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artist arun rana rajput (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Insta screenshots per title. And scope?

Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller version uploaded Parviziskender (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work highly questionable, a 2012 image uploaded to wiki in 2020 as 'own work' Denniss (talk) 13:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rozenkov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photos from https://www.opel.ru/. On the site there is no messages about CC-BY-SA

Barbarian (talk) 14:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rozenkov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

По ссылкам не видно, что файлы предоставляются по лицензии

Barbarian (talk) 07:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pedro fuentes Yoelbellotta (talk) 14:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very new building, built in 2018 [32]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for sculptures. The bust was erected in 1983 and is still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali ahmed hashmi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self portraits. Only files uploaded by this user. There are plenty of images of this building so these images contribute nothing to the Commons.

Krok6kola (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built in 2009 [33]. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 14:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image because it is so blurry. Adds no useful information to other files already in its category on the Commons. Only file uploaded by this user to the Commons. Krok6kola (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Article from 2015 (scroll the gallery to the fourth image). Turbojet (talk) 14:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Copyrigt Stefanie Rose", but uploader not this name, and this is his first uploading. I don't think this is his own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of "A677 Armen (tugboat, 1991)" PtiBzh (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of "Y640 Mengam (tugboat, 1997)‎" PtiBzh (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tone45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for vandalising danish wikipedia Hjart (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Used for vandalising danish wikipedia Hjart (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Used for vandalising danish wikipedia Hjart (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Sebastian Tătaru. (Similar images, see EXIF date & time.) Turbojet (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xhumbas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


πως προσθέτω τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα, τι πρέπει να κάνω?? κάποιες από αυτές είναι φωτογραφίες 100 χρονών που έχω στο αρχείο μου από την οικογένειά μου και τις ψηφιοποίησα εγώ, ενώ άλλες μου έδωσε την άδεια ο ιδιοκτήτης τους, μου είπε πως μπορώ να τις χρησιμοποιήσω.


Kept: I'm going to keep these to allow the uploader to provide permissions. If they can't, we will proceed accordingly. Thank you for understanding. --Missvain (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ihsan2102 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ארנון דגן (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and jpg artefacts indicate a probable copyright violation Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehediabedin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, probably not the uploader's own work: (A) the uploader incorrectly identified the subject as Heidila Guru; (B) the photo appears on another website with the caption "Foto: saša novković, pixsell",[34] possibly Aleksandar Saša Novković[35] and the Pixsell photo agency;[36] (C) it has an indistinct watermark at the bottom right that could be interpreted as "© novković"; (D) the only upload from this contributor, no camera metadata, image size is consistent with an Internet source and is too small for the watermark to be clear. May have come from the Heidila Güru Facebook page,[37] which presumably has a misleading image. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No objection, it is probably an unauthorized copy, even if it seems to be the first (2013) of those you find on the web Pippobuono (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This picture was taken by my friend during her visit this year to Al-Quds Al-Sharif and she gave it to me and I liked to participate in the competition"

  • Please tell your friend that she should better upload herself a larger file with camera EXIF, and so we would not have doubts about ownership of rights on this image. Thank you. E4024 (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Going to allow the uploader to provide permissions. The size isn't really a worry. Give it one week and if they can't then we'll proceed accordingly. Thank you!. --Missvain (talk) 01:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not US Gov't. A 2d photo of a 3d object would fall under Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. This file is copyrighted and ineligible for commons. Ich (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

higher quality verison of the same photo here (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Billie_Holiday_1949_b.jpg), so this is pointless Binho24 (talk) 17:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

higher quality of the photo here (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Billie_Holiday_1949_b.jpg), so this is useless Binho24 (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

associated pages deleted/soon to be deleted. Does this logo help improve the project at all? Quakewoody (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89000107 Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 17:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89000119 Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89000110 Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89000114 Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplocated with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89000116 Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 17:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope, no category. Same or File:East mallow town line.png. Pibwl (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo of unknown person, no category unclear notability Pibwl (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - text on a picture, unused Pibwl (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of "Ships of the Gendarmerie maritime at Tonnerres de Brest 2012" PtiBzh (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has also been uploaded to w:File:Dave Smeltz singing.jpg, where it is credited to a different author and tagged as missing evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

laut Quelle (c) Caroline Wimmer, keine Anhaltspunkte für CC-Lizenz Ralf Roletschek 18:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quelle https://www.activityschauspielschule.de/dozenten/alice-macura/ bzw. https://www.activityschauspielschule.de/wp-content/uploads/alice_macura1.jpg und Quelltext des erstgenannten Links, Seite zuletzt vor hiesigem Upload geändert. Siehe auch https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Alice_Macura.png Ralf Roletschek 18:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownership claim: [38] Gyrostat (talk) 19:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single purpose upload, probable copyright violation out of scope Jayantanth (talk) 19:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:En-NavyAircrew.jpg is much higher res; this is largely unused. Ich (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advert spam, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - text picture Pibwl (talk) 19:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor unusable photo (as most in its category). Pibwl (talk) 20:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random photo with no educational use, along with File:Zabawa klockami LEGO 14.JPG Pibwl (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, sole upload, no category Pibwl (talk) 20:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete even if it is in scope we need permission from the artist who painted the picture as well as from the photographer. The description "Fotografía de Vicki Casas pintora con su obra" indicates the artist as Vicki Casas, and 'manu tenreiro' is unlikely to be her pseudonym. Clearly not a selfie. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, unused, no category Pibwl (talk) 20:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spoilt photo of a book cover and some stuff, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused blurred kid's photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 20:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused spoilt photo of some person not showing face Pibwl (talk) 20:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 20:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, cover of a trade journal (in Category:Titelbild Fachzeitschrift), probably in scope but is a probable copyright violation, no indication that the journal has a free license.[39] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - a photo, sure not taken by the uploader, with deep thoughts. Pibwl (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete probable copyright violation, based on a previously published photo.(Page 6 of pdf) Verbcatcher (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope- text message. Pibwl (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No mention of it being under CC 4.0; snapshot: https://web.archive.org/web/20190603204604/https://www.nation.be/notre-programme/ Veverve (talk) 20:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a photo of a book, unclear copyright. Pibwl (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires OTRS confirmation of the license. Crop of an image that is widely available online. On a webpage that was published before the upload here.[40](archived)) Verbcatcher (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a "coat of arms badge", very likely copyright violation. Красный wanna talk? 20:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a "coat of arms badge", very likely copyright violation. Красный wanna talk? 20:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spoilt photo of unnamed persons, out of scope, unused, no cat, one of few uploads. Pibwl (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, no indication of a free license.[41][42] Verbcatcher (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work: low-res web format with watermark, no EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete published elsewhere before upload here.[43][44] Verbcatcher (talk) 21:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spoilt unusable kid's photo, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says Copyright Nik Pickard Ytoyoda (talk) 20:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CD/LP cover, unknown copyright, anonymous uploader. Same for remaining uploads File:Amorim Neto.jpg, File:Domingo de eleição Amorim Neto.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work made from four book covers without indications of free licenses.[45][46][47] Verbcatcher (talk) 21:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JAVIERCORP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement, all unused.

GeorgHHtalk   21:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Submarine Officer badge.jpg is much higher res version. Ich (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image with copyright from 19 june 2019 (see https://www.hetnieuwsvanwestvlaanderen.be/34-jarige-kortrijkzaan-wouter-vermeersch-ondervoorzitter-kamerfractie-vlaams-belang/ ) 2A02:1812:41D:B800:8D32:ECF8:94C0:2DEB 21:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo or text image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, crop of a larger photo on Getty Images, attributed to "Isam al-Hag/AFP".[48] Verbcatcher (talk) 21:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not appropriate, in addition to the fact that it isn't fair use. Slykos (talk) 21:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete published online before upload here.[49][50] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naval Aviation Psychologist insignia.jpg is much higher res. Ich (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ripped from the Base Joconde. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:D040:D551:798C:579F 21:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete the licensing page of the source website declared by the uploader does not have a free license: "Seule une utilisation à des fins strictement personnelles est autorisée.", meaning personal use only.[51] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, Metadata includes "Copyright holder - Copyright Nik Pickard" Verbcatcher (talk) 21:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo of unnamed person, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 21:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ripped from https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/194545. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:D040:D551:798C:579F 21:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Tagged CC0 on https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/194545. --Achim (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, на основании этого требую его удалить! Ssp 1.618 (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep - The noms rationale translates as "I, the copyright holder of this work, on the basis of this demand to remove it! " - The nom chose to upload their files here and they were fully aware of the license etc etc and the image is being used on a few pages too, I have no idea about the subject but the image is in scope and can serve a meaningful purpose here, No valid reason has been presented for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 15:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion, file is unused. --A.Savin 17:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename translates as "File: Functional block diagram of counting on the rising and falling edges of a signal, with a count of 12, and a filter at the output.jpg" - Not sure what the purpose of the image is or how it's even in SCOPE - image isn't categorised either, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a copyrighted computer software, and the copyright for its contents is most likely held by the author(s) or the company that created the software. Premeditated (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Encyclopaedia 1994 written on the map. Zunkir (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope for one person - this can also be replaced with normal ribbon templates. Ich (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sign of permission by licence holder, which is not an anonymous uploader, as well as File:Eurabus City.png and File:Eurabus Street.png. Pibwl (talk) 22:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, declared source and author is 'Eurabus Ltd.', but no indication of a free license at https://www.eurabus.com/. File:Eurabus Street.png is a crop of an image available elsewhere.[52] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sole photo of a person of unknown notability, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 22:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused painting of unknown notability, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Schalke Od 1995.gif and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schalke04.gif. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE file, Can't see how this could ever be used, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 22:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Schalke Od 1995.gif and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dfs wl d gelsenkirchen schalke 01958 1971.gif. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Ivanavga

[edit]

Probably copyright violation of the book covers that are prominently included in the photographs. These require evidence of permission from the book publishers. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schalke04.gif and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dfs wl d gelsenkirchen schalke 01958 1971.gif. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). > OTRS is incoming with license terms Lluis tgn (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keeping per pending OTRS. We will proceed accordingly as needed!. --Missvain (talk) 01:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a US Gov work, but a report submitted by a third party contractor or grantee... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not my own work, the author asks me to remove the image. Alfredo Molina (talk) 06:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Submarine Officer badge.jpg is much higher res version; this is basically unused. Ich (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, promotional advert, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 20:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Unsure, not an advertisement, appears to be teaching material relating to glaciation which would be in scope. My only concern is whether the underlying photograph was taken by the uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's showing a license plate. ILoveCocomelon(And Kaomojiǃ) (ノ≧∀≦)ノ 16:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

? --Petr1888 (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, you are confused. Is that license plate in current use? --ILoveCocomelon(And Kaomojiǃ) (ノ≧∀≦)ノ 17:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments. The uploaders have not the right to publish photos of copyrighted artworks under a free licence!

Ras67 (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments. The uploaders have not the right to publish photos of copyrighted artworks under a free licence!

Ras67 (talk) 15:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments. The uploaders have not the right to publish photos of copyrighted artworks under a free licence!

Ras67 (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures!


Ras67 (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject had an article on enwp which was deleted for not being notable. None of these images are in use.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Some of these seem iffy regarding copyright/permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak delete This is not Wikipedia, and we appear to be more relaxed about notability than English Wikipedia is. However, her website does not suggest that she is sufficiently prominent.[56] Her albums appear to be self-published. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I took one of photos of Kate playing on the streets of Evesham. It is not related to any other article on Wikipedia. There was no objection by the artist at the time. I own the copyright of the photo and I am not aware of any violation compared with any other celebrity photograph. I understand that there may be some question of the artist's notability. So given the above facts, if the quorum decide the photo is in some violation, then I will not argue. I leave my photo "at the mercy of the court".Peter_Glyn (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most of them are clearly copyvios, keeping one which is a decent photo of a busker. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo created in the United States, unclear why Italian copyright laws applies here. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Unsure: he is wearing the strip of the Washington Diplomats, a US soccer club. However, but this appears to be a collectable card published by the Italian Panini Group, so the photograph may well have been first published in Italy. However, we require files to have a free license in the US. Referring to the Hirtle chart, {{PD-1996}} would apply if this was first published in Italy in 1980 without a copyright notice. The large number of similar files in Category:Panini association football cards suggests that that may be ok. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment In fact it was my mistake, the card was not issued by Panini Italia but "Ediciones Este" of Barcelona, Spain (see card back at source given (ebay item)). I've updated the Italian license to a Spanish one so the photo is still PD in its country of origin.  Keep
 Delete the reverse of the card shown at the eBay link given above includes "© EDICIONES ESTE". This copyright claim and the 1980 publication date make {{PD-1996}} inapplicable. Also see Template:PD-Spain-photo/doc#Public domain in the United States. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1899 own work? E4024 (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • It looks more like a contemporary painting and that means we need OTRS permission from the painter to be able to keep it. --E4024 (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the picture was painted in 1899 then it would be public domain. However, the style of the painting suggests a much later date. The Arabic description is translated by Google as "Arabic: Abu Al-Hassan Madani - a painting about the month of Ramadan", indicating that the uploader is not claiming to be the painter. We need permission from the painter, or a reliable indication that the painting is public domain. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The same issue applies to these images from the same uploader, which name the same artist in the Arabic language description:
Verbcatcher (talk) 20:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep 1899 is implausible as a date, given the style and pigments. However we don't care about the date, if it's own work, and we don't require OTRS either. If there's a credible case that the photographer isn't the author of the painting, then we wouldn't have a licence from the artist, and that would be reason to delete. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete, there is a credible case that the photographer is not the author of the painting: a translation of the description indicates that the painter is Abu Al-Hassan Madani. The other three files linked here are in use at w:ar:أبو الحسن مدني, which is a biography of a Sudanese artist who died in 2012. It is clear that this was not uploaded by the painter. This requires permission from his heirs, through COM:OTRS. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The own work can be at any license because it is public domain.Alejitao123 (talk) 18:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A little  Delete, I can't believe that the author of a 1899 work can still alive and just publish it to PD by him(her)self. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks suspicious. Does't seem to be drawn by a "geopolitics researcher". Hanooz 23:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep, the source declaration indicates that this is from the book The islands of Tunb and Abu Musa : an Iranian argument in search of peace and co-operation in the Persian Gulf by Pirouz Mojtahed-Zadeh, published in the UK in 1995.[57] There is no indication that the book has a free license, or that the author has given permission. The file description and the Wikipedia article Seizure of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs indicate that this is from a 1971 memorandum of understanding between Iran and ruler of Sharjah. The writing in the image looks something like 'From a survey by Commander H. C. Sommerville R.N. HMS "Alert" 1911-12, with additions from a sketch drawn by Lieut. T. H. R. Shaw, RN 1933.' so this is almost certainly a British maritime chart. If this is a UK Royal Navy chart published before 1970 then we can use {{PD-UKGov}}. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 23:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Querying PD-US-GOV claim, Work appears to be by a Museum, not a federal agency.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The museum receives federal funding from the NEH. A condition of that funding will be that outcomes are public domain. I am unsure how to assess the 1937 publication, but it is likely that federal funding was supporting the museum even back then. This is not an obvious deletion candidate as it is unclear what "Field Museum Press", presumably an organ of the Field Museum, assesses the copyright of these 1930s dig reports as or why they make them freely available in digital archives. -- (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria for monuments. The uploaders have not the right to publish photos of copyrighted artworks under a free licence!

Ras67 (talk) 23:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Project of the monument was done in 1948 (which would be already copyright free) they start to build it in 1954 and finished in 1957 - I do not know which of these dates should be counted. However photos of this monument are being published literally everywhere for example booksː 1. PĂRVANOV, Ivan. Bălgarskite pametnici. Sofia : Millenium. 2018. 530 s. ISBN 9789545154331. - here even as one of the cover photos or 2. TRĂNKOVA, Dimana; GEORGIEV, Antoni; LOZANOV, Georgi; GRUEV, Michail. Pătevoditel za komunističeska Bălgarija. Free Speech International Foundation. 2020. 502 s. ISBN 9786199131220. and since is collective work (plus the main sculptor is dead since 1969) the publishers of those books possibly could not have authors written permission. Photos of the monument are available on all major photo banks - gettyimages, bigstockphoto, shutterstock, alamy.com, depositphotos, istockphotos etc., in numerous of tourist and travel webpages, newspapers webpages etc. - and especially photo banks are quite strict about copyright laws. Michal Valach (talk) 02:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Garstang, John, 1876-1956, This may be PD-US, but it's not seemingly PD-UK (the most likely original county of publciation). Undelete in 2027?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this image File:Meroe suntemple.jpg does not belong to the scans that were made from the book. The image is a redrawing of a plan, published in the book, that I made. It is not a scan.Udimu (talk) 08:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Wikimedia Commons only allows photos in public domain, if the author has passed in the world.Alejitao123 (talk) 17:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • A number of these images appear to be faithful representations of two-dimensional works of art in the public domain, and are thus themselves in the public domain. Those images should be separated, and not deleted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted the manuscript and illustrations authored by John Garstang (1878–1956) where the UK copyright expires 1 January 2027. Kept the extracted photos by Horst Schliephack, who is believed to have died during World War I (before 1919) and thus PD in the UK. —RP88 (talk) 02:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]