Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/11/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 18th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had drafted a BLP article on this person, and have decided to withdraw the article. I used the picture from the person's own website as an example display, without preobtaining copyright permission (for which I knew I would be notified). Now that the article is withdrawn from development, the image isn't needed. I have discussed this withdrawal with the person-subject of the article. Zefr (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 07:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsches Bild / Pogresna slika Dakygreen (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - Cheep (talk) 12:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Licensed properly: Wszystkie treści publikowane w serwisie są udostępniane na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska, o ile nie jest to stwierdzone inaczej. --Sealle (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal Alamzaid0988 (talk) 13:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It wasn't intended to be used by other users. Accidentally clicked on something that put it out here in this Wikimedia Commons section. Please do a speedy delete. PointLaVista (talk) 15:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation, not own photo anyway. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am just tast it Burhan Uddin Hafiz Phayaj Uddin (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Adsci8 (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of an AFP photo: https://as.com/motor/2020/11/11/motociclismo/1605086818_863553.html

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a not-noticeable person, Commons used as hosting, useless for educational purposes L736E (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic Content NairobiPapel (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • AshFriday, maybe you’re used to better quality porn (more and better camera angles, better lighting and sound, the guy a bit more groomed and athletic, longer footage, and some story plot, maybe?), but the goal here is educational, not recreational. There are other websites for good quality porn people can find when needed (so I heard!); in Commons we rather have this kind of media — unscripted, short, single-topic — as it is better suited to illustrate sexology topics in the context of encyclopedic reuse. -- Tuválkin 18:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Tuválkin. We have only a few videos in the relevant category. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexual content 97.83.164.180 20:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexual content 97.83.164.180 19:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


[Non-admin closure, Speedy Kept] Mass closure DR added by 97.83.164.180 because of accidental create. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 04:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fix. Minoraxtalk 12:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is porn 194.233.96.65 06:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexual content 97.83.164.180 21:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of Wakey!Wakey!_Live_at_KIDROCKERS_October_14_2007_-_2.jpg, I'm sorry for the inconvenience! Linseneintopf (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was no lunar senate in 2004. Out of scope. Slashme (talk) 14:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Jajoho (talk) 16:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Polarlys at 22:07, 18 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing, photo by Felix Schmitt/Contact Press Images-Focus --Krdbot 15:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ho caricato personalmente il file ma ho notato che non rispetta le regole di Commons e, viste le norme riguardanti gli screenshot televisivi, lo caricherò con la licenza corretta di "Screenshot con copyright " su Wikipedia per inserirla poi nella pagina riguardante il programma televisivo. Edoxx100 (talk) 18:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:19, 19 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 21:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not well edited and not yet in use and I, the owner, want to reupload it Clericus tkc (talk) 12:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as copyvio from [1]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Princess Diane Ybañez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope infographics -- appear to be created as part of a class project based on deleted contributions. They also contain graphics of unknown provenance and are likely non-free derivative works.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added File:T3 RESOURCE 4 INFOGRAPHICS ac27e6c122a6a3d42cc6f27d39adfeb6.pdf. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This stadium was originally designed by Weidleplan (architects H. Stalhout, Fr. Herre, and D.Andrikopoulos). The renovated parts including the roof were designed by still-living architect Santiago Calatrava. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Greece has no Commons-acceptable FoP. What is only allowed legally for images of copyrighted landmarks in Greece is the "occassional/casual inclusion in mass media." "De minimis" cannot be applied since the architectural element is clear here. Only way to counter no FOP is an amendment and/or reform in their copyright law to allow commercial photography and commercial publications of photos of copyrighted Greek architecture and sculptures, but as far as I know there's no indication of such reform in their copyright law as of this writing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: What if it were cropped to just above the umbrellas?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: can be. But for the usability if the file once it is cropped, I cannot guarantee that. I leave to other editors to decide if cropping would be OK. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Being less usable than "unused" would be quite a feat. I corrected your ping.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: done cropping. I also added a {{Retouched picture}} notice with a link to COM:FOP Greece. If the crop is OK, perhaps I can now  I withdraw my nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn.(non-admin closure) --A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Noah Wulf (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 15:51, 21 November 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 15:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source (local ABC affiliate station) credits the National Republican Congressional Committee for the photo. No evidence of Creative Commons license. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 11:36, 23 November 2020 UTC: No license since 15 November 2020 --Krdbot 15:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaronnave7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos, two with promotional descriptions. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 00:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kenjeekennedy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining uploads with no EXIF. I have deleted all other files as blatant copyright violations from various sources, see uploader's talk page. COM:PCP applies.

ƏXPLICIT 06:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RespectOrganization (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable musician, out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 06:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable musician, out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 06:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RifaPRolli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only intended for the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in June 2018 for misusing userspace. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 06:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seom O-dawg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photo of non-notable musician with promotional descriptions, out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 06:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr Budgie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage and article were speedily deleted in October 2009 as spam and non-notable, respectively. The contributor was subsequently blocked on that project. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 06:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdrienC.wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All works by Yannis Gaïtis who died in 1984. Needs permission, definitely not own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AdrienC.wiki: Please post your comments here. She would need to provide proof via COM:OTRS 09:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdrienC.wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these need OTRS permission from the artist, the photo of Gaitis is unlikely to be own work as he died in 1984

Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AdrienC.wiki: Please post your comments here so that we can see them
Please get the artist or his heirs to send us permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: Hello, I have just asked Mrs. Loretta GAÏTIS, the beneficiary of all of Yannis GAÏTIS's works, to send an email at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org authorizing me to publish this work. Can you tell me if this is sufficient or if further proof of authorization is required ? Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdrienC.wiki (talk • contribs) 13:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file. No need of this file on Commons. Out of scope. Junior Jumper (formerly ) 08:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagram screenshot per title, no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Draft777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Instagram screenshot per title, no exif, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abir Chowdhury 04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from insta profiles, needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. only used on a promo WP page Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text file. Looks to be some sort of personal project. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author letienvanvnn per exif, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo w-o educational use Drakosh (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Js0412 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small images without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Image is an Edited Image(Meta Data Absent). (Zoom into the top part of the Staff). The Original File is different. J.Stalin S Talk 16:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 01:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with "user comments" section at metadata; most probably taken from social media. E4024 (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Verbcatcher. --Minoraxtalk 01:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prirup37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk copyvio upload - low res, no EXIF, appeared elsewhere (e.g., File:Monterrey Skyline.jpg is here; File:Chapultepec UNO.jpg is here; etc.); Duck/COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 01:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD01000a9c0d00002274000028fa0000c50701006e180100a69f01002b8c020047a9020062bf02009ad902000b780400 E4024 (talk) 01:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pauselife71 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The following image files contain "FBMD" (Facebook metadata), implying they come from Facebook. Once an image is uploaded at Facebook, they are no longer compatible with Commons' licensing policy because they have been submitted under Facebook's own licensing (as stated in its terms of use). Original resolution versions should be uploaded, or if this is no longer possible, a permission (via COM:OTRS email system) is required to release these images under Commons-compatible licensing and thus waiving the Facebook licensing that subsists on these images.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artworks by Mu Pan

[edit]

Each is described as (i) by Mu Pan, (ii) found at mupan.com, and (iii) CC-BY-SA-4.0. True enough for (i) and (ii) -- the images are linked from here, here and here respectively -- but as for (iii), I see nothing on mupan.com about copyleft. -- Hoary (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teacher Daniele Krauz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work

Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


-All those files are my productions, they are on my sites and social media. And they are the pictures I created for the activities of the projects. There is no big deal about them. and this one * File:Adjectives for personality.jpg is a picture of a list of words with the source properly cited in the picture. What should I do about them?--Teacher Daniele Krauz (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VFalas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some claimed as own work but no exif, some have been taken from Insta. PCP as these aren't own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndrijaDreznjak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No original author of paintings and no permission.

Smooth O (talk) 11:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Athens Olympic Sports Complex tells that the building was made in 1984 and changed in 2004. Unfortunately, you can't upload photos of Greek buildings unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years. See COM:FOP#Greece. In some cases, the purpose of the images seems to be to show a team playing at the stadium. In those cases, I would argue that the building is de minimis as the main purpose is the game, so I didn't include those images in this request.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Object to deletion. Images are necessary for educational purposes and all are freely licensed. Freedom of Panorama policy is a mess and very inconsistently applied. Deletion would represent the destruction of valuable free content against which no copyright claim has been made. --Kafuffle (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Striking my oppose, as that discussion seems to be resolved. --Avenue (talk) 13:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah, yes, sorry, I'm a bit behind with following pages on my watchlist, so I hadn't noticed that discussion. I agree that it is better to wait with deciding what to do with Greek FOP deletion requests until we have seen some clarification on those points. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I will respect the requests above and not close this now. A couple of comments, though:
  • The comment above:
"Deletion would represent the destruction of valuable free content against which no copyright claim has been made."
is explicitly rejected by COM:PRP. It is unfortunate that we cannot keep images of every created work on Commons, but our first duty is to respect the copyright of those who create the works that we photograph.
  • My reading of the discussion of Greek FOP is clear -- while it may indeed intend "mass comunication" rather than "mass media", it still fails on the word "occasional" and on general commercial use. If I took one of the photographs in this list, printed it on a tee shirt, and sold tens of thousands of them, that would not be neither "occasional" nor "mass communication", no matter how you read the words in Greek. We have consistently rejected FOP rules that do not pass the tee shirt test and should do so in this case..     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think that it is clear now: Greek FOP is insufficient. However, it was much less clear earlier during this deletion discussion: it was stated at CT:FOP that the section COM:FOP#Greece partially was based on a mistranslation of Greek copyright law, and this needed to be sorted out first. This seems to have been sorted out by now. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I could make two arguments:
1) Why is a satellite image any different from an image taken from an airplane? There is still a copyright on the subject. FOP is an exception to the general law of copyright, so the Greek copyright is still in force.
2) It was taken from a NASA satellite, so US law should apply. Since the US has FOP for architecture, it is OK.
I think the former is the better of the arguments, but I'll ask Carl Lindberg to comment. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, en:Airspace tells that there is no fixed upper limit, so it is not clear if a satellite in the space is in Greece or not. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, the possible airspace limits mentioned there range from 30 km to 160 km, and this satellite orbits about 700 km above the Earth. So it seems to be a long way outside anyone's airspace. --Avenue (talk) 15:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should have looked at the source link for this photo earlier. It says that Space Imaging, Inc. hold a copyright on this photo, as it was taken from their IKONOS satellite. So it too should be deleted. The debate over which country's FOP applies was fun, so I'm a little sad that it's now moot. --Avenue (talk) 14:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I think we are all now agreed that this is ripe for closure. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP in Greece, the architecture on display is copyright.

LGA talkedits 08:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the last six one can argue that the architecture of display is de minimis, espescially in File:Greece v Malta, 17 Nov 2007 (06).jpg and File:OAKA ACDC.jpeg. Delete only the first. --C messier (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am no lawyer but my understanding is that the image may not be CC but it is allowed on the wikipedia since it is a something situated in "public space" and it is for distributed by means of mass communication. So is it more appropriate to change the license than delete it? Would it be technically better to upload it again under another license? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkoukoul (talk • contribs) 08:30, 18 August 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]
It is never necessary, or even allowed, to reload an image. Commons does not actually delete anything and the image will be restored if the community decides it is appropriate.
The Greek "mass communication" clause is not sufficient for Commons. Commons requirement that an image be free for all uses, including commercial use, goes well beyond "mass communication". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that now, that the licensing I have provide for the picture is incorrect. But since I have the copyright of this image, am I not allowed to change the license? If I upload it as copyrighted but give it for use at least to wikipedia sites, which comply with the Greek law of "mass communication", would that be ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkoukoul (talk • contribs) 09:12, 22 August 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]
No. Both Commons and WP:EN require that images be free for all uses, including commercial use. That cannot be accomplished for images taken of copyrighted works in Greece without permission from the copyright holder, in this case, the architect. That is why Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece is clearly marked with  Not OK. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Crowd scene (not populous) taken during a field event, framed by the stadium. It is more than just image of stadium  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On close inspection of the full size image, I see that you are correct. You can see that something is going on on the field. However the framing and the inability to see what is actually happening, makes it clear that the principal subject is the stadium itself. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:OAKA ACDC.jpeg -- aside from the copyright issues -- is this useful? You could argue that the images of the rock band make it useful, but, unfortunately, that argument comes against the fact that those images also have a copyright, so you can't argue to keep the image because of the rock band because that says that the rock band is not de minimis..
    crowd scene showing evidence of the popularity of a band in concert and the effects used in a concert. What copyright issues, it is a crowd  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Original21AEK.jpg -- the image on the screen that is dead center here has a copyright.
    Again a crowd scene with obvious demonstration of the use of a flare. The image on screen does not stop taking of photograph, or prevent other components
  • File:PANATHINAIKOS FANS.JPG -- again, the image on the screen has a copyright
    so what, it is not the only thing in the photograph, there is a crowd there with flares. Copyright law does not prevent or stop someone taking a photograph of a crowd scene, there is a crowd display of flages
  • File:Paralympics Opening Ceremony.jpg -- nothing here but the stadium and a large tree. Since the tree is almost certainly not real -- how would you transport a real tree and keep it green? -- the tree has a copyright as a sculpture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The ACDC image depicts a concert of the band. It can be cropped and still maintain its ues. Educational use: use of the stadium aside athletic events, the tour of the band in 2009, use of comfetti etc... --C messier (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC) - I uploaded a new cropped version, removing the stage and as much of the stadium as possible. --C messier (talk) 07:13, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Which makes the image useless imo so still delete. LGA talkedits 07:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Paralympics Opening Ceremony.jpg. There are people walking on the track, there is a crowd. This is a scene photograph in context of the opening ceremony. How else can you demonstrate the support, how else do demonstrate the context? Clearly more than FOP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • per C messier, delete the first, keep all the others. Some people need to get out and experience a sporting event and understand that there is preparation, and taking a photograph within a stadium of the event is going to capture the stadium. Copyright is not to prevent recording of history, and no court would declare those images in breach of copyright when the public is let in to participate, and record the event. Further, anyone who believes that Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are not mass communication clearly needs to come into the 2000s. More views than any newspaper.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That may be your view but it is not how the law sees it. In most countries architecture is protected and to take images of it requires either a Freedom of panorama exception or permission of the architect as you will see here there exist no Freedom of panorama in Greece. As for images on large screens, I am not aware of any country that permits reproduction of them that do not require consent. With a number of these images different strengths of fair use claims could be made to over come the copyright concerns, however such claims can not be made on commons. LGA talkedits 02:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Billinghurst's remark about mass communication misses an important point. WMF may indeed be the most important mass communication channel in the world, but Commons exists to serve all possible users of images, including many that are not by any stretch of the imagination "mass communication". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closure

[edit]

Rationale:

  1. File:2014 Olympic Stadium Athens.JPG
  2. File:Greece v Malta, 17 Nov 2007 (06).jpg
  3. File:Inside the Athens Olympic Stadium-panoramic.jpg
  4. File:OAKA ACDC.jpeg
  5. File:Original21AEK.jpg
  6. File:PANATHINAIKOS FANS.JPG
  7. File:Paralympics Opening Ceremony.jpg


  1. No FOP in Greece,the stadium is the only subject in the photo  Not OK
  2. Cropped to remove architectural design elements, photo focuses on balloons. OK
  3. As the title suggests, the stadium is the main part of the photo  Not OK
  4. Cropped, now OK
  5. Screen shows the stadium from above, DW of (c) content  Not OK
  6. Cropped, now focus on the fan block OK
  7. Cropped, tree sculpture and most of the stadium parts removed. OK

Closed: The remaining visible parts of the stadium can be considered generic not protect by (c). --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This stadium was originally designed by Weidleplan (architects H. Stalhout, Fr. Herre, and D.Andrikopoulos). The renovated parts including the roof were designed by still-living architect Santiago Calatrava. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Greece has no Commons-acceptable FoP. What is only allowed legally for images of copyrighted landmarks in Greece is the "incidental inclusion in mass media." Greek TOO might be strict too as the country is a member of the copyright-conscious European Union. Only way to counter no FOP is an amendment and/or reform in their copyright law to allow commercial photography and commercial publications of photos of copyrighted Greek architecture and sculptures, but as far as I know there's no indication of such reform in their copyright law as of this writing.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stadium is originally completed in 1982 and was renovated in 2004 by Santiago Calatrava (born in 1951). There is no freedom of panorama in Greece, permission from the architect is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevecooliofan2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious logos of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevecooliofan2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos and drawings. Not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 12:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No other global contributions, unless you count their user pages. Speaking of these, the current revision of their Commons user page sounds like a threat; is this acceptable? Brianjd (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevecooliofan2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Appear to be trying to promote someone

Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Merci de corriger les dates de prises de vue, de mentionner le(s) nom(s) du(des) photographe(s) et d'expliquer pourquoi ces images sont hors droits d'auteurs en France.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Photo prise il y a 110 ans, entreprise aujourd'hui disparue, merci  Keep.
publicité datant de 84 ans, entreprise de transport aujourd'hui disparue, merci  Keep.
Photo prise il y a 107 ans, merci  Keep.
Photo prise il y a 108 ans, casino disparu, merci  Keep.
Publicité parue il y a 111 ans, merci  Keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, postcards, drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Publicité datant de 111 ans, cette société n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Publicité datant de 111 ans, cette société n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Publicité datant de 111 ans, cette société n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
annuaire datant de 111 ans, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de plus de 200 ans, cette banque n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 100 ans, cette banque n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 100 ans, cette banque et cette succursale n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 98 ans, cette banque n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 90 ans, cette banque et cette succursale n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de  Keep cette image, le peintre Eugène Chigot est mort en 1923. --Ltqphg (talk) 09:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 119 ans, prêtée par un descendant, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 125 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 119 ans, prêtée par un descendant, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Document datant de 143 ans, prêtée par un descendant de la famille, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo prise par mes soins, entreprise disparue, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 130 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 130 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 125 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 110 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)* File:Publicité, de l'architecte Joseph Magnin, parue en 1909 dans l'annuaire général de Paris-Plage Le Touquet-Paris-Plage.png[reply]
photo datant de 1OO ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 112 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 110 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 89 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 91 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 93 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 100 ans minimum, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 122 ans, hôtel détruit en 1902, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 122 ans, hôtel détruit en 1902, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans, années 1900, Paul Ridoux est mort en 1920, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo cant de 100 ans environ, premier quart du siècle précédent, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 116 ans, casino fermé et démonté peu de temps après, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 93 ans, détruit lors de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Plan établi il y a 127 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans minimum, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 90 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 126 ans, Ernest Legendre est mort en 1914, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo prise il y a 100 ans environ et donner par un cousin de la famille Grujon, merci  Keep.
Please keep, as it has been post stamped on 22 July 1912. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep, because it has been published on 27 April 1908, as shown in the third line of hte document. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 120 ans, Charles Delambre est mort en 1906, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 111 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'une publicité datant de 111 ans, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'une publicité datant de 111 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 100 ans, Allen Stoneham est mort depuis 93 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 160 ans environ, ce pont a été détruit avant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 95 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 96 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 95 ans, il est mort en 1933. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 80 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 120 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 98 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo remise par le secrétaire perpétuel de la Société académique du Touquet-Paris-Plage pour insertion dans Wikipédia. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo en double à supprimer. merci  Delete. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 134 ans, couverture d'un livre en ma possession. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. le bâtiment n'existe plus depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 100 ans, Joseph Louis Sanguet est mort depuis 99 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 120 ans. le bâtiment a été détruit depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 100 ans, Édouard Lévêque est mort depuis 86 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 93 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 95 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 94 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 80 ans. Albert Pouthier est mort depuis 72 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus 110 ans, Léon Garet est mort il y a 108 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'environ 100 ans, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'environ 112 ans, Joseph Louis Sanguet est mort depuis 99 ans. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 100 ans, hôtel et entreprise disparus aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1960, piscine disparue aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1960. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1950, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel très endommagé pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale et qui est détruit définitivement dans les années 1960. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1900, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans minimum, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo à  Delete, merci.
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo prise pendant la Première Guerre mondiale, datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel construit en 1904 et détruit en 1909. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel construit en 1909, voir cachet de la poste. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, période de construction de l'hôtel. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, voir date manuscrite figurant sur la carte, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel construit en 1904, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, voir cachet de la poste sur la photo, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, villa qui devient l'hôtel Bristol en 1927. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel construit en 1892, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel construit en 1904, voir commentaire manuscrit, sur la carte, datant de la Première Guerre mondiale, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale et disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, voir commentaire manuscrit, sur la carte, datant de la Première Guerre mondiale. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 70 ans environ, des années 1950, hôtel disparu. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 94 ans, des années 1920, paru dans le journal "Échos mondains" de juin 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 94 ans, des années 1920, paru dans le journal "Échos mondains" de juin 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 150 ans, des années 1860, réalisée par Gustave Souquet. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans, des années 1920, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, voir la date figurant sur la photo. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900, pont détruit en 1926 pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, voir cachet de la poste sur la photo. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
à  Delete, merci. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 70 ans environ, des années 1950.
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900, pont détruit en 1926 pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, voir cachet de la poste sur la photo. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo, de 71 ans, datant de août 1949, année d'ouverture du pont routier d'Étaples.
à  Delete, merci. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
à  Delete, merci. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans, de 1926, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, pont détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 70 ans environ du pont provisoire construit après la Seconde Guerre mondiale et remplacé par le pont routier d'Étaples inauguré en 1949. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930. piscine disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930. piscine disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 60 ans environ, des années 1960. piscine disparue. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920. hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, chapelle disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1910, chapelle disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, voir cachet de la poste de 1907 sur la photo, chapelle disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, voir inscription manuscrite "1912" sur la photo, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo difficile à dater, datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 100 ans, Joseph Louis Sanguet est mort depuis 99 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
License tags must be fixed. Sorry, but 1960 photos are not in public domain in France. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ltqphg: De toutes manières, que les bâtiments aient disparus ne fait pas disparaître le copyright. Certaines des photos ne sont d'ailleurs pas assez anciennes pour être sûr que 70 ans se soient écoulés depuis la mort du photographe. Aussi, pour chacune des photos où les noms d'un photographe et/ou d'une maison d'édition sont présents (donc, ce ne sont pas des photos anonymes), vous devez rechercher les noms des héritiers des photographes et obtenir leur autorisation pour publication. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, mon intention, en apportant ces précisions, n'est absolument pas de "forcer" une décision mais juste de donner les informations qui puissent permettre de prendre la décision la plus adaptée, eu égard au temps de travail considérable que j'ai consacré pour la recherche et l'importation des ces images ainsi que leur insertion dans Wikipédia. Vous remerciant pour votre compréhension dans le respect des règles Wikimédia. Bien cordialement. --Ltqphg (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ltqphg: Peut-être mais vous n'avez pas répondu aux objections soulevées par le nominateur: "Photos historiques et publicité. Des informations appropriées sur l'auteur / la date / le pays de création doivent être fournies pour déterminer le statut des droits d'auteur et les étiquettes de licence corrigées." En matière de photographies non anonymes, le nom et date de décès du photographe sont essentielles parce que c'est à partir de là que le décompte du copyright commence; la date de création étant purement accessoire et, dans le cas qui nous intéresse, inutile. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These plaques were created by Alain Gonon, born in 1964. No freedom of panorama in France.

Chassipress (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unknown thing. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to missing educational value? Taivo (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Audio description of unspecified photo. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Denver Zoo Man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ΚΛΑΙΡΗ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source states " All Rights & Copyright reserved by TAG Media, Inc." at the bottom of the webpage Woko Sapien (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source states "Copyright © 2020 BigSpeak Speakers Bureau. All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of the webpage. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any priest? We have many notable priests. If he is not notable he is not in scope of Commons. E4024 (talk) 01:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: doesn't look like own work. --Polarlys (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error — Preceding unsigned comment added by LEANDRO RENÉ (talk • contribs) 20:36, 17 November 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lo subí por error — Preceding unsigned comment added by LEANDRO RENÉ (talk • contribs) 20:35, 17 November 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This album/single cover is copyrighted and not under a free licensed Fandi89 (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover without permission - no fair use Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

simple text, no educational value. out of project scope. Hanooz 07:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, photo already published at https://www.quimper-ensemble.bzh/ . No sign of a CC-BY-SA licence there. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 08:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: certainly not from homepage but photographer. --Polarlys (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unvalid license. It is a screenshot from a movie. Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unvalid license. A screenshot from TV show. Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 08:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content. Shows a mosaic from 1979 by Erentrud Trost (1923-2004). No freedom of panorama inside churches. FordPrefect42 (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wo sind die Grenzen für den Schutz der mit aufs Bild gekommenen Kunstwerke, wenn nur ein Teil des Kunstwerks abgebildet ist und es auch nur einen Teil des gesamten Bildes ausmacht? Es geht mir um die Architektur und ich würde eine Bildbearbeitung mit geeignetem Ausschnitt einwechseln.--Alfred Löhr (talk) 10:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bin nicht wirklich Experte in diesen Dingen, aber ich sehe drei Möglichkeiten: 1. das Bild so zuschneiden (crop), dass das Kunstwerk wegfällt, 2. das Mosaik verpixeln (blur). Das beste wäre wohl die dritte Möglichkeit: versuchen, die Erben von Sr. Erentrud zu kontaktieren und eine Bildfreigabe zu erbitten. Wobei die Frage der Erbfolge bei Ordensangehörigen vermutlich nicht trivial ist. Aber bei den Benediktinerinnen mal anzukopfen und nachzufragen, ist sicher erstmal nicht verkehrt. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: blurred, hardly recognizable mosaic. --Polarlys (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mackconor963 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PORN not educational nude photos

Hamish (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mackconor963 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not in scope, used for xwiki vandalism, uploaded by locked account

Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - I added the last one, that was nominated, but not on this list. - This is not pornhub, people are using this for exhibitionism (or whatever).. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Some of these photos are or were being used in Wikipedia articles about en:Pride parade. The general circumstance is that LGBT+ people face discrimination for many reasons. One way in which this community has drawn attention to itself is through public demonstration, including en:Nudity and protest. Increasingly at LGBT+ events there is a conflict between advertising sponsors like banks and pharma companies who want to focus on the marketable aspects of pride events, and activists who draw attention to anything other than corporate or institutional messaging. Some of these photos are at two protest events, en:Pride Toronto and en:World Naked Bike Ride. The rest of the photos are uploaded by one user, seemingly showing the same model. In general, I support keeping media which documents the activities and communication which happen as part of protests and especially for LGBT events. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - per Martin and Richard. E4024 (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of File:ServerPhotos Front-Back.jpg falsely claimed as "Own work". It isn't. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gross and very bad file 71.241.131.155 10:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate original anon IP nomination blanked, refer to history if interested.

This is out of scope because it's a poor crop, low resolution so does not meet nudity criteria. -- (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request also applies to:

Yet another set of low quality images of someones penis. We already have enough high quality images. Per {{Nopenis}} D-Kuru (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded wrong file Paul Hermans (talk) 10:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A silly error on my part, I uploaded an image of someone stood next to Sinclair, I miscounted the number of boys in the photo when capturing the image, will provide the correct image later but this one needs to be deleted Racingmanager (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to the extremely low resolution of the photo and the presence of those white borders, it could be a result of scanning process from some publication (newspaper or magazine). Glorious 93 (talk) 10:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation. Exif data says "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" without qualification. Even if this is not relevant, then there is no explicit permission from the artist. Headlock0225 (talk) 11:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild wurde von mir versehentlich 2 mal hochgeladen Rheinhütte Pumpen (talk) 12:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused backview of unidentified person. Mika Fingeroos is a female Finnish model and this doesn't look like her. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo. Without knowing which Michael Thompson this is it's not much use. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Riverside

[edit]

Fantasy diagrams, unused since March. --Slashme (talk) 14:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work Le Petit Chat (talk) 14:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kardiolog5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion of some Ukranian witchcraft, out of scope

Pippobuono (talk) 14:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the cover of a music album and it is protected by copyright. There is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 14:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the cat "Unidentified men", not in use and most probably not an "own work" due to size and lack of EXIF. E4024 (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook. E4024 (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the cat "Portraits of men", not in use and most probably not an "own work" due to size and lack of EXIF. E4024 (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the cat "Sitting men", not in use and most probably not an "own work" due to size and lack of EXIF. E4024 (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif info, seems not uploader's own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source (her campaign website) makes no mention of Creative Commons license. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of orginal photo already nominated for deletion. Images are NOT edicts. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source makes no mention of Creative Commons license. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source (her campaign website) makes no mention of Creative Commons license. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source (a local news article) makes no mention of Creative Commons license. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not properly attributed, but this appears to be her US House headshot, which is a work of the US federal government, and therefore public domain. Muboshgu (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: - I'm afraid not; as per [3] this looks to be a campaign photo. House/Senate photos usually have metadata to distinguish them and this one is uncharacteristically of low quality. Connormah (talk | contribs) 06:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Connormah: , good catch. Delete. Muboshgu (talk) 02:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source clearly has a copyright at the bottom of the page. No mention of Creative Commons license anywhere on it. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Onzichtbaar Mongolen": non notable drinking game. No educational value. Tekstman (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - offensive name also. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Software used:Google". Does this mean it was taken with a Google brand camera or mobile phone? E4024 (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MONGO as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not free. The file has been 13 years in Commons, it is used and deserves a regular deletion request. Where (in which country) the sculpture is situated? Taivo (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is the tongue of the monster intentionally made to look like something else? Now that is art. We do not only need the photographer/uploader permission but also one from the artist of the figure. Delete if we cannot get it in a week. --E4024 (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a non-free image I am pretty sure. I took this image long ago in the USA but it is of a inflatable T-Rex or something. No modifications were made to the tongue...probably just camera angle.--MONGO (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. An artistic work in the form of a dinosaur (?) — see COM:FOP US. United States has very limited FOP only for "buildings". All other artworks from sculptures to murals  Not OK. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload error - not compressed version. Compressed version File:Bleak_House1853IllustrationPage123.jpg already exists and is used. Elrond1 2eleven (talk) 18:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suppose flickr washing. Original source seems to be https://www.naturepl.com/stock-photo/weddell-seal-leptonychotes-weddelli-adult-and-pup-swimming-under-ice/search/detail-0_01089418.html (hi-res from 2010), also available @ alamy. Achim (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: I blacklisted flickr user changehali after having checked their portfolio. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at https://www.flickr.com/photos/53371280@N04/page2/ you may be correct. Nevertheless, it seems odd to me that the image on Alamy/Nature is cropped top and bottom when compared with the image here and on Flickr. It's rather difficult for a derivative image to have a bigger field of view than the original, so I guess we are assuming that there exists another (uncropped) version which was used to create the Flickr image? --RexxS (talk) 00:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also the other way round: horizontally our image was cropped (see left border region). --Achim (talk) 17:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a fake image created using https://cssauthor.com/mockup/free-office-building-logo-mockup-psd/Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely own work. Leonel Sohns 19:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suppose flickr washing, stock image from https://www.fotosearch.com/PHT037/paa037000033/ hi-res, scanned by tineye in 2008. Achim (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: I blacklisted flickr user changehali after having checked their portfolio. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was not shared under a CC license. All rights reserved to the author. This picture is not free. Now, it is not used in any Wikiedia page. Plase delete this picture. Thanks in advance. Salvabl (talk) 17:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work --- non free image Jjj1238 (talk) 19:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bessere Bildqualität hochgeladen (alle 4 Perspektiven) OliverZenglein (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bessere Bildqualität hochgeladen (alle 4 Perspektiven) OliverZenglein (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deutlich bessere Qualität (alle 4 Perspektiven) hochgeladen OliverZenglein (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deutlich bessere Qualität (alle 4 Perspektiven) hochgeladen OliverZenglein (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bessere Qualität hochgeladen (3 Bilder von allen Blickwinkeln) OliverZenglein (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bessere Qualität hochgeladen (3 Bilder von allen Blickwinkeln) OliverZenglein (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Random photo from internet, Logo Noah Wulf (talk) 21:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my son's album and this not a random picture, I am the label owner. I am new to Wiki and I was trying to to do my artist Wikipedia page. Please pay no attention to Mr. Wulf. He is 100% wrong and and my file should not be deleted. It will be added to a artist Wiki page/Autobiography.

Deleted: Commons:Project scope. --Polarlys (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. this photograph was actually taken at the Royal Gala 1978. I can't find out the photographer but it would be either press or the official photographer for the event. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope: pure text. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep since it's in use on a fawiki article. Although I agree that this is not an official logo and I personally think that it's not needed on the article (w:en:HomeToVote or w:en:ICanHazPDF, for instance, do not have a similar photo), I think it is still in scope because there is an article using it: "It should be stressed that Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope. If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope" (from COM:INUSE). I think it can be deleted if fawiki decides to remove it from the article. Ahmadtalk 00:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ahmad252: I removed the image from fawiki[4] as an active editor of that project. Using PNG images instead of directly writing the words is a poor editorial decision. Text can be searched and easily edited by anyone. Neither of which is true about a PNG image. Come on! At least upload these raw text files in SVG format :-) 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough.  Delete now that it's no longer in use; per nom. Ahmadtalk 00:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 17:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of ownership. State symbols are under the jurisdiction of the Rakhine State Government. CentreLeftRight 22:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate photo of same museum object as c:File:Kursmünzen Georg Wilhelm (1665–1705) – Residenzmuseum Celle (3).JPG, as confirmedby original uploader User:Hajotthu 12:42, 18. Nov. 2020: de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Hajotthu#c:File:Kursmünzen_Georg_Wilhelm_(1665–1705)_–_Residenzmuseum_Celle_(2).JPG HReuter (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die Datei kann gelöscht werden. Eindeutig ein Duplikat von File:Kursmünzen Georg Wilhelm (1665–1705) – Residenzmuseum Celle (3).JPG--Hajotthu (talk) 11:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there's no chance this is public domain. This is tagged as "no copyright symbol", however, The Man from UNCLE episodes always ended with a clear MGM copyright notice.[5] Indeed, this episode's registered copyright is easy to find.[6] Nohomersryan (talk) 01:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Puerto Rico (USA) A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not own work as declared (too small and has a tr code) and placed in a cat farm, including presidents (heads of state). E4024 (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy map: America First isn't holding any states, for example. Slashme (talk) 14:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cyber demigod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion, out of scope

Pippobuono (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Помилково завантажений Saharin88 (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument erected in 1955. Vasos Falireas, its sculptor, died in 1979. Also, there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably the same file that was deleted before, because there's no freedom of panorama in Greece and no permission from the sculptor to host image here under free licensing. Greek copyright law only recognizes "occasional and casual reproduction of works by mass media." No indication on whether commercial reproductions of copyrighted buildings and sculptures are recognized as legally binding with Greek copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument erected in 1955. Vasos Falireas, its sculptor, died in 1979. Also, there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably the same image as the aforementioned file. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Greece has no Commons-acceptable FoP. What is only allowed legally for images of copyrighted landmarks in Greece is the "occassional/casual inclusion in mass media." Only way to counter no FOP is an amendment and/or reform in their copyright law to allow commercial photography and commercial publications of photos of copyrighted Greek architecture and sculptures (ex. in post cards, commercial T-shirt prints, commercial travel guide books, and commercial YouTube vlogs), but as far as I know there's no indication of such reform in their copyright law as of this writing. If the Greek courts or authorities say it is not allowed to print images of copyrighted buildings and/or sculptures without architects'/sculptors'/heirs' authorization, then outright delete these images from here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument erected in 1955. Vasos Falireas, its sculptor, died in 1979. Also, there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably the same image as the aforementioned file. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Greece has no Commons-acceptable FoP. What is only allowed legally for images of copyrighted landmarks in Greece is the "occassional/casual inclusion in mass media." Only way to counter no FOP is an amendment and/or reform in their copyright law to allow commercial photography and commercial publications of photos of copyrighted Greek architecture and sculptures (ex. in post cards, commercial T-shirt prints, commercial travel guide books, and commercial YouTube vlogs), but as far as I know there's no indication of such reform in their copyright law as of this writing. If the Greek courts or authorities say it is not allowed to print images of copyrighted buildings and/or sculptures without architects'/sculptors'/heirs' authorization, then outright delete these images from here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is being spammed on enwiki in an effort to advertise. Can we delete this per COM:ADVERT? MrOllie (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose On nl.wiktionary this picture is used as an example of one possible meaning of the Dutch word "waterfles" (water bottle). As this particular brand of bottled water isn't commonly sold in the Netherlands or Belgium it is a very useful example precisely when we want to avoid advertising a particular brand. I would argue this picture meets COM:INUSE. The spamming of a picture might very well be promotional, but this picture in and of itself is not promotional in nature. --MarcoSwart (talk) 11:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не нарушается ли свобода панорамы? Зейнал (talk) 01:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Réunion (France) A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect License HistoryBookworm (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Fix the license please. --Missvain (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no COM:FOP in Denmark for 3D sculptural works. This statue was unveiled only in 2018 and was created by en:La Vaughn Belle & Jeannette Ehlers who are both still alive. Thus, photos of this statue are COM:DW & need the permission of the two artists before its publication here in Commons. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptures of Korean War soldiers in background are copyrighted Maliepa (talk) 12:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 13:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of an association not part of the Serbian State Veverve (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no COM:FOP for artworks, including 2D graphic works, in the US "even if permanently installed in public places" per COM:FOP United States. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2019 artwork by Sara Lavelle, claimed as 'own work' by drive-by account. Looks like copyvio to me. Tagishsimon (talk) 14:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no reason not to assume that the uploader is Sara Lavelle, given that's what was claimed on the upload form and there's no evidence to the contrary. Joe Roe (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keeping for now to request permissions. (Please assume good faith at this decision!). --Missvain (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

icon with an error of spelling Pippobuono (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pippobuono: You can click this to upload new version. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What if Pippobuono is as computer illiterate as myself and does not know how to make a logo? --E4024 (talk) 15:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, computer illiterate I am, and I did not commit this icon, neither do I wish to lose my time in correcting the work of somebody who did only this contribution to commons. So, please, just delete it. Pippobuono (talk) 14:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded on request, but checking dates and {{PD-India}}, this appears to fall under the life + 60 year rule, that's 1969 + 70 in this case. If no other copyright rationale applies, this means undeletion in 2030. (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality copy of File:A Brawl with Finnish Contrabandists by Vasili Khudiakov.jpg Каракорум (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality copy of File:Surikov streltsi.jpg Каракорум (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a cover of a magazine issue it's almost certainly copyrighted. CiaPan (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do have copyright permission from the publisher of Nude and Natural magazine. Nicky Hoffman. I would like the cover to be returned please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaretakerofN (talk • contribs) 21:38, 23 lis 2020‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Giovannicaciotta as Copyvio (Copyvio) - but there is no copyvio - the artist died 1926 - more then 100 years ago Rlbberlin (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good Randy Kryn (Randy Kryn) 01:37, 19 November 2027 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. As a matter of fact, the image has been redesigned by me, just using a third element (the griffin) coming from a freely-licensed image, which I have credited. The other elements are simple text & geometry, both under threshold of originality, so IMHO the supposed copyvio allegation is not well-founded. Vale93b (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Probable copyright violation. It is stated as "own work" by uploader, user Aleka Stamatiadi, and declares herself as the author of the image. But in the metadata of the file another person, "Michail Papastathopoulos", is listed as the copyright holder. Apparently, Mr Papastathopoulos is the artist who shot the photograph, the creator. Perhaps the photographer has given to the uploader the image, but this does not nesessarily mean his concession to her to have the photo published with the licence required by Commons. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pb copie wikidata Make a sentence (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Помилкове завантаження Saharin88 (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce ne sont pas les armoiries de la Famille Gillion de Roscomont. Il y a déjà un fichier sur wikimedia concernant le blason et les armoiries de la dynastie des Gillion de Roscomont. Veuillez donc, je vous prie, le supprimer. Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ce ne sont plus les armoiries des Gillion de Roscomont 82.241.168.239 20:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is used on fr:Armorial des familles de France. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for French Wikipedia, it's accurate enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file in use (=in scope). --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier existe déjà sur wikimedia : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_de_la_Famille_GILLION_de_ROSCOMONT.jpg James de Roscomont (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: (1) Ce fichier est forcément dupliqué entre toutes les versions de Wikipédia et Wikimedia Commons, c'est d'ailleurs indiqué sur cette adresse (" Ce fichier et sa description proviennent de Wikimedia Commons") et (2) le fait que ce blason ne soit plus utilisé ne justifie aucunement sa suppression. (no reason to delete) AntonierCH (d) 18:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not a duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 22:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This coat of arms is wrong ! This Family has already an original coat of arms. 91.167.187.156 18:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: please use Template:Disputed coat of arms if necessary. Ruthven (msg) 22:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le responsable de la publication de ce fichier droit procéder à l’effacement dans les meilleurs délais et au plus tard dans un délai d’un mois. En cas de réponse insatisfaisante ou d’absence de réponse sous un mois, la CNIL sera saisie. (article 17 du règlement général sur la protection des données- RGPD et droit à l'effacement). Concernant la violation de droit d'auteur, l’atteinte au droit d'auteur désigne, de façon générale, les nuisances portées à la propriété intellectuelle. Aller à l’encontre des intérêts moraux et matériels de l'auteur est ainsi passible d'une action en responsabilité pénale et civile.La personne responsable de cette publication est pénalement responsable car ne détient en aucun cas les droits d'auteur concernant les armoiries de cette famille. Dont acte. 2A01:E0A:1EE:E700:31BF:9C2:D3B7:B923 22:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce ne sont pas les armoiries de la branche GILLION de ROSCOMONT. Voici la version officielle : http://conseil-francais-d-heraldique.com/heraldique-armorial-armoiries.php?ID=858 James de Roscomont (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong coat of arms, please delete it as soon as possible James de Roscomont (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong coat of arms & copyright infringement Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 16:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation de copyright Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de copyright / Copyright Infrigment !!! Theobald de Roscomont (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Immediate deletion request - copyright infringement James de Roscomont (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close. See above. --Minoraxtalk 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information provided for this other than en:San Diego Aviators; so, there's no real way to verify whether it's been released as licensed. It might be possible to convert this to {{PD-logo}}, but it seems a little close and probably above the US's TOO per COM:TOO United States. So, unless it can be verified that the copyright holder has released this under as licensed, I don't think this can be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information provided for this other than "own work" which seems unlikely for a professional sports team like the en:New York Sportimes team logo; so, unless Commons is willing to accept such a claim of "own work", there's no real way to verify whether it's been released as licensed by its original copyirght holder. It might be possible to convert this to {{PD-logo}}, but it seems a little close and might be above the US's TOO per COM:TOO United States. So, unless it can be verified that the copyright holder has released this under as licensed, I don't think this can be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a Flickrwashing account. Reverse image search shows the picture has been previously published and the source is unclear. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you image search to find it's exact location? It's original source? Vallee01 (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this picture is a derivative work of the text and painting shown on the plaque. While the plaque itself may be a sculpture (and hence subject to freedom of panorama), the text and painting are not. Since the plaque makes up most of the picture, I don't think its appearance is de minimis either. bjh21 (talk) 13:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll not say you're wrong, but most of the contents of Category:Plaques would seem to be similarly affected. MSGJ (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, the drawing is not allowed per Template:FoP-UK. @MSGJ: in Category:Plaques in the United Kingdom i see a lot of text-only plaques, will be allowed I think. But plaques with graphics certainly not. It has been discussed in village pump, probably more then once. Elly (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the coat of arms of the Republic of Karelia, it is already here: File:Coat of Arms of Republic of Karelia.svg

Also the coat of arms of East Karelia in 1920-1922 exists: File: Coat of Arms of East Karelia (1920-1922).svg 85.76.17.179 06:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All, he appears to be a troll account - I found this page because I was looking for how to report the fact he's created a false Coat of Arms for North Caucasus (not Karelia), based on a false FLAG of North Caucasus that was uploaded six years ago to Wiki and nobody noticed. This looks like a huge problem on Wiki that the Coats of Arms and Flags of "minor" and "historical" territories are not questioned or sourced. This Karelia one does appear as Karelia since 2019 on https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/east-karelia-coat-arm-350639153 though, so not 100% it's fake. I cannot tell, I mean his Caucasus one seems to be a personal re-invention of the Coat of Arms shown on their money, combined with a misunderstanding of their flag based on the separately uploaded flag of six years ago that turned the Islamic flag into a smiley face...maybe that is legit of Wiki to freehand draw a copy of something for which there is no good historical reference? Maybe it's actually even useful? HaltlosePersonalityDisorder (talk) 14:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]