User talk:Alfred Löhr
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SilberstempelK&B.jpg was uncategorized on 13 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SilberstempelMueller.jpg was uncategorized on 13 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pfennig Bremen Jungk 002.jpg was uncategorized on 24 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Taler Bremen Jungk 0433.jpg was uncategorized on 24 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Uploads
[edit]Moin Alfred, danke für deine hochgeladenen Fotos! Ich habe File:Berne Taufengel.jpg mal überarbeitet: Die Angaben in der Dateibeschreibung (source, author, date) beziehen sich auf das Foto und dich als Fotografen. Da müsstest du jetzt noch die Lizenz anpassen (weil du ja nicht schon 100 Jahre tot bist). Lediglich bei Scans oder Fotos von 2-dimensionalen Kunstwerken (Gemälde, Zeichnungen, Stiche usw.) werden die Daten (source, author, date) von Künstler und Kunstwerk ins Formular eingetragen. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ja, so isses. Danke, Achim. Gruß,--213.168.196.144 09:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Léna (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Schauinsland Hugo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Alfred, zwar weiss ich dass Satillieu nicht gerade direkt in Bremen liegt, doch du bist ja auch ganz allgemein Kunsthistoriker. Was den Herrn (oder die Dame?) in diesem Glasfenster betrifft, grüble ich erfolglos, wer das denn sein könnte. Ich habe bereits erwogen, in der mairie von Satillieu zu fragen - ohne grosse Hoffnung, dass in dieser Bürgermeisterei jemand etwas darüber weiss. Ich habe auch nichts zu diesem Abtswappen finden können. Weisst du als Fachmann, wie ich an solche Infos gelangen könnte? Ich würde gerne die Angaben komplettieren, wenn es machbar ist. Gruss -- sarang♥사랑 07:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Lieber Sarang, bei dem im Glasfenster Dargestellten muss es sich um einen frz. König handeln. Und zwar (wegen seiner Tracht um einen mittelalterlichen, vermutlich einen heiliggesprochenen und offensichtlich einen, der üblicherweise jugendlich dargestellt wird. Das müsste, auch ohne im Pfarramt nachzufragen, rauszukriegen sein. Schwieriger ist das Wappen. Die einschlägige heraldische Literatur wird nur in Frankreich zur Verfügung stehen. Also doch eine mail an den Pfarrer. Gruß, Alfred Löhr (talk) 19:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Der König soll wohl Ludwig den Heiligen (in WP: Ludwig IX. (Frankreich)) darstellen. Gruß Alfred Löhr (talk) 20:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für deine Expertise! Ich trage das mal ein, ganz unverbindlich -- sarang♥사랑 13:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Der König soll wohl Ludwig den Heiligen (in WP: Ludwig IX. (Frankreich)) darstellen. Gruß Alfred Löhr (talk) 20:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Reaktion bitte
[edit]Alfred, bitte mal eine Rückmeldung Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports#File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1970-068-53, Bremerhaven, Verabschiedung des ostasiatischen Expeditionskorps.jpg geben. — Speravir – 19:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Speravir: Du mahnst zurecht, aber ich komme z.Zt. nicht in meine Museumsbibliothek, da werde ich die Quelle/Begründung wiederfinden. Recherche hängt bis dahin in der pipeline. Dank und Gruß, Alfred Alfred Löhr (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- OK. Die Anfrage wird ja nicht entfernt. — Speravir – 19:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Werlte Sixtus innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FordPrefect42 (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- verpixelt und erledigt.Alfred Löhr (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Quadrat Bottrop Lageplan.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Quadrat Bottrop Lageplan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Quadrat Bottrop Lageplan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Krd 06:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Oppenheim Hagar.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Oppenheim Hagar.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Oppenheim Hagar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armbrustspannhaken.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Armbrustspannhaken.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armbrustspannhaken.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)