User talk:Alfred Löhr

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alfred Löhr!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Alfred Löhr!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads

[edit]

Moin Alfred, danke für deine hochgeladenen Fotos! Ich habe File:Berne Taufengel.jpg mal überarbeitet: Die Angaben in der Dateibeschreibung (source, author, date) beziehen sich auf das Foto und dich als Fotografen. Da müsstest du jetzt noch die Lizenz anpassen (weil du ja nicht schon 100 Jahre tot bist). Lediglich bei Scans oder Fotos von 2-dimensionalen Kunstwerken (Gemälde, Zeichnungen, Stiche usw.) werden die Daten (source, author, date) von Künstler und Kunstwerk ins Formular eingetragen. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, so isses. Danke, Achim. Gruß,--213.168.196.144 09:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Léna (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schauinsland Hugo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Alfred, zwar weiss ich dass Satillieu nicht gerade direkt in Bremen liegt, doch du bist ja auch ganz allgemein Kunsthistoriker. Was den Herrn (oder die Dame?) in diesem Glasfenster betrifft, grüble ich erfolglos, wer das denn sein könnte. Ich habe bereits erwogen, in der mairie von Satillieu zu fragen - ohne grosse Hoffnung, dass in dieser Bürgermeisterei jemand etwas darüber weiss. Ich habe auch nichts zu diesem Abtswappen finden können. Weisst du als Fachmann, wie ich an solche Infos gelangen könnte? Ich würde gerne die Angaben komplettieren, wenn es machbar ist. Gruss -- sarang사랑 07:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Sarang, bei dem im Glasfenster Dargestellten muss es sich um einen frz. König handeln. Und zwar (wegen seiner Tracht um einen mittelalterlichen, vermutlich einen heiliggesprochenen und offensichtlich einen, der üblicherweise jugendlich dargestellt wird. Das müsste, auch ohne im Pfarramt nachzufragen, rauszukriegen sein. Schwieriger ist das Wappen. Die einschlägige heraldische Literatur wird nur in Frankreich zur Verfügung stehen. Also doch eine mail an den Pfarrer. Gruß, Alfred Löhr (talk) 19:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Der König soll wohl Ludwig den Heiligen (in WP: Ludwig IX. (Frankreich)) darstellen. Gruß Alfred Löhr (talk) 20:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für deine Expertise! Ich trage das mal ein, ganz unverbindlich -- sarang사랑 13:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reaktion bitte

[edit]

Alfred, bitte mal eine Rückmeldung Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports#File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1970-068-53, Bremerhaven, Verabschiedung des ostasiatischen Expeditionskorps.jpg geben. — Speravir – 19:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Speravir: Du mahnst zurecht, aber ich komme z.Zt. nicht in meine Museumsbibliothek, da werde ich die Quelle/Begründung wiederfinden. Recherche hängt bis dahin in der pipeline. Dank und Gruß, Alfred Alfred Löhr (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Die Anfrage wird ja nicht entfernt. — Speravir – 19:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werlte Sixtus innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FordPrefect42 (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

verpixelt und erledigt.Alfred Löhr (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Quadrat Bottrop Lageplan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Quadrat Bottrop Lageplan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 06:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Oppenheim Hagar.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oppenheim Hagar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Armbrustspannhaken.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Armbrustspannhaken.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]