Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_-_01965.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01967.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01970.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01973.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/empreendedorsocial/2016/08/1796770-app-e-balao-vao-monitorar-epidemias-e-seguranca-durante-olimpiada.shtml Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
......... Diyimi4353Sbon6ur (talk) 07:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Taken from a random external source, there is no evidence the image is related to the documents listed in the license template used to be in the public domain VLu (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete, copyvio per https://dokonline.com/dokumentalnie-filmi/28319-dokumentalnoe-rassledovanie-todor-zhivkov-2012.html . — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Sealle (talk) 15:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Nightflyer (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Oppose In der Versionshistorie kann man sehen, das das ein Versehen war. Ich hab es repariert. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Und warum hast Du dann einen Löschantrag gestellt, statt das Template einfach zu entfernen? "If you have resolved the issue by adding a valid copyright tag, you may remove the deletion template." --Stepro (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ich bin kein Admin, besser den offiziellen Weg nehmen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy keep. Just remove the template next time, and if anyone complains, blame me. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Privacy Consern Pfctm (talk) 02:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused personal file, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
from Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/anveshi25/photos/a.282585705251837/1631573740353020 Ravensfire (talk) 14:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fake source, taken from BD Navy page which is not CC Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Copyright Violation. Permission from owner (Bangladesh Navy) not found. MSIs 2001 (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I think it is likely below the ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
DR removed: DR has already been decided . --MB-one (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexis Méndez Ortega (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:57126 Pere Ubu.jpg
- File:Nick Cave-0517-GQ-FENC03.jpg
- File:Blixa Bargeld (Einstürzende Neubauten).png
- File:The Smiths by Kevin Cummins.jpg
- File:Depeche Mode by Anton Corbijn.jpg
- File:Echo & the Bunnymen by Lisa Haun.jpg
- File:KC JD001.jpg
- File:MarkESmith-Inline1 (1).jpg
- File:CureIn1979.jpg
- File:Wire Band 1979 london.jpg
- File:Press Kit (2 of 4).jpg
- File:Gang Of Four 1979.jpg
- File:Siouxsie And The Banshees 1979.jpg
- File:JohnLydon From PIL photo .jpg
- File:Joy Division by Anton Corbijn.jpg
- File:JohLydonPIL1979.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The uploader claims to be the copyright owner of these photographs (sourced as "own work"), which is obviously not the case. Most are either historical photographs of musicians or taken from press/promo kits. Many photographs are even credited to their original creators on the file titles. --Myxomatosis57 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cruceño2019 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ayudaincendios.jpg
- File:Ollacomununionista.jpg
- File:Union Juvneil Cruceñista.jpg
- File:Asamblea General 2019.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ulises en Gol Marplatense.jpg
- File:Ulises en GDS Radio.png
- File:Ulises en programa radial.jpg
- File:Ulises en DeporTEA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MisterPorcupine (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of paintings by author who died 2016, w:Henriette Simon Picker. Not old enough to be PD; COM:EVID of permission needed.
- File:Pickerhouse.jpg
- File:Idarohatyn.jpg
- File:Sunsetoveralicante.jpg
- File:Motherandchild.jpg
- File:Redshoes.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thant Htet 31 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in unapproved draft.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArtistSohel dhaka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArtistSohel dhaka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for self promo. Out of scope.
- File:Artist zakirul islam sohel.jpg
- File:Artist zakirul islam sohel-.jpg
- File:Artist Zakirul Islam Sohel.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in the US for sculpture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in the US for sculpture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep It seems to be an agreement here on Commons that artwork is allowed as {{de minimis}} when the image was taken for an other "purpose", here the protection of it by police officers. --Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Ras67. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Disagree with Ras67 that it falls under de minimis. The Bull is the main subject of the photo, which is also the reason of taking this photo. Removing the bull will make the derivative work completely different (or even useless) A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The sculpture strikes me as too dominant to be DM, sadly. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment Sadly we are the only ones who obey the law so stricly. I think, we have a "backdoor" as done here. --Ras67 (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Inceland. Commercial use was prohibited A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:De minimis. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Possible breach of COM:PACKAGING as a type of packaging still being used. The front part bearing the logo plus the leading image. There are two images in Category:Del Monte Pineapple Juice, though the second one is OK according to an opinion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Files under Category:Del Monte Pineapple Juice. The first one, this image, can be problematic. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment with Query: if the IPO or Bureau Director and or DOJ Secretary would rule in my or our Favor (saying that all the Deleted Photos should be Undeleted and Categorically would Rule and not Decline, that - Uploading of Photos covered by FOP in Commons or anywhere is not Infringement of Copyright Laws or would rules that Mass Deletions are Trifles or De Minimis and would never reach the Courts) would all the Mass Deletions and or Deleted Photos be Undeleted ? I respectfully suggest that you can bring this matter to the New Discussions on FOP, the Commons Admins or Village Pumps wherever is the turf appropriate
[edit]
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan; I really forgot to upload a new versions as I did lately or could have taken from afar; what I do now is to upload the Packaging and then upload a new version like food textures or Del Monte Juice itself in a cup to take off the problem; by the way I am still waiting for the draft and finished letter of IanLopez or Yours to the IPO Director or Bureau of Copyright; we are running out of time; for even if Easter Sunday Passed, still there is a New Resurrections from Gone with the Wind, and I found that the Resurrected Spirit is harvesting many of our Photos deleted already; ... respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons; NO OBJECTION to the deletion very sincerely respectfully submitted; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 05:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Packaging. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Iceland. Commercial use was prohibited A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Iceland. Commercial use was prohibited A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Finland#Freedom_of_panorama (first point). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Finland#Freedom_of_panorama (first point). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Finland#Freedom_of_panorama (point 1). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Houses are allowed to be photographed in Finland. --Abc10 (talk) 16:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Finland#Freedom_of_panorama (first point). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Other Right 수진면豊德신정1914남현걸1961 (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
File probably taken from the internet with false licensing tag. Fallaner (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 
. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational use Drakosh (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, there are plenty of pictures in Category:Großer Garten, Dresden, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 07:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, there are plenty of pictures in Category:Großer Garten, Dresden, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 07:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- +1; most likely out of scope, no purpose. --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 07:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there are plenty of pictures in Category:Großer Garten, Dresden, not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small size, missing EXIF, uploaded by an LTA. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete that's not own work.in addition bye LTA user--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Rescue teams work at a site hit by a rocket during fighting over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in the city of Ganja, Azerbaijan, early Oct. 17, 2020.png
[edit]
However, voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner. (AP) Johncdraper (talk) 09:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Valid permission {{PD-USGov-VOA}}. The copyright owner of the material is VOA News, not AP. When AP photos are used the "AP" is written on the image or its descriptions. But here we can only see "By VOA News". --Interfase (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep No indication in the source that this comes from AP or other copyrighted news outlet. Brandmeister (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Rescue teams work at a site hit by a rocket during fighting over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in the city of Ganja, Azerbaijan, early Oct. 17, 2020.png
[edit]
Photo is sourced to VOA but if we hold the mouse over the photo in the source https://www.voanews.com/europe/azerbaijan-armenia-agree-cease-fire-beginning-sunday it says https://im-media.voltron.voanews.com/Drupal/01live-166/styles/sourced/s3/afp-image/2020/10/22545c600f52b01e8be6a8d47f5f024af9f6d331.jpg?itok=J1seuktc so its most likely a photo from AFP. That matches https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/17/nagorno-karabakh-azerbaijan-says-12-civilians-killed-by-shelling-in-ganja that says “Photograph: Bülent Kılıç/AFP/Getty Images” MGA73 (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete the image can be found on http://www.afpforum.com just by searching for for 8TA39J.Remitamine (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Ts12rAc (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Cover art for music album. But arguably below the threshold to be copyrightable. Headlock0225 (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laurianne Rossi, Députée LREM des Hauts-de-Seine (92).jpg, she is probably not the author of the photo. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyright violations. User has only uploaded files around a single topic - Eshays. Files range from photos to illustrations to game screenshots. Some files are low resolution.
- File:OneFour.jpg
- File:Typical Eshay unifom in comic.png
- File:Eshays on trains.jpg
- File:Big City Earnerz.jpg
Samuel Wiki (talk) 10:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laurianne Rossi, Députée LREM des Hauts-de-Seine (92).jpg, she is probably not the author of the photo. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Actual contributor is different from the author of the summary. kahusi (會話) 12:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Published prior to upload at Commons (example: https://www.telerama.fr/cinema/deux-choses-qui-n-ont-rien-a-voir-ou-peut-etre-que-si,55417.php). OTRS verification required. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata indicates photo was downloaded from Facebook. Additional source info and possible OTRS verification required. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
The subject claims to be the copyright owner but the photo was clearly taken by someone else. More complete source info required. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture of a not-noticeable music group - useless for educational purposes L736E (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo- out of scope. Faisal talk 13:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright issue Jaymzsleepz (talk) 15:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MrGodspower (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google
- File:Donna Mee at Beauty Boot Camp.jpg
- File:Donna Mee at PHAME Expo.jpg
- File:Donna Mee work.jpg
- File:Donna Mee.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
It is obvious that the pictures are found on Google as they owner allowed them. They can even be found on her website: www.donnameeinc.com. The credit is given to her as the pictures were used on her page. That's a reason that should be judged fairly, by Wikimedia editors/users. MrGodspower (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, previously uploaded photos need OTRS-permission from copyright holder (that means from photographer, not from photo owner or depicted person). Taivo (talk) 11:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MrGodspower (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Jennifer Okere with Emeka Ossai.jpg
- File:Jennifer Okere first movie award.jpg
- File:Jennifer Okere.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I took the photos myself, from their printed photographs. This means, I took them from the already made photographs from her family photo gallery. I am a close friend to her family, and needed her first-hand photos to complete the article. I hope this is not an offense against the Wikipedia's Community? Kindly see reasons with me. Thanks. --MrGodspower (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:Derivative works. You need permission from original photographer(s). See Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No metadata, looks to be a digital rendering over a photograph. Based on the username, the uploader claims to represent the depicted company, but we need evidence of that. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No COM:EDUSE because small size makes it unreadable, in addition COM:OOS. Achim (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Crooked photo of some random trees, useless Syrio posso aiutare? 21:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope as text content that is unused and unlikely to be useful. File was uploaded without source or author, own work was assumed by a bot. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a promotional image that was more than likely pulled from Lenovo's website. Very unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality image - Better image here, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 15:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality image - better image here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality image - unlikely to ever be used - better image at here, thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry photo; a nearly identical clear photo is available at File:Ontario Highway 400 (47694176292).jpg Mindmatrix 15:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not an English-only file. Note: Azerbaijani-language characters are used to name the towns of the disputed region. Nowhere are Armenian-language characters. Since this map is on the English-version of the Wikipedia page, I recommend it's deletion. The previous map had the same issues; likely the next one will have the same issues. Readability in English is compromised, and mainly neutrality is violated. It may be suitable for the Azerbaijani-version of this Wikipedia page. Furthermore, the file title is incorrect. The title in English is Karabakh not Qarabagh. SacredForest (User talk:SacredForest) 02:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Strong Oppose: First of all, Armenian characters aren't even used for Armenian cities, so it's not a matter of politics but rather simply because it's easier to type with Latin characters. Second, you can't even see the name of the file on the Wikipedia page itself, so why would it matter? RBolton123 (talk) 04:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I agree that the Armenian characters are not being used here for anything at all. How to use one language and not the other? I don't mean to be so critical as I did not create a map myself. However, didn't older versions show everything in the disputed territory in English? How can this be made more neutral because Azerbaijan characters are used for both Azerbaijan & the disputed territory, but Armenian characters are nowhere. Why change the title of the map? Just to maintain strict neutrality in a regional conflict about whose territory this is, especially in light of some rhetoric. This is the Wikipedia page using translations in English for names. For example, on the Spanish-language page, the region would be called Alto Karabaj in translation, yes? In Catalan, it would be Alt Karabakh, and so on. Thank you, RBolton, for working on this page & for the discussion. Could you share where older map versions are stored, if anywhere? There only seems to be very recent ones that are similar in terms of labels.
- Strong Oppose:Azerbaijani and Armenian characters are not supported by most programs(ə, կ ..). City names (Some villages) are added bilingually. Most of the map is in English. Just having "Qarabagh" in the file's name does not require that file be deleted. We can change the name of file but there is no problem in its international use.You can criticize the map, suggest corrections, but I don't think it makes sense to suggest deleting the map because of the small details.Because the detailed map is prepared in about a week.---Emreculha (talk) 08:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep:, settlement names are in Azerbaijani because it is Azerbaijan. Logical. Beshogur (talk) 11:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have now updated the map to show Azeri and Armenian place names next to each other in equal font size for the sake of neutrality. I don't necessarily think that using Armenian town names in Latin letters instead of Armenian letters is a problem - I would even argue that it makes the map more neutral with regards to readability of the Armenian names as most non-Armenians can't read the Armenian script. If the map is to be further improved by consensus English names I don't have a problem with that as long as it does not reduce readability significantly, but I would argue that in its present form - the format of the map is sufficient for use on the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict article on Wikipedia. The issue regarding that neutral and reliable sources need to be used to display claims of captured areas can still be discussed I think, but that's another issue. AntonSamuel (talk) 12:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep obviously Solavirum (talk) 14:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. It is better. However, I will check with others if this is okay or if it is best to have Armenian characters for titles included. So, let's not close this just yet, ok? We know that the world is using English in many, many places. With the previous map, for readers of news in English, areas could not be located. "Stepanakert", "Martuni", etc. which are mentioned in this very article could not be found. I don't think that makes the article and map coincide/mutually readable. I wonder if you could share name of the software you are using, as all the responsibility falls on you to make such changes. This responsibility to create could be shared, and then you could simply sometimes suggest changes to maps updated by others (and you wouldn't have to make all the effort of changing). In this specific instance of software, are you sure Armenian characters are not supported as Azeribaijan characters are present? In terms of naming the file, it is always being updated & posted, yes? Couldn't the new maps simply use the title of this article Karabakh for future versions? I think it's a simple rename. Because, when you click on the map, the file title in the URL now differs from the article title's spelling. Again, this compromises readability, consistency, & neutrality. It is always best to remain neutral.
- SacredForest, I Updated the map. I added 3 names for a town (2 Latin and 1 Armenian Name)--Emreculha (talk) 16:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Strong oppose: Completely ridiculous reason. You could have requested the changes or the file to be moved, but to delete the image is nonsense. That being said, I support to move the file, perhaps to something like "KarabakhWar(or Conflict)Map(2020).svg". Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep until further territorial updates applied on the map based on both Armenian and Azerbaijani side of the story. Latin characters are intelligible in several languages, alternately Azerbaijani names of Artsakh/Karabakh should be preceded by English characters in favour of neutrality, also the Armenian font size needs to be bigger, it's not readable even the capital. سیمون دانکرک (talk) 21:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose:Keep it
I can read the Armenian, but it is unreasonable to think that the map does not show the Armenian alphabet and should be deleted. This map of Armenia is to help readers understand the approximate location, but almost no one understands Armenian or except Armenians. People can’t read special letters such as ə and ç in Azerbaijani. You can make maps based on different languages to solve this problem (such as Arabic, Cyrillic, and pseudonyms), instead of deleting the picture.
Strong oppose: Why are you even deleting this?
Nomination for deleting this piece of art is absurd. Just rename the file if it's such a problem. --Rr016 (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Strong Keep - Resnjari (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
It is simply not absurd. You didn't see the original map? The disputed territory's towns were only listed in Azerbaijan script, yet this is not Wikipedia:AZ. In this EN article, Stepanakert & Martuni were mentioned in the text of the article, but couldn't be found anywhere on the map. This is why I suggested the deletion. A map should show the areas the article discusses. When there was only Azerbaijan script in the disputed territory, these places could no longer be found. You can compare how Stepanakert & Martuni are written in English (in the article) & how they are written in Azerbaijan. Totally unreadable to anyone but readers of the Azerbaijan language. I just have to say, the arguments against having Armenian characters would apply to Azerbaijan characters too. There's nothing absurd about this: if you look at the names in the Azerbaijan-script for Stepanakert & Martuni, for example, they are totally unreadable to English-language readers (much the same as Armenian characters for the same areas would be). There is no reason to have Azerbaijan script and not Armenian, both would be often unreadable to people who do not read Azerbaijan or Armenian. Do you see what I mean? Not sure why there are differences in script size... Certainly, it's very challenging to have all 3! Does anyone have any ideas about this? Could all three titles be made smaller to fit, yet still be in bold so cities stand out? Would you please consider renaming the map to match the article's title for consistency's sake &, mainly, sizing up the map quite a bit because even when clicking on it, some letters are teeny tiny. If these changes can be discussed & settled upon, maybe we don't need to delete this but could instead keep working on alterations. Thank you for the changing so far. It is improving steadily! Thank you for responsively engaging on this topic. As I mentioned before, it would be wonderful to know the name of the map-making software you're using, if you wouldn't mind sharing the name. Other people could contribute with these tasks of updating or creating maps. It wouldn't have to just be your effort all the time — Preceding unsigned comment added by SacredForest (talk • contribs)
- Keep per reasons stated above. Marjdabi (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Strong oppose:Keep it The file is very useful. The deletion reasons are not plausible.Fullscaledx (talk) 16:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep Reason is not sufficient for deletion. It can remain as it is. --ToprakM ✉ 20:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No good reason to delete. Doesn’t help that the nominating account seems to be a sock created exclusively to nominate file for deletion. Juxlos (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Will actively harm the relevant articles where this image is used, and the neutrality concerns being raised are implausible.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete: This map has not any source. and recaptured are aginst reality. Captured areas by Azerbiajan are fake[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Anatoliy (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- sorry: Strong oppose : keep it (misunderstood the oppose / keep-system ... I'm against the deletion, and to me it's not really important, how a citys or villages name is written or if the filename is written in even japanese letters) only to add a completely out-of-EN-wiki-view: coming from the german wikipedia, this map is the only graphical resource, to kind of geographically sort this conflict region globally ... without this map this had to be done with other sources ... if that guy, that spoke for deletion, can't offer a "better" version of this map, it makes no sense, to even talk / discuss about deletion ... and - to bring it to a peak - who want's to delete any image / map with language errors / mistakes in content and / or filename, may vote for deletion of a high percentage of explanation maps / images all over ALL wikis (english, german, spanish, ... mention it, it may fit) ... <sarcasm on>daher bin ich dafür, alle nicht deutschen Wikipedia-Inhalte kompromisslos zu löschen<sarcasm off> ... so greetings to the creator of this map: keep your good work 93.243.229.227 08:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The complexity of the first version of this map, indicates it was either imported from another tool or carefully traced from a source map. The claim of 'own work' is by itself not credible, as nobody makes up a map this complex without referring to a professional published map. There must be tracability for verification that COM:L is met and that the source used matches the map detail and is suitably public domain or on a creative commons release compatible with the license chosen.
Per COM:AGF, asking for evidence to verify copyright is not a presumption of bad faith. Fæ (talk) 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Emreculha is the author if it. He might have an answer. Solavirum (talk) 20:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose: Fæ,Solavirum, I accept your criticism if I made an error on the License Issue while uploading the file. Wikipedia is very sensitive to copyright issues. It may have advanced criteria. This free licensed file was used (It has already been noted that the file can be re-edit). It was later transferred to Adobe Photoshop. Zoomed in, manual boundaries widened. Highways have been drawn. Region names were written by hand. Borders have been set. The file was first uploaded to Commons in JPG format. JPG version is still on Commons. You can check. It was decided that the JPG version was of poor quality. It was decided not to be used in the article. Then it was converted to SVG format using Adobe Illustrator. Updated day by day. I may have entered this information incomplete because I loaded the file from the "FAST UPLOAD" option. Missing information on the license can be fixed, but I am strongly against deleting the map---Emreculha (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- The order of events then was File:Azerbaijan relief location map.jpg was converted to File:Azerbaijan location map.svg, which is credible as it's a perfect overlay. The copyright statements on those files are not really correct on these as they are not literally 'own work', but exported from Natural Earth (public domain) and then edited. The distinction is that nobody should be making retrospective CC-BY-SA claims on elements of the map that are verifiably public domain, such as the terrain details.
- However comparing the subject of this DR File:QarabaghWarMap(2020).svg (first uploaded version) to the location map does not match up for the purposes of copyright validation. In particular there are lots of fine details of Lake Sevan that don't match, which are features that cannot be deduced if that jpg were traced, such as the peninsular shape at Sevan itself, which is just a smooth blob in the location map and its jpg version. There's also the problem that the location map does not go as far as Aparan, so where did those details come from, for example the lake at Kuchak? --Fæ (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fæ,The map was outright reset first. Because it was quite complicated. However, later lakes were added by enlarging them. Dimensions may change during enlargement and repainting. For example, the lake with the Xudaferin bridge was not on the map. It was added by users who changed it later. The same is true for borders. You make them thicker, if necessary, you retouch them manually. Many waterways were deleted when the map was reset and then manually re-added. If you have used these programs, you will understand or I hope I could explain. If you say, you cannot delete this map that much, you cannot edit it. The regulation on Commons is partially valid. Retouching is done to some extent. I accept your criticism. However, do not forget that borders can be drawn manually when necessary, and lakes, waterways and even highways can be redrawn as I said before. (My English isnt expert level, i use Translate, i apologise if i will make mistake) --Emreculha (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Emreculha: where did you get the lake from? It's not the source you provided above. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre:I have described it before, let me repeat. The map has been imported into Photoshop. It was raised (grown together in the lake). Borders are mixed. The boundaries were extended and thickened in accordance with the truth. It is described in more detail above. Converted to JPG format. It was then loaded into Adobe Illustrator and made into Vector Illustration. Village and city names were added by hand writing. You can select and edit any detail on the map, enlarge or shrink it as much as you want, and crop it. So if the Lake on the Map is 20x20 px, you can select the map and change it and enlarge it to 50x50 px. There was no lake in the Xudaferin area on the map. Added by other users. You can find this in the map history of the conflicts in the Xudaferin area.--Emreculha (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Emreculha: where did you get the lake from? It's not the source you provided above. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Fæ,The map was outright reset first. Because it was quite complicated. However, later lakes were added by enlarging them. Dimensions may change during enlargement and repainting. For example, the lake with the Xudaferin bridge was not on the map. It was added by users who changed it later. The same is true for borders. You make them thicker, if necessary, you retouch them manually. Many waterways were deleted when the map was reset and then manually re-added. If you have used these programs, you will understand or I hope I could explain. If you say, you cannot delete this map that much, you cannot edit it. The regulation on Commons is partially valid. Retouching is done to some extent. I accept your criticism. However, do not forget that borders can be drawn manually when necessary, and lakes, waterways and even highways can be redrawn as I said before. (My English isnt expert level, i use Translate, i apologise if i will make mistake) --Emreculha (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong Oppose Per above. HersiliaAramazd (talk) 10:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose: per Emreculha's comment. Solavirum (talk) 13:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong Oppose: maybe is the best map made about a to a conflict. Tetsou TheIronman--Tetsou TheIronman (talk) 22:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose per above. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Info Our collegiate concern is to be able to validate copyright, meeting the policy requirements of COM:L, COM:DW and COM:AGF. As of this moment, this is all extremely vague.- Regardless of the map being useful and probably educational, it lacks verifiable sources and it is not possible to compare the details of the physical map of the areas depicted with source maps. If folks want this map to be a quality reference for sister projects, then a well sourced approach for content must be verifiable, not "trust me" personal claims about the history of conflicts in the area, which may just boil down to speculation.
- Deletion requests are not a popularity vote, what has to be done here is spell out the way copyright can be validated so that in future years any reasonable person can understand it and verify it. --Fæ (talk) 11:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- These are not "trust me", these are verified by third parties, please check the interactive map on the template, and the article in whole. Beshogur (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- The image page makes no claims about a template or an article that may address copyright verification. --Fæ (talk) 19:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Armenian side has accepted the fact they retreated from Qubadli, I'm not sure how else Azerbaijani side can take over Qubadli without taking over cities such as Hadrut, Fizuli, Zengilan and Jebrayil, regarding the map there should be Azerbajani claimed controlled areas and Armenian claimed controlled areas when they cross each other it means active fighting its taking over, Azerbajani MoD has so far been more accurate with their claim so Armenian MoD's map is more of propaganda as it fails to show Suqovushan and Talish even though it has been verified by all third parties including BBC, i'm not sure what is the point of deleting this map but i propose we add the grey area back as current conflict zones so readers get better idea where the fighting its taking place, Armenian side has also confirmed all those places such as Zengavshen cave, Lachin have active fighting 37.211.159.91 19:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- The image page makes no claims about a template or an article that may address copyright verification. --Fæ (talk) 19:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- These are not "trust me", these are verified by third parties, please check the interactive map on the template, and the article in whole. Beshogur (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose: Enough trying to get this map deleted: As others have said above, this map contains Azerbaijani advances that were confirmed by third party sources through using geolocation. This map also appears to be completely hand-made by Emreculha judging by the small file size and map imperfections. I do not understand what deleting this map will accomplish, this is so far the only current map that shows Artsakh strategic situation. Would you prefer the article to have no map? --Rr016 (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Strong oppose: keep the map, per above. HastaLaVi2 (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose per above comments --Mehman 97 15:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept. I do not like, that everybody tries to get the map deleted. Emreculha explained own work and I agree with the explanation. If you do not like the current version, then you can upload another one. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Probably not allowed by copyright. P. Hughes (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted. P. Hughes (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
عکس بدون واترمارک بارگزاری شد Pixoos (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hanooz 17:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
عکس بدون واترمارک بارگزاری شد Pixoos (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hanooz 17:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
_-_01965.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01965.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title and tags Norman.seibert (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_01965.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - tags can be changed and the file can be renamed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
_-_01965.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01967.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01967.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title and tags Norman.seibert (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_01967.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - tags can be changed and the file can be renamed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
_-_01967.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01970.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01970.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title and tags Norman.seibert (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_01970.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - tags can be changed and the file can be renamed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
_-_01970.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01973.jpg){kind=link}
_-_01973.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong title and tags Norman.seibert (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_01973.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - tags can be changed and the file can be renamed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
_-_01973.jpg){kind=link}
According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Guatemala the general term is Life/Create/publish + 75 years and if from 1954 then it has not yet been 75 years. MGA73 (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
image is currently "in use". but the article is set for deletion. do we need to keep the image? How does it improve the project? Quakewoody (talk) 12:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Replacing speedy deletion to conduct appeal GlobalYouth20 (talk) 07:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Date created is listed as 2020 as it is a scan of a non-copyrighted personal photo. Date created can be corrected to reflect original date of photograph. GlobalYouth20 (talk) 07:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Invalid licence. Original file in jawiki was uploaded by Akitoishii without licence tag. The licence tag was added by 202.33.251.118 (w:ja:Special:Diff/5278138, w:ja:Special:Diff/5278163). 本日晴天 (talk) 08:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no information on the specified site about CC-BY-SA-4.0. It states: All rights reserved Venzz (talk) 10:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- The original image (it:File:Stemma SS Monza 1912 (dal 2016).png, wich has been deleted) was based on https://www.facebook.com/ACMonza/photos/a.10150283778845273/10161611608330273/--Mannivu · ✉ 12:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
According to https://cdn.retours.eu/nl/55-spoorwegrestauraties/enlarge/Etoile-du-Nord.jpg the author is William Spencer Bagdatopoulos, who died in 1965. Tekstman (talk) 11:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The file was uploaded from Flickr and the bot confirmed that the license was PD-Mark but that was not a valid license at that time so it was not properly reviewed. Now we have {{PDMark-owner}} but the file is no longer avalilable. Flickr user claim to be a photographer. I started this DR to get an opinion if we can assume the Flickr user is the photographer or not. MGA73 (talk) 12:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Why should we assume not, given that an original assessment was done? AGF is applicable here on commons as it is on WP itself, is it not? Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Chaheel Riens: On Wikipedia/Commons user add both source on author. On Flickr user often just upload the photo. For exampe one of the other photos uploaded by that user https://www.flickr.com/photos/psych0naughty/50514781867 and there is no statement that "This is a photo I took" or similar.
- Often when a photo looks professional we ask for a permission send to OTRS. We can't do that for photos uploaded to Flickr because the Flickr user do not read what we write here on Commons.
- I'm not saying we should not AGF but I'm asking what other users think. --MGA73 (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: The flickr link is dead and I'm going to assume the person who uploaded it is not the person who took it at this point. if they disagree, w can undelete with permission. --Missvain (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This photo is uploaded to a new Flickr account with very few photos. This photo is no longer online. Flickrreview bot originally confirmed it was PD Mark but I'm not sure we can trust that it is own work. MGA73 (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This map is not made by the contributor. This is a copyrighted work by the Swedish Lantmäteriet authority. Stigfinnare (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Mid-quality personal photo with a in-knowledge description, all akin to a social media post. Placed mostly by the uploader, and really adds nothing to the articles it's placed in. Guy on the right don't even look like sleeping. This photo is for Facebook, not Wikimedia. Gaioa (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Is already in commons as "Karaman 4856.jpg" Dosseman (talk) 15:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative of the well-known 1964 photo [1] [2] made by a Soviet photographer, not free in the country of origin - Russia. Sealle (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
![[1]](https://portal-kultura.ru/upload/medialibrary/695/Kultura_plenum_1964_10.jpeg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom, pcp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Sealle (talk) 15:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm. Its just one image. I'll use it in my userpage then.Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 23:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Is it your face? If not, whose face is it? Where are the underlying photos from? Why is it not tagged {{Personality}}? Why is everything crooked? See also COM:DW. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- That's a...personality right problem? And the reason Its crooked to prevent identification? And I dont know that tag existed? AGF please. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 05:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- If you're an admin I'll explain it to you via email. This is not something to talk about publicly here. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 05:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: I'm an Admin on some other projects, if that helps. Sealle is an Admin here. I use the MarkAdmins gadget to give me hints as to who has Admin and some other user group memberships. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: So could you be trusted with nonpublic information?Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 06:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Yes, I signed phab:L45 and you may verify that I am a global OTRS member by clicking here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: So could you be trusted with nonpublic information?Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 06:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: I'm an Admin on some other projects, if that helps. Sealle is an Admin here. I use the MarkAdmins gadget to give me hints as to who has Admin and some other user group memberships. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Is it your face? If not, whose face is it? Where are the underlying photos from? Why is it not tagged {{Personality}}? Why is everything crooked? See also COM:DW. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep, now in use on the uploader's user page on enwiki, where he is an active participant, but only at 10px width. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The uploader is using it. --Missvain (talk) 23:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Bangladesh Army Request Jubair1985 (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Clearly you took this photo and upload it here (see metadata). Is there any law exist on Bangladesh which prohibit photograph of Bangladesh Army? --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason to delete. Aditya (talk) 01:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Issue Jubair1985 (talk) 16:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not sure what is the copyright Issue. Clearly you took this photo and upload it here (see metadata). After 6 years, what happened that it's now copyright Issue? --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Being used in a lot of projects and "copyright issue" being claimed by the taker is kinda strange. perhaps provide better rationale. thanks. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Self-nomination to delete as the map is inaccurate. There's no Service A, B, C or D. It was planned to be used for a map locator template but it did not work. Seloloving (talk) 16:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Self-nomination to delete as the map is inaccurate. There's no Service A, B, C or D. It was planned to be used for a map locator template but it did not work. Seloloving (talk) 16:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Self-nomination to delete. This map is a derivative work of a real world map that was released by the Land Transport Authority of Singapore. I uploaded it when I had a lesser understanding of copyright law. Seloloving (talk) 16:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schindler(nachf.) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artist die at 1973 and there are no permission documented
- File:Paul Schindler 'vor Ruinen' 1967 (39x50cm).jpg
- File:Paul Schindler 'Selbstbildnis 1912' (13x20cm).jpg
- File:Paul Schindler 'ältere Dame' 1939 (46x38cm).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Codc (talk) 17:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This work is still under copyright, as the artist died in 2016 only. Culex (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No longer needed Swarthy46 (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probably copyrighted design, see COM:TOYS! Ras67 (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
...I think I misinterpreted the guidelines of posting screenshots of this game Kendotlibero (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
'auskäsen' doesn't exist, Lemma is deleted on German Wiktionary Jeuwre (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Arnold Bartels (talk) 19:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lilia Vizir (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Oscar Eichacker died in 1961. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:899A:5C88:E85D:9C36 21:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Oscar Eichacker died in 1961. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:899A:5C88:E85D:9C36 21:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Oscar Eichacker died in 1961. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:899A:5C88:E85D:9C36 21:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: screenshot of a defunct website with an archive without mention of Creative Commons https://web.archive.org/web/20190921143347/http://reign.ws/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain, property of RIA Novosti PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The rights of this image belongs to Roscosmos who does not publish their image with a Creative Commons licence RainbowVB (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Among Us is not licensed under Creative Commons, so a screenshot of it isn't either. OmegaFallon (talk) 01:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Pengabdian Selama Perang Kemerdekaan Bersama Brigade Ronggolawe; Denah sesuai kondisi di kota Tuban saat agresi militer Belanda II (1).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Most likely copyvio of this file at this or at a similar website. (A few details are different, the legend is missing there; nevertheless I fear that this file here is a copy from some project page.) Kleeblatt187 (talk) 17:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Going to assume good faith here and allow the uploader a week to provide permission. We'll proceed accordingly. Thank you! Missvain (talk) 23:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 01:06, 10 December 2020, by Fitindia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Museu Penitenciário do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (talk · contribs)
[edit]1920s, 1930s photos probably not own work,
- File:Penitenciária Talavera Bruce - Entrada Fachada.jpg
- File:Fachada da Casa de Detenção (27.12.1932).jpg
- File:Antigo Lazareto em Ilha Grande.jpg
- File:Manicômio JudiciárioManicômio Judiciário do Serviço Nacional de Doenças Mentais.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
«il n’est pas permis de “poster des illustrations, des publications électroniques, des marques, de la musique, des photos, des vidéos ou des articles [du site jw.org] sur Internet (sur un site de partage de fichiers, un site de partage de vidéos, un réseau social ou tout autre site)”»— La Tour de Garde (une revue publiée par l’auteur de ce fichier) avril 2018, Question des lecteurs 1, par. 1 Roger (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Roger: Is this available online? TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Likely to be license laundering. Sealle (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, pcp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- How do you know it is license laundering?Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 01:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Go ahead, convince us that Dwiastuty Cahyaningrum at Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade took those photos and wrote those blurbs. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Not Dwiastuty, but the Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The website explicitly says to cite the Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, not the personnel. The metadata literally says that Dwiastuty Cahyaningrum is the one who digitizes it. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 02:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Where did that person get that info? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I'm sorry, I don't understand your question. If you mean where Dwiastuty gets the document, it is from the documents at the Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. If they get it from somewhere else they would cite it (e.g. images on the bottom of this section, where they cites the source as Australian War Memorial) Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 02:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Where did that person get that info? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Not Dwiastuty, but the Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The website explicitly says to cite the Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, not the personnel. The metadata literally says that Dwiastuty Cahyaningrum is the one who digitizes it. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 02:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Go ahead, convince us that Dwiastuty Cahyaningrum at Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade took those photos and wrote those blurbs. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not clear how the Department obtained the copyright on the materials and whether they actually own it. --rubin16 (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Images of the Statue of Liberty (Joensuu)
[edit]The following files are derivative works of the Statue of Liberty (Finnish: Vapaudenpatsas), a 1923 sculpture by Yrjö Liipola (1881–1971; Q11903032), located in Joensuu, Finland:
- File:City Hall park in Joensuu.jpg
- File:Joensuu Statue of Liberty.jpg
- File:Vapaudenpuisto.jpg – De minimis may apply
The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain until 2042-01-01. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. ––Apalsola t • c 17:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- The Finnish copyright law allows including works of art in photographs when they are not the main subject. This goes farther than de minimis. I think at least Vapaudenpuisto.jpg is an image of the park, where the statue is included because it is a central element of the park, not as the real subject. I'd say the same is true for City Hall park in Joensuu.jpg. Joensuu Statue of Liberty.jpg is intended to show the statue, as can be seen from the filename, but even here the focus is on the surroundings rather than on the statue itself. I'd say there is no need to delete any of them, but I am not a lawyer. Is there any case law? –LPfi (talk) 16:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- The provision is in Section 25 (446/1995) of the Copyright Act (404/1961, here amendments up to 608/2015):
- Use of works of arts that have been made public or transferred (607/2015)
- ...
- (2) When a copy of a work of art has, with the consent of the author, been sold or otherwise permanently transferred, the work of art may be incorporated into a photograph, a film, or a television programme if the reproduction is of a subordinate nature in the photograph, film or programme. (821/2005)
- –LPfi (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- The provision is in Section 25 (446/1995) of the Copyright Act (404/1961, here amendments up to 608/2015):
- Keep per LPfi SHB2000 (talk) 09:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- At least in File:Joensuu Statue of Liberty.jpg, the statue is clearly the main subject: it is in the centre of the photograph and the photograph is focused to it. ––Apalsola t • c 17:04, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: in all photos the status is obviously in the center of the photo and is a main object. --rubin16 (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)