Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 15th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Shiva Gahlot (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 11:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|G10}} Stephan Bieker (talk) 13:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is from https://www.facebook.com/1465800330307713/posts/11082016-the-5th-shanghai-international-ballet-competition-closing-ceremony-priz/1857671107787298/ which says 11.08.2016 The 5th Shanghai International Ballet Competition Closing Ceremony, Prize Awarding and Gala Performance. Photo: Chen Lunxun 2016年8月11日 上海国际芭蕾舞比赛闭幕式,颁奖典礼,暨GALA演出 摄影师:陈伦勋

Nothing about a Creative Commons Share-Alike license. GRuban (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: No evidence of a free license, neither on pinterest nor on facebook. --Achim (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Magbanakba (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not own Work Magbanakba (talk) 02:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realized it is bad for my privacy DavidZ2020 (talk) 05:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realized it is bad for my privacy DavidZ2020 (talk) 05:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Unused redir. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW copyrighted character image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non valid license Brgesto (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - non free Flickr license. --MGA73 (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio , le site dont est copié la photo est sous copyright https://yadvashem-france.org/mentions-legales/ Havang(nl) (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" appears on https://www.modelmanagement.com/model/sky-chauhan/ with no evidence of permission to use Joseywales1961 (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of the own work, no metadata etc. Probably, copyrights violation. 37.252.89.152 20:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per nomination, grabbed from Twitter [1]. --Sealle (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate Satire on Japan's Prime Minister. The description is Die SUGA Prime Minister! Gahukuro (talk) 03:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Kwj2772. --Minoraxtalk 13:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pollock died in 1956. His works are not public domain Coldcreation (talk) 08:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2027. --Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's for the article .

Pollock died in 1956. His works are not public domain Coldcreation (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2027. --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manainti03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, joke

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File can be found on his own Instagram profile and in many other third parties articles that mention they got it from Instagram. No EXIF data, low quality. Highly unlikely to have been published by own author. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (obvious copyvio, only upload by uploader). -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see anything in the source link that supports the given license. Ravensfire (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SCOPE Lotje (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElkinUniverso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots, no indication that the software is free

Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Theres a higher resolution image available (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TUS_Schild.jpg) 194.8.192.162 08:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --Achim (talk) 12:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect could be deleted. Original is not used, neither is the redirect. Nordat (talk) 12:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYRIGHT INFRINGMENT!!!! PLEASE DELETE IMMEDIATELY !!! Questo file e' di mia proprietà. Posseggo il RAW. Questa foto vedo che e' stata caricata da un utente "Conte di Cavour"che l'ha rubata sul web e ora e' stata utilizzata da oltre 142 utenti sul web a mia insaputa. Vi chiedo di rimuoverla immediatamente e di darmi conferma dell'avvenuta rimozione per iscritto tramite email a eveniani@gmail.com Vi prego di provvedere immediatamente per non avere problemi legali. In attesa di un vostro immediato riscontro invio Cordiali saluti. Elena Veniani Elena Veniani (talk) 08:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete
Elena Veniani (talk) is saying that this photo is her property; it has been uploaded as "free to share and remix" file without her knowledge. I suggest a rapid deletion. Barjimoa (talk) 20:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (COM:PCP and uploader has history of other license-violating uploads). --DMacks (talk) 14:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danishmagotra24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos only used in promotional drafts

Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dave890T (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo by Charlotte Alex, not own work, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thecremeshop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, advertising?

Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the content of the "site marker" or information panel is copyrighted. Regrettably, Greece has no freedom-of-panorama exception for works in public space. So, we need a permission from the copyright-holder or the image needs to be deleted. If these panels are administered by an agency of the central government, it might possible to get from them a release at least for those panels, whose content is under their copyright.-- Túrelio (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like Spam or Out of scope? — regards, Revi 19:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Park Seong Soo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused random sky photos without meaningful context or location, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin09878 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS.

ƏXPLICIT 23:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this new upload is taken from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CB6QcpjOx4. Is it free? E4024 (talk) 01:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Obviously invalid nomination rationale. This is three times the size of the video.
We assume it is freely licensed because the uploader claims that it was, and your nomination has given no valid reason to begin to doubt this. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't I ever see you on other DRs of mine where you also think that the file must be deleted? (I am sure there must be one or two with which you concur.) Being present only in the negative begins to make me feel like being harassed. Whatever... --E4024 (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any valid reason here or not? Because complaining that anyone who disagrees with you is "harassing" you is not. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please confine any personal disputes to your user talk pages or the Village Pump. This page is for discussion of the deletion request. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The YouTube video was uploaded before the file was uploaded to Commons. This normally requires the license to be validated through the OTRS system. The lower image resolution of the video does not change this, it simply indicates that our file is not a still from the video. I have found another prior upload, and this one is identical to our file.[2] This is linked from page 37 of this document, which is dated "Marzo 2018". Another reason to be suspicious of this file is that it was clearly taken from a position within the orchestra, probably during a rehearsal (as the soloist is facing the orchestra).  Delete, unless acceptable license validation is received.
  • @Arielgato: , please email the OTRS system to establish your ownership of this file and the license you have assigned. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image is a picture of this recording session from 2017. This specific image can be found (at a lower resolution) in the gallery of Jorge Retamoza's website, which clearly states that it is copyright Jorge Retamoza. looking on archive.org it was added sometime between Oct 2016 and Mar 2018.  Delete unless the uploader can establish ownership or an acceptable licence for the photo. 192.76.8.82 11:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fall Mike (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, no exif. Probably Out of Scope - commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francisco r Montoya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Look like movie stills - not own work. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Looks like movie screenshots. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, numerous other uploads of this user were taken off the internet, PCP Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilyaruhi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, taken by Rembrandt photography, needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WU Talent Agency (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional photos, unlikely to be own work. And scope?

Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image can be seen here on Facebook almost a year prior to it being uploaded to Commons. The file has no COM:EXIF data or source information which can be used to verify that the uploader and the copyright holder are the same person. Moreover, there's no indication on Facebook that this file has been released under a license considered acceptable per COM:L. Even if the copyright holder and uploader are the same, the best case scenario would be COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS? with the uploader sending a COM:CONSENT email to OTRS for verification; lacking such verification, I don't think the file should be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo. Small low quality photo at undisclosed location. No educational value without more information. Malcolma (talk) 08:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. It is unclear who Lokis Parody is. Onward link quoted is dead. No obvious Google hits. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 photo, not own work. needs permission from original photographer Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, COM:DW. Wider shot of the proud owner may be fine as de minimis, but a tight crop of the cover art seems a bit much. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of unidentified group of people. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder Dave Titensor / The University of Utah - needs permission Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 2A00:23C4:E637:4201:ECCA:459C:F73A:AA9E 14:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above originality threshold Minoraxtalk 14:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I agree that this is above originality reshold. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smej (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10

Deletion challenged at UDR. Opening regular discussion. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is probably copied from here or from here, the time of publication of the photo in the news agencies is ahead of its upload time here. Also, in the photo is the logo of a political party, which is most likely protected by copyright. Mehman 97 14:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-uploading the deleted file, see talk page. Mehman 97 13:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused; pushpin maps should be used instead. Gikü (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Novanhans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anujjoshi19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used or used in unapproved draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I apparently uploaded this image years ago, however I don’t own the copyright as indicated. I don’t remember the upload but I was young at the time and likely not particularly informed on copyright issues. Y4lk3KvmXC (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Bananaufcketchup (talk) 19:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vacation photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry, no educational value in this, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry, no educational value in this, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry, no educational value in this, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no focus on any meal, poor composition, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry, no educational value in this, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry, no educational value in this, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blurry, no educational value in this, out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation. No metadata etc. 37.252.89.152 20:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. In addition, the file is small and lacks EXIF data, and, according to the uploader's username, they are the person depicted in the photo, but the copyright holder of a photo is its photographer, unless the copyright has been transferred. Ahmadtalk 21:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused persoanl photo. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful source, but maybe not copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly not own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarkaraj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source is scud official - needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture without usage in 13 years and without any encyclopedic relevance Affemitwaffe (talk) 11:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old version/not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable Stingers1 (talk) 03:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from Guillaume TOULLIEZ needed via OTRS. Minoraxtalk 04:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from Guillaume TOULLIEZ needed via OTRS. Minoraxtalk 04:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yakov Belsky was rehabilitated posthumously in 1990, so his works are copyrighted till 2060 (COM:Russia#Durations).

Sealle (talk) 07:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikola manchev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:11, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is sourceless amateurish fake with inadequate font and gross mistake: Ь instead Ъ. --KVK2005 (talk) 07:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by ԶԻՆՈՒԺ MEDIA

[edit]

No evidence that the author of the video agreed to publish his shot under provided licenses. Not original size, no metadata, just copied from internet. --Interfase (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user on more than one occasion has already tried to erase the images on the Armenian side, apparently he has personal reasons for wanting to erase the images since he is originally from Azerbaijan, one of the sides in the war where Armenia is also involved.

 Keep The user on more than one occasion has already tried to erase the images on the Armenian side, apparently he has personal reasons for wanting to erase the images since he is originally from Azerbaijan, one of the sides in the war where Armenia is also involved. Another example of non-deletion of Armenian images is that the user does not touch the Azerbaijani images (File: Ermenistana ait aracın TB2 Siha tarafından vurulması.jpg) that were uploaded and uses the creative commons license in the same way. Now try again to remove the images with the same ambiguous argument as before. LLs (talk) 26:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, there are CC license.--Nooberella (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No any evidence that the copyright holder of the video put that comment about lisence in YouTube, YouTube is not an official site. --Interfase (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for File:Clashes between the armies of Azerbaijan and Artsakh 1.jpg which doesn't have a CC license. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM1x_dfcrpE--QTHCCAN (talk) 18:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, there are CC license.--Gevorg Ghazaryan (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No any evidence that the copyright holder of the video agreed to publish his videos under this license. --Interfase (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, per nominator. These files are clear copyright violations. Provided license is also false. Nothing in the license states that these images are non-protected works. Solavirum (talk) 12:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, Please note that all the people who made the deletion are Azerbaijanis, and they certainly oppose all non-Aliyev propaganda.--uss (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COM:CIV, COM:AGF. Solavirum (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The origin of nominator can not be an argument for the copyvio save in commons. --Interfase (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More files with potential copyright violations:

No evidence that the author of the photos agreed to publish them under provided licenses. Not original size, no metadata, just copied from internet.--Interfase (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, this user keeps nominating Armenia-related files from en:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict for deletion claiming they are "copied from internet" but refuses to specify from where or give a link to the original source.

We had the same dicussion here. This user either JUSTDONTLIKEIT or simply don't know the CC YouTube guideline. I'm assuming the former. Eurofan88 (talk) 09:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Nominator reasons is bias / File are published under CC license and it is correct and there are not copy right violation [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The videos on YouTube have Creative Commons Attribution licence. Whoever was the actual author he/she agreed to provide it to "ԶԻՆՈՒԺ MEDIA" with that licence. If there are specific files from specific video then we can open a seperate disccussion but we don't have any reason to delete all screenshots from "ԶԻՆՈՒԺ MEDIA" videos. --ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 20:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per mil.am there is no doubt that the YouTube channel ԶԻՆՈՒԺ MEDIA is run by the Armenian Ministry of Defense. If they tag a video CC on YouTube there is no reason for deleting stills therefrom per lack of license except there is an evidence that the video in fact originates from a different source. Interfase is asked to refrain from abusing deletion requests as a means of political dispute. --Achim (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: all but one I couldn't find a CC license for. --Achim (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اشتباه است Radmehravini (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope + uploader's request. --Hanooz 17:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image that is outside of scope where articles for person have been, or soon to be deleted, as out of scope for the Wikipedias  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also noting that the image has been deleted once previously as being held by a copyright holder and no OTRS  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 16:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://fergana.plus/news/109387/?country=kg coppivo Па1н12 (talk) 11:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 18:33, 25 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 20:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Declined draft in one WP, is this out of scope? Maybe some other WP can use it. Any problems around the legal status of this file? E4024 (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • If there is no legal issue, I would like to keep the pic of this lady; I like her face, very representative of the ethnicity/nation. That means scope to me. (Please take this parenthesis as a joke, but I hope it is not a problem that she is dressed up... :) --E4024 (talk) 00:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Yet again, there is no valid rationale given in the nomination. Having been used for an as-yet incomplete draft on WP is no reason to delete it here. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept no evident issues requiring deletion; comments above want it kept. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. A painting made by a living artist, see en:Marco Almaviva. OTRS permission needed if released by the artist Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will reupload in a different size ratio at a later time. Michaforde (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael H. Forde, Black & White.jpg. Thanks for the nomination. --E4024 (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image unlikely own work by uploader; more likely screenshot or crop of an image from the web. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


And I've marked File:Madison Iseman.jpg, a screenshot from the same YouTube video, as copyvio. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 23:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False claims of authorship and false license. Garbage source and dating claims. Image is in use; depicts Spanish politicians c. 1890s, might be PD but actual info would be needed to determine that. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Caricature published in El Motín (1892-10-02). No artist's signature. Keep? Strakhov (talk) 06:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for finding the source. If the false claims can be removed and factual information put on the image page instead, I'll close this as kept. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I changed a little bit the infobox. I am still reluctant to remove the license (I don't know if the uploader may claim some copyright, since there are countries with sweat-of-the-brow issues, and the image is not exactly the same as the original in El Motín after all). Strakhov (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, PD original source identified; info corrected. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will reupload in a different size ratio at a later time. Michaforde (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael H. Forde, Black & White.jpg. Thanks for the nomination. --E4024 (talk) 13:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will reupload in a different size ratio at a later time. Michaforde (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael H. Forde, Black & White.jpg. Thanks for the nomination. --E4024 (talk) 13:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will reupload in a different size ratio at a later time. Michaforde (talk) 03:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is very good, because, like all your uploads, this one is also problematic. It was published in the internet months before being uploaded here (https://thehustlersdigest.com/tag/michael-h-forde/). Your uploads were in my to-do list; so thanks for helping me. --E4024 (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hope I may be forgiven for opening my third DR in a day but am almost sure a book cover like this requires OTRS. E4024 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly not the uploader's own work. Metadata says the owner is Mark Bennington; the uploader, who has only uploaded this photo, does not appear associated with Bennington in any way. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor ettore greco is still alive, needs permission. No exif so likely copyvio Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue https://mosc.in/saints/st-baselios-yeldho- Eldhose (talk) 10:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - Whoever is I have no idea, but someone got the image deleted from the above internet site. This small file (original upload: 17 KB) clearly is not an "own work". --E4024 (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Army flag with campaign streamers.png.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I screwed up the file name while uploading. Naturwiki (talk) 12:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name screwed up while uploading. The upload tool is very buggy right now and it's impossible to see what you enter into the fields. Naturwiki (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work by uploader, as metadata contain Facebook/INstagram code and images prepublished at http://riovalejornal.com.br/site/materias/2664-noite_italiana_aabb_e_visita_a_dom_irineu. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We're also not a webhost for random photos. --Missvain (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Onw work? Found prepublished in 2012 at https://voixdevie.blogspot.com/p/frere-irenee.html. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We're also not a webhost for random personal photos. --Missvain (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://underthesun.me/2017/11/20/where-time-stands-still-pazhaya-suriyani-pally-chengannur/amp/ Eldhose (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ALLEMAND D, would you mind sending a permission through OTRS for this file, just like you did with File:Aquariums expérimentaux.jpg? This black&white one looks like a rather old image; since when do you use © Allemand D sign? E4024 (talk) 13:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The "© Allemand D" notice in the metadata is not a problem as it does not conflict with the cc-by-sa-4.0 license. The 01/11/2010 date looks wrong because the design of the laboratory equipment looks typical of the 1960s. Please revise this if possible, marking the date 'approximately' if necessary. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent the permission request yesterday. I have noted the dates on the photos. I hope everything will be fine --ALLEMAND D (talk) 10:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS accepted. --Missvain (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YevhenOl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YevhenOl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article has been deleted. item will soon follow. Quakewoody (talk) 15:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article was deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 15:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably COM:SELFIE, this uploader related with Indonesian Wikipedia LTA Ratna Sarita RaFaDa20631 (talk) 15:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calling Rachmat04 (talk · contribs), Nohirara (talk · contribs), Symphonium264 (talk · contribs). RaFaDa20631 (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant discussions here. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 11:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a photograph credited to FREESTYLE PHOTOGRAPHY/André Ringuette Ytoyoda (talk) 15:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the copyright status of this publication and of the photo? Gyrostat (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gyrostat, this file (and the similar others picture magazine pictures) should be deleted, as the uploader was not aware of the copyright policy on commons (see fr:Discussion_utilisateur:Sacamol#Question_de_Richet_Philippe_(23_octobre_2020_à_18:13). Regards, --Sacamol (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not help improve the project. Quakewoody (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons isn't a place for random personal photos to be stored. Feel free to use Flickr.com. --Missvain (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" claim: [3] Gyrostat (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gyrostat, I am a freelance photographer at various cultural events and festivals across Europe including the FIPADOC Festival. I confirm that this is my own work. Please withdraw your deletion request, this file should be kept. --ClémentContrib (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, le site copié est sous copyright https://yadvashem-france.org/mentions-legales / Havang(nl) (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation - image is used on the gaiters website Quakewoody (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We also aren't a host for personal photo storage. --Missvain (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyright violation - image is found on www.janlfitness.com Quakewoody (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a non-notable organization, failed PR attempt at ro:Panda Sound. Gikü (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1925, and if not then due to lack of notice or renewal." - this photo was taken after 1925 (in 1927) and in Australia. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SaidCieza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gallery page contains only the same images as, and no other relevant information than the person's category. Archie02 (talk) 17:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful to be truely own work given how old it is PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work of this interview video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8LWEpkFOy0 Ytoyoda (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obscene message NedFausa (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake / artist's rendering. Pennsylvania does not use vowels in the second alpha position, and does not use the letter 'U' on passenger plates. Meldar667 (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The image doesn't fall under any of the deletion criteria outlined in Commons:Deletion policy. It is not a copyright violation because the design is simple enough to be considered non-original. Similar images of PA license plates with slightly different details, such as File:2010 Pennsylvania license plate - HJG-7895.jpg, already exist on Commons. Even if fake, this is educationally useful to demonstrate a plate design (actually, the use of a fake plate can help prevent a motorist's real information from being used to demonstrate the same purpose). Epicgenius (talk) 14:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obscene message NedFausa (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obscene message NedFausa (talk) 18:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as speedy "Marking as possible copyvio because The license plate design is too complex to be considered a simple design. A similar file, File:KKK-3249.jpg, was deleted for the same reason. This image is also most likely doctored rather than being a genuine license plate." by User:Epicgenius. The referenced other file was tagged and deleted without discussion. As this file was listed for deletion and kept previously I thought a listing with discussion was in order. Also, if this is a copyvio, other license plate images in the category may be similar situations. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete See history of NY plates. The two crucial dates under US copyright law are 1978 and 1989. All license plates first used prior to 1978 are all PD, assuming they don't have a copyright notice. Those first used prior to 1989 are very likely also PD, but in addition to lack of notice they must not have been registered for copyright (so a check needs to be performed). Specifically for NY, pre-1986 is just PD-text, while anything pre-2000 is likely OK but needs to be checked out. After 2000 is not OK. -- King of ♥ 03:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minors in underwear 2600:6C50:4E7F:E1E5:B942:62B1:3280:B8FC 19:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ridiculous. --Achim (talk) 19:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The picture depicts typical subculture look and has clear anthropological, sociological and educational significance. --Melirius (talk) 19:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover, it is used already in several Wikipedia articles. --Melirius (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep They are clearly not minors and are not in underwear, and even if they were, what is the reason to delete? Flase morality reasons? I ask this as it would be interestaing to understand as how this IP found this image. It was either searching ravers or candy or girls, or candy girls or by way of Category:Groovy 2007, an category about a electronic music festival. Either way the "reasoning" is completely bogus and hypocrite. Also, and mainly, file is in use n several wikis like in en.wikipedia.org "Pacifier", pt.wikinews.org "Ecstasy na página principal na Wikipédia em russo", ru.wikipedia.org "MDMA" and "Социология рекреационного использования MDMA и экстази", ru.wikinews.org "Экстази на заглавной странице Русской Википедии" and sl.wikipedia.org "Rave". Tm (talk) 22:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made by the uploader - not an actual logo of Google Docs (never used by Google). Not in Google font. Also, poorly made code with background artefacts — kashmīrī 21:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks much like a stage/studio photo of the kind made to sell to media by professional photographers. The description mentions Flickr RTP and a search in Flickr RTP either with the aurea and RTP or just on the RTP gallery only shows non compatible licenses, either because they are "all righst reserved" or the are CC BY-NC (nocommercial). Stego (talk) 22:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

should be replaced Yabatsch (talk) 23:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear what it depicts, hence of no probable use, — kashmīrī 23:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is/was a logo of the Becamex IDC Corp, which is fairly used in vi.wikipedia with a non-free rationale. Buiquangtu (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, see https://twitter.com/atraircraft/status/1194968703160504321 Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marc, I'm working for the Comms departement of ATR and in charge of updating our Wikipedia page. This picture is the property of ATR. Thanks. Fabien

Fabien, please send in an OTRS permission about these photos. See the image pages for more information. Missvain (talk) 18:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have requested OTRS permissions for this image. If we do not receive it, or OTRS does not approve, then it will be deleted. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 18:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author is ANTHONY PECCHI, and ATR didn't demonstrate to have the right to relicense the picture. As an French or Italian company, they can't be the copyright holder, but they could ask the photographer to be transfered all the rights, including relicensing under a free license. If they do such a move, the photography can be restored. --Dereckson (talk) 10:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, see https://www.atr-aircraft.com/our-aircraft/atr-42-600/ Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marc, I'm working for the Comms departement of ATR and in charge of updating our Wikipedia page. This picture is the property of ATR. Thanks. Fabien  Comment I have requested OTRS permissions for this image. If we do not receive it, or OTRS does not approve, then it will be deleted. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ATR-100125MD.jpg. --Dereckson (talk) 10:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see https://www.atr-aircraft.com/news-media/gallery/ Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marc, I'm working for the Comms departement of ATR and in charge of updating our Wikipedia page. This picture is the property of ATR. Thanks. Fabien  Comment I have requested OTRS permissions for this image. If we do not receive it, or OTRS does not approve, then it will be deleted. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ATR-100125MD.jpg. --Dereckson (talk) 10:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't have the permission from author 43.251.89.188 07:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for deletion Neurostrike (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have requested OTRS permissions for this image. If we do not receive it, or OTRS does not approve, then it will be deleted. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 18:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs)

[edit]

TV screenshots

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User joined in 2008. Still uploaded copyvios in 2015. That's... uh. DarkoNeko 14:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance Jan 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, January 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @BevinKacon: what do you mean « not matching camera models given » ? (and why « models » plural, all photos come from the same model a Canon PowerShot SX110 IS, except one from a Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL) I see nothing wrong with these pictures (and certainly nothing like the distorted copyvios by Varaine). It's ok to take precaution but here it seems a bit overkill. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As per the linked discussion, the uploader never used a Canon - "Few year ago, i had a " KODAK EASYSHARE Z950 DIGITAL CAMERA " and a "PENTAX Optio M50". actualy, i use a "NIKON D3100" and, sometime my mobil phone "Blackview A10". So these uploads are from Varaine.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BevinKacon: « So these uploads are from Varaine » is wrong on so many level, there is no way to achieve this conclusion. Do you realize how ridicoulous it sounds? The most logical conclusion is that Marianne Casamance forgot to list some of the camera she used (and I can't blame her, I have no idea what cameras I used last year, let alone in 2016). Anyway, after taking some times I indeed found a few suspicious : File:Euphorbe de Loiseleur (Euphorbia seguieriana subsp. loiseleurii).jpg, File:Euphorbe de Loiseleur (Euphorbia loiseleuri).jpg, File:Lunetière à tige courte (Biscutella brevicaulis).jpg, File:Saucissons de taureau de Camargue.jpg, File:Saucissons secs d'Arles.jpg, File:Poupeton de bouillabaisse en préparation.jpg, File:Grémil à pédoncule épais (Lypostérium incrassatum).JPG, these one can be deleted (typical Varaine-style low-res/artfacty probably-copyvio); all the others should be kept unless there is some proof or at least serious suspicion. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did you review them all? I don't think so as you missed File:IGP coteaux du Cher et de l'Arnon jeunes vignes du côté de Reuilly.JPG. COM:PCP has been met. I notify @De728631, Masumrezarock100, and VIGNERON: at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_82#User:Marianne_Casamance_2016_uploads you say nothing, but vote Keep here still with no solution.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:IGP coteaux du Cher et de l'Arnon jeunes vignes du côté de Reuilly.JPG does indeed look like an upload by Varaine, but as has been said multiple times in this discussion, mass deleting all uploads by Marianne Casamance is not a desirable solution since it would cause too much collateral damage. De728631 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. You are the one who initiated this DR, so feel free to review them individually. I am not going to volunteer because I don't have enough time because of real life. Most of these files are in use and of high quality as I said. Mass-deleting all of them blindly won't solve anything. Masum Reza📞 00:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some of them are in use, and most of the images are of high quality. We don't have any proof that all of the files uploaded by her are copyvio. They should be judged on an individual basis, and should not be mass-nominated blindly. I agree that precaution is better than cure, but this seems to be a bit overkill. Unless concrete and satisfactory evidence of each file listed here being copyvio is provided, I am inclined to vote  Keep. Masum Reza📞 09:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @KevinBacon: I am pretty sure those files were not deleted blindly. Volunteer reviewers checked each one of them, one by one. Or did I read the discussion wrong? If I recall correctly, Alexis Jazz was the one who did the most of the work. His opinion here would be helpful here since he is quite familiar with Varaine's work. Masum Reza📞 00:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Alexis Jazz and Masumrezarock100: indeed, we didn't check them one by one but we didn't deleted them blindly either. We checked a lot of them one by one and almost all where copyvios, so then we safely assumed that if in the sample most where copyvio then the same ratio would apply for the whole. This is very different from the situatio here where almost none of Marianne Casamance upload are copyvio. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @VIGNERON: the ratio was a fair bit higher, but not "almost all" of Varaine's uploads were copyvio. A substantial number were though, and the longer we looked the more we found. The degree of misdirection made it impossible to determine what was really his own work, but I guess that anywhere from 0% to 80% was own work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete @De728631 and VIGNERON: If Marianne Casamance says she didn't use a PowerShot SX110, she didn't. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: this peremptory assumption make no sense to me. Do you really think that someone can perfectly recall what models where used 4 years ago? (I know I clearly can't for myself). As I said supra, « The most logical conclusion is that Marianne Casamance forgot to list some of the camera she used ». Marianne Casamance could you confirm or infirm? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was loaned a camera, during the breakdown of one of my camera at the time. I am completely unable to tell you which model it is, probably cannon. I forgot it, not being one of my devices. Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marianne Casamance: but you also can't remember a single picture you definitely took with it? @VIGNERON: I could. Okay, maybe I'd forget something I took less than 5 pictures with, but any camera I took 242 pictures with I'd definitely be able to recall. (if not the exact model number at least the brand) And deleting those really suspect images now is a bad idea. If Marianne Casamance indeed did use a PowerShot SX110, we'll have a much harder time now to identify which photos were taken (or "taken") by Varaine. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marianne Casamance: there have to multiple photos in this list that you would be able to recall or strongly suspect having taken yourself ("that's the kind of building I would take a photo of", "that's the angle I would pick") or can confirm not having taken yourself ("I'd never take a photo out of focus like that", "I never ate that dish, why would I have a photo of it?"). Please confirm for as many as you can that are likely or unlikely to be your own work. From there we could try to analyze what was your work and what wasn't. Here's a gallery.- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to sort them out for you, but my work schedule requires me to have a little time. real life is also time consuming. Marianne Casamance (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jan 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jan 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Feb 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Feb 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Mar 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Mar 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Apr 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Apr 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) May 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, May 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jun 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jun 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jul 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jul 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Aug 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Aug 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Sep 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Sep 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Oct 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Oct 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a fake picture. I don't know whether US or PRC made it. Please refer:

芄蘭 (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not fake, but there was a person in the background who was edited out, obviously. The NARA source page states: Copied from a third party source during President Nixon's trip to China. Photograph appears on the front page of the People's Daily (Renmin Ribao 人民日报), No.2 Jintai Xilu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100733, People's Republic of China. Email: en@people.cn. Tel. +86-10-65363689. Fax +86-10-65363688. From issue dated February 22, 1972. So, should not have been uploaded.  Delete unfortunately. Will be PD in China in 2023. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The unedited photo has been uploaded at File:Mao Zedong, Zhang Yufeng et Richard Nixon.jpg. It claims a U.S. source as well, probably erroneously based on this file, but has a Chinese watermark. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any specific knowledge of this image, since it was uploaded by bot and this is the first I am looking at it specifically. As it was uploaded almost 10 years ago, and I no longer work at the US National Archives, I'm not exactly sure what happened here. Most likely, this was originally marked "Unrestricted" at the time of uploaded, but was changed at some time in the ensuing years to "Undetermined," as it appears now. Possibly a bot bug, but hard to tell, and if so, I haven't seen similar issues over the years. As such, unless anyone has a strong argument otherwise (but I doubt it, since I trust Carl's assessment above), I agree it should be deleted. Note, though I did the upload on behalf of NARA, I'm not speaking for NARA anymore in that assessment. Dominic (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, makes sense -- most likely NARA updated their information since then, and it met the criteria for the bot at the time. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I thought once an image was released unrestricted, that release could not be revoked. Isn't that what Commons applies to uploads by ordinary users? But there's a procedural point here: the nomination wants to delete it because it's a fake. That's not a valid reason, is it? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If it was released by the copyright owner, correct it can't be taken back. If there was a mistake made, in that the copyright was actually owned by someone else and it was marked incorrectly, that simply means whatever license or claim was previously there was never valid, so now needs to be corrected (by deletion). Most of NARA's material was U.S. Government created, but sometimes works by third parties were mixed in, and they likely just missed this one at the time.
As for "fake", the real question is if there is any educational use -- oftentimes fake images don't have any. This isn't really "fake"; it's just been edited to remove someone in the background. It's still plenty educational, so in this case that's not a valid reason for deletion. As an international project though, there can be words lost in translation, so I'm not sure that is exactly what the nominator meant. They also mention the problem of who actually authored it, and that question was answered at the NARA source, in that the given license (PD-USGov) is not correct and I don't think any other free license can be applied. Presumably copyright is owned by the Chinese government, and the presidential party simply got a copy while they were there. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As can be seen by the pages using this file, it's an iconic picture, so Category:Undelete in 2023 should be applied here. That's the easy part. How to restore the image in 2023 to all those article seems much harder. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - No valid reason for deletion. The File:Mao Zedong, Zhang Yufeng et Richard Nixon.jpg is PD, so can be changed in order to erase fr:Zhang Yufeng, the companion of Mao. I think this should be discussed at the village pump. The result could be to change the image, which is used so often on wiki's, by the original version with Zhang Yufeng. That is why I ping you all: @芄蘭: @Clindberg: @Dominic: @Michael Bednarek: . Elly (talk) 21:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appeared to me from here that the photograph was published in 1924.--Ipigott (talk) 07:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It says that the photo say TAKEN in 1924. It does not claim or prove that it was PUBLISHED in 1924.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2045. Elly (talk) 21:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains an image of myself used without my consent. 94.111.138.144 18:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file is used in Wikiversity. If it is needed there, it should be rather replaced with a version that does not contain the problematic photo, not being deleted. I wonder why the problem is reported after seven years. Ankry (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Consent for using an image is not required in general. However, there are other problems with this file:
  • The images of 6 people on page 2 might be copyrighted and are probably not, or not all, made by the author
  • The images contain private data (GSM numbers)
  • According to the meta data the file is authored by "Jisca Boogaerts", which might be someone else then the uploader.
  • The file contains an image of Jisca Boogaerts, which appears not to be a selfie.
On basis of these points I think the file should be deleted because several people appear to have contributed to it, other people then the uploader, so there are several copyright issues. Elly (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: can you please comment if you've got some time to spare? Elly (talk)

Kept, but in a revised version without the personal and probably copyrighted data. Elly (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is listed as an "own work". It seems highly doubtful that the uploader was the author of this 1971 photograph 107.13.186.249 05:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the source and description aren't good but photo made in 1971 and due to the importance of the event it is highly probable that the image was published at that time, too. So, kept as PD-Sudan. --rubin16 (talk) 13:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why this is in PD as claimed. Sealle (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 13:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless this file is the uploader's signature (i.e. the uploader is en:Draft:Tamal Bandyopadhyay (novelist)) , it seems strange to claim this as own work per COM:2D copying and COM:SIG; moreover, the siganture itself seems to complex and artistic to be {{PD-signature}} given that the signee is Indian and this might not be below COM:TOO India depending upon how old it is since even typical signatures are currently considered protected under UK copyright law per COM:SIG#United Kingdom and India's TOO seemed to mirror COM:TOO United Kingdom until fairly recently. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures, no matter how fancy, are not copyrightable A Tree In A Box (talk) 14:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't seem to be the case according to COM:SIG where apparently even a typical signature in considered eligible for copyright protection in certain countries. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused and no clear description to prove the status. --rubin16 (talk) 13:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perche dovevo caricarlo sulla pagina di wikiloves TorselloMonica (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs)

[edit]

TV screenshots

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User joined in 2008. Still uploaded copyvios in 2015. That's... uh. DarkoNeko 14:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance Jan 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, January 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @BevinKacon: what do you mean « not matching camera models given » ? (and why « models » plural, all photos come from the same model a Canon PowerShot SX110 IS, except one from a Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL) I see nothing wrong with these pictures (and certainly nothing like the distorted copyvios by Varaine). It's ok to take precaution but here it seems a bit overkill. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As per the linked discussion, the uploader never used a Canon - "Few year ago, i had a " KODAK EASYSHARE Z950 DIGITAL CAMERA " and a "PENTAX Optio M50". actualy, i use a "NIKON D3100" and, sometime my mobil phone "Blackview A10". So these uploads are from Varaine.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BevinKacon: « So these uploads are from Varaine » is wrong on so many level, there is no way to achieve this conclusion. Do you realize how ridicoulous it sounds? The most logical conclusion is that Marianne Casamance forgot to list some of the camera she used (and I can't blame her, I have no idea what cameras I used last year, let alone in 2016). Anyway, after taking some times I indeed found a few suspicious : File:Euphorbe de Loiseleur (Euphorbia seguieriana subsp. loiseleurii).jpg, File:Euphorbe de Loiseleur (Euphorbia loiseleuri).jpg, File:Lunetière à tige courte (Biscutella brevicaulis).jpg, File:Saucissons de taureau de Camargue.jpg, File:Saucissons secs d'Arles.jpg, File:Poupeton de bouillabaisse en préparation.jpg, File:Grémil à pédoncule épais (Lypostérium incrassatum).JPG, these one can be deleted (typical Varaine-style low-res/artfacty probably-copyvio); all the others should be kept unless there is some proof or at least serious suspicion. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did you review them all? I don't think so as you missed File:IGP coteaux du Cher et de l'Arnon jeunes vignes du côté de Reuilly.JPG. COM:PCP has been met. I notify @De728631, Masumrezarock100, and VIGNERON: at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_82#User:Marianne_Casamance_2016_uploads you say nothing, but vote Keep here still with no solution.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:IGP coteaux du Cher et de l'Arnon jeunes vignes du côté de Reuilly.JPG does indeed look like an upload by Varaine, but as has been said multiple times in this discussion, mass deleting all uploads by Marianne Casamance is not a desirable solution since it would cause too much collateral damage. De728631 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. You are the one who initiated this DR, so feel free to review them individually. I am not going to volunteer because I don't have enough time because of real life. Most of these files are in use and of high quality as I said. Mass-deleting all of them blindly won't solve anything. Masum Reza📞 00:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some of them are in use, and most of the images are of high quality. We don't have any proof that all of the files uploaded by her are copyvio. They should be judged on an individual basis, and should not be mass-nominated blindly. I agree that precaution is better than cure, but this seems to be a bit overkill. Unless concrete and satisfactory evidence of each file listed here being copyvio is provided, I am inclined to vote  Keep. Masum Reza📞 09:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @KevinBacon: I am pretty sure those files were not deleted blindly. Volunteer reviewers checked each one of them, one by one. Or did I read the discussion wrong? If I recall correctly, Alexis Jazz was the one who did the most of the work. His opinion here would be helpful here since he is quite familiar with Varaine's work. Masum Reza📞 00:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Alexis Jazz and Masumrezarock100: indeed, we didn't check them one by one but we didn't deleted them blindly either. We checked a lot of them one by one and almost all where copyvios, so then we safely assumed that if in the sample most where copyvio then the same ratio would apply for the whole. This is very different from the situatio here where almost none of Marianne Casamance upload are copyvio. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @VIGNERON: the ratio was a fair bit higher, but not "almost all" of Varaine's uploads were copyvio. A substantial number were though, and the longer we looked the more we found. The degree of misdirection made it impossible to determine what was really his own work, but I guess that anywhere from 0% to 80% was own work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete @De728631 and VIGNERON: If Marianne Casamance says she didn't use a PowerShot SX110, she didn't. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: this peremptory assumption make no sense to me. Do you really think that someone can perfectly recall what models where used 4 years ago? (I know I clearly can't for myself). As I said supra, « The most logical conclusion is that Marianne Casamance forgot to list some of the camera she used ». Marianne Casamance could you confirm or infirm? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was loaned a camera, during the breakdown of one of my camera at the time. I am completely unable to tell you which model it is, probably cannon. I forgot it, not being one of my devices. Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marianne Casamance: but you also can't remember a single picture you definitely took with it? @VIGNERON: I could. Okay, maybe I'd forget something I took less than 5 pictures with, but any camera I took 242 pictures with I'd definitely be able to recall. (if not the exact model number at least the brand) And deleting those really suspect images now is a bad idea. If Marianne Casamance indeed did use a PowerShot SX110, we'll have a much harder time now to identify which photos were taken (or "taken") by Varaine. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marianne Casamance: there have to multiple photos in this list that you would be able to recall or strongly suspect having taken yourself ("that's the kind of building I would take a photo of", "that's the angle I would pick") or can confirm not having taken yourself ("I'd never take a photo out of focus like that", "I never ate that dish, why would I have a photo of it?"). Please confirm for as many as you can that are likely or unlikely to be your own work. From there we could try to analyze what was your work and what wasn't. Here's a gallery.- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to sort them out for you, but my work schedule requires me to have a little time. real life is also time consuming. Marianne Casamance (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jan 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jan 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Feb 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Feb 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Mar 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Mar 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Apr 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Apr 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) May 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, May 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jun 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jun 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jul 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jul 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Aug 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Aug 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Sep 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Sep 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Oct 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Oct 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]