Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 14th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a photo or scan of a photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: recently deleted and recreated. --Sealle (talk) 06:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request SplashLagoonErie (talk) 12:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate|File:Comblat-le-Chateau. Le Pré.jpg}} StellarHalo (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://gshow.globo.com/programas/epipoco/noticia/memes-informacao-e-muita-diversao-vao-fazer-parte-do-quadro-ordinario-news.ghtml Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 08:10, 14 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 14:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SplashLagoonErie as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This photo is the mountain and the flag.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the nominator's rationale is unclear. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Эlcobbola talk 15:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image likely copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as obvious copyvio.  JGHowes  talk 20:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to metadata, copyright is with an agency called "Digital Apartment / HochZwei". The uploader (SPA) might of course be part of that agency (in that case: paid editing). 217.239.10.65 15:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as copyvio per exif "Copyright holder Digital Apartment / HochZwei", see COM:OTRS for required permission.  JGHowes  talk 20:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless and empty category without perspectives. Software is not for smartphones (tablets, notebooks etc.), but for OS. See cat:Android software, cat:iOS software and others. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted as CSD C2.--QTHCCAN (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, my apologies but i accidentally uploaded two images from Flickr which were already on Commons, added by their original photographer. The duplicates I'm regarding to are this file and File:Acer campestre (26431509859).jpg - NeoMeesje (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 21:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of focus photo of cabling wioth no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Released as CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 on source website. Incompatible license. P 1 9 9   17:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camilapedrazza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All taken from FB per MD as well as copyrighted newspapers. Copyvio and Commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Ben Chu, see EXIF. not uploader shizhao (talk) 03:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Permission needed. --Minoraxtalk 04:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alistark x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sagitayolanda97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mix of low quality photos of unidentifiable people. No EDUSe - Out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Huisgenoot is a South African magazine, needs permission. All this uploaders uploads have been copyvios Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder Patricio Cabral - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random snapshot of the night sky, unuse, non-usable really Podzemnik (talk) 07:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work - small, no EXIF. the other photo uploaded by the author seems to be copyvio Podzemnik (talk) 08:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:PCP. --Minoraxtalk 04:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Mr.Pakanati - needs permission Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a movie screenshot Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HPRKundM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One is marked Credit TVNOW Ruprecht Stempell - neither are own work. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added more uploads by the same user („Fotocredit Rebecca Brasse“ / „Copyright Fabian Stuertz“) -> not own work

--Johannnes89 (talk) 11:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yunus Khan Kalpi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos and copyvios as the uploader couldn't have taken them. Commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too much tilt. Plenty of other shots in same category. Sardaka (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my own work and I want it to be deleted. Harshrathod50 (talk) 11:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures from a blacklisted Flickr accounts that are too recent to belong to the public domain.

QTHCCAN (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riapastenm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rjxraj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by CptViraj. --Minoraxtalk 04:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stefanodandrea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low resolution photos of domesticated cat.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ananda.biswas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots and text-only table, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal essay/doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dapcarvalho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgarier01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Achim55 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Google Android didn't allow me to fill in the reason for opposing, but this clearly wasn't uploaded to advertise. Advertise for what? The fact AED's exist in Assen, Drenthe? These devices are used To save lives and are found globally almost everywhere. I'm baffled that the tagger thought that this was an advertisement, as it does not even list THE BRAND of the AED, it's a sign that explains what an AED is and when to use it, it's about as educational as it gets, even if it was an advertisement. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Donald Trung, I apologize and  I withdraw my nomination. I didn't notice that the file was not uploaded by User:AEDmaster, so it's enough to clean up the page. Best, Achim (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I didn't see the text by the user either, I just noticed the tag and challenged it. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment, some parts of the text like "Dekking AED neemt af tijdens COVID-19 Door COVID-19 is er veel veranderd in Nederland. Het leek in de zomer de goede kant weer op te gaan, maar nu de herfst in aantocht is lopen het aantal COVID 19 besmettingen helaas weer snel op. Hierdoor worden er vanuit de overheid weer meer maartregelen genomen om de druk op de ziekenhuizen zo laag mogelijk te houden. Echter wat vergeten wordt is daarom juist het belang van de AED dekking in Nederland. Consequenties COVID-19Doordat er rekening wordt gehouden met de druk op de ziekenhuizen, mensen afstand moeten houden en je publieke plekken zoveel mogelijk moet vermijden. Stellen veel mensen dingen uit. Zoals een ziekenhuis bezoek. Zeker de kwetsbare doelgroep, zoals de ouderen. Daarom is het belangrijk dat je zorg draagt voor de mensen om je heen. Dit bereik in eerste instantie door oprecht geïnteresseerd te zijn en op die manier te kijken of je wat voor iemand kan betekenen. Meestal gaat het om de kleine dingen, maar daarnaast als VVE kun je, door je krachten te bundelen, meer bereiken. can be considered educational as it discusses the consequences of the SARS-Coronavirus-2 pandemic on AED's in the Netherlands, although this photograph clearly predates the existence of SARS-CoV-2.

Other texts like "AED in buurt Er zitten grote groepen mensen thuis. Een gedeelte van deze mensen gaan minder snel, met bijvoorbeeld hartklachten, naar het ziekenhuis. Dat houdt in dat er meer verantwoordelijkheid bij de buurt komt te liggen. Dus daarom is het belangrijk dat er voldoende EHBO-ers zijn en dat iedereen weet hoe ze deze mensen moeten bereiken. Dit kan bijvoorbeeld door als VVE een App groep op te zetten. Daarnaast is het belangrijk dat elke bewoner toegang heeft tot een AED. De goudenregel is dat een AED binnen 6 minuten ingezet moet worden. Dit de meest cruciale periode. is a basic explanation of what first responders should do when administering an AED during the SARS-Coronavirus-2 pandemic, so it would have some value if it was actually placed in a more recent photograph of an AED in the Netherlands. The rest is just blatant advertising with only some facts mixed in between. Hence I removed it, but as this photograph predates the SARS-Coronavirus-2 the entire text was not relevant to the picture. Anyhow, maybe it's best to explain to the user how to use Wikimedia Commons, I'll leave them a more personal message on their talk page. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim (talk) 18:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reclose. --Minoraxtalk 04:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joshuawhlam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Article deleted from en-wiki for being unnotable, therefor these files are as well. COM:HOST.

Kissa21782 (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yelaawolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files have no metadata, source stated as "Instagram". Very unlikely to actually be own work.

Kissa21782 (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamzaahmedghega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly just advertising for a lawyer or a law firm, many with watermarks, not in use. COM:ADVERT and COM:HOST.

Kissa21782 (talk) 21:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Mistakenly nominated a couple extra files too, quickly fixed. Kissa21782 (talk) 21:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lopez44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Video game screenshots, derivative works

Kissa21782 (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope: low quality selfie from non-contributor as per COM:SELFIE Crep1711 (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hexaus2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All taken from various websites, all need permission

Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zainul abideen runner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple cameras, different sizes, quality, 1 batch of files are watermarked. Permission needed.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catherine Cadic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

©Astrid Di Crollalanza - not own work

Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElieSawma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most taken from FB per MD, not own work as claimed. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faundit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo on enwp

Minoraxtalk 08:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arafath123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Scope IMO

Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent to File:Bergman_cyclization_IBM2.png except shaded top edge DMacks (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any outcome is fine with me, I just wanted to remind you that Wikimedia software renders png and jpg rather differently in terms of sharpness and brightness, and this difference changes in time due to Wikimedia software updates. Materialscientist (talk) 08:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Nabi Mohmand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, 1 used for selfpromo on enwp

Minoraxtalk 06:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 01:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Hot28 (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal file of non-contributor. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hotaunty.jpg Hot28 (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hotaunty.jpg Hot28 (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file:Hotaunty.jpg Hot28 (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zmalluzboyz

[edit]

Lifted from the Internet, limited EXIF data indicating photo post-processing/laundering, unlikely to be own work because of this, as well as multiple notable people depicted in each shot, unless user is a distinguished member of the press. --Elizium23 (talk) 04:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 吴旭光 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Achatrie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:4-CUADERNILLO DE ANÁLISIS DEL TANGO.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ydna1013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laiskimus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will upload SVG. The7bab (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published on a lot of other sites, needs evidence of license. E.g., [1] --ghouston (talk) 06:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source link: Copyright 2019. The President of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. All rights reserved. Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no pages that use this file since 2011 J.G.G. (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I uploaded this file myself under my own name (see redirect after renaming user name to J.G.G.) So, this is my own request for deletion. J.G.G. (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; also from Facebook. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to an image posted to this artist's official Facebook page here. The EXIF data is also incomplete, which leads me to believe that this image is likely not the uploader's own work. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While a very fun photo, the uploader has claimed the image is their own work, but the article using this image, as well as the metadata of this image, indicates that the creator was Victor Hilitski, so the copyright status is inaccurate and is likely a copyright violation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We have a limitation on Commons in that we don't clearly distinguish the creator from the rights holder. It is entirely likely that the rights holder here is the subject of the image, rather than the photographer (a very common situation, where photographs were taken at their request). This is what our metadata records (albeit poorly). If the uploader could please clarify that, there is no reason to delete this. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We have requested permissions from the uploader. If they do not submit OTRS-"approved" permissions then we will proceed accordingly. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. It looks like a screenshot from a videoclip / ad / documentary. No EXIF, small Podzemnik (talk) 01:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication about notability or that the uploader has the right to release the logo under CC licence Podzemnik (talk) 01:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial trademark. There is a claim that this is too simple to attract protection, per COM:TOO, but I see it as more complex than that. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's the Assassin's Creed logo created with two axes. In my opinion, it is above COM:TOO. We will still have File:Assassin's Creed Valhalla text logo.svg as a free alternative. Ahmadtalk 23:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Likely this mural is old enough to not fall under Canadian copyright. This looks like a ww2 or ww1 mural, probably built a long time ago by many people. This monument is likely over 70 years old and falls out of Canadian copyright. A Tree In A Box (talk) 14:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader. Accidental creation. Wumingbai (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/bad quality. Inferior to the alternative version [2], as it deviates from actual source [3]. Note how the colour in original Wiki version and source map is different from the new version (black colour in Northeastern Turkey in source was changed to orange). Bogazicili (talk) 04:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bogazicili, There were no Dagestani Chechens on the map. Or we are still in Stalin's deportation for you?--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 06:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - No valid reason for deletion. If there is evidence indicating that it is inaccurate, then please revert to an older version (I think there is one). Ahmadtalk 07:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Historical Dagestan is inhabited by Aukh Chechens. If you don't like the answer, this is not a reason to delete.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 07:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep – but with modifications. No valid reason for deletion – in fact, vectorized maps are better from many perspectives for Wikimedia purposes than raster ones. As for modifications, I agree with Ahmad252 that this map should likely be reverted to one of the earlier versions. I'd suggest reverting to its original right-after-the-vectorization state unless further changes are properly referenced and documented in "sources" or in upload comments (which they are currently not). Cherkash (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cherkash, Please return the Chechens currently living in Dagestan to their place.--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 17:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Takhirgeran Umar: The proper place to discuss this, is the image's Talk page. Cherkash (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep superior image in preferred format. If you don't like the content, then fix it. If someone reverts you, create your own. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If the map is problematic then edit the SVG and upload a new version. Going back to the jpeg is not the right solution here. Extua (talk) 21:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building was completed in 1986, and its architect is Jean Marie Legrand. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Republic of the Congo has no Commons-acceptable FoP. Full (non-incidental) reproductions of Congolese copyrighted works are only allowed in television broadcasting and cinematography. Incidental inclusion is only allowed for photographic reproductions. The most-used image here should be transferred to both enwiki and frwiki with warning tags about no FoP in the Republic of the Congo.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook, as per metadata, no evidence of own work. Sealle (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, this is not produced by the Indonesian government, but comes from the Astra International corporate website Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veetkalpu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photo needs permission from orginal photographer which is probably Andre Kalden based on exif of painting, unlikely to be own work. The painting needs permission from Smit as the artist is still alive

Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We have requested OTRS permissions for these files. If we do not receive them or OTRS does not approve, then we will proceed accordingly. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niuniu8566 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

To clarify the copyright condition of these related images.

The photo sources are from Jie Wang, the director of "Seek Out Natural Mysteries". I am his assistant and on behalf of him to upload these pictures. These high-definition images have never been uploaded online before.

The convincing evidence is shown in the following link, please have a look.

To show that I own the copyrights of Jie Wang's images

Niuniu8566 (talk) 07:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

consentement Marcell NEMG (talk) 07:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons is not a webhost for personal photos of random people. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

consentement Marcell NEMG (talk) 12:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Early 20th century" photograph marked "own work" with no other source or publication info. This is not own work, or old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Additional information needed to know the copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this logo is released under a free license Buidhe (talk) 08:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated sourced website is under CC-BY-SA, however I doubt that the image was uploade by the autor of the photo. Looks like an official portrait to me - too small, no EXIF Podzemnik (talk) 08:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Regardless, non-notable subject and not used in any projects. We aren't a webhost for personal shots. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission. 85.212.109.219 08:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

behauptet der anonyme Troll?

Kept: OTRS approved. --Missvain (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel Marian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos are the same as his reverbnation page - https://www.reverbnation.com/gabrielmarian - think we need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons is not a webhost for personal photos of random people. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was copied over from facebook - no confirmation of permission from uploader, who isnt the copyright holder. Cannot view original image on facebook as requires a login - which I dont have Nightfury (talk) 08:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Looks liek this one got deleted. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of icon. No indication of significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused drawing. No indication of what it is a model of. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused icon of unclear significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Not strictly a selfie and has some artistic merit Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons is not a webhost for personal photos of random people. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Handwritten document of doubtful significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, originally from here and cropped User3204 (talk) 09:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: source: here, here and here. User3204 (talk) 09:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused redacted document of unclear use. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See metadata, copyvio Poppo154 (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see metadata, possible copyvio Poppo154 (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Poppo154 (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a copy of the one already uploaded to the film website: https://www.freakpower.com/freak-power-documentary I am assuming that Watkins is someone who owns the copyright to this image but COM:OTRS permission is necessary here. Buidhe (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. Watkins commissioned the work in collaboration with the artist Ralph Steadman. My understanding is he used the WikiCommons Upload wizard in an attempt to properly attribute rights for using the image on the page. What is the process for applying COM:OTRS permission? Esamsoe (talk) 15:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this image has significant differences from the image on https://www.freakpower.com/freak-power-documentary. Notably the film details on the bottom. Please remove this deletion request. Esamsoe (talk) 15:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped, lower resolution copy of https://www.listal.com/viewimage/8081702h. Good faith upload, as it was marked with a free license on Flickr, but most of the Flickr user's other uploads are selfies and family photos, no other images of beauty contestants, I think this is a copyright violation. GRuban (talk) 15:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe déjà dans mes imports Alliot A & B (talk) 15:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture missing 109.66.96.186 16:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Picture restored. no need to delete

ShaulaH (talk) 06:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyvio. see this exact copy found on this website. evrifaessa ❯❯❯ mesaj 16:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader stated "I do not want it to be publicly posted anymore." Revision #489503897 QTHCCAN (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader stated "I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore" Revision #489504842 QTHCCAN (talk) 17:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a sceenshot of a broadcast. Also, trophy and the UEFA logo feature prominently, so would likely be considered a derivative work of copyrighted works. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is directly from Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and not from NASA. In the file's metadata you can see "Copyright: GCTC". Roscosmos' media materials usage guidelines are not compatible with Commons' licensing rules. In difference to Photographs by Andrey Shelepin appears in the file's metadata "(NASA/GCTC/Andrey Shelepin) For copyright and restrictions refer to - http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/guidelines/index.html" Only these files are eligible for Commons! Ras67 (talk) 18:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smmagic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was uploaded and file name chosen by a user who has been indefinitely blocked at English Wikipedia. Its sole use is to try to associate somebody with a pro-pedophilia Dutch political party (see [4]). As trolling and an attempt at cyberbullying, it should be deleted as soon as possible. -Crossroads- (talk) 19:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution (inacurate design), and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was in the net in August 2020. Here: https://ng.opera.news/ng/en/entertainment/3df7f53a71e1a1aa9d50ff19c8ac05c1 According to metadata (no EXIF) uploaded here in September. The one-time-only (with this name ?) uploader claims to have taken the pic earlier. Probably the closing admin will determine better than me what this is about. (Sorry, I opened a DR again. :) E4024 (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free in the US. copyright restored under URAA, so 1939 + 95 = copyrighted until 2034 FASTILY 20:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 21:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wdydttm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly personal files, not in use in actual wikiprojects. Per COM:HOST.

Kissa21782 (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate, PNG version of file better as JPG (Richard Stockton, Class of 1779 (1764-1828).jpg) CzarJobKhaya (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot of a video published with license: Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives.Hit the "More" button on [5] and license is visible. I guess same goes with a screenshot. Htm (talk) 21:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate, PNG version of file better as JPG (Richard Stockton, Class of 1779 (1764-1828).jpg) CzarJobKhaya (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extract from a French weekly TV show which is protected by copyright law: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEm6y3AXRGw Etiennekd (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a presumably copyrighted google chrome wallpaper? MPF (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a presumably copyrighted google chrome wallpaper? MPF (talk) 22:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook file. Normally I would speedy it, but today (14 October) I have opened only one DR, so let me double the number for those who say I open too many DRs. See you tomorrow. E4024 (talk) 23:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looking at the file with some attention, I noticed that the calendar on the wall of some company called "Anteplioğlu" reads from right to left! Is this a photo taken from the reflection on a mirror? --E4024 (talk) 23:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Yet again (this is getting tiresome) a nomination with no attempt at a valid rationale. We do not delete files because they have been used on Facebook.
The only reason for this nomination seems to be that you haven't filed enough DRs today and you need to make your numbers up? Andy Dingley (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No; the reference to number was an allusion to your harassment. --E4024 (talk) 01:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as not in scope: unused photo of a person with no indication of notability. Probably not a copyright violation, this is clearly a selfie (confirmed by the mirror-writing), and the account name matches the file name. Facebook metadata does not override this assessment; even if a prior publication was found I would think this license was safe. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope photo of random person that isn't used in the projects. We aren't a webhost for personal snapshots. --Missvain (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If uploader is Gunter Press, then he's also depicted and this isn't a selfie (2010!) No release to Commons by the photographer. Tohma (talk) 10:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions requested. We'll proceed accordingly if it isn't approved. Missvain (talk) 18:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pulkj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions has been requested. Missvain (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier non libre de droit Iojhug (talk) 22:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted image. Can be found on the internet, eg hereDudek1337 (talk) 19:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier non libre de droit Iojhug (talk) 22:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tinnes

[edit]

Multiple issues. Copyright infringement concern, book cover(s), and the copyright for them are most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). Please delete. --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 09:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Permission verified for some. Deleted 4 without permission. --Minoraxtalk 08:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is from Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and not from NASA. Roscosmos' media materials usage guidelines are not compatible with Commons' licensing rules. Ras67 (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Technically since this image was obtained on NASA's archive library, and according to their FAQ section, images NASA gatheres and adds to their library is public domain material, regardless of where NASA employees get the image from e.g. from another space agency. User:Raphael.concorde 08:39 am, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    •  Comment I don't know where you got that from, but this is not true. Here is your source and under Usage Guidelines you can read: “NASA occasionally uses copyright-protected material of third parties with permission on its website. Those images will be marked identified as copyright protected with the name of the copyright holder. NASA's use does not convey any rights to others to use the same material. Those wishing to use copyright protected material of third parties must contact the copyright holder directly.” That's pretty clear, that we can not use this image without GCTC's permission. --Ras67 (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Thanks for the explanation @Ras67: Elly (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF, small, all other images of the uploader marked as copyvios, without a source or already deleted Podzemnik (talk) 01:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Admin Podzemnik, this is the same as when (frequently) I say "Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work" in DRs; for some reason people criticise me for that, but they do not say anything to admins who do the same... Regards. --E4024 (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That was for the first part of your presentation, for the second part, I got deleted several of their files BTW. (I saw it now. :) --E4024 (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024 I think that other uploads of the file creator play an important role in the evaluation process. For example, the uploader also uploaded File:139808011257308918732734.jpg.jpg which I believe is a screenshot from a video - yet still claimed to be own work released under CC-BY-SA. And yes, in the last few days I often picked up on your DR and checked other uploads of the uploader whose files you nominated for deletion :) --Podzemnik (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Precautionary principle. Uploader editted in december 2020 and could have commented and explained, but as they didn't the image is to be deleted. Elly (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Elly (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False CC claim - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License per source which is incompatible with commons Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As per the MacArthur Foundation Website, there is a different license for images. https://www.macfound.org/creative-commons/ 19jshi (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Foundation only allows media organisations to use Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License - whereas Commons should allow anyone to use its images Gbawden (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
According to the link indicated MACARTHUR FELLOWS IMAGES AND VIDEO are under creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, {{CC BY 4.0}}, ok for wikimedia. No ? --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 16:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. People who use this image may not be a media organization. Their terms directly contradict Commons:Licensing, which says Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. According to their terms, I cannot use it if I am not a media organization, which means it cannot be used by anyone. Dylsss (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, incompatible licence with our policies and as further explained by @Dylsss: . Elly (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Матерное (непечатное) слово T3ru (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No copyright problem, as listed on the file page the image is PD, it is a simple text-logo. In addition, the image is in scope because used on one of our projects, Wikinews. Elly (talk) 14:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The coins are not purely two-dimensional, and the book was published in 2001. Therefore, the photographs are still under copyright unless released. Buidhe (talk) 14:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, they're not purely two-dimensional. Cool. Well, you have a lot of work ahead of you, trying to delete aaaaaall the ancient coins here. Good luck. Kordas (sínome!) 16:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Currency. Relevant quote of this page A photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. A picture of a 3D-object creates in most jurisdictions a new copyright on the picture, something that is not the case when photographing pure 2D-objects. 1. The coin itself is too old to be copyrighted. 2. But the photo of it is copyrighted, because this image is taken from https://books.google.es/books?id=3c6faIlxb1IC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PRA1-PA286,M1 without written permission. Consequently, the uploader does not hold the copyright of this photo and the image should be deleted. Elly (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The coins are not purely two-dimensional, and the book was published in 2001. Therefore, the photographs are still under copyright unless released. Buidhe (talk) 14:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep – The 3D design was published when the coin was minted in 237–227 BC. The process of minting thousands of coins and releasing them to the public is a publication. Therefore, even the three dimensional design is in the public domain. The photograph of the coin is a typical representation of coins in 2D and does not exceed the threshold of originality to qualify as a derivative work. This image remains in the public domain. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep – I don't think coins can be considered 3D objects. T8612 (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I think that the question is not whether Wikipedia editors consider coins to be 2D objects, but how they are considered by copyright law. If this considers them to be 3D, then Wikipedia is breaching copyright in reproducing this image, regardless of how much of an ass we consider the law to be. Similarly, does copyright law, not our common sense, understand that a new and original creation occurs when a coin - which obviously in this case is itself out of copyright - is photographed. Our use of common sense in opposition to the law - if that is indeed what is happening - has the potential to get Wikipedia in deep trouble, and this should not be countenanced. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If the very low relief of coins is considered 3D, we have to cancel all images of coins in Commons and Wikipedias. Madness ! DenghiùComm (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Currency. Relevant quote of this page A photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. A picture of a 3D-object creates in most jurisdictions a new copyright on the picture, something that is not the case when photographing pure 2D-objects. 1. The coin itself is too old to be copyrighted. 2. But the photo of it is copyrighted, because this image is taken from https://books.google.es/books?id=3c6faIlxb1IC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PRA1-PA286,M1 without written permission. Consequently, the uploader does not hold the copyright of this photo and the image should be deleted. Elly (talk) 14:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Profesor Henryk Marconi zmarł w roku 1863. Wykluczone jest, żeby mógł dawać wykłady w 1869 (lub później). // Prof. Enrico Marconi died in 1863. It is not possible for him to give lectures in 1869 (or later). WTM (talk) 15:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Interesting observation, yes drawings must have been done at the latter date than lectures. However I do not see any stated reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jarek, you [have used the sketch to prove that prof. Marconi was professionally active until at least 1869. And now - what is it useful for? --WTM (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason to delete the image according to Commons:Deletion policy. I will add a note to the file page. Elly (talk) 14:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prof. Henryk Marconi zmarł w roku 1863. Wykluczone jest, żeby mógl dawać wykłady w 1869 lub później. // Prof. Enrico Marconi died in 1863. It is not possible for him to give lectures in 1869. WTM (talk) 15:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason to delete the image according to Commons:Deletion policy. I will add a note to the file page. Elly (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We don't delete bitmaps simply because there's an SVG. Especially not when they are far from duplicates. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Except that it is a duplicate.. The only difference here being the colors, a lower resolution, and a inferior file format for showing small details such as borders in articles. The map is sourced from SSB/Kartverket just as every other municipality map of Norway is. That goes for this map, the superseding map (File: NO 0624 Øvre Eiker.svg), and the new map of Øvre Eiker in Viken (File: NO 3048 Øvre Eiker.svg). The svg should replace this redundant file and if one wants to use the map in a bitmat-format the superseding map can be rendered as a .png by commons (this should still result in a higher quality map). The source for these files are the same for all of these maps and although the colors are changed they are duplicates of each other. There is no need for duplicate files just because a different format is being used (especially when the file in question is of lower quality and the low resolution means that the borders around the edges are not shown elegantly). Source of the map btw in-case that was being brought into question (2020, use the Internet Archive if interested in older version of map showing Buskerud instead of Viken): https://imgur.com/a/YqHNV2x --Worldlydev (talk) 10:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How many times are you going to !vote on your own nomination?
You've already had this pointed out to you at Commons:Village pump: they're different formats, because different users may have different needs (and sometimes SVGs do cause trouble) we just don't ever see these as duplicates. We've had a specific policy for this for ages: Commons:Deletion policy#DUPE.
But as one of the admins has gone ahead and deleted them anyway, and you've yourself closed the thread questioning your actions, then yes, you've "won". Andy Dingley (talk) 11:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing to do with me winning or losing but rather making me aware of deletion policy. What was pointed out to me was that files that aren't the same filetype are considered Commons:Deletion policy#Redundant instead of Commons:Deletion policy#DUPE. Meaning I should send in deletion requests on a case by case basis as done now instead of marking them as duplicates. The policy specifically says "Before requesting a bad quality file for deletion, make sure that the file is not in use anymore by using GlobalUsage. You may replace uses of the file on local projects by superior versions, subject to the local project’s policies." I have done this, and therefore I don't see the issue? As far as I am aware of this is the policy. I also did the following, "Redundant or low-quality files only get deleted on a case-by-case basis after they are listed at Commons:Deletion requests. At deletion requests you will need to provide reasons why a particular file is inferior to the alternative version". Pointing out that they are the same map from the same source and even linked an image from the source. I am sincerely sorry if you feel like my actions are hostile as this is not the purpose of my actions; I am trying up the standard of administrative maps of Norway built using government data and images. I can try to make it up to you if you tell me how or if there is anything specific you want me to do please say so. I am open to a fair discussion. --Worldlydev (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What do "superseded" and "redundant" mean? There is often a case when the use of a file has been superseded, such that a WP article will switch over to using the SVG version. But that's still a long way from saying that the Commons version needs to be deleted.
Commons talk:Deletion policy/Archive 1#Superseded clause Andy Dingley (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
By superseded I mean a higher quality map from the exact same source has been uploaded. Also have checked online with Google Image Search and there doesn't seem to be any other site using this map so this shouldn't cause any harm. --Worldlydev (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I do not justifiaction to delete the image, because it is neither a duplicate (the images are not exact copies), nor redundant (the nonimated image is not inferior to the other image). Elly (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above COM:TOO Japan

Minoraxtalk 04:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep To me it is a clear case of "although the shape is stylized, the text is in a normal arrangement and keeps its function of being read as a sequence of letters", which were deemed non-copyrighted by Tokyo High Court and the Supreme Court. --Kigsz (talk) 06:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Agree that it doesn't exceed COM:TOO Japan -M.nelson (talk) 23:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Reading COM:TOO Japan, I think these text logo's have artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation. These logo's are not composed merely of geometric shapes and texts. Therefore I conclude they have to be deleted. Elly (talk) 23:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: IMO really close to borderline but based on opinions of discussion's participants and my opinion, it is close to artistic appearance than just an utilitarian font. --rubin16 (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research + promoting of fringe theories. A map with the creator's own views. The given sources either directly contradict what is depicted (the work of Mate Bozic), or are not authoritative (the book of Semenyuk). Nicoljaus (talk) 09:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, after getting blocked you're now on a revenge quest, still trying to influence the editing of English Wikipedia. You obviously don't understand the editing policy on how to create and upload a file at Wikimedia Commons or Wikipedia. There are no original research or fringe theories. All sources are reliable. Your claims are false due to an intentional misunderstanding of the topic.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the scan from the mentioned article of Mate Božić: [6]. Feel the difference!--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's simply incredible that you still refuse to understand and accept the complexity of the topic and its bibliography. Do you want to cite you even more reliable source?--Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned Semenyuk is a complete freak. See his article in Ukrainian Wikipedia [7]. There is no education, he writes books that Poland, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Saxony, etc. are Ukrainian ethnic lands.--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article he is a historian who graduated from the University of Lviv, worked as a professor, and had various other functions. You clearly don't understand the difference between historical and ethnic lands. Are you really sure about what you write?--Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to the article, he is a former school teacher, who is now "works" as a director of "Інститут українських історико-етнічних земель при Благодійному фонді «Україна-Русь»". Obviously, this is some kind of completely fringe organization, little known even in Ukraine. You can hear the head of this fund «Україна-Русь» here: [8]. If you can not understand that Semenyuk does not look like a respected historian, then your ability to draw a map is very doubtful.--Nicoljaus (talk) 21:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Direct speech of the President of the mentioned foundation:

Президент Благодійного фонду "Україна-Русь" Ростислав Новоженець заявив, що Україна має прагнути до того, щоб повернути собі всі етнічні землі. Таку думку він висловив на львівському вічі.

"Говорячи сьогодні про Соборність, ми в основному говоримо про єднання Сходу й Заходу, але це - не зовсім так, тому творці Акту Злуки вкладали в слово "соборність" об'єднання всіх українських етнічних земель в одній українській державі", - підкреслив він, нагадавши, що в 1919 році територія України була на 60% більшою, ніж тепер.

"Ми втратили Лемківщину, Надсяння, Холмщину, Підляшшя, що відійшло до Польщі, Берестейщину, Гомельщину, яка відійшла Білорусі, Стародубщину, Східну Слобожанщину, нарешті, Кубань, яка 28 травня 1918 об'єдналася з Україною, - нагадав він. - Ми втратили Наддністрянщину, Мараморощину, Південну Буковину, яка сьогодні в Румунії. Тому в нас сьогодні немає соборності, але ми повинні до цього прагнути".

Translation:

Rostislav Novozhenets, President of the Ukraine-Rus' Charitable Foundation, said that Ukraine should strive to regain all ethnic lands. He expressed this opinion in the town's meeting of Lviv.

"Speaking today about Unity, we mainly talked about the unity of East and West, but this is not entirely correct, because the creators of the Unification Act put the meaning in the word “unity” as the unification of all Ukrainian ethnic lands in one Ukrainian state," he said, recalling that in 1919 the territory of Ukraine was 60% larger than now.

"We lost Lemkivshchyna, Nadsyannia, Kholmshchyna, Podlasie, which was ceded to Poland, Brest, Gomel, which was ceded to Belarus, Starodub, Eastern Slobozhanshchyna, and finally, Kuban, which was united with Ukraine on 28 May 1918," he reminded. Transnistria, Maramureș, Southern Bukovina, which is in Romania today. Therefore, we do not have a unity today, but we must strive for it. "

--Nicoljaus (talk) 07:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • And what about it? You think that other "respected" historians aren't part of various organizations with nationalistic tendencies? I really don't see any issue with reliability, especially for this topic. You are making SYNTH claims to discredit a single RS with an aim to discredit the whole creation of a map, also using your own personal but to us all unknown definition of a respected historian. The most ridiculous part of your criticism is the fact this source isn't even crucial to the creation of the map and could easily remove it (and replace it with another).--Miki Filigranski (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You must have meant Nationalist historiography: As a tool of nationalist ideology, the history of Europe's nations was a great success, but it has turned our understanding of the past into a toxic waste dump, filled with the poison of ethnic nationalism, and the poison has seeped deep into popular consciousness ( Patrick J. Geary). Modern scientists do not work like that - unless, of course, they are scientists, and not freaks like Semenyuk.--Nicoljaus (talk) 11:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See RSN discussion about metioned Semenyuk [9]:

Yep looks fringy to me. Not an RS.Slatersteven (talk) 10:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Usual nationalistic bullshit, no sign of reliability--Ymblanter (talk) 11:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Comment, this issue is related to this discussion. Semenyuk is a historian who graduated from the University of Lviv and worked as a professor in schools and universities. There's no issue with WP:FRINGE or WP:WEIGHT because his viewpoint on the White Croats is the same as other prevailing or mainstream views. His other private and semi-professional activities are no concern for the content used in the creation of the map. Isn't the first nor the last historian with some nationalistic, ideological, or methodological tendencies, and because of that we have NPOV and balancing principles for editing. --Miki Filigranski (talk) 21:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

If that's so, why not cite other more reliable sources? (t · c) buidhe 01:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC) I've already done that citing seven more RS. I can easily remove and even find another RS.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 17:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC) Where? As far as I can tell you have found a source that says X a source that says Y and combined them.Slatersteven (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC) I didn't do own WP:SYNTH conclusion "C".--Miki Filigranski (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

OK, so provide here two other rs that support this edit, in its entirety.Slatersteven (talk) 18:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ymblanter, Buidhe, and Slatersteven: wasn't active so didn't reply and the discussion went to archive. So, Semenyuk was used regarding his localization of the Croats on the map in Zakarpattia and Prykarpattia. Other references, among others, which locate them there are cited and show there's no SYNTH conclusion "C":
1) Sedov, Valentin Vasilyevich (2013) [1995]. Славяне в раннем Средневековье [Sloveni u ranom srednjem veku (Slavs in Early Middle Ages)]. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga. ISBN 978-86-6263-026-1, pg. 444: u istočnoj Češkoj, na reci Zale, u Šleziji i na donjem toku Visle, u Dalmaciji i istočnom Prikarpatiju (in eastern Bohemia, on the river Saale, in Silesia and on the lower Vistula, in Dalmatia and the eastern Prykarpattia).
2) Budak, Neven (2018). Hrvatska povijest od 550. do 1100 [Croatian history from 550 until 1100]. Leykam international. ISBN 978-953-340-061-7, pg. 92-93: različite zajednice s hrvatskim imenom pojavljivale na širokom prostoru od južnoruskih stepa preko Zakrpaća do Visle, Češke, Koruške i Jadrana ... dok su Hrvati na sjeveru ili u Zakrpaću bili pogani (various communities with Croatian names appeared in a wide area from the southern Russian steppes through Zakarpattia to the Vistula, the Czechia, Carinthia and the Adriatic ... while Croats in the north or in Zakarpattia were pagans).
3) Majorov, Aleksandr Vjačeslavovič (2012), Velika Hrvatska: etnogeneza i rana povijest Slavena prikarpatskoga područja [Great Croatia: ethnogenesis and early history of Slavs in the Carpathian area] (in Croatian), Zagreb, Samobor: Brethren of the Croatian Dragon, Meridijani, ISBN 978-953-6928-26-2, pg. 22, 75, 77, while 178 are abstract and conclusion: potaknule su neke znanstvenike da ih smjeste na područje istočnog Prikarpatja i Zakarpatja (incited some scientists to place them in the area of eastern Carpathians and Transcarpathia); u sastav područja Velike Hrvatske očito su ulazile i neke zemlje Zakarpatja (in part of the territory of Great Croatia were obviously included some lands of Zakarpattia); dok su pečeneškim napadima najizloženije bile hrvatske zemlje u slivu Dnjestra i u istočnome Prikarpatiju, mađarskim napadima najizloženiji je bio onaj dio Hrvatske koji se rasprostirao zapadno od Karpata (while the Croatian countries in the Dniester basin and in the eastern Prykarpattia were most exposed to Pecheneg attacks, the part of Croatia that stretched west of the Carpathians [i.e. Zakarpattia] was most exposed to Hungarian attacks); If one can surely put White Croatia with its White Croats on the Upper Elbe and the Upper Vistula, the land of Great Croatia, the historical pre-motherland for the Croats must be looked for the East of the Carpathians and may be in Transcarpathia [i.e. Zakarpattia].--Miki Filigranski (talk) 06:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Commons usually pays less attention to the factual accuracy, it is a task for Wikipedias and other projects using the image. --rubin16 (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, source:here User3204 (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Stated source is no longer live (I get a 403 error); there's an Internet Archive capture; however, I don't see that photo there. There are other uploads by Anhuicarspotter with matching, consistent Exif data (apparently all taken with an Apple iPhone 7 Plus) which would usually support the "own work" claim, though there are other slightly confusing things: File:Buick Encore II, front 20200316IMG 9561.jpg is also nominated for deletion as a copyright violation of File:Buick Encore II 005.jpg by a different uploader (Jengtingchen). Though the latter was indeed uploaded earlier, it doesn't have the camera Exif data of the later upload (which has a censored license plate). Doctored Exif data? Gestumblindi (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The source declared opened for me but the image there is different. EXIFs are consistent, despite the investigation above there is no clear evidence that the uploader has stolen this image or others. --rubin16 (talk) 13:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privat eigentum 2003:6:21FE:4808:5470:9929:EE30:76D9 19:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stand der Fotograf auf öffentlichem Grund und Boden, als er das Foto gemacht hat? Wenn ja, dann ist das kein Löschgrund. --Achim (talk) 20:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SchiDD: wurde das Foto von öffentlichem Grund aufgenommen? Wenn ja, wird der Löschantrag erledigt und das Foto behalten. Viele Grüße --Z thomas 20:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Meiner Ansicht nach ja, aber ich weiß es nicht mehr genau, daher laß es doch löschen.--SchiDD (talk) 08:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused, the uploader agreed. --rubin16 (talk) 13:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]