Vår hjelpefil for nybegynnere og vår OSS (ofte stilte spørsmål) vil være til god hjelp etter at du har registrert deg. Disse sidene forklarer hvordan du skal endre på utseendet (for eksempel språk), hvordan du skal laste opp filer, og vår grunnleggende lisensieringspolitikk. Du trenger ingen tekniske ferdigheter for å bidra her. Vær modig i dine bidrag, og anta det beste i andres intensjoner. Dette er en wiki – det er virkelig enkelt.
Thanks for uploading Image:Artichoke pendent.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cnyborg13:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Takk for at du lastet opp Image:Utsira fyr3.jpg. Jeg la merke til at bildesiden nå ikke spesifiserer hvem som er opphavsmann, så lisensstatusen er uklar. Hvis du ikke lagde denne filen selv må du forklare hvorfor du har rett til å bruke filen på Wikimedia Commons (se informasjon om merking nedenfor). Hvis du ikke har laget den selv må du også spesifisere hvor du har funnet den, hvilket i de fleste tilfeller betyr å legge inn en lenke til nettsiden hvor du fant den og til reglene for bruk av filer derfra.
Hvis bildet ikke har et lisensmerke må du også legge til dette. Hvis du har laget/tatt bildet, lydopptaket eller videofilen kan du bruke {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} for å slippe den under Creative Commons-lisens eller {{PD-self}} for å slippe den i public domain. Se Commons:Lisensmaler for en fullstendig liste over lisensmerkene som kan brukes.
Vennligst merk av filer uten kildeinformasjon og/eller lisensmerke vil bli slettet en uke etter at de har blitt lastet opp, som beskrivet på siden criteria for speedy deletion. Hvis du har lastet opp andre filer, vennligst sjekk at du har merket dem med korrekt kildeinformasjon og lisensmerke. Du kan finne dine opplastinger ved å bruke galleriverktøyet. Tusen takk for din samarbeidsvilje.
Cnyborg08:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg har nå satt på cc-by-sa-2.5-taggen da det er jeg selv som har tatt bildet (mente at jeg anga nsaa?). Sletter du ulisensiert/slette-tagen hvis du finner dette greit? Jeg hadde skrevet Public Domain i boksen. Det holder altså ikke? Takk for tilbakemeldinger og opprydning for en rookie :-) Nsaa12:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Du anga nok deg selv som fotograf, men det er flere lisensmuligheter å velge mellom, så du må nesten ta det valget selv. Det holder ikke å skrive det i infoboksen; det må også en tag til, og det beste er å legge den inn fra menyen når man laster opp bildet. Jeg har fjernet ulisensiert-taggen nå. Cnyborg12:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Som Cnyborg påpeker er dette det offisielle navnet. P.t. har noen offentlige etater ikke endret navn. F.eks. Majorstua Politistasjon. Majorsten skole skiftet nettopp navn, men webadressen sier fortsatt Majorstua [1]. Jeg er forøvrig moderat bokmålsmann som liker at det standardiseres (noe norsk språkpolitikk ved Språkrådet ikke har vært mye opptatt av). Nsaa12:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo. Så akkurat at du hadde tatt opp denne på Commons:Undeletion requests. Jeg vet ikke helt hva som skjedde der, mulig det var Safaris autofullfør som var litt for ivrig slik at begrunnelsen ble feil? Jeg har gjenopprettet den nå, så du kan se bildet. Hilsen Kjetil_r12:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:LondonSchoolofEconomics.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand13:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg setter på slike maler fra tid til annen, men har vel egentlig gitt opp. Bilder fra Commons brukes alt for mye av aviser o.l. til at det er gjennomførbart å holde rede på det. --Kjetil_r17:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Lasse Gjertsen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Damn, can't find the email (probably sent to my now defunct yahoo.com email address (it gets deactivated after four month, and I've not used anything else than gmail for the last two years). I will try to email him again and get an reconfirmation. Nsaa (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you tag an image with an OTRS template please always verify the image has a proper license template, too. Image just has a license statement you are assumed to have verified (by adding the OTRS tag) but it still has no valid license template. --Denniss (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've now updated all the pictures with the template{{Cc-by-sa 3.0}} incl. attribution as indicated as clearly stated in the text provided. Understand that we need to categorise the pictures under correct license and therefore we need to tag them with a template. Nsaa (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could you take over ticket:2016072810018861 in the permission-commons queue?. The ticket was originally in Esperanto. I answered in English but the releaser prefers communication in Norwegian (as we don't have any Esperanto speaking volunteers that was not an option).
Thank you very much. However I was trying to verify whether there was permission for the 6 smaller covers (some are simple some seemed not) as that is a commons issue for these magazines (they do not necessarily own the copyright of the depicted images on their covers). Basvb (talk) 12:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to revoke the Permission. As far as I see the owner of the Photograph has given necessary go to use it under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Maybe I'm wrong? Nsaa (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No you are right about that, there is permission for the cover, I doubted whether the person giving permission for the cover also is in a position to give permission for the 6 little images on the cover (for example the ones reading "Unumane" and "Fajrejo"), but it's not too big of an issue so I propose we'll just leave it as it is. Basvb (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
File:Hoegaas battery 1905.jpg Kjeld Magnussen, nå død
File:Hoegaas battery 2005.jpg Kåre Aas
File:Kommandantens plass.pdf John Brynhildsvoll
Er alle lastet opp av meg. Alle tre har gitt sitt samtykke til opplastingen. Dette er en god stund siden og jeg har nå problemer med å gjenfinne dette. Jeg stusser over at dette ikke er registrert. Jeg kan forsikre at dette er i orden, men om dere aksepterer mitt utsagn får være opp til dere.
@Nsaa: I was wondering, since you are also active on the Norwegian Wikipedia, if could confirm the correct English translation to be Brothers in Blood. I added it to the article but prefer you check once. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Iver Brevik.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading File:Trond Svendsen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Trond Svendsen.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hjelp til å ta de første skrittene
Få hjelp
Godsaker, tips og triks
Gjort en feil?
Done. The file has been restored and set the ticket on File:Norvega Esperantisto 2016-02.png Nsaa (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Lotje (talk) 05:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
