Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 21st, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivan Parrales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:I3VAX).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivan Parrales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promo on wikidata

Minoraxtalk 06:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph without educational value. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minoraxtalk 15:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this was a mistake. E4024 (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism. File delete from plwiki Jckowal (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. The author is not dead mre than 70 years ago. Sammyday (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 06:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:SKboxer

[edit]

dubious own work, no/bad exif, potential copyvio issue --Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in sandbox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

category creatd erroneously -KaiBorgeest (talk) 21:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Random photo from internet Userths (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Minorax at 12:06, 22 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: Screenshot of non free content --Krdbot 20:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessesary crop Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessesary crop Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessesary crop Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessesary crop Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessesary crop Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnessesary crop Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: reverted the original. --JuTa 22:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eu fiz o carregamento por engano B0713 (talk) 01:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (speedy-delete at uploader's request). --DMacks (talk) 02:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of FILENAME - (cropped)

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm busy working on this request, keeping most but reverting the source files. --JuTa 23:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --JuTa 20:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fantasy diagram. See https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginaryelections/comments/ivjymp/42nd_parliament_of_piscania_2020/ Slashme (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement  A l p h a m a  Talk 02:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 14:44, 24 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) + COM:SPAM (uploader marketing sock) --Krdbot 20:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manoj kumar rawat 226017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. x-wiki socking. --Minoraxtalk 13:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross wiki spam Roller26 (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant self promotion without any encyclopedia value Roller26 (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User request Blue Sonic (talk) 02:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinicius Antonio Zanetti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Page on pt.wp deleted as not notable. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 06:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giyantojaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal album. Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 06:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on eswp Minoraxtalk 06:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javierramos2001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on eswp

Minoraxtalk 06:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.

ƏXPLICIT 07:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EntersoftWiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not sure if the screenshots are freely licensed, terrible quality as well, unreadable

Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CPALLisM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official photos, not own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaizen-ikigai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All taken from various websites. All need permission

Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SabanDigital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enzo.rabante (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Catalogue type photos, all taken from Dayco. Not own work

Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olgasart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos with "all rights reserved" watermark, this is not compatible with CC license.

A.Savin 23:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTUSED. Random image of a quotation that does not appear to be of COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 02:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal... logo? file? however, not in use and out of scope Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources are cited, no date of publication or author. File uploaded by a new puppet of a blocked user for repeated violations of copyright. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image of poor quality, with superior equivalents.Uploaded by another puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli01:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) per watermark Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Milanopablo.71 // this is another puppet of Pablo Milano Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 03:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camila200225 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on eswp

Minoraxtalk 05:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant self promotion without any encyclopedia value Roller26 (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant self promotion without any encyclopedia value Roller26 (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 05:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 05:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 06:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused group photo, out of the scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused group photo, out of the scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, source?, COM:TOO? — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, COM:TOO? — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused painting. Personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Superlor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work - Copyright holder ©2017 Marco Castelletti per exif

Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anish nellickal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images (:ml:Anish Nellikkal ).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anish nellickal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTUSED and COM:WEBHOST Selfies/photos of family members some of them are copyvios/non-free artworks too.

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anish nellickal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTUSED and COM:WEBHOST Selfies/photos of their own and family members

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 12:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • While some of these images are the epytome of the kind of vanity cruff we don’t want to host (e.g., the same portrait outlined and pasted on different backgrounds), the whole of this user’s uploads contains many userful images pertaining mainly to gardening and landscaping services in Kerala. I was hoping that this DR affected only the former, not the latter, but I was disappointed to see that the first example it picked is File:Cyrtostachys renda 1z .jpg: This is the only one in 82 files we have in Category:Cyrtostachys renda that shows this plant next to humans, showing its size at a glance — which is useful and should be  kept. I have no idea about the others (no time right now to go through the list), but I cannot trust that only useless items are being proposed for deletion. -- Tuválkin 04:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted the selfies and some OOS stuff. Kept a few as they might be in scope/or they are in use. Renominate if you think otherwise. --Minoraxtalk 08:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Instructivo para búsqueda y selección de imágenes.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El profe Alfonso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo with no indication of significance. Malcolma (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Hasley 16:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope. Cjp24 (talk) 16:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Justinrleung (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 0ddfutur3wgkta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Edited from unknown sources.

GeorgHHtalk   18:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some issue Palkisha (talk) 18:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete this image plz Palkisha (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
not required Palkisha (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader's request within 7 days. --Minoraxtalk 08:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Justinrleung (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Justinrleung (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Seems to be cut short at the end. Justinrleung (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am sorry, but the sculptor of this statue, en:Marshall Fredericks, died only in 1998 and there is no FOP for non-buildings in the US. Thereby a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - dedicated 1958, unsigned according to SIRIS. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Jcb (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

=一⋯,=—::一⋯ 66.129.206.136 20:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 08:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Justinrleung (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Justinrleung (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Seems to have another speaker in the background as well. Justinrleung (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Barely audible, and it seems like it's a recording of a recording. Justinrleung (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 22:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope COM:NOTUSED: Not realistically useful for an educational purpose due to very small size at just 123 × 123 pixels, file size: 3 KB. This may also indicate it is a 'snip' from somewhere and not own work as purported - no EXIF metadata. Crep171166 (talk) 23:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The blogger took the image from https://www.manoramaonline.com/home.html, the watermark is clearly visible. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 00:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from Mediaone TV. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 00:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from MediaOne TV Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 00:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AyBars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low image quality and don't have exifdata. Potential copyvio.

SCP-2000 02:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted File:Vasip Şahin.png, which was probably by mistake missing in the list above. Elly (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture, needs permission from Wood Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1974 art work, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press photo, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo shoot, needs permission. Only upload by this user so not sure about scope either Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably taken by Amy Stewart AStewart Graphics and from FB per MD. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anonymousadobo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement of company of questionable notability. Unused or article had enough illustrations already.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Justinrleung (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 06:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The person speaking in the background seems to be even louder than the intended word. Justinrleung (talk) 20:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Good audio files of the same word already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The /l/ at the end is cut short. Justinrleung (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no EXIF data + out of COM:SCOPE. w:fa:Capsizer has been deleted three times. Ahmadtalk 20:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FARFAREE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos claimed as "own work". Evidence proving they are free is needed.

Ahmadtalk 20:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work. Real author, publication data and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 16:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1969 painting, needs permission from artist Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 17:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Flickr washing (Uploded at Commons on 21 September 2020 by same user account) --Alaa :)..! 12:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. It can be found here as well. --Ahmadtalk 17:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, je souhaite supprimer ma photo de ce site. Merci. Hadj Bilel (talk) 14:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 07:06, 29 September 2020 UTC: No permission since 19 September 2020 --Krdbot 02:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Datei hochgeladen Caravaggio2.0 (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Dateien hochgeladen Caravaggio2.0 (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of the band Aqua, not likely own work. TherasTaneel (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possile copyright violation Veverve (talk) 00:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is used illegally and is offered under a false license. I am the author of this work and have never granted a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license for it. 178.14.0.243 05:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Found on the web before upload to Commons  JGHowes  talk 22:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by a serial copyright violator (see Commons:Deletion requests/Photos by Dgeise), unlikely to be own work. VLu (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No objections, didn't know about Dgeise case, was assuming good faith of the initial uploader rubin16 (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Deletion requests/Photos by Dgeise.  JGHowes  talk 22:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:TOYS, derivative work of copyrighted object. Larryasou (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 22:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Friedenskirche (Freiburg) 2.jpg
File:Friedenskirche (Freiburg) 2a.jpg

copyright violation, crucifixus by Lehmann who died in 2000, no freedom of panorama Martin Sg. (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A work is insignificant in relation to the main object within the meaning of sec. 57 German Copyright Act if the work can be omitted or replaced without the average viewer noticing or without the overall effect of the main object being influenced in any way.
In addition, a work is to be regarded as an insignificant accessory within the meaning of sec. 57 German Copyright Act if, according to the circumstances of the individual case, there is no contextual relationship to the main object of exploitation, no matter how insignificant, but rather without any significance for it due to its randomness and arbitrariness. Such a secondary importance can usually no longer be assigned to the jointly exploited work as soon as it is included in the main work or the actual object of the exploitation in a recognizable style or mood or underlining a certain effect or statement, fulfills a dramaturgical purpose or is otherwise characteristic – for example in a film or theater scene.
Taking this into account, we will have to delete this image. The crucifix is clearly above the threshold defined by the court. --Gnom (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please allow me to ask a different question: The architect who designed this church died in 1994, didn't he? Then we have to delete this image anyway because the church as such is a protected work of architecture and there is no freedom of panorama for interiors in Germany. --Gnom (talk) 07:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Warum votiertst du mit Löschen, wo das doch ein Musterbeispiel für Beiwerk ist? Die architektonische Gestaltung läßt keine geistige Schöpfung erkennen, das ist alles 0815. --Ralf Roletschek 15:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weil das Kruzifix nicht "weggelassen oder ausgetauscht werden kann, ohne dass dies dem durchschnittlichen Betrachter auffällt oder ohne dass die Gesamtwirkung des Hauptgegenstandes in irgendeiner Weise beeinflusst wird". Wenn man das Kruzifix weglässt oder austauscht, fällt das dem durchschnittlichen Betrachter auf und die Gesamtwirkung des Blicks in das Kircheninnere ist eine andere. Also handelt es sich nicht um Beiwerk, ergo müssen wir das Foto löschen. Auch hinsichtlich der Schutzfähigkeit des Kircheninneres als Werk der Architektur bin ich anderer Meinung, kann diese aber weniger gut mit einem Urteilszitat belegen. --Gnom (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ich zeige doch aber, daß man das Kreuz austauschen kann, ohne daß sich der Gesamtcharakter ändert? --Ralf Roletschek 15:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aus meiner Perspektive ändert sich der Gesamtcharakter deutlich, jedenfalls würde es dem durchschnittlichen Betrachter aufgefallen, weil ja der gesamte Raum auf Altar und Kruzifix ausgerichtet ist. --Gnom (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kann es sein, daß wir aneinander vorbeireden? Ich würde sagen, die meisten würden nicht merken, daß das da oben zwei verschiedenen Fotos sind, solange sie nicht nebeneinander liegen. --Ralf Roletschek 16:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Mainly per the second point of Gnom: As the church is a modern work of architecture by Alfred Giese who died in 1994, it is protected anyway as there is no freedom of panorama for interior spaces in Germany - no matter whether we consider the crucifix "Beiwerk" (de minimis), so we don't really have to discuss this in this case. I can't follow Ralf Roletschek's dismissive statement that the church is no creative work and a "cookie-cutter" building ("... läßt keine geistige Schöpfung erkennen, das ist alles 0815"); there is certainly room for differing views on the creativity involved in designing such a building, but per COM:PCP we have to err on the side of caution if there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file. Modern buildings often look rather plain and are still regarded as notable works of architecture by experts, so except for strictly functional industrial buildings such as a storehouse or a garage where we can assume that aesthetics didn't come into play in design at all, I would assume protection. - Additionally, due to the cited very strict 2013 interpretation of "Beiwerk" of the German Federal Court of Justice, which is news to me, too, it also seems to me that maybe we have to be stricter regarding de minimis for photos from Germany in the future. It may be debatable in this case whether the crucifix is really "without any significance for it due to its randomness and arbitrariness", as it is neither randomly nor arbitrarily the central element of this image; but on the other hand, Ralf is right that at least in the thumbnail view of the photos, the original crucifix is hardly distinguishable from the "fake". So, it could have been a borderline case - but the modern architecture was the deciding factor. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} requires a proof of publication more than 70 years ago. This is missing. AFBorchert (talk) 10:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-skol 179.236.73.55 09:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is my own work image i want request to delete this one because i want uploud another photo HamidSarami (talk) 12:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-skol 179.236.73.55 22:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 06:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. The true license is the CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT, not suitable for wikimedia commons Schizògene (talk) 00:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. The true license is the CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT, not suitable for wikimedia commons Schizògene (talk) 08:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es liegt offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist Angeblich ist der Urheber Das Filmunternehmen - ein Unternehmen kann aber das Bild nicht fotografiert haben Lutheraner (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from https://merreader.emol.cl/Ranking?date=2020/07/26&section=E&publication=mercurio&action=getRanking Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is found with the same watermark at https://worldroads.ru/park-v-staroy-stanitse. Interestingly though, this was uploaded about a month before its publication there. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, the upload date was in 2017; the date I looked at was the date taken. This should actually be a speedy deletion then. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Using Google Image search, a similar photo was found at http://paradisebeautycenter.blogspot.com/2015/02/?m=1 (published on February 28, 2015, one month before this photo was uploaded here). To be exact: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QL-9VcNoHC4/VO2Lw_j4KiI/AAAAAAAAAI4/_-6kFFpoD9Y/s1600/bayugan%2Brotonda.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 12:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF by a one-time visitor; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 12:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huluxsi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all film posters which almost certainly are not for the uploader to licence.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basheera Masih (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickr source appears to be a fansite/compilation of images collected from different sources. Appears to be Flickrwashing.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Creative Concepts and the uploader appears to be the person in the photograph. Permission from the photographer is required. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the subject's Instagram profile photo: https://www.instagram.com/shahin___abbasian/. Authorship is unclear. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://fr.ulule.com/kerrian-athle-2024/ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Real funny. He invented himself a policy page in EN:WP! :) E4024 (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://eltiempolv.com/entretenimiento/manuel-medrano-disfruta-llevar-mensajes-positivos-en-su-musica-95639/ Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)15:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: The photo was uploaded on 14 August 2018, but the above mentioned source is from 2019. I could, however, find some sources from 24 August 2018 (like [1] or [2]). According to these sources, it appears that the photo is the background of the cover of the song Si pudiera from Manuel Medrano. Ahmadtalk 20:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I imported this from Wikipedia before noticing that its uploader User:MogasTheThird has actually been blocked from Commons for copyright violations and this is likely more of the same, coming a week or so after that block (see deletion discussion on Wikipedia, this has a strong smell of Flickrwashing). Lord Belbury (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo has been uploaded to Commons in typical internet resolution. The same picture is also available here. Mosbatho (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Image, unused, no educational content. GeorgHHtalk   20:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es list offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist. Angeblich ist die Urheberin Ljuba Arnautovic - es handelt sich aber ganz eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Es gibt keinen Grund den Wahrheitsgehalt der gewählten Lizenz anzuzweifeln. Und natürlich kann sie selbst das Foto erstellt haben. Sicherlich hat sie die Selbstauslösefunktion des Fotoapparats verwendet. Eine solche Vorrichtung hat jedes Fotoaufnahmegerät. MfG


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image with watermark ("the cage gear77"), may be © Cjp24 (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious "own work", potential copyvio Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see the (c) logo Oesterreicher12 (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation: widely available online, no camera metadata, metadata suggests Facebook source, low resolution, only contribution by the uploader Verbcatcher (talk) 21:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyright violation, published online before upload here:[3][4][5] + metadata suggests Facebook origin Verbcatcher (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader Davidnikolalde posted this to my user talk page:
  • Greetings, the image was freely given to me by its owners, the Ecuadorian group Black Sun, after looking at the article I created.
This is insufficient justification for the CC BY-SA 4.0 license applied to this file. Firstly, we assume that the copyright holder is the photographer, not the subject of the photograph, and secondly we have no evidence that the photographer or Black Sun have released the picture under a free license. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation, small file, no camera metadata, available online before upload here.[6] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

newspaper photo Sakhalinio (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploaders work. Photo is on IMDb[7], small photo, no camera metadata, new user whose other upload I have also nominated for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation. Widely available online before upload here,[8][9][10] small photo, no camera metadata, metadata indicates Facebook source, only upload by new contributor Verbcatcher (talk) 22:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, available on Facebook before upload here,[11], small image, no camera metadata, metadata indicates Facebook, declared author matches the file name and description but not a selfie, only upload by new contributor Verbcatcher (talk) 22:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is also from FB. Or is it the same deleted file? E4024 (talk) 22:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One-time visitor left two small files w/o camera Exif as "own work"; I doubt they are own work. I am proposing both for deletion per COM:PCP E4024 (talk) 23:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously no ow work. Old soviet photo that can be found widely across the internet. Small resolution, bad quality, scan metadata. User has several copyvio/DRs on the same topic. In case of deletion, please see also File:Старт (микроавтобус).jpg (derivate work). Druschba 4 (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely poor quality and unlikely own work in 2012. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alleged book cover (copyrighted). File not in use Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Jan Myšák (talk) 08:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2003 photo. Does not specify any particular source and the author is "unknown" Thuresson (talk) 08:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found online incl https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1525583219, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For sure not own work by the uploader (other than copying it from somewhwere else) + we already have a properly licensed version although with different ship name at File:SMS Kronprinz Wilhelm in Scapa Flow.jpg Denniss (talk) 10:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked self-made, but appears to be a screenshot of a photograph and credited to "Ralph Muzio" Ytoyoda (talk) 03:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis la personne sur cette photo et je souhaite la supprimer 2A01:E35:39A3:B680:F19E:7D0F:7D7E:1640 07:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete : The media was uploaded by the depicted person and not the copyright owner (who seems to still be unknown from us, since the field was not field properly). It is therfore a copyright violation.
    Moroever, this media was uploaded on Wikimedia Commons to be used on a French Wikipedia article (draft), but "Noni Pop" is not an admissible topic on frwiki. So: Out of project scope unused file who is probably a copyright violation. NoFWDaddress (d) 08:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Merci de supprimer définitivement cette photo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a01:e35:39a3:b680:cdd2:a87:bc2d:efca (talk) 11:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy and a certain amount of lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim (talk) 12:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete IMO a copyvio and a case for speedy deletion. See OTRS Ticket#2020102310006046

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for sculpture. Sculptor en:Eduardo Catalano died in 2010. The photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2081 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 18:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the app screen and the signboard. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for statues. Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons contains many similar examples NewtManley (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons contains many similar examples NewtManley (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons contains many similar examples NewtManley (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful Guaka (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful Guaka (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful Guaka (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio (see copyright tag at left bottom)? seems to be a colorized version of this one: https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/german-nazi-dictator-adolf-hitler-with-his-mistress-nachrichtenfoto/3325897 Joschi71 (talk) 01:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2002. No Permission from the sculptor Борис і Борис Руді. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1995. No Permission from the sculptor Данило Чепіль. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк, Андрій та Володимир Сухорські. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1960s. Statue created after 2010. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag is not PD. Ref: http://onlineservices.ipophil.gov.ph/tmgazette/Unlimited/OfficialSigns.asp?pubdate=1/24/2005 It was registered under the number 16-2004-00079 (office: "THE FLAG OF CAVITE CITY"). Therefore, it means this flag cannot be used freely since it is now copyrighted (registered at Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines or IPOPHL). It should be moved to Tagalog Wikipedia (not English), to be used under the fair use guidelines as mandated in the RA 8293. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following are supporting indications that a work once registered at IPOPHL cannot be used for profit exploits without prior permission from the owner who is in effect copyright holder. Citing the case of UP names and the UP Oblation Statue (all of which are now owned by the university who holds as their copyright holder):

But universities have long cemented their logos and slogans into their brand, and have registered specific marks such as the Oblation of the University of the Philippines and the Lux in Domino seal of Ateneo De Manila University for use on specific goods,...

This is not to say the creative community eager to express their school pride are prohibited from using their school name or symbols - just be sure your design, logo, or slogan (your “mark”) is not confusingly similar to that owned by your school. Otherwise, you must have their consent, or limit your use to personal purpose (not for commercial sale).


In a memorandum released on Monday, September 14, the University of the Philippines (UP) announced that 4 names and marks identifiable to the university are now registered marks.

Citing both the university's Intellectual Property Rights Policy and the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, UP president Alfredo Pascual said no person will be allowed "to use the trade and service marks of UP without its permission or license."

In addition, the new rules on copyright rules for government works as brought up at Template talk:PD-PhilippinesGov made mandatory the requirement of obtaining permission (wording provided) if to be used for commercial exploits. The only works that do not need permission are written texts of official and judicial manner. With regards to other government works like photos, these became 50-50 (despite an input from P199 at the same forum), since when I asked at IPOPHL's Facebook post (through a comment) about the retroactivity of the new rules, I got no response (on comment box of the said post). Perhaps paging @Howhontanozaz: about this matter. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IPOPHIL in the link you cited states that these signs are prohibited registration "UNDER SEC. 123 PAR (b) OF REP. ACT NO. 8293". That part of the law indicates that "A mark cannot be registered if it ... Consists of the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the Philippines or any of its political subdivisions, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof". Besides, Section 123 is part of the Trademark laws in the Intellectual Property Code. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination since this is a flag so not copyrightable. Nevertheless, the issue on the commercial use of government works remains debatable (at least confined to Wikimedia). The final decision for this file (not the present decision) will come after the debate has been sealed with finality. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept as withdrawn as the flag is agreed upon that it is government public domain. PyroFloe (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source. Cjp24 (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have even made a cat for her but I fail to understand the scope. If I understand "Administrative Secretary" correctly she is not the "Undersecretary" of a Ministry or Excutive Secretary of some International organization. Then why would we keep her image? (Please note that as she speaks Portugese, that may be seen as a reason of scope, at least by some.) E4024 (talk) 01:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks out of scope to me. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:16 - Maria Rita Favareto.png. E4024 (talk) 01:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. This is not a trextlogo. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many people consider this photo not true. Андрей Кровлин (talk) 10:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I have just reverted the overwrite. --P 1 9 9   21:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Userths (talk) 11:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the titled subject. What's that exactly ? Sammyday (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Profile drawing of the frame of the painting, delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Public Viewing David’s "Coronation" at the Louvre MET 2012.156 profile.jpg. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted Fernanda Lavallier isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki nor in fr.wiki. Maybe the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant to the subject Palkisha (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused recent upload. --P 1 9 9   21:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rocka1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unusably low quality scribbled graphs with no sources, at least one of which seems to be a joke.

Lord Belbury (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This hiking map has been removed. It was replaced by a new one, 20m to the east. File:Wandertafel_Firnskuppe.JPG Max60watt (talk) 19:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Kept for historical purposes. --P 1 9 9   21:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuzzy picture and very small resolution. 176.97.110.40 21:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution. There is the better image in Category:Bulldog pipe family. 176.97.110.40 21:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Improved version has been uploaded with a different filename
Tagooty (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". You may say it is a quite old file, but all the same it is not used. Therefore probably she is not even a notable model (I don't know). What I know is that Category:Female models from Germany is full of notable models. E4024 (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not notable, not even an item in WD. --P 1 9 9   14:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a social media photo and the metadata indicates this is a screenshot. Judging by the uploads, the user appears to be related to Mostbeauifulpeople (talk · contribs). The Flickr photostream is a mix of "behind the scenes" photos plus copyrighted agency photographs, so I'm not sure it's particularly trustworthy. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi Ytoyoda. no this is not a screenshot or socialmedia photo! i take this picture of claudia lynx and edited it with Photoshop-windows with Paint plugin! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TanyaRahimirad (talk • contribs) 08:47, 21 September 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

@TanyaRahimirad: where's your original, unedited image? Please upload your original, unedited image here on Commons. If you don't have the original image, send your proof of copyright holder-ship via email system (COM:OTRS). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If uploader ever submits OTRS, then it can be undeleted. --P 1 9 9   14:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

facilities map of a campus with the school logo, which would only be reproducible by the school itself, or the facilities management of the building it is in. Unable to find prior usage of this map online, however suspect that the appropriate copyright release was not obtained. Robertsky (talk) 04:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" designation is dubious, seems to be taken straight from Libertarian Party materials. (link) The only thing that would make this able to stay on Commons is if the eagle-torch logo was deemed to be ineligable for copyright, which I don't believe is the case. Thespoondragon (talk) 04:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. ― Tartan357 Talk 10:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Champion (Talk) 05:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Draceane. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from Flickr user Gary Danvers Collection

[edit]
Lacking EXIF data only contains (Desktop PC as author), very doubtful to be the Flickr user's own work. Example is File:European Space Agency satellite photo of NSW bush fires south of Nowra 31 Dec 2019. Nowra at the top, Ulladulla in the middle and the seaside holiday destination of Batemans Bay underneath the worst of it at the bottom (49406666591).jpg, which is very clearly not the Flickr user's work (though the ESA uses CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO) and 2019 RNZAF Bristol Freighter NZ5903 in the Air Force Museum atrium at Wigram, 18 Dec 2019 "Photo: Don Borthwick".

The files nominated are clearly not the work of the Flickr user (Gary Danvers), with the images stating "Photo: Blair Webster" for photos and "Video: Blair Webster" for videos. --Bidgee (talk) 08:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable Flickr source. --P 1 9 9   14:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bessere Bearbeitung Nina Eger (talk) 09:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Itsjagbir (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Itsjagbir: Hi. You have later removed the deletion tag from the file page. Does that mean you have withdrawn your nomination? Ahmadtalk 17:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope anyway. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is corrupt. /Leonel Sohns 09:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available for press per http://www.dangrimm.ninja/images.html - needs OTRS to prove uploader took the photograph Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explict NC claim in work, and this is post 1970. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NC clause and post 1970.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Batch 1 - Deletion request is because of uncertainty as to OGL(Canda) applicability given NC clause in the text of the documents concerned. I do not want to delete en-masse but precautionary princple applies unless someone can show these are covered by OGL (Canada)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would well be that Canada did intend OGL-C to apply to past use of standard Crown statements on documents like these that were encouraged to be reused, but we would need a clear official statement of retrospectivity. -- (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obvious delete. There is zero evidence that those works were released under the license placed by the uploader or under any other free license. The files are copied from Internet Archive, which does not offer any evidence of release either. Also, the files were miscategorized, and some are mistitled, as publications of the Government of Canada, which they are obviously not. (Even if they were, they wouldn't be free either without evidence of a release). They are publications of the Government of Ontario. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   14:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already redirected. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, alternate map. --P 1 9 9   14:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 12:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, alternate map style. --P 1 9 9   14:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Luca.pisu (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published as https://rushfiles.com/images/header-logo.png as seen on https://rushfiles.com/. Opening discussion rather than speedy-deleting because this MAY be pd-simple and therefore in the public domain - it's a close call. If it is, the licensing template needs to be changed. --Davidwr (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jeg er opphaveren til dette bildet og ønsker det fjernet. Begge filene Henny stokseth (talk) 15:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: doens't qualify for courtesy deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9   14:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. Thsi is small size and low resolution which reinforces the consideration that it is likely to have been scraped from elsewhere Timtrent (talk) 16:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like thumbnail screengrab. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, but more importantly, sounds unnatural, likely recorded by a non-native English speaker. Much better recordings by native English speakers already exist. Metaknowledge (talk) 18:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Justinrleung (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Guherto (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cut in the middle of the word -- Guherto (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and Metaknowledge. The /n/ at the end is definitely cut short. Justinrleung (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and redirected to File:En-US-One.oga. --P 1 9 9   14:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality and volume. It sounds different from the word "two". Guherto (talk) 19:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Extremely low quality; unusable for educational purposes. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above. Justinrleung (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and redirected to File:En-us-two.ogg. --P 1 9 9   14:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file - File:USCGC Adelie (WPB-87333) JNU09.jpg Gillfoto 19:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9   14:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il représente une oeuvre d'art réalisée en 2006 d'après les projets d'un artiste mort en 1999 Arcyon (discuter) 19:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a derivative with the source missing. VLu (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Rubin16. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One-time visitor left two small files w/o camera Exif (in this case also half a century old) as "own work"; I doubt they are own work. I am proposing both for deletion per COM:PCP E4024 (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright information for the underlying work (skulls) is missing. At Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg, the uploader wrote: There are unsigned pieces of a private collection in San Miguel Allende. As is almost always the case with Artesanías Mexicanas (Mexican curious) they are reinterpretations of very common cultural icons and I don´t think that they are truly original works. This type of figures can be found in just about any market in Mexico during Day of the Dead celebrations. Unfortunately, that's not a solid argument so I think it should be discussed in a proper DR. Things derived or re-interpretated from cultural icons can still contain enough originality be subject to copyright. Personally, I think we should probably delete it per COM:PCP. --El Grafo (talk) 07:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Under Mexican law these skulls are derivative works and therefore not subject to copyright. The primigenial subject, the skull, is not copyrightable to begin with and the rest of the elements hardly alter the original public domain figure to grant it originality benefits. Personally I think that before someone nominates an image for deletion they should read the law and determine the issue from an informed perspective and not a belief.

The law is clear if you would like to read it. Ley Federal sobre Derechos de Autor, read both the law and the Reglamento.

--Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is your duty as the uploader to provide Commons:Essential information for your files. Please find the appropriate template in Category:PD Mexico license tags and add it to the file description page. Keep in mind that Mexican law alone is not enough for the file to remain, it also needs a template for the US (→ Category:PD US license tags). --El Grafo (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • if templates are your thing then just put it. I take photographs with cultural value and share them for the common good. This is a collaborative effort, some people write, some categorize, some place images in articles, some proof read and some like myself take photographs.
So instead of wanting someone to satisfy your curiosity or ignorance of the law read it before you you go off on a deletion crusade. Google a little bit at least on Day of the Dead celebrations in Mexico and you may find out real fast that these skulls are just a variant of a popular icon with no major issues of originality.
So instead of harrasing good faith contributors you should a) inform yourself and b) contribute with what you know how to do and put the templates that cause you so much anguish.

--Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it seems we can keep it per {{FoP-Mexico}}. --rubin16 (talk) 18:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid public domain licence tag. I believe that the United Artists (UA) (a successor to the Associated Artists Productions (AAP)) renewed the original copyright for the short in 1967 (renewal registration identifier: R408958), so it won't enter the public domain soon for 95 years until the first day of January 2035.

Here are these two relevant snippets of record entries:

HarvettFox96 (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question And what about threshold of originality?
HarvettFox96 (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I believe it is trivial enough. We have some logos in the bottom corners but they are small and DM could be applied. --rubin16 (talk) 18:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I updated file to use correct colors and higher resolution but still not optimal. Is redundant due to small details better being showed by svg --Worldlydev (talk) 09:38, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep As for all the others. We don't delete PNGs, just because there's now an SVG. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a png render of Drammen's coat just temporarily as the previous coat was incorrect. The blazon says the column is placed on top of a blue background and not a turquoise background. This however I ment as a temporary fix. The previous file is incorrect as it doesn't follow the blazon and is of low resolution. The small details in the mountain underneath the column are better illustrated with a vector graphic rather than a bitmat graphic. But since I uploaded a fixed file to fix the previously incorrectly illustrated coats there are now duplicate files on the commons. Therefore I recommend deleting this version in favor of the other one as stated above. --Worldlydev (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination as seems to be superseeded. --rubin16 (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyrighted and from another wiki. See:https://micronations.wiki/wiki/File:RASF_Embelm.svg. The copyright says it needs permission which this never gained. Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Copyright Notice - Socialist State of Paloma.

This work is copyrighted by both the Government of Paloma (micronation) and the creator(s) of the work. It has been approved for use on the micronations.wiki website exclusively. Any use of the file outside of this scope without explicit written permission by the republic is strictly prohibited." Is noted. --Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that I drew it.
Kingdom of Baustralia (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) Wouter (talk) 17:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On page w:sq:Dedë_Gjo_Luli this image is used. I have transferred it to Commons because there was mentioned {{PD}} on the page. I have now seen that there is a better quality image on the English WP, where is mentioned {{PD-self|date=September 2007}}. I don't have more info about the license than mentioned with the photos. Wouter (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously proper source information and license tag must be find out. Historical photo was create much early then uploaded on Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As the man lived between 1840 and 1915 I expect that the photo has been taken around 1900. Proper source information will be difficult to find I think. Wouter (talk) 15:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Considering Template:PD-Albania, I would say it is likely that this is in the public domain. Zoozaz1 (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we still lack a source to prove the date of creation/publication. --rubin16 (talk) 18:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C) William T. Taft, 2019 - All rights reserved ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD USGov. --rubin16 (talk) 18:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from https://www.bedetheque.com/auteur-56680-BD-Gerard-Benjamin.html Bédévore (talk) 21:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


C'est moi qui ai pris la photo et qui l'ai proposé aussi sur bdgest Bd en folie (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, il faudrait le prouver par OTRS (autorisation en bonne et due forme) parce que là, nous avons seulement un pseudo sur Wikimedia Commons. Cordialement, --Bédévore (talk) 22:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Et comment je procède ? Bd en folie (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exhibitionistic nonsense (should be deleted without specific request !) 94.134.217.142 00:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's no nonsense, but a part of the male body, and the quality is acceptable. The topic itself is also potentially relevant (in scope), but commons certainly doesn't need eight images of the same penis. I'm not checking if better images for this topic already exist, it's your job to justify your eight DRs. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept one in series, this image needs categorization. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not know if we are talking about the same image or a different image with similar file name (see previous DR). Ellin has said it has to be categorised. This one is in category "low quality..." and not used. E4024 (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still can be used and has value. --rubin16 (talk) 18:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unauthorized picture 173.244.48.81 02:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

revenge porn 173.244.48.136 20:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No evidence that this is revenge porn. Image is in use so I see no reason to delete. -IagoQnsi (talk) 05:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small penis w/o ... Sorry, small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious own work. COM:PCP. E4024 (talk) 23:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]