Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![7 File:"you're the 1,271st person to take the picture of us today" (3597463162).jpg](#File:"you're_the_1,271st_person_to_take_the_picture_of_us_today"_(3597463162).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
51 KB dubious "ow". E4024 (talk) 01:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 07:46, 30 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 14:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
doublon image DimitriLbt (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Porque sí Sinsentido Caroliina Miiranda (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Not nonsense. Related to the article. Photo of relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelastdessert (talk • contribs) 20:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 19:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
46 KB small file by a rare visitor; dubious "own work". User:Thelastdessert, who took this photo? E4024 (talk) 01:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The picture is in several places like Linkedin etc. --E4024 (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Correct. This photo should be filed under "Creative Commons" as it is widely available throughout the web. --Thelastdessert
- My question was: "Who took the picture?" --E4024 (talk) 22:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
By me. I photograph people in Israel. The subject has given me the rights to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelastdessert (talk • contribs) 11:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. I believe your words and own work, no copyright is violated. The photo is unused and Jude Aravind Abraham is not mentioned in en.wiki. Deleted as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
It is improbable that this poster was licenced under a free licence, COM:PCP! At the given source the image is licenced with the Public Domain Mark 1.0 by C.Maneliza. Had he/she the right for this? Without further information we can't host it here. Ras67 (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering (F6) - here April 2020 (and may other places) well before July 2020 archive.org upload. --Эlcobbola talk 21:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Seemingly bogus claim of own work. Disruptive editor on Wikipedia Magitroopa (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 23:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Post this picture without the consent. One of the models in this picture was underage. 27.55.87.12 17:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Discussion merged into Commons:Deletion requests/File:E3 - 2009 (4981403310).jpg. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I, the uploader of this file, want it to be deleted, because there was a dispute over the copyright status at Slovak Wikipedia and I am not sure about it. MmichaelDr. (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
I, the uploader of this file, want it to be deleted, because there was a dispute over the copyright status of a similar file at Slovak Wikipedia and I am not sure about it.MmichaelDr. (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this file, want it to be deleted, because there was a dispute over the copyright status of a similar file at Slovak Wikipedia and I am not sure about it. MmichaelDr. (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
I, the uploader of this file, want it to be deleted, because there was a dispute over the copyright status of a similar file at Slovak Wikipedia and I am not sure about it. MmichaelDr. (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 23:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:58, 31 Juli 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 20:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Request SPEEDY review. Seriously doubtful that these comparisons of various game/anime images are own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violations. --ƏXPLICIT 00:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Because it is DroidFuzzing1 (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
A bunch of error code at the Metadata, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: I can re-upload the photo if that would help. This is my own photo.--Breawycker (talk) 16:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Reupload has fixed metadata issue.--Breawycker (talk) 17:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted. Lexy iris (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 19:46, 4 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: copied from https://www.natureandmore.com/en/news/sustainable-state-of-the-union-2018 --Krdbot 02:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion images. Non notable person
- File:Pragmo sets up for a beach wedding in Portugal.jpg
- File:Pragmo poses with Yamaha MODX8.jpg
- File:Pragmo poses with Roland AX Synth.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria Campiglia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Either artsy (=COM:OOS) derivatives of copyrighted photographs (thanks to the uploader for conveniently providing links to source websites) or low-resolution pictures of presumably the uploader herself, meaning they are not works of her own and likely out of scope as well.
- File:Utopías. Coronavirus.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Greetings from Nevada. María Campiglia.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 7.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 6.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 5.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 3.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 4.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 2.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia. 1.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Primavera ´20. María Campiglia.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Just Saying Hello 2. María Campiglia.jpg
- File:Postales Coronavirus. Just Saying Hello. María Campiglia.jpg
- File:Coronavirus en Nevada. Campiglia.jpg
- File:María Campiglia Calveiro.jpg
- File:María Campiglia en Barcelona.jpg
- File:María Campiglia Ignacio Graf.jpg
- File:María Campiglia.jpg
- File:Montage de la serie SOBRE EL TACTO.jpg
- File:La Ciudad de México en el arte.jpg
- File:Clase de bidimensión. María Campiglia.jpg
- File:DNI para Wiki.jpg
HyperGaruda (talk) 05:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nom d'util (talk · contribs)
[edit]The files are various files, supposedly from this page of Direct Action Everywhere. However, they are all not found on the source page. Moreover, the website declared that only contents in Press Kit page are licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0, and further searches on the Press Kit site can't find these images. Therefore, the files are unsourced.
- File:Zephyr gun piglet killing area Iowa Select Farms factory 2020.JPG
- File:Animal rights activist at piglet killing area Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Dead piglets in Iowa Select Farms factory 2020 3.JPG
- File:Dead piglets in Iowa Select Farms factory 2020 2.JPG
- File:Dead piglets in Iowa Select Farms factory 2020.JPG
- File:Water pump pipes into building to suffocate pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Water pump brand used to suffocate pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Water pump used to kill pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Steam pipes coming inside the barn used to suffocate pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Steam pipe into middle of barn used to suffocate pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Large interior tubes used to gas pigs to death Iowa Select Farms 2020 3.JPG
- File:Large interior tubes used to gas pigs to death Iowa Select Farms 2020 2.JPG
- File:Large interior tubes used to gas pigs to death Iowa Select Farms 2020 1.JPG
- File:Holes prepped for steam pipes used to mass kill pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Gas meters outside barn used to mass kill pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Side view of end loader outside Iowa Select Farms facility used for transporting dead pigs 2020.JPG
- File:End loader outside Iowa Select Farms facility used for transporting dead pigs 2020.JPG
- File:Industrial heater used for mass pig killing, Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Close up on killed pigs in truck Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Pig bone fragment in barn after culling Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Blood splatter after culling Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Workers with bolt guns looking for survivors Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Machinery scooping up dead suffocated pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Suffocated pig bodies everywhere Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Steam dissapating to reveal bodies of suffocated pigs Iowa Select Farms 2020.JPG
- File:Gruesome Footage Shows Pigs Roasted Alive at Iowa’s Leading Pork Supplier Amid Coronavirus Crisis 2020.webm
廣九直通車 (talk) 07:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Khalifa International Stadium
[edit]No FOP in Qatar
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - Opening Ceremony (3580951485).jpg
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - Opening Ceremony (3581762046).jpg
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - Opening Ceremony (3581763260).jpg
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - people in Stadium (3580963393).jpg
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - people in Stadium (3580964357).jpg
- File:Asian Games Doha 2006 fireworks.jpg
- File:Brazil vs Argentina at Khalif a Stad in Doha.JPG
- File:Doha Asian Game Opening Ceremony.jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium interior night 2009 Emir Cup.jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium2.jpg
- File:Khalifa stad., Jan 2017 (1).jpg
- File:Khalifa stad., Jan 2017 (2).jpg
- File:Khalifa stad., Jan 2017 (3).jpg
- File:Khalifa stad., Jan 2017 (4).jpg
- File:Khalifa Stadium.jpg
- File:KhalifaStadiumDoha.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- comment - I am very tempted to say the first 9 are Commons:De minimis and FOP issues are not defining. However it is not clear cut. Where only a small part of the building is shown you might be able to argue "Copyrighted work X is visible, but not identifiable" so it is OK. But several contrary indicators are "the file is categorised in relation to X", and for some "X is referenced in the description" or "X is referenced in the filename", suggests it is not De minimis for some of the first 9. Would be interested in views on this. Rwendland (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- retain these per my comment above, I think the following should be kept under the Commons:De minimis policy. None of these are intended to show the architecture of the stadium, which is incidentally included; only the last one has a large enough fragment of the architecture on show to give any detailed clue to the architecture of the stadium. Perhaps the stadium category should be removed, and these photos recategorised.
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - Opening Ceremony (3581763260).jpg
- File:Asian Games Doha 2006 fireworks.jpg
- File:Brazil vs Argentina at Khalif a Stad in Doha.JPG
- File:Doha Asian Game Opening Ceremony.jpg
- File:2009 Emir of Qatar Cup Final - Opening Ceremony (3580951485).jpg
- Rwendland (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: kept de minimis, deleted others. Ruthven (msg) 14:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Khalifa International Stadium
[edit]Per COM:FOP Qatar, there is no freedom of panorama in Qatar.
- File:Aerial view of Khalifa International Stadium in the Aspire Zone.jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (1) (cropped).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (1) crop.jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (1).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (2).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (3).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (4).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (5).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (6).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium (7).jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium, Doha 2006.jpg
- File:Khaliffa stadium - panoramio.jpg
- File:Villaggio Mall - doha.jpg
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_crop.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ƏXPLICIT 07:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Khalifa International Stadium
[edit]- File:Khalifa International Stadium (8).jpg
- File:Khalifa Stadium (Doha).jpg
- File:Khalifa Stadium, 2006 Asian Games, Doha.jpg
- File:Sortie d'air frais .jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 04:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: kept last one per de minimis, deleted others per nom. --Wdwd (talk) 08:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 08:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Commons is not a social network, unused personal image
Migebert (talk) 08:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope personal poster Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Based on the file names these are screenshots
Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Simon.Whitman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers need permission, the other is a headshot, not own work
Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:03, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bsureshgupta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work and no indication of PD status. Out of Scope IMO, only uploads of this user
Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rebequinhadopapoco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ValeskaSBAP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jugraj Aulakh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:05, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Signs of protest. -marchforourlives -enough -enoughisenough -neveragain -guncontrol -guncontrolnow (26123623687).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from posters. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not an organic whole, a deliberate collage made from disparate elements, each of which is copyrightable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
and Category:Jairam das Bheel
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, publications, painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Haji Zeynalabdin Taghiyev by Isaak Brodsky 1912.jpg
- File:The first title of the magazine Woman of the East.jpg
- File:Firangiz Ahmadova.jpg
- File:Portrait of Kara Karayev.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan qadını jurnalı.jpg
- File:Zulfuqar Bey Hajibeyov.jpg
- File:Əkbər Babayev Nazim Hikmət Novruz Gəncəli.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Global Student Helper (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Movie + games organized by GSH.jpg
- File:Prize Distribution Ceremony at Khatoon-e-Pakistan Girls School.jpg
- File:Magic Show 4.jpg
- File:Mehdi Hassan Park.jpg
- File:Magic Show 3.jpg
- File:Magic Show 2.jpg
- File:Magic Show 1.jpg
- File:Jiu Jitsu Class.jpg
- File:Jiu Jitsu Class lead by Muhammad Ammar.jpg
- File:GSH~ 4th Art Competition 2017.jpg
- File:2nd Art Contest.jpg
- File:GSH 3rd Art Competition 2016.jpg
- File:1st Art Contest.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with You about it. Lowdown (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ita Yvaté mon.jpg
- File:I.N.C.jpg
- File:Bienvenido a Villeta.jpg
- File:Ita Yvaté.jpg
- File:Monumento de Avay.jpg
- File:Muni de Villeta.jpg
- File:Municipalidad de Villeta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Growthsakup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by N.Smykodub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Fenenko Vol H senator.jpg
- File:Fenenko M V.jpg
- File:Vadim Fenenko 1917.jpg
- File:Fenenko M 1883.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by N.Smykodub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos of historical figures. Some family archive. There is no information about the initial publication. There is no certainty about the authenticity of the depicted personalities.
- File:Фененко Михайло Якович, підпор. 156-го пп, 1894 р.jpg
- File:Fenenko Mihail Vas 1883.jpg
- File:Fenenko Vadim Mih 1917.jpg
Maxinvestigator (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Matthewzilch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Spike in Morrissey's band.jpg
- File:Spike and Morrissey.jpg
- File:Spike & Killing Joke.jpg
- File:Spike HR.jpg
- File:Spike in Sacrilege.jpg
- File:Spike Smith appearance at The London drum clinic.jpg
- File:Spike T. Smith Drummer.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christian Jauch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused image of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope: personal document; promotional 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jailton Ferreira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, images uploaded to be included in the article created on pt.wiki (and deleted). The files range from photographs of the president to the logo and what appear to be promotional banners about the organization.
- File:Marco Antonio de Paula Santana, presidente do Sindael.jpg
- File:Diretores do Sindael.jpg
- File:Propaganda Sindael.jpg
- File:Sindael.jpg
- File:Sindael Oficial.png
Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 16:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:WPAJAY
[edit]
Out of scope personal photos with no COM:EDUSE. Per COM:NOTHOST. — BriefEdits (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Bogus self and CC claims - COM:DWs of various patches and insignia, many of which are 3D objects (e.g., File:VIJAYABAHU INFANTRY REGIMENT insignia.png, File:THE GEMUNU WATCH insignia.png, File:SRI LANKA SIGNAL CORPS insignia.png, etc.) and thus require permission from both insignia author and photographer (upload is likely not even the latter--all other contribs deleted as copyvios)
- File:SL Army Air Mobile Bridge shoulder tag.png
- File:VIJAYABAHU INFANTRY REGIMENT insignia.png
- File:THE GEMUNU WATCH insignia.png
- File:SRI LANKA SINHA REGIMENT insignia.png
- File:SRI LANKA SIGNAL CORPS insignia.png
- File:SRI LANKA ENGINEERS insignia.png
- File:SRI LANKA ARTILLERY insignia.png
- File:Sri Lanka Army Voluteer Force trainning school badge.png
- File:SL Army Commando Regiment shoulder tag.png
- File:SRI LANKA ARMOURED CORPS insignia.png
- File:SL Army Special Forces Regiment shoulder tag.png
- File:SFHQ West badge.png
- File:SFHQ Wanni badge.png
- File:SFHQ Mullathiv badge.png
- File:SFHQ Kilinochchivu badge.png
- File:SFHQ Jaffna badge.png
- File:SFHQ East badge.png
- File:SFHQ Central badge.png
- File:Defence Service Command and Staff College (Sri Lanka) badge.png
- File:GAJABA REGIMENT insignia.png
- File:CBRN regiment badge.png
- File:Air Mobile Bridge Sri Lanka Army.png
- File:Army Headquaters badge.png
- File:53 DIV (RSF) badge.png
_badge.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_badge.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 19:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:ADVERT. No available articles on subject or the company that he works for. Out of scope personal photo with no COM:EDUSE.. BriefEdits (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. Per COM:SELFIE. BriefEdits (talk) 19:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTUSED. BriefEdits (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work, almost all other uploads from this user already deleted Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PEENOISE OF POLITICS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poor quality extracted images of other Commons photographs. Not used on Wikipedia and unlikely to be useful.
- File:Sparta helmet.png
- File:Old Marcos.png
- File:Old Marcos hands.png
- File:OLYMPIC Poduim MODIFIED BACKGROUND.png
- File:A hand.png
- File:Cheers modified.png
- File:First cheers modified.png
- File:Korean oppa dancing.png
- File:Modifed Macarine man.png
- File:A building with a clear background.png
- File:Clear background building.png
- File:Hitler 1933-1945.png
- File:Spilled the tea.png
- File:Drink driving.png
- File:Scroll paper modified.jpg
- File:Modified Ninoy aquino.png
- File:PHILIPPINE FLAG WITH SKY BACKGROUND.png
- File:Viga Parish Church, Catanduanes.png
- File:Labor Day May 1 2019 Protest Manila 3.png
- File:SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES MODIFIED.png
- File:Front of a Bank.png
- File:Police car.png
- File:Arrest.png
- File:Mark 7 nuclear bomb at USAF Museum.png
- File:Kidnapping of a girl.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope (article was deleted).
kyykaarme (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, not own work found on the web [1]. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Admiral Ackbar
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Adm Ackbar Cosplay WonderCon 2010.JPG
- File:Adm. Ackbar & Rebel Alliance starship crewman cosplayers at WonderCon 2010.JPG
- File:SWCE - It's a Trap! (801374987).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Admiral Ackbar
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on a existing character design. So, these photos are not permitted.
See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
- File:Otakuthon 2014- Admiral Ackbar (14843190667).jpg
- File:Otakuthon 2014- Admiral Ackbar Cropped.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- STOP and read : the file File:SWCE - It's a Trap! (801374987).jpg should have not been deleted, it has been posted by the official Star Wars account on flickr [2] under a free license, you go too fast. --Cody escouade delta (d) 10:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
What about the two photos still in the category? @Christian Ferrer: --Trade (talk) 20:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- They were not nominated for deletion, hence have not been deleted here. But if they had been nominated here, then I would have deleted them too. Feel free to nominate them if you wish. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Darth Revan
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cosplay of Darth Revan
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
COM:COSPLAY says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on existing character designs. So, these photos are not permitted.
See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers.
- File:Darth Revan Cosplay - Motor City Comic Con 2008 Retouched.png
- File:Darth Revan Cosplay - Motor City Comic Con 2008.jpg
- File:LBCE 2014 - Darth Revan (15353480081).jpg
- File:Long Beach Comic Expo 2011 - Darth Revan (5648639406).jpg
- File:Montreal Mini-Comiccon 2014- Darth Revan (15784152680).jpg
- File:Montreal Mini-Comiccon 2014- Darth Revan (15970781232).jpg
- File:New York Comic Con 2016 - Revan (30163670205).jpg
- File:PAX South 2016 - Star Wars cosplay (24095589713).jpg
- File:SWCA - Darth Revan and Tusken Raider Sith (17016721889).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep Fan art → cosplays based on the character description from the books Star Wars: Darth Bane: Path of Destruction (2006) and Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan (2012). --Cody escouade delta (d) 04:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment Darth Revan appears on the cover of the book you indicated, "Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan (2012)". That's exactly one of the things that show cosplays of Darth Revan is "based on existing character design". I don't understand your logic why you claim "keep". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment the cover is based on the character depiction from the book, as these cosplays (and as all Harry Potter fan arts, Harry Potter also appears on all book covers), please read Commons:Fan art#Literary copyright. --Cody escouade delta (d) 18:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Harry Potter characters don't wear masks. So, that has nothing to do with this case. According to Jim (an administrator), "Costumes that do not cover the face are utilitarian and have no copyright. Those that do cover the face (masks) have a copyright". [3] You've read this sentence before, haven't you? [4] --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment You do not understand what Jim was talking about. Here we are talking about a book character, not a movie or TV character, so we are in the same case than Harry Potter, please read Commons:Fan art#Literary copyright if you have not. --Cody escouade delta (d) 11:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Darth Revan is not the character only in the book. Darth Revan was visualized in the video game [5], and has been made into an action figure [6]. The appearance of the cosplayers in the photos I nominated are based on these "existing character designs". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment his look changed between the video game Star Wars knights of the old Republic [7] and the latest book, the major difference is in the mask, its design changed. About the action figure, it was released in 2017 (I just read the link you put in the discussion), while all these pictures were taken in 2016 or before. --Cody escouade delta (d) 04:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Gforce-_Ultraman_and_Ultraman_(42219900).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The new "deletion rationale" Harry Potter characters don't wear masks. looks like a humor (at least, are you sure that you will try to delete all 683+ masks images?) That said, an originally-enough costume is just free-license-able. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
The image is old and Space Net no longer exists on The Strand. Newer images are available on the Townsville City Council website. 203.24.71.17 00:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Hi - that something is no longer there doesn't mean it's not relevant. It just means it's a historical image! -- Deadstar (msg) 08:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC) (P.S. I will add your note to the image so other people know that it's no longer there too. Any idea when it was removed?)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion, in use. --Achim (talk) 09:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per comments. --Ahmadtalk 12:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:SELFIE. Out of scope. BriefEdits (talk) 06:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 13:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Exact dupliate of File:To tyske krigsgraver. Et maskingevær lagt på graven. (5986869535).jpg TommyG (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. If needed, please create a redirect. --Ahmadtalk 13:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Project Alyssa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional.
Edslov (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The template is used to tag Dutch government works that are licensed under {{Cc-0}}. However, their copyright page already stated that CC0 does not apply to photographs, videos, infographics or other images. This means it is not permitted to reuse or share images, unless permission is clearly stated for a specific image. Given that COM:PS stated that only media files are in Commons project scope, the template itself is meaningless to us, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused template. --JuTa 05:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:47, 7 August 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gachapin and Mukku --Krdbot 20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:48, 7 August 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gachapin and Mukku --Krdbot 20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:47, 7 August 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gachapin and Mukku --Krdbot 20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Self deletion request not applicable to G7. The original video was changed to private and we cannot confirm the license. It must be deleted. COM:CSD#F7 may apply. mirinano (talk) 11:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- The video was changed to public again. However, since the license has changed from CC-BY to YouTube, this file that has not been license reviewed needs to be deleted. --mirinano (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination cf. ja:Wikipedia:井戸端/subj/ライセンス・ロンダリングが疑われる画像の扱いについて. --miya (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Self deletion request not applicable to G7. Since the original video license has changed from CC-BY to YouTube, this file that has not been license reviewed needs to be deleted. mirinano (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. cf.ja:Wikipedia:井戸端/subj/ライセンス・ロンダリングが疑われる画像の扱いについて. --miya (talk) 11:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Kemuel Worship.jpg ValenJun (talk) 02:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the quality is poor but we have no other picture of this band. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Kemuel.jpg ValenJun (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as a duplicate. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image Migebert (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: it is not possible to define who is this guy and why we might need his picture. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
self promotional photo, no education use. Drakosh (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Self promotional phot, no educational use Drakosh (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image Migebert (talk) 08:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of project scope. --Alaa :)..! 16:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 20:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 16:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
No proof that the uploader owns the image rights Hektor (talk) 12:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Cette image est libre de droit et appartient à wikipédia, elle est ma propre création
Can you explain briefly how you happen to be able to create images of French ministers ? Hektor (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- +1. --Julmath (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete taken from https://www.la-croix.com/France/Politique/Elisabeth-Moreno-dirigeante-battante-engagee-2020-07-06-1201103736 --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 18:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
No proof provided that the uploader owns the rights of this image. If you do make an OTRS ticket Hektor (talk) 12:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete taken from https://www.netzwerk-ebd.de/nachrichten/neuer-europa-staatssekretaer-in-frankreich-clement-beaune/ --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 04:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The YouTube video it was gotten from (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xOzBYdrnLE Feb 9 2020, only video of the account) is a pretty clear copyright violation of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZK38c3ObRw (Sep 24, 2019, lots of other videos of the account, named Aadil Khan, watermark on the video). GRuban (talk) 01:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#F1. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy rather than DR. --Herby talk thyme 13:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Batholith (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: suspectedly uploaded sorely for advertisement. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
著作権侵害の可能性があります。 芯正 (talk) 09:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
こちらのページからコピーされた可能性があります。→[8]--芯正 (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This map is copyrighted, as you can read at the watermark in the bottom right side "Copyright Stratfor 2014". It was copied from the article "As Caliphates Compete, Radical Islam Will Eventually Weaken". TheseusHeLl (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test videos.
- File:GkXfo13.webm
- File:GkXfo15.webm
- File:GkXfo14.webm
- File:GkXfo12.webm
- File:GkXfo11.webm
- File:GkXfo10.webm
- File:GkXfo9.webm
- File:GkXfo8.webm
- File:GkXfo7.webm
- File:GkXfo6.webm
- File:GkXfo5.webm
- File:GkXfo4.webm
- File:GkXfo3.webm
- File:GkXfo2.webm
- File:GkXfo1.webm
- File:GkXfo0.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Jdx. --Minoraxtalk 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Not own work per description 83.250.136.207 20:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Calligraphy is copyrightable in China (COM:TOO China). Creator of the calligraphy is 因弘白伞 whose death year is unknown, thus the image is likely non-free. Wcam (talk) 13:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC) who died in 1976 (per Njzjz below), and China's copyright duration is life+50 years. Not PD until 2027. --Wcam (talk) 03:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment:Photo authorW:Hong Yi (弘一法師) dead in 13 October 1942. 1942+50=1992. 1942+75=2017. I think it is PD now. Willy1018(talk) 10:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hong Yi is the author of the content of the book, not the creator of the calligraphy. --Wcam (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is a book cover, copyright own by publisher, doesn't matter even W:Hong Yi (弘一法師) dead before 1000 BC.--Jarodalien (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hong Yi is the author of the content of the book, not the creator of the calligraphy. --Wcam (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Wcam: 因弘白伞 died in 1976. See [9][10][11].--Njzjz (talk) 00:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Njzjz, undelete may be happened in 2027. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
probably not own work 190.231.218.94 07:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
probably not own work Hilaya45 (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete 89 KB and the uploader confirms that it "probably is not an own work". E4024 (talk) 22:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Candidate for mayor in São Paulo, Brazil. Partial copy of an advertising poster. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1243830492637259&set=ecnf.100010309600780 Nemracc (talk) 00:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Notafish at 07:05, 18 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1243830492637259&set=ecnf.100010309600780 --Krdbot 19:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Not "own work"; maybe non-free. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Notafish at 07:06, 18 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): logo, not used --Krdbot 19:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Probably not an own work as declared. No indication that the uploader holds the copyright. Viniciusmarvin (talk) 04:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:55, 8 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: newspaper content is copyrighted --Krdbot 13:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Probably not an own work as declared. No indication that the uploader holds the copyright. Viniciusmarvin (talk) 04:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:55, 8 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: newspaper content is copyrighted --Krdbot 13:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 04:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Author Request Andrezadnik (talk) 08:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep used on four projects. One (de) is a user talk page, but the rest are articles. Ahmadtalk 13:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
uploader is not the photographer, commons is not a porn site Migebert (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- It is correct that I, Ulf Larsen, am not the photographer, but I have the rights to use the picture. I am not going to argue for keep or delete, as I leave it up to the community here on Wikimedia Commons to decide if they shall be kept or not. Regarding consent, the various models I have paid to be with me in amateur porn has all agreed to have the pics and videos uploaded by me on the Internet. I do of course respect it if a decision is made to remove such media as amateur pornography from Wikimedia Commons, but I believe then that one would have to discuss professional pornography. And if both of them are unfit for presentation here, what about other media that may be disturbing for some viewer (nude people, dead people, pictures of war). I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2004, and I will continue to contribute, regardless if some or all of my amateur pornographic pictures are removed. As an exhibitionist, amateur porn model I do however believe that this also is a part of what should be of interest for a project that: "is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content (images, sound and video clips) to everyone, in their own language." - a direct quote from Commons:Welcome. Ulflarsen (talk) 11:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete; vanity picture. (SD/G10) --E4024 (talk) 23:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the first section of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg, Fred Walsh, Jeromi Mikhael, and COM:CENSOR. This is a fatuous nomination. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As said by Jeff G. in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen 09.jpg, this file are as much in scope as others kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 07.jpg, 08, 09, 10, 11, the first section of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg. Also, per previous deletion nominations as those were closed as kept proves the scope of this files. Also per other users and COM:CENSOR. Tm (talk) 00:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Reinhard Kraasch. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by มองโกเลีย๔๔ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:์NMT Logo .svg.png, non-trivial and no indication of own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by มองโกเลีย๔๔ (talk · contribs)
[edit]both files are from https://news.gimyong.com/article/9848
Migebert (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, useless screenshot of a video -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, useless screenshot of a video -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete No use at all. --Leoboudv (talk) 11:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope! Image of alleged singer, uploaded to be added to the pt.wiki's biography, which has already been deleted twice. Last year, a similar file was deleted Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Band logo without any hint of notoriety, deleted on pt.wiki for improper use of user page. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 16:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, record label logo with no hint of notoriety (article deleted three years ago on pt.wiki) Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own photo, https://www.massbio.org/about/board-of-directors/david-lucchino/ Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
advertising only Migebert (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Obviously out of COM:SCOPE. Speedily deleted at rowiki: ro:Renato Neagu Gikü (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, Poor quality vanity picture Timtrent (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
No EXIF, looks like a scan of a pro photoshoot. Suggested copyvio Timtrent (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Cross-wiki uploaded by a new user, exif info says "all rights reserved", which could suggest that the uploader is not the copyright holder. The image is not currently in use (article was deleted) so it's also out of scope. kyykaarme (talk) 22:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Neither CC-BY-SA nor public domain. Source: http://www.radarlitoral.com.br/noticias/12079/diocese-de-caraguatatuba-comemora-20-anos-com-missa-e-procissao-nesta-terca-feira Py4nf (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Only (remaining) uploading by this user.
Estopedist1 (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Kind of a pride buzkill! Also a shame given that the MTA doesn't care about such restrictive copyrights. ɱ (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not Gunther Burstyn. The real Burstyn's appearance is well-known and confirmed by his biographers, Vienna Museum, and the Austrian Army. Hengistmate (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Information can be changed without needing to delete. --Fæ (talk) 20:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Fæ. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Changed to what? This isn't Burstyn. It's somebody else. Should we change it to "Photograph of Unknown Austrian Soldier"? There is already a genuine image of Burstyn on Wikipedia Commons. This image appeared about 6 years ago and has been misleading people since. Hengistmate (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept and renamed according to source ( https://onb.digital/result/BAG_15513197 ) TommyG (talk) 18:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Wvdp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: out of com:scope. To be speedied, some form of proof of copyright must be provided and "out of scope" is not a valid speedy criteria. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- I Think i Hit the wrong button on the side bar. But i'm doing to many of these. sorry for the error --Wvdp (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- The guy may be OoS but the relation with the animals bring this file into scope. For me it is a keep. --E4024 (talk) 05:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The subject is out of scope. SCP-2000 04:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Leave deletion aside, IMHO this DR should have been closed as keep the day Wvdp said it was a mistake. Save the goats. (I have one on my TP, but not that beautiful.) Regards. --E4024 (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope, uploader is indefinitely blocked in en.wiki as sockpuppeteer. The photo was used only in article draft deleted as spam. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
I checked the website of the artist which is mentioned as the source, and the image is there but no mention of a license. kyykaarme (talk) 22:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, "Copyright © 2021 Iara Dias. All rights reserved." at iara.fi. EXIF: "All rights are own by photographer Jarno Artika. If you are interested of using the photo, please contac www.kuva-artika.fi" Thuresson (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Files depicting Roman Lozynskyi
[edit]- File:2Z4A0946.jpg
- File:Lozynskyi Roman.jpg
- File:Роман Лозинський на фініші Oceanman Odesa.jpg
- File:Роман Лозинський на з'їзді УГП 2019.jpg
- File:Зустріч представників УГП та Голосу щодо об'єднання на парламентські вибори 2019.jpg
- File:РЛ ЛШ 2012.jpg
The copyright status of these files depicting Roman Lozynskyi are uncertain. All are tagged own work by the uploader, but of these uploaded files: File:2Z4A0946.jpg and File:Lozynskyi Roman.jpg are credited, via EXIF metadata, to Vladimir Buganko, whose website http://www.bugaenkophofto.com/ seems inaccessible. EXIF metadata indicates that File:Роман Лозинський на з'їзді УГП 2019.jpg was photographed by Yaroslaw Tymchyshyn. Metadata for File:Роман Лозинський на фініші Oceanman Odesa.jpg indicates use of the photo editor Picasa prior to upload onto Wikimedia Commons, while metadata for File:Зустріч представників УГП та Голосу щодо об'єднання на парламентські вибори 2019.jpg indicates (via FBMD) that the image was uploaded to Facebook first, and Facebook's terms do not match the free license required of contributions to Commons. Rights to works belonging other people must be ascertained via COM:OTRS prior to upload at Commons. --Vycl1994 (talk) 00:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Awkwardly angled and framed; I can't see any likely educational or historic value given the abundance of better-shot photos in Category:Chinatown station (MBTA). In particular, File:North part of the northbound platform at Chinatown station, July 2019.JPG is a better shot from almost the exact same location less than two weeks apart. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
No authorization from the author who is Tatiana Ventôse herself (in a video) Tyseria (d) 02:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded these photos myself a while ago, but prefer to delete them because they are not so typical of the species, and might cause confusion with other similar species. 130.95.204.152 02:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Por violación de derechos de Autor ya que el archivo en si cuenta en su fuente de origen con Copyright ©, es decir el autor de la imagen no da derecho a distribuir su imagen en otros artículos. LOKI ZETA (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Blurred image unuseful, no educational value. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Tiven2240,
- You clear do not understand about photo.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rogério Peccioli de Queiroz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site
- File:Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca por Rogério Peccioli de Queiroz (01).jpg
- File:Parque Nacional Restinga de Jurubatiba por Rogério Peccioli de Queiroz (03).jpg
- File:Parque Nacional de Caparaó por Rogério Peccioli de Queiroz (06).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Tiven2240,
- The first two shows scientist on camp ¬¬
- Moreover, they came from WLE, so let the organizers deal with that.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 03:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Rodrigo.Argenton: , Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope you can have a look here. Moreover our fellow volunteers from WLE are open for discussion here. Kindly note this is not speedy deletion, if they are under Wikimedia commons guidelines they won't be deleted. Thank you for understanding. Best wishes. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
-
- Tiven2240
- This a very unhealthy posture, away further from what we expected from a OTRS volunteer.
- Request the deletion of files from a newcomer based on a no solid evidence is very hurtful for the community.
- Moreover, this animosity: "Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope you can have a look here" is not even close to a OTRS, or even from a regular contributor.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 04:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I se nothing wrong with keeping these photos which show scientists in National Parks. We certainly have far more "selfies" to worry about than these high quality images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
It seems unlikely that the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs would release their logo under a free licence and I don't see evidence of their having done so. 207.161.86.162 05:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
If the photo is copyright, as the description claims, it's not freely licensed. No indication that the uploader is the photographer. Sdkb (talk) 06:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Author request Andrezadnik (talk) 08:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
wrong naming Flanoz (talk) 08:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please tell me which name you prefer and I will rename it for you. --E4024 (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chaiyasate (talk · contribs)
[edit]A strange mixture of vanity pictures of the uploader rather than by the uploader, and scanned or otherwise copied newspaper articles, all of which appear to be copyright violations. If copyright donation verification is provided I think each picture will have to be handled separately
- File:Freep - June 19 - Mauled by raccoon shes inspiring others 2.pdf
- File:Free Press - March 14 - A Real Chance Now.pdf
- File:Free Press - July 16 - Dr Chaiyasate.pdf
- File:Detroit Free Press Thu Jul 10 2014 -2.pdf
- File:Detroit Free Press Thu Jan 26 2012 -2.pdf
- File:Detroit News - Jan 19 - Nigeria man finds help for tumor from Michigan doctors.pdf
- File:Detroit free press Jan 2012 second page.pdf
- File:Happy faces and me.jpg
- File:636356447292339988-inside-RussianBoy-020316-SG05.jpg
- File:Excellent care award.jpg
- File:636356445524068653-inside2-071217-DFP-plastic-surgeon-.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:636356447292339988-inside-RussianBoy-020316-SG05.jpg and File:636356445524068653-inside2-071217-DFP-plastic-surgeon-.jpg copied from Detroit Free Press GeorgHH • talk 21:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Some were deleted previously, I removed the remaining copyrighted images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Aerial photography as this one cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of a construction model. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of a construction model. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of a construction model. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Useless too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 10:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I've seen much worse, and it may be fixable. Images have to be irredemably low quality to be deletable. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of the copyright work. SCP-2000 12:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
1957 newspaper clipping, too recent to meet {{PD-newspaper-assumed}}. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Since when do we add "police officers' vacation pics" to Commons? I will ad SD/F10 to their images, FYI. E4024 (talk) 14:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license: image taken from a TV show, presumably non free. Grasyop ✉ 14:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 15:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 15:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, low resolution, screenshot -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file is copied from Wikitia (see extended details). That site holds no true sourcing details, yet this looks like a pro photoshoot. Please will an admin look at the route of files via other self created sites and consider the wider issue whether they are being used for some form of "copyright laundering". This looks very much to me to be a back door copyright violation, but requires discussion by wiser heads than mine Timtrent (talk) 15:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This seems to be part of a photo series that is © HeadshotPro.ch / Christophe Senehi. See a similar image here. Apart from that it was uploaded at Commons as "own work" while the usernames here and at Wikitia are different. And finally, Wikitia states that its content is available under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike but does not provide a version number for the licence, nor a link to CC which is required for a valid licence. So this is just a no-go. De728631 (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I have seen while using the file that a similar file have been used in wikitia before. I knew that the files used by wikitia are free from any copyright and thus decided it would be fine to go ahead with the upload here at Wikipedia. Also, about the tag of 'created by me', I wish to extent my ignorance regarding the file uploading wizard interface, as you can see my file upload history and its timeline (I have started recently), I am apologizing unconditionally if I have done the upload in violation to any of the rules especially in violation of copyright. I promise to be more scrupulous in future. Thanks. --Harryishere (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is from LDS website and is presumably copyrighted by them Mangoe (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The Logo uses the en:Christus (statue), which is in the public domain and the text is also free.--93.195.203.215 04:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: I found the image on the LDS website at official website. I changed my opinion.--93.195.203.215 19:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of proof regarding a free use license. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 00:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Md Shaifuzzaman Ayon (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, it appears to be a clipping or print screen of a television program. I question the license and the authorship indicated in the file, as well as the relevance of it since it is a case similar to this one. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 16:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Other images from this uploader were deleted for having been taken from the (now defunct?) https://croupiers.fr website. Presumably the same applies to these, which all have a "Permission" field of "www.croupiers.fr".
- File:Rateau de roulette Française.jpg
- File:Superviseur de Hold'em Poker.JPG
- File:Croupier de Hold'em Poker.jpg
- File:Croupiére de Hod'em Poker.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Chronic spam, COI advertising. Repeatedly created image by the newspaper creator (under a different name, see File:Uttarbanger Gramunnayan Cover.jpg) for a repeatedly recreated article on the English Wikipedia (see Uttarbanger gramunnayan and Uttarbanger Gramunnayan). J. M. (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
low quality duplicate of File:NikolausLauda.JPG Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
No sign of CC-by-SA notice at named source, which is certainly the copyright owner Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Vanity shot on advertorial in en WP draft space. Looks like taken on a selfie stick, so no probs with copyright Out of scope for commons Timtrent (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
crop and derived version ist not useful in this way, image will not be used in future with this kind of modification Migebert (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:International Monetary Fund
[edit]The logo of the IMF is likely above the threshold of originality, and the organization's copyright notice prohibits the use of the logo without prior permission.
Ytoyoda (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- IMF logo.png is a derivative works of File:IMFMaailmanpankkiSuomalaisessaPostimerkissä.JPG, which is in Commons under license CC BY-SA 4.0. In addition, the autorship and the license is duly acknowledged. So, I'm against this deletion request for this reason.--Babelia (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand the reasoning here. If I take a photograph of that happens to show a copyrighted work in the corner of the image, I could argue that the copyrighted element is de minimis so I own the rights. But if I crop it to show only that copyrighted element, then it's no longer de minimis and I can't claim to own the rights. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:International Monetary Fund
[edit]As before: The logo of the IMF is likely above the threshold of originality, and the organization's copyright notice prohibits the use of the logo without prior permission.
Jonteemil (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Professional image cross-wiki uploaded as "own work", which it clearly is not. Image can also be found elsewhere online. We would need proof via COM:OTRS to make sure that the actual copyright holder of the image has agreed to release the image with the said license.Minulta voi kysyä lisätietoja niin voin auttaa lähettämään luvan suomenkieliselle käsittelijälle. kyykaarme (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Bad file, incomplete version of File:EscudoGuardiaCivil.svg Di (they-them) (talk) 23:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
-2020-07-30T23:36:00.000Z-File:Escudo_Guardia_Civil_2.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Meet COM:TOO UK.
File:London school of economics logo with name.svg- File:LSE AIC logo.png
- File:LSE Alternative Investments Conference.png
- File:LSE IDEAS.jpg
File:LSE Logo.svg- File:LSE Students' Union Logo.jpg
File:LSE-London-RGB-txtBlk-1024x398.pngFile:LSE.png- File:TEDxLSE.png
SCP-2000 02:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose for the following reasons:
- Since the LSE is a state entity, its logo falls under Crown copyright and is therefore public domain under PD-UKGov.
- The logo doesn't meet the threshold of originality, since it only consists of simple geometric forms and text and is therefore public domain under PD-textlogo.
Best, TheGlobetrotter (talk) 02:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- First, please provide the evidence to prove these work were published prior to 1970. Second, the level of originality required for copyright protection in the United Kingdom is very low. See also Future Publishing Ltd v. Edge Interactive Media Inc--SCP-2000 06:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020091110004831 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 13:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:London_school_of_economics_logo_with_name.svg” under ticket:2020091110004831. --Bencemac (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw some nomination. --SCP-2000 06:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Bencemac and SCP-2000: Could you please also add the OTRS-tag to the other files mentioned above and subsequently remove the deletion requests? Thanks! TheGlobetrotter (talk) 13:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: keeping some (OTRS received) and those that are close derivatives to the logos under OTRS permission. Others - deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Files containing the lyrics to the song Category:Tre små kinesere (Danish song)
[edit]The original song (see w:Drei Chinesen mit dem Kontrabass is a German traditional and most likely has no copyright problems, but the Danish translation may have. According to w:da:Tre små kinesere, it was first published by Jens Sigsgaard (1910–1991) in 1945, so he is very likely also the translator. The publisher attributes the copyright to the text to him (see for example [12], first page of the text). It is a relatively short text, but Danish copyright law has presedents for giving copyright protection to very short translations. I am refering to the 1951 supreme court case U1951.725/3H, in which copyright protection was given to Ole Restrup's translation of the title of the Hemingway book "For Whom The Bell Tolls" to "Hvem ringer Klokkerne for?". Briefly put, translating "the bell" to "klokkerne", changing singular to plural, was found to be sufficiently original to meet the threshold of originality. In this case, a significant change to the text has been made by changing "Kontrabass" to "Højbro Plads" (the name of a square in Copenhagen), which is at least as original as "klokkerne", so it must meet the threshold of originality. And with Sigsgaard being the author, the copyright hasn't expired.
Peter Alberti (talk) 12:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've also started a parallel deletion discussion for the corresponding text on Danish wikisource at da:s:Wikisource:Sletningsforslag#Tre små kinesere. Peter Alberti (talk) 12:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- It is plausible that Jens Sigsgaard (1910-1991) is the translator of the original German song text, but it is not clearly specified anywhere. In another collection of children's songs in Danish, Din egen sangbog (Lademann A/S, 1994, ISBN 87-15-03873-4), the Danish version "Tre små kinesere" appears on page 78, however, both the author and the composer are stated as unknown, with no mentioning of Jens Sigsgaard. In the song book's colophon it says: "Tekster og melodier er forfatternes og komponisternes ejendom og trykt med rettighedsindehavernes tilladelse. Hvor dette er et musikforlag, er det anført ved sangen." ("Texts and tunes belong to the authors and composers and have been printed with permission from the copyright holders. If this is a music publisher, it is stated for the song.") Since it is not clear whether Jens Sigsgaard is the translator, I am not sure whether the supreme court decision of 1951 would also apply to "Tre små kinesere". --Bob Collowan (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- You are right that if Sigsgaard isn't the translator, it is an anonymous work and no longer protected in Denmark. The US copyright will not be expired, though, but the US threshold of originality may be different and I am not quite sure, how high the US threshold is for translations. Since it was still protected in Denmark in 1996, there is no point in checking for compliance with US copyright formalities, as if the protection in USA was lost for lack of formalities, it would have been restored by the URAA.
I note that the copy of "Abel Spendabel", I found on google books, says "Tekst © Jens Sigsgaard 1945", so if Sigsgaard is the translator, it won't be classified as an anonymous work. As the book also contains a couple of other texts, there is a possibility that that copyright attribution only covers some of them, but if the translation was very recent in 1945 and it wasn't by Sigsgaard, how would the publisher know the translator didn't own any copyright making it legal for them to attribute all copyright to him?
The attribution you've found in "Din egen Sangbog" is interesting and relevant, but is it possible they are simply distinguishing between author and translator? I would also state the author as unknown, regardless of whether Sigsgaard is identifiable as the translator.
All in all, I am not 100% sure, there is a problem here, but I do have doubt. Peter Alberti (talk) 19:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- You are right that if Sigsgaard isn't the translator, it is an anonymous work and no longer protected in Denmark. The US copyright will not be expired, though, but the US threshold of originality may be different and I am not quite sure, how high the US threshold is for translations. Since it was still protected in Denmark in 1996, there is no point in checking for compliance with US copyright formalities, as if the protection in USA was lost for lack of formalities, it would have been restored by the URAA.
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Audrey ICON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bâtiment construit par des architectes et donc soumis au droit d'auteur, pas de liberté de panorama en France
- File:Jardin anglais de Chantilly.jpg
- File:Boutique Dior Parfums Champs-Elysées.jpg
- File:JTE10.jpg
- File:ARCHI Cherbourg water tower.jpg
- File:URBA Granvia - Barcelona.jpg
- File:MUSEO Pierre Paulin Exhibition - Chanel Nexus Hall.jpg
- File:EVENT Colosseum Light Messages.jpg
- File:ARCHI Pompidou center - Metz.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy close. This request sounds like a joke. "No FoP in France on architecture" for buildings in Spain or ancient Roman buildings in Italy? Eiffel tower? Nominated files are of completely different contexts. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: partially deleted. Eiffel is old enough, the jardin (first file) for me is DM as it is at night and less visible. Spanish building - not applicable, FOP exists there and so on. --rubin16 (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work and is very small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by The Hydrophilian as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This photograph is still copyrighted in Switzerland, while public domain in the US, it was published in 1921. Please explain why it is still copyright in Switzerland for the file. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: For information, the life dates of the photographer Charles-Edouard Boesch are 1885-1961 [13]. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still not free, 70 years since the death of the author still not passed. --rubin16 (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Collage - includes artwork. Does not appear to be own work, and is likely copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
The website given as source is not a website of the Indonesian government. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
The website itself is the official website of PT Pindad, which is under the control of Ministry of State Owned Enterprises. Jauhsekali (talk) 04:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: not sure that government equals to state owned enterprises, usually it is different. --rubin16 (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
ich habe sie versehentlich hochgeladen. Nun ist sie ebenfalls auf der von mir gewünschten Seite der Ortschroniken. Martina Jessenberger (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Also:
Post this picture with out the person's consent. The model in the picture was underage. 27.55.87.12 17:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The model in this picture was underage at the time. Photo was taken without her parents consent. Need to be remove immediately. Her attorney has been in contacted with WikiCommons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.24.152.57 (talk • contribs)
The original picture on Flickr no only exists. The photographer has taken his account down on Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted per COM:PCP. No community participation or discussion since orginal posting. Refer to ticket:2020073010004871. ~riley (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}