Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 16th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mani tandan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mani tandan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted by Fitindia and Túrelio. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arman Nayak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on en.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 07:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD#F10. ~riley (talk) 07:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cc-by-nc-2.0 Ntsctalk (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of already uploaded image SecretName101 (talk) 06:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 12:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie, Nonsense Martian-2007 (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 16:23, 16 April 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of areeady uploaded image SecretName101 (talk) 03:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 20:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer died in 1937, so the German copyright expired after the URAA date. Also, it is a TIF, which we do not generally use for images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? The photographer died more then 70 years ago and the picture was published with a Public Domain Mark by ETHZ (http://ba.e-pics.ethz.ch/latelogin.jspx?records=:500482&r=1587050366046#1587050386635_3). --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you read URAA-restored copyrights, which will explain that for almost all works, if they were under copyright in their home country after 1/1/1996, they have a US copyright which lasts longer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: Ah, Walter Mittelholzer, that's a very particular case! I once thought about creating a special license template for him that explains why URAA restoration doesn't apply to his works, I still have a draft User:Gestumblindi/Draft-tl-Mittelholzer-unknown. But you'll find the explanation also at Category:Walter Mittelholzer. Mittelholzer was Swiss. The Swiss copyright on Mittelholzer's works expired at the end of 1987, since Switzerland had a copyright term of 50 years after the death of the author until 1993, and the extension to 70 years made in 1993 did not restore already expired copyrights. Thus, Mittelholzer's work were in the public domain in their source country (Switzerland) on the URAA date. - In 1998, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court confirmed in its "Sternheim" decision that the extension to 70 years wasn't retroactive. Maybe you would consider withdrawing the deletion request? Oh, and of course  Keep. The TIF format is also absolutely fine, we have large collections of TIF images, and JPEG versions are generated automatically from these, so I don't see the issue. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn by nom. I suggest you read COM:TIFF which quite clearly deprecates the TIFF file type. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map for a mayoral election that is being considered for deletion on the English Wikipedia. Wow (talk) 22:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The map itself is my own work. I derived it from the City of Hartford's website, which was noted on the first map I did of this city, here. The data per district was gained from the Hartford Courant, here.

CosmicKanan (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. Uploader has included a source for the map now. --Wow (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free movie poster The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 17:51, 16 April 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: movie poster --Krdbot 07:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cc-by-nc-2.0 Ntsctalk (talk) 06:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:30, 16 April 2020 UTC: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/50249220@N00/265933654 is licensed under cc-by-nc-2.0 --Krdbot 07:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from Getty Images: https://www.gettyimages.ch/detail/nachrichtenfoto/jeff-wilbusch-and-anna-platen-attend-the-premiere-of-nachrichtenfoto/1205608742 2003:E2:A705:2500:1117:5FF0:CBDF:274D 21:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Eligible for speedy deletion. --De728631 (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's to much cropped KD Graphy (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 18:37, 17 April 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 01:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unsourced map for a non-notable election that is being considered for deletion on the English Wikipedia. Wow (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Per COMMONS:SCOPE I think we should wait for the result of the AfD, specially since consensus is leaning towards keeping. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll happily source it here. https://enr.electionsfl.org/BRO/1815/Precincts/16206/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjx987 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn as the creator has provided a source now. As for the AfD, it will most likely result in a WP:TRAINWRECK, but even if the 2018 Fort Lauderdale mayoral election page on the English-language Wikipedia were to be deleted, I think that this image could be used on Dean Trantalis. --Wow (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This screenshot is from a proprietary game (Minecraft). It contains copyrighted material (textures) from Minecraft. Minecraft EULA allows for distribution of screenshots however under license terms that are not considered "free licensing". Therefore, I believe it should be considered non-free media and not be on WIkimedia commons. 1 Great Username (talk) 21:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an accidental Flickrwashing, highly unlikely that the Flickr user owns the rights to this image Ytoyoda (talk) 01:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it's copyrighted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HiChrisBoyleHere (talk • contribs) 02:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That user's photostream is entirely copyrighted images, and all claimed as public domain. I'll add her to the list of disallowed Flickr users. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the filename there is the year 1964 that seems wrong.. another user asked me to re-upload the file with the correct year and I've done it.. the correct file now is this: File:Trabant-601 1973.JPG, and so the original file is now to be deleted Luc106 (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the filename there is the year 1964 that seems wrong.. another user asked me to re-upload the file with the correct year and I've done it.. the correct file now is this: File:Trabant-601_1973-Heck.JPG, and so the original file is now to be deleted Luc106 (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of already-uploaded image SecretName101 (talk) 21:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map for a mayoral election article that is being considered for deletion on the English Wikipedia. Will withdraw nomination if there is an adequate source to confirm the accuracy of this results map. Wow (talk) 22:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source for the data in the map. I used this site when making the map originally. SpeedMcCool (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn per above. --Wow (talk) 04:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 08:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt und falscher Name, Wunsch des Hochladers Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: adn redirected. --JuTa 08:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not cc licensed Eatcha (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 10:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not cc licensed on YouTube Eatcha (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 10:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aea.zisan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on bn.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 06:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 01:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry and unidentifiable to be usable. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 07:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 02:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE - out of COM:SCOPE DannyS712 (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 02:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I727 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, commons is not a photo album. And unlikely to be own work if he is in the photo

Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orpener (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Orpener.

Out of project scope. All files by this uploader are flags, maps and whatever related to some fictional state Katowish Federation (0 hits on Google). Some files are definitely copyvios.

--Harold (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Poloha Katowské federace.png --Harold (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - blurry Mindmatrix 21:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; failed PR attempt at ro:Utilizator:Snikuletz/teste. Gikü (talk) 10:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Failed self-promo attempt at ro:Utilizator:Kisamed/sandbox. See also File:David Radu.jpg Gikü (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Failed PR attempt at ro:Utilizator:FlorentinaGionea/teste. Gikü (talk) 10:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikishinvo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copied images, you can find them in net

Barbarian (talk) 07:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Эти изображения от АЗ УРАЛ, конечно они есть в сети, потому что это достаточно старые фотографии.
нужно расширить фонд изображений для карточки описания автомобилей. Nikishinvo (talk) 07:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Урал Лого.jpg should be below threshold of originality.  Delete all others per nomination, as uploader stated that they are no own work, but taken by the manufacturer. --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion; logo also deleted per COM:TOO Russia. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This screenshot does not show the free software itself but rather texts and graphics that are not part of the program and are not a direct result of the program code itself. Wcam (talk) 03:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful for any educational purpose / out of scope Don-kun (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OoNieknafarst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: promotional

4nn1l2 (talk) 06:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image from someone writing an autobio on EnWiki The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gr4phonyx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 06:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Batch of four penis images uploaded by Proxyvon

[edit]

Newly uploaded completely unremarkable penis images. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is whether the image is newly uploaded relevant? Surely what should matter is whether the image is within scope and is policy compliant? I call upon our nominator to confine themselves to nominations based on our policies and standards. Geo Swan (talk) 21:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant guideline is COM:PENIS (also known as COM:VAGINAS). There are so many pictures of penises on Commons that there is a special guideline about new ones. Have you read it? Among other things, it says "A new image of decent quality may mean that a similar poor image can be deleted". So if these new brownish penis images are kept, that implies that an equal number of white penis images should be deleted. It's not like there's a shortage. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
COM:PENIS is only a guideline. It doesn't say that for every penis photo we gain, we need to lose one penis photo. The guideline is saying that we on Commons, as many of us in real life, prefer big (resolution) penises over small (resolution) penises. russavia (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I quoted it. It says exactly what I wrote. The implication is that if a new image is of better quality (not resolution) than an existing image, it is an opportunity to delete a low quality image. In the case of penises, we have lots of low quality images to choose from. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, you misquoted it. What it says is A new image of decent quality may mean that a similar poor image can be deleted. It does not say that we have a limit of any sexuality images here on Commons, and that we need to make sure we stick to quota. It does mean that given we have a poor quality image, if that can be replaced by a new upload, we can delete the poor quality image. It does not say we have to. Therein lies the difference. In future, I'll ask you not to skew our policies and guidelines like you have attempted, because it only detracts from your argument, and reduces your already low credibility on this project. russavia (talk) 01:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not skewing anything, Russavia. I accurately quoted the guideline and gave the obvious inference. We simply disagree. Disagreement is not "trolling", "disruption", or attempted "skewing", it is just disagreement. Please stop trying to label my actions here. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3 Kept and 1 Deleted INeverCry 00:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons does not need you to take off your trousers and take a bad photo of your genitals. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a reproduction of a previously published photograph rather than genuine own work. Buidhe (talk) 07:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prince58albert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS, no educational value

DannyS712 (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Architguptaaviatorflight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images still watermarked, unlikely own work from repeat copyvio uploader and en.wiki spammer

Ariadacapo (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is the subject of the photo, which indicates the photo was not taken by them; plus can't verify license on their website. acagastya 08:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, nothing to see, non-sufficient resolution Joschi71 (talk) 10:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 舞月書生 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image from Rocket Girls 101 Rocket girl 101 official weibo[1] 舞月書生𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚 11:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 舞月書生 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image from Rocket Girls 101 Rocket girl 101 official weibo[2] 舞月書生𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚 12:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ratoncito1978 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res promotional art, unlikely to be own work

Ytoyoda (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image — Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 13:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xorasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

the other uploads by this users were a screenshot and a album cover. These two photos don't have any EXIF data. I'm not convinced this is their own work

Vera (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the creator A1Cafel (talk) 13:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

They used my name and I did not write this paper it is fake and malicious 188.70.8.92 14:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete this or I will sue for illegal use of my name 188.70.8.92 14:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Self promotion. Edslov (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Self promotion. Edslov (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Self promotion. Edslov (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chenostile (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader hasn't provided the links to the photos, but all photographs from this Flickr account appear to be all rights rserved

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


We (Com'Over agency) work with the FFBB and Julien Bacot is their official photographer. They gave us those pictures with his agreement to update Diandra and Andrew profile pictures. I can provide written agreement if needed. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenostile (talk • contribs) 17:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chenostile: Thanks - they'd have to agree to a license that allows modifications and commercial reuse, like {{Cc-by-2.5}} and send their permissions statement to the OTRS board (instructions are at COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please provide agreement via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image - Unfortunately due to the way the picture was taken it's meant realistically it's not going to be used inside or outside of Wikimedia,
We currently have 3 images of the same model in the same colour here, here and here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a reproduction from a book is copyright violation ProfessorX (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have copyright. ISBN 978-5-9909912-0-0, © 2017 Viktor Pinchuk User: Виктор Пинчук


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF, this image was taken from Facebook; further proof of permission is needed Gikü (talk) 19:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon (talk) 21:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is blurry everywhere. Taivo (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says "copyright Matthew Noel 2015 2 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" and credits findingflavors.com. Can we verify that this is the uploader's work? Ytoyoda (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks above TOO (although the fruits are stylized, they are not any obvious standard, and I think there is sufficient artistry. DMacks (talk) 04:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map for a mayoral election that is being considered for deletion on the English Wikipedia. Wow (talk) 22:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. Tagging this file with {{No source}} instead. --Wow (talk) 07:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map for a mayoral election that is being considered for deletion on the English Wikipedia. Wow (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. Tagging this file with {{No source}} instead. --Wow (talk) 07:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small file. Very likely from dorar-aliraq.net. See TinEye search. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused duplicate file (File:Ténès.JPG ). --Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dupe of File:Madrid - Día de la fiesta nacional - 131012 122652.jpg — Draceane talkcontrib. 20:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrecht Franz Wössner (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, derivative work. Otto Bauriedl died 1961. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Mindex (at Green Room, Flagstaff).jpg, but little bit smaller Estopedist1 (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorer-quality copy of File:Blason des rois d'Angleterre.png; not in use. Alkari (?), 16 April 2020, 19:23 UTC 19:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Qualität, versehentlich hochgeladen Berndsch72 (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Qualität, versehentlich hochgeladen Berndsch72 (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Ruslan.kuziak (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test upload; also, COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly Uploaded Rath270297 (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, contextless photo of a shadow on water - no possible educational use. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a certain project, no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyc value for an unknown plant in a generic setting. The purpose of the upload to enwiki was to discuss what type of plant it might be, but not conclusively resolved best I can tell (viable to leave on enwiki, but nothing COM:EDUSE on commons) DMacks (talk) 03:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that this image that I downloaded is not with good quality of definition and coloring. It is derived from another image on the same page, with better coloring and quality. It was a mistake I made. Mário NET (talk) 04:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal ad The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon avec le fichier "Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB - Intérieur" et de moins bonne qualité Kev22 (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 17:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality, unusable and duplicated with: File:Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB - Intérieur nuit.jpg. Kev22 (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon avec le fichier "Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB1" et de moins bonne qualité Kev22 (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 17:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality, unusable and duplicated with: File:Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB nuit1.jpg. Kev22 (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - some guy holding a trophy at some local club sporting event. No possible educational use. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Response

[edit]

The Australian Natives Association started in 1871 as a mutual society providing health, hospital and funeral benefits to Australian for men who wound not otherwise be able to gain this support. They expanded their scope to social and national issues. The ANA promoted sports, forestry, and federation. Australia day was originally titled ANA Day. Like all organisations it went in some directions that seem quite inappropriate today. Nonetheless, it has many successes and has made a significant contribution to Australian society.

The ANA had many sporting clubs for cricket, skiing, and held major bike riding events. The Footscray ANA Cricket club is one of the few such clubs that continues to exist. The club is now over 100 years old. While organisationally now disassociated from the ANA, there is a loose informal tie.

I do agree it is not a great photo. It is not a momentous event. Graeme Hodgart is a past Captain of the team, a long term member and a speaker at an annual ANA Foundation Day Lunch. In receiving the trophy is being recognised for his long and notable contribution to the club and local cricket.

The photo was taken due to relationship between the two organisations, ANA and the Footscray ANA Cricket Club.

It represents a little piece of history. Robert (Bic) Bicknell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert (Bic) Bicknell (talk • contribs) 11:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Award given to some guy by his local casual cricket club - no possible educational use. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response - Support Retention

[edit]

As per the Footscray ANA Cricket - Graeme Hodgart.jpg comments.

The Australian Natives Association started in 1871 as a mutual society providing health, hospital and funeral benefits to Australian form men who wound not otherwise be able to gain this support. They expanded their scope to social and national issues. The ANA promoted sports, forestry, and federation. Australia day was originally titled ANA Day. Like all organisations it went in some directions that seem quite inappropriate today. Nonetheless, it has many successes and has made a significant contribution to Australian society.

The ANA had many sporting clubs for cricket, skiing, and held major bike riding events. The Footscray ANA Cricket club is one of the few such clubs that continues to exist. The club is now over 100 years old. While organisationally now disassociated from the ANA, there is a loose informal tie.

I do agree it is not a great photo. It is not a momentous event. Graeme Hodgart is a past Captain of the team, a long term member and a speaker at an annual ANA Foundation Day Lunch. In receiving the trophy is being recognised for his long and notable contribution to the club and local cricket.

The photo was taken due to relationship between the two organisations, ANA and the Footscray ANA Cricket Club.

It represents a little piece of history. Robert (Bic) Bicknell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert (Bic) Bicknell (talk • contribs) 11:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif, have watermark. Obviously not own work. 轻语者 (talk) 10:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, nothing to see Joschi71 (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:14, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion this screenshot is copyrighted and needs OTRS-permission from creator. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://kamoblog.tv/ Bilgemagma (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Probably copyright violation, see watermark on the file Estopedist1 (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo, no evidence that this is "own work" or appropriately licensed. creffett (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo, no evidence that this is "own work" or appropriately licensed. creffett (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed due to re-upload with fixed title. Skrattar du Fölora du (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo, no evidence of "own work" or appropriate licensing. creffett (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie, Nonsense Martian-2007 (talk) 15:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Martian-2007 (talk) 15:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. --P 1 9 9   02:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: I just restored it and copied the license information from File:Waltershofener See mit Tafel im Freiburger Mooswald.jpg from which it was cropped before. And what exactly do you refer to, when calling it "Nonsense", Martian-2007? --Flominator (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook (see EXIF), unlikely to be own work.

Sealle (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like not notable organization/company. An advertisement? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work low resolution, small size, no EXIF data, uploader has copyvios loading history. Unlikely to be a photo of the "original Kate Middleton wedding dress" taken in 2020. It is probably a derivative work from an unknown source. The appropriate source and license information must be provided to determine copyright status. LMLM (talk) 20:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Si cancella 109.118.116.192 00:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cancella 109.118.116.192 00:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de nommage. Merci *j*jac (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, already renamed. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid author. Probably copyright violation. See uploader's edit: [3] Estopedist1 (talk) 11:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: advertising (phone no. in filename and address in description but no identification of dish). --P 1 9 9   18:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird mass spam attempt - a different random food image with the restaurant's phone number and address categorised in suburbs far from where the restaurant is that they apparently deliver to The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep On scope, useful photo of a dish.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:ADVERT. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

link provides no proof of free use at all 47.223.78.205 02:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No eidence that the image was created by a California employeee -- presence on the web site does not automatically take away the photographers copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Procedural listing. This file was tagged for deletion with the same rationale, but never included in the nomination above. ƏXPLICIT 11:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files uploaded to the U.S. Embassy Jerusalem Flickr stream - U.S. Embassy Jerusalem. But, unfortunately, the photos taken by Israeli GPO photograpgers. U.S. Embassy Jerusalem does not holdes the copyright. The file name started with "D" are the photo id in the Israeli National Photo Collection every phot can be check through {{GPO Israel-image}} and parameter id=. I have nominated only the files taken after 31.12.1969 and not qulify as {{PD-Israel}}.

-- Geagea (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SantiagoG971 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Julio Cesar Romera (d. 2006), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still from an UK TV series, no reason for U.S. Law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC) At the time the template was {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Well, it applys to the laws for the public domain license I now put below. Bacromisee 05:10 April 19, 2020 (UTC)
@Bacromisee: Again a funny license? {{PD-UK-posthumous-non-photo-1996}} doesn't fit: image (or screenshot) is too recent to be public domain in UK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence it's an U.S. work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain yet in Hungary. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Source country UK has low threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep.
Je ne sais pas pourquoi ces fichiers sont proposés à la suppression, ni la catégorie qui contient des photos de jouets en plastiques, de peluches, de déguisements et de boissons. On m'a notifié, mais je n'ai fait que transférer depuis Flickr certains fichiers, dans le cadre permis par la licence
. X-Javier (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS, 3D designed object that's likely not in public domain.


Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between the picture of these small sculptures placed in a context, with pictures of a sculpture by a contemporary artist? a.m. COM:TOYS doesn't clarify on this.Chescargot (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chescargot For our purposes, not that much. Though many countries allow freedom of panorama, where copyright doesn't apply to art (or "art") placed in public locations, though that depends on the local laws. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Would the addition of {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}, similar to what is done here, do the trick to save the picts? Chescargot (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chescargot No, the tag you mentioned is about copyright in the photo, but the problem here is copyright in the toys. Brianjd (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok. But now you mention it, the picture of barbapapa and -mama is not at all a picture of toys, but a picture of ceramic sculptures/statues.Chescargot (talk) 14:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chescargot I did not know what they were; I was just following the nomination.
It doesn’t really matter from a copyright point of view. (If anything, being sculptures makes things slightly worse, because you lose what little chance you had of claiming that they had a functional use and therefore a copyright exemption.) Brianjd (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 10:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, derivative of work that was first published way too recently to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ErnestoLazarte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eraevsky. Every image from http://hm.msu.ru may be found earlier on different websites under an unfree license. So obviously http://hm.msu.ru is not their author and can't relicense them under a CC license. http://hm.msu.ru itself changed their license from 1996–2014 © Факультет ВМК МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова to a CC one before the uploads (2018).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jouma is in Lebanon and has no "National" Parliament. The party names are in pseudo-Japanese and don't seem to exist. Fantays diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mis information in main image, the view of the site is monte alban, in Oaxaca, all the rest of the images are correctly cited 201.103.29.159 16:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Moved. The DR can be closed as unsuccessful --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

She died in 1932, so this is too recent to assume that the artist has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file makes no mention of the artist, so why is that relevant? The license on the photo says the individual who took the photo has released it, that should be sufficient, no? Kaiser matias (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, I found the sculptor: Ivan Shadr (1887—1941), which does show he has been dead for 70 years. Kaiser matias (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - withdrawn by nom. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was made public domain by it's author. Geek3 (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW of copyrighted helicopter model. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It claims to be a picture of a secretive egyptian special forces. The original poster is chinese, so its unlikely its his own work. This picture also appears on numerous websites before the posting on Wikimedia commons. It is also the successor to two other circa 2010-11 pictures that were deleted for the same reasons. The picture is also likely fake and appears to be from either a movie, video game, or reenactment. AttackHelicopter51 (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haywon123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is possibly a case of Flickr washing. All uploads come from Flickr and the corresponding flickr users ([4], [5], [6], [7]) happen to have published just these few pics which were subsequently uploaded by Haywon123. Once these Flickr accounts were created and got their images uploaded their were transfered to Commons without delay.

AFBorchert (talk) 06:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFBorchert I claim and acknowledge that I did not create a Flickr account or uploaded the pictures to Flickr. The photos were uploaded from the artists accounts as you can see in the usernames. I just follow these artists on Flickr. Therefore, I got a notification to my phone the moment they went online, and I uploaded them to Wikimedia right away. Another point is that I don't believe you can find these pictures on social media. I did some Google search by image and I could not find any of the pictures. I believe they were solely uploaded on Flickr. Therefore, I don't believe this is license laundering/Flickr washing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haywon123 (talk • contribs) 06:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Please let me know if you have any questions.[reply]

Sorry but this does not appear to be trustworthy. You are already involved in sockpuppetry. Once you have learnt from the first upload that Flickr can be successfully used for license laundering, you continued to abuse Flickr and Commons for this. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AFBorchert, I totally understand your concern. I already explained why I was misunderstood for Sockpuppetry and my block is still under review. I am not sure what decision will be taken for my sockpuppetry case, but I promise you that this is not license laundering. The artists are the ones that uploaded the pictures, not me. I wish there was a way I could prove it for you... I can try contacting the artists if that would make you gain back the trust towards me and my account, but I guarantee and promise you that I am not the one who uploaded the pictures to Flickr in the sake of license laundering and/or using them on Wikipedia for Flickr washing. Please let me know what would work best for you. (talk) 09:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... yes the “roommate” theory – where one hand created a draft for Naseem Alatrash on 9 September 2019 while the other hand kindly created the corresponding Flickr account in September to upload this picture on 15 September 2019. This was subsequently uploaded as File:Naseem Alatrash.jpg on Commons and added to the draft on 27 September 2019. GSS summarized this collaboration quite well. In case of File:Liza Jane.jpg, the Flickr account was created in November 2019, its only picture uploaded on 24 November from which it was transfered to Commons and added on the very same day. It is hard to tell what is going on here. Your “roommate” disclosed a COI and paid editing is suspected. We are less concerned about COI at Commons. However, even if you are in contact with or working for the respective artists, this needs to be done properly and Flickr must not be used to short-circuit this. File:Liza Jane.jpg is unlikely to be taken by herself as claimed. And in case of File:Fatrin Krajka.jpg we would need a written permission from the copyright holder, i.e. Altin Celmeta PHOTOGRAPHY per EXIF data, through COM:OTRS. The corresponding Flickr account which is obviously not the one by Altin Celmeta PHOTOGRAPHY was created in September 2019, its only picture uploaded on 4 September 2019, and transfered to Commons on 26 September 2019 to add it to the corresponding article. --AFBorchert (talk) 00:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And the next sockpuppet appeared at en:wp. Another roommate? --AFBorchert (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AFBorchert, I understand that you don't trust me, and you are right for not doing so. However, I want to gain your trust and I am willing to do it in any way possible. Do you want me to contact Liza Jane and Fatrin Krajka, and ask for their photographer/their permission for keeping the photos? Please let me know. I am willing to do it. I want to prove that I am not license laundering because I am really not doing so. And for the "roommate" story, the story is true. I don't even care about the account Musiclover20199, it is not mine. Again, you are right for not trusting me, but I promise you that I am only trying to be a good Wikipedia contributor, and I want to prove it in any way possible. Please let me know what you need me to do and I will proceed with it for proving every single word of mine. --Haywon123 (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The last photo in the list above, File:Andrew Andraos.jpg, refers to ticket:2019052310000457. I cannot comment to that ticket in public in detail but I do not think that it is genuine. I have outlined my reasoning for this in a note that is attached to that ticket. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AFBorchert, how can I access the ticket? I tried logging in through Wikimedia OTRS but it does not seem like I am able to do it. Please advise me (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haywon123 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia OTRS is subject to the meta:Access to nonpublic personal data policy, access is restricted to OTRS volunteers. See meta:OTRS for more information. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AFBorchert, I am not sure how to fix File:Andrew Andraos.jpg problem, but I believe it was solved a while ago (maybe a year ago), I am not sure though. How can I proceed with fixing the problems for the rest of the files? Please advise me. -- Thank you for your help. (Haywon123 (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Haywon123, all this would require trust. And at least from my viewpoint, I do not consider yourself trustworthy on base of the tickets related to your uploads, the use of the Flickr accounts, and the sockpuppetry. Sorry. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AFBorchert, how can I gain back your trust? I can do it in whatever way it takes... I promise and pledge that none of these artists or photographer will ever contact Wikimedia for taking down any of the pictures. I am 100% sure that this is not license laundering. Do you want me to talk with one of the artists as a way of proving it? Please let me know who and I will contact the artist through Instagram dm. I believe they all have Instagram accounts. -- I promise you that this will be the last time I encounter similar problems on Wikipedia. It was my fault for not knowing all the rules, but now I do. I hope you can forgive me. It will be the first and last time, I promise (Haywon123 (talk) 19:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hi GSS & AFBorchert, I talked to Fatrin Krajka and Andrew Andraos, and they are both able to ask their photographers to send an email to you clarifying that you have the rights to use the pictures. I contacted both of them through their Instagram profiles. Also to clarify, I am not getting paid for that in any way. I am only doing it to hopefully get back your trust and to be a good Wikipedia contributor. To which email should their photographers send the message to? Please let me know (Haywon123 (talk) 04:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Also, Andrew Andraos told me that he communicated in May 2019 about the picture File:Andrew Andraos.jpg with Alfred Neumann through permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, and according to his emails, it was clarified that Wikimedia has all the rights to use the picture. Therefore, I am not sure why the picture is nominated for deletion. (Haywon123 (talk) 05:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: All of them except File:Andrew Andraos.jpg do not have OTRS tickets and there's reason to suspect Flickrwashing. Should this all be sorted out, the uploader can go to COM:REFUND for undeletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Euro2024 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: not used
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For my eye, copy of file:Kit shorts fcporto1516h.png. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation https://www.golosarmenii.am/article/23423/orel--podbityj-v-rodnom-gnezde# Bilgemagma (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://art.biblioclub.ru/picture_41898_rojdestvo/ Bilgemagma (talk) 11:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот дубль File:Лужа._Мост._P1140427.jpg Pansosh (talk) 04:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (not the exact same photo, therefore, does not qualify for COM:DUPE). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These two characters are beyond the threshold for copyright protection, c.f. the "LY" company logo examples on the page COM:TOO China. Wcam (talk) 11:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is no visible characters in the logo, just simple geometry, which is still in the threshold of COM:TOO China. VulpesVulpes825 (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 14:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The previous DR failed to compare this logo with the copyrighted examples in COM:TOO China properly. The LY logo consists of only a simple ellipse and the letters L and Y; the Gang Heng logo contains only partial ellipses and simple letters. The logo in question is apparently a more complex geometric shape and shows more creative elements than the aforementioned two examples. Wcam (talk) 12:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Essentially duplicate image in the original file format and at a higher resolution exists at File:Erwin Canham in Boston.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:US Marine in action at Peleliu Island, Palau Islands, Ca HD-SN-99-02841.jpg with low resolution Drakosh (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Press photo Martian-2007 (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no, it is a screenshot from YouTube under CC license, see the source. it can be viewed around 8:35. - MHIRM talk 08:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor copy of File:Tanner scale-male.png Bilgemagma (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I do not see the problem. It's supposed to be a screenshot from a YouTube video with a compatible license with Commons. The "English description" indicates the time frame from video attached with this picture (3:36). --Apoxyomenus (talk) 18:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For whole video the screenshot is de minimis, but on this photo it is main object and needs permission from screenshot author or evidence of free license. Taivo (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (the image behind the subjected is assumed copyrighted). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Festivallyly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

They're marked CC-BY-SA-self, but credited to different photographers. No evidence of permission.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Kept: files with OTRS permission. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Comment I do not see the problem. It's supposed to be a screenshot from a YouTube video with a compatible license with Commons. The "English description" indicates the time frame from video attached with this picture (0:57). Did you check the video license? --Apoxyomenus (talk) 18:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I checked. For whole video the screenshot is de minimis, but on these photos it is main object and needs permission from screenshot author or evidence for free license. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (Image in the background is copyrighted). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyrighted work without author's permission- User:RoyalCathayan is not owner Tibet Nation (talk) 23:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Funcionally it is a duplicate of File:IRFU flag.svg. Similarities are even more evident if you compare second to last version of IRFU flag (as I edited it this week). Both were created by the same user User:Setanta Saki (formerly Caomhan27) who uploaded tones of variants of the same files: in every possible format - flags, coats of arms, SVG, PNG, JPG etc.

These two files have exactly the same purpose - they are Irish rugby flags. Both are in the same format. One is used widely (IRFU flag), the other is not used at all (this one).

You might have seen applications like this before - it's because I'm trying to clean up this mess of multiple Irish flags. So I can't promiss it will be the last deletion request.

Aʀvєδuι + 11:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was intending to load the png version of this image, which has been done DavidCane (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was intending to load the png version of this image, which has been done DavidCane (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from http://esyria.sy/sites/code/index.php?site=damascus&p=stories&category=ruins&filename=201408020906331 Ytoyoda (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se creo por error y es duplicado de titulo similar Rujomar (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 07:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:OOS whole category: Category:Twin_Peaks_All-Star_Bikini_Contest_2010 which includes 254 images its a private image collection of a Bikini contest filled with personality rights issues. None of the images are used on Wikimedia projects Moreover, whole collection is available on Flickr: no archival or educational reason for keeping this content. There is also no evidence that this documents any notable individuals, Sadads (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Northamerica1000: Incremental deletion of topics as I find them -- just found these two categories that appear well out of scope of our educational intent. I didn't want to do a huge batch of these all at once, and see a backfire of conversation: I had a good chance to evaluate this particular collection however. Sadads (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 05:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images contain non-free logo (File:Hefei-metro-logo.png) in the top left corner that needs to be removed.

Wcam (talk) 11:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can {{De minimis}} be suitable for them? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: I do not think so. De minimis applies to incidental duplication of copyrighted materials, and the copyrighted materials are not the focus of such duplication. However, in this case, in making these maps the creator needs to deliberately duplicate the non-free logo in its whole form, and the logo can be easily removed from the maps. There is no reason to keep the logo and defend the infringement with {{De minimis}}. --Wcam (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: De minimis. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent (2000-present) copyrighted murals. US does not have freedom of panorama for artworks.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Files are very different, have different copyright status, please nominate them in separate DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of contemporary murals all completed in recent years. These works are not public domain. Some might even include derived works of copyrighted images. Per COM:FOP US we should not host these on Commons.

Missvain (talk) 18:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Self keeping this and I'll just nominate them all as separate things. --Missvain (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary murals that have been painted in the past decade (on average). None of these are public domain and per COM:FOP US we should not host this on Commons.

Missvain (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Missvain,
    Stop this massive nomination, all murals are different cases.
    i.e., This, is not a copyvio;

Kept: Self keeping this and I'll just nominate them all as separate things. --Missvain (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seeking opinions - possible spam. it may or may not be a logo. the file is uploaded by and being included in a wp article, by a cross wiki spammer (who is globally blocked). But I am unable to read Japanese to verify if it has a proper usage. i reverted the edits of the article, and soon thereafter another sock re-added most of the same information. I don't want to get in an edit war for possible legit edits in a language I can't read. Quakewoody (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not attributed to Fars photographers and isn't watermarked as a work by Fars. I couldn't find it on a gallery page of Fars, either. Fars News isn't likely to be the copyright holder. Ahmadtalk 19:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The license line at the bottom of pages of Farsnews is general. If they publish a picture and not mention that it's from another source with a different licence, that's infringement. Then the copyright holder can file a complaint against the news agency. In this particular case, it is very likely that the news agency has had a reporter at the event (the article on Farsnews starts with the phrase "به گزارش خبرنگار دفاعی خبرگزاری فارس" which translates to "According to the defense correspondent of Fars News Agency"). Now, it could be that the photo is not taken by a Farsnews photographer, but given that the photo is taken in a military HQ, I think it is likely that they have had the photo taken for them by a trusted photographer of the IRGC (for obvious security reasons) and then they have acquired the photo and the required rights to publish it as is. So I don't think there is an issue, unless there is a credible claim on the photo. Dalba 21:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I think it was taken by a photographer of the IRGC, and that's the point. I think it's unlikely for the photographer to release the photo under CC-BY 4.0 permission (or any other license - my point is that it's quite unlikely for Fars to even ask the photographer of the IRGC to publish their photo under a license). Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Tasnim News Agency, "all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency [Tasnim] photographers are presumed to be outside this [CC-BY 4.0] license". Although that discussion was focused on Tasnim, I think other agencies are more or less the same. For Fars, I think there are many examples of problematic photos when talking about their website posts (and not the gallery). I think it's likely for the photo to be outside CC-BY 4.0 license, per COM:PCP. Ahmadtalk 21:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    See also: Mehr's gallery of similar photos categorized as "دریافتی" ("received"). "Received" photos are not the agency's work and the agency is not the copyright holder. Usually, such photos are problematic and, under COM:PCP, are likely to be deleted. Ahmadtalk 21:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, maybe, maybe not. I'm not going to extend the discussion by more speculations. Don't know if Fars has a Received or similar photos section or not... Anyway, to the closing admin, if it gets decided that Farsnews photos should treated the same as Tasnim, then please add the same warnings to the template. Dalba 22:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced map for a mayoral election article that is being considered for deletion. Wow (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]