Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![20 File:Juan Pablo Roa, foto del álbum "perdiendo todo".jpg](#File:Juan_Pablo_Roa,_foto_del_álbum_"perdiendo_todo".jpg){kind=link}
![52 File:Is there "Enough" of education!.jpg](#File:Is_there_"Enough"_of_education!.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![78 File:"Erämaateatteria katsomassa Utjoen Kevolla" elokuvan juliste. Graafinen suunittelu Jukka Tarkiainen.jpg](#File:"Erämaateatteria_katsomassa_Utjoen_Kevolla"_elokuvan_juliste._Graafinen_suunittelu_Jukka_Tarkiainen.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_em_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Get out, idiot. --Hellickhook (talk) 00:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Likely not uploader's "own work" given its online prevalence. Cryptic Canadian 00:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
that's my own work, you retard. --Hellickhook (talk) 00:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Wannaren_screenshot.png Miactroll (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal work by the uploader; likely out of COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 06:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 16:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Lucphan (talk) 13:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ARR @ flickr. --Achim (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Lucphan (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ARR @ flickr. --Achim (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Also the crop, File:Isaac Newton by Quentin Blake - 1585274 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This is a derivative work of the drawing by Quentin Blake. The drawing is the main subject of the picture, so COM:DM doesn't apply. It's a graphical work, so COM:FOP doesn't apply either. bjh21 (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright violation. Will also delete other problematic images from same category. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Je l'ai téléversé par erreur Rockilib 04:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
bassa risoluzione Artemio982 (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hellickhock (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Dr manhole 3rd.jpg
- File:No stephen hillenburg.jpg
- File:CBy-xHdd 400x400.jpg
- File:Coronavirus doctor manhole.jpg
- File:Harold Slikk SpriteHD.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: All copyvios, user blocked indef per block evasion. --Achim (talk) 20:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
File:കൊറോണ വൈറസ് ; ലക്ഷണങ്ങൾ, മുൻകരുതലുകൾ, പ്രതിരോധം.ഡോ .അബ്ദുൽ കാദർ ഫരീദ്ഷിഫ ജിദ്ദ പോളിക്ലിന.webm
[edit]Please check properly before uploading , it's not freely licensed Eatcha (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Similar problem with File:CoronaVirus Safety Measures.webm -- Eatcha (talk) 15:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 09:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
版权错误，应当删除。 Miactroll (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 10:43, 9 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation: not own work by uploader, just a Google Search result MarekOrolov (talk) 10:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:15, 9 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5239239/mediaviewer/rm3151965952 --Krdbot 13:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
{{copyvio|https://www.flickr.com/photos/elhamalawy/4576173950/}} Goldsztajn (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 10:43, 9 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hyolee2 as Speedy (speedydelete) hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:02, 9 April 2020 UTC: G7 --Krdbot 13:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Taken from the subject's Twitter profile, not the Flickr user's original work: https://twitter.com/Ramanbhai_BJP Ytoyoda (talk) 13:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Judaespi Ukelele.jpg
- File:Judaespi Man Box.jpg
- File:Judaespi Grabando.jpg
- File:Judaespi Art.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
![15:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/04/08#c-EugeneZelenko-2020-04-08T15:41:00.000Z-File:Juan_Pablo_Roa,_foto_del_álbum_"perdiendo_todo".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
![05:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/04/08#c-Jianhui67-2020-04-15T05:05:00.000Z-File:Juan_Pablo_Roa,_foto_del_álbum_"perdiendo_todo".jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jesucristoeliluminate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mizginnnn arslan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Image is from Google, not uploaders own work MB (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
possible copyright violation from https://twitter.com/c1c2c130/status/1210547416404905985 posted to twitter on 27 December 2019. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Deriviative from here. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photoshopped image of electronic equipment (?), unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused team photo, no educational value, out of scope. Likely copyvio as well: photo credit doesn't match uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Irfan Shahid.JPG
- File:Irfan Shahid at Loughborough University.JPG
- File:IRFAN SHAHID.jpg
- File:Irfan delivering lecture on Islamic Finance.JPG
- File:Irfan Shahid speaking on Career Guidance.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rebeldedecorazón (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality chart, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photo of nothing, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
![20:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/04/08#c-P199-2020-04-08T20:27:00.000Z-File:Is_there_"Enough"_of_education!.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
![05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/04/08#c-Jianhui67-2020-04-15T05:12:00.000Z-File:Is_there_"Enough"_of_education!.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Theblessinglr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adamcurator (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused artworks,COM:WEBHOST, out of scope and missing permission.
- File:Isaacakemadaekenley 4.jpg
- File:Isaacakemadaekenley 3.jpg
- File:Isaacakemadaekenley 2.jpg
- File:Isaac "Akemadae" Kenley, (b- 1977, United States) artist, and former volunteer for Global Change Music, Global Change Multi-Media from 2000-2007- Has done work for musicians with the record label and also more 2014-05-22 16-57.jpg
_artist,_and_former_volunteer_for_Global_Change_Music,_Global_Change_Multi-Media_from_2000-2007-_Has_done_work_for_musicians_with_the_record_label_and_also_more_2014-05-22_16-57.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imacaticat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Captura de pantalla 2018-07-09 a la(s) 18.13.28.png
- File:Maida 020.jpg
- File:Maida teatronescafepiano.jpg
- File:Maida 008.jpg
- File:Maida 024.jpg
- File:Maida Teatro Nescafé de las Artes 2020.jpg
_18.13.28.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works: credit in watermark doesn't match the uploader.
- File:Guitarrista Guilherme no primeiro show da nova formação..jpg
- File:Baterista Rodrigo no primeiro show da nova formação..jpg
- File:Baixista Caio no primeiro show da nova formação..jpg
- File:Guitarrista Hell no primeiro show da nova formação..jpg
- File:IRVIN 2014.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suryaniiseu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Islah network cover photo.jpg
- File:Islah network Facebook cover photo.png
- File:Islah Network Logo.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neeraj1shrestha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused blurry photo of random greenery, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused logos and nondescript photo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Seem to be a case of COM:NOTHOST, if not also COM:DW and even COM:COPYVIO. Also, not used and grotesque miscategorization (meanwhile removed).
- File:Rockilib mobile.png
- File:Rockilib america.png
- File:Rockilib good.png
- File:روكيليب.png
- File:Rockilib A.png
- File:Rockilib روكيليب.png
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
screenshot of a website Mjrmtg (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; non-free screenshot. --Ahmadtalk 21:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
File:"Erämaateatteria katsomassa Utjoen Kevolla" elokuvan juliste. Graafinen suunittelu Jukka Tarkiainen.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Sismarinho as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: fair-use (movie poster) Eatcha (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:"Erämaateatteria_katsomassa_Utjoen_Kevolla"_elokuvan_juliste._Graafinen_suunittelu_Jukka_Tarkiainen.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020041110005125. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:"Erämaateatteria_katsomassa_Utjoen_Kevolla"_elokuvan_juliste._Graafinen_suunittelu_Jukka_Tarkiainen.jpg” under ticket:2020041110005125. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 22:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope/deriviative. ~Cybularny Speak? 15:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; apparently is a photo of another photo. --Ahmadtalk 22:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't think that it needs any explanation Nadzik (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- That qualifies for speedy deletion. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, was already speedily deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
probably copy-protected cover --Killarnee (T•1•2) 18:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 22:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Works by Steven Menendez are copyrighted (© Steven Menendez 2017). User should make his his identity verified via COM:OTRS or change the footer of his website for a valid license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Lady_Miss_Kier_with_Flowers.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020040810009093. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Lady_Miss_Kier_with_Flowers.jpg” under ticket:2020040810009093. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Ahmadtalk 23:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
According to COM:TOO South Korea, "'Work' refers to a creation that expresses human thoughts or feelings." The logo of a South Korean political party forming a resemblance of a person holding a hand up looks original enough for Korean copyright. As for the US copyright, explained in COM:TOO United States, it's hard to decide. Per COM:PCP, I can assume it meets US thresholds due to the expression resembling human expression, but that's also the same reason that Korean law would protect this logo. Per COM:L, a work should have been free in both the source country (e.g. Korea) and the US, but possible Korean copyright would make the logo not comply with the Licensing policy. George Ho (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- 영어 해석이 완벽하진 않지만 번역기를 통해 어느정도 돌려서 봤습니다. 저작권 문제인걸로 아는데요 이 파일은 제가 창작한건 분명히 아니지만 이 정당의 당사의 홈페이지에 로고에 다운을 받을 수 있게 해놔있었습니다. 물론 이게 문제가 된다면 삭제를 하십시오 --아리엘황제 (talk) 23:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- You should also know that fair use (공정 이용) is allowed only in some local projects; it is not allowed in Commons, however. George Ho (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- ok sorry --아리엘황제 (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's all right. If you're willing to save the logos from deletion, then you should instruct the organizations to send their permissions to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org or permissions-kowikimedia.org. More at COM:OTRS --George Ho (talk) 00:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's all right. If you're willing to save the logos from deletion, then you should instruct the organizations to send their permissions to permissions-commons
- ok sorry --아리엘황제 (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- You should also know that fair use (공정 이용) is allowed only in some local projects; it is not allowed in Commons, however. George Ho (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- 영어 해석이 완벽하진 않지만 번역기를 통해 어느정도 돌려서 봤습니다. 저작권 문제인걸로 아는데요 이 파일은 제가 창작한건 분명히 아니지만 이 정당의 당사의 홈페이지에 로고에 다운을 받을 수 있게 해놔있었습니다. 물론 이게 문제가 된다면 삭제를 하십시오 --아리엘황제 (talk) 23:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Logos of Future Korea Party
[edit]- File:Logo of Future Korea Party(3rd).png
- File:Logo of Future Korea Party.png
- File:Logo of Future Korea Party(NEW).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The logos of the Future Korea Party have sufficient artistic merit to warrant copyright protection in both the US and South Korea. Their shapes are complex and nothing like simple shapes that are ineligible for US copyright protection. --George Ho (talk) 23:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- 앞선 File:Logo of Future Korea Party.png 파일 및 File:Logo of Future Korea Party(NEW).png는 미래한국당측에서 PI로고를 배포 하라고 다운로드가 되어 있었으나 미래한국당의 로고 고채가 잦았습니다. 그리고 현재 나온 File:Logo of Future Korea Party(3rd).png에 대해서만 다운로드 하라고 되어 있긴 합니다.File:Logo of Future Korea Party.png 파일 및 File:Logo of Future Korea Party(NEW).png 이거 두개는 솔직하게 로고 교채작업으로 인하여 삭제가 맞지만 File:Logo of Future Korea Party(3rd).png는 그 정당에서 사용하라고 이미 다운로드를 공개적으로 하였습니다. 자세한 사항은 http://miraehanguk.co.kr/page/logo 에서 보시길 바라며 그럼에도 불구하고 저작권에 문제가 있다면 삭제를 하십시오.--아리엘황제 (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Above COM:TOO South Korea. 홈페이지에서 다운받을 수 있도록 한 것과 저작권은 별개의 문제입니다. 저작물로서의 창작성이 있으므로 삭제 처리합니다. – Kwj2772 (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused document, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. Uncertain copyright status of DW images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Promotional material taken from https://www.vila-balea.ro/ro/preturi/ - uploader is most likely someone working at the hotel Gikü (talk) 23:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope; ad. Gikü (talk) 23:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Satlasana.jpg VIJAYSINH RANA 542 (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Invalid reason. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 05:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
this version has the logo and there are other version available without Ecklacell (talk) 21:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, CDC logo is PD. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabina Orlandi (talk · contribs)
[edit]© 2019 Cultural Association for Social Promotion IVO SASSI. All rights reserved., COM:DW of copyrighted work by Carlo Zauli (d. 2002), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Ivo Sassi CENTAURO.jpg
- File:Ivo Sassi, Rotonda Donatori di Sangue, Faenza, via Emilia..jpg
- File:Ivo Sassi, installazione al Mic.jpg
- File:Ivo Sassi, Sfera rossa.jpg
- File:Ivo Sassi,Disco n.2 2016.jpg
- File:06 Fremito Naturale, 1973.jpg
- File:05 Carlo Zauli vaso sconvolto, 1976.jpg
- File:04 Carlo Zauli Ruota Strappata, 1967-68.jpg
- File:03 Carlo Zauli, al lavoro 1972-73.jpg
- File:01 Carlo Zauli e il Cubo alato, 1991 copia.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Smart Cangjie
[edit]These images are derived from here, and the website doesn't mark the copyright statue. Thus, these materials must be assumed to be copyrighted.
- File:Makscj aamt.jpg
- File:Makscj aar.jpg
- File:Makscj bfs.jpg
- File:Makscj btt.jpg
- File:Makscj c.jpg
- File:Makscj hxc1.jpg
- File:Makscj hxc2.jpg
- File:Makscj hxu.jpg
- File:Makscj ikf.jpg
- File:Makscj mmrm.jpg
- File:Makscj mr.jpg
- File:Makscj nnju.jpg
- File:Makscj nnxb.jpg
- File:Makscj qyb.jpg
- File:Makscj tox.jpg
- File:Makscj ydg.jpg
- File:Makscj ypu.jpg
- File:Makscj yrr.jpg
- File:Makscj yyog.jpg
This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Seas with Nemo & Friends
[edit]Images of screens and/or copyrighted characters of Disney/Pixar
Elisfkc (talk) 18:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Seas with Nemo & Friends
[edit]No FoP in US for artworks.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Seas with Nemo & Friends
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy. Jonteemil (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Filing for Andreone93 (talk · contribs) who also created the file.Jonteemil (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Cropped from File:Zhuhai Jintai Temple inner court view and monks.jpg, untrue claim about the author and source. ŠJů (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 21:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Cited copyright text reads “ Commercial usage of the material is prohibited without prior authorization of Rijkswaterstaat and the author.” Ytoyoda (talk) 03:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright statement says “ Commercial usage of the material is prohibited without prior authorization of Rijkswaterstaat and the author.”
- File:Luchtfoto Zijtaart, Veghel - 14 oktober 1991 - 01.jpg
- File:Citadel van 's-Hertogenbosch, 3 februari 2014 - 01.jpg
- File:Jumbo Distributiecentrum Zuidkade, Veghel - luchtfoto.jpg
- File:Kuehne + Nagel Logistics Veghel Hoogbouw.jpg
- File:Waalwijkse Haven.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Oude Haven - 01.jpg
- File:FrieslandCampina DMV - DMV International, Veghel.jpg
- File:Bedrijventerrein Ekkersrijt 03.jpg
- File:Bedrijventerrein Ekkersrijt 02.jpg
- File:Bedrijventerrein Ekkersrijt 01.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel bedrijventerrein de Dubbelen - 05.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel bedrijventerrein de Dubbelen - 04.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel bedrijventerrein de Dubbelen - 03.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel bedrijventerrein de Dubbelen - 02.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel bedrijventerrein de Dubbelen - 01.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 10.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 09.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 08.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 07.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 06.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 05.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 04.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 03.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 02.jpg
- File:Bernhoven luchtfoto A50.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Inland Terminal Veghel - 01.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Nieuwe Haven Dubbelen - 01.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel Glijhaven en Loskade ZWV - 01.jpg
- File:Nistelrode luchtfoto A50.jpg
- File:A50 over rivier de Aa bij Veghel.jpg
- File:'s-Hertogenbosch Stadsgezicht.jpg
- File:Sint-Oedenrode luchtfoto A50.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Randweg Eindhoven, Strijp.jpg
- File:Jumbo Distributiecentrum Amert, Veghel - luchtfoto 2.jpg
- File:Jumbo Distributiecentrum Amert, Veghel - luchtfoto.jpg
- File:Maximakanaal 2-4-2014.jpg
- File:Werkbezoek van minister Eurlings aan Veghel - 04.jpg
- File:Werkbezoek van minister Eurlings aan Veghel - 03.jpg
- File:Werkbezoek van minister Eurlings aan Veghel - 02.jpg
- File:Werkbezoek van minister Eurlings aan Veghel - 01.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel industrie- en bedrijventerrein, Zuid-Willemsvaart 04.jpg
- File:Mars Factory, Veghel, Netherlands, 2013.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel industrie- en bedrijventerrein, Zuid-Willemsvaart 03.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel industrie- en bedrijventerrein, Zuid-Willemsvaart 02.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto Veghel industrie- en bedrijventerrein, Zuid-Willemsvaart 01.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Personal picture. Out of scope. SirEdimon (talk) 04:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Image is a personal picture and out of the project scope.--SirEdimon (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Amsterdam Airlines Airbus A320 Nussbaumer.jpg with watermark DS28 (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
crop duplicate of File:Amsterdam Airlines Airbus A320 Nussbaumer.jpg DS28 (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:PH-AAX A320-231 Amsterdam Al MAN 02MAY09 (5885424753).jpg DS28 (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not the author's own work. The source is a copyrighted page. Edjoerv (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Not the author's own work. The source is a twitter account, so it is sure copyrighted. Edjoerv (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep:「黑警死全家」is the main part of the subject, not the background--Wpcpey (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)- Keep per above. Deryck Chan (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Appell der Gewerkschaften und Personalvertretungen - geplante Abwicklung der Germanwings.pdf
[edit]Copyrighted Text. No sign of CC-Licence on the source page JTCEPB (talk) 06:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Objection! The document does not violate any right to reproduce. It is a union document and deals with a public labor dispute. If the document has been marked with the wrong license, I am sorry. I would be grateful if someone provided the correct license. WikiFreibeuter (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- source page has explicit copyright notice -- ©2020 Vereinigung Cockpit e.V. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
According to metadata the image is copyrighted by EFIMETS_YURY. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disney D23 Expo 2011
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:D23 Expo 2011 - 101 Dalmations movie dog (6075808176).jpg
- File:D23 Expo 2011 - 101 Dalmations movie dog (6075808224).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disney D23 Expo 2011
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. And, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:D23 Expo 2011 - Mickey memorabilia mailbox (6075809050).jpg.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:D23 Expo 2011 - Mickey memorabilia mailbox (6075809018).jpg
- File:D23 Expo 2011 - Mickey memorabilia Minnie mailbox (6075809144).jpg
- File:D23 Expo 2011 - Mickey memorabilia Minnie mailbox (6075809196).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disney D23 Expo 2011
[edit]Not the work of MingleMediaTV. Copyright belongs to Disney and/or WireImage.
- File:D23 (6065829941).jpg
- File:D23 (6066372686).jpg
- File:D23 EXPO125261 8146 (6066987826).jpg
- File:Jennifer Garner (6063800586).jpg
- File:Jennifer Garner at D23 expo 2011.JPG
- File:Kelsey Chow, 2011 (cropped).jpg
- File:Robert Downey Jr. Expo 2011 (cropped).jpg
- File:Robert Downey Jr. Expo 2011.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Garner image apparently belongs to Disney. Not clear what this means as the uploader on Flickr does show original work has been uploaded, including on free licenses.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Re: File:D23 EXPO125261 8146 (6066987826).jpg + its derivative File:Kelsey Chow, 2011 (cropped).jpg. Delete per nom. Suspected not own work by the Flickr uploader or entity. The indicated description reads: "D23 EXPO - The cast of Disney XD's hit series "Pair of Kings," join together to meet fans and sign autographs at Disney's D23 Expo, the ultimate event for Disney fans at the Anaheim Convention Center in Anaheim, California (August 21).(DISNEY XD/MICHAEL YADA)" Likely a case of COM:Flickrwashing by Flickrstream MingleMediaTV. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Elly (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hamish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com.hk/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuFoLAELliorAS69o9tK_187sdWuQnS_1LnA2r9muAUwY3nkWG72CIQu-FwwQcYUjzsUXaLqgB9QKzJA0hlza_1Vu6jkwBLSsDVQtbsCYOOThUM-iNXtqknqCDCwA8hKU_1wNOpURsETOZXNgUhba0SOlotuWEr7eFbJdp1UxAokxBJvfSYweZByFPc8eHP9rTP8CwXJyrCYxNmsoSTi4YrXfqKHAmwN5psnqyrotZd41RmpWc-_1744DX2VXZjs-eunsgf3gjhI5QdUrOxHzR-VLbyhFAxUQMqLasv9r4oSvhCeSZDMol-rf1k-wtIe2YfQbpBhSYHaqGMr7wIJesf6b3PmsjATgg&safe=strict&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWypPQ2tHoAhVIIDQIHXasDfUQ9Q8oAHoECAEQJg If this is indeed form the 1790s, it is Public Domain. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: If you were saying "indeed from", I do not consider the photo is made in 1790s, though the objects in it may. However, that does not affect its copyright status. --Hamish (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Sorry. Remedy for that failed ping. --Hamish (talk) 11:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hamish: We do not recognize a new copyright on faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works. Please see the policy at COM:PD-Art and the accompanying template {{PD-Art}}. Storkk (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Thank you for that. And, Yes, I know that policy. I've read about the article where collected it, and I regard the picture as an reproduction, which does not meet the "simply a faithful" requirement, of the picture above it based on Google Translate. As I see fr-3 in your user page, if you do confirm it's the original publishment or other format that meets the policy, I hope you help me close my silly request. --Hamish (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hamish: your Google link does not take me where you imply it takes you. Could you link to the article itself that leads you to believe that this is a modern reproduction? Storkk (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Sure, here. --Hamish (talk) 13:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hamish: clicking the image on that blog takes you to this source, which seems clearly PD... while it's not the same physical object as was reproduced for the upload for us (there's a stain missing on ours), it does appear to be the source document. I'm still not clear why you believe this is a modern reproduction, though. Storkk (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Oh, sorry, I really did not click the image. Please kindly close the request. Sorry again for any inconvenience. --Hamish (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hamish: clicking the image on that blog takes you to this source, which seems clearly PD... while it's not the same physical object as was reproduced for the upload for us (there's a stain missing on ours), it does appear to be the source document. I'm still not clear why you believe this is a modern reproduction, though. Storkk (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Sure, here. --Hamish (talk) 13:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hamish: your Google link does not take me where you imply it takes you. Could you link to the article itself that leads you to believe that this is a modern reproduction? Storkk (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Storkk: Thank you for that. And, Yes, I know that policy. I've read about the article where collected it, and I regard the picture as an reproduction, which does not meet the "simply a faithful" requirement, of the picture above it based on Google Translate. As I see fr-3 in your user page, if you do confirm it's the original publishment or other format that meets the policy, I hope you help me close my silly request. --Hamish (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hamish: We do not recognize a new copyright on faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works. Please see the policy at COM:PD-Art and the accompanying template {{PD-Art}}. Storkk (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment I've uploaded a higher res version sourced from Gallica. Storkk (talk) 14:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by I dream of horses as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. If the uploader did indeed commission this as a work for hire as claimed in the Source field, they should confirm this by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Achim55 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Site reads: "The UN-ICTY grants permission to Users to visit the Site and to download and copy the information, documents and materials (collectively, “Materials”) from the Site for the User’s personal, non-commercial use, without any right to resell or redistribute them or to compile or create derivative works therefrom." Per archive.org at least since Jan 2016. I agree with the rationale, however if the more specific permission regarding photographs can be found (I tried and failed, presumably as did Achim55), that permission would likely supersede the overall site terms and conditions. Storkk (talk) 10:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Creamy Mami, 30th Anniversary
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Romics 2013 45.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 46.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 47.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 48.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 49.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 50.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 51.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 52.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 53.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 54.JPG
- File:Romics 2013 55.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kanurito 916 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Familia acogida por Elena y Óscar.jpg
- File:Pandilla del parque.jpg
- File:Raquel con su esposo y su hija.jpg
- File:Elena y Óscar con sus gemelos .jpg
- File:Daniel y Clara con sus hijos.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romics 2019 - Spring edition
[edit]COM:TOYS / COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 128.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 129.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 13.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 130.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 137.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 138.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 88.jpg
- File:Romics 2019 - Spring edition 91.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romics 2019 - Spring edition
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romics 2018 - Autumn edition
[edit]COM:TOYS / COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 55.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 58.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 59.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 60.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 61.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 63.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 74.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 75.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 76.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 91.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romics 2018 - Autumn edition
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 101.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 40.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 41.jpg
- File:Romics 2018 - Edizione Autunnale 47.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romics 2017 - Spring Edition
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Romics 2017 - Edizione Primaverile 08.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Edizione Primaverile 09.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Edizione Primaverile 12.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Edizione Primaverile 18.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Edizione Primaverile 19.jpg
- File:Romics 2017 - Edizione Primaverile 22.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition
[edit]COM:TOYS / COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 04.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 06.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 08.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 09.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 10.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 11.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 21.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 27.jpg
- File:Romics 2016 - Autumn Edition 29.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Avatar (8229091859).jpg
- File:EMP Seattle (26119998715).jpg
- File:Experience Music Project, Science Fiction Museum, Seattle - Alien (9447266538).jpg
- File:Icons of Science Fiction - Anakin Skywalker (15632809020).jpg
- File:Icons of Science Fiction - Independence Day (15388182675).jpg
- File:Icons of Science Fiction - Independence Day (15632254158).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW. Copyrighted character.
- File:2019-03-02 09-30-16 ILCE-6500 DSC05377 (46573254424).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-30-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05378 (46573255864).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-30-20 ILCE-6500 DSC05379 (46381712025).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW. Copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-39 ILCE-6500 DSC05332 (47296355881).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-41 ILCE-6500 DSC05333 (46381666785).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-21 ILCE-6500 DSC05463 (47296452371).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-21 ILCE-6500 DSC05463 DxO (47458849391).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
- File:2019-03-03 14-47-18 ILCE-6500 DSC01481 (47305249181).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-47-19 ILCE-6500 DSC01482 (47305249731).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-43 ILCE-6500 DSC01483 (33429495838).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-43 ILCE-6500 DSC01483 DxO (32535116497).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-44 ILCE-6500 DSC01484 (47305251871).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-45 ILCE-6500 DSC01485 (46581980904).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-46 ILCE-6500 DSC01486 (33429498628).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-49-03 ILCE-6500 DSC01487 (47305254911).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-49-03 ILCE-6500 DSC01487 DxO (46753681194).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-49-12 ILCE-6500 DSC01488 (46581982584).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-13 ILCE-6500 DSC02312 (46582882464).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-14 ILCE-6500 DSC02313 (46582883024).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-14 ILCE-6500 DSC02313 DxO (46753719844).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-24 ILCE-6500 DSC02314 (33430422688).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-25 ILCE-6500 DSC02315 (47306139081).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-26 ILCE-6500 DSC02316 (33430424848).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-26 ILCE-6500 DSC02316 DxO (46753720294).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-28 ILCE-6500 DSC02317 (46582886594).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-29 ILCE-6500 DSC02318 (33430426388).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-17-49 ILCE-6500 DSC05292 (47244112392).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-17-49 ILCE-6500 DSC05292 DxO (46735822654).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-06 ILCE-6500 DSC05294 (46573173154).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-06 ILCE-6500 DSC05294 DxO (46735825104).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-06 ILCE-6500 DSC05294 DxO-EFFECTS (46640099165).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-18 ILCE-6500 DSC05295 (33420627998).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-33 ILCE-6500 DSC05300 (33420634258).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05301 (40331796823).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-19-42 ILCE-6500 DSC05314 (46573193824).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-19-44 ILCE-6500 DSC05315 (47296333321).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-19-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05316 (46573196434).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-07 ILCE-6500 DSC05322 (40331823023).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-08 ILCE-6500 DSC05323 (47244145652).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-08 ILCE-6500 DSC05323 DxO (47458838121).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-09 ILCE-6500 DSC05324 (46381658855).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-22-37 ILCE-6500 DSC05343 (46381678735).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-22-38 ILCE-6500 DSC05344 (46573219824).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-29-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05375 (46573251034).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-29-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05375 DxO (47458845241).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-29-57 ILCE-6500 DSC05376 (46381708035).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-17 ILCE-6500 DSC05396 (32354735057).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-18 ILCE-6500 DSC05397 (33420734828).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05398 (33420735768).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05398 DxO (46543632325).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-35 ILCE-6500 DSC05428 (46381755315).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-36 ILCE-6500 DSC05429 (46381756135).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-43 ILCE-6500 DSC05430 (46573296734).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-43 ILCE-6500 DSC05430 DxO (47458848621).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-44 ILCE-6500 DSC05431 (46381761095).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-41-03 ILCE-6500 DSC05434 (46381765555).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-41-04 ILCE-6500 DSC05435 (47296432261).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-41-16 ILCE-6500 DSC05436 (46573302604).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-05 ILCE-6500 DSC05457 (47296448661).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-09 ILCE-6500 DSC05458 (32354783977).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-10 ILCE-6500 DSC05459 (47296450191).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-10 ILCE-6500 DSC05459 DxO (33582600978).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]- File:2019-03-02 09-45-25 ILCE-6500 DSC05451 (46381779255).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-45-26 ILCE-6500 DSC05452 (40331942253).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-45-32 ILCE-6500 DSC05453 (47244244752).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-45-35 ILCE-6500 DSC05454 (46381780435).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-12 ILCE-6500 DSC05481 (46573343064).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-13 ILCE-6500 DSC05482 (46381801675).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-13 ILCE-6500 DSC05482 DxO (46543636825).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]- File:2019-03-02 15-25-10 ILCE-6500 DSC08445 (32358437567).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 15-25-13 ILCE-6500 DSC08446 (46577036074).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:TOYS and COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-23-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05353 (47244175392).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-23-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05354 (47244174832).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-12 ILCE-6500 DSC05460 (47244251892).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-15 ILCE-6500 DSC05461 (32354785657).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-16 ILCE-6500 DSC05462 (33420794818).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-23 ILCE-6500 DSC05464 (33420795358).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-28 ILCE-6500 DSC05465 (47296454731).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-29 ILCE-6500 DSC05466 (33420797518).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-31 ILCE-6500 DSC05467 (33420798378).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-31 ILCE-6500 DSC05467 DxO (47458851411).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-32 ILCE-6500 DSC05468 (47296457751).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-39 ILCE-6500 DSC05469 (33420799318).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05470 (47296459991).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-48 ILCE-6500 DSC05471 (47244261372).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-50 ILCE-6500 DSC05472 (33420801638).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-53 ILCE-6500 DSC05473 DxO (47458851931).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-54 ILCE-6500 DSC05474 (47244263442).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-58 ILCE-6500 DSC05475 (46573338034).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-00 ILCE-6500 DSC05476 (33420804518).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-01 ILCE-6500 DSC05477 (47244266032).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-01 ILCE-6500 DSC05477 DxO (40492803643).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-03 ILCE-6500 DSC05478 (40331959013).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-05 ILCE-6500 DSC05479 (46573340614).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-08 ILCE-6500 DSC05480 (40331960423).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05485 (46381804315).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-20 ILCE-6500 DSC05486 (32354799707).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-27 ILCE-6500 DSC05487 (46573346334).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-28 ILCE-6500 DSC05488 (32354801367).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-41 ILCE-6500 DSC05489 (47244277312).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-43 ILCE-6500 DSC05490 (32354802937).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05491 (47244282682).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-46 ILCE-6500 DSC05492 (32354806737).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 12-41-43 ILCE-6500 DSC07158 (47246217032).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 12-41-44 ILCE-6500 DSC07159 (33422773378).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-26 ILCE-6500 DSC01021 (32362966437).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-27 ILCE-6500 DSC01022 (47304739411).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-30 ILCE-6500 DSC01023 (47252243922).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01024 (32362968407).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01025 (47304741411).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-43 ILCE-6500 DSC01026 (33428943968).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-44 ILCE-6500 DSC01027 (47304744401).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-52 ILCE-6500 DSC01028 (47252249132).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-54 ILCE-6500 DSC01029 (46581437324).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-56 ILCE-6500 DSC01030 (47252251552).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-00 ILCE-6500 DSC01031 (47304747881).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-02 ILCE-6500 DSC01032 (46581440754).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01033 (46389750715).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-22 ILCE-6500 DSC01034 (46389751945).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-23 ILCE-6500 DSC01035 (40339886923).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-25 ILCE-6500 DSC01036 (47304753951).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-33 ILCE-6500 DSC01037 (46389753725).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-34 ILCE-6500 DSC01038 (47304755871).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-05 ILCE-6500 DSC01041 (47252274452).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-06 ILCE-6500 DSC01042 (47252277052).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01043 (46389761285).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01043 DxO (33600471498).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-31 ILCE-6500 DSC01044 (47252280562).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01045 (46581457404).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-34 ILCE-6500 DSC01046 (40339898923).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-52 ILCE-6500 DSC01047 (47304765581).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-57 ILCE-6500 DSC01048 (40339902473).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-59 ILCE-6500 DSC01049 (46581460204).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-01 ILCE-6500 DSC01050 (47304768561).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01051 (33428974308).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-08 ILCE-6500 DSC01052 (40339905503).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-14 ILCE-6500 DSC01053 (47304772541).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-16 ILCE-6500 DSC01054 (33428977688).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-17 ILCE-6500 DSC01055 (40339912213).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-19 ILCE-6500 DSC01056 (47252290092).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-24 ILCE-6500 DSC01057 (40339916963).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-25 ILCE-6500 DSC01058 (46389776325).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01059 (47252294822).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01059 DxO (32535089537).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-33 ILCE-6500 DSC01060 (46389779925).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-34 ILCE-6500 DSC01061 (47304778091).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01062 (46389783145).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01062 DxO (33600471988).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-45 ILCE-6500 DSC01063 (47252297712).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-57 ILCE-6500 DSC01064 (33428991818).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-58 ILCE-6500 DSC01065 (46581472784).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-02 ILCE-6500 DSC01066 (47252299352).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-03 ILCE-6500 DSC01067 (33428994358).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-19 ILCE-6500 DSC01070 (47252303792).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-23 ILCE-6500 DSC01071 (32363016187).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-12 ILCE-6500 DSC01075 (46581488724).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-13 ILCE-6500 DSC01076 (33429009028).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-15 ILCE-6500 DSC01077 (32363028487).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-15 ILCE-6500 DSC01078 (47252311502).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-25 ILCE-6500 DSC01079 (32363031247).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01080 (46389805425).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01081 (32363035227).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-37 ILCE-6500 DSC01522 (47305295461).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01523 (47305296781).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01524 (46390377765).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01524 DxO (32535119247).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01525 (47305297811).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-49 ILCE-6500 DSC01526 (47305298861).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-50 ILCE-6500 DSC01527 (46390380535).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 13-12-59 ILCE-6500 DSC07357 (47298690911).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 13-13-00 ILCE-6500 DSC07358 (32357028777).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:FOP UK - no FOP for 2D graphic works, or in fact impermanent works. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I deliberately didn't nominate this when I nominated the rest of the 800th-anniversary banners. Most of the banner is, according to the Final Report of the 800th Anniversary Steering Committee[1] is "A detail of illuminated manuscript from the founding charter of the University". Now this is a little confusing because I don't think the University was founded by charter, but any manuscript from around the University's nominal founding in 1209 is likely to be out of copyright by now. If there's doubt about this I'll see if I can find out where it actually came from. The text "University of Cambridge 800 years 1209-2009" and "800 years of inspiration" are below the threshold of originality, and the University arms in the top left are small enough to be de minimis (noting that the arms themselves are ancient, so it's only this particular realisation that might be in copyright). A declaration of interest: I work for the University of Cambridge, but I'm not speaking for them here (or anywhere on Wikimedia projects). --bjh21 (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Checking the source[2], it claims that the manuscript is "the first part of the charter of Edward I, dating from 1291/2, confirming the privileges of the University", which I think places it in the public domain. There might be an interesting edge case if it had managed to remain unpublished until 1969, but that would require an understanding of pre-1911 copyright law that I really don't have. --bjh21 (talk) 16:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: A tiny amount of additional research: This is the top-left corner of UA Luard 7*[3], which the University agrees is from 1291/2. --bjh21 (talk) 12:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Given the age of the charter, I don;t think there is anything here that has a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused text-only table, should be in wiki markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Useless due to watermark that takes up a large portion of the foreground. Kinu (talk) 20:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Is there any evidence this is Tegucigalpa? I don't recognise any of this in a city I have lived in and it keeps being spammed into the en Tegucigalpa article by a dubious multiple IP user. And the buildings are too big, there are like maybe two or three skyscrapers in the whole city and none of them appear in the collage. The city just looks too developed to be this poor, third world city. So I'm convinced it is a fake and as such should be speedily deleted. It's also been tagged as having no sources and is very new, i.e., uploaded this month. --RichardWeiss (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The copyright status of the Chinese palace is not known. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
DW of video mapping. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note that the nominator appears to be referring to the image of the Yellow Crane Tower of Wuhan at the bottom left corner. Hzh (talk) 08:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks. I didn't know its name. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There is freedom of panorama in China. Brandmeister (talk) 12:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- The Chinese tower itself may not be a problem, but what about its picture? Who took the photo and who made a projection mapping out of it? 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think it's moot and projections like this may not be covered by copyright. However, the photo is still awaiting review by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the free license is valid. Brandmeister (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- The Chinese tower itself may not be a problem, but what about its picture? Who took the photo and who made a projection mapping out of it? 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Based on FoP in China--Pinkfloyd amir (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per FOP Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Chinese FoP requires the name of the creator and of the workl. Neither is provided here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Not own work according to file name. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Split_Harbour_Croatia.jpg Krexi (talk) 23:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Request of own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo. Ecummenic (talk) 23:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
No permission Cjp24 (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
No permission Cjp24 (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wavepainter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works, unclear copyright status of original ones.
- File:Last address sign – Buynaksk, Dagestan, Shikhova Street 45. (2020-03-21) 27.jpg
- File:Last address sign – Buynaksk, Dagestan, Shikhova Street 45. (2020-03-21) 21.jpg
_27.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_21.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VLu (talk) 22:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jdx as no permission (No permission since)
- Keep I sent OTRS a screenshot of the release (Ticket:2020030910000494), but it's insufficient for a ticket because it didn't come directly from him. I'll reach out to the rights-holder and try to get him to send it directly, however if he doesn't do so, I still think what I sent over to OTRS is sufficient for the file to be kept. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:MKLeo.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020042610000272. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:MKLeo_at_Frostbite_2020.jpg” under ticket:2020030910000494. --Ankry (talk) 03:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I am involved, so any uninvolved admin can trout me if necessary, but with the OTRS permission resolved, this should be good to close. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- also file:Logo kölner Fahrradsternfahrt.jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
It's my picture uploaded be my, which I upload when I didn't yet fully know how to properly use Wiki. I don't want it public and I don't it's really essential for Wikipedia. Lukáč Peter (talk) 14:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:30, 25 Juli 2020 UTC: my personal photo which I uploaded when I wasn't famialiar at all how does the publicity of all photos here work --Krdbot 12:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 19:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 23:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused election diagram, superseded by File:POL Sejm RP seats 2011.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Approval--Kiepski1 (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Batman and his cast
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted statues.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- And, these photos were taken at the Museo Nazionale della Scienza e della Tecnologia Leonardo da Vinci, Italy. No FOP in Italy. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/marco verch
[edit]Files from an apparently malicious Flickr user, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch
- File:Holzofen für Pizza in einer Pizzeria in Moskau.jpg
- File:People playing Dobble.jpg
- File:North avenue beach chicago.jpg
- File:Split Harbour Croatia.jpg
- File:Ho chi minh city skyline.jpg
- File:Vegan Eggs.jpg
- File:Vegan Cheese by Happy Cheeze.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Also adding
- File:Tangerine and persimmon smoothie.jpg, uploaded after this request started. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Additional images:
- Yet more images:
- Keep @Ytoyoda: But did you check if any of the photos was online before they were online on Flickr? User is marked as bad but that just mean that you have to be careful. This is the text in the review template:
- "The image should be checked carefully because some Flickr users are blacklisted for only a limited portion of their uploads."
- If it means we should always delete then we should just let the Flickrreview bot delete the photos.
- I reviewed some of those files and I did not find any evidence that the photos were uploaded anywhere else.
- So I think we should close this DR and start a DR for the files that may actually be taken from somewhere else.
- Sometimes photos are uploaded to US-gov websites without photos being PD-USGov. But that does not mean we automatically delete EVERY photo from a US-gov website. We evaluate them one by one. --MGA73 (talk) 20:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Reading back I see the old DR's is mainly because the photographer actually enforce his copyright. So if he require attribution and someone uses his photo without attributing him he will sue them. Well what is the purpose of letting Commons host photos that require attribution if we delete photos because someone is to lazy to attribute correctly?
- If we do not like attribution then Commons should delete ALL photos that is not released as Public Domain. --MGA73 (talk) 21:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 | Note: This photo require attribution. The creator of this file is known to enforce his copyright. So if you use this file make sure to attribute him correctly or you will risk to pay for your mistake. Just saying. Be lazy or sloppy if you want! Just don't complain to us if it will cost you! |
- If we wanna protect our reusers we could create some template to add on all his photos to warn them against just using files without giving the required attribution. --MGA73 (talk) 21:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep These are high quality photos that should not be deleted lightly. Tischbeinahe (talk) 05:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
I would like to delete https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Split_Harbour_Croatia.jpg. All this was just my school project and I honestly do not understand what is going on, but I would like it to be deleted immediately. Can you help me? Krexi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krexi (talk • contribs) 23:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- We can make a template to make something like {{Pixabay}} or this one:
(Please notice the photographer is known to enforce his right to require attribution!)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- We have other templates where license reviewers is needed to make sure everything is okay. --MGA73 (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: I nominated all images from the user was because the previous DRs seemed to indicate there was a blanket ban on images from the Flickr account. If it's merely the Flickr being picky about attribution, then yeah, your suggestion of a custom template could work. I'd like the closing admins from the previous deletions — Srittau, Túrelio, A.Savin and Didym — to weigh in if possible. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Great! Thanks a lot. Then we do not have to worry about Flickrwashing but "only" the Flickr user being picky :-) And yes the DR history would indicate that we usually just delete his photos. But since many of the files on Commons require attribution I think we should be able to handle situations where photographer really do require attribution. --MGA73 (talk) 13:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all. This guy is known to take actions against even the slightest faults in attributions, usually very expensive for the reusers. --Didym (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Didym: is that not the same as supporting users who do not attribute the photographers correctly? Photographers let us use their photos for free and all they require is to be attributed. --MGA73 (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- No. When the attributions are missing or contain major faults, this may be justified. But a missing link to the license or using CC BY 3.0 instead of CC BY 2.0 is not a reason to demand about 500 euros. You can read more about this here (in German). --Didym (talk) 21:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- But Commons have a very clear link on the main page to Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia and #4 clearly specify: "Attribution: If attribution is required, provide attribution. If the copyright holder (usually the content creator[2]) has specified how, be sure to follow this."
- We may find it silly to require 500 EURO if someone does not attribute correctly. But the only way to protect our users from claims is to ban all files that require attribution and only allow PD files. --MGA73 (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- We have the General disclaimer, found at the bottom of every page. We do our best to faithfully validate and display correct licenses, but it is nobody's responsibility but the user's to ensure they don't misuse them. Any misuse or licence violation that happens off Commons is strictly between the reuser and the copyright holder. We shouldn't cripple Commons because some people might do dumb things. --Animalparty (talk) 06:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- No. When the attributions are missing or contain major faults, this may be justified. But a missing link to the license or using CC BY 3.0 instead of CC BY 2.0 is not a reason to demand about 500 euros. You can read more about this here (in German). --Didym (talk) 21:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Didym: is that not the same as supporting users who do not attribute the photographers correctly? Photographers let us use their photos for free and all they require is to be attributed. --MGA73 (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete
Personally I believe these files should be kept asattribution is the responsibility of the reuser (though we should probably add a template so that reusers know that attribution is strictly enforced for such files). However consensus says that all files by this user are banned. To overturn such ban should be discussed in a more appropriate place. --pandakekok9 14:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- After reading some related threads, this issue is indeed very serious. Commons should not be turned into safe haven for copyright trolls. Even dewiki is complaining about this problem. I think we can argue that all images by this banned user are out of COM:SCOPE because they are not made in good faith. Therefore, I fully support the deletion of these files and all future images by this user, until they stop being a copyright troll. pandakekok9 14:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Question: Is the files licensed under a free license? Answer: Yes. Question: Is the copyright holder free to pursue any and all violations to said license if not followed? Answer: Yes.
- We should not delete all images licensed under a free license where copyright holders enforce that those licenses are followed, because if we would do so, in turn that means we only want public domain images.
- If e.g. Disney were to be kind to license a short trailer, or a still from one of their movies under a Creative Commons license, you bet they would pursue anyone not abiding by the license, however we would be derilict in our duty to uphold Wikimeida Commons mission if we would not host that file. Strong keep --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and restore everything previously deleted on this basis. I have previously expressed my opinion on the matter at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch; neither the facts, nor my opinion, nor the reason behind it have changed since then. Back then I seem to have been fairly alone in supporting keeping these files; it is good to see that there are now more voices supporting this. Tokfo (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as files by a person violating our mission and values through these files. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It was a community decision to ban all uploads of this particular photographer since these are functionally unfree files. If a free license is used in such a way that it is practically an unfree photograph, then it should be treated as "All Rights Reserved". Abzeronow (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment At the risk of oversimplifying, I feel like the "keep" arguments amount to either:
- (a) It's not our fault if reusers get sued because they make attribution errors, or
- (b) If we delete this guy's files, why even allow Creative Commons images at all?
- Neither is a completely unreasonable point, but (a) is unconvincing to me because it runs counter to the foundation's mission, to have informative, useful images that can be used by anyone without restrictions. If a simple attribution error leads to legal issues, then it's not a very user-friendly experience at all, not at all "free" and (b) doesn't work for me either, because for the most part, Creative Commons is a system that seems to work well for creators and reusers for the most part. We're talking about one creator out of thousands who's operating in bad faith. You should be able to use Commons files without needing a lawyer.
- Yes, these are high-quality photos, but I don't think of any of his contributions are irreplaceable. Deleting a handful of photos to keep Commons useful is not a huge loss. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed. It's like keeping GFDL-only or GFDL+CC-BY-NC photos just because it uses a "free" license. Licenses alone don't define what "free" is, the realistic usage does. If you can't easily use GFDL-only or GFDL+CC-BY-NC photos for a commercial purpose without having to fear violating one's copyright, that ain't free. "Commercial use" is not even defined such that everyone accepts it. Are "xerox" shops who charges you for each paper "commercial use"? This is why we stopped allowing such photos since 2018. pandakekok9 04:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- You should be able to use Commons files without needing a lawyer. We can talk all day about what "should" be and how copyright law "should" work. It remains a fact that CC licenses are very long, complex legal documents, and due to the way copyright law works, it is certainly advisable to get legal advice if you do not fully understand them, because if you do not comply with them, you risk breaking copyright law. No one who simply clicked "I agree to license this under this-and-this license" in UploadWizard ever legally agreed to "but I'm not going to try to enforce this provision or this one against these kinds of reusers under these circumstances". All of us agreed only to the exact license text and there is always a risk that any media file hosted on Commons may be tested with the Tentacles of Evil test. As far as I can see, no one has yet come up with an actual policy-based argument to delete these files, or even with an exact set of criteria what constitutes license enforcement that is too strict. It's all just appeals to essentially "ignore all rules", but that's meant to be used in cases where the wiki is actually improved: how does deleting freely licensed educationally useful files improve anything?
- Interesting too that the decision to ban GFDL-only uploads is now being used as a precedent of some sort: this was a decision by a small group (around 30) of contributors in a discussion not nearly as widely advertised as such, frankly, revolutionary policy changes should be, and I think it may have gone very differently if there had been more participation by people like me who do not follow village pumps nearly as closely. I'm not here to relitigate this, but citing it as a new principle we can derive new ideas from isn't a very good argument. Tokfo (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Pandakekok9: there were like 6 users who voted delete in the first DR. If you include the nominator and the deleting admin that makes 8. Second DR was the same. After that the same group of users started speedy deleting. So a group of perhaps 10 users implemented a ban for photographers that require attribution. I do not think that is true consensus. Especially not when there are a few users that opposes and vote keep.
- I don't know what the best way to sort this is but I try to get more users to comment and I suggested other solutions. For example that we add a template explaining to reusers that they have to make sure that they attribute the photographer correctly. --MGA73 (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep (This is not "a vote"), The Marco Verch thing has bothered me for years, I know that he is a rent-seeking scammer that leeches of Germany's draconic copyright laws, furthermore by hosting his “trap” images we are endangering the reputation not just of Wikimedia Commons, but Wikimedia websites as a whole. Imagine getting sued because you used free images from a website that promotes the free re-usage of educational content at no cost and then being dragged to court over it threatened with legal action. By hosting his images we have a ticking time-bomb on our hands. That being said, I hate these deletions as well, Marco Verch is an extremely talented photographer that makes high quality educational pictures with a free license of subjects we need illustrations of and the exclusion of his work is detrimental to the mission of Wikimedia websites. This puts us at a conundrum.
- Personally I see a number of options, (1), my preferred choice”, we create “{{Copyright troll}}” and explain on the file pages that re-users should know that the source is a “copyright troll” and that by using it it’s their own risk, this basically cleanses our (and the Wikimedia Foundation’s) hands 👐🏻 by choosing to host his work. (2), we keep all of his work deleted and say that the issues he cause outweigh the benefits of his fantastic educational works. This is the status quo and it bothers me because it could essentially be seen as a message by Wikimedia Commons users that we should not treat copyright violations
asof our work as copyright violations, maybe I’m reading too much into it, but if Wikimedia Commonists aren’t allowed to rightfully sue copyright violators it means that all of our (own) works are already de facto in the public domain. While I would never sue any copyright violators making my work also de facto in the public domain, I don't want such a mentality to scare away professional photographers who do this for a living and take the rights to their works more serious. (3), this is “the vulture option” and we wait until Marco Verch is incapable of filing legal actions against anyone and then mass-Undelete his files. Personally I’m more inclined towards the 1st (first) option. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)- @Donald Trung: I agree with your arguments but I would find another name for the template than "Copyright troll" ;-)
- As for the comment about "not a vote" then the templates are called Template:Vote keep and Template:Vote delete. That's why I like to call I at vote even if the result not always is that the side with the most "votes" win :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a place to feed mobsters. They even sue people who use their pictures the same way as we do (like on a Wordpress Site) and argue, that they are wrong licensed, since there is a page (called "full view") where the picture is not attributed at all. They just don't do it here, since they live from the free promotion they get from commons the projects. Unbelievable ... but if we allow these pictures here, we are acting as partners in crime. --Mirer (talk) 02:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mirer: If you read en:Copyright troll you will see that we have other images from photographers that are "aggressive": File:Daughtry 2013.jpg as an example. --MGA73 (talk) 19:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete None of these files are irreplaceable - indeed most are pretty generic - and there appears to be a demonstrated history of problems caused by the photographer. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete A known "copyright-troll" (see [4]). We should not provide users like this with a free platform where they can make shady business - that is not what Wikimedia Commons (or Creative Commons) is for. /Sofie Sigrinn (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: --Pitke (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted per precedent set by Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Images_by_Marco_Verch, Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedMarco Verch, Commons:Deletion_requests/Remaining_files_uploaded_by_Wuestenigel.
- Community consensus has previously been established that this author's photos cause more trouble than they are worth due to their spotty record with authorship status of their uploads, history of aggressively demanding fees from reusers of his media who fail to follow the license precisely, and being apparently an indefinitely banned user here on Commons. Their Flickr account is placed on our internal Flickr user blacklist.
- Reuploading previously deleted-by-due-process material is General reason #4 for speedy deletion: "page or file matches content that was previously deleted per community consensus." This rule is not restricted to the precise content of the files/pages, but can cover entire scopes of media, such as here, the works of a specific author. I find previous community consensus to not allow media authored by Marco Verch on Wikimedia Commons plentiful and well established. --Pitke (talk) 09:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
https://www.campograndenews.com.br/campo-grande-115-anos/bruxa-da-sapolandia-a-historia-que-de-tanto-assombro-virou-lenda-urbana O revolucionário aliado (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of PD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
unknown photographer photo reproduction, not own work Drakosh (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Support deletion; this was part of a larger batch of files I uploaded to show structures in and around Legoland Florida. Mliu92 (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Kathisma (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of project scope MisterSynergy (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. FredWalsh (talk) 16:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In scope and with Wikidata item and file is in use in Wikidata. Nomination possibly made as in a moral crusade and FredWalsh said in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melodie Gore at Man's Ruin party 2.jpgthat this is a minor actress, but uploads images of random and unidentified cosplayers, like File:PAX 2008 - Cosplay (2810847274).jpg and File:PAX 2008 - Pirate cosplay (2810002113).jpg, so dont see how can claim that this image of an identified actress is out of scope but his images of random cosplayers are in scope. Tm (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Also this actress entered in en:Wrestling Isn't Wrestling, so one more proof of this image being in scope. Tm (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- If you don't have a clue why this file has been nominated for deletion, you better not start an ad hominem attack here. The Wikidata item was nominated for deletion, which is exactly the only reason why I nominated the files for deletion here as well. The Wikidata item will be gone as soon as these files and the category are deleted. —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do you even read what people right in each DR ir you just copypaste comments calling unrelated discussions to this discussion? Doing this you are misquoting and deturping and try to spin what others said and so you are the one making a straw man argument. To give proper context to anyone that does not know of what you are talking about, he discussion that you wrongly pointed is in Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Bunny Bleu where this present discussion is and Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/06/Category:Single item categories, where there was an discussion why you did created this category and ended with other users seeing what where your real intentions and with with an administrator saying, 4 years ago, to "leave us a note when your crusade is done so that we can clean up the crumbs". Are you going to contradict or spine what others said 4 years ago?
- About this nomination, i´am not blaming you for this nomination, but, again repeating what i said above, you still haven't explained why did you vote to delete this image of an in scope actress and cosplayer, when you uploaded images of unknown and random cosplayers. This is a flaring contradiction, that you upload files of the same subject but of less value (and so think that your uploads are in scope), yet you vote to delete images of cosplayers with greater value. Contradictory at its finest.
- And dont put words in others people mouths, like when you claim that i said or subtexted that i "blamed" you for this nomination or that this is an my "favourite actresse" (in particular when i´ve never before edited this images or category, so there goes your favoritism). Tm (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 13:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope MisterSynergy (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. FredWalsh (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Who is Melodie Gore? --E4024 (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. Then go ahead and delete. --E4024 (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
-
- Keep In scope and with Wikidata item. Nomination possibly made as in a moral crusade and FredWalsh said that this is a minor actress, but uploads images of random and unidentified cosplayers, like File:PAX 2008 - Cosplay (2810847274).jpg and File:PAX 2008 - Pirate cosplay (2810002113).jpg, so dont see how can claim that this image of an identified actress is out of scope but his images of random cosplayers are in scope. Tm (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also this actress entered in en:Wrestling Isn't Wrestling, so one more proof of this image being in scope. Tm (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- If you don't have a clue why this file has been nominated for deletion, you better not start an ad hominem attack here. The Wikidata item was nominated for deletion, which is exactly the only reason why I nominated the files for deletion here as well. The Wikidata item will be gone as soon as these files and the category are deleted. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do you even read what people right in each DR ir you just copypaste comments calling unrelated discussions to this discussion? Doing this you are misquoting and deturping and try to spin what others said and so you are the one making a straw man argument. To give proper context to anyone that does not know of what you are talking about, he discussion that you wrongly pointed is in Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Bunny Bleu where this present discussion is and Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/06/Category:Single item categories, where there was an discussion why you did created this category and ended with other users seeing what where your real intentions and with with an administrator saying, 4 years ago, to "leave us a note when your crusade is done so that we can clean up the crumbs". Are you going to contradict or spine what others said 4 years ago?
- About this nomination, i´am not blaming you for this nomination, but, again repeating what i said above, you still haven't explained why did you vote to delete this image of an in scope actress and cosplayer, when you uploaded images of unknown and random cosplayers. This is a flaring contradiction, that you upload files of the same subject but of less value (and so think that your uploads are in scope), yet you vote to delete images of cosplayers with greater value. Contradictory at its finest.
- And dont put words in others people mouths, like when you claim that i said or subtexted that i "blamed" you for this nomination or that this is an my "favourite actresse" (in particular when i´ve never before edited this images or category, so there goes your favoritism). Tm (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: appears to be in scope. Ruthven (msg) 13:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope MisterSynergy (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. FredWalsh (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In scope and with Wikidata item. Nomination possibly made as in a moral crusade and FredWalsh in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melodie Gore at Man's Ruin party 2.jpg said that this is a minor actress, but uploads images of random and unidentified cosplayers, like File:PAX 2008 - Cosplay (2810847274).jpg and File:PAX 2008 - Pirate cosplay (2810002113).jpg, so dont see how can claim that this image of an identified actress is out of scope but his images of random cosplayers are in scope. Tm (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also this actress entered in en:Wrestling Isn't Wrestling, so one more proof of this image being in scope. Tm (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- If you don't have a clue why this file has been nominated for deletion, you better not start an ad hominem attack here. The Wikidata item was nominated for deletion, which is exactly the only reason why I nominated the files for deletion here as well. The Wikidata item will be gone as soon as these files and the category are deleted. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I was referring at the "moral cursade" claim where you attack me for what you assume is my motivation, although you have no idea what is behind my request here. Bad style, really.
I have filed these files (and previously the category related to that person) for deletion as apparently nobody else is willing to dive into the Commons-related deletion business. A while ago some Commons users, including admins, have successfully lobbied at Wikidata to consider Wikidata items notable when only a (category) sitelink to Wikimedia Commons is present in the item, as in this particular case as well. This is in general okay, but very difficult in some cases since Commons content (categories in particular) is usually unreferenced; Category:Melodie Gore was apparently incorrectly categorized as "porn actress" for almost 10 years without reference and that is of course a problem. —MisterSynergy (talk) 14:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC) - To MisterSynergy: i didnt accused you of being in a 100% certain "moral crusade", but it is usual to moral crusaders make this kind of dr (or even hijack wiki hackathons) with a hidden agenda, and given that you initial deletion request didn't explain what was on the side of Wikidata (nor given any link) and merely spoke of "out of project scope", dont expect others to guess what were your real intentions. Being thi said, i dont take a word out of this being an attempt by an Wikidata administrator of editorializing other project. Other project, other policies, so this attempt of subverting an decision on Wikidata says a lot of this request and its intents. And if there is a miss categorization or other problem, the proper way to do is to correct it, like any other Wiki, as usual. In Wikidata as in Commons when one sees an error it should correct it, not deleting just because is wrong.
- To FredWalsh: Do you even read what people right in each DR ir you just copypaste comments calling unrelated discussions to this discussion? Doing this you are misquoting and deturping and try to spin what others said and so you are the one making a straw man argument. To give proper context to anyone that does not know of what you are talking about, he discussion that you wrongly pointed is in Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Bunny Bleu where this present discussion is and Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/06/Category:Single item categories, where there was an discussion why you did created this category and ended with other users seeing what where your real intentions and with with an administrator saying, 4 years ago, to "leave us a note when your crusade is done so that we can clean up the crumbs". Are you going to contradict or spine what others said 4 years ago?
- About this nomination, i´am not blaming you for this nomination, but, again repeating what i said above, you still haven't explained why did you vote to delete this image of an in scope actress and cosplayer, when you uploaded images of unknown and random cosplayers. This is a flaring contradiction, that you upload files of the same subject but of less value (and so think that your uploads are in scope), yet you vote to delete images of cosplayers with greater value. Contradictory at its finest.
- And dont put words in others people mouths, like when you claim that i said or subtexted that i "blamed" you for this nomination or that this is an my "favourite actresse" (in particular when i´ve never before edited this images or category, so there goes your favoritism). Tm (talk) 21:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I was referring at the "moral cursade" claim where you attack me for what you assume is my motivation, although you have no idea what is behind my request here. Bad style, really.
- Comment apart being little in scope as far as we know, is there any notable work in which the subject has had a remarkable role? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Notable work Wrestling Isn't Wrestling, so in scope. Tm (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- She had only a cameo appearance in that movie, according to en:Wrestling Isn't Wrestling#Cameos. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- And that is enough. Tm (talk) 11:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Tm: Well, that makes me think Common's notability criteria should be improved. I don't mind keeping the images, there are a lot of useless/non-notable files here anyways, but I do I think the category should be deleted. Keeping it harms Wikidata, as we are obliged to keep items with valid sitelinks, even if they are non-notable. I have dealt with many cross-wiki cases like this, and believe me, it's a pain when other projects do not want to cooperate like they should. Esteban16 (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Esteban16 If the item on Wikidata cant be deleted this is a problem to Wikidata to solve not Commons to solve (or on your parley "other projects do not want to cooperate like they should"), or is it now obligation of Commons to delete itens in Commons, just because Wikidata wants delete this itens and "cant" change its policies, passing your responsabilities\policies to other projects that are independent? Or are now Wikidata policies above Commons? If you have this current policy it was made users of Wikidata, not Commons users that forced Wikidata to adopt this policies, so this is a Wikidata problem and this deletion request is a fine example of one project not knowing to work themselves and passing the hot potato to others, as a fine example of "other projects (Wikidata) do not want to cooperate like they should (and change their policies and not trying to game the system". Tm (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tm: You are partly right. I just hope in LTA cases, projects realize what should be done to stop harming Wikimedia. Esteban16 (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- She had only a cameo appearance in that movie, according to en:Wrestling Isn't Wrestling#Cameos. —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm. Ruthven (msg) 13:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The photo is similar with [5]. It probably a screenshot from the internet live of herself and their is no detail data of the photo which means that the photo is probably not come from the uploader. AT (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- New verison had been uploaded. It seems the new one is OK. Therefore only the old one need someone to delete it.-AT (talk) 10:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: ...and deleted the older version. @まっは＠長谷側315: please do not overwrite files!. Ruthven (msg) 13:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bencemac as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10|Wikidata item was deleted as spam. Bencemac (talk) 07:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC) I do not want to delete it speedily, because it has OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- I say we Keep it. Even if it's not educational as the logo of a company, a cropped version (removing the text, keeping the city design) can be educational in my opinion. Ahmadtalk 22:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 13:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I couldn't find this specific image, but all images from this Flickr account appear to be copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Will be deleted soon "This image was originally posted to Flickr by WorldForumEco at https://flickr.com/photos/143121151@N03/44922415324. It has been reviewed on 1 September 2020, 21:14:10 by FlickreviewR 2, who found it to be licensed under the terms of the All Rights Reserved, which isn't compatible with the Commons.QTHCCAN (talk) 21:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: License review failed. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution file without metadata, unlikely to be own work // 176.59.48.14 16:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Не совсем понятные претензии. Можно поточнее - что надо исправить?!--Monololo (talk) 08:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio from https://www.facebook.com/KozelProFootball/. --Sealle (talk) 10:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
My Mistake Twice: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F%C3%BCrstengruft-Seyfriedsberg.jpg Riquix (talk) 15:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
schlechtere Kopie von File:Stiftungsdekret Narvikschild II.jpg Gunnar (💬) 22:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
schlechtere Kopie von File:Narvik Silber.jpg Gunnar (💬) 22:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
schlechtere Kopie von Narvik Gold.jpg Gunnar (💬) 22:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
schlechtere Kopie von Narvikschild Gold I.jpg Gunnar (💬) 22:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright © 2020 אוסף התצלומים הלאומי תנאים והגבלות
Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
No indication that this is a satellite image from NOAA A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Small and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
this is clearly not uploader's own work, as mr kasifpur was assassinated in 1990. No provenance, no explanation as to why it is suitably licensed. DS (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Same reason for File:Eli kasifpur1.jpg and File:Eli kasifpur.jpg. DS (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Image seems a digital 3d model and not a photo. By analises, i suspect that this is taken from Google Maps. Tm (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
OTRS-permission from author Marie-France Xavier Alves is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. At moment the file is used in as.wiki on userpage of active user. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - it has no educational value and they happened to be using wikipedia as webhost as all their contributions are to make that userpage [[6]] only. thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
_em_2018.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_em_2018.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Metadata credits BIANCA VASCONCELLOS as the copyright holder Ytoyoda (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
_em_2018.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
_em_2018.jpg){kind=link}
No indication that this is a satellite loop from NASA A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes there is. You can check the website itself to check it out and see how I did it. The website is owned by NASA. It is also stated that the author is NASA and there is a valid copyright tag. Hurricaneboy23 (talk)
- I can't find it on the website. It could be come from other copyrighted satellite. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep link and license fixed. --219.79.96.37 03:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOO Italy logo has a complicated design and gradient. This not PD-textlogo Чорний Кіт (talk) 02:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Non-free in the US, no comment re Italy. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- The upload of this image (7 years ago) was the only edit ever performed by User:Huitziluc, which leaves us with no substantive evidence, and no one to ask, about the "own work" question. Is it reasonable to delete an image based on a subjective judgment about "likelihood"? There are, after all, lots of small images on Commons. I'm inclined to think we should just stick with the policy of assuming good faith and retain it. -- WikiPedant (talk) 04:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:AGF is a guideline, but COM:PCP is a policy. There is longstanding consensus that suspicious files may be deleted after a DR, especially when there is no information provided (EXIF metadata, additional images, details of circumstances, original photograph, etc.) to support a claim of own work. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Not the author's own work. It says it's his but considering his other two uploads being screenshots from copyrighted pages, this one could be as well, checking the metadata from the file. Edjoerv (talk) 06:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. "CREATOR: gd-jpeg" metadata -> copyvio, almost every time. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Offener Brief an den Vorstand der Deutschen Lufthansa AG zur geplanten Abwicklung der Germanwings.pdf
[edit]Copyrighted Text. No sign of CC-Licence on the source page JTCEPB (talk) 06:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Objection! The document does not violate any right to reproduce. It is a union document and deals with a public labor dispute. If the document has been marked with the wrong license, I am sorry. I would be grateful if someone provided the correct license. WikiFreibeuter (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. There is no license that would cover this file other than an explicit release under a free license. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
The image contains the copyrighted Microsoft icons. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free icons, removing them would leave only out-of-scope text content. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cancellare versione precedente con targhe auto visibili Walter Giannetti (talk) 08:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Non riesco a capire come mai le targhe risultano ancora visibili Walter Giannetti
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Revision deleted. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
My own work. it did not happen like I want Hatas (talk) 21:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE: w:fa:براسیرو (نرمافزار). --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphan images of a non-notable Romanian actor (per this DR at rowiki). Please consider deleting everything under Category:Adi Gheo and the category itself. Gikü (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Picture taken between 1900 and 1905 (period were the depicted building existed). Unknown author. No information about the publication history. Not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. BrightRaven (talk) 08:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images with trademark of copyright of infofilter.net There is indeed a watermark, but it's not immediately obvious that this is above the COM:TOO. Storkk (talk) 10:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ok Storkk , I just practising COM:PCP Encik Tekateki (talk) 06:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope MisterSynergy (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. FredWalsh (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In scope and with Wikidata item. Nomination possibly made as in a moral crusade and FredWalsh in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melodie Gore at Man's Ruin party 2.jpg said that this is a minor actress, but uploads images of random and unidentified cosplayers, like File:PAX 2008 - Cosplay (2810847274).jpg and File:PAX 2008 - Pirate cosplay (2810002113).jpg, so dont see how can claim that this image of an identified actress is out of scope but his images of random cosplayers are in scope. Tm (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also this actress entered in en:Wrestling Isn't Wrestling, so one more proof of this image being in scope. Tm (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- If you don't have a clue why this file has been nominated for deletion, you better not start an ad hominem attack here. The Wikidata item was nominated for deletion, which is exactly the only reason why I nominated the files for deletion here as well. The Wikidata item will be gone as soon as these files and the category are deleted. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do you even read what people right in each DR ir you just copypaste comments calling unrelated discussions to this discussion? Doing this you are misquoting and deturping and try to spin what others said and so you are the one making a straw man argument. To give proper context to anyone that does not know of what you are talking about, he discussion that you wrongly pointed is in Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/05/Category:Bunny Bleu where this present discussion is and Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/06/Category:Single item categories, where there was an discussion why you did created this category and ended with other users seeing what where your real intentions and with with an administrator saying, 4 years ago, to "leave us a note when your crusade is done so that we can clean up the crumbs". Are you going to contradict or spine what others said 4 years ago?
- About this nomination, i´am not blaming you for this nomination, but, again repeating what i said above, you still haven't explained why did you vote to delete this image of an in scope actress and cosplayer, when you uploaded images of unknown and random cosplayers. This is a flaring contradiction, that you upload files of the same subject but of less value (and so think that your uploads are in scope), yet you vote to delete images of cosplayers with greater value. Contradictory at its finest.
- And dont put words in others people mouths, like when you claim that i said or subtexted that i "blamed" you for this nomination or that this is an my "favourite actresse" (in particular when i´ve never before edited this images or category, so there goes your favoritism). Tm (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- As is becoming usual, Tm is clutching at straws by trying to blame me for this nomination. The images s/he points to were crops from copyright violations. S/he knows this but wants to dress it as a "moral crusade". No Tm, almost every file and category I have tagged has been deleted on policy grounds. You could try using policy reasons for keeping photos of your favourite actresses perhaps? FredWalsh (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank for clearing it up. The deletion request that you talked but didnt linked Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q54595346, contrary to the claims that i making an "ad hominem attack " shows that this is a cosplayer model, so one more surprise that someone that uploads images of anonymous and random cosplayers, votes to deletes of a cosplayer with much more notability than some random cosplayer from the Internet. Also this deletion request shows that you, MisterSynergy, an administrator in Wikidata is trying to editorialize other projects with statements like "Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox." and "As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done. So to win a deletion on Wikidata, you try to delete files that are in scope in another project that you almost dont contribute? Yes, i "don't have a clue" when we are talking about manipulation of projects and the attempt to delete in scope files and you dont have a clue about the policies and scope of this project when you opened Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:Melodie Gore before this DR to delete this files and category. Tm (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Closing as stale. Nominating one out of four photos of a person, under notabiltiy grounds, is not going to generate a useful conversation. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Versión en desuso CITY MVD (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requests deletion for unused content, no opposition. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Versión en desuso CITY MVD (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
I am concerned about this image's suitability for the Commons. It purports to be a medical diagram with labels for symptoms of a serious medical condition. However, based on what the child is doing it does not look like this is actually a serious medical diagram and was possibly uploaded without the consent of the minor subject. Because it is strictly inferior in educational value to File:Photo of baby with FAS.jpg, I think it should be deleted. Mz7 (talk) 17:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
It's double Jaycharan Khandey (talk) 18:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unopposed request for deletion from author of unused file. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Falscher Name, falsche Lizenz (von einer neuen Museumsmitarbeiterin so hochgeladen) Karsten Meyer-Konstanz (Diskussion) 22:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ich habe es zum Löschen vorgeschlagen, weil ich es selber und dann richtig hochladen möchte. --Karsten Meyer-Konstanz (Diskussion) 23:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Alles geradegerückt, kein Löschgrund mehr ersichtlich. --Magnus (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oh wenn man doch nur mal das machen würde, was gewünscht wird. Das Bild enthält oben schwarzen Rand, der offenbar zum Rahmen gehört. Es gibt keinen Grund, diese Version zu behalten. Karsten Meyer-Konstanz (Diskussion) 11:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Der schwarze Rand ist mitnichten schwarz, sondern nur beschattet, enthält aber durchaus Bildinformationen. --Magnus (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oh wenn man doch nur mal das machen würde, was gewünscht wird. Das Bild enthält oben schwarzen Rand, der offenbar zum Rahmen gehört. Es gibt keinen Grund, diese Version zu behalten. Karsten Meyer-Konstanz (Diskussion) 11:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Alles geradegerückt, kein Löschgrund mehr ersichtlich. --Magnus (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Reasonable argument against deletion, does not meet COM:REDUNDANT. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
Not own works copied from external websites, needs evidence that images are anonym works ("Unknown - probably dead the photo was first published in Lebanon and taken by a government photographer working for the local press") to comply with PD-Lebanon.
- File:Hermanos Rahbani 1940.jpg
- File:Rahbani-Brothers.jpg
- File:Marwan khoury مروان خوري.jpg
- File:Philmon Wehbe en comedia.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe, Fairuz, Mohammad Abdel Wahab y Farid.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe y Fairuz.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe y Fairuz decada del 60.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe, Sabah y Abdel Wahab.jpg
- File:Mohammad Abdel Wahab 1920.jpg
- File:Zakaryya Ahmad Oum Kalzum 01.jpg
- File:Zakaryya Ahmad tocando Laud.jpg
- File:Kamal Al Taweel Abdel Halim Hafez.jpg
- File:Taweel Halim.jpg
- File:Kamal Al Taweel.jpg
- File:Kamal Al taweel Warda Mekawy Hamdi.jpg
- File:Kamal Al Taweel Umm Kalzum.jpg
- File:Sayed Mekawy.jpg
- File:Kazlum Mekawy.jpg
- File:Kalzum Mekawy 2.jpg
- File:Mohamed Al Qasabji.jpg
- File:Qasabji Oum Kalzum.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 5.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 2.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 3.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 4.jpg
- File:Mohammad al Mougui Um Kalzum.jpg
- File:Mohammad al Mougui.jpg
- File:Mohammad al Mougui Abdel halim Hafez.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Not own works copied from external websites, needs evidence that images have been published one day ("Unknown - probably dead the photo was first published in Syria/Egypt and taken by a government photographer working for the local press").
- File:Nihad Qali Durait.jpg
- File:Nihad Qali Hosni.jpg
- File:Ghawwar Daurid Lahham.jpg
- File:Nassri Shamseddin.jpg
- File:Sabah fakhri2.jpg
- File:Wadih el safi1.jpg
- File:Baligh umm kalzum.jpg
- File:Baligh hamdi 2.jpg
- File:Baligh hamdi 1.jpg
- File:Kulthum.jpg
- File:Farid Asmahan.jpg
- File:Asmahan1.jpg
- File:Fatrash.JPG
- File:Ahafez.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Patrick, All that work dates from 2010 is in the public domain and was never noticed. They are images taken from newspapers both in Lebanon, Syria and Egypt. Many of them are from people who died more than forty years ago. Please review this decision. Derbake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derbake (talk • contribs)
- @Derbake: The fact that the person pictured are dead more than 40 years is irrelevant since laws of Syria and Egypt talks about publication (not creation) so you have to provide evidence that these images have been published one day in Syria and Egypt. The case is slighty different for Lebanon because they care about creation but only for anonym works so you have to explain how do you know that these works are anonym. You may explain too your genric statement "probably dead the photo was first published in (name of the country) and taken by a government photographer working for the local press" and explain as well how you know that. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: The images are from the beginning of the 20th century. in many cases it is impossible to know who took the photo. Many of them are from 1930s newspapers. Others are images used by government media to provide the culture of their countries. --Derbake (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- It strikes me that all that work dates from 2010 is in the public domain and was never noticed. After ten years they notify the deletion when the images are part of hundreds of Wikipedia articles around the world. The images are taken from newspapers in both Lebanon, Syria and Egypt. Many of the artists are people who died more than forty years ago. .Many images are from the beginning of the 20th century. In some cases it is impossible to know who took the photo. Other photographs are from newspapers of the thirties and forties. Others are images used by government media to spread the culture of their countries around the world. Please review this decision. The images in question are under license {PD-Syria} / {PD-Egypt} / {PD-Lebanon}. For example *File: Fatrash.JPG and more.--Derbake (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- You doesn't explain neither how do you know that these photos are anonym ("In some cases it is impossible to know who took the photo" doesn't mean they were anonym at publication date) nor how do you know that the authors "are probably dead; the photo was first published in (name of the country) and taken by a government photographer working for the local press" (you are right: it's almost 13 years that you are using this same explaination). May you explain too, because you claim having taken them from newspapers, your inability to provide a valid date of publishing (like a year or a DD/MM/YYYY since each newspaper is dated). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: These images you nominated to delete are in the public domain in Egypt under license {PD-Egypt}. They were all taken before the (1981) requirement for the United States and before the (1987) requirement for Egypt. I consider that they should not have the deletion form. To this we add that many images to which you inserted the deletion form were recently uploaded more than 10 years ago and their licenses were included by Wiki Commons at the time. The deletion of images with licenses {PD-Lebanon} and {PD-Syria} also does not correspond for having expired their rights and being images in the public domain of cultural figures. In the middle of the 20th century, in the countries mentioned, copyright was not taken into account, which is why in the publications of the time it does not establish who took the photograph. Look at the author and the license of this image taken from a newspaper. File:Ahmed Shawqi & Mohammed Abdel Wahab.JPG. Regards---Derbake (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Your 2007 files have not been reviewed before and are today so it's now that you may explain how screenshots of copyrighted programs may be PD (in matter fact every single upload by you since 13 years is problematic: please re-read this discussion and comments made by users at the time). But I see you try another time to cloud the issue by not responding to the simple questions I've asked to you. So the questions above remain unanswered and the closing Administrator will appeciate your non-collaboration. Bonus is the question of the day: may you explain too, because you claim having taken them from newspapers, your inability to provide in the Source field the name of the media they have been published in and instead insert a false {{Own}}? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: These images you nominated to delete are in the public domain in Egypt under license {PD-Egypt}. They were all taken before the (1981) requirement for the United States and before the (1987) requirement for Egypt. I consider that they should not have the deletion form. To this we add that many images to which you inserted the deletion form were recently uploaded more than 10 years ago and their licenses were included by Wiki Commons at the time. The deletion of images with licenses {PD-Lebanon} and {PD-Syria} also does not correspond for having expired their rights and being images in the public domain of cultural figures. In the middle of the 20th century, in the countries mentioned, copyright was not taken into account, which is why in the publications of the time it does not establish who took the photograph. Look at the author and the license of this image taken from a newspaper. File:Ahmed Shawqi & Mohammed Abdel Wahab.JPG. Regards---Derbake (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- You doesn't explain neither how do you know that these photos are anonym ("In some cases it is impossible to know who took the photo" doesn't mean they were anonym at publication date) nor how do you know that the authors "are probably dead; the photo was first published in (name of the country) and taken by a government photographer working for the local press" (you are right: it's almost 13 years that you are using this same explaination). May you explain too, because you claim having taken them from newspapers, your inability to provide a valid date of publishing (like a year or a DD/MM/YYYY since each newspaper is dated). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Licencias de dominio publico {PD-Egypt}, {PD-Lebanon}, {PD-Syria}
[edit]Estas imágenes que nominaste para borrar son de dominio publico en Egipto bajo licencia {PD-Egypt}. Las mismas fueron todas tomadas antes de (1981) requisito para los para los Estados Unidos y antes de (1987) requisito para Egipto. Considero que no deben tener la planilla de borrado. A eso le sumamos que muchas imágenes a las que le insertaste la planilla de borrado recientemente fueron subidas hace mas de 10 años y sus licencias fueron incluidas por Wiki Commons en su momento. También no corresponde el borrado de las imágenes con licencias {PD-Lebanon} y {PD-Syria} por haber caducado sus derechos y ser imágenes de dominio publico de figuras culturales. Dime como las enmendamos.
Con licencia {PD-Egypt}
[edit]- File:Baligh umm kalzum.jpg
- File:Baligh hamdi 2.jpg
- File:Baligh hamdi 1.jpg
- File:Kulthum.jpg
- File:Farid Asmahan.jpg
- File:Asmahan1.jpg
- File:Fatrash.JPG
- File:Ahafez.jpg
- File:Mohammad Abdel Wahab 1920.jpg
- File:Zakaryya Ahmad Oum Kalzum 01.jpg
- File:Zakaryya Ahmad tocando Laud.jpg
- File:Kamal Al Taweel Abdel Halim Hafez.jpg
- File:Taweel Halim.jpg
- File:Kamal Al Taweel.jpg
- File:Kamal Al taweel Warda Mekawy Hamdi.jpg
- File:Kamal Al Taweel Umm Kalzum.jpg
- File:Sayed Mekawy.jpg
- File:Kazlum Mekawy.jpg
- File:Kalzum Mekawy 2.jpg
- File:Mohamed Al Qasabji.jpg
- File:Qasabji Oum Kalzum.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 5.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 2.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 3.jpg
- File:Riad Al Sunbati 4.jpg
- File:Mohammad al Mougui Um Kalzum.jpg
- File:Mohammad al Mougui.jpg
- File:Mohammad al Mougui Abdel halim Hafez.jpg
Imagenes con licencia {PD-Lebanon}
[edit]- File:Hermanos Rahbani 1940.jpg
- File:Rahbani-Brothers.jpg
- File:Philmon Wehbe en comedia.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe, Fairuz, Mohammad Abdel Wahab y Farid.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe y Fairuz.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe y Fairuz decada del 60.jpg
- File:Philemon Wehbe, Sabah y Abdel Wahab.jpg
- File:Wadih el safi1.jpg
Imagenes con {PD -Syria}
[edit]- File:Nihad Qali Durait.jpg
- File:Nihad Qali Hosni.jpg
- File:Ghawwar Daurid Lahham.jpg
- File:Nassri Shamseddin.jpg
- File:Sabah fakhri2.jpg
--Derbake (talk) 02:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
About the File:Marwan Khoury
[edit]This image File:Marwan khoury مروان خوري.jpg was uploaded on their public official Facebook page of the singer Lebanese Marwan Khoury. The source and author are specified along with the license.
- File:Marwan khoury مروان خوري.jpg
- date=2020-03-11, 07:55
- source= originally posted to Facebook as Marwan khoury
- author= Marwan khoury
- License = {cc-by-2.0}
- Original location Facebook official fan page Marwan Khoury
--Derbake (talk) 23:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by JamesLWoodward. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Low-re screenshots, not own work.
- File:A.Maher.jpg
- File:Ahmed F. Hassan.jpg
File:Aziza Jalal عزيزة جلال2.jpg(Retracted per talk)- File:SSK Wall Fame.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
"Low-re screenshots, not own work"
- It is the only free material I have available to illustrate Wikipedia biographies.
As my previous edition was reversed by user Patrick Rogel, I rewrote my release of the remaining files under discussion.--Derbake (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Close again. Page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 15:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Trying yet again. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Looks fishy. Link is dead and the original publication would have to be examined for any copyright claims that might appear next to the image. Buidhe (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete https://web.archive.org/web/20160306155054/http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/sis.html?_nkw=MC+PHOTO+aib+493+Reginald+Maudling+British+Home+Secretary&_itemId=191164294743&_trksid=p2047675.m4099 gives enough to trust the US PD-no-notice template. However, given that this is a photo of a UK politician that was sold on ebay.co.uk by a seller that sold images from UK publications (though not exclusively), it seems likely that this image was originally created in the UK. COM:L requires that images be free in the source country as well, and I see no evidence of that. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of Grand National Party (Korea)
[edit]- File:한나라당-로고.jpg
- File:Grand National Party(korea) logo 001.jpg
- File:Grand National Party(korea) logo 002.jpg
_logo_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo_002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
More likely to pass South Korea's threshold of originality (COM:TOO South Korea). The logo seems to resemble a person crossing one's arms as a pose or some kind of gesture; it's used to represent one of South Korea's political parties. I can assume that it "expresses human thoughts or feelings". And the shape is not common, so it may more likely meet US's originality standards. --George Ho (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)