Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 2nd, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yes and no but out of scope to me and speedily gone. --Herby talk thyme 15:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

removed on October 31, 2019 and replaced without a return request, see deletion debate and decision Jameslwoodward. Gouwenaar (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per previous DR. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UnDR. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no good conection 112.203.10.233 12:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, no criteria for deletion of project page offered Infrogmation (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gfhdfhdgfgff 24.38.126.131 20:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nicht Kategoresiert und mit falschem Logo Leo Rugien (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is just a test of how to upload video on wiki Megninour (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it's also a copyright violation; please don't do that. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 17:49, 5 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:SELFIE --Krdbot 19:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette version comporte des erreurs. Je vais en charger une nouvelle. Alacoolwiki (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Anthere at 21:04, 5 Januar 2020 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 01:49, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette version comporte des erreurs. Je vais en charger une nouvelle. Alacoolwiki (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Anthere at 21:05, 5 Januar 2020 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 01:49, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Meaningless scribble. Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted as per COM:CSD#G1. --P 1 9 9   02:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varenikze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional logos, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Unused promotional logos, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomberry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional screenshots and logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Unused promotional screenshots and logos, no educational value, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A.R.Rostamzade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Com:PS.

Hanooz 05:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of Com:PS. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dispute the "own work" label. How is it possible that this user made "own" photos of Victor Skumin as a child, unless he is Skumin himself? But the user says here that they are from Chuvashis, while Skumin is not. Also, those photos were taken all over the world, so it is unlikely that they are own by the same author. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now I realize that all photos are copied from here. They should be speedily deleted. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination above. - FitIndia Talk Mail 15:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir

[edit]

Hi Vanjagenije. All deleted files in the list you provided are marked as borrowed from Wikimedia Commons. On the Internet there is information that Skumin, in addition to Moscow, works in Chuvashia too, located by the standards of Russia near Moscow. Thank you for your attention and please be more scrupulous when removing valuable materials. With respect, Leništudent (talk) 07:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axel Nuno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Godie27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Diego hernan fernandez).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Fma12 (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LIBRE CONOCIMIENTO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from trophies.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all except File:Campeonatoargentinoant.png, which is the trophy of "Copa Campeonato", first awarded in 1896 (see source here), therefore PD in Argentina. Fma12 (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Commons:Derivative works from trophies. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the press article https://www.ouest-france.fr/sport/football/stade-rennais/coupe-de-france-francois-pinault-et-le-cirque-fou-des-grands-clubs-europeens-6328379. Not under a "free" licence. Jules78120 (talk) 19:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work from staderennais.com Jules78120 (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio- caption indicates game played in 2019, description cites “own work” from 2 Jan 2020. Larry Hockett (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, I no longer have on Flickr and it is no longer available under a Creative Commons license Keithallisonphoto (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First Creative Commons are irrevocable, second this file is in scope, third they have zero personality rights problems, fourth they have been available on flickr for years and so there are in Commons, fifth at the time i write this there is an flickr account with around 3335 images.
To boot, sixth this image is in heavy use, in dozens of article and\or languages, seventh this file is avaible here for years, eighth files were with free licenses for years (here and in flickr) and so there is not a single reason to this author request. Also this image is an Featured Picture in Commons, was featured on Wikimedia Foundation blog and picture of the day in Commons, the former and last in June 8 2012. Tm (talk) 22:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation – unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 21:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samanta precioso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work (uploader is pictured in), probably out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toshi conan (toshi ota) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toshi conan (toshi ota) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, not used, alt. File:S-Trioxane.svg, File:1,3,5-Trioxane.svg. Wostr (talk) 13:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 23:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabrielFL7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of non-notable team, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   03:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adil Anwar Ansari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are personal images used promotionally on en wp - outside the scope of this project.

Herby talk thyme 16:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LiisRaadla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Georges Braque (d. 1963), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Copyrighted work by Georges Braque, No permission. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LiisRaadla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Georges Braque (d. 1963), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Copyrighted work by Georges Braque, No permission. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal math notes, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal notes, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. Only used on a userpage but no meaningful contributions by this user. P 1 9 9   02:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope; or DW, missing permission. P 1 9 9   03:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 17:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Edjoerv (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 12:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Image with no meaningful explanation. Is it some sort of brain scan? Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 10:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the work of Mahatma Gandhi Central University. So I'll provide the link to this notification Rohitmishra111 (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Infrogmation at 19:21, 12 Januar 2020 UTC: false license, per del req --Krdbot 01:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake MNHNL pbraun (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 09:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 10:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:55, 29 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://mohammadalmallah.blogspot.com/2016/12/blog-post_830.html --Krdbot 01:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chart, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only chart, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only math equation, should be in TeX markup, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, possibly a prank. jdx Re: 05:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unknown person GAndy (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata suggests this is a Facebook photo, requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 01:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hrabei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentations of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hrabei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Unused or used in articles nominated for deletion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hrabei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + questioalbe authorship (possibilty of copyvio). --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an older version of an existing photo I took, and the quality is not that good either. - ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie705 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an older version of an existing photo I took, and the quality is not that good either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie705 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A social "profile" page has been created on the Portuguese Wikipedia. This is a blogger with no indication of validity, the image looks more like a personal photograph, ie out of scope. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused icon file in an inappropriate format. Many similar but more useful images are available including File:Blue question mark icon.svg which has been used as a replacement in en:Template:Suggestion. GKFXtalk 00:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, blurred and unused image, with alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, dark, blurred and unused image, with alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues with screen SecretName101 (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 03:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Donald Trump announced the resignation of John Bolton 12 minutes (8:58 a.m.) before this post. Bolton is no longer an employee of US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since Mr. Bolton was using his official government Twitter account I believe that at this moment he still was employee of the federal government. Keep. --Matthiasb (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Matthiasb. --P 1 9 9   16:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is apparently a promo for the video so where is the copyright release? Also, it's uterly useless as none of the subjects can be clearly seen. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm Gabe Mangold, the guitarist of the band. This picture was a quick promo taken by the director of the video and sent to me. I own rights to the image and there is no copy right release. Regarding your comment on how it is "utterly useless": We strive for a vague, mysterious image and this picture suits this vibe well. You can find the same image as our Facebook, Instagram, and Spotify profile pictures. It is our intended profile picture and we would like it to remain. The current image on our Wikipedia is VERY old and does not have any of the current members except Dan Watson. Please leave the new picture as is, thank you. Gabriel Mangold21:49, 1 January 2020 (MST)


Deleted: not taken by uploader as admitted above. Needs COM:OTRS ticket. Undelete if ever received. --P 1 9 9   16:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to me to be simply a photograph of a copyrighted sign. Jmabel ! talk 05:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   16:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears simply to be a photograph of a copyrighted sign Jmabel ! talk 05:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see no way this heavy motion blur image of nothing in particular is in scope. Jmabel ! talk 05:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request Monique Haen (talk) 05:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license is irrevocable. --P 1 9 9   16:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request Monique Haen (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: many years already on Commons, license is irrevocable. --P 1 9 9   16:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description. Not the animation. Bad GIF. An unused and uncategorised file. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, taken from tv. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With a dark shadow on the image, the object can't be seen clearly. Replaced by File:HRH the Crown Prince of Bhutan.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is better idea to add a new file version instead of deleting this page and creating a new one. Never mind me, thought you were creating a new page with an alternative version. --Commons2020 (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of File:Tako to ama retouched.jpg — Racconish💬 09:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These statues were not permanently situated. So, FoP in Germany does not apply.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source gives no indication of CC0 license Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 10:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the work of Mahatma Gandhi Central University . So I'll provide the link to this file which is official website of Mahatma Gandhi Central University. So please tell me the way to upload license for this file ?Rohitmishra111 (talk) 11:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 14:21, 12 January 2020, by Infrogmation. --P 1 9 9   17:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful upload, we need the permission from Yvan Richeux-Rey via OTRS, COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 11:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely to be "own work" given the fact that it does seem to be the logo used by the Metro de Libson for this particular line per their official website. Given that this does seem to at least questionable per COM:FAIR and seems complex enough to be above both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Portugal, any claim of "own work" should really be verified by OTRS; otherwise, I don't think either version of this logo file can be keep per COM:PCP. This file is being used quite a lot on various Wikipedias which is why I thought a DR was better than tagging the file with {{Npd}} or {{Copyvio}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely to be "own work" given the fact that it does seem to be the logo used by the Metro de Libson for this particular line per their official website. Given that this does seem to at least questionable per COM:FAIR and seems complex enough to be above both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Portugal, any claim of "own work" should really be verified by OTRS; otherwise, I don't think either version of this file can be keep per COM:PCP. This file is being used quite a lot on various Wikipedias which is why I thought a DR was better than tagging the file with {{Npd}} or {{Copyvio}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, P199,
What about: , and ? --Andyrom75 (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely to be "own work" given the fact that it does seem to be the logo used by the Metro de Libson for this particular line per their official website. Given that this does seem to at least questionable per COM:FAIR and seems complex enough to be above both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Portugal, any claim of "own work" should really be verified by OTRS; otherwise, I don't think this file can be keep per COM:PCP. This file is being used quite a lot on various Wikipedias which is why I thought a DR was better than tagging the file with {{Npd}} or {{Copyvio}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely to be "own work" given the fact that it does seem to be the logo used by the Metro de Libson for this particular line per their official website. Given that this does seem to at least questionable per COM:FAIR and seems complex enough to be above both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Portugal, any claim of "own work" should really be verified by OTRS; otherwise, I don't think this file can be keep per COM:PCP. This file is being used quite a lot on various Wikipedias which is why I thought a DR was better than tagging the file with {{Npd}} or {{Copyvio}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Svg version of File:MetroLisboa-linha-azul.png which seems unlikely to be "own work" given the fact that it does seem to be the logo used by the Metro de Libson for this particular line per their official website. Given that the source file does seem to at least questionable per COM:FAIR and seems complex enough to be above both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Portugal, any claim of "own work" should really be verified by OTRS; otherwise, I don't think either version of this file can be keep per COM:PCP. This file is being used quite a lot on various Wikipedias which is why I thought a DR was better than tagging the file with {{Npd}} or {{Copyvio}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URs, https://kolistan.blogspot.com/2016/11/mata-manikeshwari-amma-koli-saint-godess.html. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Foxjumps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is (are) the painter(s) and why is he/she in COM:SCOPE?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Patrick,
 thank you for your hint to missing information at the following pictures:

File:Peau bleu No.1, 1994, Montoypie einer Frau mit weissem Kimono, Halbakt.jpg

File:Selbstportrait Jo Nin 1994 Monotypie.jpg

File:Artist nin monotype-painting serie-bas-nylons-rouge canape1997.jpg

File:Artist nin monotype-painting serie bas-nylons-rouge "fenetre" 1997.jpg

File:Artist nin monotype-painting serie afrique femme-noir1996.jpg
T

The artist is Jo Nin ( https://www.jonin.de ), a painter of contemporary art and lives and works at Lake Constance in Germany. He has exhibitions in Germany, Austria and Hungary and taught at a private school in Switzerland. Since he has no affinity to Wikimedia/-pedia as an artist and I am a sponsor and supporter of him and his art activities, I take care of his publications and am authorized to place his works on Wikimedia in his name. At the moment two catalogues raisonnées are still waiting for registration in the German National Library, afterwards there will be an entry in Wikipedia, which will refer to these images.

> Correction: I would now enter the artist name of Jo Nin under "Author", so that the assignment is clear. I have already done this for "Peau bleu No.1, 1994, Montoypie einer Frau mit weissem Kimono, Halbakt.jpg".

> Question: is this sufficient / correct ? On the part of COM:SCOPE my above mentioned remarks should be sufficient. If not, I could enter an "OTRS". But I think that this is not necessary. If it is, I ask for a message and some time to organize it. Gladly I hear your message. Foxjumps (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS ticket needed. Also out of scope since no lasting notability has been proven. --P 1 9 9   17:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umesh Didharia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Website down, not found at http://www.manikeshwarimatha.com/photogal/ Anyway ©2009 Administrator : www.manikeshwarimatha.com , All Rights Reserved.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: published by A380_TLS_A350 on Flickr. Gyrostat (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Why would this alone be grounds for deletion? There could be many causes for a broken URL. Josh (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Joshbaumgartner: Yes it may: that's why uploader is given a delay to correct the URL. Nevertheless {{no source since}} is a deletion template. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Good to know. I'm not involved in a lot of file deletion, so was curious. Josh (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It appeared on the website. --Jonund (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of free license. --P 1 9 9   17:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway unfree screenshot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZHRMZ1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from unfree videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, false date, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zina Salamzade.tif foto-şəkli Zina Salamzadınin özü tərəfindən təqdim edilib. Saxta deyil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by İnsaatci muhendis (talk • contribs)
@İnsaatci muhendis: Please modify the date of shooting for the real one (it can't be 2019 since the subject died 1988). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rochrozario (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If the owner of these images wishes to freely license them for unrestricted public use, then they should send permission in accordance with instructions at COM:CONSENT.

GMGtalk 13:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OfficialDhavalPanchal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works (the uploader is pictured in), probably out of COM:SCOPE (the fact that "Dhaval Panchal has worked with many well renowned celebrities such as Josh Hutcherson, Jennifer Lawrence, Damon Wayans Jr., Jake Johnson, Owen Wilson, Vince Vaughn, Dylan O’Brien, Taissa Farmiga and Clint Eastwood" is vey unlikely)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by İnsaatci muhendis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Falses dates of shooting, mostly photos of photos in .tiff format. Since almost every .jpg file is copyvio I suspect .tiffs are as well (Google reverse search doesn't work with .tiffs). Besides too many cameras (7 at least), unlikely to be the same people's work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by İnsaatci muhendis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re corporate/official portraits: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by İnsaatci muhendis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re corporate/official portraits: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate to File:A skeleton and a devil flank a coat of arms. Etching, 1807. Wellcome V0042192.jpg MassiveEartha (talk) 14:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I agree, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination relates to original upload only (not current cropped version); prominently-featured artwork is derivative copyvio. Ubcule (talk) 15:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating original uploaded version as derivative copyvio (includes box art as part of main focus). Please retain current cropped version if original is deleted, or restore the latter if this nomination is rejected. Thanks. Ubcule (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dgpixel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image not suitable for use on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lugavoi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical publications and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fandy Aprianto Rohman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fandy Aprianto Rohman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree/support deletion since "Autonomica" is not a registered company in Norway (searched proff.no). The logo itself is quite nice, though, but it has no educational value. Ketil3 (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   17:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RGBTNB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибка в названии файла Pr9nik2 (talk) 16:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from TV emission -> copyvio j.budissin+/- 19:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from TV emission -> copyvio j.budissin+/- 19:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from TV emission -> copyvio j.budissin+/- 19:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from TV emission -> copyvio j.budissin+/- 19:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from TV emission -> copyvio j.budissin+/- 19:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo. Appears private too. Hjart (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:37, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The quality of this picture is too low. It is completely unexploitable. Myloufa (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from copyrighted material A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of 03:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photograph contains derivative works which may be subject to their own copyright. 62.64.152.154 22:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you're referring to the photos that they're holding, one thing that may be mentioned in this debate is that the photos are rather blurry from the glare. The photos aren't very usable if taken out of this context. And another thing is that we have a lot of these images that show " a picture of a picture" but it's only copyright violation if we crop it to only show those (otherwise we would have to delete many pictures that coincidentally show a photo). I mean look at this one. She's wearing a photo.--Hipposcrashed (talk) 01:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am Christopher Hogue Thompson. I posted this picture. The photos of the tribesmen meeting Prince Philip were a personal gift from the Prince to the Yaohnanen. The pictures themselves are not under any form of copyright. The tribesmen also displayed these pictures in public as a public display. This picture as a whole can be considered a news event, like someone holding up a picture and posing for the cameras (for example, President Truman holding up the Chicago Tribune newspaper with Thomas Dewey's face the day after his re-election in 1948 -- the picture of Thomas Dewey is not considered copyright under these circumstances).

Kept: per COM:DM. --INeverCry 01:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted photos. They are the subject of this photo and COM:DM is not applicable A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:DM. --King of 03:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aneczkab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Assumed-copyrighted box art, insufficient indication of permission.

Ubcule (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of 03:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Northrider640 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of 03:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is still under copyright. These images infringe on the copyright and there is no FoP exception in France.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wwwnath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yuikamaru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is just present in Commons... 109.113.196.228 22:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website logo. The site and its contents are protected by copyright. There is no proof that the logo is available under a free license. GAndy (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F3. Derivative work of non-free content Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS for over 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It should not be deleted. The subject avers that this image is in the public domain. Voland0 (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then you should not write "own work" and, more importantly, you need to forward said permission from the depicted person to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My work was cropping the image some. Thank you for the email address. Voland0 (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; likely taken from the net. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2013 Akcja Katolicka Diecezji Zielonogórsko Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Witwe des Bildhauers C.J. Hoffmann möchte das Foto dieser in Privatbesitz befindlichen Holzplastik gelöscht haben. Sie entzieht mir ihre Genehmigung zur Veröffentlichung der Datei. Bärwinkel,Klaus (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (no permission by heirs of artist). --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of the Sibelius Monument 10

[edit]

The following photographs are derivative works of the Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402), located in Helsinki, Finland:

The Sibelius Monument is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only.

Related cases:

––Apalsola tc 18:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Astoria Blvd 2019 platforms.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan. "Adam and Eve" was established in 1991, and the author Munehiro Ikeda is still alive. http://www.creek.jp.net/gold/hyakuson.html そらみみ (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, only tables. --Ezarateesteban 18:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE, the tower already showing most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright B dash (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Still in construction. Ruthven (msg) 07:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UAE's FOP only includes brocasting programme 219.78.190.136 16:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This bronze statue was established in 1988. No FoP in Japan. http://www.takenakadouki.com/cms/w_all/cate_area/kanto/tokyo/post_2205.html そらみみ (talk) 19:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded in 2017 by a user who had previously uploaded two other pictures of the same dude. Both of those were deleted as copyright violations. This image comes from a campaign site which is now defunct. You can see in this archived version from around the same time that it is clearly marked at the bottom as copyrighted. The same image appears in newspaper articles from years earlier with the credit to the campaign website. For example, this one about Invictus killing a goat and drinking its blood. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 18:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich sehe keine Freigabe der Autoren und insbesondere nicht der Fotografen, daher wohl URV. Jbergner (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin kein Fachmann für Urheberrecht. Falls die Fachleute der Meinung sind, dass der Upload nicht den rechtlichen Vorgaben entspricht, so kann die Datei gerne gelöscht werden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pseppelfricke (talk • contribs) 06:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Silver chromate is an ionic bond, not a covalent bond --Hoa112008 (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of File:Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - ALUF AVRAHAM ADAN.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 00:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of File:Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - ALUF AVRAHAM ADAN.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 00:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I (the file creator) created two versions of this map, the other being "File:IRNSS Coverage Polygon.png". The extra information on this version is an approximation and therefore of little encyclopedic value. I suggest deleting this version and redirecting the title to "File:IRNSS Coverage Polygon.png". I will handle the required cleanup on Wikipedia (three instances). Brilliantwiki2 (talk) 23:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Brilliantwiki2: : Please make the Wikipedia updates now. If you don't, there's a danger that CommonsDelinker will remove the links before you get a chance to update them, and also the file is technically ineligible for deletion from Commons under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 12:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: : Done. Brilliantwiki2 (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright, see this discussion. Rots61 (talk) 00:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This was released as CC0, see the template and https://web.archive.org/web/20151120134147/http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/copyright The above discussion has to do with new material. --Hannolans (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete If you go to this link and you search to this foto, you see © RVD, foto: Jeroen van der Meyde, this file is copyrighted. On this page it says Tenzij anders vermeld, is op de inhoud van deze website de Creative Commons zero verklaring (CC0) van toepassing. This file says that he is copyrighted. -Rots61 (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, all recent pictures of the Dutch government are copyrighted. © RVD, foto: Jeroen van der Meyde says that RVD is the copyright holder, and Jeroen van der Meyde is the photographer. RVD usually works with the requirement that all the copyrights are transfered to the government. It doesn't say 'alle rechten voorbehouden', it just say who the copyright holder is and the photographer, essential information for any Creative Commons license. --Hannolans (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The website says CC0 Tenzij anders vermeld" or unless otherwise indicated. I would interpret a (C) notice on a photo as otherwise indicated. Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(C) is not a copyright notice in the Netherlands, but expressing the copyright holder. In the United States it is another situation as the copyright mark is a legal requirement to claim copyright. RKD is the Dutch government and not relying on the American law. --Hannolans (talk) 12:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vysotsky has emailed to the Dutch government (see here), they say that we may only use it if we use it in the media, in public spaces, private use and educational purposes. Rots61 (talk) 09:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep! This file has no copyright issues. The editor who nominated has not state the basis for the nomination other than the name of this child ride. I also suspect that, from reading this editors talk page, they might well be sockpuppet account due to the short time they have had this account and by the amount of the unsuccessful deletion nominations of the editor in question. Kolforn (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cant see what the problem here, the child rides is a car and the Character set in it only shows a vague recolation to this :File:Hello kitty character portrait.png Kolforn (talk) 14:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much everything else in that picture is de minimis, practically if everything but the ride is taken together.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a good licence. The author was Rolf von Barm (see a better copy here https://oldthing.de/Ak-Schauspieler-Joachim-Gottschalk-Portrait-0029924767). But as far as I can see, nobody knows when Barm has died Mutter Erde (talk) 13:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rosenbrunn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical document and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrishchik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP for 2D works of art in India.

Majora (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrishchik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same file available on Hamara photos with their own watermark. Same upload date. Hamara has 679 × 1024 pixel photo while BH has 585 × 882 pixel photo.

CptViraj (📧) 10:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

भाई आप ऐसा कीजिये, सभी Images को delete कर दीजिये. How would I know whether this image was with Hamara Photos or not? I simply searched this image in Bollywood Hungama, found it and uploaded it. As far as I know, I have used the correct license and permission. You have mentioned yourself that this image was uploaded on the same date. Why can't two different websites upload a similar image? I don't want to sound rude but I just can't understand where the problem lies? --Vrishchik (talk) 14:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vrishchik: मैं समझ सकता हूं कि यह आपकी गलती नहीं है लेकिन जो फोटो बॉलीवुड हंगामा के फोटोग्राफर द्वारा नहीं खींचे उसे हम कॉमंस पर कॉपीराइट की वजह नहीं रख सकते। मैं आपको सुझाव दूंगा की जब तक यह बॉलीवुड हंगामा का मुद्दा सुलझा नहीं जाता तब तक आप बॉलीवुड हंगामा से कोई अपलोड ना करे। आभार। -- CptViraj (📧) 16:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrishchik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

BH file is probably crop of https://www.freepressjournal.in/entertainment/bollywood/celebrity-spotting-kangana-ranaut-twinkle-khanna-and-others-spotted-around-mumbai

CptViraj (📧) 15:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrishchik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to have been shot in the 1940s (subject is born 1929). Some of them are watermarked with the photographer's name. Besides a recent website is not a proof that images has been published (if ever, moreover if website claims File:Nargis - Hindi Movie Actress (5).jpg has been unpublished before 2019) more than 60 years ago.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In all of these files, I have specially mentioned that the date of publication of these photographs is ranging from 1940s to 1950s (between 1940 and 1960). According to the website from which I have taken these files, we cannot deny the fact that they actually belong to this time period. Regarding File:Nargis - Hindi Movie Actress (2).jpg, I have found better and more convincing sources which I'll add shortly. In File:Nargis - Hindi Movie Actress (4).jpg, I will add the name of the photographer in the author section. If you have a close look at the film career of this personality, she started working from 1943 and was almost inactive in 1960s which means there is a strong possibility,that some of these images actually belong to 1940s and others to 1950s. Vrishchik (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vrishchik: Once again you don't provide evidence that these pictures have been first published (not created) more than 60 years ago is India. Internet doesn't exists back in the 1960s so your reliance on this website as proof is irrelevant. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrishchik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP for 2-D works in India. Artist's (or his heir's) permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. He is a film director in Iran. The file may be in scope. No idea about its copyright at the moment. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@4nn1l2: I see one university teacher, one screenwriter, one actor but no director. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@4nn1l2: ... but you're right: image is in use (for now). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He is both an actor and a film director[1]. He has photos with high-profile actors[2]. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination --D-Kuru (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is a derivative work of Bad Bad Boy (Q26723790), a 2013 sculpture by Tommi Toija (b. 1974; Q21550176), located in Helsinki, Finland. The author of the original work (the sculpture) is still living, so it is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola tc 18:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is a derivative work of Rumba (Q48875337), a 1992 sculpture by Martti Aiha (b. 1952; Q3374374), located in Helsinki, Finland. The author of the original work (the sculpture) is still living, so it is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola tc 18:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The {{FoP-Finland}} template quite clearly states that freedom of panorama does not apply to artworks, such as this one. Gabbe (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable status. Publication cited is 2002. If there was no earlier publication this is still under copyright in Czech Republic and the US. Buidhe (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cited is a 1988 book. If that was the first publication, the image is still under copyright in Czech republic and the US. Buidhe (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given. In order to be PD-US, it would have had to be published in Czechoslovakia before 1946. See {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}. Buidhe (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. https://www.pinterest.fr/prabhjyotbali/meena-kumari/. Not a movie still: film is in black and white. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly see this video- [3] at 2:19. This song belongs to the same film. Vrishchik (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then perhaps it's a colorized image...? To be discussed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt, it can be a colourised image but the important thing which is to be observed is that it still belongs to the film which today falls in public domain. Even if it is now coloured, it must have been a black and white image sometime as the whole film is in black and white. Any material, even promotional photographic stills which are older than sixty years fall in public domain. Regarding, the originality of the image, whether it even belongs to the particular film or not, I have already provided the link above. Vrishchik (talk) 06:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Once again you are wrong: if it's a color photography taken during the shooting of the film (and not a "still" - an extract from the B&W movie) copyright lasts 60 years after the photographer's death. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/588282770049617765/: not a movie sill (film is in black and white). Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have similar reasons ([4]) for this one as well. I am focusing on the authorship of this image, whether it belongs to this particular person from pinterest or the film for which this picture was taken? We already know that there are zero percent chances that this pinterest guy actually clicked this picture. Moreover, there are scenes ([5]) which are around this particular potrait in the background. Why can't we take this as a still from the film then? Vrishchik (talk)
Nobody says Pinterest image is the original one since Pinterest didn't exist back in 1955. There's still no proof it's a film still: indeed how do you explain that an B&W image becomes a color one? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 08:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarianaAneva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Didym: I am an admin in Bulgarian wikipedia and I had a phone conversation few minutes ago with the uploader. At least he second file is confirmed as a family archive - Mrs. Aneva is a granddaughter of Bulgarian general Tzviatko Anev (on the picture). The license is not correct - Own work hardly can be applied here, probably it has to be changed. But the file is unique and informative and it will be a pity to delete it. Regards --Vodnokon4e (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need a permission from the person on the picture, but from the photographer. However, the image might be in the PD, but we need more information (date etc.) to determine this. --Didym (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was told File:Tzviatko Anev.jpg was taken on 6 April 1960 and is from a family album. --Didym (talk) 21:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 08:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stalin990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While the source site does have a Creative Commons license for its original content, the photograph is from a third party photographer who contributes to the AP, and Creative Commons did not exist when the photograph was first published in 1993. I don't see evidence that the CC license applies to republished work.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytoyoda: I think you should have reviewed that when the website uses its own image in the description the name of the photographer is placed and when they use a photograph outside the company they place the name of the website or media. I rely on this because the author of the image Moisés Castillo appears on the staff of the website. Other evidence?. Stalin990 (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Stalin990: Apologies for not digging deeper and thanks for pointing that out. I saw “courtesy of” and assumed it was from an outside contributor. I still have concerns about the photo’s original publishing and license, but I’m withdrawing the nomination for now. Apologies again for the trouble. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lutheraner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Urheber und Rechteinhaber offensichtlich nicht mit Hochlader identisch Regasterios (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need discussion. --Regasterios (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was CC. Looks like the uploader somehow chnaged or hide the license via attributing the video to the source video. --❣Paseyn msg 20:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep " was reviewed on 10 September 2017 by reviewer Leoboudv, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date." --QTHCCAN (talk) 18:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: reviewed properly, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:Burnley Council 2019.svg Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Burnley Council 2018.svg. Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]