Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_PMA_(10)_(25144975369).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_в_монастыре_преп._Иова_Почаевского_в_Мюнхене.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 01:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio, image copied from https://sverigestidskrifter.se/publicerar/basta-magasinsjournalistiken-2017-enligt-malin-ekman/ EPIC (talk) 14:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept, withdrawn (see history of the request). Taivo (talk) 11:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - renamed it. A false title is no valid reason for deletion. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
One or two of these may be within scope, in something like Category:Framingham, Massachusetts. But many of these are pretty clearly out of scope, and are extremely low resolution images of the back of someone's head or some apparently random anonymous child. GMGtalk 21:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, only 125 × 98 pixels. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed
- Keep - renamed - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC) (wrong title is not a valid reason for deletion)
- Kept
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
- Kept - no reason to delete it. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be closed.
- No reason for deletion, is renamed. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
- Kept, no valid reason to delete this and it's renamed. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:37, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
- Kept, no valid reason for deletion, is renamed now. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 09:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Poster for a movie; unlikely to be freely licensed and can't find any evidence of free licensure from a quick Google search. Purplewowies (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: (speedy) per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Complex logo, dubious PD claim. Sealle (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- The only complex part over TOO US is the wings, but it's based on US air forces' badges Category:United States Air Force aviation badges File:US - Aviation Wings.png.--Roy17 (talk) 14:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The background texture (wood-like), makes the image above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Author request deletion Ashzhu (talk) 21:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality 98.6.21.229 01:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Heavily in use. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
No educational use, COM:OOS. Pbrks (talk) 05:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
deletion in own userspace Eatcha (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue. In addition, the (so called) owner of the building has just nothing to say on the picture ; or he has to tell us why it does matter. Michel421 (talk) 21:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- PS - @Allony: Le propriétaire d'une chose ne dispose pas d'un droit exclusif sur l'image de celle-ci, il faut établir qu'il y a un trouble anormal : https://www.courdecassation.fr/jurisprudence_2/assemblee_pleniere_22/arr_ecirc_459.html Michel421 (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep per previous keeps and that no actual reason for deletion offered. Nominator offers repeated rants about alleged "false information" and "scandal" while never explaining what information is wrong nor what the supposed "scandal" is. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 11:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous keeps and that the nominator has offered no reason for deletion. (Repeated rants and allegations of false information and scandals, while never explaining what information is incorrect or what the supposed scandal is.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Rant with unspecified allegations of misinformation without explaining what is incorrect; no actual reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment: I don't know the French laws. Looking at Google maps satellite it is obvious that the photographer didn't stand on a public road or the like but about 100 m or less southward of the depicted object. To be seen best on this image where the edge of the corn field is visible. --Achim55 (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)- Speedy close. Disruptive DRs from a persistent sockpuppet. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet Thomthom888 (talk) 05:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue ; Michel421 (talk) 10:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 11:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous keeps and new nomination offering no reason for deletion, only vague ranting. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked . Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is a fevered rant that offers no reasons why the file should be deleted. Again and again I ask you: If some information is wrong, please explain what the correct information is. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Thierry 74 comment osez vous affirmer autant de bêtises dans vos écrit Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux la page donjon du temple. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairemePage de trollsicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 194.199.3.13 08:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous keeps and that the nominator has offered no reason for deletion. (Repeated rants and allegations of false information and scandals, while never explaining what information is incorrect or what the supposed scandal is.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 20:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment That is interesting opinion rant about supposed "trolls". You have not offered any reason why this image should be deleted. If something stated is wrong, please say what the correct information is.
Why do you keep refusing to explain? What are you hiding?(Pardon, I should not descend to such a low level of discussion, even if someone else has.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC) - Speedy close. Are there any more of these still left? They're disruptive DRs filed repeatedly by a sockpuppet. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Closing as Kept -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep troll nomination, vague allegations without offering any actual reasons why file should be deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Chabe01 (talk) 08:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this picture is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept, bad faith nomination without specific reason for deletion; blocked troll user -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
bonjour je suis l'auteur de cette photo et je souhaite sa supression car elle est prise dans un lieu privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas qu'elle soit difusé sur internet Thomthom888 (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Besides, the deletion was already requested once: it was a fail and it is totally useless to ask it the deletion once more. Chabe01 (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Thomthom888 est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande. Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep
- 1) Is that IP address entitled to talk on behalf of Thomthom888 ?
- 2) On the file Temple batie cour.jpg Thomthom888 wrote :
w:en:Creative Commons attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.PS - La photo prise le 14 juin 2018 est couverte par cette licence Creative Commons depuis au moins le 25 juillet 2019. Si l'auteur de la photo ne veut pas la voir ou la faire voir, il n'avait qu'à ne pas la publier ici.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it.
Photo privée prise dans un lieu privé ; sans autorisation. Le propriétaire ne peut pas l'effacer. 1Rames3 (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Photo of registered historic monument (monuments historiques de la France). Unless an explanation of what "authorization" is needed to take photo and how lack of such "authorization" makes it unusable on Commons, Keep. Also, do not remove categories and descriptions when nominating images for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it. Photo privée prise dans un lieu privé ; sans autorisation. Le propriétaire ne peut pas l'effacer. 1Rames3 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- The previous deletion request is still open; no need to list it again while it is still under consideration. More information might be helpful. Feel free to answer in French; someone can translate. (Traduction mécanique : La demande de suppression précédente est toujours ouverte ; inutile de le ré-inscrire tant qu'il est encore à l'étude. Plus d'informations pourraient être utiles. N'hésitez pas à répondre en français; quelqu'un peut traduire. ) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Et bien, ce n'est pas avec vous que Wikipédia deviendra crédible et source de référence pour un travail. Quand je lis tous vos commentaires, je comprends mieux pourquoi il est impossible de travailler avec vous. Avec un peu de bon sens, faire des recherches nous amène toujours à des résultats. Commencez donc à faire ce travail. J'annule toutes mes mises à jour sur cette page, je ne souhaite plus partager mes informations avec des personnes qui font n'importe quoi. La plupart des informations sont fausses et il suffit de faire un peu de lecture pour le voir. Aussi, soyez honnête avec vous-même, sur cette page, sont partagé des photos prisent dans un lieu privé, sans autorisation, elles ne peuvent plus être enlevé, car les utilisateurs sont bloqué et elles sont utilisées sous prétexte d'une licence libre. Elles sont même reprises sur monumentum. Comment pouvez-vous faire cela ? Vous vous croyez en toute impunité dernière vos ordinateurs. Si ce sont vos valeurs sur Wikipédia, alors ne vous étonnez pas si à cause de vous plus personne n'a confiance à ce qui est marquée dessus. 1Rames3 (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Auto translation, as my French is poor:
- Well, it is not with you that Wikipedia will become credible and a source of reference for a work. When I read all of your comments, I understand better why it is impossible to work with you. With a little common sense, researching always leads to results. So start doing this work. I cancel all my updates on this page, I no longer want to share my information with people who do anything. Most of the information is wrong and you only need to do a little reading to see it. Also, be honest with yourself, on this page are shared photos taken in a private place, without permission, they can no longer be removed, because users are blocked and they are used under the pretext of a free license. They are even repeated on monumentum. How can you do this? You think you have complete impunity behind your computers. If these are your values on Wikipedia, then don't be surprised if because of you no one trusts what is marked on it anymore.
- Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thankyou for your long comment. Can we please discuss this, so as to better understand the issue.
- There are images here that you did not photograph. There are images here, I understand, that you did photograph? Or that at least you uploaded them?
- Why should these images be deleted? Your claim is that they were taken on private property? These would not be covered under French FoP, if they are not in a public space, however that is irrelevant. FoP only exists to grant permission for a photographer to reproduce a copyrighted design, such as an artwork or a new building, in addition to their general rights to photograph the world at large (Photography is permitted in France). As this building appears ancient, there is no such design right being protected, or eased by FoP, and so any photographer may simply photograph it anyway.
- As I understand your complaint, you claim that these photographs involved some form of trespass in order to access the building? You then claim that the photographer thus has no right to their photographs. I am not a lawyer, I am certainly not a French lawyer, so please explain what aspect of French law would forbid this. We have no knowledge of how the photographer gained access. Perhaps they were invited into the building by the owner. Even if they were trespassing (Which we have no reason to believe), I know of no reason (My familiarity with French trespass law is old and now rusty) why such a trespass would then affect the licensing of photographs produced during such a trespass. I agree that French privacy law is much stricter than British law on privacy and photography, but to my limited knowledge that extends to photographs of people, not of buildings.
- Wikimedia Commons recognises (albeit inconsistently) that photography involves privacy issues, and such claims have often been listened to in the past. But you have not made such a claim clearly here, and it is hard to see where privacy has been breached over these innocuous photographs of a building. A building that is recognised as a historic monument, and thus of some public interest: Category:Donjon du Temple I note that you are focussing on one set of images from this category, not all of them. Can you please explain why only some are a problem?
- When you make allegations such as "Most of the information is wrong" it would be more helpful if you could be more specific: what is wrong? How should we correct this? We do hold accuracy to be of high value here and would wish to correct any such misunderstanding. However we are also volunteers here and unfamiliar with this building, so please help us.
- Apologies for my poor French, and so I will not attempt a translation. Please feel free for anyone to post translations of my posts. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Your efforts to delete fr:Donjon du temple don't seem to be gaining much support either: https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donjon_du_temple&action=history Andy Dingley (talk) 12:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- 1Rames3, what is your relation to Thomthom888 (talk · contribs) ? Are you the same editor? If not, has there been some past conflict between you? Is this all a continuation of Discussion utilisateur:Thomthom888? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fenetre batie.jpg. Yann (talk) 12:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @1Rames3: Do not remove photographer's license tag when nominating images for deletion -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep protect and indef block. This is just vandalism. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- This file was kept for 6 times, what's your new rationale? Repeating old rationales will only lead this file Speedy keep. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept. No reason to delete. Sock troll continues with vague rants and refusing to reply to questions of substance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Cette photo à été prise dans un lieu privé et le propriétaire ne souhaite pas que cette photo soit difusé sur internet sans son accord Thomthom888 (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
The author declares in description "It can't be used on Wikipedia". This means out of COM:SCOPE. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 06:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The author (Thomthom888) didn't write that: it was written by 2a01:e35:87fa:1170:c431:a645:894f:647a. I've reverted the change. --bjh21 (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: You're right. And Thomthom888 asked for deletion above for a false reason. Whatever, this a subject with problematic users. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Besides, the deletion was already requested twice: it was a fail and it is totally useless to ask it the deletion once more. Chabe01 (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Thomthom888 est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande.
Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason ; no copyright issue ; 4th invalid request Michel421 (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it. 1Rames3 (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per multiple previous listings; unclear what "authorization" is needed to photograph a registered historic monument in France and why lack of such "authorization" would invalidate use on Commons. Also: Please do not remove description and categories when nominating an image for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Et bien, ce n'est pas avec vous que Wikipédia deviendra crédible et source de référence pour un travail. Quand je lis tous vos commentaires, je comprends mieux pourquoi il est impossible de travailler avec vous. Avec un peu de bon sens, faire des recherches nous amène toujours à des résultats. Commencez donc à faire ce travail. J'annule toutes mes mises à jour sur cette page, je ne souhaite plus partager mes informations avec des personnes qui font n'importe quoi. La plupart des informations sont fausses et il suffit de faire un peu de lecture pour le voir. Aussi, soyez honnête avec vous-même, sur cette page, sont partagé des photos prisent dans un lieu privé, sans autorisation, elles ne peuvent plus être enlevé, car les utilisateurs sont bloqué et elles sont utilisées sous prétexte d'une licence libre. Elles sont même reprises sur monumentum. Comment pouvez-vous faire cela ? Vous vous croyez en toute impunité dernière vos ordinateurs. Si ce sont vos valeurs sur Wikipédia, alors ne vous étonnez pas si à cause de vous plus personne n'a confiance à ce qui est marquée dessus. 1Rames3 (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Temple batie cour.jpg. I suggest that all discussion be centralised there. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per precendence of prior related file discussions. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue. Chabe01 (talk) 08:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Justecommejaime est bloqué et veux supprimer cette photo. il en a droit. Vous l'avez bloqué alors supprimer cette photo comme il le demande. Supprimé cette photo. 2A01:CB15:8252:CA00:19B4:348:B2B:DA7A 09:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason ; no copyright issue ; 2th invalid request Michel421 (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Private photo taken in a private location; without authorization. The owner cannot delete it.
Photo privée prise dans un lieu privé ; sans autorisation. Le propriétaire ne peut pas l'effacer. 1Rames3 (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Photo of registered historic building. What is the problem? Keep unless better explanation is offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Temple batie cour.jpg. I suggest that all discussion be centralised there. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept from troll renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
_PMA_(10)_(25144975369).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_PMA_(10)_(25144975369).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo from Flickr may be under a free license, but this is derivative of the artistic work. Image taken in Philadelphia, and there is no freedom of panorama in the US for 2D works. We would therefore need reason to believe that the work by Faith Ringgold, who is a living person, has also been released under a compatible free license. GMGtalk 16:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
_PMA_(10)_(25144975369).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
_PMA_(10)_(25144975369).jpg){kind=link}
Per website: "© 2019 Manito Média. Tous droits réservés." Badzil (talk) 16:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
loaded in error it has a NC license Victuallers (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
loaded in error it has a NC license Victuallers (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of memorial by finnish sculptor Kirsti Liimatainen, died in 1964. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Photo uploaded in fi-Wiki. Htm (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of memorial by finnish sculptor Kirsti Liimatainen, died in 1964. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 17:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Personal image used by now-blocked sockpuppet at enwiki. No other presumed encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 20:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Tribute to National Championship Coaches, Notre Dame Stadium, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana (11045981044).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright protected content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Tribute to National Championship Coaches, Notre Dame Stadium, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana (11045857345).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright-protected content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded wrong image by mistake (resolution was too high and could be concern of privacy) Matt Hafner (talk) 13:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Phoops of photos, missing permission.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yvan Nijimbere (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
- File:Yvan Nijimbere 5.jpg
- File:Yvan Nijimbere 3.jpg
- File:Yvan Nijimbere 4.jpg
- File:Yvan Nijimbere 1.jpg
- File:Yvan Nijimbere.jpg
- File:Yvan Nijimbere 2.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Localhost007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low resolution photos of common subject.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kapitan3101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 19:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Image for made-up micronation used by now-blocked sockpuppet at enwiki. No other presumed encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 20:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Image for made-up micronation used by now-blocked sockpuppet at enwiki. No other presumed encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 20:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Image for made-up micronation used by now-blocked sockpuppet at enwiki. Essentially redundant to related image with a green dot at apparent location of made-up entity. No other presumed encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Personal image used by now-blocked sockpuppet at enwiki. No other presumed encyclopedic use. Kinu (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
JPG graphics of fluoride ion with serif font that should not be used in structures; not used. Alt. File:F- crop.svg. Wostr (talk) 01:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The atoms in the xenate anion do not all lie in the same plane. ChemNerd (talk) 13:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:Sodium Xenate.png This image has the same issue.
- File:Monosodium-xenate-3D-vdW.png This image has the same issue.
- Comment Two of them, File:Xenate-3D-vdW.png and File:Monosodium-xenate-3D-vdW.png, have now been replaced with updated versions that address my concern. ChemNerd (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Fixed ones kept, unfixed one deleted. --DMacks (talk) 10:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Sodium xenate is ionic. This image inaccurately depicts the sodium-oxygen bond as covalent. ChemNerd (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 10:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Although the chemical structures of the individual elements are accurate, this is an inaccurate 3D representation of a salt with these components. They are not layed out all in one plane like this. Also, this is a licensing issue here because the uploader has apparently created this image by combining other uploaders' images without attribution. ChemNerd (talk) 14:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
FeO is not a molecular solid DMacks (talk) 19:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely 3D geometry of a 3D image. N of amides should be tetrahedral (confirm with File:Lithium-orotate-from-xtal-3D-balls.png) DMacks (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: Na is not covalently bound; alternatives available in Category:Tartrazine. Leyo 16:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Four additional files from the same uploader have the same problem: ChemNerd (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per the incorrect sodium-oxygen covalent bonding. ChemNerd (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: all per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 00:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of finnish sculptor Reino Puustinen. Puustinen was born in 1920. Sculpture was unveiled in 1979, so it is not possible it to be in PD yet. No FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Use the SVG flags and dont upload PNG.
- File:Oman.svg.png
- File:United States.png
- File:Vietnam PNG.png
- File:Sweden PNG.png
- File:Peru PNG.png
- File:Netherland PNG.png
- File:Marruecos PNG.png
- File:Nigeria PNG.png
- File:España PNG.png
- File:Great Britain PNG.png
- File:India PNG.png
- File:Brasil PNG.png
- File:Costa Rica PNG.png
- File:Argentina PNG.png
Roy17 (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Not public domain 94.197.121.98 21:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyviol 79.52.32.51 23:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyviol 79.52.32.51 23:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyviol 79.52.32.51 23:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of publication
- File:ARTICLE POMMEREAU ERMITAGE Juin 2016.pdf
- File:ARTICLE P B DE LA T BA HS Juin 2015.jpg
- File:ARTICLE DORA ROGAN Dec 2017 page 2.jpg
- File:ARTICLE DORA ROGAN Dec 2017 page 1.jpg
- File:ARTICLE DORA ROGAN Dec 2017 page 1 et 2.jpg
- File:ARTICLE ART ABSOLUMENT NOV 2017.jpg
- File:ARTICLE 92 COLLECTOR 2016.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The user, Mboulart, did probably not understand that he/she needs to own the rights on the depicted work & photo to release it under a free license & Wikimedia Commons. Clearly a copyright violation. AntonierCH (d) 10:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
All user images appear to be screenshots from the TV
- File:Lorenda Starfelt with Flower.jpg
- File:Lori Floating.jpg
- File:Lee Taylor-Allen & Kenneth Boys.jpg
- File:Alex and his droogies.jpg
- File:A Clockwork Orange - the treatment.jpg
- File:Dancing on Baltimore rooftop.jpg
- File:Brad Mays editing "Stage Fright," 1987.jpg
- File:Jerseybackyard.jpg
- File:Trojan Women - Andromache.jpg
- File:Brad and Susan Gilbert in "Wolves".jpg
- File:Rain Pryor - JOAN publicity shot.jpg
- File:Joan - Rain Pryor - Saints Beckoning.jpg
- File:Wolvesbradbridgette.jpg
- File:Devilsmadgrandier.jpg
- File:Whitewhorefinale.jpg
- File:Cornertheatrestanleykeyes.jpg
- File:Defrank Crumb Madman&theNun.jpg
- File:Stage Fright - Performance.jpg
- File:Cornersandymacdondald1971.jpg
- File:Cornermortlubitz1971.jpg
- File:Inconnuejudyrowe.jpg
- File:Inconnuebethtrott.jpg
- File:Barreholdingcourthalf.jpg
- File:Devilsgrandiermingon.jpg
- File:Grandieratstake.jpg
- File:Robinwhitewhorecrosshalf.jpg
- File:Shelley Walpert-Fineman.jpg
- File:The Water Hen Lamplighter small.jpg
- File:Stagefrightposter.jpg
- File:Dragon Slayers - The Dragon.jpg
- File:Stagefright frannie on stage.jpg
- File:Bacchae teiresias joins the dance.jpg
- File:Bacchae pentheus in drag.jpg
- File:Bacchae pentheus agave.jpg
- File:Bacchae dionysus arrested.jpg
- File:Bacchae dionysus opening.jpg
- File:Bacchae opening ritual.jpg
- File:Bacchae death of pentheus.jpg
- File:Lorendastarfelt.jpg
- File:Trojan Women - Helen & Menaleusonline.jpg
- File:Trojan Women - Hecuba & Talthybios.jpg
- File:Audacitytexan.jpg
- File:Marat-sade-note01.jpg
- File:Waterhenfoursome.jpg
- File:Singularity.jpg
- File:Thebacchae1997.jpg
- File:The Water Hen - NYC, 1983.jpg
- File:Equus-Dysart02Online.jpg
- File:Alankneeling.jpg
- File:Brad & Sherry Equusonline.jpg
- File:Equus-Jill&Alanoline.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Most look like photos of stage plays to me, as the photographer describes them as being. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- No, they are clearly screenshots of the TV and did not take pictures himself.In addition, there is no metadata ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Many predate digital camera metadata, going back to the 1970s and 1980s (and many photographers were still working with film through the 1990s). Some show photoshop metadata as one would expect from a scanned film photo that had some contrast adjustment before uploading. I see no evidence for your assertions that these are TV screenshots, nor that the uploader is not the photographer. If you do, please share it. If this was just your assumption, I suggest your assumption was mistaken. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: FWIW, the picture of Brad Mays on Wikipedia was uploaded by Evalpor1955 and is OTRS-pending. This reinforces my initial impression that the attribution provided by Bradmays is legitimate. Perhaps he lost credentials for Bradmays and this is his new account? In any case, the pictures uploaded by Bradmays may also be verified by OTRS if we want to be sure. Nardog (talk) 07:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Many predate digital camera metadata, going back to the 1970s and 1980s (and many photographers were still working with film through the 1990s). Some show photoshop metadata as one would expect from a scanned film photo that had some contrast adjustment before uploading. I see no evidence for your assertions that these are TV screenshots, nor that the uploader is not the photographer. If you do, please share it. If this was just your assumption, I suggest your assumption was mistaken. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- No, they are clearly screenshots of the TV and did not take pictures himself.In addition, there is no metadata ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Concur with Infrogmation. None appears to be a screenshot. Some are in resolutions so high they could not possibly be from TV. Nardog (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Skazi as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 18:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Skazi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I'm a hundred percent positive that this is copy and not a personal photo + https://nlmodels.ru/blog/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/imported_from_media_libray/hdog_zen.png?bwg=15586897351 + https://www.instagram.com/p/BvqeiTwg8Ly/ etc.
Converted by me to regular DR due to the previous DR. However, the Instagram-hit (dated March 31st) is rather convincing. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Not clear if this is own work or not, if not, then it appears to be a copyrighted album cover, if so, then it's not clear that it is in COM:SCOPE and if it is, we need information on all these other derivative elements, the logos and other images. GMGtalk 20:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
The image incorrectly shows a sodium-oxygen covalent bond when it should be ionic. ChemNerd (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; sodium chromate is ionic and doesn't have a covalent bond between sodium and oxygen. File is unused & ready for deletion. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect (right portion is citrate not gluconate as was its use-case or glucolate as filename says). And it's obviously a graphical composite of lower-res images of uncited origin...that's a Commons policy violation. DMacks (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment It has now been updated with one that is chemically correct, but still obvious composite of uncited originals, which is still a policy problem. User:Hoa112008, you are skating on thin ice here. DMacks (talk) 09:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- And now it's not-correct again (one of the charge values contradicts the fundamental nature of resonance that is explicitly illustrated). DMacks (talk) 06:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Uncited derivative of other files, unused, salt model depicted as anion+cations instead of a crystal structure, different size of atoms of the same element. Wostr (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS, 3D art is copyrighted Ytoyoda (talk) 04:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by القيادة العامة لمكافحة الارهاب والتطرف (talk · contribs)
[edit]Inappropriate use of Wikimedia Commons, out of project scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a free web host.
- File:لأئحة النظام الاساسي 10 لجان القيادة العامة2019.pdf
- File:القيادة العامة لمكافحة الارهاب والتطرف والفساد.jpg
- File:القيادة العامة لمكافحة الارهاب والتطرف.jpg
- File:القيادة العامة لمكافحة الارهاب والتطرف .jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader is globally locked. --Achim (talk) 13:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Jianhui67 in DR below. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:NMU Michigan.jpg
- File:NMU bowling Green Senior Year.png
- File:Roger Trudeau Greenville Grrowl ECHL 2001 Leading Scorer.jpg
- File:Roger NMU Pix 4.jpg
- File:Roger Trudeau After College NMU.jpg
- File:Roger NMU Pix 7.jpg
- File:Roger Trudeau NMU Wildcat Hockey 1998.png
- File:Roger Trudeau of Marquette MI Achieves Deams of Playing in the NHL.pdf
- File:Trudeau Achieves dreams.pdf
- File:All star growl.jpg
- File:Trudeau signs with NHL.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permissions, copyright issues. --Jianhui67 T★C 15:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by संदीपसिंह759 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in self-promotional article.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and misuse of these images on other projects. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation MB (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Likely incorrectly licensed lossy version of File:Sumitomo Heavy Industries logo.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 02:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Causeway Bay Last Day - Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution -umbrellarevolution -umbrellamovement -a7s (15833282158).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to EXIF, the author is unlikely to be the creator A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I don't think that nickoelodeon allowed the CC license Avron (talk) 14:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:DW, a 2D representation of a copyrighted character art Ytoyoda (talk) 04:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Dubious PD claim, no evidence of pre-1949 publication. Sealle (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
image qui n'a pas à être sur wikipédia, mauvaise interprétation, faux nom et non consentement de la part des propriétaires du lieu et de la photo Allony (talk) 06:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, it is not because the name is wrong that you have to remove a file. The way to do it to rename it. Besides, the buildings looks like other buildings photographed in other photos in Donjon du Temple category. Chabe01 (talk) 08:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: historical image of unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Ce lieu est privé et le proprietaire ne souhaite pas que la photo soit difusé sur internet, la photo est prise sans avoir au préalable contacté le propriétaire Thomthom888 (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason ; the file is in use and I do not see any copyright issue Michel421 (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un lieu privé, non consentement du propriétaire et ce n'est pas une photo de panorama, elle est utilisée et reprise par trop de site internet et les informations décrites sont fausses. Allony (talk) 06:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The reason is not valid as it was said for the last deletion request. The way the request was written makes me think that Allony is or is close to Thomthom888 and other accounts he created to try to remove files about the building. Chabe01 (talk) 08:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No known copyright issue ; in addition, the (so-called) owner of the building has to tell us how this image is causing him any harm Michel421 (talk) 11:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué. 1Rames3 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous keeps and no reason for deletion offered by nominator (nominator offers a vague rant while refusing to specify what the supposed misinformation is). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Chères Internaute, méfiez vous et lisez bien toutes les discutions avant de prendre au sérieux cette page. Elle est séquestrée par des trolls qui se feront un malin plaisir de vous faire bloquer pour que vous ne puissiez pas modifier le contenu. Ils ont un intérêt clairement explicite et le font savoir. Si vous modifiez ou annulé une de leur information, ils vous font bloqué, et ils ont les armes!! Que cachent-ils ? 'Cette page doit-être supprimé, elle est rempli de fausse informations et de photos prise dans le lieu privé, sans autorisation. Ils ont bloqué ceux qui ont pris les photos pour qu'ils ne puissent plus les supprimer. Ils agissent en toute impunité. Je vous appelle tous a l'aide pour faire arrêter ce scandale et pour supprimer cette page avant que je ne sois bloqué 89.156.12.25 18:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
File is unavailable under claimed license; copyright is held by Riot Games. Most likely copied from here. CentreLeftRight ✉ 07:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CptViraj as Fair use (Fair use) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleting this file would be inconsistent with all the other logos of India we kept so far. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
#
- Delete@Hedwig in Washington: This file is copyrighted because of loss of public domain flag, it is possible as a out of project scope, I decided to delete them. Regards, Jkg1997 (talk • contribs • CA) 18:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No enough rationale for deletion. The image contains just shapes and a image of chakra which is already seen in public domain. The license can be changed to {{PD-shape}}. The image is obviously in scope. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, under COM:TOO. --Strakhov (talk) 20:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:Flag of the Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi.png
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Same flag published here in May 2019, i.e. prior to our upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for starting this discussion, this file was priviously deleted here and to me its no surprise that, Tiven came to rescue here, I think we need to watch this account for suspicious activities as this file was used on the pages created by hiwale or his socks. thanks QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: after reading this, which is given as a reference in Copyright rules by territory/India, it is far from being obvious that this can be considered below ToO in India. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clinton motors (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old adverts, definitely not own work - needs permission
- File:Pontiac 1948 - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Clintons Motors Advertisement 1950's.jpg
- File:Pontiac 1947 - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Pontiac 1946 - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Vauxhall - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Buick General Motors Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Vauxhall Victor - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Plymouth Suburban - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Buick - General Motors - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
- File:Vauxhall Velox Saloon - 1949 - Clintons Motors Advertisement.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - bogus licenses. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
If this was just found online somewhere and the performers are unknown then the license here is improper. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
This is by the JSDF; Japan doesn't have instant public domain release for government works. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
{{Blurry}} Lotje (talk) 05:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
It is old and outdated. Devonte.Riley (talk) 06:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
F10, personal pic by non-contributor, even uploader wants it deleted Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
This image appears to be from a photoshoot by Tawni Bannister for InStyle magazine (see similar image at https://www.instyle.com/celebrity/abby-stein-hasidic-rabbi-transgender). Based on the uploader's numerous other copyvios related to this subject, I doubt it is their "own work". Funcrunch (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per copyright violations. Gwenhope (talk) 08:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Note that the same applies to derivative image File:AbbyStein 2 (cropped).jpg, which was created yesterday (not sure if I need to file a separate request for that file). Funcrunch (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Also File:AbbyStein 2018.jpg which appears to be from the same InStyle shoot. Funcrunch (talk) 17:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photograph taken by me. But the subject wants to make it down. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Dear, Jameslwoodward, the person who depicted in this image wants to make it down. And as a creator of the file, I don't have any problem with this. ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
I do understand that, but, as a general rule we do not take down images of people at the request of the subject and we never take them down at the request of third parties, even if the third party is the photographer. If the subject wants the image taken down, have them send a request using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Unused random uploaded file. Authors request. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Uploaded in 2017. --Kadı Message 09:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
False titel, Doublette to F_115_00002 SBB Historic (talk) 08:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
no need to delete this item, it has been renamed. The delete-request can be cancelled.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soukane amadou (talk · contribs)
[edit]All flags that are most likely already available here. Filenames seem to be pure garbage or an extremely obscure language. The date, for example "߂߀߁߉-߁߁-߂߄" on File:ߞߊ߬ߝߊ.jpg when searched for in Google strangely does seem to correspond to 24 November 2019. It's like this is a screwed up font? How does that even work.. Only File:ߡߊߦߕߏ߫ ߕߌ߲ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png and File:ߞߊ߬ߝߊ.jpg are not flags.
- File:ߛߎ߬ߘߊ߲߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.gif
- File:ߋߙߕߙߋߦߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߖߌ߲߬ߖߌ߬ߓߊ߯ߙߌ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߛߌߛߍߟ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߕߊ߲ߖ߭ߊ߲ߣߌ߲߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߖߌߓߎߕߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߛߏߡߊߟߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߞߣߋߦߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.gif
- File:ߌߗߏߔߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߞߡߐߙߌ߬ ߕߌ߲ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߏߙߋߛߌߦߏߛߌ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߟߊߥߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߘߊߜ߭ߊߛߌߞߊߙߌ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߙߊߦߎߣߌߦߎߣ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߊߦߕߏ߫ ߕߌ߲ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߏߖ߭ߊߓߌߞ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߝߘߊ߬ߝߌ߲߬ߠߊ߫ ߡߊ߲߬ߕߎ߬ߙߋ߬ߦߊ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.jpg
- File:ߖߘߍ߬ߞߟߏ߬ߓߊ߰ߦߊ ߜߊ߬ߙߊ ߛߌ߲߬ߝߏ߲߬ߧߊ߬ߟߌ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.jpg
- File:ߋߙߐߔߎ߬ ߞߋ߬ߟߋ߲߬ߧߊ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߝߘߊ߬ߝߌ߲߬ߠߊ߫ ߕߟߋ߬ߓߐ ߞߙߎ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߊߙߊߓߎ߫ ߖߊ߯ߓߘߊ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߎ߬ߢߎ߲߬ߠߊ .png
- File:ߞߊ߬ߝߊ.jpg
- File:ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- What is this? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Answering my own question.. It appears to be w:N'Ko script. Invented in 1949 and unclear how many "speakers" (it's only written) it has. 1949.. I'm pretty sure the Latin alphabet had already been invented at that point, as well as Russian, Arabic, Japanese, etc.. Creating a new standard was a great way to cut Africa off from the rest of the world, culturally. We could try converting some of these to redirects, but I doubt that would be very useful. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, considering it does use the Hindu–Arabic numeral system but made up completely new symbols for the numbers instead of just using 123 strongly suggests Solomana Kante had medidated far too deep that night. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Answering my own question.. It appears to be w:N'Ko script. Invented in 1949 and unclear how many "speakers" (it's only written) it has. 1949.. I'm pretty sure the Latin alphabet had already been invented at that point, as well as Russian, Arabic, Japanese, etc.. Creating a new standard was a great way to cut Africa off from the rest of the world, culturally. We could try converting some of these to redirects, but I doubt that would be very useful. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soukane amadou (talk · contribs)
[edit]SVG versions of country flags are available for long time.
- File:ߟߛߌߕߏ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߛߎߥߊߖ߭ߌ߬ߟߊ߲ߘߊ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߝߘߊ߬ߝߌ߲߬ߠߊ߫ ߥߙߏ߬ߘߎ߮ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߓߐߛߌߥߣߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߣߊߡߓߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߛߊߓߎߕߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲ (ߍߛߌߔߊߢߌ߲߬).png
- File:ߡߌߛߌ߬ߙߊ߲߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.jpg
- File:ߟߓߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߊߙߊߓߎ߫ ߕߌߢߍߞߏ߲ߞߏ߫ ߓߍ߯ߦߟߊߞߊ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߞߣߊߙߌ߫ ߕߌ߲ߞߙߎ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲ (ߍߛߌߔߊߢߌ߲߬).png
- File:ߕߌߣߌ߲ߛߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߊ߬ߙߐߞߎ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߡߊߟߋߟߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲ (ߍߛߌߔߊߢߌ߲߬).png
- File:ߊߟߌߖ߭ߋߙߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߛߊߥߎߕߏߡߌ߲߫ ߣߌ߫ ߔߍ߬ߙߍ߲ߛߌߔߍ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߣߌߗ߭ߋߙߌ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲ (ߖߋ߬ߟߌ߬ߓߊ߬ߟߊ߫).png
- File:ߞߏ߲߬ߞߏ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߣߌߗ߭ߋߙߌߦߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲ (ߖߋ߬ߟߌ߬ߓߊ߬ߘߎ߯).png
- File:ߝߘߊ߬ߝߌ߲߬ߠߊ߫ ߕߍߡߊߓߊ߲߮ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߞߊߡߌߙߐߣߌ߲߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߖߌ߲ߓߊߓߎߦߋ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߖ߭ߊ߲ߓߌߦߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߗߊߘߌ߬ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߙߎߥߊ߲ߘߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߓߎߙߎ߲ߘߌ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߞߏ߲߬ߞߏ߫ ߓߍ߯ߦߟߊߞߊ ߞߊ߲ߓߍ߲߫.png
- File:ߎߜ߭ߊ߲ߘߊ߫ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߛߎ߬ߘߊ߲߫ ߥߙߏ߬ߘߎ߮ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
- File:ߙߊߦߎߣߌߦߎߣ ߖߏ߲߬ߖߏ߲.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:นิศากาล
[edit]- File:20120801 131053 resize.1.jpg
- File:รถตัดไม้.jpg
- File:ไม้สับ 4.jpg
- File:ไม้สับ.jpg
- File:ไม้สับ 3.jpg
- File:สวนป่ากิตติ.jpg
- File:ผลิตกล้า.jpg
- File:สวนกิตติ 1.jpg
- File:บริษัท สวนกิตติ.jpg
- File:รูปผู้บริหาร ๑๙๐๒๑๘ 0213.jpg
- File:คุณแคท.jpg
- File:รูปผู้บริหาร ๑๙๐๒๑๘ 0007.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0009.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0007.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0008.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0011.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0010.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0003.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0004.jpg
- File:วิกิ ๑๙๐๒๑๔ 0005.jpg
- File:สวนกิตติ.jpg
- File:กิตติ ดำเนินชาญวนิชย์ .jpg
The user cross-uploaded the photo from Thai Wikipedia, expecting to use these images for her subpage at Thai Wikipedia (about Suankitti Group). However, the user claimed in a discussion with Thai Wikipedia administrator that "the owner of the photo do not permit the use of the photo" (see Special:Diff/8282297). In view of this, I have a reasonable cause to suspect that the user may not have permission to upload these images. The user herself also requested at Thai Wikipedia that the image be deleted (see Special:Diff/8601807). To facilitate the request, I would like to nominate the images uploaded by นิศากาล be deleted. I will inform the user accordingly. --G(x) (talk) 10:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Samicana only exists on nationstates.net (https://www.nationstates.net/nation=samicana), fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Samicana only exists on nationstates.net (https://www.nationstates.net/nation=samicana), fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Nonsense XRay talk 10:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unused file--√Tæ√ 07:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Nonsense, awful categorization. That can not be serious. XRay talk 10:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Nonsense, awful categorization. That can not be serious. XRay talk 10:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP in Russia for monuments. 176.59.50.197 11:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP in Russia for monuments. 176.59.50.197 11:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP in Russia for monuments. 176.59.50.197 11:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NoFoP in Russia for monuments. 176.59.50.197 11:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NoFoP in Russia for monuments. 176.59.50.197 11:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal picture; Out of COM:SCOPE and in conflict with COM:NOTHOST. CptViraj (📧) 11:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
File:HK 灣仔 Wan Chai 謝斐道 Jaffe Road Hang Shun Mansions shop Gold Coast Seafood Restaurant name sign March 2019 IX2.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:FOP Hong Kong, the sign is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Dubious license "own work" - Picture found on the internet http://www.stauer-publishing.dk/OM_SKK_NONSK_site.htm and http://denstoredanske.dk/Kunst_og_kultur/Litteratur/Dansk_litteratur/Efter_1940/Jens_Staubrand Pugilist (talk) 12:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Per File:JulienOdoul RassemblementNational.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
No publication date, no date, no author.
- File:Khieu Samphan and Norodom Sihanouk.jpg
- File:Ieng Sary (Foreign Minister).jpg
- File:Chairman Khieu Samphan.jpg
- File:Khieu Samphan 1980.jpg
- File:Nuon Chea.jpg
- File:Ieng Sary.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Khieu Samphan 1980 has an author and date --Havsjö (talk) 18:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- yes, but the date makes it clearly still under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo posted on Flickr by the Metropolitan Transportation may be freely licensed, but there is no freedom of panorama for 2D works like this in the United States, and so we would need evidence that the original work by en:Chuck Close, who is a living person, has also been released under a compatible free license. GMGtalk 14:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I have no opinion on this, but would like to point out that this is used on several wikis. As the uploader, I did not know about this issue. If this is the case, the following files may also be affected:
- File:86thStreet- Chuck Close, Subway Portraits (31374025800).jpg
- File:86thStreet- Chuck Close, Subway Portraits (31374027190).jpg
- File:86thStreet- Chuck Close, Subway Portraits (31374027880).jpg
- File:86thStreet- Chuck Close, Subway Portraits (31630806721).jpg
- File:86thStreet- Chuck Close, Subway Portraits (31630807151).jpg
- File:86thStreet- Chuck Close, Subway Portraits (31630807591).jpg
- I think that the MTA does have Close's permission, but can't confirm it right now. epicgenius (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: I think you should add the above images to the deletion discussion as well. epicgenius (talk) 20:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Hmm? I simply presumed the reviewing admin would take them into consideration also. GMGtalk 20:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Why is image public domain in the U.S.A.? Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Works by Pavel Fedorovitch Chelischev (d. 1957) made in Russia before he acquires US Citizenship are still under Russian law so not public domain yet.
- File:Ожерелье из роз. 1931 г. Частное собрание, Россия.jpg
- File:Ожерелье из роз. 1931 г. Частное собрание.jpg
- File:Экселиор.jpg
- File:2016 CKS 13765 0020 000(pavel tchelitchew the concert).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Mass upload of bogus self claims. Sourcing/Evidence of PD claim, if any, needed
- File:Johannesfink.jpg
- File:MartinFiebig.jpg
- File:Falkowski Kurt von - Generalmajor.jpg
- File:Fahnert.jpg
- File:Erdmann.jpg
- File:Danckelmann.jpg
- File:KBvonDoring.jpg
- File:5-Nachtjager-Leaders-Kurt-Bertram-von-Doring-01.jpg
- File:Hans-wilhelm-doering-manteuffel.jpg
- File:Deichmann.jpg
- File:Dahlmann.jpg
- File:Conrad-Gerhard.jpg
- File:Coeler.jpeg
- File:Wolfgang von Chamier-Glisczinski.jpg
- File:General der Flakartillerie HeinrichBurchard.jpg
- File:General der Flakartillerie Heinrich Burchard.jpg
- File:Bogatsch.jpg
- File:Boenigk.jpg
- File:Boenicke.jpg
- File:Bodenschatz.jpg
- File:Werneranton.jpg
- File:Angerstein.jpg
- File:Kurtandersen.jpg
- File:Stoeckl-Alois.png
- File:Erichpetersen.jpg
- File:WilhelmSussmann.jpg
- File:Hannes stelzer.jpg
- File:Wilhelm-Sussmann.jpg
- File:Helmuth Hufenbach.jpg
- File:Wilhelmsoeth.jpg
- File:Wilhelm Söth.jpg
- File:Maxlemke.jpg
- File:Hanns-Horst von Necker.jpg
- File:Wilhelm-bleckwenn.jpeg
- File:Heinrich-von-Behr-Baron.jpg
- File:Hermannschulte.jpg
- File:Kleeman.jpg
- File:Marcks.jpg
- File:Vonsodenstern.jpg
- File:WolfXylander.jpg
- File:Wernerneumann.jpg
- File:Risse.jpg
- File:Demme.jpg
- File:Haehlingkurt.jpg
- File:Brunoschatz.jpg
- File:Harald-Schultz (1).jpg
- File:Harald-Schultz.jpg
- File:Mauritz freiherr von strachwitz und gro -zauche large.jpg
- File:KurtHerzog.jpg
- File:GottfriedWeber (1).jpg
- File:GottfriedWeber.jpg
- File:Thomaschki.jpg
- File:AlfredGause.jpg
- File:FriedrichJobstVolckamervonKirchensittenbach.jpg
- File:Alberthenze (1).jpg
- File:Alberthenze.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 14:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Austria, it doesn't appear that 3D works of art displayed inside museums are free of copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio, found on various websites, no OTRS permission. EPIC (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Dubious upload without EXIF. See also https://forum.newsroyal.ru/threads/okruzhenie-monarxij.109/#post-16438 (#11, 13.09.2019) Mutter Erde (talk) 15:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bezierscatane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Edoardo Puglisi , artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bezierscatane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Lettre de remerciement à Edoardo Puglisi pour son exposition à l'espace Riquet.jpg
- File:Con Anita Ekberg.jpg
- File:Attestato di Cavaliere al Merito della Repubblica Italiana.jpg
- File:Gèrard Xuriguera, Edoardo Puglisi, Henry Peryer .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
The photographer sent a permission to OTRS for the photos taken and uploaded by him however this is a derivative work of a non-simple illustration (hand and pen). Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Delmi Álvarez. Regasterios (talk) 15:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work Mutter Erde (talk) 15:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, our project is used as a project for school subject called Biophysics. It was created based on Exam question as a summary for students. In the description of Commons is said, that we can add anything we want, because Commons is a public medium. So, this project is used primary for our school and students, but can be used for anybody within public users. We didn't breach any rules of Commons, so no need for deleting this poster. Thank you --gryfinn (talk)
- How can you judge the notability of this poster and its importance for teaching biophysics, Eugene? Are you an expert in pedagogy and medical biophysics? And what is "out of project scope" here? Definitely not to delete, it is important part of our Wikiversity study project. --Kychot (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - This poster is illegible at the resoultion at which it was uploaded, therefore it is useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
License laundering. It is a video produced by the Agencia EFE, as the logo captioned in the first second of the video (or the logo in this image seen in the glass-wall behind) indicates. Asqueladd (talk) 15:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dimanavidinova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Ива Хаджиева 5.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов снимка.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева снимка.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 4.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 3.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 2.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева 1.jpg
- File:Ива Хаджиева.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 8.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 7.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 5.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов -4.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 3.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 2.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов 1.jpg
- File:Димитър Арнаудов.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dimanavidinova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Iva Hadzhieva and/or Facebook images, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:8. Ива Хаджиева Брод, бронз, 1988; Iva Hadjieva Stream Passing, bronze, 1988.jpg
- File:6. Ива Хаджиева Студентка, шамот, 1984 Iva Hadjieva Student, chamotte, 1984.jpg
- File:1. Ива Хаджиева Хирошима, шамот, 1982 Iva Hadjieva Hiroshima, chamotte, 1982.jpg
- File:4. Ива Хаджиева Ябълка, 40х25х75см Iva Hadjieva Apple, 40x25x75 cm.jpg
- File:11. Ива Хаджиева “Отдих“, Гипс 50x70см, 1985 Iva Hadjieva “Relaxation”, gypsum 50x70сm, 1985.jpg
- File:9. Ива Хаджиева Куклар, Почетен приз, връчван от Академията за Куклено изкуство, бронз, 1995 Iva Hadjieva Puppetier,.jpg
- File:10. Ива Хаджиев Леви-Десни, бронз, 1991 Iva Hadjieva Left-Right, bronze, 1991.jpg
- File:7. Ива Хаджиева Мълвата, бронз, 1983 Iva Hadjieva The Rumor, bronze, 1983.jpg
- File:2. Ива Хаджиева Куклар, плакет, бронз, 1995 Iva Hadjieva Puppeteer, plaque, bronze, 1995.jpg
- File:3. Ива Хаджиева Клюкарки; бронз 40х15х20 см Iva Hadjieva Gossip Girls, bronze 40x15x20 cm.jpg
- File:5. Ива Хаджиева Мъжко хоро, бронз, 1986 iva Hadjieva Male's Line Dance, bronze, 1986.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
no permission Mutter Erde (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, painting and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Alexander Kircher mit Frau Romana - nach 1900.jpg
- File:Torpedokanonenboot SMS Magnet - Nach einem Gemälde von Alexander Kircher - Reproduktion von Andreas Szklenar, ungarischer Maler.jpg
- File:Estratto dal passo ancestrale delle famiglie Kircher-Teichmann del 6 giugno 1939.jpg
- File:Il pittore Alexander Kircher con firma all'età di 45 anni (2).png
- File:Der Maler Alexander Kircher, etwa im Alter von 45.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
There is nothing to discuss in my opinion. - The file: "Estratto dal passo ancestral delle famiglie Kircher-Teichmann del 6 giugno 1939.jpg" is a copy of my own ancestor passport that my father, who died in 1983, the physicist Horst Teichmann "https://de.wikipedia.org › wiki › Horst_Teichmann" has created for me that means I have the unrestricted rights of this Document. - The German-Austrian marine and landscape painter "Alexander Kircher" (died 1939) was my grandfather. The photos I posted on Wikipedia are part of our family archive. I have the unrestricted rights to publish photos and images from the archive. - Exact details, for example in which year or where individual photos were taken, are unfortunately no longer possible after almost 100 years. Regardless, the painter has been dead for over 75 years. ...... The file: "Torpedo gun boat SMS magnet ...." was left to me by the owner and copyright holder of the painting freely for publication at Wikipedia. - That he must confirm this release on Wikipedia personally, I did not know. - My identification and the family connection Kircher / Teichmann I have now proven by several copies from my ancestor pass. These documents are now available at permissions-Commons@wikimedia.org. -- Buonasera (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Note please that you must not claim {{Own}} when uploading photographs and art work made by others. Incorrect claims make it difficult to believe anything you say and may lead to your being blocked from editing on Commons.
- Items 1,4,5 (5 is a duplicate of 4):Simply owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph, does not give you the right to freely license it. The copyright to photographs belongs to the photographer or his heirs and cannot kept here without a free license.
- Item 2 - the file description says "After a painting by Alexander Kircher - Reproduction of Andreas Szklenar, Hungarian painter"., which says that this is a DW of a work by Andreas Szklenar. While the reproduction by Alexander Kircher has its own copyright, Szklenar's heirs also have a the copyright. (Note that the description is ambiguous -- I may have the original and the copy revrsed, but the same rule applies either way -- the heirs of each artist must provide a free license.) Note also that just as with photographs, the owner of a painting is not the copyright holder unless the artist executed a formal written copyright license separate from the bill of sale for the work. If the owner of the work wishes to freely license it, he must provide a copy of that license via OTRS.
- Item 3: The passport serves no educational purpose.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear Arosio Stefano,
- Comment: Marco Verch's flickr account is blacklisted. The Admin (Turelio) referred me to this particular case which he launched. Also this long DR taks about misuse and doubtful attribution by Marco Verch. It is clear that Marco's account was added to the blacklist. I was not around for the discussion. Leoboudv (talk) 10:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Refer to the main discussion page that you link above, to decide if the image must be kept or deleted.
- Keep From my point of view the images must be kept: as stated in the main discussion page, it is not the responsibility of Commons to "protect" reusers from getting into licence trouble. Commons must only verify that the individual imported photos have the correct license (without ambiguity or tricks).--Arosio Stefano (talk) 09:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: De728631, Alexis Jazz, Turelio & Jeff G. think or say Here that Commons has to protect its users by deleting images from Marco Verch’s account. I think Lymantria has this view too. This DR has been open since November 26 (20 days) but I don’t know how Commons can keep this image if Commons cannot protect users who use this image and the copyright owner is quick to use a lawyer over a discrepancy over the licensing of his images. The image may be licensed freely Arosio but what guarantee does anyone have that they won’t be threatened by Marco Verch in future? This is indeed a unique case...where an image license is free but the copyright holder is dangerous to deal with. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Was deleted as part of Commons:Deletion requests/File:SPD-Kandidaten für Köln- Martin Dörrmann, Elfi Scho-Antwerpes, Dr. Rolf Mützenich und Prof. Dr. Karl Lauterbach (37388077235).jpg on January 12, 2020 Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Suspected flickr washing: Single upload by flickr user "Vivek Yeljale", there tagged to be a "still from TVC" Achim (talk) 13:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Edit: In addition, might be related to sockmaster User:Vivek.k.Verma. --Achim (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Suspected Copyvio – in deWP there given Kevin Kleebach as rightholder 109.40.130.245 15:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
no permission Mutter Erde (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from album covers. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
13 KB. Dubious "own" work Mutter Erde (talk) 15:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
5 KB. Dubious "own" work Mutter Erde (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Василий Ганоцкий (talk · contribs)
[edit]Living astist bio. Works undercopyright, a permission via OTRS is needed.
- File:001 Ганоцкий В в мастерской 2018.jpg
- File:Портрет Калабухіна 2000.jpg
- File:Півонії 2007.jpg
- File:Ганоцкий В.Л. Подих весни.jpg
- File:Красный натюрморт.jpg
- File:Портрет художника Константинопольского А.М.jpg
Anna (Cookie) (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Bogus CC0 license - per source "of use, is authorised, for personal use or for further non-commercial or commercial dissemination, provided that the entire item is reproduced" The underlined is a restriction of derivatives that renders the images non-free. We require unrestricted alteration.
- File:Elsi KATAINEN.jpg
- File:Ville NIINISTÖ.jpg
- File:Eva KAILI.jpg
- File:Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU.jpg
- File:Salima YENBOU.jpg
- File:Irène TOLLERET.jpg
- File:Pierre KARLESKIND.jpg
- File:Agnès EVREN.jpg
- File:David CORMAND.jpg
- File:Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD.jpg
- File:Jérémy DECERLE.jpg
- File:Stéphane BIJOUX.jpg
- File:Alicia HOMS GINEL.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Denmark.
- File:Valgplakater Koge 2015maj30 0147 (17681624483) (cropped).jpg
- File:Valgplakater Koge 2015maj30 0147 (17681624483).jpg
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: --Trade (talk) 21:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging, toys, game artwork.
- File:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition unpacking (27347710261).jpg
- File:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition unpacking (27347713671).jpg
- File:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition unpacking (27419131385).jpg
- File:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition unpacking (26810537274).jpg
- File:Valve awards (3080618115).jpg
- File:Valve games (3081458564).jpg
- File:L4D Hunter Sock Monkey (3330381884).jpg
- File:L4D Witch Sock Monkey (3486898309).jpg
- File:Left 4 Dead merchandise freebies (3081473986).jpg
- File:The Mystery Machine from Scooby-Doo at 2013 Comic-Con International (9342392464).jpg
- File:Robin from Teen Titans Go! at 2013 Comic-Con International (9342383858).jpg
- File:Starfire from Teen Titans Go! at 2013 Comic-Con International (9339587295).jpg
- File:Beast Boy from Teen Titans Go! at 2013 Comic-Con International (9342370436).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Corporate documents. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- 'Corporate documents'? You can't be serious. Would you kindly stop filling frivolous deletion requests? Anyways both and the entire web-based collaborative-fiction project are both very clearly licensed under CC BY-SA --Trade (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the game these images are from is freely licensed, as noted by Trade and the README here. First image: [1], second image: [2]. clpo13(talk) 17:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
![[1]](https://github.com/Regalis11/scpcb/blob/master/GFX/items/docRAND3.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://github.com/Regalis11/scpcb/blob/master/GFX/items/docORI.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
I found higher quality cover images so these are not needed
- File:Drugs single album cover.webp
- File:I Hear an Orchestra Play single cover.webp
- File:Pills single cover.webp
- File:This Song Is Not About Anything single cover.webp
- File:Anprim Anthem single cover.webp
Trade (talk) 02:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
images that are not free licensed. because package is still copyrightable. it is kinda COM:DEMINIMIS for me.
- File:Hostess Limited Edition Pumpkin Spice Cheesecake Twinkies (29218795483).jpg
- File:Pringles Sugar Cookie Potato Crisps (30445516190).jpg
- File:Hostess Limited Edition White Peppermint Twinkies (30888562401).jpg
- File:Ben & Jerry's Limited Batch Confetti Cake Ice Cream (31177113361).jpg
- File:M&M's White Cheesecake (32143337121).jpg
- File:Limited Edition Haribo Watermelon and Cherry Gold-Bears 5 (32275868196).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- also see, similar DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Satirdan kahraman modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 20:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do you still consider the first photo to be copyrightable? Trade (talk) 22:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- uhm... yes? because cakes and litte yellow man? modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 12:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. The slight Gaussian blur there does not reduce these elements to de minimis. - Jmabel ! talk 16:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do you still consider the first photo to be copyrightable? Trade (talk) 22:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
The concept of the threshold of originality is not generally recognised under UK copyright law for almost all logos. ([3]) 194.207.146.167 10:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Completely standard fonts are one of the few exceptions to UK sweat of the brow. This is below TOO. --Majora (talk) 03:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Original rationale invalid: Here in the UK, a logo which consists of 'simple plain text' only still enjoys copyright. If it is a logo and it is understood 'as such', then it enjoys UK copyright (subject of course to the usual time limit constraints). UK copyright thresholds are really THAT low. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_Group_for_Change.png 194.207.146.167 08:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Our understanding of UK threshold of originality is what was mentioned previously. Please provide evidence in the form of a court decision that shows that simple plain text such as this is copyrightable. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
The concept of the threshold of originality is not generally recognised under UK copyright law for almost all logos. ([4]) 194.207.146.167 10:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Completely standard fonts are one of the few exceptions to UK sweat of the brow. This is below TOO. --Majora (talk) 03:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_Group_for_Change.png ; Newly-created logos of registered political parties with the UK Electoral Commission (which would include the logo) is usually understood as subject to UK copyright. (For the purpose of UK copyright law, the text also forms part of the logo, and not just the symbol.) 194.207.146.167 08:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, it was kept before because it is made out of simple texts and shapes and is thus ineligible for copyright. DiegoAma (talk) 00:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Our understanding of UK threshold of originality is what was mentioned previously. Please provide evidence in the form of a court decision that shows that simple plain text such as this is copyrightable. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
esta duplicado Lorca Músico (talk) 00:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio due to being a duplicate of File:Lorca Ficha.png. GFJ (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
esta duplicado Lorca Músico (talk) 00:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio due to being a duplicate of File:Lorca Ficha.png. GFJ (talk) 23:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Polonista12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Leszin.jpg
- File:Stanisław Gostkowski z matką i siostrą w Kościerzynie.jpg
- File:Stanisław Gostkowski. Zdjęcie na cmentarzu.jpg
- File:Stanisław Gostkowski, lata 70..jpg
- File:W ostatnim okresie życia..jpg
- File:W dniu I Komunii Św..jpg
- File:Stanisław Gostkowski jako dziecko.jpg
- File:Stanisław Gostkowski.jpg
- File:Mieczysław Czychowski w roku 1979..JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a CFC (Canadian Film Centre) photo and it is not in the public domain as the poster has claimed. This photo along with several others from the event are publicly accessible, but not public domain. The CFC has consulted legal counsel to clarify this matter. Therefore this photo needs to be taken down 194.35.233.4 18:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- An deletion request of an image derived from this one was closed as keep, in June.
194.35.233.4 submitted a second deletion request on November 25th. That request was reverted (correctly, IMO). Geo Swan (talk) 04:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&diff=354547263&oldid=339332387){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=377886792&oldid=354547263){kind=link}
- No, the image is not in the public domain. Rather, it was published under a cc-by-sa license, as confirmed by flickrreview.
- I frankly don't believe the claim the "CFC has consulted legal counsel to clarify this matter." It sure looks like the CFC have been uploading thousands of cc-by-sa images, for something like a decade, in full knowledge of what a cc-by-sa license means.
- Now if 194.35.233.4 were actually Ms Barber, and the real reason she called for its deletion was, well, vanity, I'd encourage her to say so. When it was first nominated it was in use, as it was our only image of her. So, it wouldn't have been a good candidate for a request for courtesy deletion. Since then we have acquired alternate images.
- However, I'd encourage them to first use OTRS to confirm her identity. In the past we have been vulnerable to POV-pushers who claim to be the principal in an image, or a BLP, when they are merely a fan, or a stalker. In my opinion we should never extend a courtesy deletion to anyone who hasn't used OTRS to confirm they are who they say they are. Geo Swan (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per Geo Swan. Follow the OTRS process if needed. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{BadSVG}}: the two red oxygen atoms do not display in all views. DMacks (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The architect of this building, the National Library of Azerbaijan, was Mikayil Huseynov who died in 1992, so it is still protected by copyright. There is no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan (no commercial use). Gestumblindi (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Correcto Lorca Músico (talk) 00:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request deletion and I have my doubts about claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps of Argentina
[edit]These stamps seem to be copyright for 50 years after issue or after the death of the designer per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Argentina#Stamps. They are certainly not the work of the uploaders. The stamp File:Estampilla.png has an author attributed who is not dead long enough per Eleodoro Ergasto Marenco (July 13, 1914 – June 17, 1996). I can't find any records for Albert Barbero Zurita (maybe Zubita) the attributed designer of File:Argentina 1939 Fonopost stamp.jpg, so unless someone can find the death date, this may be public domain in January 2020 anyway, so is hardly worth deleting. The 2004 stamps in File:STAMPS.jpg and the 1983 stamp File:4.arg.archipelagos.1983.svg are just too new to be freely licensed. File:Argentine stamp 150th anniv May revolution.jpg is questionable but as I cannot read the attributed designer it may be considered anonymous and so may have become PD this year.
- File:4.arg.archipelagos.1983.svg
- File:Argentina 1939 Fonopost stamp.jpg
- File:Argentine stamp 150th anniv May revolution.jpg
- File:Estampilla en Homenaje a los radioaficionados.jpg
- File:Estampilla.png
- File:STAMPS.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Ww2censor: You place the notification about this DR on my talk page, but I did not upload none of those files. - Fma12 (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Fma12: According to the log for this image you uploaded it back in 2015. Perhaps you have forgotten considering you uploaded 6600+ images in the last 11 years. I certainly can't even remember my 2,300+ in 14 years. Ww2censor (talk) 23:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- But the file I uploaded (File:Argentine stamp 150th anniv May revolution.jpg) is almost 60 years old and the portraits of leaders depicted there, are certainly reproductions of old paintings of them, such as Manuel Belgrano's portrait by Casimir Carbonier (1787–1873). Sorry for the omission, I don't really remember each file I uploaded here... - Fma12 (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- So my vote is
- Delete File:4.arg.archipelagos.1983.svg (less than 50 years old)
- Keep File:Argentina 1939 Fonopost stamp.jpg (In January 2020 there will be 80 years since the issuance of this stamp)
- Keep File:Argentine stamp 150th anniv May revolution.jpg (per reasons given above, entered into PD on Jan 1, 2011)
- Delete File:Estampilla en Homenaje a los radioaficionados.jpg (less than 50 years old)
- Delete File:Estampilla.png (the author (credited at bottom of the stamp) died in 1996, still not PD-old)
- Delete File:STAMPS.jpg (less than 50 years old)
Fma12 (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: 3 deleted, 2 kept per Fma12. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
La imagen es antigua Prensacalcagno (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ildivisore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Even if the threshold of originality in Italy is quite high, I doubt that these logos can be considered PD (in particular for the details of the falling star/comet for the first logo, for the ball in the second one). A second opinion is welcome.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ruthven (msg) 13:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
This is just a PROJECT. It was not accepted as an official symbol. — Redboston 16:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I created it and never used. Better files are elsewhere. Guy vandegrift (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 01:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
No date? No source? No author? No valid license? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- + Right license now! --Orgelputzer (talk) 12:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Orgelputzer: there's no date or information about when this was published. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient source information. --ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Dated 1905, no source, no author, no valid license. (GFDL isn't valid for photos anyway) Something like {{PD-anon-70-EU}} might apply if we could know more, or the author may have died more than 70 years ago. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Now right license! --Orgelputzer (talk) 12:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Orgelputzer: that license requires that the photo was made available to the public more than 70 years ago. Like, published in a newspaper or something. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient source information. --ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Совещание архиереев РПЦЗ под председательством Иоанна (Максимовича) в монастыре преп. Иова Почаевского в Мюнхене.jpg
[edit]_%D0%B2_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF._%D0%98%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%B2_%D0%9C%D1%8E%D0%BD%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B2_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF._%D0%98%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%B2_%D0%9C%D1%8E%D0%BD%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Any evidence it has been published in Germany? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- This image surely was done in Germany. In Munich, to be exact. But I don't know when it was first published. This file was taken from that page, dated on 16 November 2017. ~ 20:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Photograph of copyrighted text book. Clear copyvio. suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- It's not from a copyrighted textbook but from thottam paattu or ancient songs which describes the origin of the diety — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satvikgeetha (talk • contribs) 06:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Looks like newspapers scans.
- File:Lucien Jame.jpg
- File:Louis-Armand Petchot-Bacquet.png
- File:Charles Tournier-Lasserve 1981.jpg
- File:Louis Armand Petchot Bacque 1958.jpg
- File:MGI Robert Ronflet DCSSA.jpg
- File:MGI Pierre Juillet DCSSA.jpg
- File:MGI Francois Sclear DCSSA.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Patrick Rogel, this pictures come from a paper i make when i was in school back in the 80's. I have all the rights to share them. Is it okay ? Best regards. --Ath wik (talk) 08:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ath wik: Who is (are) the photographer(s)? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Don't know. This pictures had been given to me in 1988 by the the French Defence Health Service central management, with all the right to use them. I just don't have the original files, that's why i scanned them. --Ath wik (talk) 13:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ath wik: Who is (are) the photographer(s)? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We require explicit permission from the photographer per COM:OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Bonjour, le visage de l'agent n'étant pas flouté, je vous remercie de supprimer cette photo. 193.134.187.44 13:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Une version floutée est uploadée File:Marche pour le climat, Genève 2018-27-flouté.jpg. --MHM (talk) 22:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:BLP. --Majora (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution image of an original photo. Clear copyvio suggest to delete. Also there are good chances to get a good photograph of this object.. Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Are these photos really originated in USA?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Costume of Serb military Frontiersmen.jpg
- File:Serbian hussar in service for the Russian Empire, the 18th century2.jpg
- File:Serbian hussar in service for the Russian Empire, the 18th century3.jpg
- File:Princess Jelena Karadjordjevic, 1905.jpg
- File:Serbian, Ottoman and Greek delegation visiting Hilandar, Mount Athos, 1896.png
- File:Hotel Serbian king, 1937.jpg
- File:A drawing - Serbs from Herzegovina awaiting in ambush2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- I am currently unable to give the info you ask for. The drawings and most of the photos are from the 19th century, which should be reason enough to keep them. If you have the time, please help me to Google the required info. thank you Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 17:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Most photos were published in USA before 1924. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 14:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Are you sure that USA is country of origin? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Honestly - I am not sure, but I think that they were published in the USA at some point (before 1920s). Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- You need to find out country of origin. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Honestly - I am not sure, but I think that they were published in the USA at some point (before 1920s). Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Are you sure that USA is country of origin? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Most photos were published in USA before 1924. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 14:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I am currently unable to give the info you ask for. The drawings and most of the photos are from the 19th century, which should be reason enough to keep them. If you have the time, please help me to Google the required info. thank you Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 17:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If reliable information on publication is found, please ask at COM:UDR for restoration. --Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
