Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_RP-P-1941-492.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Unused chemical structural formula, containing some small SVG & layout errors. Superseded by File:Structural formula of ethylene glycol monohexyl ether.svg as corrected, high-quality replacement with better file name. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Scanned image, unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 11:20, 2 November 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1) --Krdbot 13:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
No permission found. Only "2019 - Guayaquil es mi Destino ® . Todos los derechos reservados para la Empresa Pública Municipal de Turismo, Promoción Cívica y Relaciones Internacionales de Guayaquil, EP." where a part of it translates to All Rights Reserved.
- File:Guayaquil city.png
- File:Guayaquil City.jpg
- File:Rueda-Moscovita-Guayaquil-Lugares-Turisticos-en-Guayaquil.jpg
- File:GUAYARTE.jpg
- File:TPG Guayaquil.jpg
- File:Coliseo Fedeguayas.jpg
- File:Farol Guayaquil.webp
- File:Catedral Parque Seminario Guayaquil.jpg
- File:Ciudad del Rio Guayaquil.jpg
- File:Torre Morisca Gye.jpg
- File:Kisspng-logo-universidad-ecotec-university-organization-br-5b7733ffb7da29.7439271315345387517531.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
These photos looks like of the uploader's family. Personal and out of project scope photos.
- File:Literatura para niños.jpg
- File:Juegos de rompecabezas.jpg
- File:Tiempo de jugar.jpg
- File:Visita investigacion.jpg
- File:Pedagogia.jpg
- File:Pedagogia hospitalaria.jpg
Masum Reza📞 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Irrtum, das Bild zeigt eine andere Person Fronsvir (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:25, 2 November 2019 UTC: Irrtum, das Bild zeigt eine andere Person --Krdbot 01:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sunsportsbangalore (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms.png
- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms (1).png
- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms (2).png
- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms (3).png
- File:Sun Sports.png
- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms (4).png
- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms (5).png
- File:Sun Sports Cricket Uniforms (6).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
All files deleted by EugeneZelenko as "advertisement". Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Judging by his last name, this woman is likely his relative. This is a out of project scope file then. Also it's blurry which reduces it's educational value. Masum Reza📞 12:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Vanity selfie, only use was in a now-deleted "social media profile" style page on en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks with rationale "Vanity selfie, only use was in a now-deleted "social media profile" style page on en.wp" Non-admin closure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Unfree artworks, should not have been extracted from the original image.
- File:Bentley Compu-Vision 440.jpg
- File:Enterprex Apollo 2001.jpg
- File:GHP Wonder Wizard 7702.jpg
- File:LLoyds' TV-Sports 802.jpg
- File:Unisonic Olympian 2600.jpg
- File:Universal Research Labs - Video Action IV Indy 500.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 13:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, why you say that is unfree artwork? For example in indy 500 image there is only the photo of the videogame console. It's like a photo of the playstation...
For the other photos, if you tell that the box of console are to be removed, I can delete them from images.
I remove the offending box artwork as an example in "GHP Wonder Wizard 7702.jpg". It's good enough? --Arosio Stefano (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: I removed all the boxes of the consoles in your list. The images can now be accepted? --Arosio Stefano (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep yes it's fine now. There is no copyright violation now. -- Archimëa (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)- Keep Closing admin: please revdel the old versions. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: btw, why did you also nominate the original image? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- The original file was not nominated, only files linked there were. Feel free to close this DR and tag files with {{Non-free frame revdel}}.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: My mistake, you linked the original in the title but didn't nominate it. So I do get keep/del links for it because it's linked. I had already added the images to Category:Media with unacceptable data in old versions. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- The original file was not nominated, only files linked there were. Feel free to close this DR and tag files with {{Non-free frame revdel}}.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: btw, why did you also nominate the original image? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Files categorized for revision deletion, nomination withdrawn. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
unused user image - out of scope? Verne Equinox (talk) 03:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:35, 3 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 13:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personsal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:34, 3 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 13:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
http://www.dafist.unige.it/dipendente/6086/ Déjà vu • ✉ 22:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:38, 3 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.dafist.unige.it/dipendente/6086/ --Krdbot 13:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to be notable, poor quality. Verne Equinox (talk) 02:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:25, 3 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 01:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:25, 3 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 01:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by "SP Moulding" Beethoven9 (talk) 10:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 10:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personsal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personsal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personsal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Seems to be a derivative work, no permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:FotoFicha.png
- File:Taller educativo.png
- File:Pati anglès.png
- File:Ambiente espacial.png
- File:Árbol de vidrio.png
- File:Patio inglés.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sutnawseng15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samira Behbudqizi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete It is very unlikely that these images are the person's own work. Both images lack metadata. A quick Google image search reveals that the images are indeed property of "Gallo Images / Sunday Times / Alon Skuy". This should actually be a speedy deletion request, since both images are copyrighted. Lefcentreright (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NC license stated in EXIF. Can't get through the source for verification. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Speedy keep, 大诺史 read: Commons:500px licensing data -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 13:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NC license stated in EXIF. Can't get through the source for verification. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep, 大诺史 read: Commons:500px licensing data -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 13:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
NC license stated in EXIF. Can't get through the source for verification. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep, 大诺史 read: Commons:500px licensing data -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 13:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
unsharp, very low qualtiy Kritzolina (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no educational content Kritzolina (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no educational content Kritzolina (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file has "FBMD" in the exif-data, this indicates that the file was downloaded from Facebook.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich möchte nicht das unser Haus im Internet gezeigt wird. 93.244.193.55 17:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Kept. Not a valid deletion reason per Freedom of Panorama. Image was taken in Germany from a public street. --Raymond 09:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich möchte nicht das unser Haus im Internet gezeigt wird. 93.244.193.55 17:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Kept. Not a valid deletion reason per Freedom of Panorama. Image was taken in Germany from a public street. --Raymond 09:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich möchte nicht das unser Haus im Internet gezeigt wird. 93.244.193.55 17:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Kept. Not a valid deletion reason per Freedom of Panorama. Image was taken in Germany from a public street. --Raymond 09:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP South Korea, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.
ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HotwheelHustler1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Picture of non-free products of Hot Wheels.
- File:’91 Mazda MX-5 Miata.jpg
- File:’19 Ford Ranger Raptor.jpg
- File:'69 Dodge Charger Daytona.jpg
- File:HW ARMORED TRUCK.jpg
- File:Jaguar XE SV Project 8.jpg
- File:HW 450 F.jpg
- File:HEAVY HITCHER.jpg
- File:MERCEDES-BENZ UNIMOG 1300.jpg
- File:RV THERE YET.jpg
- File:ROLLER TOASTER.jpg
- File:CUSTOM '71 EL CAMINO.jpg
- File:'68 CHEVY NOVA.jpg
- File:BMW K 1300 R.jpg
- File:PEDAL DE METAL.jpg
Ahmadtalk 17:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HotwheelHustler1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Majora (talk) 01:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Not notable, self-uploaded Verne Equinox (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Not notable, self upload Verne Equinox (talk) 03:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). Uploader added a link to a license. I’m not convinced it is correct but felt a DR is the logical next step. Green Giant (talk) 20:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete the template added specifically states these works are copyrighted in Brazil until 70-71 years after initial publication. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not meet the 70-year mark (i.e. 1949). --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Accidental duplicate of File:Nice F88 Project for Mark Farrow @ MDF Great Yarmouth.jpg Eissink (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no educational content Kritzolina (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Good quality artistic image. AshFriday (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unsharp, very low quality Kritzolina (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Radiossans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Random out of COM:SCOPE images.
- File:South sudanese artits nation sound ( ssans).jpg
- File:Ross radio.jpg
- File:Radio talk shows.jpg
- File:Monjesh.jpg
- File:Ross south sudan.jpg
- File:Radio ssans.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Per File:Arhaan Khan (cropped).jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; broken dr. --Indeedous (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by دلفان نورآباد (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad uploader claiming own work, stolen Getty image File:Pejman-hadadi-sina-jahanabadi-shahram-nazeri-hafez-nazari-and-hussein-picture-id101903690.jpg. Lifted from newspaper File:Concert usa 2006.jpg, strange file names File:Flickr.com1.jpg.
- File:Concert usa 2006.jpg
- File:کنسرت آمریکا 2006.jpg
- File:Flickr.com1.jpg
- File:Flickr.com2.jpg
- File:35854310172e2285030c z.jpg
- File:Aref Ensemble , Parviz Meshkatian & Mohammad Reza Shajarian.jpg
- File:Abvsyahafkgjyncwt9b8.jpg
- File:110611801 3716b753e2-کنسرت سن دیگو 1384-2005.jpg
- File:AIMG 244-در این کنسرت دیگر اعضای گروه دستان حضور نداشتند.jpg
- File:Pejman-hadadi-sina-jahanabadi-shahram-nazeri-hafez-nazari-and-hussein-picture-id101903690.jpg
- File:Shajarian & dastan.jpg
- File:264566 101516187307کنسرت.jpg
- File:همایون شجریان و سهراب پور ناظری کنسرت پاریس سالن تئاتر دولاویل- 1392-2013.jpg
- File:Work big-3.jpg
- File:Work big-4.jpg
- File:Work big-2.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 13:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work claims are not credible. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Same as https://twitter.com/amasakikohei/status/1174256846024192002 こんせ (talk) 09:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Uploader disagrees (and removes tag) so a regular DR instead. After claiming it's a friend's work, uploader now claims "own work". Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- I can't believe this is happening, I feel we have a case of someone not using their brain and believing throwing templates into people's talk page is a way of communicating with them.
- So let's recap here, that evening I noticed that Michèle Ray-Gavras did not have a picture on her article. When I met with her, I asked her if it was okay for me to take a picture of her. She gladly accepted. I realised that my friend who was with me had a better phone so I asked him to take the shot at my direction. I am responsible for directing the shot, checking pictures, choosing the best one. I then uploaded it first as my own since it was easier, then changing the author as being my friend, because this was accurate. This is a shared work.
- No, I won't ask my friend to submit a legalese contract to OTRS, they don't know what it is and they shouldn't have to.
- If this is the way the Commons community has evolved in the last few years, I find it very sad and makes me wonder whether I should just stop trying to improve articles with pictures that I am the legal owner of. I have spent way to much of my time on this, when I could be working on improving the encyclopedia. Luk (talk) 14:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: I searched the image on google and found no results other than wikipedia. Also, the metadata suggests that the photo was taken with a smartphone (Iphone X), which makes it seem like a casual photo, giving more creedibility to what Luk says. --Gindomarlo (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Luk's explanation is plausible and credible enough. The question of who the legal "author" and owner of the copyright is if person B is operating a camera under the direction of person A can be tricky, but I think it's usually assumed that if B (in this case, Luk's friend) is only following A's (in this case, Luk's) direction (all aspects of the image composition are determined by A; B is just pressing the shutter), then it is A, that is here: Luk. High resolution and full Exif data further strengthen the explanation. I think that no OTRS permission is needed in this case. --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal + not in use = out of COM:SCOPE 90.91.39.158 20:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom : out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal + not in use = out of COM:SCOPE 90.91.39.158 20:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom : out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 01:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Ahora Repúblicas
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I request that these logos be maintained for its encyclopedic interest and for having its own work for its elaboration. Hand shape and flowers are simple shapes that have no attribution and the letters are also not subject to copyright. In addition, the owner of this logo would be ERC, and its own party logo, used by pages throughout Wikipedia, (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ERC_logo_2017.svg) is also selected as simple forms that do not violate copyright. Please, I beg that it not be deleted because its use is fully informative, electoral and for the purpose of completing incomplete articles. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 18:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hand shape and flowers are not too simple for copyright. The law is quite clear about that, and no amount of complaining will change it. And we don't care if it's encyclopedic. Please familiarize yourself with Commons policies before uploading any further logos. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- A question, could it not be used as "non-free content" and specify its encyclopedic use? In other files I have seen that a file is placed explaining its use and non-free content is allowed because there is no free equivalent available. And finally, is it necessary to have that level of aggressiveness when I am being educated with you and when I am not having any bad faith in uploading the files? Thanks. Phalbertt (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hand shape and flowers are not too simple for copyright. The law is quite clear about that, and no amount of complaining will change it. And we don't care if it's encyclopedic. Please familiarize yourself with Commons policies before uploading any further logos. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete: Per nom. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic use, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC) (comment edited on 22:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC) --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS).)
Deleted: per nomination. Can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Partido Verde Animalista
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Geroa Bai
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO.
- File:Geroa Bai logo - copia.jpg
- File:Geroa Bai logo nuevo.jpg
- File:Geroa Bai logo.jpg
- File:Isotipo Geroa Bai.svg
- File:Logo actual Geroa Bai.svg
- File:Logo completo Geroa Bai.svg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is from my own work, being extracted from the previous archives of the category of Geroa Bai and using graphic vectorization programs to increase its resolution. The shape of the tree is seen to be simple geometric shapes of concentric circles and the letters below cannot be classified as copyright. In addition, the use of such logos are exclusively encyclopedic and are included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and that are identifiable to the reader. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving for the current Spanish general elections. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- The file you based yours on was a copyright violation, which is also listed here. You don't get to automatically claim copyright because someone else violated the original author's. We don't allow fair use, and you clearly haven't read the article I linked on the threshold of originality, which is well below the levels on this tree. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- One question, could it not be used as "non-free content" and specify its encyclopedic use? In other files I have seen that a file is placed explaining its use and non-free content is allowed because there is no free equivalent available. And finally, is it necessary to have that level of aggressiveness when I am being educated with you and when I am not having any bad faith in uploading the files? Phalbertt (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- The file you based yours on was a copyright violation, which is also listed here. You don't get to automatically claim copyright because someone else violated the original author's. We don't allow fair use, and you clearly haven't read the article I linked on the threshold of originality, which is well below the levels on this tree. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic use, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. -- Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:29, 12 November 2019
Deleted: per nomination. Can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Labour Party (UK)
[edit]Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is my own work with application of graphic vectors and bitmaps, when using files already existing in Wikipedia, supported and maintained, being recognized as logos, simple figures and simple geometric shapes: See the logo [https: // commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scottish_Labour_logo.svg of the Scottish Labor Party], used in many pages; modified from the Labor Party or from Scottish Wikipedia. In addition, the use of this logo is exclusively encyclopedic, adjusted in policy pages and is included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and that are identifiable to the reader. Therefore, I beg that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving for recent and upcoming elections in the United Kingdom. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, new user making mistakes.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:42, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Seriously, your only argument is going to be to repeat that I am a new user without being true?Phalbertt (talk) 04:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Bevin is trying to assume good faith, given that your arguments are transparently incorrect. We don't accept fair use, as I've explained to you several times, and which you've ignored, so you're making that harder by the moment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Trying to assume good faith? Where? Because I only can read in all files "new user making mistakes". Where is the good faith there? Apart from that, could it not be used as "non-free content" and specify its encyclopedic use? In other files I have seen that a file is placed explaining its use and non-free content is allowed because there is no free equivalent available. And finally, is it necessary to have that level of aggressiveness when I am being educated with you and when I am not having any bad faith in uploading the files? Thanks Phalbertt (talk) 17:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Bevin is trying to assume good faith, given that your arguments are transparently incorrect. We don't accept fair use, as I've explained to you several times, and which you've ignored, so you're making that harder by the moment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Seriously, your only argument is going to be to repeat that I am a new user without being true?Phalbertt (talk) 04:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. The images are a clear copyvio. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic value, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is its own work with application of graphic vectors and bitmaps, when using Flickr photos with a Creative Commons license CC-BY-2.0, such as is. Once vectorized, it was compared with the original logo of the website that appears in the description and the colors arranged according to the style manual. On the other hand, the other photo is correctly labeled, with the CC posted and verified, which corresponds to this photo. In addition, the use of these logos is exclusively encyclopedic, adjusted in policy pages and is included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and that are identifiable to the reader. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving for recent and upcoming elections in the United Kingdom. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, new user making mistakes.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:42, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Seriously, your only argument is going to be to repeat that I am a new user without being true?Phalbertt (talk) 04:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. The image is a clear copyvio. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic value, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
as described, election poster. Very unlikely to be under free licence. Rhadamante (talk) 03:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Cover of book still in copyright, author died in 1972 Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Previously published here, no permission 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Houda Echouafni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad uploader claiming own work, stolen Getty image File:Jaipur Festival.jpg, stolen press photo File:DUG 8994.jpg, low res \ mix images.
- File:Jaipur Festival.jpg
- File:Houda as Sharazad in 1001 nights .jpg
- File:Piercing Brightness still.jpg
- File:STILL FROM 'JUST GONE'.jpg
- File:DUG 8994.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jittubabyraju (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad uploader claiming own work, stolen Getty image File:Mundakayam.jpg and File:Mundakayam Town.jpg, mixed meta data, low res photos.
- File:Mundakayam.jpg
- File:Copy of SCHOOL.jpg
- File:1429003970.ce2b3b9e25504de483acbea627598996.jpg
- File:Mundakayam Bus Stand.jpg
- File:Mundakayam Town.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Serperegrino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Mujer en intimidad II.jpg
- File:Ribeiro en Carrousel du Louve (Paris).jpg
- File:Pazo de Rubianes.jpg
- File:Sergio Ribeiro en Museo du Louvre (Paris).jpg
- File:Martina Bugallo González.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:05, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional. Ahmadtalk 19:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep: This photo is in the public domain.https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8539780/mediaviewer/rm1071224065 -- Hossein.income 19:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Although [1] claims CC0, it isn't clear whether this license is valid or not. I could find a similar version here, it was published almost 1 year ago. This suggests that the IMDb profile has been there since 2017, but without this image. I think we need a OTRS permission to confirm the CC0 license. Ahmadtalk 17:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copy of invoice. Probably copyright issue Rudolphous (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Out of COM:SCOPE, no educational value. @Rudolphous: , I must note, the question of copyright may not an issue (See: File:Mr_Bricolage_logo.png), however, I could be mistaken. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 14:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is extracted from ECR's own page, Branding section, where logos are available for download. In its legal notice it says textually the same as the European Parliament Reproduction of textual data and multimedia items which are the property of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group (© European Conservatives and Reformists Group, year) or of third parties (© External source , year) and for which the European Conservatives and Reformists Group holds the rights of use is authorized for non-commercial purposes only provided that the entire item is reproduced and the source is acknowledged. In addition, the use of such logo is character exclusively encyclopedic and is included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and that are identifiable to the reader, since he has changed his logo recently. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving European elections and information on the European Parliament. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- None of those is a valid reason to keep this image on Commons. We don't allow non-commercial only, nor works which disallow derivatives. We don't care if it's encyclopedic since we don't allow fair use. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, new user making mistakes, needs to read help pages such as COM:DW.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. The image is a clear copyvio. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic value, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. WIkimeida (a free media repository) does not allow fair use files to be stored, while individual Wikipedia projects might. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copy of invoice. Probably copyright issue Rudolphous (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Out of COM:SCOPE, no educational value. @Rudolphous: , I must note, the question of copyright may not an issue (See: File:Mr_Bricolage_logo.png), however, I could be mistaken. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 14:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment There is actually a Category:Invoices, bills and receipts where this could fit as an example of a modern French invoice, but I'm not so sure about the "Briconautes" logo which seems to be of some complexity. The text itself I would consider {{PD-text}} ("Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship ..."), as no no creativity is involved in a simple invoice. Gestumblindi (talk) 02:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per User:Nat. Numerous alternatives already available in Category:Invoices. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Csandu0729 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. All appear to be taken from elsewhere, with no author indicated. One might be PD (not nominated).
- File:Img18251fh.jpg
- File:Scania OmniCity CN230UB 4x2 EB.jpg
- File:MAN Iasi.jpg
- File:M8C tram delivered in Iasi.jpg
- File:ST10 tram on route 6.jpg
- File:Iasi tram green.jpg
FDMS 4 00:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 22:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Schildpad wint de wedloop van haas Le lièvre et la tortue (titel op object), RP-P-1941-492.jpg
[edit],_RP-P-1941-492.jpg){kind=link}
,_RP-P-1941-492.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Random photo from internet, Other 93.22.135.148 18:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep just a spam DR. --GPSLeo (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Vandalism, false nomination, so kept. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Pintura del artista local, Luis Aresti, que recrea los tiempos en que la curtiembre San Vicente operaba en el hoy Portal del Humedal..jpg
[edit]
- also file:Pintura Jaaukanigás por el artista ocampense Luis Edgardo Aresti (Julio 2016).jpg
OTRS-permission from painter Luis Edgardo Aresti is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is its own work, which is composed of the map of the province of Teruel (without copyright), letters (which are not subject to copyright) and a small symbol, which would be the only thing that could be considered problematic but is minimal. Within the party website there is no logo like this. Please do not delete this logo because it has an encyclopedic interest and also serves as information for the current elections in Spain. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 18:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- A logo being "small" doesn't magically make it uncopyrightable. Are you even reading the essays I linked? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. of course. I wrote that it is only a minimal part of the logo based on the examples in this section of the COM:TOO. Phalbertt (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- That section says nothing about a logo being small. At this point it is obvious you are searching for excuses rather than being able to admit when the evidence is against you. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- What I mean when referring to that section is that there are figures in certain photos uploaded here and they are allowed to be.
- A question, could it not be used as "non-free content" and specify its encyclopedic use? In other files I have seen that a file is placed explaining its use and non-free content is allowed because there is no free equivalent available. And finally, is it necessary to have that level of aggressiveness when I am being educated with you and when I am not having any bad faith in uploading the files? Phalbertt (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- That section says nothing about a logo being small. At this point it is obvious you are searching for excuses rather than being able to admit when the evidence is against you. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. of course. I wrote that it is only a minimal part of the logo based on the examples in this section of the COM:TOO. Phalbertt (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- A logo being "small" doesn't magically make it uncopyrightable. Are you even reading the essays I linked? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: , I have the explicit permission of the party to use the logo and it has already been communicated by email to Wikimedia Commons. Phalbertt (talk) 13:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great! Volunteer action should be pending. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi! @Phalbertt: , if a permission was send to OTRS, please let me know the ticket number in order to process it. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Ganímedes: ! The ticket number is [Ticket#2019110310000303]. Thanks a lot! Phalbertt (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- As I explained in that ticket, we don`t acept forwarded messages. Copyright holder should email us directly, using this template and adding Re:[Ticket#2019110310000303] in the subject line of the email. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Ganímedes: ! The ticket number is [Ticket#2019110310000303]. Thanks a lot! Phalbertt (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi! @Phalbertt: , if a permission was send to OTRS, please let me know the ticket number in order to process it. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great! Volunteer action should be pending. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No confirmation from OTRS yet. --JuTa 18:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete: while the stamp is freely licensed, the cachet on the left side is not US government work. The source attributes the cachet to "Butler Publications" as more clearly shown in this other webpage and is most likely copyright. I cannot find any more information about this company so PCP must apply. Ww2censor (talk) 00:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete: It`s not Arsen Riczynski. And this photo can`t be made in 1910s. According to the clothing, hair and style of photo itself - it should be a photo of the roughly 1970s. --Leonst (talk) 01:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
over COM:TOO China. Roy17 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, not educationally useful MrLacpierre (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Requires COM:OTRS. --ƏXPLICIT 00:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Complex logo per COM:TOO Hong Kong or COM:TOO China
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Also:
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
fair use 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:43, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Above TOO. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- File:01 Шашк1727.jpg
- File:46-101-4084 Lviv Kopernika Shashkevich 002.jpg
- File:Lviv Shashkevych Monument RB.jpg
- File:Львів Пам'ятник Шашкевичу М. С. 052.jpg
- File:Львів Пам'ятник Шашкевичу М. С. 053.jpg
- File:Львів Шашкевич.jpg
- File:Львів, Пам'ятник Шашкевичу М. С. українському письменнику, вул. Коперника.jpg
- File:Львів,пам.М.Шашкевичу.jpg
- File:ПАМ'ЯТНИК МАРКІЯНОВІ ШАШКЕВИЧУ(1).jpg
- File:ПАМ'ЯТНИК МАРКІЯНОВІ ШАШКЕВИЧУ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Шашкевичу М. С вул. Коперника.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Шашкевичу М. С., українському письменнику.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
How is this self-created? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete clearly a copyvio/non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
This sign does not exist in the Jamaican Traffic Control Devices Manual. Without a source, it should not be on Commons.. Fry1989 eh? 20:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and Commons:PRP. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
This sign does not exist in the Jamaican Traffic Control Devices Manual. Without a source, it should not be on Commons.. Fry1989 eh? 20:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and Commons:PRP. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Re-uploaded unsourced content. Fry1989 eh? 15:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
This sign does not exist in the Jamaican Traffic Control Devices Manual. Without a source, it should not be on Commons.. Fry1989 eh? 20:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and Commons:PRP. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
This sign does not exist in the Jamaican Traffic Control Devices Manual. Without a source, it should not be on Commons.. Fry1989 eh? 20:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
You must be stupid cause I switched them to own work since I noticed you're going to delete them. Besides they're custom-made by me. Kingwarnen (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- There is no need for you to insult me. Your image perports to be a real road sign in Jamaica, but it doesn't exist unless you have some other source that it does. It if doesn't, it should not be on Commons. This is not a personal issue, notice that I have not nominated the images that you have uploaded which we do have a source for. Fry1989 eh? 16:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and Commons:PRP. If fictional, then per Commons:OOS --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Then explain this: 
. That doesn't have a source at all and maybe you can redo it like you did with the Customs sign. Kingwarnen (talk) 22:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment That image File:Singapore Road Signs - Warning Sign - Y-Junction.svg may itself be subject to a DR if nominated, other than missing a source, it is COM:INUSE, therefore, in scope. The image discussed here, however, lacks a proper source, COM:NOTUSED and, therefore, my be out of scope. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I was talking to Fry. Kingwarnen (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kingwarnen: Anyone may comment, esp. here, on a DR. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- The Singapore Y-junction sign, I haven't updated because there was no source for it. However I have recently found one, which is an older sign chart. But Singapore is still a work-in-progress. Please understand that this is not an attack against you. I am extremely grateful for the signs you have uploaded which do have sources. But right now, the sign manual that I have been using (admittedly 16 years old at this point) and real life photos are the only sources we have. This file in particular contradicts the sign manual, which has assigned R43 to a parking sign. Fry1989 eh? 19:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: I recently added a source to the Singapore Y-Junction sign, which was available on the Singapore Police website (Basic Theory of Driving - Singapore Police Force). --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- P.S. would you like me to go through the files to add the source, or would you like to do it yourself? --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC))
Info Just for reference, we're point to this document. @Kingwarnen: if you've got access to a more recent copy, we'd love to see it. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Cambié de opinión, no quiero que siga siendo visible públicamente Yajaira1990 (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 00:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Wayuuepieyu (talk) 02:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 00:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Not exactly released under cc-by-sa-4.0. The uploader does not allow some media companies to use the photo (Description: "本照片禁止年代、三立、東森、自由、蘋果記者引用"). Xiplus (talk) 09:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
你要刪就隨你吧，大不了再拍一張 Foxy1219 (talk) 13:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Nom. now seems to be moot, as uploader seems to have removed stated restrictions. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 14:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
This image has no official source or any historic use to my knowledge. I searched and found a most probable source: https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/i-request-chinese-province-level-divions-flags.115412/ which is an "alternative" history post that someone draws an imaginary flag in 2009. I suggest that we shall not use this flag to represent the city of Beijing. Xplorld (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyright violation. It was posted to alternatehistory.com by Lord Grattan, who implied it was their own work, but didn't indicate that they released it under a free licence. Azure Dragon of the East claimed it as their own work at upload and purported to licence it under CC BY-SA 3.0. If Lord Grattan is Azure Dragon of the East then we need some evidence of that, probably a post on alternatehistory.com linking them (or simply licensing the flag). --bjh21 (talk) 18:35, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation + fictional flag. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of deleted content, socking, etc. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1998. No Permission from the sculptor . Микола Василечко (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1992. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mildathome (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:1893 Мелодии чувашских песен.pdf
- File:Скриншот 01-11-2019 180022.jpg
- File:Гагаузы Бендерского Уезда.pdf
- File:Мошкова А И (жена).jpg
- File:Мошков В А 5.jpg
- File:Мошков В А 4.jpg
- File:Мошков В А 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elenilton Fernando Rodrigues Roratto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Nilton José Roratto Comarca de São Marcos.jpg
- File:Nilton Roratto - Sentinela militar 1° Regimento de Cavalaria Mecanizado do Exército Brasileiro Itaqui.jpg
- File:Nilton Roratto recebendo sua Diplomação Colégio Comercial Francisco Jorge Logemann.jpg
- File:Nilton Roratto e cantor Mano Lima.jpg
- File:Nilton José Roratto.jpg
- File:Olimpio José Roratto.jpg
- File:10 ge nnaio 1918 - la Chiea di Chiarano e il palazzo di un ramo dei Rorato.tif
- File:Vapor Giulio Mazzino.png
- File:Familia Gertrudes e Olimpio Roratto.jpg
- File:Gertrudes e Olimpio Roratto.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]After today identifying +40 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Flickr-accounts, photo-hoster, blogs, official sites etc.) it´s difficult to believe that the remaining files are really - as declared - own work: Impressive talk page (now 57 problem tags, mostly regarding copyvios) and inconsistent upload behaviour (res changing from low to high to low to thumb, mostly without exif). Without counting the identified copyvios still an arsenal of different digicams in use: Motorola Xoom, SAMSUNG SL620, Sony DSC-W215, M1 V1702 and Fujifilm FinePix Z3. File:Douala Airport Fence.jpg + File:Douala Airport Fence 2.jpg with mysterious watermarks. File:Mbankomo7.jpg (uploaded in 03.2013) already circulating as thumbnail since 02.2013 via http://camfoot.com/actualites/e1-deux-equipes-du-tkc-contre-coton-sport-a-garoua,16221.html (Copyright ©2010 Camfoot. Tous Droits Reservés) = http://img2.camfoot.com/local/cache-vignettes/L150xH113/arton16221-392ab.jpg. Summarizing: Unlikely to be own work, IMHO untrusted user uploading a row of copyrighted material so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
- File:Douala Airport Fence.jpg Info watermark "CCAA" = http://www.ccaa.aero/ (Cameroon Civil Aviation Authority), added by Gunnex
- File:Douala Airport Fence 2.jpg Info watermark "CCAA" = http://www.ccaa.aero/ (Cameroon Civil Aviation Authority), added by Gunnex
- File:Ferme Poulailler.jpg
- File:Douala Airport 3.jpg
- File:Douala Airport Tarmac.jpg
- File:ChèvreBamena.jpg
- File:Mbankomo31.jpg
- File:Mbankomo33.jpg
- File:Mbankomo32.jpg
- File:Mbankomo28.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo26.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo27.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo23.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo25.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo24.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo21.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo22.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo20.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo8.jpg
- File:Mbankomo11.jpg Info previously circulating as thumb via http://www.camnews24.com/fr/sports/10-sports/21059-ils-preparent-leur-can-au-cameroun- (2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo9.jpg
- File:Mbankomo7.jpg
- File:Mbankomo10.jpg
- File:Mbankomo6.jpg
- File:Scène de marché.jpg
- File:Le Chef inaugure le Rond point de la chèvre.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena 2.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena 3.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena 4.jpg
- File:Bamena 34.jpg
- File:Bamena 33.jpg
- File:Bamena 32.jpg
- File:Bamena 31.jpg
- File:Bamena 27.jpg
- File:Bamena 28.jpg
- File:Bamena 29.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena.jpg
- File:Bamena 16.jpg
- File:Bamena 09.jpg
- File:Bamena 07.jpg
- File:Bamena 08.jpg
- File:Bamena 06.jpg
- File:Bamena 05.jpg
- File:Bamena 04.jpg
- File:Bamena 01.jpg
- File:Bamena 02.jpg
- File:Bamena 03.jpg
- File:KeulongMbapNzweuh.jpg
- File:Enseignant à Bamena.jpg
- File:Lycée Technique de Louh 1.jpg
- File:Construction3.jpg
- File:Construction 2.jpg
- File:Habitation 2.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang8.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang7.jpg
- File:Scène du marché.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang6.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang4.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang5.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang3.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang2.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 7.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 6.jpg
- File:Koung Ngang.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 5.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 4.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 3.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 1.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 2.jpg
- File:Situation de Bamena.jpg
- File:Villa Tchaya.jpg
- File:Tribune du défilé de Bamena.jpg
- File:Place des Cérémonies.jpg
- File:Majestés.jpg
- File:Maison moderne de Bamena.jpg
- File:Paysage de Bamena.jpg
- File:Paroisse.jpg
- File:Lycée Technique de Louh.jpg
- File:Lycée.jpg
- File:Keulong Mbâp Zweuh.jpg
- File:Case.jpg
- File:Chèvre de Bamena.jpg
- File:Rond point Tchaya.jpg
- File:Atelier lycée technique de Louh.jpg
- File:Paysage vu de la route.jpg
- File:Lyvivmvy.jpg
- File:Lycée de Louh.jpg
- File:Mont Batcha vu de Touh lah.jpg
- File:Défilé 11 février.jpg
- File:Kouh Ngang.jpg
- File:Groupement Bamena.jpg
- File:Sa Majesté Njoukwe Nietcho Alexandre.jpg
- File:Case de réunion de Toubiéh.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 11:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Info Instead of eventually contesting all or some files of this DR, the envolved user preferred to upload 3 more copyvios... Gunnex (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I won't say I looked at all of them, but File:Groupement Bamena.jpg says to me that he's not trying to hide anything, he simply doesn't care. "Own work" isn't meaningfully a lie in this case; that would imply that he intended it to mean something.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]The license of these files do not seem compatible with that of Wikimedia Commons. See http://www.ird.fr/infos-pratiques/mentions-legales
Takeaway (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Score Beethoven (serial copyright violator: false licensing, file cropper, watermark remover, Panoramio etc. grabber etc. etc. etc.). Video screenshots, unsourced Flickr files, maps, songs (example: File:Sound Mangambeu.ogg --> grabbed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TnwUQgyipk, 2011, © by "Patrick Marsepoil"), website screenshots, etc. See also previous mass DRs.
- File:NanaArdo1.jpg
- File:NanaArdo3.jpg
- File:Allée Palais de Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Palais de Bafoussam3.jpg
- File:Porche Palais Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Palais de Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Palais de Bafoussam2.jpg
- File:Célestin Monga.jpg
- File:ADC.png
- File:Aéroports du Cameroun.jpg
- File:Tiko Airport.jpg
- File:Daouala Airport.jpg
- File:Menchum.jpg
- File:Aeroport Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Port Kribi.png
- File:Port Kribi.jpg
- File:Cameroun - Cameroun 1960 - Assassinat Félix Moumié.ogg
- File:Map Douala2016 01.jpg
- File:Map Douala2016.jpg
- File:Ceremony Ndop.jpg
- File:Benskin Choutouale.ogg
- File:Un village Un defaut.ogg
- File:Pourquoi dit-on Bamena voleur de chèvres.ogg
- File:Bandjounparlermoderne.ogg
- File:Sound Mangambeu.ogg
- File:Pnina Tamano-Sata.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical maps and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Singap Martin.jpg
- File:Lettre libération de Fossi Jacob.pdf
- File:Ngaoundal.png
- File:Carte Ndé.jpg
- File:Village Bamiléké.jpg
- File:Reseau Hydrographique Bassin Versant Wouri.jpg
- File:Bassin Superieur Noun Reseau hydrographique.jpg
- File:Bassin Sanaga Mbam.jpg
- File:Bilan apports hydriques Estuaire Wouri.jpg
- File:Réseau hydrographique Wouri.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ets Mas Douala 1.jpg
- File:Ets Mas Douala.jpg
- File:Caoutchouc et Cacaos du Cameroun.jpg
- File:Bongola Lokundje N'yong.jpg
- File:Fossi Jacob.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
identified person that clearly does not consent Reseletti (talk) 02:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Identified person is clowning around. (If Kibo objected to this photo, he would have made such known years ago.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Infrogmation of New Orleans. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:19, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Is very Old, and I do not look this way 190.215.247.99 02:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on es:Hernán Precht. So long as Spanish Wikipedia finds the file useful, we should keep it under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
If the owner asks to be removed, have some respect on his decition. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.215.252.50 (talk) 12:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @190.215.252.50: If you are Hprechtb (talk · contribs), it would be advisable to log-in to comment and make such request. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 12:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21 and Nat. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Not notable, self upload Verne Equinox (talk) 03:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- implausible file size, suspect embedded data Krd 04:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep（to: Krd). Android Phone.png is an APNG (Animated Portable Network Graphics) file (See also: Category:Animated PNG). According to the Wikipedia, APNG is an extension to the Portable Network Graphics (PNG) specification and it allows for animated PNG files that work similarly to animated GIF files. Because of the animation combined with several static graphics, it has a big file size. -- 嘉傑 (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete嘉傑 has been uploading files deemed non-free, like this image containing artwork by Jack Larson, an artist drawing zombies, showing the gingerbread and Android surrounded by zombies.[2][3][4] The Apache License 2.0 applies to software documentation, not content, like the artwork depicted in the image. Also, the page has Restriction section, saying that the License does not apply to proprietary trademarks and brand features. The gingerbread is one of trademarks, and, evidently, neither the artist Jack Larson nor Google has used one of acceptable licenses to release the artwork unless I'm proven wrong otherwise. --George Ho (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:Android™.png and File:Android.gif are tagged as not yet proven to be approved by Google or artist Jack Larson. George Ho (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Change to Keep per uploader's recent changes on above files to screenshots of Android logo, released under CC-BY-SA 3.0. George Ho (talk) 04:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, the screenshots of the zombie art should be deleted. --George Ho (talk) 04:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Change to
- @嘉傑: The onus is on you to find the licencing for Zombie Art by Jack Larson. Please comment. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 13:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep, per changes. However, the closing sysop should delete the first version. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- @嘉傑: The onus is on you to find the licencing for Zombie Art by Jack Larson. Please comment. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 13:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, also revdel'ed the old version. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be used for self promo on id wiki, no edits out of user space. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Can't find any permission at the links provided. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Fixed link.--えのきだたもつ (talk) 06:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: While the intent of the image title on the source site is most likely to put the image under a free license, it is unfortunately too vague for Commons' purposes. It is definitely not the same as putting the image under a CC-0 license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted software, per COM:COPYVIO 119.94.164.171 07:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted software, per COM:COPYVIO 119.94.164.171 07:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted software, per COM:COPYVIO 119.94.164.171 07:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim. Autor Lana kovalenko and same person on photo. No self photo. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
erreure : mort de l'auteur en 1973 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/48073350768/in/photolist-2gf5ukj 2.13.33.183 17:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
And also
- File:0-02-05-a2e96ba8153f73b21611164e4bf230ba82498526bc594a98d77b9c90e1330d70 b04adb5.jpg
- File:0-02-04-fc278ab47e236dae78bd26e24a4f13d454035c8089353c8633b67df5d35b0282 756d05f7.jpg
- File:0-02-04-257902b8db57142a3730559d7a0fba7cac5814e48865382fbf8f7b1fffb34604 9bcdb7d4.jpg
- File:0-02-04-5720fbc4b1ccaa495d075da7f3e1dad15218255d87416dcf046523e7cc327cb4 a29fbcb0.jpg
Abracadabra in name. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Too many copyrighted work in this picture, as they are important for the file, no de minimis can apply Quedel (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most likely no de-minimis under German copyright law. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture in the background, too big for de minimis Quedel (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'm leaning towards Keep The picture in the background isn't that big, it's clearly not the subject of the image, and the image's meaning ("interior of an archive") wouldn't change if that picture weren't there. In my opinion, this makes it de minimis. Furthermore, the resolution is rather low, so it wouldn't be possible to get a useful result from extraction of the picture. And the image is in use in de:Archive Artist Publications. If needed, the copyrighted picture could be blurred, but I think that's not even necessary. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Not worth having a gallery on a single geometric construction when there is an appropriate (and not very big) category at Category:Ewald's sphere. GKFXtalk 10:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
This is not a historical photo, but a fake (photo montage). Compare with File:Gaston Doumergue.jpg and [5]. Yellow Horror (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
![[5]](https://s9.stc.all.kpcdn.net/share/i/4/1427925/wx1080.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
This is not a historical photo, but a fake (photo montage). Compare with File:Gaston Doumergue.jpg and [6]. Previously, it was kept as used, but is no longer in use. Yellow Horror (talk) 08:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
There's no information at all about the author or when and where the picture was taken. As the photo shows a woman who died in 1960, the photographer could very well have lived beyond 1948, which would mean the image is still protected by copyright per the usual 70 years pma formula. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
This photo, showing an Austrian / German woman (Hitler's younger sister Paula) is taken from a website, said to be from 2020 (obviously not true), and the author is said to be unknown. It is also claimed to be under a CC license, but I could not find any evidence to support this on the source website.
As the photo shows a woman who died in 1960, the photographer could very well have lived beyond 1949, which would mean the image is still protected by copyright per the usual 70 years pma formula. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle, unless it can be convincingly shown that it is indeed under a free license or in the PD. Rosenzweig τ 11:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
別ファイルで保存 Hama2222002 (talk) 12:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request on upload date, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
別名で更新済みです。 Hama2222002 (talk) 13:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request on upload date. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Author and uploader request deletion. BeauH (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Author and uploader request deletion. BeauH (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for sculptures and other works of art. Therefore we cannot keep a derivative photo of this original statue. De728631 (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
poor quality, blurred Gower (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
poor quality, blurred, not in use, we have much better photos of that cemetery in Commons Gower (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
The file is not own work and "public archive" is not an acceptable source. If Francisco Alves de Souza is really author, then per pt:Eleição municipal de Parauapebas em 2016 he was still living in 2016. I suspect copyright violation, at least better source and correct license must be given. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Google translates file description: "photographed by the Breton daily Le Télégramme". OTRS-permission from newspaper representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama licenses some of the images appearing on its site under the terms listed at {{BollywoodHungama}}. This image does not meet the requirement for that template. The source page has only "Copyright © 2019 Hungama Digital Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: see below. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
files copied from elsewhere; not a bollywoodhungama website image Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Questionable licensing.
Princepratap1234 (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete Surely a copyvio. Not even worth trying to fix the file description, unless the uploader can provide more information. Brianjd (talk) 11:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 00:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark. like: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals in Copenhagen Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gretathunberg1.jpg C.Suthorn (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.4icu.org/reviews/universities-english/11925.html. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Erreur dans la description figurant au fichier exif. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader request, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Erreur dans la description figurant dans le fichier exif Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader request, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). The uploader claimed a CC-license but I’m not convinced because the purported source only shows the raw image. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Brande
[edit]No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark. like: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals in Copenhagen Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gretathunberg1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
C.Suthorn (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nonsense. If you had done your due diligence, you would see this is a copy of the Swedish sign File:Sweden road sign A21.svg, which is in the public domain by the Swedish Transport Agency. Most of the symbols in the Jamaican road sign manual have been "borrowed" from Sweden. I can provide you with a copy if you wish. Fry1989 eh? 16:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nope. It's your job as the uploader to provide the correct permission information, not mine to magically know the history of Jamaican road signs. If a file is free, you need to provide an explanation in the permission field, not just provide an incorrect license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- I applied a perfectly valid license. You can not copyright something you took from somewhere else and which was in the public domain already. There is no "We took this from Sweden and it may or may not have been under a re-licensing from the Swedish Government but this is unclear and there's no way to find out." license. Considering we have never gotten along, it annoys me that you can't trust me to know what I am doing and leave me alone. It is not my fault Jamaica pirated their signs from another country (btw there's 2-3 other countries I will be uploading in the future that have also pirated their signs from Sweden, the UK and other countries). BTW, due diligence is as simple as asking. It would be best if you withdraw your nomination. Fry1989 eh? 20:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nope. It's your job as the uploader to provide the correct permission information, not mine to magically know the history of Jamaican road signs. If a file is free, you need to provide an explanation in the permission field, not just provide an incorrect license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment: @Fry1989: Derivative works of public domain works can, themselves, attract their own copyright. The onus is on you to prove that works of the Jamaican Government and its agencies (e.g. the National Road Operating & Constructing Company, Jamaica Infrastructure Operator, etc), even if they are derivatives, are freely licensed or in PD. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes they can garnish new copyrights, if you add something new or original to them. Jamaica has not, they simply took the workman figure and changed the background from yellow to orange. Fry1989 eh? 18:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No creative elements have been added to the original PD work. Finnusertop (talk) 16:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
1) can be a selfie ; 2) copyvio from http://sam40.fr/a-propos/a-propos-de-lauteur/ Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 17:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Ce n'est pas un selfie, mais une photo me concernant dont je peux disposer librement. Je l'ai déposée à la requête de Wiki, indiquant sur l'article me concernant: une photo libre de droits serait la bienvenue. Par ce dépôt, j'en ai donc cédé l'usage selon les règles de wikicommons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierre Hénin (talk • contribs) 09:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, not own work as admitted above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg)
- hm it's an old (outdated) preversion of the logo the company has in use today. See the blue dot in the Logo of https://www.hermann-weihrauch-revolver.de/ The pic is a dervivate work of the original Hermann aka Arminius, which as been made like others. In the meantime i found, that it is a transitional version, which is based on the sign of the pre-war company of Friedrich Pickert who used it for the first "Arminius-Revolvers" as it can bee seen in this historic collection, which is ca. 80 years old. But never mind ... if people around here think the file is to nice ... just kick it. Best --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 08:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Complex enough to bee above TOO. Finnusertop (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Also
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is extracted from the official document of the Central Electoral Board, as specified and attached in the description of the file, as an electoral, official and identification logo. In addition, this logo is made by myself but based on that document, since the resolution was very low. This logo is a composition of two logos categorized as simple forms that do not violate copyright (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Comprom%C3%ADs.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%A1s_Pa%C3%ADs.svg). Please, I beg you to be maintained for your encyclopedic interest and for serving as relevant information for the current Spanish general elections. Phalbertt (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic use, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. In both logos (Más País and Compromís) it is recognized that they may be subject to legal restrictions. This Més Compromís logo is my own work, built with programs like Photoshop and based on the two previous logos. I don't see a fair reason for its deletion. Phalbertt (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- However, you are not the copyright holder of these images. You may have recreated them, but the images themselves are not yours. They belong to the creator of the original. Therefore, in addition to the nom in that (A) they are not too simple for copyright, (B) the images are considered non-free. As such, they are not allowed on Commons. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 01:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Also:
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep This logo is extracted from the thumbnail of a YouTube video of the political party channel Podemos, which has a Creative Commons license, as you can be seen in the video (Creative Commons Attribution License (reuse allowed)). The only difference is to make it available horizontally, as it appears in other videos of the same channel. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving for the current Spanish general elections. Phalbertt (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete: Per nom and per Commons:PRP.
- The video may be under a CC licence, but the logo may not be.
- If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic use, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content.
- Phalbertt (talk · contribs) uploaded it as {{Own}} in the source, however, by their own statement, it's derivative work. The uploader has claimed to be the copyright holder when it is not the case. (P.S. {{Own based}} is a better IF the original is free, and the derivative is your own work).
- If the image is covered under the YT-CC licence, the CC licence used on YouTube is CC-BY-3.0, therefore, attribution is required which the uploader has not done. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, @Nat: . Thank you for your comments. First, if the entire video is under a CC license, and it is not specified if there is any content to which that license does not apply, it is understood that all video material has permission. If not, they should have specified it in some way, right?
- Second, I understand what you say about non-free content, but how do I upload it on Wikipedia if it is not through Commons? That is, the image I can not embed in an article if it is not previously in Commons, at least I do not know how to do it without going through here before. Without an image, it makes no sense to link it or put a link in its place.
- On the other hand, the fact that it was their own work was due to the fact of finding the image, trimming it, retouching it with digital editing programs and converting it into a readable and proportionate image. That was my job and, as I understand that the authorship would be of the party, I have no problem that the license goes from CC-BY-4.0 as my own work to the CC-BY-3.0 license and is put in the field "Source "and" Author "the YouTube video link and the name of the game, respectively. My only interest is to keep these files for the encyclopedic value they have and their great utility in the articles that are being carried out. I only beg that it be taken into account.
- Thank you very much and greetings. Phalbertt (talk) 07:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- On English wikipedia, through the following en:Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard or en:Special:Upload. Unfortunately, the Spanish wikipedia does not allow even local upload. An image must comply, therefore, with Common policy. And I still have doubts about the licencing of the image, therefore, I maintain my Weak delete. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 12:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- The author of the photo and who uploads the video with the license are the same, in this case, Podemos. Also, the photo is exactly that of the cover, that is one: https://thumbnailsave.com/t/o-JJnNx7InQ. If the cover is in the video, the author of the photo is the same as the video and uploads it with licensed content, that cannot be "doubtful". It releases it clearly. I maintain my Keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phalbertt (talk • contribs) 19:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- The author of the photo and who uploads the video with the license are the same, in this case, Podemos. Also, the photo is exactly that of the cover, that is one: https://thumbnailsave.com/t/o-JJnNx7InQ. If the cover is in the video, the author of the photo is the same as the video and uploads it with licensed content, that cannot be "doubtful". It releases it clearly. I maintain my
- On English wikipedia, through the following en:Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard or en:Special:Upload. Unfortunately, the Spanish wikipedia does not allow even local upload. An image must comply, therefore, with Common policy. And I still have doubts about the licencing of the image, therefore, I maintain my
- PODEMOS does not own the copyright to the Esquerda Unida logo, of which this image is a derivative. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 04:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I don't buy the theory that thumbnails are licensed the same as the videos. YouTube's CC page only talks about videos, but the Terms of Service make a distinction between videos and other types of Content. Has this been discussed before? Finnusertop (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is from my own work, being extracted from a video of the YouTube channel of Greens / EFA in 00:47s or this video in 00:35s, and that video has the corresponding Creative Commons license. With this photo, I used graphic vectorization programs to increase its resolution and adapt the color according to its official website. In addition, the use of this logo is exclusively encyclopedic and is included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and that are identifiable to the reader, since the coalition has changed its logo. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving European elections and information on the European Parliament. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, new user making mistakes, needs to read help pages such as COM:DW.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I am not a new user. However, is being a new user an argument to support the deletion of a file? Phalbertt (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. Furthermore, the Greens-EFA website only notes "COPYRIGHT 2019 BY THE GREENS/EFA GROUP IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT." and does not indicate a free licence for its images (including logos). --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As it seems that you don't want to read, I repeate it again: This logo is taken from a video on the YouTube channel of Greens / EFA in 1:07 and has the corresponding Creative Commons license. With this photo, I used graphic vectorization programs to increase its resolution and adapt the color according to its official website. On the other hand, the own European Parliament puts this photo in his gallery and his legal notice says textually As a general rule, the reuse (reproduction or use) of textual data and multimedia items which are the property of the European Union (identified by the words' © European Union, [year (s)] - Source: European Parliament 'or' © European Union , [year (s)] - EP ') or of third parties (© External source, [year (s)]), and for which the European Union holds the rights of use, is authorized, for personal use or for further non-commercial or commercial dissemination, provided that the entire item is reproduced and the source is acknowledged.. If it appears on the website of the European Parliament, the party has given it permission and, once it appears in a video of the European Parliament, that particular photo becomes under Parliament's regulations. Phalbertt (talk) 20:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- What you seem not to understand is that the YouTube video and the EP websites are not the original sources for these images and were clearly published elsewhere before (and as such, may not be free licensed). The website of the G/EFA would most definitely superseded that of YT or of the EP website. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is taken from a video on the YouTube channel of Greens / EFA in 1:07 and has the corresponding Creative Commons license. With this photo, I used graphic vectorization programs to increase its resolution and adapt the color according to its official website. On the other hand, he himself European Parliament puts this photo in his gallery and his legal notice says textually As a general rule, the reuse (reproduction or use) of textual data and multimedia items which are the property of the European Union (identified by the words' © European Union, [year (s)] - Source: European Parliament 'or' © European Union , [year (s)] - EP ') or of third parties (© External source, [year (s)]), and for which the European Union holds the rights of use, is authorized, for personal use or for further non -commercial or commercial dissemination, provided that the entire item is reproduced and the source is acknowledged. In addition, the use of such logo is exclusively encyclopedic and is included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and make them identifiable to the reader, since the coalition n has changed its logo. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving European elections and information on the European Parliament. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 18:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, new user making mistakes, needs to read help pages such as COM:DW.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I am not a new user. However, is being a new user an argument to support the deletion of a file? In addition, The European Union allow to use this logos, as I said before.Phalbertt (talk) 04:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. The image is a clear copyvio. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic value, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the Greens-EFA website only notes "COPYRIGHT 2019 BY THE GREENS/EFA GROUP IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT." and does not indicate a free licence for its images (including logos). (In this case, the old logo still exists as the website icon). --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As I said literally before, the European Union allows to use the logo, so it's not a clear copyvio. Phalbertt (talk) 10:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As it seems that you don't want to read, I repeate it again: This logo is taken from a video on the YouTube channel of Greens / EFA in 1:07 and has the corresponding Creative Commons license. With this photo, I used graphic vectorization programs to increase its resolution and adapt the color according to its official website. On the other hand, the own European Parliament puts this photo in his gallery and his legal notice says textually As a general rule, the reuse (reproduction or use) of textual data and multimedia items which are the property of the European Union (identified by the words' © European Union, [year (s)] - Source: European Parliament 'or' © European Union , [year (s)] - EP ') or of third parties (© External source, [year (s)]), and for which the European Union holds the rights of use, is authorized, for personal use or for further non-commercial or commercial dissemination, provided that the entire item is reproduced and the source is acknowledged.. If it appears on the website of the European Parliament, the party has given it permission and, once it appears in a video of the European Parliament, that particular photo becomes under Parliament's regulations. Phalbertt (talk) 20:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Very unlikely that this organization will disregard the rights of third parties. The copyright notice goes on to say that "the reuse of certain data may be subject to different conditions in some instances; in this case, the item concerned is accompanied by a mention of the specific conditions relating to it." Well, in this case, it only mentions "Identification of origin mandatory", which just means attribution required. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment@P199: The problem remains what licence should be used. It is clear not too simple for copyright. Fair use (under US law) is not allowed on Commons, and if we are seeking permitted use under EU law, then we need permission via COM:OTRS. Again, the G/EFA website makes no mention of a free licence, and unless we can confirm a free licence from the original source (the G/EFA website) or permission via OTRS, then it should be deleted per COM:PCP. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 04:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP. ~riley (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is its own work with application of graphic vectors and bitmaps, when using files already existing in Wikipedia and using newspaper photos with Creative Commons permits, such as this one, or this one. Once vectorized, it was compared with the original logo of the web and the colors arranged according to the PRC style manual. In addition, the use of this logo is exclusively encyclopedic, adjusted in policy pages and is included in many Wikipedia pages, both in Spanish and in other languages, to illustrate the articles and that are identifiable to the reader. Therefore, I request that the file be maintained, please, for your encyclopedic interest and for serving for recent and upcoming elections in Spain. Thank you. Phalbertt (talk) 19:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. The images are a clear copyvio. The uses in the newspapers are clearly under fair use, which is not allowed on Commons. If it's non-free content and has encyclopedic value, then it should be uploaded to Wikipedia. If it's used on multiple WPs then it needs to be uploaded to each. While it's a hassle, Commons doesn't allow non-free content. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 00:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Aarhus
[edit]No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark. like: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals in Copenhagen Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gretathunberg1.jpg
- File:Aarhus - panoramio (18).jpg
- File:Anettes Sandwich.JPG
- File:Atomkraft? Nej tak (5020295253).jpg
- File:Atomkraft? Nej Tak.jpg
- File:Building Painting Groennegade Aarhus.jpg
- File:Ceres gademaleri.jpg
- File:En væg på Marselis Boulevard - Aarhus - panoramio.jpg
- File:Facade painitng, Aarhus, 1.jpg
- File:Facade painitng, Aarhus, 2.jpg
- File:Facade painitng, Aarhus, 3.jpg
- File:Faded mural in Aarhus.JPG
File:(ekkor Århus), Skovvejen 11. Fortepan 75672.jpgComment 2File:(ekkor Århus), Kystvejen, jobbra a Nørreport torkolata. Fortepan 75674.jpgComment 2File:Frydenlund 7.jpgcomment 1File:Frydenlund 8.jpgcomment 1- File:Gartnergården (Åbyhøj).jpg
- File:Green-eyed Beauty (Graffiti).jpg
File:Grundtvigsvej4.jpgcomment 1- File:Hammerhaj Eske Touburg.jpg
File:Illerupvej 38-40-42 - panoramio.jpgcomment 1File:Klostervangen 3.JPGcomment 1- File:Mural in Aarhus.jpg
File:Mural, beer, Aarhus.jpgComment 2- File:Mural, Frederiks Alle.jpg
- File:Mural, Nørre Allé.jpg
- File:Mural, Nørregade.jpg
- File:Mural, Nørregade1.jpg
- File:Mural, Silkeborgvej.JPG
- File:Mural, Sjællandsgade.jpg
- File:Mural, Sjællandsgade1.jpg
- File:Mural, The Old Town Museum.jpg
- File:Mural, Vestergade, Annettes Sandwich.jpg
- File:Mural, Åbyhøj.jpg
- File:Murmaleri i Gellerupparken.jpg
- File:Rosensgade 7.jpg
- File:Seagull Kiss - Fiskergade in the center of Aarhus - Hans Krull 1985 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Seagull kiss.jpg
- File:Skovvejen, aarhus.jpg
- File:The flute player - mural - Andrzej Kowalczyk 1990 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Trøjborgvej 76.jpg
- File:Valdemarsgade 54A.jpg
- File:Vestergade 7 OOA.jpg
- File:Vestergade Mural.jpg
- File:Vestergade port mural2.jpg
- File:Vægmaleri is stræde.jpg
- File:Åboulevarden.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Skovvejen_11._Fortepan_75672.jpg){kind=link}
,_Kystvejen,_jobbra_a_N%C3%B8rreport_torkolata._Fortepan_75674.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
C.Suthorn (talk) 15:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- According to ORTS, this "Solar Label" File:Atomkraft nej tak.pdf should not be deleted, and also apply to other images of it. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Villy Fink Isaksen: Please check the name of the file you mentioned, it is a red link. And/Or could you tell the number of the OTRS ticket, so that an OTRS member can check, if the ticket applies to the files in the category. --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- (ticket) #2011012910005696 --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Could you look into the ticket? Some of the files in this DR might qualify for speedy keep? --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Not only "speedy keep", but Permanent Keep. This file has been discussed endlessly, because uninformed drive-by taggers wants to nominate it for deletion over and over. Can we stop this madness, please? RhinoMind (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Could you look into the ticket? Some of the files in this DR might qualify for speedy keep? --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- (ticket) #2011012910005696 --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Villy Fink Isaksen: Please check the name of the file you mentioned, it is a red link. And/Or could you tell the number of the OTRS ticket, so that an OTRS member can check, if the ticket applies to the files in the category. --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the following: (noted above as "Comment 1")
- in these cases, it is not a 2D artwork painted on the façade of the building, but rather the original design of the façade. Denmark has FoP for buildings (§24(3) Danish Copyright Act). --Rotkraut (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the following: (noted above and below as "Comment 2")
- File:(ekkor Århus), Skovvejen 11. Fortepan 75672.jpg (struck through above)
- File:(ekkor Århus), Kystvejen, jobbra a Nørreport torkolata. Fortepan 75674.jpg (struck through above)
- File:Mural, beer, Aarhus.jpg (struck through above)
- File:Mural, Silkeborgvej.JPG(not struck through above)
- File:Skovvejen, aarhus.jpg(not struck through above)
- They're below the threshold of originality.--Kjeldjoh (talk) 10:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Atomkraft nej tak.pdf and File:Atomkraft nej tak.jpg per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smiling Sun - English.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Smiling Sun. @C.Suthorn: Ticket:2011012910005696 is 8+ years old, in 13 Articles, and in Danish, but like Jim and Yann, I reviewed it anyway. It refers specifically to the GFDL license, File:Atomkraft nej tak.pdf, and File:Atomkraft nej tak.jpg. Pinging @MGA73 as ticket holder. Direct derivatives of those two files licensed as only GFDL here on Commons should be kept. Photos of derivatives painted on buildings, signs, and whatnot that do not comply with the GFDL, and that therefore infringe on the rights of OOA, should be deleted. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Note that at Commons:File_types#Scanned_text_documents_(DjVu,_PDF) it is not recommended to upload graphics as PDFs, so we probably should not keep File:Atomkraft nej tak.pdf since we have File:Atomkraft nej tak.jpg which is identical. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
I agree with the first three files in Comment 2, but the last two are not below the ToO -- they are both far too complex for that. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted most, including the "Atomkraft nej tak" ones per analysis by Jeff, kept a few per discussion. Also kept one where the mural is de-minimis. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Denmark
[edit]No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark. like: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals in Copenhagen Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gretathunberg1.jpg
File:Just Like Me series at Copenhagen, Denmark.jpg(kept per OTRS)- File:Large ROA Mural at the City Island in Odense.JPG
- File:Make peace.jpg
- File:Street art by belgian artist ROA.JPG
- File:Sund mad ....jpg
- File:Sunset and wall mural in Odense.JPG
- File:Wall-painting Hillerod Chr-4.jpg
- File:Wandmalerei Holstebro.JPG
C.Suthorn (talk) 15:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment File:Just Like Me series at Copenhagen, Denmark.jpg has a valid OTRS ticket. It should be checked if this refers also to the mural and not only to the photograph. De728631 (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- The former file (Just Like Me series at Copenhagen, Denmark.jpg) can be kept. We have a permission from the original artist. The rest needs to be deleted. De728631 (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
I cannot understand why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk • contribs) 12:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please read COM:Derivative works and COM:FOP Denmark. The paintings themselves are copyrighted and non-free, so even if the photos come with a free licence, they should not have been published without permission from the artists that created the murals. Many countries do not protect works of art that are permanently located in public places, but in Denmark this is only valid if derivative photographs are only used for non-commercial purposes. De728631 (talk) 22:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: File:Make peace.jpg and File:Sund mad ....jpg. It's below the threshold of originality.--Kjeldjoh (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- I would agree to keep File:Make peace.jpg, but the other one seems to include some drawings, so that shouldn't be kept. De728631 (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept the file with OTRS permission and the "Make peace" one. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)