Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 31st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name - description Doublecaffe (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tun Shwe Sin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio from the software — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violations can be speedied. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any explanation for the license provided? Just because the copyright holder put it online doesn't make it free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm new here and I uploaded file without basic information about its licensing or even source. I found this info later and now I know it's not free. Please delete this file. I'll try to not upload non-free files anymore. Rail01 (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per uploader. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie, Nonsense Jéjé9000 (talk) 21:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 12:44, 1 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 19:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:25, 3 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 01:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Adolf Hoffmeister (d. 1973), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: received permission in OTRS in ticket:2019102710005257. Proceeding. No valid reason for deletion. --Mates (talk) 15:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unaccepted Majid00001 (talk) 12:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete user talk pages. --Achim (talk) 19:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). out of scope (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kavinnikil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DeanneSa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"© 2014 Foto Look Intl. - LasVegasStudios.com"

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Taivo. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DeanneSa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, most of them © 2014 Foto Look Intl. - LasVegasStudios.com

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph was taken at the Elliott & Fry studio on 29 March 1951, not public domain in UK yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Com:PS. Hanooz 01:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadhanananda mahathera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal documents, out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structural formula; partly jagged bonds. Have File:Structural formula of diisobutyl ketone.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test upload for wiki image competition T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 06:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Encyclopedic value missing Hans Haase (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom; not good to illustrate any of the category scopes Pitke (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per all reasons specified in COM:VAGINA. Commons already has much much better photos of human genitals, no need for this poor quality image. Masum Reza📞 09:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external hosting tool for Reddit's Model house of Commons Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external hosting tool for Reddit's Model house of Commons Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external hosting tool for Reddit's Model house of Commons Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external hosting tool for Reddit's Model house of Commons Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external hosting tool for Reddit's Model house of Commons Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused shot of a nonentity. Instances of a Pankaj Prajapati only exist on vanity social media. WM not a personal photo album. Acabashi (talk) 10:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realized it is bad for my privacy Imrannigam (talk) 10:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Farshad Dehbozorgi was twice deleted due to non-notability and promotionality. Probably his photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not understand, what is depicted here. Does not look like boxing or wrestling match. Maybe out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional / social media-related image. While in use on Wikipedia, it is on a user talk page and not for “educational” purposes. Senator2029 13:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 14:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 14:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file. Title descibes it as a "header" - for what? Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to Wikibooks if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently non-notable company. Check the history. For some reason this logo has attracted some strange socking; but it is not in use and I can't find notability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unneeded  —GoldRingChip (please reply on wp) 18:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldRingChip (talk • contribs) 18:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper geometry. Category:N-Propylbenzene has several correct alternatives. DMacks (talk) 02:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it's just a test. I'm testing about panoramic photos and I needed to upload the photo for someplace and wikimedia was choice. Please, remove this photo. Jbernardorj (talk) 02:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work. The uploader has had several images deleted now and I strongly suspect this is yet another copyvio. The image has been taken inside a vehicle so, unless the uploader is closely associated with Mariah Huq, and there is no evidence of this, it seems that this is yet another case where the uploader has copied an image from a website and then claimed it to be his own work. AussieLegend () 09:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 12:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:N-Propylbenzene has several alternatives with more appropriate bond-lengths (problem tagged by User:Wostr). This image here is a composite of diverse originals, which is why there are multiple graphical inconsistencies. And those originals are not cited, which is against commons policy. DMacks (talk) 02:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the replacing! DMacks (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 18:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure (User:Mykhal tagged it: "this claimed (cyclobutane ring containing) structure [smiles: O=C(O)C1C2C(CCC(O)C2(C)C(=O)O)C2CCC3(O)CC21C3=O] does not even exist in PubChem database, as well as claimed "gibberellin 452D". [1] mentions a chemical by this name with a different structure, but I can't find the refs it mentions. Searching SciFinder for that structure gets me CAS #66538-98-5, which has no refs. DMacks (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep under COM:INUSE until it's permanently removed from pl:Gibereliny where it's been the lead image for over a decade. --bjh21 (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, no longer in use. Ed (Edgar181) 18:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is privacy Abal7lis (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author or uploader requested deletion of personal unused content. --Alaa :)..! 12:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is at the personal request of the owner of the photo for privacy concern. Abal7lis (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author or uploader requested deletion of personal unused content. --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is at the personal request of the owner of the photo for privacy concern. Abal7lis (talk) 21:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author or uploader requested deletion of personal unused content. --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inadequate source data; also very low quality MPF (talk) 00:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, per nom. ("Unknown" source, "unknown" author - no evidence of claimed free license. Image was not in use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with little or no educational use. Nonsense description. Out of scope. Sije (talk) 03:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore di caricamento - Marchio registrato Lanerossitextiles (talk) 10:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, prompt uploader reqest. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo without metadata (114×134 pixels), the uploader's last remaining contribution. Looks like copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, per nom. (File was not in use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Horst P. Horst (d. 1999). Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:52, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Apparent DW/incorrect license on Flickr. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelling JoJan (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, empty. --Achim (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from tasnimnews.com credited to Khamenei.ir

[edit]

The license on the website applies only to content created by Tasnim News Agency, see footer of the website. This file is credited to Khamenei.ir

Martin H. (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Khamenei.ir is also a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License like tasnimnews. You can see this in here
Good hint, some photos can be found there (your # 01, 02, 04). Attribution can be changed to that true source. Some other cant be found on that gallery. Maybe there is another gallery on Khamenei.ir, otherwise i see no evidence of publication under a free license. --Martin H. (talk) 12:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep--There is no difference between images of Khamenei.ir and tasnimnews.com because we asked them to publish the pictures under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Saman-1984 (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by GTVM92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination for the second part. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC) keep the first part as Khamenei.ir content is clearly freely licensed, per nomination for the second part. closed in two time as I did not notice the first part of the nomination when I closed it the first time Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GTVM92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

 I withdraw my nominationNot Fars News images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 11:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GTVM92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who are the painters? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 08:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio by user with history of uploading copyvio images DHN (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 17:15, 20 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use. No permission (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an album cover, fair use. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character form Plants vs Zombies. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong cut from the picture, i made a mistake with the upload, no faces on the picture Geerestein2 (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Speedy had been the other choice. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (unusable crop). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An updated version of this file from the author is available as an SVG on the Wikimedia Commons Aharonium (talk) 00:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok, author request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque quiero quitarlo. Matiast97 (talk) 01:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is still copyright protected in Greece and elsewhere. The author passed away in 1966 (less than 70 years ago). Flashdart2 (talk) 01:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks a license for its home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image provides no workable source, and references a third party author. We need a better source and likely OTRS permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How is this PD-old? The source gives an upstream source of 2002. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I downloaded this image from the image on wp:en as for File:Blepharodes cornutus female.jpg and by taking the license indicated {{PD-old}}. I imagine that if Boston indicated it this way by giving the link to "Tree of Life Web Projec", it was because he had good reason to do so. By the way, if we click the image on Tree of Life Web Projec page, it opens another page in another window that contains: "This media file is in the Public Domain.". So no more doubt! --Titou (talk) 08:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"2002" in the upstream is for the list of species of Carrikerella. The source of the image is given on Tree of Life as M. Beier. 1935. Mantodea. Fam. Mantidae. Subfam. Thespinae. Genera Insectorum de P. Wytsman 200:1-32. That doesn't obviously support a claim of publication before 1924. --bjh21 (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per bjh21. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.But this is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. But this is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it is a fake page: Cross-wiki vandal. miya (talk) 07:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader User:John Doe Texas (talk) has made this page in order to upload fake photos used in these fake articles which are requested deletion in jawp DR, ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/富山県So-netによって立項された記事群.--miya (talk) 07:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerald Dickinson.jpg has been deleted as "nonsense/hoax/joke". I filed a deletion request of its wikidata page d:Q67173049, whose source is this creator page.--miya (talk) 02:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Morio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no enough information about copyright status. The same picture was posted before 17 April, 2013, by ex-Sega employee[2], and you can find some articles about it[3][4][5]. This picture was uploaded on 17 June 2013, 2 months after the original post, by a disposable account editor. Uncertain whether the uploader have permission for the image.
Converted by me to regular DR, as in such a case a discussion seems to be appropriate. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Sega Saturn prototype with netlink backside.jpg


Deleted: per nomination - quite unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist died in 1972

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:50, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - lacks of permission(s) from the actual copyright holder(s) and/or unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution; various alternatives of better quality are available in Category:Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1686 edition)‎ Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, uploader has problems with copyright. Looks like copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimasheff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) Здравствуйте! Мы разместили на официальном сайте Пепаняна Р.А. assnova.ru ссылку на лицензию https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Что еще нужно? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimasheff (talk • contribs) 14:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimasheff: BY-NC is not a valid license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Sealle, furthermore higher resolutions are available therefore the copyright status is quite unclear, e.g. https://of.ru/imagesww/ObjectModel1254/0b88be_underPageSpeedOptimizationSimpleGradientFromTop_3008%C3%972000.JPG. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a newspaper article and is therefore likely to be subject to copyright.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saalai Kannan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo, newspaper, publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lmmnhn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not permanent display as required by Commons:Freedom of panorama in Hong Kong.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:香港反引渡條例修訂大遊行現場 02.jpg - Is this not permanent display too ? --Mokina Minkoo YAN (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, masks are not permanent display. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 15:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Benin. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license. Most probably fair use. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published on various website, no permission (see TinEye). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trackerjackerly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fair use logos, permission needed.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC, the design of the cover is of 1979 by an unnamed (unknown??) designer Goesseln (talk) 16:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong CC, the design of the cover is of 1979 by an unnamed (unknown??) designer Goesseln (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The Coverdesign is first appeared January-December 1915 in the Magazine The Forerunner: hb/Joan Hall.--Fiona (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The cover of the Forerunner was different: [6] --Magnus (talk) 12:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is obviously a modern collage (using older elements) and as such protected by copyright. The original 1915 cover was, as pointed out by Magnus, completely different. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Roger Arékian, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gino Severini (d. 1966), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a photoshoot by Tushy.com, + previously published on some websites. Can't find the exact location of where the file originated from but I believe that this is a paid content. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

still from a Dutch TV program - probably no own work Velocitas (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted - see watermark; probably no own work, see also uploader's other pictures and nominations Velocitas (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Juarez Machado, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, photo credited by MASSIMO PINCA / REUTERS (cf. metadata) — danyele 18:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CGI graphic which is unlikely a user's own work. Roy17 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - artistic object in addition as to be utilitarian, see COM:UA. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La Nación has copyright 190.231.218.21 19:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:56, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry/shaky, unused, much better File:Scotch-branded spool with magnetic tape (16679602557).jpg in place. Retired electrician (talk) 19:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:56, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noahedits (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Beth Hatefutsoth Photo Archive, courtesy of Ron Aufseesser-Stein, Switzerland Photo Unit Number: 15483 © All Rights Reserved

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - bogus pd tag: Yemenit tags are for works published in Yemen not for all photos taken in Yemen. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot of the cover of the book in 2016. There is no evidence of free license GAndy (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot of the cover of the book in 2019. There is no evidence of free license GAndy (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wolfmann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is the illustrator? Robert Ley seems not to have been one.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately, the illustrator's name is not mentioned in the book and apparently unknown to those (professional militaria stores etc.) presenting/selling this book on the Internet. The 1943 version of the ORGANISATIONSBUCH DER NSDAP was the 7th edition of the official Nazi Party guide published by Reichsorganisationsleiter dr. Robert Ley and the Zentralverlag der NSDAP in Munich. It was never for public sale. The organization (as well as its leader) ceased to exist in 1945, 75 years ago.
The files on wikimedia are taken from this copy found at archive.org. scanned by The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). The digital copy is marked with: The USHMM is unaware of any copyright restrictions for this item. The uniform plates by this illustrator was also published in the 1940 edition of the book. Earlier editions, for example the 1936 or the 1937 editions, show uniform illustrations made by other artists.
As unsigned contributions to an official handbook almost 80 years old, I considered the illustrations to have fallen into the public domain, and didn't see them as "genuie" orginal work of art by a named artist with copyright restrictions. But I am by no means an expert in this field, and the legal restrictions vary among countries. So what are we going to do to keep the image files in the wikimedia commons database? Find the correct tag? All the best from me :-) Wolfmann (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not me who will decide but an Administrator. Since such material is protected in Germany 70 years after the author's death it's probably still under copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Closing as stale. Can be renominated without prejudice. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim of own work for a photograph that is circa 1910 is not credible. No proper source provided. Whpq (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 18:44, 29 November 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mr rqasimzade --Krdbot 01:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. But this is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - cannot be identified, only edit of this user - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 09:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's Pierre Laffon de Mazières, I found him on a french wikipedia page (Ramsault was his nickname). JeanBono (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that sounds to be a very good possibility - I have added categories - can be kept. Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Famous person, in scope. Yann (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai moi-même apporter ce fichier. C'était pour un projet d'article qui n'a pas vu le jour. Ne servant pour aucune autre page, j'aimerais l'enlever si possible. Merci. Pierre.le.marque (talk) 11:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission must come from photographer, not from depicted person. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the sculptor so there is copy-right violation 109.129.53.170 13:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a deletion justification, only a blank statement. If I said: the IP 109.129.53.170 is just here to disrupt the project, it's just also an blank statement. There must be something more to justify this deletion request from the IP 109.129.53.170.
The uploader and photograph are identified as User:Asurnipal. Ass long as Asurnipal can't verify that he (she) is the sculptor there is of course copyright violation. In Luxembourg freedom of panorama doens't exist. --109.129.53.170 19:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nice statement. In what law is this? Asurnipal (talk) 19:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Loi sur les droits d'auteur, les droits voisins et les bases de données. --87.66.131.33 09:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear IP. Do we have to pull everything out of your nose? Article, § and case law. But exactly to this point, namely works of art in public space. Not just the name of the law book. What kind of strange action is that?, Asurnipal (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You ass the uploader should know this. It is not the duty of other users to explain you the laws. --81.242.58.70 21:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not correct. It is your duty to prove that your claim is correct. You want to delete the picture. No one else. They complained that there was no freedom of panoramic in Luxembourg for works of art in public spaces. This, without proof. So what is inadmissible under the rules of Wikipedia and reject such a deletion request.
On this file:
(Panoramafreiheit_in_Europa_(Karte).png) you see, that in Luxemburg and Belgian the freedom of panoramic it is possible in some cases (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Luxembourg#Freedom_of_panorama).
This on the condition that these graphics are correct, which no one can not understand without the legal text and the case law.
By the way, a rudeness does not make your arguments any better.
The only exception is that in Luxembourg a copyright holder may not prevent "the reproduction and communication of his or her works located in a publicly accessible place, when such works do not constitute the primary subject of the reproduction or communication. This is not the case for your picture because it is the primary subject of the reproduction. --81.242.58.70 18:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Loi du 18 avril 2004 modifiant 1. la loi du 18 avril 2001 sur les droits d’auteur, les droits voisins et les bases de données, et 2. la loi modifiée du 20 juillet 1992 portant modification du régime des brevets d’invention.
Very good, now we're getting closer to it. So it's not the way you wrote above, that there's a general ban on depicting artworks in public space in Luxembourg. Correct is, that we have to be differentiated according to the image's content. You find this also here Copyright_rules_by_territory/Luxembourg # Freedom_of_panorama Freedom of panorama (Luxembourg). Now the Question is, what you write at last above, put the image of me the artwork in the foreground, so the artwork is primary subject of the reproduction? We have for this De Minimis Examples. So the question is in the essence: does the de minimis rule apply in this particular case?
In my image is a copyrighted work identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject, and is essential to the subject (e.g., blacking it out would make the file unusable or invalidated useless - the picture down is even more problematic them mine, but is still considered to be permissible under certain circumstances). But also the work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity, so de minimis may apply. It is therefore a discretionary decision, whether this is a landscape with bus shelter or a work of art in the public space with surroundings. Most likely it would be a violation if the artwork is to be seen alone (which is not the case here). But even there are exceptions for this, for example, if a piece of art does not have copyrighted Grafiti on a protected work of art and it is about representing the Grafiti. Then the work of art can also stand in the center of the picture / in the foreground, unless it is otherwise possible to show the detail associated or related to the work of art. BR, Asurnipal (talk) 08:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
mini
You say: In my image is a copyrighted work identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject.
That's not correct, because every detail seen on the picture can be pictured without the sculpture. So its not an element that you can't avoid. --81.242.58.70 09:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is how you see it. I see it differently and have also made the picture in this context. The picture shows a certain area of Steinfort, near the workers' housing estate, just because of this bus shelter, the sculpture. What would interest me more now: what is your personal interest, delete this picture? That you are not a "normal" IP, I think everybody has already noticed. Why do you want to delete this image if you are an outsider? But if you are a Wikipedian, why are you hiding behind an IP address instead of being open? Very strange. Asurnipal (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a problem with IP's or do you think that IP's have less rights than other users. --81.242.58.70 15:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, but I ask myself, why someone, just because of this file such an effort drives. I have not experienced that yet from an IP. What could be the real reason? Because the protection of the project is not. Because such a thing usually interests only Wikipedians, no IPs. My interest is of course conditioned by my job, because I wonder why someone is doing something that others IP usually do not do. BR, Asurnipal (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
just because of this file such an effort drives
I'm not driving en effort. I only give you answers to your questions in the sense of the luxemburgish law in relation with no panorama freedom in Luxembourg and this to avoid problems with a copyrightholder. --Les Meloures (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Les Meloures. Thank you for the release of your WP name. I've already guessed that you're a WP pro. Of course it is still incomprehensible to me, what has moved you to act here first as an IP. Understandable, however, is the concern for our joint project. I am glad to meet a Luxembourg colleague in this matter because I really appreciate the country and its people. Still, in the context of the file, I still see the thing differently than you and refer to the examples I mentioned above. We will see how others see this. For my unfortunately not very good English I apologize, but that is already very rusty :-)
what has moved you to act here first as an IP.
There were technical reasons that I don't undertstand myself. Apparently it works now correctly again. --87.64.59.46 15:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ohhh it seems not. :-( --87.64.59.46 15:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination This did not deserve anything like this much discussion -- it is a perfectly clear case of a photograph of a copyrighted work of art in a country that does not allow such photographs. It is not up to the nominator or anyone else to teach copyright law to uploaders. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required for it to be PD in Russia+US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, delete all Indonesian (especially Surabaya and Jakarta) skyscrapers pictures in Wikimedia Commons! But, before you delete this picture, show the copyright act. Ivan Humphrey (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request Javierm18 (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- This is a beautiful image. I see no reason to delete it. The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image does not show the correct flag of the Bezirk Oberbayern, it is purely fictitious Sukaq (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The image is widely used, so apparently many others disagree with you. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio? Cheep (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cheep: Why do you think it is a copyvio? Masum Reza📞 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - small image, no EXIF, description quotes the sibject as author. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the same file with a differrent name (Jean-Marc Nattier (1685-1766) - Portret van maarschalk hertog Richelieu - Lissabon Museu Calouste Gulbenkian 21-10-2010 13-34-54.jpg) Paul Hermans (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep They are photographs of the same subject, yes, but with different lighting, exposure and sizes. There's no problem keeping two versions, particularly since both are in use. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1980s photo. No free license listed at the claimed source. The following copyright information is available at vlaanderen.be: "Most of the photos on this site have been commissioned by the Flemish Government with photographer Joris Casaer. Some photos have been purchased and listed below per photographer." (translated from Dutch). Thuresson (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for graffiti/mural and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 21:56, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

keine Aussage, zu dunkel Norbert Rau (talk) 22:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - true, except that we have several identical images that aren't almost black and aren't tilted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsmith47 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/wpaog/albums/72157677916554207

Déjà vu 23:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Flickr is ARR and the statue is under copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

People watching

[edit]

Looks like User:Jon Kolbert just grabbed everything by Flickr user Atomic Taco regardless of usefulness. Two pictures of people atop buildings; can't see much of the people, or of the buildings. Each has a {{Location dec}} template, but neither appears to be particularly close to where the picture was taken (just a generic Downtown Seattle location).

If someone can identify the buildings these just might be vaguely within scope, but even then I don't see much use to them. -- Jmabel ! talk 23:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file renamed Bahnmoeller (talk) 23:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If 1967 not public domain yet in Germany. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mojmir Churavy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not public domain yet in Germany.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://ioannpr.ru/o-khrame/slugenie-nastoyatela/1280-mitropolit-antonij-prinyal-uchastie-v-prazdnovanii-dnya-angela-blazhennejshego-mitropolita-kievskogo-i-vseya-ukrainy-onufriya Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. But this is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was paid for by me the person in the photo. --TheWolfius (talk) 13:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TheWolfius: Please follow the instructions above. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted for now, can be restored if OTRS permission is forthcoming. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Advertisement with hand-coloring and words. This is complex enough to be eligible for longer protection terms in Peru, not {{PD-Peru-photo}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose: The copyright protection extends to published images (broadly construed), not simply photographs, prior to 1976. Nobody has "hand-colored" the image either; that's just how they were printed in the magazines. The Inca Kola advertisements in question are older than 1976. Where are your citations/proof that your logic is valid within Peruvian copyright law? This is a frivolous deletion request.--MarshalN20 (talk) 03:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru all images were protected for 20 years, I can't see why this should be different. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is modern wersion of COA (lion looking east) https://powiatlwowecki.pl/images/article/image/Agnieszka/herb%20Powiat%20Lw%C3%B3wecki%20nowy%20z%20ramk%C4%85.png, updated version of this COA (lion looking west like here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Lw%C3%B3wek_%C5%9Al%C4%85ski_Ratusz_dekoracja_elewacji_wie%C5%BCy.JPG) was uploaded here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:POL_Ksi%C4%99stwo_Lw%C3%B3weckie_COA_1.svg Diatlove (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image of historic coat of arms are in scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karel Hrdina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Massive imagevio from [7], no permission, missing EXIF; some files aren't available now (after 6–7 years), but the images still link source pages

— Draceane talkcontrib. 14:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed my nomination and some of the files state the authorship of Karel Hrdina in the EXIF. These could be OK:
These other probably have an original EXIF description from the camera, so they might be also own work of the user.
— Draceane talkcontrib. 22:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, even files that might be ok, since they are still sketchy, considering they are taken from the source site and not uploaded in full quality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of these are in Germany; a few are in the UK. The images all infringe on the copyright held by the creator of the floats. Neither country's FoP allows the exemption for works that are not permanently on display in a public place.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep There is a permission from the Creator. https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2009032910008434 Trockennasenaffe (talk) 18:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This ticket contains an email from 2009, that gives permission for 6 files Jacques Tilly created before 2009 (obviously). The same ticket (I think they where merged by mistake, or maybe the emailer confused threads) the caricature File:Jacques Tilly Karikatur.jpg. There are other permissions from the same artist for File:Jacques Tilly.jpg, File:Grossplastik Pruegel-Nonne.jpg, File:Grossplastik Trump Baby G20 Summit.jpg and File:Brexit-is-a-monstrosity-float-2017-10-01-in-manchester-photo-robert-mandel.jpg. That's all I can find in OTRS. Ciell (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
--AFBorchert (talk) 21:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. The OTRS ticket does not seem to apply (except for the images pointed out by AFBorchert). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]