Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 26th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matisse, Femme au chapeau (1905).jpg

[edit]

This work of art by Henri Matisse is copyrighted in its source country until 1 January 2025 Coldcreation (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. Not yet PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atelier rouge matisse 1.jpg

[edit]

This work of art by Henri Matisse is copyrighted in its source country until 1 January 2025 Coldcreation (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:145 kV Hybrid Module.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation the same as File:72,5 kV Hybrid Switchgear Module.jpg : [1] page 5 Darklanlan (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy as copyvio. --DMacks (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:145 kV Hybrid Module 2.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation the same as File:72,5 kV Hybrid Switchgear Module.jpg : [2] page 5 Darklanlan (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy as copyvio. --DMacks (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tobacco use.jpg

[edit]

Obvious photo of screen. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matisse Souvenir de Biskra.jpg

[edit]

I made a mistake: this work is still under copyright in France. Braaark (talk) 03:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Not yet PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mind Wars (305504574).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work: the book covers are presumably copyrighted. Jmabel ! talk 04:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lacey-bed.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Bijay chaurasia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploaded from Perfectnacked.com Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COPYVIO. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SAVED-20190609 1112 43372.png

[edit]

Selfies don't have significant educational value. Truthman10200 (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Pretty much has to be a copyvio, no? Jmabel ! talk 04:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Clear DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Pretty much has to be a copyvio, no? Jmabel ! talk 04:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Northgate Station Roof Alternative 1 (6858703096).jpg

[edit]

Pretty much has to be a copyvio, no? Jmabel ! talk 04:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Northgate Station Roof Alternative 1 (7004821057).jpg

[edit]

Pretty much has to be a copyvio, no? Jmabel ! talk 04:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charlotte Fürst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos. Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted false license claims as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Errol Spence in training.jpg

[edit]

https://3kingsboxing.com/de-la-hoya-wants-canelo-vs-spence/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Errol Spence in training.jpg

[edit]

copyright claim Prettyboy361 (talk) 05:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Not made by the user / copyvio. - PS Why nominate it two times? :) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Utah - Bryce Canyon National Park Scenic Trails Historic District - 20110807234932.jpg

[edit]

uploaded in error Wiki-zprzasny (talk) 06:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Utah - Bryce Canyon National Park Scenic Trails Historic District - 20110807214706.jpg

[edit]

uploaded in error Wiki-zprzasny (talk) 06:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Utah - Bryce Canyon National Park Scenic Trails Historic District - 20110807212428.jpg

[edit]

uploaded in error Wiki-zprzasny (talk) 06:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Utah - Bryce Canyon National Park Scenic Trails Historic District - 20110807211827.jpg

[edit]

uploaded in error Wiki-zprzasny (talk) 06:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Utah - Bryce Canyon National Park Scenic Trails Historic District - 20110806222522.jpg

[edit]

uploaded in error Wiki-zprzasny (talk) 06:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bývalý hřbitov Maloměřice 06.jpg

[edit]

I uploat wrong image MIGORMCZ (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eraver Fordmort Eraveraliment 2019.svg

[edit]

out of project scope, Commons is not an external hosting tool for nationstates.net Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Edit Abot.jpg

[edit]

COM:SS; not own work Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, DW, unsourced, false license, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Սբ. Պողոս-Պետրոսի տաճար.jpg

[edit]

I dont like this picture ArpineG. (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, fairly prompt uploader request; unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:D7793.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by -revi as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Semi-)Professional self-portrait of themselves, claiming "Own work" which is too good to be true. — regards, Revi 16:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo-output 2.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: B&W version of [3], + watermarked removed if you look closely. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion)

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo-output.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Similar files here and here with credits to given in the latter as sniper_ajix. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pozsgay Gyula.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: From [4] (bottom), doesn't seem to have any permission to reuse. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yemi-Moraf.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: From Instagram, permission from photographer needed. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nadia Malacrida at marriage, 1922.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license (No license since) Public domain license information has since been added. Atsme Talk 📧 16:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy-kept, as this DR was created unintentionally and the image is obviously in the PD. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta Single Cylinder Racer at Brands Hatch, 1995 02.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italiancopyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 16:29, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta Single Cylinder Racer at Brands Hatch, 1995 01.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 16:29, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta Single Cylinder Racer at Brands Hatch, 1995 03.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 16:29, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta GP Racer at Brands Hatch, 1995.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 16:29, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta 6 Cylinder at Brands Hatch, 1995 02.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 16:29, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta 6 Cylinder at Brands Hatch, 1995 01.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 16:28, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta 600cc Motorcycle at Brands Hatch, 1995 01.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:19, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta 600cc Motorcycle at Brands Hatch, 1995 02.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:19, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta Enduro at Brands Hatch, 1995.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:20, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV Agusta and BMW Classic Racing Motorcycles at Brands Hatch, 1995.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:20, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magni-MV Agusta at Brands Hatch, 1995 03.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:19, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magni-MV Agusta at Brands Hatch, 1995 04.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:19, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magni-MV Agusta at Brands Hatch, 1995 02.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:19, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magni-MV Agusta at Brands Hatch, 1995 01.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:19, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magni-Moto Guzzi at Brands Hatch, 1995.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:18, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aermacchi Road Racing Motorcycle at Brands Hatch, 1995.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:18, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paton Racing Motorcycle at Brands Hatch, 1995.tif

[edit]

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 17:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 20:20, 26 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dennis Mapa.jpg

[edit]

{{duplicate|File:Photo of Dr. Mapa.jpg}} Grace angel7 (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 06:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Daniel Rosenfled.jpg

[edit]

Source fails to confirm the mentioned license (CC BY-SA4.0) acagastya 15:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Copyvio of https://c418.org/2017/01/25/who-is-daniel/. — regards, Revi 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YaraHennaoui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://mohdamush.com/f/telecel-global-african-startup-initiative

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; coyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YaraHennaoui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://huguesmulliez.com/f/hugues-mulliez-nous-d%C3%A9livre-le-secret-de-la-r%C3%A9ussite-en-afrique

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 17:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:British-airways-logo.png

[edit]

COM:TOO United Kingdom states that the threshold of originality is low for United Kingdom images. Seeking clarification in this case. Wikiacc (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could any admin please delete this logo and close this DR? The uploader requested deletion. Thanks! Masum Reza📞 10:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Binary prefixes (41983361972).jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful - misleading and does not depict what binary prefixes are or do, while perpetuating misogynist views on technology; Previous discussions have completely ignored that this image is not educationally useful, which supercedes any censorship discussion. Particularly trouling is that the filename and description are misleading and clain that this is a technologically relevant image; COM:PS, COM:PORN, Seazzy (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 06:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per my previous closure at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, though I will accept that renaming it would be useful. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No educational value, misleading at best.Artchivist1 (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, mattbuck and the IP. Nominator, in the last three years, did, except for two uploads, only edits related with this images and the one of the other deletions votes is by AshFriday , that has almost only edits on this kind of DR and almost always to delete. Image is in scope, image is of an photographer that has this kind of imagery published on technology magazines, and again this smells of someone nominating this kind of images because of "moral, religious or pudency reasons" and not as stated because of not being "educationally useful". Also i find if funny that someone claims someone claim that this images are misogynist and "aggressively perpetuates misogynist views of women and tech", when this images were taken of adult, mature and free women, modeling on their own terms and conditions, clearly as professional models. A random Commons user (statistically most probably an adult men, please correct me if i´am wrong) knows more and mansplains that free and adult female models know less about their free choices and decisions of where, when, how and to whom make this kind of images. So, what is in fact an misogynist position? And what Artchivist1, as i suppose an feminist (male of female) as to say about the free choice of adult women? Are they not entitled to do show (or not) their bodies whatever the way they choose? Is it not feminism fighting to make women make equal to men and and make free choices without anyone mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices? Is it not the Antithesis of feminism? Tm (talk) 19:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment First some of the models work\worked with this photographer since the begging of the project ten years ago until today. So you have adult and free women that choose to participate in this project "GEEKOGRAPHY", an ensemble of images that fuses artistic nude photography and technology, covered by several tech, photo and generic media outlets, like the ones i linked above. But there is a lot more coverage, like the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012 had an article about his project.
But to show that this is really an conceptual artist and not some creepy random dude, let the people that are the artists speak. He not only had photos published in a "nude art photography" book, but he won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
Second claims. in these or other DR that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is plainly inaccurate if it was make unaware or clearly fake if made aware of who this photographer is? No model is participating anonymously, you can clearly see their faces and names (Olya, Darina, Y., Olga, Olga, Alena, Maria, Anna, V., Margo, Polina, Agneta, Masha, Marusia, Alexandra, Luiza, Kristin) on his website, besides the many flickr images that show their face, the vimeo videos and the photos published in many news articles i´ve linked. So no, they are not participating anonymously in his work of ten years.
And, last but not least, the claim here or other DR that "sometimes women do degrading things for money" and then add that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is appaling, shocking and demeaning to "these women". Besides the fact that i stated before that these are not anonymous models is a fact, but now, because of your comments this is not only a question of scope and educational use, but a question of basic human decency and dignity of this models. By saying that they did this work anonymously (false) and only for money (proofs of this statement) and not for example for liking of his work and contribute to it, and them add the claim that they thought this work was "degrading things" is almost, if not totally, slut shamming them, by blame the models for their choice of work. We are talking of professional models, working in their field of work, posing to a reputable and famous photographer for several years and situations. Or are you implying that he coerced 17 models to pose for him, against their own free will?
Please show some respect for this models, their work and their free choices or show hard evidence of your claims. Or show solid proof that this models made the "Participation in a patriarchal capitalist world does not make you approve of that world" i.e. that this models posed only a anonymously (a false statements), that they that did this because they thought this work was one of those "degrading things" "sometimes women do (...) for money". If not, your only making wild and inaccurate claims that attack the integraty and professionalism of the photographer and denigrates, slut shame, undervalues and makes misogynist claims on these models and their work by mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices, typical of people that attack the political, spiritual, sexual, moral, reproductive and other basic rights under the cover of "moral, religious or pudency reasons".
Funny, also, that Violet Blue, an reputable and famous feminist, tech and sexuality writer, sex educator makes good comments about this images and the photographer. Is she a member of the "patriarchal capitalist world"? Tm (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close as Kept. Free licensed, no consensus to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erlang (9690003046).jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful. Does not describe, illustrate or provide context for the Erlang programming language. Not a repo for non-notable photographers. COM:PS, COM:PORN Seazzy (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per my previous closure at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, though I will accept that renaming it would be useful. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, mattbuck and the IP. Nominator, in the last three years, did, except for two uploads, only edits related with this images and the one of the other deletions votes is by AshFriday , that has almost only edits on this kind of DR and almost always to delete. Image is in scope, image is of an photographer that has this kind of imagery published on technology magazines, and again this smells of someone nominating this kind of images because of "moral, religious or pudency reasons" and not as stated because of not being "educationally useful". Also i find if funny that someone claims someone claim that this images are misogynist and "aggressively perpetuates misogynist views of women and tech", when this images were taken of adult, mature and free women, modeling on their own terms and conditions, clearly as professional models. A random Commons user (statistically most probably an adult men, please correct me if i´am wrong) knows more and mansplains that free and adult female models know less about their free choices and decisions of where, when, how and to whom make this kind of images. So, what is in fact an misogynist position? And what Artchivist1, as i suppose an feminist (male of female) as to say about the free choice of adult women? Are they not entitled to do show (or not) their bodies whatever the way they choose? Is it not feminism fighting to make women make equal to men and and make free choices without anyone mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices? Is it not the Antithesis of feminism? Tm (talk) 19:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment First some of the models work\worked with this photographer since the begging of the project ten years ago until today. So you have adult and free women that choose to participate in this project "GEEKOGRAPHY", an ensemble of images that fuses artistic nude photography and technology, covered by several tech, photo and generic media outlets, like the ones i linked above. But there is a lot more coverage, like the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012 had an article about his project.
But to show that this is really an conceptual artist and not some creepy random dude, let the people that are the artists speak. He not only had photos published in a "nude art photography" book, but he won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
Second claims. in these or other DR that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is plainly inaccurate if it was make unaware or clearly fake if made aware of who this photographer is? No model is participating anonymously, you can clearly see their faces and names (Olya, Darina, Y., Olga, Olga, Alena, Maria, Anna, V., Margo, Polina, Agneta, Masha, Marusia, Alexandra, Luiza, Kristin) on his website, besides the many flickr images that show their face, the vimeo videos and the photos published in many news articles i´ve linked. So no, they are not participating anonymously in his work of ten years.
And, last but not least, the claim here or other DR that "sometimes women do degrading things for money" and then add that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is appaling, shocking and demeaning to "these women". Besides the fact that i stated before that these are not anonymous models is a fact, but now, because of your comments this is not only a question of scope and educational use, but a question of basic human decency and dignity of this models. By saying that they did this work anonymously (false) and only for money (proofs of this statement) and not for example for liking of his work and contribute to it, and them add the claim that they thought this work was "degrading things" is almost, if not totally, slut shamming them, by blame the models for their choice of work. We are talking of professional models, working in their field of work, posing to a reputable and famous photographer for several years and situations. Or are you implying that he coerced 17 models to pose for him, against their own free will?
Please show some respect for this models, their work and their free choices or show hard evidence of your claims. Or show solid proof that this models made the "Participation in a patriarchal capitalist world does not make you approve of that world" i.e. that this models posed only a anonymously (a false statements), that they that did this because they thought this work was one of those "degrading things" "sometimes women do (...) for money". If not, your only making wild and inaccurate claims that attack the integraty and professionalism of the photographer and denigrates, slut shame, undervalues and makes misogynist claims on these models and their work by mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices, typical of people that attack the political, spiritual, sexual, moral, reproductive and other basic rights under the cover of "moral, religious or pudency reasons".
Funny, also, that Violet Blue, an reputable and famous feminist, tech and sexuality writer, sex educator makes good comments about this images and the photographer. Is she a member of the "patriarchal capitalist world"? Tm (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close as Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colmseoighe2.jpg

[edit]

i want to stop the photo being deleted because I took the photo myself Redshoedancer (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But, why does it contain Facebook code? Did you eventually copy it from Facebook? --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint John, NB Collage.jpg

[edit]

Not PD, and incompatible license at source, see Use Policy here (not speedily deleted in case I overlooked something). P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Partridge Island Lighthouse, Irish immigration to Saint John, NB.jpg

[edit]

Not PD, and incompatible license at source, see Use Policy here (not speedily deleted in case I overlooked something). P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Original-Logo-MR Version-A SB Pos-NB.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La socialització de gènere o socialització diferenciada .pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NTNUs litteraturpris 2018.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Kjersti L. 15:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Sunwapta Falls

[edit]

Out of scope - personal photos

Mindmatrix 15:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KJR 8262 0.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; author Lasha Kuprashvili per exif not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:สากล ม่วงศิริ.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Ployrapat1977 (talk) 16:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:สากล ม่วงศิริ.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Asdavdh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xikAwkYmRwU7a1qw6JtPD3liSFRAhLfH  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo-output 3.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:XrwJaZpnRTA.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 16:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP; no exif. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Snapseed (3).jpg

[edit]

useless, out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wellington da Beira Rio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jürgen Thormann und Ivar Leon Menger (2010).jpg

[edit]

Found on Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter Weis & Christian Rode (2017).jpg

[edit]

Found on Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diethyltoluenediamine wikipedia.pdf

[edit]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thomas Friebe in der Lanxess Arena.jpg

[edit]

Found on Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gerry Hüttemann (April 2019).jpg

[edit]

Uploader claims to be that guy, so this obvious selfie of another person can't be his "own work". The depicted person is non-notable (article in deletion progress). King Rk (talk) 19:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by William righi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Italy.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eichel eines Menschen.jpg

[edit]

Mangelnde Bildqualität Johann234 (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Commons does not need very poor quality photos of extremely common objects which we already have good quality photos of. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eichel eines Menschen.jpg

[edit]

Poor quality per Commons:Nudity --ghouston (talk) 22:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steifer Penis mit großer Eichel.jpg

[edit]

Poor quality per Commons:Nudity --ghouston (talk) 22:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steifer Penis mit großer Eichel.jpg

[edit]

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CapturaPantalla.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Test image ("load test"), but no indication of what exactly this is supposed to be testing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is some German text, hard to read, seems like a menu of some sort. The German words are in the center: versenden, gelb..bedienung, anfragen, auft..gewech.., einzeli..ndel. On the right there's English text: part, invent, request, change. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Signature of N.K.Mandal.jpg

[edit]

out of scope; non-notable person, articles spammed to wikis, and deleted by communities  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flor De Barquisimeto Venezuela (68090263).jpeg

[edit]

The file is really archived under license CC-BY-SA-3.0. But file description says: "© 2014 Yhisleym Ruiz. Todos los derechos reservados. No usar sin permiso y no esta disponible para usar en websites." That means: "© All rights reserved. Please do not use without permission." Most of Yhisleym's photos in 500px have no such statement. What should we do? Maybe Yhisleym's wish is that the photo is still all rights reserved? Taivo (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ta z kwiatkiem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, FBMD in EXIF data, exist elsewhere on the web. Unlikely to be own work.

~Cybularny Speak? 10:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Victor Perli, MdB.jpg

[edit]

Bild mit Copyrightvermerk (Alexander Klebe) Schnabeltassentier (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:12mohandoss mds.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20190224 075147000 iOS.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abhilash S.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abigailaryaputras half body.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aboti.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Advik Han's (Siddhu Shambhu).jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AksHiT pAuL (4).jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AksHiT pAuL.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Al.B.Sure!.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alfasa.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexis Yañez Oficial.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ALEXIS MACIEL-LORITO ÓGA.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alfred Wreh.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anil c Tamgondra.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aneeb.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Artist gopal prasad sharma with son and daughter.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AsbuSang.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ashish Sardana Official.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Afiche de «Cuando florezca el chuño».jpg

[edit]

out of scope MiguelAlanCS (talk) 11:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bidadzanganli.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Betha.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cats 006.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Damian Zwardoń.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Daneil.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dabass Records Ceo.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cyprusaurus in its natural habitat. .jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DattaramG.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deepa jethwa.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dragan Premović .jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Da,slika jeste moja i sva autorska i intelektualna prava su moja,slika je radjena davno za potrebe izrade Cv - a, a ovde je upload - ovana,zbog toga što je trebala bliže da odredi izvor sa kojeg će da potekne stvaranje stranice koja će u sebi da sadrži stvari koje su pravatne svojina,pa da bi približnije odredili mesto i način budućih objava slika.Nadalje slika se možda još ne nalazi na mestu na kom bih ja to voleo da bude pa ovom prilikom ukoliko neko može da pomogne kako da sliku prebacim na početak svoje stranece gde je moja biografija pa da se napravi konkretan izvor.Koliko sam upoznat i sama biografija se dovodi u pitanje i nekoliko puta je brisana ne zanam iz kog razloga jel je na kraju prihvaćena kako bih mogao da napravim početni izvor iz kog dalje mogu da razvijam članke ili članak koji bi objavljivao.U biogrfili se pominju i nekoliko dela koja su u mom vlasništvu i koja su autorska pa kada sam hteo da pojasnim i sama dela isto dolazi do brisanja a razlog je kako tema nije prihvatljiva za wikipediyu.Takođe me i to interesuje zašto se dešava ako sam autor tih dela a postoje svi brojevi koji su potrebni da bi se litetratura citirala i ispunjeni su svi uslovi jel su knjuge objavljene davno.Tačno se navodi gde se mogu dobiti podatci o tim delima pa je u skladu sa svim pravilima funkcionisanja a imajući u vidu da je predhodno prihvaćena biografija koja dovodi do izvora koji se odnosi na mog oca i mene sada mene (pogledajte biografiju pa će te videti o čemu je reč)i to nas dovodi do slike i autentičnosti zbog koje je slika upload - ovana iz kog je dozvoljena biografija da bi se stvorila tačna veza sa koje bi se moglo doći do tačnih podataka o delima o kojima se u prvom trenutku govori i da bi se dao doprinos zajednici i stvaranju sve veće baze koja bi u budućnosti nastajala.Još jedanput ako može pomoć u prabacivanju slike u pradvidjeni prstor jel slika ne bi trebala biti obrisana već stranu treba imati veći doprinos iz razloga koji sam naveo.Slika dakle jeste moja i ovim putem to potvrdjujem.Može li i pomoć ili makar uputstva gde da uređujem da li ovde ili na wikipedizi i kako dalje ići.Unapred zahvalan. Dragan988 (talk) 12:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eshiaq Al Noushat phoo.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fazlullahsadiq.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giovaniinfo1b.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Godhyl kaye okit.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Goldy Kahlon and Satpal Malhi.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HARIHAR CHTRA.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hardik Faldu Balambhadi.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hardik kothiya.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit yates.jpg

[edit]

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hassan t.png

[edit]

Non-free screenshot. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hassan tIK.png

[edit]

Non-free screenshot. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hassankingsam.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HRIMON.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hinh The.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Idan Aedan.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image of Tony Huang .jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMG-20190404-WA0023.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMG-20190218-WA0004.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hermilo Gonzalez.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Herman-Mas.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jiyenkrishnakumar.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jay Dev.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Murtaza12.JPG

[edit]

Unused file. Group of people at a meeting with no clear explanation of where or why. OUt of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ot of woind.jpg

[edit]

Out of focus bad quality photos, unusable. Pierre cb (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rabbit fur hat "ushanka".jpg

[edit]

File no longer used anywhere V8powerage (talk) 12:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B Chakradhar-22.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BAAJ.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jose farid campuzano.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juan Vallejo González.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JuanVallejoGonzalez.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kamalesh Golui.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K S Kular.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kadasa with his family.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karan Kumar.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kaung Myat Phone Kyaw Profile.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kdnazh.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kautuk bhatnagar in 2014.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kawsar ahmed akash.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ketan 1811379 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KGOSHI MAERA.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khalifa twist.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khoudr7.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K3rLP7VDM4M.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 13:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: More likely F10. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EduardoTobon65 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1923 Advertisement for Merlin Gerin.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Andry-Farcy (d. 1950), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pavel Chinarev 2012.jpg

[edit]

https://www.peoplelife.ru/321520 копирайт TatBazhenova (talk) 13:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chinarev P 2012.jpg

[edit]

Редирект на файл к удалению TatBazhenova (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NeueKapelleGebhardsreuth 14.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, artist born 1939, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NeueKapelleGebhardsreuth 08.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, artist born 1939, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SchoenauKircheInnen.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, artist born 1939, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Body painting - display.jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful. Image does not support or explain CSS display property in an educational format as described in the description. Perpetuates misogynist views of women and tech. Previous discussion was literally concluded with ""Objectifies women" - yes, I suppose the ones where a woman is explicitly stated to be an object do objectify women, but beyond that I don't think it's an issue." COM:PS, COM:PORN Seazzy (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm: Do you consider this image to be educationally useful? If so, please explain in more detail. I'm curious to know how this could be considered an educational resource. AshFriday (talk) 23:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AshFriday: My explanation is above and the previous nomination. As you almost make votes on this images to delete and with only less than four words, i answer with the same question. Please explain, in more than two or three words why are these images not educationally useful? Tm (talk) 23:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I would like to ask a question to the (male or female) that call themselves feminists and that voted to delete this images. But first let me state that i think this this are good images about naked art, and this shows that many of this images are in use, and so in scope per Commons:Scope.
These are women, working as models, but your comments seem to denigrate their work. Comments as calling their work as misogynist, creep, worthless, no-educational, i usually see in religious extremists, anti-women rights people. But from feminists (male or female) admires me the most, shaming adult and free women that make art as models. Those are people that made a choice to pose nude or semi-nude freely and willingly. In these times of of strong attacks on women rights (work, personal, moral, sexual, reproductive) it frightens me to see some people that call themselves feminists attacking the choices of other women, calling their work, creepy, no-educational, worthless, etc.
Dont these women deserve respect for their choices and work, instead of name calling? And dont these comments seem almost like be "anti-women"? It reminds me of the slut-saint dichotomy and of the slut-shaming that i thought was being thrown into the garbage bin of history. Tm (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment And to all delete votes, if this images are non-educational, why them did reputable and educational newspapers, websites and feminists and sex educators, covered this Exey Panteleev, his projects and this photos, publishing them to boot. Just as an sample the The Next Web, GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération and Violet Blue "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator". Or are they not reputable and educational sources? Or are they so crazy to publish images with the same subject and of the same author and speak about his photos and work in praise. Or is an sex educator be really confused. Tm (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment First some of the models work\worked with this photographer since the begging of the project ten years ago until today. So you have adult and free women that choose to participate in this project "GEEKOGRAPHY", an ensemble of images that fuses artistic nude photography and technology, covered by several tech, photo and generic media outlets, like the ones i linked above. But there is a lot more coverage, like the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012 had an article about his project.
But to show that this is really an conceptual artist and not some creepy random dude, let the people that are the artists speak. He not only had photos published in a "nude art photography" book, but he won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
Second claims. in these or other DR that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is plainly inaccurate if it was make unaware or clearly fake if made aware of who this photographer is? No model is participating anonymously, you can clearly see their faces and names (Olya, Darina, Y., Olga, Olga, Alena, Maria, Anna, V., Margo, Polina, Agneta, Masha, Marusia, Alexandra, Luiza, Kristin) on his website, besides the many flickr images that show their face, the vimeo videos and the photos published in many news articles i´ve linked. So no, they are not participating anonymously in his work of ten years.
And, last but not least, the claim here or other DR that "sometimes women do degrading things for money" and then add that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is appaling, shocking and demeaning to "these women". Besides the fact that i stated before that these are not anonymous models is a fact, but now, because of your comments this is not only a question of scope and educational use, but a question of basic human decency and dignity of this models. By saying that they did this work anonymously (false) and only for money (proofs of this statement) and not for example for liking of his work and contribute to it, and them add the claim that they thought this work was "degrading things" is almost, if not totally, slut shamming them, by blame the models for their choice of work. We are talking of professional models, working in their field of work, posing to a reputable and famous photographer for several years and situations. Or are you implying that he coerced 17 models to pose for him, against their own free will?
Please show some respect for this models, their work and their free choices or show hard evidence of your claims. Or show solid proof that this models made the "Participation in a patriarchal capitalist world does not make you approve of that world" i.e. that this models posed only a anonymously (a false statements), that they that did this because they thought this work was one of those "degrading things" "sometimes women do (...) for money". If not, your only making wild and inaccurate claims that attack the integraty and professionalism of the photographer and denigrates, slut shame, undervalues and makes misogynist claims on these models and their work by mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices, typical of people that attack the political, spiritual, sexual, moral, reproductive and other basic rights under the cover of "moral, religious or pudency reasons".
Funny, also, that Violet Blue, an reputable and famous feminist, tech and sexuality writer, sex educator makes good comments about this images and the photographer. Is she a member of the "patriarchal capitalist world"? Tm (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tm. --Strakhov (talk) 17:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful - does not usefully depict what iframes are or do, while perpetuating misogynist views on technology; Previous discussions have completely ignored that this image is not educationally useful, which supercedes any censorship discussion; COM:PS, COM:PORN, Seazzy (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment This is not censorship. This image is freely available online for anyone to use. It does not, however, have any use on Commons. It's presence and the dialogue around maintaining it has a serious chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes. That is censorship. It creates a culture of exclusion that is directly counter to Commons' stated claims to inclusivity. -Seazzy (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Proofs that deleting this image are not an act of censorship? And proofs that this images make an "chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes"? He have almost 60 million images and are these dozen of images that make women participate less in Commons? Or are their other reasons like the unfortunate fact all Wikimedia and Wikipedia projects have a lot more men then women. And many of they dont have or link this images. A few images in tens of millions of images are the fact that stop women from participating in Commons, albeit the fact that all Wikimedia projects suffer the same problem despite the fact that they share the same unfortunate fact of female participation, despite all efforts and projects in all Wikimedia projects to revert that.
I could take the same route as you and besides talk again that you never contributed nothing to Commons in the last three years, point out the fact that could point to your talk page and say that your have serious problems with copyright violations in your uploads and say that so deduce that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", but that last fact would be irrelevant and an ad hominem attack like the one you just did. Instead i will point to my block log and invite people to see that almost all blocks since 2012 were reverted for those blocks being abusive, unwarranted, against policy and were all reverted by other administrators. Besides that, see my archived talkpages and see why was i blocked and why almost all were reverted (and two of those blocking administrators have been desysoped). You will see that i do not have an "extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour" contrary to the false accusations of Seazzy. And, to the contrary of what you claim below, "Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", please see what the unsuspected Fæ had to say in other related deletion request. Please provide links, like i do, that proofs of what you claim that i have an "bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times

Besides a comment by are not" and that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", speacilly the part about those being "frequently false or misleading". Either you show proofs what you claimed about me or your making some "frequently false or misleading" "arguments" and statements. Tm (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tm: Do you consider this image to be educationally useful? If so, please explain in more detail. I'm curious to know how this could be used as an educational resource. AshFriday (talk) 23:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AshFriday: My explanation is above and the previous nomination. As you almost make votes on this images to delete and with only less than four words, i answer with the same question. Please explain, in more than two or three words why are these images not educationally useful? Tm (talk) 23:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: No reputable textbook, encyclopedia or educational article would use this photo. If you have an example which contradicts this statement, please link to it, and I'll happily change my vote. AshFriday (talk) 23:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AshFriday: "No reputable textbook, encyclopedia or educational article would use this photo". So The Next Web, GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération are not are educational and reputable sources? Or are they so crazy to publish images with the same subject and of the same author and speak about his photos and work? Please, "happily change (...) [your] vote". Tm (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: They aren't educational sites; one of them is just a blog. Now please explain in detail: what educational purpose does this photo serve? AshFriday (talk) 00:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: this photo doesn't appear in any of the links posted above, and Exey Panteleev doesn't even have an article on Wikipedia.ru. Apparently, neither the photographer nor his photographs are considered noteworthy enough for a wikipedia page in his native language. AshFriday (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So GQ one of the most well known and reputable men's magazines is not an educational site. A newspaper like Libération founded by Jean-Paul Sartre and Serge July, some of the most brilliant minds of the XX century is not an educational site? The Next Web one of the most reputable and accurate websites about technology and owned in part by the heavyheight that is "Financial Times" is not an reputable and educational site. Or an well known and reputable journalist, author and sex educator is not an educational source? These must be some "alternative facts", really or your trying to hide the sun with a sieve. Tm (talk) 00:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: No, a men's magazine is not educational in nature. The "article" in Libération that you linked to has less than 30 words, and doesn't read like an educational piece. As for NextWeb, can you honestly say it's an educational journal? Please stop making appeals to authority (Sartre and Serge) and just explain what educational purpose this photo serves. If you can make a case that Exey Panteleev is a notable artist or photographer, it would go a long way to proving your point. AshFriday (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AshFriday: No, dont move the goal posts, first it should be educational, not it should be educational in nature. And that men's magazine is educational. And that article in the Libération is in an culture, cinema, photography and arts column, so this article is educational. Or is it not covering culture, cinema, photography and the arts educational by itself? And speaking of the founders of the Libération is not an appeal to authority, but just to show the kind of newspaper you are talking about. And being well covered by some of the big names in the international online and priting press is not a reason to call someone an "notable artist or photographer"? Giving an interview to the tech page of Mail.Ru, one of the 30 biggest websites in the world and owners of gigantic websites like two of the biggest 100 websites in the world is something to be dismissed? Being news in Reflex, "one of the Czech Republic's most controversial and widely read social-political magazines" is something that doesnt shows notoriety? So being covered by one of the biggest and most reputable tech sites in the world, one tech page of the number 30 website in the world, being news in one of the most read Czech magazines, being news in one of the biggest and most reputable French newspapers, covered by the likes of GQ and an sex educator and tech writer like Violet Blue is all to be dismissed as not showing an "notable artist or photographer"? And instead your word is the golden standard? We really live in strange times. You havent showned why is this images are not educational and havent shown why this photographer is not "notable". And again i´ve shown why are this images in scope and educational. Tm (talk) 01:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I would like to ask a question to the (male or female) that call themselves feminists and that voted to delete this images. But first let me state that i think this this are good images about naked art, and this shows that many of this images are in use, and so in scope per Commons:Scope.
These are women, working as models, but your comments seem to denigrate their work. Comments as calling their work as misogynist, creep, worthless, no-educational, i usually see in religious extremists, anti-women rights people. But from feminists (male or female) admires me the most, shaming adult and free women that make art as models. Those are people that made a choice to pose nude or semi-nude freely and willingly. In these times of of strong attacks on women rights (work, personal, moral, sexual, reproductive) it frightens me to see some people that call themselves feminists attacking the choices of other women, calling their work, creepy, no-educational, worthless, etc.
Dont these women deserve respect for their choices and work, instead of name calling? And dont these comments seem almost like be "anti-women"? It reminds me of the slut-saint dichotomy and of the slut-shaming that i thought was being thrown into the garbage bin of history. Tm (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: As far as I can tell, nobody here has identified themselves as a "feminist". However, I'm still curious to know why you are so vehement about keeping this photo on the project. Scope requires that the image "must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". What educational purpose does it serve? AshFriday (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AshFriday: About people calling themselves feminists, see all the user pages. And, again i say the same thing, see my answer above, and back to you "please explain, in more than two or three words why are these images not educationally useful?" Tm (talk) 00:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: You must have missed my reply above, but I'll repost it here for your convenience: No reputable textbook, encyclopedia or educational article would use this photo. If you have an example which contradicts this statement, please link to it, and I'll happily change my vote.
Now, as I've answered your question twice (in more than three words), please do me the courtesy of answering mine: what educational purpose does this photo serve? AshFriday (talk) 00:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• BTW @Tm: I've checked the userpages as you suggested, and nobody on this thread identifies as a feminist. AshFriday (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Not one, but three for your convinience. "No reputable textbook, encyclopedia or educational article would use this photo". So The Next Web, GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération are not are educational and reputable sources? Or are they so crazy to publish images with the same subject and of the same author and speak about his photos and work? Please, "happily change (...) [your] vote".
 Comment@AshFriday: Or Violet Blue "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator" must be really confused. Tm (talk) 00:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment 13ab37 is the "Canadian ambassador for the Art+Feminism Wikipedia project", per own talkpage. Tm (talk) 00:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: That particular user still hasn't hasn't identified as a feminist. I'll leave it to them to confirm their political affiliations. AshFriday (talk) 00:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An ambassador for an Wikipedia project related with art and feminism is not an feminist? That would be odd, but whatever. And feminism being an "political affiliation"? I thought that feminism was about basic human rights, decency and true equality between men and women. Or i know IRL the wrong feminists, be it males or females feminists and whatever i learned, read, listened, taught and thought i knew about feminism is wrong? Tm (talk) 02:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment And to all delete votes, if this images are non-educational, why them did reputable and educational newspapers, websites and feminists and sex educators, covered this Exey Panteleev, his projects and this photos, publishing them to boot. Just as an sample the The Next Web, GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération and Violet Blue "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator". Or are they not reputable and educational sources? Or are they so crazy to publish images with the same subject and of the same author and speak about his photos and work in praise. Or is an sex educator be really confused. Tm (talk) 00:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: Violet Blue is a successful blogger/podcaster, but I wouldn't describe her as an educator. I may be wrong, but to the best of my knowledge, she hasn't used this image to teach in schools or universities. The other sources you mentioned are not educational in nature; one of them is just a blog. Now, please, answer my question: what educational purpose does this image serve? AshFriday (talk) 00:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment So by a little word change you change the goal post. First they were "not educational sites", now they are "not educational in nature". Always moving the goal. The fact is that one of the most reputable men´s magazine is an educational source, but, worst, one of the most reputable websites about technology is educational, or do you think that an heavyweight like the newspaper Financial Times would by a big stake at an tabloid and inaccurate and non-educational websites. Or that one of the most reputable and reliable french newspapers is educational, whatever you state, is not educational? Even worst founded by the likes of Jean-Paul-Sartre one of the most known and brilliant philosophers of the XX century and Serge July one of the most french reputable journalists? Or are not philosophers one of many kind of educators? And journalists and newsspapers dont inform and educate their readers in a broad spectre of subjects? Or is it not a reputable and reliable newspaper one of the big educators of the citizens?
And Violet is an sex educator, whatever way you may try to spin it, or is it not lecturing in San Francisco Sex Information sexual fetishes panel not sex and sexual education? Doesnt she lectures and covers sex education? Or covers other sex educators and people helping others that have suffered sexual abuse? Or having several books about sex education and erotica not making her an sex educator and erotica author? Or being nominated in 2013, by SF Weekly as one of the best sex educators. The text about why she was nominated is clear as crystal "Although she has written about all kinds of topics in sexuality, controversial commentator Violet Blue is most famous for her tech coverage. The former SF Gate columnist loves discussing free speech on the Internet, hackers and sex, and the best-designed new sex toys.". So you have an well known and reputable sex educator, that also covers tech for the likes of "Boing Boing" and Zdnet to boot, that speeks positively of this images and author, and you dismissed as someone you "wouldn't describe her as an educator."? Again an educator of sex education and tech, what this images cover, speaks positively of this author someone that should and dismissed as someone that doesnt know what she does? And so, again more reasons why this images are educational. Or your going, whatever your sex and gender to patronize and mansplaine an sex educator and tech writer. Tm (talk) 01:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: Perhaps there's a translation problem, but in English, saying "a site is not educational in nature" means that "it is not an educational site". All of the examples you've discussed are media outlets, they are not educational in the same way as The Encyclopedia Britannica, The American Journal of Psychology or even something as humble as Popular Mechanics. Violet Blue is a web-journalist and media personality, not an educator in the same sense as Camille Paglia or Germaine Greer. However, I won't continue this discussion, as it's clear you are unwilling explain the educational purpose of this image. To be honest, you don't even need to explain at this point, as the consensus is to keep the photo, regardless of whether it's within scope or not. That's pretty much all I have to say on the subject. Regards to everyone who participated in this discussion. AshFriday (talk) 02:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AshFriday: First, your userpage says why you participate in this deletion requests. First you said that you were "Planning to clean up en.Wiki and Commons of copyright vios and smut." or by your current words you are "fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut". Smut is not as you "define "smut" as poor quality pornographic images with no educational value", but is instead, using what are, by your own definition of educational site in nature, smut are "magazines, books, pictures, films or jokes that offend some people because they relate to sex" or "pictures, writing, language, or performances that deal with sex and are offensive". So your fighting what are, to you, offensive images related with sex, not trying to delete non-educational images. And what you call educational sites are academic sites, one small subset of a vast source of educational sources, like magazines, newspapers, site. Even in historical research one of the main sources are contemporary newspapers of the studied subject (or will you nominate out of copyright newspapers and magazines uploaded to Commons as being out of scope and not educational?). And reputable, accurate and newspapers and sites that covered tech are educational. And, no matter the way you spin it, Violet Blue is an sex educator, as she is a published author on the subject, works with sex education organizations and is called that by reputable newspapers an sex educator (and won prizes as best sex educator). Again sex educators are not merely academics, not matter what you said of her being only an "web-journalist and a media personality, [and not an educator in the same sense as...]. As in "educational" to "educational in nature", now the goal post moves again, from not being an "educator" to not being an "educator in the same sense as". And web-journalist is a journalist, as we are in 2019, not 1919. Journalists is a journalist, be it on paper or online.
No matter what i state, you keep saying that i´am to "unwilling explain the educational purpose of this image", albeit what i´ve being showing all the time the reasons why this images are educational, being that some of this images were kept previously for the same reasons, that some are in use, that the images are by notable artist and photographer, covered by several reputable and big educational sources, some of which are sex educators and tech writers or some of the biggest and most reputable tech sites in the world, nothing of this seem to alter your disposition, as your fighting what yourself call smut. For that, i will not keep ad eternum explain all the reasons to someone that keeps moving his own reasons, clearly as an particular agenda to censor images that he finds offensive no matter what and only seems to view the education by the narrow binoculars of academic sources and persons and so "making appeals to authority" but not stating why this images are not educational.
I´ve better, but "not educational" things to do like linking Commons categories and Wikidata itens related with the portuguese listed monuments and the 2019 Wiki Loves Monuments. Clearly listed monuments are not "educational sources" as they are not "academic sources". Tm (talk) 03:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note for closing admin - Please note that contrary to the claims made above, this particular image does not appear on the media outlets for Libération, GQ Italia or The Next Web. In addition, there is no article for Exey Panteleev on Wikipedia.ru; evidently, this photographer isn't notable enough to rate a Wikipedia page in his own language. Regards, AshFriday (talk) 04:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note for closing admin To the contrary of what is claimed by AshFriday there is not a single claim to the fact that "this particular image (...) appear on the media outlets" but, conviniently ommited AshFriday, is that this image is part of an emsemble of images "GEEKOGRAPHY" covered by this same french newspaper, tech website and men´s magazine appear on several media outlets beside 'Libération, GQ Italia or The Next Web", some of the most important and reputable world media outlets. Add to the fact that we have an reputable and famous sex educator and tech writer, Violet Blue, that speaks highly of this work. Also he was interviewed, on the same subject, by the tech page of the 30 world´s biggest website and also was covered by one of "most controversial and widely read social-political magazines" in Czech Republic. Also the fact that he is covered by many news outlet is pretty easy of finding. Another example, the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012, had photos published in "nude art photography" book.
And to the contrary of what AshFriday claims, he is not some random russian dude. Besides the many articles published about him previously showned, he had photos published in "nude art photography" book, won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards. But good to know that now the wikpedia is the golden standard of notability. Being covered or interview by some of the big players in tech industry media, men´s magazine, french newspapers, czech, russia, ukrainian and italian magazines, having books published on this same subject of the DR, having one important Russian photo award, and being nominated three times in another american photo award, is not enough? Tm (talk) 15:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please see user Tm's talk page for their extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times. Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading. -Seazzy (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment First some of the models work\worked with this photographer since the begging of the project ten years ago until today. So you have adult and free women that choose to participate in this project "GEEKOGRAPHY", an ensemble of images that fuses artistic nude photography and technology, covered by several tech, photo and generic media outlets, like the ones i linked above. But there is a lot more coverage, like the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012 had an article about his project.
But to show that this is really an conceptual artist and not some creepy random dude, let the people that are the artists speak. He not only had photos published in a "nude art photography" book, but he won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
Second claims. in these or other DR that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is plainly inaccurate if it was make unaware or clearly fake if made aware of who this photographer is? No model is participating anonymously, you can clearly see their faces and names (Olya, Darina, Y., Olga, Olga, Alena, Maria, Anna, V., Margo, Polina, Agneta, Masha, Marusia, Alexandra, Luiza, Kristin) on his website, besides the many flickr images that show their face, the vimeo videos and the photos published in many news articles i´ve linked. So no, they are not participating anonymously in his work of ten years.
And, last but not least, the claim here or other DR that "sometimes women do degrading things for money" and then add that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is appaling, shocking and demeaning to "these women". Besides the fact that i stated before that these are not anonymous models is a fact, but now, because of your comments this is not only a question of scope and educational use, but a question of basic human decency and dignity of this models. By saying that they did this work anonymously (false) and only for money (proofs of this statement) and not for example for liking of his work and contribute to it, and them add the claim that they thought this work was "degrading things" is almost, if not totally, slut shamming them, by blame the models for their choice of work. We are talking of professional models, working in their field of work, posing to a reputable and famous photographer for several years and situations. Or are you implying that he coerced 17 models to pose for him, against their own free will?
Please show some respect for this models, their work and their free choices or show hard evidence of your claims. Or show solid proof that this models made the "Participation in a patriarchal capitalist world does not make you approve of that world" i.e. that this models posed only a anonymously (a false statements), that they that did this because they thought this work was one of those "degrading things" "sometimes women do (...) for money". If not, your only making wild and inaccurate claims that attack the integraty and professionalism of the photographer and denigrates, slut shame, undervalues and makes misogynist claims on these models and their work by mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices, typical of people that attack the political, spiritual, sexual, moral, reproductive and other basic rights under the cover of "moral, religious or pudency reasons".
Funny, also, that Violet Blue, an reputable and famous feminist, tech and sexuality writer, sex educator makes good comments about this images and the photographer. Is she a member of the "patriarchal capitalist world"? Tm (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tm. --Strakhov (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Body painting - before.jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful - misleading and does not depict what binary prefixes are or do, while perpetuating misogynist views on technology; Previous discussions have completely ignored that this image is not educationally useful, which supercedes any censorship discussion. Particularly troubling is that the filename and description are misleading and claim that this is a technologically relevant image; COM:PS, COM:PORN Seazzy (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment This is not censorship. This image is freely available online for anyone to use. It does not, however, have any use on Commons. It's presence and the dialogue around maintaining it has a serious chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes. That is censorship. It creates a culture of exclusion that is directly counter to Commons' stated claims to inclusivity. -Seazzy (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Proofs that deleting this image are not an act of censorship? And proofs that this images make an "chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes"? He have almost 60 million images and are these dozen of images that make women participate less in Commons? Or are their other reasons like the unfortunate fact all Wikimedia and Wikipedia projects have a lot more men then women. And many of they dont have or link this images. A few images in tens of millions of images are the fact that stop women from participating in Commons, albeit the fact that all Wikimedia projects suffer the same problem despite the fact that they share the same unfortunate fact of female participation, despite all efforts and projects in all Wikimedia projects to revert that.
I could take the same route as you and besides talk again that you never contributed nothing to Commons in the last three years, point out the fact that could point to your talk page and say that your have serious problems with copyright violations in your uploads and say that so deduce that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", but that last fact would be irrelevant and an ad hominem attack like the one you just did. Instead i will point to my block log and invite people to see that almost all blocks since 2012 were reverted for those blocks being abusive, unwarranted, against policy and were all reverted by other administrators. Besides that, see my archived talkpages and see why was i blocked and why almost all were reverted (and two of those blocking administrators have been desysoped). You will see that i do not have an "extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour" contrary to the false accusations of Seazzy. And, to the contrary of what you claim below, "Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", please see what the unsuspected Fæ had to say in other related deletion request. Please provide links, like i do, that proofs of what you claim that i have an "bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times

Besides a comment by are not" and that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", speacilly the part about those being "frequently false or misleading". Either you show proofs what you claimed about me or your making some "frequently false or misleading" "arguments" and statements. Tm (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The above mentioned page ko:나체 미술 is a stub, and the images included are clearly non-notable examples of the topic "Nude Art". The "not educationally useful" argument stands. -Seazzy (talk)
 Comment A file in use in an article in any wikipedia or other project is in scope and with educational useful, per Commons policies, so your arguments of "non-notable examples" are of no value. Quoting Commons:Scope, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough.". Tm (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I would like to ask a question to the (male or female) that call themselves feminists and that voted to delete this images. But first let me state that i think this this are good images about naked art, and this shows that many of this images are in use, and so in scope per Commons:Scope.
These are women, working as models, but your comments seem to denigrate their work. Comments as calling their work as misogynist, creep, worthless, no-educational, i usually see in religious extremists, anti-women rights people. But from feminists (male or female) admires me the most, shaming adult and free women that make art as models. Those are people that made a choice to pose nude or semi-nude freely and willingly. In these times of of strong attacks on women rights (work, personal, moral, sexual, reproductive) it frightens me to see some people that call themselves feminists attacking the choices of other women, calling their work, creepy, no-educational, worthless, etc.
Dont these women deserve respect for their choices and work, instead of name calling? And dont these comments seem almost like be "anti-women"? It reminds me of the slut-saint dichotomy and of the slut-shaming that i thought was being thrown into the garbage bin of history.
 Comment And to all delete votes, if this images are non-educational, why them did reputable and educational newspapers, websites and feminists and sex educators, covered this Exey Panteleev, his projects and this photos, publishing them to boot. Just as an sample the The Next Web, GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération and Violet Blue "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator". Or are they not reputable and educational sources? Or are they so crazy to publish images with the same subject and of the same author and speak about his photos and work in praise. Or is an sex educator be really confused. Tm (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please see user Tm's talk page for their extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times. Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading. -Seazzy (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment First some of the models work\worked with this photographer since the begging of the project ten years ago until today. So you have adult and free women that choose to participate in this project "GEEKOGRAPHY", an ensemble of images that fuses artistic nude photography and technology, covered by several tech, photo and generic media outlets, like the ones i linked above. But there is a lot more coverage, like the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012 had an article about his project.
But to show that this is really an conceptual artist and not some creepy random dude, let the people that are the artists speak. He not only had photos published in a "nude art photography" book, but he won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
Second claims. in these or other DR that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is plainly inaccurate if it was make unaware or clearly fake if made aware of who this photographer is? No model is participating anonymously, you can clearly see their faces and names (Olya, Darina, Y., Olga, Olga, Alena, Maria, Anna, V., Margo, Polina, Agneta, Masha, Marusia, Alexandra, Luiza, Kristin) on his website, besides the many flickr images that show their face, the vimeo videos and the photos published in many news articles i´ve linked. So no, they are not participating anonymously in his work of ten years.
And, last but not least, the claim here or other DR that "sometimes women do degrading things for money" and then add that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is appaling, shocking and demeaning to "these women". Besides the fact that i stated before that these are not anonymous models is a fact, but now, because of your comments this is not only a question of scope and educational use, but a question of basic human decency and dignity of this models. By saying that they did this work anonymously (false) and only for money (proofs of this statement) and not for example for liking of his work and contribute to it, and them add the claim that they thought this work was "degrading things" is almost, if not totally, slut shamming them, by blame the models for their choice of work. We are talking of professional models, working in their field of work, posing to a reputable and famous photographer for several years and situations. Or are you implying that he coerced 17 models to pose for him, against their own free will?
Please show some respect for this models, their work and their free choices or show hard evidence of your claims. Or show solid proof that this models made the "Participation in a patriarchal capitalist world does not make you approve of that world" i.e. that this models posed only a anonymously (a false statements), that they that did this because they thought this work was one of those "degrading things" "sometimes women do (...) for money". If not, your only making wild and inaccurate claims that attack the integraty and professionalism of the photographer and denigrates, slut shame, undervalues and makes misogynist claims on these models and their work by mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices, typical of people that attack the political, spiritual, sexual, moral, reproductive and other basic rights under the cover of "moral, religious or pudency reasons".
Funny, also, that Violet Blue, an reputable and famous feminist, tech and sexuality writer, sex educator makes good comments about this images and the photographer. Is she a member of the "patriarchal capitalist world"? Tm (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fire ops -Movie- (3816640677).jpg

[edit]

I'm guessing from the description that this is a still from a non-notable video. I can't think of any reason to keep it. Jmabel ! talk 02:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Moving! (7715491658).jpg

[edit]

I see nothing here that is both legible and in scope. Jmabel ! talk 04:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pedro Silva Pereira, Festa de Natal do PS Montalegre de 2015.png

[edit]

I think that photo is really, really terrible, and out of respect for living people we shouldn't use this photo. Jcornelius (talk) 11:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against that. Do you have any better photos ?--Astrolys (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is casual and soft-focus, but I think "really, really terrible" is much too harsh. I see nothing disrespectful about the photo. A better free-licensed photo of the person would certainly be welcome, but since at present Commons seems not to have anything better, and this photo is in use,  Keep -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Astrolys and Infrogmation of New Orleans. --Strakhov (talk) 17:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poems of Mohammad Salim3.jpg

[edit]

out of scope if self-published; copyright violation if not uploader's work  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-zu.svg

[edit]

This is a redirect to an old logo, which was never used.

The current logo is at File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-zu (alt).svg, and it should be located at a standard name. -Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Radio_button_and_female_nude.jpg

[edit]

This image (arse through tyre) has no encyclopedic value/ cannot be used for educational purposes 80.187.97.49 10:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy  Keep. I´am the uploader. This image is not even here in 5 minutes and there is already a coward (i call this as to how come a IP finds this image so fast if it even is searchable? So to the IP get some corage and login to see who you are and see what are your real intentions) and a crusader that by not liking the natural nudity, tries to hide its "i dont like nudes". Image is in scope as it shows a female nude in s situation not still in others images in Commons. Also how come is that this image as "no encyclopedic value/ cannot be used for educational purposes" in case you really think this. Also commons is not censored, "could also be used as an illustration in an html-teaching text (amusingly enough)" (here you have your educational value). Tm (talk) 10:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Likely moralistic crusading. The image is borderline educational, i give you that, but to say that it has no way to become educational is beyond lying (especially since the title suggests what it depicts educationally). VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 10:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - part of a series of nude HTML images. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - That looks like a rather pleasant way to swipe one's credit card. It's such a nice shot that I'm sure someone could find it useful and educational, eg a teenage lad finding out how long it takes him to... yes well, enough of that. Keep, if only for the fact that it's such a cute derrière. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 21:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Per the rest of the "gang" -- Gddea - Daniel E. Als-Juliussen (talk) 10:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Radio button and female nude.jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful - misleading and does not depict what a radio button is or does, while perpetuating misogynist views on technology; Previous discussions have completely ignored that this image is not educationally useful, which supercedes any censorship discussion. The filename and description are misleading and claim that this is a technologically relevant image. Deeply troubling is that the previous nomination was voted "keep" because voters felt that a young womans vagina is a nice place to put their creditcard, and that this would be useful for young men to mastrubate to. These comments do not condiser how "useful" this is to young women attempting to learn web development, or for young men.:; COM:PS, COM:PORN Seazzy (talk) 01:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment This is not censorship. This image is freely available online for anyone to use. It does not, however, have any use on Commons. It's presence and the dialogue around maintaining it has a serious chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes. That is censorship. It creates a culture of exclusion that is directly counter to Commons' stated claims to inclusivity. -Seazzy (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Proofs that deleting this image are not an act of censorship? And proofs that this images make an "chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes"? He have almost 60 million images and are these dozen of images that make women participate less in Commons? Or are their other reasons like the unfortunate fact all Wikimedia and Wikipedia projects have a lot more men then women. And many of they dont have or link this images. A few images in tens of millions of images are the fact that stop women from participating in Commons, albeit the fact that all Wikimedia projects suffer the same problem despite the fact that they share the same unfortunate fact of female participation, despite all efforts and projects in all Wikimedia projects to revert that.
I could take the same route as you and besides talk again that you never contributed nothing to Commons in the last three years, point out the fact that could point to your talk page and say that your have serious problems with copyright violations in your uploads and say that so deduce that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", but that last fact would be irrelevant and an ad hominem attack like the one you just did. Instead i will point to my block log and invite people to see that almost all blocks since 2012 were reverted for those blocks being abusive, unwarranted, against policy and were all reverted by other administrators. Besides that, see my archived talkpages and see why was i blocked and why almost all were reverted (and two of those blocking administrators have been desysoped). You will see that i do not have an "extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour" contrary to the false accusations of Seazzy. And, to the contrary of what you claim below, "Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", please see what the unsuspected Fæ had to say in other related deletion request. Please provide links, like i do, that proofs of what you claim that i have an "bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times

Besides a comment by are not" and that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", speacilly the part about those being "frequently false or misleading". Either you show proofs what you claimed about me or your making some "frequently false or misleading" "arguments" and statements. Tm (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Commentmattbuck, the keep comments on the previous closure were based on arguments that the woman's vagina and anus are visually pleasing. There is a "joke" referring to the "keep" voters engaging in "gang" sex on the woman in the comments. This image does not depict a radio button or illustrate how a radio button might work. There is zero educational usefulness, but there is a strong effect on deterring new users, particularly women, from participating in Commons as an educational resource - something Commons claims to want to work on. -Seazzy (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No educational value, misleading at best.Artchivist1 (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, mattbuck and the IP. Nominator, in the last three years, did, except for two uploads, only edits related with this images and the one of the other deletions votes is by AshFriday , that has almost only edits on this kind of DR and almost always to delete. Image is in scope, image is of an photographer that has this kind of imagery published on technology magazines, and again this smells of someone nominating this kind of images because of "moral, religious or pudency reasons" and not as stated because of not being "educationally useful". Also i find if funny that someone claims someone claim that this images are misogynist and "aggressively perpetuates misogynist views of women and tech", when this images were taken of adult, mature and free women, modeling on their own terms and conditions, clearly as professional models. A random Commons user (statistically most probably an adult men, please correct me if i´am wrong) knows more and mansplains that free and adult female models know less about their free choices and decisions of where, when, how and to whom make this kind of images. So, what is in fact an misogynist position? And what Artchivist1, as i suppose an feminist (male of female) as to say about the free choice of adult women? Are they not entitled to do show (or not) their bodies whatever the way they choose? Is it not feminism fighting to make women make equal to men and and make free choices without anyone mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices? Is it not the Antithesis of feminism? Tm (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please see user Tm's talk page for their extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times. Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading and in bad faith. -Seazzy (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 04:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Banknotes of Nepal

[edit]

Derivative of copyrighted work. See COM:CUR Nepal: Not OK. Banknote and coin designs are copyrighted. Permission required.

Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Banknotes of Nepal

[edit]

Per COM:CUR Nepal

A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 22:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandra Simizu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files are possibly from Facebook. Original uploader's permission needed via OTRS

大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:800x340 KOIN 6 News.png

[edit]

Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Category:CBS logos. Thuresson (talk) 14:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per De728631. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Казаков Михаил Александрович (1898—1982).jpg

[edit]

Участник, загрузивший файл, указал автора: "Сотрудник фотоателье артели «Прогресс», г. Смоленск". Однако при лизензировании участник присвоил себе авторские права на фото, сделанное в 1954 году. Согласно законодательству действительный автор или его наследники могут предъявить соответствующие претензии. vvk121 (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Я "присвоил" себе только право называться наследником того, кто изображён на фото. Он, в свою очередь, сделал фото не художественного, а информационного плана исключительно для официального документа - личного дела сотрудника КГБ СССР. Это произведение не охраняется авторским правом согласно статье 1259 части четвёртой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации № 230-ФЗ от 18 декабря 2006 года. — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 21:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Никакая фотография сама по себе не может являться "официальным документом государственных органов". Кроме того, в законодательстве нет понятия «фото информационного плана». Обсуждаемое фото — это очевидное «фотографическое произведение», о котором идёт речь как об объекте авторского права в п. 1 статьи 1259. Это что за нонсенс: размещение фото в личном деле лишает фотографа его авторского права? — vvk121 (talk) 22:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Это вы сами придумали? Прочтите: Авторское право на служебные произведения — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 22:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no author's permission. --Sealle (talk) 11:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طليع من الأمن الرئاسي في جنازة الرئيس الراحل الحبيب بورقيبة.png

[edit]

Photo of a photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 32

Nominating all files where the mosque's architecture is the main subject. Per previous deletion requests: no COM:FOP Morocco, so copyrighted until 2070 (architect Michel Pinseau died in 1999).

HyperGaruda (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 33

[edit]

Recent work of architecture by Michel Pinseau, not allowed in Commons because no FOP in Morocco.

Darwin Ahoy! 19:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Three photos showing mosaics and two showing interior architecture. Commercial freedom of panorama is not allowed in Morocco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg Per COM:FOP Morocco:"It shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless the image of the work is the main subject of such a reproduction, broadcast or communication and if it is used for commercial purposes." The main subject of File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg is the person. Also, Michel Pinseau is not the author of the mosaics. إيان (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@إيان: Commons does not host files that are not resuable for commercial end-users. Per COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses, non-commercial licenses are not allowed. Moroccan FOP is simply unacceptable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What about File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg? If its main subject is the person, then the image can be used also for commercial purposes, if I understand the quote correctly (I cannot see the image as the file was deleted a few days ago). –LPfi (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 34

[edit]

No FOP in Morocco

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 35

[edit]

No FOP in Morocco

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Me in Seattle (5224861325).jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, plenty of similar views, no reason to keep this. Jmabel ! talk 04:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poet Chinu Modi and Anant Rathod.jpg

[edit]

This file was uploaded by me. Now, I think, its violates personality rights of persons depicted in photos. Hence, It should be deleted. Gazal world (talk) 11:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hassan Ur Rehman Taqvi 2.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:This really, really doesn't exist (105641225).jpg

[edit]

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 16:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AISvsHybrid Comparison.JPG

[edit]

Copyright violation the same as File:72,5 kV Hybrid Switchgear Module.jpg : similar image at page 58 of [5] Darklanlan (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KarlEberhardSchongarth.jpg

[edit]
  •  Delete Photographer is unknown, so there's no way to determine if the copyright holder has been deceased for 70 years as stated in the license. Diannaa (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep German copyright law applies; copyright law states: "Bei einem anonymen Werk erlischt (gemäß § 66 UrhG) aber das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach Veröffentlichung. Ist das Werk 70 Jahre nach Schaffung noch nicht veröffentlicht, läuft die Schutzfrist 70 Jahre nach Schaffung ab." (My translation: "The copyright period of anonymous works expires (according to § 66 UrhG) seventy years after the work is made public. If the work hasn't been made public 70 years after creation, then the copyright protection period expires 70 years after creation.") Conclusion applied to this photograph: more than 70 years after creation there is no author known, and that name is unlikely to pop up. (I checked several databases of German archives, and NIOD). Anonymous work, published more than 70 years ago, so copyright has expired ("kein Urheberrecht, 70 Jahre nach Schaffung"). Perhaps the current license to this photograph needs to be corrected. Would the license Anonymous-EU be better fit for this photo? Vysotsky (talk) 10:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Hello Vysotsky, what is the basis for your assumption that German copyright laws apply in this case? Because of the fact that the person in the picture is a German? I have a different point of view: The servers of Commons are located in the United States respectively in the Netherlands. Therefore, local laws apply where the file is hosted. Cheers, GeoTrinity (talk) 12:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC) // Schongarth was hanged exactly 70 yrs ago, btw. Cheers, GeoTrinity (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment You are right: US law also applies -after German law- because of the location of the Wikimedia servers. US Copyright Law: anonymous photograph, published between 1923 and 1963, copyright not renewed: copyright term of 28 years: USCode at Cornell.edu & EN-Wiki: 28 years (from publication) if copyright not renewed. As to Dutch copyright law: anonymous works: 70 years. (Art. 38 Nederlandse auteurswet). So, according to US, Dutch and German law, copyright of this photograph has expired. Vysotsky (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep convinced, keep it. GeoTrinity (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KarlEberhardSchongarth.jpg

[edit]

If the photographer is unknown how do we know they've been dead for 70 years? The source webpage gives no copyright information either — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The reasons why this file is in the public domain according to US, German and Dutch copyright law are given in the earlier deletion request (above). You are right in one aspect, though: the licence should be changed, most likely to {{Anonymous-EU}}. Vysotsky (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This has now been fixed, so I now withdraw this nomination. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miss International 1991 Agnieszka Kotlarska,Andre Gasiorowski ( Art B ), 1991.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andre Gasiorowski, Jerusalem 8 May 2013.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Seems in scope. Why are you requesting deletion 6 years after you uploaded it here? -- 14:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andre Gasiorowski, Daniel Rozen, Israel XII 2013.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Helping Hand Coalition - Asia Pacific 2012.jpg

[edit]

Helping Hand Coalition Bialysnieg (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magi Gasiorowska, Luke Gasiorowski (Helping Hand Coalition) Izrael.jpg

[edit]

Helping Hand Coalition Bialysnieg (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sofa Landver, Bozena Gasiorowski ( HHC ), Rita Tager, Ashdod 2013.jpg

[edit]

Helping Hand Coalition Bialysnieg (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Malgorzata Gryniewicz, reporter TVN24.jpg

[edit]

prosze o usuniecie mojego zdj, jest nieaktualne, slabej jakosci. Malgorzata Gryniewicz 2A01:116F:311:700:85F4:1449:C23C:6EDF 15:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Malgorzata Gryniewicz, reporter TVN24.jpg

[edit]

Helping Hand Coalition Bialysnieg (talk) 06:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Män som hatar kvinnor",Michael Nyqvist, Malgorzata Gryniewicz, Stockholm 2008.jpg

[edit]

Helping Hand Coalition Bialysnieg (talk) 06:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Män som hatar kvinnor",Michael Nyqvist, Malgorzata Gryniewicz, Stockholm 2008.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sejm RP,spotkanie zespołów politycznych Europy Plus, Ryszard Kalisz, Malgorzata Gryniewicz, 2013.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Janusz Palikot i Małgorzata Gryniewicz kandydatka Europy Plus i Twojego Ruchu w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego 2014.jpg

[edit]

prosze o usuniecie mojego zdj, jest nieaktualne, slabej jakosci. Malgorzata Gryniewicz 83.26.244.36 14:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Google translates nomination reason as "Please, delete my photo, it's out of date, poor quality". Quality is indeed rather low; the photo shows two notable people (Małgorzata Gryniewicz and Janusz Palikot), there are enough better-quality photos of Gryniewicz as well as of Palikot on Commons, but it seems that this is the only one with both of them, maybe reason enough to keep? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Janusz Palikot i Małgorzata Gryniewicz kandydatka Europy Plus i Twojego Ruchu w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego 2014.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sejm RP 07 09 2013 spotkanie zespołów politycznych Europy Plus, Ryszard Kalisz,Małgorzaty Gryniewicz.jpg

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Odsłonięcie Ławeczki ks. Jana Twardowskiego, metropolita warszawski kard. Kazimierz Nycz,wiceprezydent Warszawy Jacek Wojciechowicz, autor pomnika artysta rzeźbiarz Wojciech Gryniewicz.JPG

[edit]

please delete my photos Bialysnieg (talk) 06:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:D100HF (3468391211).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by SounderBruce as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot from city traffic camera, which is not free-use
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Last debris of site W32 (5006083879).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by SounderBruce as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot of non-free webcam
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trollgen 2018.svg

[edit]

Trollgen does not seem to exist, this diagram is out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:King's Birendra Banknotes of Nepal

[edit]

Derivative of copyrighted work. See COM:CUR Nepal: Not OK. Banknote and coin designs are copyrighted. Permission required.

Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SQL - DROP TABLE.jpg

[edit]

Not educationally useful - misleading and does not depict what drop tables are or do, while perpetuating misogynist views on technology; The filename and description are misleading and claim that this is a technologically relevant image; Previous deletion discussions contained only 4 brief comments on well over a dozen images - ignoring the specific problems for each; COM:PS, COM:PORN Seazzy (talk) 01:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment This is not censorship. This image is freely available online for anyone to use. It does not, however, have any use on Commons. It's presence and the dialogue around maintaining it has a serious chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes. That is censorship. It creates a culture of exclusion that is directly counter to Commons' stated claims to inclusivity. -Seazzy (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Proofs that deleting this image are not an act of censorship? And proofs that this images make an "chilling effect on women and others who are using Commons for research and educational purposes"? He have almost 60 million images and are these dozen of images that make women participate less in Commons? Or are their other reasons like the unfortunate fact all Wikimedia and Wikipedia projects have a lot more men then women. And many of they dont have or link this images. A few images in tens of millions of images are the fact that stop women from participating in Commons, albeit the fact that all Wikimedia projects suffer the same problem despite the fact that they share the same unfortunate fact of female participation, despite all efforts and projects in all Wikimedia projects to revert that.
I could take the same route as you and besides talk again that you never contributed nothing to Commons in the last three years, point out the fact that could point to your talk page and say that your have serious problems with copyright violations in your uploads and say that so deduce that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", but that last fact would be irrelevant and an ad hominem attack like the one you just did. Instead i will point to my block log and invite people to see that almost all blocks since 2012 were reverted for those blocks being abusive, unwarranted, against policy and were all reverted by other administrators. Besides that, see my archived talkpages and see why was i blocked and why almost all were reverted (and two of those blocking administrators have been desysoped). You will see that i do not have an "extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour" contrary to the false accusations of Seazzy. And, to the contrary of what you claim below, "Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", please see what the unsuspected Fæ had to say in other related deletion request. Please provide links, like i do, that proofs of what you claim that i have an "bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times

Besides a comment by are not" and that "many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading", speacilly the part about those being "frequently false or misleading". Either you show proofs what you claimed about me or your making some "frequently false or misleading" "arguments" and statements. Tm (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 06:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per my previous closure at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, though I will accept that renaming it would be useful. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No educational value, misleading at best.Artchivist1 (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology, mattbuck and the IP. Nominator, in the last three years, did, except for two uploads, only edits related with this images and the one of the other deletions votes is by AshFriday , that has almost only edits on this kind of DR and almost always to delete. Image is in scope, image is of an photographer that has this kind of imagery published on technology magazines, and again this smells of someone nominating this kind of images because of "moral, religious or pudency reasons" and not as stated because of not being "educationally useful". Also i find if funny that someone claims someone claim that this images are misogynist and "aggressively perpetuates misogynist views of women and tech", when this images were taken of adult, mature and free women, modeling on their own terms and conditions, clearly as professional models. A random Commons user (statistically most probably an adult men, please correct me if i´am wrong) knows more and mansplains that free and adult female models know less about their free choices and decisions of where, when, how and to whom make this kind of images. So, what is in fact an misogynist position? And what Artchivist1, as i suppose an feminist (male of female) as to say about the free choice of adult women? Are they not entitled to do show (or not) their bodies whatever the way they choose? Is it not feminism fighting to make women make equal to men and and make free choices without anyone mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices? Is it not the Antithesis of feminism? Tm (talk) 18:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - does not illustrate the subject matter. 13ab37 (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seazzy (talk • contribs) 22:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I would like to ask a question to the (male or female) that call themselves feminists and that voted to delete this images. But first let me state that i think this this are good images about naked art, and this shows that many of this images are in use, and so in scope per Commons:Scope.
These are women, working as models, but your comments seem to denigrate their work. Comments as calling their work as misogynist, creep, worthless, no-educational, i usually see in religious extremists, anti-women rights people. But from feminists (male or female) admires me the most, shaming adult and free women that make art as models. Those are people that made a choice to pose nude or semi-nude freely and willingly. In these times of of strong attacks on women rights (work, personal, moral, sexual, reproductive) it frightens me to see some people that call themselves feminists attacking the choices of other women, calling their work, creepy, no-educational, worthless, etc.
Dont these women deserve respect for their choices and work, instead of name calling? And dont these comments seem almost like be "anti-women"? It reminds me of the slut-saint dichotomy and of the slut-shaming that i thought was being thrown into the garbage bin of history. Tm (talk) 00:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Reduces quality "by providing innacurate and misleading technical information"? Even of this was remotely true about this images, Commons is mainly an imagery repository, not an alternative Github. And to all delete votes, if this images are non-educational, why them did reputable and educational newspapers, websites and feminists and sex educators, covered this Exey Panteleev, his projects and this photos, publishing them to boot. Just as an sample the The Next Web, GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération and Violet Blue "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator". Or are they not reputable and educational sources? Or are they so crazy to publish images with the same subject and of the same author and speak about his photos and work in praise. Or is an sex educator be really confused. Tm (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please see user Tm's talk page for their extensive history of bad faith and abusive behaviour, including having been blocked from Commons at times. Many of the arguments this user has made do not have any relevance to the requirements for inclusion in Commons, and are frequently false or misleading and in bad faith. -Seazzy (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment First some of the models work\worked with this photographer since the begging of the project ten years ago until today. So you have adult and free women that choose to participate in this project "GEEKOGRAPHY", an ensemble of images that fuses artistic nude photography and technology, covered by several tech, photo and generic media outlets, like the ones i linked above. But there is a lot more coverage, like the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012 had an article about his project.
But to show that this is really an conceptual artist and not some creepy random dude, let the people that are the artists speak. He not only had photos published in a "nude art photography" book, but he won Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod and with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. An he was nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
Second claims. in these or other DR that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is plainly inaccurate if it was make unaware or clearly fake if made aware of who this photographer is? No model is participating anonymously, you can clearly see their faces and names (Olya, Darina, Y., Olga, Olga, Alena, Maria, Anna, V., Margo, Polina, Agneta, Masha, Marusia, Alexandra, Luiza, Kristin) on his website, besides the many flickr images that show their face, the vimeo videos and the photos published in many news articles i´ve linked. So no, they are not participating anonymously in his work of ten years.
And, last but not least, the claim here or other DR that "sometimes women do degrading things for money" and then add that "These women at least had the choice to do so anonymously" is appaling, shocking and demeaning to "these women". Besides the fact that i stated before that these are not anonymous models is a fact, but now, because of your comments this is not only a question of scope and educational use, but a question of basic human decency and dignity of this models. By saying that they did this work anonymously (false) and only for money (proofs of this statement) and not for example for liking of his work and contribute to it, and them add the claim that they thought this work was "degrading things" is almost, if not totally, slut shamming them, by blame the models for their choice of work. We are talking of professional models, working in their field of work, posing to a reputable and famous photographer for several years and situations. Or are you implying that he coerced 17 models to pose for him, against their own free will?
Please show some respect for this models, their work and their free choices or show hard evidence of your claims. Or show solid proof that this models made the "Participation in a patriarchal capitalist world does not make you approve of that world" i.e. that this models posed only a anonymously (a false statements), that they that did this because they thought this work was one of those "degrading things" "sometimes women do (...) for money". If not, your only making wild and inaccurate claims that attack the integraty and professionalism of the photographer and denigrates, slut shame, undervalues and makes misogynist claims on these models and their work by mocking, denigrating and lower their own choices? Is it not something that could said to be a patronizing and moralistic view, that shames and lowers one woman for their choices, typical of people that attack the political, spiritual, sexual, moral, reproductive and other basic rights under the cover of "moral, religious or pudency reasons".
Funny, also, that Violet Blue, an reputable and famous feminist, tech and sexuality writer, sex educator makes good comments about this images and the photographer. Is she a member of the "patriarchal capitalist world"? Tm (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other DRs started by Seazzy:
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close as Kept. Free licensed, no consensus to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Good video coming... (4097125682).jpg

[edit]

Little encyclopedic value SounderBruce 03:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:King County Metro On Board Stop Announcements (5556373290).jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of video SounderBruce 03:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Inbound from Stadium (4124431984).jpg

[edit]

Unencyclopedic image SounderBruce 03:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The House of Venerables 437 AU.svg

[edit]

Does not seem to correspond to an existing country, year, or actual parties. Out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Амелин Степан Васильевич.jpg

[edit]

Depicted person lived 1909–1994. The photo is not own work, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand Central Station (1941) - Bernice Abbott.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of formal publication (or what publication's copyright had not been renewed). Unpublished works like this need to be 120 y.o. ɱ (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Here is not for LETTERS (7105120163).jpg

[edit]

Low encyclopedic value SounderBruce 03:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seúl, Corea Del Sur - panoramio (12).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seúl, Corea Del Sur - panoramio (18).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Torre de seul - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tower Seoul Corea - Asia Photography - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Namsan Tower at night, Seoul.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is hardly any copyright on a radio tower. It's not a building that would have unique architectural designs. Teemeah (talk) 18:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is clearly a "building" within the meaning of that word in copyright law -- it has restaurants and shops. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Inverted sign (4294443416).jpg

[edit]

Low quality and of questionable encyclopedic value SounderBruce 03:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (16506334544).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (16940949668).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (16941223650).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (16941224890).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (16941213800).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (17102765646).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (17102827166).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (17102828796).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (17128719555).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (17128134271).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt N 首爾塔 (17128157301).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:In case you didn't believe me (4406251110).jpg

[edit]

Low quality image that is replaceable SounderBruce 03:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Looking forward (4021795814).jpg

[edit]

Blurry and hard to use in an encyclopedic context SounderBruce 03:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Photoshopped image that could be misleading SounderBruce 03:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Link Light rail at Lander St -movie- (4411708931).jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of video SounderBruce 03:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Unclear encyclopedic value SounderBruce 03:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wongwt 南山公園 (16506328234).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seven Dials Programme.jpg

[edit]

Not a credible claim of "own work" by uploader Matthew D. Wright, as the picture is signed "CH 82" and was described in the Wikipedia's Seven Dials Jazz Club article as being the work of illustrator Clifford Harper. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bob-manuel.jpg

[edit]

Selfies don't have significant educational value. Truthman10200 (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GBETONGNINOUGBO JOSEPH HERVE AHISSOU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pas de COM:FOP au Bénin.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GBETONGNINOUGBO JOSEPH HERVE AHISSOU: Suite à votre email, il ne s'agit pas d'un problème technique mais effectivement, il manque la permission des sculpteurs à adresser à COM:OTRS/fr autorisant la reproduction de leurs ouevres par voie photographique. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Patrick Rogel. Ce sont toutes des photographies de monuments se trouvant dans des places et lieux publics au Bénin. Elles ont été télévisées dans le cadre du concours Wiki loves monuments 2019 au Bénin. La liste de ces monuments a été publiée sur la page projet du concours. --Fawaz.tairou (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fawaz.tairou: Peut-être que c'est listé sur la liste de WLM mais ça ne change rien au fait que GBETONGNINOUGBO JOSEPH HERVE AHISSOU doit obtenir l'autorisation des sculpteurs pour reproduire leurs oeuvres. Le fait qu'elles se trouvent sur des lieux public n'est pas une raison suffisante pour les reproduire. En effet, il n'existe pas de liberté de panorama au Bénin. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fawaz.tairou: P.S. Par ailleurs, je m'étonne que vous ne connaissiez pas les lois du pays pour lequel vous organisez un concours. Dès lors il n'est pas surprenant que les participants aient été induits en erreur. Cf Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Benin : ça fait quand même un nombre conséquent de fichiers problématiques... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Il s'agit alors d'une mauvaise compréhension de ma part du dernier point des Exceptions au droit d'auteur. On sera plus vigilant les prochaines fois. Merci. --Fawaz.tairou (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Concernant "La reproduction, sous certaines conditions, des œuvres placées de façon permanente dans un lieu public", les "certaines conditions" sont que l'inclusion des oeuvres "n'a qu'un caractère accessoire ou incident par rapport au sujet principal". Or, ici, les oeuvres sont bien le sujet principal. Mais vous pouvez toujours tenter d'obtenir la permission des sculpteurs ou architectes. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Je comprends mieux. Merci --Fawaz.tairou (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
::: @Fawaz.tairou: P.S. Par ailleurs je vous invite à contacter @Rachad sanoussi: et à l'enjoindre a stopper immédiatement ses téléversements; il risque en effet de se faire bloquer plus tôt qu'il ne le pense. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: C'est fait. Je viens de lui envoyer un message aussi. --Fawaz.tairou (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Murales in Piazza Zotti.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Otelmar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Italy.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Easter (67751505).jpeg

[edit]

Blurry and unidentifiable. OoS Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gian Carlo Di Martino y el Presidente de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela Nicolás Maduro.jpg

[edit]

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Photos about presidents are usually not own work. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fauxdenzel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As stated, promo pics. No permission and not own work

Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:За селом 2.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:За селом 2.jpg

[edit]

Причина: Організатори фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю 2019.» залучили фотографію шляхом обману і шахрайства! (Оцінки моїх фотографій, і фотографій переможців надати відмовились.) Відмову видалити фотографію розцінюватиму як крадіжку. Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:За селом 2.jpg

[edit]

ЯКА ПРИЧИНА ВАГОМА, ЯКЩО КРАДІЖКА НЕ ВАГОМА? Рішення субу буде вагомою причиною? PS. Попрошу надати оцінки фотографій переможнів та моєго фото, на фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить Землю 2019.»! 

Михайло Пецкович (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шпиці 2.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шпиці 2.jpg

[edit]

Причина: Організатори фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю 2019.» залучили фотографію шляхом обману і шахрайства! (Оцінки моїх фотографій, і фотографій переможців надати відмовились.) Відмову видалити фотографію розцінюватиму як крадіжку. Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шпиці 2.jpg

[edit]

ЯКА ПРИЧИНА ВАГОМА, ЯКЩО КРАДІЖКА НЕ ВАГОМА? Рішення субу буде вагомою причиною!? PS. Попрошу надати оцінки фотографій переможнів та моєго фото, на фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить Землю 2019.»! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шпиці 3.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шпиці 3.jpg

[edit]

Причина: Організатори фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю 2019.» залучили фотографію шляхом обману і шахрайства! (Оцінки моїх фотографій, і фотографій переможців надати відмовились.) Відмову видалити фотографію розцінюватиму як крадіжку. Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шпиці 3.jpg

[edit]

ЯКА ПРИЧИНА ВАГОМА, ЯКЩО КРАДІЖКА НЕ ВАГОМА? Рішення субу буде вагомою причиною?! PS. Попрошу надати оцінки фотографій переможнів та моєго фото, на фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить Землю 2019.»! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Гнатася.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Гнатася.jpg

[edit]

Причина: Організатори фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю 2019.» залучили фотографію шляхом обману і шахрайства! (Оцінки моїх фотографій, і фотографій переможців надати відмовились.) Відмову видалити фотографію розцінюватиму як крадіжку. Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Гнатася.jpg

[edit]

ЯКА ПРИЧИНА ВАГОМА, ЯКЩО КРАДІЖКА НЕ ВАГОМА? Рішення субу буде вагомою причиною!? PS. Попрошу надати оцінки фотографій переможнів та моєго фото, на фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить Землю 2019.»! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 09:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Крижані смереки.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Гаджуги.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Старі смереки.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Старі смереки.jpg

[edit]

Причина: Організатори фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю 2019.» залучили фотографію шляхом обману і шахрайства! (Оцінки моїх фотографій, і фотографій переможців надати відмовились.) Відмову видалити фотографію розцінюватиму як крадіжку. Михайло Пецкович (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Вечірня.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Зимовий туманний ранок.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Світлотіні Чорногори.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Світлотіні Чорногори.jpg

[edit]

Причина: Організатори фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю 2019.» залучили фотографію шляхом обману і шахрайства! (Оцінки моїх фотографій, і фотографій переможців надати відмовились.) Відмову видалити фотографію розцінюватиму як крадіжку. Михайло Пецкович (talk) 15:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Світлотіні Чорногори.jpg

[edit]

ЯКА ПРИЧИНА ВАГОМА, ЯКЩО КРАДІЖКА НЕ ВАГОМА? Рішення субу буде вагомою причиною? PS. Попрошу надати оцінки фотографій переможнів та моєго фото, на фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить Землю 2019.»! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 09:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Світлотіні Чорногори2.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Світлотіні Чорногори3.jpg

[edit]

Тому, що це моє фото! і я хочу забрати його з цього ресурсу! Михайло Пецкович (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Athens con 2018.jpg

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Greece. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint John, New Brunswick collage.jpg

[edit]

Unused near duplicate of File:Common SJ.jpg. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoey2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not found at URL.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NP002 Spomenik palim borcima na Kozari.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:World War II memorials in Republika Srpska. The previous request was closed 6 years ago as deleted due to unclear copyright situation. Maybe at moment the situation is more clear. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Same requests with World War II memorials can be seen here: (1, 2, 3 and 4). --Smooth O (talk) 08:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gerhard Derbitz

[edit]

Probably historical photographs and not "Own work"

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poster Exhibition ESPGG Daniel bernard DCB (own work).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus.. Maybe the uploader is copyright holder. Posters can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. One week for uploader to send the permission. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the uploader is Daniel Bernard but the logos are not his own work. As stated on the poster the copyright holder is www.espgg.org and their content is copyrighted. But he may upload the drawing without the logos. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick Rogel, Thank you very much for your explanation. I will suppress the logos as required, and in few hours I will change the file as requested.BERNARD.dcb (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC) I have now the new file without logos as you requested but I don't succeed to change my file for the new file. How to do ? Thank in advance for your response. BERNARD.dcb (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Urgent : There are now four times that I try to change my file without any success (as you requested without logos). I click on 'upload new file', and I proceed but at the end when I see the file on wikimedia, it seems there is no change. Why? Could you help me? Could you authorize the uploading or verify if there is something wrong ? BERNARD.dcb (talk) 18:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - logos are de minimis. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adelolophus maxilla.jpg

[edit]

No indication uploader is David Evans, who is a palaeontologist. The user's history of deleted uploads also indicates a habit of copyright violation. FunkMonk (talk) 15:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:הרב שלמה שטנצל בצעירותו.pdf

[edit]

Unaceptable image format. Also, subject was born in 1937, so the photo was likely made in 1960s, not in 2014: unlikely {{Own}}. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BBX52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Locomotives are not permanently installed as required by Commons:Freedom of panorama in Hungary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BBX52 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These photos are from Facebook and Instagram. No permission from the photographers. --Regasterios (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mansa Cole.jpg

[edit]

From imdb, photographer claimed to be AmazingKlef Photography. Found website with no permission 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Al Hassan II.jpg

[edit]

No FOP in Morocco. Guideline states that "for a work permanently located in a public place if it is not the main subject of the image, however, the Mosque (including its interior) seems to be the main subject. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:101st Airborne at Little Rock Central High.jpg

[edit]

This image was previously nominated for deletion, but with incomplete information. The source listed on the image page is a .mil web page, but that does not make it a work of the US government. Indeed, I searched Google Images and found that it actually comes from here, which you can see is just a US Army magazine using that image, not claiming it is a US Army work. That article states the image is used "Courtesy of the National Archives," but not everything in the US National Archives is in the public domain. In this case, the image can be found at the image library Magnum Photos, and the photographer is listed as Burt Glinn, who is a news photographer and not a federal employee. I've spoken with the NARA still pictures staff, who confirm that the image is owned by Magnum Photos, and that is why it is not available through the online catalog. It comes from the collection of the US Information Agency, and many of the USIA's records at NARA consist of news clippings and news reel footage that was not produced by the government, but used for the USIA's propaganda purposes. Unless it can be claimed as public domain for a different reason, this should be deleted as the current license is invalid and there is a known copyright holder. Dominic (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Čára.png

[edit]

An unused and uncategorised image. Can be easily recreat if needed Estopedist1 (talk) 18:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jörg Stuttmann während einer Lesung (2002).jpg

[edit]

Taken from Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Regina Lemnitz (2017).jpg

[edit]

Taken from Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ARBOL DE DECISIONES.pdf

[edit]

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thomas Friebe im Studio (2016).jpg

[edit]

Found on Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Douglas Welbat & Christian Brückner (2013).jpg

[edit]

Found on Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joseline Gassen (2019).jpg

[edit]

Taken from Facebook. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They greatly differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since another user correctly noted that the linked edit doesn't reveal his age, I'd like to explain: He wrote a speedydeleted article about the person he revealed himself as, and there he gave his year of birth as 2003. Admins on German Wikipedia could confirm that. It doesn't really matter for this deletion request though, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mario von Jascheroff (2018).jpg

[edit]

Found on the Facebook profile of the depicted. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this uploader which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. They differ in quality and were taken over a period of almost 20 years, while the uploader admits herewith that he's actually a teenager. King Rk (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not to argue with the deletion request, and not to argue that the linked edit looks like it was done by a teenager (or a very careless person, for that matter), but I don't see anything there that explicitly says "I'm X and I'm a teenager" (not to mention that you shouldn't blindly trust anything a person says on the Internet...) -- Wesha (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You're right and that's why I already left out that part in my latest deletion request and thought about deleting it from the other ones. The uploader wrote a (speedydeleted) article about himself in German Wikipedia where he gave his year of birth as 2003; German admins can confirm this. But of course it doesn't really matter for this deletion request, I just wanted to give a bigger picture. --King Rk (talk) 23:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thank you. As an outside observer, I did not have visibility into these facts, thank you for clarifying! -- Wesha (talk) 04:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khrushchev U2.gif

[edit]

This may have been placed on CIA website, but it definitely is made by Soviet photographer so couldn’t be PD-US. 77.232.15.221 20:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment! Contemporary news reports reveal that international journalists were invited to witness and photograph the presentation of the U2 wreckage to Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev. Thus this photograph (as related photographs in this series, which are in the public domain section of the National Archives), probably originates with a US government employee. To be one the safe side, it will be replaced by a National Archives image with proper public domain attribution. -- Enemenemu (talk) 14:32, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sidorenko G.S.JPG

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blackberry Storm.png

[edit]

See COM:DW. I will withdraw this nomination if someone is willing to obscure the copyrighted screen. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naman Wakil E.png

[edit]

There are some people named Naman Wakil in es.wiki, but no companies. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ido-Bassok.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Theinstantmatrix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: c:COM:NETCOPYVIO|source=http://cms.education.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/A3414EED-513E-4AEA-8013-6A4FDE299499/96091/BeinIvritLeisraelit12.pdf

Contested by uploader on my talk page. I am somehow uncertain whenever the license is valid or not. The PDF I linked to exists on archives starting in 2016, but the website the uploader linked to has the image after the Wayback Machine archive on January 2019, and anyone can modify their web page to easily make free license claims to images they did not photograph. Because it's in Hebrew, I think someone else proficent in it should take a look at this and see what they think.

If this contested request ends in a delete anyway then someone who took this image (not the subject in photo) will need to send permission via OTRS. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. Person in the photograph can't be the photographer, we need OTRS permission from the photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carlos Fernandez Compositor Uruguayo.jpg

[edit]

Promotional. Edslov (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; not finding it via google either. Possibly in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Partido Unionista Democrático de Irlanda del Norte (DUP).pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sameh Sami.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10

Original speedy rationale does not apply as Sameh Sami exists, showing the potential in-scope nature. Fæ (talk) 20:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the first upload appears some sort of experiment, but this upload a few hours later does have credible EXIF data and is clearly not a simple screenshot. --Fæ (talk) 17:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

أنا أرسلت إيميل إلى OTRS فيه الصورة وصور إخرى تثبت أن الملف تصويري الشخصي. شكرا، أحمد الدولة — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 105.181.111.195 (talk) 21:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No OTRS for over 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MarkusPaschke.Pressebild.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission(s). // Copyright infringement from https://www.spdfraktion.de/abgeordnete/paschke?wp=18 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Low quality shot SounderBruce 03:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sob logo.jpg

[edit]

Logo of a non-notable blog Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subject has a enwp article, en:Sound of Boston. Thuresson (talk) 03:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated that article for deletion for lack of notability as well. Even if the article is not deleted, OTRS is needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio too. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:28 de Abril é Greve Geral - SindiSaúde-RS (2017).jpg

[edit]

The end, non-image, for a long time 179.236.79.157 20:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hurtling through Downtown Seattle on a Double Tall (5580492148).jpg

[edit]

Screenshot from video SounderBruce 03:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Northgate Ped Bridge Option 3 (14160936630).jpg

[edit]

Sadly, I think a maquette like this falls under copyright in the U.S., so I think this is unacceptable derivative work. Jmabel ! talk 04:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GLORIA LASSO Casino Contrexéville 2003.jpeg

[edit]

En tant que propriétaire du site officiel de GLORIA LASSO et propriétaire de la photo de Mme LASSO sur la scène du Casino de Contrexeville en 2003 , prenant acte que sur sa fiche Wikipédia les informations données et son site ne seraient pas fiables je ne vois pas l'utilité à ce que Wikipédia Commons continue d'utiliser ma propriété et la photo dont je suis l'auteur que je regrette d'avoir partagée jusqu'à ce jour . RICHARDJRBP (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Too late. Sammyday (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GLORIA LASSO Casino Contrexéville 2003.jpeg

[edit]

Ce fichier appartient au site officiel de Gloria Lasso de part son auteur, propriétaire du site et se trouve dans la rubrique https://www.glorialasso.com/biographie et cette photo n'a rien à faire sur Wikipédia. Cabeza burro (talk) 08:00, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GLORIA LASSO Casino Contrexéville 2003.jpeg

[edit]

{{speedydelete|<justification textuelle de votre demande>}} Même si cette photo est une pâle copie de la photo originale, Wikipédia reprend une photo protégée par des droits d'auteur issus de pages web sans en avoir l'autorisation et ceci conformément aux dispositions de l'article L. 122-4 du Code de la propriété intellectuelle., en l'occurrence en bas de page de sa biographie de son site https://www.glorialasso.com/biographie Site Gloria Lasso Copyright (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Anatoliy (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shouta aoi december (cropped).jpg

[edit]

See discussion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shouta aoi.jpg; original file is unknown and is credited as uploader's own work Lullabying (talk) 08:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feuertornado--physikanten-4560-Hzdie-de.jpg

[edit]

Possibly Copyvio: http://physikanten.de/mix/feuertornado--physikanten-4560-Hzdie-de.jpg Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Die Spur des Falken.jpg

[edit]

kein eigenes Werk sondern von Hans Georg Hillmann, der 2014 starb Schnabeltassentier (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angira16072016-2.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos of or by non-contributors.. I'd like to allow discussion for a week. Maybe it has some kind of value. But maybe it is copyrighted screenshot? Taivo (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Doesn't seem to be a screenshot though. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Панель Snip & Sketch в Windows 10.png

[edit]

Not own work, taken from Windows 10. Maybe, PD-trivial, but, if so, needs relicensing.

Attribution for the templates: Special:History/Template:Delete, Special:History/Template:Idw. Note: there are translated versions. If you want to see authors of Translations, please go to Special:History/Template:Delete/xx, Special:History/Template:Idw/xx and change the XX to the language code. Examples: Special:History/Template:Delete/ru, Special:History/Template:Idw/ru.

Licensing: CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons. Pages of templates: Template:Delete, Template:Idw. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jägerkreuz 2.jpg

[edit]

Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. 178.165.128.62 06:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NASA Artemis Gateway logo.png

[edit]

Copyright violation: this is a fake, it is not from NASA but from collectspace.com Vespiacic (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We can't be fully sure about the provenance of the image at this time. We can wait until NASA officially releases it. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per this UDR discussion. The logo seems to be clearly by NASA, however may be non-official. Ankry (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jodhpur (Rajastão), RTW 2012 (8403953745).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ricky81682 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish 💬 13:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 14:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:René, Cateautbriland, , extrait 8p ill Malo-Renault.pdf

[edit]

Doublon avec un fichier 15 pages au lieu de pages 8 et fautes d'orthographe ... François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

subst:delete2|image=File:René, Cateautbriland, , extrait 8p ill Malo-Renault.pdf|reason=Doublon avec un fichier 15 pages au lieu de pages 8 et fautes d'orthographe .

Deleted: 1925 work. Illustrator died in 1938 so this has a URAA copyrihgt until 1/1/2021. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:René, Cateautbriland, , extrait 8p ill Malo-Renault.pdf

[edit]

Doublon avec un fichier 15 pages au lieu de pages 8 et fautes d'orthographe ... François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1925 work. Illustrator died in 1938 so this has a URAA copyrihgt until 1/1/2021. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/09/26&oldid=377320712"