Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 24th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: second recreation of deleted content. --Jcb (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can this really be free? Looks like photo of likely copyrighted material. 188.150.196.12 14:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Derived work of copyrighted album covers. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal photo. Ahmadtalk 17:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:SPEEDY. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angeles Pacheco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible screenshots, no source/permission.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP based on other uploads. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

created in error Keith Edkins (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low graphical quality, and per the "HX" byproduct the reactant should be "X2" not just "X". We have a ton of Category:Electrophilic aromatic halogenation reactions. File:Aromatic halogenation.PNG is not-worse quality and chemically correct. DMacks (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO Hong Kong states that most logos are copyrightable in Hong Kong. Seeking clarification in this case. Wikiacc (talk) 19:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Uploader concurred with request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a football club, so very unlikely to be a free image. On en.wiki as a non-free image (here). Number 57 (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Infrogmation at 22:30, 25 September 2019 UTC: false license claim. --Krdbot 01:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Google Street View. The shape of clouds is the same. https://www.google.co.jp/maps/@25.1765503,121.449636,2a,75y,216.28h,105.4t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJZOAVbAhvk56l7UFlWTOOA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656. そらみみ (talk) 01:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: sd, per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rachad sanoussi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Benin, artists' permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. See COM:FOP Benin. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rachad sanoussi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pas de COM:FOP au Bénin, merci d'expliquer pourquopi ces oeuvres sont dans le domaine public.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. See COM:FOP Benin. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rachad sanoussi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pas de liberté de panorama au Bénin, permission des sculpteurs et/ou architectes nécessaires via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:FOP Benin. ~riley (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rachad sanoussi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pas de liberté de panorama au Bénin, permission des sculpteurs et/ou architectes nécessaires via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:FOP Benin. ~riley (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Flickr washing, see [1]. Source claims to be from Weibo, no permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no contiene imagen Yungelita (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: allready deleted. --JuTa 02:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO United Kingdom states that the threshold of originality is low for United Kingdom images. Seeking clarification in this case. Wikiacc (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could any admin please delete this logo and close this DR? The uploader requested deletion. Thanks! Masum Reza📞 10:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Monument récent par Jean et Joël Martel (1896-1966), pas dans le domaine public avant 2037.
English: Recent artwork by Jan et Joël Martel (1896-1966), not in public domain before 2037.
VIGNERON (talk) 13:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an image from NASA. JCP2018 (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct! My original assumption when I uploaded this image was that NASA had obtained permission for commercial use of these images. Subsequent investigations determined that APOD was not doing this! I have uploaded this image to Wikiversity under Fair use. Please feel free to delete! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Huntster (t @ c) 05:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an image from NASA. JCP2018 (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct! My original assumption when I uploaded this image was that NASA had obtained permission for commercial use of these images. Subsequent investigations determined that APOD was not doing this! The NSO image use policy states: "NSO allows reproduction, authorship of derivative works, and other transformations of the original work strictly for educational and research purposes without further permission, subject to the General Conditions section stated above." and "NSO allows reproduction, authorship of derivative works, and other transformations of the original work strictly for personal, non-profit/non-commercial/non-retail use without further permission, subject to the second paragraph under II.B. and the General Conditions section stated above." I have uploaded this image to Wikiversity under Fair use. Please feel free to delete! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Huntster (t @ c) 05:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that this picture isn't licenced for free use. Picture's source is Google search. Puppe100 (talk) 03:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 05:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sambos109 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. OOS. + seems to be self promo.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for self promotion es:Margarita Camarena Luhrs Aldo Dávalos (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Yungelita (talk) 07:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author requests deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from https://wlokniarz.com/sklad/ Salicyna (talk) 07:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max0784 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images copied from around the web, unused, low-resolution, and out of scope

Ariadacapo (talk) 10:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de cette photo Lev. Anthony (talk) 11:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de cette photo Lev. Anthony (talk) 11:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de cette photo Lev. Anthony (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:PS UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope test file, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haider SF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These photos were published before and require a permission through our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Freedom of panorama in Denmark is restricted to buildings, this public artwork is therefore not covered. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)'[reply]

There are more and other mural images in public space by this artist in Wikimedia commons, so why is this one set to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neogeografen (talk • contribs) 05:50, 24 September 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

That is probably for the reason, that the user is working on media of demonstrations and protests, not street art. OTOH: see this. --C.Suthorn (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Neogeografen: Where are this other and more murals by the same artist? The only other, that I found, was uploaded by user:Fyrtaarn. --C.Suthorn (talk) 05:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Freedom of panorama in Denmark is restricted to buildings, this public artwork is therefore not covered. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear situation. Uploader doesn't answer, see User_talk:Syedfahad.kamal#Question Estopedist1 (talk) 05:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Has been published before. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اثر انشقاقی - با حذف موافقم Mostafameraji (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:موزه مردمشناسی کاخ خورشید 03.jpg and uploader's request. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a copyright infringement Aqetz (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this is ineligible for copyright per COM:TOO, I've updated the license tag accordingly. We should, however, follow this DR at ru:wp to see if this company is of sufficient notability in regard to COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flag is an invention of the author Kingopai1. It has never existed i reality. B****n (talk) 05:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is unused, the uploader had very few edits and inactive since years. As a response by the uploader is unlikely, I follow B****n here. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 06:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Indeed, this is a derived from a copyrighted work. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for self promotion es:Music Songr Colombia Aldo Dávalos (talk) 06:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Thanks for the notification!. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Ponvelraj (talk) 16:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Ponvelraj (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Ponvelraj (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KRISHNA GURUJI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these images. Possible promotion or self-promotion as well.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a derivative of the artwork on the poster-board and requires a permission from the original artist(s). - Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:3D Image of Tagalog component Languages.png, just in 2D, which is up for deletion here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:3D Image of Tagalog component Languages.png. As with the other file, the source material does not reflect the data. Mr. Gerbear (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing source. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality image of unknown people doing nothing special: of little educational value. Olybrius (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional content. It is/was in fact the profile picture of an Instagram account (I saw it a couple of days ago), but it seems like that account is now disabled/renamed. Ahmadtalk 20:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio; complex drawing without permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is low resolution and low quality due to an unusual filter being added. A higher resolution version without the filter exists here
Auguel (talk) 20:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image whose copyright status is unverifiable. It's claimed as "CC/own work", but it's a straight crop of a photo that appears elsewhere on the web, including the subject's main campaign website and Facebook profile -- so absent proper WP:OTRS confirmation, it's impossible to properly verify whether the subject is actually the rightful holder of any copyrights on it, or just grabbed it from the web in a random image search. Furthermore, this exact same photo has been deleted from our servers twice before (once per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Bw14 and once by speedy), because it wasn't under the correct copyrights those times either. Bearcat (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Missing permission via OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I noticed after I uploaded it the amount of noise in the picture as well as its overall quality. I would appreciate if you deleted it. I will be reshooting this soon, George E. Koronaios (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TuranHan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all said to be "own work" of the subject. That's unlikely, as they do not appear to be selfies. Therefore the copyright belongs to the actual photographer. In addition, two of them show copyrighted book covers.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:LA INCLUSION.pdf

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, slightly smaller, and opaque background compared to File:Acrylamide-2D-skeletal.png DMacks (talk) 21:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

that in addition to those weaknesses has in-image caption text. DMacks (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not belong to user, who has continued to try and upload image on Wikipedia itself. Livelikemusic (talk) 21:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not belong to user, who has continued to try and upload image on Wikipedia itself. Livelikemusic (talk) 21:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see how the given license is applicable to this image from ChemSpider. It may be either PD (because it's a software generated image), or copyrighted. + Low quality 3d image with black background. Wostr (talk) 19:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Cyclopropanone 3D structure.png. Wostr (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
+ File:Cyclopropanol 3D.png. Wostr (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: (File:Acrylamide3D.png) per discussion. The other two are kept for now, being in use. Ed (Edgar181) 15:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be an unauthorized screenshot from an aftershow, see https://www.antena3.com/series/casa-de-papel/tercer-grado/alex-pina-el-primer-proyecto-de-la-casa-de-papel-se-llamo-los-desahuciados_201705105912b43b0cf2a1da48263ccb.htmlsgeureka tc 12:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a crop from an (apparently) copyrighted image, see https://www.lavanguardia.com/series/20170509/422415395188/la-casa-de-papel-antena-3-alex-pina.htmlsgeureka tc 12:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin Rodríguez Macías (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these files listed below appear to be created by its own uploader.

Most of these files are clear-cut copyvios (grabbed from the web somewhere, e.g "Av. Oscar Flores..jpg" is downloaded from Facebook [2]), and have low/web quality resolution. Other files are non-free logos (meeting above the threshold of originality, such as Escudo del equipo de Delicias..png) and an improperly uploaded file (File:Pelícanos en el río San Pedro..jpg). See also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle.

theinstantmatrix (talk) 06:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass-deleted alluploads of the user. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin Rodríguez Macías (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, watermarks, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; highly unlikely that these are his work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin Rodríguez Macías (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Once again, questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin Rodríguez Macías (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Once again: likely fraudulent authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history. Several of these files are blatant out-of-process recreations of previously deleted copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free illustration in Japan. Batholith (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is released under CC BY-NC 4.0, which is not allowed here Gouwenaar (talk) 14:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 04:37, 8 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Commons:Deletion requests/Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rondarb:

Hi there, im writing regarding the photos being deleted that i uploaded Just letting you guys know, i am the sole owner of the pictures and the person in the pictures. I can provide as much evidence need to support my claim.

What is need to prove this? Only thing i can think of , is supplying screens shots with me logged into the original source it was uploaded to

Thanks. Rondarb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rondarb (talk • contribs) 21:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rondarb: you'll have to contact OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not "own work" ShinePhantom (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shervinabbasi1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely to be promotional.

Ahmadtalk 13:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 09:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo out of scope, user's only contribution in a year Mjrmtg (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree for Deletion --BlinxTheKitty (talk) 19:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 14:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. oos. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 19:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 07:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goodlepups (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional.

Ahmadtalk 17:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bei dieser Datei handelt es sich um eine Reproduktion eines von französischen Neonazis in den 1960er Jahren verbreiteten Wappens und nicht um das Abzeichen einer im 2.Weltkrieg kämpfenden militärischen Einheit. Dieser Umstand ist in der Fachliteratur eindeutig belegt und z.Bsp. hier ausführlich dargelegt: https://zeithistorische-forschungen.de/3-2012/id=4690#pgfId-1039689a Pinin (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a reproduction of a coat of arms spread by French neo-Nazis in the 1960s and not the badge of a military unit fighting in World War II. This fact is clearly proven in the literature, you may find some more details here: https://zeithistorische-forschungen.de/3-2012/id=4690#pgfId-1039689a --Pinin (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on many Wikipedia articles, from be:30 грэнадзёрская дывізія войскаў пры СС to zh:武裝親衛隊師列表. Commons' policy, expressed in COM:NPOV is that we should not delete files that Wikipedia is using simply because they're inaccurate. Maybe it's a copyright violation, though. --bjh21 (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: thanks for your comment. Well, the issue is that the description does not match the file. I fully agree that it is a matter for the local communities of the individual projects to decide how to use content provided by commons. Therefore it's definitely an option to keep the file if the description is corrected. However, with the current description local communities are mislead. They use the content because they think it represents something that it actually DOES NOT.--Pinin (talk) 20:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Pinin: You can edit the description yourself in order to correct it. Use the "Edit" button at the top of File:33. SS-Waffen-Grenadier-Division „Charlemagne”.svg, just like any other wiki page. You might find the {{Factual accuracy}} template useful. If you think the file should be renamed, you can use the {{Rename}} template or the "Template:Vector-action-move" option to request that. --bjh21 (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Done. Thank you for being a good mentor.--Pinin (talk) 08:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benchire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM of not notable company.

Stanglavine (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scaled-up exact duplicate of File:Greek Phoenix.svg, falsely claimed as own work. Constantine 18:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1968. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Василечко (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request acagastya 18:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request acagastya 19:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request acagastya 19:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request acagastya 19:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request acagastya 19:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request acagastya 19:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 19:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional. Ahmadtalk 19:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This photo is in the public domain.https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8539780/mediaviewer/rm1071224065 -- Hossein.income 19:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although [3] claims CC0, it isn't clear whether this license is valid or not. I could find a similar version here, it was published almost 1 year ago. This suggests that the IMDb profile has been there since 2017, but without this image. I think we need a OTRS permission to confirm the CC0 license. Ahmadtalk 17:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 17:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only for spam on enwiki by now-indefinitely blocked sockmaster. No other encyclopedic value. Kinu (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

official logo of state company [4] without OTRS permission. Rios (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of myself from 2008 that I would like deleted. Thank you How do I go about doing so? 172.90.6.10 23:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:People, these are identifiable minors on private property, wearing swimwear. There is no evidence they consented to having their picture taken at all, let alone displayed for the world to see. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've also just discovered that it is a copyright violation [5] and have tagged it as such, so I guess this discussion is moot. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:11, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the photo has been deleted (although the photo was taken by the camp, and the relevant minors' parents/guardians would have signed permission for the photo of their children to have been taken) this reason for deletion is no longer relevant. However, as to the complaint that the page is not notable enough: it is the Massachusetts Audubon Society's only overnight camp. The Massachusetts Audubon society has its own page, as well as a list of every one of its sanctuaries and camps. And all of those sanctuaries and camps have their own Wiki page–except for Camp Wildwood. Especially if some of the Society's less notable sanctuaries have their own Wiki, Camp Wildwood deserves to have its own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I'mAdam2019 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@I'mAdam2019: , we are here on Wikimedia Commons to discuss this image, not the article on Wikipedia. And the image is in fact still here, I merely removed it from the WP article while this is sorted out. And since, as you say, you just took it straight from the camps' own website it is a copyright violation and therefore cannot be hosted on Commons at all. Unless and until you can prove you have the right to release the file under a free license, meaning it can be re-used by anyone for any reason, it can't be here. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am associated with the organization, but given that I can't provide you any documentation to prove I have the ability to use this photo, than I concede that the deletion of the photograph is fair.I'mAdam2019 (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no value on project, used on non-notable Wikidata item only, possible copyvio Papuass (talk) 14:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 13:42, 29 Oktober 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Benchire --Krdbot 19:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional + not a web host QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No contribs to any wm project. --Achim (talk) 22:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a web host + out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Screenshot with no obvious educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, low resolution, dubious "own work" claim. Wcam (talk) 10:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an image from NASA. JCP2018 (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an image from NASA. JCP2018 (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: According to the source site, it was made by Gary Stevens who is a NASA employee. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the source. Unclear copyright status: according to the Comments section (from the source, by Svetlana), the article existed at the start of September, but the file was added to Commons later. Also WebArchive thinks that this was copied. I can't find cc by-sa 4.0 at the source.

Attrubution info: Template:Delete, cc by-sa 3.0, Wikimedia Commons. List of authors can be found at Special:History/Template:Delete. Authors of translations can be found at Special:History/Template:Delete/xx, replace xx with the language you interested in (use the URL bar), example: Special:History/Template:Delete/ru.

Attrubution info: Template:Idw, cc by-sa 3.0, Wikimedia Commons. List of authors can be found at Special:History/Template:Idw. Authors of translations can be found at Special:History/Template:Idw/xx, replace xx with the language you interested in (use the URL bar), example: Special:History/Template:Idw/ru. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 11:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. The sculpture was erected in 2000. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken at the same press event as File:Álex.Pina.jpg, which I already nominated for deletion along with other contributions by User:Solomandita because I have reasonable doubt he took these picture himself. – sgeureka tc 12:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright renewal R491846; not to mention that each of the individual plays would need their own renewals checked. The current license is completely inappropriate, as life+70 is not a copyright applicable to US works published in this era Prosfilaes (talk) 13:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film poster, needs OTRS permission; and also I think it can be out of COM:SCOPE. Ahmadtalk 13:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logotype of company with no apparent notability. Based on messages left at en:User talk:Lean Hippo, it was apparently uploaded for spamming in en:Draft:Arora Group and en:Arora Group, which have been deleted for failing to demonstrate notability and for being promotional. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 13:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:49, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but everyone can find this work in the public place so called New Town Hall (Hanover). And so we have a the Freedom of panorama. Thank you for your attention. Kindly regards Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination FOP applies only if the work is visible from a public street, Since the building is surrounded by a wall, that seems unlikely here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he died 1957. But everyone can find this work in the public place so called New Town Hall (Hanover). And so we have a the Freedom of panorama. Thank you for your attention. Kindly regards Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, in Innenräumen, auch von öffentlichen Gebäuden, in Deutschland greift die Panoramafreiheit nicht! --Martin Sg. (talk) 10:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination FOP applies only if the work is visible from a public street, Since the building is surrounded by a wall, that seems unlikely here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he died 1957. But everyone can find this work in the public place so called New Town Hall (Hanover). And so we have a the Freedom of panorama. Thank you for your attention. Kindly regards Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination FOP applies only if the work is visible from a public street, Since the building is surrounded by a wall, that seems unlikely here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of previously deleted File:Scott Jacoby (cropped).jpg, which was deleted as a copyvio or product of undisclosed COI. BD2412 T 13:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1957, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underexposed photograph. 90.43.55.116 14:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, can be promotional Ahmadtalk 14:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No categories, therefore lost in our 50 milllion images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jjb91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Underexposed photographs.

Chassipress (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Mothersspace was twice deleted as spam. Its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 14:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daltonmartins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What is actual license terms? Last pages contain both Non-Derivative and Non-Commercial symbols.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:59, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by W Roefs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:59, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from anime/manga/comics. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete i dont think fop china applies to bus ads.--Roy17 (talk) 19:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then what about Category:Coca-Cola advertisements on vehicles in China? --TuxStrikesBack (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The fact that there may be other files that should be deleted does not mean that these are OK. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM photo of yourself Jonteemil (talk) 14:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This photo was taken by my brother at a warm up practice for a preseason game. I received proper permission from him to submit it to Wiki Commons. As such, it is our own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theblackaviator (talk • contribs) 15:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think this is a big deal the old one is shit quality — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:569:74E4:B000:C552:89AB:3E77:1B8B (talk) 03:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, low resolution, and it is not used in any pages. Looks like an out of scope file. If it can be any use in a project, then it should be transferred there. Masum Reza📞 15:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo without metadata, the user's only uploaded photo. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Please provide evidence that image has been published 20 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The source page is this. As the legend states, it was taken in 1984 (note that Bilardo is wearing a shirt by Le Coq Sportif, main sponsor of Argentina until 1990). Furthermore, as a Government agency of Argentina, the contents of "Archivo General de la Nación" are under a {{Cc-by-4.0}} international license (see at bottom). - Fma12 (talk) 09:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The fact that it appears in the national Archive says nothing about its copyright status -- the archive is a collection of works from many sources. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original uploader is likely the photographer, but I doubt they are the one who created the original artwork. It maybe under FOP in North Korea, but in South Korea only non-commercial use is permitted. I've no idea what the source country is, but since it is a hanji artwork, it is likely from either South or North Korea. Masum Reza📞 15:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the representative and social media manager of the musical band "Sonora Malecón", and we request this file deletion because it's inaccurate and outdated, the logo is wrong, and many of the people who are in the photo don't agree to appear there, because they are not part of the band any more. This file also was uploaded some years ago to Wikimedia Commons without our authorization. We also have uploaded new photos to Wikimedia Commons with correct and accurate information. Pevicentini (talk) 15:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We routinely keep images such as this one, showing a prvious makeup of the band for historical reasons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:54, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Russia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Копивио, видимо. AVRS (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some days ago, I reviewed a few photographs uploaded from transport.mos.ru, and marked them as free following Template:mos.ru. User:Krassotkin came to my talk page and explained that transport.mos.ru was administratively not a part of mos.ru, but an independent site that just happened to use the same domain. He also directed me to this discussion on Russian Wikipedia about this issue. That discussion has stopped, with the conclusion that the Template:mos.ru license applies to subpages of http://mos.ru itself, but not necessarily for its subdomains. For example (as of September 2019), pages from http://data.mos.ru and http://gorod.mos.ru are under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, while http://ombudsman.mos.ru, https://stroi.mos.ru, and http://transport.mos.ru are not obviously under any Creative Commons license, so should be considered not free, per Commons:PCP.

So I'm nominating all these files for deletion. To be honest, I'm kind of hoping someone finds proof that they are, actually free. But for now, Krassotkin and User:Alex Spade are pretty convincing that they are not. --GRuban (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GRuban (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my thesis in Ru-Wiki discussion. From subordination point of view the CC-BY-3.0 (then 4.0) permission for mos.ru was given by Department of IT; stroi.mos.ru and transport.mos.ru are managed by another departments - Department of Urban Planning Policy and Construction and Transport Department. Alex Spade (talk) 18:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawing. User:PereslavlFoto got a signed letter from the Moscow administration saying that transport.mos.ru is part of mos.ru, and the same legal rules apply. Please close this request, and if you have any spare barnstars lying around, you just might want to give one to him. --GRuban (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nom. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

xwiki vanity spammer, selfie with no encyclopedic value. Praxidicae (talk) 15:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, per above Veracious (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portretee (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q47996594) doesn't like this photo. She expressed her wish to be deleted to me, the uploader. -- Hladnikm (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the uploader and then only if she herself makes the request using OTRS. This is the only photowe have of her. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de cette photo Lev. Anthony (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio , closed by. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a web host + self promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1989. No Permission from the sculptor В.Одрехівський / architect К.Малярчук. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Антонич Б.-І.,укр. поет, художньо-меморіальна табличка (ск. В.Одрехівський, арх. К.Малярчук, 1989, бронза), с.Бортятин 07.jpg--Khymrysja (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC) Категорія: Зображення з обґрунтуванням добропорядного використання Файл містить зображення з історичним значенням та допомагає в ілюструванні історичних подій, зображення таблиці має низьку роздільну здатність, є доступне широкому колу відвідувачів Музею-садиби родини Антоничів, який є пам’яткою історії Мостиського району разом з художньо-меморіальною таблицею, яка підтверджує історичні події.Khymrysja --Khymrysja (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Не плутайте Вікіпедію з Вікісховищем. І навчіться елементарних правил редагування. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Дякую, я дійсно вчуся, тільки перший місяць в WIKI...--Khymrysja (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF document claimed as own work, but unlikely thus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As described at the respective Wikipedia article, the Litvak report was published on January 1973 by Joseph Litvak, then head of a department at the w:Ministry of Aliyah and Integration. This particular copy of the report was leaked by another Israeli government employee to Moshe Bar-Yuda, who exposed it at Israeli national TV, causing a scandal. Bar-Yuda tells that to me in minutes 38:12-45:24 of this interview. The exact leakage date is unknown, but the TV program in which it was exposed aired from May 1976 to October 1979, implying that the leaked copy has been in the public domain for at least 40 years.
The license I chose reflects the fact that I do not request any credit for scanning this public domain document into a PDF file. Please let me know if a different license should be chosen. Thanks, ליאור (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ליאור: : Who actually created the document? Why do you think it's become public domain? The act of stealing it/leaking it doesn't make it public any more than stealing your dog would make the animal the property of the entire world. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellin Beltz: : The copyright for the original report belongs to the Israeli Government, as per clause 18 of the old Israeli copyright law. I think the copyright status of its leaked copy is equivalent to that of these 1976 Israeli government documents, that were first displayed at some exhibition on 2016: 1, 2, 3, 4. With respect to your metaphor: If the German government sends a message and the United States government intercepts it, then the copyright status of the intercepted message is determined by American copyright laws, rather than by German copyright laws. Which suggests that the act of leaking an internal document may alter its copyright status. Then again, I'm no lawyer. Best, ליאור • Lior (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - This is apparently an Israeli government document, but does not seem to be PD under {{PD-IsraelGov}} and therefore has several years before it will pass the 50 year mark. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no indication of permission. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramrxrx3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low file size, No EXIF; Please send permission via COM:OTRS and/or upload original file. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS for over 30 days, other deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a web host + out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who's the author of this work? As far as I can tell, it is after a deceased painter, but the modern work is copyrighted as well. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

同一张照片但不完全相同的页面File:Suyu1955.jpg 颐园新居 (talk) 08:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher res file published at [7], terms of use states "only within allowed usage". (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image needs a better resolution and quality. Kiriusz (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, possibly out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 13:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, very low resolution logo. I've provided a vector version here. Masum Reza📞 13:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, possible promotion. Ahmadtalk 14:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Please provide evidence that image has been published 20 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As Atilio Fruet (right, #10) played his last basketball game in 1971 (as indicated on hereClarín newspaper–, this photo is PD in Argentina. The link does not indicate where the photo was scanned from, I guess it was El Gráfico, a popular sports magazine (1919-2018) in my country renowed for its photographs.- Fma12 (talk) 22:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fma12. Ruthven (msg) 16:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that image has been published before 2018 (date on the Facebook account of Asociación Bahiense de Básquetbol.). So mention of Clarín or El Gráfico is irrelevant. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC) @Patrick Rogel: [reply]

I won't repeat my arguments. You're going too far with some DR - Fma12 (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No proof of the other way around. Renominating a file with public license makes no sense and hurts the project. --Ruthven (msg) 18:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: It's a strange reversal of the official policy about evidence: it's up to the uploader to prove that the so-called license PD-Argentina is valid ("For photographic works, the duration of the right of ownership shall be 20 years from the date of first publication")... I prefer not to comment the last part. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: So, you are nominating for deletion a photo from the '70s[8][9] because you are sure that it was published in 2019 for the first time? Do you have evidences of that? Otherwise, it's a violation of assuming good faith (something that every good wikimedian should assume) and a -as written above- an abusive DR. It should be useless to repeat that, but I do so: if you have no proof of that first publication in 2019, you're nominating files for deletion without really knowing why, a behaviour that is very close to vandalism... --Ruthven (msg) 08:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The date of shooting is not sufficient: "Both at least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created, and it was first published at least 20 years ago." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: :  Keep as obvious as it sounds... my talk page is full of DR (like this) by user @Patrick Rogel: , who has been (IMO) abusively nominating files and doubting uploader's good faith, even when all files have a proper source indicated, and even when the sources themselves include dates of (previous) publication; most notably with images from El Gráfico official IG page, which compiles photos from the magazine's archive and (obviously) previously published on paper editions. – Fma12 (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Fma12: Indeed your talk page is full of deleted images (Fma12 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)) beginning back in 2014 and you are still (mis) or (ab) using PD-Argentina. If you think there's an "abuse" from me and that you "good faith" is not recognized, you can report it to the Administrators. I'll be glad to do it too. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Of course I have "a lot" (really so many?) of deleted images (as you glady described), most of them first discussed on their respective deletion requests, but all of them uploaded in good faith for my part. When you have more than 66,500 edits since 2008, of course you may have commited mistakes. So your statement about my (ab)using of PD-AR-Photo template is absolutely falacious and tendentious, unless you have proof of such behaviour... Do you?
I haven't uploaded only "PD-AR-Photos" but a lot of own work, including photographs, sports uniforms and railway maps, as you can see at my user page (which you have already done, besides). The question is: why should I report you? I'm talking about your "abusive" behaviour in some punctual DRs that involve me, I didn't refer to your "whole" activity in the project (which is not my business, either). If the word "abusive" offended you I apologize for that, I don't usually tend to personal attacks to anyone. I hope you do the same with me from now on. – Fma12 (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Please clarify what do you mean with "I'll be glad to do it too." Are you threatening Fma12 in some sort of way? I don't want to interpret this wrongly, but you should clarify what are you aiming here. --Ruthven (msg) 17:36, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo Yogwi21 (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it simple enough? --T.Bednarz (talk) 12:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: yes, simple logo. Ruthven (msg) 16:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a football club, so very unlikely to be a free image. On en.wiki as a non-free image (here). Number 57 (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: seems simple enough. Ruthven (msg) 17:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a derivative of the artwork on the display-board and requires a permission from the original artist(s). -- Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo from a presentation by a Ukrainian publisher of foreign comics in Ukrainian (on «CCU2019»), this publisher are owns the rights to release and distribute photos of these comics and their covers. During which you were allowed to take photos and videos and post them on the Internet.--Sourlemoning (talk) 06:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. {{ping|Sourlemoningçç Please forward us the permission to take photo and publish them under free license. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 17:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does not provide attribution of component images. Considering this user's history on English Wikipedia, it is likely that the images used are copyrighted. Also, there is that issue of the watermark in the corner of unknown origin. Mr. Gerbear (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr. Gerbear: Hi, It is images of the Philippines has been protected by the copyright because of No FOP in the Philippines? Jkg1997 (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't even consider freedom of panorama, though that shouldn't particularly apply here as the image doesn't depict a work of art in a public space. The problem here is that the image isn't sourced, and the contributor has had a history of copyvios. He could have taken it from anywhere and there's really no way to verify that Commons has permission to have that image. Mr. Gerbear (talk) 17:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a web host + self promotional + out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and cleaned up, not a serious case. --Achim (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Please provide evidence that image has been published 20 years ago. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bilardo 1984.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is the source, from the AGN, where it indicates the photo is dated 1986. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fma12 (talk • contribs)
@Fma12: We don't ask you if the image has been created 1986 but evidence it has been published and where. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment You asked for a source (read your first sentence) so I gave it. Following your thought, all the images in the General Archive of the Argentine Nation should be banned from Commons so there is no indication WHERE they were published (only the date is indicated in each case).
@Fma12: Yes I asked for a source and the source you have provided is not the original source; Facebook didn't exist back in 1999. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this photo, it is clear that it was scanned from a magazine/newspaper (most probably El Gráfico) –no EXIF data, low resolution unlike modern digital images, considering that there was no internet in Argentina in those times–. I'm struggling to understand where are you goingo to with this DR. - Fma12 (talk) 22:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Additional  Comment: As a Government agency of Argentina, the contents of "Archivo General de la Nación" are under a {{Cc-by-4.0}} international license (see at bottom). - Fma12 (talk) 09:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your explainations are nonsensic: you are claiming at the same time it comes (probably) from a newspaper and that it's a work by the Government of Argentina. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Don't try to distort my arguments. The photo is clearly PD, I provided the source with the information required. What I mean is whether the photo was previously published on paper or not, it has a valid commons license per the reasons given above. - Fma12 (talk) 12:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think a notable libarary is a valid source for the claim that a picture's metadata, at least in the absence of a contradictory evidence. If it says the picture was taken in 1968, that's good enough for me. As for whether it was published 20 years ago or earlier - although I cannot be abosolutely sure, that seems highly likely. I cannot imagine a situation where a photo from a professional sports event is hidden from publication for a long time *and* then goes to a library's archive somehow. A library collection normally consists of publications unless there is a particular reason that something was not published (such as being classified for security reasons). whym (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Whym: Apparently it's both public and private archives (that's what I asked @Fma12: without clear reply to date: does it comes from a newspaper and is it a work by the Government of Argentina?) so it's normal that photograph is watermarked with the Archivo General de la Nacion Argentina seal since it has been numerized by them. This seal and even the metadata doesn't proves however if the photograph has been published one day and, contrary to what you are stating, stock photography banks are full of unpublished items. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. The question is not if the photo was taken in 1986 or not, but when it was first published. It has not been established that this photo has been published before August 13, 2019. It has not been claimed that the National Archive of Argentina claims to own the copyright of this particular photo. Thuresson (talk) 00:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unauthorized use. the person is not john spyridakis. 2604:2000:E2C3:9500:20DF:C58D:8B84:AA6 13:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no article exists on person 68.174.123.217 18:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate DR. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt noch nicht geklärte Probleme mit dem Landesamt für Denkmalpflege bezüglich der Farbgebung M.Ne-Mue (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt noch nicht geklärte Probleme mit dem Landesamt für Denkmalpflege bezüglich der Farbgebung M.Ne-Mue (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt noch nicht geklärte Probleme mit dem Landesamt für Denkmalpflege bezüglich der Farbgebung M.Ne-Mue (talk) 17:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt noch nicht geklärte Probleme mit dem Landesamt für Denkmalpflege bezüglich der Farbgebung M.Ne-Mue (talk) 17:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ImranAvenger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: Thanks for sending me deletion message. These photos are copy of my original captured photos. And they were edited. So high resolution and matadata are not availablle. After when I shall come here then I shall update the files with original better resolution. Please do not delete. Thank you.—ImranAvenger (talk) 09:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ImranAvenger: Hello. Please send in your permission and original files to OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@大诺史: Unfortunately they have been deleted and the present files are gotten from my social network. Now what can I do? —ImranAvenger (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ImranAvenger: There is nothing I can do about it now. Sorry. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no OTRS, no higher resolution. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also other files from Category:Bohdan Ihor Antonych monument - No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2016. No Permission from the sculptor Володимир Одрехівський / architects Денис Белюх, Олександра Лібич, Олександр Матушков. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, please file a separate request for other files. See Help:VisualFileChange.js for an easy way to do it for a category. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]