Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 8th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://www.facebook.com/lally.beaute/photos/a.1856579291024723/1856579327691386/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in US (where E3 takes place) and also a copyrighted character

Elisfkc (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC) )[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful, as per COM:DICK. And looks vandalism motive to me see userpage of the uploader. CptViraj (📧) 04:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC) )[reply]


Deleted We do not blurry poor quality photographs of this type of very common object. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erro de envio Patrícia Mosqueira (talk) 08:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ksenia Krivko Kemerovo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work since she's pictured in.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of project scope. Commons is not your free web host.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, not in use. Please read this,

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos - have been deleted several times in the past.

Frood (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (see also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#C raju kumar). --DMacks (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a publicity picture. Tbhotch 04:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete the first version of this image. An incorrect file was inadvertently uploaded. The current version is correct. Tagooty (talk) 06:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


✓ Done -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Random picture about human's leg or hand. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Excessive ugly penis photos, no representative, normal glans are not like this Jjyenter (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept Anatomical illustration. Whether one considers this particular penis "ugly" or not, file is in use in more than 20 projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo, repeat in commons 43.225.100.211 13:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy closed Kept; mischief repeat request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Excessive low quality penis photos, no representative, normal foreskin is not like this Jjyenter (talk) 07:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept in use in multiple projects. (Apparently someone's foreskin is like this.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the author and subject I'd like to remove this picture. Willb2016 (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep in use in multiple projects (and uploaded to Commons more than 5 years ago, irrevocable license). I would support, however, if you wish to have your user name removed from the image. Might I suggest if broadening the license from a CC-by (requiring attribution) to public domain, so the image could continue to be used without name attached? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • File is no longer in use Willb2016 (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Several such images no longer in use within a week makes me assume the removals were not editorial decisions on those projects. If you removed them, were there good replacements? Links to the affected articles would be nice, so that others can judge, and perhaps search for better replacements. The point of INUSE is on one hand that we shouldn't disrupt the projects, on the other that files that the projects find useful are in scope. Images don't get out of scope just because they are no longer used, so the question is whether the replacements are good (and diverse) enough. –LPfi (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete privacy concerns are compelling with sensitive photos like this, so I think we should honor uploader requested deletion. Not in use on any project, after ample time for the issue to be resolved.  Mysterymanblue  03:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Excessive low quality penis photos, no representation, already in commons Jjyenter (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept In use in more than a dozen projects; not "low quality". (Jjyenter, I suspect you could find poor quality unneeded genitalia images uploaded to Commons that would be appropriate to list for deletion, but the ones you've been nominating do not meet that description.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo, repeat in commons 43.225.100.211 14:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy closed. Please read previous recent del request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no permission. Copied from [1]. Yann (talk) 08:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Yoinked photo, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bugs Bunny might still be a copyrighted character under US law. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom (and the uploader is certainly not the creator and license holder as they falsely claim). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Someone is joking (Bisha Domestic Airport??). The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Uploader's original description and categorization makes clear only intent is prank/personal joke. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La rivière Chi ne passe pas près de Surin ni de la province du même nom ! 109.15.49.144 15:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Files uploaded by User:Buhaiova

[edit]

Not used, uncategorized images. Advertisement. No article in ukwiki or ruwiki --Estopedist1 (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: scan from Wade Organic Chemistry (possibly hand-annotated to translate labels). DMacks (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

DMacks (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will upload a free version instead Diglio.simoni (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://milaap.org/fundraisers/help-gohela Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photographie non libre de droit et publiée sans accord. origine :https://www.survoldefrance.fr/affichage2.php?&lieu=Montereau-Fault-Yonne&f=0&img=60815&prev_suiv_link=1 86.204.251.154 09:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:42, 8 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This file is copyrighted and no authorisation was provided; reported via OTRS 2019090810001601. --Krdbot 01:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In image copyright "Vaclav Havel Airport Prague" show it is not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:56, 8 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Not own work as claimed. Image is clearly marked with copyright. --Krdbot 01:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe this is the work of the uploader as other uploads have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:54, 8 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Not own work as claimed. http://aviationtribune.com/airlines/middle-east/qatar-airways-to-launch-direct-flights-to-gaborone/ --Krdbot 01:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Disagree that the focus is bad enough to require deletion, but I am concerned about possible derivative work of the photos on the 2 computer screens which are the main focus of the image. (If kept, better categorization is strongly advised.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments in Bangladesh/Rules and FAQ#Non-eligible entries. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata. Very propably from the internet. Harold (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because its from internet Benjaminsufner14 (talk) 18:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Uploader concurs.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Journalist Ayush Singh (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical Content; Unencyclopedic CooperScience (talk) 21:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 23:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is 108.177.6.56 05:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Z.harimi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly used for self promo. Article on fa.wiki on DR.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; and likely copyvio. found on the web. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, user's personal photograph  — FR (mobileUndo) 15:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dominican provinces don't have flags. This is made up. 68.116.162.130 23:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 04:33, 9 September 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of provinces of the Dominican Republic --Krdbot 07:25, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self Promotional Photo and Out of scope of Wiki Education - IndrajitDas 09:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context Sankoswal (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe this is the work of the uploader as other uploads have been copyright violations and the size and lack of metadata indicates a web source MilborneOne (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 06:35, 9 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing permissions from the copyright holder and partly out of scope

Copyright protected logo and photograph from the web:

Zaccarias (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: While in scope as they were in use there is no evidence that permission was granted for them to be under that license. So, per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

dubious claim of own work. no exif. 2 files are very similar (other than 1 of it being blur).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reupload was because since i have the original files, when i uploaded, i noticed it was too big, covering the whole article so i had to resize it and re upload, only that. Hurungudo (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurungudo: You could've just overwrited the file. Also you can adjust the image size using 200px. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:DawnChiedza.png
like this

Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nominated more files without metadata. Possible copyvio.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per Doc James in previous DR nom. I think it is better to delete the files per COM:PCP as Hurungudo might not be the actual photographer. If it is Hurungudo's own work, he/she should send the full file to OTRS for verification. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hurungudo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Considering the upload history of the user, all files are likely copyright violations. The PaperBag logo might fall under COM:TOO, but I am not sure about South African laws.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I believe the paperbag logo is below TOO considering that there are more complex ones in Category:Logos of companies of South Africa. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, but two are  kept as ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unlicensed, unsourced, and out of scope. Duplicate uploaded to circumvent another DR. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 13:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal photo Mindmatrix 01:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no license. There is a license tag, but the OTRS release was set by the uploader himself. JuTa 01:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no license. There is a license tag, but the OTRS release was set by the uploader himself. JuTa 01:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no license. There is a license tag, but the OTRS release was set by the uploader himself. JuTa 01:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no license. There is a license tag, but the OTRS release was set by the uploader himself. JuTa 01:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Same File:Jorgegastelum.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 05:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The yellow van strikes back: out of COM:SCOPE personal image.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; user warned. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe this is the work of the uploader as other uploads have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Sealle. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe this is the work of the uploader as other uploads have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Deriviative of a copyrighted work. See this youtube video at about 4:19 in. I suspect that this derivative image is also not the work of the uploader given all the other copyright violations -- Whpq (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Sealle. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shojaei.foad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely to be promotional. Note that there are three other photos uploaded by User:Shojaei.foad. Though I believe they can be promotional as well and their quality isn't really high, I think it's possible to use them for an educational purpose.

Ahmadtalk 21:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio; found elsewhere on the web. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alpegon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copy of File:Esteban_Cabal.jpg with low quality

ManniLo (talk) 07:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alpegon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are not free and there are no articles with the same names

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding,


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sonic way too substantial to be de minimis.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 00:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariela alvarez videla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small/pixelated. A key COM:EDUSE is the numbering, and this detail in particular is almost too small to be legible. Have File:1-butene.svg as replacement. DMacks (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise:

DMacks (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 12:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ADIKA KOKOU JEROME (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ADIKA KOKOU JEROME (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY PICTURE Sai vardhan9 (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 18:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mortezaborji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused; Out of COM:SCOPE; COM:NOTWP Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikkanWitch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical movie posters and screenshots. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per request at COM:UDR; public domain because of publication before 1924:

De728631 (talk) 09:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted because of PD status after consulting Jcb:

De728631 (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, artificial stuff Joschi71 (talk) 20:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree,  Delete.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work, out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Cata Castel). Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

provinces in the Dom. Rep. don't have "escudos" nor flags. This is made up. 68.116.162.130 23:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Used in native language Wiki, seems to be correct. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - nominator is right, these escudos are hoaxes. --Jcb (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshopped of two different photos without any speciality. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Same File:Jorge gastelum.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 05:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused .pdf-file with unknown importance, the uploader's only contribution, maybe out of project scope. (But it is not copyright violation, source site has free license). Taivo (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 11:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Anders Andersson, https://www.fotografhalmstad.se/tearsheets Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

length 2.52, but only 1 second word Estopedist1 (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I've trimmed the file to the second with the actual audio in it. --bjh21 (talk) 12:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Silences trimmed, so seems ok now. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a photograph of a book photo, so it is possibly a copyrights violation. Low quality photo also. C messier (talk) 18:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF data states Jani Laukkanen as the author and "Kirkon kuvapankki / Jani Laukkanen" (Image database of the Church / Jani Laukkanen) as the copyright holder, so this image might be a Copyright violation. It is possible that the image is here with permission: the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland has given some permissions (see File:Turun arkkihiippakunnan piispa Kaarlo Kalliala.jpg for example). However, the permission should be verified via OTRS also in this case. I also considered tagging the image with {{Copyvio}} but ended up with a regular deletion request. Apalsola tc 18:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland image database [2] does not allow commercial use in general, only with special permission, so I agree: this needs special permission. --Htm (talk) 04:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte die Verbindung zwischen meinem persönlichen Blog und meiner Wikipedia-Autorschaft aufheben. 1falt (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Purpose was userpage image, no longer in use, otherwise out of scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a professional photo not actually taken by the uploader Jonah Shacknai. Photo was taken by Brian Ach, [3] who used the same serial-number camera to take this photo [4] of Hillary Clinton. Elephanthunter (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File has OTRS permission. --Krd 06:11, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Filed this deletion request because, at the time, the copyright information was incorrect. It appears as though Krd since updated the copyright info [5] -- Elephanthunter (talk) 15:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has permission. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentally uploade LutzBruno (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As the uploader requested it.--GPSLeo (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: upload is recent enough that COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is 108.177.6.59 05:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of context Sankoswal (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a similar logo to this one already on commons File:Flag of Inter.svg, in addition to that this logo is very old and was used between 1998-2007 so it's irrelevant now DZwarrior1 (talk) 01:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The logos are significantly different (File:Flag of Inter.svg has a star, while File:Nero e azzurro strisciato con.png has an "FCIM" monogram). Also, this one is in use on ar:إنتر ميلان, ar:جائزة نادي القرن العشرين, and la:FC Internazionale Milano. Under COM:INUSE, if it's relevant to Arabic and Latin Wikipedias, it's relevant to Commons. Finally, the same user has nominated File:Flag of Inter.svg for deletion as well. It would obviously be wrong to delete two files as being redundant to one another. --bjh21 (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --whym (talk) 11:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy, copyvio. -- ~ Nahid Talk 20:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 15:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1951. To be undeleted in 2022. Jcb (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly tilted. Commons has better photos about the same basketball venue. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found on Google, unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fiding a photo on Google is not a way to disqualify that as own work. Permission has not been taken from the photographer (Bugatti in this case) and neither Bugatti is quoted as the author of the photo.U1 quattro  03:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol Dan Kenshi (talk) 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Alaa :)..! 12:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not notable, seems like self-promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Blatant self-promotion & article page using PDF, follow up Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AryanJakhar An upcoming star.--Achim (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Advertisement. No links even in ukwiki. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree. --GPSLeo (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree. --GPSLeo (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, wrong license. Can it be {{PD-textlogo}}? Yann (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official product image, license laundering. Retired electrician (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official product image, license laundering. Retired electrician (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SONDOS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Composite of uncited source, likely scan of presumably copyrighted textbook.

DMacks (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a duplitaced map and not updated of File:2022 world cup qualification.PNG Yona B. (t) 17:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Veikk0.ma as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No proof that the uploader is the copyright holder of this product render. According to TinEye, versions of this image have been around 5 years before it was uploaded here. |source=


Deleted: very unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Veikk0.ma as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No proof that the uploader is the copyright holder of this product render. According to TinEye, versions of this image have been around 5 years before it was uploaded here. |source=


Deleted: very unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Self-promotional article pages in PDF format. No contribs to any wm project. --Achim (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that the author (who is claimed to be an entire country) died more than 70 years ago. No US PD rationale as required by Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law and explained by the PD tag used. No information on when the photograph was created or first published (it obviously wasn't 2018-06-05). LX (talk, contribs) 19:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no author's name, no source country (not necessarily a Turkey). That way here's no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the uploader doesn't know who the author is or when or where this was first published (it certainly wasn't first published on Pinterest), the claim that the author died more than 70 years ago is completely unfounded. There is also no US PD rationale as required by Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law. It seems likely that the uploader Ayybarss is a sockpuppet of Aybeg, who previously uploaded a file under the same filename. LX (talk, contribs) 17:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the stated PD rationale. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kemal Atatürk.jpg. LX (talk, contribs) 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wu bao tse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no idea what these files could be used for. COM:OOS

Roy17 (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, EXIF data indicate it is from facebook, thus it is a copyvio. C messier (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low resolution personal photo. IMHO, out of scope. C messier (talk) 18:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution unused personal photo, probably from facebook. Out of scope and possibly copyvio. C messier (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, useless Joschi71 (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No value without meta information. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Architectural drawing is copyrighted - author = architect Josse Franssen (died 1990) Henxter (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any evidence it has been published without copyright. A 2019 website (© 2019 Cielodrive.com) is not the original source. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found on google. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Aram Grigoryan is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but user:foton095 and Aram Grigoryan is a same person. how to solve this problem?--Armenak Margarian (talk) 19:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent into our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Taivo (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the own work is credible here as they uploaded other photos with the same camera. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio as this is a screenshot from a video from IWA Mid-South : https://www.clickwrestle.com/pro/9981/mike-levy-vs-mickie-knuckles CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not own work as claimed. Real author and real source are needed. Maybe this is 20th-century painting from India, that case it is not necessarily in public domain. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is low quality and does not serve a realistically purpose as better pictures of the same subject exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKKNL1488 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is tabloid quality, which is discouraged on Wiki, and does not reflect any encyclopedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKKNL1488 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, not public domain in France yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

photo anonyme et publique, aucune mention d'auteur, de fait dans le domaine public, --Céach (talk) 06:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Non: si anonyme, tombe dans le domaine public en 2021 (1950 + 70 ans). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, not public domain in France yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

photo issue d'une circulaire électorale publique et officielle, non créditée d'auteur, --Céach (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Si anonyme, tombe dans le domaine public en 2054 (1973 + 70 ans). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, low quality Joschi71 (talk) 00:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on the Flickr album, this image was taken in the US, which does not have FOP. See Commons:Deletion requests/Wax figures for other wax figures. Elisfkc (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No data in file. Completely transparent image Kissmykumbaya (talk) 03:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent photo without Metadata seems not to own work. Description marked as "Screenshot". ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a 2D-work. Author died in 1974, so it will be PD until 2074 (if published in Mexico). Tbhotch 07:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the ticket is from the owner of the painting, not the heirs of the painter. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly from Facebook, no source &/or permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ynon Idan, who is apparently both the uploader and creator is the name of Naama Idan's husband, which makes it logical to assume he uploaded an image the photographed himself. Isn't that enough? DGtal (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DGtal: I understand your point but the file is derived from Facebook and taking a file straight from FB violates their Terms of Use. Furthermore, it looks more like a selfie than a photograph taken by her husband and if it was really taken by any of them, why upload the FB file instead of the original one? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't find yet the image on fb, but the timestamp on the image (which is uncommon in fb images) suggests fb isn't the origin of the image. It might have been uploaded to both sites from one source, DGtal (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DGtal: I would say that the subject took the image and uploaded it to FB and the user downloaded it and uploaded to commons on 14/3/2018. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Probably true, but I assume his wife gave him permission so he might as well have taken it from her phone directly. DGtal (talk) 11:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - We cannot assume that User:Ynonidan is in fact Ynon Idan -- it is not uncommon for vandals to use fake identities here. Restoration will require an OTRS license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly from Facebook, no source &/or permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Cropped image so result should conform with result of Commons:Deletion requests/File:נעמה עידן.jpg. DGtal (talk) 05:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect pronunciation. Should be [tʰɑkʰɑˈvɔɾ] in Eastern Armenian, not the hypercorrect *[tʰɑgɑˈvɔɾ]. See the orthoepic dictionary: http://www.nayiri.com/imagedDictionaryBrowser.jsp?dictionaryId=57&query=%D5%A9%D5%A1%D5%A3%D5%A1%D5%BE%D5%B8%D6%80 Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 09:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is used on wikt:en:թագավոր, wikt:hy:թագավոր, and wikt:mg:թագավոր. So long as those Wiktionaries think it's useful, we should keep it. COM:NPOV explains Commons' policy here. --bjh21 (talk) 12:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Those were added automatically by a bot. No human thinks the file is useful. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 11:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Derbeth, your bot is responsible for spreading this incorrect pronunciation. Please take responsibility. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See wikt:en:User:DerbethBot#Frequently_Asked_Questions. The responsibility is on the user uploading this file. There is no way an automatic program can determine if an audio file is correct or not.
 Delete I think bjh12 is wrong, no human ever thought this as useful, there was only a bot edit. Speaking of NPOV policy, the file is not used in 'good faith'. 'Good faith' use would be only linking to this file as an example of incorrect pronunciation. This is not the case now and I doubt any Wiktionary allows including examples of incorrect pronunciation (or incorrect spelling or inflexion) as there are a lot more ways to do things wrongly than correctly. --Derbeth talk 06:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep If a wiki community decided to allow bot adding file links without verifying the files, it is up to the wiki community. I think we cannot remove the file while it is used unless we have uploader's request or an evidence that it was uploaded in bad faith (eg. to mislead bots). It rather should be fixed (by overwriting with a correct file) or renamed (if that is file name that is misleading). Ankry (talk) 07:43, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - file is in use in several places and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent photo without Metadata seems not to own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This screenshot is maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - leaning towards  Keep Good quality image of pole vault, reasonable size. Would be in scope for Category:Pole vault; we could question whether it's really uploader's own work, but I have currently no indication that it's taken from some other site. Couldn't find this image anywhere else on the web with TinEye or Google's reverse image search. There is no Exif data, but that's not mandatory. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Per comment, also, the subject has multiple Google hits, possibly notable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a professional photo not actually taken by the uploader Jonah Shacknai. Photo was taken by Brian Ach, [6] who used the same serial-number camera to take this photo [7] of Hillary Clinton. Elephanthunter (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/08.svg is a vector version of this file.

Error: No SVG image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: {{Vector version available|new image name}}.


File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/08 → File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/08.svg

For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages
Alemannisch  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  нохчийн  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  British English  Esperanto  español  eesti  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  galego  Alemannisch  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  Ido  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  lietuvių  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  prūsiskan  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  Scots  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  ไทย  Türkçe  татарча / tatarça  українська  vèneto  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(中国大陆)  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(马来西亚)  中文(新加坡)  中文(臺灣)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

GladiusTM (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by File:Signature Georges Clemenceau.svg. P 1 9 9   17:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for temporary use. File can be deleted after 8/31/2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasbak (talk • contribs) 2019-09-01T11:01:39‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate. The other version of the image has better colour Shenzybaby (talk) 12:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion of unused own upload. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cilento luciana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, probably from Facebook. Please only upload original files from your camera.

Yann (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

別のもっと写りの良いファイルをアップロードしたためと、タイトルのスペルを間違えているため。 Kuroc622 (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, superseded by File:Series 189 last ran ”arigatu189kei”.jpg. P 1 9 9   17:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Didzha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly OOS. Images of random people who does not seem notable. Deleting admin please also take a look at other 3 uploads, especially File:Didzha.jpg

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:14, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation. The author has uploaded several copyrighted files as his own work, without specifying the source. This photograph may have been taken by an official French army photograph. Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9   17:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isha Judd .jpg
Isha 2019
Hola me gustaría modificar la imagen para ponerla en mejor calidad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cintia estrai (talk • contribs) 00:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: now a small duplicate of File:Isha Judd .jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as no source (No source since) Since the text is written in the old Russian orthography, it is likely was published before 1817, and is thus {{PD-RusEmpire}} or PD-Old or both./ However, we do not hav e a slightest idea what it represents and whether it is in scope. Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this file is a page of the below book

Sbornik statisticheskikh svi︠e︡di︠e︡nīĭ o Kavkazi︠e︡, Volume 1 [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have noticed this after the nomination. This means this is not a copyright violation, but we still need to decide whether the file is in scope of the project.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1949. Depicted person died in 1955. Jcb (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Date: around 1912 (compared to similar photographs). Unknown photographer. Romanian law applies: {{PD-RO-photo}}. Pre-1923, so for US: {{PD-1996}}. Vysotsky (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Vysotsky. P 1 9 9   17:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate with this file (higher quality) Cheep (talk) 22:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9   17:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adam Freemen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. {{free screenshot|license={{GPL}}}} may apply, but the authors may need to be credited.

Yann (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The game screenshot is definitely unfree File:Linux Mint 19 LOVE Edition - Запущенная через Proton в Steam игра GTA V.png the images here are unfree too File:Linux Mint 18 LOVE Edition - Программы мультимедиа.png. And if the wallpaper is free needs to be carified too. But the application screenshots are definitely okay. --GPSLeo (talk) 11:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. unfree video game shots. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:TOO? Thyj (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 17:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File still contains faulty source information after numerous attempts to have this fixed. The user admitted that these files are DW, not completely own work. But instead of fixing this, they have chosen to remove the DW no source tags without solving the problem. I think Castillo has been quite patient with this uploader, I would not have been so patient. Removal of problem tags from your own uploads without solving the problem can easily lead to a warning. Two days ago, uploader promised that they would fix it, but still they didn't. This DR is to make sure that they fix it and can be keep-closed as soon as the erroneous 'own work' claim in the source fields has been replaced by correct information. Jcb (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Invalid nomination as nothing's changed since undeletion request (kept quiet about in nomination), still no evidence is provided that these are derivatives. Nominator also ignores advice received via COM:VPC entirely. Nominator still merely ignores the fact not all maps that use some source data are necessarily derivatives in sense of copyright. At this stage of events it's hard to see that nominator is interested in solving copyright issues, rather than they act upon grudge and hence keep harassing the uploader with baseless demands that are not backed by any actual Commons policy nor copyright concept. Pikne 09:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the source is not copyrighted, that's not a justification to put a false 'own work' claim in the source field. And yes, it is mandatory to provide adequat source information. The UDR closure statement invited to start a regular DR, here it is. Jcb (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Response from uploader only to set record straight: I did not "promise[] that [I] would fix it," because no fix is required. If our friend looked at the context of that comment, it was about the Pacific (and Caribbean) maps, which are newer, based off a specific Commons SVG, and yes, I already went back and properly sourced them. --Golbez (talk) 12:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The very minimum is that you indicate in the source field of these four files that you traced another map as a starting point. Instead of making us all tired with endless pointless conversations, FIX THEM! - Jcb (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As already described in UDR and VPC: 1) if source data is non-creative and all creative elements are by uploader then mere "own work" makes sense, and 2) while listing sources is definitely useful (e.g. so that others can check that map is accurate), it is not mandatory copyright-wise if work isn't a derivative work really. Using bold caps does not make your demand less baseless.
It's also worth pointing out that "user admitted that these files are DW" is obviosly a distortion. Having "traced the outline" does not necessarily mean that uploader incorporated another creative work or its creative elements into their work (which would make it into a DW).
To me it seems that you are the only one who makes us go through pointless conversation over and over, while the underlying issue was settled a while ago in multiple DRs where similar maps were kept (not to mention, again, that boundary data being generally not copyrightable is also documented at COM:DW#Maps). Pikne 17:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: uploader's explanation that they traced PD maps is sufficient. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image elsewhere on Internet Shev123 (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Much bigger and older. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Wappen FC Augsburg bis 1950.gif" is a duplicate of this with the correct name (see http://www.dfs-wappen.de/uefa/ger/verein_58.html). HERCVLES (talk) 18:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

png is the better file format for logos. Please kepp this file and delete the other duplicate. Chaddy (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
png versions of "Wappen FC Augsburg bis 1950", "Wappen FC Augsburg bis 1969", "Wappen FC Augsburg bis 1997", "Wappen FC Augsburg bis 2002" added. --HERCVLES (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep both versions. There are reasons for both formats. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]