Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 31st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.facebook.com/121900971243964/photos/a.121908734576521/121908737909854/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Martin H. at 16:30, 31 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, low quality photos of sunsets. Lack of educational value as we have multiple better images on this topic.

~Cybularny Speak? 09:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploaders requests. --JuTa 00:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created by error this page. Roberto Fiadone (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other 2600:1702:1C10:93B0:D978:877F:495:83B7 19:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, the reason for deleting is incomprehensible. JohnNewton8 (talk) 05:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded it by accident 1940CStreet (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:24, 1 September 2019 UTC: BLP subject does not like image at all, and i uploaded it by mistake. please delete --Krdbot 13:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded it by accident 1940CStreet (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:24, 1 September 2019 UTC: BLP subject does not like image at all, and i uploaded it by mistake. please delete --Krdbot 13:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded it by accident 1940CStreet (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:24, 1 September 2019 UTC: BLP subject does not like image at all, and i uploaded it by mistake. please delete --Krdbot 13:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be cropped from this website or this. No permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong namespace Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"aimable autorisation" n'est pas suffisant, sous quelle licence Forez-info a-t-il mis cette photo ?
"kindly given" is not enought: witch licence was really choosen by Forez-info? --MGuf (d) 12:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused file with unclear license Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, replaced by others within the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep "small and unused" are no valid reasons for deletion. Nor is 800×600 "small". Andy Dingley (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ueli Staub Signature Portughetti (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Advertisement. Related to File:Omniasharpwala.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Related to File:Abdul malik sharp offset.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it myself before realizing, per voy:Wikivoyage:Banners that it is not wide enough in pixels. SelfieCity (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, unused Zenwort (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free software. The permission granted for File:TreeSize Mainform.png does not apply to all screenshots of this program. See Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:TreeSizeEn.png and ticket #2008062310012392 Ixfd64 (talk) 19:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry 2600:1702:1C10:93B0:D978:877F:495:83B7 20:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist (Jón Gunnar Árnason) died in 1989 and Iceland has no Freedom of Panorama, so unfortunately, it seems the sculpture is still subject to copyright.

Themightyquill (talk) 14:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Iceland. These are subject to copyright restrictions.

Themightyquill (talk) 14:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the category description at Category:Sólfar, these four images "[feature] an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in Iceland. There are no Freedom of Panorama exemptions for commercial works in Iceland, which means that they cannot uploaded to Commons."

Lord Belbury (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't notice that. Thanks for informing me. :) 62.44.135.32 12:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture is subject to copyright. No Freedom of Panorama to use.

Themightyquill (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Iceland. This sculpture is copyright restricted.

Themightyquill (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Iceland. This sculpture is copyright restricted.

Themightyquill (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture is subject to copyright restrictions.

Themightyquill (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a map, not an edict. It is probably copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Can I G7 it? Masum Reza📞 05:38, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sourcing provided is inadequate; the uploader says that it's his/her own work but it was uploaded yesterday and a reverse image search here turns up results as early as November 2018. I'd like to assume good faith on the part of the uploader, which is why I didn't tag this for speedy deletion, but could User:Asargana96 please provide more evidence that he/she produced this image? John M Wolfson (talk) 02:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As for other images uploaded by the same user, File:Empathy VR.jpg is on the edge as it has 2 TinEye reverse image search results, and File:Empathy And technology.png is in the clear as it has no such results. John M Wolfson (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Update Given the failure of the uploader to provide evidence that he/she holds the copyright to this image after the requisite 7 days, I have tagged the image for F4. John M Wolfson (talk) 02:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Idostuff12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SAeed061b (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, COM:DW + small size + most of them from Facebook as metadata states = Not likely to exist here. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheSimmer0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Slickliving (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eltontirao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i uploaded it by accident 1940CStreet (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its a useful image, the license is fine, serendipity gave wiki this image Victuallers (talk) 14:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I uploaded these images by mistake, and the subject of the page didn't like them at all, so I want to respect the BLPs' wishes. I reverted to the image they uploaded. 1940CStreet (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 13:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabiobonansone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal information EchoWellington (talk) 13:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mokeab55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BBX52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Locomotives are not permanently installed as required by Commons:Freedom of panorama in Hungary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BBX52 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These photos are from Facebook and Instagram. No permission from the photographers. --Regasterios (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 京都東 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers, fair use.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - self-promotion Lotje (talk) 13:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal information — Preceding unsigned comment added by EchoWellington (talk • contribs) 2019-08-31T13:14:49‎ (UTC)


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matwav1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nzonzimi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BJxyz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Photoadd75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission of each painter needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source displaying is CC-BY-NC-ND. Thyj (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stanisław Sokalski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful and probably not free

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation again. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I really do not believe own work. Real source and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small size. The only upload by uploader. COM:OOS. -- Geagea (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arbellot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope of the project. see fr:Discussion:Sébastien Vergnaud/Suppression and fr:Utilisateur:DantieuLabrime/Brouillon Drongou (talk) 18:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope of the project. see fr:Discussion:Sébastien Vergnaud/Suppression and fr:Utilisateur:DantieuLabrime/Brouillon Drongou (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope of the project. see fr:Discussion:Sébastien Vergnaud/Suppression and fr:Utilisateur:DantieuLabrime/Brouillon Drongou (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubrum19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubrum19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derived versions in PDF from images found in the net like here, COM:PCP.

Ras67 (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 11:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: COM:OOS per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata. Very propably from the internet. Harold (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because its from internet Benjaminsufner14 (talk) 18:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Uploader concurs.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KshitizBathwal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images seem to come from https://www.pictosee.com/skyscape_photography/ (possibly an Instagram clone). KshitizBathwal (talk · contribs) may own the copyright for those images, if so, permission should be forwarded through our OTRS system.

Ariadacapo (talk) 07:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@IM3847: Sure. Those images are used on several websites though, and I think getting some form of confirmation from the uploader isn’t unreasonable, before they are posted here with CC licenses for everyone to re-use. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: The OTRs request has been submitted, can you please check it once.—IM3847 (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! I don’t have access to the OTRS system. But appropriate OTRS tags will rapidly be posted by the team there. These are terrific photos, by the way. Ariadacapo (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Steinsplitter: can you help here? (I just lookes at here and remembered your name and saw that you were active today. That's why I ping you) --D-Kuru (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS-permission is confirmed. --Natuur12 (talk) 10:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo for the film Guardians of the Galaxy it seems unlikely that it can be Public Domain, and is probably miscategorized. 109.78.193.37 05:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Orphan, certainly wrong license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published here allready earlier, anyway obviously no own work of 2017 (photograph of 1962 with watermarks). Druschba 4 (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be a work from the federal US government. Jcb (talk) 10:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; not found in online LOC photos in search for person's name-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is seriously misleading, around Deep web (search) ideas Deku-shrub (talk) 14:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Deku-shrub: Could you tell something more? If something is misleading, we can just correct it. And this file it's not intended to illustrate the search process in the Deep web. It just illustrate the general process how the Tor network works. --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image presents a very confused conflation of deep web search index iceberg metaphor with IP address which doesn't add clarity to any article Deku-shrub (talk) 10:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep See a problem = Fix it. Rezonansowy (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The file is in use on wikinews:ru:Facebook официально доступен в Tor: facebookcorewwwi.onion, so under COM:INUSE it's not eligible for deletion just for being very confused. That doesn't stop it being renamed, or the description being changed, to remove references to "deep web". --bjh21 (talk) 11:19, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close as kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is owned by a college. It's copyrighted in China. Larryasou (talk) 10:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted per nom. Tiny orphan photo.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Copyviol/false license; clear copyright notice on actual source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material without evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Also orphan, miscat, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Dorian Geostationary VIS-IR 2019.jpg (A file which is not meant to be duplicated) CooperScience (talk) 15:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a duplicate, but a crop. SelfieCity (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, it is not duplicate. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern scan of a 2019 newspaper, copyright is thus held by David Nibert. --Animalparty (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern scan of a 2019 newspaper, copyright is thus held by author Tom Manley. --Animalparty (talk) 20:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted clear DW copyright violation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusably low-res / overcompressed. Retired electrician (talk) 22:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted orphan, unusably blurry, no evident compensating uniqueness/importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encyclopedically useful among images of notable people & other people engaged in activities in Acadia National Park; probably spouse, relative or friend of photographer Brian W. Schaller (talk) 02:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Photo of unidentified person; minimal inclusion anything in background.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please give a more specific link. The source is not accurate enough A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image appears to be a screenshot of this video on YouTube, or a screenshot from the livestream of the camera looking to earth on the ISS, then cut so that the NASA logo in the upper-right corner isn't shown. Either way - that is, as far as I know - the file in question would be in public domain as it would have been made by NASA. DarkShadowTNT (talk) 09:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree, only NASA can take a picture from the ISS and thus it is copyright free. So put that link and keep the photo. Pierre cb (talk) 14:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
NASA isn't the sole operator of the International Space Station. 121.45.215.11 09:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree per previous reasons. The image is very likely a derivation of the ISS livestream and therefore is usable due to it being taken by NASA. Rainclaw7 (talk) 04:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Updated link to its source at NASA.gov. Details posted at source, feel free to copy. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 154.119.40.241 (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a) too blurry to be useful b) likely that the original photos were not made by the uploader and not licensed. --ghouston (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted both unusably blurry and DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO Netherlands. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:17, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted and bogus licnese claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Low-res orphan uncat personal photo with no context. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made redundant by higher-resolution file: File:Krusty Krab Training Video title card.png IagoQnsi (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted smaller dupe. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexander Gerst is an astronaut from ESA, not NASA A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep All images taken on the ISS are "shared work" of the participating organisations and free usable due to the ISS treaty. A work must be declared specifically as the org's "own property" to take it in it's own asset. --Ras67 (talk) 11:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as Kept per Ras67. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercetools was deleted both from de.wiki and en.wiki due to non-notability. Apparently the logo is out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe ; © Thibault Savary dans les métadonnées, aucune information sur le site. N.B. Cet élu politique ne peut mettre en licence CC-BY sans l'autorisation du photographe. Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 04:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/gold-medalist-kaori-icho-of-japan-celebrates-during-nachrichtenfoto/591590678 the photo is credited to a different author. The uploader may explain the situation and provide wirtten permission. The upload was used to replace File:Kaori_Icho.jpg in various wikis by uploader and in some wikis by IP (e.g. ko.wiki. The IP is from Azerbaijan. The photgrapher on Getty Images puplished today photos of a today german Bundesliga match Schalke vs. Hertha that ended one hour ago ([2]). --Martin H. (talk) 15:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 18:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image belongs to Sigit Budi Wisangkoro. This image is published in his Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/p/B1GxHALln5Y/

Please note that the copyright holder prohibits anyone to re-upload all images uploaded by him (@transportation.id) to Commons.

Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 02:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded, small, low res JPG version of File:Flag of Greece with border.svg. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/PAKUTASO

[edit]

Some of the nominated files seem to misrepresent the licensing status. [3][4] - PAKUTASO's site-wide license is not CC0 nor CC BY SA. [5]

The other two files have the "Copyrighted free use" template, but a closer inspection into the original license reveals a problem. Their site-wide license does not seem to be free enough by the standards of COM:L, because of limitations onto commercial use [6] - they don't allow for commercial uses in which mere reproductions, not derivative works, of their materials are sold ("写真素材をほぼそのままの状態で販売する行為(有料素材で販売する行為も含まれる)は、クレジット表記があったとしても公開差止めや賠償請求の対象となります。").

If they specifically release these works under CC0 or other free licenses, evidence must be provided on their website or via COM:OTRS.

whym (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep There is no need to delete those images because it is not a violation of Pakutaso's terms. ("Q.Wikipedia で写真を利用したい")[7]--XFB38K (talk) 11:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wikimedia Commons is a repository of freely usable materials. It's not good enough that we can use it. Everyone needs to be able to use it under a free license. whym (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Although I am the uploader in one of the files affected, I must say that there's a chance where the team behind Pakutaso is not aware how much freedom a media needs to have in order for them to be hosted on Wikimedia projects under a free license. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 13:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Princess Serenity2 is probably not the copyright holder: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCslHayQYCRv5cq9VxvZaJAQ/about Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Indonesia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no exif. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no name of photograph ; no permission ; date unknown ; © in the source web https://www.expertisez.com/magazine/charles-lapicque-entre-figuration-et-abstraction Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning,
"no name of photograph": yes, there is nowhere the name of the photograph, his name cannot be found anywhere, so he is considered as anonymous, there is no author disclosure.
It is according to the license {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}.
"no permission": permission granted by the license {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}.
"date unknown": dates are currently unknown for a lot of photographs. But they can be dated by the topics, or by the age of the subjects. In this case, Lapicque is the subject, he was born in 1898.
"Expertisez.com" have copyrigths upon their texts and upon the photographs they take, but not upon old anonymous photographs taken long time before they exist.
Thank you, Best regards, Kertraon (talk) 09:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour
Avez-vous regardé dans les ouvrages, articles, catalogues d'exposition consacrés à Lapicque si la photo y était publiée ? Non. Vous ne pouvez donc affirmer que "there is nowhere the name of the photograph, his name cannot be found anywhere, so he is considered as anonymous, there is no author disclosure" sans avoir fait ce travail. Le site a pris la photo quelque part, et ce n'est pas parce que vous avez trouvé sur le net une photo contrefaçon probable que vous pouvez décider que cette photo est libre de droits sans avoir fait les recherches.
Vous avez daté la photo de 1940-1945 ; en observant les photos disponibles sur le net, il me semble que vous ayez fait une erreur d'estimation, et que la date de 1955-1960 serait plus raisonnable.
Bien à vous
--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no proof that is was published before 1949. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Patrick Rogel claims this is "fair use" and applied speedy-delete, I'm changing to slowly-delete do discuss. It's not "fair use" though, as it's quite clearly CC-BY, as I tagged it. Read the source link or just look at the picture itself, which clearly shows the CC logo. FakeShemp (talk) 09:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any indication on the source of which CC BY licence is meant. The symbol just links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/, which is unhelpful. --bjh21 (talk) 11:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is true and needs to be clarified from the creator. Right now it's tagged 4.0 because the jpg version is. FakeShemp (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This copy is not needed, due to it replacing the old file here: File:ElephantsDreamPoster.jpg. Also, the source of the file (https://cloud.blender.org/p/elephants-dream/55f2d0dc2beb33006e43dd82) clearly marks this as CC-BY. Look to the left of the name Francesco Siddi. It's true that it doesn't mark it as CC-BY 4.0, but since that is the current version of the license, and the file was originally posted on cloud.blender.org after that version of the Attribution License came out, we'll have to safely assume it's under 4.0. - Stinkyjaden (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Stinkyjaden[reply]
I think I've found evidence that 4.0 is intended: https://cloud.blender.org/terms-and-conditions says "Unless notified otherwise, all digital content (webpages, video, artwork, 3D data) is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0." --bjh21 (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res image, unlike to be own work. Also no EXIF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Draft about depicted person was declined in en.wiki. The photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image qualit Derbrauni (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless & Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal rights Derbrauni (talk) 13:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Beliag29 (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. If you feel that this is blurry and unusable, please go ahead with deletion. Rameshng (talk) 06:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I found no other image with the motive of the image. For me it could stay until there is a replacement withe a better picture from motive.--Riquix (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no exif. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with no apparent educational purpose. Out of project scope because Commons is not a personal photo host. De728631 (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated: File:Dramil Dodeja.jpg which needs a permission from the original photographer anyway. De728631 (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan. So, photos of this artistic fountain may not be redistributed without permission by the sculptor. De728631 (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated:

De728631 (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source the image is "Ian Wright, 2005 (NIWA; http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/05fire)" and while it is hosted by NOAA it seems to have been created by an employee of the New Zealand National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research which appears to claim copyright on its works. So not PD-USGov Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: low quality image of subject posing for picture. Image uploaded by single contribution user. BadHombres (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (television series 2017, fair use forbidden on Commons) Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 17:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr screenshot (although the photo is, indeed, CC if not for the picture on the wall). Retired electrician (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Features a work under copyright protection Rrwagner59 (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Features a work under copyright protection Rrwagner59 (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is tagged as PD-Libya, but the author is Rex Features, a photo agency, so there is no guarantee that it was first published in Libya, and under COM:PCP it should be removed. howcheng {chat} 22:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the copyright information, including source and author, is found in {{PD-Demis}}. whym (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is no source information showing that this particular image came from Demis. Jcb (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: Could you please elaborate the problem you perceive? Are you perhaps saying that {{PD-Demis}} should not be applied because you don't think it's the real source of the image? whym (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - there is no source shown, so we cannot confirm that it caome from Demis. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Alan Shorter. The archived version of the external link does not tell anything. Jcb (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal rights Derbrauni (talk) 13:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:20, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not own work ShinePhantom (talk) 10:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion (why not own work?). P 1 9 9   20:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ck3141 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Date and permission missing.. Date is 30 December 2009 (per EXIF) Still OTRS-permission from author Gaurav is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. © OdishaDiary.com. Previously was speedy, see history of the image Estopedist1 (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ck3141 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unnecessary and bad image quality with no purpose. This is not a reason for speedy deletion. We can discuss this for a week, maybe the photo has some kind of value, for example category:Streets in India. Taivo (int:Talkpagelinktext}}) 11:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep it really does have some kind of valueː as mentioned above and also see categoriesː category:Towns to be categorised by country (India does'n have it's category yet), category:Streets in Uttar Pradesh , category:Political advertising in India , category:Utility poles in India --Oo91 (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   20:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr screenshot (although the photo is, indeed, CC). Retired electrician (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license 84.238.170.189 19:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license is {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Unclear deletion rationale. P 1 9 9   20:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ersatz dieses Bildes durch zwei neue, die das gleiche Haus ohne Baugerüste zeigen. RoxFuchs (talk) 13:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correction: now other delete request Commons:Deletion requests/Obsoleted road icons

Very poor drawn SVG, unused (will never be used - better road icons exist!) -- sarang사랑 17:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason for deletion

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JoKalliauer as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Céu noturno.jpg  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: jpg file has correct licensing information. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]