Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 30th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IYS A LIE WRITEN BUY MY ABUSSER Alisonla (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 06:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & old chemical structure; unfavorable presentation of bond angles, superseded by File:Tert-Butanol Structural Formula V.1.svg as correct alternative Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & old chemical reaction equation, missing catalyst; superseded by File:Industrial synthesis of maleic anhydride (variant 2).svg as new, high-quality replacement with exact catalyst Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Rakesh Ranjan Vajpayee (talk) 13:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rakesh Ranjan Vajpayee: Seriously? -- CptViraj (📧) 14:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: Not uploaded by the nominater. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 14:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have been a category. Stigfinnare (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Gyrostat (talk) 21:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F1. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Gyrostat (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F1. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not used, should be SVG if useful anyway. --Yann (talk) 05:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A TV station logo is unlikely to be own work even under the best circumstances. Beyond any potential licensing issues, this is claimed to be the logo for television station WEHT, but the station's actual logo is different, so there's no real benefit to keeping this false logo anyway. WCQuidditch 01:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not used, should be SVG if needed anyway. --Yann (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not used, should be SVG if useful anyway. --Yann (talk) 05:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sourya33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images + everything by this user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sourya33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Exists on Arabian Wikipedia.

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nom Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Should be confirmed through COM:OTRS by the real copyright holder(s).

JuTa 08:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OTRS permission from the artist is needed.

Yann (talk) 07:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:59, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paintings by Haider Ghaleb

[edit]

Potential copyvio of this artist. –MJLTalk 21:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission via OTRS needed. --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission after extended period of time. –MJLTalk 21:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by JuTa. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hosein652 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Did a google translate on the page that the files are used, which translates to Powered by MediaWiki Wikimedia Foundation.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 23:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayush Kush (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not a web host + educationally not useful

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 04:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayush Kush (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The yellow van strikes back: out of COM:SCOPE personal image.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; user warned. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no license (No license since) There is an OTRS ticket but apparently with no mentioned license. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also

‍‍‍4nn1l2 (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, license added. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 09:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie Syced (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 08:07, 1 August 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ayush Kush --Krdbot 13:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boga Ali Hashim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhardwajumesh256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhardwajumesh256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vgfes2asj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vgfes2asj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Revenantmukesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claims that files are sourced from google.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CKOMM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo media. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Also from WhatsApp, no permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akkycreative (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (pt:David Vieira Asevedo). Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly oos. Seems to be a test file. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly taken from Facebook (per EXIF), thus a possible copyvio, (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "© Ben Davidson Photography 2019. All rights reserved", requires OTRS ticket to verify license Ytoyoda (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mieet.shah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Achim (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guyyaaaaaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (en:Draft:C. Higgins).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I tend to agree with the SCOPE aspect of this. These images have been uploaded by a user whose only edits on Wikipedia are to w:Draft:C. Higgins. This draft has been in progress for 9 months now and has been rejected by three different editors a total of 5 times, myself included. The draft isn't going anywhere as this person is not (as yet) notable. These images are, therefore, effectively useless to our purpose. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/76350156168701488/, very unlikely that illustrator is a personel of USDA. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Patrick Rogel: Why are you even linking pinterest? How does that mean anything? w:Smokey Bear is an American campaign and advertising icon created by the U.S. Forest Service with artist Albert Staehle. @Clindberg: I'd think the legislative notes for 17 USC 105 apply: it can be assumed that, where a Government agency commissions a work for its own use merely as an alternative to having one of its own employees prepare the work, the right to secure a private copyright would be withheld. Though there could be exceptions perhaps. (derivatives made by Ad Councel and NASF) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If they go outside for particular skills that a USDA artist would not have, it would not necessarily be PD-USGov. But that is a USDA character, and there is even special protection for it in the U.S. (18 USC 711), so anything would have to be done in conjunction with the USDA. The existence on pinterest really isn't evidence of anything -- is there a named, non-government artist ? In the nomination at least, I don't see any reason to doubt PD-USGov. I don't see what makes it unlikely to be a government artist.  Keep under the info here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep as uploader, per Alexis Jazz -- its a character maintained my the forestry service and with material commissioned by the Forestry, used by an official account on Twitter for an official anniversery-- I would be very, very very suprised if was created out the scope of their work. Sadads (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shadab Khokar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ten different cameras at least, unlikely to be same people's work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP and one had authors name in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly taken fron Facebook, no permission. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 22:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Using Google Image Search, it appears that a higher resolution version of this image is available on IMDB. If it is the uploader's own work, it would be good to have the higher resolution image in both places. BigrTex (talk) 23:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The reason for deletion is unwarranted. The same image on IMDB is the exact same resolution as this photo uploaded to wiki. Please reverse the deletion, it is a wonderful photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahmmont (talk • contribs) 20:08, 31 July 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]


  •  Delete The resolution here at Commons is actually higher (300 dpi vs 96 dpi at IMDB), and the image dimensions are the same. However, there is another image that appears to come from the same photos session – note the dress, earring and background, and it is credited to Chemist Warehouse (ad campaign?). This and the fact that the original image appears at IMDB without a free licence requires an OTRS ticket. De728631 (talk) 22:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Notable but copyvio see https://www.goodreads.com/photo/author/14688251.Svetlana_Turan. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kampung bensin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope:The account seems to be for propaganda purposes only

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist lacks notability. image not in use on wikipedia. the wikidata item for the artist has been deleted as not notable. Quakewoody (talk) 11:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist lacks notability. image not in use on wikipedia. the wikidata item for the artist has been deleted as not notable. Quakewoody (talk) 11:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist lacks notability. image not in use on wikipedia. the wikidata item for the artist has been deleted as not notable. Quakewoody (talk) 11:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist lacks notability. image not in use on wikipedia. the wikidata item for the artist has been deleted as not notable. Quakewoody (talk) 11:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope Mindmatrix 13:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zakir hussain kazmi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS. Did a google translate on the page that the files are used, which translates to Powered by MediaWiki Wikimedia Foundation.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:OOS (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khoirul hamka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Picture of a non-contributor. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 13:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hafez Rashid Ahmad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hafez Rashid Ahmad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not is uploader's self drawing Thyj (talk) 14:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly OOS. Seems to be a family tree. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant (use Flag of France.png or Flag of France.svg instead). Not used anywhere. Henxter (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like home made artwork for something. There seems to have been a series of these already deleted. Description unhelpful. Out of Scope Malcolma (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like personal artwork. Many other files with similar titles by this person have already been deleted. Out of Scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter and why should it be public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nicht selbsterstellt Eric Rothstein (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 08:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly improperly licensed. Screenshot of a instagram post. oknazevad (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr San lay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:PS and some need OTRS permission.

Ahmadtalk 13:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam in violation of COM:ADVERT and license laundry.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Gosh, well, I can't speak for the motives of User:steevomorris5, but these images are not in breach of Copyright rules, are not large in number as "spam" would seem to imply (just 3 original images and one cropped version), and are among the very few examples of such yoga props available on Commons; I have found them extremely helpful on Wikipedia in articles such as w:Yoga brick. To be honest, it would be very difficult to provide any photographs of yoga props, in use or not, that did not carry at least some sort of branding or potential for advertising. But Commons contains large numbers of photographs of goods, and these are not in breach of policy. I think therefore we should Keep all of these images. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{vk}} I see no visible logos or anything that would make the images spam in themselves. Since the spam is in the text, it can be replaced with something more neutral. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh is that what the issue was. I've edited all the description pages for neutrality, and have added neutral categories also. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete the nomination rational is bogus but the files seem to be license laundry.
In the light of this new info,  Delete Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rcurra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rcurra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Falses dates, not own works. Please modify the dates of shooting and explain why images are public domain in Venezuela.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rcurra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Falses dates, not own works. Please modify the dates of shooting and explain why images are public domain in Venezuela.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rcurra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roferbia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Why are the photos out of Commons' scope? They were taken at the FILSA 2018 (Chile's biggest book conference). The photos depict famous writers. Some of them have already been added to articles.Freddy eduardo (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why are qualified as out of scope; these are photos of writers taken in a book fair, and I think that its educational value is clear.--Roferbia (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roferbia: In which articles are they COM:INUSE, please? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Freddy eduardo: @Roferbia: You're right for Mónica Ojeda and Daniel Alarcón (wikidata), Claudia Apablaza, Ricardo Wiesse Rebagliati, Fernando Ampuero, Edoardo Albinati and Alejandro Zambra (Wikipedia). David Aniñir, Eduardo Andrade, Cecilia Almarza and José Carlos Agüero seem COM:OOS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Even the ones that don't have Wikipedia articles yet, are known writers. A google search shows that they are relevant and that have published many books, many newspapers from different countries have stories on them.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Freddy eduardo: Have you read COM:SCOPE? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: I did, and the files are indeed realistically useful for an educational purpose. The writers they depict will eventually have articles in Wikipedia, as I said, a simple google search shows they are relevant. Freddy eduardo (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I read again COM:SCOPE, and the conditions enumerated are: Must be a media file; must be of an allowable free file format; must be freely licensed or public domain; must be realistically useful for an educational purpose; must not contain only excluded educational content. And about the condition that could be unclear (educational purpose), the scope page explains that «The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".» I think that the photos meet this requirements; and the fact that they are not in use at the moment doesn't mean that you have to deleted them; what the page says is that any photo in use in other wikiproyect cannot be deleted (because «Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects»), but it doesn't state that the ones that are not used in other wikiprojects should be eliminated. Books fairs are important cultural events, and as such they do have educational value and potentially the photos can also be used outside wikimedia projects.--Roferbia (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Roferbia and Freddy eduardo. --Strakhov (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roferbia (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

This collection is rather obviously the work of many people. The uploader claims that they're all his/her own work. This is unbelievable. (Incidentally, there may be many more such files, but after glancing at 250 or so thumbnails I was too exhausted to continue.)

Hoary (talk) 09:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was poorly written; I'll try again. Just to take two examples, the photographs File:Dominguez, Pablo - El paseo de los pinguinos -mosaico en EPL124 -fRF03.jpg and File:Stfi! (Estefanía Leighton) - El jardín de Gabriela -Barrio Lastarria -20181103 fRF08.jpg are both attributed to Rodrigo Fernández but the former depicts something attributed to Pablo Domínguez and the latter something attributed to Estefanía Leighton. Presumably Domínguez and Leighton are two different people; Rodrigo Fernández can't be both. I'd guess that Roferbia is (honestly) saying that Fernández is the photographer, and that the photograph is what's his own work; but I believe that when we're dealing with a photograph of a two-dimensional work such as a painting the copyright of that work is what matters (and that when we're dealing with a photograph of a three-dimensional work such as a sculpture the copyright of that work matters too). -- Hoary (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{Own}} here refers to their photos.
what their photos captured is considered with COM:FOP Chile in mind.
 Keep unless real copyvio is identified. RZuo (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I took some random pictures and checked the EXIF data - all of them were taken by the same camera. (Canon writes the camera serial number into EXIF headers.) So we can assume these images were all taken by the same photographer. All cases seem to be covered by FOP in Chile. So what's the problem? Taking a picture of a street scene including a mural or public art etc. is considered an "own work" of the photographer. That's good practice here since the very beginning. It is not considered a mere reproduction of 2D artwork (like a scan of a photograph or a repro photo of a painting) – that would not be an own work. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That template doesn’t make any sense. Geohakkeri (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 20:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://babynyar.org/en/byhmc-news/posts/news/vikonavcij-direktor-byhmc-ana-barinova-stala-clenom-evrejskogo-diplomaticnogo-korpusu-vsesvitnogo-evrejskogo-kongresu Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a free or CC file, credited by Italian newspaper "Corriere dell'Umbria". — danyele 15:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weird cropping, dubious metadata - I don't believe the uploader is the photographer. Esprit Fugace (talk) 08:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. Seems to be watermarked (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on net (see TinEye and Google reverse image search). EXIF data is consistent accross uploads. Ahmadtalk 13:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: per Ticket:2019102510005528. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of own work. This seems like a photo taken by the person herself (selfie). So, how is this the uploader's own work? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adastra1143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be advertisement, out of COM:PS.

Ahmadtalk 13:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. It seems to be a photoshoot but uploader states that he created this in powerpoint (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmxflatlandbogota (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. 2 files from Facebook, no permission. 2 files with no metadata.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piperalbrecht (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots, no permssion or source.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablomatamoros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of Dutch prime minister smoking a joint is almost certainly a fake. Copyvio: failed to credit autorship of underlying photograph. Out of scope - meant to be harmful Henxter (talk) 14:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly taken from Instagram per EXIF (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

different crop but probably copyviol - not a "own" work -, cf. Google Images. — danyele 15:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyviol, cf. Google Images. No indication about a free or CC licence... — danyele 15:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication about a free of CC licence for this football crest. — danyele 15:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly uploaded from https://radandolejs.wordpress.com/ CptViraj (📧) 15:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waseemkalowal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly taken from Google, no permission. Also, user has 5 files used in draft space that will be deleted soon. Please check.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waseemkalowal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata, low res. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tintintin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res files that have dubious claim of own work. 1 file may be taken from Google (per EXIF).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly taken from Instagram per EXIF (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GalanGarcía79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos from different periods, low-re, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Lucien Smith, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The author is unknown (untagged wall painting) --Jibi44 (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Deleted: copyrighted work of art (even if the author is unknown, even if the work is illegal: copyright is automatic, and is anyway presumed absent proof of the contrary on Commons out of precaution), no FoP in France. Rama (talk) 21:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:DW

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in Japan for artistic works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, are duplicates of files that are already on commons. Notice that the uploader merge some words together so the files can be uploaded (Landedat instead of Landed at, Saudi ArabianAirlines instead of Saudi Arabian Airlines).

大诺史 (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

大诺史 sorry for the inconvenience it was due to Flickr to commons uploads as i thought this pictures contain name problems, i was not informed those are already uploaded. Agree on delectation. Thanks Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, files are duplicates of files that are already available on commons.

大诺史 (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

大诺史 as transferring from Flickr i am not acknowledged about the duplicate except the name change. So i am also agree on delete these files. Thanks, Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, files are duplicates of files that are already available on commons.

Aside to Jcb & JuTa: User re-uploaded numerous files that are duplicates despite warnings on talk page.

大诺史 (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Kerstin Boel Bernhard (d. 2004).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image, oos.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I´m the owner of this file 186.0.47.69 00:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please follow the OTRS process to prove ownership. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used in any project and its seems stolen from Facebook 119.30.35.21 06:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Li Yuchuan (talk) 06:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juannuzzi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist died in 2016 therefore the pictures will become in the public domain in 2087

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inadvertently created a duplicated file Sarilho1 (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; next time use Duplicate or tag as speedy. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is extracted from this page[1], possible from this image [2] 2003:DE:728:5FB1:ACE9:79EE:AEA2:3234 09:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir or Madam, thank you for your hint with regards to the picture. Both, the picture on wikipedia as well as on the page you just mentioned are in property of Dr. Schumacher GmbH of which I am an employee and have the rights for uploading this picture. Best wishes, Anton Lutz


Deleted: per nomination; Please send permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is extracted from this page[3], possible from this image [4] 2003:DE:728:5FB1:ACE9:79EE:AEA2:3234 09:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir or Madam, thank you for your hint with regards to the picture. Both, the picture on wikipedia as well as on the page you just mentioned are in property of Dr. Schumacher GmbH. This account holds the rights for uploading. Best wishes, Anton Lutz


Deleted: per nomination; Please send permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think is not own work, it's from https://www.schumacher-online.com 2003:DE:728:5FB1:ACE9:79EE:AEA2:3234 09:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir or Madam, thank you for your hint with regards to the picture. Both, the picture on wikipedia as well as on the page you just mentioned are in property of Dr. Schumacher GmbH. This account holds the rights for uploading. Best wishes, Anton Lutz


Deleted: per nomination; Please follow OTRS for permission. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio from [5], no EXIF — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jde o fotografii, kterou jsem sám pořídil - co mám, prosím, udělat, aby nebyla smazána? dusekpe5
@Dusekpe5: Ideálně potvrzení skrze systém OTRS. — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs OTRS permission, low quality. Ahmadtalk 13:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://fundacionlegadodelascortes.wordpress.com/category/personaje/ --Achim (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. could be free by now but this was taken from a website. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Purpurs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Jacques Yves Bruel died in 2010. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As uploader of file I would like to reupload the photo in jpg format as opposed to png Meeepmep 14:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; You can upload the JPG. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not informative enough within the context of its surroundings. Knlchopra (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file is on a flash page. Just visit the «Galerie de photos» page 2. It's the ultimate photo in this page. But the photographer gave us the resize photo published on wikimedia commons --Bionet (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bionet: The license is not valid: you put it under cc-by-4.0 though it is under © Association Inochi 2015 at source so either the copyright holder sends a permission via COM:OTRS/fr or modify the website with a valid license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll send an email for this to the author of the photography, best regards --Bionet (talk) 08:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by N0WIS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently not public domain in the U.S.A.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Why is not the combination of {{PD-Sweden}} and {{PD-1996}} enough in these cases? --N0WIS (talk) 21:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@N0WIS: If I don't make a mistake photos that lack artistic value are only protected for 50 years after creation. So 1968 pictures (like the ones published in Allers 1968) were not public domain in 1996 so are not public domain either in the U.S.A. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: That conclusion is not really accurate concerning this type of photos taken (and published) before 1969. Untill 1 July 1994 it was just 25 years protection in Sweden for these type of photos, and swedish photos that was public domain in 1994 have been public domain ever since (for exemple during 1996). The year "1969" in {{PD-Sweden}} is simply not there just because we now live in year 2019 (see here: [6]). --N0WIS (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the notion of N0WIS. This issue would concern most if not all pictures covered by {{PD-Sweden}} and created years or decades before 1969. Are these not welcome on Wikimedia Commons? There are quite a lot of these photos here on Wikimedia Commons. What to do about them?--Paracel63 (talk) 08:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: I was under the impression that the Swedish copyright regulation of 1994, 25 years after 1969, clarified that non-artistic pictures from before 1969 would not be covered by the new copyright protection of photographers. And since then, the complementary legislation concerning non-artistic photos that covers a protection going back 50 years will move this threshold, starting in the year 2020 (where the non-artistic photos from 1969 would bee PD in Sweden). More on the issue here. As more input would be needed, I ping @LPfi, Ɛsquilo, and Ascilto: , who have dealt more with these issues.--Paracel63 (talk) 08:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: : English is not my first language, I hope this is understanable: Is the issue that the photo must be PD both in Sweden and in the USA? That means the template never can be applicable for Wikimedia Commons in its own right. Do I understand the issue correctly then?--LittleGun (talk) 09:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that N0WIS is right. It is well described in Swedish Wikipedia. So Swedish 1968 pictures of this sort were indeed in the Public Domain in 1996 (in Sweden, globally, and even in the USA). Ainali (talk) 09:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The template {{PD-Sweden-photo}} simply says that the photo is free in Sweden, nothing less and nothing more. So far, as of 2019, that means photos taken before 1 Jan 1969. Those photos were subject to the previous copyright law with 25 years protection, so they were all free at the UURA-date. However, at 1 Jan 2020 photos taken during 1969 will be free acording to the new copyright law (50 years protection). These photos were not free at the UURA-date and will need another template to indicate that they are free in the US. This is a future problem, but that future is just months away. /ℇsquilo 09:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I received the ping, but I think the situation has been explained well enough above. I see no problem with Swedish "photographic images" taken before 1969, and no one has explained why these images would have any special issues. --LPfi (talk) 19:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no indication of registration/renewal in the US. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Derivative works of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Derivative works of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque me e equivocado en crear la pagina Steven YT Gameplays (talk) 00:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, fair use image ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Wikipedia article this image was used in, Akhilendra Sahu, was deleted. Unless there is any reason that this image might be used on another wiki, it should be deleted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, fair use image. Not own work to release un CC4.0 ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Derivative works of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:TOYS Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LFCacahuetes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation. COM:TOYS

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:TOYS

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:TOYS

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamps are subject to copyright, and the copyright period for this has not passed. Huji (talk) 00:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Stamp most certainly was not released under a cc-by-sa-3.0 license. False copyright statement. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamps are subject to copyright and the copyright period for this has not passed Huji (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Bogus license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the Author is named as Pablo Foster, there is no source he released the image with that license Yilku1 (talk) 01:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Apparently yoinked photo with false claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. COM:PACKAGING Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuraily Lic: Cropped and blurred. I think the ones left are argueably {{PD-shape}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Thank you for your processing. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept cropped/blurred version; Deleted older version with DW problems. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A wider version can be found on the web and it seems too professional so we would need a proof of permission anyway. Note that the same user also uploaded a clear copyvio, claiming to be the author of this photo (c) Martin Godfroid.

This DR also concerns the two other versions of the file : File:Les Frères Taloche .jpg and File:FrèresTaloche.png. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

veiled copy of File:The yellow book, an illustrated quarterly Volume 9 (1896) (14593454610).jpg F (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Illustrative of how such books were printed and constructed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Victor Servranckx (1897-1965), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover art by w:Jozef Peeters (1895–1960), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 11:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from fiwiki: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Etelä-satama.jpg, but licensed incorrectly. Should be deleted, and fi-wiki file should be correctly imported and credited, and file usage redirected to that file. Kissa21782 (talk) 12:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I've updated the file description to reflect the older information from fiwiki. fiwiki doesn't seem to support FileExporter, so there's not much benefit to a re-import. --bjh21 (talk) 16:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{{}}}

Thank you, I didn't know about the possibility to edit the file description the way you did. Fiwiki does support FileImporter, but I suppose that this is the easiest way to go forward with this file. I'll redirect fiwiki usage.  I withdraw my nomination Kissa21782 (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ach, yes: I'd forgotten that FileExporter was a beta feature that I needed to enable specially. Now that I've turned it on, it refuses to export this image because there's a duplicate of it on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Problem seems resolved. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by the original creator. Cangjie6 (talk) 12:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by the original creator. Wrong process. Cangjie6 (talk) 12:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has no source or author information, so copyright status cannot be determined. Parsecboy (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted No source, no date for original image; thus no evidence for claimed license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not a 2010 photo as stated, but scan of a Soviet picture. Doubtful authorship and permission. A.Savin 14:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: not valid reason. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope, not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept PD, in scope. Not being currently used is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What USA law is applied to photo originated from Mexico? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC) I have no idea, but it is a photograph which is more than a hundred years old and therefore can be claimed by no one...[reply]


Deleted might or might not be PD for some reason or another, but "old magazine" with no date is too vague a source, and unclear how US copyright would apply. Image was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional sign with no existence anything like it in the UK and does not contain a UK road sign symbol (it is a Swedish symbol) Nathan A RF (talk) 23:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on en:List of youth hostels in England and Wales. Under Commons policy, that makes it immune from deletion on quality (COM:INUSE) or accuracy (COM:NPOV) grounds. The file description accurately states "not a real road sign". --bjh21 (talk) 16:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Fictitious logo. *Not* in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © All Right Reserved. NPLIndia.org Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is claimed to be a copy of an original logo which would make it a Derivative Work, and not own work. It may be considered PD-textlogo, but with the statement of copying, I am dubious of the actual freeness of this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: - Your opinion? Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is en:File:Federacion Colombiana de Futbol logo.svg uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as non-free content; that file seems simple enough to be PD in the US per COM:TOO United States, but I'm not sure about Colombia since there's no information about Colombia's TOO in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Colombia. Unless the consensus is that the original logo is {{PD-textlogo}} or {{PD-simple}} in both the US and Colombia, I don't think this "imitation" can be kept since that would seem to make it a derivative work. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Christogol: Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
in accoerdande to Colombian law, is allowed create imitations, as long as the creator doesn't have any economic interest this is the transcriprion of the article in Spanish on the matter in question:

ARTÍCULO 16. Limitaciones y excepciones al derecho de autor y los derechos conexos. Sin perjuicio de las limitaciones y excepciones establecidas en la Decisión Andina 351 de 1993, en la Ley 23 de 1982 y en la Ley 1680 de 2013, se crean las siguientes:


a) La reproducción temporal en forma electrónica de una obra. interpretación o ejecución, fonograma o emisión fijada, que sea transitoria o accesoria, que forme parte integrante y esencial de un proceso tecnológico y cuya única finalidad consista en facilitar una transmisión en una red informática entre terceras partes por un intermediario, o una utilización lícita de una obra, interpretación o ejecución, fonograma, o emisión fijada que no tengan por sí mismos una significación económica independiente.


Para los fines del presente literal, se entiende que la reproducción temporal en forma electrónica incluye, los procesos tecnológicos que sean necesarios en la operación ordinaria de computadores, dispositivos digitales o de internet, siempre y cuando se cumplan con los requisitos mencionados en el párrafo anterior.


b) El préstamo sin ánimo de lucro, por una biblioteca, archivo o centro de documentación · de copias o ejemplares de obras, interpretaciones o ejecuciones artísticas, fonogramas y emisiones fijadas, siempre que figuren en las colecciones permanentes de esta o hagan parte de un programa de cooperación bibliotecaria y hubiesen sido lícitamente adquiridas.


c) La puesta a disposición por parte de bibliotecas, archivos o centros de documentación, a través de terminales especializados instalados en sus propios locales, para fines de investigación o estudio personal de sus usuarios, de obras, fonogramas, grabaciones audiovisuales y emisiones fijadas, lícitamente adquiridas y que no estén sujetas a condiciones de adquisición o licencia.


d) Se permitirá la transformación' de obras literarias y artísticas divulgadas, siempre que se realice con fines de parodia y caricatura, y no implique un riesgo de confusión con la obra originaria.


e) Se permitirá la reproducción por medios reprográficos para la enseñanza o para la realización de exámenes por instituciones de todos los niveles educativos, en la medida justificada por el fin que se persiga, de artículos lícitamente publicados en periódicos o colecciones periódicas, breves extractos de obras lícitamente publicadas, y obras aisladas de carácter plástico, fotográfico o figurativo, a condición que tal utilización se haga conforme a los usos honrados y que la misma no sea objeto de venta u otra transacción a título oneroso, ni tenga directa o indirectamente fines de lucro. Lo anterior siempre que se incluya el nombre del autor y la fuente.

English

a) Temporary reproduction in electronic form of a work . interpretation or execution, phonogram or fixed emission, that is transitory or accessory, that forms an integral and essential part of a technological process and whose sole purpose is to facilitate a transmission in a computer network between third parties by an intermediary, or a lawful use of a work, performance, phonogram, or fixed issue that does not have an independent economic significance in itself.

 

For the purposes of this letter, it is understood that the temporary reproduction in electronic form includes, the technological processes that are necessary in the ordinary operation of computers, digital or internet devices, provided that the aforementioned requirements are met in the previous paragraph.

 

b) The non-profit loan, for a library, archive or documentation center · of copies or copies of works, performances, phonograms and fixed issues, provided they appear in the permanent collections of this or are part of a library cooperation program and would have been lawfully acquired.

 

c) The making available by libraries, archives or documentation centers, through specialized terminals installed in their own premises, for the purpose of research or personal study of their users, of works, phonograms, audiovisual recordings and fixed emissions, lawfully acquired and not subject to conditions of acquisition or license.

 

d) The 'transformation' 'of' 'published literary and artistic works will be allowed, provided that it is carried out for parody and cartoon purposes, and does not imply a risk of confusion with the original work.

 

e) Reproduction by reprographic means for teaching or for examinations by institutions of all educational levels, to the extent justified by the purpose pursued, of articles lawfully published in newspapers or periodic collections, brief extracts of lawfully published works, and isolated works of a plastic, photographic or figurative nature, provided that such use is made in accordance with honest uses and that it is not subject to sale or other transaction for consideration, or directly or indirectly for the purpose of profit. The foregoing provided that the author's name and source are included.


French

a) Reproduction temporaire sous forme électronique d'une œuvre. interprétation ou exécution, phonogramme ou émission fixe, transitoire ou accessoire, qui fait partie intégrante et est essentielle d'un processus technologique et dont le seul but est de faciliter la transmission sur un réseau informatique entre tiers par un intermédiaire, ou une utilisation licite d'une œuvre, d'une interprétation ou exécution, d'un phonogramme ou d'un numéro fixe qui "n'a pas de signification économique indépendante en soi".

 

Aux fins de la présente lettre, "il est entendu que la reproduction temporaire sous forme électronique inclut les processus technologiques nécessaires au fonctionnement normal des ordinateurs, des appareils numériques ou Internet", à condition que les conditions susmentionnées soient remplies. dans le paragraphe précédent.

 

b) Le prêt sans but lucratif, pour une bibliothèque, une archive ou un centre de documentation, de copies ou de copies d'œuvres, interprétations ou exécutions, de phonogrammes et de numéros fixes, à condition qu'ils figurent dans les collections permanentes de la présente ou fassent partie d'un programme de coopération entre bibliothèques et aurait été acquis légalement.

 

c) la mise à disposition par les bibliothèques, archives ou centres de documentation, par l'intermédiaire de terminaux spécialisés installés dans leurs propres locaux, à des fins de recherche ou d'étude personnelle de leurs utilisateurs, d'œuvres, de phonogrammes, d'enregistrements audiovisuels et d'émissions fixes, acquis légalement et non soumis à des conditions d'acquisition ou de licence.

 

d) La 'transformation' dœuvres littéraires et artistiques publiées sera autorisée, à condition qu'elle soit réalisée à des fins parodiques et caricaturales , et n'entraîne pas de risque de confusion avec l'œuvre originale.

 

e) Reproduction à des fins d'enseignement ou à des fins de contrôle par des établissements de tous niveaux d'enseignement, dans la mesure justifiée par l'objectif poursuivi, d'articles légalement publiés dans des journaux ou de collections périodiques, de courts extraits de les œuvres publiées légalement et les œuvres isolées de nature plastique, photographique ou figurative, à condition que cette utilisation soit faite conformément à des usages honnêtes et qu'elle ne soit pas soumise à une vente ou à une autre transaction à titre onéreux, ou directement ou indirectement aux fins de: profit Ce qui précède à condition que le nom de l'auteur et la source soient inclus.

So if i didn't have any economic purpose, this image is allowed to maintain in wikipedia. Thanks so much --Christogol (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:L states that non-commercial restrictions aren’t acceptable for Commons files. I think this means any files uploaded to Commons need to allow the possibility be used for “economic purposes” by anyone anywhere in the world at any time. Moreover, Commons and the various Wikipedias are different Wikimedia Projects and each project has its own policies and guidelines. This file has been uploaded to Commons and how it’s used on any of the different language Wikipedias is not really a concern of Commons. All that matters is whether the licensing complied with COM:L. Points b, d and e of what you posted above seem to be too restrictive for an acceptable Commons license. — Marchjuly (talk) 20:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear threshold of originality in Colombia, PRP applies. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Christof Spengemann (1877–1952), deutscher Grafiker, Schriftsteller und Verleger Mutter Erde (talk) 10:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Lothar Schreyer (1886 -1966), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Lothar Schreyer (1886 -1966) Part II, copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Lothar Schreyer (1886 -1966), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Otto Nebel (1892-1973), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Clauappl2a, files attributed to a non-nude underage porn collector and therefore of unclear copyright.

Ytoyoda (talk) 10:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and the linked DR. While the files in question have OTRS permission, and I don't have access to the OTRS, I believe there is reasonable doubt per the precautionary principle. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carrotcake5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Clauappl2a, files attributed to a non-nude underage porn collector and therefore of unclear copyright.

Ytoyoda (talk) 10:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and the linked DR. While the files in question have OTRS permission, and I don't have access to the OTRS, I believe there is reasonable doubt per the precautionary principle. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Otto Nebel (1892-1973), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Otto Nebel (1892-1973), Part II, copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Victor Servranckx (1897-1965), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It’s hard to tell because I’m working off Web Archives, but it doesn’t look like Gymnastik.se licensed its images CC-BY: https://web.archive.org/web/20160113050448/http://www.gymnastik.se/Genvagar/Media/

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Caption at source says "Fotografija: dr. Anka in Maksim Sedej ml. 1979", so it is Maksim Sedej Jr. with his wife in 1979 and PD-Slovenia doesn't apply. Sporti (talk) 11:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source credits AP, not the Army. You can see more detailed source info at Shutterstock, which specifies it's for editorial use, and therefore not compatible with Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The main subject of this photograph is the displays. The work being displayed on these displays is copyright protected, making this a derivative work. Cropping this part isn't really an option since there isn't much left of the picture without these displays. Vera (talk) 11:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections. The image contains derivative work and should be deleted. --Rhodes00 (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected flickrwashing. Photo uploaded to flickr same day it was added to commons. Only 2 photos in photostream Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is authorized by the person in the photo. The person who took it also glad to share the copyright to people (without commercial uses).
Although they are not sure about the paperwork that how to claim their authorization. Cause it’s already uploaded on the Flickr and agreed for public use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bclilu8000 (talk • contribs) 07:29, July 30, 2019‎ (UTC)
@Bclilu8000: Thank you for your response. A few things:
  • If you do not allow commercial use for this image, then you cannot upload it here. Please see Commons:Licensing/Justifications for details.
  • The photographer needs to follow the steps described at COM:OTRS and declare that there are no restrictions on the photograph (and must allow commercial use).
  • Yes, we know it's from Flickr. The issue is that it looks like you created a Flickr account specifically to license images for Commons. This is considered COM:Flickrwashing and is frowned upon. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
i see. i will send the evident and a permission to publish a file under a free license to OTRS immediately.
and also we allow commercial use if it's the criteria to upload to the Wikimedia.
thanks for the reply and the advice!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bclilu8000 (talk • contribs) 23:12, July 30, 2019‎ (UTC)

Kept: now has OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешения на обложку художника или издательства Dogad75 (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, files don't need to be used to be kept. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo não mais utilizado. Bruno Bernardino (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Götterfunk - The More Or The Less (7661229808).jpg and cropped version

[edit]

The first file and the second file (which is cropped from the first one) were transferred from Flickr to Commons. In the meantime the original file was removed from Flickr due to legal reasons. It shouldn’t have been put under this licence on Flickr in the first place. --Funke (talk) 15:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The mentioned legal reasons are not right: Mr. Pötzelsberger - subject of a lemma on German wikipedia - accepted in an email conversation (which we could publish in case of emergency) that the removal on Flickr had "only personal reasons" based on friendship to a former employee of Radiofabrik. The licence on Flickr was OK, and would be OK right now if we would switch on the source image to "visible". Same to the way, we produced this image. Alf Altendorf - CEO Radiofabrik Salzburg (and responsible person for the image archives of Radiofabrik)

I can confirm that the detailed legal reasons given by Mr Pötzelsberger in the first place do not support in any way that the removal from Flickr should be seen as a confirmation that the publication by Radiofabrik Salzburg was wrong. That's why I change my initial text, especially the accusation that the file shouldn't have been put under this licence on Flickr. --Funke (talk) 21:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WW2 photo - I don't think we can credit this as PD-Russia-2008 yet (Russia's engagement was 1940-45 IIRC)... won't be PD until 2011-16 Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Thank you for inquiring, Magog the Ogre. I believed license in enwp and uploaded this image. Please delete this image if it's a fact.--Hideokun (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about pre-1946 publication that would make it PD in both US and Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: considering this is marked as an "early publicity photo" on the source site, a publication during the war is very likely. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This in not a photo, the license is only for photograph. The source, seems to be a video, its not linked in the page. EMans (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely false. A precedent of this kind of files can be found right here. This deletion request comes from an blocked user in spanish wikipedia who harassed me in the past years. --Turkmenistan (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Turkmenistan: The next time you mention or make some kind of allusion to something external to commons, I will proceed to report you.
The file, as you can see in the edition he just made [7], is an audiovisual material. The license tag clearly marks "Use this template exclusively for photos". The license tag does not aplly to this archive.
By the way, the law governing intellectual property says that the audiovisual material has 50 years of protection (art.34), that's why we have the {{PD-AR-Movie}}
--EMans (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to report me if youbfind reasons to do so. I do not say anything but real facts. You have been expulsed in spanish wikipedia beacuse you harassement to me and others accounts, and multiple use of puppets or meatpuppets. This kind of things you're doing right now are a continuation of your disruptive behavior. --Turkmenistan (talk) 21:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When someone runs out of arguments, the most common is that he attack others. And clearly I can say it's you who harassement me with actions actions that had to warn you that you should stop. Anyway, that is not what this page it's for.
I did not refer to you or your behavior. Please, for the last time, I ask you to limit yourself to the arguments.--EMans (talk) 22:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Facts talk for theirselves [8] [9] Thats why you're acting this way. I will not enter on your tricks this time. A disussion about this kind of files can be found here. Have a nice day. --Turkmenistan (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alredy report your personal attacks. This discussion has nothing to do with anything else. Stop harassement me. The facts is that the license tag clearly marks "Use this template exclusively for photos'", and the archive its not a photo. --EMans (talk) 22:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not how you say. The deletion request that I show above your message says another thing. --Turkmenistan (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you even read the template that you use? It's in the template, it's not what I say, It's what Commons says.--EMans (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep De acuerdo al art. 28. ley 11723 la noticia es de interés público por lo que puede ser reproducida libremente, por consecuencia la captura de pantalla al ser obra derivada es libre Ezarateesteban 23:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This picture was taken from the Argentine Public TV and the news are of public interest so it can be freely reproduced. There's no reason to delete it. The user:EMans proposes the deletion of this image as a personal revenge against the user who uploaded it. User:Emans has been harassing Turkmenistan on different projects and this is part of the harassment.--Jalu (talk) 00:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm amazed the way you stay on topic. The harassement of Jaluj keeping me track even in here is amazing!
By the way, maybe you mixed the arguments in the deletion requests. The source footage video [10] :it's not news, so doesn't apply the art 28 of the law. The footage is evidently a documentary - historic film. The law governing intellectual property says that the audiovisual material has 50 years of protection (art.34), that's why we have the {{PD-AR-Movie}}. --EMans (talk) 02:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Absolutely false. A precedent of this kind of files can be found right here.--Malvinero1 (talk) 02:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The argument is pretty weak. That something has been allowed in the past, does not imply that it should stay that way forever. Especially when I am presenting arguments not presented there. The same argument they hold in the discussion presented is the one they are presenting here: It's news, so it's under the art. 28.
I'm demonstrating that these files are not news, but are documentary - historic films. So it's not under art. 28, it's under art. 34. It will be in public domain in 2032. --EMans (talk) 02:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In this deletion request you can see that this problem it's not related with any personal problem or anything else. Others users also question the validity of stills taken from videos that not are in public domain. --EMans (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Las noticias podrán ser utilizadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas, porque no hay derechos exclusivos sobre estas ya que no constituyen la creacion de una obra en el sentido de la ley 11723. las noticias, como las ideas, no se protegen por el derecho de autor. Así, se ha expresado que la noticia ilustrada publicada en diarios, revistas u otras publicaciones no está revestida de los atributos que la ley 11723 exige para su amparo legal" (Emery, Propiedad Intelectual, 4ta. reimpresión 2009 editorial Astrea, pag. 163. 164)).
Las palabras "publicadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas"... It means that everybody can freely use them. The law requires atribution just if you use them as an exact or verbatin copy. Remember that this law is from 1933, it is, in fact a freedom of information article, but it also fits as a free license. For more information please visit http://www.bea.org.ar/2010/07/breve-guia-hacia-el-dominio-publico-en-argentina/
"se restringe el derecho de autor sobre los artículos publicados sobre temas económicos, políticos o religiosos de actualidad, difundidos por la prensa, radiodifusión, transmisión por cable, y se permite su reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública, a condición de que se asegure la indicación de la fuente y el autor si el trabajo apareció con firma ... (por ejemplo, Argentina art. 28 inciso 2, Brasil, art. 49 inciso I, Colombia, arts. 33 y 34,...) " Lipszyc, Delia. Derechos de Autor y Derechos conexos. Editorial Unesco, Cerlalc, Zavalía, pag. 233. Se restringe el derecho de autor, las noticias no son obras a la luz de la 11723. Las noticias están en dominio público. --Turkmenistan (talk) 03:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The source it's no newscast, it's historic archives. So, talking about news has no relation here.
If you want to do a simple test, look at the site where the source is uploaded and read what is the license that corresponds to them. If it said CC or public domain, there would be no discussion. But it clearly marks that they are under the copyright rules.--EMans (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The image is the screenshot of a film, and therefore {{PD-AR-Movie}} applies. The argument above regarding art. 28. ley 11723 is bogus. According to that, any element published as part of a piece of news would be in the public domain. If so, please, discuss it accordingly in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Argentina. --Discasto talk 10:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC) PS: discussion in Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#News_in_Argentina[reply]


Deleted: per Discasto, this is obviously from a movie, not a photo. See also Discato's analysis of the "news" exemption. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This in not a photo, the license is only for photograph. The source, seems to be a video, its not linked in the page. EMans (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absolutely false. A precedent of this kind of files is here. This deletion request comes from a blocked user in spanish wikipedia who harassed me in the past years. --Turkmenistan (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Turkmenistan: The next time you mention or make some kind of allusion to something external to commons, I will proceed to report you.
The file, as you can see in the edition he just made [11], is an audiovisual material. The license tag clearly marks "Use this template exclusively for photos". The license tag does not aplly to this archive.
By the way, the law governing intellectual property says that the audiovisual material has 50 years of protection (art.34), that's why we have the {{PD-AR-Movie}}
--EMans (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This picture was taken from the Archivo Histórico de Radio y Televisión Argentina and the news are of public interest so it can be freely reproduced. There's no reason to delete it. The user:EMans proposes the deletion of this image as a personal revenge against the user who uploaded it. User:Emans has been harassing Turkmenistan on different projects and this is part of the harassment.

Art. 28. — Los artículos no firmados, colaboraciones anónimas, reportajes, dibujos, grabados o informaciones en general que tengan un carácter original y propio, publicados por un diario, revista u otras publicaciones periódicas por haber sido adquiridos u obtenidos por éste o por una agencia de informaciones con carácter de exclusividad, serán considerados como de propiedad del diario, revista, u otras publicaciones periódicas, o de la agencia.

Las noticias de interés general podrán ser utilizadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas; pero cuando se publiquen en su versión original será necesario expresar la fuente de ellas.

Source: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/40000-44999/42755/texact.htm

Translation:

Article 28 The unsigned articles, anonymous contributions, reports, drawings, recordings or information in general that have an original and own character, published by a newspaper, magazine or other periodical publications because they have been acquired or obtained by this or by an exclusive information agency, will be considered as property of the newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publications, or of the agency.

News of general interest may be used, transmitted or retransmitted, but when they are published in their original version it will be necessary to express the source of them.


Jalu (talk) 01:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The source footage video [12] it's not news, so doesn't apply the art 28 of the law. The footage is evidently a documentary film, mixing variuos sources and newscasters. In a non-exhaustive count: José Gómez Fuentes, the news program "60 minutos" of Canal 9 de Capital Federal, the news program "División Noticias" of Canal 7 of the city of Neuquén, the sport presenter "Enrique Macaya Márquez", the news program "Noticiero 13" of the province of Corrientes, among others.
So law governing intellectual property in the art. 34 says that the audiovisual material has 50 years of protection (art.34), that's why we have the {{PD-AR-Movie}}.--EMans (talk) 02:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Absolutely false. A precedent of this kind of files is here.--Malvinero1 (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The argument is pretty weak. That something has been allowed in the past, does not imply that it should stay that way forever. Especially when I am presenting arguments not presented there. The same argument they hold in the discussion presented is the one they are presenting here: It's news, so it's under the art. 28.
I'm demonstrating that these files are not news, but are documentary - historic films. So it's not under art. 28, it's under art. 34. It will be in public domain in 2032. --EMans (talk) 02:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In this deletion request you can see that this problem it's not related with any personal problem or anything else. Others users also question the validity of stills taken from videos that not are in public domain. --EMans (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Las noticias podrán ser utilizadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas, porque no hay derechos exclusivos sobre estas ya que no constituyen la creacion de una obra en el sentido de la ley 11723. las noticias, como las ideas, no se protegen por el derecho de autor. Así, se ha expresado que la noticia ilustrada publicada en diarios, revistas u otras publicaciones no está revestida de los atributos que la ley 11723 exige para su amparo legal" (Emery, Propiedad Intelectual, 4ta. reimpresión 2009 editorial Astrea, pag. 163. 164)).
Las palabras "publicadas, transmitidas o retransmitidas"... It means that everybody can freely use them. The law requires atribution just if you use them as an exact or verbatin copy. Remember that this law is from 1933, it is, in fact a freedom of information article, but it also fits as a free license. For more information please visit http://www.bea.org.ar/2010/07/breve-guia-hacia-el-dominio-publico-en-argentina/
"se restringe el derecho de autor sobre los artículos publicados sobre temas económicos, políticos o religiosos de actualidad, difundidos por la prensa, radiodifusión, transmisión por cable, y se permite su reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública, a condición de que se asegure la indicación de la fuente y el autor si el trabajo apareció con firma ... (por ejemplo, Argentina art. 28 inciso 2, Brasil, art. 49 inciso I, Colombia, arts. 33 y 34,...) " Lipszyc, Delia. Derechos de Autor y Derechos conexos. Editorial Unesco, Cerlalc, Zavalía, pag. 233. Se restringe el derecho de autor, las noticias no son obras a la luz de la 11723. Las noticias están en dominio público. --Turkmenistan (talk) 03:07, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The source it's no newscast, it's historic archives. So, talking about news has no relation here.
If you want to do a simple test, look at the site where the source is uploaded and read what is the license that corresponds to them. If it said CC or public domain, there would be no discussion. But it clearly marks that they are under the copyright rules.--EMans (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The image is the screenshot of a film, and therefore {{PD-AR-Movie}} applies. The argument above regarding art. 28. ley 11723 is bogus. According to that, any element published as part of a piece of news would be in the public domain. If so, please, discuss it accordingly in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Argentina. --Discasto talk 10:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC) PS: discussion in Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#News_in_Argentina[reply]


Deleted: per Discasto, this is obviously from a movie, not a photo. See also Discato's analysis of the "news" exemption. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If 1972 not public domain yet in Indonesia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: correctly attributed now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If 1986 not public domain yet in Indonesia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: correctly attributed now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FeodorGrigorita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are all pretty clear ancient manuscripts. We can retag them as {{Licensed-PD-art}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spotifeyed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Most files do not have metadata and 1 (Zombie Pub) apparently taken from Google (per EXIF).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am Romar Daniel, the owner of the photos / artist "Daddy Dinero". I'm uploading the photos under my alias Wikipedia account "Spotifeyed". I have all of the original photos on my home laptop with metadata. I am currently on my work computer and downloaded the photos from my google account. Spotifeyed (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Spotifeyed: Please send permission to OTRS. Thank you. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@大诺史: Can you please delete all of the photos. I'm going to re upload them with the proper metadata to save you guys extra work. I'm new to how everything works, but I'm correcting my habits and learning fast. Thank you again. Spotifeyed (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]