Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Obviously not in the public domain, and obviously not taken by the Flickr uploader. This is a screenshot and the copyrighted property of the film production company. Softlavender (talk) 00:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Obviously not taken by the Flickr uploader, who is the subject of the photo. Obviously taken by a photographer who is not credited and who did not sign off on the improper Flickr upload. Softlavender (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Obviously NOT taken by the Flickr uploader, who is the subject of the photograph. This is obviously a professional headshot and therefore the property of the photographer. Softlavender (talk) 00:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Obviously NOT the property of the Flickr uploader, who is in the photo, This was improperly uploaded to Flickr and is the property of the unnamed, unattributed photographer. Softlavender (talk) 01:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:39, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Obviously NOT the property of the Flickr uploader, who is the subject of the photo, This was improperly uploaded to Flickr and is the property of the unnamed, unattributed photographer. Softlavender (talk) 01:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:39, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos
- File:Sayan Garai 4.jpg
- File:Sayan Garai3.jpg
- File:Sayan Garai2.jpg
- File:Sayan Garai.jpg
- File:Sayan Garai1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. User blocked for puppetry. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. This looks like a video screenshot. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Ross_kramerov_Flickrwashing Yann (talk) 06:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- It is a screencap from this video, which is marked no commercial use. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 13:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as per WLC. --Yann (talk) 13:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation - movie poster - found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahin.t.a.c.f (talk · contribs)
[edit]All are derivative works without a source.
- File:Ebony Maw.png
- File:Corvus Glaive.png
- File:Black Dwarf.png
- File:تانوس و فرقه سیاه.png
- File:Cerebro 12.png
- File:IMG-20190704-WA00.jpg
- File:Cerebro (Marvel Comics device).png
- File:Xmen2.jpg
- File:X men.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios may--and should--use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 17:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
author request Bbdyn (talk) 10:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment Image seems in project scope with no obvious problem. Why the wait almost 2 years to request deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bbdyn (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Can the deleting admin please remove the 1 July DR as it is redundant (previous not even closed yet). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep My concern expressed earlier has not been addressed; seems in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bbdyn (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Closed as Speedy Kept; previous DR closed less than a week ago; no additional info or reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- User:Thoughtful and Considerate tagged this for speedy deletion as a copyright violation with the following text: "The intellectual property that is the subject of this correspondence consists of two original works owned and authored by The Nicholas Alahverdian Trust (hereafter referred to as "The NA Trust" or "The Trust) in the form of photographs. This is one of those photographs. The photographs are not in the public domain in any country, nor are they freely licensed and are therefore illegally uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons platform by users who do not have the requisite permission or license. The Wikimedia users who uploaded these images intentionally misrepresented any permission or license from The NA Trust as none was given. The NA Trust is left to resolve that internet users who may be the Wikimedia users themselves or users associated with them downloaded the photographs from the Trust website, Flickr account, or through another website, and uploaded the photographs with a falsified copyright tag and made false representations about ownership and copyright. This allowed the photographs, which are the intellectual property of The NA Trust, to be used across Wikimedia projects without license or permission from The NA Trust. The uploads were processed deceptively and violated applicable copyright laws. Patently false information about the license, copyright, and ownership status was given on the file description pages accompanying the photographs. The two photographs that are relevant to this correspondence are the work product of workers, contractors, freelancers, or volunteers of The NA Trust who, as part of their work-related responsibilities and duties outlined in their contract, assisted in the taking of photographs of officers and trustees of The NA Trust along with other guests and people at events that were Trust-sponsored or attended by officers or trustees of The NA Trust. At no time did any Trust employee, contractor, or volunteer violate their contractual obligation regarding the ownership of these two or any other photographs. As a result of the unauthorized uploading of these two photographs, The Trust, as described earlier, is sufficiently confident that they were downloaded as unlicensed copies of photographs published on website(s) owned or contracted with The Trust to host intellectual property on the basis that Trust property would be viewed solely in context with the articles or photographic essays or albums published by The Trust, which would include works authored by the Trust such as essays, photographs, videos, and other media. At no point did The Trust grant permission, license, or otherwise allow in any way for the Wikipedia Commons users to upload original works considered copyrighted intellectual property in the form of photographs authored by The NA Trust under a contractual basis with Trust employees, interns, and volunteers. To conclude, under the Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter section COM:NETCOPYVIO it unequivocally states that “[t]he vast majority of images found on the internet are copyright-protected and may not be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here. Many websites are silent on copyright issues, but images on those sites are just as off-limits as those on sites which explicitly say “Copyright, all rights reserved.” Works are copyrighted by default; a copyright notice or a © sign is not needed.” On The Trust website, and on any website or platform where The Trust contracted for exhibition of any intellectual property, a detailed copyright notice informing the viewer that the intellectual property was copyrighted by The NA Trust was published along with a © sign and the message “Copyright (year). All rights reserved” when those safeguards are not necessary only as an abundance of caution. As a result of the copyrighted photographs owned by The NA Trust which were downloaded from the Internet by Wikimedia Commons users who were not given permission or license to upload the original works owned by The Trust to Wikimedia Commons and later intentionally misrepresented the copyright and actual ownership of the works, we respectfully ask that this photograph and the other photograph tagged as a copyright violation that are the subject of this correspondence, as well as the cropped version of one of the photographs located on the same page, be deleted and permanently removed from Wikimedia servers in accordance with copyright law of the United States and Wikimedia Commons policies, guidelines, regulations, and procedures. Thoughtful and Considerate (talk) 14:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)" I have converted the "speedy" tag to a deletion request. Note: This would also apply to the derivative work File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III (cropped).jpg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per info from User:Thoughtful and Considerate at User_talk:Infrogmation#Hello. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Deletion overturned following DRV at [1]. These files are subject to repeated attempts at deletion by one or more users abusing multiple accounts, please ensure future deletion requests are filed by editors in good standing and not single purpose accounts or accounts blocked for sockpuppetry on other projects. Nick (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused & orphaned file. Replaced by equivalent File:Structural formula of methyl formate.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of Disney character. Categorizing (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Clear DW problem -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
He even added BBC as source ... King Rk (talk) 11:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:15, 9 Juli 2019 UTC: Obvious copyright violation, the uploader named BBC as source. --King Rk (Diskussion) 11:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC) --Krdbot 19:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Although the ship logo has been used at least since 1977, it's still probably copyrighted. Roy17 (talk) 11:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, fraudulent license, claim of creation/copyright holding, and date. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio book cover photo Sakhalinio (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 13:53, 9 Juli 2019 UTC: Commons:Licensing: book cover --Krdbot 19:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Stolen from https://www.slideshare.net/infosecedu/cissp-d5cryptography-v2012mini-coursev2 Veracious (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Was using this as a simple test, this work is myown, and using the tools created by David Richfield. TomTRW (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Test, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Regular Deletion Process MBPF (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, no reason to delete user talk page -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Inappropriately used on the English article Alex Morgan. Iggy the Swan (talk) 17:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept Brief misuse of image in en:W is not a reason to delete from Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
derivative work issue Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
This file is just a test of the upload wizard with PDF files, and is empty WikiB0liy0 (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Test, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mishi dar (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:59, 9 Juli 2019 UTC: Uploader request --Krdbot 01:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Most likely copyrighted or used without permission, judging by the big watermark Saucy (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:48, 10 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: https://cricclubs.com/CL/viewPlayer.do?playerId=807442&clubId=16 --Krdbot 01:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Fehlende Nutzungsrechte des Screenshots der Google-Map Lisa2508 (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, copyright violation. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Permission from Sarah Matheson Photos should be sent via COM:OTRS. Roy17 (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019071210000411 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 06:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 06:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morris obuhuma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Obuhuma imende.jpg
- File:Mrris obuhuma.jpg
- File:20161108 084954 Cam.jpg
- File:Imende.jpg
- File:Morris obuhuma.jpg
- File:Morris Obuhuma.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morris obuhuma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morris obuhuma (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:Andeso.jpg
- File:Obuhuma technolist.jpg
- File:Morris obuhuma .jpg
- File:Biometric Department and Focim.jpg
- File:Biometric Department.jpg
- File:Technical Consultant.jpg
- File:Mr Morris obuhuma .jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete Self promotion. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I believe that it is a copyright violation. I could find its usage here; it's a copyright violation according to all those sources. AhmadTalk 14:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 09:03, 13 Juli 2019 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Dooby Way --Krdbot 13:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from background images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality with in-image caption text that inhibits reuse. Have File:Acyl-chloride.svg among various replacements in Category:Carboxylic acid chlorides DMacks (talk) 06:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & opaque file. Proposed replacement is of high-quality & has a transparent background! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 15:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Weird font and formatting choices; have File:Methylfluoracetat.svg as MOS replacement DMacks (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, such font is not acceptable by any standards, including IUPAC drawing recommendations. Wostr (talk) 17:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; useless colouring & opaque background. Proposed replacement is of good quality! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep why not fix rather than delete? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Isn't "here's a replacement file under a different name" the fix? DMacks (talk) 04:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 08:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
You can delete the work (picture) if you want. I don't speak English very well, that, I couldn't defend any position with property. My aunt Ana died 2014. And, last but not least, I became so disappointed with wekipedia that I forgot my password and can't sign in anymore. Luiz Carlos Cappellano — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14C:4E8:12D5:B1AC:73EF:9734:3573 (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Personal montage of unidentified people. Unused file. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Personal montage of unidentified people. Unused file. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality/resolution, several better alternatives in Category:Fuchsine. Leyo 09:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Inferior chemical structure; unused & orphaned, also opaque & jagged (low-res). Have File:Fuchsin.svg as high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 10:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Inappropriate depiction of OH group; replaced by File:P-Hydroxyzimtsäuren Strukturformel V1.svg. Leyo 09:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; unused & opaque. Proposed replacement is of high-quality and fixes the "OH-group" mistake! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality; replaced by better alternatives in Category:Aconitic acid (for each isomer). Leyo 09:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; poor-quality chemical structures; unused & opaque, also jagged & low-res. Have File:Cis-aconitic acid.png and File:Trans-aconitic acid.png as possible replacements for each isomer! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality/resolution; better alternatives in Category:Eicosapentaenoic acid. Leyo 09:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; unused & orphaned; opaque & small resolution. Have File:Eicosapentaensaeure.svg as high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AwesomeSauce Creative (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Awesomesauce creative icon logo .png
- File:Awesomesauce creative logo .png
- File:Awesome Sauce Creative Clients.jpg
- File:Surbhit - awesomesauce creative.jpg
- File:Rishi - awesomesauce creative.jpg
- File:Cross Stitch 5 Branding by AwesomeSauce Creative Pvt. Ltd.jpg
- File:Cross Stitch 4 Branding by AwesomeSauce Creative Pvt. Ltd.jpg
- File:Cross Stitch 3 Branding by AwesomeSauce Creative Pvt. Ltd.jpg
- File:Cross Stitch 2 Branding by AwesomeSauce Creative Pvt. Ltd.jpg
- File:Cross Stitch 1 Branding by AwesomeSauce Creative Pvt. Ltd.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, self-promotion. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alismith88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment uploader is an indefinitely blocked troll. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused in any project. Unknown purpose. Alex Spade (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
معلومات خاطئة Mkhelf (talk) 23:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and previous section. Reuploaded. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: same person as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:مخيلف الشويلخ.png; out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by शुभम सिंह बाघेल (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:अयोध्या धर्म सभा में.jpg
- File:क्षत्रिय महासभा युवा के राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष कु०अवनीश जी के साथ.jpg
- File:Nation First Voting Must.jpg
- File:लखनऊ विश्वविद्यालय में बैठक के दौरान.jpg
- File:Shubham Singh Baghel.jpg
- File:शुभम सिंह बाघेल छोटे भाई के साथ.jpg
- File:शुभम सिंह बाघेल abvp अवध प्रान्त.jpg
- File:शुभम सिंह बाघेल abvp.jpg
- File:शुभम सिंह बाघेल Abvp.jpg
- File:शुभम सिंह बाघेल.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by शुभम सिंह बाघेल (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
- File:वृक्षारोपण करते शुभम सिंह बाघेल.jpg
- File:वृक्षारोपण करते Shubham Singh Baghel.jpg
- File:वृक्षारोपण.jpg
- File:सामाजिक अनुभूति 2K19.jpg
- File:हिन्दू नव वर्ष की अनन्त शुभकामनाएं.jpg
- File:शुभम सिंह बाघेल,Abvp रायबरेली.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by शुभम सिंह बाघेल (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images of a non-contributor. Out of scope.
- File:बल्केश्वर महादेव के दर्शन.jpg
- File:ABVP तहसील अभ्यास वर्ग.jpg
- File:भरत भैया(मधुवन विधानसभा) के साथ.jpg
- File:सारनाथ भ्रमण.jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 10:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:37, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Private photo, no use on any pages. Catherine Laurence 14:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Austrassia does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Austrassia does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Austrassia does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Malivia is a fictional country, out of scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Malivia is a fictional country, unused file, out of scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:05, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Election apportionment diagrams
[edit]Most of the norms are test files (some already has a DR ongoing, but I decided to include them in for easier deletion if applicable). Others are diagrams of fictional places.
- File:3534fe4xwParliament.svg
- File:45g66ut4.svg
- File:Austrassia National Parliament 1920.svg
- File:Austrassia National Parliament 1924.svg
- File:Austrassia National Parliament 1930.svg
- File:Bundestag 2019.svg
- File:Example Parliament 2019.svg
- File:F1SimSpain Parliament 2019.svg
- File:F1simspain1 1.svg
- File:GileadParliament.svg
- File:Green majority parl.svg
- File:Lidow Bk Parliament 2006.svg
- File:Lidow Bk Parliament 2010.svg
- File:Lidow Bk Parliament 2018.svg
- File:Lidow Cd.Bk Parliament 2014.svg
- File:Lidow Senate 2014.svg
- File:Malivia Federal Council 4603.svg
- File:Malivia Parliament 4598.svg
- File:Mdt.svg
- File:Municipales Euskadi-Navarra.svg
- File:My Parliafcfment.svg
- File:My Parliamddent.svg
- File:My Parliame1111nt.svg
- File:My Parliament 2.svg
- File:My Parliament.2018.svg
- File:My Parliament.svg
- Keep this one - it's the file that users can use to test the system without filling Commons with test files. --Slashme (talk) 18:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- deleted. This category has a lot of files for testing -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- File:My Parliament.svg2.svg
- File:My Parliament22.svg
- File:My ParliamentHypotheticalABLeg.svg
- File:My Parliameyyynt.svg
- File:My ParliSFDament.svg
- File:Mysenate 20180612.svg
- File:Parlament3.svg
- File:Republic of China - Legislative Yuan.svg
- File:Senado Mexico.svg
- File:Senado quito.svg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Election apportionment diagrams
[edit]Seems to be test files. File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing.
- File:Althing parliament.svg
- File:My Parliadfsment.svg
- File:My ParliaGFGFment.svg
- File:My Parliamennnt.svg
- File:MY Parliament 2019.svg
- File:My Parliament1234599.svg
- File:Parliament 2024.svg
- File:Parliament12.svg
- File:Russia Parliament 2035.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2018-12-12-11-48-35-107926-14893976299137314436.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2019-08-31-03-11-14-840071-13014824273983182006.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2019-08-31-03-11-14-840071-13014824273983182006.svg.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Election apportionment diagrams
[edit]Seems to be test files. File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing.
- File:My Pardsadasliament.svg
- File:My ParliaDFSVSment.svg
- File:My Parliamentlishpo.svg
- File:My Parliamentmwitbord.svg
- File:My Parliamentpol.svg
- File:My Parliamentul.svg
- File:Parliament 2014.svg
- File:Testingperliament2019.svg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lulyminshang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising.
- File:125541-22-2 125541 tert-Butyl 4-anilinopiperidine-1-carboxylate.jpg
- File:99918-43-1 99918 white powder crystal N-phenylpiperidin-4-amine,dihydrochloride.jpg
- File:2fdck 2-fdck white crystal.jpg
- File:Ndh hexen hex crytsal bkebdp bmdp.jpg
- File:100-07-2 p-Anisoyl chloride.png
- File:Pmk pmk powder crystal pmk glycidate 13605-48-6 13605.jpg
- File:Bmk bmk powder crystal bmk glycidate 16648-44-5 16648 01.jpg
- File:Phenacetin 62-44-2.jpg
- File:5fmdmb2201 5fadb 5f2201.jpg
- File:Bmk powder crystal bmk glycidate 16648-44-5 16648.jpg
- File:125541-22-2 tert-Butyl 4-anilinopiperidine-1-carboxylate.jpg
- File:2fdck white powder crystal 2f-dck.jpg
- File:2226-96-2 Tempol.jpg
- File:99-92-3 4-Aminoacetophenone.jpg
- File:40064-34-4 40064 4,4-Piperidinediol hydrochloride.jpg
- File:5fmdmb2201 5f2201 5fadb.jpg
- File:Bmk bmk glycidate 16648-44-5 16648 bmk powder.jpg
- File:99918-43-1 99918 white powder crystal.jpg
- File:Eutylone dieutylone big caystal bmdp bkebdp.jpg
- File:Eutylone dieutylone bmdp bkebdp.jpg
- File:Eutylone dieutylone big crystal bmdp bkebdp.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete @Patrick Rogel: adverts can be deleted by prepending {{SD|G10}}.--Roy17 (talk) 17:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, SPAM, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lulyminshang (talk · contribs)
[edit]G10 intended as advertising
- File:Ketamine 2-Fluorodeschloroketamine.jpg
- File:2fdck ketamine.jpg
- File:2-Fluorodeschloroketamine 2f.jpg
- File:2fdck DCK.jpg
- File:2fdck DCK KETAMINE.jpg
- File:2f-DCK.jpg
- File:2fdck 2f-dck.jpg
- File:111982-50-4 2-Fluorodeschloroketamine.jpg
- File:Dck ketamine.jpg
- File:2f-dck.jpg
- File:2f dck.jpg
- File:2fdck.jpg
- File:2-Fluorodeschloroketamine.jpg
- File:Ketamine DCK.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lulyminshang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement only, non-educational, unused.
GeorgHH • talk 17:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; G10. --Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC) Ciao, perché le foto che ho impostato nella pagina sono state tutte poste in richiesta di cancellazione? Per cortesia mi aiuteresti a capire di modo io possa imparare? Grazie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefano Floris (talk • contribs) 17:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC) Salve, potresti spiegarmi cosa c'è che non va nelle foto da me caricate? Vorrei imparare a fare tutto regolarmente. Grazie --Stefano Floris (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (msg) 16:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 16:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
File:A Panorama of the Mercedes-Benz Superdome for Wrestlemania XXX on Sunday April 6th 2014 .jpg
[edit]COM:OOS, remaining part doesnt show much of the event. Roy17 (talk) 16:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Glitch upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope and superseded by any other map in Category:PATH maps. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope and superseded by several alternatives in Category:Maps of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority rapid transit system. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Unusably low resolution Ubcule (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MatthewLanez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the project scope. Promotional.
Edslov (talk) 23:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
most likely not own work (taken around 1950, low resolution) Polarlys (talk) 08:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
most likely not own work (date, resolution) Polarlys (talk) 08:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Please modify the dates of creation and explain why images are public domain.
- File:Ernst Nobs.jpg
- File:Karl Kobelt.jpg
- File:Eduard von Steiger.jpg
- File:Walter Stamphli.jpg
- File:Enrico Celio.jpg
- File:Ernst Wetter.jpg
- File:Hermann Obrecht.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
False dates. Please explain why images are public domain.
- File:Jean Bourgknecht.jpg
- File:Friedrich Traugott Wahlen.jpg
- File:Lepori.jpg
- File:Thomas Holenstein.jpg
- File:Hans Streuli.jpg
- File:MWeber.jpg
- File:Friedrich.png
- File:Ernst Nobs.jpg
- File:Karl Kobelt.jpg
- File:Eduard von Steiger.jpg
- File:Walter Stamphli.jpg
- File:Enrico Celio.jpg
- File:Ernst Wetter.jpg
- File:Hermann Obrecht.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
If this is the own work of the uploader, why do I find this picture in better quality and in colors on the web? [2] King Rk (talk) 11:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xuanphuocle (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, watermarks, and the nature of several of the images.
- File:Xây dựng đường tỉnh 328.jpg
- File:Phuoc Tan District in Usagi Storm 2018.jpg
- File:Vung Tau P&T Hotel.jpg – https://pix10.agoda.net/hotelImages/280/280768/280768_121123093710482.jpg?s=1200x800 from https://www.agoda.com/p-t-hotel-vung-tau/hotel/vung-tau-vn.html?cid=-999
- File:Hoa Tieu Hotel.jpg – http://www.pilotco1.com/uploads/gallery/pic/1308709347.nv.jpg from http://www.pilotco1.com/index.php
- File:Metropolitan Urban.jpg – e.g. https://cafeland.vn/du-an/metropolitan-vung-tau-do-thi-trong-long-do-thi-305.html, http://www.baoxaydung.com.vn/news/vn/bat-dong-san/cong-ty-ia-oc-khang-linh-dau-tu-khu-vui-choi-danh-cho-thieu-nhi.html and https://dantri.com.vn/kinh-doanh/vi-sao-nu-dai-gia-bat-dong-san-vung-tau-bi-bat-1393835294.htm
- File:Marine City Cua Lap.png – http://canmuanha.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/%C4%91%E1%BA%A5t-n%E1%BB%81n-d%E1%BB%B1-%C3%A1n-Marine-City-2.png from http://canmuanha.com/dat-nen-du-an-marine-city.html
- File:Ho Tram Project.jpg – https://www.vir.com.vn/stores/news_dataimages/kimoanh/082018/18/11/why-investment-flow-into-the-multibillion-dollar-complex-ho-tram-strip.jpg from https://www.vir.com.vn/why-investment-flows-to-multibillion-dollar-complex-ho-tram-strip-61854.html
- File:Go Gang Island.jpg – http://www.ardorarch.com/files/upload/du-an/Noi%20That/Go-Gang-Island.jpg from http://www.ardorarch.com/projects/detail-projects/dao-go-gang.html
- File:Vung Tau Plaza.jpg – https://web.archive.org/web/20161027011907/http://www.panoramio.com/photo/85258079
- File:Julia Suite Sea Hotel.jpg – https://s-ec.bstatic.com/images/hotel/max1280x900/145/145243532.jpg from https://www.booking.com/hotel/vn/julia-suite-sea.en-gb.html with a watermark from Foody.id
- File:Silver Sea Tower.jpg – https://file4.batdongsan.com.vn/resize/745x510/2017/04/20/RvFcZpPK/20170420135116-eeed.jpg from https://batdongsan.com.vn/ban-can-ho-chung-cu-duong-ba-cu-phuong-1-24-prj-silver-sea-tower/cao-cap-4-sao-tai-tp-vung-tau-pr12127499
- File:Nemo Hotel.jpg
- File:Petro Hotel Vung Tau.jpg – https://images.trvl-media.com/hotels/12000000/11970000/11966700/11966697/f73fa675_z.jpg from https://www.expedia.co.uk/Vung-Tau-Hotels-Petro-Hotel.h11966697.Hotel-Information
- File:Hodeco Apartment Phu My.jpg – http://imagesfb.tintuc.vn/upload/images/vungtau/20180518/images1436003_Phu_My.jpg from http://vungtau.tintuc.vn/tin-tuc/ngay-185-tan-thanh-chinh-thuc-tro-thanh-thi-xa-phu-my.html
- File:Apartment 15 floors in Vung Tau.jpg – http://hodeco.vn/files/150235670cc8b72656.jpg from http://hodeco.vn/view/5/to-hop-chung-cu-15-tang-tttm
- File:Kim To Apartment.jpg – http://baobariavungtau.com.vn/dataimages/201312/original/images893731_KIM_TO.jpg from http://baobariavungtau.com.vn/kinh-te/201312/du-an-nha-o-dau-tu-chap-va-lac-long-428040/
- File:Lakeside Apartment A,B.jpg – https://file4.batdongsan.com.vn/resize/745x510/2015/06/15/20150615104214-fbff.jpg from https://batdongsan.com.vn/ban-can-ho-chung-cu-duong-nguyen-huu-canh-phuong-10-11-prj-lakeside-apartment/chcc-a1-khu-do-thi-chi-linh-tp-vung-tau-lien-he-0911604976-thong-pr7161567
- File:Seaview Apartment Building.jpg – http://dic1.vn/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/seaview_12_4.jpg from http://dic1.vn/chung-cu-doi-21-tang-chi-linh-vung-tau/
- File:Son Thinh Apartment Building.jpg – https://t-ec.bstatic.com/images/hotel/max1280x900/111/111099367.jpg from https://www.booking.com/hotel/vn/premium-beach-front-full-option-service-apartment.en-gb.html
- File:Pullman Hotel vung tau.jpg – http://bvu.edu.vn/image/journal/article?img_id=475133&t=1533966518277 from http://bvu.edu.vn/web/du-lich-dieu-duong/tin-tuc
- File:Hodeco Plaza.jpg
- File:Ho Tram Strip 1.jpg – https://luxuryhotelawards.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/189A2790-Edit.jpg from https://luxuryhotelawards.com/hotel/the-grand-ho-tram-strip/contact-84917556875/
- File:Ho Tram Strip 2.jpg – from page 15 of http://thepviet-bd.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/TVC-Profile-Website.pdf
- File:Malibu Hotel.jpg – http://www.poolspa.vn/uploads/files/2016/08/17/9-1471428592.jpg from http://www.poolspa.vn/project/detail/khach-san-malibu-vung-tau
- File:Tháp báo thiên - ba vì.jpg – http://baolaocai.vn/userfiles/image/Nam%202014/Thang%204/Ngay%2017/dulich2.jpeg from http://baolaocai.vn/du-lich/leo-bo-len-dinh-ba-vi-z9n22611.htm
- File:Vietcombank Hoàn Kiếm.jpg
- File:Hanoi Tower.jpg
- File:Trung Hòa Nhân Chính T34.jpg
- File:Dolphinplaza.jpg
- File:SME Hoàng Gia Building.jpg
- File:Handico Tower.jpg
- File:Indochina Plaza.jpg
- File:EVN Tower.jpg
- File:Van Phu Victoria toan canh.jpg
- File:FLC Twin Towers.jpg
- File:Goldmark City 136 Hồ Tùng Mậu 2.jpg
- File:Goldmark City 136 Hồ Tùng Mậu 1.jpg
- File:Thang Long Number One.jpg
- File:Thang Long Number One 2.jpg
- File:FLC Complex 36 Pham Hung.jpg
- File:Thang Long Number One 1.jpg
- File:The Pride Towers.jpg
- File:HPC Landmark 105.jpg
- File:Hanoi-landmark-51-tháng-09-2018.jpg
- File:Discovery Complex.jpg
- File:Diamond Flower Tower.jpg
- File:Ho Chi Minh Metro Maps.jpg
- File:Ben Thanh Station.jpg
- File:Depot Tham Luong.jpg
- File:Line 2 HCM Metro.jpg
- File:Depot Long Binh.jpg
- File:Line 5 HCM Metro.jpg
- File:HCM Metro maps.png
- File:Line 1 HCM Metro.jpg
- File:HCMCmetro.svg.png
- File:Hotram beach.jpg
- File:Doi dat me.jpg
- File:Vancoi nha tho.jpg
- File:Pt-xm street.jpg
- File:Duongtinh 329.jpg
- File:Xuyenmoc tren cao.jpg
- File:Th tranquoctoan.jpg
- File:Duongtinh 328.jpg
- File:27thang4, phước bửu.jpg
- File:VoThiSauStreet,phuocbuu.jpg
- File:PhuocBuu in night.jpg
- File:CongvienBoHo, Phước Bửu.jpg
- File:Phối cảnh chợ xuyên mộc. tt phước bửu.jpg
- File:Đường HMT, phước bửu.jpg
- File:Đường 27-4, phước bửu.jpg
- File:QHC PhuocBuu-2025.jpg
- File:Abr, phước tân.jpg
- File:Avk, phước tân.jpg
- File:Att, phước tân.jpg
- File:Ats3, phước tân.jpg
- File:Ts4, xã phước tân.jpg
- File:Xã phước tân, huyện xuyên mộc.jpg
- File:Phuoctan.jpg
- File:Phước tân,xuyên mộc.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xuanphuocle (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small photos. Most taken from other websites on which no CC licences could be found. Uploader had another batch of copyvios that were deleted in Dec 2018.
- File:HCMC National University Dormitory Zone B.jpg
- File:Phường 9, vũng tàu.jpg
- File:The Grand Ho Tram Strip Resort.jpg
- File:Ba Ria General Hospital.jpg
- File:DIC Phoenix Vung Tau.jpg
- File:Muong thanh song lam hotel.jpg
- File:Cua Lo town skyline.jpg
- File:Vinh city skyline.jpg
- File:Images907466 Tr17 Uong Bi.jpg
- File:Cẩm Phả, Quảng Ninh.jpg
- File:Hạ Long, Quảng Ninh.jpg
- File:Van Don International Airport, Quang Ninh.jpg
- File:Ksmongcai (2).jpg
- File:Duc Phu Hotel, Uông Bí.jpg
- File:Newlife Towers Apartment Ha Long.jpg
- File:The Sapphire Residence Ha Long, Quang Ninh.jpg
- File:Ksmongcai.jpg
- File:Muong Thanh Luxury Ha Long Hotel.jpg
- File:Daophulam smci.jpg
- File:Thanh khe, danang.jpg
- File:Ditp Tower, lien chieu, danang.jpg
- File:Hue Junction.jpg
- File:Tiến độ thi công Risemount Apartment Đà Nẵng.jpg
- File:Vinpearl-condotel-riverfront-da-nang-2.jpg
- File:Azuru Building, Danang.jpg
- File:Muong Thanh Luxury Danang hotel, son tra, da nang.jpg
- File:Danang administrative center.jpg
- File:Danang sygg.jpg
Roy17 (talk) 12:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio of a photograph from at least 2015 : https://la1ere.francetvinfo.fr/wallisfutuna/2015/12/08/pas-de-miss-wallis-et-futuna-au-concours-de-miss-france-2016-313079.html Skimel (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo, newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Hartmut+D-Ausschnitt.jpg
- File:FilmlandschaftNRW.Regisseure.pdf
- File:Peter Steinhart,1978.pdf
- File:Filmgruppe Düsseldorf,1973.pdf
- File:Filmgruppe Düsseldorf.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Besonders wertvoll (DieKindervonH.).pdf
- File:Mannheim-DieKindervonH-markiert..pdf
- File:Fipresci(DieKindervonH.).png
- File:Preise-StummeSchreieWZ19.10.83-markiert.jpg
- File:DerGerechteKrieg-Berlinale1977-2.pdf
- File:Hartmut Kaminski, 1968 mit Super-8-Filmkamera.jpg
- File:Hartmut Kaminski, 1969.jpg
- File:Text-DieKindervonHimmlerstadt.jpg
- File:RP-Steh-auf-es-ist-Krieg-20.06.1991.jpg
- File:Text-DieKinder-vonHimmlerstadt.jpg
- File:Text-StummeSchreie.jpg
- File:Ausstellung-Köln-StummeSchreie.jpg
- File:Hartmut-984x886sw-.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lindaalzate (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo pmaterials. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. no EXIF.
- File:Glasses Dominic Schmidt Famous Actor Model.png
- File:Dominic Schmidt Freezer Picture.jpg
- File:DominicBear.jpg
- File:Dominicschmidt.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality personal photographs by user whose only other global contributions are creating the (possibly autobiographical) English Wikipedia article on this apparently non-notable youtuber. That article is now nominated for deletion, and these qualify as F10 without the article.
- File:Glasses Dominic Schmidt Famous Actor Model.png
- File:Dominic Schmidt Freezer Picture.jpg
- File:DominicBear.jpg
- File:Dominicschmidt.jpg
GMGtalk 14:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hah. Well User:大诺史. I guess VisualFileChange doesn't notice the duplicate if you nominate the same thing at exactly the same time. GMGtalk 14:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: Shall we merge? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I figure if we just leave it the way it is, whatever admin comes by will at least find a good explanation for why things are so messy. GMGtalk 14:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: Shall we merge? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Possibly copyvio - found matching pictures using reverse image search Hmxhmx 14:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. No EXIF. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vansontv 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Very blurred. There are many more perfect images of this area to choose from Judithcomm (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Accidental creation by myself Fleets (talk) 15:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1970 (stained-glass windows), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1980 (stained-glass windows), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1968 (stained-glass windows), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1968, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1968, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2018 UCPB General Insurance Company, Inc. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Pictures of artworks by Reinhard Heß
[edit]- File:Andernach Liebfrauenkirche Fenster389.jpg
- File:Andernach Liebfrauenkirche Fenster390.jpg
- File:Andernach Liebfrauenkirche Fenster391.jpg
- File:Andernach Liebfrauenkirche Fenster392.jpg
- File:St Peter 11 Koblenz 2013.jpg
- File:Trier St. Ambrosius BW 6.JPG
- File:Wershofen St. Vincentius Gestirne 19.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster11.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster15.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster638.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster640.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster642.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster643.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster644.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster645.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster646.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster647.JPG
- File:Wershofen St.Vincentius Fenster651.JPG
Copyvio; artist died in 1998; no fop --Martin Sg. (talk) 16:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
https://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/14947566/current-all-ufc-champions
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
copyviol (it's written on the image) Melquíades (msg) 16:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
low resolution, no EXIF: unlikely own. Ankry (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Signed photo by Heide Smith, available at https://heidesmith.com/special-edition-photographs/judith-wright-portraits/ apparently for sale. Uploader's only upload. Uploader's username Romu2345 remarkably unlike "Heide Smith". GRuban (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Francis Meunier died in 1995. Copyright violation. 90.43.68.156 20:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Wolfgang Paalen died in 1959. No OTRS, copyright violation. 90.43.68.156 21:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- How would one secure OTRS for this? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Send an email with permission from the heirs of the artist to bring this image under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-4.0 to permissions@wikimedia.org Vysotsky (talk) 23:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
© 2015-2019. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aqiluciano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image).
hiàn 20:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aqiluciano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Please confirm you are the copyright holder by emailing COM:OTRS.
- File:Aqiluciano vv.jpg
- File:Aqiluciano 048.jpg
- File:Aqiluciano 054.jpg
- File:Aqiluciano 059.jpg
- File:@aqiluciano2.jpg
Roy17 (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
appears to be copied from Google Street View Famartin (talk) 23:07, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No information about the author of the artwork, therefore no proof of free license or authorization. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the poster creator A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Well, my beloved pic, you've had your 9.5 years of fame. It's enough, you have to go. Apdency (talk) 22:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the poster creator A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the poster creator A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the poster creator A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the poster creator A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in France, needs permission from the poster creator A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
The file is an image from Flickr, which was tagged with public domain mark. According to COM:PDM, the public domain mark is not a valid license template, and therefore the copyright status of the image is unknown. However, User:Jamez42 and User:Tim commons reverted my deletion templates, and therefore this deletion request is filed in order to enable further discussion. 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Also pinging @Jamez42 and Tim commons: for reference.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
SupportI think so.𒁂TIM𒀱COMMONS𒀱On ja.wp𒁂 08:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose If you look at the actual template, you'll see it's an image from PROVEA, which can license its images into the public domain. It's just easier to transfer the image from Flickr. Honestly, read the license on the page. Kingsif (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Missing license; PDM is a mark and not a license. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mishi dar (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 15:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the organization is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Complex calligraphy logo. Hong Kong has a very low threshold of originality per Commons:TOO Hong Kong. Wcam (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: That’s only letters. --DaB. (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @DaB.: Please see the closing admin's rationale for deletion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:SCAA logo.svg. This is really calligraphy rather than simple standard characters. --Wcam (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Wcam: I know what calligraphy is. The logo you nominated for deletion is in my eyes just a bunch of (maybe nice written) letters with circles – and that’s just not enough. File:SCAA logo.svg had at least some graphical elements. I’m sorry, but I will not change my mind here. But you can of course re-nominate it (with a good explation) and maybe you can persuade another admin. --DaB. (talk) 21:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
TOO in Hong Kong is as low as that in the United Kingdom which is extremely low. Logos that are literally "only letters" are not ok per COM:TOO United Kingdom, let alone calligraphy. Those admins who are not familiar with UK TOO are advised to see past DRs regarding UK TOO. Wcam (talk) 15:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep logo has been in use at least since 1938 = copyright expired.--Roy17 (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Roy17: Thanks for the info. Could you change the license tags accordingly? --Wcam (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination as license tags are updated. --Wcam (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: nomination withdrawn, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
A high chance that this is a DW, words cropped out on the top right. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio (used on different web-sites like https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/12618307.Waleed_Al_Husseini/blog ). --Wdwd (talk) 15:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk · contribs)
[edit]If published 1974 not public domain yet. Anyway permission of each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Tassili n'Ajjer rock art.jpg
- File:Maffei 1 and 2 1968.jpg
- File:Pioneer 10 Plaque colour.jpg
- File:Mars (Mariner 9).jpg
- File:Radio astronomy image of star Alpha Cassiopeiae.jpg
- File:Hidrocarburos saturados fósiles.jpg
- File:Código genético en la evolución.jpg
- File:Ammonite extinct marine mollusc.jpg
- File:Prolates heberti.jpg
- File:Precambrian fossil draws.jpg
- File:Paw prints.jpg
- File:Institut Pasteur 1970s.jpg
- File:X-ray spectrometer 1973.jpg
- File:After DNA replicationː two strands.jpg
- File:DNA replication drawn.jpg
- File:Crystallized nitrogenous bases.jpg
- File:Solenostemon leaves with and without iodine treatment.jpg
- File:Preparación de hormonas con radical tritio a partir de hormonas iodadas.jpg
- File:Paramecium in green.jpg
- File:Fish spawn blue.jpg
- File:Chromogens in microbiology.jpg
- File:Comet Bennett.jpg
- File:Solar wind taken from Skylab.jpg
- File:Spectrograph Earth.jpg
- File:Mars (Viking Program).jpg
- File:Axinite crystals.jpg
- File:Calcium oxalate crystal.jpg
- File:Base pairing in DNA.jpg
- File:DNA model double helix.jpg
- File:Tres métodos de obtención de alimentos.jpg
- File:Chymotrypsinogen scheme.jpg
- File:Plasmolysis.jpg
- File:Esquema de la estructura primaria de la insulina.jpg
- File:X-ray crystallography pattern.jpg
- File:Adipose tissue section.jpg
- File:Metaphase of meiosis in pollen.jpg
- File:Lilium pollen microphotography.jpg
- File:Coral reef photography.jpg
- File:Carbon dioxide production during germination.jpg
- File:Mitosis microphotography.jpg
- File:Lituola (Haplophragmium) scitulum.jpg
- File:Nebula in Serpens constellation.jpg
- File:Halocynthia papillosa or red sea squirt.jpg
- File:Coatlicue National Museum of Anthropology.jpg
- File:Orion Nebula colour.jpg
- File:Amoeba microphotography.jpg
- File:Felis silvestris catus egg cell.jpg
- File:Human spermatozoa microphotography.jpg
- File:Chironomus chromosomes.jpg
- File:Histology of human tongue.jpg
- File:Salamander embryo 2.jpg
- File:Salamander embryo 1.jpg
- File:Multipolar neuron histology.jpg
- File:Diatoms microphotography.jpg
- File:Eocene fossil.jpg
- File:Paramecium microphotography.jpg
- File:Deep sea photography.jpg
- File:Cell fission and cell fussion.jpg
- File:Fucus platycarpus microphotography.jpg
- File:Chara foetida microphotography.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Question. Do you understand that all NASA images are in public domain regardless of when they were published? Ruslik (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruslik0: I do and I don't see NASA images (except perhaps File:Mars (Mariner 9).jpg) nowhere, especially in the file description. Perhaps you should name which are NASA images and put the appropriate tag on them. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is your problem, not mine. Until you do your homework I will Oppose all deletions. Ruslik (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruslik0: You may oppose what you want but I dont think your advice will be followed unless the uploader gives a proper license for these work. Please note it's his/her own problem to provide the correct licenses for the works he/her uploads. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is your problem, not mine. Until you do your homework I will Oppose all deletions. Ruslik (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruslik0: I do and I don't see NASA images (except perhaps File:Mars (Mariner 9).jpg) nowhere, especially in the file description. Perhaps you should name which are NASA images and put the appropriate tag on them. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete These uploads are not Patrick Rogel's homework rather from Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata. You can find the NASA files at the plant genus! category "Nasa" with false attribution and licence. All other ones are probably not from NASA and we need the authors' permission via OTRS. Additionally all files are heavily over-categorized. The uploader have to correct that, not Patrick Rogel! --Ras67 (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of the respective artists needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Obra de Maricel Martínez.jpg
- File:Obra de Jesús Azpitarte Almaguer.jpg
- File:Pintura de Carmen Esquivel.jpg
- File:Vitral de Felipe López.jpg
- File:Eiki Ito work.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Fonseca Mata (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Frida Kahlo, permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Viva la Vida (1954) - Frida Kahlo.jpg
- File:Retrato de mi Padre (1951) - Frida Kahlo.jpg
- File:Mi Familia (1949) - Frida Kahlo.jpg
- File:Autorretrato con Stalin (1954) - Frida Kahlo.jpg
- File:Naturaleza Muerta (Tondo) (1942) - Frida Kahlo.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted DW/incorrect license. Works by this artist are not yet in the PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, spam.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably INSCOPE as art but needs permission from artist. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
The picture´s engine does not belong to a Diesel Engine, it has distributor. Thanks. Wikitapatio (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Rather rename it to Unknown Mercedes engine or similar. --Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
No proper explanation of how these images are free. In Spain, Andorra, and France, all images remain copyrighted for at least 70 years after the death of the author.
- File:Maria Gispert.png
- File:Pau Gambús.png
- File:Feliu Crespí.png
- File:Alfons Borrell i Palazón.jpg
- File:Antoni Vila i Arrufat.png
- File:Feliu Vilarrúbias.png
- File:Vila Cinca.png
- File:Marçal Ballús.png
- File:Eulàlia Garriga.png
- File:Dolors Miralles.png
- File:Tomàs Viladot i Rosa Anton.png
- File:Magí Marcé.png
- File:Fidela Renom.png
- File:Dolors Viñas i Camps.png
- File:Francesc Izard.png
- File:Salvador Sarrà.png
- File:Armand Obiols.png
- File:Lluís Casassas i Simó.png
- File:Patro Agulló.png
- File:Placa casa Rosa Gorina.jpg
- File:Miquel Carreras i Costajussà. Dècada 1920.png
- File:Pl. de Narcisa Freixas de la Garriga.jpg
- File:Casa Narcisa Freixas.jpg
- File:Camil Geis i Parragueras.png
- File:Eduard Brossa i Trullàs.png
- File:Agustí Rius i Borrell.png
- File:Josep M. Marcet i Coll.png
- File:Josep Masllovet.png
- File:Joan Sallarès.png
- File:Pau Vila i Dinarès.png
- File:Josep Rosell i Casablancas.png
- File:Joan Puig i Pujol.png
- File:Esteve Maria Relat i Corominas.png
- File:Virolet Sant Pere.JPG
- File:Antoni Llonch i Gambús.png
- File:Teresa Claramunt.png
- File:Alcalde Ribé.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Please modify the link.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, images are at Flickr links under license listed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tom354 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Achim (talk) 09:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Yesterday I declined speedy deletion because this image was in use on several pages. Tom354 (talk · contribs) removed all file links (see https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?by=date&user=Tom354) and tagged it again for speedy deletion (G10). Now we'd like to hear what in detail the presumed advertisement should be. --Achim (talk) 09:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete watermarked. COM:PCP.--Roy17 (talk) 18:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) Image has "©: akeza.net" watermark in upper left, Facebook metadata, and indeed appears here. --Эlcobbola talk 19:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
© Punjab Vidhan Sabha, All Rights Reserved.. If 1962 not public in India domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Complex logo: The threshold of originality of Hong Kong is the same as UK (COM:TOO Hong Kong), which is extremely low (COM:TOO UK). Wcam (talk) 15:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: even with an extremely low TOO borderline at worst. --Jcb (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Image is marked "own work", as if the uploader had been there in 1938. Ketil3 (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False source & license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Own work, subject of hoax on English Wikipedia ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
user request Bubbasax (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See COM:Courtesy deletions. File appears to be correctly licensed and within scope. No reasonable rationale for deletion presented. --Storkk (talk) 08:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bubbasax (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Why requesting deletion now, more than 2 years after uploading? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- I am the author of this file and I am respectfully requesting deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubbasax (talk • contribs) 18:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
I am the author of this file and I am respectfully requesting immediate deletion. Bubbasax (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Repeating the same request over and over while your initial request is still open will not do anything to speed up the request. Giving more information on why you want the photo deleted might. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would like the file deleted because it is not linked to any wikipedia articles and I have the right to delete my own photo that I uploaded. Bubbasax (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation if you could please delete this photo in accordance with my request that would be appreciated. Bubbasax (talk) 08:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would like the file deleted because it is not linked to any wikipedia articles and I have the right to delete my own photo that I uploaded. Bubbasax (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. No source link, work of US government is not sure. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
uploader request Bubbasax (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Not own work as claimed, probably copyright violation. I'll delete crop file:Michael Chippendale.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
user request Bubbasax (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bubbasax (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why do you want it deleted, and why the more than 2 year wait after it was uploaded? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bubbasax: I see you uploaded many pictures of Nicholas Alahverdian, of widely disparate qualities. Could you please confirm whether you were, as you claimed at upload, the photographer of these files? If so, we probably cannot delete them, since they are correctly licensed. If you are actually the subject, then you likely never had the authority to upload them in the first place, and they can (where they are not US Government works) be deleted as copyright violations. Storkk (talk) 08:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept, this is selfie as claimed. No acceptable reason for deletion is presented. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after upload; here 2 years have passed. Educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
As the owner of the photo I am Bubbasax (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Closing this one since the user has opened two different deletion requests, and this one restates an earlier closed one. (The other deletion request which I've left open has a different statement of reason.) Bubbasax - please only open one deletion request for a particular image at a time. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Stolen from Facebook and other personal websites Bubbasax (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Clarify please - so you are not the actual creator of this photo, but took it off someone else's facebook page? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - image has EXIF from iPhone -- no evidence of FB at all. Bubbasax, if you nominate this again, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
The uploader has a history of uploading copyvios related to this same Nicholas Alahverdian subject. This is just as likely to be a copyvio lifted from Facebook or similar as his other uploads were. EnPassant (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- There's been a mostly successful attempt at deleting all the real photos of Nicholas Alahverdian, while a fake photo of Nicholas Alahverdian was promoted as truth. I think we need firmer proof to delete this. Starship.paint (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as likely copyright violation given the uploader's other files. People who perpetuate a hoax and upload copyvios should not be trusted. PanAndScan (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per the previous rationales. Note that the above user has been globally locked as an xwiki sock. Praxidicae (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The exif data looks fine, and reverse image search via TinEye and Google Images doesn't reveal any evidence of copyright violation. Dylsss (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Since there was an attempt to introduce a phony image of this person, I think it is worth having a legitimate image of Alahverdian in case there is another case of identity hoaxing. Liz (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
The intellectual property that is the subject of this correspondence consists of two original works owned and authored by The Nicholas Alahverdian Trust (hereafter referred to as "The NA Trust" or "The Trust) in the form of photographs. This is one of those photographs. The photographs are not in the public domain in any country, nor are they freely licensed and are therefore illegally uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons platform by users who do not have the requisite permission or license. The Wikimedia users who uploaded these images intentionally misrepresented any permission or license from The NA Trust as none was given. The NA Trust is left to resolve that internet users who may be the Wikimedia users themselves or users associated with them downloaded the photographs from the Trust website, Flickr account, or through another website, and uploaded the photographs with a falsified copyright tag and made false representations about ownership and copyright. This allowed the photographs, which are the intellectual property of The NA Trust, to be used across Wikimedia projects without license or permission from The NA Trust. The uploads were processed deceptively and violated applicable copyright laws. Patently false information about the license, copyright, and ownership status was given on the file description pages accompanying the photographs. The two photographs that are relevant to this correspondence are the work product of workers, contractors, freelancers, or volunteers of The NA Trust who, as part of their work-related responsibilities and duties outlined in their contract, assisted in the taking of photographs of officers and trustees of The NA Trust along with other guests and people at events that were Trust-sponsored or attended by officers or trustees of The NA Trust. At no time did any Trust employee, contractor, or volunteer violate their contractual obligation regarding the ownership of these two or any other photographs. As a result of the unauthorized uploading of these two photographs, The Trust, as described earlier, is sufficiently confident that they were downloaded as unlicensed copies of photographs published on website(s) owned or contracted with The Trust to host intellectual property on the basis that Trust property would be viewed solely in context with the articles or photographic essays or albums published by The Trust, which would include works authored by the Trust such as essays, photographs, videos, and other media. At no point did The Trust grant permission, license, or otherwise allow in any way for the Wikipedia Commons users to upload original works considered copyrighted intellectual property in the form of photographs authored by The NA Trust under a contractual basis with Trust employees, interns, and volunteers. To conclude, under the Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter section COM:NETCOPYVIO it unequivocally states that “[t]he vast majority of images found on the internet are copyright-protected and may not be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here. Many websites are silent on copyright issues, but images on those sites are just as off-limits as those on sites which explicitly say “Copyright, all rights reserved.” Works are copyrighted by default; a copyright notice or a © sign is not needed.” On The Trust website, and on any website or platform where The Trust contracted for exhibition of any intellectual property, a detailed copyright notice informing the viewer that the intellectual property was copyrighted by The NA Trust was published along with a © sign and the message “Copyright (year). All rights reserved” when those safeguards are not necessary only as an abundance of caution. As a result of the copyrighted photographs owned by The NA Trust which were downloaded from the Internet by Wikimedia Commons users who were not given permission or license to upload the original works owned by The Trust to Wikimedia Commons and later intentionally misrepresented the copyright and actual ownership of the works, we respectfully ask that this photograph and the other photograph tagged as a copyright violation that are the subject of this correspondence, as well as the cropped version of one of the photographs located on the same page, be deleted and permanently removed from Wikimedia servers in accordance with copyright law of the United States and Wikimedia Commons policies, guidelines, regulations, and procedures. Thoughtful and Considerate (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- So it's the intellectual property of an unregistered trust of a dead guy? How curious. This was uploaded by the subject themselves with full meta data many years ago. This legal screed has no basis in reality and this should be kept. Praxidicae (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: https://www.nicholasalahverdian.com/surviving-torture/ keeps exactly the same photo File:Vice President Mike Pence and Nicholas Alahverdian.jpg, but that's no proof because it was uploaded to Commons in 2017. The domain nicholasalahverdian.com has been created in 2018 according to domaintools.com. --Achim (talk) 22:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The image and Exif data are consistent with a selfie and not at all with being copied from Facebook, which strips Exif data from images. Noting also what Dylsss and Achim say and that there is no indication that the image is improperly licensed. On the screed above, the so-called 'Nicholas Alahverdian Trust' does not appear to exist outside a few blog posts, and the writer is now glocked as 'Long-term abuse' with multiple sockpuppets (quelle surprise!) including the 'delete' voter above, PanAndScan. The sockpuppetry can be disregarded. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no evidence of copyright issues, per comments above. sock puppetry nominations. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator is a patroller at EN:WP, FYI. E4024 (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was referring to the tagging/nominations by Thoughtful and Considerate amongst others, eg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg and the now closed ones above. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, as always it's me who is mistaken. I hope I did not hurt your feelings. I apologize. E4024 (talk) 04:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nah, reading it over my comment was understandably ambiguous/unclear. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, as always it's me who is mistaken. I hope I did not hurt your feelings. I apologize. E4024 (talk) 04:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was referring to the tagging/nominations by Thoughtful and Considerate amongst others, eg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg and the now closed ones above. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator is a patroller at EN:WP, FYI. E4024 (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The file seems to be in order, an "own work" with EXIF, and in scope; what else do we need? E4024 (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: "PanAndScan" and "Thoughtful and Considerate" ignored as some sort of LTA; otherwise there is consensus as usual for keep. --DMacks (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
user request Bubbasax (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, this is selfie, but not Nicholas Alahverdian's selfie. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
All files seem to be a derivative work.
- File:Yenbai.png
- File:Vungtau.png
- File:Vinhphuc.png
- File:Vinhlong1.jpg
- File:Vinhlong2.jpg
- File:Travinh.gif
- File:Thanhhoa.jpg
- File:Thainguyen.jpg
- File:Thaibinh.jpg
- File:Tuyenquang.jpg
- File:Tay ninh.jpg
- File:Sonla.jpg
- File:Quocphong.png
- File:Quangtri.jpg
- File:Quangngai.jpg
- File:Quangninh3.jpg
- File:Quangninh1.jpg
- File:Quangnam.jpg
- File:Quangbinh.jpg
- File:Phuyen.jpg
- File:Phutho.png
- File:Ninhthuan.png
- File:Nghean.jpg
- File:Ninhbinh.jpg
- File:Namdinhlogo.jpg
- File:Laocai.jpg
- File:Langson.jpg
- File:Lamdong.jpg
- File:Laichau.png
- File:La34.jpg
- File:Khanhhoa.jpg
- File:Kontum.jpg
- File:Hungyen.png
- File:Huelogo.jpg
- File:Htvthethao.png
- File:Htv9.jpg
- File:Htv7.jpg
- File:Hoabinh.jpg
- File:Hatinh.jpg
- File:Hanoi2.jpg
- File:Hanam.png
- File:Haiphonglogo.jpg
- File:Haiduong.jpg
- File:Hagiang.jpg
- File:Gialai.jpg
- File:Dongthaplogo.jpg
- File:Dongnai2.jpg
- File:Dongnai3.png
- File:Dongnai1.jpg
- File:Dienbien.jpg
- File:Danang2.png
- File:Danang.png
- File:Daklak.jpg
- File:Daknong.png
- File:Chú thích 2019-06-15 183804.png
- File:Caobang.jpg
- File:Binhthuan.jpg
- File:Binhphuoc2.png
- File:Binhphuoc1.jpg
- File:Binhpguoc.png
- File:Binhduong3.png
- File:Binhduong1.png
- File:Binhduong2.png
- File:Bacninh.jpg
- File:Backan.jpg
- File:Bacgiang.jpg
- File:Angiang.png
- File:Large kg1.jpg
- File:KG.jpg
- File:Logohg.png
- File:Chưa có tên.png
- File:Stv2.png
- File:Stv1.png
- File:Logon.jpg
- File:Large thtg.jpg
- File:Ctv.jpg
- File:1540969994 29750147881 917ff525e0 m.jpg
- File:Thuyen bat nha 2.jpg
- File:Phat Vang 2.jpg
大诺史 (talk) 13:36, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment files have little or no EXIF. 大诺史 (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - as much as I like PD-Textlogo, it's not the case... --Yuval Y § Chat § 13:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment see also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Huỳnh Đức DeuGer. 大诺史 (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
file seem to be a derivative work.
大诺史 (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: Pinging you in case you missed this one out. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Possibly fair-use logo. --Vansontv (talk) 10:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC) Possibly fair-use logo.
- File:Bạc LiêuHD.jpg
- File:Yên Bái.jpg
- File:VITVHD.png
- File:Vĩnh Phúc.png
- File:Vĩnh Long1.jpg
- File:Vĩnh long 2.jpg
- File:Trà Vinh.gif
- File:Thừa Thiên Huế.jpg
- File:Thanh Hóa.png
- File:Thái Nguyên.jpg
- File:Thái Bình.png
- File:Tây Ninh 11.png
- File:Tuyên Quang.png
- File:Tiền Giang.jpg
- File:Sơn La.jpg
- File:Quảng NgãiHD.jpg
- File:Quảng Trị.png
- File:Quảng Nam.jpg
- File:Phú Yên.jpg
- File:Quảng Bình.jpg
- File:Nhân Dân.png
- File:Ninh Thuận.png
- File:Nghệ An.jpg
- File:Ninh BìnhHD.jpg
- File:Nam Định.jpg
- File:Long An34.jpg
- File:Lâm Đồng.jpg
- File:Lạng Sơn.png
- File:Lào Cai.jpg
- File:Lai Châu.jpg
- File:Khánh HòaHD.png
- File:Kon Tum.jpg
- File:Kiên Giang.jpg
- File:Kiên Giang 1.png
- File:Hưng Yên.png
- File:Hòa BìnhHD.jpg
- File:Hậu Giang.png
- File:Hải Phòng.png
- File:Hải DươngHD.jpg
- File:Hà Tĩnh.jpg
- File:Hà Nội2.png
- File:Hà Nội1.png
- File:Hà Nam.png
- File:Hà Giang.jpg
- File:Gia Lai.jpg
- File:Đồng Tháp.jpg
- File:Đồng Nai2.png
- File:Đông Nai1.png
- File:Điện Biên.png
- File:Đak Lak.jpg
- File:Đà Nẵng2.png
- File:Đà Nẵng.png
- File:Cần Thơ.jpg
- File:Cà Mau.jpg
- File:Cao Bằng.gif
- File:Bình Phước3.png
- File:Bình Phước2.png
- File:Bình Phước1.png
- File:Bình Dương2.png
- File:Bình Dương1.png
Hamish (talk) 05:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably {{PD-textlogo}} applies, but logos are of little/no importance. Not in use. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Possibly fair-use logo.
- File:Bắc Ninh.png
- File:Bến Tre.jpg
- File:Bắc Giang.jpg
- File:Bà Rịa Vũng Tàu.jpg
- File:Bắc Kạn.png
- File:136820-ThuanVietHD1.png
- File:676296-sam.png
- File:Phim hay tv.png
- File:VOVTV.jpg
- File:VITVKinhDanh.jpg
- File:THNDHD.jpg
- File:Taynguyen.png
- File:Taynambo.png
- File:Vinhlong3.png
- File:Vinhlong4.png
- File:Soctrang2.png
- File:Soctrang1.png
Hamish (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- However, there is another file I couldn't find source online but it must be an copyrighted image without permission.--Hamish (talk) 05:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably {{PD-textlogo}} applies, but logos are of little/no importance. Not in use. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 17:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
self-request Bbdyn (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
self-request Fred newman (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
There is a OTRS permission for the same picture with a different author File:Wouter Polspoel en Herman Van Campenhout.jpg. This one is probably correct because it's not a selfie. Doubt about origin. Agora (talk) 10:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Blurred. There is an alternative: File:Ranipauwa-Muktinath, Nepal-WLV-0922.jpg Judithcomm (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from mascot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work.
- File:צלילי החירש הגדול.jpg
- File:בריאת העולם, יום רביעי.jpg
- File:גלגל של זוגיות.jpg
- File:בריאת העולם, יום חמישי.jpg
- File:בריאת העולם, יום שישי.jpg
- File:בוקר דייגים.jpg
- File:אמביציה.jpg
- File:דיוקן שרה.jpg
- File:בריאת העולם, יום שני.jpg
- File:התפילה.jpg
- File:משה ולוחות הברית.jpg
- File:שרה.jpg
- File:זר אנושות.jpg
- File:גביע קידוש.jpg
- File:יהודית.jpg
- File:איוב.jpg
- File:אדם עתידי.jpg
- File:אנדרטת זיכרון.jpg
- File:Sculptor Alexander Cherkov.jpg
- File:Alexander Cherkov.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
The photos are of original works of the artist and uploaded with his permission Art202020 (talk) 06:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
{{OTRS pending}} Art202020 (talk) 13:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019071010005848 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Alexander_Cherkov.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Sculptor_Alexander_Cherkov.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:אדם_עתידי.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:איוב.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:אמביציה.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:אנדרטת_זיכרון.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:בוקר_דייגים.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:בריאת_העולם,_יום_חמישי.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:בריאת_העולם,_יום_רביעי.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:בריאת_העולם,_יום_שישי.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:בריאת_העולם,_יום_שני.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:גביע_קידוש.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:גלגל_של_זוגיות.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:דיוקן_שרה.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:התפילה.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:זר_אנושות.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:יהודית.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:משה_ולוחות_הברית.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:צלילי_החירש_הגדול.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:שרה.jpg” under ticket:2019071010005848. --דוג'רית (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
May be a copyright violation, seems like a professional photoshoot. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camastropierro (talk · contribs)
[edit]May be a copyright violation, seems like a professional photoshoot. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:SS19133-03.jpg. Also, the 3 files are uploaded by a stale account with no edits (except this 3 uploads) since the creation of the account which was 8 years ago.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation - https://www.grantuk.com/about/news/grant-uk-s-2019-chosen-charity/ - click info you'll see ownership is attributed to the air ambulance charity 109.144.220.99 18:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload" (US copyright expires 2040, Russia copyright ends 2047) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload" (US copyright expires 2041, Russian copyright expires 2047), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
This is a "pre-upload" (US copyright expires 2039, Russian copyright expires no later than 2060), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation/unlicensed derivative. USA has no freedom of panorama. EnPassant (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- But it's a really good picture, and it's not hurting anybody. Has anyone complained? -- Toughpigs (talk) 00:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Ukraine. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
авторство не подтверждается Анна Гончаренко (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from fb per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Computer-generated image, and therefore derivative of work of the State of Maine 95.45.245.174 20:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Still clearly in the public domain as per Template:PD-textlogo and Template:PD-US-1978-89. Recommend an admin speedily close this as dubious and frivolous. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 01:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well sorry to say but if it's a computer-generated image created without the involvement of the State of Maine, then it's a derivative of a work of the State of Maine and therefore not allowed on here. Doesn't matter if this rule is broken intentionally or unintentionally 95.45.245.174 20:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- The original would not have been copyrightable in the US, because it is merely simple text and even if it wasn't, there were formalities that had to be followed then that Maine didn't.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- WTH are you talking about? 95.45.245.174 19:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe you should look at the templates that Illegitimate Barrister linked to. This is pretty basic US copyright law.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Well I'm sorry, but the fact of the matter is that this is a computer-generated image that was created without the involvement of the State of Maine and is therefore illegal on here. A legal computer-generated image would be one that *was* created with the State's involvement. 95.45.245.174 20:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- You say "is therefore illegal" and that's the point I disagree with. What obligates the involvement of the State of Maine here?--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Wow. You *still* don't get it.
- Well, let me say this: double standards should not be allowed here. 95.45.245.174 20:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- How would I get something that you haven't bothered explaining? Commons tries to follow the law, and the law says this is okay.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- I *have* bothered explaining. You clearly have not been paying full attention.
- I have said that it is a computer-generated image that was created *without* the involvement of the State of Maine, and therefore it is a derivative of a work of the State of Maine, and hence illegal on Commons.
- Does it not say, "Derivative works are not allowed on Commons"? And have users not had such images deleted, regardless whether or not they know of this rule?
- Either you have read the law wrong, or the law itself has some kind of loophole in it that allows for such images to stay up - and hence for double standards to apply.
- The *only* images of license plates that should be allowed here on Commons are images of *real* plates (provided they don't break any rules either), or computer-generated images that *were* created with the involvement of the state or territory in question. *Not* images from fan sites like licenseplates.tv.
- I don't need to explain further here, do I? 95.45.245.174 14:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- What's "it" that says? That is not a complete statement of the rule or the law. The law is full of loopholes, or "double standards" as you put it, and again, you need to look at the templates that Illegitimate Barrister linked to.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- How would I get something that you haven't bothered explaining? Commons tries to follow the law, and the law says this is okay.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- You say "is therefore illegal" and that's the point I disagree with. What obligates the involvement of the State of Maine here?--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Well I'm sorry, but the fact of the matter is that this is a computer-generated image that was created without the involvement of the State of Maine and is therefore illegal on here. A legal computer-generated image would be one that *was* created with the State's involvement. 95.45.245.174 20:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe you should look at the templates that Illegitimate Barrister linked to. This is pretty basic US copyright law.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- WTH are you talking about? 95.45.245.174 19:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- The original would not have been copyrightable in the US, because it is merely simple text and even if it wasn't, there were formalities that had to be followed then that Maine didn't.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well sorry to say but if it's a computer-generated image created without the involvement of the State of Maine, then it's a derivative of a work of the State of Maine and therefore not allowed on here. Doesn't matter if this rule is broken intentionally or unintentionally 95.45.245.174 20:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep clearly PD text.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- "What's "it" that says? That is not a complete statement of the rule or the law."
- Well I'm sorry to say, Prosfilaes, but this just confirms once and for all that you are quite pathetic.
- Come on, Commons admins - it's been two months now since I made this request, and all that has happened in that time (aside from a single comment by the user who uploaded this image) is that I have tried and tried to get Prosfilaes to understand just why this image is illegal. That Prosfilaes *still* doesn't understand, after all these explanations and all this time, is of very great disappointment to me.
- So please, admins, delete this illegal image pronto, and it will be a *lot* easier for everybody. It should *not* take two months to delete an image after the request has been made.
- Incidentally, I have already removed it from the article in which it was used. I'm sure Prosfilaes does *not* need me to point out in big capital letters what that article is. 95.45.245.174 20:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- If ever you are in court, I strongly urge you hire a lawyer, and that you listen to them about what the law says. You have not once cited anything besides your own opinions and interpretations, and that's not how the law in any form works.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sigh. Another comment that just proves how absolutely pathetic you are, Prosfilaes.
- Let me tell you, you'd better be thankful that I don't use curse words when I'm greatly frustrated and disappointed.
- Now hurry *up*, User:Jameslwoodward, User:EugeneZelenko, User:Ellin Beltz or whoever (yes, I looked at the admins list). You may all be volunteers, but it should *not* take you as long as two months to delete an illegal image after the request has been made. 95.45.245.174 13:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- This plate is clearly fall into {{PD-textlogo}} category. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- If ever you are in court, I strongly urge you hire a lawyer, and that you listen to them about what the law says. You have not once cited anything besides your own opinions and interpretations, and that's not how the law in any form works.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
The subject of this image is "Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo". Uploader claimed the author is "Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo". There is no evidence that uploader is the same person as "Kemi Omololu-Olunloyo". Even if they are the subject, we will need evidence of permission to COM:OTRS from the original photographer. T CellsTalk 07:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs confirmation via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
(Sorry french) Ce n'est pas pertinent d'avoir une photo centrée sur les fesses de cette catcheuse Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ah en effet (j'ai uploadé un album, pas vraiment fait attention...) --Rashinseita (talk) 18:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Image is really wonky quality and in any case it seems dubious that it was the uploader's own work. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Littorio Mazzucconi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, L'aurora interiore, 2997.pdf
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, Il vello d'oro, 1978.jpg
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, L'anima e il corpo, 1990.jpg
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, La Piramide del Palatino, Roma.jpg
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, La Città Nascente, progetto per il nuovo centro di Firenze.jpg
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, Alchemicus, 1989.jpg
- File:Vittorio Mazzucconi, Il lavoro spirituale, 1977.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
self-request Pro lights (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This is the source of File:Robert G. Flanders, Jr..png, which is used on, among others, en:Robert Flanders and Robert Flanders (Q7344610). File:Bob flanders nick alahverdian.jpg should be kept in order to demonstrate the provenance of the crop. --bjh21 (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Stolen from Facebook and other personal websites Bubbasax (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment As its INUSE I advised Bubbasax to request deletion via OTRS with proof that it was stolen Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Blatant copyright violation. This is a personal photo from a private collection and was stolen from either the company website or from Flickr where copyright was undeniably asserted and our rights were reserved. This photograph is our intellectual property. No permission or authorization was granted for its use and will not be granted if sought. User prolights (name redacted for privacy) contacted us to seek permission for the file to remain and permission was denied. We requested that she delete the file yet she is unable to do so. Therefore we resort to placing this notice of copyright violation and request immediate disabling of this content uploaded without permission. ... Further information: As the owner of this file I know when, how, and where it is authorized to be used. The answer is nowhere on Wikimedia at any time. The photograph was uploaded without permission. Wikimedia users then requested permission for it to be uploaded and then for it to remain; both requests were denied. I informed user prolights [name redacted for privacy] that she should not upload the file and request its deletion. Apparently the file was being used on other wikipedia pages, again without permission. I have emailed the Wikimedia foundation multiple times to have this file deleted because permission was never granted for it to be used on any website other than flickr and a company website. It was later deleted from flickr. I reached out again today to request that the file be deleted since it is no longer in use on any page and remains in violation of copyright as permission has not been granted and will not be granted if it is sought. The image in question is not in the public domain, a user unaffiliated with me and/or my company uploaded the file to wikimedia servers without proper authority, and thus stole intellectual property where it remains. I therefore respectfully request your assistance as I have received no reply to the emails I have sent, nor can the user apparently delete her own file, nor can I delete the file. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated at this juncture. I kindly ask that the photo to which there is no permission or authorization be deleted as I assert it is not in the public domain nor does the doctrine of fair use apply to this intellectual property. I hereby request that access is disabled forthwith for the reasons heretofore mentioned in good faith. OneGood (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, cropped derivative as well. --Achim (talk) 17:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- ticket:2020020310008231 relates to this file and provides a similar rationale for deletion. While investigating that, I was not able to find this image elsewhere online. I did find a DMCA complaint to Google complaining about the image and claiming https://www.nicholasalahverdian.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Bob_flanders_nick_alahverdian.jpg (apparently uploaded in December 2019) as the original work. https://www.flickr.com/photos/nalahverdian/ also does not contain the work now. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- As I indicated earlier the image was disabled from Flickr upon discovering it had been illicitly uploaded to other platforms including but not limited to wikimedia. The original work has been temporarily restored for the purposes of verification and authentication here. As you can see, that is the original and uncropped version of the work, and this is what was modified and thereafter uploaded without permission and in fact was brazenly declared as a “self-published work” which is a brazen lie and a theft of our intellectual property. Again we kindly request upon proof of the origin and ownership of the file that this be removed and access disabled as it has not and never has been authorized to be in the public domain.OneGood (talk) 05:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be re-uploaded after providing OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
It has JPG-format and I have uploaded a version with SVG-format and identical descriptions. This version is superfluous. AstroOgier AstroOgier (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
It has JPG-format and I have uploaded a version with SVG-format and identical descriptions. This version is superfluous. AstroOgier AstroOgier (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
I would say this is a duplicate of File:ABBA logo h256.svg as the file will are of the same size when scaled. Which is actually meaningless to keep both as SVGs are meant to be scaled. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- ABBA logo h256.svg
- ABBA logo w512.svg File:ABBA logo w512.svg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![70 File:"Jacob Marlow 2019.jpg.jpg](#File:"Jacob_Marlow_2019.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
_Evangelische_Kirche_Altar.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=524886037#File:Nicholas_Alahverdian_and_Andre_Dubus_III_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%87_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![16:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/07/09#c-大诺史-2019-07-09T16:01:00.000Z-File:"Jacob_Marlow_2019.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
![11:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/07/09#c-George_Chernilevsky-2019-07-16T11:36:00.000Z-File:"Jacob_Marlow_2019.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://www.biovoicenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Dr_Krishna_Ella_Bharat_Biotech-reduced.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Evangelische_Kirche_Altar.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Evangelische_Kirche_Altar.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Evangelische_Kirche_Altar.jpg){kind=link}
_Evangelische_Kirche_Altar.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_scitulum.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Frida_Kahlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Frida_Kahlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Frida_Kahlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Frida_Kahlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1942)_-_Frida_Kahlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
See the comparison above, both scaled to 300px. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @大诺史:
- I have made it from the same base, yes. But the code is different. The commons software already notices duplicates. In the code you can easily see the difference hopefully you can view them (view-source:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0a/ABBA_logo_h256.svg, view-source:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/ABBA_logo_w512.svg.
- The h256 is for when you want it to scale more perfect in height. The w512 is for when you want it to scale more perfect in width. I hope that doesn't fall out of scope. Best regards – GeMet [talk] 14:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @GeMet: Is it possible to "merge" the files together? The difference is just to small to have to seperate versions. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @大诺史: Yes, the difference is tiny. You'd probably have to enlarge them very much (e.g. football-field) to see any difference. Merging is not possible. If files with different h. and w. is out of scope i think the w512 should be deleted. Since the image is based on letters, which you regularly measure in height. – GeMet [talk] 15:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @GeMet: I wouldn't say that the files are out-of-scope. But as mentioned by you, difference can only be seen if enlarged to football field-size, which I don't think that the files would be used at that kind of size. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @大诺史: Yes, the difference is tiny. You'd probably have to enlarge them very much (e.g. football-field) to see any difference. Merging is not possible. If files with different h. and w. is out of scope i think the w512 should be deleted. Since the image is based on letters, which you regularly measure in height. – GeMet [talk] 15:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, we'll see what an admin thinks. I uploaded both for the user to have a choice. Have a good day 🙂 – GeMet [talk] 15:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The files are the same, so one should be deleted. WMF software recognizes files that have the same bytes, but these files are not byte equivalent because they have different
heightandwidthattributes, and the paths have been scaled differently. The coordinates in both SVG files have lots of precision, so there should not be an issue with scaling. The font size is also large enough that font hinting is irrelevant. Glrx (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion (the page was a redirect anyway). Ruthven (msg) 22:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation / COM:DW. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Drawing by Reb (René Besserve, d. 1959). Will enter the public domain in France in 2030. BrightRaven (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Invalid SVG which is a very near duplicate of File:ABBA-Logo.svg. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted already by other admin. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work from Tower of the Sun (1970), created by Taro Okamoto (1911-1996). Copyright violation of art. Categorizing (talk) 03:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I would say that this is a complex logo. Also no permission to reuse. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Questa immagine è sfocata. Esiste una versione migliore: Scarpetta rossa contro la violenza di genere (San Giovanni Valdarno) 01.jpg) Walter Giannetti (talk) 06:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Better version File:Scarpetta rossa contro la violenza di genere (San Giovanni Valdarno) 01.jpg. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Auf diesem Bild bin ich persönlich abgebildet inkl. meines Namens (Mitte). Aufgrund einer Suche bei Google bin ich erst darauf gestoßen. Meine Zustimmung zum Upload lag nie und liegt nicht vor. Bitte alle Versionen löschen. Urheberrecht (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Com:IDENT. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
I've converted to no-permission tag (though it was correct) into a regular DR to allow some time to obtain a permission, as this "historic" image was uploaded in 2010 under a then "public domain" claim. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: The original image includes the following release:
Original Scan by VC&G for entertainment purposes. We claim no rights over this image,
but if you use it, we would appreciate some credit. Thanks in advance!
www.vintagecomputing.com
- IMO this amounts to a release which only requires attribution but personally I'm not comfortable with the various release tags used herein. If you agree why not just change the tag to the approriate one? Tom94022 (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes I agree, I think its just a matter of just changing the tag to the approriate one, I think it's very clear that the owner just wants some sort of attribution..--Mcapdevila (talk) 16:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Attributed in the license. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
unusefull page extracted from page 129 of File:Obraz literatury powszechnej tom II.djvu Matlin (talk) 08:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Bandera Unión Nacional Sinarquista HD.png
- File:Logo Vertical De La Guardia Nacional.png
- File:Logo V2 Oficial De La Guardia Nacional.png
- File:Logo Oficial De La Guardia Nacional.png
- File:Logo Semi Oficial De La Guardia Nacional .png
- File:Logo Guardia Nacional 2019.png
- File:Recreación Logo Guardia Nacional Horizontal.png
- File:Logo Recreación De La Guardia Nacional Mexicana.png
- File:Logo Guardia Nacional.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: * Keep: If you even know the Federal Copyright Law of Mexico, this logo of a recognized organization is not protected according to the Art 14 subparagraph VII and indicated in {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}--Roman Medellín (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Please explain this to uploader. Also File:Bandera Unión Nacional Sinarquista HD.png is logo of political party, so it could not be {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Maybe the file File:Bandera Unión Nacional Sinarquista HD.png It is copyrighted, but the other files do not contain copyright, because they are shields or banners of the Mexican nation and according to the law and article 14 that I mentioned above says This file depicts the coat of arms, banner, or emblem of Mexico, one of its states, municipalities, or any other political subdivision, or a similar distinctive symbol belonging to an international or "recognized" organization, or NGO, operating in or outside of Mexico. According to Mexican copyright law, article 14 subparagraph VII [1] these coats of arms are not eligible for protection under the federal copyright law.Therefore, with the exception of this file File:Bandera Unión Nacional Sinarquista HD.png, the others as stated in the law mentioned above are coat of arms or emblems of Mexico--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: For that reason they should not be eliminated and should be preserved.--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- I just wanted to clarify situation with File:Bandera Unión Nacional Sinarquista HD.png. Anyway all explanations about copyrights law of Mexico should be addressed to uploader since he/she used bogus licenses. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: For that reason they should not be eliminated and should be preserved.--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Except for File:Bandera Unión Nacional Sinarquista HD.png deleted as it's probably copyrighted, the rest of the files are kept with a proper tag: {{PD-MX-exempt}} Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Drawing signed by Louis Icart (d. 1950). Will be in the public domain in France in 2021. BrightRaven (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Restored in 2021 per copyright expiration. Platonides (talk) 15:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
License in "permission" box incompatible with commons, "©Rhŷn Williams, this is a 'share-alike' piece, it may be shared anywhere, such as on social media or for education, however it cannot be used for profit unless they are given permission from the copyright holder." see Commons:Licensing Thespoondragon (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
counter argument
[edit]
I 'Hogyncymru' am the person who created and uploaded this file, it is intended to be used as an art reference which is accurately depicted in history books, it is a contemporary image based on Owain Glyndŵr's privy seal.
In this image, the dragon is depicted as a dragon with only two legs (essentially what we would refer to as a Wyvern today). The reason I created this was to update what others had wrongly depicted, (which was a gold dragon with four legs) the issue with other versions having four legs was that they compared it with the current Welsh flag and assumed that only the colour was different, when Owain's dragon did not have those four legs.
I make no claim that my image is the correct one.. but it is a more correct depiction of what he would have used within the Battle of Tuthill
As for the copyright conditions, I feel I need to protect the image from those who wish to profit from it, even though I have gifted this image to the community, I still hold some rights to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogyncymru (talk • contribs) 16:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- The problem is that the file is incompatible with Commons if it cannot be used commercially, see Commons:Licensing. --Thespoondragon (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Commons requires that all files must be available for commercial use. If you won't permit commercial use of your file, Commons won't host it. --bjh21 (talk) 10:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Image description changed, if anyone has the power to remove the deletion request, that would be lovely, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogyncymru (talk • contribs) 01:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader had a change of heart :-). --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Not own work. Please link to the NAA page. If 1979 not public domain yet in Australia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for flagging this image. I will delete the image while I check on its copyright status, but I did give the direct National Archives of Australia accession details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glyphodon (talk • contribs) 07:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Although this 1979 image is still within its copyright term, as an employee of the National Archives of Australia, I have been granted permission to upload this image on Wikipedia on 11 July 2019 under a CC-BY-NC licence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glyphodon (talk • contribs) 01:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Glyphodon: Sorry but your link leads nowhere. Besides files within the NAA are not supposed to be public domain per se so the copyright holder (whoever he is) must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: CC-BY-NC not allowed on Commons. Permission needed from (c) holder. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Cloth texture is probably copyrighted —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 23:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Converted from a speedy to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image had been found at Alamy. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Another Paul Fearn Alamy sock that copies content from Commons, completely meaningless. But looking at the other uploads from Azelot, I doubt this is own work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Since July some users have started to delete this photo because of Copyright violation: Converted from a speedy to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image had been found at Alamy.
But I would like to say, that this is my grandfather's photo and it is our family propriety. I put it on the page in 2013, so 6 year the picture have been on the article without any question, but now somebody has decided, that it is illegal here.
I really don't understand why do the people from this site sell it and for whom? In addition you can find 2 versions and 2 different authors of the photo, what justifies, that they stole it.
There is no Copyright violation on my part. A lot of sites have copied the image and use it, but only Alamy makes money on my picture and I become its victim in this situation!
If you need any profs, that I am the owner of the image, I can send you the full version of the photo and some necessary information about it.
I kindly ask you to help me protect my rights: to put the picture back on the page, where it has been since 2013. Otherwise My family will be forced to take legal action.
I strongly believe, that truth and justice will prevail.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Azelot (talk • contribs)
- Comment copied from talk page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Azelot: You can mail the full version and information to OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Info Same photo File:Anatolii Smîșleaev.jpg was uploaded in 2013 by User:Malina18 claiming own work. Thuresson (talk) 22:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the research. My deletion of this older upload (based on the same copyvio assumption as above) might have been premature, considering the fact that it is undated on Alamy and is claimed to come from an "UtCon Collection" which is not further specified. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Alamy copied it from Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the research. My deletion of this older upload (based on the same copyvio assumption as above) might have been premature, considering the fact that it is undated on Alamy and is claimed to come from an "UtCon Collection" which is not further specified. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Thuresson: Malina 18 is my previous profile, I forgot the password and that is why I made another one (Azelot). I told you before that I put this image in 2013 and it has been here during 6 years without any problems. Azelot (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: We need permission via OTRS. Its a photo of his grandfather. The person who took it must release it. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.icao.int/publications/journalsreports/2015/7002_en.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- (Page 7) That can't be the source, the picture here shows a larger angle. --mfb (talk) 00:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel and Mfb: I used Adobe Acrobat Pro DC to extract all the images and the embedded photo is 629 x 526. There must be some masking to make it more square in the PDF. This wider version includes all of the left side (including the glass) but is cropped on the right not to show the end of the chair the woman is sitting on. That the commons version has a lower DPI leads me to believe the photo is owned by someone besides the uploader. William Graham (talk) 21:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Also a Google Image Search of the Commons image gives a search result that that PDF has that photo. [3] But that image is full and uncropped but with a stated resolution of 794 x 526. This may indicate a limitation of Adobe Acrobat. I don't have the Linux tools on this machine (pdfimages) that I would usually use to extract images. William Graham (talk) 21:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel and Mfb: I used Adobe Acrobat Pro DC to extract all the images and the embedded photo is 629 x 526. There must be some masking to make it more square in the PDF. This wider version includes all of the left side (including the glass) but is cropped on the right not to show the end of the chair the woman is sitting on. That the commons version has a lower DPI leads me to believe the photo is owned by someone besides the uploader. William Graham (talk) 21:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably from https://spacewatch.global/2017/08/unoosa-directors-statement-60th-session-committee-peaceful-uses-outer-space/ but also found online before upload. The PDF appears to be copyright as well. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:SdP UNOOSA Director.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I found the image "SdP UNOOSA Director.jpg" with the license "CC BY-SA 4.0" on the WikiCommons page, I changed it and then I uploaded the result. Whether the source file rightly took advantage of this license, I have not checked. Fritzober 18:54, 9 July 2019
Deleted: Probably from https://spacewatch.global/2017/08/unoosa-directors-statement-60th-session-committee-peaceful-uses-outer-space/ but also found online before upload. The PDF appears to be copyright as well. --Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
For the same reason the U.S. Navy Band version got deleted; this recording is clearly not from 1900. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical technical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
British work, who is the author and why is it public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- There appears to be no firm information about original publication country and there are no copyright marks. Reuse elsewhere claims this post is "1960s" which is likely to be true based on style and colours. BOAC ceased existing under that name in 1974, becoming British Airways, de facto a terminus ante quem. SDASM mark their archive as copyright unknown rather that stating this is public domain. For Commons' purpose COM:PRP would lead to a worst case assumption that BA may still own the commercial copyright and, if 1960s is correct, this may not expire until the 2030s. --Fæ (talk) 04:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
False dates, https://egemen.kz/article/159110-zhetpisbay-duysembekov-otandyq-qurylys-materialdary-tabanymyzdynh-astynda-dgatyr
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- I would like only one image to remain (File:Duisembekov.jpg). I forgot to upload such a photo before. And the date was wrong.--Daniyar (talk) 11:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violations, not own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused wikipedia screenshot. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @大诺史: I don't know english well. I know korean well
English
This screen shot is Korean Wikipedia 토막 article edit by me
I don't know your comment meaning. help me. Where is 'wikipedia screenshot function page'? or How do 'wikipedia screenshot function'?
Korean
제가 한국어 위키백과에서 직접 편집한 것을 스크린샷 프로그램을 통해 스크린샷 하였습니다.
구체적으로 'Unused wikipedia screenshot'라는 표현은 위키 공용 등의 프로젝트 어딘가에 직접 스크린샷이 가능한 기능이 있는데, 그것을 사용하지 않았다는 내용으로 저에게는 느껴지네요.
영어를 잘 모르기에 미처 놓치고 있는 위키미디어 공용의 기능이 있을 수도 있습니다. 정말 그렇다면 그러한 기능이 있다면 어디인지 알려주십시오. 해당 사진은 위키백과 문서 스크린샷이 맞습니다.
-- Exj Talk 04:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- @-revi: Could you have a look here? Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Exj: 저작권 틀은 {{Wikipedia screenshot}}을 사용하시기 바랍니다. + 공용에서는 위키백과에서 "사용"되지 않는 위키백과 스크린샷을 삭제합니다. 이 사용의 기준은 1. 본문에 [[:파일:블라블라|이러쿵저러쿵]] 식이든, 2. 단순 [[파일:블라블라]] 식이든 사용되고 있어야 합니다. — regards, Revi 03:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unusued, low quality. Should be regenerated in high quality an get a proper license tag if useful. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
