Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 6th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no source (No source since) which is correct as it is a 2007 upload and there wasn't a source field on the template. However it does say that the piece dates to 1876 and that there is a licence with the author having been dead over 100 years which would make sense if it dates to 1876. Converting to DN for consensus in effort to keep apparently historical image of over 100 years date. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • The image is from Page 344 of "Cunninghame topographized by Timothy Pont 1604-1608. Continuations by James Dobie. Glasgow : John Tweed. 1876." Sorry about the inconvenience. RSLlGriffith (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Source question resolved (and upload was consistent with pre-template Commons uploads of early 2007) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I added this by mistake (why would I delete my own User talk page...) Please somehow remove this request Kevinkassimo (talk) 03:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept accidental nomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per What Commons is not Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Out-of-scope; apparent personal joke or possible insult image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Adithya Pakide 07:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


Deleted, upload mistake, prompt request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely a derivative work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, prank/joke image with deliberately misleading title. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist has not been dead for at least 100 years. Fails FOP in US and also fails de minimis. Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 00:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Kahlo's art are not yet PD; DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not under CC anymore: https://web.archive.org/web/20190706002854/http://www.dshv.mil.gov.ua/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Still under CC:
What makes you think the CC was removed? --VoidWanderer (talk) 11:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, blatant false license, false claim of authorship/date -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abadonna (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

own work, please delete ASAP, thanx--Abadonna (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closed the nominated page Commons:Forum will not be deleted. The file [[:]] refered to in this request deleted per Commons:Courtesy deletions, uploader requested deletion short after upload. --Martin H. (talk) 18:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yamaha XSR Wikisympathisant (talk) 16:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-sense request. --JuTa 17:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stadtzentrum Weinfelden Lukas 91 (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Die Datei Stadtzentrum Weinfelden bitte löschen diese ist mein eigenes Werk[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altstadt von Weinfelden Lukas 91 (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Altstadt von Weinfelden bitte löschen dies ist ein fremdes Werk[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Helmut Tribus Goldhähnchen (talk) 15:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Bright_Diamond.jpg Arielle Diamond (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept - obviously erroneous nomination.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An obvious error: I dropped the 'g' in 'pornographic'. "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted redirect from typo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Jcb (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source added Afif Brika1 (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pronunciation is incorrect, as the stress should be on the first syllable (similar to the word merrily): see "wikt:neroli". — SGconlaw (talk) 06:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pronunciation is still incorrect, as the stress should be on the first syllable (similar to the word merrily): see "wikt:neroli". — SGconlaw (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 86.141.81.202 06:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Facebook © 2019 — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of original work, seems scanned in from a magazine Hold and wave (talk) 22:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 00:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porn isnt allowe on commons Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep not pornographic. Illustrative in-use photograph of naked adult man at a nudist beach. @Alexis Jazz: Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Buckaroo bob 91: COM:NOTCENSORED - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per both "COM:NOTCENSORED" and "COM:INUSE". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license 71.175.84.215 03:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What should be the correct one? --E4024 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File has metadata, and I don't see any reason to doubt the uploader was the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s copyrighted under a different publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snh999 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: An otherwise unacceptable file does not become "in use" if the uploader simply inserts it into an article. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Restored per UnDR..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My photo, should be deleted 65.202.39.131 15:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as per the last 2 DRs and Undel. SPA & 2 IPs, raises an eyebrow. -- (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
North American IPs, anybody can say this person could be an American? (Maybe judging by his eyebrows? :) --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Survived DR's and was undeleted and kept. No valid reason - depicts nudity at a nudist beach so could be used. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's mine and I want it down Snh999 (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Free licenses may be irrevocable, but we allow for courtesy deletions. In this case, we should honor the author's wishes. Doing otherwise could discourage photographers from contributing their work for fear that their requests will be dismissed out of hand. AshFriday (talk) 23:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of course such requests should be generally dismissed, that's the idea of free licenses. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, as I said, we allow for courtesy deletions. We don't want to drive away our contributors by appearing too pedantic. AshFriday (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Commons already contains a large number of nude male images, and this one is not in use on any mainspace. AshFriday (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


OP requests it 5editorph (talk) 00:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and AshFriday. Actually not a selfie, so permission from photographer is needed. --Yann (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not educational Alek01913 (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alek01913: ..that begs the question why you uploaded it in the first place. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden. Reason for deletion: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope nude person (dressed up would still be out of scope). E4024 (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If my memory serves me correctly, this is the same image as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: It appears the uploader of both mistakenly assumed they couldn't fix their licensing mistake.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Confusing, this file was (or maybe several different-but-same-name files were) nominated several times and successfully deleted as per above, however in 2019 an undeletion request of this file was also successful, maybe @Jeff G., De728631, Ankry, Yann, and : should explain why their undeletion rationales are still valid for keeping this file, otherwise I would {{Vd}} this per COM:NOPENIS. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: At least one of the discussions refers to a different-but-same-name file, as it refers to a sign that is not shown in this file. What about the others? It’s too hard to read through all these discussions without knowing what they are referring to. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: What undeletion rationales? This appears to be a different photo than the ones discussed in DRs 1-5 above, and should be considered on it's own merits.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Unless there are clear copyvio reasons to delete, this is deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity. In the Beach nudity category, there are just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera, this is one. Therefore COM:NUDE does not apply because we don't have loads of existing alternatives. For exactly the same reasons this photograph is in scope -- (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Fæ. OTOH, the uploader's willingness to ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved." is suspect.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. "this is not deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity" nor it should be keep "because someone does like nudity". It is a DR asking the deletion of the image of an out-of-scope person, nude or dressed up, just like those hundreds of young men and women smiling at a camera that I proposed for deletion. Most, or almost none of those previous DRs have not attracted any keep votes; therefore I would be right in suspecting that these votes are because some people like nude images, IOW exactly the same subjectivity (personal PoV) that has been tried to accuse me of. Best regards. E4024 (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: Please strike your question. Hassling folx in public, in order to out their identities is not just uncivil, it's against the terms of use of this website. Refer to "violation of privacy" at wmf:Terms of use. Thanks -- (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes: 1. I wrote my previous comment above the last one, because although that argument sounds like "delete" it could be seen as a part of the "keep" by an IP. 2. It is not necessary nor correct to add a "number" to the DR pages, because they are not related to the same file, they simply use a "previous file name". 3. An occasional visitor comes and adds an image of an out-of-scope person and we make a fuss around it. They must be happy for this welcome. My suggestion: Let us change our guidelines and not delete anything from now on, on scope basis. Everybody has a right to want to see his/her image on the internet; not only those that dare to expose their genitals in public... --E4024 (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Re 2: It is necessary and correct to add a "number" to the DR sections because they are on the same page with each other and browsers will only see the first one if they all have the same exact name.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WRT guidelines; this is a pointless straw man argument. Thanks -- (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Any user whose name I hear from time to time as probable candidates to adminship may strike (bolded my consent to make life easier) whatever I have done that deserves being censured in this DR. I do not care. What I am most curious about is, when and if they are elected to the said post, how will they be able to close any deletion request regarding naked people images as I see they -IMHO of course- have a favourable approach to almost all of these without paying attention to the considerations of regular users like myself.
(BTW bravo, newcomer; you have been received as a hero. You even made me repent having opened this discussion, although I still believe your valuable contribution must be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: Strike your own question. If you are writing about me, I cite policies and guidelines directly or indirectly. To be clear, this is 1 of just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera on this project, and thus is in scope.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: I can fill it in if you give me access to see the info. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rumblerumble33: Signatures in discussions should include timestamps. I have added timestamps to your signatures. Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically include a timestamp. Brianjd (talk) 08:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rumblerumble33: If you are referring to the info in the deleted file File:Naked man on the beach.jpg, I cannot give you access as I do not have access myself. This is why I asked an admin to check. Brianjd (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Photo coordinates are (40.4585670, -73.9925572), I just don’t know how to list them. I also have the original unedited photo if that helps with EXIF. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rumblerumble33: Thanks, I added the location for you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Thank you! Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rumblerumble33: You're welcome! What's the name of that beach or area, and what did you retouch? Also, please do not ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved" again.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: It’s Gunnison Beach in Sandy Hook, NJ. That particular area is a service road and he wasn’t supposed to be there :*) ... I made the photo brighter and colorful as it came out dark due to limited exposure. I’ll make sure to rename if I get that warning again. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I have other photos of him from that same day. Is it valuable to post them and should I post them raw and unedited? Also should I rename the file given your original message and if so how do I do that? Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rumblerumble33: Please consider how the photos fit into COM:PS before doing so. If you do so, please post the highest resolution raw and unedited version with metadata per COM:HR, and then the edited version with overwrite or a separate name. What new name would you choose for this file?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I am not very creative with names. Perhaps “male nakedness on beach?” Or should it be more precise? I am open to suggestions.
@Jeff G.: I suggested “File:Naked and barefoot man on Gunnison Beach.jpg” as a file name replacement.
@Jeff G.: @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Rename request rejected because this is still up for deletion nomination. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Should this be in Category:Beaches at Sandy Hook, New Jersey? This seems like a surprising result (which we are told to avoid, though I cannot find a relevant policy). Brianjd (talk) 10:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: Would you prefer Category:Sandy Hook, New Jersey or Category:Gateway National Recreation Area, as the location isn't exactly on Gunnison Beach? Perhaps we need a Gunnison Beach cat that isn't surprising?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: @Jeff G.: You need a Gunnison Beach cat. There are about 12 separate beaches in the Gateway National Recreation Area. Gunnison is the only nude beach of the 12. It’s the furthest from the old military equipment and will be the only one where you will find nudist people and signs about nudity. It has a life and aura of its own. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I was using the phrase "surprising result" in the same sense as User talk:Etsidun#Avoid surprising results, that is, nudity in a non-nudity category. Apparently you are not supposed to do this. Brianjd (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: @Brianjd: I agree we should create the Gunnison Beach cat. How can I help do that? NudistPhotographer (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NudistPhotographer: See Commons:Categories. This page contains a quick guide to categorisation, followed by details. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<Exif Metadata> Aperture: f/6.3

Aperture (APEX): 5.375

Aspect Ratio: 3 × 2

Camera Maker: Canon

Camera Model: Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Camera Lens Model: 8.8-36.8 mm

Color Model: RGB

Color Space: sRGB

Components Configuration: 1, 2, 3, 0

Custom Rendered: Normal

Date Taken: Jun 7, 2020 02:50:33 PM

Depth: 8

Digital Zoom: 1

DPI Width: 72

DPI Height: 72

EXIF Version: 2.3.1

Exposure Bias Value: 0 ev

Exposure Mode: Auto

Exposure Program: Program AE

Exposure Time: 1/1600s

File Name: IMG_0011.JPG

File Size: 9.9 MB

Flash: No Flash

Flash Pix Version: 1.0

FNumber: f/6.3

Focal Length: 8.800000000000001 mm

ISO: 125

Metering Mode: Multi-segment

Orientation: Normal

Profile Name: sRGB IEC61966-2.1

Resolution: 20 MegaPixels

Scene Capture Type: Standard

Shutter Speed Value: 1/1579s

White Balance: Auto

Author: Emily Claire Braston



Kept: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 10:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file discussed in this section was renamed to File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg 11:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) and then deleted 12:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC) per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg. The filename was salted 14:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sva prava pridržana © 2019 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Polarlys at 08:49, 8 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerhard.Trottmann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, photos, drawing and map. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep most of the files. Those are documents from the 16th and 18th century, so the country of origin is pretty meaningless, but the license tag needs correction. File:Mathilde Riede-Hurt.jpg could be a copyvio, but I'm in contact with the uploader in order to solve the problem. --Didym (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Gerhard.Trottmann and Didym: Please fix the source(s). --Yann (talk) 22:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerhard.Trottmann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Mathilde Riede-Hurt (d. 1988), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To use the global user page at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jaimemf Jaimemf (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Detlef Dauer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from https://www.oblivion-art.de/ of various three-dimensional works. There doesn't appear to be any free license from oblivion-art.de. The photos uploaded here appear to be upscaled.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 06:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, Facebook © 2019 — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; unused & opaque, also poor alignment of atoms & bonds, seems to be a semi hand-drawn structure. Have File:Structural formula of methyl formate.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 14:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Structure of sodium phenoxide with some absurd colouring; better and correct versions are available in Category:Sodium phenoxide. Wostr (talk) 17:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 12:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Structure of potassium phenoxide with some absurd colouring, different fonts. At least one alternative structure exists. Wostr (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 12:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of presumably copyrighted painting Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted painting Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted painting Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted painting Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted painting Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted painting Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparent copyvio based on exif data Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it looks like the uploader is affiliated with the museum. We probably need OTRS verification though. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably copyrighted artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magician aslam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pleguezuelo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All remaining images uploaded by this users happen to be copyvios. In particular, File:JAVIER AYALA ORTEGA.jpg is detected by Google images as coming from the mayor's blog while the second one is a clear institutional image. Per precautionary principle

Discasto talk 22:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colibritho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colibritho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Extremely small images that do not seem to be created by uploader -else why are they so small and so blurry?

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwjVEUShfwK/ eien20 (talk) 06:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE; possibly COM:CSD#F10 and/or COM:CSD#G10 Hmxhmx 09:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture; low resolution; watermark Hmxhmx 09:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture; low resolution; watermark Hmxhmx 09:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No advertising / self-promotion allowed per COM:ADVERT Senator2029 09:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). May be derivative work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johny Anderson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1997-2019 © Russian Darkside e-Zine. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo with unknown importance, maybe out of project scope. Cjp24 (talk) 10:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmoud magdy Abd elkawy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s) for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 13:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by حليم محمد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s) for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 13:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AKarjun555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clumpus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamsouleymane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web: https://jolyday.com/profile/yanihumor/photo/1971277002469295092_6358931934?hl=de Albinfo (talk) 14:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per previous deletion of this image. --Herby talk thyme 16:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Laurence Jenkell is born in 1965. No OTRS. 90.43.130.158 20:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE; not used anywhere Hmxhmx 20:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image needs author's permission through OTRS. Gazal world (talk) 21:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previous DRs

No freedom of panorama in the United States. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are copyrighted by Gaylord. COM:FOP#United_states has no provision for statues.

67.87.46.39 21:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is well established -- a ruling by the US Supreme Court -- that the sculptures of the soldiers are under copyright and cannot be reproduced without compensation to the sculptor. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, + the one with keep request as well. The reflections make it unusable. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

BMacZero (🗩) 21:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial. (Sorry closing admin, I don't know how I missed this many last time I looked through here)

BMacZero (🗩) 22:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My fan again!!
BMacZero, thank you for noticing... however I have one question, this sculptures were not commissioned by the USA Government? They do not have a law covering this kind of case? I saw the case of the Post Office, since them nothing changed? Anyone check it again?
Hedwig in Washington you had kept the file File:Korean Memorial4.JPG, no? "per nomination, + the one with keep request as well" Why did you delete it after? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 13:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: I have briefly Googled and was unable to find an overturning decision. Works made for the United States Government by a contractor are generally not placed in the public domain, especially in this case as Gaylord's contract explicitly specified that he maintained the rights. – BMacZero (🗩) 15:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BMacZero, humm, okay, thank you for the information. And thank you again for noticing. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 15:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

BMacZero (🗩) 16:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm back again with more of these copyrighted statues. See the above DRs. Sorry, this batch is mostly from my bot.

BMacZero (🗩) 04:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptures here are under copyright.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I skipped nominating these on my last pass because there may be a weak case for DM, but I don't oppose deletion. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This one also extremely similar: File:Korean War Memorial at National Mall & Memorial Parks (4f0f6a20-27a2-45c0-b724-658c67d6e07c).jpg. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

BMacZero (🗩) 15:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violations: there is no freedom of panorama in the United States, and these images lack permission from the heirs of the sculptors. File:Washington F2492 (7144738487).jpg is not de minimis as it is not trivial here: US de minimis is more restricted as it uses triviality concept. See also a court case Gaylord v. United States.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, all sections above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 01:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free sculptures, see previous discussions.

BMacZero (🗩) 00:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all nominated images. See also: USA Today article (Gaylord v. United States conclusion, with the sculptor the victor). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom, all sections above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom. Sennecaster (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: However, I must remind everyone that photos taken in a public place are not eligible for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F3. -- King of ♥ 07:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images show at least one of the soldier statues in a non-trivial manner. There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States. This artwork is not freely-enjoyable: see Gaylord v. United States (USA Today article). Retention of these images will put American and even international reusers at risk of lawsuits from Gaylord's heirs!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom, all sections above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete and trim the one with Former President Bush. Sennecaster (talk) 19:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 2 and trimmed 1 per nom. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

insufficient public domain rationale. " Simply a photo from another wiki" means "someone found it on the internet and nobody has any clue as to copyright". --Animalparty (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal rights violation (see comment), out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a far better version here so this file is useless TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 Bezier Games. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is shared under Creative Commons here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/182560415@N08/48214332296/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toulousifer (talk • contribs) 18:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Toulousifer: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) is not a valid license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Herbythyme. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcrebillet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick Rogel -- thanks for reviewing these photos. Though I'm not nearly as familiar with Commons policies as you are, I wanted to give you some context for these photos to see if that changes their status. I created the English Wikipedia page for this musician, Marc Rebillet. I couldn't find a properly licensed photo of him, and so I followed the instructions I found here and sent an inquiry through the musician's website for a freely licensed photo. Then the musician uploaded these photos to Commons. Is that the appropriate process? -- Cloud atlas (talk) 19:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Cloud atlas: Yes it's OK now. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mian Muhammad Sharif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mian Muhammad Sharif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:52, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/andreyderzhavinru/photos/a.113995385905117/400579773913342/?type=1&theater
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as uploader has objected. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; dubious claim of own work by a new user. Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 SPN SA Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:10 PKR Coin Obverse.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope selfie, accidentally uploaded in batch Flickr upload Mindmatrix 20:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Vlastislav Hofman (d. 1964), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I totally forgot EU copyright doesn't have a cutoff year like US copyright does. I'll restore them on en.wiki. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 21:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of another file Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 21:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Rik Klein Gotink Jcb (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author should be the photographer, not the person in the picture. Not notable person. Ganímedes (talk) 13:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fue un pequeño error que pase por alto, pero ya está corregido Aspermaster (talk) 17:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even so, there's no evidence of permission from the photographer. And remains still the problem of notability. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a re-upload of a deleted image. See [1]. Creator/uploader is a non-notable artist site banned from en.wiki after 13 years of self-promotion: adding his name and images to articles. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Алексей Любимов в объективе фотографа Александра Кабанова.jpg Karina Khafizova (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 12:20, 18 Juli 2019 UTC: No permission since 6 July 2019 --Krdbot 19:11, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Attia.hakim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on smaller than Facebook files which seem to be about some kind of sports awards (and the award itself).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos not used on any page. Not educationally useful Catherine Laurence 09:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a private photo. This is a film Director and performer of the main role - a well-known media person, journalist and kulturtrager. The photo will be used in the material about the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HominiLupus (talk • contribs) 09:49, 6 July 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, in use in Wikidata -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, Derivative Work, uploader lacks authority to license as own work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: That's not a poster. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, may not be a poster, but clear Derivative Work. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright of the object is OK, but who is the photographer? Yann (talk) 13:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Thuresson and Ruthven: Yann (talk) 13:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Well, this is exactly the issue. The uploader wrote me that he doesn't know who the photographer is (but the photo isn't present at the indicated source). It's a 3D object, being a font/holy water container, so we cannot accept it as PD-art, i.e. a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. --Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Commons:Derivative works reads: a derivative work is not merely a work that is "based on" another work, a derivative work is considered a new work because of some significant amount of additional creativity that went into its production— all subsequent works based on another, previous work but lacking substantial new creative content are merely considered copies of that work and are entitled to no new copyright protection as a result and should not be referred to as "derivative works", as this has a very specific meaning in copyright law. Therefore, no substantial new creative content implies no new copyright protection. As far as I can see, this file shows the ancient stoup only, without any substantial new creative content.--3knolls (talk) 13:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We can't keep this image without a formal written permission from the photographer. --Yann (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sounds like derivative work? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 07:55, 30 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia screenshot. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry, I did not know that was wrong. ou can delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin Borg (talk • contribs) 14:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's just a table of contents, nothing copyrightable in it - kept because it's used in a Wikipedia Teahouse archive page, no need to break that, will change the license template to {{PD-text}}. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work, and pdf format. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, most likely not own work. -- User: Perhelion 19:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This should NOT be deleted. I, Kevin Qian (Github handle: kevinkassimo), am the Deno logo creator and Deno contributor. You can find reference here: https://deno.land/manual.html#logos Kevinkassimo (talk) 03:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kevinkassimo: Now I update the author ,sources and license. I am sorry for not seeing this. --Catherine Laurence 03:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Kevinkassimo: Also see COM:Username policy for ways to verify your identity. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most likely own work. -- User: Perhelion 19:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality version of File:Seal of Midlothian, IL.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, it's same quality and a flag. -- User: Perhelion 19:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cambio foto Giovanni celeste carboni (talk) 05:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, personal. -- User: Perhelion 20:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems out of scope to me Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 20:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. No evidence of permission, would need OTRS verification if the uploader represents the organization. GermanJoe (talk) 20:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 20:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has a vector version File:Youcontrol logo.svg. Because this logo in use only at one page—w:uk:YouControl, and SVG file already in use at that page, PNG version can be safely deleted as is not used. Rino ap Codkelden (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 20:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerns copyright violation (or fair use). It seems this emblem is used in Dragon Ball. Senatsuki (talk) 01:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a rephoto, look at left and lower edges. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size suggests copied from Facebook, no helpful meta. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and likely out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gk998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from various websites that do not assert open license. Some uploads were already speedied after others tagged them with specific websites where they were found, and spot-checking the others finds them all over the web. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davey01 for another account with this behavioral pattern and same topic interest.

DMacks (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erekkudla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some old and new pictures, inconsistent EXIF data, some from Facebook. Unlikely to be own works, no evidence of a permission or a free license. Yann (talk) 08:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stated in the en article caption to be from a 1973 US motorcycle competition programme (added in this diff)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faysalcsse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. Some others don't have a source, "Bank logo" is not a valid source

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tokaji aszú (still photos)

[edit]

I cleared up that the still photographer of this film was László Szente, see here (p. 5 in text, állófényképész=still photographer). I don't know when he deceased but I know he was born in 1908 (see parish register nr. 79.). See him on IMDb. According to the sources the photographer was unknown but it is likely taken by him. --Regasterios (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cleared up that the still photographer of this film was László Szente, see here (p. 4 in text, állófényképész=still photographer). I don't know when he deceased but I know he was born in 1908 (see parish register nr. 79.). See him on IMDb. In the source the photographer was not showed but it is likely taken by him. Regasterios (talk) 12:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work of a poster with unfree artwork. A.Savin 13:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not art for me. Just a quick drawing made with color markers for a protest in the street. The quality is not there, at full size, the shapes and the details are very rough and simple. It is almost certain that this banner is in the garbage bin now the protest has finished, and not under a frame in a gallery or on the wall of a living room. But the {{PR}} template was missing, I've added it -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Even bad art may be copyrighted and we have the Precautionary principle. --A.Savin 12:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:PD-shape may apply here -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 09:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Deleted and Reuploaded The protest sign was made in order to be seen by as many as possible, not in order to make bucks. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per previous deletion request, and the purpose of the sign is irrelevant to COM:LICENSING. Please read that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional image watermarked with website suggests the uploader is not the copyright holder Sillyfolkboy (talk) 13:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, no permission to reuse. (definitely not own work). Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious error in title (was corrected through rename). I see no reason to keep the false title. Akela (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a orrect map ffor Palestine 37.8.118.132 15:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   13:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't accept cc-pd-mark from Flickr: Template:Flickr-public domain mark. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File comes from Theresa May's twitter, does OGL applies? 219.79.126.237 02:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this photo is obviously not taken by May herself, so it must be the work of her staff, i.e. a member of Her Majesty's Civil Service. I believe http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/re-using-public-sector-information/uk-government-licensing-framework/open-government-licence/ applies.--Roy17 (talk) 11:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I made a mistake in my last evaluation. You cannot use information which has not been offered for use expressly under the OGL. However, this photo is available under OGL3 on https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-at-the-pride-reception-2-july-2019 .--Roy17 (talk) 09:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 20:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'accède à une demande de suppression qui a été déposée sur ma page de discussion Wikipédia Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 10:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per request of subect; we have a better alternative anyway. --James F. (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. The author of the sculputure has not been declared in the file description, but it is most likely that public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Vija Mikane, the author of the sculpture, made it in 2006 so public domain rules do not apply in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of presumably copyrighted artwork - painted 1931 in US Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Please check the file's license tag - the artist died in 1935, so it has been more than 70 years since the he died. I believe this puts it within the public domain. with all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 20:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of presumably copyrighted artwork - made 1938 in US Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Please check the file's license tag - the artist died in 1945, so it has been more than 70 years since the he died. I believe this puts it within the public domain. with all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 11:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 20:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's two copies of the Library of Commons TIFF, but, for some reason that I really don't know, this is the copy that is not identical to the one at http://cdn.loc.gov/master/pnp/cph/3c00000/3c00000/3c00800/3c00831u.tif - as checked by an attempt to upload that. I believe they're from the same source *more or less*, but... this one seems to be the wrong one. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 20:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission(s). Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die Urheberrechtsangabe zum Foto wurde ergänzt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scitt2 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely "Bouwwebcam.nl - WebcamPro BV" copyright (q.v metadatas & timelapse Youtube video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_BxHr9hFys) Pilkarz (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jairorincones1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any reason to be public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any reason to be public domain?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Rouch.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cuatro Remos as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: File does not appear as released under the mentioned license Strakhov (talk) 08:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

esta fotografía esta bajo esta licencia de Memoria Chilena para su Libre uso{cc-by-sa-3.0}--Read more is to know more (:)) Historiadormundo 16:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Retiro mi solicitud inicial de borrado puesto que la imagen pertenece al patrimonio cultural común de Chile. He subido una versión de mayor calidad. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 18:07, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, apparently the nomination is withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RS34 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bitte löschen. Wunsch des Erstellers.
Converted by me to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. However, a courtesy-deletion might be discussed. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 14:51, 16 September 2019 UTC: author's request --Krdbot 18:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7moxy7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist's heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7moxy7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: first two: per nomination, last is old enough for PD-old-assumed. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es wurde irrtümlich eine falsche Bildbeschreibung kopiert H. H. W. Preuß (talk) 15:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload day. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот файл не имеет разрешения на публикацию/This file does not have permission to be published WikiSpirit1234 (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:John D. Vanderhoof Colorado Governor.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Please explain why image is public domain. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cape Diamond MM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two photos of two different locations captured on nearly same time with different cameras and claimed as own works. How can be a person is in different locations at the same time? A photographer from Myanmar claimed that File:Protest for Victoria.jpg is his own work and someone cropped and uploaded to Commons.

NinjaStrikers «» 18:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: good catch. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From license template: This license is not valid for content that was produced (i.e. date taken) by Agência Brasil after 23 February 2017. (see Village Pump discussion) 190.231.217.70 21:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Brasil is not valid for content that was produced (i.e. date taken) by Agência Brasil after 23 February 2017 Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a copyright violation. See the main website (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@大诺史: not a copyright violation. I am an OTRS and I have received the file for update. It is driven from the old file which is already on Commons. (Ping me)--Épine (talk) 11:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Épine: shouldn't there be an OTRS ticket? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@大诺史: my bad. Added template.--Épine (talk) 11:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I’m sorry, I was mistaken. We didn’t receive a ticket for that file, we received it for this one. Sorry!--Épine (talk) 14:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; too complex. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JSlaughter3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure files from Ministry of Public Security have been ever published before 2014. Please provide where and when the image was first published. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andros64: What make you think that mugshots are free in Poland? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Polish Copyright Law

"Article 4. The copyright shall not cover:

   1) legislative acts and their official drafts,
   2) official documents, materials, logos and symbols"

ACT of 4 February 1994 ON COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS

Mugshots are official police documents, made by state institution. Andros64 (talk) 07:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Poland. Ruthven (msg) 21:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is given as szyk.org. This website is dead now, but you can use Wayback Machine to see that the site's license is as follows:

"Unless otherwise stated, The Arthur Szyk Society and/or its licensors own the intellectual property rights in the website and material on the website. Subject to the license below, all these intellectual property rights are reserved.

"You may view, download for caching purposes only, and print pages or images from the website for your own personal use, subject to the restrictions set out below and elsewhere in these terms and conditions.

"You must not:

"republish material from this website (including republication on another website); sell, rent or sub-license material from the website; show any material from the website in public; reproduce, duplicate, copy or otherwise exploit material on this website for a commercial purpose; edit or otherwise modify any material on the website" [2]

Which is definitely not compatible with Creative Commons license. — Kpalion(talk) 21:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permissions. Ruthven (msg) 21:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LLs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A 2011 website is not a proof that images are in use for 25 years ago or first published before February 20, 1972. permission of María Elena Solé needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: photos from 1967. Ruthven (msg) 21:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 1

No FOP in the Philippines

LGA talkedits 04:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the midst of the Bustos town fiesta festival when I chanced to discover this almost hidden or by the side Monument; Thanks for the message; in Commons:Derivative works, I ponder that the logo and seal is part of the Cultural heritage, monuments and memorials in Bulacan or in the Philippines emanating from the Tourism aspect for the site is 100 years marker and landmark of the town. No objection to the deletion, though.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 2

no FoP in Philippines. Though maybe some can be considered DM

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good morning; I looked at the photos of the Wikipedia Takes Manila for example this 2012 Image of the Public Market 6 photos taken by this Project in the Category; this market which is now reconstructed, hence, I presume that the photos of the facade and interior are well within the Philippine projects; I just passed by this place to hear mass at the Church near this market; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, Category:Santa Ana Public Market, Manila includes 6 photos of the same facade by the the Wikipedia Takes Manila

sincerely --Judgefloro 19:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC) (talk)


Deleted: most, kept two as DM. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 4

No COM:FOP in the Philippines, artists' permission needed via COM:OTRS.

List of files

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)\[reply]

Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
With all due respect, I am submitting here the legal ramifications on the matter, to wit:
Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Rizal Park was granted to herein photographer editor by the Head of the Visitor Centre of Rizal Park, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the said Visitor Office of the Park including the Tourist Map Category:Tourist map of Rizal Park;
Category:Rizal Park Visitor's Center the head explained to me each and every numbers corresponding to the places of the tourist spots of the park, including the subject Sentinel of Freedom or Lapu-Lapu monument which is now the property of the Government; b) she assisted me in the photography of the Park's Tourism information center and even pointed to the bust of Jose Rizal for me to take photo of;
All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx Category:Colossal brass statue-monument of Lapu-Lapu (Sentinel of Freedom), Rizal Park Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark sport; Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 02:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
@Judgefloro: First they are works of the respective sculptors even if commissionned (which remains to be proved). Concerning the Sentinel of Freedom monument it has been founded by the Korea Freedom League so it can hardly be a Pinoy Government work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If all of the above files are deleted, deleting admin should consider nuking all of the uploads under COM:FOP Philippines as they are taken by the same person within the same area. 大诺史 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning and thanks for your notes as I respectfully submit my Rejoinder Buildings and sculptures as works of art; However,
I would like to differ in the application, interpretation of the cited Article Sec. 172 of the IP Code of the Philippines, and other related provisions, for the following reasons: in Statutory construction, the spirit and intent of the Copyright law in its related provisions should be looked into so as not to make absurd the Section; in this case the Rizal Park administration, that is Rizal Parks Develoment Committed through the Head of the Visitors Office, paid all the labors and works of the architect or sculptors, and all the foreman and manual laborers to build in in Agrifinal Circle; the same can be said of all thousands works now owned or transferred to the Government of the Philippines; as in our Government, the Rizal Park Board owns as Corporate entity all the properties of the Park irrespective of who crafted or built the church; in fact a Park cannot be created and the Attractions or Tourist spots thereat cannot be exposed to Public domain if the architect, laborers and lot owner will not transfer title to the Park and Government; this is the difference between the moral rights of the Copyright holder and one who lost all his rights when he is paid his job or works by Board or Committed of the Park; hence, the Visitors Center and Committee has control and jurisdiction over the Park and sculptures; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, for this is a National Cultural Treasure as declared by Law and even evidence by the Historical Markers, and by the Declaration List of National Cultural Treasures in the Philippines Rizal Monument declared a National Cultural Treasure Under Philippine Law, to wit, REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10066 should be read with the Philippine Copyright Law; and all the Tourist spots in the Tourist Map of Rizal Park including the Category:Soul Waves - Filipino-Korean Soldier Monumentincluded in the given Map by the Visitor's Center fall within the Express Exception to FOP, hence the Lost Rights of Sculptors, inter alia, that is all now of the Public Domain, because of being Government Property; here with Express Permission of the Head of the Visitors Center; I respectfully submit this Rejoinder, References
Sculptor is Filipino Juan Sajid Imao who was paid, and lost all his rights since this work is upon Bilateral Relations of Korea and Philippines; The hard evidence to Donations or Full transfer to Rizal Park, National Government are the 2 Historical Markers Monuments that state so and the name of the Sculptor Juan Sajid Imao is engraved therein; for this matters, I respectfully submit that the same 3 Sculptures including Lapu-lapu monument are of the Public Domain of the Government of the Philippines expressly falling with the Exceptions of the Copyrright Law as I respectfully underscore the Express Assistance and Permission to photo by the Management of Rizal Park Tourist Visitor Center, very sincerely Judgefloro 04:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
References of the Filipino Sculptor and Donation are the marker and marker 2 very sincerely Judgefloro 04:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 Agree with the deletion of the rest of the images given rule on FOP and that most, if not all, of these artwork's authors (esp. Jose M. Mendoza, author of Bisig) are still living which means not suitable for PD-Philippines. Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the following images since the artwork is not the main focus of the image but the surrounding Agrifina Circle Markoolio97 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:9283Statue of the Sentinel of Freedom 09.jpg
File:9283Statue_of_the_Sentinel_of_Freedom_07.jpg


Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama unfortunately. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 5

per COM:FOP Philippines

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and Good Afternoon from hereat Cloudy Bulacan Philippines due to LPA; please allow me to let the researchers consider that Laborers or Paid Workers and not artist, work per piece or per day with minimum daily wages paid by Employers, here, the University Board; Love arts are scattered all over the Philippines; and here in my country, no artist will execute a work in the streets or outside the Schools; I ♥ love Landmark are manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist, hence outside the scope of Copyrights law; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter; Very very sincerelyJudgefloro 09:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
It isn't up to you to say "manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist", it is the copyright law of the country (Philippines) which follows the law of the U.S.. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Unsure With regards to current standing of the Philippines on FOP, I agree yet the subject of the image is a mass-produced generic work and does not violate the Commons:Threshold_of_originality rule, thus the subject having no copyright. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC) {{Pd-ineligible}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markoolio97 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unclear TOO in the Philippines. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 6

No FOP in Philippines for sculptures

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 Keep This might apply for PD-Philippines tag given that the subject of the images are examples of old-style of architecture (around early 1900 to late 1960) Markoolio97 (talk) 02:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC) {{PD-Philippines}}[reply]
  •  Comment Looks to be rather generic mass-produced garden fountain and decoration figures. Many of the photos don't even show the "sculptures". How old is the building? If old enough to not be a FOP concern, I don't think a fresh coat of paint changes the status. (I'd lean keep but I'm not familiar with the history of the building nor details of Philippines copyright.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Here are a few examples of similar architecture reference 1, reference 2. I have been looking on the subject and references. and there are some hints that point to the subject being a recently-built structure that was designed to look similar to the old style of houses. This image shows a set of glass doors in the upper level of the house which continues through the windowed portion of the house, an uncanny and not period-correct design. The stone design on the left also looks artificial and attached only and not period-correct. Apart from these, there are not enough information available to correctly date the structure. Markoolio97 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have done a quick look in Google Earth and the structure is visible as of the earliest satellite image, April 25, 2004. It also shows that the place had been renovated sometime between March and October 2015 which might explain the uncanny and out-of-period design of the place. I'm going for keep (see above). Markoolio97 (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept most, deleted a few where the sculpture or fountain were a clear focus. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 15

COM:Derivative work of a model of the city. There is no freedom of panorama for 3D model works in the Philippines, and also as per User:Elcobbola/Models.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 17

COM:Derivative works: of a map and various photographs. There is no freedom of panorama for such works. The map is undated but I suspect the map dates to 90s or 2000s considering the print and age of map degradation. For others, the photos look as if they are recent and the photographers must be still alive. COM:VRT correspondence of permissions from the heirs of the map's author and photographers of the photos are required.

Map
Photographs

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 19

Derivative work violation. Billboards, no COM:FOP Philippines, and missing COM:VRT correspondence of authorization for Judgefloro's use of commercial license from the graphic artists.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 22

[edit]

Modern-looking statue. But there is no freedom of panorama here. Google Street View imagery shows this statue is no longer existing in public space. Hence it can be questioned its eligibility for future FOP as proposed (House Bill 799 and House Bill 2672).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iramallo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, coat of arms and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 02:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]