Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/05/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 18th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No found this photo was posted under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Catherine Laurence 02:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant copyvio. --4nn1l2 (talk) 02:34, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Two 12 year old girls showering.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading photos of minor which is evidently restricted per COM:NUDITY. 104.248.169.170 13:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: en:Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

an outdated information Robert Right (talk) 13:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El Del Flow Autentico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El Del Flow Autentico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album.

Civa (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El Del Flow Autentico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --1989 (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

опечатка в редиректе PavelMukhin98 (talk) 11:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by A.Savin at 12:56, 18 Mai 2019 UTC: long-term abuse sockpuppet uploads, not tolerated --Krdbot 19:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error - should be a category Beethoven9 (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de créatuon KAPour les intimes 18:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo created by vandal for use on article of an 18-year old athlete MB (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear case. --JuTa 06:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ist doppelt Holger Schulz (talk) 10:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged for speedy deletion as copyrighted logo. This needs to be discussed though. De728631 (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see anything overly creative in this design that would raise it above the TOO, so the PD-textlogo rationale should be alright.De728631 (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:TOO#India No different from File:Star Television logo.svg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Now that you mentioned it, Indian legislation is irrelevant in this case. The Walt Disney Company Asia Pacific who owns the channel is based in Hong Kong. The threshold of originality in HK, however, is similarily high as in the UK, so this one is very likely not ok. De728631 (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: The Star logo is from 2011, maybe older. Disney aquired 21st Century Fox in March 2019. And afaik, we only care about the country of origin anyway. The Star logo's country of origin is India, even if the current trademark holder is from Hong Kong. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying this. In this light we may keep the file. De728631 (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 03:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tarta46 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: STANNO USANDO LE MIE FOTO SPACCIANSOLE PER LORO
Converted by me to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


  • Comment I have left a note at Commons:Bar italiano, as someone who speaks Italian should understand this better than can people whose only skill is in English or German. Nyttend (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The comment means "They are using my photos purporting to be the authors" (there's a typo, should be "spacciandole"). So this seems to be an attempt to revoke the license due to abuse by third parties. I'll write the uploader. Nemo 06:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao @Tarta46: , sei tu a aver caricato le foto qui, quindi potresti spiegarmi dov'è il copyviol? Fammi sapere --NewDataB (talk) 11:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Tarta46 is also the uploader of the photos. If there are any problems, they can write to commons-copyvio@wikimedia.org stating clearly what are the copyvios and why. I quickly closed this DR, because the problem seems external to Commons, e.g. some website using the photos without acknowledging the author/respecting the license terms.
Chi ha caricato le foto è anche colui che dichiara che "le stanno usando". Se si tratta di un problema di uso delle immagini senza rispettare i termini di licenza da parte di terzi, è un problema legale fra l'autore e chi riutilizza le sue foto in tale modo. Ruthven (msg) 14:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Walter Stoneman died in 1958. Undelete in 2029 when it becomes free in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeatedly uploaded copyright image — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:44, 20 Mai 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: repeatedly uploaded copyright image, from https://twitter.com/wilsonngoniart/status/608984430183653377 --Krdbot 13:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be copied from a book based on the caption. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liebe Ellin Vielen Dank, dass Du das genannte Bild überprüft hast. Ich habe es für die Wikipedia Seite "Kundelfingen" eingefügt. Die erste Version wurde bereits akzeptiert. Nun habe ich eine kleine Korrektur auf dem Bild vorgenommen: fehlendes .ch auf der Adresse des Amtes für Archäologie. Ich musste dabei das Bild bearbeiten und neu aufladen. Du findest unter der Kategorie Kundelfingen auch das alte Bild. Vielleicht habe ich bei der erneuten Abfrage ein Fehler gemacht. Bitte die gleichen Eingaben vom alten Bild übernehmen (ich wusste nicht wie man das macht). Ich wurde vom Amt für Archäologie TG autorisiert das Bild zu benutzen. Bitte allenfalls bei Frau Irene.Ebneter@TG.CH (Archäologin) nachprüfen. Bitte das Bild auf keinen Fall löschen. Freudlicher Gruss Cunolf--Cunolf (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cunolf, Please have Mrs. Ebneter fill in the simple email form at COM:OTRS. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Ellin; ich habe Frau Ebneter gebeten, dies zu erledigen. Gruss Cunolf--Cunolf (talk) 10:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist hier keine OTRS-Freigabe erzielbar. --Krd 15:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/photo/hockey-player-royalty-free-image/AA038179 2001:569:71BB:7000:7D47:F0BD:239C:D76A 08:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:12, 22 Mai 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree stock image --Krdbot 01:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted by Túrelio at 21:12, 22 Mai 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree stock image --Krdbot 01:28, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio (having a sort of watermark top right) + personal picture that is unused + copyright status unclear (as the photographer may not agree to it) + spam description . Delete. Cohaf (talk) 06:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no quiero ue se vea Guzmi06 (talk) 09:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Momeka55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-left panel contains S&P 500 data obtained through FRED. Source page states "Copyright © 2016, S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC" and FRED terms of use state that only non-commercial personal use is permitted for copyrighted data series. Wikiacc (talk) 01:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated as these graphics and their data have not been put under a free license. The uploader's claim to be the author and to be in the right to publish this composition of charts under a free license is bogus. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:49, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


author request Bauma319 (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per author's request. This diagram was not out of COM:SCOPE as it was used as illustration for TMEM171. However, the author of this article and of this diagram decided to replace it by File:Schematic Illustration of TMEM171.png and seconded the deletion request. SVGs would indeed be preferable but this is not a question of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed PD-USGov, but source (FRED) states "Copyright © 2016, International Monetary Fund". FRED terms of use specify that copyrighted series can only be used for noncommercial use. Wikiacc (talk) 02:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is indeed not {{PD-USGov}} as claimed but copyrighted by the International Monetary Fund and was used with permission by FRED. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restored today per UnDR
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:42, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar

B dash (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is a real shame but unfortunately all these photographs have to go as the architecture of this museum is eligible for copyright. This is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and unfortunately we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:07, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in Qatar B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately this has to be deleted as this is the work by the renowned architect I. M. Pei who died this year and we have no freedom of panorama in Quatar. The copyright protection lasts in Quatar for 50 years after his death, hence we will have to wait until 2070. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ulikely to be own work: small size, low res, missing EXIF, user upload history. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed this does not appear to be trustworthy. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This file is used as a PDF version for community monthly, Qiuwen (zh), which might have been exempted as it has a property of community co-operation. "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like." Also, all media files used are credited in this PDF. --WQL (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: I don't see any notability requirements on Commons:Project scope. On the last page of the document, it's clearly licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0, compatible with the license on the file summary.--Alexander Misel (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep with the following reasons: a) This text document is made by the user group in Mainland China, the country with the largest population in the world, in Chinese Wikipedia, the 14th largest Wikipedia with over a million articles, which means its notability is obvious; b) This text document, as a community monthly with a release frequency of a month, consists the news from the community of Chinese Wikipedia and other communities around the world, with all of the texts published in the Chinese Wikipedia under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, which is compatitible with the license on the file summary, which means the texts of the document have no problem in copyright status; c) All of the figures and pictures consist in this document are either released under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA licenses, all compatitible with the license on the file summary, with authors' names listed and texts of the licenses on the CC websites linked, or simple figures desined by free and open source softwares with all of the editors signed, and all of the fonts used are open-sourced ones, which means the other parts of the document have no problem in copyright status. --BoyuZhang1998 (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep community files. EugeneZelenko doesn't understand Chinese and should generally refrain from nominating files they don't understand. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep previously insufficient reasons to delete.--Hamish (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To my surprise, in the last DR no user addressed an obvious problem--who took the cover photo? More, where does the photo on page 13 come from? If it's PD, upload it to Commons. Otherwise, delete this PDF. I've just skimmed through a few issues of this thing. I urge the editors to include a complete hyperlinked list of figures in file/file talk pages for each issue, so that the copyright status of all files involved can be easily verified. Roy17 (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please don't let everything surprise you, such as I as an image reviewer don't know there is no commercial-free FOP in Japan and a bunch of people have no idea what image they are using in their PDFs. The cover photo comes from pixabay, after altering as it needs to be suited for the front cover, it totally complies pixabay's license, and no attribution is needed. The photo on page 13 comes from the website of the government of Taiwan, which according to Taiwan government agencies' copyright license, are usable and some of them have already uploaded onto Commons, such as the portrait of Taiwan's president. The reason we don't upload these two files onto Commons is that there is not our obligation to upload any copyright-free images we use and our graphic designer didn't want to bother to fill out all the forms that come with the upload wizard. It is our choice. The only defect here is our graphic designer thought Taiwan government's license equals public domain, thus wrote "public domain" next to the picture along with correct attribution that Taiwan's license needed. But that does not mean there is anything wrong with this PDF since all images require an attribution got one.

Also, I recommend you use Google image search and several other tools before nominating files for deletion. Once again, users working on these PDFs know what they are doing, and it's not our obligation to provide a list for anyone to inspect or upload any copyright-free image we used to Commons. Everyone knows how painful it is to fill out copyright statements on Commons, and there's no need for that as long as we know all images used are copyright-free when we are designing those PDFs in the first place. --TechyanTalk16:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the lecture. I hate to say, but you have made a few glaring mistakes:
  1. Derivative works hosted on Commons must be sourced, but the cover photo was not.
  2. The caption on the photo of the native Taiwanese tribe, 公有領域 (public domain), would let anyone with some knowledge of Taiwan govt's handling of media to raise eyebrows. Various Taiwan govt agencies have adopted an open licence along the lines of {{Attribution}} in recent years, but the media are generally not released into PD. For example, the one used by the President's website says all of the Office of the President’s publicly posted information and materials that are protected under copyright provisions may be reauthorized for public use without cost in a non-exclusive manner. It should be noted even though all these declarations are titled 政府網站資料開放宣告/Government Website Open Information Announcement (GWOIA), the terms vary by agency. I'd say it's a trap.
  3. I had traced the photo online to the website you kindly provided at last: https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=0F21B3DE621E6880&type=84B62E287CE43C4FD0636733C6861689 , but I had not written this evidence immediately, because I suspected you group of editors would not fall for one trap but two. https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=EBD95B2A663C7432 says 原住民族委員會全球資訊網(以下簡稱本會網站)上刊載之所有內容,除依著作權法第9條規定,不得為著作權之標的(如憲法、法律、命令、公務員於職務上撰擬之講稿、新聞稿)者外,其他包括文字敘述、攝影、圖片、錄音、影像及其他資訊, 均受著作權法之保護。 and 本會網站資訊內容受著作權法保護者, 除有合理使用情形外,應取得本會之同意或授權後,方得利用... English version says Content or services downloaded or copied by users from the Legislative Yuan Website are for personal use and non-commercial purposes only...
Your omitting sources and making mistakes are no surprise for me by now, but your attitude is. The irrelevant old case you quoted could be undeleted only because a CC-licensed identical copy could be found online afterwards. Japanese governmment works are not automatically PD or covered by their online CC-BY declarations.
These pretty straight-forward cases of missing/wrong sources make me start to question your judgement as a licence reviewer now.
 Delete DW of fair use material.--Roy17 (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: I actually did notice there was no obvious credit in latin script for the cover photo. I don't understand Chinese though, so I couldn't really know what it said exactly. I opposed "out of scope" deletion and the "unclear copyright status" which suggested the magazine didn't originate here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better use File:Rhombicdodecahedron.gif. 217.117.125.72 16:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on many Wikipedia pages, from bar:Catalanischa Keapa to zh:交錯 (幾何). This still JPEG version is a significantly higher-resolution than the animated GIF, so it's not a duplicate. Under COM:INUSE, we should thus treat this file as being useful for an educational purpose. --bjh21 (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: I agree with all arguments from User talk:Bjh21. The JPEG is 675 × 599 pixels while the gif is only 256 x 256. Should you also consider that gifs tend to be CPU intensive in old machines. --Cyberpunk (talk) 17:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid deletion rationale provided. The two images under comparison serve different purposes; one is lower-resolution and animated; the other is higher-resolution and static. Beyond issues of older machines and bandwidth (the animation is 10x the file size of the jpg), many people find animated gifs annoying. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per David Eppstein. I find them extremely annoying and should not be replaced without good reason. Imagine everything was rotating here: en:Catalan_solid - Christian75 (talk) 01:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Je suis d'accord avec les remarques précédentes. Les images sont différentes et ne jouent pas le même rôle. Une image immobile est parfois préférable. I agree with the remarks above. Not the same image, not the same purpose. Not moving picture is sometimes better. HB (talk) 17:21, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Better use File:Rhombictriacontahedron.gif. 217.117.125.72 16:53, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Same as above. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 KeepSame as above. - Christian75 (talk) 01:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Idem. Same as above.HB (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Strakhov (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AFBorchert as no source (No source since). However, it appears to be quite old, so it is worth having a little more time for any input on the copyright status. Green Giant (talk) 23:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: The specified date is actually right and the author (János Arany) has been dead for quite long time now (137 y). It's PD old. --grin 07:07, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Grin: This is not about the PD status of this file. A proper source is still required per COM:L#License information. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @AFBorchert: I'm not really sure what you wanted to underline here, as the source is specified. The author is János Arany, as well as the date is known and included. While I am sure that the photo was made in National Széchényi Library (at least that is indicated on the stamp) it is not really relevant, since it is a noncreative copy of the manuscript (same as a photo of a PD two-dimensional object, like a painting). Would you like to include this information somehow, is that the request here? Thanks! --grin 19:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Grin: No proper source has been given, just a Google image search link that points back to hu:Családi kör (költemény). A proper source is to be given by policy. To quote from COM:L#License information:
    Otherwise, please include a web link or a complete citation if possible. Note: Things like "Transferred from Wikipedia" are generally not considered a valid source unless that is where it was originally published. The primary source should be provided.
    If indeed this scan originates from the National Széchényi Library, this would be a primary source which would need to be documented by a proper citation. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:39, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Old. --Strakhov (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|F10}}

For updating file Suspectinterrogation (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)===[reply]


Deleted: By Jmabel. --Alaa :)..! 03:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An advertisement does not seem within the scope of this project Ricky81682 (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajeshvermaup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion of another famous artist. No contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 22:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photos, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringment Come from this copyright website: https://ru-clip.net/video/1Mgz7Y_Cniw/iraqi-writer-shahad-al-rawi-exclusive-interview-mbifl2019-mathrubhumi-com.html Twopower332.1938 (talk) 23:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect, to the meta redirect that directs to m:Avoid copyright paranoia, is confusing when used in discussion as it gives the impression that the rambling and out of date essay/selection of snippets on meta is some sort of Commons policy or has been accepted by the Commons community. This is particularly confusing considering the way it talks about Fair Use, which is not acceptable on Commons. Those wishing to link to the meta essay, should use the meta link to do so in order to make this clear, or create a Commons essay pitched at Commons issues and seek community discussion to support it.

There are a few discussions which use this link. The links should be replaced with the full meta link. (talk) 14:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect has been created in the main (gallery) namespace, but it should have been created in the project (Commons) namespace. I fixed all the links to point to COM:Copyright paranoia. Now we can delete this wrong redirect. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it anymore Waqartariq222 (talk) 06:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want it anymore Waqartariq222 (talk) 06:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (already speedily deleted by Túrelio). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samarth05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (both files already deleted by EugeneZelenko). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samarth05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most probably grabbed from the web: https://www.pinterest.de/pin/355362226824960188/ & https://www.instaguz.com/post/1978975402606912167_10958725591 and some more Albinfo (talk) 13:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source says "© 2019 Geological Society of China" - no indication of purported CC-by-SA license. Эlcobbola talk 13:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 13:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (out of scope, unused personal picture). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, election of a fictional country without a date Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably the uploader is not the author. Not own images false own work claim. Photocopy. Bogus license.

And also File:Vitcovsky.jpg

Микола Василечко (talk) 04:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably the uploader is not the author. Not own images false own work claim. Photocopy. Bogus license. Микола Василечко (talk) 04:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe not his/here own work, out of scope for a photo of WLE, No Meta Data Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata has authorship and copyright information, it does not appear to be the same person as the uploader, need permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work — Racconish💬 09:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of some unknown persons – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:30, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 95.76.228.85 as Copyvio (db-f9) and the most recent rationale was: url=original source
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as the nominator presented no evidence, just stated "the image is claimed under a free license when this is obviously not the case". -- Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 12:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:24, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image without exif. High likely a screen cap from copyrighted video Matthew hk (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 22:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be US federal government, but appears to be a work of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, whose terms of use prohibit commercial re-use. Wikiacc (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, not the federal government. Appears not to be a free image, because Cleveland Fed terms of use prohibit commercial reproduction. Wikiacc (talk) 03:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, not the federal government. Appears not to be a free image, because Cleveland Fed terms of use prohibit commercial reproduction. Wikiacc (talk) 03:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, not the federal government. Appears not to be a free image, because New York Fed terms of use prohibit commercial reproduction. Wikiacc (talk) 03:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be US federal government, but given source is Minneapolis Federal Reserve, whose disclaimer states that photos on their website "are the property of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and may not be used without written permission". Wikiacc (talk) 03:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be US federal government, but stated source is the Richmond Fed, whose terms and conditions assert copyright and prohibit commercial reuse. Wikiacc (talk) 03:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1993. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 04:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine cover FR30799386 (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Racconish. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine cover FR30799386 (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Racconish. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hani-86 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all the files are uploaded at the same time and 4 of 5 are Copyvio maybe the last one is not his/her own work

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 06:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominationl; most deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; COM:HOST and self-promotion.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader suggests he is the person in the photo, the metadata has credits to "Author: AngeloCasteltrione, Copyright holder: dirittiriservati". Need permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.google.com/search?q=K%C4%B0RE%C3%87BURNU+SPOR+logo&rlz=1C1GCEV_en&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiHnLjG3aTiAhWSZFAKHaPECqwQ_AUIDigB&biw=1366&bih=625 Sakhalinio (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Freedom_of_panorama. Sculpture from 2019. Smooth O (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos contain copyrighted images.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 13:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills fromù unfree videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

RQ-LABO.JP videos are copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of non free content. We need a permission from the copyright holder of the poster.

Yann (talk) 09:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catia Goston (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC) I, Katia de Almeida Santos, I am the legal rights holder of the submitted files and I am releasing them for the use of Wikimedia Commons.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Commons is not a personal photo album. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catia Goston (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvios, at least one was from FB. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catia Goston (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Thyj (talk) 12:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Litlok as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|2=Copyright watermark on the photo  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file was uploaded by WCL19 ArwenA LycéeDumas, and the picture is tagged "© Alexandre Dell'Olivio". I thought the case was pretty obvious, but am OK with the slower deletion procedure Litlok (talk) 14:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not is own work Thyj (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://eu.northjersey.com/story/entertainment/2019/04/22/new-jersey-storytellers-share-conversations-changed-their-lives-event-tickets/3538963002/  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Photo: Tamara A. Fleming not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:East Liberty Map Detail 1910.jpg.
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical maps actually.  Keep as these were published pre-1924 in the US. Fixed info, which you could have done in less than 2 minutes rather than file a DR. Abzeronow (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Abzeronow. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused collection of memes of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked Associated Press, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/6624437.stm Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Waste of air and space (also looks stupid) 2001:8003:A8D1:A500:288A:C995:2C42:B685 16:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Muchos errores .... . Yo J.R. estoy de acuerdo. WJRODRIGUEZPORADO (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Billinghurst. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: is not free picture
why?
... However to be speedied some information needs to be provided. I personally vote delete due to the size and lack of quality of image, but there is insufficient data to prove it, and thus am converting it to Deletion Nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; only upload of user. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contain FBMD, which means the photo was captured from Facebook. AlexLeeCN (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We do not need this copy of File:Rembrandt_Harmensz._van_Rijn_-_The_Return_of_the_Prodigal_Son.jpg which is claimed as own work and of much lesser quality than our other holdings of this image Category:Return of the Prodigal Son by Rembrandt Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruthven as no permission (No permission since), I must be missing something, this has an author and a source, I can't find a copy of it on the internet, please advise! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP, source is whatsapp. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuelschmid84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on band/singer photos. Check out the bright yellow seal in the corner of the "promo" photo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr Chef Sunil Kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not a web host / personal photo

QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:35, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a web host / personal photo QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to en.wiki as non-free, not own work. TFerenczy (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - likely above the threshold of originality, and certainly not the uploader's own work. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image of a delinquent "youtuber" called "huevito rey". Created to vandalize the spanish wikipedia Vareloco (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on both the photo and the frame. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this, but it turns out the Flickr account is considered a 'bad author'. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 21:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 80stunes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of own work on any of these uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FredericaBern (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional gallery of contemporary art and portraits of artist, do not have COM:OTRS from actual creator.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin had to say these are derivative works. The user was never instructed about this intellectual-propery concept. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: В.Г.1–8 and Свет2 are not even derivatives but just copies of Vulfovich’s paintings. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But this work is not a derivative ([1]). FredericaBern 15:52 19 may 2019 (UTC)

Keep Художник_Вульфович.jpg, Григорий_Вульфович.jpg (nothing incriminating), and Вульфович.jpg (the background thing is too trivial to be copyrightable), but delete nine photos showing non-trivial artworks. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The portrait photos, (two of same) File:Художник_Вульфович.jpg & File:Григорий_Вульфович.jpg is not "derivative" but a plain copy. It has "Unique ID of original document xmp.did:78EC49E868E1E7119697B079327C1B3A" in metadata suggesting it came from Facebook or another upload site before arriving here. The image File:Вульфович.jpg is blurry, of small size and no metadata. There is no indication of user's own work on the photo and certainly not on the art. As for "user never instructed" - the Internet custom is to Read The Instructions, such as COM:L which are quite clear. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, Ellin is wrong: Художник_Вульфович.jpg is an edited derivative off Григорий_Вульфович.jpg, namely certain background subjects were removed. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ellin Beltz. All files were previously published in the public domain on vk.com. https://vk.com/public85159534?z=album-85159534_209995519 loaded January 17, 2015. FredericaBern 22:00 20 may 2019 (UTC)

FedericaBern: Please provide the page which shows the license, I can see the pictures but not a license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin Beltz, here is the license agreement of the site vk.com (ВКонтакте — Russian social network. Opportunities of the social network VKontakte allow each user to upload and download various images without restrictions). [2] FredericaBern 8:42 21 May 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination When the OTRS is approved and tagged on files. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by FredericaBern (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Valery Anatolyevich Tsaplin (d. 2016), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by FredericaBern (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader marked works as {{Copyvio}}.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accy Al-Qahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work, even on the two large images, one is facebook sized (x720) and the other could also be from Facebook, but all meta data has been removed from all four images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accy Al-Qahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accy Al-Qahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khalid Awan 91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work on these tiny images and book covers.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claims of own work on these small Facebook sized images... also possible promotionalism due to subject.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivan1960soldak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on military medals and portrait picture of man.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information at source given to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information at source given to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information at source given to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to have free license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this portrait image of a prime minister. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously from published source without attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work from file size and quality, more likely harvested from the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The halftoning in this image shows it is from a published source and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khangul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook or smaller images of contemporary men, unlikely own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of subject depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claims of own work, letterboxing, professional portraits, odd cropping, small sizes and no metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if this is a real image or something from a film, note its use on draft page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work, due to file size and lack of quality, plus location of photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architectural renders are rarely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indicaiton of user's own work, 3 cameras in meta, two with no meta, all facebook or smaller sizes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop (see https://www.kloster-plankstetten.de/kloster/krypta/) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop (see https://www.kloster-plankstetten.de/kloster/krypta/) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemporary artwork, no fop (see https://www.kloster-plankstetten.de/kloster/krypta/) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PresidentIL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Due to small sizes and low quality, plus lack of useful metadata, suspect these are copied from internet not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elkesisabe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, these look like professional photos harvested from internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to have a watermark on it from a stock agency. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - too badly blurred to be educationally useful MPF (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, only text Ezarateesteban 21:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, only text Ezarateesteban 21:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

collague without sources Ezarateesteban 22:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amruthary.2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These might be frequency patterns of unknown sound samples (of birds?). The uploader says test files in descriptions. (Unless someone could recreate the sound from the waves and identify what it is? Too much unnecessary work anyway.) Useless and out of scope.

Roy17 (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no authorship information. Probably not below TOO, so that the current license is invalid and permission is missing. Jcb (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZmartManager (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional logos over TOO in the UK, allegedly "own work" but really copies of work already present on the Internet, permission needed via OTRS.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Track of a hypothetical storm... i.e the storm is not encyclopedic or helpful to the project in any way, shape, or form. Hurricane Noah (talk) 23:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sofiane Mohsen 21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maybe not his/her own work, out of scope and small.

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalafate halima (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maybe not his/her own work, no meta data, very small and out of scope

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the file was uploaded at the same time with a Copyvio photo, so maybe this is not his/her own work no Meta data ans small Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owenjones111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.discogs.com/artist/3160458-Quartz-17

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gerhard Richter, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader's only two edits are to this file, it's irrelevant to Category:National Gallery, London and it's of no obvious educational value. Ham II (talk) 14:08, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geugeor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BLehnen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eli de guerrero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't look like an own work, lack of exif data. User with a large history of copyvio. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kid's paint Agafoklea (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The file is currently being used in en:Draft:Anish Luitel which means COM:PS is probably not much of an issue. However, the uploader seems to be claiming to be the person in the photo which might be more of an issue. This doesn’t look like a selfie, but rather a photo taken by someone other than the uploader/subject. It might be best to have this verified by OTRS at the very least to make sure the uploader and the copyright holder are the same person. If copyright ownership cannot be verified, the file should be deleted. — Marchjuly (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: that draft has been deleted multiple times as spam. I just deleted it again and salted it. The creator(s), who disclosed having been paid by the subject, have been blocked as sockpuppets. --Randykitty (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darkwolf0218 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from non-trivial logo and advertisement. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo supplied by the family. What credit details do I need to obtain from them? {{ }} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.26.228.94 (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File corrupted Tomskyhaha (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Size and quality, plus information in metadata, suggest this was copied from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was provided by the author himself, at the request of students from the class project (Winter semester) who contacted him independently. It may be possible to reduce the size, if that's an issue, although I'm not sure how to do that DoctorKarpiak (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "author" Chris Uggen, did not take the photo. We need licensing from the actual author of the photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lmachambers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on these images of awards, meeting head table and group shot.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos by the Atlanta Fed

[edit]

The stated source and author is the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's website. They further claim PD US Government. But the Atlanta Fed's terms of use prohibit commercial reuse, so these files are unlikely to be PD.

There are two other open deletion requests with this reasoning: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Birmingham-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Birmingham Branch Office.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dennis Lockhart 01-19-2012.png. Wikiacc (talk) 03:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not interst Its.vikramrajput (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Page blanked by requestor instead. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user:Ivo Van Damme

[edit]

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018121010009425 regarding

However, this permission came from other than the photographers. Scanning files from old photos. Permissions from the right copyright holders are needed. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We also received Ticket:2019011210003124 from a different person claiming to be the copyright holder of these files, so... --Ganímedes (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Jcb - no OTRS for 30days. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free software screenshot. AlexLeeCN (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – The program's author uploaded it with {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi everyone. I'm new at this, and when uploading it to a page failed, I thought Wikipedia was directing me to upload it to Commons. Michael Bednarek informed me of my error, and I have now uploaded an alternative elsewhere according to his instructions (not completely sure where) and linked to it. So File:Mozart14.jpg is now surplus to requirements. Please feel free to delete it - or to I have to do anything myself? Dave Webber (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Author OK'd deletion and the issue was the software shown is not free, not the photo. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission (No permission since), with which I do not disagree. The only metadata is photoshop. However I would like to give it one week for Deletion as it is possible it may be ok to use, but needs the collective wisdom of our users to figure it out. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin Beltz, this is a 1960s photo of the Soviet composer without any evidence how in the hell it can be PD. @Sreejithk2000: was this obviously false PD claim enough for you to transfer this blatant copyvio from enwiki onto Commons, where it was twice deleted (see deletion log)? How many other files like this and [3] did you transfer? Sealle (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Sealle. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as no permission (No permission since) but there is a source & author, please clarify. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is fine with this image. The author just wrote some articles into Estonian Wikipedia (like this) as part of specific article writing campaign and added few of his images to Commons. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:07, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMO above the threshold for a PD-textlogo. A.Savin 15:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree with the opinion. — Speravir – 20:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Please also take a look at Category:Organic certification labels - This design is standart design! and the background is this, so there is all standart, nothing really new created. Habitator terrae 🌍 20:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Das Logo ist klar gestalterisch designed und nicht mal eben schnell zusammengeklickt. Für mich deutlich überhalb SH. --Stepro (talk) 22:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. A combination of simple shapes can result in a complex logo, as is the case here. --ƏXPLICIT 07:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvious scan of PD-USGov work. --Majora (talk) 20:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this small black and white image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ellin Beltz, I am writing to you about your doubts about the nature and authenticity of the photo in question, I can assure you that it is the same (smaller) copy of the previous File: Gino Lacquaniti.jpg, in fact you will notice how the versions are the same. I only improved the detail of the image by software. The same photo is present in it.wikipedia.org under the heading File: Luigi_Lacquaniti.jpeg (Gino is the diminutive of Luigi). As for the user license, it is a pic taken in Italy (or in Italian territory) and is in the public domain because the copyright has expired. Furthermore, I myself own it because I am a member of the family of Gino Lacquaniti (my grandfather) and the other heirs gave their permission. --Enzo Cristina (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Enzo Cristina Please have the heirs use the form at COM:OTRS to send permission. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have just used the form to send permission as heir of Gino Lacquaniti. Thanks --Enzo Cristina (talk) 07:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is given that the copyright holder ("Freelance Journalist" from 1929 or other) has released this image under CC0. The uploader claims own work, which is unlikely. I haven't been able to find if the image is public domain. (Hulton Archive/Getty sells the same image.) Wikiacc (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 14:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is quite blurry and the bat cannot be identified. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 14:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And other files from Category:Bust of Mykola Karpenko in Ternopil.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1984. No Permission from the sculptor Василь Садовник. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@~riley: above also Category:Bust of Mykola Karpenko in Ternopil. What?--Микола Василечко (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Микола Василечко: - If you would like these files considered for deletion, you will have to nominate them. I cannot delete files that have not been tagged with {{Delete}} and without their author being notified. Due process :) ~riley (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:East Liberty Station 1913.jpg

Historical postcards. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:East Liberty Station 1913.jpg. Fixed license and source. Pre-1924 American postcard
 Weak delete File:Metz-Kaiser Wilhelm Ring ca. 1910.jpg. Since this was very likely first published in Germany pre-WW1, we can undelete this in about a decade when the 120 year rule kicks in. I wouldn't mind someone decides this is {{PD-anon-70-EU}} but German law is rather strict on its definition of "anonymous" pre-1995 from what I've been told on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above and 1 kept. ~riley (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramon Garcia Piment (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, drawing and stamp. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Dw no source since (dw no source since). However, it is not clear what other source there may be. Green Giant (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The source seems fine to me. --bjh21 (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nice beach but wihtout description and categories is unuseful Ezarateesteban 21:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason fro deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительное авторство: https://valet.ru/user/453616641/, https://www.facebook.com/kalininscreen/ -- Tomasina (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ファイルが別のファイルと重複したため トライトーン (talk) 10:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the duplicate file was deleted, and in use. I added licensing. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Absecon 49 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

User is taking files from elsewhere and uploading to Commons with false 'own work' claims. Copyright violations.

Martin H. (talk) 17:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 08:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Absecon 49 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-trivial license plates. Proper license tags should be used if works of particular state are in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep all per Template:PD-US-no notice. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 09:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Illegitimate Barrister. --Majora (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот файл загружен по ошибке. Valentin Kundeus (talk) 08:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Would have been G7 at the time. --Majora (talk) 03:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed PD-USGov, but appears to use FRED to create a graph using this series, which is "Copyright, 2016, Freddie Mac". FRED terms of use specify that graphs based on copyrighted data can only be used for noncommercial purposes. Wikiacc (talk) 02:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think data (as with any facts) can be copyrighted.
So the question is whether the chart is under: Template:PD-ineligible.
See Commons:Threshold of originality#Charts for more info.
I don't think FRED is considered part of the federal government exactly. See w:Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) and w:Federal Reserve Bank.
--Timeshifter (talk) 03:04, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FRED and Freddie Mac are certainly not federal government agencies, at least for copyright purposes. The PD-USGov tag is definitely wrong. I think the only reasonable outcomes are (1) keep and retag as PD-ineligible, or (2) delete. (On a side note, apart from copyright, there's also the FRED terms of use; not sure if we're compelled to follow them.) Wikiacc (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I started a discussion here:
Commons talk:Threshold of originality
--Timeshifter (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright claim is somewhat dubious to begin with -- if it's a single data point, it's hard to see how creativity entered into it. There can be copyright on the selection and arrangement of data, so choosing a particular set of data points, especially along with their labels, could possibly be copyrighted. But even assuming it is copyrighted, the terms of use does say: Series with the following copyright labels—Public Domain: Citation requested and Copyrighted: Citation required—may be used for internal commercial uses and may be displayed in textbooks, newsletters, or reports to clients provided that appropriate attribution is given to FRED as well as the original source of the data. So, they lump "Copyrighted: Citation required" along with "Public Domain: Citation requested" in terms of similar permissions -- other than the citation being required instead of requested (which is a permissible restriction) they are the same. There is a third category where separate permission is required. The series in question is marked "Copyrighted: Citation required", so it would seem to be in the same bucket as ones marked "public domain". They do seem to claim that some other commercial uses require permission, but they seem to also require that of the public domain category data, which is nonsensical, though I guess could be enforced if it truly is copyrighted. On the other hand, they do put some restrictions on their generated charts, such as not being allowed to change the labels. That seems more designed at not changing the chart to misrepresent the data, but it is quite debatable if it runs over the "non-free" line if they are using copyright to enforce it -- and even if the raw data is not copyrightable, the generated chart *might* be, and if so would be subject to those restrictions. But that is borderline too, as it's a pretty basic line graph. There are some uneasy questions here, but it sure does seem as though the terms of use are being somewhat aggressive about claiming rights over stuff which is apparently in the public domain. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep See Bobby Glushko communications here:
Commons talk:Threshold of originality#Bobby Glushko communications --Timeshifter (talk) 01:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. Data itself cannot be copyrighted. Just the display of that data. This is a basic chart. {{PD-chart}}. --Majora (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution bar chart. Not clear what data are being represented ("price history", is this consumer prices?), or where the data came from. Wikiacc (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some relevant info is en:special:diff/877426. It could be replaced, but I cant find a replacement right now.--Roy17 (talk) 12:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it's being used right now. Until a replacement can be made I don't see the reason to delete the chart out from under a project that is actively using it. --Majora (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]