Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 15th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mitchelaaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

flickr-washed uploads by xwiki sock, see Bothiman. Also very poor quality, over filtered and clearly copyvios.

Praxidicae (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted by Shout Kids Doomdorm64 (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:27, 15 März 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Movie poster --Krdbot 19:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 ДДХ ба номи академик Б.Ғафуров Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:19, 15 März 2019 UTC: Blocked Sock uploads --Krdbot 01:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 ДДХ ба номи академик Б.Ғафуров Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is licensed as self, but appears to be a screenshot of an MTV show, clarification neeeded ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 13:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of a previously twice speedY deleted file. Unlikely to be the sitter's work. — Racconish💬 17:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - re-uploaded other files by same user - some collusion going on. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, cannot be used on Commons Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 19:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, cannot be used on Commons Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted file File:Testament box art.jpg. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identity check via OTRS is needed. Original file here is all rights reserved. Jcb (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/-aristographic.. LX (talk, contribs) 11:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category renamed to Category:Ufa TV tower


Deleted: Empty & dupe, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stelioskox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermark/photo credits on these photos suggest they’re not free

Ytoyoda (talk) 01:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, not used in any project, out of scope for commons Cohaf (talk) 06:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, not used in any project, out of scope for commons Cohaf (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, not used in any project, out of scope for commons Cohaf (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 06:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 09:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier est en fait sous copyright Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 07:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramya chintu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1810280vedikaguptha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All corrupted uploads; F7

Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akosimem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veeranjine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le fichier est en fait sous copyright) Les Bergers des Pierres - Moselle Association (talk) 20:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taylorengstrom91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Marianne Aulie, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taylorengstrom91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these images seem questionable. Low resolution and no exif-data and a majority of the images are pictures of artwork where there's no evidence the original artist provided a release.

TommyG (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All images seem to have been uploaded to Flickr by "Ty Henriksen" (https://www.flickr.com/people/181792432@N03). A quick check of their other Flickr files reveals e.g. [1], which is credited André Galli on https://kunstforum.as/2010/01/galleri-bjarne-melgaard/. - 4ing (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rii'jeg'fkep'c (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: raw text in the form of mathematical formulas which can be typed if needed.

4nn1l2 (talk) 23:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rii'jeg'fkep'c (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope personal drawings.

Roy17 (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional pic, out of scope. Prongs31 00:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published, requires OTRS ticket: https://www.thesponsorshipspace.com/single-post/2018/04/10/How-21-Year-Old-Erikas-Kirvelaitis-Is-Helping-Drive-BC-Vytautas-Popularity-Forward-With-The-Ball-Brother Ytoyoda (talk) 02:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 03:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be based on a stock photo: https://www.shutterstock.com/cs/image-vector/high-detailed-illustration-fullsuspension-mtb-spare-136464623 Ytoyoda (talk) 11:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, Vandalism, unused personal image, Item from a private personal collection The file has been 6 years in Commons, so regular deletion request is created. I do not consider this neither selfie nor vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, Vandalism, unused personal image, Item from a private personal collection. The file has been 6 years in Commons, so regular deletion request is created. I do not consider this neither selfie nor vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Six years on, is immaterial. It's a selfie, and has no educational value. This is not Facebook. - Broichmore (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]
This is one of a series of images of a nobody, imported en-masse from Flickr without inspection or evaluation. This nobody is not famous in Dunoon, and is not the leader of that community. If this is allowed then there is nothing to stop me or anyone else importing a 100 pictures of my mother in the garden. That's not the aim of the project by the way. - Broichmore (talk) 09:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, Vandalism, unused personal image, Item from a private personal collection>. The file has been 6 years in Commons, so regular deletion request is created. I do not consider this neither selfie nor vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to that it has no educational value. This is not Flickr or Facebook.- Broichmore (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, Vandalism, unused personal image, Item from a private personal collection>. The file has been 6 years in Commons, so regular deletion request is created. I do not consider this neither selfie nor vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, Vandalism, unused personal image, Item from a private personal collection>. The file has been 6 years in Commons, so regular deletion request is created. I do not consider this neither selfie nor vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, Vandalism, unused personal image, Item from a private personal collection>. The file has been 6 years in Commons, so regular deletion request is created. I do not consider this neither selfie nor vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no educational value. Selfie, Vandalism Broichmore (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. In my opinion this is not a selfie and this is not vandalism. Educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Look at it in the context of this is one of a series of images of a nobody, imported en-masse from Flickr without inspection or evaluation. This person is not famous in Dunoon, and is not the leader of that community. If this is allowed then there is nothing to stop me or anyone else importing a 100 pictures of my mother in the garden. That's not the aim of the project by the way. Education is! -Broichmore (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat: educational value exists. Not due to depicted person (he is nobody, as you said), but due to soap bubbles. And sometimes (not always, of course) photos about your mother have educational value too. Taivo (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked we have over 322 images of blowing bubbles, you need another? -Broichmore (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description claims it is a photo of the uploader, which means somebody other than the uploader took the photo, so "Own Work" is not possible. RoySmith (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope anyway. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. This Image is a screenshot from a YouTube video that does not have a "CC license". Vistadan 00:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality chemical structure; several better alternatives available in Category:Aldols like File:Aldol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. Checking by their MD, among the uploads of this colleague, almost only those images which are out of scope personal appearances are "own work" and most others are not. E4024 (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4AGZE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Corrupted uploads

Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1840460mahesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zotov andrey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (:ru:Натуральная косметика TM VitaminClub).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo => transferred in wikipedia.fr LeFnake (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bpgus own work claim. Seems to be some magazine cover. Natuur12 (talk) 16:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a screenshot from a copyright TV show. There is insufficient evidence to show it can be Creative Commons licensed. 109.77.237.217 22:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, selfie Aloneinthewild (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SAYSHILO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Shmuel Raayoni (d. 1995), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Universidad Católica Carlos yo (Discusión) 16:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, shows contemporary artwork Martin Sg. (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photo - out of scope Ronhjones  (Talk) 05:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy F10. Last deletion request claimed it was in use; it is no longer in use, and the user is not an active/constructive contributor. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite photo, likely retouched based of a Boeing photo published on https://aviationweek.com/awin-featured-story/delta-aeromexico-plan-new-mro-facility among others (identical except for airline logo). Ariadacapo (talk) 09:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i was upload this picture of myself but i want to delete this . thanks 93.6.222.223 11:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata suggests this was taken from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” means it’s from Facebook, and image credit doesn’t match the uploader info Ytoyoda (talk) 11:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Logan Wallace/ Virginia Tech, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Doiyk Exposures, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I am Arch-Angel Raphael the Artist, I own the copyright of this image... I paid a photographer to take a portrait of me which he did and which transferred every copyright rights to me. This is a Portrait of me, paid for by me and to be used by me which I now give out under the creative commons license (c)Doiyk Exposures, I have Permission. Arch-Angel Raphael the Artist (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2019 (WAT)


Deleted: per nomination; permission from the photographer needs to be sent to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo UNAMA / Kirk L. Kroeker. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not good Andysmith248 (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Anna Maslova, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Raymond Adams, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Raymond Adams, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Ale Paladino, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://rcdlc.org/our-bishops Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0266536/mediaviewer/rm2609890560 Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagem com direitos autorais do Google Cyberini (talk) 15:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright viiolation. --JuTa 07:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP UK: Mural does not enjoy freedom of panorama in the United Kingdom. Mys_721tx (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Juan Almagro López).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Patrick Rogel, le agradezco la información que me ha enviado sobre el aviso de borrado. Soy historiador del arte jubilado y en la actualidad, estoy elaborando el siguiente proyecto: Juan Almagro López, pintor (https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario:ILDE.ZAFRA.P/Taller&action=submit) y para poderlo realizar necesito los archivos de fotografías y de infografías que aparecen en dicho trabajo (como soy nuevo he subido más de los que en realidad necesito). Por otra parte, he de comunicarle que las fotos son originales hechas con un iphone 7, (los archivos no están fotografiados ni escaneados de libros) y soy el autor con los permisos de las personas e instituciones dueñas de las pinturas y dibujos. Igualmente, las infografías están hechas por mí. Por tal motivo, solicito la restauración de los mismos. Le pido disculpas y agradezco su comprensión. Saludos cordiales. --ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ILDE.ZAFRA.P: Please re-read the section "Commons tiene un propósito específico" on your talk page. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ILDE.ZAFRA.P: Besides Juan Almagro López's work is copyrighted until 2036. Have you provided a permission of the painters's heirs before uploading here? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, Patrick Rogel, me pongo de nuevo en contacto con usted para comunicarle que tengo autorización de los herederos y dueños de los cuadros que corresponden a las imágenes del proyecto, sobre Juan Almagro López, alojado en https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario:ILDE.ZAFRA.P/Taller&action=submit Saludos cordiales. --ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have you sent a permission via COM:OTRS? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Juan Almagro López), already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Juan Almagro López), already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment This could be in scope. The quality is sufficient, so that they can used to illustrate this style of painting. But of course, we need an OTRS permission from the artist's heirs. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Patrick, con fecha dom., 17 mar. 21:26 (hace 23 horas) se ha enviado un correo electrónico a: permissions-es@wikimedia.org [Ticket#2019031710005771] Confirmación de recepción (Re: Cediendo derechos de [...]) Cediendo derechos de autor a usuario ILDE.ZAFRA.P para Wikimedia

Inés Solas Almagro <inessolas@gmail.com> dom., 17 mar. 21:26 (hace 23 horas) para permissions-es

Por la presente declaramos que somos las titulares de los derechos de autor exclusivos de las OBRAS DE ARTE DEL PINTOR JUAN ALMAGRO LÓPEZ que se encuentran alojadas en [2] [3] [4]. Estos derechos los hemos cedidos a Ildefonso Zafra Peña (usuario ILDE.ZAFRA.P) para la publicación del artículo Juan Almagro López en Wikipedia.

Consentimos publicar dichas obras bajo la licencia libre Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (BY-SA-4.0).

Reconocemos que concedemos a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades.

Somos conscientes de que siempre retendremos los derechos de autor de nuestro abuelo Juan Almagro López, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para su obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no le serán atribuidas.

Somos conscientes de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y nos reservamos el derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas.

Reconocemos que no podemos retractarnos de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.

Inés Mª Solas Almagro (nieta de Juan Almagro López)

Dolores Mª Solas Almagro (nieta de Juan Almagro López)

17 de marzo de 2019


Muchas gracias. Saludos --ILDE.ZAFRA.P (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination+lacks of permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+lacks of permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Namalric86 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Georges Fréset (d. 1975), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Ticket#2019032010003374 pending. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now there's a PNG version (File:Logo of Tsun Jin High School.png) with transparent background available for use. Comparing with that file, this one doesn't have enought quality. Whisper of the heart (talk) 08:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's a PNG version (File:Logo of Tsun Jin High School.png) with transparent background available for use. Comparing with that file, this one doesn't have enought quality. Whisper of the heart 14:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Whisper of the heart: Why two requests?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Because nobody processes the first one for too long time.--Whisper of the heart 04:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a valid reason to open multiple DRs. Regards. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 07:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; better quality PNG file available. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographic or sexual exhibition photo BamLifa (talk) 03:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I always find fascinating as to how someone that has something against "pornographic or sexual exhibition photo" and so shouldn't search this images, manage to find this kind of images and even adds categories to images of the same type. First, this is not an "pornographic or sexual exhibition photo", but even if it was pornography and sexual content are in scope of Commons. Second, this image was taken in a known adult industry expo (AVN Adult Entertainment Expo that has articles in 11 languages wikipedias) and shows two adult movies actresses (Abigail Mac that has articles in 10 languages wikipedias and Mia Malkova Mia Malkova that has articles in 27 languages wikipedias). Has this image is clearly in scope, per event and persons depicted and has zero personality rights problems, i smell an attempt to censor content that is not of the liking of someone. Tm (talk) 04:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, per Tm. I would also point out that this photo is the only one we have (categorized as) either of the two subjects that is not a solo portrait, which adds to its particular relevance. -- Tuválkin 18:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion. Strakhov (talk) 19:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographic or sexual exhibition photo BamLifa (talk) 03:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I always find fascinating as to how someone that has something against "pornographic or sexual exhibition photo" and so shouldn't search this images, manage to find this kind of images and even adds categories to images of the same type. First, this is not an "pornographic or sexual exhibition photo", but even if it was pornography and sexual content are in scope of Commons. Second, this image was taken in a known adult industry expo (AVN Adult Entertainment Expo that has articles in 11 languages wikipedias) and shows two adult movies actresses (Jaelyn Fox that has articles in 8 languages wikipedias). Has this image is clearly in scope, per event and persons depicted and has zero personality rights problems, i smell an attempt to censor content that is not of the liking of someone. Tm (talk) 04:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion, no valid reason for deletion. Strakhov (talk) 19:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description (auto-) translated to "A special black background with a red box, very special." Looks like a test upload and out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de:Conrad Felixmüller (1897-1977) (F M = Felix Müller), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 09:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately - this is true. My error! --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject on the left is a private citizen and has not given permission/consent for the photo to be uploaded online. Luntian (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Orphan image uncat since June 2016, no evidence of notability nor compensating in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In order to reupload and recategorize. I am the original uploader. Olorin0222 (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted While deletion is not needed for reuploading and recatagorizing, prompt request by uploader, orphan file. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.scoop.it/topic/histoire2guerres/p/4005074466/2013/07/23/les-carnets-de-guerre-de-mgr-villepelet-archives-diocesaines-de-nantes May be old enough. Yann (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no information. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gwenriche (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gwenriche (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, probably screenshots, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No answer, user blocked again. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auschwitz letter

[edit]

When I uploaded these on 20 February, I believed they were free, but now I'm not sure. In fact I'm totally confused, so I'm nominating them in the hope that someone can advise.

The files are screenshots of a letter/postcard written in July 1944 by a Church of Scotland missionary, Jane Haining (1897–1944), in the Auschwitz concentration camp in German-occupied Poland during the Holocaust. Haining had been working in a school for Jewish and Christian children in Budapest, Hungary, when she was arrested by the Gestapo after it became clear that she supported her students. She died a few days after writing the letter. The recipient was Margit Prém, head of the school. The original letter is in the National Library of Scotland. The images as they were in the article (since removed).

I took the screenshots from a Hungarian documentary about Haining: Bánóczi, Lídia (director); Orsolya, Székely (producer) (2014). "Szeretettel, Jane" [With love, Jane]. Budapest: IKON Stúdió, from 00:24:03.

I believe the letter is in the public domain in its country of origin, Poland, which has a copyright term of author's life + 70. I believed at the time I uploaded it that the letter was also in the public domain in the US because the first known publication was 2014, and following the Hirtle chart ("Works First Published Outside the U.S. by Foreign Nationals or U.S. Citizens Living Abroad" → "Works Published Abroad After 1 January 1978" → "After 1 March 1989"), it was first published outside the US after 1 March 1989 in a country that has copyright relations with the US (Hungary). (For Hungary, see "International Copyright Relations of the United States", p. 7.) This means the copyright term in the US is also author's life + 70.

However, I now have two concerns. First, do we need to distinguish between the copyright of the letter and copyright of photographs of it? Second, I've recently learned that the left side of the letter (the left side of file 1) was published in 1998 in the UK by a Scottish minister. That moves it into a different category of the Hirtle chart: "Works First Published Outside the U.S. by Foreign Nationals or U.S. Citizens Living Abroad" → "Works Published Abroad After 1978" → "1978 to 2002". This says of works published in 1978–2002: "Created before 1978 and first published in a country that is a signatory to the Berne Convention or other 17 USC § 104A(h)(3) treaties" → "The greater of 70 years after the death of author ... or 31 December 2047".

I hope someone can help untangle this. I'm pinging Yann, who has offered very helpful advice about images in the past. SarahSV (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is no copyright on the pictures. These are faithful reproductions of 2D works, so {{PD-scan}} applies. Yes, the letters are in the public domain in Europe. I am not sure about the USA though. Also there is no copyright on the 3rd file, which is {{PD-ineligible}}. The second file copyright status is even more murky... Regards, Yann (talk) 10:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, thanks for the feedback. That's good to know about file 3. I wonder whether the same applies to file 2. That shows the standard Nazi German text on letters from Auschwitz: that the prisoners are allowed to receive two letters a month, etc. SarahSV (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the copyright of that text is certainly expired, even if there was one in the first place. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Should I add {{PD-ineligible}} to file 2? SarahSV (talk) 19:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure if there was originally a copyright, that's why I didn't add this. But {{Anonymous-EU}} most probably applies. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've just noticed Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, which says Nazi German postage stamps are not PD, so that complicates file 2 even further. I might have to blur the Hitler stamp, which would take us into truly bizarre territory. SarahSV (talk) 01:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The stamp is {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least from the German point of view, the text in file 1 is below the threshold of originality, so {{PD-ineligible}} might apply. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above discussion. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double cropped. This is the middle iteration. Not needed since we have original and File:Beto O'Rourke in 2012.jpg. -- I am the creator of both crops Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex and unused logo. E4024 (talk) 00:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Unknown photographer" is not true. There is a signature at the right bottom. Considering Andonian's death year, a discussion is necessary. E4024 (talk) 01:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Indeed there is a signature, but I couldn't find on the Internet any trace of an "Abes Paris" photo studio so I don't think there are beneficiaries today. As for when this picture was taken, Aram Andonian died at 76 in 1951, but he looks 30-40 here. So this picture was taken well before 70 years ago. -- RSVartanian (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC+1)
We suppose a pic is certainly PD -sort of to resume a complex story- when it is taken at least 120 years ago. IMHO we could lower this a bit, but that is what exists and rules now at Commons. --E4024 (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The building is clearly the main subject. 68.193.211.254 01:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quality, weird cropping on the edge and the X in the corner indicate this is a screenshot, not an original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 02:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in the US for artwork. One artist is still living and the other died in 2009, so copyright has not expired. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 02:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without much EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 03:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist B dash (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this painting (Lin Yu-shan) died in 2004. Therefore, the deadline of copyrights protection will be 2054. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this painting (Guo Hsueh-hu) died in 2012. Therefore, the deadline of copyrights protection will be 2062. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. The author is seen in the picture. Mhhossein talk 04:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the poster designer B dash (talk) 08:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 11:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of paronama in United Arab Emirates, needs permission from the architect B dash (talk) 09:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: The focus is the window-cleaning, not the tower. --DaB. (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Burj Khalifa. Although the focus is in window-cleaning, that's not enough. The building has still too prominent place in the photo. Actually for window-cleaning the building has almost always very prominent place, that means: it's almost impossible to make a Commons-eligible photo about window-cleaning in UAE. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted logo B dash (talk) 10:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted logo B dash (talk) 10:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the designer B dash (talk) 10:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Individual named in the image description is a private citizen and has not given permission/consent for the photo to be uploaded online. Luntian (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol: Trademark logo (as written small "TM" after last N) Holapaco77 (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res with no EXIF, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Older image Petrsk (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of 1970s/80s toys require permission of toy creator per COM:TOYS. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS Lord Belbury (talk) 12:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS Lord Belbury (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Emil Gadzhiev, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS request has been sent by the photo creator. Please check. Please proceed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JazzMusicien (talk • contribs) 21:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Received OTRS (not checked the ticket itself). --DaB. (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to DR to allow for discussion about whether this image might be useful (subject: young woman with head scarf) and thereby in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work — Racconish💬 13:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At least in 2011 (the earliest capture I could find), the website given in the "permission" parameter of the Information Template did not contain anything that would suggest that this is in the public domain. Rather, the footer said very clearly 2011 ©Messaging Architects. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. (= All rights reserved). The article this was used in was deleted at de.wp as advertisment. It was re-created in user space, which I've nominated for deletion again now … Out of scope, I guess? El Grafo (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (would at least need confirmation via OTRS). Too intricate for {{PD-textlogo}}. Likely copyright violation. Huon (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete the current version and the June 2018 upload. It is copyvio (https://esporte.uol.com.br/futebol/campeonatos/brasileiro/serie-b/ultimas-noticias/2017/11/01/william-pottker-nao-tem-lesao-e-sera-avaliado-diariamente-no-inter.htm) and not a crop of the free image shown in the description. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now it’s the 2nd and 4th latest versions that are copyvio. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cleaned history, projected against uploading for 1y. --DaB. (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 19:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim "own work" most likely unwarranted. Subject was born in 1924 and the photograph likely was taken no later than ca. 1955 (based on photographic content). Archie02 (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be copied from here. The categories are completely wrong. The description language says it's in English, but it's obviously not, and I tried using Google translate to determine the language, but without success. The picture is of mars, but it's lifted from a Google site and may be copyrighted. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Walk Like an Egyptian as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: isn't this file supposed to be deleted because it was uploaded after the flickr user revoked the license for free use
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This file was extracted from File:Bill Bradbury.jpg which passed flickreview. This file is a crop so the upload date would be different but its still a crop of a file that was free when uploaded to commons. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please at least delete the various previous versions. It looks like the user is a monarch. E4024 (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader doesn't seem to own the picture's copyright. SirEdimon (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS is needed. --Ezarateesteban 13:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader doesn't seem to own the picture's copyright SirEdimon (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS is needed. --Ezarateesteban 13:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Sanvidm (talk) 07:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Sanvidm (talk) 07:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus Ymblanter (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But no art visible. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nothing copyrihtable here. --Ezarateesteban 13:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Existence of this Flag is Really uncertain. Only Source comes from a Blogger who makes Fictional flags http://zebratigerfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_03.html The Real Howland flag is from FOTW https://www.fotw.info/flags/um-hwlnd.html BlinxTheKitty (talk) 02:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is in use by projects. --DaB. (talk) 11:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per DaB. There are other ways to indicate a disputed file. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real flag, designed by a blogger who makes fictional flags http://zebratigerfish.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_03.html and not used elsewhere. Is not and should not be in use on any project: meets deletion criterion of Out of scope/Not educationally useful. Reywas92 (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per above, private fantasy image, OOS, unused, uncat since May.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 03:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is in use by the uploader AFAIS. --DaB. (talk) 11:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And? Any contributions to Commons or WP (I mean other than his personal appearence? :) --E4024 (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: user with 7 contributions on Commons and 1 on meta. Can be considered a "selfie by no contributor". Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

به دلیل اینکه زیرنویس آن درست نمی باشد بهمن حبیبی (talk) 19:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shkuru Afshar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No identification of the specific reason why each file would be PD in Iran, as required by {{PD-Iran}}. Also, the uploader has been blocked for uploading unfree files before.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Copyright ownership and permission for pblication confirmed by calling to company's office. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shkuru Afshar (talk • contribs) 01:51, 16 March 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • @Shkuru Afshar: Signing your posts on talk pages is required by Commons:Signatures policy. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep for every file which is shown to be free license or PD. In addition, I wish to state for the record that I consider this mass DR to be disruptive, counter-productive and smelling suspiciously of a personal grudge. The nominator should know better, considering how many years they've been editing this project. AshFriday (talk) 02:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    According to {{PD-Iran}}, "The media description page should identify which reason applies", and it gives three potential reasons for a work created in Iran to be PD as follows: 30pma for creators who died before 22 August 1980; 50pma for creators who died on or after 22 August 1980; or "30 years from the date of publication or public presentation for Photographic or cinematographic works ... In cases where the work belongs to a legal person or rights are transferred to a legal person." This uploader seems to almost never identify the reason. In addition, for the first two reasons, we would need evidence of the creator's name and date of death, currently before 1969, upon upload. For the third reason, we would need evidence of the "date of publication or public presentation" in Iran at least 30 years ago, currently before 1989, upon upload. Every file marked {{PD-Iran}} that does not comply is a copyright violation and we should not host it or we could get sued for hosting it and our reusers could get sued for reusing it. This is not personal, I am trying to protect this project, our reusers, and Iranian creators and heirs.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If problem is with the dates, please refer to introduced sources. If you need more accurate links, please inform me. If you need this formation to be added to the files' pages, please let me know.

If you want to know about newspapers archives, feel free to call them. Unfortunately, many of them on their websites have archive of after 2010. I usually have to refer to their offices.

Published images from newspapers are mainly from famous newspapers and magazines in Iran. Mainly: Ettela'at, Keyhan, Jomhuri Eslami, Aandegan, Tehran mosavvar, Ferdowsi, Akhbare iran. Some photographers are: Ahmad Kavoosian, Mahshid Amirshahi, Hengameh Golestan.

Also: Pahlavi dynasty, Military of the Pahlavi, SAVAK "Organization of National Intelligence and Security of the Nation", and other governmental organizations of Pahlavi Dynasty dissolved in 1978-1979. Consequently, organizations that created these images have "died" before 1981.

Sincerely yours.Shkuru Afshar (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as this DR is including several files of different nature, a huge quantity of them seeming also to be PD, I would suggest to open several specific DR, for groups of files that are not in the public domain because of their age. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shkuru Afshar (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

No proof of publication more than 30 years ago, name of the creator, creator's year of death, or applicable reason sufficient to satisfy {{PD-Iran}}. Many images are from BBC Persian, which does not specifically attribute. The uploader sometimes uses the name of the subject as the name of the author.

For whom is going to make the decision. Please check the information I provided for every photo.

Jeff G. has applied the photo that I took with my own phone (file:Qazvin, Tehran City Gates-2016.10.28, 12.12.36.jpg) and photos I just translated and uploaded with the exact same copyright tag in other languauged (File:HAARP ionogram (Farsi-Persian).png, File:Boeing 727 flight control surfaces (Farsi-Persian).png, File:Flight dynamics with text (Farsi-Persian).png, File:Alieron A-44 (PSF) (Farsi-Persian).png)

Photos from tasnim are provided with link and creator's label (Hossein Zohrevand) https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/media/1393/09/11/575713/%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%AA%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AE%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%A8

Some of them are scans of books and newspapers that are officially published (Over 30 years ago). Like en:Ettela'at newspaper. Hence, source and creator of the photo is newspaper. If it is required, I can separate newspapers, books ect.

Some of them are from 100 years ago. That means copyright is expired all over the world.

File:Peykan 1971 5.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 4.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 3.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 2.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 1.JPG, File:Akhbar Hafte Magazine.jpg, and File:Institute for the Intellectual Development of Children and Young Adults 1965.jpg are scans of magazines.

Just like @Yann: said: Many of these files may be in the public domain in Iran, but the information provided is quite poor. I know that is the problem and it needs to be fixed and this is what I am trying to do.

.

I provide information in English, so everyone can check them.

I don't have any problem if any of these photos are investigated and been deleted individually. But mass deletion is unfair. As I said some of them are my personal photos. This is total hostility

@4nn1l2: Shkuru Afshar (talk) 10:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of 1953 Iranian coup d'etat by William Arthur Cram, a former education officer at the US embassy in Tehran. Sourced from The Guardian.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

For whom is going to make the decision. Please check the information I provided for every photo.

Jeff G. has applied the photo that I took with my own phone (file:Qazvin, Tehran City Gates-2016.10.28, 12.12.36.jpg) and photos I just translated and uploaded with the exact same copyright tag in other languauged (File:HAARP ionogram (Farsi-Persian).png, File:Boeing 727 flight control surfaces (Farsi-Persian).png, File:Flight dynamics with text (Farsi-Persian).png, File:Alieron A-44 (PSF) (Farsi-Persian).png)

Photos from tasnim are provided with link and creator's label (Hossein Zohrevand) https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/media/1393/09/11/575713/%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%AA%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AE%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%A8

Some of them are scans of books and newspapers that are officially published (Over 30 years ago). Like en:Ettela'at newspaper. Hence, source and creator of the photo is newspaper. If it is required, I can separate newspapers, books ect.

Some of them are from 100 years ago. That means copyright is expired all over the world.

File:Peykan 1971 5.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 4.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 3.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 2.JPG, File:Peykan 1971 1.JPG, File:Akhbar Hafte Magazine.jpg, and File:Institute for the Intellectual Development of Children and Young Adults 1965.jpg are scans of magazines.

Just like @Yann: said: Many of these files may be in the public domain in Iran, but the information provided is quite poor. I know that is the problem and it needs to be fixed and this is what I am trying to do.

I provide information in English, so everyone can check them.

I don't have any problem if any of these photos are investigated and been deleted individually. But mass deletion is unfair. As I said some of them are my personal photos. This is total hostility


Kept: This is not gonna work; You (Jeff G.) already did this in 2019, and the closing admin said the DR should be splitted. I echo what they said again. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Topology~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; at least one had author info in exif, showing its not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an organisation;s logo. The claim to being the copyright holder is not credible. The design might be too simple to copyright though. Whpq (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep seems textlogo to me. --Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple Indian textlogo.--Roy17 (talk) 15:48, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for w:India Greens Party and w:User:Mortalrahu/sandbox. No other use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no longer in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:34, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ADavenport (WMF) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

For various reasons.

1) some of those documents contain a picture that clearly isn't own work. Evidence of a free license isnt 'provided. 2) The files not containing the photographs use some standard template to add a background. No evidence that the background tempalte is relased under a free license is provided. 3) The lose pages are out of scope. There is little educational value in pages from non notable a brochure in different and often wrong file formats. 4) They fail Commons:Project_scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. Not all files are PDF's but the same rational still applies.

Natuur12 (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh the irony. A few of these files are INUSE, so I don't see the scope issues with those. The png copies of the PDF pages are redundant to the PDF, same thing for the SVGs assuming that the PDF was constructed using vector graphics. A source for the derivative works is definitely required though. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to at least save the PDFs from deletion if we provided additional information about the images used within? --Dimi z (talk) 07:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment would it be too much to ask, to interact on talk with the WMF employee, and ask for an OTRS, rather than greeting with a mass deletion? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I send this to some WMF people, please give this some extra time and consult me before taking any action. Multichill (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, this discussion got flagged to me to look into, thanks so much for being patient. I don't have all the info for the comments about the files here yet unfortunately, but I can provide some updates. First, the image is This landscape photograph. It should definitely be credited in the file descriptions. If anyone sees this and wants to add it before I or my colleagues can get to it (it might take me a few days to make time to go through all the files listed here) please feel free. Second, the various single pages were requested by various community members during the EU copyright campaign because they were helpful for the translations. If you'd like to consolidate and just keep one full copy of the whole pamphlet rather than a bunch of separate single files for each page, we're fine with that. The last thing is I'm still looking into the theme on some of the pages. It's honestly pretty simple and probably doesn't meet the standard for copyrightability in the 9th circuit (where the WMF is based), so I would say it's not a cause for deletion in any case, but I would like to figure out where it's from. If anybody knows, you can let me know, otherwise I'll keep looking and see if I can find out where it came from. Hope that helps resolve this discussion. -Jrogers (WMF) (talk) 02:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: source provided. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi patrick File: Rosh H I.jpg I photographed myself on the camera of the smartphone from the photo of my father Rosh Nikolai Ivanovich — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiralnikto (talk • contribs) 10:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You want to delete my father's photo. What do I need to do to prevent this from happening? I am new to wikipedia this is my first article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiralnikto (talk • contribs) 10:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo by Rosh N.I.jpg was made by me on a smartphone from another photo taken many years ago in a photo,The photographs used are paid to the photographer and I am fully in right to use them publicly. Then it was used on the Internet on the website of honorary citizens, I am his son, he already died, How can we prove or fix it? thank you in advance. Tiral (talk) 08:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this photo was taken in a stationary photo many years ago (about 40 years), of course, money was paid for it, this is an ordinary purchase and it became private property from the moment of paymentTiral (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to DR to allow for discussion about whether this image might be useful and thereby in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We have the Category:Children of Tanzania, it's a file relating to projects or events of the Wikimedia community Wiki Loves Africa 2019 in Tanzania and is realistically useful for an educational purpose, fo instance illustrating a book about the children's life in Tanzania. --Emha (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: consensus for keep. P 1 9 9   16:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Buxtehude (talk) 13:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 13:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was originally tagged for speedy deletion but seems to be used in a guesthouse at the English-language Wikipedia, comments? Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the one uploaded by User:Kaushik Srinivasa Rachakonda, because it's an unused selfie per CSD F10.
@Buxtehude and Green Giant: Undelete the one uploaded by User:Varunpalacharla because it was not unused personal image.--Roy17 (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment, apparently the old (2014) photo with the same file name was used at the Teahouse, and the old link now points to this new picture. Just an extra reason for deletion. Buxtehude (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Buxtehude. And its use at an archived teahouse page is hardly a meaningful use. P 1 9 9   16:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 2D graphic works in the UK

— Racconish💬 12:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

re your deletion request. I contacted the organizer of wooferendum long ago. He wanted to agree to the publication of the files at wikipedia, but would only have written to OTRS if I was going to disclose information about myself. He has not replyied for a long time. So I see three choices (as you requested deletion):

  1. withdraw the DR, as the copyright owner does not want deletion
  2. go on with having the files deleted, as there will be no OTRS ticket
  3. contact the copyright owner yourself, if you want the files kept, perhaps you are more lucky than me

The files as they are will not be used with a DR on the description page.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 20:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC) (moved from Racconish talk page)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. Ruthven (msg) 14:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]