Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 14th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my page and it was posted as a joke, it possesses no real information and i want the photo removed from google images Darkogolub (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nonsense, unused selfie. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.evolutionofbodybuilding.net/ifitpro/ Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error license JacobHung (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raquelbdc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Created as advertisement so speedy and gone. --Herby talk thyme 12:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Khonakhan Mosque, Margilan.jpg. Both images' sizes and resolution are very identical. JWilz12345 (talk) 13:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: {{Duplicate}} would have been quicker, but it is identical. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Caro administrador, por favor, poderia apagar? Coloquei a foto no momento errado. Obrigada! Lu Brito (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 17:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I have kept the 2 images in use on his user page on hi:wp per COM:INUSE. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unencyclopedic personal photos, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 11:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amardeep Sahu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. OOS.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Block evasion by Umagranger (talk · contribs). See also . Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 16:36, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 20:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Thomas Linard as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Antu preferences-desktop-screensaver.svg|2=screenshot of the SVG file before correction Huntster (t @ c) 18:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Question can JoKalliauer explain what mean garbled black letters? Surely wasn’t this PNG a test uplopad? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It was the correct rendering of https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/6/69/20180507142707%21Antu_preferences-desktop-screensaver.svg, since flowroot is supported by view renderers (not even all inkscape-Version render it correctly) I needed it for a disscussion.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 23:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. Huntster (t @ c) 03:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for free license for the recording. The underlying music is PD, sure. But there's zero evidence that the recording is. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 22:39, 15 Januar 2019 UTC: No license. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information. - --Krdbot 02:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Roland Neveu Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. --ghouston (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Maheyan Islam (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:GawkyAmoeba

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:GawkyAmoeba. Are infringing copyright and use of trademarks, previously a DMCA was sent. 189.150.71.18 08:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is unclear and the meaning is unknown. Thyj (talk) 07:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eccjahun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NorthBrucewayne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this image is way out of date. Fundamental metric tensor (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mateo152 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo 1989 (talk) 15:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ka786143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable logo 1989 (talk) 15:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mc Triple U (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image 1989 (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Me (2644359736).jpg, File:Me (3336147117).jpg, File:Me (4369051080).jpg.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gcelayir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encylopedic NMW03 (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, poor quality 1989 (talk) 17:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ikomoff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, advertising

1989 (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by X14xshadowx14x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of non-notable software

1989 (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image 1989 (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems like a mistake OsmHydrant (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Otourly (talk) 08:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is the photo of photo, not the real person. AT (talk) 04:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, derivative work of presumably non-free photo without a license from the original photographer. LX (talk, contribs) 15:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Moheen. --Jianhui67 TC 14:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos by Louis Kim on Flickr

[edit]

File:Chen at EXO The Lost Planet Concert in Guangzhou, in August 2014.jpg is a cropped version of this image watermarked by "124812com All For One", while File:Taemin at the SMTown Live World Tour IV in Seoul (1).jpg is a cropped version of this image watermarked by "Sweety Candy". This immediately raises a case of license laundering by the Louis Kim account on Flickr, which is no longer available. All uploads from this account should be deleted under the precautionary principle.

xplicit 07:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. Nice find. The Flickr account being removed is also a less than great sign. --GRuban (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Kissakaito

[edit]

Other files uploaded by User:Kissakaito are tagged as copyright violations. Although I couldn't find these images used in other sites, I strongly suspect that these files are also copyright violations. --01miki10 (talk) 14:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xavier corvol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by Georges Bruyer (d. 1962). In the PD in France in 2033.

BrightRaven (talk) 14:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xavier corvol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1918 and 1920 photographs by an unknown photographer (the author mentioned is incorrect: he is actually the subject of the photographs). So, no information about the author and the publication history. Not old enough to be for sure in the PD in France. (It is possible that a photographer active in 1918-1920 was still alive 70 years ago, i.e. in 1948.)

BrightRaven (talk) 14:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

je suis le propriétaire de toutes les photos et illustrations publiées dans cet article
Xavier Corvol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xavier corvol (talk • contribs) 19:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Le droit d'auteur ne permet pas au propriétaire d'une photographie ou d'une œuvre d'art de la publier. Seul l'auteur ou ses ayants droit ont ce droit. BrightRaven (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep sorry, but this nomination is complete rubbish. How can one argue with something that makes no sense whatsoever?
"Why do we have such enormous DR backlogs?", well, this is part of the answer. Why does this DR even exist? Who benefits from this? Who is annoyed by this image to the point of needing it deleted? What is the bloody point? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per COM:UDR discussion. Ankry (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AGR21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JCKRETAS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 浪速丹治 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:TOYS.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 浪速丹治 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two sets of similar images that appear to be video captures. One of them has been previously published at https://ir-japan.net/blogs/blog/2018/03/blog20180309.html

Ytoyoda (talk) 12:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 浪速丹治 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work

— Racconish💬 16:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willande123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images / advertising

1989 (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was just a test picture provided by ffwstb. It does not contain a hydrant. OsmHydrant (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Otourly at 07:56, 21 Januar 2019 UTC: Test page or page with no valid content (G1) --Krdbot 14:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Getty Images appears to be the copyright owner Ytoyoda (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr. Wiki Charles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam, no notability

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

made an error with the name and photo, need to re-upload it Graptaloyia (talk) 07:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deprecated for years; no remaining uses in Wikipedia articles.

Jc86035 (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No objections. Useddenim (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: For the record, here’s the equivalence:
    •   (evSTR+r-STR)    =   (vexSTR+r-STR)
    •   (evSTRr-STR)     =   (vexSTRr-STR)
    •   (exvSTR-STRg+l)  =   (exvSTR-STR+l)
    •   (exvSTR-STRgl)   =   (exvSTR-STRl)
    •   (exvSTRg+r-STR)  =   (exvSTR+r-STR)
    •   (STqy)           =   (RYq)
    •   (vBHF-xKBHFa)    =   (vBHF-exKBHFa)
    •   (vDSTa-STR)      =   (vKDSTa-STR)
    •   (vDSTe-STR)      =   (vKDSTe-STR)
    •   (veBHF-xSTR)     =   (veBHF-exSTR)
    •   (vSTR-DSTe)      =   (vSTR-KDSTe)
    •   (vSTR-STRg+l)    =   (vSTR-STR+l)
    •   (vSTR-STRgl)     =   (vSTR-STRl)
    •   (vSTRg+r-STR)    =   (vSTR+r-STR)
    •   (vSTRgr-STR)     =   (vSTRr-STR)
    •   (xvSTR-STR+l)    =   (vSTR-exSTR+l)
    •   (xvSTR-STRl)     =   (vSTR-exSTRl)
Deleting admin, please link this DR in the deletion summary. -- Tuválkin 17:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kittymccaffery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hjeuruht179 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


File:HaQuynhNhu.jpg
Hình này do tôi tải lên, Do tôi mới hoạt động trên Wikipedia trong thời gian ngắn nên không nắm rõ cách tải lên, cách sử dụng hình ảnh và các quy định khác trên Wikipedia nên làm sai cách, qua tìm hiểu và các thành viên thảo nên tôi nắm rõ hơn các vấn đề, nhờ bạn quản trị viên nào đó xóa hộ tôi bức ảnh này. Xin cám ơn.
Hjeuruht179 (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Target2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality, small resolution, most likely derivative work that requires permission.

1989 (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Joan Miró (d. 1983), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 07:47, 22 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 14:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Josep Renau (d. 1982), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 07:47, 22 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 14:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, http://netgazeti.ge/news/329114/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 09:20, 22 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 14:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This old png-file can be deleted! It´s from really bad quality and isn´t used anymore! Replaced by this high-quality svg-file: File:Strukturformel von Isopropylamin.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:241 Street vc.jpg Vcohen (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete I agree with you, Vcohen. I upload it automatically, and didn't check every file. --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 06:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The tool should automatically check it. I don't know why it doesn't do it. Vcohen (talk) 10:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: redirected. --Sealle (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 03:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF suggests author is one Remus Suciu, who does not seem to be the same as the uploader. Clarifications are needed IMO. —Andrei S. Talk 13:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission, https://adevarul.ro/locale/hunedoara/spargere-casa-fostului-primar-devei-furat-hotii-locuinta-petru-marginean-1_5aea05a3df52022f75832ec5/index.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 03:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Horrible quality. Unused. COM:Redundant. Rye-96 (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user page image JuTa 20:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error Upload Hynerd (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website, which the [original] uploader purposefully left out, also says "Our site may contain text, artwork, photos or other content that is copyrighted by others and is being used with the express permission of the copyright holder. Therefore, it is recommended that you contact our Webmaster for permission to use information contained on this site". The state of Washington doesn't release their images in the Public Domain, and hasn't for quite sometime. Permission is still needed. Corky 19:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two things: One, just a reminder of WP:ASSUMEGOODFAITH. I think it's poor taste to assume I deliberately left anything out. I can assure you I did not. Remember to Hanlon's razor. I made a mistake based on my lack of experience with such things.
Second, it does explicitly say right where I quoted the source that we can assume to use the website freely. It seems the website itself is inconsistent. I did my work based on what I saw. I would just ask that statement be kept in mind before any deletion. PrairieKid (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@PrairieKid: this isn’t directed at you (I apologize if it looks that way). The original uploader (Amishai GG) has continuously uploaded copyrighted images, which is why I believed they “purposely left out the rest of the privacy policy”. Going back, it looks like this IP user added the “permission”, though I suspect it’s Amishai GG. I think you were notified because you uploaded the HQ version, which is assuming good faith. I’ve added “original in brackets above. Again, I apologize if you thought I was talking about you. Corky 06:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: While I assume the uploader acted in good faith, the license was simply wrong. It is not public domain U.S. Government as that does not apply to state works. From the website, we can't know that the image is free at all. Jonathunder (talk) 22:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blagoveschenskaya_Church,_Saint_Petersburg,_Vasilievsky_Island.jpg Alexkom000 (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image 1989 (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Platflyer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per their talk page, this is most likely derivative work that requires permission.

1989 (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright CHRIS PAYNE IMAGES 2015 Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) HARRY ATKINSON Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not for wikipedia 49.184.214.40 19:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 14:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is an inappropriate. IDAZ09 Corporation (talk) 09:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is inappropriate image or logo IDAZ09 Corporation (talk) 09:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not for wikipedia 49.184.214.40 19:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 14:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is inappropriate image or logo IDAZ09 Corporation (talk) 09:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image, obviously a professional photo Lugnuts (talk) 12:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. False authorship claims from serial copyright violator. Previously published at https://en.prothomalo.com/sports/news/170276/Teen-IPL-breakthrough-boosts-Nepal-domestic. LX (talk, contribs) 15:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and LX. --Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see (c) in the image Edoderoo (talk) 12:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no permission and clearly marked copyright. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Pepe Ferrin Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You cannot see what the image is supposed to picture as it is out of focus. No encyclopedic use. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the pic is CR'ed we should need OTRS. E4024 (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Annunciation_Church_-_panoramio_(1).jpg Alexkom000 (talk) 18:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author removed del tag. Closing. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate head shot for American businessman. Uploader claims it is their own work, but their identically named Flickr account only has this one photo. Appears to be some kind of license washing from Flickr. William Graham (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely Flickrwashed. Photographer should confirm authorship and license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

everywhere on the web, not free. Lofhi (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyright violation (the photo itself - the chair is a utilitarian object). --Storkk (talk) 11:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False attribution in EXIF, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3469651/mediaviewer/rm92765952 Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry, mistake! copyrighted image Elly (talk) 17:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader requested within a short time frame. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no author, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - original photographer's date of death must be ascertained. --Storkk (talk) 11:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG version. Replaced by JPEG version uploaded to Commons Woko Sapien (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Connecticut governmental works are not Public Domain. See en:Copyright_status_of_works_by_subnational_governments_of_the_United_States. --Storkk (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG version. Replaced by JPEG version uploaded to Commons Woko Sapien (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Connecticut governmental works are not Public Domain. See en:Copyright_status_of_works_by_subnational_governments_of_the_United_States. --Storkk (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of trophy are considered under copyright.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; also see User:Elcobbola/Awards#Trophies,_statuettes,_and_figurines. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encylopedic NMW03 (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused personal image. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be REMOVED from deletion. I own this image. 108.56.237.135 21:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image should be REMOVED from deletion. I own this image. 108.56.237.135 22:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove from the deletion list. The photo was taken of me and I own the photo.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.montgomerytimes.com/ Source is too small Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Owning a paper or digital copy of a photo does not give you the right to freely license it. That right is held by the photographer. If they have licensed the image to you, then you must provide evidence of that using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC) This is a family photo taken inside Mamoru Matsunaga's house of a plaque that he was given by the Dominican National Police. The original photo of the plaque was taken by Mamoru Matsunaga's son Yuji Matsunaga and sent on to Yuji's son Daniel, who is my husband. I have permission from the family to share this photo. Is the photo incorrect because it is in the wrong place, does it have to be a real photo of Mamoru to go in the info box? Thanks. ClaraDR24 (talk) 05:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The problem here is that the plaque itself is copyrighted and there is no evidence that you have the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Brigitte Carnochan, yet claimed as "own work". Copyright generally belongs to the person who takes a picture, not who purchases, scans or uploads it, unless rights have been explicitly transferred. --Animalparty (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of paronama in France, requires permission from the artist B dash (talk) 06:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist B dash (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot B dash (talk) 06:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source page says “All Rights Reserved” so derivatives aren’t allowed doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0192}}Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May be it is a "derivative", no idea. I have drawn it myself in several hours and stating the original source. You can see the differnces in detail.... but it doesn't matter on commons... may be a stronger alienation/modification will help because the file is important for the pictorial representation of some biological adaption processes. --DagdaMor (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - sorry it looks like it's a derivative work, something less similar would probably be out of scope for lacking of educational value. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work. Exact copy of https://www.facebook.com/vero.irizar/photos/a.1574559499471327/2054362688157670/?type=1&theater Not exact - facebook image is a slight crop Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WTF The original claim was "Own work". Speedy delete was valid. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the photo is used as a profile and it is very plausible that it has been cropped, after a first download, for the purpose of optimization - seems to lacls of permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Assemblée nationale, https://twitter.com/JeunesAvecDC/status/884074222791905281 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Les droits de cette photo, prise dans l'hémicycle en début de législature, appartiennent au député concerné. --Authueil (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no indication of a free license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, as the Assemblée Nationale, does not release its pictures under CC. Rhadamante (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, as the Assemblée Nationale, does not release its pictures under CC. Rhadamante (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing of Macron B dash (talk) 02:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's a controversial subject. But thank you for stopping censoring my work. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not de minimius, the main subject are the image and the text. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship. Too complex to be in the public domain. Hiàn (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appaer to have been uploaded by the author; source here gives no indication of permission TenPoundHammer (talk) 03:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner B dash (talk) 05:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is laughable. The sign was made to be seen on the streets, and it is just some letters and non-unique symbols. Please stop this nonsense. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 09:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]
@Jürgen Eissink: Please read {{NoFoP-France}} and more @ Com:CRTFR FR copyright law is a bi.... --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata on Flickr, this Flickr account also uploaded have several other images clearly not own. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from non-trivial logo, Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims, absence of EXIF data, found elsewhere on the web. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, small resolution, most likely derivative work 1989 (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Small resolution: ok - though it was accepted when uploading. Poor quality: debateable - what is "poor" quality? Technical? Aesthetical? Derivatie work: - no high-gloss PR comissioned work indeed. It's a situational shot from a discussion truely mirroring the man. So why deleting it at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eskimo47 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very small without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

print screen from TV show, copyright owned by Vietnam Television, not free-content media --Hjeuruht179 (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + DW issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at metadata. E4024 (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark that's just barely visible in the lower right corner indicates that this was a collage including a non-free image DS (talk) 22:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it's from FunPhotor.com - still, non-free. DS (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Jcb (talk) 17:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random selfie not in project scope. Image is used on userpages that pre-date the image being on commons, or that are of blocked vandals. I also request that the filename be protected. DS (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tuvalkin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: obviously not own work. Possibly a derivative of NASA. King of ♥ 02:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, and no clear educational purpose. --P 1 9 9   15:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted relief in Romania made in 2011. No FoP in Romania. Regasterios (talk) 19:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 19:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif and image suggest a scan of a cut out image. No real source Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For your informationː The architect is Ferdinand Bauguil, who constructed the building in 1924-1925. I could not find any more information about Bauguil, no year of death. But in the Category:Palais du Commerce (Paris) are more pictures of this building, ever since 2011, and apparently nobody has ever complained. Is it possible to give these files the benefit of the doubt until the year of death of Bauguil is found?JopkeB (talk) 21:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. A version with more natural colouring [1] exists at [2] which existed prior to this files uploads. The EXIF data for this file also states it was processed with VSCO which could explain the colour filter. Uploader has no other uploads so that doesn't give me any other faith in the upload either. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Unlikely own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted picture. Low quality, stolen from a website Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 22:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted picture, stolen Online Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 22:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality. We have plenty of usable photos of Britney Spears; we don't need this badly out-of-focus one. Not used anywhere anyway. —Mahāgaja · talk 15:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata on Flickr, this Flickr account also uploaded have several other images clearly not own. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING. Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Yasu (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is the photo of the photo, not real person. AT (talk) 09:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, derivative work of presumably non-free photo without a license from the original photographer. LX (talk, contribs) 15:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot and the rights owner is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 07:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

אני צילמתי ואני בעל זכויות היוצרים של התמונה הזאת. מי שמחק הוא פזיז מידי ולא אחראי. עט הזמיר (talk) 09:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
התמונה היא מצילום מסך של סירטון שאני הסרטתי, הזכויות יוצרים הם רק שלי ולא של אף אחד אחר. עט הזמיר (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission(s). © Rafaela Proell from https://www.suhrkamp.de/autoren/robert_menasse_3213.html Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Originally nominated for deletion directly at the file page:

This work of art is in Italy, with very strict copyright rules, and no Freedom of Panorama at all, see Copyrights in Italy. The artist died in 1973, so less than 70 ago. To publish this file in Wikimedia Commons you need permission of the copyright holders, usually the heirs of the artist. JopkeB (talk) 11:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

De728631 (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue Thescrubbythug (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#Thescrubbythug Yann (talk) 05:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My only contribution shall be this. I genuinely thought that this (as well as several other images) was permitted to be used on Wikipedia based on the copyright statement here [3]. Given that multiple people are now saying that this isn't in fact the case and that I misinterpreted (and they themselves admitted it was easy to misinterpret), I have since removed the offending images from every Wikipedia page that they were used on, and reverted them back to what it was beforehand. I have marked every offending image for deletion, and I hope that this matter will swiftly be closed --Thescrubbythug (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Панн as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://s-narodom.ru/world/43822-biografiya-deputata-nikolaya-brykina.html Cannot be source - image is a crop Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.dialogue.am/%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%B8-%D5%AB%D5%B4-%D6%84%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%AC%D5%AB-%D5%A9%D5%A5%D5%AF%D5%B6%D5%A1%D5%AE%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%AB-%D5%B0%D5%A1%D5%B4%D5%A1%D5%AF%D6%80%D5%AB-%D5%B8%D6%82-%D5%AB%D5%B4/ Source too small to be source Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 06:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. De minimis. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 15:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]


Kept: per above, De minimis applies (guideline 4). --Mates (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source should be a broadcast of VS fashion show. The Vimeo account looks like a content farm rather than the broadcast distributor. Roy17 (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Used license not avaliable at linked video file. --Mates (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made an error with this photo, some detail and licensing terms Graptaloyia (talk) 07:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need to delete this file and replace it Graptaloyia (talk) 07:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Graptaloyia: This file has been on Commons since 2015, so you'll need to explain why you need to delete it. If you just want to change the information on the file description page, you can use the "Edit" link at the top of the page. --bjh21 (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bjh21: Yes, apologies for the extended delay. Just need to have this photo adjusted. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graptaloyia (talk • contribs) 21:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.



Deleted: per nomination - previously published with a copyright notice http://www.seafolks.com/bigphoto.php?lid=10189&pid=4825. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by a living artist, Claude Chaigneau. His permission is necessary (see COM:OTRS). BrightRaven (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticket received. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published outside Commons/Wikipedia and requires an OTRS ticket: https://ianiworld.com/kazan-north/ Ytoyoda (talk) 01:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the author of both: the photo and the web site where the photo is used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianiworld (talk • contribs) 17:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The exact duplicate of File:J'ai acheté une GOPRO 4K à 25 €... Bon plan ou arnaque.webm. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Already redirected as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made an error with this photo, some detail and licensing terms Graptaloyia (talk) 07:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Made an error with this photo, some detail and licensing terms Graptaloyia (talk) 09:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio because from facebook, see EXIF shizhao (talk) 07:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already deleted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Cherches may be a shortened version of George Cherchesov. Nevertheless a permission is needed via COM:OTRS since user claimed in the past being Sergey Savrasov or Dima Gvazava. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://bti-hannover.de/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Zurabishvili's Inauguration.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo, copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dafea23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

First photograph taken from Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/p/BoPjTs2FO3a/, the other photograph is likely from social media as well.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first image was indeed from Instagram and was used with the permission of the owner. It has since been removed and replaced by the new photograph File:ChoWSL.jpg which was taken by myself, using my own phone and I assert my right as the owner to use it. Dafea23 (talk) 17:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dafea23: For File:ChoAvaldsnes.png, you can't claim to be the owner—since it was published somewhere else first, you need documented evidence of permission from the owner. Please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. I had my doubts about File:ChoWSL.jpg because it's relative low-res and does not contain the EXIF data from the phone. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dafea23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be a screenshot of a social media video.Visible signs of cropping, imperfections.

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No fire-fighting-facility OsmHydrant (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Romania. Regasterios (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ː Delete Tambo (talk) 17:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 00:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Não foi feito pelo usuario Agronopolos discussão 02:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agronopolos (talk • contribs) 02:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a proper source would be needed. --JuTa 20:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronn as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No own work + artist is still alive. Can be under PD. Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How come this "Can be under PD"? Aren't signatures protected by privacy laws? Ronn (talk) 09:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely not won work of the uploader. --JuTa 20:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a free image, no permission known for a cc-license Edoderoo (talk) 12:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Josep Renau (d. 1982), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Ramón Puyol Román (d. 1981), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this 1915 illustration from the German satire magazine "Kladderadatsch" is claimed to be "unknown", but he isn't. Anybody can see that the illustration is signed. The artist is the German painter and illustrator Werner Hahmann, who worked for said magazine starting in 1914 and died in 1977. The illustration was published in Germany and is still protected there until the end of 2047, so it should be deleted. It can be restored in 2048. Rosenzweig τ 19:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Source. The image could be found on the website of NDRC. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201606/W020160603338693660573.pdf NTooru (talk) 22:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: reverted to 1st version, hided 2nd. --JuTa 20:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo; does not belong in Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 20:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyrighted content just enhanced by software http://www.martinelliluce.it/designer-en/show/32 Cohaf (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation Thescrubbythug (talk) 09:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freigabe wurde nicht erteilt. Ich habe dieses Foto im Auftrag der ISG Intermed Service GmbH & Co. KG hochgeladen. Der Kunde hat anschließend intern noch einmal diskutiert. Es gibt keine Freigabe. Also bitte löschen. Danke. Einfach machen Hamburg (talk) 10:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Permission was not granted. I uploaded this photo on behalf of ISG Intermed Service GmbH & Co. KG. The customer then internally discussed again. There is no permission. So please delete. Thank you. Einfach machen Hamburg (talk) 10:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:53, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not mentioned in the OTRS correspondence, thus no permission is given to this file. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 10:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not uploaded by the photographer, no permission either Edoderoo (talk) 12:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:54, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Death certificates are Crown Copyright and not PD as indicated here Pontificalibus (talk) 12:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Japan for architecture, but not for signboards. The photo violates signboard creator's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giogera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist, Jacques Chesnais, died in 1971. Will enter the public domain in France in 2042.

BrightRaven (talk) 12:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La publication des deux fichiers est autorisé par l'actuel propriétaire.
Selon le droit d'auteur, le propriétaire des œuvres matérielles n'a pas le droit de les publier. Seuls les ayants droit de l'auteur peuvent donner cette autorisation. Si vous avez l'autorisation des ayants droit de Jacques Chesnais, vous pouvez la transmettre en suivant cette procédure : COM:OTRS/fr. BrightRaven (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Les deux oeuvres ont fait l'objet d'une vente publique en décembre 2016; elles étaient publiées dans le catalogue online de la vente. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giogera (talk • contribs) 11:43, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Effectivement, dans ce cas la reproduction de l’œuvre est autorisée par l'art. 122-5 du code de la propriété intellectuelle : « Lorsque l’œuvre a été divulguée, l'auteur ne peut interdire [...] Les reproductions, intégrales ou partielles d’œuvres d'art graphiques ou plastiques destinées à figurer dans le catalogue d'une vente judiciaire effectuée en France pour les exemplaires mis à la disposition du public avant la vente dans le seul but de décrire les œuvres d'art mises en vente [...]. » Cela ne signifie pas qu'il est permis de la publier sur Commons sous une licence libre. BrightRaven (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kolforn as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope Kolforn (talk) 07:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC) However, this file is used on the user page of the uploader. AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --JuTa 20:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 17:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Personality rights, snapshot of unnotable photographer, not looking best, obviously not agreeing with the shot Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 20:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sladovnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first 3 documents clearly fall under {{PD-CzechGov}}, no valid reason for deletion. The 4th document is disputable: a document of a public research institute probably doesn't fall under PD. --ŠJů (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no reliable sources. --JuTa 21:08, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source, therefore the PD status is not clear. E4024 (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two 1934/1937 German caricatures, the authors are claimed to be unknown and in one case "nicht lesbar" (not legible). I can read the signature just fine as "Garvens", and that is most likely the caricaturist Oskar Garvens, who died in 1951. The other caricature is signed as "G.", and similarities in drawing style as well in how that letter "G" is written make me think that said caricature was drawn by Garvens as well. Anyway, the authors are definitely not "unknown" in a legal sense, and the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of these two 1918 illustrations from the German satire magazine "Kladderadatsch" is claimed to be "unknown", but he isn't. Anybody can see that the illustrations are signed with "Johnson" or "A. Johnson". That's Arthur Johnson, an American who lived in Germany for 65 of his 80 years, worked for said magazine from 1896 to 1944 and died in 1954. The illustrations were published in Germany and are still protected there until the end of 2024, so they should be deleted. They can be restored in 2025.

Rosenzweig τ 18:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image 1989 (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 20:58, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]