Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 7th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is very injurious for Muslim people. It should be removed, if Wikipedia has respect to believes. 88.235.201.254 23:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Speedy Kept. Two previous deletion requests at File talk:Maome.jpg; no new reason for deletion introduced. (You may consider it inappropriate or absurd, but is a work by an Islamic artist of 300+ years ago and cannot injure anyone. See File talk:Maome.jpg) -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. To portray the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)and his companions is an insult and a mockery to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 01:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept. This is the 4th request since 2007. Note previous discussions and the talk page. (Note as well that this *is* Islamic art with no insult nor mockery intended; the Islamic Persian artists seem to have had a different interpretation of appropriateness of such images. It is not the role of Wikimedia to determine who has the more correct interpretation of Islam nor any other religious question.) Thank you for your attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. Portraying the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is an insult to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 01:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and speedy close as a bad-faith nomination. The image is not intended to be insulting, the Wikimedia Foundation is not bound by the rules of Islam, and we don't censor content for the benefit of any particular group. The fact that some (not all) Muslims are insulted is their choice, and not the WMF's problem. You may want to look at Wikipedia:Talk:Muhammad/FAQ for more information about why these images are kept. Anachronist (talk) 07:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Потому что это оскорбляет мою религию и всех мусульман планеты земля 5.76.224.248 17:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. Portraying the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and angels is an insult and mockery to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. To portray the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), angels and companions is an insult and a mockery to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is very funny, beacuse actually muslims made this image. And you said that you did to mock yourselves? What is wrong with you people?--Nous (talk) 09:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. To portray the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as a fire!!! and the companions is an insult and mockery of Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and speedy close as bad-faith nomination. No valid reason given for deletion. We don't censor content for anyone's benefit, and you can configure your browser to avoid seeing these images (see Wikipedia:Talk:Muhammad/FAQ). Many of these depictions were created by Muslims. The fact that some contemporary Muslims may be offended isn't a reason to censor this. Anachronist (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. To portray the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his associates is an insult and a mockery to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, taken from Flickr and disrespects the legal rights of the subject. 95.91.241.136 11:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio COM:DW of copyrighted photo. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Closing per my request. nominated for speedy deletion

This image is copyrighted, as seen from his governor website. Just because it’s on YouTube under whatever license, doesn’t mean it’s available for use. The author of the image is still alive, and the state of Minnesota does not release its images. Corky 03:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, this should probably be  Speedy delete since the original upload was from the governor’s website with an attempt to cover it up... Corky 03:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Vertical panorama of the Mayakovskaya Metro Station.jpg Vcohen (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate processed. -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

motivos pessoais Matt Souza (talk) 00:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propriété personnelle Кирилл Венедиктов ( talk) 13:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I created a derivative, File:François Lunven (retouched).jpg. The washed out colors may have even been the reason User:Lunven.francois wanted this deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is my grand father I'm 100% honest please delete the picture I wrote this ID because this is the name of him. Delete the picture I don't want my name on it for autor rights I can send u the picture by mail and u post it retouched User: Alexis Jazz

Cheers Lunven.françois (talk) 23:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lunven.francois: If you want to change your username, go to m:Special:GlobalRenameRequest.
You can mail your photo and information to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org if you want, don't mail anything to me, I have no use for it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Majora: If the only concern of this user is to not have their username being visible, something can probably be arranged? On my talk page they said "I can send u the original by mail and u post it retouched on Commons because I don't want my name on it for autor rights". Maybe we need to use {{Extracted from deleted}}? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File talk:François Lunven (retouched).jpg suggests the same thing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please can u use this ?

@Majora:

Lunven.françois (talk) @Yann: : you have recently hidden the username of the uploader of a file. Can you do the same thing here? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:10, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Yann: Please delete the image I get the autor rights and @Alexis Jazz: create a copy {violcopy} I send you my picture by mail and u insert it into the article Lunven.françois (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. User request within one week of upload. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-Art}} does not apply to depictions of three-dimensional works. This photograph is probably too recent for the copyright to have expired. LX (talk, contribs) 16:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:55, 8 Januar 2019 UTC: uploader request deletion, copyright violation --Krdbot 14:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ankit Shukla Singer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion using multiple acounts

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ankit Shukla Singer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission; Kind of spam.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also see File:Search best restaurants on FINDGO.jpg. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Findgo0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE; Spam; Uncredited stock images

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty. Misspelled CaribDigita (talk) 08:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carribean.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous discussion; nothing new in this request. --Ankry (talk) 22:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope and false naming and categorization! Ras67 (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Television sceenshot. Source and author is missing so it can not verified if the broadcaster has published this under an acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a cutout poster, an unacceptable derivative work.

xplicit 02:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the most famous American photographs of the 20th century (see Emmett Till) is not the creation of some guy on Flickr. This image is from Getty Images, and respectable publications credit this to Bettmann/Getty Images (see Time.com) or Mamie Till-Mobley, Gannett News Service (see USA Today). No credible evidence of free license. --Animalparty (talk) 05:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept Fair-use images, see Commons:Fair use. I have no objection to properly licensed and labeled images being used on various Wikipedias under fair use, but it is insincere and false to allow copyright violations on Commons, which only hosts media that can be freely used for any purpose, including commercial. --Animalparty (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 06:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project scope Willy1018(talk) 06:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project scope Willy1018(talk) 06:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project scope Willy1018(talk) 06:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teknisi Tamvan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek Vaishnava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siben Ray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, noised, overexposed parts, redundant with many images with much more better quality in Category:Window of the Holy Trinity and Bohemian Kings in St. Vitus Cathedral Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Remiisrael (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AADYA PATEL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehboob Ali Kathat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chef Singh Lokendra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See previous discussions. This is getting tedious. Maybe consider blocking some sockpuppets?

LX (talk, contribs) 19:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And, since Chef Singh Lokendra keeps uploading problematic files instead of commenting here:
LX (talk, contribs) 12:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And again:
LX (talk, contribs) 21:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I've taken the view that this is simply an abuse of Commons over a number of years now. The links provided on the other DRs show a complete disregard for policies and practice here. As such I've indefinitely blocked this user (and will block any future accounts I see).--Herby talk thyme 15:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshatjain016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kenichsberch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, illustrations, newspapers, documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no COM:FOP in France; recent building and park. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 1

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoît Prieur: If it is not in France, what was it doing in Category:Disneyland Paris? Also, according to the GPS tag on the image, it is in France. Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say it is not in France: I said the topic and what it is represented is not concerned by the lack of FoP. --Benoît Prieur (d) 21:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunderklumpen: I would presume so, but that is a better question for someone on French Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This building has been destroyed in december 2010 and it seems that «The destruction of the work extinguished copyright.» Is that correct? - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, un éventuelle suppression des fichiers est à voir au cas par cas. En effet, certains équipements photographiés ne constituent pas une œuvre de l'esprit originale, lorsqu'il s'agit par exemple de la reproduction de bateaux ou de constructions anciennes. Concernant spécifiquement File:Plaque de rue Auguste-Gusteau à EuroDisney.jpg, il n'y a aucune raison de le supprimer, il s'agit de la simple reproduction à Eurodisney des milliers de plaques de rue qui existent à Paris, il n'y a aucune création originale pour cette plaque. Concernant File:Espace Euro Disney 2008.JPG, je ne vois aucune œuvre de l'esprit du point de vue architecturale à protéger ; à moins que ce soient les droits d'auteurs sur les graffitis qui justifiraient la suppression du fichier. O.Taris (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'ajoute que l'Espace Euro Disney a été détruit en 2010 (lire plus haut) et il semblerait que la destruction entraîne l'extinction des droits d'auteur. Cependant, dans l'exemple donné plus haut, il est question de peinture murale et non d'architecture. Merci @Benoît Prieur: d'avoir relevé cette exception. - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je reproduis ce que je viens d'écrire sur le bistro de #WpFr.
Quand le bâtiment est détruit le droit d'auteur ne semble plus s'appliquer et apparemment l'image est acceptable sur Commons :
"The destruction of the work extinguished copyright." => [1] sur un exemple équivalent File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Destruction of art never ended a copyright on the art itself ! Loreleil (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: I would rather have open a deletion request in order to facilitate a discussion and decision on such files that may be on the edge than to have them be sitting around and being used by others. Elisfkc (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 2

copyrighted site plans.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at them, File:Disneyland Resort Paris Kaart.png looks like there might be a chance that it came from Disney or somewhere else. The other two look like they were done in Paint. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it all. The first and the third are the same pictures and they seem to be based on a road map and the real land. There is no derivative work. - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep own work, not copyrighted. Multichill (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLRP schema.png was accidentally included. Withdrawing nomination for that image only. Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@O.Taris:
English: The topiary and the fact that there is no FOP in France. Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Français : Le topiaire et le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de FOP en France. Traduit avec Google Translate Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si on considère que les jardins et plantation sont en général soumis au droit d'auteur, on va devoir supprimer beaucoup de photos de commons... La plantation représentée sur la photo ne me parait pas particulièrement originale pour pouvoir justifier un droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we consider that the gardens and plantation are generally subject to copyright, we will have to delete many photos of commons ... The plantation shown in the picture does not seem to me particularly original to be able to justify a copyright. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 20, 22 et 6 : je ne vois pas d'oeuvre pour laquelle le droit d'auteur serait enfreint, il s'agit de simples photos de rue ou de parking. O.Taris (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2, delete the rest. Yann (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats with artistic designs have previously been deleted, if I remember right. Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These pictures were not deleted because of "boat of artistic design", but for the other elements of the settings. BTW in only two of them there is a boat. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 7

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, les arbres et autres plantations, les lampadaires quelconques, les bateaux ou les trains dans un paysage ne sont pas des bâtiments soumis au droit d'auteur dans le cadre de la liberté de panorama. On se demande même pourquoi une pauvre guitoune peut-être proposée à la suppression pour une question de droit d'auteur ! En revanche, le respect du droit d'auteur architectural se pose effectivement pour File:Sleeping Beauty's Castle Disneyland Paris - panoramio.jpg et File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (15).jpg. O.Taris (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per O.Taris above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Topiaries have been found to be copyrightable in the past. I try to nominate files like these to have a precedent set for them later. I would rather nominate 50 files that are fine and have a decision made about them than to have one that is not ok left alone. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not in France, AFAIK. Your practice doesn't help admins. It pass the burden of review to them, and they are already overbooked. It would be much more useful to carefully review your nominations before making them. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Pretty sure Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris was an example of topiaries that were deleted because of copyright in France. If not, I remember having another case at some point, I'd just need to find it. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them show some copyrightable element, and IMO, File:DLP Maze View.JPG was deleted by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go, the example of topiaries in France being deleted that I was thinking of was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 8

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (3).jpg et File:Disneyland - panoramio (15).jpg : les camions ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions,  Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (18).jpg, l'élément principal est la montagne et le HOLLYWOOD, qui ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions. O.Taris (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is  kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 13

Copyrighted characters

Elisfkc (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 15

No FOP in France. Moving files to correct categories, as this is too high up for most.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 16

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 17

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all as derivative work copyright violations ({{France-cv}}). The Flickr photographers and uploaders here did not obtain permission from the architects, sculptors, graphics artists, and other authors of the copyrighted works of Euro Disney. Such permissions must be sent via COM:OTRS. French FOP doesn't suffice Commons standards because it is noncommercial, and thus doesn't adhere with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 18

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Tube Disaster cause of non originality. Delete the others. - ~~ Bzh-99 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted two, kept the other two per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jopeumbrella (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising material

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leavehook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

本網站係採用 Creative Commons 姓名標示-非商業性-相同方式分享 3.0 台灣 (中華民國) 授權條款授權 on source site - CC-BY-NC-SA

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VSL56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


These images are for wiktionary, they are in maximum quality available for free access, they are needed to read originals of Swiss books of 16 century, while working with them i found 4 mistakes in text recognition of the first(!) bible sentence which laid untouched 7 years. So they certanly are useful. These are articles where they are used now:

and they are quite good and in place on a page ...

VSL56 (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --Sealle (talk) 05:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Ymblanter (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not what it is alleged to be: it looks like an ancient ruin, not something "destroyed by the Soviets" in the 1980s. It's being used as "evidence" of Soviet military atrocities and it's almost certainly a false attribution. This is an archaeological site. IWPCHI (talk) 05:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep
First, even if this was an ancient archeological site, not a recent ruin, it would still be in scope;
Second, Todd Huffman spent years in this area, working with Afghans. I am going to trust his Afghan informants, over IWPCHI, who hasn't explained how he knows the description is inaccurate. Geo Swan (talk) 05:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: You might want to examine IWPCHI's problematic editing, unsourced commentary, and misrepresentation of sources at Soviet war crimes on Wikipedia (diff). In a nutshell, IWPCHI asserts that scholars that have cited figures of between 600,000 and 2 million Afghan civilian deaths during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan are guilty of "outrageous claims" and that the real number is likely closer to 11,000, because that's how many political prisoners the Soviet-backed Afghan government itself admitted to executing during "the Government's first 20 months in power, up to the time that Soviet troops arrived in December 1979." However, this 1989 admission does not contradict more recent sources, refers to political executions rather than war casualties, is limited to a time period predating the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and has nothing to do with the "Soviet war crimes" topic. Further, all of IWPCHI's "outrageous" editorializing is entirely unsourced: It's just one Wikipedia user's idiosyncratic opinions, stated as fact in wikivoice. Given this record, I have serious doubts about both the objectivity and competence of IWPCHI's analysis on all matters pertaining to the Soviet–Afghan War.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 10:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: File is in use across many Wikipedias, from azb:افغانیستان ساواشی (۱۹۷۹-۱۹۸۹) to sh:Afgansko-sovjetski rat. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete files that are in use merely because they are mis-described. It's possible that the description should be changed or the file should be renamed (see COM:FR), but deletion is not appropriate. --bjh21 (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Per all of the above. The title is based on the author's own description. I see no reason to disbelieve him --Raoulduke47 (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion and file in use on multiple wiki. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mackenzie Bomek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional only - see User:Hridyam Heart Care/Dr. Gaurav Singhal at enwiki Home Lander (talk) 14:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded only for promotion at enwiki Home Lander (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded only for promotion at enwiki Home Lander (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded only for promotion at enwiki Home Lander (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded only for promotion at enwiki Home Lander (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering user's upload history, this JPG file is most probably taken from a book. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hossein karimii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:PS: pure text; seems to be some (possibly copyrighted) news pieces or personal essays

4nn1l2 (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are from the Bollywood Hungama site (so no ding on the licensereviewer(s)), but are almost certainly originally from Hamara Photos. They are low resolution, do not bear the BollywoodHungama watermark, and most awkwardly cropped to remove the HAMARAPHOTOS.COM watermark from the top and middle of the Hamara photo. Compare:

In each case, the top half of the Hamara photo (to avoid the prominent Hamara watermark in the middle) with just a slice off the top (to avoid the second Hamara watermark at the top left). I haven't looked at all of them, but was able to find these three clear copyright violations out of the first five random ones from this set that I looked at, so strongly suspect they're all like this.

GRuban (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused map of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PRESENCE2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stereo 2.0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanualani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nuttyprofessor2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HFCL.jpg has been taken from the internet and can be deleted if you wish but the other files are my work andI have been given full authority and right to use them. I can provide a letter signed by Vaibhav Maloo or Vinay Maloo assigning me the rights and in any case my IP address is on file. Nuttyprofessor2016 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Nuttyprofessor2016[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nur-Salam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at the MD. E4024 (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - Wikia Page screenshot for non-notable "artist", and excluded content anyway Эlcobbola talk 21:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornography Snowdawg (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elmirwikipedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has history of stealing images, all these are different in resolution and meta data and low res, so probably stolen too.

BevinKacon (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abramis Brama (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://www.metalrus.ru/groups/586?p=2

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, useless, redundat to images with much more better quality in Category:Pulpit in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, useless, redundat to images with much more better quality in Category:Pulpit in St. Vitus Cathedral. Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work, out of scope. Also unacceptable requirement in EXIF. Yann (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file, obviuosly corrupted. Ganímedes (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical picture which is not an "own work". Must be licensed correctly, as it may already be PD. I don't know. E4024 (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file, obviuosly corrupted. Ganímedes (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry to identify photo subject Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW or some other CR violation, I guess, but "own work" not so likely. E4024 (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1941 presumably German photograph was uploaded with a bogus license that is not valid for this type of image. There is no information at all about the author, who could have easily lived beyond 1948. Plus, a 1941 German image would have had its US copyright restored by the URAA until the end of 2046. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused usergape image. Looks to me fairly out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 19:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

map accidentally uploaded in batch upload Mindmatrix 20:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just an Arabic text without encyclopedic value. Out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cover of a non-encyclopedic book. Rapsar (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-encylopedic image and it's not being used. Out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of deleted copyrighted file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:“Books (Please)! In All Branches of Knowledge”.jpg

Darwin Ahoy! 21:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license (No license since) Ratzer (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source of this file says clearly: Copyright expired. Isn't that enough? How do you put this information into a license?--Ratzer (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Following the discussion here, I felt safe to use the license tag {{PD-Australia}}.--Ratzer (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license (No license since) Ratzer (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source of this file says clearly: Copyright expired. Isn't that enough? How do you put this information into a license?--Ratzer (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Following the discussion here, I felt safe to use the license tag {{PD-Australia}}.--Ratzer (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (pixelated); replaced by File:Diisobutyl Phthalate.png and File:Diisobutylphthalate Structural Formula.svg. Leyo 14:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Существует аналогичное (но не идентичное) изображение лучшего качества. Vefib (talk) 19:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: broken upload. --Sealle (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because Ratna is playing with Commons. See her "many" deleted files and this link (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Ratna_Sarita&action=history) pls. E4024 (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: This is a user talk page spuriously renamed as a gallery. It's probably speedy deletable under CSD GA1, but even if not it's still not a good use for a gallery. I don't think there's anything on this page that merits merging back into User talk:Nadia Anggraini. --bjh21 (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Argh, I get [XEh20ApAADwAABwvFgwAAABC] 2019-01-23 14:14:40: Fataler Ausnahmefehler des Typs „MWException“ if I try to move it back. --Achim (talk) 14:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The user is already indeffed, better delete and "freeze" this gallery title. --E4024 (talk) 14:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It should be moved back (without a redirect) to User talk:Nadia Anggraini where it came from for to keep the history visible. --Achim (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now it did as wanted, don't know why. --Achim (talk) 10:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Moved back to user's tp without leaving a redirect. --Achim (talk) 10:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Posting Gillfoto 20:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested soon after upload. --Storkk (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (:pl:Andrzej Bryl) Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need the mural's position to assess the freedom of panorama, else COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 00:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Police badge, not created by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 01:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 02:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source is cc-by-nd-nc, not cc-by shizhao (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 03:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you message and good afternoon from here, Philippines; actually, this is a gift to me by my sibling as memory, and I have no objection to the deletion, very sincerelyJudgefloro 05:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. Out of the project scope Edslov (talk) 04:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Removed from USMC website per my request and no longer part of public domain 2600:1702:2E70:1880:1133:28FA:471A:3083 05:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No, removal from the USMC web site has no effect on its copyright status. We do not generally remove images at the request of the subject and never remove them on anonymous requests After all, you could be anyone -- the subject or his enemy. You may send a message using OTRS and it may be removed if you satisfactorily identify yourself. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

painting/drawing of unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

signature of promotion-only spammer Mahir256 (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Ymblanter (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical picture that could already be PD, but "own work" it is not and has to be licensed correctly. E4024 (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is for Trail Purpose page creation. Kindly delete the page Prerna005 (talk) 07:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --Green Giant (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amitabh_CEO.jpg Prerna005 (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Amitabh CEO.jpg
Amitabh Chaudhry, Managing Director & CEO of Axis Bank Ltd.
Prerna005 (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
Two points:
  • I am not an expert on all the wiki guidelines, protocols and etiquette. But as far as I understand it, if you want a picture deleted using this process, it is helpful if you tell us why. The original uploader (whether or not s/he read about it and knew it at the time) transferred certain rights to wikipedia when uploading the picture. It's up to members of the human race acting on behalf of wikipedia to decide whether or not to delete the picture. And it's up to he "nominator for deletion" to explain why it should be deleted. The decision process is not simply a robotic one.
  • I got to this page when I clicked on a picture of the back end of a red Alfa Romeo Montreal (a car). So I am unclear whether you want someone to delete (1) a picture of the back end of a red Italian sports car (which is what I had thought this was about) or (2) of a gentleman in a grey suit on or by a desk (which is the picture reproduced on the nomination page itself). Please, which picture should we be discussing?
Thank you (in anticipation) for any clarifications. Regards Charles01 (talk) 09:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Based on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amitabh CEO.jpg, I think Prerna005 meant to delete that picture, and not File:Terenure, Co. Dublin - Ireland (6038238704).jpg. --bjh21 (talk) 12:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dannylinden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo, out of scope. Non notable person who created his own wikidata item

Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty. Misspelled CaribDigita (talk) 08:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carribean.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Redirects like this are not useless. --Green Giant (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty. Misspelled CaribDigita (talk) 08:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carribean.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not useless redirect. --Green Giant (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty. Misspelled CaribDigita (talk) 08:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carribean.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not useless. --Green Giant (talk) 07:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation - promotional shot found on many websites (one example), no evidence of Commons-compatible permission. — Yerpo Eh? 12:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality and there's a guy in the middle of the picture. I'd say, it's out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See EXIF: Author: Saeid Sorkhi. Copyright holder: 2018 All Rights Reserved Yann (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:17, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is a mugshot, should be federal work, not "own work". Also, [2] Ganímedes (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The image is the work of the Houston Police Department, who are presumably the copyright holder. --Rrburke (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:6ix9ine's mugshot.jpg Premeditated (talk) 11:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also File:6ix9ine Prison.jpg. Rodrigolopes (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination but normally police departments release these images on public record, which is not a license or PD. --Green Giant (talk) 07:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a better version File:2008. Свистулька.jpg. ПростоУчастник (talk) 08:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, will tag as duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not focus at all MNXANL (talk) 11:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not focus MNXANL (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, useless, redundant to images with much more better quality in Category:Old Archiepiscopal Chapel (St. Vitus Cathedral). Daniel Baránek (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate. 88.196.169.52 23:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Achim55. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

xplicit 23:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These appear to be scanned from a book. They're unlikely to be SiefkinDR's own work as stated. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These images originally come from Histoire des Bagnes depuis leur creation jusqu'a nos jours by Pierre Zaccone., published in Paris in 1869. I believe they are available for use on Wikimedia Commons because the author has been dead more than seventy-five years. I apologize that I put myself as author; I thought that meant the name of the person who posted them to Wikimedia Commons. SiefkinDR (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding source info. I've withdrawn the nomination for the images struck out above. The last is still missing source info. Additionally the CC BY-SA tag is invalid since you don't own the copyright - I've replaced it with {{PD-old-auto-1996}} on the withdrawn images. Hairy Dude (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 20:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a SVG logo here with higher quality. Gabr guedes (talk) 04:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 20:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. Out of the project scope Edslov (talk) 04:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://www.donnees.pays-de-la-loire.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/data/fiches/diatomees/Gomphonema%20acidoclinatum%20-%20GADC.pdf Panek (talk) 08:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was decided at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Incremental_service_awards_(Ribbons) that there was no need for higher level incremental service award levels. This recent upload is against that consensus. Vanstrat (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was decided at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Incremental_service_awards_(Ribbons) that there was no need for higher level incremental service award levels. This recent upload is against that consensus. Vanstrat (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was decided at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Incremental_service_awards_(Ribbons) that there was no need for higher level incremental service award levels. This recent upload is against that consensus. Vanstrat (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, moreover, it looks like the scan of a photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

svg version available here, File:Penang constituency map by ethnicity.svg *angys* (talk) 09:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

svg version available here, File:Penang constituency map 2018.svg *angys* (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a image of PLA Navy destroyer PLANS Haikou, which has a "AP" watermark at the lower right corner, possibly means that the file is from Associated Press (AP). As according to Template:PD-USGov-VOA, only files created by Voice of America are in US Federal Governmental public domain, the file is possibly copyrighted by AP and was unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translation/翻譯:肇事檔案為一張中國人民解放軍海軍海口艦的照片,而檔案的右下角則有「AP」的水印,由此可以推斷此檔案可能是由美聯社僱員拍攝的。由於Template:PD-USGov-VOA註明,只有美國之音職員製作的媒體檔案才處於公有領域,因此美聯社很有可能持有此檔案的版權,令本檔案可以被提刪。廣九直通車 (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Sorry, but there is no usable freedom-of-panorama exception in Estonia. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but there is no usable freedom-of-panorama exception in Estonia. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but there is no usable freedom-of-panorama exception in Estonia. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but there is no usable freedom-of-panorama exception in Estonia. So, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

made a new version, these failed Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's req. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. Can someone experienced check all the uploads of this user, please? E4024 (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, overexposed parts, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Stained glass in the Thun Chapel (St. Vitus Cathedral). Daniel Baránek (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Acho que o arquivo não será útil Desvelom (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining file, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Author: This photo was really made by me by smartphone, and because of that it is small and it is without EXIF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egor Ulianov (talk • contribs) 17:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Egor Ulianov + I haven't found copies on the web. Ruthven (msg) 20:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? Please... E4024 (talk) 18:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from site FN https://www.rassemblementnational.fr/author/jordan-bardella/ - site protected by legislaton © see https://www.rassemblementnational.fr/mentions-legales/ - not the first time Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jordan_Bardella_2017_-_crop.jpg --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork not deminimus SecretName101 (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

made a new version. too many errors. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Détenteur du droit d'auteur @laurencetange, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map without any source. Rapsar (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2019

   Sources Are provided Aldan-2 (talk) 26:34, 7 January 2019

Kept: per Aldan-2. Ruthven (msg) 20:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is an imaginary photo of Phophet , and Muslims all over the world want this file to be removed 116.58.92.130 07:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Commons is not censored, and this image is clearly PD-old. Everything else is not a copyright issue. See also COM:CENSORSHIP --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Picture of Prophet Mohammad is not allowed in islam 80.1.72.101 17:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is still no valid reason for a deletion. --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no deletion request in the file any more Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Per Cholo. --Martin H. (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. Portraying the prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is an insult to Muslims. Please delete this image. AKE1992 (talk) 01:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept no new argument, see previous discussion on talk page. Wikimedia is not a forum for resolution of differing opinions of religious faith. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it belong Non-free logo, see zh:File:Logo_of_the_United_Democrats_of_Hong_Kong.svg. Willy1018(talk) 06:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be from https://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id99719/ where it is marked copyright by Jan Ševčík GRuban (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Packaging. Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, no educational value B dash (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; frisst kein Gras. --DaB. (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, no educational value B dash (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 14:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo belongs to me and was used without permission. I took it myself in 2015. I don't know who Crawford Clark is. JESmooth (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JESmooth: Where the photo has been published before? Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 20:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I can't find this photo no where else on the internet.Charterville (talk) 06:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Charterville. --Ezarateesteban 21:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:វ័ណថារិទ្ធ

[edit]

All book covers uploaded by វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (talk · contribs) are from http://www.sipar-books.com/. Although they are licensed with attribution license, there is no proof for that on original source website. --Smooth O (talk) 08:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per source: Copyright © 2014 Sipar Books, All Rights Reserved. --Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Icons, like other "old" paintings, are normally PD, but I gather as long as they are "own shoots". In this case the image seems to have been taken from a copyrighted page: https://novyklokocov.webnode.sk/news/zazracna-ikona-klokocovskej-presvatej-bohorodicky/ E4024 (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Lacking information on author's death. — Racconish💬 05:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file have mistake Kaischa27 (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --xplicit 07:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused invention. Out of scope until shown to be "representative". E4024 (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image texture shows this is a scanned paper copy of a professional photograph. Photographer's permission required. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:AGF. --JuTa 03:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Существует аналогичное (но не идентичное) изображение лучшего качества. Vefib (talk) 18:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request on upload day. --JuTa 03:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]