Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(16371766276).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![85 File:सनी कुमार "विद्रोही".jpg](#File:सनी_कुमार_"विद्रोही".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![158 File:Екатерина Губарева на выставке картин молодых художников "Дерзай" (cropped).jpg](#File:Екатерина_Губарева_на_выставке_картин_молодых_художников_"Дерзай"_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(1)_(14923843169).jpg){kind=link}
_(3)_(14923974077).jpg){kind=link}
._—_Задняя_переплетная_крышка.jpeg){kind=link}
._—_Форзац.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Damian filomeno jugador de futbol argentino and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Damian filomeno ex jugador de futbol argentina. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - this files has been deleted several times already. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://twitter.com/tomp_soda/status/1048740127453765632. Who is the painter? Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/562175965978221124/?lp=true Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/292100725816832752/?lp=true Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://twitter.com/tomp_soda/status/1048740127453765632. Who is the painter? Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
{{SD|G7}} Delete at my request I love rpgs (talk) 15:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: you cannot have your talk page deleted. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
устарела версия фото Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 18:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:06, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images come from 3 nearly identical single-purpose, zero-follower Flickr accounts created around the same time this year: Justin Wang, Terry Holt and [1]. The images are all low-res photos of single NFL teams that are screenshots of web images, not original photographs. Looked at together, they appear to be an attempt to Flickrwash images from the web/social media.
- File:Javon Wims 2018.jpg
- File:Carr 2018.jpg
- File:Garson Conley 2017.jpg
- File:Arden Key 2018.jpg
- File:D line 2018.jpg
- File:Karl Joseph 2016.jpg
- File:Packers at Bears.jpg
- File:Nick Kwiatkowski.jpg
- File:Michael Burton at camp.jpg
- File:James Conner at camp.jpg
- File:Steeler DBS at camp.jpg
- File:Trey Burton at camp.jpg
- File:Kevin White at camp.jpg
- File:Charles Leno at camp.jpg
- File:Dion Sims and Adam Shaheen at camp.jpg
- File:Anthony Miller and Allen Robinson at camp.jpg
- File:Adrian Amos at camp.jpg
- File:Jordan Howard and Tarik Cohen at camp.jpg
- File:Eddie Jackson at camp.jpg
- File:TJ Watt at camp.jpg
- File:Juju in Pittsburgh.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works
- File:Arik Armstead 2018.png
- File:Greg Mabin 2018.png
- File:Antone Exum 2018.png
- File:Tavarius Moore 2018.png
- File:Marcell Harris 2018.png
- File:Tyvis Powell 2018.png
- File:Dante Pettis 2018.png
- File:Ross Dwelley 2018.png
- File:Colin Holba 2018.png
- File:Kendrick Bourne 2018.png
- File:Eric Kush 2018.png
- File:Kevin Toliver 2018.png
- File:Kylie Fitts 2018.png
- File:Jonathan Bullard 2018.png
- File:George Kittle 2018.png
- File:Jeff Wilson 2018.png
- File:Matt Breida 2018.png
- File:Roy Robertson-Harris 2018.png
- File:Mitchell Trubisky Back 2018.png
- File:Ben Braunecker 2018.png
- File:Michael Burton 2018.png
- File:Taquan Mizzell 2018.png
- File:Adam Shaheen 2018.png
- File:Deon Bush 2018.png
- File:Richard Sherman 2018.png
- File:Mike McGlinchey 2018.png
- File:Kyle Fuller 2018.png
- File:Cody Whitehair 2018.png
- File:Sherrick McManis 2018.png
- File:Nick Kwiatkoski 2018.png
- File:Cody Parkey 2018.png
- File:Danny Trevathan 2018.png
- File:Adrian Amos 2018.png
- File:Eddie Goldman 2018.png
- File:Leonard Floyd 2018.png
- File:Pat Odonnell 2018.png
- File:Chase Daniel 2018.png
- File:Josh Bellamy 2018.png
- File:Tarik Cohen 2018.png
- File:Prince Amukamara 2018.png
- File:Taylor Gabriel 2018.png
- File:Anthony Miller 2018.png
- File:Trey Burton 2018.png
- File:Charles Leno 2018.png
- File:James Daniels 2018.png
- File:Jordan Howard 2018.png
- File:Allen Robinson 2018.png
- File:Mitch Trubisky 2018.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
I UPLOADED THE ALL OF THE ORIGINAL IMAGES, PLEASE DON'T DELETE THE PHOTOS NOW?
- ok
Keep or/and 
I withdraw my nomination, the uploader uploaded the images, they are available in Category:2018 San Francisco 49ers season, example File:Kyle Fuller 2018.png comes from File:Bears vs 49ers 2018 Image 21.jpg. The uploader is very likely the photographer. Thanks you LaDanian1000000 to have uploaded the full photo set with full resolution and EXIFs. Good and usefull. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaDanian1000000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Stills from unfree videos.
- File:Erik McCoy.png
- File:Ryan Ramczyk.png
- File:Younghoe Koo.png
- File:Marcus Williams 2019.png
- File:Marshon Lattimore.png
- File:Tyreek Hill.png
- File:Michael Thomas 2018.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment The last 2 files comes from free licensed video from YouTube (even if the CC YouTube license seems to be CC-BY 3.0 and not CC-BY-SA 4.0 as stated) so -assuming that uploaders on YouTube are really the authors of the videos- they seems to bear no problem. For all other images effectively the video where they came from now doesn't bear a CC license but they had it at the time of upload (according to the Wayback Machine Archive link provided in the pages of the files). In my opinion it safe to delete as precautionary principle these last files since we don't know why the license was changed (maybe uploader realized not to have all the right to free license it ?) --Civitas13 (talk) 07:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'll second Civitas13's comment and I can confirm that the Atlanta Falcons used to publish content under a CC license (@LaDanian1000000: , I recommend using the {{YouTube}} template for future uploads, since it comes with a license review template attached, and it's a more specific license). As long as Falcons were using their own footage and not video from NFL Films or the league broadcaster partners (you know, This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience...), I think they're fine. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- When I added the photos from the Atlanta Falcons' Youtube channel, it was Creative Commons Reuse Allowed. If the images were added when reuse was allowed, can they stay? LaDanian1000000 (talk)
- @LaDanian1000000: I think you're in the clear — Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. The source video for the first image had a free CC license in December 2019, and that still applies. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- can the deletion tags be removed now? I think the pictures are in the clear. LaDanian1000000 (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- @LaDanian1000000: I think you're in the clear — Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. The source video for the first image had a free CC license in December 2019, and that still applies. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- When I added the photos from the Atlanta Falcons' Youtube channel, it was Creative Commons Reuse Allowed. If the images were added when reuse was allowed, can they stay? LaDanian1000000 (talk)
- I'll second Civitas13's comment and I can confirm that the Atlanta Falcons used to publish content under a CC license (@LaDanian1000000: , I recommend using the {{YouTube}} template for future uploads, since it comes with a license review template attached, and it's a more specific license). As long as Falcons were using their own footage and not video from NFL Films or the league broadcaster partners (you know, This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience...), I think they're fine. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The videos are free. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2014-2018 Бизнес-портал fdlx.com. Keep. Translated, the source reads in part "All materials on this site are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International." — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Good day. The footer of the site clearly indicates the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://fdlx.com/politic/6933-kontuzhennyj-v-uglegorske-semen-semenchenko-popal-v-dtp-na-trasse-debalcevo-chernuxino.html Pa30T (talk) 13:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will take that as a Keep. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- This one is OK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Can you also see another file? Best regards, Pa30T (talk) 13:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will take that as a Keep Pa30T (talk) 13:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I removed your {{Withdraw}} (from this edit) as inappropriate, only the nominator has the right to withdraw. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly, the photo does not violate copyright and can be used. Can anyone remove the Delete pattern? Pa30T (talk) 15:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Pa30T: Yes, an Admin like @Yann can in very early 2019. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly, the photo does not violate copyright and can be used. Can anyone remove the Delete pattern? Pa30T (talk) 15:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- This one is OK. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will take that as a
Kept: as per above. @Pa30T: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 05:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality nonsense image, uploaded to vandalize in en:Christmas. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Matanya at 18:24, 25 Dezember 2018 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3): Copyright violation: Goatse image --Krdbot 08:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Picture มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
The image of the rural highway signs that are inaccurate from the standard of traffic signs of the Department of Rural Roads of Thailand มองโกเลีย๔๔ 16:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not a deletion reason. --E4024 (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no source. --JuTa 14:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 12:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no source. --JuTa 14:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file 
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 18:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Picture on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Source image deleted for unknown reason Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I assume @Mardetanha: deleted the original in order to remove one or more peeps. If this is a keeper, we just need to remove the link. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I took the picture and I am the copyright owner, and as you said I have deleted soruce file to fix the crop Mardetanha talk 08:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
неверное и неправильное перенаправление Панн (talk) 17:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied per nomination, as nominated on day of creation. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too blurry; not useful Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:ESAN University
[edit]Seems above Com:TOO.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florian Cravic (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files are not trivial: complex curves, gradient fill.
- File:AD Cantolao.svg
- File:Los Caimanes.svg
- File:FBC Melgar.svg
- File:Copa Movistar 2018.svg
- File:Octavio Espinosa.svg
Maxinvestigator (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Михаил Тарбеев (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, definitely not own works, no sources given, copyright status is unclear.
- File:Митник ПЕ.jpg
- File:Митник Петр Епифанович.jpg
- File:Гайлит Иван Фомич.jpg
- File:Саноцкий Антон Степанович.jpg
- File:Мышкин Николай Павлович.jpg
Sealle (talk) 05:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: We already have plenty of penis pics. Green Giant (talk) 14:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Another low quality penis picture Ies (talk) 14:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This photo has been nominated for deletion twice already and has been deleted twice. Reuploaded 1/22/2019. Mjrmtg (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above comment is a copypaste standard message, see the previous nomination as well. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Nude Genital! Not enough information and wrong picture please delete Fishermansfriend2 (talk) 15:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Why was this uploaded again, Fishermansfriend2? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete random low quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fantasy2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Flaccid penis 01.jpg
- File:A male ejaculation.jpg
- File:A male penis flaccid.jpg
- File:A male penis erected.jpg
- File:Glans penis of a 25 year old.jpg
- File:Human penis ejaculating.jpg
- File:Pre-cum.png
- File:Pre cum.png
- File:3rd burst during male ejaculation.png
- File:2nd burst during male ejaculation.png
- File:Ejaculation.png
Majora (talk) 01:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fantasy2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More low quality penis pictures by an uploader of solely low quality penis pictures.
Ies (talk) 15:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep on File:Male ejaculating.jpg, Delete on the other. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: both per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fantasy2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More low quality dick picks from a user with already more than a dozen deleted low quality dick picks.
- File:Ejaculate seminal fluid.jpg
- File:Erected penis with down bending shape.jpg
- File:Ejaculate semen.png
GMGtalk 12:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
_(16371766276).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16371766276).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too blurry Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
_(16371766276).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
_(16371766276).jpg){kind=link}
Own work claim doubtful, user uploaded confirmed copyvios. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
maybe TV screenshot shizhao (talk) 02:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Not own work. Magazine published in the 1940's. The drawings are by Pierre Lardin who died in 1982. They will be in the PD in France in 2053. The texts are copyrighted too.
- File:Page avec illustration de Pierre Lardin du Crack.jpg
- File:Page avec illustration de Pierre Lardin de la revue le Crack.jpg
- File:Page Crack avec illustration de Pierre Lardin.jpg
- File:Page de la revue le Crack avec illustration de Pierre Lardin.jpg
- File:Page du Crack avec illustration de Pierre Lardin.jpg
- File:Couverture Revue le Crack.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 09:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Walid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons project scope unused personal files
- File:Muhamedabdulrhman.png
- File:Mahamuadqahtan.jpg
- File:AbdullahBenMohammed.png
- File:Dr ayed al qahtani.jpg
- File:Ehab Ghaith.jpg
- File:Haydarhamdane.jpg
- File:AbdulrahmanAlgamily.png
- File:Mazen elqatone.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Walid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, bogus licenses.
- File:صورة 7.png
- File:Janadria soliman.png
- File:Janadria.png
- File:Felipe and sultan bin soliman.png
- File:Sultan bin soliman.png
- File:Sultan bin soliman gafi.png
- File:AlKhaialAlmomken.jpg
- File:صاحب السمو الملكي الأمير سلطان بن عبد العزيز رحمه الله مع أعضاء مجلس الإدارة الأولى المعنيين لذواتهم.png
- File:لقاء يجمع خادم الحرمين الشريفين فهد بن عبدالعزيز يوم تسليم منصب أمين عام الهيئة العليا للسياحة.png
- File:صاحب السمو الملكي الأمير سلطان بن عبد العزيز رحمه الله وصاحب السمو الملكي الأمير خالد الفيصل في لقاء أيها حول السياحة.png
- File:Sonntat.jpg
- File:Al - Qari Newspaper.png
- File:Gbalfuge.png
- File:Localhost.png
- File:The first traces of the archaeological excavations.png
- File:صورة جديد 4.png
- File:Exhibition of trade routes in the Arabian Peninsula.png
- File:Musée du Louvre.png
- File:Laurebit College of Tourism and Hotels.png
Yann (talk) 13:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishu2000p (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Vishal Pandey.jpg
- File:Vishal Pandey....jinendra.jpg
- File:Vishal Pandey..........vishu.jpg
- File:Vishal Pandey....jaihind.jpg
- File:VishuVishal Pandey.jpg
- File:VishalvishuPandey.jpg
- File:Vishal Pandey.vishu.jpg
- File:Vishal Ganesh Chandra Pandey.jpg
- File:Vishal Pandey. .jpg
- File:Son and brother. .jpg
- File:Son and brother.jpg
- File:Vishwer.jpg
- File:Vish.jpg
- File:Vishal .jpg
- File:Vinishkialta.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mayank Mishra 03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE selfies.
- File:Screenshot 20181011-225814tigermanoj.png
- File:20181002 010503amraplidube.jpg
- File:20180930 121556yadav nirahua.jpg
- File:20180925 142835panderitsh.jpg
- File:FB531557342419pawan Bhaiya.jpg
- File:20181101 063525aksrmayank.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20181011-225822manojtiger.png
- File:20180925 123843Amrapalimayank.jpg
- File:20180930 121558met on 30septmbr.jpg
- File:20181030 195402 met Ritesh Pandey .jpg
- File:20181101 141625 mayank akshara.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20181011-225849manoj singh tiger.png
- File:20180925 123845 Amrapali Dubey Ji .jpg
- File:FB IMG 1545491423788 Ritesh Pandey.jpg
- File:20180930 121602.mayankmishra .jpg
- File:20180930 121618.mayankmishra .jpg
- File:Meeting With Dinesh Lal Yadav 'Nirahua'.jpg
- File:Mayank Mishra .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mayank Mishra 03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense explanation of copyright status. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged file Snowdawg (talk) 23:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Not own work.
- File:Commission Juridictionnelle Objection 1970 Verso.jpg
- File:Commission Juridictionnelle Objection 1970 Recto.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
own work doubtful
- File:Jean-Jacques de Felice.jpg
- File:Fête du Garm au Mont Vedun le 19 juin 1971.jpg
- File:Groupe d'action et de résistance à la militarisation.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- All restored: legal document not covered by copyright, and own pictures. Yann (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a screen --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Used for vandalism at en:Conrad Logan. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:3-Cushion World Cup 2017-7
[edit]COM:DW of poster
- File:3-Cushion World Cup 2017-7-Tournament poster.jpg
- File:3-Cushion World Cup 2017-7-Turnierplakat (Original).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Request by subject - no permisson given to publish image. OTRS Ticket:2018122410004994 Ronhjones (Talk) 23:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW per e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW per e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Missing EXIF for own work; plus the awfully small file size is another hint. 117.222.89.209 10:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Missing EXIF data, and tiny file size for own image. 117.222.89.209 10:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Extremely tiny file size for an own work with no metadata. 117.222.89.209 10:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Extremely small file size for own work with no valid metadata. 117.222.89.209 11:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born 1954 Martin Sg. (talk) 11:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Not notable. Out of Com:PS Hanooz 11:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This file contains watermarks of the photography agency which is against the the rules of Wikimedia Commons Wikilover90 (talk) 11:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Not in line with COM:L, etc. (E.g. copryrigt related restrictions can't be ignored, etc.) Not needed. See also:
- Commons:Village pump/Archive/2010/12#Common_sense_and_ignore_all_rules
- Commons:Village pump#ignore_all_rules?
--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not needed. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- (and the redir-page Commons:IAR) too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete or Userfy, without prejudice against recreation including some reasonably thoughtful & nuanced treatment of the subject WRT this project’s mission & norms.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This is extremely appropriate on a project like Wikipedia, where most of the rules are internal. It's not so much appropriate on a project like Commons, where most of the rules are external. GMGtalk 21:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- userfy but this attempt to shift responsibility of rules enforcement from commons onto the law is delusional. no lawyer would act as a commons admin does. you need to accept responsibility for the open flouting of rules when it suits you, based on who you know, not what the law is. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 19:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This page should be re-deleted because it's absolute nonsense to say all rules could be ignored under any circumstances. We can't ignore copyright, for example, although ignoring copyright would improve Commons (until it got shut down). Moreover, this page was cited in support of the unilateral deletion of thousands of images by an admin who faced unanimous opposition in an ANU thread. If someone thinks they are justified in a gray area in which two or more criteria may be in conflict, they need to be prepared to defend how their actions are justified by a more important imperative, and this kind of call to anarchy, regardless of how tempered it is, is unhelpful. Also see previous discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Ignore all rules and linked pages. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging User:Ɱ, User:Jmabel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also pinging User:Jeff G., User:Odysseus1479 and User:GreenMeansGo, who participated in the 2019 discussion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There are plenty of explanations on the page describing how IAR should be used; if that section is not comprehensive enough, then it should be improved. The possibility of misuse is not a reason to delete the page. On enwiki, admins have been desysopped over misuse of IAR, but you don't see anyone calling for its deletion. ArbCom put it very well: "When users decide to ignore a rule, they must be able to show what they were prevented from doing and why being so prevented was detrimental to Wikipedia." The only difference between Commons and Wikipedia is the additional legal issues, but the page says very clearly that copyright laws are an exception to IAR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- We're not Wikipedia, nor will ever be. The scenarios are different, and nobody really ever suggests deleting policies. But for an essay to contradict policies here and be abused by someone who is supposed to set an example is egregious. And that user even cited this page's simple existence as the reason they felt comfortable defying all our procedures. I suggest User:King of Hearts/IAR exist, but COM:IAR as a linkable set of instructions must not be able to be cited again for justifying ignoring procedures. ɱ (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I'm pretty much with User:King of Hearts here. I'm going to make an edit to that page that may satisfy some of the issues originally raised. - Jmabel ! talk 18:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The title itself is inflammatory and thoroughly objectionable. I will never support having a page by this name, regardless of what content might contradict the name. Since we all agree that all rules cannot be ignored, the fact that some people want to keep the article boggles the mind. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Page was already deleted by consensus, and restored in an improper way (see G4). This page has already been abused by an administrator in order to justify ignoring our policies. If an administrator feels the very existence of this page and link allows them to do this, then this page must be moved or deleted. It has already happened before with significant damage, and will happen again. ɱ (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Adding that the title advocates the ability to break all rules, which can include breaking legal copyright laws and must be changed. Thank you for pointing that out Ikan Kekek. ɱ (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete this is a terrible idea all around, and demonstrably so. On Wikipedia IAR is a protection against bureaucracy, lawyering, and newbies being held liable for not knowing the rules. On Commons this idea has immediately been appropriated to protect admins from accountability. Commons has to have a stricter ruleset because it is the backbone of countless other projects. Dronebogus (talk) 02:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as amended (I cited the source). — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 05:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Question Jeff G., I don't understand. You previously stated that this page was not needed. Why do you think it's needed now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I respect the opinions of King of Hearts and Jmabel. I would like to see the source continue to be cited as this edit 17:21, 17 April 2002 (UTC). Note that "Commons:Village pump#ignore_all_rules?" above referred to a section which was later archived to Commons:Village pump/Archive/2018/12#ignore_all_rules?. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- I may be missing it, but I'm not seeing the text. I do see this argument by User:Innotata, though: "Even on English Wikipedia 'IAR' is rather misleading, I'd like it if it were changed to 'rules are not set in stone'." That seems like a good argument to me, if we're going to keep this essay. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Try searching for "08:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)" without quotes. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is the text something other than ""If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Commons, ignore it.", which is quoted at the top of Commons:Village pump/Archive/2018/12#ignore_all_rules? I do see a subtle difference between that and the current language of Ignore all rules ("IAR") normally means "if a rule (policy or guideline) prevents you from improving or maintaining the wiki, ignore it." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- I may be missing it, but I'm not seeing the text. I do see this argument by User:Innotata, though: "Even on English Wikipedia 'IAR' is rather misleading, I'd like it if it were changed to 'rules are not set in stone'." That seems like a good argument to me, if we're going to keep this essay. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I respect the opinions of King of Hearts and Jmabel. I would like to see the source continue to be cited as this edit 17:21, 17 April 2002 (UTC). Note that "Commons:Village pump#ignore_all_rules?" above referred to a section which was later archived to Commons:Village pump/Archive/2018/12#ignore_all_rules?. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It might be relevant to note that User:Lojbanist, who created this page twice, is globally locked. So their violation of rules does not appear to have benefited this site or Wikimedia in general. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- And it might be relevant to note that is an ad hominem argument. - Jmabel ! talk 04:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- That's fair. I'm just shocked that there ever was, let alone still is an essay by this title here, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Like m:IAR, a bit of discretion is required before using this as reasoning for an action (though the m:IAR is a global policy while this is an essay). It does not mean "break the law", in which case includes copyright restrictions. For that specific case regarding Andre Carrotflower (ACF), it just so happened to be that Andre misused the essay, and like King of Hearts (KOH), I agree that admins need to explain what they couldn't do, and why they used IAR. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- I still lean toward Delete. No animosity toward those who have tried to clarify the essay, but what we're left with is an essay about ignoring rules that's mostly about why you shouldn't. It's a bit like having an essay about why you should ignore speed limits, but the body is all about how dangerous it is to drive too fast and you'll probably get issued a fine.Anyway, if the only case where this applies is in accordance with community consensus, then we're not really ignoring rules at all. The consensus is just the new rule. And that's only in cases where consensus applies, since the majority of rules we follow here aren't negotiable. GMGtalk 10:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Lean Keep, although swaying delete, as Commons has a different gameboard than Wikipedia, and has to be cautious to a fault. So ignore all rules wouldn't work here. But at Wikipedia it is policy, and this discussion is about an essay. Essays pretty much are allowed from the stands but are not part of the gameboard. So Keep doesn't give any power to the thing at all, and essays should never have veto power over a policy or guideline so that shouldn't even be of concern. The main question here is should essays start to be deleted on Commons (have you ever deleted an essay before?). Randy Kryn (talk) 02:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It may theoretically have no official power, but an admin already used it as a justification for taking unilateral actions that were unanimously opposed and created a mess. So why is it better to have it than not have it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- In almost every case where a longtime user has been called on the carpet for their actions, they have cited some essay, policy, or guideline in their defense. That does not usually lead to the deletion of the essay, policy, or guideline. - Jmabel ! talk 04:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- The question remains: Why is it better to have this essay by this title than not have it or at least change the title to a more accurate one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Jmabel, I am actually familiar with many cases of citing specifics in policies, guidelines, and essays that don't make sense, and that highlights issues, which prompts efforts to change the text. I'd say this probably happens at least every month. The only difference is this effort is a little larger of a change, and wouldn't have been necessary if the page wasn't recreated suddenly without an undeletion request. ɱ (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment OK, let's try again: Allowing an essay by this title is asking for trouble. Don't be surprised when it causes more trouble. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. I am satisfied with the current language and the name change. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Amicably resolved by some edits and a move to Commons:Be flexible (with redirect back). - Jmabel ! talk 17:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
no exif, low res. File found here: https://pijamasurf.com/2010/01/vida-al-desnudo-5-buenas-razones-para-quitarse-la-ropa/ as uploads of 2010. Upload here is 2017. Unlikely own work. Amada44 talk to me 12:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
professional photo, no exif, this and an other nude are uploaders only uploads. Very unlikely own work. Tineye found one here: https://66.media.tumblr.com/8d3389952a988653e5685602b145015b/tumblr_ns6oencBfW1thg0u0o1_540.jpg first found in 2015-08-07. Amada44 talk to me 12:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Small file without EXIF data, last remaining file, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 12:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 13:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This is only a test. So, please try to delete this. AppleWormBoy (talk) 13:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ross kramerov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 14:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lovedhama1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW. No source and no permission. Probably also out of scope.
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0011.05.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0011.03.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0011.04.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0011.01.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0005.07.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0005.05.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0005.04.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0005.06.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0005.03.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0005.02.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0004.01.png
- File:คัมภีร์ คัมภีรญาณนนท์ 0002.02.png
Yann (talk) 14:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Fictional flag, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Zitadeland.png
- File:Umbria.png
- File:Aufreland.png
- File:Schussland.png
- File:Fictional flag 6.png
- File:Fictional flag 4.png
- File:Fictional country's loyalist flag.png
- File:Flag of another fictional country.png
- File:Fictional Flag 1.png
Ies (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
incomplete photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
incomplete pictures Snowdawg (talk) 15:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
![15:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/12/25#c-Snowdawg-2018-12-25T15:37:00.000Z-File:सनी_कुमार_"विद्रोही".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
![20:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/12/25#c-Didym-2019-01-01T20:16:00.000Z-File:सनी_कुमार_"विद्रोही".jpg){kind=link}
incomplete photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
incomplete photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope fake micronation cruft. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused out-of-scope fake micronation cruft. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dylan.bieniakbetz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out-of-scope fake micronation cruft.
- File:The Micronation of the Kingdom of Limonsylvania's Coat of Arms.png
- File:The National Flag of the Micronation of the Kingdom of Limonsylvania.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from album cover. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamwikedit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Holykrons2018.jpg
- File:Alexholykrons.jpg
- File:Oscarzurdoholykrons.jpg
- File:Freddy.brionessholykrons.jpg
- File:Tonydrumsholykrons.jpg
- File:Alineación de Holykrons (2013 - 2016).jpg
- File:Holykrons tocando.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused and non-existent logo of the Liberal Party of Corrientes Yilku1 (talk) 17:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused and non-existent logo of the Liberal Party of Corrientes Yilku1 (talk) 17:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook (see EXIF), unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 17:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Not under COM:DM. Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I guess that's okay, I didn't know that the logo had to be minimal. I'll find another image. Kyerjay (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo. Not under COM:DM. Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The website contains a copyright notice and I don't see why the logo would be freely licensed. Its usage is fine at English as a non-free logo but it's still non-free. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged picture Snowdawg (talk) 19:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Used for vandalism at en:Conrad Logan Mattythewhite (talk) 20:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DASQofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous DJ. Out of project scope.
- File:DASQ (Romanian DJ & Producer).jpg
- File:DASQ (Electronic Music Artist).jpg
- File:DASQ (Techno DJ & Producer).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- one more:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Senseless, used for vandalism [2], [3], [4]. Хоббит (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
It is looks like copyright violation [5] Sakhalinio (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: https://www.eldjoumhouria.dz/art.php?Art=11601 Daehan (talk) 22:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jaider El Flow El Impactable (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous artist. Out of project scope, no contribs to any wm project, blocked on wikidata.
- File:JAIDER EL FLOW EL IMPACTABLE.jpg
- File:Jaider El Flow El Impactable.jpg
- File:D p jaider original TRESS.jpg
Achim (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation MisterXS (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged file Snowdawg (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
garbage photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution. Metadata indicates that it was sourced from Facebook or Instagram. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Sadly the upload is corrupted with less than half (top part) of the photograph showing. Bidgee (talk) 01:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My own photo, apparently batch-uploaded from Flickr. There are several similar photos, much less blurry, from the same event (see category). Pete Forsyth (talk) 01:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I don't see how an advertisement like this falls within the scope of the project Ricky81682 (talk) 03:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, personal and unused. Steinsplitter (talk) 08:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Bana ait olan fotografımı 2 senedir engelliyorsunuz. Bana bir de bu resimle ilgili yazı yazma diyorsunuz. Çok garip bir durum. bu fotoğrafı benim Canon 650 D makinem ile çektim burada paylaştım. O günden beri bana bir engel yaptılar hala doğru dürüst Wikipedi de yazamıyorum. Silecekseniz silin ama beni engellemeyin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamukova Haber (talk • contribs) 21:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Drawing by Pierre Lardin who died in 1982. In the PD in France in 2053. BrightRaven (talk) 09:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Material from different sources, unclear copyright status. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical book and photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Looking over the editor's talk page at English, this was only used for a single AFC and a logo doesn't like it falls within the scope of the project. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
derivative work make original file non-free. Now it's not "State emblems and official signs (flags, armorial bearings, decorations, monetary signs and other State symbols and official signs)" ShinePhantom (talk) 03:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Original creator's request. Wrong shape. Cangjie6 (talk) 04:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Upload by User:Kwokmiles for the subject Guo Wengui (aka Miles Kwok). Such upload should be verify by OTRS. Without OTRS, should be deleted due to unclear copyright Matthew hk (talk) 07:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete file because we believe "they look to good to be owk work". I checked, this is bu far the largest version around and has valid EXIF suggesting that this file is the original. Significant doubt wasn't raised. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:45, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Techyan as no permission (No permission since) Techyan（Talk） 00:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- This image can be found in https://guo.media/photos/47213 which published at the same day (Nov 2, 2018) as this file on Commons. Thus OTRS verification needed. --Techyan（Talk） 00:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Nice trick by the uploader to flip the image. It is more likely an impersonator than the subject himself. It seem copyvio unless OTRS Matthew hk (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
unrelated image in the file history 100cellsman (talk) 07:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Deleted the unrelated file. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Lori Light Foot Petition Launch 3 Days Away 40097812 877234899330974 6760582912531234816 n.png.jpg
[edit]
Duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 09:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Missing EXIF for an original image; also very small file size. 117.222.89.209 10:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- The EXIF erased by the program Picasa (cropping process). Acceptable size. No reason to delete. Keep Insider (talk) 13:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Per above. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status B dash (talk) 10:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Roborovski hamster
[edit]Files were deleted from Flickr, undetermined copyright status
- File:Roborovski hamster sitting.jpg
- File:Roborovski hamster (2).jpg
- File:Roborovski hamster sitting in sand.jpg
- File:Young Robo hamster.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B dash (talk) 10:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination :(. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Uploader requested deletion via reply to Ticket:2018060510006441. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, 6 months old. Request is reasonable. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://cdn.rbth.com/468x312/web/en-rbth/images/2015-05/big/Ganieva_468.jpg as per [6] and ru:Special:Diff/54478320. Yann (talk) 14:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=332274231#File:Алиса_Аркадьевна_Ганиева.jpg){kind=link}
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Алиса Аркадьевна Ганиева (1).jpg. Yann (talk) 14:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- this photo has 468x312 pixels. File in Wikipedia was bigger: 900 × 599! ~ Чръный человек (talk) 14:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete. On the one hand, this was first uploaded on ru.wiki on 4 April 2013, and I didn't find in the web earlier images that sized. On the other, the original uploader, now indefblocked, had ~10 accounts, all with multiple file copyvio warnings on their talkpages. I'm afraid we, with COM:PCP in our minds, should go with the delete option. Sealle (talk) 17:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Таких подробностей я не знал. Это меняет дело. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 13:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://mk-london.co.uk/news/u5287/2016/03/31/12476 See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Алиса Аркадьевна Ганиева.jpg. Yann (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
https://yablor.ru/blogs/jena-gubernatora-samozvanca-pokazal/4409348 копиво нашёл пардон за загрузку Панн (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
file is blurry GeorgDerReisende (talk) 22:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of Veljmies-patsas (Q11900861), a 1959-sculpture by Heikki Konttinen (1910–1988; Q11211502), located in Kuopio, Finland. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. Apalsola t • c 12:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kuopio market hall - Veljmies.jpg. ––Apalsola t • c 12:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
If its against Finnish copyright laws, just delete it. --Ion Tichy (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 05:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
The photograph is a derivative work of Kisailijat, a 2007 sculpture by Juhani Saksa (b. 1939, Q21044186), located in Jyväskylä, Finland. The author of the original work (the sculpture) is still living, so it is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 13:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 05:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for sculptures, only photos of the MSU building are to be uploaded on Commons for the time being. A.Savin 15:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes I know this. I know Russian FOP much better than your editors did back in 2015 when I quit editing wikipedia because of the way they treated me at the time.
I contend that this sculpture is part of the building but, your consensus on FOP is very bizarre sometimes so I'll just go with whatever you decide. E.3 (talk) 15:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
No further discussion here. We decided that with Monument to the Conquerors of Space that a "sculpture" affixed to the building is free. I suggest that because this sculpture is part of the building it is also free. Does anyone want to contribute? E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). Suggestor of the project Wikiwide on MetaWiki [7]. Suggestor of avoiding particular English words in the Commons 11:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
_(1)_(14923843169).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1)_(14923843169).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
picture not useful; object hidden behind a branch; there are better pictures in the same category Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
_(1)_(14923843169).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
_(1)_(14923843169).jpg){kind=link}
_(3)_(14923974077).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3)_(14923974077).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
picture not useful; object hidden behind a branch; there are better pictures in the same category Poecilotheria36 (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
_(3)_(14923974077).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
_(3)_(14923974077).jpg){kind=link}
It is twice Jonuz Kola (talk) 20:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
It is twice Jonuz Kola (talk) 20:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Not seeing any duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Sculpture in the US, which does not have freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 20:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ idem for background. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS. This is a derivative work of 3D-artworks. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as a derivative work of 3D item, due to lack of licensing evidence of the 3D work to be used in the image. - Cameron11598(talk) 21:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- The original location on Flicker has changed to https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffweese/4161935408/ and there is no indication there that the carvings (which are not toys) are in any way under copyright. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Everything is under copyright by default (until proven otherwise). Carvings, statuettes, toys, busts, paintings, sculptures. The mention of "toys" above is to link to the general guideline about these sort of objects, but even non-toys are covered by the same principles. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have read it and the case is that most commercially created pieces like this do not have a copyright. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, everything is assigned copyright protection automatically (per the Berne convention) comercial or not doesn't matter, as long as it is published. Secondly, on https://www.hallmark.com/gifts/home-decor/figurines/willow-tree-nativity-figurines-6-piece-set-26005.html it states that they are under copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. That makes it clear. I suspect that the fact it was arranged as a work of art exempts it from copyright. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, everything is assigned copyright protection automatically (per the Berne convention) comercial or not doesn't matter, as long as it is published. Secondly, on https://www.hallmark.com/gifts/home-decor/figurines/willow-tree-nativity-figurines-6-piece-set-26005.html it states that they are under copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have read it and the case is that most commercially created pieces like this do not have a copyright. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Everything is under copyright by default (until proven otherwise). Carvings, statuettes, toys, busts, paintings, sculptures. The mention of "toys" above is to link to the general guideline about these sort of objects, but even non-toys are covered by the same principles. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment They are from the 2000 set "Willow Tree Nativity" by the artist by Susan Lordi (still alive). (Thanks cameron11598 for your research). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Any time! - Cameron11598(talk) 21:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hold - Before this is deleted could someone replace this image on all projects with File:Weihnachtskrippe.jpg - Deleting this would be harmful to the projects,
- Like everyone here I'm having a few beers and celebrating the festive period with loved ones and the last thing I want to do right now is spend 2 hours trying to replace this image on various Projects (Bear in mind English is my only language and it would take me 10 minutes to translate the project and replace each image),
- If no one wants to take this task on then I'll do it in a months time but right now like I said I want to relax with the family but at the same time I don't want to see this deleted without any sort of replacement done. Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 21:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Weihnachtskrippe.jpg has the same problem: a commercially created piece of work with known copyright. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- And I suspect that any nativity image we select will be nominated for this reason, which is tenuous at best. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, old ones to be in the public domain (either artist died more than 70 years ago, or published in the US before 1923 etc.) should be kept, or if an artist would release a set under a free license, that would be good. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- AH thanks for that, In that case I don't really know what should replace it but as I said I feel something should replace it, I'll go with whatever the community wants tbh. –Davey2010Talk 22:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- And I suspect that any nativity image we select will be nominated for this reason, which is tenuous at best. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Weihnachtskrippe.jpg has the same problem: a commercially created piece of work with known copyright. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: If this image is deleted, I hope there is a replacement for it as it is a heavily used image. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS. This is a derivative work of 3D-artworks. The description claim these are from "early 20th century", however without a specific date or artist, we lack enough COM:EVIDENCE to claim the artworks to be public domain. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- per COM:TOYS. This is a derivative work of 3D-artworks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
This is utterly ridiciulous. It's a pretty standard German nativity scene, in my family's possession since ca. 1900, artisan work without any indication as to an artist (as are all those nativity scenes). At least it's PD-anonymous. Find yourself another area to play, and leave my files alone. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not to argue the points in this specific comments, but as a technicality: "work without any indication as to an artist" doesn't hold up as an argument. Everybody (known artist, company or private person) receives the same copyright protection, and without researching this specific nativity scene, we can't know if the artist made their identify known (simply not knowing it isn't the same). Please see the actual template. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File no longer needed since it has been replaced by a dynamic map Naseweis520 (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File no longer needed since it has been replaced by a dynamic map Naseweis520 (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File no longer needed since it has been replaced by a dynamic map Naseweis520 (talk) 23:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO (there is a face in the logo) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Trademark and copyright are not synonymous. I see no evidence of copyright release. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raphaelbaudet2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Is this logo above COM:TOO? The right corner seems to be depicting a circuit board of some kind.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Uploaders statement: Ricco Baroni, and i have this picture from Gamzatov. Peronal pircture for me Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: anyway unlikely to be own work but grabbed from a social media (standart size+no EXIFs). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Unverifiable source, no metadata for file to question originality, plus small file size. 117.222.89.209 11:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: old, used and rewieved, no specific reasons to believe it's a copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Лукашевич К. Забава. Сборник рассказов, сказок, сцен из детской жизни. (1907). — Задняя переплетная крышка.jpeg
[edit]._%E2%80%94_%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8F%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%E2%80%94_%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8F%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture has definitely not been published before 7 November 1917. Bogus license. No evidence of permission from the photographer. Jcb (talk) 13:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Лукашевич К. Забава. Сборник рассказов, сказок, сцен из детской жизни. (1907). — Форзац.jpeg
[edit]._%E2%80%94_%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%E2%80%94_%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture has definitely not been published before 7 November 1917. Bogus license. No evidence of permission from the photographer. Jcb (talk) 13:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. May be OK under Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain#Freedom of panorama, but better ask. Yann (talk) 13:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: don't seems to be permanently displayed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No EXIF data. Posted on Twitter on 18 Dec: https://twitter.com/domodedovod/status/1075108384515477506 and available here https://domodedovod.ru/aeroport/svyaznoj-otkryl-v-domodedovo-eksklyuzivnyj-magazin/ Yann (talk) 14:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Converted from speedy deletion. Is this OK for PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 14:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no info about the country where it is from, therefore impossible to say. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 25 December 2018 (UTC) I do not know what to answer in such cases. If they doubt the originality of the text, then let them give the source, where the original text comes from. The text is indeed published on the site Russika.ru under my last name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk • contribs) 18:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC) That there is no doubt about the originality of the text, I will provide a link to the catalog where they are stored http://www.russika.ru/a.php?a=390 There are many articles of similar content and a published article, only one of them. I plan to post the main ones on Wiki. (Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk • contribs) 20:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- If this document is your own creation, please see COM:OTRS to release it; otherwise consider uploading it to Wikisource. Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
У меня нет лицензии, подтверждающей мое авторство. Я просто опубликовал материал на сайте Russika.ru, а теперь хочу опубликовать в Wikimedia. Там много моих статей аналогичного содержания. Т.е. я доказываю, что это моя статья, а не ворованная. (Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 01:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC))
- @Evgeniy Yakubovski: please read the rules about the scope of Wikimedia Commons, specifically the section about excluded educational content (link: Неприемлемые образовательные материалы): "Не могут быть размещены: [...] Файлы, не содержащие ничего пригодного для образовательных целей, кроме текста. Для публикации различных текстовых материалов, таких как рецепты, инструкции, стихи, проза, цитаты, образовательные программы тоже есть свои проекты: например Викиучебник, Викицитатник, Викисловарь, Викиверситет или Викитека." --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete – defies COM:EDUSE#PDF, fringe science by an author unable to write such symbols as «km» (kilometre), «s» (second), or «Гц» (hertz in Russian) properly. Note: I have an expert-level knowledge of both Russian and space-time theories. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Also note that—of three reference works provided—none is relevant to gravitation. 1. Якубовский Е.Г. “General solution of the Navier-Stokes equations and…” in the context of collision of black holes. And further two references are all hydrodynamics. Risible. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Критика не по существу вопроса, по-видимому не понимают текст статьи. Это не эксперт "space-time theories" не существует, такого термина в физике нет. Принимается критика основных положений статьи, а не сомнительные придирки к обозначениям размерности. Вообще я разочерован уровнем критики на викискладе. (Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 09:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC))
- Дорогой первооткрыватель! Такие вещи как «метр» и «секунда» — единицы измерения, а не размерности. Для их обозначения существует международный стандарт ISO 80000-1:2009. Русскоязычные стандарты предписывают ту же типографику, что и западные/международные. Кому тут нужны неизменяемые (PDF же) безграмотные формулы?Dear explorer! Such things as “metre” and “second” are units, not dimensions. Notation for them is standardized with ISO 80000-1:2009. Russian-language standards agree with Western/Intl standards on typography. Does anybody here appreciate these illiterate formulas immutable due to PDF? Note:Русский: придирки к обозначениям размерностиis translated as “quibbles about notation for dimension”, that is stated again in the message just below, hence certainly lack of understanding by Evgeniy Yakubovski and not a random glitch. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Я специально посмотрел файл, там действительно имеется русское и латинское обозначение размерности величин, в частности "км" и "km". Но и то и другое описаны правильно. Так что на содержание текста такие помарки не влияют. (Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 10:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC))
- Yet another time: we don’t want the stuff about black holes which cites books on fluid dynamics. Don’t want it at all on our site, in any form (PDF or else). But even for such publications Commons could be interested in, we don’t appreciate PDF uploads containing trash like «10 kG» and «78 гц» (with “reciprocally” wrong case and also both italic). We don’t accept PDFs to be heavily edited. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Как вы грубо оченивает использование гидродинамике в файле о гравитации. Во-первых таким образом я описываю кинематическую вязкость вакуума ih/(2m) и это следует из связи уравнений Навье-Стокса и Шредингера. Во-вторых уравнение Навье-Стокса нелинейное, как и уравнение гравитации ОТО и они тоже связаны. Извините, не могу найти ссылку о их связи, но если вы покапаетесь в интернете, то там опубликована такая статья. Но в статье дается неявная формула их связи.
How rudely you use hydrodynamics in a file about gravity. First, in this way I describe the kinematic viscosity of the vacuum ih / (2m) and this follows from the connection between the Navier-Stokes and Schrödinger equations. Secondly, the Navier-Stokes equation is non-linear, as is the gravitational equation of GR, and they are also related. Sorry, I can not find a link about their relationship, but if you surf on the Internet, then there is such an article published. But the article provides an implicit formula for their connection.(Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)) Criticism is not to the point, apparently do not understand the text of the article. This is not an expert "space-time theories" does not exist, there is no such term in physics. Criticism of the main provisions of the article is accepted, but not dubious quibbles about the notation of dimension. In general, I’m disappointed with the level of criticism in the Wikimedia Commons.(Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC))
Я учту Ваше замечание о файле pdf и буду представлять в word. Wikimedia надежное хранилище информации. Но я уже опубликовал два файла в pdf и изменить не могу. (Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC))
- "Это не эксперт "space-time theories" не существует, такого термина в физике нет." Oh really: Spacetime/Пространство-время. --HyperGaruda (talk) 13:25, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo B dash (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Arguably de minimis; the image is documenting the city of Nyíregyháza being part of the Earth Hour movement, the logo is incidental. Also, it's probably free at least under Hungarian law, as freedom of panorama applies to fine art erected "with a permanent character outdoors in a public place". --Tgr (talk) 23:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=337293221#File:F%C3%B6ld_%C3%B3r%C3%A1ja_v%C3%A1rosa_2012,_2017_S%C3%B3st%C3%B3gy%C3%B3gyf%C3%BCrd%C5%91.jpg){kind=link}
newer version available File:Districts and PBT of Johor.svg *angys* (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: , unused for now.*angys* (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
newer version available File:Districts and PBT of Johor-zh.svg *angys* (talk) 16:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: , unused for now.*angys* (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
newer version available File:Districts and PBT of Johor-zh.svg *angys* (talk) 16:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
@Christian Ferrer: , unused for now.*angys* (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: ok Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
newer version available File:Districts and PBT of Johor-zh.svg *angys* (talk) 16:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
L'origine incertaine de l'image rend peu probable qu'il y ait une autorisation du photographe (voir Commons:OTRS/fr). Sinon, il faudrait que l'image est plus de 70 ans ce qui ne semble pas le cas. Donc (et malheureusement), il faudra certainement attendre avant d'accepter cette image sur Commons. Shev123 (talk) 16:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Cette photographie provient des archives départementales de l'Aude dans lequel le fonds Albert Gau est conservé. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martialis87 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DeltaQuad as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/jo/maze/chartres/index.htm Maybe under PS-Shape? Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
устарела версия Sarhat bek Varsaman (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Contains unauthorized use of government logo and no longer represents organization or brand Aziza Yunusova (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mars_from_horizon_to_horizon_ESA394793.tiff vip (talk) 14:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: different file formats, no reason to delete. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
believe its not from free game, seems dubious I love rpgs (talk) 22:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Not enough information. Old book means what? Why you think this is a non-copyright picture needs a better explanation. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- L'absence de source appelle à sourcer mais pas à supprimer.--213.245.46.200 00:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Bronisław Piłsudski
(1866–1918)    |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||
| Alternative names |
Bronisław Piotr Piłsudski | ||
| Description | Russian anthropologist and revolutionary | ||
| Date of birth/death |
21 October 1866 (in Julian calendar)  |
17 May 1918 | |
| Location of birth/death |
Zalavas |
Paris | |
| Authority file | |||
- Keep – unlikely was first published after 1923 and the creator is dead for a century. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:33, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Upload from a sock farm with long history of copyvios. No source, no credibility. For all we know this might be a manipulated photograph of a living person. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- For clarity, the assertions made in the first DR (above) about authorship were by disruptive sock account. There is no reason to trust any assertion by the sock farm. Nobody independent of the sock farm has validated copyright or even confirmed that the photographer was Bronisław Piłsudski. --Fæ (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © ГУ НП в Дніпропетровській області There is indeed a mention of a free license at the source. Yann (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Yann: . The new website (http://mvs.gov.ua/) is under CC, not the old one (http://old.npu.gov.ua). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. The website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine uses a license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This is indicated in the footer. http://mvs.gov.ua/en/ The site http://old.npu.gov.ua belongs to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. So this file can be used? Pa30T (talk) 13:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- This is the temporary government site of Ukraine. All Ukrainian government sites use the license CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 Pa30T (talk) 13:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Various news publications also use this photo with reference to the website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. https://espreso.tv/news/2014/09/01/prezydent_nahorodyv_semenchenka_ordenom_bohdana_khmelnyckoho_za_muzhnist_ta_boyovi_zasluhy http://www.litsa.com.ua/show/a/17364 Pa30T (talk) 13:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will take that as a Keep This content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Copyright may not be violated. Pa30T (talk) 13:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- It should also be enough that the Ukrainian police is one of the structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. All content of the Ukrainian police is regulated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Police_of_Ukraine Pa30T (talk) 14:05, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will take that as a
- Various news publications also use this photo with reference to the website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. https://espreso.tv/news/2014/09/01/prezydent_nahorodyv_semenchenka_ordenom_bohdana_khmelnyckoho_za_muzhnist_ta_boyovi_zasluhy http://www.litsa.com.ua/show/a/17364 Pa30T (talk) 13:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- This is the temporary government site of Ukraine. All Ukrainian government sites use the license CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 Pa30T (talk) 13:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. The website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine uses a license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This is indicated in the footer. http://mvs.gov.ua/en/ The site http://old.npu.gov.ua belongs to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. So this file can be used? Pa30T (talk) 13:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
This is a patent that is published after 1989, therefore it is a copyvio I love rpgs (talk) 21:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, the requisite copyright claim that would mark this as non-PD does not appear in the patent. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment, ah, nominator appears to be indef blocked due to sockpuppeting and therefore cannot respond. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Notice is not required after 1989. Patents after that are under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
a direct SVG version of this file is available, hence there's no need of this .png derivative of that vector image Eelelectric25 (talk) 11:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not for the reason given in the DR but because it is a request by the uploader within seven days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
https://ruspekh.ru/people/item/sukhikh-valerij-aleksandrovich копиво Панн (talk) 14:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by His Majesty the King (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:First Treaty of Vienna (1725).png
- File:Second Treaty of Vienna.png
- File:Bolts - "Considerations on India(n) Affairs...".jpg
- File:Share No. 4527 of the Ostend East India Company.jpg
.png){kind=link}
_Affairs...%22.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep All obviously public domain. DRs shouldn't be used as a license improvement process. Abzeronow (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: All OK now. --Yann (talk) 05:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
No source, no authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: is it {{PD-shape}} ?
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 09:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. Jcb (talk) 12:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- There are several sources that declare this immage as PD, but they are newer than this upload.
- The oldest(2007-11-13) source I have found is: http://www.clker.com/clipart-1780.html
- I think there might be a mirrow of the old clipart (indexed by google in May 2009): http://static.nlps.tyc.edu.tw/openclipart/gallery/index_338.html
- Deleting file does not make sense since It could be uploaded at any time from the sources named on the descriptionpage.
- Keeping the file is problematic, since every source is later that this upload-date.
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 14:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. Jcb (talk) 12:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be fixed now. --JuTa 17:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
