Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_photo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-Fangruida.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_Field.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_bio.jpg){kind=link}
_picture.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_golden_field.jpg){kind=link}
2015.jpg){kind=link}
2015_photo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_Field.jpg){kind=link}
2014.jpg){kind=link}
_is_in_the_golden_field_(Jeos.).jpg){kind=link}
![67 File:Smith'S Rocket(Fangruida"S Rocket-----Dual-engine high-speed heavy-duty non-traditional chemical fuel rocket (nuclear power composite heavy rocket).jpg](#File:Smith'S_Rocket(Fangruida"S_Rocket-----Dual-engine_high-speed_heavy-duty_non-traditional_chemical_fuel_rocket_(nuclear_power_composite_heavy_rocket).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![90 File:Li Kui in "Shui Hu Zhuan" (2011).jpg](#File:Li_Kui_in_"Shui_Hu_Zhuan"_(2011).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Rheinfeld_Marschierendes_Regiment.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Dairy_Division,_Dept._of_Agrl._who_studes_microscopic_organisms_and_their_relation_to_health,_flavor_and_keeping_qualities_of_dairy_products_LCCN2016824533.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Page_view_totals_at_the_end_of_one_week_(Issue_1_to_Issue_12).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Sidneysidneysidney (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Guaraci jogador.jpeg
- File:Gadao.png
- File:Gadao guerreiro.png
- File:Gado.jpeg
- File:Bruneti.jpeg
- File:Sininey.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:32, 19 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Already deleted as File:Andre Marcel.jpg --Krdbot 02:14, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
неверное перенаправление Панн (talk) 17:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:22, 19 Dezember 2018 UTC: неверный редирект --Krdbot 02:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Images of unknown origin and not used on Wikipedia
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Taking it easy - Thames Valley Police and Land Rover, Waltham Abbey White Water centre, 2012 Olympic games (7691905728).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 11:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 00:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
wrong user page Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Info: Page has been created by a different account User:Apurbo Chowdhury, content is obviously meant as an article page. --Achim (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Achim (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hakunamatata12345678 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Com:Penis Out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Just curious, but why do you always seem to comment "{{Vd}} Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope." On images of nudes and porn regardless of their quality? You are free to comment on deletion requests as you like, but I would at least want to see some actual arguments put forth as you've stated this of both high quality images of a penis as well as those that are in use, I think that both you and the project would benefit more from making actual arguments for deletion based on the individual files and their status within current policies and guidelines than just repeating the same sentence. If you keep repeating the same arguments there will come a point that sysops will just turn a blind eye to them and ignore them in their decision, also deletion requests are not elections and simply voting "
Keep" or " Delete" doesn'tshouldn't affect the outcome. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC) - Ignore the above, I posted it on their talk page, but for informational purposes their comment does seem to be a repetition, so any admin reviewing this deletion request should take that into account. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Just curious, but why do you always seem to comment "{{Vd}} Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope." On images of nudes and porn regardless of their quality? You are free to comment on deletion requests as you like, but I would at least want to see some actual arguments put forth as you've stated this of both high quality images of a penis as well as those that are in use, I think that both you and the project would benefit more from making actual arguments for deletion based on the individual files and their status within current policies and guidelines than just repeating the same sentence. If you keep repeating the same arguments there will come a point that sysops will just turn a blind eye to them and ignore them in their decision, also deletion requests are not elections and simply voting "
Comment, these files are very likely not their own work, these images appear to have been taken from WhatsApp-Messenger which means that the uploader is most likely the receiver of these dickpics and not their author. In fact this might even be a case of "revenge porn" as the images were received in 2013 and 2014, respectively. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Exhibitionist_uploads. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Louise Bourgeois not P.D. Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This sculpture is placed in Bilbao, Spain. Spain has freedom of panorama. See Commons:Freedom of panorama. Vysotsky (talk) 14:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is no problem for Spain. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Photos of this particular sculpture can be difficult cases, as more than one copy of the sculpture exists, and not all are on permanent display. If this were one of the temporary displays of "Maman", Spanish Freedom of Panorama wouldn't apply, as it's only for "Works permanently located in parks, streets, squares or other public places ..." (emphasis mine). But after a bit of research, it seems to me that this Bilbao location is permanent, so FoP applies. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Louise Bourgeois not P.D. Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This sculpture is placed in Ottawa, Canada. Canada has freedom of panorama. See Commons:Freedom of panorama. Vysotsky (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As noted, freedom of panorama applies, and the appropriate template is attached. I am the photographer/original poster. Radagast (talk) 17:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The nomination for deletion is a bit weird: FoP applies, original photographer had given consent (both licenses were given) -and the photo has been in Commons for more than 13 years. Vysotsky (talk) 20:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Photos of this particular sculpture can be difficult cases, as more than one copy of the sculpture exists, and not all are on permanent display. If this were one of the temporary displays of "Maman", Canadian Freedom of Panorama probably wouldn't apply, as it's only for works that are "permanently situated in a public place or building". But after a bit of research, it seems to me that this location is permanent, so FoP applies. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hatim NAJI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Hatimnaji Driss Laraki.jpg
- File:Hatimnaji ahmed soultan.jpg
- File:Hatim NAJI - Ouarzazate.JPG
- File:Hatim NAJI, Nabil Elderkin and Said Taghmaoui.JPG
- File:Hatim NAJI and Juan Pablo Di Pace.JPG
- File:Hatim NAJI - Saad Bellouadi.png
- File:Hatim NAJI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Icon with unclear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
From a copyrighted TV series, not free Timmyshin (talk) 01:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused picture of an unidentified person, appears to be out of scope Nikki (talk) 12:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 09:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unidentified logo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Decentking (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Rafael Acevedo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hind El achchabi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
poor quality selfie of a global spammer, unlikely to ever be used. Praxidicae (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused Files uploadet bei User Mjchael
[edit]- File:G Wechsel schnell.gif
- File:G Wechsel langsam.gif
- File:G mit Haus.gif
- File:G besser.gif
- File:EFG.gif
- File:03.01.C 2.gif
- File:03.01. G C D.gif
The first graphics of the German guitar book are no longer needed. They have been replaced by better graphics, or the content has been resolved differently. All links have been deleted. Since I have created the graphics, an information of the uploader is unnecessary. --Mjchael (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
неверное перенаправление Панн (talk) 17:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. User has been warned against this VoyenTech–Solomon203 bollocks. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 14:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
набор букв и цифр Пашка12 (talk) 10:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
_photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_photo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_photo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_photo.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
-Fangruida.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Fangruida.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
-Fangruida.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
-Fangruida.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_Field.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_Field.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_Field.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_Field.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Smith’s Rocket, Fangruida’s Rocket Large-scale interplanetary spacecraft---Super Rocket-Super Spaceship (International Patent Application Technical Project).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_bio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_bio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_bio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_bio.jpg){kind=link}
_picture.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_picture.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_picture.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_picture.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_field.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_field.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_golden_field.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_golden_field.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_golden_field.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_golden_field.jpg){kind=link}
2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2015.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
2015.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
2015.jpg){kind=link}
2015_photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2015_photo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
2015_photo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
2015_photo.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_the_Field.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_the_Field.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_Field.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
_in_the_Field.jpg){kind=link}
2014.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2014.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
2014.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
2014.jpg){kind=link}
File:The golden sun shines on the earth, and the golden wheat in the fields shines golden. . . . . Smith(Fangruida) is in the golden field (Jeos.).jpg
[edit]_is_in_the_golden_field_(Jeos.).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_is_in_the_golden_field_(Jeos.).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--Mbazri (talk) 12:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Smith'S Rocket(Fangruida"S Rocket-----Dual-engine high-speed heavy-duty non-traditional chemical fuel rocket (nuclear power composite heavy rocket).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: the file description is nonsense, the file itself has no clear education purpose. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Unidentified logo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused organization logo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons Project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo of non notable person Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal photo of non notable person Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal photo of non notable person Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mortuzza Mahmud Sani (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, personal photo of non notable person
Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Communitarian Natural Resource Management in Alirajpur.webm
- File:Mahendra Singh Sisodia.jpg
- File:Subhash Yadav INC.jpg
- File:Jamuna Devi INC.jpg
- File:Rajmani Patel.jpg
- File:Umang Singhar.jpg
- File:Arun Yadav.jpg
- File:Jitu Patwari.jpg
- File:Meenakshi Natrajan.jpg
- File:IBus Smart Card.jpg
- File:IBus Single.jpg
- File:IBus On Road.jpg
- File:IBus Lined Up.jpg
- File:Front Night DAH New Int. Airport Indore.jpg
- File:View from Inside DAH New Int. Airport Indore.jpg
- File:1 Front DAH New Int. Airport Indore.jpg
- File:Const. of DAH New Int. Airport Indore.jpg
- File:2 Front DAH New Int. Airport Indore.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Puneetpal Singh Miglani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images (:en:Draft:Puneetpal Singh Miglani).
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 14.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 18.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 17.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 16.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 13.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 15.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 12.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 11.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 10.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 9.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 7.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 8.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 6.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 4.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 5.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 1.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 2.jpg
- File:Puneet singh (puneetpal) 3.jpg
- File:Puneetpal singh- puneet singh.jpg
- File:Puneet singh puneetpal.jpg
- File:Puneet Singh.jpg
- File:Puneetpal Singh.jpg
_14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_18.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_17.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.Out of COM:SCOPE: a unnotable calendar. Mys_721tx (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- How can I show my permission to publish a scanned photo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudzil (talk • contribs)
- @Rudzil: Your permission is not needed, the photographer's is. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have permission from photo owner. How can I show it?
- @Rudzil: Please have him sending a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have permission from photo owner. How can I show it?
- @Rudzil: Your permission is not needed, the photographer's is. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted image, see https://www.inria.fr/institut/inria-en-bref/prix-inria-par-annee/laureats-2012/jeune-chercheur 194.57.250.59 12:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Venko Kolev, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oleg Zaplatynsky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Z15598101V,Odbudowa-zamku-w-Malborku-w-latach-60-.jpg
- File:Z15598100V,Odbudowa-zamku-w-Malborku-w-latach-60-.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- File:بازیهای آسیایی.png
- File:عکس در بازیهای آسیایی جاکارتا.jpg
- File:Wrestling.jpg
- File:مهران نصیری، در مسابقات کشتی آزاد جان باشگاه های جهان.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata. Seems like not own work, but historical photo. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per Nominatore. Not seems to be an Own work.--Mbazri (talk) 12:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Geotechnical Engr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in irrelevant context.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this image in error Rising Star Entertainment (talk) 04:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
I have accidentally posted the wrong picture. This picture should not be up for others to use. Havanna01 (talk) 12:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Promotional picture from a 2011 TV series (en:All Men Are Brothers (TV series)), not free Timmyshin (talk) 01:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
![01:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/12/19#c-Timmyshin-2018-12-19T01:35:00.000Z-File:Li_Kui_in_"Shui_Hu_Zhuan"_(2011).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
![16:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/12/19#c-Ymblanter-2018-12-27T16:33:00.000Z-File:Li_Kui_in_"Shui_Hu_Zhuan"_(2011).jpg){kind=link}
It seems to be from television ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://m.facebook.com/niknazminikahmad/photos/a.474985900294.289226.159556865294/10156457472890295/?type=1&theater *angys* (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Tuangelitofx
[edit]All files uploaded by Tuangelitofx (talk · contribs) are obviously copyvios taken from various sources. --Smooth O (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: all deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Roxxter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense upload, see nonsense filename and nonsense description
Ies (talk) 08:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
because the text of the poem in the photo I inserted is published without the permission of the ECIG publishing house. that in Prelude to Silence explicitly specifies that: "no part of the book can be reproduced or transmitted". Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 08:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
File from Facebook page (uploaded on 31 Aug 2018) and also per FBMD Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 05:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rudolphous (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Chase & Kaitlin Cleveland OH 2009-07-14at03-38-121 (25750988438).jpg
- File:Kaitlin & Chase Cleveland Family OH 2011-04-29at23-04-42 (25750988818).jpg
- File:Halle, John, Tim & Bettina 196 ? Clevelend OH (25750985758).jpg
- File:Johnny, Bettina & Tim June 66 Cleveland OH (27844995329).jpg
- File:John Bainbridge house 1966-4 (25750984588).jpg
- File:John, Mom, Bettina & Tim 1963-1 (25750983828).jpg
- File:John, Stephanie, Chris, Halle, Tim, Bettina, Halle Jane Dad's Funeral Virginia Beach VA 1998?? (38914225424).jpg
- File:John, Bettina, Dad,Tim Virginia Beach VA 1970 ?-8 (39592762522).jpg
- File:John, Sandy, Bettina & Tim Virginia Beach VA 1967-8 (38725914225).jpg
- File:Tim, Dad, John, Bettina Virginia Beach VA 1968 ?-8 (39592748252).jpg
- File:Tim, John, Bettina 1966-4 (25750970528).jpg
- File:John 1977 (25750969468).jpg
- File:Kaitlin Foster 1996 ? (39592743522).jpg
- File:Bettina, John, Tim Virginia Beach VA 1968 ?? (27844973439).jpg
- File:Tim, Bettina & John Steamboat Springs CO 1995 ? (39592740622).jpg
- File:Chase, Bettina & Kaitlin 1993-1 (27844972469).jpg
- File:Chase, Corning, Kaitlin 1991-11 (39592735482).jpg
- File:Jamie, John, Bettina & Tim 1993-1 (39622211811).jpg
- File:John 1993-1 (38725883765).jpg
- File:Kaitlin, John & Chase 1992 ? (38914163494).jpg
- File:Chis, John, Pam & Bettina 1963 ? (38725873365).jpg
- File:John 1997-10-17 (39592688942).jpg
- File:JHF JR (39592681192).jpg
- File:Bettina, John, Kelli Steamboat 1996 ? (39622149961).jpg
- File:Chase, Bettina, John & Kaitlin OH 1988-6 ?? (27844907129).jpg
- File:Bettina & John Steamboat CO 1996 (38914098424).jpg
- File:John, Kaitlin & Chase Steamboat CO 1996 (39622130951).jpg
- File:Kaitlin & Chase Steamboat CO 1996-3 (38914087774).jpg
- File:John, Chase, Kaitlin, Kelli & Bettina Steamboat CO 1996 (39622122351).jpg
- File:John & Sheryn Foster Sedona AZ 2015-12-04at17-22-58 (38914565624).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Done Agree, wanted to delete them after finish uploading. Rudolphous (talk) 09:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by the uploader. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5vwNiTEIP8 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because it is copyrighted by Nintendo. The file is from the video game series "Super Smash Bros." and not an own work by the user. Kigsz (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
copyrighted image see https://vsbattles.wikia.com/wiki/File:Kirby_Ultimate.png DBigXrayᗙ 22:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Edmond Goergen (d. 2000), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Das Foto wurde von der Tochter Viviane Goergen erstellt und frei gegeben für die Darstellung auf Wikipedia Edmond Goergen. Bitte frei geben Danke Fannigo
- @Fannigo: Viviane Goergen must send the permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work: File:Tiger wild.jpg. Yann (talk) 12:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small file without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Plenty of previous publications found elsewhere. Also affects File:Tiger wild (cropped).jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 20:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmet Turhan
[edit]- File:Sacred-War.ogg
- File:Nesokruşimaya i legendarnaya.ogg
- File:Da zdravstvuyet nasha derzhava.ogg
- File:Naş parovoz.ogg
- File:Eshelonnaya.ogg
- File:Gimn Partii Bol'ševikov.ogg
Sound recording does not share the same 70 years limit as the music score. Also, it is unlikely that this particular recordings were published in the same year as the original songs. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mega super editorman as Copyvio (copyvio)
- PD-text-logo ???? Alan (talk) 23:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose because it is not copyrightable per Commons:Threshold of originality. Royalbroil 04:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: indeed PD-textlogo, definitely not above threshold of originality, not even close. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
The filename is dated incorrectly - it should be c1908. Swarren16 (talk) 21:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Person's name is misspelled and date is incorrect. Will be replaced with corrected filename. Swarren16 (talk) 21:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Swarren16: : You can request that the file be renamed by putting a {{Rename}} template on it, or using the "Move" option from the "More" menu. See COM:FR for more details. --bjh21 (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: : Thanks, I did that. I withdraw my request to have the file deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarren16 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file renamed. --bjh21 (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Дубликат файла: Siegfried Tod+ Витольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 19:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Этот файл есть точная копия файла : Siegfried Tod+ Витольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 20:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate file, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 18:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
the picture has bad quality, i will try and reupload with better quality YuanRuizong (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arslanarif233 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. First one published here in 2014. The second one... unlikely own work. Strakhov (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
A college of profiles on a website, the CC license cannot be verified. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentifiable Snowdawg (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentifiable Snowdawg (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not really a reason for deleting. We don't need every minute detail, but we've got "Flying out of Houston, some solar power at work here". Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Historical photos and radio broadcast. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Antolina Boada Ferrer. Primera locutora de Ràdio Terrassa EAJ 25. (1910-1997).jpg
- File:Radio Terrassa " la emisora del Vallés".1978. Locutado por Guillermo Salceda.ogg
- File:Eudald Aymerich Tarradella.jpg
- File:Inauguración Oficial de EAJ 25 Radio Terrassa .2 abril 1933.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Eudald Aymerich.jpg
- File:Antolina Boada,primera locutora de Radio Terrassa EAJ25.1932.jpg
- File:Inauguración Oficial de EAJ 25 Radio Terrassa 2 abril 1933.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
This photo was stolen from bdnews24.com and therefore it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 06:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
This photo was downloaded most probably from www.navy.mil.bd (the official site of Bangladesh Navy), it can be the author's own work, this photo can't be a public domain, it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
The person is ont famous nor he had indulged in any war with any country of his neighbor, the admiral is totally unpopular (though these things can't be the reasons for removing the photo from wikimedia commmons) and the photo was personally uploaded by the admiral, the author's page is not verified that it was run by the admiral himself, this photo is most probably taken from www.navy.mil.bd, and the site's permission is not granted it is confirmed, may be the photo had been downloaded from a popular news site of Bangladesh named bdnews24.com, the photo is not worthy of being a public domain, it should be deleted. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
@Moheen, this photo can't be a public domain. Shanaya Pandey (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
@Nahid, This photo is actually taken from Bangladesh Navy's official website without their permission. The link from where it was downloaded is:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. The photo should be deleted. Saeed Hossain (talk) 13:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
@Nahid, This photo was dowloaded from Bangladesh Navy's official site, the link is:https://www.navy.mil.bd/former_chief.php. You will clearly understand that it was downloaded from here, therefore it is not the author's own work and should be deleted. বিশাল খ (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio taken from the BD navy site, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
File is no longer needed. All links have been deleted. The author is me, and thus informed. Mjchael (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File is PD. We don’t normally delete such files just because they are no longer needed. --Green Giant (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am really angry. I am forced to draw graphics as SVG. After doing everything, this action seems to have been pointless. What shoud that? It is nonsensical to keep this file. The logic behind the graph is not obvious, unless he reads the appropriate chapter. The graphic is not self-explanatory. No one will ever use this graphic with any probability. In addition, this graphic would have been drawn as a vector graphic. I solved the lesson differently on the corresponding page. Delete this file! --Mjchael (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
File is no longer needed. All links have been deleted. The author is me, and thus informed. Mjchael (talk) 11:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File is PD. We don’t normally delete such files just because they are no longer needed. --Green Giant (talk) 18:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
_28.11.2018.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by IG86 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: author's wish. author's wish is reason for deletion only during first week after upload. Here 3 weeks have passed. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per Taivo. --Green Giant (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
_28.11.2018.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by IG86 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: author's wish. This is reason only during first week after upload. Here 3 weeks have passed. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per Taivo. --Green Giant (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
_28.11.2018.jpg){kind=link}
There is freedom of panorama in USA only for architecture, but not for other kind of art. The photo violates artist's (logo author's?) copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
categories Kaushikakash388 (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request within seven days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
wrong license Nomen ad hoc 15:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
File:US-CO - Denver - Sign - North America - Road Trip - Starbucks - The West (4892404818).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 15:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist permission via Commons:OTRS is needed. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted photo B dash (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi B dash, I've cropped it to remove the photographs (I'm surprised you didn't think of this solution). You can delete the original version and close this. Fences and windows (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Original version hidden from public view. --Green Giant (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
перенаправление неправильное Панн (talk) 16:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: meaningless title. --Green Giant (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
not an image from the source ArturSik (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and warn the uploader. He/she has been doing this a lot it seems. IndianBio (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work. Google shows there are higher resolution images avalable fore example this one. No meta data and it is the ony contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work. Google shows there are higher resolution images avalable fore example this one. No meta data and it is the ony contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 16:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of File:MJII logo.png, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kurt August Greifeneder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims. The uploader claims that these photographs are all his own work and that he is the author and copyright holder. However, at least two of the photographs are the works of Stephan Schreiner of Stephan Schreiner Photography according to the metadata. User:Kurt August Greifeneder seems like an unlikely username for someone by that name.
- File:Jupitersuite bei vollmond.jpg
- File:Jupitersuite.jpg – this file is also unusable because it's affected by this bug of the cross-wiki upload hack (why is this still around?)
- File:Bubbletent.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- 2 and 3 are in use in Arabic Wikipedia--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete --Alaa :)..! 02:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel and Ymblanter: articles deleted in Arabic Wikipedia now --Alaa :)..! 02:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
aucune certitude que cette photo soit dans le domaine public Pierrette13 (talk) 11:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: To me this seems to be in order for PD-US. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
doppelt vorhanden Gaumach (talk) 19:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: was already redirected to duplicate. --Rosenzweig τ 21:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artmasterreo
[edit]
Historical paintings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. Artmasterreo (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:delete2|image=File:Louis Joseph Raphaël Collin.jpg|reason={| align="center" border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" style="border:2px solid #777; background-color:#F1F1DE; font-size:x-small;" Artmasterreo (talk) 00:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:delete2|image=File:Louis Joseph Raphaël Collin.jpg|reason={| align="center" border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" style="border:2px solid #777; background-color:#F1F1DE; font-size:x-small;" Artmasterreo (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate file of File:Mirshad Majedi.jpg DBigXrayᗙ 21:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Nikki de St. Phalle in Stedelijk Museum . Nummer 2 Nikki de St. Phalle, Bestanddeelnr 920-6243.jpg
[edit]
Nikki de St. Phalle not P.D. Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:59, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture looks like it was taken from a TV screen, and from the official broadcast of the event, which of course is protected by copyright. Not sure if this warrants speedy deletion. — ΛΧΣ21 17:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete and it looks like files from the same batch have also been deleted for similar concerns. Hiàn (talk) 18:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is possible that this image, used on several Wikipedias, can be saved, but I'm not sure and, sadly, the uploader (User:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu) is "retired" from Wikimedia projects so he can't help us out. The description acknowledges these to be a "derivative drawing", but any sources are unacknowledged. It is quite possible that the originals are in the public domain, in which case this would be fine, but I am not sure how we could determine that, nor how closely he hews to the originals (enough of a difference would make this not a copyright matter: you can grab a general pose from a poster without violating copyright). But it's not encouraging that he says on his user page, "I have already told to the Commons administrators that they can (and must) delete all that they consider necessary, because I have uploaded some images improperly (by example without OTRS)..." Jmabel ! talk 01:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is a very small chance that the two posters are PD and despite a search I could find any of them. --VIGNERON (talk) 10:42, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Non realistic and erroneous representation and, as a result, without any educational use. See here for the exact representation of the statue. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete A case of a no-value, non-educational, pseudo-artistic photo manipulation by user Harry Gouvas, who most likely has chosen this "solution", in order not to erase himself standing in front of the statue from the original memories-like/touristic photo of him. ——Chalk19 (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete, I agree with the previous. Good effort of the user Harry Gouvas but it is obvious that he has not maintained the proportions, which shows wrong impressions.--Stepanps (talk) 20:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Hoax. Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
_Rheinfeld_Marschierendes_Regiment.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Rheinfeld_Marschierendes_Regiment.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Erroneously alternated version of this file and with wrong information-caption. Glorious 93 (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_Rheinfeld_Marschierendes_Regiment.JPG){kind=link}
Delete Another case of user H.Gouvas, trying to promote his pseudo-meuseum, as supposedly hosting the original painting (fake statement about source). Τhe image is a photo manipulation, not stated in the caption, of the original painting, a forgery, since it is the original image "doubled" by its vertical mirror like opposite put together (note the "right to left" written signatute of the artist in the bottom left corner of the manipulated by Gouvas image). ——Chalk19 (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
_Rheinfeld_Marschierendes_Regiment.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Hoax. Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
_Rheinfeld_Marschierendes_Regiment.JPG){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted logo B dash (talk) 09:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
KBRI Sana'a, Yaman Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work per EXIF data. --Majora (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
UK channel logo above of COM:TOO, listed as own work John123521 (talk) 01:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: processed as a duplicate. --Majora (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
duplicate file (File:Peter H Gilmore by David Shankbone.jpg) Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: processed as a duplicate. --Majora (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
I created a much better and leaner version as a GIF animation. So this heavy file is obsolete. Maximilian (talk) 11:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Would have been G7 if done properly originally. --Majora (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
because the text of the back cover in the photo I inserted is published without the permission of the ECIG publishing house. that in Prelude to Silence explicitly specifies that: "no part of the book can be reproduced or transmitted". Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 08:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
False date, Photo by Pierre d’O / Troillet.ch, https://www.climbing.com/news/new-route-on-matterhorn-north-face/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. One more upload without permission from this user... and he seem to not understand that we need a correct attribution and permission via OTRS. --AntonierCH (d) 09:54, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, tout indique que le téléchargeur est bien détenteur des droits, même si la date de la photo n'est pas correctement renseignée. O.Taris (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission required. Especially considering it is sourced to a different person at that URL. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
No licence specified, the current "permission" is not enough for this, or any other image. FunkMonk (talk) 20:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Comment Agreed that the statement on the deviantart source page is nothing like a free licence. It appears the Facebook link in the Permissions field is only accessible with a login: could someone with an account there please relay here what it says?—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Facebook posts are not stable, and I can't even see the post. The uploader needs proof on the Deviant art page or through email sent to Commons:OTRS, or by the artist uploading the images themselves (which i have explained to them several times). FunkMonk (talk) 01:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
SOLVED: The Licence appears here: https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Ohmdenosaurus-778182641?ga_submit_new=10%3A1545761709&fbclid=IwAR2W5bKgdGT7BxZvkpguQvUNvWad-3G87sroAFwnHuP9lfrNy9-l9vFYocw Yewtharaptor (talk) 19:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Non commercial licences are not allowed. FunkMonk (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Noncommercial and no derivative type licenses are not allowed here. Please see COM:L for more information. --Majora (talk) 23:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Negative Reaktionen. Ist doch nur eine Bastelarbeit und nicht wissenschaftlich ,auch nicht so gedacht!!! Kein Verständnis. Frank John-Lorenz (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (who is also the uploader). Out of scope. Unused. --Majora (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Ärger mit meiner Bastelarbeit. Selbst eigenhändig erschaffen, gegen keine Rechte versto0en dennoch beschuldigt. Frank John-Lorenz (talk) 15:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Ärger mit meiner Bastelarbeit.Selbst eigenhändig erschaffen, gegen keine Rechte verstoßen, dennoch beschuldigt, Frank John-Lorenz (talk) 15:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion and probably out of scope. Unused and we have better examples of Category:Inaccurate Tyrannosaurus models. --Majora (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Jcb: It is to show the interior, especially the chairs made of wooden strips, of old buses in Canton. Such buses have been retired before early 2000s so it is not possible to recreate one. This photo is so far the only one I see that happen to include the wooden chairs. It is therefore encyclopaedic.--Roy17 (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- It does not show sufficient of the wooden chairs to be useful. Nothing more than an ordinary group picture. Jcb (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- But there is not any other photo that could show the wooden strips, not even unfree images on the net! Of course the photographer took it as a group photo, but the inclusion of the chair back is enough to evoke readers' memories of the old buses.
- Plus this bus was unairconditioned and had full slide windows and a skylight, all of which were distinct features, compared to current aircon designs that you can find on commons and on the net.--Roy17 (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Try Googling 廣州 公交車 木凳, 廣州 公交車 木條, 廣州 公交車 木椅, 廣州 公交車 內觀, 廣州 公交車 車上, 廣州 公交車 舊, Guangzhou old bus etc. There is not any photos of interior of buses between 1990s and early 2000s. What this file shows is typical of design of that time, but that was before the advent of digital cameras and Internet in China. No other images, free or unfree, could be found at all. I would not hesitate to use one that only shows the interior, but there is not!--Roy17 (talk) 17:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- It does not show sufficient of the wooden chairs to be useful. Nothing more than an ordinary group picture. Jcb (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Roy17 who has placed the image on an appropriate article. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely authorship claims. Low-resolution photos without EXIF data, uploaded by a user with a long record of uploading copyright violations. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not quite sure what you mean by "long record" as the uploader has 4 edits globally but the image appeared on the Internet before uploading here so partially per nom. --Majora (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
See https://www.rstudio.com/about/trademark/ This image is trademarked by RStudio and the image filename includes the RStudio name. We have recently discovered it has been used by others because this page creates confusion. Please remove it immediately. 104.59.205.104 21:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
|
This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. |  |
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Trademark and copyright are two different things. Commons cares about copyright. This doesn't meet the threshold to gain that. --Majora (talk) 04:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep it's a decent shot of the Mount St. Helens crater from the northeast. clpo13(talk) 17:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- This image is in the public domain as per American law.--Cabeza2000 (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- The episode from 1962 or '63 is in the public domain because its copyright expired and was not renewed. This is why use of the screenshot is allowed here. -NowIsntItTime (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It is an extract made made with CropTool from File:Dick Van Dyke and Jerry Paris.jpg, a file in the public domain as per American law.--Cabeza2000 (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- This is not eligible for deletion. May I also point out that Patrick Rogel (although I'm not fully sure, I may be wrong on this somehow) likes to not only tag free images for deletion as supposed "copyright violations", but they also tag ones that are created by users who hold the copyright. I'd like to know what's really going on here as this appears to be suspicous activity. -NowIsntItTime (talk) 23:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Just FYI I just DR'ed a crop by Cabeza from a file which is not free. --E4024 (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, what does that have to do with this file? -NowIsntItTime (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: properly licensed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Alice C. Evans, Facter(.) in Dairy Division, Dept. of Agrl. who studes microscopic organisms and their relation to health, flavor and keeping qualities of dairy products LCCN2016824533.jpg
[edit]_in_Dairy_Division,_Dept._of_Agrl._who_studes_microscopic_organisms_and_their_relation_to_health,_flavor_and_keeping_qualities_of_dairy_products_LCCN2016824533.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Dairy_Division,_Dept._of_Agrl._who_studes_microscopic_organisms_and_their_relation_to_health,_flavor_and_keeping_qualities_of_dairy_products_LCCN2016824533.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Adam Cuerden as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low-resolution copy of File:Alice C. Evans, National Photo Company portrait, circa 1915 - Original.tif. Now, it's a different format, but given we can generate JPEGs of arbitrary size with the thumbnailer, this seems pointless.
- Pointy speedy request, consensus exists to maintain both formats for these collections. Fæ (talk) 11:08, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Why on earth would there be "consensus" to keep low-resolution files derived from a main file? Can you please point to this consensus? Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Vk}}
Neutral User talk:Dyolf77#JPEG copies of TIFFs - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I'm not trying to be difficult here, but I did ask for evidence of there being a consensus to keep these low-res, unused, unlinked copies, and I still don't have it. I'm not sure just saying "There is consensus" is enough. This was uploaded in February of this year, under a filename completely unrelated to the TIFF (Which was uploaded in 2016). There's a MUCH older file than this in widespread use. Why does this exist? I honestly do not understand. Why does it have such a random filename? Isn't File:Alice C. Evans, National Photo Company portrait, circa 1915.jpg (a full-resolution, restored version, uploaded a year and a half before this) good enough? Does this actually have any use? Please explain to me, because I'm honestly not understanding the logic here. The timescale means this goes way beyond maintaining and into an active insistence on both formats. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: that's new. I oppose deleting this .jpg as a duplicate of File:Alice C. Evans, National Photo Company portrait, circa 1915 - Original.tif for all the reasons that were given. Deleting it as a duplicate of File:Alice C. Evans, National Photo Company portrait, circa 1915.jpg (restored .jpg) doesn't really bother me. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I'm not trying to be difficult here, but I did ask for evidence of there being a consensus to keep these low-res, unused, unlinked copies, and I still don't have it. I'm not sure just saying "There is consensus" is enough. This was uploaded in February of this year, under a filename completely unrelated to the TIFF (Which was uploaded in 2016). There's a MUCH older file than this in widespread use. Why does this exist? I honestly do not understand. Why does it have such a random filename? Isn't File:Alice C. Evans, National Photo Company portrait, circa 1915.jpg (a full-resolution, restored version, uploaded a year and a half before this) good enough? Does this actually have any use? Please explain to me, because I'm honestly not understanding the logic here. The timescale means this goes way beyond maintaining and into an active insistence on both formats. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 21:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Temporarily undeleted per request of more thorough discussion. See [1]
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Haldjad_ooperist_Midsummernights_Dream_Madis_Nurms.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Costume-design-Eisenstein-Nurms.jpg
- File:Makeup-designs-Fledermaus.jpg
- File:Model-Fledermaus-Nurms.jpg
- File:C.Kreek Reekviem.jpg
- File:Sygis.jpg
- File:PromFest Thais Act2.jpg
- File:Thais Meditation Madis Nurms.jpg
- File:Thais ooperist Thais Madis Nurms.jpg
- File:Nunn ooperist Thais Madis Nurms.jpg
- File:Hippolyta ooperist Midsummernights Dream Madis Nurms.jpg
- File:Haldjad ooperist Midsummernights Dream Madis Nurms.jpg
- File:Crobyle ooperist Thais Madis Nurms.jpg
- File:Taevi konkursi finalistid.jpg
- File:PromFest Thais.jpg
- File:PromFest logo.jpg
- File:Carmen Finale.jpg
— Racconish 💬 12:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - see here - Jcb (talk) 00:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- As per undeletion request comment at least one file (File:Nunn ooperist Thais Madis Nurms.jpg) seems to have a valid permission. So it seems that initial deletion was sort of careless, and proper rereview of permissions hasn't been conducted. I'd say keep all for which it isn't shown that permission for particular file has been misreviewed earlier. Pikne 06:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Our policy is the other way round. We can only keep files if there is evidence of a valid permission. In this case we know that at least for most of the files the permission is valid, so that all files should be deleted per COM:PCP, unless there is clear evidence of permission for a specific file. Jcb (talk) 13:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know if the permission is valid or invalid for most images. When I first asked you about this then you implied that they were all invalid, but in comment to undeletion request it turned out that this wasn't the case. So it seems that both users, one who initially accepted permissions and one who later deleted images, made some errors in judgement. I don't think that precautionary principle requires deleting images for which valid permission is available and accepted. In this situation, in order to overturn previous judgement on validity of permissions, I believe individual review of all permissions is appropriate. I also still believe that it's fair to expect that OTRS correspondence will continue regarding images which will fail individual review on second turn. Pikne 13:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thera are five other images that are said to be drawings by the same designer as File:Nunn ooperist Thais Madis Nurms.jpg. So I'd assume that permission for these is also valid. In addition there are three collages and a logo that are said to be by the same person. Pikne 13:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Each image and OTRS ticket should be evaluated separately. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: should be handeled by OTRS stuff. --JuTa 22:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyviol; Lucio Fontana died in 1969. As in c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6361509.jpg, c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico (Italia, 1955) - BEIC 6341250.jpg o c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6347001.jpg Paolobon140 (talk) 15:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
_-_BEIC_6341250.jpg){kind=link}
- Note that Wikimedia has already received from BEIC a written confirmation of the photos' license, originally acquired by the photographer and then transferred to Fondazione BEIC. The photographer himself was generally contracted by the authors for the sake of publication, and must have received a waiver to that purpose. Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 15:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I can imagine, license must have been valid for any image contained in the editors' publications but not for photographs which were not published in those publications. Am I wrong?Paolobon140 (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Federico Leva (BEIC): We have a permission for Paolo monti's photos, but not the authorisation of the original artist, as we are talking here of a derivative work. Then there is still the open question if the waiver allows us to consider these photos of 3D objects copyrightable by Fontana's heirs or not. --Ruthven (msg) 17:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't see how this can be kept in the absence of documented evidence of permission from the artist or the artist's estate. On the other hand, there's no reason to question the permission of the photographer. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6365449.jpg may also be relevant. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Justlettersandnumbers, as you say we have no reason to question the photographer's documentation. The photographer stated he acquired the necessary rights, which in this case (per the legal opinion by lawyers Aliprandi and Piana) comes in the form of a waiver from the author of the 3D object. Of course we could launch a debate, among all those who claim to have read the Italian law, on whether the "derivative work" doctrine applies and whether a detailed written copyright license is needed, but I personally recommend to avoid to play the armchair lawyers. We already have a legal opinion about the general framework, which lays down the various cases, and another legal opinion from the BEIC lawyer indicating in which case this photo falls (that Fondazione BEIC has acquired all the rights). Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 07:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see how this can be kept in the absence of documented evidence of permission from the artist or the artist's estate. On the other hand, there's no reason to question the permission of the photographer. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paolo Monti - Servizio fotografico - BEIC 6365449.jpg may also be relevant. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Federico Leva (BEIC): We have a permission for Paolo monti's photos, but not the authorisation of the original artist, as we are talking here of a derivative work. Then there is still the open question if the waiver allows us to consider these photos of 3D objects copyrightable by Fontana's heirs or not. --Ruthven (msg) 17:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I can imagine, license must have been valid for any image contained in the editors' publications but not for photographs which were not published in those publications. Am I wrong?Paolobon140 (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Truliewezt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Creating awareness on neurodevelopmental disorders and early intervention.jpg
- File:Teachers training.jpg
- File:Nobelova Gradani competency training IBCCES.jpg
- File:Nobelova Gradani competency training.jpg
- File:Community training on developmental surveillance.jpg
- File:Helen Obiageli with IBCCES Nobelova Gradani Trainees.jpg
- File:Helen Obiageli (nee Anekwe).jpg
- File:Helen Obiageli with Nobelova Gradani team.jpg
- File:Helen Obiageli.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete File:Helen Obiageli with Nobelova Gradani team.jpg and File:Helen Obiageli.jpg as lacking permission since they're attributed to someone else. File:Helen Obiageli with IBCCES Nobelova Gradani Trainees.jpg is a low-resolution duplicate of File:Helen Obiageli with Nobelova Gradani team.jpg claimed as own work, so delete that one for the same reason.
- Unsure about File:Helen Obiageli (nee Anekwe).jpg, which is claimed as own work but lacks camera metadata, and File:Community training on developmental surveillance.jpg, which is from a different camera than the others.
- Keep the rest, which are claimed as own work and have consistent metadata. Additionally, they're in scope as photos of professional training and mental health awareness in Nigeria. clpo13(talk) 17:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. --JuTa 22:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:KTM Class 92 Leaving Kuala Lumpur Station.jpg
- File:Bowsette by SNN95.jpg
- File:Ixora chinensis 17 June 2018.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
@Yann: So how do I proof these work are mined and the KTM one is requested to move from en.wiki to commons?
- File:KTM Class 92 Leaving Kuala Lumpur Station.jpg - this file was nominated to transfer to Commons. So I transferred it as Commons guideline (from en.wiki to commons).
- File:Bowsette by SNN95.jpg - This is my own work. I owned this and I have the raw file for this art if you want proof.
- File:Ixora chinensis 17 June 2018.jpg - I owned this picture. I do have the picture in my saving.
SNN95 (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: one. Deleted the others. --JuTa 22:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Needs permission from artist(s)
- File:Enggang Gunung "Wreathed Hornbill" by Jaafar Taib, Acrylic, 1996.jpg
- File:Enggang Gunung "Wreathed Hornbill" by Jaafar Taib, Acrylic, 1996 (frame).jpg
- File:Pendendang "Masked Finfoot" by Jaafar Taib, Acrylic, 1990 (frame).jpg
- File:Pendendang "Masked Finfoot" by Jaafar Taib, Acrylic, 1990.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Is screenshot of my conversation with him enough? I will attached his official social media with that. SNN95 (talk) 13:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- The artist will need to provide permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 14:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020070510002278 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 21:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 18:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Unverified source: well the important part is that the copyright status is mentioned in the end credits and to bypass this by taking a screenshot of trailer is not justified. Bambi was inspired by Tyrus Wong, who died just two years ago. See: (Tyrus Wong, Bambi artist, dies at 106) acagastya 05:59, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free historical image
Converted by me to DR, as there is not sufficient evidence. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: why not own work. --JuTa 22:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not clear what value this photo has beyond the text, which is only interesting if it's interesting enough to be copyrighted, and unless the Flickr uploader was the same person as the cooperative that owned the copyright on the text, they were in the wrong releasing it under a license, which means we are in the wrong hosting it. Apologies if this nomination is not formatted correctly or is incomplete; assistance in such a case would be most appreciated. Hijiri88 (talk) 13:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No copyright violation. The script says "秋篠宮眞子内親王殿下 小室圭様 ご婚約内定おめでどうございます。". {{PD-text}} can apply . Also, there is no privacy concern because Princess Mako of Akishino and Kei komuro are famous persons. The KFC logo may be considered as de minimis. Darklanlan (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "ご婚約内定おめでとうございます。" very simple frequently-used expressions (Congratulations signs). And, They are few words. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Darklanlan and Benzoyl: What purpose does the image serve outside of showing the text in question and perhaps the KFC logo? Also, I think we should probably wait for the opinion of someone who doesn't also think the text included in File:Petbottled water shortage.jpg is a frequently enough used expression that it's cool for Commons. (Just FTR, that file in all of its presumable copyright violation is transcluded on Benzoyl's user page, unlike the deletion requests linked in bad faith here.) Hijiri88 (talk) 02:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Of course, if we can't find any purpose for use, then it should be deleted. Darklanlan (talk) 04:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- BTW, the KFC logo does not look anything like the examples listed at Commons:De minimis. The same might not be true for the poster, but clearly legible, presumably copyrighted text 胡椒＆ガーリックで、あとひく辛さ NEWあら挽き黒胡椒チキン is hardly PD-text. Those rationales may justify the other stuff like the 〇〇の〇〇手入れは９月２４日… or the 大倉山記念館右に300m, but not the KFC stuff. Hijiri88 (talk) 02:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- clearly legible? Is it in Full size photo? In any case, KFC ad are not main subjects in this photo. Basically, Titled by Flickr uploader keyaki "ご婚約内定おめでとうございます". He (She) focus on it. --Benzoyl (talk) 03:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Commons:De minimis includes a number of examples of similar "background" objects on which there is clearly text, but what that text says is impossible to parse without consulting higher def images of the same text. The same is not true of this photo. Hijiri88 (talk) 05:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- The phrase "あとひく辛さ" is commonly used. Most of short catchy slogans will not be copyrighted. (Tokyo High Court 平成13(ネ)3427, Intellectual Property High Court 平成17(ネ)10049 ) However, if someone use this slogan for his sales, the company may sue him for a tort case. (Article 709 of the Civil Code in Japan)石川, 正樹 (2018) ビジュアルデザイン発注時に知っておきたい！ 著作権のキホン, 第一法規, pp. 59‐63 ISBN: 9784474059399. Darklanlan (talk) 04:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- clearly legible? Is it in Full size photo? In any case, KFC ad are not main subjects in this photo. Basically, Titled by Flickr uploader keyaki "ご婚約内定おめでとうございます". He (She) focus on it. --Benzoyl (talk) 03:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Darklanlan and Benzoyl: What purpose does the image serve outside of showing the text in question and perhaps the KFC logo? Also, I think we should probably wait for the opinion of someone who doesn't also think the text included in File:Petbottled water shortage.jpg is a frequently enough used expression that it's cool for Commons. (Just FTR, that file in all of its presumable copyright violation is transcluded on Benzoyl's user page, unlike the deletion requests linked in bad faith here.) Hijiri88 (talk) 02:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: FOP. --JuTa 22:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
[[Category:]]
File:The Royal Prison and the St. Sophie Church, Altstadt, Dresden, Saxony, Germany-LCCN2002720568.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Adam Cuerden as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low-res JPEG copy of File:Dresden. Zwinger & Sophienkirche. - Detroit Publishing Co. - Original LoC scan.tif. Our thumbnailer can generate JPEG copies of TIFFs at arbitrary sizes.
- Pointy speedy request, consensus exists to maintain both formats for these collections. Fæ (talk) 11:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Actually, I need to ask this: Why was this created a whole year after the TIFF it's connected to, under a different filename, but was never even linked from that TIFF until four years later, literally three weeks ago? If these are important to maintain, what is up with the history of it? Several other JPEGs derived from the TIFF exist, most with improvements; what makes this one valuable? Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 22:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
E semnatura personala si nu mai vreau sa fie disponibila pe site-ul vostru . Raul Bribete (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work of the uploader as claimed. --JuTa 22:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 22:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Raul Bribete nu mai doreste ca fotografia lui sa se afle pe site-ul Wikipedia . Pdadrian (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 22:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, no source. Natuur12 (talk) 20:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
This image is to be replaced with different version and corrected date. Swarren16 (talk) 21:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. --JuTa 22:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:ISR-HW-3965.svg which was created following the Israeli government guidelines along with all the other images in the set. Gonnym (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 22:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
