Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/10/01
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
No FOP in France Thesupermat2 (talk) 07:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 10:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|1}} Dubrowinskaja (talk) 11:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|It was accidentally}} Dubrowinskaja (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Puramyun31
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This photo (and cropped version) is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 on Flickr, but it is a magazine cover, so the files should probably be deleted due to improper licensing on Flickr, as the name of the uploader of the file on Flickr isn't even the same as the name of the person who performed the concert photography. Logan Talk Contributions 22:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Deleted: Copyvio Béria Lima msg 20:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Puramyun31 (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
5 photos of Asuka Nishi, Japanese voice actress.
These photos are taken without her consent. (see COM:BLP, COM:CSCR#Japan.) She is requesting they are deleted. (cf. her radio program Asuka Nishi's Delicate Zone #57 8m7s–; official tweets [1][2]) --Waiesu (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per previous discussions, photo of a public figure, taken in a public place during a public event, fall into the COM:CSCR#Japan exceptions. If there's really a legal problem with those pictures, the personality or the producer/agent should contact legal@wikimedia.org instead with some proof. They're also welcome to send us an official picture, see COM:OTRS/ja for more information. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Not in use, doubtful educational value.
— Racconish ☎ 20:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
COM:TOY issues. Lots of stuffed animals that would be copyrightable in the US. Part of a large batch upload. Most were fine or de minimus but these are a little too close for comfort so I'm bringing them here.
Majora (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- Also note that I could not find a CC-BY icon on the source page. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
According to this translation, these images just are screenshots and are not photos taken by the blogger. these uploads are my mistake.
Puramyun31 (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Deleted: Unused. Uploaded recently. DR by uploader request. Speedy G7. --Majora (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No metadata, license laundering is suspected and/or the uploader on lofter is not the copyright owner. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Channel does not exist, unable to verify the official status. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC) partial except 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊 无限循环播放 (秦岚), since the images are from http://peachring.com/weibo/user/5628148368/4283527518323172 Puramyun31 (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
"By your own words, four files in this DR alone are not licensed by their author. The previous DR on this page also shows files that have this problem. Taking those into account, Lofter is untrustworthy for its copyright declaration and metadata must be required for verification. The lack thereof also warrants deletion." : the reason of "The previous DR" as you said is not related to the existance of metadata but I opened the DR just according to blog user's comment, as the reason that is screenshots from a TV program from another site. also don't make the mistake of blanket/hasty generalization of "trustworthiness" of lofter images without talking about "where the images are from another website(s)" for each lofter images. "The channel in question is not verified on Youtube. Merely having the word "official" does not mean this channel is indeed the copyright owner. There is at least one case the YouTube licensing is abused. Until the identity of the channel has been confirmed, the irrevocability of the CC license is irrelevant to the discussion." : the youtube account (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumoYG0Ijzya5vcry8szlzQ, "author" section of the file page) is official account, as per HTML Code of archived TPE48 official website Puramyun31 (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
I had no doubt that the blog owner is the copyright holder of the images in their posts, and no metadata is not sufficient grounds to argue deletion under COM:PCP, as I have an uploaded of a picture I took myself on the English Wikipedia with no metadata other than the program I used to edit it (en:File:FNC Entertainment entrance.jpg). So, as I searched for more conclusive evidence, I was led to a link which redirects to the user's Weibo account. There, I made the unfortunate discovery of the following text: "好多鱼【本博图禁止去logo、商用以及任何形式二改，转载请注明出处。】". Google Translate: "A lot of fish [This blog is forbidden to go to logo, commercial and any form of second change, please indicate the source. 】". I don't understand Chinese, but it seems pretty clear derivatives and commercial use is prohibited. I think this cements the user's credibility as the photographer, but not in the way we needed.
These pictures, as well as some others not found on the Lofter blog, are found on other webpages. COM:PCP can be applied here.
This is based on the blog contents. It is mostly fan art, with an occasional picture. This other photo has a second watermarked, but its unclear of what it says. This might be screenshot (is that a cropped logo in the upper left?). This is mostly a stab at the dark, really... I don't think there's sufficient evidence either way. Lofter is a blog service, so scrutiny should be made by account rather than the site as a whole. We don't call Flickr untrustworthy based solely on the amount of license laudering that goes on there. ℯxplicit 09:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC) @Explicit: according to these searches (1 2 3), "160106 幻城媒体探班" photo themselves don't exist on the weibo blog https://www.weibo.com/rofs0712, so the weibo text does not applicable in this case. Puramyun31 ( talk) 07:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, all but 【TPE48一期生徵選形象歌曲】「向前走」★小花絮③★.webm. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC) |
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Oops, sorry for my mistake. these are accidentally uploaded (using flickr2commons, Flickr tag "新内眞衣")
- File:Nogizaka46 14th Single "Harujion ga Sakukoro" Promotional Posters at Nogizaka Station Shinuchi Mai (25697117994).jpg
- File:Nogizaka46 11th Single "Inochi wa Utsukushii" Promotional Poster at Iidabashi Station Shinuchi Mai (16746281890).jpg
- File:Nogizaka46 Harujionga Sakukoro Autographed CD Booklet (41314036835).jpg
- File:Nogizaka46 2nd Album "Sorezore no Isu" Promotional Event "Nogiten" at Shibuya Tsutaya Shinuchi Mai (27004776750).jpg
- File:Nogizaka46 2nd Album "Sorezore no Isu" Promotional Event "Nogiten" at Shibuya Tsutaya Shinuchi Mai (27183931362).jpg
- File:Nogizaka46 Nogizaka46's Fractal Advertisements at Nogizaka Station Shinuchi Mai (51509135092).jpg
Puramyun31 (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Oops, sorry for my mistake. these are accidentally uploaded.
- File:Comic Market 101 Day 2 Cosplayers (52993407516).jpg
- File:Comic Market 101 Day 2 Cosplayers (52992804472).jpg
- File:Comic Market 101 Day 2 Cosplayers (52993770765).jpg
Puramyun31 (talk) 14:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Not covered by Freedom of Panorama Denniss (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Nonsense. It is an official memorial, integrated into a bus stop as a creative means. You, sir, have no idea of what you are talking about. --188.192.204.89 22:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep Of course it is (it is located in Berlin, Germany). Why should it not be? Read de:Panoramafreiheit. If it was not covered by FOP I would not have uploaded it. ;) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- The source image is covered by FOP - no question here. The close zooming in on parts of the image is not covered by FOP and the Eichmann image in question was not made by the exhibition commitee. It's at best of unknown source and has to be deleted. --Denniss (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- German law does not forbid derivative work of this kind. Close zoom-ins of FOP photos are treated just like the source images. It is legal, so there is no reason to delete it. Prove me wrong, if you can. But you can't. --188.192.204.89 22:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- +1. UrhG § 62 Abs. 3 Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- The source image is covered by FOP - no question here. The close zooming in on parts of the image is not covered by FOP and the Eichmann image in question was not made by the exhibition commitee. It's at best of unknown source and has to be deleted. --Denniss (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- FOP allows derivative works of copyrighted images if they are not the main part of the image. Using the memorial as whole is covered by FOP, using the image not if the source is not explicitely stated like coming from Bundesarchiv or other free sources. As an Army/SS image the copyright holder is the photograph who made this image. --Denniss (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- I can find your interpretation nowhere in the text of the law. Will you admit that you are pulling that out of thin air? --188.192.204.89 23:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Once again: please read de:Panoramafreiheit#Deutschland (and the cited law texts therein). It seems you are confusing FOP and de minimis (which would only be relevant if a country does not have FOP). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- No. I'mnot confusing anything here. FoP is an option for a photographer to create (and reuse) images from otherwise copyrighted material if it's permanently placed and accessible by the public. It does not tangle the rights of the creator(s) of the original artwork(s). If you use a FoP work but zoom-in on copyrighted or possible unfree artwork it becomes a derivative work and has to be deleted. Let's assume there a FoP object using several reproductions of Picasso paintings. Photographing it as a whole is covered by FoP but zooming-in onto a reproduction of a Picasso painting is a derivative work. --Denniss (talk) 09:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- See also: COM:FOP#The right to modify. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- This photo ("work") is in the public and FOP applies. There is no rule in German FOP law that forbids FOP for photos. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 11:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Lets make it more simple. If somebody uploaded a scan/copy of the original photography of Eichmann (such as en:File:EichmannAdolfSS.jpg), would we let it stay or delete it? The image is claimed to be from 1942. If the photographer was killed on the next day, we would still have to wait until end of 2012 (1942 +70). --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -
butbecause it is not in the FOP. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 11:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC) changed --Saibo (Δ) 23:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)- With "not in the FOP" you refer to the original File:Eichmannreferat BusStop3 2009.jpg? If yes, well, I fear it needs to be, as there is too much copyrighted content in this scene. --Túrelio (talk) 11:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- With no in FOP I refer to the file you asked about: en:File:EichmannAdolfSS.jpg Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- With "not in the FOP" you refer to the original File:Eichmannreferat BusStop3 2009.jpg? If yes, well, I fear it needs to be, as there is too much copyrighted content in this scene. --Túrelio (talk) 11:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
This entire discussion is useless. German law is clear: If a copyrighted work - both three-dimensional or two-dimensional - is part of something that is permanently on display in a public space or even only visible from public space, you can take photos of it, produce derivative work of it (including zoom-ins) and also publish the resulting photos. Why do certain people here at Commons not understand this simple principle? Why should anyone bother and upload a perfectly legal image file here instead of uploading it locally with Wikipedia, if the risk of deletion out of ignorance is so high? --188.192.204.89 13:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, seems to be not so clear or at least not undisputed, if you read this recent expert assessment by a law-office in Germany (see 3.b.), asked for by Wikimedia Germany. To be sure, IANAL, but the situation seems to be less clear than we would like to have it. --Túrelio (talk) 14:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The "expert assessment" you've liked to does not contain "panoramafreiheit". And if it does: please cite the paragraph. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Den Miniaturhinweis auf 3b habe ich überlesen. --Saibo (Δ) 00:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)- Mag sein, dass es nicht ganz klar ist. Aber die grundsätzlichen Probleme sind nicht bei deisem Bild sondern global in Commons zu diskutieren - wenn du meinst das das so ist. Das Gutachten scheint mir reichlich ungenau zu sein. Etwa: "Eine Lizenzierung unter einer Creative Commons-Lizenz, die die Bearbeitung des Fotos gestattet (z.B. CC BY – SA), ist hingegen nicht möglich ..." Toller Satz - irgendwas kann in ihm nicht stimmen (etwa, dass sie die CC-Lizenzen nicht verstanden haben), wenn sie Ahnung von der WP haben (wo ausschließlich Lizenzen verwendet werden, die ausdrücklich Bearbeitungen erlauben) oder sie haben keine Ahnung von der WP, was auch schlecht ist. Kurzum: das Gutachten scheint mir irrelevant zu sein, da unklar geschrieben oder einfach mit Unkenntnis erstellt. Zum Schlechtachten siehe auch: de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Urheberrechtsfragen/Hausrecht und gemeinfreie Werke Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oder, Achtung Überraschung, Option drei: Sie haben Ahnung von der Lizenz und Wikipedia, halten es aber für eine eher schlechte Idee, ihre rechtliche Einschätzung davon abhängig zu machen, welche Lizenzen in Wikipedia verwendet werden. Aber klar, es ist natürlich auch sehr schön, Leuten "keine Ahnung" zu unterstellen und das Gutachten erstmal ein paar lustigen Wortspielereien zu unterziehen. —Pill (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Der Sinn des Gutachtens ist doch der Wikipedia zu helfen (wofür sicher ordentlich bezahlt wurde - monetär und mit Werbung für die Kanzlei in der Wikipedia) - mit der Aussage im Gutachten ist das (aus welchem Grund auch immer) verfehlt. Disclaimer: Mag sein, dass ich etwas übersehe oder falsch interpretiere. ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oder, Achtung Überraschung, Option drei: Sie haben Ahnung von der Lizenz und Wikipedia, halten es aber für eine eher schlechte Idee, ihre rechtliche Einschätzung davon abhängig zu machen, welche Lizenzen in Wikipedia verwendet werden. Aber klar, es ist natürlich auch sehr schön, Leuten "keine Ahnung" zu unterstellen und das Gutachten erstmal ein paar lustigen Wortspielereien zu unterziehen. —Pill (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Da ein Großteil hier Deutsch spricht: Panoramafreiheit gibt uns das Recht das zu fotografieren. Ich seh grundsätzlich folgende Punkte:
- Panoramafreiheit dieses Bildes: ist das Bild selbst legal dort abgebildet? Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass diese Werbetafeln rechtlich legal sind, dann müsste für das Foto selbst ja auch ein Nutzungsvereinbarung vorliegen, die das permanente Zeigen auf öffentlichem Grund erlaubt. Somit musste der Lizenzgeber auch Nutzungen durch die Panoramafreiheit dann hinnehmen. Oder gibt es hier noch andere Möglichkeiten, solch ein Bild zu verwenden?
- Dann ebenfalls noch eingeworfen wurde §62 UrhG sowie das Rechtsgutachten, welches Veränderungen des Werkes nicht gestatten. Das stimmt zunächst, doch scheint es mir hier falsch ausgelegt zu werden. Zunächst §62: „Soweit nach den Bestimmungen dieses Abschnitts die Benutzung eines Werkes zulässig ist, dürfen Änderungen an dem Werk nicht vorgenommen werden.“ Damit wird hier argumentiert, dass man an dem Foto nichts verändern dürfte, damit legt man das aber falsch aus. Denn: nach Teil 1 des Satzes dürfen wir ein Werk benutzen, das ist hier die "Schautafel-Bushaltestelle". Teil zwei des Satzes beruft sich auf das Werk (i.S.v. dieses Werk). Also auf das gleiche Werk wie in der ersten Satzhälfte. Legen wir den Gesetzeslaut vom Allgemeinen in das konkrete um, so kommt folgendes raus: „Soweit nach den Bestimmungen dieses Abschnitts die Benutzung der Schautafel-Bushaltestelle zulässig ist, dürfen Änderungen an der Schautafel-Bushaltestelle nicht vorgenommen werden.“ Ich hoffe es wird klar: es wird verboten, die Schautafel in ihrer Abbildung zu verändern. Das wird hier aber nicht gemacht, die Tafel bleibt gleich, wir vergrößern nur einen Ausschnitt. Zu gleichem Schluss kommt man auch, wenn man das Rechtsgutachten, was Túrelio einwarf, in genau jenem von ihm genannten Abschnitt anschaut: „da § 59 UrhG keine Bearbeitung des abgebildeten Werkes gestattet, so dass z.B. Fotomontagen mit Abbildungen von urheberrechtlich geschützten Gebäuden unzulässig sind.“ Hier wird eindeutig auf Fotomontagen verwiesen, also veränderte Darstellungen des Gegenstandes, die das geschützte Werk (hier die Tafel mit den Abbildungen) so darstellen, wie sie real nicht sichtbar sind. Es gab da mal ein ähnliches Urteil zu einer Skulptur, die farbig eingefärbt wurde (in regelmäßigen Abständen). Die durfte man auch darstellen. Jemand hat dann aber mal einfach eine Nikolaus-Version gemacht (die es nie gab), das aber wiederum war verboten, weil man es nie so sah. Kurz wird es in de:Panoramafreiheit#Entstellung_und_Bearbeitung_des_Werks und in de:Holbeinpferd#Rechtsstreit_um_Postkarten erwähnt.
Solange also man nicht davon ausgeht, dass die Infotafel an sich illegal ist (Punkt 1), so kann man das Foto hier benutzen. --Quedel (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Schön auf den Punkt gebracht. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 07:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Denniss's own interpretation of German copyright is indeed only his own, and is not shared by anyone else I know of, let alone by any of the literature. Finding a suitable detail and photograph angle does not equal creating a derivative work from the original. Otherwise, the whole concept of FOP would be nonsense. Hence, keep without any doubt. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 13:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)—
I think it's fair to assume that this zoom-in version is fine. While I wouldn't consider the DR itself nonsensial or absurd, as some seem to suggest, I don't find Denniss' argument particularly convincing. The reason is that it is already legitimate to create a photograph of (only) Mr. Eichmann's portrait as displayed on the information board. The reason here is that the portrait is a work of its own, thus FOP would equally apply (note that, in the case of photographs, the restrictions Denniss and Quedel describe serve to protect the creator of a [displayed] work from inacceptable modifications of this work as shown in an "FOP image" of this work -- you cannot infringe these restrictions if you take a photograph of the original work and do not modify this photograph at all). But if we assume then for a moment that Denniss is right this would lead to the contradiction that while it would be acceptable to publish a photo of A, it would not be acceptable to take a picture of B and A and then removing B before publication. This would, however, for no apparent reason lead to the different treatment of an entirely identical work (i.e. the resulting photograph of a photograph) depending on how it was produced. (Let me add that the only thing I'm not sure about at first glance is whether the (original) photograph does really comply with FOP (frankly, it doesn't look particularly "bleibend" to my eyes ...), but as I have no clue about that, in my comment I just, as you seem to do, assumed it to be a permanently installed information board (which it probably is anyway, given the location, but I don't know).) Best wishes, —Pill (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: German FOP is very broad -- "works" -- without limitation, may be copied. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Heinrich Hoffmann photo that isn't public domain in its source country. See File:Adolf Eichmann (1942).jpg. Christoph Braun (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hast Du mitbekommen, dass es sich um einen Zuschnitt aus File:Eichmannreferat BusStop3 2009.jpg handelt, welches von der Panoramafreiheit gedeckt ist? -- Rillke(q?) 18:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I did. As we have seen in the first RfD, the argument to keep the image is entirely based on Germany's FoP. While I do not object the prevailing interpretation of Germany's FoP in principle, I have doubts about the image's compliance with our current licencing policy.
- Per Commons:Licensing "[a]ll copyrighted material on Commons must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose [...]", furthermore Wikimedia Commons only accepts media "that are explicitly freely licensed, or that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work."
- The current use of {{PD-Old}} doesn't really make sense in this context. Neither Sargoth, Der Bischof mit der E-Gitarre nor Heinrich Hoffmann comply with 70 years PMA. Therefore I propose to remove {{PD-Old}}.
- AFAIK there is no reliable case about the interaction of FoP and free licences (especially Creative Commons licences). The image in question is a further derivative work per COM:FOP (which is neither official policy nor guideline).
- Quedel pointed out that unrestricted editing wouldn't be possible (referring to §§ 59 and 62 UrhG), which IMHO contradicts the applied CC licence: Per Section 3. b) of CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported the licensor grants the right "to create and Reproduce Adaptations provided that any such Adaptation, including any translation in any medium, takes reasonable steps to clearly label, demarcate or otherwise identify that changes were made to the original Work." If there are restrictions to the creation and reproduction of adaptions, the licensor would be unable to grant this right in the first place.
- Conclusion: A frictionless interaction of Germany's FoP provision and free licences seems unlikely without reliable cases or legal comments. Independant of this RfD's conclusion: an improvement in re-user communication is due.
- Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the detailed explanation. -- Rillke(q?) 22:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Ridiculous. If we delete this one on these dubious grounds, we have to delete every single of our thousands and thousands FOP images from Germany (pretty much all public art and all modern architecture), plus all images of living people (since personality rights apply and hence the images cannot be altered as freely as one could imagine). Keep --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Bearbeitungskonflikt: Wollte gerade Nonsense schreiben und das gleiche Argument wie Andreas anführen. Nun halt auf deutsch: behalten und den Troll verwarnen --Historiograf (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please note that Creative Commons licenses do not waive or otherwise affect rights of privacy or publicity to the extent they apply. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete - German FOP requires that a work is permanently placed in the public; menaing the work's more or less "lifetime". Such posters/billboards in bus stops are exchanged after a while (mosty after some months); such works are not covered by FOP. In this specific case the original picture shows the bus stop as main subject - with some goodwill, the Eichmann poster can be seen as inevitable "accessory". While the crop is not an "accessory", thus not covered by FOP - especially not in regard to derivates of a protected original work. --Martina talk 18:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)/18:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Strong objection to the last statement. This is not a poster at a bus stop, but an official, permanent memorial, integrated in a bus stop in Berlin. rgds --h-stt !? 10:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- keep. FoP in Germany is a broad limitation of copyright, this memorial is public and permanent. Therefore it is covered by German FoP. We can and should use the picture. Or ask a Berlin Wikpedian to take a new better one with the cropped part in question at the center and in better resolution. rgds --h-stt !? 10:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- It is not a memorial but a simple bus stop. Posters/Billboards are exchanged after a while, and do not stay permanently in the public. --Martina talk 12:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- This is a memorial, permanent since 1998, when it was erected. The bus stop stands in front of the building that once hosted the infamous "Judenreferat Berlin", the agency where Eichmann worked. And it is covered by German FoP. rgds --h-stt !? 16:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- It is not a memorial but a simple bus stop. Posters/Billboards are exchanged after a while, and do not stay permanently in the public. --Martina talk 12:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
This is apparently a permanent installation, which would mean that it satisfies German FOP rules -FASTILY 22:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
The image added 04:06, March 26, 2016 is not from the bus stop, and needs to be removed, as it is not released under the stated license. Diannaa (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Diannaa, why would this image be under copyright? Is it not an official (government) image of him? SarahSV (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Government documents are PD in the United States, but not in all countries. Canada for example has no such rule. And we don't know if it's an official government document. This page at the USHMM credits the image to "DIZ Muenchen GMBH, Sueddeutscher Verlag Bilderdienst", ie. a German publishing house. The image may be in the public domain in the US and UK as seized enemy property, but we have no proof of that. I can't find it at NARA or the Library of Congress. Given that there's no proof it's in the public domain, we have to assume that it's not. Diannaa (talk) 22:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep FoP in Germany. --Ralf Roleček
22:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Пам'ятник_поету,_письменнику_Олександрові_Пушкіну.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1942.jpg){kind=link}
_JPG.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_location_map.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%E5%8F%AA%E8%83%BD%E5%AF%84%E5%87%A0%E6%89%BE%E7%B3%96%E5%90%83%E4%BA%86_%E9%82%A3%E5%A4%A9%E7%9C%8B%E6%AF%94%E8%B5%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E5%80%99%E5%B0%B1%E8%A7%89%E5%BE%97%E8%BF%99%E4%BF%A9%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%9E%E6%8E%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%94%BB%E9%9D%A2%E5%8F%AF%E4%BB%A5%E5%BD%93%E4%B8%AA%E6%83%85%E5%A4%B4%E4%BA%86_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E5%8F%AA%E8%83%BD%E5%AF%84%E5%87%A0%E6%89%BE%E7%B3%96%E5%90%83%E4%BA%86_%E9%82%A3%E5%A4%A9%E7%9C%8B%E6%AF%94%E8%B5%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E5%80%99%E5%B0%B1%E8%A7%89%E5%BE%97%E8%BF%99%E4%BF%A9%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%9E%E6%8E%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%94%BB%E9%9D%A2%E5%8F%AF%E4%BB%A5%E5%BD%93%E4%B8%AA%E6%83%85%E5%A4%B4%E4%BA%86_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E5%8F%AA%E8%83%BD%E5%AF%84%E5%87%A0%E6%89%BE%E7%B3%96%E5%90%83%E4%BA%86_%E9%82%A3%E5%A4%A9%E7%9C%8B%E6%AF%94%E8%B5%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E5%80%99%E5%B0%B1%E8%A7%89%E5%BE%97%E8%BF%99%E4%BF%A9%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%9E%E6%8E%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%94%BB%E9%9D%A2%E5%8F%AF%E4%BB%A5%E5%BD%93%E4%B8%AA%E6%83%85%E5%A4%B4%E4%BA%86_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E5%8F%AA%E8%83%BD%E5%AF%84%E5%87%A0%E6%89%BE%E7%B3%96%E5%90%83%E4%BA%86_%E9%82%A3%E5%A4%A9%E7%9C%8B%E6%AF%94%E8%B5%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E5%80%99%E5%B0%B1%E8%A7%89%E5%BE%97%E8%BF%99%E4%BF%A9%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%9E%E6%8E%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%94%BB%E9%9D%A2%E5%8F%AF%E4%BB%A5%E5%BD%93%E4%B8%AA%E6%83%85%E5%A4%B4%E4%BA%86_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: kept the file, reverted to the last version that was actually excerpted from the FoP photo and hid the version from another source that was uploaded over the earlier versions. --Rosenzweig τ 00:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
The file comes from Facebook, deciding by FBMD... in beginning of special instructiions field of metadata. Previously published files need OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new version with the original metadata. QuinteroP (talk) 20:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, QuinteroP proved own work, uploading bigger version with EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://chimiephysique.net/images/site/ChimieUniversitaire/generale/1-ATOMISTIQUE1.pdf Reda benkhadra (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:40, 1 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://chimiephysique.net/images/site/ChimieUniversitaire/generale/1-ATOMISTIQUE1.pdf --Krdbot 01:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. THIS VIDEO IS JUST FOR FUN. No copyright infringement intended. All rights to clips and music belong to their respective owners.respective owners. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 21:48, 1 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
дефект изображения Alexandronikos (talk) 07:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VenkateshMgna (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Bollywood Hungama watermarks.
- File:Rashmika at South-Indian-International-Movie-Awards.jpg
- File:Rashmika at Filmfare-Awards-South-2018.jpg
- File:Nayantara at siima 2013.jpg
Hello this file is Origanally posted to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/south-indian-international-movie-awards-2013-day-2/south-indian-international-movie-awards-2013-day-2-27/ you can also see the watermark. Plz remove this from nomination deletion request.
- File:Nani at South-Indian-International-Movie-Awards-.jpg
- File:Nayantara at SIIMA-in-Abu-Dhabi.jpg
- File:Sudheer Babu SIIMA-2016-finale-in-Singapore-12.jpg
- File:Sudheer Babu at SIIMA-Awards-2018-2.jpg
This photo was also was first posted to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/celebs-grace-siima-awards-2018/celebs-grace-siima-awards-2018-2/ you can also see the watermark, how could nominate after seeing the watermark too?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VenkateshMgna (talk • contribs) 05:00, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, but deleted two as copyvio. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 15:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- According to French Wikipedia page of Hôtel de la Bessière, it was built in the 16th Century. Plaque commemorating Georges Bernanos (died 1948) is shown in the picture but is de minimis. Also seems reasonable that uploader was the photographer even if they didn't put any information on the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 01:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Cet hôtel est réertorié dans la base Mérimée du ministère de la culture de France sous référence PA00106476 et date de la fin du XVI http://www2.culture.gouv.fr/public/mistral/merimee_fr?ACTION=CHERCHER&FIELD_1=REF&VALUE_1=PA00106476. J'ai été arrêté par le fait que la procédure d'introduction de sphotos sur Commons a été modifiée at je ne retrouve plus la marche à suivre pour ajouter davantage. Pouvez-vous m'aider techniquement. Cordialement Mortier.Daniel (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, I added the missing data, everything seems OK. Ji-Elle (talk) 06:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Cet hôtel est réertorié dans la base Mérimée du ministère de la culture de France sous référence PA00106476 et date de la fin du XVI http://www2.culture.gouv.fr/public/mistral/merimee_fr?ACTION=CHERCHER&FIELD_1=REF&VALUE_1=PA00106476. J'ai été arrêté par le fait que la procédure d'introduction de sphotos sur Commons a été modifiée at je ne retrouve plus la marche à suivre pour ajouter davantage. Pouvez-vous m'aider techniquement. Cordialement Mortier.Daniel (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
created with a typo in the title; my apologies... GeXeS (talk) 16:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please consider speedy deletion for future cases. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Weißer Rand. Ersetzt durch File:Michel Garnier The Letter Minneapolis Institute of Arts,jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 03:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion). --Yann (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
I wish to delete this pdf, because all I needed was the jpeg, and this is only a crop from Hasse A. Hammelsmith (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 07:18, 3 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 18:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Osanemeterio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:PRP. All the uploads from this user has been already deleted as they were blatant copyright violations. Although I haven't been able to find the source of the remaining ones, it's pretty clear this user uploads content from the Internet claiming ownership
Discasto talk 10:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination The images have been sourced and license reviewed. --Discasto talk 21:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept. Per nom. Strakhov (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Fop in France Thesupermat2 (talk) 07:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 11:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Probable copyright violation from the admitted source: https://ilcentrostoricodiagrigentoag.jimdo.com/. The site states its content is copyrighted. Acabashi (talk) 10:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this image then found one that was better framed. Classicalwiks (talk) 06:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:43, 4 Oktober 2018 UTC: No permission since 26 September 2018 --Krdbot 19:07, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
out of known scope --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:51, 6 Oktober 2018 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 13:04, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrong upload Saeedmoj (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:42, 6 Oktober 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:04, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrong upload Saeedmoj (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:45, 6 Oktober 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:04, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo already present in many website before the uploading. Website under copyright. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:13, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation from the admitted source: https://ilcentrostoricodiagrigentoag.jimdo.com/. The site states its content is copyrighted. Acabashi (talk) 10:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 12:26, 7 Oktober 2018 UTC: Broken redirect --Krdbot 19:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
good is not AzadshahGanjali (talk) 06:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of page (G7). --Hystrix (talk) 01:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution photos copied from Facebook. The photos were taken in various occasions and have a number of prior uses, for instance on [3] and [4] in August, well before the upload. The uploader might in theory have taken them and be the upstream provider for all those social media posts, but it's far from certain.
- File:Tabella Grotta di Cesare.jpg
- File:Inizio murales.jpg
- File:Vialetto.jpg
- File:Murales Grotta.jpg
- File:Dentro la Grotta.jpg
- File:Inaugurazione Grotta di Cesare.jpg
- File:Fontana Grotta di Cesare.jpg
- File:Interna Grotta.jpg
- File:Viale grotta di Cesare.jpg
- File:Gradini dell'amore 4.jpg
- File:Gradini dell' amore.jpg
- File:Gradini dell'amore.jpg
- File:Gradini dell'amore 3.jpg
Nemo 07:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
good is not AzadshahGanjali (talk) 07:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of page (G7). --Hystrix (talk) 01:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 07:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Uploader has problems with copyright (look his talkpage). I suspect again copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is blurry and quite dark, and it's hard to make out anything meaningful in it. In addition, the description doesn't seem to match what little can be distinguished in the image. Auntof6 (talk) 08:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
good is not AzadshahGanjali (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of page (G7). --Hystrix (talk) 02:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
good is not AzadshahGanjali (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of page (G7). --Hystrix (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
good is not AzadshahGanjali (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of page (G7). --Hystrix (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itshaileshyadav (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Shailesh Yadav Life.jpg
- File:ShaileshYadavq.jpg
- File:ShaileshYadav.jpg
- File:ShaileshYadav1.jpg
- File:Shailesh Si.jpg
- File:Shaileshyadav Jee.jpg
- File:Shailesh Yadav G.jpg
- File:Shailesh122.jpg
- File:Shailesh Yadav 4.jpg
- File:Shailesh yadav3.jpg
- File:Shailesh Yadav2.jpg
- File:Shailesh Yadav.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: File File:Shailesh Yadav.jpg in use on user page. --Hystrix (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Squeebumps (talk · contribs)
[edit]OOS personal artworks by a non-notable artist, unrelated to WLM, misusing WLM and NRHP templates.
- File:Laraine.png
- File:She's like a Rainbow.png
- File:Sun Rise China circa 1969.png
- File:Land of Fire.png
- File:Oh what a night.png
- File:Man In the Corner.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
nonsense image Denniss (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image Denniss (talk) 13:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file + possibly copyrighted Denniss (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 14:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shifra1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos. Out of scope
- File:Abhiruba or joshuva.jpg
- File:Abhiruba the singer.jpg
- File:Abhiruba.jpg
- File:Abhiruba a singer.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 17:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johanvonderwielen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictional rank insignia and heraldry of a made-up "family" (see https://vonderatlantis.org/). Highly unlikely to be used anywhere in any serious Wikimedia project.
- File:136-SWG-Kolonel Generaal.png
- File:135-SWG-Generaal.png
- File:134-SWG-Commandeur Generaal.png
- File:133-SWG-Luitenant Maarschalk.png
- File:132-SWG-Veldmaarschalk.png
- File:131-SWG-Maarschalk.png
- File:130-SWG-Grootmaarschalk.png
- File:129-SWG-Kapitein Maarschalk.png
- File:128-SWG-Kolonel Maarschalk.png
- File:127-SWG-Generaal Maarschalk.png
- File:126-SWG-Rijks Maarschalk.png
- File:125-SWG-President Maarschalk.png
- File:124-SWG-President.png
- File:123-SWG-Rijkspresident.png
- File:122-SWG-Prins.png
- File:121-SWG-Radja.png
- File:120-SWG-Koning.png
- File:119-SWG-Maharadja.png
- File:118-SWG-Tjaar.png
- File:117-SWG-Sultan.png
- File:116-SWG-Sjah.png
- File:115-SWG-Kalief.png
- File:114-SWG-Keizer.png
- File:113-SWG-Khan.png
- File:111-SWG-Paus.png
- File:112-SWG-Vicaris Paus.png
- File:110-SWG-Kalief Paus.png
- File:109-SWG-Rhan.png
- File:108-SWG-Wereldvicepresident.png
- File:107-SWG-Wereldpresident.png
- File:106-SWG-Wereldkoning.png
- File:105-SWG-Wereldkeizer.png
- File:104-SWG-President Pauw.png
- File:102-SWG-Pauw.png
- File:103-SWG-Keizer Pauw.png
- File:100-SWG-Kroon.png
- File:Familie von der Atlantis mitt text groot formaat.jpg
- File:Familievlag von Habsburg mit Familie waffen von der Atlantis Familie.jpg
HyperGaruda (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamrohitkushwaha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:India's Soar Entertainment).
- File:India's Soar Entertainment New Logo.jpg
- File:Kaise Vidai Kari 'RS RAJ YADAV' " India's Soar Entertainment".png
- File:Parvat Par Niwas Karelu 'RS Raj Yaday' " India's Soar Entertainment".png
- File:Lalbaughcha Raja 2018 " India's Soar Entertainment".png
- File:Jai Kaara Laga La "RS Raj Yadav" India's Soar Entertainment.png
- File:Visiting Card Front "India's Soar Entertainment".png
- File:Visiting Card behind "India's Soar Entertainment".png
- File:'India's Soar Entertainment - 2018.jpg'.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamrohitkushwaha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images of no apparent educational value. Commons is not a web host and the user has had similar images deleted before
Herby talk thyme 10:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Jianhui67 T★C 07:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanjosegonzalezmendoza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal photos.
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza, (2015).jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza, (2015)..jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza, (2018)..jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- Edificio.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- ciudad en la playa.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- Machu picchu.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- ciudad medieval.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- New York.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza (2014) 2.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza (2014).jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- Casa azul.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza (2015).jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza- museo ruso.jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza (2018).jpg
- File:Juan Jose Gonzalez Mendoza.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Фотография пожара на заводе из архива ведомственного музея Профессионального училища №4, бывшего ремесленного училища.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work. Insider (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
"если бы Вы выразили своё мнение о нём на его странице." - так и не поняла, где именно выразить, сделаю это здесь.
Выложенное фото сделано лично мной в ведомственном музее с разрешения сотрудника музея и имеет, на мой взгляд, некоторую историческую ценность, так как сам музей вряд ли сподвигнется оцифровать и выложить в ближайшем будущем свои архивы. Как и все ведомственные музеи, он не особо посещаем и развиваем. Кто снимал сам пожар, к сожалению, не известно. Возможно, съемка этого фото в составе композиции моей фотографии нарушает чьи-то авторские права. Не сильна в этом. Фотография была сделана и выложена исходя из ее полезности. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoshkaLaoska (talk • contribs) 14:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Да, именно так. Фотография нарушает авторские права авторов оригинальных работ. --Insider (talk) 06:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't think this is own work. See higher resolution image here from Getty images Wouter (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:33, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Unauthorised use of assets from The Isle video game
[edit]- File:The Stomping Land Dinosaurs + animations (.c4d) Tyrannosaurus 4.png
- File:The Stomping Land Dinosaurs + animations (.c4d) Tyrannosaurus 5.png
- File:The Stomping Land Dinosaurs + animations (.c4d) Tyrannosaurus 6.png
- File:The Stomping Land Dinosaurs + animations (.c4d) Tyrannosaurus 7.png
- File:The Stomping Land Dinosaurs + animations (.c4d) Tyrannosaurus 8.png
- File:The Stomping Land Dinosaurs + animations (.c4d) Tyrannosaurus 9.png
_Tyrannosaurus_4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tyrannosaurus_5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tyrannosaurus_6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tyrannosaurus_7.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tyrannosaurus_8.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tyrannosaurus_9.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This is an unauthorised use of assets taken from The Isle video game (formerly The Stomping Land). They also incorrectly have CC Attribution 3.0 licenses -- Monsieur X (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dinaraalieva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dinaraalieva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and video disc artwork. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Anton Zemlyanoy Alieva 3070.jpg
- File:Dinara Alieva .jpg
- File:Anton Zemlyanoy Alieva 2018.jpg
- File:Requiem DVD (Cover-Booklet Design- Nana Alieva).pdf
- File:DISC- DVD.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daviddenmark (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:LaxTRHEATY.jpg
- File:Lax 04S.jpg
- File:Lax 09S.jpg
- File:Lax 10S.jpg
- File:Lax 13S.jpg
- File:Lax 07S.jpg
- File:Lax 14S.png
all these photos can be found on http://www.heraldica.com or http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/lax
for more information on licicing see: Commons:Licensing
--Wvdp (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please include:
- The image is a fragment of the Bayeux Tapestry, likely copied from somewhere despite the claimed "own work" (exact same horizontal cut as File:Odo_bayeux_tapestry.png) with no relationship whatsoever with any "Lax", just like the "peace treaty" is SurnameDB's "surname scroll", printed and sold on request, and the rings "preserved in the castle of Durham" are signets sold by Heraldica. The uploader appears to have a fundamental disrespect for the purposes of this project. -- Rojelio (talk) 20:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
I think it is a copyrighted image taken from the Federatia Romana de Rugby website. See original file here: https://images.google.ro/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Ffrr.ro%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2FIMG_4503melniciucMarianBurlacu.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ffrr.ro%2F2016%2F02%2F06%2Fovidiu-melniciuc-este-singurul-reprezentant-al-universitatii-cluj-in-grupul-de-23-de-jucatori-cu-care-romania-va-infrunta-portugalia%2F&docid=aSqdKLxjUtsbuM&tbnid=Lsr6tt4cU3tYGM%3A&vet=1&w=800&h=539&itg=1&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim Gabinho (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image it is a copyrighted image taken from the Romanian SuperLiga website. Gabinho (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
COM:PENIS Ronhjones (Talk) 18:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
I think this image is copyrighted. See original source here: https://www.world.rugby/news/24892 Gabinho (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image represents a copyrighted logo of an organization. Logos are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. See the guidelines here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Gabinho (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image represents a copyrighted logo of an organization. Logos are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. See the guidelines here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Gabinho (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image represents a copyrighted logo of an organization. Logos are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. See the guidelines here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Gabinho (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image represents a copyrighted logo of an organization. Logos are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. See the guidelines here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Gabinho (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This image represents a copyrighted logo of an organization. Logos are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. See the guidelines here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses Gabinho (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Stock image of low res, identical to this user's other uploads in these regards. ɱ (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Also listing:
- File:Golden Gate Bridge My View of it.jpg
- File:THE DOME.jpg
- File:Mt. Rushmore The front side.jpg
- File:New York, Statue of Liberty.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Ɱ: please use COM:VFC to make proper mass DRs. Sealle (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arvindmistry007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. DPC (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
COM:PENIS Ronhjones (Talk) 17:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
File has .svg suffix but redirects to a .png image. No incoming links, so this isn't likely used so let's delete before it might be. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 19:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
there is no permission for the screenshot of the software. and it features a big copywritten photo Wvdp (talk) 11:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
likely copyvio, proshot image with no proper sourcing, single interest user with only 1 other upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 11:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a concern. I've worked on Wikipedia articles about Prabhupada and ISKCON in relation to George Harrison and the Beatles, and have found that the organisation (ISKCON) venerate their founder to such an extent that they're happy to have the content out there – I don't think Commons or Wikipedia run any risk relating to copyvio. While I was writing and expanding those articles, a devotee got in touch and offered to provide a couple of free images of the Radha Krishna Temple singers, who recorded for the Beatles' Apple record label in 1969–70. The only stumbling block there, I gathered, was that copyright might have been jointly owned by Apple Records, so it wouldn't have been the work of a moment, by any means, to get the pictures released into PD. JG66 (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, proshot image with no proper sourcing, single interest user with only 1 other upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 11:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Own work? Missing metadata, small resolution
Hystrix (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: self-published paper Mys_721tx (talk) 21:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurred, bad quality better image .jpg){kind=small}
Z thomas 08:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of WM scope: reverse image search shows only the uploader and another Leninist called rennschnizzel use this pic, not a single Anarcho-Communist does Jhartmann (talk) 11:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
This is clearly a personal attack rather than an actual complaint for the symbol. This user has called me (the uploader) names and told me to "fuck off" on Wikipedia; they clearly have some sort of grudge. Take everything they say with a massive grain of salt. Even if their argument about the symbol were valid, Wikimedia Commons is home to hundreds of self-made symbols that have no actual usage. Overall, this request for deletion is based on nothing. DiegoAma (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
somewhat blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
somewhat blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
somewhat blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry image, superior alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too blurred to be useful in any Wikimedia context Chris j wood (talk) 14:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moud hosny (talk · contribs)
[edit]For the logos:
Unused, out of COM:SCOPE, if useful license must be fixed.
For the photographs:
Files found on other websites, user has a history of copyvios. Delete per COM:PCP
- File:فاطمة شلبي.jpg
- File:الشيخ احمد عبدالله العويفي.jpg
- File:غلاف العدد 118 من مجلة الباحة.png
- File:صورة مبنى غرفة الباحة.jpg
- File:لوجو ديزاين.jpg
- File:لوجو مجلة ديزاين جايد.png
- File:لوجو مجلة البورصة والاقتصاد.jpg
- File:لوجو مجلة سعودي موتورز.jpg
- File:لوجو مجلة موبايل ترند.jpg
- File:فكرة للطباعة و النشر.jpg
--Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
dear --Steinsplitter why you put my files to be deleted ? thank you
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
INeverCry why ???????
Files uploaded by Moud hosny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Any reason to be public domain in Egypt yey.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Scan of a Newsweek cover. It's from 1976, so not sure if the painting on the cover is public domain (for failing to comply with copyright formailities) but it would need to be demonstrated to be PD. B (talk) 19:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Dear User: B/B: Patty Hearst Newsweek Magazine cover, March 1, 1976 belongs on Wikipedia.org with the same right as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Newsweek_decline.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.102.74.23 (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @204.102.74.23: That image is used under a claim of fair use. Commons does not accept images used under a claim of fair use. If it meets with Wikipedia's non-free content policy, then it can be uploaded there and added to an article ... but as of right now, it's not used anywhere. --B (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete it may be usable at en:Patty Hearst under a claim of fair use with a proper rationale, but there isn't enough evidence to show that it's free enough for Commons. In order to be public domain, it had to have been published without a copyright notice, but it seems unlikely that a major news magazine would have failed to put a copyright notice in their publication. The onus is on the uploader to prove that if that want to make a public domain claim. If it's not public domain and the copyright holder (either the painter named, Burt Silverman, or Newsweek, if it was a work-for-hire) is willing to freely license the image, permission should be provided through COM:OTRS. clpo13(talk) 15:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Clpo13 & B. Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
A screenshot is not your own work - it's a derivative work of whatever website or app this is B (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helmut Wendt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Misstrauensantrag.pdf
- File:Anfrage von H.W.png
- File:Überfall auf Nationalsozialisten.png
- File:Wahlausgang.png
- File:Heinrich Wagner.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Данило Галицький, Тернопіль.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник князю Данилові Галицькому.jpg
- File:Моя Тернопільщина Місто507.jpg
- File:Площадь Свободы в Тернополе.jpg
- File:Тернопіль, Майдан Волі, Пам'ятник князю Данилові Галицькому.jpg
- File:Тернопіль, Пам'ятник князю Данилові Галицькому, Майдан Волі.jpg
- File:Украина, Тернополь - Костел доминиканцев 02.jpg
- File:Церква Непорочного Зачаття Пресвятої Діви Марії 3.jpg
- File:Д. Галицький.jpg
- File:Майдан волі. Пам'ятник Д. Галицькому у Тернополі.jpg
- File:P1410054 Майдан Волі.jpg
- File:61-101-0004 Ternopil DSC 9180.jpg
- File:61-101-0239 DSC 9811 Ternopil.jpg
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2002. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valerio5000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- File:Rohaj.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- File:Event by.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Unused photo. Apparently depicts the uploader himself, so likely a copyright violation. B (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fan-made, non-official covers. out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Elhijodelalegenda27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravi Shyam giri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE Personal photos.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravi Shyam giri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Wrong upload Saeedmoj (talk) 21:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrong upload Saeedmoj (talk) 21:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Saeedmoj: Please explain what you mean by "wrong upload". 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of Huawei's Android UI, which is a non-free software. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:29, 10 Oktober 2018 UTC: This image is a screenshot of a non-free program or other copyrighted material. Although the image may be usable in certain circumstances under the doctrine of fair use, fair use claims are never allowed on Commons: see COM:FU. This file may be deleted without further notice.
Note: If the screenshot shows a program or other material that is itself under a free license like GPL, please indicate this with the {{ --Krdbot 00:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
clearly photoshopped from this photo. [5] No metadata. Domdeparis (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It looks like a press photo [6] and needs clearer permission. --whym (talk) 01:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
No Bollywood Hungama watermarks. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Not taken in India, so permission is not valid. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
And also
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2040. No Permission from the sculptor Олександр Маляр. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission from the sculptors Макар Вронський, Олексій Олійник, Олександр Скобліков. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission from the sculptors Макар Вронський, Олексій Олійник, Олександр Скобліков. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission from the sculptors Макар Вронський, Олексій Олійник, Олександр Скобліков. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission from the sculptors Макар Вронський, Олексій Олійник, Олександр Скобліков. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83,_%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%83_%D0%9E%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%96_%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%83.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83,_%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%83_%D0%9E%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%96_%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%83.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission from the sculptors Макар Вронський, Олексій Олійник, Олександр Скобліков. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1982. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Невеселий. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
And also File:61-101-0228 DSC 9784 Ternopil.jpg
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1982. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Невеселий. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Тернопіль, вул. Грушевського, Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Шевченку.jpg
[edit]
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1982. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Невеселий. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of Huawei's Android UI, which is a non-free software. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Twitter and snapchat logo is copyrighted. Not de minimis. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Apparently scanned from a funeral program. No indication what the original source is or that the license is valid. B (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Twitter logo is copyrighted. Not de minimis, since it is included intentionally. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. Article deleted in June en:DJ_Quest_GH_(DJ). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The Flickr account uploads has wildly inconsistent metadata. Flickr laundering is suspected. Mys_721tx (talk) 04:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Apparently taken from here (http://www.wrk.ru/forums/attachment.php?item=955729) (#18.09.2018 13:02). The watermark was removed, and the file uploaded here shows manipulation on that corner. Strakhov (talk) 17:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Info:
- This image seems not to be derived from the image linked above: The watermark has not been removed (check fotoforensics.com) but been added there, reduced # of colors there, different software, different histograms.
- Per EXIF it is a print scan, so original source & copyright status are unknown.
- The flickr uploader TGuruAvinash is not trustworthy. Most (if not all) of their flickr uploads seem to be not own work but grabbed from the web.
--Achim (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
wrong PD, Rudolf Ortner died 1997 Goesseln (talk) 08:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks like a copyrighted museum sign artwork. FunkMonk (talk) 20:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Hubei Travel Passenger Bus and roundabout in former campus of Huanggang Normal University.jpg
[edit]
It seems something went wrong. I can't find the picture uploaded. そらみみ (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep OMG...this photo is here. I find it just after I added this deletion request. I think it's OK now.そらみみ (talk) 13:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 08:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Unclear status. Proof ? TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Not PD-Japan-film. — Racconish 💬 08:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrightable text. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Fine for it to be deleted - DougRM — Preceding unsigned comment added by DougRM (talk • contribs) 17:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in France, though I am not sure if it applies since it is a UN building. Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Replicat SanCarll (talk) 23:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:48, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Stadium rendering published elsewhere before Commons, requires OTRS ticket: http://piccinisacm.com/ Ytoyoda (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF data B dash (talk) 02:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment: the small resolution seems consistent with the other Pentax Optio images posted at en:w:User:Kvasir#Photographic Contribution. File:Extraterrestrial-highway.jpg suggests there should be higher resolutions versions somewhere. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Even it is the case, the image was small and unused, also out of scope. --B dash (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by numerous alternatives. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:51, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete per User:47thPennVols opinion that this image might have a questionable copyright status, please see here. Taterian (talk) 04:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Photo was created more than 120 years ago by William Notman & Thomas Campbell. Studio existed until 1880. https://notmansociety.wordpress.com/william-notman-biography/ Abzeronow (talk) 15:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Seconding Abzeronow's opinion.Учхљёная (talk) 15:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC).
Kept: old enough. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete per User:47thPennVols opinion that this image might have a questionable copyright status, please see here. Taterian (talk) 04:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I see no reason to doubt this picture was part of an article from 1905. Abzeronow (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Abzeronow. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Novi Pazar 1944. Mitingu i parë pas Luftë së II Botërore, qytetarët me plisa të bardhë.jpg
[edit]
The uploader did not indicate which publication this comes from and thus there is no way of ascertaining whether or not it is PD. 23 editor (talk) 05:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:53, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The uploader did not indicate which publication this comes from and thus there is no way of ascertaining whether or not it is PD. 23 editor (talk) 05:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:53, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
_1942.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1942.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader did not indicate which publication this comes from and thus there is no way of ascertaining whether or not it is PD. 23 editor (talk) 05:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
_1942.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:53, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
_1942.jpg){kind=link}
The uploader did not indicate which publication this comes from and thus there is no way of ascertaining whether or not it is PD. 23 editor (talk) 05:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:53, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Test page (COM:GCSD) ysjbserver (talk) 08:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Violation de droit d'auteur (la pyramide du Louvres est un bâtiments récents couverts par le droit d'auteur, car l'architecte Ieoh Ming Pei est contemporain . Pierre André (talk) 12:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: pyramid is DM, see for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Need to update the photo Mahesh Chandrakant Chetwani (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Photo of non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hey there. I'm the contributor who took this photo. When you indicate that this is a photo of non-free work, are you referring to the election sign itself? I'd need to be familiarized with the Wikipedia regulations on election signage if that was the case. Thanks, HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC).
- Hi HamOntPoliFiend, Yes, it's the sign. In particular, in this case, the photograph, which is the work of a professional photographer. (The overall design of the sign and the logo could also be considered if they are complex enough to be copyrightable, but in the present case the main element on the sign is the photograph.) This is not specific to election signs. It is the general rule, which applies to any copyrighted works, such as advertisements, murals, etc. For a detailed explanation, you can see the page Commons:De minimis. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:59, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
_JPG.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_JPG.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
_JPG.jpg){kind=link}
R. Schleyer generated the photo originally and "own" the copyright. As stated in the submission of the photo to Wikimedia Commons, I am granting free use to the world community as long as my name (R. Schleyer, M.A.) is cited as the responsible artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Protogonus (talk • contribs) 16:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
_JPG.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: original photographer needs to submit COM:OTRS ticket. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
_JPG.jpg){kind=link}
Imho the unused truncated file cannot even be "saved" by cropping. In this condition it is not suitable to illustrate the depicted object or the topic. It thus falls out of common's scope. Jotzet (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: failed upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete source is File:السيد علي بن فليس.jpg, which is probably a copyright violation itself --Didym (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
accidentally added M.karamat (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo (the NRA button on the back). For that matter, the embroidery of the snake on the front may be sufficiently distinct from the original en:Gadsden flag to qualify for protection. (Not sure about that, but the button definitely is.) B (talk) 19:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The creation of a new file has been demanded. BrunoBernardino (talk) 21:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
The creation of a new file has been proposed. BrunoBernardino (talk) 21:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The creation of a new file has been proposed. BrunoBernardino (talk) 21:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @BrunoBernardino: I am not understanding your reasons for deletions. If they are the same image, just to a higher quality, then we can update these images with better quality. If there are existing better quality images, then we can manage for the process for duplicates. There is no obvious reason to delete these images, especially without seeing the replacements. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The creation of a new file has been proposed. BrunoBernardino (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The creation of a new file has been proposed. BrunoBernardino (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The creation of a new file has been proposed. BrunoBernardino (talk) 21:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The creation of a new file has been proposed. BrunoBernardino (talk) 22:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Noting that these same images also exist in other language productions of Alice in Wonderland. Are we better to look in Category:John Tenniel's illustrations of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and identify duplicates. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Authorship information may be on the left, but the text is not readable. Jcb (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
ffffffffffffffff Fayaziyan (talk) 22:24, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
ddddddd xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fayaziyan (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
idk Tyler S 5608 (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
idk Tyler S 5608 (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
_location_map.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_location_map.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Есть более качественное векторное изображение File:Ethiopia (1941-1987) location map.svg, файл в викисклад загрузил я. Vahe (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
_location_map.svg){kind=link}
_location_map.png){kind=link}
Deleted: superseded by File:Ethiopia (1941-1987) location map.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
_location_map.png){kind=link}
L'utilisation sur la Wikipédia francophone de ce média n'est pas libre. Elle n'est autorisée que comme exception conformément au vote de la communauté. Son usage, dont la justification est obligatoire, est réservé exclusivement aux articles qui lui sont directement liés. Justification de l'utilisation de ce média : L'œuvre architecturale récente étant protégée, aucune illustration n'est possible avec des images libres de droits. Pierre André (talk) 09:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
L'utilisation sur la Wikipédia francophone de ce média (- Tour Total (Coupole) n'est pas libre. Elle n'est autorisée que comme exception conformément au vote de la communauté. Son usage, dont la justification est obligatoire, est réservé exclusivement aux articles qui lui sont directement liés. Justification de l'utilisation de ce média : L'œuvre architecturale récente étant protégée, aucune illustration n'est possible avec des images libres de droits. Pierre André (talk) 09:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Original tagged with {{Copyvio}} by 62.202.181.195 --Habitator terrae (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree with that, because it isn't protected by copyright, because in my view it falls under COM:TOO. So please discuss this under the aspect of the TOO. Habitator terrae (talk) 12:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
I upload a svg: File:Logo fair-food.svg --Habitator terrae (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It's a tough one, but I'm inclined to agree with TOO based on the provided TOO examples. BMacZero (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Leyo 10:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in France Thesupermat2 (talk) 07:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 00:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
This file comes from CRW flags, and Geogarphyman says "own work". Geography and Space (talk) 00:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep It could just be a matter that they entered the default license, and I'm willing to give OP the benefit of the doubt providing that they change it accordingly. Учхљёная (talk) 15:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination: no valid license added since nomination. Still doubtful. Ruthven (msg) 14:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
It contains Personal identifiable data on a current u service member. It poses a security risk. Please delete this and help me reduce the signature of my personnel information. 38.90.134.90 00:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Depicted service member consented at the time of publication, and DVIDS has not taken this down, so not a valid reason for deletion. Kges1901 (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion + file still public on flickr. Ruthven (msg) 14:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EdgarAndre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Jacques larochelle en compagnie de Gilbert Bécaud, Gérard Thibault et Pierre Roche.jpg
- File:Jacques Larochelle en compagnie de Charles Aznavour.jpg
- File:Jacques Larochelle chante au cabaret La Porte Saint-Jean à Québec.jpg
- File:CFCM 1.jpg
- File:Costume Jacques Larochelle.jpg
- File:Jacques La Rochelle.jpg
Sealle (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above deletion rationale does not apply to these three files: "CFCM 1.jpg", "Costume Jacques Larochelle.jpg" and "Jacques La Rochelle.jpg", for which the uploader does not claim that they are his own works. In particular, I would keep the file "Jacques La Rochelle.jpg". The uploader wrote that it is a family photo, and that's exactly what it looks like, and he credits it to a person who we can reasonably assume was his mother. The statement of the uploader to have been the copyright owner, before he released it to the public domain, is thus plausible and there doesn't seem to be a basis that would allow us to contradict this statement, in the absence of anything to the contrary. About the file "Costume Jacques Larochelle.jpg", the uploader's statement about having been the copyright owner of this file looks like a mistake, as I noted in 2014 on its description page. It seems a professional photo created in 1948 and likely published in the U.S. I did not nominate it for deletion because it might be in the public domain for absence of notice or renewal. The file "CFCM 1.jpg" looks like it could be a 1957 corporate photo from the CFCM Canadian TV station, which would thus be in the public domain in Canada. For those two files, "Costume Jacques Larochelle.jpg" and "CFCM 1.jpg", I do not make any suggestion to keep or to delete. I can't find solid arguments either way. The three other files, photos of the uploader's father, "Jacques larochelle en compagnie de Gilbert Bécaud, Gérard Thibault et Pierre Roche.jpg", "Jacques Larochelle en compagnie de Charles Aznavour.jpg" and "Jacques Larochelle chante au cabaret La Porte Saint-Jean à Québec.jpg", are stated to be own works by the uploader. It is a plausible statement. The fact that the uploader does not claim authorship of the three photos already discussed above shows that he did not just automatically put "own work" on everything he uploaded. That, and the fact that he provides good descriptions, gives more credit to his statements about the three photos for which he actually does claim authorship. From the life dates of his father, born in 1920, the uploader may be about 70. He may have been in his early 20s when the photos were taken in the 1960s. I wondered about that when I saw the photos, but I can't find a factual element that would allow to contradict the authorship statement of the uploader. One might speculate that the photos could always have been taken by some other person, such as an employee of the cabaret or a press photographer, but unless factual elements are provided, that would be unsupported speculation and it would require an unsupported assumption of bad faith. The mere fact that photos are about 50 years old, without any other fact or argument, is not a sufficient basis to reverse the policy of assuming good faith. In the present state of the situation, in the absence of known facts that would contradict the claim of authorship, we must probably assume good faith and I would keep these three photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no valid license/attribution tiny resolution for 'CFCM1.jpg' which makes it out of scope + if it's a family photo but the uploader is not the photographer, an email to OTRS should be sent. Ruthven (msg) 14:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The file has two problems. At first notability. The man is mentioned in en.wiki once, as one of 5 co-scenarists of soap opera. He isn't mentioned in es.wiki at all. Maybe the photo is out of project scope. At second, this is small photo without metadata and maybe this is not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Taivo. Thanks for your message. First, there have been some problems with the Johnny Gavlovski's wiki due to redaction. This is my 2nd time creating a Wikipedia's article with the help of WikiVenezuela. WikiVenezuela is increasing the number of articles on relevant art people, that's why you just saw that he's mentioned in en.wiki once. The file: Johnny Gavlovski.jpg is my own work. I edited some exposure issues of the file on PS, maybe that's why it doesn't have metadata. Taivo, would you recommend me to delete this file and upload the file without editions? Directly from the camera's card.
Thank you very much Taivo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuottoAbad (talk • contribs) 15:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- You can re-upload new version under new name or even under same name. That case old version does not need to be deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: own work and possibly notable (please open a new DR if the articles on the subject have been deleted for lack of notability). Ruthven (msg) 14:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Taken from the Japanese official website, the graphics of the logo is too highly advanced to be considered below TOO, especially per COM:TOO Japan. The background is silver and reflective, especially with some shadowings all over. Also, the green title font is rendered with some black spots, resembling some kind of a marble material. If anyone can create a simple black or simple green generic logo resembling this logo, that would be great. Either way, I still consider the logo copyrighted.
Same for File:Monster Strike.gif. George Ho (talk) 20:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: simple text, there are no graphical elements. Ruthven (msg) 14:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Not sure the statement is sufficient for Commons. To be discussed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- This page should not be deleted. Hi, I am here to tell that this page should not be deleted as the image has no copyright issues.I have taken image from this site:https://www.jamaran.ir/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1-10/25626-%D8%A2%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%88%D8%AD%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%87-%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%87%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%82-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B4%DB%8C%D8%B9%D9%87-%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA which states on the bottom of the page that "All intellectual and moral rights reserved for Jamaran News and Information Center so Using the site's content is free". So there is no copyright issue as content is free to use. Thanks Tubi719 (talk) 04:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- To be exact Google says "© All rights reserved for Jamaran Information and News Agency. Using the site's content is free." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The conditions on the reuse of the file aren't clear. Ruthven (msg) 14:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Spapchat logo is copyrighted. It is the main focus and included intentionally and not incidentally which is needed to be de minimis --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ford is not a Federal employee. That someone in the Senate scanned this doesn't mean they own the copyright to the text. GMGtalk 21:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- This was entered into the Congressional Record due to it being read by Christine Blasey Ford before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. It is in the Public Domain.Jasonanaggie (talk) 05:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per .Jasonanaggie. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot of Huawei's Android UI, which is a non-free software. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep it consists of text and small icons which all seem non-copyrightable to me. whym (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per whym + in use. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: A screenshot of Huawei EmotionUI (aka EMUI), which is copyrighted. [7]. Yann (talk) 10:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=360195367#File:%E5%8D%8E%E4%B8%BAP7%E8%AE%BE%E7%BD%AE%E7%95%8C%E9%9D%A2.jpeg){kind=link}
Kept per Whym. Nothing copyrightable here. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)