Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 5th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   01:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (advertising & also very probable copyright issues). -- Darwin Ahoy! 05:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

in WLM, perosnal photo will be deleted without any notice Mmrsafy (talk) 09:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per contest's rules. -- ~ Nahid Talk 10:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by XenonX3 as no permission (No permission since), but I don't see a problem with this picture. It looks like own work to me? Ciell (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Too many copyvio's from this user from AGF. --Ciell (talk) 17:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le sculpteur Lionel Ducos est contemporain ses œuvres n'entrerent dans le domaine public (pas de liberté de panorama en France) Pierre André (talk) 16:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le sculpteur Christophe Charbonnelest contemporain ses œuvres n'entrent pas dans le domaine public (pas de liberté de panorama en France) Pierre André (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 08:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Late in September 1918, while gathering material for 'Gassed' near Peronne, Sargent was struck down with influenza and taken to a hospital near Roisel. Here, he spent a week in a hospital bed next to the war-wo Art.IWMART1611.jpghttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Late_in_September_1918,_while_gathering_material_for_%27Gassed%27_near_Peronne,_Sargent_was_struck_down_with_influenza_and_taken_to_a_hospital_near_Roisel._Here,_he_spent_a_week_in_a_hospital_bed_next_to_the_war-wo_Art.IWMART1611.jpg Labattblueboy (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With image extracted template included the request is withdrawn. It was not initially clear whether this was a duplicate and its clearly an extraction.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is copyrighted, per https://www.consolidatedtheatres.com/terms-and-conditions, which provides that "[a]ll materials contained in the Site are the copyrighted property of Reading..." Aoi (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Majora at 02:25, 6 September 2018 UTC: Logo above the threshold of originality. --Krdbot 07:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is copyrighted, per http://www.readingrdi.com/terms-conditions/, which provides that "logos...are owned, controlled or licensed by Reading, its subsidiaries or affiliates and are protected from unauthorized use, copying and dissemination." Aoi (talk) 20:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Majora at 02:24, 6 September 2018 UTC: Logo above the threshold of originality. --Krdbot 07:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:27, 6 September 2018 UTC: Out of scope --Krdbot 13:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 11:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:27, 6 September 2018 UTC: Out of scope --Krdbot 13:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too unclear Rudolphous (talk) 12:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (uploaded by mistake). -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete.... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete it foe my request..... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL: Why delete?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrongly uploaded DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mistaken uploaded DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrongly uploaded... please delete it soon.... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete it mistaken uploaded... DJSHIVAMOFFICIAL (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 11:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I forgot to write "Category:" at the beginning before the creation of the category... I renamed it right away, and the redirection is now useless. Thanks. - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 21:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Sebak Biswas (talk) 23:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This book is under copyright and was uploaded by a mistake. Hermolaou (talk) 00:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licence. Web image (https://www.hdwallpapers.in/2018_pogea_racing_fplus_corsa_ferrari_488_gtb-wallpapers.html amongst others) and watermarked to suggest it's not the uploader's own work, as claimed. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divyansh actor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Commons is not a model portfolio site.

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Author Jonathan Brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising, out of scope. Furthermore, no or little educational value and DW images as well.

P 1 9 9   02:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Author Jonathan Brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional images for a non-notable author. They appear to have been used for a now-deleted eswiki article.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Author Jonathan Brand (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion for his books, out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 11:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not have the proper license. Luisalvaz (talk) 02:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: serious doubts that this is not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This user tends to reuse photos from other media (including videos) and doesn't show the proper license or permission. Luisalvaz (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NickBr956 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per FBMD. grabbed from facebook

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NickBr956 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own work

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nguoiluongtai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All the photo claimed as "created by uploader" but very low quality, just upscale from various thumbnail photo. User have history of copyright violation at Vietnamese Wikipedia, see vi:user talk:Nguoiluongtai#Cảnh báo vi phạm bản quyền. Some photo even can easy found on Internet by Google Images, example: File:Hồ thị trấn Thứa.jpg. A warning should be send to user by a sysop.

--minhhuy (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lonelyboy90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of video/broadcast, need to source original work

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mujeres en el deporte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook downloads, needs to cite original source

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark credits Laurent Peigue Ytoyoda (talk) 04:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quality suggests this is a news photo. EXIF is missing and the uploader has a history of copyvios Ytoyoda (talk) 04:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meyar83 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meyar83 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image collections - outside the Commons:Project scope

and also

Hystrix (talk) 04:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riouwa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The subject depicted in these works have raised concerns over non-consensual upload of these pictures in Ticket#2018090510004741 and have asked for their deletion. I think the concerns need to be addressed as per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.

Mhhossein talk 09:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Jcb. Can you please address this case? --Mhhossein talk 09:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • The original permission is fine from a copyright perspective. The message from the depicted person seems weak to me, as these pictures seem to be from a photoshoot that had the specific purpose of having free pictures from the Wikimedia Indonesia board members at Commons. May be deleted as out of scope though, the depicted person being non-notable. She seems to have played some role in a Wikimedia chapter, we know nothing more on here. Her tremendous contribution of 2 global edits does not tell us much either. Jcb (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Jcb: I don't think the recent email could have been from anyone else but the subject. Moreover, I don't know how the amount of her contributions can be related to her request for deletion of her photos. I pinged you since you had asked her to contact OTRS. Per Removal requests, "the subject, photographer, or uploader of an image may request that it be removed from Commons. The reasons for removal may include such things as "It causes embarrassment" or "It was published without my consent", etc." Regards. --Mhhossein talk 11:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • I don't doubt that the person who sent this message is the depicted person. I doubt that there would not have been consent, given the nature of the photoshoot. On the other hand I have been unable to find a reason why these pictures would be in scope. I found so little on her, even not more than two edits, for a (former?) board member of a Wikimedia chapter, that I see no reason to keep these files. If it would be a courtesy deletion I am not convinced. But I would support deletions of these pictures as 'out of scope' and I think she will be happy anyway. Jcb (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope due to background Mjrmtg (talk) 10:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashik Uz Zaman Antu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wizzmoalim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ba colomba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Biagiofg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Biagiofg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Biagiofg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very similar to the previous DR about this user's contributions: unlikely to be own work: files with small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, some can be found on other web sites with Google Images.

Ruthven (msg) 09:48, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MOHAMED AMHMOD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: low resolution photos of unidentified locations.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mass upload of private snapshots -> out of scope. Note: There are much more; I nominate for now "only" the first 1000.

JuTa 20:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The next batch of out of scope mass uploaded images.

JuTa 02:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work by the uploader. Permission of the original work author is needed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, doubtful own work claim, OOS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of an animation. Upper right of this screenshot is the author of this animation, Spt赛小息6. - I am Davidzdh. 13:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - base layer is from Google Maps. Eureka Lott 13:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avanish5013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COPYVIO from https://psi.id/logo-psi/ Bagas Chrisara (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from club representative. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - no realistic educational use Эlcobbola talk 14:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also dont see the use of this image. Also you can create it with very simple HTML and CSS if you need it somewhere (bot i dont think so). Remember also the users History here on commons. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a video or a photograph, unable to verify license. User has a history of copyvio uploads. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing EXIF, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CatherineHabbie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These are the book covers of books designed by me, Catherine Habbie and I hold the rights to the same.

Please confirm your authorship/copyrights ownership via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CatherineHabbie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violation. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably copyrighted image. The source is http://estrellacervantes.es – at the bottom you can see © 2018 Estrella Cervantes. Szczureq (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Craneneuro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album cover and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aizazulhassan0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permission

Krd 15:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of a non-notable person, article created at English Wikipedia was deleted following an Articles for Deletion discussion, then the same article was recreated as draft which only ended up getting deleted. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 15:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of no informational value. There are hundreds of photos of Category:Saiful Muluk Lake already. Kalbbes (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; musician group without notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights violation, no reason to make the cover a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tinyeye shows this image in higher res at multiple websites. FunkMonk (talk) 17:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wouldn't necessarily object to keeping this, but it looks to me like an unused personal photo accidentally grabbed off of Flickr in with a bunch of much more clearly in-scope photos by the same photographer, and I suspect she never really intended this for somewhere quite as public as Wikimedia Commons. Jmabel ! talk 18:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. reprinting the package design. eien20 (talk) 18:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a photo from 2016, taken without attribution from several sites [1] SamHolt6 (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate use of Wikimedia as a web host for Nazi fancruft. The creator of the colorourised version is "Ruffneck88" which is an obvious neo-Nazi dog whistle, with "88" being understood as "HH" (Heil Hitler) in far-right circles. No educational value to the project as Wiki Commons already holds an authentic B&W photo from Germany's Bundesarchiv. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the painter Martiros Sarjan died only in 1972, his works are copyrighted till end of 2042. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Túrelio, the law in my country Armenia says if the work is in the National Gallery, and not in a private collection, then the rights belong to people. Best regards and appreciation of your job.--Marina Melik-Adamyan (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's interesting. However, then we should have a license-template on Commons which reflects that situation. Nevertheless, these works may still be copyrighted in the USA, which would make the incompatible to Commons' requirements, COM:L. You should bring this up at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong title MGB CEE (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm posting this DR at the request of the subject of the video. The subject notes:

  • first, I was not advised that the filming of my presentation would be made public and I do not remember being asked for my permission to be filmed which is why it came as a surprise to me that my presentation is publicly available
  • second, recently the 'off the cuff presentation' is having an adverse impact on my personal professional life for reasons I’m unable to disclose - as a result it is causing harm to me and my family.

I support this request. The file is unused and is unlikely to be used for any realistic purpose. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of a non-notable person, article created at English Wikipedia was deleted following an Articles for Deletion discussion, then the same article was recreated as draft which only ended up getting deleted. Same as File:Revaz Lordkipanidze 17.12.12++.jpg (histlogsabuse log). -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 15:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. maybe the board installed after 1968. eien20 (talk) 18:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, possible copyright violation, see https://web.archive.org/web/20171221160738/http://olpshighschool.org:80/ Verbcatcher (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : L'architecte Ali Tur est mort en 1977. Ses œuvres n'entreront dans le domaine public qu'en 2047 (pas de liberté de panorama en France).
English: The architect Ali Tur died in 1977. His works will not be in the public domain before 2047 (no freedom of panorama in France).
VIGNERON (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je l'ai mal édité je n'arrive pas à le poster comme je souhaite donc s'il vous plait supprimez cette photo que je puisse la remettre correctement étant débutante Sarusse (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of questionable usability due to lack of updates, possible original research, etc. HapHaxion (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC) No it doesn't. How you figure?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nischalnalinsingh (talk • contribs) 20:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Schaller GmbH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Schaller GmbH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: invoices of questionable notability. One is used on user talk page

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanspeter Dolder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Кирилий (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP for 3D artwork in Ukraine Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Ukraine. Need name and death date of creators.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

будьласка коректно українською поясніть що не так з цими всіма файлами, я не розумію як працює ваше "обговорення" де нема взагалі :жодної інформації і ніяких питань ні відповідей.
я порушую якісь правила чи недодаю якусь інформацію?
якщо я правильно зрозумів щось не так з назвами. добре. Поясніть будь ласка як треба ПРАВИЛЬНО підписувати файли (copied from talk page - user:Кирилий



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Кирилий (talk · contribs)

[edit]

NO COM:FOP in Ukraine. Who are the sculptors? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Можливо я не правильно розумію питання, але я перший раз чую що треба питати дозвіл у автора памятника такого типу щоб зробити власну світлину та викласти її в інтернет. Тобто немає дозволу - я немаю права викласти фото у вільне користуваня у інтернеті. Добре але як тоді викладають файли памятників яким по 100-200-300 років? де автори фото шукають авторів памятників І як отримають дозвіл ? нотаріально через спадників у четвертому поколінні? а як що їх немає? І як тоді існує ваш сайт? я жодного разу не бачив на якіхось фотографіях з категорії памятки позначку "є дозвіл від автора". щось тут не те


я не дуже просунутий користувач. можливо я роблю помилки. але я прошу як і раніше - поясніть будь ласка як можна простіше. до речі так само як і з назвами фото.


Ще до речі. У попередньому "діалозі" я так і не отримав відповіді на питання . ось ці: "Ronhjones (Talk) 18:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

будьласка коректно українською поясніть що не так з цими всіма файлами, я не розумію як працює ваше "обговорення" де нема взагалі :жодної інформації і ніяких питань ні відповідей. я порушую якісь правила чи недодаю якусь інформацію? якщо я правильно зрозумів щось не так з назвами. добре. Поясніть будь ласка як треба ПРАВИЛЬНО підписувати файли (copied from talk page - user:Кирилий

@Кирилий: Hi Kiril. Following your email please use my Talk page instead. They are no 300-400 years old monuments among your pictures and they are anyway not covered by copyright because they are too old. Copyright in Ukraine lasts 70 years after the death of the sculptor hence why I asked you their name. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Created after 1970. No Permission from the sculptor. --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Nawaz2400 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2111811279067475&id=100007158692719&set=a.1375703592678251&source=11&ref=content_filter

I think this may be some kind of personally targeted, abusive copyvio tagging (see page history), but it needs clarification. Saqib is in the photo, so who is the photographer? I'd also like to see the original file with EXIF metadata. Guanaco (talk) 20:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Guanaco: This FB profile is fake. Someone is trying to impersonate me. The photograph was took by someone but the rights belong to me. --Saqib (talk) 05:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The FB link doesn't even load here so I don't mind ignoring that. @Saqib: who took it? Please note that Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie isn't policy. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Will get the permission. --Saqib (talk) 07:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Guanaco: obvious sock. --Saqib (talk) 07:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked indef. Guanaco (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The first and second comment by Saqib appears to be contradictory. In the first comment, they said "The photograph was took by someone but the rights belong to me." and another response, they said "Will get the permission.". Saqib, Why do you think you need a permission to use what belongs to you? Do you mean the FB account user has been inpersinating you for over 5 years now? When did you learn about this impersonation? Do you have other facebook account (please not that you are not under any obligation to declare your facebook account here) ? When last did you login on the account? The account you called fake was registered on facebook in 2013 (the same year you registered on Commons) and followed by a Wikipedian who has at least 80 mutual friends with me on facebook. Regards. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@T Cells: I just saw your comments now. Yes the photo was took by someone using my phone so I thought the rights belong to me. Anyways, I've asked the original photographer to send the permission. I hope xe will do soon soon. I think someone renamed this FB recently to impersonate me - the photo was posted there on 3 September. By the way my name is not Saquib Qureshi and I don't use FB. Anything else? --Saqib (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This sort of thing happens all the time during a Wikimedia events. It's fine, we just want to be on a saver side. Happy editing. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 13:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission has arrived. --Guanaco (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About which artist you request the permission ? Richard Orlinski or the painter ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarusse (talk • contribs)
@Sarusse: From Itsmewess. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevant info and topics for this photo Arezarni (talk) 00:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File has been in use in en:Glasgow's Needy since 2014, so that we cannot delete it for 'scope' related reasons. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random image of a palm foliage. No context, no useful coordinates, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's not a palm, it's an Agavaceae apparently, in what seems to be a train station in Sochi.-- Darwin Ahoy! 05:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Makes no difference. Still low quality, no educational value, and unusable. --P 1 9 9   15:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictional test map, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on a personal sandbox. P 1 9 9   02:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictional test map, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on a personal sandbox. P 1 9 9   02:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictional test map, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on a personal sandbox. P 1 9 9   02:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by the original creator and uploader Cangjie6 (talk) 02:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by the original creator and uploader Cangjie6 (talk) 02:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res photo available elsewhere on the web, no EXIF info Ytoyoda (talk) 03:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe TV screenshot? shizhao (talk) 03:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad background. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE, personal photo Insider (talk) 05:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото представлена как фотосессия, малый размер файла, отсутствуют метаданные, использование участником других фотографий сомнительных ресурсов (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Хор_Турецкого.jpg). Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора фотографии. Dogad75 (talk) 06:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, blurry Lotje (talk) 06:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental upload, I'm sorry. Puramyun31 (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. The sculptor Jeff Koons is still alive.

Civa (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too dark Rudolphous (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep To me it seems obviously on scope, and very much usable - especially considering the lack of of photos for Najaf.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Not to dark, but a conscious use of underexposed areas, something along a chiaroscuro, to highlight the sunrise over the Wadi-us-Salaam, the largest cemetery in the world. Tm (talk) 00:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep not a criteria for deletion -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Not great, but OK enough for Commons. We don't have many images of Najaf. Strakhov (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Much as I appreciate the efforts of the 500 Px archive team, this picture lack a description that makes any sense. Nor is the picture clear. It is possibly some sort ring based fighting - wrestling perhaps? Without a description I would say it is out of scope. Headlock0225 (talk) 20:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Headlock0225
First, there is a sequence of photos, it's quite easy find:
Also, is quite clear to figure it out what's going on. Even just looking that photo. Masks, cords, jump... super easy.
"lack a description that makes any sense"
#ring ,#santiago ,#chile ,#bertoni ,#endemol ,#xnl ,#titanes
A ring fight at Santiago, Chile... only for that you could figure out what's going on
But if you google #chile #xnl #titanes...
Xplosion Nacional de Lucha Libre - Titanes del Ring
How this makes no sense??
I'm not a google guru, I just took the words and used it, took me 5s, and I'm not from Chile...
With the date of the photo I bet that it's even possible to find the name of the fighters...
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 03:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Apparently related to "Xplosion Nacional de Lucha". In scope. Strakhov (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better picture : File:ATX computer case - left - 2018-05-18.jpg Bretwa (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discernible car license plate numbers parked outside a legal brothel. Not sure if this image should be deleted, but there is a concern about personal privacy given the nature of the establishment. Right, they shouldn't park there if they don't want their photo taken.. ok, but we don't need to show the license plate either for the image to serve its purpose. The plates could be blurred. GreenC (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The number plates are only just discernible and the image has been in use for over 10 years, so I would have thought any privacy issues would have come to light by now. I will edit out the number plates just in case. --John B123 (talk) 10:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken upload. Hystrix (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted logo. See [4]. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: have you an experience with trademarked stuff on Wikimedia Commons? What namely of the logo is, in your opinion, copyrighted? Except for two scripted words “Daily Cafe” there is nothing of slightest possibility for copyright protection. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: The packaging of Perfect 85 Degrees C, Inc. is protected by copyright, per COM:PACKAGING. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Packaging can be protected with copyright like any other thing, but this design with some circles, disks etc. on a conical surface is rather trivial. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why should US law apply: was the logo first published there? According to enWP the company is based in Taiwan but registered in the Cayman Islands. If the latter’s law applies, I suppose it to be similar to that of the UK, with a fairly low TOO and no presumption that typography is uncopyrightable.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at their website and only saw locations in California, so I mistakenly assumed it was an American company. The Cayman Islands are a British Overseas Territory, so UK law applies. Unfortunatley, COM:TOO doesn't offer a lot of guidance for text logos in the UK. The EDGE logo mentioned there was determined to be copyrightable because the typeface was modified in a unique way (from the case text: The stretching of the font was combined with the distinctive slash and projection on the middle bar of the "E". What is required for artistic originality is the expenditure of more than negligible or trivial effort or relevant skill in the creation of the work). I don't know about the copyrightability of typefaces in the UK, but I can't imagine that merely typing a few words in a particular font counts as "the expenditure of more than negligible or trivial effort". However, a UK court would likely determine there was enough original thought in how the parts of the logo are arranged, so this probably should be deleted. It would be okay on the English Wikipedia, though, which only accounts for US law. clpo13(talk) 21:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Clpo13: the question is, what is the source country. The country where something was first published (USA) or whatever tax haven they have chosen for their shell corporation (Cayman Islands)? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:40, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: I'm not sure where this photo was taken, but it looks like this is the logo used in China, Taiwan, and Australia but apparently not in the United States, so it probably wasn't published first in the US. I actually don't know what country's laws would cover this. In my experience, we tend to determine the TOO of logos based on where the company is located (or perhaps where it was founded, for multinationals), but would a tax haven count for that if their physical presence is elsewhere? FWIW, according to en:85C Bakery Cafe, the first location was opened in Taiwan in 2004, but I don't know if the same logo was used then (their main website had a different logo in 2005, though). clpo13(talk) 16:39, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope B dash (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment He is member of en:G4 (band) and the article has even picture about him. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Request Djszanto (talk) 13:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nominate file for deletion by author request 2600:1700:AC50:D760:1197:EEDC:6A54:7A88 14:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio anyway. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, could probably be uploaded to English Wikipedia as a non-free file Verbcatcher (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. The image shows a logo of Better Business Bureau drawn by hand and of low quality. A nice version of the logo exists: File:Better Business Bureau.svg Jarash (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Yes, a nicer version of that logo exists. Did you look at that nicer file you linked? The terrible one is linked *there*, because the BBB logo has been put up for DR and I created this terrible MSPaint version has a demonstration of why the original is PD-Geometric/PD-Text. I don't honestly care if this file stays, but the original reason it stayed is because it "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" - which it was. It was a perfect demonstration of what PD is all about. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 22:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Princess_Aliiya_Al_Zahrani_Wiki1.jpg 87.205.147.104 13:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aliiya_Al_Zahrani.jpg 87.205.147.104 13:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 05:45, 26 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 12:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res version of: File:Nvidia Robocar.jpg Father of Lies (talk) 05:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been published before on another website [5]. Needs an OTRS ticket to confirm permission. -- Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 06:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed Justsaurabh (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   02:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the good new logo ArnaudDl (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not the good new logo ArnaudDl (talk) 11:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessay for my files Enzo 12Nov (talk) 10:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope anyway. P 1 9 9   02:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already published on http://www.pva-lb.org/ so needs to go through COM:OTRS. However, from their username, I think that obtainging the required permission should not be that difficult. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is out of scope for the project as it has no educational value or benefit. Based on the edit by image uploader to the English Wikipedia, it is very clear that the image was uploaded with the intention of it being insulting, derogatory, and offensive. See also this edit from an IP that added this image with a derogatory description. TheFarix (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA

B dash (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- There is a special exemption for photographs of illegally-placed art (i.e. graffiti) --- see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Graffiti. AnonMoos (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:AnonMoos. P 1 9 9   02:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why US law is applied to book published in British India? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete This file. This is a Holy Book of Namasudra(Namassej) Community . It has no copy right or anything like that . — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.194.203.75 (talk) 07:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:34, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this mural is clearly above COM:TOO. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This file is the Facebook profile picture of Ramfis Domínguez-Trujillo, and seems to be not a work by the uploader. See https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10160778243625147&set=a.10150293890010147&type=3&theater. 179.52.161.48 10:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DW of PD, see File:Karl Marx 001.jpg. COM:GRAFFIT may also apply. P 1 9 9   20:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:GRAFFITI. P 1 9 9   20:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and DW. P 1 9 9   20:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Luxembourg and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. The sculptor is still alive. Civa (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 11:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn, {{Non-free graffiti}}. --B dash (talk) 14:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 14:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawn, {{Non-free graffiti}}. --B dash (talk) 14:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Buysite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files could not be found at the given source. However, a similar image exists.

4nn1l2 (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios, no permission. --Yann (talk) 06:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of trophies are considered derivative works of 3D art, copyright belongs to the trophy owner Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve red the motivation of the delete’s request but this is not the original trophy but a reproduction made by myself. Intact there’s not a “custom trophy” for this competition and during those years it changes many time. So I’m asking you to remove this request Lonelyboy90 (talk) 07:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lonelyboy90: Couple of questions:
  1. If that’s not the actual trophy, then why are we using it to represent the trophy on Wikipedia?
  2. You say you created it yourself, but it looks extremely close to the trophy image at https://www.wilsontrophy.com/1191-series-italian-silver-cup/1191seriesitaliansilvercup/ (down to the reflection on the trophy) and it looks like you incorporated the logo. Both elements are copyrighted and while you might have done the editing, it’s considered a derivative work and under copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW from [6]. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France for works in the public. So, we need a permission from artist or this photo needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also for example in France: Category:Graffiti by E2C's trainees in Cosne-Cours-sur-Loire and:
--Cjp24 (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Likely not, at least for the right portion of the mural. However, this one looks more like an illegal graphitti. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. So "Non-free graffiti" template was added to this graffiti today. --Cjp24 (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is made in 1939 in Hamburg, Germany. Maybe it is still copyrighted. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died? If the photo is anonymous – how do you know that? When and where it was first published? Taivo (talk) 09:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My response is as follows The photo was given by Judy Katz (whose children I taught) to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Judy Katz is the grand daughter of George Spitz who appears in the picture. Judy directed me to the Museum, where she donated the photo, to obtain a copy of the image. Judith Cohen, at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, sent me the image and gave permission to use it as did Judy Katz herself.

Please let me know if you require any further information.

Unfortunately yes. Original photographer's name and death year are needed. Copyright belongs not to depicted person, but to original photographer. Maybe Judy Katz knows? If not, then it is likely anonymous work and publication date becomes important. Publication date is likely the year, when Judy donated the photo to museum. Which year? But maybe the photo was published even earlier? Taivo (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll check with Judy Katz and get back to this page. Thanks, Eli — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.31.70.119 (talk) 00:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment ticket:2018090510011894 is related to this image. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just heard back from Judy Katz who referred me to Judith Cohen from the USHMM. Please see below - it was donated to the USHMM on November 6, 2006.


On Sep 17, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Cohen, Judith <jcohen@ushmm.org> wrote: November 6, 2006.

On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Eli Rubenstein <elir@bell.net> wrote: Thanks Judith. Can you let me know the date of the agreement? Judy Katz does not remember when it was donated. Thanks & Shana Tova, Eli


On Sep 5, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Cohen, Judith <jcohen@ushmm.org> wrote:

Regarding the photo George Spitz.JPG the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) has a signed and countersigned license agreement from the donor allowing us to distribute the photos to third parties.

-- Judith Cohen Chief Acquisitions Curator National Institute for Holocaust Documentation 202.488.0429 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place SW Washington DC 20024-2126 Fax 202.479.9726 www.ushmm.org

Thank you for investigation. As photographer is still unknown and first proven publication is quite recent, we have at moment no other choice than general rule 120 years from creation. The file should be deleted and restored in January 2060 (120+1 years from creation). Taivo (talk) 06:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Taivo. Is there any way to appeal this decision? In the meantime, I will check with the family to see if they have any idea who took the photo, although the photographer is no longer alive for certain. Also, can you let me know where the source for this 121 year rule is? Thanks, Eli

Please read COM:L. The request is not yet closed, so here's nothing to appeal. Until closing you can write right here. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem that the image in question is covered by Fair Dealing/Fair Use (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing_in_Canadian_copyright_law / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use) as an Orphan Work (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_work) since it is being used for educational purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 164.82.60.65 (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use is prohibited in Commons. See COM:FU for that. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I would like to 'oppose/keep' this file.
Nobody has the direct information about the photographer.

In context, we see a permission from the person's family (shown in the picture). Therefore, we have established, that no personality rights are violated.

We also got the permission from the museum. They support the means of preserving historic material (there are no moral objections from an authoritative institution).

A picture is a special kind of medium. The creative nature of the photographer is mixed with content on the shot (person's shown). If we look at the creative value, it is disputable if (and how much) of it creative value is violated within the context above.

Facts show, that there is a likelihood, that person who took the shot is a part of the family. In this case, there is an approval of the use.

In short:

  • a) no personality rights have been violated
  • b) there a strong (authoritative) indication, that file should be kept for historical preservation
  • c) the only means (family of the person on the picture) have shown full support of preserving the information
  • d) creative value is relative. For example, a person on the shoot owns all the unique traits of his being (personality rights).
  • e) there is a likelihood, that shot was made from one of the family members (to the man on the photo).
  • f) all the evidence shows that file is used on good faith, for a specific project (Wikipedia), limited in nature (information preservation purposes).


United States House of Representatives 110th Congress, 2nd Session https://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html

"we recommended a framework whereby a legitimate orphan works owner who resurfaces may bring an action for “reasonable compensation” against a qualifying user. A user does not qualify for the benefits of orphan works legislation unless he first conducts a good faith, reasonably diligent (but unsuccessful) search for the copyright owner. As defined in our Report, reasonable compensation should be the amount “a reasonable willing buyer and reasonable willing seller in the positions of the owner and user would have agreed to at the time the use commenced.".

By the given context, I would argue that there is a reasonable doubt of copyright infringement, because

  • - limited nature of the use
  • - possibly one of the family members took the shot
  • - personality rights not being violated
  • - support from family & museum — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.148.144.163 (talk) 07:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • - no indication of harm of any relevant body of interest (information preservation)

Best, Arvids. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.148.144.163 (talk) 06:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am the granddaughter of George Spitz, the person in the photograph. This photo has been in our family for generations, and as far as we know, was taken by one of our family members. Over the years, we have gladly allowed the photo to be used for educational purposes by a number of organizations including the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum so that the memory of the Holocaust is never forgotten.

We are very pleased to see the photo being used on the Wikipedia page for Congregation Habonim, which my grandfather helped found and where he was the first President. We are also pleased to see it being used by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. We can’t understand why anyone would have an objection to this usage and hope this brings closure to this discussion — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.101.124 (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public Domain Mark at source, not cc0. (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 14:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in India B dash (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file comes from it:File:Matera-Stemma.png, which is in fair use on it.wiki, because it's taken from http://www.araldicacivica.it with a permission "for Wikipedia only". A situation that is very similar to the one in Commons:Deletion_requests/Italian_CoA. Ruthven (msg) 14:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2016 Landcom - Allied Land Command | All Rights Reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in France. The coats of arms depicted on this sign are original enough to be copyrighted, so we cannot keep a derivative photo. De728631 (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated: File:Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure - Blasons communes jumelage (août 2018).jpg. De728631 (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Coats of arms are not eligible to copyright. According to me, this plaques are not a work of art and don't meet the threshold of originality. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is wrong. While the blazon, i.e. the heraldic description of a coat of arms is traditionally not copyrighted, the actual depiction is always copyrighted to the relevant artist. Unless the copyright has expired due to old age (70 years past the death of the artist), this image cannot be kept. De728631 (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately freedom of panorama in Argentina is only valid for buildings (architecture), but not for other works like this mural which is most likely based on a likewise copyrighted original photograph. As a derivative work, we cannot keep this image. De728631 (talk) 15:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@De728631: The original image is on public domain as seen here.--BugWarp (talk) 02:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing this out. If it was only the original photo that was shown, I would withdraw my nomination, but I'm still not sure whether the mural is original enough to constitute a work of its own. So I'd like to see some more opinion. By the way, you don't need to ping me here because I'm watching this page. De728631 (talk) 13:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that.--BugWarp (talk) 22:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie autorskich praw majątkowych.

Fotografia przedstawiająca Ryszarda Siwca została przekazana do IPN-u w latach 90. przez autora zdjęcia Leszka Łożyńskiego dla celów statutowych tej instytucji. Dziwi mnie, że została tu umieszczona, tak jakby IPN nie podawał źródła pochodzenia fotografii. W ubiegłym roku Leszek Łożyński sprzedał prawa do swoich zdjęć agencji fotograficznej Reporter, która jest obecnie jedynym legalnym źródłem tego zdjęcia. Agencja posiada negatywy i stosowną dokumentację. Uprzejmie proszę o usunięcie fotografii z zasobów Wikipedii. Marek Zajdler

188.95.26.50 10:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I know this comment might not be relevant in copyright matters, but I strongly ask for this iconic picture, which uniquely documents the history of Polish and Czechoslovak people under communism and their fight for freedom, to be preserved and keep serving as a memento for the future generations so that they do not forget the heroic protest of Ryszard Siwiec and of those who followed him, including Jan Palach in Czechoslovakia. Although I am a Wikipedian who knows and respects copyright principles, my conscience tells me that for the purposes of historical testimony, honor of these men's sacrifice and future preservation of freedom (on which the existence of copyright and private ownership is fully dependent), this picture should not be forcefully torn out of the public domain and hidden from the eyes of millions of the public here on Wikipedia, whom the picture can help perceive the described topic much more vividly – including the visual and emotional aspects carried by the picture. Or do Mr. Leszek Łożyński or the Reporter photo agency, or, for that purpose, you, Mr. Marek Zajdler, really think that Mr. Siwiec, whose intimate moments of suffering and death are depicted in the picture, would agree with your effort to hide this unique testimony of his sacrifice and even try to make money on it? To the contrary: As far as I can tell, he wanted his message to be conveyed to as much people as possible. And it is sad to realize that it was originally only those whom he fought who had an interest in the world not learning about him (or telling he was mentally ill), including the censorship of news and pictures. It was so sad to find out about this deletion nomination a few days before the 50th anniversary of Jan Palach's death. Sincerely, a long-time Czech Wikipedia contributor, Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - source of "IPN" is entirely inadequate. COM:EVID requires the uploader or person(s) arguing for retention to provide appropriate evidence that the image is free. That has not been done here, and we only accept verifably free images (i.e., that it is "iconic" is not sufficent; consider hosting the image on a project that supports fair use.). --Эlcobbola talk 18:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]