Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 28th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload - I am the creator and wish it to be removed. Mockarena (talk) 02:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload - I am the creator and wish it to be removed. Mockarena (talk) 02:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload - I am the creator and wish it to be removed. Mockarena (talk) 02:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload - I am the creator and wish it to be removed. Mockarena (talk) 02:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page meant to be category. Category created. Conservatrix (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC) --البوعياشي أمين (talk) 22:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: was previously deleted content. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: what ne could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 06:06, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license, unlikely to be own work. --Yann (talk) 06:38, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is available online. Uploader has not shown sufficient proof he/she is the copyright holder, and is unlikely to be the copyright holder - ක - (talk) 17:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted TV show title card - ක - (talk) 17:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from instagram, available here: https://www.instagram.com/p/BgsG2w6n2a5/?hl=en&taken-by=deweni_inima - ක - (talk) 17:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is clearly taken from a news article online - ක - (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

2-D sketch of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted, given the original uploader's track record on en.wikipedia. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.Juliancolton | Talk 14:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Renominating because it is a derivative of this photo. See User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 4#Deletion of File:Sirimavo Bandaranaike.jpg for the undeletion. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image available elsewhere online- such as at: https://www.newsfirst.lk/2016/10/today-marks-16th-death-anniversary-sirimavo-bandaranaike/151368/ - ක - (talk) 17:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a TV series- image is available online such as here: https://lifeasasrilankan.blogspot.com/2018/ - ක - (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/BgqaokiAh_e/?hl=en&tagged=raweenkanishka - ක - (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is clearly taken from a professional photographer's portfolio- the watermark is even visible. Likely taken from: https://www.lkmodelzone.com/event/118/deweni-inima-teledrama-on-location-album-2/Photograhpers?page=6 - ක - (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a TV show, taken from Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/Be0n2z0nEyF/?hl=en&taken-by=_sanuhas_ - ක - (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwarare of the band concerned releasing material under Creative Commons- OTRS desirable ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deletion. There is a 0% possibility that the band magnanimously decided to release this song through a random kid from Brazil. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UAE has no FoP ..

Saqib (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the proposed deletions or how to respond Clémence Jacqueri (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These deletion requests come from the fact that "In almost all countries, art, architecture, and other works are protected by copyright for a specified period." See Commons:Freedom of panorama and Commons:Derivative works. Sadly there is no much that you can do. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What about all other photos in Category:Burj Al Arab an so on? Must they also be deleted? I don't think so. --ProfessorX (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the UAE

Saqib (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: can you please delete the first part this DR as well.. --Saqib (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the UAE

Saqib (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the UAE... some of the images can be kept under De Minimis but I am not sure which ones.

Saqib (talk) 08:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted most per nomination, kept some as DM - Jcb (talk) 13:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the UAE. some of the photos can be kept under De minimis.

Saqib (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination and per COM:TOYS, kept some as COM:DM or no derivate work shown. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 21:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no objection. --وهراني (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -SuperRollex (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC) This picture has been stolen from the website "voilesetvoiliers.com" where it was first published in 2004 (please, have a look here : http://www.voilesetvoiliers.com/cultures-voiles/un-document-unique-maupassant-a-bord-de-bel-ami-vers-1890/ ). No authorisation from the publisher, from the journalist or from the owner of the photo has been requested. This photo of Maupassant aboard his yacht is unique and the owner of the only one existing print refuses to let it published without permission.[reply]

  •  Comment

Unacceptable behaviour

  • I first asked to delete the picture because taken from voilesetvoiliers.com without permission.
  • The answer of Racconish is that this picture was in fact coming from www.laurentcharpentier.com
  • Racconish has decided to download a new file from this website without getting any permission, then he reframed it and put it on wikimedia.
  • Racconish justified this strange action telling the author of the photo is unknown, probably dead for a long time.
  • The fact is I am both the journalist having published this picture on voilesetvoiliers.com and the owner of laurentcharpentier.com and, also the owner of the famous original print showing Maupassant aboard Bel-Ami.
  • I have published this photo on my website well after it was shown on voilesetvoiliers.com
  • When I saw it was again put on Wikimedia this time in 1920 pix, and without my consent, I decide to put watermarks, too late, of course.
  • Question: on what legal ground Racconish can decide to steal this photo from my website and put it on Wikimedia ?
  • Question: as far as I can understand the way Wikimedia works, who gives the authority and rightfulness to Racconish to behave like a narrow minded cop without discussing before the point with the community ? And with me ?
    The legal ground is the image has fallen in the public domain. Comme expliqué ci-dessus, la propriété matérielle du support ne confère aucun droit d'autoriser ou d'interdire une reproduction, ces derniers étant n'appartenant qu'à l'auteur ou à ses ayants droits selon les conditiions définies par le Code de la propriété intellectuelle. — Racconish 08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I ask again to delete this picture from Wikimedia Commons.

— SuperRollex 23:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

=== [[:File:Bourget à gauche sur bel ami de Maupassant (Rocca).jpg]] ===

Taken without permission from www.laurentcharpentier.com, see discussion. SuperRollex (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The image description at laurentcharpentier.com has changed between April 30 and May 1, 2018. April 30 : "Guy de Maupassant (right), aboard Bel Ami II, with friends. Villefranche harbour. Photo : ©Pierre Borel (?) / Circa 1890 / coll. L.C.". May 1: "Guy de Maupassant (right), aboard Bel Ami II, with friends. Villefranche harbour. Photo : ©/ coll. L.C." One wonders why the reference to Pierre Borel has disappeared... In any case, it is very unlikely to claim, as Voiles et Voiliers does [2], that Borel himself was sitting in front of Maupassant in 1889-1890 on that boat, since he was not born yet [3]. This photograph has also been published by Alain Gérard in his book La Côte d'Azur de Maupassant [4]. As a side note, the name of the previous owner of the boat is Recca and not Rocca [5]. — Racconish 08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Behind your anonymity you pretend to know better than the other. But your judgement is based on many mistakes and at least one wrongdoing made by you. And above all, you refuse to answer my previous questions.
  • As you may understand now, the only source of the picture both on www.voilestevoiliers.com and www.laurentcharpentier.com is me, Laurent Charpentier, as I am the owner of the original print.
  • Regarding the book by Alain Gerard La Côte d'Azur de Maupassant, : a private mail to me from the Publisher (Editions Pimientos) recognize that they took the picture from voilesetvoilers.com, without permission. You haven't obviously seen this book as it is mentioned : "Légende et illustration trouvés sur le site de Voiles et Voiliers."
  • From your arbitrary position of unlegitimate judge you have decided to download the picture from my website, reframe it and drop it on Wikimedia without willing to contact me first : why ?
  • Is It because, hidden behind your anonymity, you wanted to punish me for being demanding ? I'd be glad to know who you are and why you act like this.
  • Regarding the picture itself. It has been published in the book by Pierre Borel "Le Destin Tragique de Guy de Maupassant" , by "Les Editions de France" in 1927, then Gallimard republished it in 1987 in one Album La Pléaide about Maupassant. The author of the picture is, up to now, unknown and probably dead from a long time.
  • I am the owner of the only print known to be existing. I made a digital repro of it, in order to share this find with people interested with the subject. Not to give it to anybody. Of course I have not the copyright of this picture, neither you.
  • Instead of willing to discuss the point with me, asking me If I would be OK to GIVE a low res picture to Wikimedia, you are accusing me for changing the caption of the photo as published on my website : classic way to send back the guilt, when one doesn't have a strong case.
  • If I follow you way of thinking, any old photo can be given to anybody, published anywhere. For instance, if I find a photo made by your great-grand-father in a family album, can I publish it without asking you ? Is it the way Wikimedia Commons works ? If yes, Wikimedia would be the instrument of a dictatorial power. Is it the case ?

Thank you in advance for answering and deleting these pictures.

  • ONCE AGAIN, I ASK THIS PHOTOS TO BE DELETED FROM WIKIMEDIA

>— SuperRollex 13:231, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

It follows from what you write above the photo was published at latest in Léon Fontaine's 1927 book. Other prints seem to exist, such as the one auctionned by Ader in 2012 [6], from which we learn the woman seating next to Bourget was likely Marie Kann, but even if the print scanned here was the only surviving one, it would not give its owner any patrimonial right on the photograph. — Racconish 12:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment

I've never pretended I had the patrimonial rights on this photo. And the hypothetic fact that it could be another print somewhere (to be proved), does not change the point : You, Racconish, assumed the "right" to download this picture from my website without any permission. As somebody else has done from voilesetvoiliers.com.

  • From where comes your legitimacy to steal this photograph ?
  • It is interesting that you did not answer any of my previous questions. And the assumption about Marie Kann has nothing to do with the problem we are talking about.
  • At the end of it, what is your problem with this photo ? What do you want to do with it ?
  • As this picture has been stolen from me, I still ask Wikimedia Commons to delete it without delay. SuperRollex 16:48, 1 May 2018
You cannot say this image has been "stolen" when it has been published on various web sites and has fallen in the public domain. Once again, the owner of the print published by voilestevoiliers.com and www.laurentcharpentier.com, as well as voilestevoiliers.com and www.laurentcharpentier.com themselves do not own any patrimonial right on this image, provided it has fallen in the public domain. — Racconish 15:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SuperRollex: 1. Deletions on Commons are decided according to copyright laws. 2. Owning a print doesn't mean owning the copyright. 3. The description says it was taken in 1890, and the author is anonymous. So it is in the public domain. It won't be deleted unless you show that the author was still alive after 1947. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment My point is not about copyright laws. It is about the fact that somebody took a picture from my website without permission and drop it on Wikimedia. May I understand, it is not a problem in this community ? As I received a warning for telling what I think with conviction & strength, I understand also that it is not acceptable to speak about such a subject. So, let's say one last time that I wish this picture to be deleted. Regards. SuperRollex (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2018
    • @SuperRollex: : As the picture was taken in 1890, it is not yours. That's the point about copyright which you do not understand. It is in the public domain, which means that the picture does not belong to anyone now. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Yann: : I do understand the problem copyright, of course. As I say since the beginning, my point is a question of principle : a website is not an open box of candies where everyone can help himself freely. When a member of this community (Racconish) has decided to download, from my own website, a picture, without asking me, is it a normal way to act ? What are the ethical rules of this community : being simply predatory or working clearly to gather proper informations & photos from reliable sources ? I am foolish enough to believe that good information needs strong work, competence and respect for the people. That is not the case here. This is the reason why I want this picture deleted. Regards. SuperRollex (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2018
      SuperRollex I have a suggestion for you : instead of pursuing your rants as here, why don't you add in the permission field a mention such as "scan courtesy of Laurent Charpentier" or anything similar to the effect of informing the end user it is up to him to add it or not, since it is not a CC-BY-SA license ? — Racconish 07:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Racconish: : I have also a suggestion for you : as you don't want to delete this picture, why don't you limit the highest resolution available to 640 x 450 pixels ? SuperRollex (talk) 19:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:FT: a higher definition is preferable. — Racconish 20:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • SuperRollex: Racconish can't delete the picture, as he is not an administrator. And there is no point to repeat ad infinitum your request. We got your point, but that's not how we take decisions here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep this XIXth Century image per the above "keep" arguments and let's continue to make it available to the general public. --E4024 (talk) 08:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Nominator blocked for editwarring. --Yann (talk) 08:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daydonboi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not free images. Taken from WayBig, which copyrights o Its images

EvergreenFir (talk) 00:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteAlso, the files are porn images with low resolution and little educational purposes, so it is likely to be a violation of COM:PORN and COM: NUDE.廣九直通車 (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

6 files uploaded by Madhumitaworld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of six unused, rather small-sized uploads related to Himachal Pradesh, India, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 01:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

7 files uploaded by Arvi1817 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of seven rather small-sized uploads which are missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? comment: files not in use at Wikimedia projects,

Roland zh (talk) 01:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

remark: some of the files are tagged "Sweet Selfies", Roland zh (talk) 01:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

4 files uploaded by Pranavsuthar50 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of four uploads which are missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? comment: files not in use at Wikimedia projects,

Roland zh (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

16 files uploaded by Nancygrover (talk · contribs)

[edit]

your opinions are asked : batch of 16 unused, rather small-sized uploads which also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?

Roland zh (talk) 01:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javier Fake

[edit]

Uploads of historical images about footballers from Santiago Wanderers. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, unknown sources. Some files appear to be scans or cropped, and some others are copyright Prensa Fútbol... --Carlos yo (Discusión) 02:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an unused personal photo. Formerly on w:User:AlhassanSadiq/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 04:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an unused personal photo; also unusably blurry. Formerly on w:User:Saqibhaider1334. —Cryptic (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

29 files uploaded by Svinod3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of 29 unused, thumbnail or rather small-sized uploadd related to Udhagamangalam (Ooty) town, partially PNG format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free, wrong attribution. Given source indicates copyright EvergreenFir (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Jianhui67 TC 14:11, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chris Be (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion, out of scope

Cabayi (talk) 02:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 03:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 03:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 03:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file (selfie), hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 03:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 03:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Gonflash

[edit]

The files are promotional materials of a Youtuber, so the files are out of scope and violations of COM:ADVERT. --廣九直通車 (talk) 04:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal photo. Formerly in w:Moolakkarai rajesh. —Cryptic (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused company logo. Formerly in w:Draft:Finedine Menu. Also see File:Finedine-wbg540.png. —Cryptic (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused company logo. Formerly in w:Draft:Finedine Menu (Company). Also see File:Finedine Menu logo svg.svg. —Cryptic (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 08:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from http://163.32.160.2/images/20110221084337.jpg without vaild licensing. 118.167.29.228 10:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SELF PROMOTION Cabayi (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 10:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata indicates the image was copied from Facebook Cabayi (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 12:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is not my own, but I mistakenly declared its my own when uploading. Would like to delete it so I can reupload it under the right license. Me 9497s (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violacion. --AxelHH (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 TC 14:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some files uploaded by Exblue7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused artwork without educational value, OOS.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hand drawing dollar image.jpg has some potential educational use for articles like en:United States one hundred-dollar bill.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jianhui67: Would you care to rule on this section?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Exblue7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a promotional material of a Youtuber, which is a violation of COM:ADVERT. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Alaa :)..! 14:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Alaa :)..! 14:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thelink3202 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djlamont (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MonVe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images (w:Draft:Sophia Maria Lucia)

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lais Costa Araujo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 TC 14:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely sock, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Thepoliticsexpert and en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thepoliticsexpert. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 02:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

7 files uploaded by Aratidgr8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

your opinions are asked : seven unused uploads which are missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ??

Roland zh (talk) 02:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Revista Estadio 1978 Carlos yo (Discusión) 02:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Dean.jenkins~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused rather small-sized format without EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 02:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


They are rather small but at the time thought they were useful for the web. They lack EXIF data because they are both digitally merged panoramas from multiple photos. I have all the original photos of the composites.

Dean.jenkins (talk) 09:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per uploaders motivation. --Ciell (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 04:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Ciell (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free content. --Ciell (talk) 16:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: potentially, described as "Picture contributed by http://indianyug.com",


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screen capture ? A photo/scanning of a newspaper ? Either way, it doesn't look like a file that should remain on Wikimedia Commons... Glorious 93 (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image prepared just to illustrate vandalism Eingangskontrolle (talk) 08:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source of each photos have to be provided in order to determine the copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All photos of this file are taken by Wikiphysicsgr as mentioned in the license chosen. --Wikiphysicsgr (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per uploader motivation. --Ciell (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Uzbekistan. Sorry. Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Freedom_of_Panorama_in_UZ --93.201.19.53 08:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now there is FOP https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Freedom_of_Panorama_in_UZ. --Ciell (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite the fact that a freedom of panorama exception has been implemented in Uzbekistan for some time, it is still limited to noncommercial purposes (similar to Slovenian situation, see COM:FOP Uzbekistan and the accompanying discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Uzbekistan#FOP in Uzbekistan?), so still unfree enough and conflicts with Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. I'm not sure if the country will undergo another copyright law amendment that would remove commercial restrictions for pictorial reproductions and publications of Uzbek architecture and sculptures, but given the fact that they have already amended their law in 2018 (too recent), there is no indication that they would amend their law to fit it with Commons:Licensing policy within this year, next year, or so. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 08:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wird im RegiowikiAT benötigt. --K@rl (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my deletion request per K@rl. --Dandelo (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my deletion request. The File is used in RegiowikiAT. --Dandelo (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geekdidi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely all copyright violations all images claimed as "own work" by uploader.

Zaccarias (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: the uploader removed most of the details from this image (which I restored after a history check) and I asked them why. Their explanation is on their talk page and it seems they were trying to get the image deleted. I assume this is in good faith so recommend we delete it. Besides which, it is a low resolution orphaned image. Ww2censor (talk) 09:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Simple text and fonts. {{PD-textlogo}} Jianhui67 TC 09:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added Template:PD-textlogo as it contains only simple text and fonts, it does not meet threshold of originality. –Wefk423 (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 16:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vireshstudio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam. Out of project scope.

Achim (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteAs they are advertisments,they are not only copyvios, but also a violation of COM:ADVERT.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information to identify the subject of the photo means it's of no use to the wiki Cabayi (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not understand, what is depicted. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's a mushroom sort: fungi in latin. --Ciell (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auf Wunsch der abgebildeten Person GFHund (talk) 11:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, https://twitter.com/CasadoMargal/status/937371811846807552 Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found everywhere such as http://www.siegfriedmuresan.eu/2017/11/press-release-2018-eu-budget-approved.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, https://www.facebook.com/SiegfriedMEP/photos/a.765257030204908.1073741825.731035500293728/1551051451625458/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://www.facebook.com/1400670250181850/photos/a.1404471396468402.1073741829.1400670250181850/2078143985767803/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://pp.userapi.com/c824701/v824701260/b9ae8/m0lH-MkuNBY.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily own work w:File:Abel Salazar.png gives a different source and is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unknown152438 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of publication under a free license. These files look like TV‌ screenshots.

4nn1l2 (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - personal photo unused except on an unsubmitted draft (now tagged for deletion) on enwiki Home Lander (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:56, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. PD-textlogo does not apply: while the white dots may be seen as "simple geometric shapes", their configuration certainly is different. Randykitty (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: ticket:2018050810012653. Anyway, this is PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 04:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from song. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sin2aCos2a (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 16:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkremenova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, posters and docuemnts. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC) Dobrý večer, všechny dokumenty jsou rodinné a týkají se výhradně praděda Rudolfa Kaisera, tudíž autorská práva jsou v mém případě nezpochybnitelná. Mohu doložit svůj rodný a oddací list. Původ je Československá republika. Data mohu doplnit. Fotografie ročník a u článků a dokumentů přesně. Dejte mi prosím čas na opravu. Jsem v tuto dobu nemocná. Domnívám se,že by bylo škoda dokumenty smazat. Jedná se o dokreslení historie loutkového umění nejen v Československu, které bylo a je dosud značně zmanipulováno. Ale také dokreslení historických událostí v průběhu zakládání mezinárodní loutkové organizace UNIMA. Prosím o strpení, abych mohla informace doplnit. I když popravdě řečeno, v tuto chvíli ještě nevím jak a kde je budu opravovat či doplňovat. Děkuji za upozornění S pozdravem Marcela Kremeňová[reply]


Deleted: please contact Commons:OTRS to provide your proof of permission. --Ciell (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:TTC16 domains and sites.png. Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above the threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This logo is of simple text and an image of a quill. This logo is not above the threshold of originality. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above the threshold of originality Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above the threshold of originality Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not ineligible for copyright protection. Dubious "own work" claims. LX (talk, contribs) 14:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission, above threshold. --Ciell (talk) 17:11, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-textlogo can't refer to a 3D object. See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-textlogo can't refer to a 3D object. See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-textlogo can't refer to a 3D object. See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NC Politician Jim Graham.jpg should immediately be removed from this discussion. Button is de minimus in a properly licensed image of a notable individual. SecretName101 (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue that coins are an problematic comparison. Coins are a pressed and textured object. Wheras campaign buttins are practically flat.00:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
NC Politician Jim Graham.jpg was never in this discussion. (?) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As for what you'd argue, it doesn't much matter. The WMF has stated that any 3D object deep enough to cast a shadow is to be considered eligible for copyright. And a lot of these items cast shadows, you'll notice, so clearly buttons are eligible for copyright according to the WMF. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by عبد الله as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Image not free Maybe the image does not surpass threshold of originality. One week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mallucal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requset deletion of page [7] Hystrix (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File did not upload correctly (grey band at the bottom) GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 16:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal image. Cjp24 (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Comes from facebook (see Special instructions) — Bukhari (Talk!) 16:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Houses ? why houses ? Only a diagram without description and without use. Out of scope. Civa (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hariperi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in the UAE, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing but unidentified and no notable people eating on a terrace in the town of Montpellier. Out of scope.

Civa (talk) 16:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file. Incomplete image upload. In this form not useful to keep. Zaccarias (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I cropped and categorized the image and think it is in common's scope after all especially since there's no other file depicting that subject for now. --Jotzet (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine with me. With this fix I vote  Keep but I don't know how to close this request which I've started here. (I wonder why the image preview is wrong while the image itself is now cropped but otherwise okay.)--Zaccarias (talk) 21:43, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Zaccarias, refreshing your browser's cache should help. This DR will be closed by an admin as time goes by ;-) yours --Jotzet (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 17:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gosh ! What is it ? Unidentified artwork ; stupid file name (why date.jpg ?) ; no encyclopedic value and out of scope. Civa (talk) 17:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

!!!
Hello Civa.
Thank you for your inconvenient writings!
Please type the date word in Google images Search:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=807&ei=EdPkWv6xD5HJwQK53JnADA&q=date&oq=date&gs_l=img.3...2454.4035.0.4877.5.5.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..5.0.0.0...0._7Mn1LfrY1M#imgrc=_
To see the dates! The precedent message was written by User:Koorosh-O
Hello,
The word date is more often used as date of the day (for example), than as an exotic fruit. So why do you use a generic file name Date.jpg instead of Crushed date.jpg or Date from Marrakech market.jpg (for example).
And why do you use the very general Category:Photographs instead of Category:Dates in Morocco or Category:Medjool dates (for example) ?
And do you think that your photo has an encyclopedic value ? Doubtful ! Date is a fruit with elliptic shape. What happened to yours ? Too ripe fruit ? Crushed ? I thought it was a modern artwork ! Here is a typical photo of date : File:Date Fruits-Duo.jpg. Not yours ! --Civa (talk) 12:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thanks for teaching English!
Well, you know, you can not take the time and date with the camera.
So the name of the date for a photo is just a reminder of a fruit, not a date or a time.
Of course, if you like, you can delete the photo with a stupid name! The precedent message was written by User:Koorosh-O

Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; Photographer, but not a good one, the bottom of the photo is all grey ! Civa (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File available elsewhere online- unlikely to be "own work" - ක - (talk) 17:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location. What is Ch thi si tioun of the description ? and Ch.jpg of the file name. No encyclopedic value. Civa (talk) 17:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
je suis le créateur de la photographie "Chanteloup-Luc.jpg". Afin qu'il n'y ai aucun doute, je vous propose de contacter la personne sur la photo, Luc Chanteloup, sur son e-mail suivant : luc.chanteloup@orange.fr ou sur son téléphone personnel : zéro six 79 65 49 02.
Cette photo a sans doute été utilisée pour d'autres sites Internet sans mon autorisation ou par Luc Chanteloup lui-même avec mon accord pour l'utiliser comme il le souhaite.
Toutes les photos déposées par mes soins sur Wikimedia Commons ont été réalisées par mes soins et vous pourrez, si vous le souhaitez, contacter les personnes prises en photo, afin d'être rassuré sur les crédits photos.
Merci de me tenir au courant pour la photo "Chanteloup-Luc.jpg" --Jean-Luc Prou (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I created the DR.
 Keep Luc Chanteloup who is a Chemist from France. --Civa (talk) 09:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by infomusic.fr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos whose the subjects are himself and a personal logo.

Civa (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisment for washing product Civa (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 18:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope. Unused and unidentified screenshot without any description. Zaccarias (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 18:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

16 files uploaded by Vktatwal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of 16 Kerala-related unused uploads, rather small-sized formated, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

19 files uploaded by Prasannampd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of 19 unused small-sized uploads, potentially 'screenshots' (see File:Different rose.png), png format, hence, also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Muniez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused personal file or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?

Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsed personal file or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo?, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 07:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ITs not true so, its in regional a wiki in use. See here http://regiowiki.at/wiki/Jonny_Filterlos

-K@rl (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Translation of Karl Gruber's argument: The image is in use in Regiowiki AT (an Austrian regional encyclopedia supported by Wikimedia AT) which is only using embedded images from Commons. So it is in scope, "useful for an educational purpose" per COM:SCOPE. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I referred to {{RegiowikiAT}} which Karl had embedded here, but now removed. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Yes, this might be another opportunity to point out that COM:SCOPE isn't limited to encyclopedic use. Even though this particular image is even used in an (external) encyclopedic project, that's not a requirement. Commons isn't just the image repository of Wikipedia, it hosts images that are useful for educational purposes. Gestumblindi (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Weghoferhansdc: Thanks for your contribution, but I took the liberty of reverting your vote, as you simply copied my text, which I find strange and doesn't make a good impression. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gestumblindi: sorry if I have annoyed you with my vote, but you wrote exactly what's the matter about the file, so I wasn't able to express my opinion better...

I withdraw my deletion request per K@rl. --Dandelo (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten! The image is in use in Regiowiki AT (an Austrian regional encyclopedia supported by Wikimedia AT) which is only using embedded images from Commons. So it is in scope, "useful for an educational purpose".Its in regional a wiki in use. See here http://regiowiki.at/wiki/Jonny_Filterlos

I withdraw my deletion request per K@rl ("use in RegiowikiAT"). --Dandelo (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten! It's IN scope! The image is in use in Regiowiki AT (an Austrian regional encyclopedia supported by Wikimedia AT) which is only using embedded images from Commons. So it is in scope, "useful for an educational purpose".Its in regional a wiki in use. See here Template:RegiowikiAT

I withdraw my deletion request ("use in RegiowikiAT"). --Dandelo (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wird im RegiowikiAT nach Commons:Weiterverwendung legal verwendet. --K@rl (talk) 10:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten! It's IN scope! The image is in use in Regiowiki AT (an Austrian regional encyclopedia supported by Wikimedia AT) which is only using embedded images from Commons. So it is in scope, "useful for an educational purpose".Its in regional a wiki in use. See here http://regiowiki.at/wiki/Jonny_Filterlos

I withdraw my deletion request ("use in RegiowikiAT"). --Dandelo (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten! It's IN scope! The image is in use in Regiowiki AT (an Austrian regional encyclopedia supported by Wikimedia AT) which is only using embedded images from Commons. So it is in scope, "useful for an educational purpose".Its in regional a wiki in use. See here Template:RegiowikiAT

I withdraw my deletion request ("use in RegiowikiAT"). --Dandelo (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 07:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wird im RegiowikiAT nach Commons:Weiterverwendung legal verwendet. --K@rl (talk) 10:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten! It's IN scope! The image is in use in Regiowiki AT (an Austrian regional encyclopedia supported by Wikimedia AT) which is only using embedded images from Commons. So it is in scope, "useful for an educational purpose".Its in regional a wiki in use. See here

I withdraw my deletion request per K@rl. --Dandelo (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 07:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is made in space, so own work is under doubt. Maybe this is work of NASA, but real photographer, real source and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 07:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Yogafederationofchina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two rather small-sized uploads which are missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 19:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos whose the subject is himself and a logo. Civa (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : upload missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? btw: see also File:Elumalai Scenic Sasidev.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be out of Commons:Project scope. Can't find any indication of relevance of this subject. Zaccarias (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; Generic file name  ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos whose the subject is himself and a logo. Civa (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

4 files uploaded by Saagar Malaichamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of four unused uploads, personality right issues, potentially 'profiling', but also (mostly) missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content respectively out of scope Wikimedia Commons?

Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jean-Louis PASTEUR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Georges Pasteur's publications. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 19:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RodrigoGarzon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown location. Demonstrations and protestations, but where ? and why ? Concerts ? Which one ? Where ? So no encyclopedic value.

Civa (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by AnjanaChandan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused, rather small-sized uploads without EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If shot in UK in 1954 not public domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 08:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

7 files uploaded by Dyutiabha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of seven unused, rather small-sized formated uploads, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 06:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

5 files uploaded by SARAVANAN UTHAYASURIAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of five rather small-sized format uploads, one with personality right issues, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content, and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment files not in use at Wikimedia projects,

Roland zh (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

5 files uploaded by Revathi97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of five unused uploads without EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

9 files uploaded by Sharmagourang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of nine unused rather small-sized uploads missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by A.G.Amal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused uploads of rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one-file-upload of rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

5 files uploaded by Nabihtrap007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of fife unused files, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

7 files uploaded by Sasidhar143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of seven unused files, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 22:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

4 files uploaded by Akhil N Suresh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of four unused uploads, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen sin fuente (no se puede justificar como trabajo propio ya que la foto no incluye metadatos), si puedes subirlos o enviarlos para su justificación esta foto no será eliminada

Victor Gibby (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metadatos agregados

[edit]

Los metadatos pertinentes han sido agregados y pueden ser consultados en licencia CC en el flickr del personaje en cuestión.

Bien hecho (corregire el formato de metadatos luego), ahora solo debes de poner el enlace de Flickr en el parámetro "Fuente", de la descripción y agregar la plantilla {{FlickreviewR}} para que un bot reitere la licencia utilizada sea válida --Victor Gibby (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Jeckmint (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused, rather small-sized uploads that are missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 03:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, rather small-sized upload which is missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 04:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 04:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one-file-upload, tagged and unused, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 04:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload, tagged and small-sized PNG format, hence, also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

4 files uploaded by Vishnu T G (talk · contribs)

[edit]

four rather small-sized uploads which are also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? comment: files not in use at Wikimedia projects,

Roland zh (talk) 05:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 05:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 06:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--GPRUnuU2iQ/VIB-V_tJp_I/AAAAAAAADjk/cC6tboD2bfo/s1600/PA291873.JPG Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is not on the page linked anymore, but there is copyright info there. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, source site www.adpc.ae is dead. Probably we should now delete the photo. Taivo (talk) 21:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

4 files uploaded by Ceonishant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of four unused, rather small-sized uploads, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Alwoodlandooty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused files, potentially advertisements, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?

Roland zh (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload with no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and many better alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9   15:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, small-sized upload which is missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 06:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: possibly own work, seeing that there is another image (File:Meadow with occasional sheeps.jpg) at same time and place by this uploader. P 1 9 9   15:28, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : two enormous tags, hence, hence, unusable, and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 06:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 06:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

becuse i did it so i want delat this Roger1917 (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. P 1 9 9   15:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably unused autopromo, along with other uploads: File:Apodemia.jpg, File:Anillo de compromiso Apodemia.jpg Pibwl (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo has direct reference to my name 196.216.53.66 19:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, license irrevocable. High quality image uploaded long ago, so doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   15:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo has direct reference to my name 196.216.53.66 19:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, license irrevocable. High quality image uploaded long ago, so doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   15:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one-file-upload which is missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP and many alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsichere Identifizierung, keine Lizenz Mehlauge (talk) 20:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   15:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark with copyright : XEON (C) Civa (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:44, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused gif file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:44, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hardly "own work", all over net, and previosly deleted File:Sarah Siddique pressebillede.jpg, which was "own work" by someone else... Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found everywhere such as http://i44.tinypic.com/1ifqch.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Paterm (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   15:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia commons ? Roland zh (talk) 23:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unuses personal file (selfie), hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload of rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   15:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, https://f4.bcbits.com/img/a2181688643_10.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found elswhere. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho very 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 22:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy request made on behalf of the original uploader via OTRS ticket #2018042810004644. The terms of the licence have been discussed and the grounds of the application in the correspondent's own words are: 1. I am the owner of those photographs. I don't want my name to be displayed on Wikipedia. 2. I didn't expect anyone to write their own descriptions on one my photographs (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IndianRailways.JPG). 3. I have seen numerous abuse over the internet of use of my images on their personal blogs and websites without giving reference to the wikipedia site. The simple solution I see is Delete images from the source, Wikipedia. Images are my work, not yours and not anyone's on the Internet. Nthep (talk) 16:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. 1. Too late for that. Deleting the image will not remove your username from WP and Commons. 2. This is a wiki, edits by others are to be expected. 3. Misuse of images is the copyright holders responsibility, see COM:ENFORCE. License is irrevocable and image is in use. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per rationale given by User:P199. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy request made on behalf of the original uploader via OTRS ticket #2018042810004644. The terms of the licence have been discussed and the grounds of the application in the correspondent's own words are:

  1. . I am the owner of those photographs. I don't want my name to be displayed on Wikipedia.
  2. . I didn't expect anyone to write their own descriptions on one my photographs (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IndianRailways.JPG). #. I have seen numerous abuse over the internet of use of my images on their personal blogs and websites without giving reference to the wikipedia site.
 Keep. 1. Too late for that. Deleting the image will not remove your username from WP and Commons. 2. This is a wiki, edits by others are to be expected. 3. Misuse of images is the copyright holders responsibility, see COM:ENFORCE. License is irrevocable and image is in use. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per rationale given by User:P199. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has copyright information in the metadata, no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (C) Stellar Exposures, who must confirm the license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 15:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official Australian government photo of this person, not "own work" and does not have a usable CC license. the metadata states: "No lending, selling or framing for profit or favour is allowed unless authority is gained from AUSPIC - S1-112.2 Parliament House, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia." Photos from the official website, for example, are "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia", which we can't use on Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Saumya Joshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused uploads, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 23:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 37.171.14.236 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://viva.org.co/cajavirtual/svc0321/articulo05_clip_image003.jpg

"Se permite la reproducción de nuestros artículos siempre y cuando se cite la fuente." Translation: "The reproduction of our articles is permitted provided that the source is cited."

This permission may only apply to article text, not the photos. Guanaco (talk) 05:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also no permission to modify. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From MorgueFile, which has a custom license with unclear terms. The legal text of the license is unavailable, so I can't determine if it is acceptable for Commons. Guanaco (talk) 05:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The full text of the license is here. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Wrong license in the file description. Someone would need to review the license at the source page and create a proper license tag if we were to keep this file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Wikipedia, the term nanocellulose originated in the 1980s. It seems highly unlikely this is public domain under US copyright rules. Guanaco (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meiner Meinung nach sollte man dieses Bild löschen. Es ist ganz verzerrt und von mieser Qualität; vermutlich hochgeladen, als hier noch nichts Besseres war. Es gab schon eine kleine Diskussion und mittlerweile haben Achim 55 und besonders Lämpel für ein viel besseres Bild gesorgt, das auch schon eingebunden ist. Beste Grüße. /// Hallo. This photograph should be deleted, because of its miserable, distorted quality! Here are other portraits of Bussy-Rabutin from much better quality, which can be used instead; Lämpel and Achim 55 made a much better image yesterday. Greetings, Marie Adelaide Marie Adelaide (talk) 09:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photo more than ten years ago when at that time the resolution of apparatus was low and where also at that time (2006) no photo at all exist on wikipedia for this subject. Since then, camera have very strongly improved and it is clear that much better works are now available thanks to the effort of other contributors that have made very constructive job. But I don't think that this is the policy of wikipedia to remove older works which quality is now less than what can be achieved today. Moreover (and more importantly for me), I don't think that this the use on wikipedia commons to show not the slightest sign of respect to the work of previous contributors (especially in the discussion page where words such as miserable and all possible german synonyms should be avoided to qualify the work of someone who take personnal time to photography and then to upload, classify, etc ...) . I do not see any reason at all for removing this way the contribution and I am quite shocked on the way the problem of this photo is handled (for me, there is no problem at all as this contribution of reduced quality can remain unused and everybody is happy). Christophe.Finot (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Commons is a repository of educational media. This image has been superceded by an image of better quality, which is why it lost is status as being educational useful. This does not mean that the community is not grateful for or does not value your contribution!. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logically inconsistent filename / uploader requesting deletion / not in use in any reader-facing pages Jc86035 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logically inconsistent filename / uploader requesting deletion / not in use in any reader-facing pages Jc86035 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Indonesia. Seems to be recent artwork per Blanco Renaissance Museum. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jean-Luc Prou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of person without notability (I think) ; No use on wikipedia : Commons is not a personal web site ; I did not put DR on a photo of musician and another of writer.

Civa (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
je suis le créateur de la photographie "Chanteloup-Luc.jpg". Afin qu'il n'y ai aucun doute, je vous propose de contacter la personne sur la photo, Luc Chanteloup, sur son e-mail suivant : luc.chanteloup@orange.fr ou sur son téléphone personnel : 06 79 65 49 02.
Cette photo a sans doute été utilisée pour d'autres sites Internet sans mon autorisation ou par Luc Chanteloup lui-même avec mon accord pour l'utiliser comme il le souhaite.
Toutes les photos déposées par mes soins sur Wikimedia Commons ont été réalisées par mes soins et vous pourrez, si vous le souhaitez (je vous donnerai les e-mail et n° de téléphone de chacune des personnes photographiées), contacter les personnes prises en photo, afin d'être rassuré sur les crédits photos.
Merci de me tenir au courant pour la photo "Chanteloup-Luc.jpg".
Dans l'attente de votre réponse. Cordialement. --Jean-Luc Prou (talk) 05:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Quelques explications :
Wikipédia et Commons sont des encyclopédies. Cela veut dire qu'il ne faut y charger que des articles ou des photos de sujets ou de personnes ayant une certaine notoriété. Voir Commons:Critères d'inclusion/Résumé. Ce n'est pas comme Flickr où on peut charger ses photos de vacances. Une exception : on peut charger une photo de soi-même si on souhaite simplement illustrer avec sa photo sa page utilisateur sur un des sites wikipédia ou Commons. Dans ce cas, au lieu de prévoir une category, il suffit d'ajouter dans la description de la photo {{User page image}} . Cela classera la photo dans Category:User page images.
Il m'a semblé que les personnes dont vous avez chargé les photos n'entrent pas dans ce critère de notoriété. A l'exception de File:Hamerel-Tiphaine.jpg (musicienne) et File:Rossignol-Marguerite.jpg (écrivain). Peut-être me suis-je trompé. Dans ce cas il suffit de remplacer leur category Category:Photographs par une category plus précise telle que Category:Writers from France et le signaler en commentaire dans la suite des présents paragraphes : Dont delete ....jpg who is a writer in France.
Bien sur, vous me direz qu'il y a dans Commons des milliers de photos sans intérêt. Par exemple les photos de vagues dans tous les océans du monde. Mais ce n'est pas une raison pour ajouter des photos de lieux ou de personnes sans une certaine notoriété.
Quelques précisions si vous le voulez bien :
  • Il faut éviter ces category très générales : Category:Photographs, Category:Images, Category:Plants, Category:Paris et utiliser des category plus précises : Category:Writers from France, Category:Basilique Notre-Dame de la Garde, Category:Sequoiadendron giganteum, Category:Paintings from Italy in the Louvre.
  • Pour vous éviter tout désagrément, ne donnez pas de mail ou de numéro de téléphone dans vos commentaires. Si vous vous créez une page utilisateur (pas compliqué) avec une adresse mail (que les autres wikipediens ne verront pas), ils pourront vous envoyer des mails sans connaitre votre adresse mail.
  • Essayez de charger des photos avec une plus grande définition (>500 Ko) et avec les metadata ajoutées par l'appareil photo numérique ou le scanner. Elles sont appelées ici EXIF. La petite taille de fichiers de photos et l'absence de metadonnées peuvent laisser penser que la photo a été prélevée d'un site web quelconque, sans vérification de licence et d'autorisation.
  • Commons est très chatouilleux pour la vérification de l'autorisation donnée par une personne à utiliser sa photo. Le mail ne leur suffit pas. Il faut suivre une procédure dite Commons:OTRS assez complexe que je n'ai jamais mise en oeuvre.
Voila. C'est sans prétention de ma part. De toute façon, je ne dispose pas (et ne veux pas disposer) des droits d'administrateur pour supprimer des fichiers. Si je vous ai blessé, je vous prie de m'en excuser. Si vous souhaitez poursuivre la discussion ou bien des conseils (?), le mieux serait que vous m'écriviez dans ma page de discussion.
Bonnes contributions. --Civa (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am the creator of the DR.
 Keep Kervella-Gilles, Photograph from France. In use : There is a page in French wikipédia : fr:Gilles Kervella.
 Keep Chanteloup-Luc, Chemist from France.
--Civa (talk) 09:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept two: one per other DR, the other because it is in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a professional portrait. A similar portrait uploaded by Geokal123 was deleted as a copyvio. This leads me to believe that the own work claim on these portraits is not genuine. SpanishSnake (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo possibly above COM:TOO, depending on country --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If restored and re-released in 2017, very likely that copyright has been renewed. Anyway found any reason for a 1953 film to be public domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a restriction, as well, on Editorial Use Only? CerroFerro (talk) 20:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: invalid license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If restored and re-released in 2017, very likely that copyright has been renewed. Anyway found any reason for a 1953 film to be public domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, are there restrictions on Editorial Use Only? Another question, what happens what a Film Society, a which there are hundreds, posts the image on their site, then reposted, again and again. Do wiki editors have investigate every posting to determine if the film copyright has been renewed? CerroFerro (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: invalid license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at http://choufijdid.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are other copies of this file that do the task. For example, File:History of the Universe lang.svg can use the lang=qct parameter to produce the same image without having any characters converted to curves. The file proposed for deletion is a workaround, but it is no longer needed. Glrx (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree Delete (I am the uploader.) JoKalliauer (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://vkfaces.com/vk/user/eugenerise Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creator died in 1988, no permission given. Gnom (talk) 21:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be permanently located at the Kunstmuseum Basel? FOP is applicable, as in Switzerland this applies not only to streets and places, but within buildings, too. --Quedel (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Museum items are not "permanent". And this photo clearly wasn't taken in the exhibition. --Gnom (talk) 08:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Reinhard Kraasch: added an OTRS ticket and removed the {{Delete}} template, but seems to have forgotten to close this DR. Storkk (talk) 15:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: now has OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Assemblée nationale, https://twitter.com/JeunesAvecDC/status/884074222791905281 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Les droits de cette photo, prise dans l'hémicycle en début de législature, appartiennent au député concerné. --Authueil (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no indication of a free license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, as the Assemblée Nationale, does not release its pictures under CC. Rhadamante (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unscharfes nutzloses Bild Mehlauge (talk) 22:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: image seems fine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://lib.bibiana.sk/workspace/images/00000006665/toth_dezider.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the website linked, or was at some point; the website has no licensing information but since the photo was created by someone other than the uploader it requires their permission for the uploader to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of the uploader attributed to a photographer, need the photographer's permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was taken from a fan wiki. It could be from anywhere. Need information about the actual author and license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website it is from does not appear to have licensing information, so need permission to use the photo or clarification of the license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The public domain tag does not apply, the photo file was taken from this medical journal, which is copyrighted, and there is no other information about the photo that indicates it is not copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]