Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 23rd, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, but a derivative of the poster with unclear copyright status. Sealle (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The poster is not protected by copyright under Russian law. {{PD-RU-exempt}}Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 07:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Eg0rk0t323, it is you who must provide proper licensing info, not anybody else. Sealle (talk) 07:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Basically I work in Wikipedia with articles, not on the Wikimedia Commons with the files, so I did not learn all the local rules. Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 08:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 08:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See - Commons:Currency#Philippines, Simmilar images were deleted previously, w:File:New PHP200 Banknote (Obverse).jpg was non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banknotes of the Philippines. --Sealle (talk) 09:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sirenikfire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unambiguous copyvios - see user talk/history; File:Princeton 2017.png is here; File:Princeton Perez.jpg is here; File:Princeton and Camila Cabello.jpg is here; etc. --Эlcobbola talk 13:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 07:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The world map and disc graphic portion is non trival - w:File:Forthnet logo orig.gif was non-free... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 10:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 10:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 11:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No given license, and this looks like poster art from a third party ( which are not typically under a free license). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use on an attack page. Yann (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie still, not acceptable. Yann (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, spam Chrissymad (talk) 19:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nick at 19:50, 23 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation and Promotional usage of Commons - --Krdbot 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; spam Chrissymad (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nick at 19:50, 23 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation and Promotional usage of Commons - --Krdbot 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, spam Chrissymad (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nick at 19:50, 23 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation and Promotional usage of Commons - --Krdbot 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; spammy garbage. Chrissymad (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nick at 19:48, 23 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violations and Promotional usage of Commons - --Krdbot 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (screenshot) of a photo without proper attribution of the author and license terms. A.Savin 20:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have to find that image, but I don't know where to look, as I don't speak the Bulgarian language. It's easier if you remove it. Sorry for the miss understanding, as I wasn't aware that I had to source the images in the screendump as well. But It's logical. Sorry. Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  17:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The difficult way to find the source of the image:
1- Read the description in english abput the image, in the Bulgarian Wikipedia.
2- Search for "Saksaywaman" on the internet.
3- Open en:Sacsayhuamán.
4- Scroll down and secomd image is File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 05.JPG , the original image (and Featured image to boot). Tm (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Tm. P 1 9 9   17:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@P199: Don't you see that the picture is still not properly licensed and attributed? --A.Savin 17:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason as previously. Nothing has changed, the attribution and licensing are still not sufficient. At least three images used in the screenshot (including WP logo; the Vlad Dracula portrait may be PD, though) are copyrighted and not owned by the uploader. So, either the screenshot is to be properly licensed, or it must be deleted. The closing admin unfortunately does not respond on the pinging. A.Savin 18:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

en:WP:POINT? Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  19:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Same reason as previously. Nothing has changed.

Again difficult way to find the sources of the images:

1- Read the description in english abput the image, in the Bulgarian Wikipedia.

2- Search for "Saksaywaman" on the internet.
3- Open en:Sacsayhuamán.
4- Scroll down and secomd image is File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 05.JPG , the original image

Repeat again to the image of Vlad the Impaler, read the en:Vlad the Impaler and see the image File:Vlad Tepes 002.jpg or Category:Portrait of Vlad III the Impaler (Ambras Castle)

Repeat again to the image of Metabolism, find bg:Метаболизъм, and see the image File:AdenosineTriphosphate.qutemol.gif.

The Wikipedia logo is straight forward. Total time spent=5 minutes. Tm (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Total time spent fixing the licensing of the image=15 minutes. Why the DR, when is more simple and easier to just correct the licenses? Tm (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm not the uploader and it's not my job. --A.Savin 21:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment So, improving the description and\or licensing is not your job, but instead, open two deletion requests is your job? Right. Your answer says it all. Tm (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As always, you are extremely friendly and intelligent. Fixing the correct license IS the job of the uploader, and anyone who finds an incorrect license IS of course free to open an RfD. Any more questions? --A.Savin 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No. Your answers and actions speak for themselves about your motives to open a second deletion request. Tm (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn, as the licenses have been fixed. --A.Savin 12:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably no own work of the uploader + permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 11:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The sculpture benefits from Freedom of Panorama in Spain and since EXIF is present, I see no reason to doubt {{Own}}. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this work permanently located in a public place? Gouwenaar (talk) 13:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was assuming it's on permanent display in Capmany but have been unable to ascertain whether this is the case. I will gladly strike my !vote if so, but will wait for the uploader to confirm/deny. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: superseded by speedy COPYVIO request. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam. Spam. Spam. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably no own work of the uploader + permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 11:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably no own work of the uploader + permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably no own work of the uploader + permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably no own work of the uploader + permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errant upload SecretName101 (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission artist Stokhof de Jong is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 20:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:30, 24 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentally uploaded non-free video ~nmaia d 19:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentally uploaded unfree video ~nmaia d 22:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentally uploaded non-free video ~nmaia d 19:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentally uploaded non-free video ~nmaia d 19:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was supposed to be a category Nv8200p (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a third party logo not own work as claimed, compare w:File:Quinnipiac Bobcats.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Non-free logo above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from KOEI game[1] Outlookxp (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 10:53, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. The institution was established in 2010. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessairly simple given the non-free status of w:File:Wassmer logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threhsold of originality concern in graphic element (top) , Equivalent at English Wikipedia was w:File:Tanzania Telecommunications Company Limited generation T logo.png was non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's only uploaded photo. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See - Commons:Currency#Philippines, Simmilar images were deleted previously, w:File:New PHP100 Banknote (Obverse).jpg was non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marchjuly as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=File cannot be found anywhere on the source website, but it is doubtful that this could be accepted under a CC-by-sa-4.0 license even if it could per COM:CUR#Philippines Yann (talk) 23:11, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rayxer Web (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By French rules this is complex logo, because it has artistic intent. This is not a specific font, because both e-s are very different. OTRS-permission from company representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Migebert (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osama faris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MANDEZVERA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

حاوی تبلیغات است E.houshyar (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 10:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality unlikely to be a own work Perumalism Chat 10:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not realistically useful for an educational purpose (Private image collections) and violation of the depicted person's personality right or right of publicity - Commons:Project scope, Personality rights 최광모 (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not realistically useful for an educational purpose (Private image collections) and violation of the depicted person's personality right or right of publicity - Commons:Project scope, Personality rights 최광모 (talk) 10:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pkstiger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Vj7895

[edit]

The files are Filipino 10 peso coins, which are prohibited from reproduction by the Central Bank of the Philippines according to COM:CUR, so both files are not appropriate on Wikimedia Commons. --廣九直通車 (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Another Patch of) Files of User:Vj7895

[edit]

The files are Filipino 1 peso coins, which are prohibited from reproduction by the Central Bank of the Philippines according to COM:CUR, so both files are not appropriate on Wikimedia Commons. --廣九直通車 (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Yet Another Patch of) Files of User:Vj7895

[edit]

The files are Filipino 25 cents coins, which are prohibited from reproduction by the Central Bank of the Philippines according to COM:CUR, so both files are not appropriate on Wikimedia Commons. --廣九直通車 (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Replacement images courtesy of WayKurat.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like self-promotion, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Found it here https://www.facebook.com/pg/PeterBakarePB/posts/ and other sites Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single upload account; fake organization Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway it is above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, copyright Copyright: silvano bacciardi as per exif Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+ it can be found in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adidasegypt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license. Obviously not the Youtube user's work. LX (talk, contribs) 11:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license. Obviously not the Youtube user's work. LX (talk, contribs) 11:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk, What you saw wrong, the image is about free license. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jheme1997 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 23 April 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't see wrong. This is a non-free photo by Miguel Tovar/LatinContent/Getty Images. "TeleTomas" has no right to publish a slideshow containing the photo under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 15:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete While Getty & their subsidiaries have been known to sell images that are freely licensed elsewhere, evidence of an original source is needed to overturn the presumption that they own or manage the rights as advertised.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license. Obviously not the Youtube user's work. LX (talk, contribs) 11:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk, What you saw wrong, the image is about free license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jheme1997 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 23 April 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't see wrong. This is a non-free photo, probably grabbed from http://www.tvnotas.com.mx/noticias-espectaculos-mexico/fernando-colunga-le-quitan-exclusividad-de-2-millones-por-berrinchudo. "TeleTomas" has no right to publish slideshows containing other people's non-free photos under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 15:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license. Obviously not the Youtube user's work. LX (talk, contribs) 11:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't think this is own work based on the (c) in the watermark Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+can be found in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GlitZ Kolkata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+unlikely to be own work, one comes obviously from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lrt000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False licensing claims. These are not screenshots of GPL software but logos of Italian TV channels.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Small size, no metadata.

MTinka (talk) 16:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque debería estar en un curriculum subida o en un enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:36, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:36, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:36, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:37, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:36, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un archivo pdf que debería estar en un curriculum o enlace externo Fouba-asi (talk) 18:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 00:36, 30 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fouba-asi --Krdbot 06:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JIMI KENDRIX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader; similar issue at en.wiki).

hiàn 03:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Buitrungnghia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camilo rabelly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ekemini Otung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)‹‹‹‹››››[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Moheen Reeyad. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ekemini Otung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like an advertising image saved rom a website Migebert (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type image, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadeemabbasbhatti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thomasantony123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The copyright to a photograph almost always belongs to the photographer, not the subject. These photos are pretty clearly the work of multiple different photographers, who should all confirm that their work is freely licensed by contacting OTRS.

Storkk (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thomasantony123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work

Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. The uploader's last remaining contributions, camera data is different. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This licensing doesn't make sense on this upload. The trailer is from a major movie from 2014 from Universal Studios with a copyright notice and everything but was uploaded to YouTube by Comedy Central? From what I can tell Comedy Central had absolutely nothing to do with this movie at all. This appears to be license laundering which would be quite surprising coming from a major company like Comedy Central. Majora (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Xiumin at the 2016 Asian Music Awards (2).png was deleted as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from Flower Bed due to license laundering. As such, this collage is compromised. xplicit 04:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it not easier to create a new version with another Xiumin image? --SuZumiya (talk) 23:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SuZumiya: You can create one and overwrite this file, but this specific version still requires deletion. xplicit 03:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gargara151 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads by a new user with inconsistent low resolution and incomplete EXIF. Images of a public figure (Iranian pop singer) with questionable authorship and no evidence of permission (the first one is clearly taken from a commercial site and has no educational usage). A better image with reviewed license is available at File:Ali Abdolmaleki.jpg

GermanJoe (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gargara151 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing EXIF, user upload history.

4nn1l2 (talk) 11:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal. Non used. Out of scope.

Sturm (talk) 14:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality / Non used / No focus / Out of scope

Sturm (talk) 23:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SotaLCB2416 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unfree license: https://www.japanfs.org/en/news/archives/news_id030816.html

Green Mostaza (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a lower quality version of File:Atascocitahighschool2006.jpg - No reason to keep it WhisperToMe (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information on the photographer of this 3D object, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photography of a photography. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Foto eines Fotos RiHanna12345 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found as early as 2017 at http://s3.amazonaws.com/dostuff-production/band_alternate_photo/custom_photos/81955/custom2a145c5a840de16c760963e1d1b6d4cc.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/188e28b2b8172777b7c6f75b32df6846/5B5A4901/t51.2885-15/e35/30079358_196813664440356_4523423860674002944_n.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found elsewhere:

and more. -- Geagea (talk) 22:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo belongs to the University of Chicago. In other words, the US Government is not the author of the photo. George Ho (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at http://www.zlotalinia.pl/robert_lenard_bachmann_malarstwo.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, similar to https://geo-static.traxsource.com/files/images/b950340_large.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image obviously is a scan of an old postcard. The photograph, which was used for the postcard in the 1930/1940s, was taken by Mr. Alfred Wugk, a local photographer at Wilsdruff. His original image can be found at http://www.autobahngeschichte.de/Menueoptionen/Autobahnen/Bruecken/A4/Saubach/saubach.htm, there as Abb. 19 ("image no. 19") almost at the bottom of the page. There is no evidence that this file here is truely an own work of User:Polypropylen, the postcard and the imaged linked by me are identical. Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 22:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:Shounter Vally 2.jpg Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tvretv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tvretv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious PD rationale. These files were apparently uploaded in 2016 under the claim that the copyright holder had released them into the public domain using the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. After DCB tagged them as missing evidence of that, Florstein removed the problem tag, changed the source to {{own}}, and the {{cc-zero}} tag to {{PD-RU-exempt}}. However, this doesn't seem to fall into any of the categories enumerated by that template (and it's certainly not the uploader's own work). It's artwork on a smartcard, not a law, state symbol, folk lore or news fact.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file does not fall under public domain. Rileyjharms (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This files does not exist in the public domain. Rileyjharms (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This files does not exist in the public domain. Rileyjharms (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright: File is very unlikely to be own work. Picture depicts Federico Ivanier's El bosque book published by Alfaguara. ·×ald·es 02:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, not own work, if work is from other ph needs authorization for this upload. Frodar (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Election poster. COM:DW. No permission. 85.212.173.125 06:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted painting eventually still in copyright by paintor. Who is the paintor? When die he/she die? -- Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW - no permission for the depicted poster Jcb (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed, no problem. Just let me know where you see the original is above the threshold of originality. Is it only because it contains a logo? --Vаdiм (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is a problem, but also the text. In principle, text is copyrightable as well. That won't be an issue if there were e.g. 5 words, but this text is too big to be below TOO. Jcb (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then. Thanks for your effort. --Vаdiм (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: text above TOO. --Guanaco (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo does not have permission from its source[http://blogs.dw.com/womentalkonline/2012/10/08/my-life-as-a-tv-presenter/چ Shxahxh (talk) 20:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Guanaco (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Protocolled (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, unused, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. -- 109.238.80.47 17:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal image. Cjp24 (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This files does not exist in the public domain. Rileyjharms (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason given for deletion. P 1 9 9   18:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An administrator should check whether the originality threshold is indeed not crossed Hektor (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   18:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file format; low quality Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary redirect Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful. Out of scope. COM:TOYS otherwise. Yann (talk) 13:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too many people in the foreground to be useful. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that PDF file can't be displayed in Wikidata. Instead, I have uploaded File:Medical_Finding_Model_Example_Midsystolic_Click.png to use in wikidata:Wikidata:Property_proposal/medical_finding_model. --Okkn (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Medical Finding Model Example Midsystolic Click.png. P 1 9 9   18:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billelaggab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billelaggab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations, considering the user's upload history.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO - File:Keith Bergelt.jpg, for example, is here. --Эlcobbola talk 08:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billelaggab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictional maps of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

All fictional and personal test maps, some are used in a personal sandbox as a test. No educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Fictional test maps, no educational value, out of scope. Some only used on a personal sandbox.

P 1 9 9   17:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All sandboxes were deleted, images are now unused. --P 1 9 9   19:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sir, i want to delete my own photo Tushar Singha (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. And out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test image Strawberriez (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   18:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ronn (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error uplaod SecretName101 (talk) 17:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   18:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the motiv is more to the right, driving along buildings and taking fotos needs some preparation GeorgDerReisende (talk) 18:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is very dark, I cannot see almost anything. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted sculpture is likely still in copyright. Regrettably, Japan has not freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. Permission by sulptor or deletion required. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, there is no Freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Japan. It is unlikely that the sculptor has been dead for >70 years, or that the sculpture is otherwise in the public domain. --Storkk (talk) 09:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, but this is clearly poster art by a third party. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteAlso a fair use, which is a violation of COM:FU.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily, by Túrelio. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos from 970214jh.tistory.com

[edit]

Although the posts are labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, the blog's homepage states "상업적 2차가공 및 로고크롭은 허용하지 않습니다" (commercial use, secondary processing, and logo crops are not permitted). This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons.

xplicit 09:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator, and COM:PCP. See also Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2015/02#Photos_from_http://jjoggomi.tistory.com/ and the DRs linked there. --Storkk (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the post is labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, the blog's homepage states "사진 2차 가공은 로고 크롭 & 재보정 금지입니다" (Secondary processing, logo crops ... are not allowed). This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons. xplicit 09:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Storkk (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Ma Jir Bo, die in 1985, not PD shizhao (talk) 13:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Ma Jir Bo, die in 1985, not cc-by-sa shizhao (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Ma Jir Bo, die in 1985, not cc-by-sa shizhao (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from souvenir. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason for the deletion הלל יערי (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How is this different from the other balls appearing on the Wikipedia website? הלל יערי (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Toys are not utilitarian objects, and have copyright. See COM:TOYS. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free website screenshot. Seems like the author of the screenshot is not the user shown in the photo 109.172.101.69 00:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Terms of Use: All contents of the Site and Services including but not limited to design, text, software, technical drawings, configurations, graphics, other files, and their selection and arrangement are: Copyright © Keybase, and/or the proprietary property of its suppliers, affiliates, or licensors. All Rights Reserved. Ruthven (msg) 06:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Antonio de La Gandara self portrait.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 06:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nome errado. Aline Saldanha (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:NWFR.jpg]]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Usar {{Rename}}. Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC) shizhao (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the company is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the company that operates it is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the company that operates it is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the company that operates it is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the artist is based in the USA, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Not created by a Chinese author. Besides, the work looks to be printed, rather than calligraphic. Disclosure: I used CommonsHelper to upload the file. Adabow (talk) 22:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the company is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hong Kong's TOO is very very and very low, it's even possible that MTR logos are beyond that and deleted, not sure why the previous kept decision is based on Mainland one? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Low-resolution versions of corporate logos enjoy fair-use protection in non-commercial contexts such as Wikimedia. UnitedStatesian (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. @UnitedStatesian: We do not do non-commercial. --Ruthven (msg) 06:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the organization is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not a calligraphy, but above ToO. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the university is based in Taiwan, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO China: copyrighted shape and font. 10:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saudónio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and TV screenshot. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Hystrix. Ruthven (msg) 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saudónio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Small resolution, no metadata. One iPhone pic from an album cover.

Hystrix (talk) 15:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 06:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 06:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: if it's a Government's work, copyright belongs to the Government, not to the author of the calligraphy. It's a work for hire. Ruthven (msg) 06:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Logo wurde von mir aus der Chinesischen Wikimedia bei der dortigen Darstellung der "China Academy of Art" übernommen und in den aus verschiedenen Quellen erarbeiteten Artikel zu eben dieser Academy of Arts eingearbeitet. Hat das was mit Threshold of Originality zu tun?


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not a calligraphy, but above ToO. Ruthven (msg) 06:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's hilarious, I do not see anything considered as calligraphy.--Cicku (talk) 02:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Cicku. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the organization is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex calligraphy logo. Hong Kong has a very low threshold of originality per Commons:TOO Hong Kong. Wcam (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That’s only letters. --DaB. (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DaB.: Please see the closing admin's rationale for deletion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:SCAA logo.svg. This is really calligraphy rather than simple standard characters. --Wcam (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wcam: I know what calligraphy is. The logo you nominated for deletion is in my eyes just a bunch of (maybe nice written) letters with circles – and that’s just not enough. File:SCAA logo.svg had at least some graphical elements. I’m sorry, but I will not change my mind here. But you can of course re-nominate it (with a good explation) and maybe you can persuade another admin. --DaB. (talk) 21:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO in Hong Kong is as low as that in the United Kingdom which is extremely low. Logos that are literally "only letters" are not ok per COM:TOO United Kingdom, let alone calligraphy. Those admins who are not familiar with UK TOO are advised to see past DRs regarding UK TOO. Wcam (talk) 15:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep logo has been in use at least since 1938 = copyright expired.--Roy17 (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: Thanks for the info. Could you change the license tags accordingly? --Wcam (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination as license tags are updated. --Wcam (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination withdrawn, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the organization is based in Taiwan, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Moonian. Ruthven (msg) 06:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. Calligraphy is protected in Taiwan (Commons:TOO Taiwan). Wcam (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted previously deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/flag files uploaded by kowp users. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a calligraphy. Ruthven (msg) 06:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, I don't think this is a personal work (no metadata + small size) Kikiroux (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 06:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsely uploaded as own-work; a cursory search shows it can be found in several news websites cubic[*]star 19:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So what, is the main entrance of a public service. There are thousands photographs like this (Dor-astra (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Deleted: not own work. Ruthven (msg) 06:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie posters

JuTa 19:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification I will try to obtain their official permission statement soon. Can you keep these for few more days? Orgio89 (talk) 01:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have the owners permission letter and I scanned the letter where can I send the permission letter? Thanks. Orgio89 (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've just sent the permission letter for above files to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Orgio89 (talk) 04:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: waiting for OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 06:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magnusvidisson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader appears to be posting photos from the web/social media claiming as own. All low-res images from different settings.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted moview posters.

JuTa 19:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible license. Licensing problem. Out of project scope. 1233 (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by World's Lamest Critic as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derived from copyrighted image. http://rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royinterface/13/124/20160555/F4.large.jpg ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note about deletion due to copyright violation:

I am working with small group of people to put up a Bioelectricity wikipedia page, in order for the general public to have working knowledge of this very important scientific field. An artist that works with us, Jeremy Guay has recently uploaded a couple of images that he created himself (with instruction of Dr. Michael Levin, http://ase.tufts.edu/biology/labs/levin/, who we both work for) onto the wiki commons space. One of the images was immediately deleted and it was cited as a copyright violation. Though in the article where this image is, Jeremy Guay is given credit for creating this photo and Michael Levin was a main author of the paper. How can we go about releasing rights on wiki commons? Can you please tell us exactly what is wrong with the image, so we can correct this? Thanks, (User talk:Tiadeeharrison)

The photo in question is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ion_channels,_electrical_synapses_%E2%80%93_Neural,_Developmental.png&action=edit&redlink=1

  • Comment @Moheen Reeyad: This deletion discussion should probably include all images contained in this Wikipedia draft article. They were uploaded by a variety of users and some appear to be derivative images of unknown origin (probably textbooks or journal papers). World's Lamest Critic (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment' These are images which we created and/or have rights to; please specify precisely which images are not allowable to release based on the journal in which they were published. We need to see the reasons why each image is being deleted.

Thanks, (User talk:Tiadeeharrison)

@Jeremycguay: Please see COM:OTRS for a way to assert the copyright for this and other images. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is the uploader's sole contribution to Commons and there is no evidence of permission for its use. Leoboudv (talk) 07:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: source site not reachable, license can't be checked. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe the photo violates text author's copyright. 1931 texts are not enough old to assume public domain without evidence. Who is author of the text and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 07:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality query on the graphic element (left) , Equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Sberbank.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be by the subject (not the uploader), but there's no evidence it's been suitably released Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file format; duplicate of File:FlAlexanderSpring.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 09:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Billy Black as per exif. not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Procedural close, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gmbrega for a DR involving all user's files. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tトリミング未処理で投稿しましたので削除お願いします 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 10:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on day of upload. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング未処理で投稿しましたので削除お願いします 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 10:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on day of upload. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect rename on my part, original file has now been redirected to correctly renamed file. No need to keep this redirect. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is credited to Gene Hanson at http://www.milwaukeeastro.org/history/awards.asp. The license shoud be confirmed using COM:OTRS. --ghouston (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have started the process of confirming the license via COM:OTRS as I am the Gene Hanson referred to at the link. That photo in the link cited is now credited to Wikimedia Commons with the attribution link to this page. --Milwaukeeastronomer (talk) 21:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, editing the other site is probably good enough to show authorship. --ghouston (talk) 23:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: authorship confirmed. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, author given as POPOVA_GALINA_GEORGIEVNA in exif Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains EXIF copyright notice, so "own work" is probably bogus. Appears to be copy of image from http://valet.ru/user/273554373/ RoySmith (talk) 12:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: User name has similarity with photographer's name per EXIF, photo on website in newer than upload. This looks legitimate. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sturm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book cover.... Possibly {{PD-text}}? Storkk (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP, no idea about the TOO in the source country. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sturm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book cover. Possibly {{PD-text}}? Storkk (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP, no idea about the TOO in the source country. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verschwommen + unscharf + schlecht ausgeleuchtet, auf eigenen Wunsch als Ersteller -Dispvas2018 (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". Metadata shows Author MARC EDISAD. Converting to DR Per file talk page, which states that the uploader is the copyright holder. @Eurenansantos: , please follow the instructions on OTRS so that we can properly archive your copyright claim. Thank you. Storkk (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hardly an own work but a PR photo from SOHO China Matthew hk (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hardly an own work but a PR photo from SOHO China Matthew hk (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is possible that the uploader was the creating artist and copyright owner of the logo of this hockey league, but a confirmation of those claims would be necessary from an address officially associated with the league [3]. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. No original size, no EXIF, other copyright violations by uploader. Insider (talk) 13:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WIKITRIPAU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS.

Yann (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour Yann

Par la présente j'atteste sur l'honneur que les photographies fournies sont des photographies personnelles de ma collection personnelle de figurines, figurins qui sont toujours en ma possession. En cela elles ne contreviennent pas sauf erreur de ma part, aux règles de Commons puisque l'on peut prendre me semble-t-il des photographies personnelles. Je suis à votre écoute pour plus d'information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIKITRIPAU (talk • contribs)

@WIKITRIPAU: Le problème ici n'est pas l'autorisation pour les photos, mais pour le sujet. Vos images sont des travaux dérivés, et donc soumis aux droits d'auteur du fabriquant de Playmobil. Voyez aussi le lien que j'ai donné au-dessus. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yann comme expliqué sur l'autre page, il ne s'agit pas de playmobil mais d'airgam boys, une société qui a disparu et dont les jouets ne sont plus commercialisés. Est ce que cela ne peut les sauver ? --WIKITRIPAU (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Supprimer Toujours fr:Œuvre orpheline, voir User_talk:WIKITRIPAU#File:Catalogue_airgm_boys_.pdf. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
je constate le peu d’intérêt pour cette discussion, sans doute y a t-il des cas plus sérieux, et plus évident que mes photos personnelles de figurines qui ne le sont pas moins. Sur le principe, j'ai anticipé la suppression de ces photos, en les enlevant sur l'article en sourçant à la place (après tout belle revanche de l'écrit sur i'image si je peux me permettre un mot d'esprit) je comprends tout à fait vos considérations en terme de propriété intellectuelle, ceci dit si on raisonne en termes de pur risque juridique, le risque d'action d'un ayant droit d'une société qui n'existe plus et peut être limité. Pour cette raison je m’abstiens sur ce vote. Si d'ici quelques mois en revanche, je constate qu'elles ne sont toujours pas effacées, je me permettrais de les remettre sur l'article initial pour qu'elles soient de nouveau utiles cdlt --WIKITRIPAU (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately the fact that the company producing these toys does not exist anymore does not mean that the right have expired. Thank you for your understanding. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio probably.


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. There may be more.

 Delete This upload is a mistake of mine. There is no reason to exist. It's OK to delete it. Thanks and sorry.--Stepanps (talk) 14:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Yann: I was specifically referring to the last photo, File:THW Jugend Playmobil.jpg. Please note that according to German FOP laws, even artworks that e.g. are moved during the night are considering to fall under FOP provisions. I.e. it's not important that they are immobile, it's just important that the exhibition is permanent (even if it is not exhibited all the time). Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I thought Playmobil was very old, but it was only invented in 1974: Playmobil. - Alexis Jazz 13:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

- Alexis Jazz 13:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept one per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Playmobil was invented in 1974. COM:TOY

- Alexis Jazz 14:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some notes:

- Alexis Jazz 14:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: File:SpeyerPlaymobil.JPG doesn't seem that permanent. It's about as permanent as a movie poster. Would a photo of a movie poster be considered FoP in Germany? - Okay, the date actually indicates it would have been in place for about half a year. That's longer than a movie poster, not sure if it qualifies as "permanent" though considering it has a set end date. - Alexis Jazz 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment {{FoP-Germany}} does not allow temporary displays in public space. — Racconish 16:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think we have had this discussion already about election posters. See also Srittau's comment above. Special cases like this one should be nominated separately. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think Srittau's comment refers to non-stationary art, as in the AIDA kissing lips German jurisprudence, which is not the case here. I would argue the Liebe deine Stadt jurisprudence is more pertinent, with its reference to the criterium of persistence (bleibend), where the Court specifically ruled the artwork was displayed for "a period of time longer than a temporary art exhibition". In any case, I agree with you : such a specific case should be discussed separately. — Racconish 08:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't have an opinion on the copyright for toys. However I'd like to highlight that my Playmobil pictures were uploaded 8 years ago and have been used in 6 Wikipedias since then. Other files proposed for deletion here were uploaded 13 or even 15 years ago and have been used on Wikipedia for over a decade. Commons rule on toys did not exist at the time these files were uploaded. This is an obviously demoralizing situation for Commons contributors, myself included. Moving forward, Commons rules should be made clear and applied swiftly and no file should be left lingering for 15 years before being deleted. D4m1en (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@D4m1en: I agree with that. Unfortunately getting clear rules in place is something that is in practice reserved for a lucky few and there are not enough volunteers to apply them swiftly. Any suggestion to help this situation would be welcome at the Village Pump (or copyright Village Pump). - Alexis Jazz 19:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentThe rational given for deletion of File:Sarajevo Dolac-Malta 2011-10-25 (14).jpg is COM:TOY. The picture doesn't show a toy. It shows an advertisement car. I don't think the picture should be deleted. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 01:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are right it is not a toy. Here is a new DR for it: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarajevo Dolac-Malta 2011-10-25 (14).jpg. - Alexis Jazz 18:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filtering some possible FoP cases from the DR above:

- Alexis Jazz 19:25, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept one. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild würde vom Verein Zukunftsraum Thayaland ausgetauscht Andrea Asinger (talk) 13:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kann gelöscht werden, Freigabe nicht erreichbar. Foto wurde ausgetauscht. --K@rl (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedied by User:Túrelio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen de mala calidad y repetida File:Juan Cordero - Portrait of Doña Dolores Tosta de Santa Anna - Google Art Project.jpg Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Woaw!  Delete and RD. Excellent pic in the link. --E4024 (talk) 07:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author of "中国银行" calligraphy is Guo Moruo [4], die 1978, not PD, and meet Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC) shizhao (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And

--shizhao (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: inferior copy of another file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the organization is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP, we have no information about the threshold of originality in Hong Kong. But since the PRC affords copyright protection to calligraphy and the TOO is very low in the UK, it is likely that this is copyrightable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2018 image with very low resolution, no permission, no metadata. Cjp24 (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samao makhloof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, self promotion content and obviously derivative work

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Kristine Bonnevie portrait.jpg with low quality edges. Contested {{Duplicate}}.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep One is the archive original and the other is a derivative, conventionally we keep both, and where we overwrite, the archive original is often reuploaded as a new file at some point in the future. They can be linked by a gallery or {{Extracted from}}. -- (talk) 15:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fae. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tasnim photo without photographer credited, not in /media (instead in /news) and no black credit border. - Alexis Jazz 15:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Brazil states - "Commercial use is allowed, as long as the artist's work is properly attributed" - here the uploader is claiming copyright, and there is no mention of the artist. Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a web photo, clearly not original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, HQ image, appears to be official team portrait, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 17:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://twitter.com/krreykjavik/status/864223108357607428?lang=en Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Small size, no metadata. MTinka (talk) 17:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Small size, no metadata, one date, different places, external source, no permission.

MTinka (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AP photo per data SecretName101 (talk) 17:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Ratna Sarita Cantik has spammed Commons with her personal images under different user names. --E4024 (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 17:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to delete an old redirect. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused placeholder Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have by mistake given a same name for different images and uploaded it . Hence kindly delete this image (set) so that I can upload them with separate proper file names Jegan 17:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted motion picture; there is no evidence that this image is from a public-domain film trailer. WFinch (talk) 18:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a crop of an official parliamentary photograph. No evidence that the uploader holds the copyright. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Igrexa_de_Santiago_de_Anse%C3%A1n,_Lal%C3%ADn_2.JPG Estevoaei (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by PCock as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.sunvalleyforum.com/mina-guli/
Converted by me to DR, as I'm not sure whether the external hit is really the source of our image or the other way round. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The external image has this path: http://sunvalleyforum.com/wpsvf/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Mina_Guli.jpg which suggest upload in June 2016, whereas the upload to Commons was in January 2016. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: While I don't think the referenced photo is the source, this was uploaded in a fairly small format without EXIF data by a one-shot account, so deleted per the PRP as a likely copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像がほぼ重複しているため。 Rebirth10 (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Miya, Whym, Yasu, and Y.haruo: Can one of you help? Unfortunately I don't understand the deletion reason when trying to translate with Google Translate. Thanks! Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"ほぼ重複" means "almost redundant"; these two files, perhaps?
--miya (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, thanks, miya!. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]