Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/03/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 20th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

practically the same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boeing_747_(7336841910).jpg GeXeS (talk) 06:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A scan of the same photo as File:Ryder_liebe.png which is found elsewhere in the Internet. See e.g. http://media.kansascity.com/smedia/2010/12/09/11/leon_jordan_2.embedded.prod_affiliate.81.JPG indexed by tineye.com since September 2011. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: file at [1], found by Google on a forum (I can't locate the post where it's included, but the username "Svizc88" doesn't appear there). No evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 09:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GetsDownWithSicknesses12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of unknown/insignificant subject (the uploader herself?), serves no educational purpose. (It's in use on Extremaduran Wikipedia, but the article seems to be about a blatantly non-notable person -- it would be a clear CSD A7 candidate on English Wikipedia. I've asked over at COM:Café for someone who speaks the language to tag the article for deletion.) IagoQnsi (talk) 04:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Is there an Extremaduran Wikipedia? I never heard that there is a language called Extremaduran. Wikipedia teaches me something every day. :) I agree with nom,  Delete. --E4024 (talk) 09:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, There is an Extremaduran wikipedia. We are trying to engage new people to enlarge the number of articles in wikipedia and it is possible that some users publish pictures like this as practices. Just give us a little time. Sorry for any inconvenience but it is all for the good of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanginu (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the info. Gracias. --E4024 (talk) 10:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let's delete it. Could you please tell me how to delete this pic by my own? I guess it will just get deleted with the procedure above. Am I right? Thanks Tanginu

@Tanginu: Since you requested it, I've tagged it for speedy deletion, so an admin will likely delete it shortly. -IagoQnsi (talk) 20:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Yann (talk) 05:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find this at the source mentioned. Yann (talk) 14:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wellcome Images has reorganized their server and apparently broke our gallery links. I spot-checked Category:Files_from_Wellcome_Images and almost all are broken and searching by obvious terms also did not help me find them. So I say  Keep this one here (uploader is not known for falsifying sources!) and instead recommend a more centralized discussion of how to fix the links. DMacks (talk) 15:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep moi aussi, au lieu de supprimer les photos disponibles, autant trouver une solution avec Wellcome, --Pierrette13 (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This should have been {{Licensereview}}, as I have advocated many times. :( Yann (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here is an archived link [2]. Indeed, search through wellcomelibrary.org or Google does not lead anywhere. We can hope that there is a temporal glitch in the search system of wellcomelibrary.org, or we can ask someone to write a simple bot fixing the broken links via archive.org. The trouble is wellcomelibrary.org aparently changed license for some of their image from cc-by to cc-nc-by over time. Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fæ uploaded a copy of this image in File:Melanie Klein (1882-1960); correspondence, Wellcome L0018518.jpg. The links are broken there too, but you can confirm the original license through the EXIF metadata. Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but then this is a duplicate. @Materialscientist, , Pierrette13, and DMacks: Do we need to keep it? Regards, Yann (talk) 04:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Melanie Klein 1952.jpg is an earlier file. It is a minor crop of File:Melanie Klein (1882-1960); correspondence, Wellcome L0018518.jpg, to remove inhomogeneous edges. Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have re-uploaded the file as a crop from File:Melanie Klein (1882-1960); correspondence, Wellcome L0018518.jpg to keep the EXIF. — Racconish 07:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above, but we need more License review. --Yann (talk) 07:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an album art. It might be non-free poster. Not a free file. Siddiqsazzad001 (Talk) 17:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 21:23, 20 März 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Album cover -- requires free license from record comapny via OTRS. --Krdbot 01:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://www.facebook.com/midtownstaxx/photos/a.461115367348838.1073741828.379108392216203/1351343908325975/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright 2018 Indigo Ag, Inc., similar to https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/3406799/Indigoag-July2017/Images/David-Perry-600x680.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Shailendra Bhojak / Press Trust of India Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere : حقوق النسخ محفوظة http://faselah.net/uploads/images/upload_1468944756.jpg, 2018© Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake own work probably copied from somewhere on the internet (user tags everything as own work). it appears to have been cropped from this painting and then the left side reconstructed (where the child covered Julie Clary in the original). Reconstruction is probably copyrightable but we don't know if this one is freely licensed--and it probably isn't. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed description, keep. --Taterian (talk) 03:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: request withdrawn. --JuTa 10:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded the wrong file. Please delete Sophiag1616 (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader requesting deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement[3] Shxahxh (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. Agreed. I shall delete and replace with non-copyrighted version. Rahman.mukras (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2018 (GMT)

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon ou sans intérêt encyclopédique.

Thesupermat (talk) 08:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: some, deleted and redirected most, kept a few as no duplicates. --JuTa 23:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this image is Saveliev. Therefore the tag should be updated accordingly. Armenius vambery (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any proof that Saveliev is the author and further more what's the reason to delete the file?--Sanandros (talk) 06:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Please see direct reference first publication: Projector (Spotlight) issue 21(67) dated Nov 15 1925. Also it was heavily digitally enhanced. --Armenius vambery (talk) 08:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And what is the full name of the photographer?--Sanandros (talk) 04:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Direct proof for copyright (and copyvio) is necessary. Place of publication of course should be added as supplementary info. It makes no difference in question of copyright. More - photo could be published simulatanously in other Soviet contemporary issues. Andros64 (talk) 08:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with images from earlier USSR is the authenticity. This one is heavily edited image: Rykov was moved from left to the center and for the sake of showing the facts not fiction it would be better to delete.--Armenius vambery (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: work of Vassily Ivanovich Saveliev (1888—1943), PD since 1 January 2018. --Sealle (talk) 05:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Shxahxh (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is published under free license. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Shxahxh (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is published under free license. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pomyłka w nazwie pliku Pece (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 22:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images. Commons is not a personal webhost

Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

During enquires into the status of Rail Alphabet, an e-mail back from the National Archives, concerns arose that the Transport typeface and certain related materials might not be Crown Copyright (with respect to additional design rights), despite them appearing on a large number of road signs in the UK, and being practically ubiquitous..

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC) [reply]

On hold - clarification has been sought from relevant parties.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unless explicit OTRS provided confirming relevant design elements (i.e the diagrams in the Schedule) explicitly and entirely crown copyright and thus covered by OGL etc., Furthermore the response to emails in OTRS tickets, 2017052210014402, 2017052210016428 seemed to indicate an incompatibility between OGL and Creative Commons licensing, and a need to check the status, despite the relevant document source indicating OGL status. I suggest you direct further concerns in the direction of the following contacts (psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk, TRAFFIC.SIGNS@dft.gsi.gov.uk), because I have so far had no response from the latter on the issue raised.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The copyright issue does not exist, for two very important reasons. The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) is quite clear that regardless of the copyright within a typeface, no copyright infringement occurs when the typeface is used to create imagery, such as the files listed in the deletion review, so the underlying OGL licence is valid and no other copyright exists in these images. Additionally, typeface protection in the UK, also under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) is for a maximum of 25 years, Transport font pre-dates this, but out of an abundance of caution, assuming a new copyright may have been created when the new act came into force, 25 years from 1988 takes us to 2013 (or 1 January 2014 as a likely date) when the Transport font (once again) passed into the public domain. I'm closing this DR for those two reasons. Design Rights, if they were to exist, would not apply to road signs due to their commonplace nature at the commencement of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) which specifically excludes commonplace designs. --Nick (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic signs are Crown copyright. You may reproduce traffic signs free of charge and without having to seek permission, but you must reproduce them accurately and not in a misleading context (e.g. not on roadside billboards where they could mislead drivers). (ref [4])

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst the above is applicable to Uk Traffic Signs content on Wikimedia Commons, this DR has been opened due to concerns over the continued presence of this and similar material on Commons, given a recent news item (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-43470241), Whilst there is no evidence indicating that the suspect mentioned obtained any material from Wikimedia Commons, the news item raised a 'safety concern' about the potential use of traffic signs material, and hence this DR has been filed per the precautionary principle..
Also affected (with far too many images to list indvidualy would be) Category:Diagrams_of_road_signs_of_the_United_Kingdom and it's sub-categories. Especially the files in Category:Transport_Alphabets_of_the_United_Kingdom and Category:Old Transport Alphabets of the United Kingdom, for which I may file an additional DR in the next few days. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn - Issued was raised at COM:VP and there was no substantial objection to these being retained. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Persuant to a concern raised here - Commons:Village_pump#A_concern_about_UK_Traffic_Signs_Content,_pursuant_to_a_recent_news_item_on_the_BBC_website, and that the status of these on review seems unclear, These say Crown Copyright in the documents, without giving any additional indication of OGL status.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn : 5 days at COM:VP and no concern raised. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comment and nominator withdrawing nomination. --Nick (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Persuant to the lack of clartiy regarding the status of the "Transport" and "Motorway" typefaces. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The copyright issue does not exist, for two very important reasons. The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) is quite clear that regardless of the copyright within a typeface, no copyright infringement occurs when the typeface is used to create imagery, such as the files listed in the deletion review, so the underlying OGL licence is valid and no other copyright exists in these images. Additionally, typeface protection in the UK, also under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) is for a maximum of 25 years, Transport font pre-dates this, but out of an abundance of caution, assuming a new copyright may have been created when the new act came into force, 25 years from 1988 takes us to 2013 (or 1 January 2014 as a likely date) when the Transport font (once again) passed into the public domain. I'm closing this DR for those two reasons. Design Rights, if they were to exist, would not apply to road signs due to their commonplace nature at the commencement of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) which specifically excludes commonplace designs. --Nick (talk) 20:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Persuant to Commons:Village_pump#A_concern_about_UK_Traffic_Signs_Content,_pursuant_to_a_recent_news_item_on_the_BBC_website and that this is derived from material with an unclear status with respect to the claimed OGL status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - 5 days at COM:VP and no substantial objections. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shyani nilesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Previously deleted file, re-uploaded by globally blocked user, sockpuppet of Yahadzija

Noting that this file is in use and exists locally at af:image:Siprage-panorama.jpg and hi:image:Siprage-panorama.jpg. Consequently a Deletion request appears the standard procedure, rather than speedy deletion and if deletion is recommended on the basis of a false attribution of own work, this should apply to local versions.

Any previous deletions should be linked, they cannot be found under this file's SHA1 value. -- (talk) 08:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Siprage-panorama.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Yahadzija. --Smooth O (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
One of those DRs was closed by an admin now known to be rogue. Both DRs were nine months ago, yet the recommendation to remove local copies cross-wiki seems to have neither been done, nor is there any coordinated action to do so.
We should add the obvious local copy vec:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg to the list.
@Boing! said Zebedee: as an interested party who may be able to recommend a better cross-wiki solution than this Commons DR on one copy of the image. -- (talk) 08:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is lot of local copies of this and other deleted photos, and from time to time someone will transfer it here to Commons. See more examples: it:File:Siprage-panorama-nova.jpg and tr:File:Siprage - Panorama 2014.jpg. So coordinated action to delete all files, as you propose, should be necessary. --Smooth O (talk) 10:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yahadzija is banned, not blocked. Delete all, everywhere. Seb az86556 (talk) 03:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Running a custom query for this image's SHA1 value across 258 wikipedias, including all those with greater than 1,000 articles, annoyingly shows zero matches. However, running the same cross-wiki search based on other images listed above throws up:

Seed: tr:File:Siprage_-_Panorama_2014.jpg

  • SHA1 66cd9f15cd0d37cd06b21320ab3a6f67edd5fc42
  1. tr:File:Siprage_-_Panorama_2014.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-08
  2. lv:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-22
  3. et:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-07
  4. be:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-07
  5. ba:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-11
  6. ja:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-21
  7. lt:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-23
  8. vi:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-20
  9. hi:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-21
  10. mk:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-07
  11. uk:File:Шипраге,_Панорама.jpeg Yahadzija 2017-05-20
  12. af:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-18
  13. id:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-11
  14. sl:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-07
  15. ka:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-05
  16. kk:File:Siprage-panorama.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-25

Seed: vec:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg

  • SHA1 c82819e888f0ec9f5ffb2542bfdee74203086b39
  1. lb:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-10
  2. vec:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-12
  3. frr:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-12
  4. kn:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-14

Seed: it:File:Siprage-panorama-nova.jpg - appears unique

The good news seems to be that after the global ban on 2017-06-17, no sockpuppets have uploaded the same images to more Wikipedias.

If someone wants me to do some follow-up reporting based on other images, drop me a note on my user page. After asking on IRC, I do not believe that there are any standard tools to handle this type of inter-wiki searching, nor is there a global policy for handling them; though presumably Stewards could do the deletion with a consensus on meta. -- (talk) 11:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even more with different file name:
  1. bar:File:Siprage-panorama-my.jpeg
  2. cy:File:Siprage-panorama-my.jpeg
  3. frr:File:256px-Siprage.jpg
  4. frr:File:Siprage-panoramanova.jpg

-- Smooth O (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • SHA1 9d11e16f9c75fdd21b24983c1f628b588f11749d
  1. bar:File:Siprage-panorama-my.jpeg Yahadzija 2017-06-08
  2. eml:File:Siprage-nova_panorama.jpeg Yahadzija 2017-06-08
  • SHA1 0abd95b3a82a937d7f466d3e42ebdd0efc63d855
  1. cy:File:Siprage-panorama-my.jpeg Yahadzija 2017-06-08
  2. frr:File:256px-Siprage.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-08
Now covering 258 Wikipedias, hence frr appearing.
There are "harmless" images on local wikis, such as de:File:Ostaci_rimske_naseobine.jpg which seems obviously public domain and is unlikely to be contentious despite being uploaded locally on 25 different projects. However others could benefit from review. This image I noted on cy and would be unsure about:
  • SHA1 e87fd17d6600f1104f84a374e671c74fe9612d33
  1. lv:File:Stecak-a.jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-31
  2. cy:File:Stecak-a.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-08
  3. sr:File:Stecak_(2).jpg Yahadzija 2017-05-04
  4. is:File:Stecak-a.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-01
  5. ka:File:Stecak-a.jpg Yahadzija 2017-06-05
However this is not solvable from Wikimedia Commons, it should be a meta request for analysis and action. -- (talk) 13:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is an out-of-process reupload by a confirmed sock of a globally banned user. Discussion of cross-wiki solutions to uploads on other projects is for another venue. --Эlcobbola talk 14:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheBellaTwins1445 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:PACKAGING

Elisfkc (talk) 00:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheBellaTwins1445 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be fan art, but it looks as to be a drawing of art already published online (examples: [5], [6], [7]). I am the OTRS agent handling this case under Ticket:2020031610000122, but cannot make a determination as to its copyright status.

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude but this is my drawing my fan-art drawing a drawing I made myself taking inspiration from the subject, obviously I needed an image to take note on how I needed to draw him. We need to keep my images as well because the Kemonito page has none images and actually there are any free files of Kemonito on the internet, please we need to kept them. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 15:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please once again, I beg you to leave my drawing, it is the only CC file for him thus I didnt mean to use copyright or something it is a drawing I made myself based on an image of him, pleaseee. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 04:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@TheBellaTwins1445: Sorry, but this Commons doesn't care if an English Wikipedia article needs a photo, this is a separate project with different rules. This work might be Fan Art, but I feel like this is more a derivative work. You might own the copyright on the drawing, but using the drawing to illustrate Kemonito is not allowed. To put it another way, if I make a drawing of Mickey Mouse, I may own the copyright to said drawing, but if the drawing I make is based on en:File:Mickey Mouse.png, Disney would have a slam dunk case if I tried to use it as Mickey without their permission. I'd say  Delete these files. Elisfkc (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete All these files are out of scope, the biography of the person deserves a better illustration. Taichi (talk) 06:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, There is no other file we can use for Kemonito in commons at the moment, and actually why cant this be kept? the image here, which is also in disussion - commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:George Floyd mural Mauerpark Berlin its under the same cirmstances and it looks it will be kept even thought is the same stuff as my draw here, its a derivated work, it isnt fair we cant keep it. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although these photos are published under a CC license on Flickr by Gibson Lounge, the copyright belongs to Getty Images.

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ytoyoda, Nevermind, if they have to go they have to, please delete them as fast as you can, I uploaded them because they were CC on flickr, go ahead. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 04:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. First set violates our fan art policy. George Floyd images were kept due to freedom of panorama in Germany – freedom of panorama isn't applicable here. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be uploader's own work, inconsistent EXIF data Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rimas_de_calaucha_-_Agenor_Quinteros.pdf (my bad) Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 00:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: uploader request. --Hystrix (talk) 19:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unencyclopedic montage, possible attack image, doubtful "own work" statement for source elements (DW); single upload of troll/vandal account. -- Tuválkin 01:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Cover of a textbook, should be presumed non-free per COM:PRP. Same cover is also seen here (though a different image): http://mybook.biz.ua/index.php?mode=book&id=174861 IagoQnsi (talk) 03:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pryathna-SN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation. Image has a complex background and likely exceeds the threshold of originality, so PD-ineligible/PD-textlogo does not apply.

IagoQnsi (talk) 04:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zolzaya M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. According to the Wikipedia article that these photos appear in, the subject of the photos died in 1965. It's unlikely the uploader is the person who took these photos 53+ years ago.

IagoQnsi (talk) 04:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; serves no educational purpose (currently used on a Wikipedia article, but it's tagged for speedy deletion so it'll likely be long gone by the time this deletion request closes) IagoQnsi (talk) 04:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom; not used any more. --E4024 (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted file with no encyclopedic information. Kalbbes (talk) 21:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was already deleted once (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Out of this World Adventure), and all the same rationale still holds: extremely low resolution and watermarked. Apocheir (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear licensing. Author field lists AlanVelazco17 as the author, the description names Alan Cisneros as the author, and the EXIF data names Jorge Nogura as the author. Who is the real author, and do we have their permission to use the photo? IagoQnsi (talk) 03:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Image appears to be a screenshot/photo of another page, based on the bad quality, apparent upscaling, and the random black bar on the left side of the image. Should delete per COM:PRP. IagoQnsi (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, as the uploader's other 10 photos of Travers Beynon were copyright violations IagoQnsi (talk) 03:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused photo of unknown subject, serves no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 04:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monokamui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/03/File:Leon M. Jordan official photograph.jpg. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Also no descriptions, no categories, therefore useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brchenry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos -- out of scope

IagoQnsi (talk) 07:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spammer, kind of difficult to stop. E4024 (talk) 07:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal file by an insistent spammer. E4024 (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tabish1086 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos, personal logo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tabish1086 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos -- out of scope

IagoQnsi (talk) 07:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tabish1086 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Scope, Personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in France. Thesupermat2 (talk) 07:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type photo, out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saapeh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album and likely copyvios

Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cesarbongon21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CM85u8wUwAAxYdo.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cesarbongon21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Googling a few of these at random showed they're not original; also, this user has a long history of copyright violations; also, these seem to be from stadiums all over the place taken with a variety of cameras, so it's unlikely they all came from one author. Doesn't seem worth my time to find sources for each of them; they should just be deleted per COM:PRP.

IagoQnsi (talk) 07:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor statues uploaded by Szilas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The authors died less than 70 years ago: hu:Huszár Imre (szobrász) (†1985), hu:Miklós Gusztáv (†1967), hu:Kövesházi Kalmár Elza (†1956), hu:Csáky József (szobrász) (†1971). --Regasterios (talk) 10:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jannna1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A number of the photos have a NAJLASTUDIO watermark, likely copyvio

Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but regrettably Finland has freedom-of-panorama exception only for buildings, not for other works. So, we either need a permission for all elements of the depicted plaque content or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to put black boxes over the pictures? The reason for uploading was the text. --Kenny McFly (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Nevertheless, it needs to be evaluated whether the remaining text is above or below treshold of originality to be copyrightable in Finland. --Túrelio (talk) 14:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The text is way beyond the ToO for text -- that's usually at one or two sentences. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, nothing encyclopedic Hugo.arg (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected license laundering, copyright status also undeterminable 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the source page has been modified or deleted, it is impossible for me now to prove the that this picture is indeed in public domain (I don't know whether we can check the cached version of that link). However, I have been a member of the Wikipedia/media community for a very long time, and such baseless accusation of me using license laundering for this picture is rude, unhelpful, and does not contribute anything to the discussion. Grenouille vert (talk) 13:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about my expressions, but as the author is not an official of the US federal government, why did you used a federal PD template? Isn't that an act of license laundering? Anyways, I have sent an email to contact the webmaster according to the contact information given in the main Webpage.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The archive is available. And yes, I agree that {{PD-USGov}} does not apply here. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Grenouille vert: Which part of "This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state" in {{PD-USGov}} do you not understand?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Today is the 7th day of the deletion request created. Do anyone thinks that the situation is controversial that more time is needed for discussion? KTT 廣九直通車 (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: No, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code clearly does not grant an exemption from copyright to any state, including the State of Washington.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality and same format as File:Amphetamine-2D-skeletal.png (smaller, opaque bg, low-res, unusual font) DMacks (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and low graphical quality. Have PNG alternative in Category:Dimethylglyoxime DMacks (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect geometry (the two rings should be are parallel--see en:sandwich compound) and generally low graphical quality with in-image text. We have many images of each compound in Category:Uranocene and Category:Ferrocene, and it was easy to replace this image with a wiki-generated composite of them at es:Organolantánido DMacks (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low-res image; similar images exist as SVGs in this category. GKFXtalk 01:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Saqib as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. Image might be out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 02:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Saqib as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. Image might be out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 02:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work: see EXIF Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 02:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear what this sound is supposed to be of -- too short and low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 03:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 04:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unimasbot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo seems complex enough to exceed threshold of originality in my opinion, so PD-textlogo doesn't apply. It's not freely licensed as the uploader indicated -- the source website explicitly states that the image may not be used without permission.

IagoQnsi (talk) 04:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, failed upload IagoQnsi (talk) 05:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 05:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplication Koltbot (talk) 06:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplication Koltbot (talk) 06:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplication Koltbot (talk) 06:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplication Koltbot (talk) 06:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. Also, this does not look like a selfie, so it is likely that another person owns the copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. Also small size, no EXIF, does not look like a selfie, so likely someone else holds the copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was published in Projector issue 9(55) May 15 1925. Therefore all the information in source is incorrect. Armenius vambery (talk) 16:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need to ask you: you deleted my upload from the same source, by the same author. What is different about this image?--Armenius vambery (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The problems with this image: it has known date of publication. It is important because the image (as many other) was reissued many times and some people were deleted. Therefore in order to identify the original it is important to be sure that it is used to identify people, time and place. --Armenius vambery (talk) 08:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 09:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, just like File:Praia0517.jpg. E4024 (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image tag refers to the antique shop which tries to sell the image. no possibility to establish the time when the image was created or the author Armenius vambery (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My deletion request is based on the following simple fact: the image source provides the link to the Antique shop http://www.vnikitskom.ru/antique/auction/36/13831/ which tries to sell this image. It does not allow to establish when and by whom the image was created. Apparently the category "Portraits in 1922" does not establish the date.

I have doubts that this image is authentic and apart from desire of the shop to sell it there is no need for it to be on the page of historic personality.--Armenius vambery (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Cases like this have been discussed many times. a) The date of creation is shown on the back side of the photo as the source states. b) We don't need to know the author, when using this particular license tag. c) This is a typical professional photo made in an unknown photographic studio, like any other in the Category:1922 portrait photographs. See Berne Convention Article III (3): The expression “published works” means works published with the consent of their authors, whatever may be the means of manufacture of the copies, provided that the availability of such copies has been such as to satisfy the reasonable requirements of the public, having regard to the nature of the work. Sealle (talk) 13:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How can one be sure that it is an authentic image? It is used to illustrate the wikipedia page Genrikh Yagoda. So you are sure that this is Yagoda on the image, but not the actors who played him in the movie/on the stage? The ones published in mass media, books etc at least have passed through the editors.--Armenius vambery (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion request is not based on the license. It is about the possibility to date the photo and to establish the personalities. Genrikh Yagoda was one of the top functionaries of the country and there is no proof that it is him on the photo. --Armenius vambery (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, We have no significant doubt about who are depicted persons. Filename can be changed, if needed. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. The logo is {{PD-textlogo}}, but this is a picture. Who is the photographer? Yann (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 07:41, 30 März 2018 UTC: No license since 22 March 2018 --Krdbot 12:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Старое фото, возможно из домашего архива: фамилия автора и изображённого на фото лица совпадают Dogad75 (talk) 12:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:04, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion of own file uploaded recently. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check: Commons:Deletion requests/User:Unknown1243 --Ganímedes (talk) 12:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Materialscientist 28 Jan 2018. --Achim (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedy deletion Shxahxh (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Circumcised or not,  Delete. --E4024 (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

speedydelete, 1=[10].-- Shxahxh (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete -speedy or not. --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fnikolov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Authors' permissions must be sent to OTRS. --Sealle (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teghra manish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope; Hosting

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Teghra manish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative from deleted photo. 37.145.27.215 19:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative from deleted photo. 37.145.27.215 19:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by w:Pyotr Otsup see [11]. 37.145.27.215 19:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is of low resolution and has no EXIF info and does not look like uploader's own work. Wcam (talk) 19:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор изображения и персона на фото-одно лицо. Лицензионный статус сомнителен. Персона скончалась в 2000 году Dogad75 (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день! В описании фотографии стояла не работающая ссылка в графе "источник фотографии". Я поправила ссылку на действующую. Фотография взята с сайта https://sites.google.com/view/borisyampolsky Автор фотографии тоже был указан некорректно. Я это исправила. На странице с фотографиями есть знак - Creative Commons, что дает право использовать фотографию. В Википедии есть два Бориса Ямпольских, наличие фотографии необходимо. sonyayamp 23:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Во-первых, указана лицензия cc-by-nc-nd, что неприемлемо для Википедии. Во-вторых, этот сайт неизвестно кем создан и откуда у создателя вообще право распоряжаться этими произведениями. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Сайт создан семьей персоны, что указано на главной странице сайта https://sites.google.com/view/borisyampolsky. Фотографии взяты из семейного архива (также оговорено на главной странице сайта). На странице с фотографиями стоит лицензия cc-by, подходящая для Википедии. С уважением, sonyayamp 0:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Deleted: most likely licence laundering, see ru:ВП:СЕМАРХИВ. --Sealle (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo and cannot found from the source. AT (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Come from [12], which is posted in 2015. AT (talk) 20:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from the offical website [13] AT (talk) 20:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo from[14] AT (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo AT (talk) 20:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo from [15] AT (talk) 20:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo from [16] AT (talk) 20:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo from [17] AT (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkdbasket2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio? 154 files. 153 photos and one logo. Any without EXIF datas, mostly small. Any with EXIF datas: cams: Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Canon 6D Canon EOS 60D Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Canon EOS 1100D iPhone 4S Nikon D3 Nikon D300 Nikon D4 Nikon D600 Nikon D610 Nikon D750 and any more?

photographers: (two files, from EXIF)

ales fevzer and

SAVO PRELEVIC

Hystrix (talk) 23:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen subida sin el consentimiento del autor. SuZumiya (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 20:02, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 09.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 01.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 02.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 05.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 07.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 04.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 08.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 10.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 11.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 12.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 13.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 14.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 15.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 16.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 17.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 18.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 19.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 20.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francezeta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Answers on following pictures:

Dear sir, all pictures are dating back second half of XIX century (average 120-150 years ago). According to law 633/41, any possible copyright status (if any) has expired and no license is needed at all. No information has ever been available on original author. Please do resume the pictures, thanks.


Answer on following picture:

Dear sir, the map displayed in this picture is dating back to XV century. This is a public document displayed in a public library, as specified in the relevant description. No copyright or license applicable at all. Please do resume the picture, thanks. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 21.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 22.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hi fortress wan chai 2018 23.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mpistoia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both Copyvios as both claimed "Own work", and both are corrupted uploads. per Metadata: Author: Manuel Zabeo Copyright holder: Fotostudio Roma

Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am OK with deleting them because the uploads were corrupted. However I have permission from the photographer to use those files. I paid for them and I am the person depicted on them. But let's delete them for now until I reupload them successfully. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.34.20.19 (talk) 18:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't forget to obtain and store at Commons:OTRS permissions from the photographer after uploading. Thank you, --Taterian (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake own work, no source. can't find any reliable source characterizing this as a portrait of who it's supposed to picture (though many unreliable sites do). it appears the painting is in the chateau d'eu (see https://www.flickr.com/photos/laurent-lenotre/14111313159/in/album-72157644897228772/), but their website is dead and i can't corroborate anything about the painting. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This one turned to be O.K. --Taterian (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably an unused personal photo GeXeS (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously copyvio. --Alaa :)..! 23:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tendancebg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Corrupted: Bad uploads unfortunately, can't distinguish subject

Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CARTER LARSEN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios and Corrupted uploads: Bad uploads unfortunately, can't distinguish subject. Also Claimed "Own work", per Metadata: Author: LORENZO_PIPI Copyright holder: LORENZOPIPIFOTOGRAFO

Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused Copyvio, Claimed "Own work", per Metadata: Author: Fabio Vazquez -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Bad upload unfortunately, can't distinguish subject -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to have a free license at the source: [18] --ghouston (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Unknown Source, Unknown Auhor. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This picture came from Course of Design TOKAI University. Copyright holder is Hiratsuka. In Addition, the object is artworks installed in public places of Japan. Then, Wikimedia license for this picture is not consistent with U.S. and Japan copyright law. -Loasa (talk) 06:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pomyłka w nazwie pliku Pece (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a duplicate. --Sealle (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weil sie falsch beschriftet ist WSWolfi (talk) 19:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no such file. --Sealle (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file description, likely no educational value. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files Malyacko (talk) 09:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file description, likely no educational value. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files Malyacko (talk) 09:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a third party website; no file description; likely no educational value. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files Malyacko (talk) 09:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope stuff Joschi71 (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Nikolay Alexeyevich Kuleshov (died in 1982), not PD until 2057. Sealle (talk) 13:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

News reporting are exempt from copyright as clearly stated in this tag {{PD-RU-exempt}} --Armenius vambery (talk) 08:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image was published in the weekly supplement to Pravda to illustrate the story. It is news reporting and nothing less.--Armenius vambery (talk) 15:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is common incomprehension of respective statement of law. News as itself is uncopyrightable, but their specific reporting is copyrightable - this is explained in basic textbook and commentaries on the Russian copyright law. So, fact/news "Molotov had returned to Moscow on Nov 15 1940" as itself is uncopyrightable, Pravda can not forbid other agencies to make similar news, but specific photowork is copyrightable. Alex Spade (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The work was published in illustrated supplement to Pravda. The format are pictures and captions. There are no text.--Armenius vambery (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And? Alex Spade (talk) 08:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2057. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Nikolay Alexeyevich Kuleshov (died in 1982), not PD until 2057. Sealle (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Published as news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character. Indicated as {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Therefore free to use.--Armenius vambery (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then write this in the tag.--Armenius vambery (talk) 08:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The tag states "News reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like)". The image was published in the weekly addition to the most widely circulated newspaper (Pravda) in the country to illustrate the news event. To copyright text w/o an image is nonsense. --Armenius vambery (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2057. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of w:Boris Yefimov (died in 2008), not PD until 2082. Sealle (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2082. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not {{PD-RU-exempt}}. No evidence that the author (K. Zhdanovsky) died more than 74 years ago (COM:CRT#Russia and former Soviet Union). Sealle (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exempted as news report. --Armenius vambery (talk) 15:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not {{PD-RU-exempt}}. No evidence that the author (N. Tsymbalov) died more than 74 years ago (COM:CRT#Russia and former Soviet Union). Sealle (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I understand about the author. My understanding is that it is news reports, therefore could be used under {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --Armenius vambery (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в австорстве и лицензии: фото низкого разрешения, дата загрузки совпадает с датой создания снимка, в рамке, взято из какого то СМИ Dogad75 (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimensh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото низкого разрешения, дата создания совпадает с датой загрузки,

Dogad75 (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong authorship and license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Бойкита (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of the photo sort of gave a permission for his photos at http://sobory.ru/profile/?authorid=3056 "Любые мои материалы, размещённые на проекте Соборы.ру, можно использовать совершенно свободно" ("all my materials posted at sobory.ru can be used absolutely freely") however as much as I know, this is not considered quite equaling the CC-BY-SA conditions (at least not expressing possibility of derivation), thus this has to be clarified. Tatewaki (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is from the 1960s, so the image summary and EXIF data are both wrong. 1960s is old enough that it might have entered public domain if it was originally published without a copyright notice (see {{PD-US-no notice}}), but we need more information about the origin of the photo to know if that's the case. IagoQnsi (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding File:First skyway in Minneapolis.jpg to this request, as it's an uncropped version of the same photo. -IagoQnsi (talk) 05:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   18:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture quality is bad Koltbot (talk) 06:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: yes it's a tiny image but the only one of this school. P 1 9 9   18:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:British_Airways_747_(7336699512).jpg GeXeS (talk) 06:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

darker version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CN-ROT_B737-8B6W_RAM_TLS_04SEP11_(6336083970).jpg GeXeS (talk) 06:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9   19:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CS-TGL_B.Ae_ATP_SATA_Air_Acores_LPA_23JAN10_(4379564401).jpg GeXeS (talk) 06:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9   19:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CS-TNI_A320-214_TAP_AMS_12MAY09_(3530181238).jpg GeXeS (talk) 06:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9   19:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arguably exceeds threshold of originality and is therefore a copyright violation. Even if it's not, this seems to be an insignificant company and their logo thus serves no realistic educational purpose. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 07:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cute kid, but  Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashu zeff 1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Unused personal photos.

IagoQnsi (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: promotional material with no realistic educational use IagoQnsi (talk) 07:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo IagoQnsi (talk) 08:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KAILASH HARGAON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Unused personal images.

IagoQnsi (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: advertising. P 1 9 9   19:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photo. Regasterios (talk) 10:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   19:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is under doubt, because text is too small to be readable. Probably stolen from somewhere. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo. "Personal supporter" is not mentioned in en.wiki. da:Personal Supporter was speedily deleted due to non-notability. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my personal photo, i don't want my photo is publicly available on Wikimedia 182.16.167.210 11:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - unused and out of scope. --E4024 (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res duplicate of File:Mack Sennett cph.3b05764.jpg. De728631 (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9   19:25, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the 2 swirls are below TOO. P 1 9 9   19:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thenie-nga-Fan-Noli.jpg. E4024 (talk) 11:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thenie-nga-Fan-Noli.jpg. E4024 (talk) 11:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thenie-nga-Fan-Noli.jpg. E4024 (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type photo, out of scope, even if it is free on flickr Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, even if it is free on flickr Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, just like File:Praia0516.jpg. E4024 (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: on 17:01, 28 March 2018, by Hystrix. P 1 9 9   19:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio and low quality, given the uploader's history. Spam for LGN MILLINERY at livhats.com.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

my name is John Livingston I am the copyright owner who would like to share my design with the wiki community please give me direction how to do this on a attribution basis as im fairly new to wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoveGodnow (talk • contribs) 02:08, 23 March 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]
Read this:COM:OTRS. --E4024 (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: also read COM:PS - clearly the intent by uploader is to advertise, which is out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 12:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file used on a different user's userpage, which should not be counted per COM:INUSE. E4024 (talk) 13:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, no encyclopedic value Hugo.arg (talk) 13:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is under 70 years license but the artist died in 1957 - so only 61 years - there are quite a few of these loaded from Flickr Victuallers (talk) 13:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is present under PD-simple, but it doesn't seem to me simple at all. Complex logos should be deleted from Commons if they don't have an authorisation. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Materialpp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    13:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Self uploaded image Godric ki Kothri talk 14:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sympathetic kid, but out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: serves no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 14:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own: copied from a book (no evidence that the book was published under CC0). Author (Govind Solegaonkar) died in 1986 so he could not publish this post-mortem. Ankry (talk) 14:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CarloBalestrieri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyrighted screenshot from a television series. GMGtalk 15:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded the wrong file with the wrong license, I need this file to be taken down Tammypmc (talk) 15:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   19:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny picture with no EXIF. All other uploads from the user come from 3rd party sources, no indication that this is any different Ytoyoda (talk) 15:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pochette d'un album musical (album cover). GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 15:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Bad upload unfortunately, can't distinguish subject Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Also Copyvio: Claimed "Own work", per Metadata: Author: VFMICT Copyright holder: VFM Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AKSHAYA1991 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Bad upload unfortunately, can't distinguish subject Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Bad upload unfortunately, can't distinguish subject Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. It's too bad we can't distinguish subject.--Categorizing (talk) 05:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, along with File:NEW IDENTITY INDIA.jpg (user's only uploads). An approproate article was deleted as a promo. Pibwl (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a proposal made by the uploader, perhaps to the municipality. Delete as Original research. Gikü (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research by uploader. This is a proposal for new tram lines in Galați Gikü (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research by uploader. This is a proposal for new tram lines in Galați Gikü (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo clearly exceeds the threshold of originality. Vajotwo (post) 18:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It clearly doesn't. --Leyo 22:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   19:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je n'avais pas les droits pour publier ce drapeau Gjp-39 (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality photo, unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality personal photo of a bodybuilder, unused Pibwl (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unused logo, uncategorized, sole upload, doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, unusable, out of a scope Pibwl (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Unknown content, can't distinguish subject Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Bad upload unfortunately, can't distinguish subject Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LOA LOCA DE BIGO LIVE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not unique or informative enough to be encyclopedic. Plenty of fire images already. Plus I'm not sure about the licensing. Kalbbes (talk) 23:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerfootballwiki (talk • contribs) 2018-02-19T10:01:29‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Soccerfootballwiki as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: I ask to delete the file I uploaded. The file is ineligible for speedy deletion, because once it survived a regular deletion request. The nominator deleted the infobox. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused and out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerfootballwiki (talk • contribs) 2018-02-19T09:58:22‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Soccerfootballwiki as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: I ask to delete the file I uploaded. The file is not eligible for speedy deletion, because once it survived a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Pi.1415926535. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://www.premierguitar.com/Stream/StreamImage.aspx?Image_ID=B77FF98B-DF06-4BA8-8620-4B5B13970A16&Image Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: probably copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 18:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably imagevio from there — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably imagevio from [19] — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably imagevio from [20] — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Shxahxh (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: shoud be speedied: published in 2014: https://pakusalumninetwork.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/hazara-1.jpg. --Ankry (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS needed Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 12:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation. Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation. Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: published elsewhere: https://www.hsreat.com/threads/%D8%A8%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85-%D9%83%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%88-%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%88-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B0%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%8A%D8%A9.3313/ No evidence of free license. --Ankry (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation. Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: scanned; not own. --Ankry (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation. Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dies Bild ist identisch mit File:Hamm, Germany - panoramio (573).jpg GeorgDerReisende (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the 1st one of Pioneer Saturn- project manager daily stand up meeting (4994063804).jpg! Ras67 (talk) 20:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

リダイレクト先の肖像画は朱雀天皇ではなく平将門であると結論付けられたので、このリダイレクトは誤りであり不要となりました。File talk:Taira no Masakado detail.jpgを御覧ください。 The redirected portrait isn't of Tenno Suzaku, but of Taira no Masakado. Tomomori (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: He seems to be notable. --Yann (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hiàn as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per Google search (excuse the Commons link, was crawled at a later time than the others). All copies are smaller than Commons version. Yann (talk) 14:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'd think permission would be needed? hiàn 23:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензионном статуме. Фотограф неизвестен, фото из семейного архива, неизвестно,обнародовалось ли ранее. Dogad75 (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: no evidence fror PD status nor that uploader is authorised for licensing. --Ankry (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-INB_A321-231_Spanair_PMI_23MAY10_(4631922061).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-ISY_B757-256_Privilege_Style_MAN_07APR09_(3420595331).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-JDL_A319-111_Iberia_LPA_04FEB11_(5425049085).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-KCP_A330-343E_Iberworld_MAN_06MAY09_(3507327788).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree photo AT (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This has a proper license for a text logo attached. Perrythwi (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason for deletion per {{PD-textlogo}}. --Achim (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DYS_B737-8ASW_Ryanair_PMI_20MAY10_(4624755953).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-REP_ATR.72-212A(500)_Aer_Arann_MAN_02MAY09_(3494101640).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EK-32011_A319-132_Armavia_DXB_17MAR10_(4459816118).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EP-ASC_B727-228_Iran_Aseman_DXB_18MAR10_(4459041211).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poorest quality Joschi71 (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: quality is OK; no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HA-LKB_B737-86Q-W_Tvl_Svc_Hungary_LPA_30JAN10_(4379574631).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. Also small size, no EXIF, does not look like a selfie, so likely someone else holds the copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 13:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Too simple to be copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 05:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned, several better alternatives in Category:Partito della Rifondazione Comunista. Leyo 22:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; obsoleted by eg. File:Rifondazione Comunista.svg. --Ankry (talk) 13:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo contains copyrighted images. 2A02:1812:41D:B800:5DED:5F22:27EF:4B67 23:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:OTRS free license poermission needed. --Ankry (talk) 13:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

changing speedy to regular. maybe copyvio. I'm not convinced... I'd go for keep... Rupert Pupkin (talk) 08:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reason for speedy was: [21] but ultimately leads to 404. So at least there is no other use of the picture on the www.--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 09:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clearly grabbed from Internet. --Ankry (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although not exactly taken from this page which is dated January 2014 (https://www.emaratalyoum.com/life/society/2014-01-08-1.638422) but it appears this photo has been taken from somewhere and is under copyright. The same photo appears in few more sources such as this which is dated 2016. Saqib (talk) 09:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: low res, no EXIF; unlikely own. --Ankry (talk) 19:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The grain graphic in this poster is too complicated to be free from copyright restrictions, making this photograph derivative work Vera (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Ankry (talk) 19:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Ferry Knijn uploaded by user: Jazz facts. There is no permission. Rode raaf (talk) 10:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file violates the PD license (published in 1940) Alexander Misel (talk) 12:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If published in 1940, that PD in 1991 and the declared license applies. I see no violation,  Keep. Ankry (talk) 13:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file violates the PD license (is not included in copyright exceptions) Alexander Misel (talk) 12:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the license template, if the author/copyright owner info is correct, the photo became PD in 1995 (1944+50+1). I see no violation.  Keep Ankry (talk) 13:25, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --shizhao (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be on Commons without authorisation. Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright of materials SecretName101 (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright: Facebook sources Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Google image search comes up with numerous higher sample copies. Also an advertisement Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikieditorkrishna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free images and copied from internet, not own work

~AntanO4task (talk) 23:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original picture is presumably non-free as it seems like a promotional picture. See https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjQQV8CVEAEGHaA.jpg Billytanghh (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, author is correct, Dick Thomas Johnson is really the photographer. He has created many similar promotional photos and some of them are published under free license. Original picture is free, license is reviewed. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely likely to be derivate work of non-free work, and license laundering, intentionally or not. Dick Thomas Johnson on Flickr has uploaded a series of derivative photos in which the original photos are with unknown copyright status. The previous DR failed to prove that Dick Thomas Johnson is the original creator of the photo on display. Wcam (talk) 23:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Considering [24] and [25], it looks like it was a photograph of a photograph. Since the original photograph was displayed at an official event of the subject, we'd need to go through COM:OTRS with a statement from http://www.nogizaka46.com. --whym (talk) 06:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a football club Gikü (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for CC0 provided. Author died in 1986. Ankry (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence fot CC0 provided. Author died in 1986. Ankry (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Flickr author Elisfkc (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt knew about this. I often upload files local to that area on Commons from Flickr. I found this file on filckr under cc-2.0, and uploaded it. It was only after uploading, that I came to know about the author being on this list. I will try to be more careful next time. - ArmouredCyborg (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 DeleteAs the Flickr user is assumed routinely uploading copyrighted photos, I think the file can be deleted as it is likely to be copyrighted based on the assumption.

Deleted: per above, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adnan Safee Siddiqui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In project scope? Advertising or promotion? But see also producer: Adnan Safee.

Hystrix (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that Adnan Safee produced at least one film: IMDB. Anyway, promotionality is quite sure for this high number of personal pictures. Maybe, we could maintain a pair of them.
Anyway, if all the pictures would be deleted, please, remove also the category Category:Adnan Safee that I created some days ago to collect them. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused promotional content. --Sealle (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adnan Safee Siddiqui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in India for 2-D artworks.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Adnan Safee Siddiqui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. User Sealle please comment. Armenius vambery (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problems: 1) the description is incorrect: the procession is moving to the House of Unions, not to the Labor Temple; 2) the image has the author. it is Samsonov, therefore it was not published unanimously as section Permission claims, therefore, the whole licensing is incorrectly described; 3) the original caption does not identify Lev Kamenev on the left, in fact it is difficult to identify who is on the left; 4) the image used was digitally enhanced since the clarity of the published original. The original image publication: Projector (Spotlight) Jan 31 1924 issue 2 (24) page 10--Armenius vambery (talk) 08:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Direct proof for copyright (and copyvio) is necessary. Place of publication of course should be added as supplementary info. It makes no difference in question of copyright. More - photo could be published simulatanously in other Soviet contemporary issues. Andros64 (talk) 08:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have put the original (so to speak) on Commons with all the source information and metadata, but it was deleted by user Sealle for "violation of copyright". Logically the enhanced copy could not be better in terms of copyrights--Armenius vambery (talk) 08:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good illustration how the historical photos should not be restored. The restorer, without knowing the details of this important historical event, deleted the snow. My constructive proposal is to leave my upload File:Lenin funeral photo by Samsonov.jpg which has all the correct source data (date, author, caption) as well as metadata and try to restore from square one.--Armenius vambery (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per unclear copyright status as the author death date is unknown. Ankry (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real source for this image, just a random pinterest pin. it appears to have been cropped from this painting and then the left side reconstructed (where the child covered Julie Clary in the original). Reconstruction is probably copyrightable but we don't know if this one is freely licensed--and it probably isn't. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, a crop can be easily produced if requested. --Taterian (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo,

das Wappen zu Nidda Eichelsdorf wurde erneuert. Das alte wurde von mir erstellt, war nicht offiziell und wurde nur auf meiner Internetseite verwendet. Ich bitte um Löschung des Wappens.

Jetzt gibt es ein offizielles von einem Heraldiker erstelltes Wappen. Das kann von meiner Seite heruntergeladen werden. http://www.nidda-eichelsdorf.de Gruß Oliver Lein Oliver73L (talk) 09:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable Copyvio: Found on Facebook. Appears to be a promotional photo and would need the Authors permission. One of the users 2 uploads both with questionable permission. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry, dark Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there no DW here? Please also see File:Femmes et Féminisme (Hérault) 2018-02-06 (39424672554).jpg. Even if the original file belonged to the same user (see Flickr data please), "Culture Herault presents affiche", is it free? I'm a bit confused, therefore if I'm mistaken please forgive me. E4024 (talk) 11:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It is a picture of en:Jeanne Galzy probably from the late 1920s. We need to know a bit more about the photographer. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; there are also other issues with some of the logos included. Ruthven (msg) 21:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern statue, no FOP in Greece. Geraki TLG 15:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader Info.Bruno is listed as author and given their contributions here and elsewhere, it's pretty obvous that this is the subject himself. However, this is clearly not a selfie, so the copyright status of this file is unclear. I don't see any metadata, but perhaps somebody else can find something. Randykitty (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Goodmorning, this pics is taked whit my iPhone.[reply]

Good morning, this picture was taken with my iPhone from my assistant after the victory of the Sanremo festival at my request. Then I decided to load it having also warned Beppe Carletti who appears and agreed. I hope my explanation is sufficient.

Regards --Bruno Santori (talk) 08:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we can consider a work for hire and/or directed by Bruno Santori. Ruthven (msg) 21:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo d'un tableau datant du dernier quart du xxe siècle, son auteur est peut-être encore vivant ou si il est mort c'est certainement pas plus de 70 ans. Pas d'autorisation de l'auteur spécifiée pour publication dans Commons 2A01:CB04:1B8:C100:9502:9BD3:14D4:F325 16:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo d'une oeuvre d'art réalisée par Philippe Kaeppelin qui est mort en 2011 (date de décès inférieure à 70 ans) 2A01:CB04:1B8:C100:9502:9BD3:14D4:F325 16:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de vitraux réalisés par Émile Aebischer, mort en 2012 (date du décès inférieure à 70 ans) 2A01:CB04:1B8:C100:9502:9BD3:14D4:F325 16:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de vitraux réalisés par Émile Aebischer, mort en 2012 (date du décès inférieure à 70 ans) 2A01:CB04:1B8:C100:9502:9BD3:14D4:F325 16:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de vitraux réalisés par Émile Aebischer, mort en 2012 (date du décès inférieure à 70 ans) 2A01:CB04:1B8:C100:9502:9BD3:14D4:F325 16:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de vitraux réalisés par Émile Aebischer, mort en 2012 (date du décès inférieure à 70 ans) 2A01:CB04:1B8:C100:9502:9BD3:14D4:F325 16:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is sourced with itself, so actually here's no source. OTRS-permission from author Jaluj is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the source, which is claimed to be "own work"; in case, both files should be deleted or kept:
--Ruthven (msg) 21:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, this is complex logo, but let's assume good faith: maybe really work of Jaluj. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file violates the PD license (does not meet copyright exceptions) Alexander Misel (talk) 12:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The license was changed by an effective. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wenn dies ein Scan einer alten Postkarte ist, ist die Schutzfrist höchstwahrscheinlich noch nicht abgelaufen. Dies ist erst 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Fotografen der Fall. Auf der Rückseite sind sicherlich Angaben zum Fotografen und zum Jahr der Aufnahme zu finden. Die Lizenz ist auch falsch, da es sich bei dem Original wohl kaum um ein Werk das Uploaders Lambiotte handelt, sonst wäre ja keine Postkarte als Quelle erforderlich. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a higher resolution version at http://www.weton.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Hingst.jpg (in the page at http://www.weton.de/presse/ under 2014, strangely enough), so I somehow doubt the user uploading this lower resolution version is the rights owner. GRuban (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete if suspicious; it's in use but we've got other pics of her. --E4024 (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted drawing. Regasterios (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And: File:Henodus drawing, Munich, 2017-09-11.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lucien Lévy-Dhurmer died in 1953. Yann (talk) 14:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 23:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted in 2024, after Lucien Lévy-Dhurmer copyright expiration. Platonides (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Gaines Ruger Donoho by John Lavery.jpg. ALH (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep enhanced colouring or other lighting. Useful, IMO. Ankry (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Ankry. --Y.haruo (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-KGJ_ATR.42-212A(500)_Binter_LPA_04FEB11_(5425049561).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the lower duplicated image was deleted. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-KOH_A320-214_Iberia_DUS_28JUL08_(3181025016).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DHT_B737-8AS-W_Ryanair_MAN_15JAN09_(3198693045).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DWM_737-8AS-W_Ryanair_LAS_19JAN10_(4379573761).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the lower duplicated image was deleted. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:07, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a slightly worse version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DYP_B737-8ASW_Ryanair_PMI_25SEP10_(5033441278).jpg GeXeS (talk) 20:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the lower duplicated image was deleted. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake own work. may be {{PD-old-70}} or {{PD-EU-anonymous}} but impossible to tell without more info Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed description, good to go now. --Taterian (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Taterian. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erweiterter_Vorstand_Heinz_Lachinger,_Jaan_Albrecht,_Karsten_Benz,_Klaus_Froese_(v.l.n.r.)_(8946345469).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:06, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower resolution version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erweiterter_Vorstand_Heinz_Lachinger,_Karsten_Benz,_Klaus_Froese,_Jaan_Albrecht_(v.l.n.r.)_(8946967924).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die vorliegende Datei ist eine mangelhafte Vektorisierung von File:Wappen_von_Erpolzheim.png. Diese zeigt das Wappen Erpolzheims allerdings im standardisierten Schild aus dem Großen Wappenbuch der Pfalz von Karl Heinz Debus. Eine Revektorisierung wurde bereits - allerdings unter Berücksichtigung des Orginalschildes - mit der Datei File:DEU Erpolzheim COA.svg vorgenommen. Somit wurde das vektorisierte Wappen Erpolzheims für die Wikipedia nicht nur qualitativ, sondern auch inhaltlich auf einen höheren Standard gebracht. Die vorliegende Datei erfüllt keinerlei Qualitätskriterien und bietet der Wikipedia keinerlei Mehrwert. Daher beantrage ich die Löschung. Fränsmer (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant/bad quality. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, fake own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lower resolution version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erweiterter_Vorstand_Heinz_Lachinger,_Karsten_Benz,_Klaus_Froese,_Jaan_Albrecht_(v.l.n.r.)_(8946967866).jpg GeXeS (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/965702754495881218/ehJeJ4NM_400x400.jpg, similar to https://static.wixstatic.com/media/12102d_9adc9043ed4c4e2f91db06fbe2b7e2a3~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_727,h_727,al_c,q_85/12102d_9adc9043ed4c4e2f91db06fbe2b7e2a3~mv2.webp too. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not actually appear to be from an advertisement, as stated (and thus no-notice would not apply) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krinzl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from Flickr - All from account "pirátská strana". However all these images have "(C) www.MichalValenta.com - Michal Valenta" in the EXIF. No evidence that it is the same person - there are plenty of other "pirátská strana" images, but they do not have the copyright notice. Also "pirátská strana" appears to have a rather large range of cameras on the other non copyright notice images.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Flickr account seems to belong to a Czech political party "Česká pirátská strana" https://www.pirati.cz/ and the photos seem to be profile photos (probably works for hire). I think they can be contacted to resolve whether they have appropriate permission to freely license their profile photos. @Mates, Mormegil, and Podzemnik: can you help us to resolve this problem? Ankry (talk) 10:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Michal Valenta seems to have been hired (and paid) to make work-for-hire photographs of the candidates by the Pirate Party, see [26]. --Mormegil (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep unless there are serious suspicions that the Party is a copyright violator. Ankry (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept - see Mormegil's and Ankry's comments. --Podzemnik (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Assuming User:Zarateman didn't spray the graffiti.. - Alexis Jazz 18:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Graffiti and {{Non-free graffiti}} - Themightyquill (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)`[reply]
 KeepLooks like {{FoP-Spain}} actually covers it.
 I withdraw my nomination - Alexis Jazz 09:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --Themightyquill (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Temporarily delete this file SGill (WMF) (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SGill (WMF): What do you mean "temporarily" ? - Themightyquill (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There was a requirement to delete these video due to some legal issues but those have been resolved now. No need to delete now. --SGill (WMF) (talk) 17:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Request withdrawn by nominator. --Gestumblindi (talk) 08:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedydelete|1=Copyright infringement. Shxahxh (talk) 13:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is a file from the Ali Khamenei website, which states in its footer, "All Content by Khamenei.ir is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." Any proof of copyvio? --Ruthven (msg) 21:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ruthven. --Storkk (talk) 12:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Temporarily delete this file SGill (WMF) (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SGill (WMF): What do you mean "temporarily" ? - Themightyquill (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There was a requirement to delete these video due to some legal issues but those have been resolved now. No need to delete now. --SGill (WMF) (talk) 17:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality unused photo of e-cigarette(?) (according to description, it portrays Nemesis...). Pibwl (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (subject not quite clear, low quality, unused - not likely usable). --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Date Source and Author are given in the infobox.--Sanandros (talk) 09:32, 16 May 2018 (UTC). --Sanandros (talk) 09:32, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crédit : KEYSTONE-FRANCE (https://www.gamma-rapho.com/fr/asset/assetFile/id/3807665/size/1), unknown photographer, any evidence that picture has been first published (if ever) in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep taken in Italy. - Groupir ! (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Groupir !: It had already been replied to you here (to your own question : Does photographs from Italian photographers are always under the Italian laws about copyright ... ?) that you should refer to the Berne Convention. Please read again what has been written by @LX: (about unpublished works and country of origin vs. country of first publishing) and @Clindberg: ("for Commons purposes [...], the country of creation does not matter. Obviously there are exceptions for unpublished works (since there is no country of first publication), but most of the time it is the country of publication"). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Après examen attentif des clauses et spécificités du droit italien en la matière, cette photo répond aux critères requis. Tisourcier (talk) 17:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - if this is from a French photo agency, it's highly likely that French copyright rules apply. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: The photo was taken in Italy ! As this or this ! - Groupir ! (talk) 02:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, I have overlooked this while closing the other nomination --> renominated - Jcb (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely to have been created by uploader (all other files--including many deleted files--are fake own work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely to have been created by uploader (all other files--including many deleted files--are fake own work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hu:Endresz Alice was born in 1899. Year of her death is unknown. No proof that she died before 1948. Regasterios (talk) 14:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sign of her life or work after World War II. Szilas (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is indicated by the uploader as "Celeste", but the metadata say "Luca Cicchello". Whichever is correct, I don't think that the uploader (Info.Bruno) could release this under CC-BY. Delete as likely copyvio. Randykitty (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree, seeing the history of the user on it.wp. I almost forgot to having uploaded this file, and it seems quite strange that I'd do it. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the script notified you, not InfoBruno (I just posted a message on their it talk page), but I don't see your name in the file history. No clue why you got that notification. There are two more files that I'll be nominating, so perhpas you'll get notifications for those, too... --Randykitty (talk) 16:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Randykitty: It seems I've been notified 'cause I moved those files through CommonsUpload. Anyway, there's an OTRS ticket regarding Bruno Santori texts on his MySpace account, and in fact, at least this image comes from his MySpace account. I haven't checked the other two, but it's highly likely. My hypothesis is that they thought they agreed to release the images too, but they didn't. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's good to ping @Info.Bruno: as well. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


At the time of the photo I acquired the photo by the photographer Celeste who, if I'm not mistaken, came with an assistant who could be Luca Cicchello. Probably he used his camera to take the picture and from there could be metadata. I hope this explanation is sufficient. All photos uploaded by me are photos of which I have full license to use. Regards --Bruno Santori (talk) 09:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I assume this was released under CC-By by the uploader, Info.Bruno. However, Lorenzo Foschini is listed as author, so this appears to be a copyvio. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The photo was given to me for use. I have completed all the requests that had been asked to me during the upload. Let me know if I have to do anything else, but the photo, acquired by the photographer, is freely used by me. Regards --Bruno Santori (talk) 08:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruno Santori: A questo punto, ci servirebbe un'autorizzazione inviata per e-mail da Lorenzo Foschini al servizio OTRS. Così chiariamo la paternità della foto una volta per tutte. Grazie --Ruthven (msg) 21:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artificial out of scope stuff Joschi71 (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why it is out of scope? For me this pic is fine, as it shows a building.--Sanandros (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web ([27]), copyrighted according to metadata and watermark on the older version. Permission needed. ~Cybularny Speak? 09:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiem że istnieje -w końcu nawet mam na swoich stronach - jednakże zgodziłem się na prośbę portretowanej osoby i udostępniłem w Wikipedii. Swoją drogą - nie rozumiem Waszego uporu by wszystko udostępniać i zmuszać autorów do pozbywania się praw autorskich... Nie wystarczy że zgadzam się udostępnić swoją pracę bez opłaty? To jeszcze robicie jakieś problemy...
@Max581: Wyjaśnienie problemu [28]. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wysłałem pozwolenie do podpisania przez p. AM. Ma odesłać na OTRS. Jeżeli tego nie zrobi będziemy szukać innego zdjęcia. -- Geralt Riv (*talk) 20:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
p. AM odesłał pozwolenie na OTRS. Czekamy na akceptację -- Geralt Riv (*talk) 09:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the request cannot be open forever. After processing the OTRS-permission the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better cropped non-coyvio version here : File:Émile Mao-Renault La petite chatte, Fouesnant-vers 1912.jpg WikiLeMalo (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
@Daehan: Bonjour, Je ne comprends pas votre langue mais je suis d'accord pour la suppression. il y a mieux avec la fiche du Musée de Bretagne. Ok, à supprimer, Merci.
--François Malo-Renault (talk) 08:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour François Malo-Renault et WikiLeMalo,
Il ne fallait pas supprimer l'ancienne, mais la mettre à jour en cliquant sur "Importer une nouvelle version de ce fichier" sous l'historique.
Je ne sais pas si on peut les lier à nouveau, par contre. Il faudrait demander sur le Bistro de Wikimedia Commons (menu latéral gauche).
Cordialement, --Daehan (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated to date from ca. 1955, so that PD-Australia cannot be applied. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But the source says it's out of copyright as it is a state libary. Maybe u can ask them how they came to that conculsion.--Sanandros (talk) 09:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And they suggest that the library is the author, by requesting to be creditted. Unless a proper explanation is given, we cannot go on that statement. Mistaken statements about copyright situation from libraries and archives are more common than correct statements unfortunately. Jcb (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no publication data, no evidence for creation or publication before 1955. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about the real ownership of copyright by the author. Furthermore, the logo clearly exceeds the threshold of originality. Vajotwo (post) 18:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely to have been created by uploader (all other files--including many deleted files--are fake own work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Žádám o odstranění mé fotografie, k níž jsem neposkytla souhlas. Děkuji. Sandra Kreisslová 46.135.36.254 10:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die Aufnahme entstand anlässlich einer öffentlichen Buchpräsentation durch die Waldviertel Akademie im Tschechischen Zentrum in Wien, wo auch Frau Kreisslova zu den Vortragenden gehörte. --GuentherZ (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No reasonable educational use for this photo. It is unflattering due to being taken mid-expression, and we have two better photos for the purpose of identifying the subject. Guanaco (talk) 10:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per Guanaco. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo doesn't look simple enough to be under PD-simple. Complex logos without permission should be removed.

The same holds for the original file: File:Italian Social Movement logo (1972-95).png, which was kept in a former deletion request, but a second check would be precious.

Ruthven (msg) 13:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the copyright page, the Apache license does not apply to "trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names" so I am pretty sure the logo is not released under a compatible license. Diannaa (talk) 14:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to the following logos: File:Apache Zeppelin.png; File:Apache Celix.png. I think File:Apache Archiva.png is simple enough to qualify as PD-text-logo. Diannaa (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is something I do not agree with. Using the Help Wanted wanted tool it is clearly visible the Apache Software Foundation wants to have a page created for every project. See [29].

Looking at these pages

it clearly shows that the Apache Logo and name may be used, if not in a Software Product.

I noticed you also deleted the Apache Any23 wiki page. If still possible, can you restore this page as soon as possible, as the same rules apply to the wiki page! Thanks!

Roy Lenferink (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the license, material created using the software is released under license. But the license does not appear to extend to their webpages, logos, and so on. Asking for pages to be created is not the same thing as releasing copyright material under a compatible license. This page specifically states "do not change the appearance of ASF product logos", whereas our license permits alteration and derivative works. So therefore these logos are not compatibly licensed. Diannaa (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 195.143.129.132 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Reason: Image should be under license CC-BY-NC Unknown author from 1945 might be OK. Yann (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about the real ownership of copyright by the author. Furthermore, the logo clearly exceeds the threshold of originality. Vajotwo (post) 18:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IL LOGO DI iNDIPENDENZA VENETA L'HO CREATO IO STESSO CIRCA UN ANNO EMEZZO FA DAL MIO PC E DATO POI AL MOVIMENTO POLITICO INDIPENDENZA VENETA DI CUI FACCIO PARTE DA PIU' DI 4 ANNI, IN QUNATO ADETTO ALLA PARTE GRAFICA. GRAZIE. ALBERTO DAVIDE LORENZI


 Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Euro coins of San Marino

[edit]

Updated motive: No proof that the national side designs from San Marino are freely-licensed. ››Fugitron - 16:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

En vertu de COM:EURO. Le site officiel de la Banque centrale (www.bcsm.sm) renvoie à un document, qui indique à la page 16 que 2001/C 318/03 s'applique aux pièces d'euro de Saint-Marin. De plus, rien ne montre que les faces des pièces de Saint-Marin sont libres de droits.
Per COM:EURO. A document featured on the official website of the Central Bank states that 2001/C 318/03 applies to San-Marinese euro coins. Furthermore, nothing proves that national sides from San Marino are freely licensed. ››Fugitron - 18:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, COM:EURO refers to the common side, not the national sides with are being discussed here and has been discredited as reason for deletion in similar previous deletion discussions. Secondly the linked document (2001/C 318/03) refers to the common side as well (is it really that difficult to read a title?). Thirdly, that document actually contains following passage:
Reproduction of all or part of the common face design of the euro coins is authorised without recourse to a specific procedure in the following cases:
-for photographs, drawings, paintings, films, images, and generally reproductions in flat format (without relief) provided they are in faithful likeness and are used in ways which do not damage or detract from the image of the euro;
That actually means that our ruling regarding photographs of the common sides is actually wrong and should be changed.
Taking all that into account I say keep since no evidence has been brought forward that pictures of the Sammarinese national sides are prohibited.Tvx1 (talk) 15:46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tvx1: 2001/C 318/03 refers to the common side. However, I thought that by referring to this text, the Central Bank actually asserted that it applied to their national sides as well. Anyway, thanks for not shifting the burden of proof. Any work of art is, by default, copyrighted. The responsibility of proving anything here lies with the uploaders. As for what concerns the common sides, our rules are relevant: no free licence (that I know of) is compatible with claims such as "[must be] used in ways which do not damage or detract from the image" of the subject. ››Fugitron - 16:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, free-licenses can perfectly be compatible with such claims since they are not copyright restrictions. The Sammarinese Central Bank refers to that text because the coins minted on their authority use the common side as well and the common side on their coins has to respect the international regulations. That these apply to the national sides as well is only your personal assumption. Also, you are the one proposing the deletion of a set of files so the burden of providing justification of it by proving that copyright that is allegedly being violated does actually exist lies quite certainly with you.Tvx1 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tvx1: (edit conflict: I thought the directive applied also to the national sides, but I understood it didn't) They cannot. Free licences do not allow owners to make such claims. In the case of CC-BY-SA, any modification is allowed. Same for CC0. Also, the uploaders are the ones who state, while uploading a file, that this file is freely licenced and compatible with Commons' rules. In our case, this statement is unsure, since nothing proves that the San Marinese Central Bank released the national sides designs under the terms of a free licence. The fact that Commons upload process relies only on the uploader's good faith and knowledge of the rules, does not mean that the uploader is not the one who should present proofs. Let me cite COM:SCOPE: "Commons' users aim to build and maintain in good faith a repository of media files which to the best of our knowledge are free or freely-licensed. The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." ››Fugitron - 17:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
They quite patently can. The restrictions regarding common sides were discussed in a deletion discussion and there was a clear consensus that the restrictions weren't copyright restrictions. And even though someone decided to ignore said discussion and unilaterally delete them, this action was logically overturned following a deletion review. What's being discussed here though are the national sides. And I see no evidence here that pictures of the Sammarinese national sides are prohibited.Tvx1 (talk) 18:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tvx1: Whatever. That does not solve our problem. You have to provide proof that these designs are freely-licensed, so please do. See COM:EVID. ››Fugitron - 16:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well according to that we need to specify the sources of the file. That is already the case. We created the files and have correctly indicated so when we did.Tvx1 (talk) 17:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tvx1: You have to prove that the image is freely-licenced, which comes along with proving that the subject is compatible with a free license. See COM:DERIV. In either case, unless the underlying work is in the public domain (see Commons:Public domain) or there is evidence that the underlying work has been freely licensed for reuse (for example, under an appropriate Creative Commons license), the original creator of the work must explicitly authorize the copy/ derivative work before it can be uploaded to Commons. ››Fugitron - 17:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - nothing at Commons:Currency on San Marino. Copyright situation remains unclear. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]