Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_at_peak_intensity_8_-_4_-_09.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyviol da qui [1] Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder, please see OTRS#2018011010006931 for details. Yunshui (talk) 13:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Facebook profile photo: https://www.facebook.com/laird.shaw uploaded in 2008. clearly copied from there. Speedying. Ankry (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy: clear copyvio. --Ankry (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:La Raiz Producciones
[edit]
The metadata states this photo is by "Ignacio Orrego" and copyrighted, all rights reserved, by www.fotorock.cl. Would need evidence that the uploader is that person or has permission to license and distribute a copyrighted photo. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 07:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Евгений Пиманов (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence that the copyright holder licensed the images under {{PD-author}} or allows commercial use and creating derivative works. The license text:
| “ | You can use the photos free of charge, for the preparation of materials (please only refer to the Press Service of KAMAZ). | ” |
—Фотографии можно использовать безвозмездно, для оформления материалов (просим вас лишь ссылаться на Пресс-службу «КАМАЗа»)., http://kamaz.livejournal.com/645279.html | ||
- File:KAMAZ-65802(5).jpg
- File:KAMAZ-65802(4).jpg
- File:KAMAZ-65802(2).jpg
- File:KAMAZ-65802(1).jpg
- File:KAMAZ-65802(3).jpg
- File:Kamaz-65801(1).jpg
- File:Kamaz-65801(4).jpg
- File:Kamaz-65801(2).jpg
- File:Kamaz-65801(3).jpg
- File:Kamaz-6580(5).jpg
- File:Kamaz-6580(3).jpg
- File:Kamaz-6580(4).jpg
- File:Kamaz-6580(2).jpg
- File:Kamaz-6580(1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete, see also User:A.Savin/Archive/2017/3#Fragliches_Bildupload (german, also @A.Savin: ) and the comment section of the KAMAZ page, where up to now there is no answer from KAMAZ about giving a permission or not. I'll keep monitoring the page for some time, in case that anything positive happens there, the pictures can be undeleted.
- In case of deleting the pictures, please also delete Category:KamAZ-65801 for now as it will be empty (no valid content). I'll recreate it when we get pictures of the truck by the time they're here (if nobody else does, of course). --Druschba 4 (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --A.Savin 00:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 07:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be self-promotion, and a possible collection of copyrighted images. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, my bad (Must overwrite the original image, but uploaded separated Nino Marakot (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Apparently a Samsung marketing image from [2], with a spammy description here. Needs a license from the copyright holder. --ghouston (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. I'll delete most of the user's uploads due to that reason. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Tabercil (talk) 03:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, by Julo (talk · contribs). Taivo (talk) 11:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
mistaken upload Jesshb (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jesshb: : put {{speedydelete|Uploader request.}} at the top of the file page and you can skip the week wait. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Not Myriam Fares : out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Admins, can we salt the title? --E4024 (talk) 06:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
fake, deleted before, etc. Rafic.Mufid (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Admins, can we salt the title? --E4024 (talk) 06:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Being discussed for deletion. E4024 (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The insistence on creating this file with the name of a respected artist makes me think it could be an attack page. Unknown person, out of scope. --E4024 (talk) 11:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Admins, can we salt the title? --E4024 (talk) 06:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The file has been uploaded illegally without the permission of its author and when viewing the watermark it is possibly under copyright. SuZumiya (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 16:44, 11 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 19:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Not encycloaedic: claims to be a murder victim Technopat (talk) 00:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Rastrojo (D•ES) 22:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Game of Thrones pic shared by a million websites such as this, original authorship and copyright status of the pic is unknown. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion/advertising, the user's only contribution, the file is not in use and has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Source link is dead, source information indicates that the photo was commissioned by the politician in the photo, and there is no evidence he (or the uploader) has permission to license and distribute it. Also, political advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source site is dead and the license was never reviewed. Now here's no other possibility than delete the file. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Photo of the uploader, who claims "own work", but doesn't appear to be a self-portrait, and the metadata contains the name of the photographer. Needs permission to license and distribute. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. OTRS-permission from photographer Mark Badal is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
From Flickr, where it is marked copyrighted. Did not go through the Flickr Bot check at upload. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Advertising for a website; the logo is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Covered liberally in the watermark of a professional photographer. If the uploader is that person they should clarify this and preferably remove the mark; if not, needs permission from the photographer. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. en:Rhet Mavity was twice deleted due to non-notability, he is out of project scope too. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Advertising by or on behalf of a lawyer, and an unused photo of a nonnotable individual. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Gmbalternativo
[edit]- File:Sabión Con su tatuaje de Pata bendita, mejor que el de Pini Ron.jpg
- File:Sabión en portada del Diario popular (La Cuarta).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Scans of a tabloid publication. Copyrighted unless there is clear evidence otherwise. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, newspapers are copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Television screenshot. Copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the Map is illegal , and use of this map is also illegal in INDIA, IT violate sovereignty and integrity of Republic of India. It must be deleted 61.2.47.13 04:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- No one in India is forced to use this map. NNW 09:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep: Commons should not delete an image just because its use is illegal in some countries. See Commons:Non-copyright restrictions for details. --bjh21 (talk) 14:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Then don't use it in India. Besides, if one map could >>violate the sovereignty and integrity of (the) Republic of India<<, how about building rockets that drop myriads of maps on enemy territory? WMD de deluxe.--TUBS
08:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Then don't use it in India. Besides, if one map could >>violate the sovereignty and integrity of (the) Republic of India<<, how about building rockets that drop myriads of maps on enemy territory? WMD de deluxe.--TUBS
Kept, speedily. The file is used in multiple projects and cannot be deleted due to any other reason except copyright. Commons does not care about non-copyright restrictions, as explained by Bjh21. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
File has mistake HaJo88 (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect upload. It has been uploaded again on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ESEAP_2018_logo.png. Christy.localtobacco (talk) 06:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect upload. It has been uploaded again on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ESEAP_2018_logo.svg Christy.localtobacco (talk) 06:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's work - there is not enough evidence or information provided. The image appears to belong to Stu Switzer, a London Lightning media person. It has been used many times by Lightning media (Facebook, Twitter) prior to the upload date. See http://www.cbc.ca/sports/basketball/nba/royce-white-london-lightning-1.4132779 and https://twitter.com/LondonLightning/status/891000784363687937 DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, per EXIF: author Phatso Photography, all rights reserved. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Photo from instragam does not have a clear free license SeraphWiki (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Файл будет заменён. Данный файл не актуален Finkrek (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation, cropped from [3], which is a Getty Images photograph and not licensed under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
These three are unused selfies of same person. No encyclopedic value. Kalbbes (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
One of multiple selfies by this uploader. Has no encyclpedic value. Kalbbes (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
One of multiple selfies by this uploader with no encyclopedic value. See [4] Kalbbes (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
one of many selfies by this uploader [5] without encyclopedic value. Kalbbes (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
another selfie by User:Rajkumar kar. Out of scope. See [6]. Kalbbes (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfies. Same as File:In mcdonald.jpg and File:Singlevisit.jpg This user uploads only selfies as far as I can tell. See [7]. Kalbbes (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
User: Rajkumar kar is serial uploader of personal images. His account has been blocked but all images uploaded by him appear to be out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
See [8] Multiple out of scope uploads Kalbbes (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope personal file. Kalbbes (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope per personal photos. See [9] Kalbbes (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 23:51, 12 Januar 2018 UTC: Out of project scope - --Krdbot 01:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope personal file. See [10]. Kalbbes (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 23:51, 12 Januar 2018 UTC: Out of project scope - --Krdbot 01:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
I found this file in Category:Wife carrying. Is it in scope, or a personal file? E4024 (talk) 09:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, no, this is not a normal illustration for wife carrying. In addition, this is small unused photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Bei dem Upload ist ein Fehler bezüglich der Urheberschaft entstanden. Die IBA Hamburg GmbH besitzt alle Rechte an dem Bild, allerdings ist der Urheber ein anderer. Daher muss die Lizenz von "Eigenes Werk" in "Fremdes Werk" geändert werden. Die Lizenz bleibt die gleiche. Tbebaum (talk) 10:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Same reason for File:Dan Dorell Architect.jpg, Not "Own work". Derived from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=557885944371094&set=a.468324853327204.1073741828.100004490804662&type=3&theater Shev123 (talk) 11:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This photo is my "own work", photographed with my camera and with the help of my wife. there are no copywriter issues attached to this photo. the same photo is also used on my facebook account.
thanks for your comprehension Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddorell (talk • contribs)
Deleted, by Ronhjones on the same day with reason "re-uploaded File:Dan Dorell Architect.jpg". Taivo (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
A blurry test upload of an unidentified highway interchange – can we just get rid of this? El Grafo (talk) 12:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes. As the name implies this was a test upload, I think from an early version of the commons app. My apologies for not deleting it back then. Ter-burg (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also supports deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Test upload from what appears to be a test account: not used for anything anymore, out of scope El Grafo (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, very out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks like an unused out of scope image of an unknown person, perhaps taken from http://www.morgan.edu/student_affairs/center_for_career_development/student_success_stories/adrien_w_feudjio_temgoua.html. E4024 (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
uploader is not owner of the media Parinapan42 (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Little Jackie (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has uploaded own fan art. All are non-notable and outside project scope.
- File:Mona Lisa reprod.jpg
- File:DisneyPixarCoco fanmade.jpg
- File:KylieMinogueWordisout fanmade.jpg
- File:CelineDionIncognito fanmade.jpg
- File:ChristinaAguileraStripped fanmade.jpg
- File:BEPMonkeyBusiness fanmade.jpg
- File:JenniferLopezOnThe6 fanmade.jpg
- File:JenniferLopezJLO fanmade.jpg
- File:AlaskaThunderf**kAnus fanmade.jpg
- File:NickiMinajTriniDemGirls fanmade cover.jpg
- File:Nicki Minaj Did it on ‘em - fanmade.jpg
- File:MadonnaTrueBlueBooklet.png
- File:BritneySpearsBabyOneMoreTimeBooklet2.jpg
- File:BritneySpearsBabyOneMoreTimeBooklet.jpg
- File:KylieLightYearsCover2017.jpg
- File:Kylie Minogue - Let’s Get To It (with Miley the Stylist Fairy, Vanessa the Dance Steps Fairy, and Roxie the Baking Fairy).jpg
- File:Lady Gaga - The Fame (with Rosalie the Rapunzel Fairy).jpg
- File:Star-Wars-The-Last-Jedi-Fanmade-Poster.jpg
- File:Kylie Minogue - Shocked (with Roxie the Baking Fairy).jpg
- File:Kylie Minogue - Step Back in Time (with Honor the Happy Days Fairy).jpg
- File:Fergie Lisa.jpg
- File:Serpio the Slithering Shadow.jpg
- File:I Should Be So Lucky.jpg
- File:Hellion Cover.jpg
- File:New RM logo amathist.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I see Pixar copyvios in some of these images, particularly several derivative works of Coco. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- EDIT: The Star Wars one suggests that the cartoon figures are from a children's book series called Rainbow Magic. I haven't heard of it before, but these should all be {{Copyvio}}able. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unnecessary upload Mindteater (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Courtesy, per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
will replace through main wikipedia Mindteater (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused image; deleted per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No educational value (Aside from being a small internet meme, and even then, is this really the right image?), might be used for vandalism.Person who formerly started with "216" (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
![15:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/01/10#c-Person_who_formerly_started_with_"216"-2018-01-10T15:46:00.000Z-File:The_Knuckles.png){kind=link}
- The original source for this image seems to be here SpanishSnake (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by OluwaFresh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aurang Zeb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Cethos 02:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept / Used in personal page.--Fanghong (talk) 02:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image — Cethos 03:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept / Used.--Fanghong (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Photo of the uploader, who attributes it to a photographer, who has a copyright mark on the photo; needs permission from this person. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can add File:Pepedelvalle4.jpg, which is attributed to the same person.
-Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I add a derivative work from Pepedelvalle4.jpg for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal artwork, not in use, contains no educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal image and out of scope. ∆Jæ∆ 06:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete. Out of project scope. not a notable person. The article on Giorgos Manolopoulos (in Greek: Γιώργος Μανωλόπουλος) aka Manos, has been deleted three times ([11], [12], [13]) in Greek-language WP. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Santiago jvv
[edit]Santiago jvv (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal file, out of our scope. E4024 (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Freedomsound
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Freedomsound (talk · contribs):
- File:Dangles Pics 040.jpg
- File:Dangles Pics 066.jpg
- File:Dangles Pics 015.jpg
- File:Dangles Pics 281.jpg
- File:Dangles Pics 041.jpg
Singer Dangles is not mentioned in en.wiki. Probably all photos depicting him are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Chaudhary Amit Ruhil
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of CHAUDHARY AMIT RUHIL (talk · contribs):
- File:AMIT CHAUDHARY RUHIL.jpg
- File:AMIT CHAUDHARY RUHIL SATWAI.jpg
- File:AMIT RUHIL.jpg
- File:AMIT RUHIL CHAUDHARY.jpg
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 10:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Thahdeel Thahir
[edit]THAHDHEEL THAHIR (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:MECHANIUM 2K17 DIAS (2013-17 BATCH) NIT CJB.jpg (author ANOOP B KRISHNAN)
- File:MECHANIUM 2K17 THAHDHEEL THAHIR.jpg (author ANOOP B KRISHNAN)
- File:MECHANIUM 2K17 THAHDHEEL THAHIR (2013-17 BATCH) NIT.jpg (author ANOOP B KRISHNAN)
_NIT_CJB.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_NIT.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
First group. Not own work, files are credited to another person.
- File:MECHANIUM 2K17 DIAS THAHDHEEL THAHIR (2013-17 BATCH).jpg
- File:MECHANIUM 2K17 THAHDHEEL THAHIR (2013-17 BATCH) NIT COIMBATORE.jpg
- File:MECHANIUM 2K17 THAHDHEEL THAHIR (2013-17 BATCH) NIT COIMBATORE STUNT SHOW.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_NIT_COIMBATORE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_NIT_COIMBATORE_STUNT_SHOW.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Second group. Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Kaisei
[edit]Here are all contributions of Kaisei (talk · contribs):
- File:DJ BURGER USING TONIUM PACEMAKER.jpg (600×600, collage)
- File:DJ Kaisei at the DJ Academy Philippines.jpg (717×960)
- File:DJ using dj controller for compact events.jpg (960×717)
Small photos without metadata, probably not own works, but copyright violations. Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javier rodrigo (talk · contribs)
[edit]While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. The only other contributions of this user are a self promotional user page which probably violates COM:ADVERT and a one image gallery which mirrored the user page and violated our rule that personal galleries must be in User space.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Not sure if it's my crappy internet connection but the first image seems to have pixels missing too. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 11:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Venom4k322
[edit]Here are both contributions of Venom4k322 (talk · contribs):
- File:KIZARU.png (217×247)
- File:Kizaru.jpg (960×960)
Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal file, out of Commons scope. E4024 (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks like an unused out of scope image of an unknown person. E4024 (talk) 13:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks like an unused out of scope image of an unknown person. E4024 (talk) 13:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The portretee doesn't like this photo of mine. Todayl I have taken and uploaded two better photos of him. -- Hladnikm Hladnikm (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
useless on wiki JomaIranگفتگو 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete clearly out of project scope. MasoodHA (talk) 10:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Askolika
[edit]- File:A student exchange.jpg
- File:Annette (on the left) with her mother (on the right).jpg
- File:Career beginnings.jpg
- File:"Days Go By".jpg
- File:"Imagination".jpg
- File:"Coffee, Please".jpg
- File:Annette (2017).jpg
- File:Annette in December 2017.jpg
- File:Annette (December 2017).jpg
- File:VEVO Channel.jpg
_with_her_mother_(on_the_right).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Personal and publicity-style images of no real use to the encyclopedia. The individual appears to be NN going by the file usage and name searches. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 17:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 19:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file, 'profling' or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
out of focus, private picture with a long private message Migebert (talk) 19:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:Faksha Entertainmwnt short time.jpg
- File:Faksha Entertainmwnt short time 02.jpg
- File:Faksha Entertainmwnt short time 01.jpg
- File:The Faksha Entertainment Group.jpg
- File:Tz Rafi.jpg
FDMS 4 20:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploader request: low quality image, superseded by a better version. A1AA1A (talk) 20:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Nabeel.tariq798 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Six images of user, who has made no other contributions. Commons is not social media.
- File:MNabeel.jpg
- File:M Nabeel.jpg
- File:Muhammad Nabeel (c).jpg
- File:Muhammad Nabeel (b).jpg
- File:Muhammad Nabeel (a).jpg
- File:Muhammad Nabeel.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faizalnims (talk · contribs)
[edit]Five images of same person, possibly uploader. However Commons isn't social media, so no reason to keep private images like this.
- File:Faisal sir.png
- File:M.S.Faizal Khan.jpg
- File:M.S.Faisal Khan.jpg
- File:M S Faizal Khan.jpg
- File:Md3.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope,kept used one.--Fanghong (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused blurry personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
MAURO PIMENTEL/AFP/Getty Images Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata or valid source, copy of https://i.pinimg.com/236x/49/dd/6a/49dd6ab9b3c8d6a0a8df59f12d89d5d8.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Any valid description : out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
copyrigh violation, the same pic was found at http://waskucity.com/threads/the-malaysian-girl-picture-blog-thread-by-spankwiki.199129/page-199 with date Dec. 24, 2014 and at many other sites Stan old (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement Gikü (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo images and songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Gülcahan Salamova.jpg
- File:Xatirə Məmmədova.jpg
- File:ƏLİFBA karaoke.ogg
- File:Ədəbiyyat.jpg
- File:Məhməd Polat.jpg
- File:Qaynanamız serial.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private photos of the user to show them in the gallery in the personal space. Wiki is not a hosting.
- File:Mehdi Fəyyazov Quran oxuyarkən.jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Mehdi Afiq oğlu (2017).jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Mehdi 2-ci sinif.jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Sadiq şəkli (3).jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim1).jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Sadiq şəkli (1).jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Sadiq şəkli (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Bilderling (talk) 11:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Şəkildə göründüyü kimi, şəkillər mənə məxsusdur. Sadiq Fəyyazov isə mənim qardaşımdır. Как вы видети на картинке, фотографии принадлежат мне. Садиг Фаязов - мой брат. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Comment Depicted Sadiq Fayyazov is uploader's Masalli qasimli's brother. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: commons is not a webhost. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Passport scans of a granddaddy - sensitive data
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun pasportu 4.jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun pasportu 3.jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun pasportu 2.jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun pasportu 1.jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun pasportu.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 08:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Bu fayllar mənə və mənim ailəmə məxsusdur. Sadəcə faylları mənə qardaşım göndərib. Эти файлы принадлежат мне и моей семье. Просто эти файлы отправил мне мой брат. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is passport of Soviet Union. Soviet Union does not exist since 1991. All those data are public and do not consist any secret, also during more than 25 years from issuing some data in the passport aren't correct anymore. Being more specific, the passport belongs to person, who was born in 1921 and died in 1998, so his privacy does not need to be protected very much. The files are used in az.wiki in article nameroom, so they are in scope too. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of project scope, fan art, some derivative works, videos with non free sounds/music and in some pictures the author seems to be the subject of the photograph.
- File:Mehdi Fəyyazov (Namaz qılarkən).jpg
- File:Mehdi Fəyyazov (Namaz qılarkən1).jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun imzası.png
- File:Fəyyazov Sadiq şəkli.jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg
- File:Fəyyazov Mehdi 1-ci sinif.jpg
- File:Mehdi Afiq oğlu Fəyyazov 2005.jpg
- File:Tatarıstan Respublikası (Mehdi Fəyyazov).jpg
- File:Başqırdıstan Respublikası (Mehdi Fəyyazov).jpg
- File:Maşın - Mehdi.jpg
- File:İtlər - Mehdi.jpg
- File:Aslan - Mehdi.jpg
- File:Stəkan - Mehdi.jpg
- File:Pişik - Mehdi.jpg
- File:Tülkü - Mehdi Fəyyazov.jpg
- File:Ördək - Mehdi Fəyyazov.jpg
- File:Tülkü maskası - Mehdi Fəyyazov.jpg
- File:Balıqçı və balıq haqqında nağıı (Mehdi Fəyyazov).jpg
- File:Rzayev Şirindil Salman oğlu (3).jpg
- File:Fəyyaz babam (Mehdi F'yyazov).webm
- File:Rzayev Şirindil Salman oğlu.jpg
- File:Qaçıb, kəndimizə getməyim gəlir!.webm
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlu (3).jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlu (2).jpg
- File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlu.jpg
- File:Tan sülaləsi. Çinin ərazisi.jpg
- File:İdil Bulqar dövləti. Xəritə.jpg
- File:Avarların köçü. Xəritə.jpg
- File:1 Aprel gülüş günü.jpg
- File:Images.PO.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Bu fayllar mənə məxsusdur. Eyni zamanda meta məlumatlar da qeyd olunub. Silinməyə heç bir səbəb yoxdur. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
These files belong to me. At the same time, meta data, and records were. Delete there is no reason. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Personally, I think private pictures in user pages should be kept in the minimum. Having said that general opinion (that we can delete "excess" personal files although used in user space) we must check if some of these files are used here and there, in pages not belonging to users. (For example the last file...) --E4024 (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm no english language. Yes Azerbaijani, Turkish and Russian language. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Could you please do not delete these photos as this photos was done by me and genuine.
--Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- User:Masalli qasimli, büyük sözü dinlerseniz özel hayatınızı herkesin önüne sermeyin derim. That's all from a friend. --E4024 (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- E4024, teşekkür ediyorum. Ama ben özel hayatımı kimsenin önüne sermiyorum. Yuxarıda olan dosyaları sile bilirsiniz ama, bu
dosyalar az vikide makaleler için çok önemli. Lütfen o dosyaları silmeyin. Hürmetle: --Masalli qasimli (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep File:Fərəcov Fəyyaz Qasım oğlunun imzası.png ({{PD-trivial}}, in use in az.wikipedia), File:Images.PO.jpg (plausibly an own photo / похоже на собственную фотографию). Delete 13 files above as deception / обман / kandırma. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Уважаемая коллега - Incnis Mrsi, Я не вру. Можете посмотреть последную фотография? File:Images.PO.jpg --Masalli qasimli (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Вот именно Images.PO.jpg только и является собственной работой. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: what do you mean with «deception»? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: I mean forgery of authorship records. A ≈ 14-years-old youth claiming authorship of photographs made decades ago. Are you happy with all this rampage of deceptive forgers (like this) on Commons?! Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: thanks for explaining your apparently random accusation; it’d be good to be clear the first time around. And of course I’m not happy with uploaders being deceptive, why should I? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: I mean forgery of authorship records. A ≈ 14-years-old youth claiming authorship of photographs made decades ago. Are you happy with all this rampage of deceptive forgers (like this) on Commons?! Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: what do you mean with «deception»? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Вот именно Images.PO.jpg только и является собственной работой. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Incnis Mrsi, Так они все является собственной работай. В том числе: File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg --Masalli qasimli (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Fəyyazov Mehdi (uşaqlıq şəklim).jpg является сканом старой фотографии, а старая фотография не могла быть сделана юношей, позирующим с надписью «Азербайджан». Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep all contents pertaining to Category:Fəyyaz Fərəcov, as it seems to be in scope and therefore doen’t meet the DR claim about COM:NOTHOST. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Incnis Mrsi, I did not cheat. When i was a kid shot this picture. Poor english language.
Tuvalkin, I thank colleagues. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Incnis Mrsi, Mən heç kimi aldatmıram. Mən uşaq olanda çəkilib o şəkil. İngilis dilini zəif bilirəm.
Tuvalkin, Təşəkkür edirəm həmkar. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The 2 keep "votes" were for DW that were claimed as own work but had no proper source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
copy of http://styleinsider.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/KAZKA.jpg. Found elsewhere on the web : https://www.facebook.com/kazka.band/photos/a.1878748752399621.1073741825.1878719885735841/2042973369310491/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere (http://mark.artschaplaincy.net/wp-content/uploads/marley-reading-bible-520x385.jpg, http://thecatholiccatalogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/404518_3091433536504_1583991559_2739367_62299457_n-588x376.jpg or https://i.pinimg.com/236x/5d/20/bc/5d20bc64e21d20049a5d21fa405076bf--jah-rastafari-bob-marley.jpg), false date, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author Jon Endow Copyright holder in metadata doesn't match the data in the template. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author Jon Endow Copyright holder Jon Endow in metadata doesn't match the data in the template Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author Jon Endow Copyright holder Jon Endow in metadata doesn't match the data in the template Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author Jon Endow Copyright holder Jon Endow in metadata doesn't match the data in the template Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
All these images are sourced to others, but given self licenses. Unlikely own work.
- File:Made Mahaguna Putra.jpg
- File:Prof. Dr. David Sontani Perdanakusuma, dr., Sp.BP-RE(K).jpg
- File:Prof. Indah S. Tantular, dr., M.Kes., Ph.D., Sp.Par-K.jpg
- File:Aucky Hinting, dr., Ph.D., Sp.And.jpg
- File:Prof. Dr. Nursalam, M.Nurs. (Hons).jpg
- File:Dr. Kusnanto, S.Kp., M.Kes.jpg
- File:Dr. Ahmad Yusuf S, S.Kp., M.Kes.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The site is copyrighted. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Ac oolection of likely copyright violations, not used in any meaningful way. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Croatia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Germany.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
950123.tistory.com
[edit]- File:160924 i30 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i31 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i32 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i33 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i34 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i35 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i36 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
- File:160924 i37 핫해치 페스티벌 헬로비너스 라임 앨리스 여름 직찍.jpg
The blog post is tagged as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, but the photographer also states "상업적 용도의 2차 가공 및 크롭을 금합니다", which translates as "Commercial use, secondary processing, as well as logo cropping is prohibited", contradicting the Creative Commons license. These images are not acceptable. ℯxplicit 00:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused, undescribed image that looks like a copy. See uploader's discussion page. Richard Avery (talk) 10:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
The cover of a book. Copyrighted by the publisher, author, and/or artist unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Edit section
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Edit section (talk · contribs):
- File:Awakening Conference.jpg (602×401)
- File:Awakening Conference at Coimbature.jpg (574×340)
- File:Green Campus Campaign.jpg (594×447, source site www.newskannada.in is copyrighted)
- File:NWF.jpg (627×299)
- File:Save Women's Rights.jpg (640×385)
- File:Soni Sori Acid attacked.jpg (636×477, obvious copyvio)
- File:Soni Sori bofore attack pic.jpg (1304×1528)
- File:Soni Sori chemical attacked.jpg (obvious copyvio)
- File:Tribal Activist Soni Sori.jpg (389×461)
- File:Women Rights.jpg (1368×1026)
- File:Women rights.jpg (1344×1010)
Small photos without metadata, copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Devbhoomi1
[edit]Here are all contributions of Devbhoomi1 (talk · contribs):
- File:Amma Gari photo.gif (3000×2400)
- File:Kokila manjula sree.jpg (3120×4160, camera Motorola Nexus 6)
- File:Kokila manjula sree .audio function.jpg (351×960)
- File:Kokila manjula sree Prog.jpg (330×533)
- File:Manjula sree Bhagavatam.jpg (768×576)
- File:Manjulasree in Usa.jpg (713×475, author Raghu)
- File:SSD 2639.jpg (656×435)
Mostly small photos without metadata. One photo is credited to another person. Probably not own works, but different photographers' copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not free enough: Het auteursrecht op de foto's in deze rubriek berust bij de Rijksoverheid en wordt uitdrukkelijk voorbehouden. Het is evenwel toegestaan de foto’s te downloaden ten behoeve van redactioneel gebruik door nieuwsmedia, het tonen in openbare ruimten, privégebruik en educatieve doeleinden.
No speedy, see talk page Wdwd (talk) 10:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Per license, commercial use is prohibited. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Google image search reveals all these images are previously published elsewhere. The uploader should offer some evidence of ownership through the OTRS process.
- File:SStailandia.jpg
- File:SSGNoite.jpg
- File:SSGuarapiranga.jpg
- File:Solo-sagrado-japao-kyoto-00.jpg
- File:Solo-sagrado-japao-hakone-0.jpg
- File:Solo-sagrado-japao-atami-03.jpg
- File:PaláciodecristalAtami.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, small images, the newer photos don't have any metadata, the older ones were taken with lots of different cameras
- File:Tuna unsch.jpg
- File:SemanaSanta Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 13.JPG
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 12.jpg
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 14.JPG
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 07.jpg
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 04.jpg
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 02.jpg
- File:Semana Santa Ayacucho - 03.jpg
- File:ViernesD1.JPG
- File:Senorass.JPG
- File:ViernesD3.JPG
- File:ViernesD2.JPG
- File:Sabadochamizo.JPG
- File:Miercoles sentencia4.JPG
- File:Miercoles sentencia.JPG
- File:Miercoles sentencia2.JPG
- File:Encuentro Ayacucho 2.jpg
- File:Encuentro Ayacucho 1.jpg
- File:Ramos ayacucho2.jpg
- File:Nazareno ayacucho.jpg
- File:Ramos Ayacucho.jpg
- File:Basilio Auqui.jpg
- File:Miercoles semana santa ayacucho.jpg
- File:Virgen Dolorosa Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Arbol de Pati en Wari 2.JPG
- File:Arbol de Pati en Wari.JPG
- File:Entrada Sondondo.JPG
- File:Wari, Templo en D.JPG
- File:Alle Wari.JPG
- File:Obelisco Quinua 3.JPG
- File:Plaza Vilcashuaman.JPG
- File:Arbol de Pati, detalle.JPG
- File:Perspectiva wari.JPG
- File:Portada Wari.JPG
- File:Placa Obelisco de Quinua.JPG
- File:Andamarca.JPG
- File:Vivandera de Muyuchi 2.JPG
- File:Busto Ventura Ccalamaqui.JPG
- File:Vivandera de Muyuchi.JPG
- File:Procesión salesiana Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Banda Salesiana.JPG
- File:Casona Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Catedral Huamanga.JPG
- File:Mercado Magdalena Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Catedral Huamanga 2.JPG
- File:La Higuera ayacucho.JPG
- File:Obelisco Quinua.JPG
- File:Escuela Música Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Portada Escuela Música Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Artesanía ayacuchana.JPG
- File:1-Ayacucho09147.JPG
- File:01-P1040935.JPG
- File:Mercado Carlos F Vivanco Ayacucho.jpg
- File:Arco alameda ayacucho.jpg
- File:Panoramico Ayacucho.jpg
- File:Lugar de la Memoria, la Tolerancia y la Inclusión Social.jpg
- File:Templo San Cristóbal, Ayacucho..JPG
- File:Templo San Francisco de Paula, Ayacucho..jpg
- File:Templo de La Compañía, Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Templo de Santa María Magdalena, Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Insignia Santa Clara, Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Templo de Santa Clara, Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Templo de San Francisco, Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Morochuco Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Alfombra en Semana Santa Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Ayacucho domingo resurrecion.JPG
- File:Viernes Santo Ayacucho.JPG
- File:Casona Velarde Alvarez.JPG
Didym (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Didym
[edit]There are my photos; signed like "shaelkonef" in some places (ex, in former panoramio) or anothers taken and uploaded by my from flickr or another similar site. It comes from my personal photo library (and sometimes screenshots from some videos), from about more than 10 years living in Peru. thanks.--Eduzam (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 00:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Derivatives of non-free works of art. Jorge Eielson died in 2006. His works remain protected by copyright throughout 2076. Undelete in 2077.
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson - Aldebaran.jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson cuadro2.jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (39256584222).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson - Nudos (38577040384).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (38408611335).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson. Paracas Pyramid. 1972 (38408574675).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson. Clavicembalo Ben Temperato di J. S. Bach. 2004 (39285107721).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (39285320641).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (38577777034).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (38577776904).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (39285294201).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson. Cabeza de chamán VII. (Dedicada a César Vallejo). 1985-1988 (25417710078).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson (38408615925).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson - Nudos (27508498199).jpg
- File:Eduardo Eielson - Nudos (39255700212).jpg
- File:Jorge Eduardo Eielson - Nudos (39284477451).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._1985-1988_(25417710078).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, there are all my photos, taken in december at Eielson's exposition at Art's Museum of Lima. --Eduzam (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:Trabajos derivados. You cannot issue a valid copyright license for a photograph depicting someone else's copyrighted work. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Book scans, not own works. No date, no author, no permission.
- File:Летопись Кр 3.JPG
- File:Летопись Кр 2.JPG
- File:Летопись Лив 6.JPG
- File:Летопись Кр 1.JPG
- File:Летопись Лив 5.JPG
- File:Летопись Лив 4.JPG
- File:Летопись Лив 3.JPG
- File:Летопись Лив 2.JPG
- File:Летопись Лив 1.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 7.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 5.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 6.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 4.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 3.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 1.JPG
- File:Летопись Мц 2.JPG
- File:Летопись Б5.JPG
- File:Летопись Б3.JPG
- File:Летопись Б4.JPG
- File:Летопись Б1.JPG
- File:Летопись Б2.JPG
- File:Городище. гипотеза.JPG
- File:Городищеворот.JPG
- File:Let7.png
- File:Let4.png
- File:Let6.png
- File:Let5.png
- File:Let3.png
- File:Let2.png
- File:Let1.png
Yann (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Закон допускает использование чужих объектов авторского права в части (фрагментарно) без согласия авторов (правообладателей) путем цитирования.
Гражданский кодекс Российской Федерации. Статья 1274. Свободное использование произведения в информационных, научных, учебных или культурных целях 1. Допускается без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения, но с обязательным указанием имени автора, произведение которого используется, и источника заимствования: 1) цитирование в оригинале и в переводе в научных, полемических, критических, информационных, учебных целях, в целях раскрытия творческого замысла автора правомерно обнародованных произведений в объеме, оправданном целью цитирования, включая воспроизведение отрывков из газетных и журнальных статей в форме обзоров печати.
Источник: http://www.gk-rf.ru/statia1274 Skklm15 (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Если согласно ст.1274 ГК РФ допускается фрагментарное использование (в данном случае для информационных целях), то возможно следует восстановить удалённые файлы: Лив.1 - 6 ? Skklm15 (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of non-free artworks, no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures.
- File:P1070917 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070594 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070585 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070574 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070567 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070250 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070249 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070248 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070247 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070246 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070245 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070244 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070243 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070242 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070241 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070240 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070238 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070239 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070235 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070237 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070236 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070561 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070282 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070286 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070274 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070272 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070271 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070270 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070269 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070267 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070277 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070209 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070227 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070266 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070231 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070216 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070182 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070193 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070210 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070194 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070192 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070190 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070188 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070181 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070173 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:P1070177 Памятники города Орла.jpg
- File:0790 Памятник А. А. Фету в Орле.jpg
- File:P1060534 Троицкое кладбище в Орле.jpg
- File:P1060527 Троицкое кладбище в Орле.jpg
- File:0037 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:0036 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:0034 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:0035 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:0033 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:MEMO0001 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:0880 Парки и скверы Орла.jpg
- File:0040 450-летию города Орла.jpg
- File:0305 Сквер Танкистов (Орёл).jpg
- File:P1050969 Памятный знак.jpg
- File:966 Орловский парк культуры и отдыха.jpg
- File:Памятник Л. Н. Гуртьеву в Орле.jpg
- File:Памятник А. В. Горбатову в Новосиле.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Fair use, screenshot and possible copyright https://twitter.com/AndreCool0 — Cethos 02:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Well known Chinese temple, with articles in several wikis. Also, image quality is not so bad to be eliminated. --Érico (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: DR proposer failed to explain how this image doesn't fills project scope. I don't see any major issue. --Érico (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 06:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. but the photo is nevertheless used in ja.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It seems to be the picture of 勤式指導所, which is something ja.wiki seems interested in depicting.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete: in use and meets project scope. --Érico (talk) 03:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
User:Cocoametal doesn't seem to be an active user nor he seems to have been "really active" some time. I think this file is an OoS personal image as the musician depicted does not seem to be notable. E4024 (talk) 08:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- If the file is kept for some reason please correct "rooll" in the title to "roll". --E4024 (talk) 08:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The nominator created two articles in es.wiki, so I consider him eligible for one personal file. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I looked at the edit count only. If you say so, no problem from my side if you close this DR as keep/withdrawn, Taivo. --E4024 (talk) 12:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --Érico (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
unused random panoramio upload, small-sized and of of poor quality, Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep usable, with coordinates. --Ralf Roleček 18:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, usable, in scope. --Insider (talk) 07:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I also believes that meets project scope. --Érico (talk) 03:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
user picture of highly inactive user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
inappropriate PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Incredibly inappropriate deletion request, as (another) attempt to censor Commons on a moral ground. If PlanespotterA320 finds this content "incredibly inappropriate", he has a good way of avoiding it: Dont look at it, instead of trying to impose your own moral values on others. Image of good quality is in scope, per categories and subject(s). Tm (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- It was in Category:People with Teddy Bears. Can you see how easily an innocent person could stumble upon it? It's a problem to have disgusting pictures among innocent teddy bears. At the very least, it should ONLY be in the respective categories for such horrible pictures, not ones like "People with Teddy Bears".--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC) (and I'm a she)
Kept: Commons is not censored. Argue that "disgusting" some people can't be considered a valid reason to open an DR. I also didn't notice any other issues, such as the age of the model or her notability. We have several other similar images with this one and of the same model. --Érico (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation from Google Street View João Justiceiro (talk) 04:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work (scan), wrong date, different web-sources like http://www.theantiguaguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/db-Maria_Chinchilla_Recinos-feature.jpg or http://laestrella.com.pa/media/news/image/77142_800x600_crop_547a801ab5ea3.jpg Wdwd (talk) 11:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Guatemala demands 75 years from author's death (or from publishing for anonymous works). As depicted person died in 1944, this is even possible, but evidence for that is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
I do not know if this is the file deleted before, but "own work" it is not. I am sure about that. E4024 (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A blurry test upload from 2011 – I guess there's no good reason to keep this around? El Grafo (talk) 12:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: We're not short of good pictures of the same thing. --bjh21 (talk) 14:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:2016 Czech Demonstration Against Communist party China in Prague with Picture of late President Václav Havel & Tibetan leader 14th Dalai Lama and Flags of TAIWAN & Tibet 反中示威在捷克.jpg
[edit]
Delete I have concern that we know nothing about the copyright status of the predominant derivative photo of Havel and the Dali Lama that are central to this image. Ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete after reviewing the status of the photo itself, I also think that the depicted media has unknown copyright status and is probably copyrighted per COM:PCP --AntonierCH (d) 11:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 09:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Possibly copyvio - however, refer File:HSBC.svg. This is basically the same, but slightly different and not SVG. Bellezzasolo (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - obviously below TOO. Even if the logo would have been from the UK, as nominator mistakenly claims. Jcb (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - I nominated because this had been marked as COM:SPEEDY by User:Krdbot. I filled out the copyright data based on the (virtually identical) previous logo and referred to here. Bellezzasolo (talk) 00:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 09:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
This image includes File:Mohammed Morsi (Crop).jpg, which was deleted as a copyright violation. Presumably that makes this image a copyright violation as well. bjh21 (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Week delete: The Mohammed Morsi image is not an issue by itself; it is so small one could consider it de minimis or even censored through a pixellation filter. If you can fix by editing, why delete? But the image seems unused at the time. Given its contents and nature, its presence isn't within the project scope. I am not saying a screenshot of Firefox showing the element selector is automatically considered not realistically educational. No. I am saying this image, because of its outdatedness, has limited educational value in a fast-evolving world web browsers full of free image. In other words, I am supplying a situational editor's judgment. The page view statistics don't exactly say it is a popular image. –Codename Lisa (talk) 09:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've replaced the image of Mohamed Mursi with another one, so the rationale for deletion should now fall by the wayside. -Mardus /talk 11:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, per my arguments above ^. -Mardus /talk 11:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Excellent.
I withdraw my nomination --bjh21 (talk) 12:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Excellent.
Kept: withdrawn… and the first version of the file deleted. Ruthven (msg) 09:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope selfie. See [14]. Kalbbes (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Dyolf77. Ruthven (msg) 09:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
highly inappropriate PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Incredibly inappropriate deletion request, as (another) attempt to censor Commons on a moral ground. If PlanespotterA320 finds this content "incredibly inappropriate", he has a good way of avoiding it: Dont look at it, instead of trying to impose your own moral values on others. Image of good quality is in scope, per categories and subject(s). Tm (talk) 22:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
incredibly inappropriate PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Incredibly inappropriate deletion request, as (another) attempt to censor Commons on a moral ground. If PlanespotterA320 finds this content "incredibly inappropriate", he has a good way of avoiding it: Dont look at it, instead of trying to impose your own moral values on others. Image of good quality is in scope, per categories and subject(s). Tm (talk) 22:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, at first I wanted to keep it, because such photos are allowed in Peru, but Perú (Buenos Aires)... Sorry, Argentina does not allow that. Taivo (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Looks like the reproduction of an old poster. Possibly in the Public Domain. --Ruthven (msg) 09:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with you. Also the idea here, I understand, was to take a pic of the station name sign "Perú"; the posters are secondary. --E4024 (talk) 09:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Those are not original posters but recreations made in the 2010s. (see: http://cdn2.buenosaires.gob.ar/subte/libro_de_arte_subte_version_web.pdf page 118-123) Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with you. Also the idea here, I understand, was to take a pic of the station name sign "Perú"; the posters are secondary. --E4024 (talk) 09:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- What do you mean by derivated work? There's a source, a free license, it's OK to use. SegataSanshiro1 (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Yes a derivative, but of a work in the public domain. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Those are not original posters but recreations made in the 2010s. (see: http://cdn2.buenosaires.gob.ar/subte/libro_de_arte_subte_version_web.pdf page 118-123) Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Doesn't this fall under the 70 years thing? That ad is form 1930 (ish). MarianoC (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Those are not original posters but recreations made in the 2010s. (see: http://cdn2.buenosaires.gob.ar/subte/libro_de_arte_subte_version_web.pdf page 118-123) Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of non-free work of art. Elena Izcue died in 1970. Her works remain protected by copyright throughout 2040. Undelete in 2041. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ok, i guees if I take a photo and uploaded with free permission, it was supposed to be OK for the commons. Sorry for the mistake. How i can delete it? --Eduzam (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:Trabajos derivados. You cannot issue a valid copyright license for a photograph depicting someone else's copyrighted work. Only administrators can delete files. This deletion discussion will be probably be processed by an administrator within 7–10 days. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, undeleted in 2041. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Not an own work. This user and his puppets used to upload copyrighted files all time. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete file:BOCA DE SUBTE.jpg due to same reason (small photo without metadata). These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Uploader is indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet of Pablo Javier Milano. Taivo (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License laundering of non-free photograph taken in 1976; see http://perufolklorico.blogspot.com/2016/08/peruanos-ilustres-joaquin-lopez-antay.html and http://sanfernando80peru.blogspot.com/2014/10/joaquin-lopez-antay.html. Protected by copyright at least throughout 2046. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A non free logo uploaded under different licence https://www.passage.ai/ 1997kB (talk) 16:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, in my opinion this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
non-free logo (above COM:TOO).-- Mǎkèlóng (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- rejected: COM:TOO is not a reason for deletion. Otherwise you can also not keep the Boeing-Logo as presented on COM:TOO in the top right corner. --Pechristener (talk) 04:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept, no-no, this is simple logo. Taivo (talk) 21:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Argentina for sculptures. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The statue was inaugurated in 2009 (see sources: here and here) FoP does not covers sculptures in Argentina. Besides, the creator and copyright owner of Mafalda, Joaquín Lavado (aka) "Quino", is still alive. Fma12 (talk) 03:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivated work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
No author, and no proof that the image was released under a free license. Nunabas (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Image easily passes the threshold for originality Nunabas (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Image easily passes the threshold for originality Nunabas (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Image easily passes the threshold for originality Nunabas (talk) 16:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Seems like a marketing image, published elsewhere before it was uploaded here, e.g., [15]. Needs a license from the copyright holder. --ghouston (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Seems like a marketing image, published elsewhere before it was uploaded here, e.g., [16]. Needs a license from the copyright holder. --ghouston (talk) 02:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical photo, invalid claim of own work from 2016. No author / publication information to determine if it's public domain. --ghouston (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of belt - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:WWE championship belts Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
photo of photo. Not original ShinePhantom (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
photo of photo. Not original ShinePhantom (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
photo of photo. Not original work ShinePhantom (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ольга Эльбрехт (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files do not appear to have correct license as it is unlikely that the person who scanned in these old scratched prints is the actual creator of the images.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
copied pasted from the website ' http://www.irenabyss.com.au/vanishing-falls-on-the-salisbury-river/ ', which states at the bottom 'All rights reserved © 2014 Matthew Brain' this is probably a copyvio 199.212.7.78 00:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
apparently lifted from https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/multi-color-vinyl-canvas-truck-tarps_60526568074.html , listed under 'Vinyl-Coated Tarps' on that webpage 199.212.7.78 00:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
lifted from https://dailypost.in/news/entertainment/gurdas-maan-birthday-special10-must-read-facts-gurdas-maan/?seq=1 Probably another copyvio by this new wikiuser 199.212.7.78 00:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Similar Vodafoone logos have been perviously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Logo klein.svg because the teardrop aspect of the logo was considered to be above c:COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Also, see the ongoing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Greece logo2017.png. So, unless the consensus is that it is not, this file also needs to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, this is complex logo by UK rules. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the same photo posted in Google Maps since 2016
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Versailles+Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines+University/
This is definitely not "own work" nor dated "9 January 2018" as claimed by the uploader. This image should not be used in the wiki with the CC license. PFHLai (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The metadata states the author is "Armin Straehle" and the Copyright holder is "MARTIN BURSCH FOTODESIGN2014 Z". Apparently copyrighted and needs permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Zaudig DSC0812.jpg, which has no metadata at all. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
From Flickr, where it has a Noncommercial CC license, which is not compatible with Commons. Did not have a Flickr Bot check at upload. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The source link is dead but would need permission from the authors listed (and from a third which is stamped in the metadata?) or clarification about where the Creative Commons license comes from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, per infobox, authors are Susi Knoll and Florian Jaenicke. Per EXIF, author is Martin Deschauer. OTRS-permission is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Artwork, see COM:FOP#United States Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in USA for murals. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Text-only PDF document. Would be better suited to Wikisource, except that it is the original research of the uploader, and Wikimedia is not a good place to publish one's own research. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
copyvio image. Störm (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
copyvio image. Störm (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mangoldip saha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent promotionalism, image appears to be i.d. photo and the other page is a self-advertisement, not in use and out of COM:SCOPE.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Taken from a concert program or newspaper or similar, no indication of the copyright status. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Unclear authorship; is it "own work" or copyrighted by someone? Or are these the same person? If copyrighted, would require permission from the copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can add these two files for the same reason:
-Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. This is not actual aircraft; it would never fly. OTRS-permission from artist Spencer Trickett is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mr.choppers as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: These are period photos, at least the top two are official Citroën images. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Gilomoux
[edit]Giloumoux (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
Bad quality penises. Small photos without metadata, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blahblah41822 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional PR photos without EXIF, 2 of them low-res. Unlikely to be "own work".
GermanJoe (talk) 12:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pavel Fric (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status (derivative work of copyright content).
- File:Lollypop - radios.png
- File:Lollypop - left sidebar - genres.png
- File:Lollypop - popular albums.png
- File:Lollypop - playlists.png
- File:Cantata-Context-info.png
- File:Cantata-Context-insidebar.png
- File:Cantata-Album-images.png
- File:Cantata-Artist-images.png
- File:Cantata-Album-covers.png
- File:Sayonara-cover-view.png
- File:Sayonara-minimal.png
FDMS 4 20:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
And what's the problem? The parts (small images) of the images of GUI that represent covers - are considered in the suggest as real copies of the originals? They aren't, and are they aren't the same - meaning their tiny size. These are the screenshots of the screen (PC monitor). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavel Fric (talk • contribs) 2018-01-10T21:07:02 (UTC)
- @Pavel Fric: Please read the guideline linked to in the rationale. FDMS 4 21:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused closeups of drill tips, apparently from a company catalog.
- File:Weldon shank annular cutter.jpg
- File:Macshank annular cutters from Macstroc.jpg
- File:Universal cutter or One-touch annular cutter.jpg
- File:Weldon shank macstroc annular cutter.jpg
- File:Weldon-shank annular cutter.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- also crop file:Jim Flint.jpg
The metadata states the photo is copyrighted, with name and website of copyright holder, would need evidence the uploader is the copyright holder or has permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I added a crop for deletion due to same reason. Article about depicted en:Foster James Flint was deleted, he is probably non-notable. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Sona Sh
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Sona Sh (talk · contribs):
- File:EIMZA1.jpg (723×482)
- File:ISESCO and the Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication of Azerbaijan .jpg (750×530)
- File:ISESCO-The Center for Analysis of Economic Reforms and Communication.jpg (750×500)
- File:Jana Krimpe.jpg (2048×1365)
- File:Scenery of Baku.jpg (245×206)
Mostly small photos, metadata is always missing. Probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Somi60bay
[edit]Somi60bay (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Al-ameen.jpg
- File:Dyeing.jpg
- File:Instulation of large carpet.jpg
- File:Opening.jpg
- File:Weaving carpet.jpg
First group. Big watermarks spoil the photos.
- File:845A0579.jpg (314×209, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III)
- File:Ali khaiqi.jpg (4032×3024, Apple iPhone 7)
- File:Ali Khaligi.jpg (2258×2362)
Second group. Different resolution, different cameras. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
A new image would come out soon but cannot be replaced as a true color and grid-less here. Nino Marakot (talk) 01:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, with alternate version available. --B dash (talk) 10:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:B dash. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope, poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and probably copyvio as screenshot. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope, Poor-quality image Categorizing (talk) 06:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and probably copyvio as screenshot. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Suspicion of copright violation. Probably captured image from a television program, considering characters on the upper-left corner. Categorizing (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Is the photo enough good to illustrate fish dishes of Ghana? Taivo (talk) 12:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Is there any fish in the image? IMHO we could sacrifice this file, as the Category:Fish dishes of Ghana presents many nice pics. --E4024 (talk) 12:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- BTW "grounded" may be an airplane, the pepper should better be "ground". If the file is kept I will ask for a move. --E4024 (talk) 12:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable, alternatives available in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Nice village, but the villager (probably the uploader) is too much in focus. E4024 (talk) 12:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
There is a watermark with a c in a circle on the pic. E4024 (talk) 12:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Unclear about the copyright TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Without a meaningful description, this map is useless. Is this a map of places Bar Ezra visited? It's a mystery. Apocheir (talk) 15:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Apocheir this a map of places Bar Ezra visited, I made 2 at is request and he chose the other one--Mikey641 (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, so who is Bar Ezra? -Apocheir (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- A user on he:wp. This is the second file: File:Bar Ezra Map (+Zoom).svg, not used as well. --Robot Monk (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, so who is Bar Ezra? -Apocheir (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Mikey made these two files as a request of user ברעזרא. Both files qualify for Category:User page images if there are in use. So Mikey641 בר do you have an intention to use these files? -- Geagea (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've used the map before and I think I'll use it in the future. If possible, please do not delete the map. Thank you! בר (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- If you want them to be kept, please give these two images a meaningful description on their pages, so future editors don't get confused. -Apocheir (talk) 02:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've used the map before and I think I'll use it in the future. If possible, please do not delete the map. Thank you! בר (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No description has been added and still not in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
A photograph of artwork; needs info about the source and author of the artwork. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 20:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : caimed logo with potentially coypright issues, or, (obviously) a montage of images not linked to sources at Wikimedia Commons, hence, out of scope ? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright? Rudolphous (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not own work ShinePhantom (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- What are your evidences? Георгий Палкин (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- you do not know the date of the photo, rely on the dates of life. And photo was published in other source: http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/67703-legion-of-merit-showcase/ ShinePhantom (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info about usmilitariaforum. But in this forum there is no date, not the source of the photo. Георгий Палкин (talk)
- you do not know the date of the photo, rely on the dates of life. And photo was published in other source: http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/67703-legion-of-merit-showcase/ ShinePhantom (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
not own work ShinePhantom (talk) 20:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of two gadgets, stated to be "Works of KITA Toshiyuiki 021-2013." which if these are art require COM:OTRS from Toshiyuki heirs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and spam. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
If the photo is dated correctly on its face it's from 1939. If the ghostly writing at lower corner is to be believed it's from Mexico-MF-enfotos Tabasco. Not 2016, nor own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IamAnisurrahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be COM:NETCOPYVIOs. For example, File:Darul Uloom Ishatul Islam Battagram.jpg was uploaded 4. May 2016. That image, however, appeared here 16. November 2013, more than two years prior to your upload, in a higher resolution, and with someone else's authorship credit (overridden in the Commons version). File:Beautiful Battagram.jpg, as another example, is merely a colorshifted and resized version of this from tripmondo, where it was credited to Majid khan. All images consequently in doubt, and indeed are generally low resolution, have telling visual artifacts (e.g. misalignment at the bottom of File:Shingli Payeen 2014.jpg) and lack camera EXIF.
- File:Landey Jumaat Shingli Bala.jpg
- File:DHQ Hospital Battagram.jpg
- File:Hazara University 2016.jpg
- File:Gijbori 2015.jpg
- File:Morning Assembly of Sir Syed Institute.jpg
- File:Government Centennial Model High School, Battagram.jpg
- File:Al Syed Garden Public School & College Battagram.jpg
- File:Sky Hawk International Public School & College Battagram.jpg
- File:Government Degree College Battagram.jpg
- File:Beautiful Battagram.jpg
- File:Shingli Payeen 2014.jpg
- File:Darul Uloom Ishatul Islam Battagram.jpg
- File:Shingli Bala 2011.jpeg
- File:Shingli Bala 2016 Feb (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 22:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Already deleted as File:Renaud SIRY.png, any metadata, false date, similar to http://e-k-p.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/renaud-siry.jpg or http://a405.idata.over-blog.com/287x300/3/97/30/92/RS---2-logos.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
The uploader indicates this is in the public domain from the subject's website, but the website indicates "You can use any of the photos from my site as long as you link back to my site." Commons doesn't allow disclaimers like this. The website also has copyright information, not an actual Creative Commons license. Commons doesn't have a license to fit this situation. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
From this blog, which doesn't indicate a licensing status or author. The uploader is apparently not the author, so they need indication of a license, or permission to use it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
According to the watermark, it is from this website, which has obvious copyright information. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suhailmk1998 (talk · contribs)
[edit]your opinions are asked : batch of six unused uploads, small-sized (HD format), missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', but also partially personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
- File:SLN boys koraput.jpg
- File:Flower seen in pulamanthole.jpg
- File:Flower in kerala.jpg
- File:Kodikuthimalla.jpg
- File:Ponnani Beach.jpg
- File:Sln boys.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 20:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MaddaSullaStrada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be a fan gallery, but the images do not appear to be own work (Facebook or smaller sizes, no meta, etc.).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikidWizardOfTheWest (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication that this high school logo, or the photo of the principal of the school is own work of uploader.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
In use on a user gallery of questionable images, this appears to be a handwritten text which could be reproduced by typing the letters any time it was needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mssriraksha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some of these even say "images are subject to copyright" right on them... four files with odd letterboxing and statements, obviously not own work of uploader.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Gallery of images licenced as "self" but book cover, medals, certificate, and diverse photos, all of small sizes and no indication of own work.
- File:AFFIHE.JPG
- File:Carré militaire de 1914-18 Villefranche de Rouergue.jpg
- File:Serges Roques Maire de Villefranche de Rouergue.jpg
- File:Diplome d'honneur du Souvenir Français.jpg
- File:Medooo.jpeg
- File:Medail.jpeg
- File:Medai.jpeg
- File:Lllol.gif
- File:Carré militaire de Villefranche de Rouergue avant rafraichissement.jpg
- File:Serge-barcellini-president-national-du-souvenir-francais 2565554 289x405p.jpg
- File:M THOMPSON Florian.jpeg
- File:François-Xavier Niessen, Fondateur du Souvenir Français.jpeg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Collage of images without copyright permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perfilprofesional (talk · contribs)
[edit]This series of images are very small, and do not appear to be created by the uploader. They are apparently promotional of an educational facility.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ritabordacs (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fan gallery of a pianist, includes variable sizes (including a couple that look like Facebook from the sizes), but only one has metadata. They don't seem to be licensed correctly as several of these do not appear to be in situations that any member of the general public could capture. Even the gorgeous landscape photo is credited to another in lower right hand corner watermark.
- File:Maan Hamadeh ThePianoMaan pianist perform Arouwad Award 2016 Beirut Hilton Hotel.jpg
- File:Baakleen Iyad Fayad Photo.jpg
- File:FurElis MaanHamadeh Prague.jpg
- File:Beirut Airport Maan.jpg
- File:Skydiving in Dubai.jpg
- File:Maan Hamadeh's Atlantis Performance.jpg
- File:Maan Hamadeh PopUpPiano Dubai.jpg
- File:Maan skydiving.jpg
- File:Maan wiki.png
- File:Maan Hamadeh wiki.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Monaguillobautista (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook or smaller images, unlikely to be own work of uploader, particularly notice the old one in black and white with the wrinkles showing rephotography.
- File:Feria-346463.jpg
- File:Iglesjiop.jpg
- File:12065838 1010fvxgf.jpg
- File:9481hg.jpg
- File:Images 1776.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Metalontra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be a promotional gallery for a musical group, but no reason to assume uploader holds copyright to these unused images.
- File:Mariano Salto.jpg
- File:Madame Rita -.jpg
- File:Madame Rita - 666 Besos Antes Del Amor.png
- File:Madame Ritas.jpg
- File:Madame Rita.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://i.ytimg.com/vi/h9SM8Bo0Mec/maxresdefault_live.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://blogmagie.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/norbert-ferre-magicien-prestidigitateur-1040x693.jpg and https://image.jimcdn.com/app/cms/image/transf/dimension=1920x400:format=jpg/path/s0a10c5ae9430cd99/image/if7c952dab5a6a0ea/version/1498222252/image.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo with poor composition, very little educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- If no use for it can be foreseen, Delete, indeed.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Has author and copyright information in the metadata, needs confirmation that the uploader is the copyright holder or has permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format and also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
There is no direct link to the web-page it came from, but the website has copyright information that would apply to all the content, unless otherwise noted. The uploader gives it a PD-Art (PD-old) license, which wouldn't apply anyway. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ami.bangali 2ed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Source and uploader isn't the same person, in few cases no meta data, in few cases copyvio and even use source as google
- File:কদমা প্যাকেট.jpg
- File:সাজ মিষ্টি ২.jpg
- File:সাজ মিষ্টি ৩.jpg
- File:কংসনারায়ন ও বিষ্ণুপুর রীতি.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা ১২.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা ১১.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা ৭.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা৫.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা৬.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা ৪.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা ১.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা ৩.jpg
- File:ধ্রূপদী দুর্গা২.jpg
- File:মৃন্ময়ী মাতা.jpg
- File:মৃন্ময়ী মাতা ১.jpg
- File:মৃন্ময়ী মাতা ২.jpg
- File:ছানার জিলাপি.jpg deleted https://silkcitynews.com/109652 Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:কামারপুকুরের সাদা বোঁদে.jpg
- File:বড়দেবী ১.jpg
- File:কোচবিহার বড় দেবী ২.jpg
- File:যতীন্দ্রমোহন বাগচী.jpg
- File:কস্তার লাড্ডু.jpg
- File:কানসাট.jpg
- File:Chhanabora.jpg
- File:লাল দই.jpg
- File:কোলাজ মা লক্ষ্মী.jpg
- File:ব্রত কথা.jpg
- File:বেদির সামনে আলপনা.jpg
- File:সরা.jpg
- File:আলপনা.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OTRS authorisation needed from the author, eventually. Ruthven (msg) 23:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Nemigo
[edit]Nemigo (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Astafersa A Grana Ferrol.svg
- File:CCD CURTIS BODEUS 50 anos.svg
- File:CD Narón fútbol O Cadaval.svg
- File:CLUB DE BALONCESTO CITY REAL.svg
- File:Club Lemos Fútbol Lugo.svg
- File:Escudo Santa Comba A Coruña.svg
- File:Estrella Galiza tapa de botella A Coruña.svg
- File:Ferrol en Común política.svg
- File:Karbo Deportivo A Coruña.svg
- File:Logo Astano 1941 Fene.svg
- File:Logo Club Rápido de Bouzas.svg
- File:Logo Hispania Ferrol Vello.svg
- File:Racing de Ferrol CF logo.svg
- File:RFGF real federación galega de fútbol logo final.svg
- File:Ribadeo RCF logo centenario.svg
- File:Sociedade Ximnástica Lucense Lugo.svg
- File:Ural CF logo svg.svg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Please, before delete that files review that undeletion request because some of this files could be affected by it. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think that some of these files can be in Commons:
- File:CD Narón fútbol O Cadaval.svg is only a derivative work of File:Escudo de Narón.svg
- File:CLUB DE BALONCESTO CITY REAL.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms
- File:Club Lemos Fútbol Lugo.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because it's a derivative work Tau Cross and letters
- File:Estrella Galiza tapa de botella A Coruña.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms
- File:Ferrol en Común política.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms
- File:Karbo Deportivo A Coruña.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms and letters
- File:Logo Club Rápido de Bouzas.svg, similar to undeleted file File:Rapido de bouzas CR logo alternativo.svg
- File:Racing de Ferrol CF logo.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because is a Saint James Cross, and simple elements in shield
- File:RFGF real federación galega de fútbol logo final.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms and letters
- File:Ribadeo RCF logo centenario.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms and letters
- File:Ural CF logo svg.svg, don't surpass COM:TOO because are simple geometric forms and letters
- Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 17:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: almost all are rather complext. Kept simple logos. Ruthven (msg) 23:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Kasalan
[edit]Here are all contributions of Kasalan (talk · contribs):
- File:KASALAN.jpg (900×675, watermark)
- File:Kasalan.jpg (800×450)
- File:Kasalan2.jpg (800×450)
- File:سفرنامه میرزا فتاح خان گرمرودی.jpg (cover)
Small photos weithout metadata. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. One book cover. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW: missing the permission of the original copyright holder. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Copenhagen - zeemeermin v1.jpg
- File:Copenhagen - zeemeermin v2.jpg
- File:European Greens gather to save the Little Mermaid from rising sea levels (4031106613).jpg
- File:European Greens gather to save the Little Mermaid from rising sea levels (4031860506).jpg
- File:Saving the Little Mermaid from rising sea levels (4031859774).jpg
- File:Saving the Little Mermaid from rising sea levels (4031859920).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The statue of The Little Mermaid in Copenhagen is subject to copyright because the creator Edvard Eriksen (* 1876; † 1959) died less than 70 years ago. Dannebrog Spy (talk) 12:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
I am not finding the Creative Commons license at this URL. EricEnfermero (talk) 15:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; me neither. Ruthven (msg) 23:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of Laxman Singh Gurjar
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Laxman Singh Gurjar (talk · contribs):
- File:Shree Chhaikur Wale Sarkar.jpg
- File:Shree Chhaikur Wale Sarkar 1.JPG
- File:Shree Chhaikur Wale Sarkar 2.jpg
- File:Shree Chhaikur Wale Sarkar 3.jpg
- File:Shree Chhaikur Wale Sarkar 4.jpg
Unused files with unknown importance, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of Chetanbond
[edit]Here are all uploads of Chetanbond (talk · contribs):
- File:4-thescientifi.jpg (800×394)
- File:Mischertraxler scientific-nature-of-jewellry growingglasses.jpg (450×300)
- File:Scientific microscope.jpg (960×640)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- 1: https://www.utilitywise.fr/2017/01/18/faut-il-avoir-peur-des-led/
- 2: https://inhabitat.com/mischertraxlers-leafy-living-necklace-dazzles-with-seeds-instead-of-gemstones/mischertraxler-growing-jewelery-3
- 3: http://www.cmosis.com/technology/applications/scientific
- --Achim (talk) 20:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of Eleazarquintana
[edit]Eleazarquintana (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Atardecer en la perla del Caribe.jpg (640×402)
- File:Ocaso en la Isla de Margarita.jpg (640×402)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. We have whole category:Sunsets of Isla Margarita, which includes quality images, featured pictures and subcategories. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Freshman404 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Probably a book page
No peedy delete, see file discussion page Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I created the file. My detractor says "probably from a book" but won't trouble himself to obtain one shred of evidence.--Achim Hering (talk) 18:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that the image had blurry halos indicative of jpg overcopying. Should it actually be own work, uploading a larger, higher quality SVG would be of use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of Nadiasinitiative
[edit]Here are all uploads of Nadiasinitiative (talk · contribs):
- File:It's On U Team in Dohuk Kurdistan.jpg (821×620, Facebook file)
- File:Luis Moreno Ocampo at Duhok Genocide Investigation Unit for It's On U Initiative.jpg (1280×986)
- File:Nadia's Initiative with President Emmanuel Macron.jpg (4853×3236, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III)
- File:UNODC Goodwill Ambassador Nadia Murad at the Élysée Palace.jpg (1600×1200)
Mostly small photos without metadata, one comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of IlionMusicSchool
[edit]IlionMusicSchool (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
Educational value is not big. Uploader is indefinitely blocked due to sockpuppetry, maybe we can delete them. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.defenseone.com/voices/sarah-kreps/11671/
No speedy, please send permission via COM:OTRS Wdwd (talk) 11:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The photo has two problems. At first, video blogger Edvinas Navickas isn't mentioned in en.wiki and only once mentioned in lt.wiki, his notability is not sure. At second, this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, maybe not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW: missing the permission of the original copyright holder. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW: missing the permission of the original copyright holder. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, find in internet, no permission. 5.58.77.77 13:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 91.219.24.99 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Derived from File:Обивочные материалы.jpg (by the same user), but adds lines "Available types of cover materials" and "With regards to availability of desired colour, consult the managers". Apparently both files are promotional media. While the other file may possibly be useful, the present one is unlikely so. However, advertising is not a CSD for files. bjh21 (talk) 13:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, with note that both files were collages with unattributed images, the advertising nature of the material not withstanding. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by StraussInTheHouse as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Advertising However, advertising is not a CSD for files, so a full DR is required. bjh21 (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping Bjh21, in which case Delete as out of scope. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
(c) Mathieu Puga. Copy of https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9758f6_fd3f6275abc646c6b68a5656fe01ff77~mv2_d_4016_6016_s_4_2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_518,h_776,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/9758f6_fd3f6275abc646c6b68a5656fe01ff77~mv2_d_4016_6016_s_4_2.webp Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
(c) Mathieu Puga. Copy of https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9758f6_fd3f6275abc646c6b68a5656fe01ff77~mv2_d_4016_6016_s_4_2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_518,h_776,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/9758f6_fd3f6275abc646c6b68a5656fe01ff77~mv2_d_4016_6016_s_4_2.webp Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Not found at the URL, any permission nor valid author. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Also one revision of File:Wassabi IMG 1372 (2596797731).jpg (16:18, 10 January 2018), which was identical. --bjh21 (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. With note that not only one version of File "Wassabi" but also the other 3 were copyvios. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
I see no evidence that the source image is released to PD. Also, ticket:2018011010002998 suggests that the image at http://myautisticpov.com may be a copyfraud. Ankry (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
{{copyvio|source=http://www.catsnco.com/heartcat.html}}
[edit]
I am the person who submitted the ticket that Ankry mentioned above, and I'm the creator of Heartcat ©1999 C. "Cats" Starfire. It has been on my website www.catsnco.com from at least 2002. It is NOT released to public domain or Creative Commons. The versions on catsnco.com have my nic "Cats" and the year on the image (and always have done).
The cat silhouette used for "Autisticat" is an unauthorised copy of Heartcat that was added to multiple clipart sites without my knowledge or permission in 2015. The clipart sites were notified 8 Jan 2018 (as soon as I found out) and have all removed the infringing image.
(I hope I added the copyviolation tag correctly; please let me know if I did not. Thanx.) Zentomologist (talk) 00:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Possibly copyrighted derivative work of a football club's intellectual property. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
lox res version of File:Abduction-of-Europa.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fake logo, no sources indicating that this logo really existed. Also, out of COM:SCOPE Sfs90 (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Found elsewhere (https://www.ismus.is/Apps/WebObjects/Tatu.woa/swdocument/9a97eb8e-65d1-4790-badd-bf0bd7688d57/G%C3%ADsli%20Magn%C3%BAsson%201959.jpg or http://images.45cat.com/gisli-magnusson-waltz-in-a-flat-major-op69-no-1-parlophone-odeon.jpg), not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.ismus.is/Apps/WebObjects/Tatu.woa/swdocument/80730cce-2f2d-4d7b-9dc1-497b20507e41/G%C3%ADsli%20Magn%C3%BAsson%20vi%C3%B0%20p%C3%ADan%C3%B3i%C3%B0%201985.jpg, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is a picture of my grandfather! I gave the image to Ísmús and my family owns the copyright to the images of him! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bales2 (talk • contribs)
- Hi @Bales2: The problem with that file is that it has the same resolution as the one posted at Ísmús (600x800 px). Perhaps you should scan again the print you own with a better resolution. In the meantime please change the field "Own work" to the name of the photographer. I remember you too that any reproduction from this website is subject to authorization. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Ok! I will for sure do that, sorry about this, I am new to Wikipedia :)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.ismus.is/Apps/WebObjects/Tatu.woa/swdocument/44547206-8884-4cc7-b354-c7a29a830ec8/G%C3%ADsli%20Magn%C3%BAsson%20vi%C3%B0%20p%C3%ADan%C3%B3i%C3%B0%201979.jpg, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- These are public photos! There is no copyright of them. They are from my family! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bales2 (talk • contribs)
- Please read previous reply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Permission from RODRIGO VIPYCH should be verified via Commons:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Rodrigo,
I am new to the community, this is the first page I made. I received the photo over email from Femke Weidema herself, and I do have authority to use the photo. What should I do to prove this to you? I can also have Femke write in stating her approval of the use of the photo, in which she is owner of.
Best, Miranda; user: Miraceson
Deleted: per nomination - all questions were answered in the nomination, and 2 weeks have passed since last effort. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
No indication of permission. MB298 (talk) 22:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Files of Saifisaman
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Saifisaman (talk · contribs):
- File:Salman F Rahman (Photo).jpg (640×960)
- File:Salman F Rahman.jpg (640×868)
- File:Nazmul Hasan Papon (Photo).jpg (640×868)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Small? These look relatively big. If not copyvios, I'd suggest deleting the first because it is bigger than the other two, the former of which is a cropped version. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- TinEye found no matches for the first two. The third, however came up with this:
- [17]
- None of the three images includes his mid-torso, though. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please upload the original image, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
_at_peak_intensity_8_-_4_-_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_peak_intensity_8_-_4_-_09.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Might duplicate with original image that already exits. Nino Marakot (talk) 09:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
_at_peak_intensity_8_-_4_-_09.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment The file is still used in zh.wiki. File:Goni 4 August 2009.jpg is similar, but not identical. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, unused, with alternate version available. --B dash (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used. --Yann (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
_at_peak_intensity_8_-_4_-_09.jpg){kind=link}
Files of Lambano Blosko
[edit]Here are both contributions of Lambano Blosko (talk · contribs):
- File:CBWestSah2001.jpg (170×249)
- File:Cynthia Basinet.jpg (600×900)
- redirect file:C. Basinet.jpg
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright of the photo 217.73.129.108 11:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: AGF. --Yann (talk) 05:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Down-sized duplicate of File:A young star cluster 6000 light years from Earth in the constellation Vela. (2940665939).jpg Lithopsian (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't really care which version of the image is kept. However, the title "Young Stellar Cluster RCW 38 in X-ray" is an accurate description, while the title "A young star cluster 6000 light years from Earth in the constellation Vela" includes an inaccurate distance and doesn't even contain the name of the object, making it completely unsearchable. OtterAM (talk) 00:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the other file is renamed. --Yann (talk) 05:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image from Flickr with unconvincing copyright argument, as it was apparently created some time between 1942 and 1963. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep AR 50 year rule applies. Same for others listed please. --Fæ (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Fae Please add appropriate license information to the files for posterity, and let me know. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-AR-Photo. --Yann (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image from Flickr with unconvincing copyright argument, as it was apparently created some time during the 60s or 70s according to the text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The precise date given is 1968. {{PD-AR-Photo}} applies. --Fæ (talk) 00:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Fæ Please provide catagories for this series as well as the right licenses! Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- The original license is not incorrect on its own. Missionary Archives have no significant doubt that the Church holds all rights, putting these up for deletion when the release by the church is on record at Flickr Commons seems to pointlessly risk losing these from Wikimedia Commons. Let's spend time on better things than hypothetical wikilawyering. --Fæ (talk) 10:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not "hypothetically wikilawyering" but suggesting since you know the correct answer and it's not obvious on our template, to please make it obvious on the template and add the categories. If know you don't like the calling of names, so please don't start it. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Fae. --Yann (talk) 05:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image from Flickr with unconvincing copyright argument, as it was apparently created some time between 1957 and 1960. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep There is no copyright argument and the date is given precisely as February 28, 1956. The release by the Mennonite Board of Missions gives no reason for significant doubt. Keep per precautionary principle. --Fæ (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Please add categories, and it won't ever pop out on a "needs work" category again! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- 'Needs categories' is not a deletion rationale. --Fæ (talk) 21:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Never said it was, merely asked you to add them since you know so much about the images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- 'Needs categories' is not a deletion rationale. --Fæ (talk) 21:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Fae. --Yann (talk) 06:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Nagakshetra5 (talk · contribs)
[edit]your opinions are asked : two affected files with potentially personality rights, but also contact details (phone, one file), hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
Roland zh (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I removed the personal information. --Yann (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This appears to be a photo of an art exhibition in Toronto. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This would be a public installation of a 3D artwork in Canada, and thus subject to FOP, right? In which case, keep, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Canada. James F. (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- If kept, please get it into a good category before closing nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per James F. --Yann (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
incredibly inappropriate PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Incredibly inappropriate deletion request, as (another) attempt to censor Commons on a moral ground. If PlanespotterA320 finds this content "incredibly inappropriate", he has a good way of avoiding it: Dont look at it, instead of trying to impose your own moral values on others. Image of good quality is in scope, per categories and subject(s). Tm (talk) 22:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 06:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not clear: "Anonymous author" as indicated or Rolph31000? Cjp24 (talk) 23:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je soussigné Tirat Jean-Christian, alias "Rolph31000" certifie par la présente que la photographie en cause m'appartient et que j'en détiens exclusivement les droits. Pour information, cette image qui me représente a été prise à ma demande, avec l'un de mes appareils photo par un passant anonyme que je ne connais pas. Je précise d'autre part que je cède les droits à pour toute utilisation sur Wikipedia. Cordialement, Jean-Christian Tirat
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Jean-Christian Tirat. --Yann (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
it is copy Shamsiyev (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Might duplicate with the gallery version existed. Nino Marakot (talk) 09:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The file is still used in zh.wiki. File:Krovanh 2009-08-31 0120Z.jpg is similar, but not identical. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, with alternate version available. --B dash (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Atardecer Porteño.jpg
Considering our hundreds of sunsets of Venezuela, these files have small size and bad quality. In my opinion they are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
The image copyright owner requests deletion of the image via OTRS. It is a low resolution image, so likely a copyvio. Ankry (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The original uploader on Dutch Wikipedia was Ladino~nlwiki, whose last contribution was in 2005. --bjh21 (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the OTRS claim is not from Ladino (of course I can never be 100% sure) and they showed a higher resolution version of the photo. Ankry (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
National Register in Texas
[edit]- File:BekkenHouse.jpg (1979)
- File:Brogdonfarm.jpg (1979)
- File:BronstadHouse1.jpg (1979)
- File:ColwickFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:GodagerHomesite.jpg (1982)
- File:HoffUlland.jpg (1979)
- File:JensonHouse.jpg (1982)
- File:KnudsonFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:LahlumHouse.jpg (1979)
- File:LarsonHouse.jpg (1979)
- File:LinbergFarm1.jpg (1982)
- File:NorwayMill.jpg (1979)
- File:OlsonFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:OlsonNelsonFarm.jpg (1982)
- File:PedersonFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:PiersonFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:QuestadFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:ReederOmensonHouse.jpg (1979)
- File:SchultzFarm.jpg (1979)
- File:WilsonHomesite1.jpg (1979)
- File:722WestMadison.jpg (1984)
- File:625CantrellHouse.jpg (1985) HHM, Inc.
- File:500NorthMainEast.jpg (1984)
- File:Building500EastMain (1 of 1).jpg (1985) HHM, Inc.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:LocustGrove1.jpg (1977)
- File:DialHouse.jpg (1977)
- File:MimosaHall.jpg (1977)
- File:PierceHome.jpg (1973)
- File:Edgemont.jpg (1972)
All of these files are taken directly from National Register of Historic Places nomination files. All of these were taken by either an employee of the Texas Historical Commission (David Moore, Daniel Hardy, Ken Breisch, Stanley Klein)or by a private contractor (HHM, Inc.). Rights of images in National Register noination files from Texas remain with the photographer and do not become Federal public domain. Unless we have authorization from these photographers, these have to be removed. --25or6to4 (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The handful I looked at are clearly mislabeled at best. Some of them might qualify for {{PD-US-1978-89}} (based on the interpretation that submission of the National Register form constitutes publication), which would require more research on each image. Magic♪piano 20:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, here's what I can add in that regard. I went through and dated each image, with the date noted in the nomination file. All but 5 would fall in the 1978-1989 threshold. Now I split off the 5 images images, since they would fall under the "PD no notice" category. The PieceHome and Edgemont images in their nomination form show that there is a stamp on the back noted "Property of the National Register", and was taken by the "Texas State Historical Survey Committee". Taking the "publication" criteria into account, I would find the PD tags acceptable for all these nominated images.25or6to4 (talk) 19:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge
[edit]No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine)
- File:Sculpture Mir Dnipro Metro Station Kiev 01.jpg
- File:Дніпро (станція метро).jpg
- File:Дніпро станція метро.jpg
- File:Днепр (станция метро) 03.jpg
- File:Днепр (станция метро) 11.jpg
- File:Комплекс споруд Станція метрополітену «Дніпро» 01.JPG
- File:Міст Метро Tren.jpg
- File:Міст Метро, Набережна Дніпра-1.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_11.jpg){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:02, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Связался с [наследником] архитектора станции метро. Попросил разрешение. --AMY (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- На словах получил подтверждение о разрешении. Отправил в почту архитектору текст стандартного разрешения. Ожидаю ответ. --AMY (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: permission from architect is received: ticket:2017070410029892. --Anatoliy (talk) 22:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge
[edit]Ticket:2017070410029892 does not provide permission for any statue or sculpture. Photos of this statue are not DM. Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge can be deleted once empty. No FOP for statues or sculptures in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine).
- File:Sculpture Mir Dnipro Metro Station Kiev 01.jpg
- File:Дніпро (станція метро).jpg
- File:Дніпро станція метро.jpg
- File:Днепр (станция метро) 03.jpg
- File:Днепр (станция метро) 11.jpg
- File:Комплекс споруд Станція метрополітену «Дніпро» 01.JPG
- File:Міст Метро Estatua 2.jpg
- File:Міст Метро Tren.jpg
- File:Міст Метро, Набережна Дніпра-1.JPG
- File:Станція метрополітену «Дніпро» IMG 3866.jpg
- Category:Statue of Peace, Metro Bridge
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The last sculptor died in 1999, so undelete in 1999+70+1=2070 per {{PD-Ukraine}}. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep Скульптури є невід’ємною частиною архітектурного оформлення станції метро «Дніпро». Як архітектори, так і скульптори у відповідності з Законом України «Про авторське право і суміжні права» як співавтори мають рівні права. Причому жоден зі співавторів не має права без достатніх підстав відмовити іншим співавторам у наданні дозволу на опублікування (фотографування) твору. Таким чином отриманого дозволу від одного зі співавторів достатньо для того, щоб у розумінні діючого українського законодавства авторські права інших співавторів вважалися би не порушеними:
--AMY (talk) 22:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Авторське право на твір, створений у співавторстві, належить всім співавторам незалежно від того, чи утворює такий твір одне нерозривне ціле або складається із частин, кожна з яких має самостійне значення.
Якщо твір, створений у співавторстві, утворює одне нерозривне ціле, то жоден із співавторів не може без достатніх підстав відмовити іншим у дозволі на опублікування, інше використання або зміну твору
Delete. AMY argued, that Commons has permission from architect of the metro station and the sculpture is also part of the metro station. I disagree. The sculpture is not part of metro station. OTRS-permission from sculptor's heir is needed to restore the photos. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep In this case statues were built especially for this metro station, put during construction of the station (in other cases 1-2 years after) and are part of one uniformal architectural complex, which, among others, includes the station, interiors, external beautification of the station. Whoever is familiar with the design of the Soviet metro stations will be able to tell that they are designed and build as one common complex and statues are integral part of the complex. Permission of the architect who has designed and build the station and has decided which statues will be added to his project should be sufficient in such cases. One can easily prove that statues were build exactly in the same time and put exactly on the station. Here are some pictures with dates where we can see that before there was no station and no statues and after construction there is a station WITH the statues. (Similar pics can also be found in the newspapers and I personally saw one from 1962 with statues.) Oleg (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep There is no need to obtain additional permission from the sculptors. According to Ukrainian law, there is no violation of their rights. The sculptures are an integral part of the station complex; therefore, the existing permission of one of the co-authors suffices. StefanMashkevich (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dnipro Metro Station - statue.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Palosirkka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: proprietary software. However there is a note on the talk page where the uploader states that they are the creator of the software in use (on the Unity platform). At least this deserves a hearing, not just "copyright violation." Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission from TroubledGames needed. Ruthven (msg) 18:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malkhaztchubabria (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files are from sources all labeled (C) at the bottom of their respective pages, except the last one which is from Facebook. Not own work, no indication that actual copyright holder/s' permission/s has or have been obtained via COM:OTRS.
- File:Giorgi Gakharia.jpg
- File:Ketevan Tsikhelashvili.jpg
- File:SozarSubari.jpg
- File:Levan Davitashvili.jpg
- File:Logo of Prosecutor's Office of Georgia.png
- File:Mikheil Janelidze and Rex Tillerson.jpg
- File:Logo of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia.png
- File:Irakli Kobakhidze.jpg
- File:Logo of Ministry of Corrections of Georgia.png
- File:Mikheil Giorgadze.jpg
- File:Victor Dolidze.jpg
- File:Zurab Alavidze.jpg
- File:Giorgi Mghebrishvili.jpg
- File:David Bakradze Photo.jpg
- File:Otar Danelia.jpg
- File:Paata Zaqareishvili.jpg
- File:Sherigeba logo.png
- File:Aleqsandre Jejelava.jpg
- File:Ministry of Energy of Georgia Logo.png
- File:Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, no OTRS for 1½ months. Taivo (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malkhaztchubabria (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://twitter.com/MIAofGeorgia/status/977602258677518343
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as obvious copyvios. JGHowes talk 13:44, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope due to extremely low quality. The image is not the correct logo for Gillingham School. As stated by Bellezzasolo, they created this from a CC0 picture of a deer. Previously, the image was deleted as a copyvio, but I don't think that's the case. It seems to be simple text and shapes, plus CC0 content. Still, delete it as it's not in scope and not useful. Guanaco (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I contest scope based on COM:INUSE (wikipedia:User:Bellezzasolo), regarding "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project.". The image quality is low, however it's sufficient for the uses on my user page - however, if there's a way to convert to SVG easily that would be great. Bellezzasolo (talk) 02:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Converting this image to SVG would require some hand-tracing, due to the quality. Can you link to the source image of the deer, to put the copyright concerns to rest? Guanaco (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- publicdomainpictures.net, states CC0. I reflected this image. Bellezzasolo (talk) 02:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Also, although TOO would apply, this is my source for the shield outline: as above Bellezzasolo (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm reluctant to support this because the "creator" has been running up and down AN/U and JCB's talk page and frankly that's enough of a loss of decorum to turn me off. At this point I'd support getting rid of it just because it's not any good. If we're going to try to drag people into a fight over an image at least have it be something of substance. If you own the copyright of the derivative isn't really the issue here with me. If I write the word "Kleenex" on a box it doesn't violate copyright because yes it’s simple but it's also not the same thing. To be clear, we're fighting this much over a simple white deer over a green shield. And before you come after me with INUSE INUSE INUSE, read a bit further down the page and see that each of the admins that have questioned this image simply on the merits of this being of poor quality have not been wrong. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Sixflashphoto: I went to JCB’s talk page as the deletor - the talk page for this photo was deleted, after all. I kept going because he wasn’t substantiating his claims, and didn’t even seem to take what I quoted from COM:INUSE into account. He seemed to accept that it wasn’t COPYVIO. When I basically beat him on the meaning of inuse, he said “I am not restoring it. End of discussion”. I went to AN/I because of that statement- admins who are losing arguments shouldn’t resort to their position- that’s abuse of power. Bellezzasolo (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- There may be something to that but as I heard someone else say the other day I think we're making a tempest in a teapot out of all of this. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Sixflashphoto: I went to JCB’s talk page as the deletor - the talk page for this photo was deleted, after all. I kept going because he wasn’t substantiating his claims, and didn’t even seem to take what I quoted from COM:INUSE into account. He seemed to accept that it wasn’t COPYVIO. When I basically beat him on the meaning of inuse, he said “I am not restoring it. End of discussion”. I went to AN/I because of that statement- admins who are losing arguments shouldn’t resort to their position- that’s abuse of power. Bellezzasolo (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm reluctant to support this because the "creator" has been running up and down AN/U and JCB's talk page and frankly that's enough of a loss of decorum to turn me off. At this point I'd support getting rid of it just because it's not any good. If we're going to try to drag people into a fight over an image at least have it be something of substance. If you own the copyright of the derivative isn't really the issue here with me. If I write the word "Kleenex" on a box it doesn't violate copyright because yes it’s simple but it's also not the same thing. To be clear, we're fighting this much over a simple white deer over a green shield. And before you come after me with INUSE INUSE INUSE, read a bit further down the page and see that each of the admins that have questioned this image simply on the merits of this being of poor quality have not been wrong. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Converting this image to SVG would require some hand-tracing, due to the quality. Can you link to the source image of the deer, to put the copyright concerns to rest? Guanaco (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Not a copyvio. Quality is sufficient for usage on the uploader's userpages. Usage there satisfies any concern of being COM:OOS. Deleting Admin should have started a DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The only way I could consider keeping is if it were renamed description adjusted to avoid suggesting it's the logo of the school..."just some white deer on a green shield". If nobody thinks it's trying to be the logo of the school, it's possible that it's not related to that non-free image. But otherwise it's misrepresenting itself as the logo, which is a promotion of a possible trademark violation by others. As it stands, Delete as an apparent and stated-by-creator attempt to recreate the non-free image using free material, but that means it's still a Commons:Derivative works. The deer is too complex to be a simple shape. DMacks (talk) 04:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's also a fair point. Even if it is bad, intent matters. If this was done in an intent to circumvent copyright it's still a copyvio. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Intent is to have a non-copyright way of representing the school. I'm definitely pro putting a trademark tag on the image - even though it's not offical (indeed, I don't believe the logo to be a registered trademark). Bellezzasolo (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Bellezzasolo: Is there a high-res photo of the gate with that logo? If not, can you take one? File:Entrance drive to Gillingham School main hall and arts centre (geograph 4291475).jpg doesn't qualify. The original logo is probably 501 years old. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: regarding the logo, it probably is PD, but I'm not certain, hence this effort. I found a use of the deer in 1934, however that's a question of "is the author anonymous?" Bellezzasolo (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Bellezzasolo: Is there a high-res photo of the gate with that logo? If not, can you take one? File:Entrance drive to Gillingham School main hall and arts centre (geograph 4291475).jpg doesn't qualify. The original logo is probably 501 years old. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Intent is to have a non-copyright way of representing the school. I'm definitely pro putting a trademark tag on the image - even though it's not offical (indeed, I don't believe the logo to be a registered trademark). Bellezzasolo (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's also a fair point. Even if it is bad, intent matters. If this was done in an intent to circumvent copyright it's still a copyvio. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep but not against moving this to a better title. Bellezzasolo (talk) 04:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per DMacks and also per COM:NOTUSED, since it has no "educational use". The uploader also keeps stating that it is inuse on their userpage but it isn't and why would one create and name it as if it was the logo of the school and also states "FREE stand in logo for wikipedia:File:GillinghamSchool.jpg" in the description. Bidgee (talk) 05:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Bidgee: The creation of en:File:GillinghamSchool.png on the 4th passed control of the two uses of this file to that local version. It is used here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Jeff, my point is that the logo is not of Gillingham School (this logo is all but fictional), therefore there is no valid reason to keep it (ie. "File not legitimately in use"). Bidgee (talk) 06:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- May I point out that COM:NOTUSED says "A media file which is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above". Hence your argument doesn't apply, since it falls under the remit of "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." Bellezzasolo (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- and then it also states "that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope". Bidgee (talk) 09:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Bidgee: The creation of en:File:GillinghamSchool.png on the 4th passed control of the two uses of this file to that local version. It is used here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Bidgee: Your point? What that's saying is that use on non-user Wikipedia automatically makes the image within scope. It doesn't mean that an image on user space is not - the clause I stated then applies. Bellezzasolo (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- It doesn't mean you can upload and use what you want. The file isn't in scope since it fictional (ie. not the real logo) nor is it "educational". Bidgee (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Bidgee: Your point? What that's saying is that use on non-user Wikipedia automatically makes the image within scope. It doesn't mean that an image on user space is not - the clause I stated then applies. Bellezzasolo (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - out of scope - Jcb (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per all of the above - Out of scope here and this is something I too would consider a COPYVIO .... anyway it's out of scope for this project and as such should be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 18:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality and out of scope. Should be recreated as SVG if useful. Yann (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep unless someone can link to a replacement. --Fæ (talk) 13:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's either copyvio or fake. In cases of copyvio, waiting for a replacement is not a valid reason to keep. In case of a fake logo, the wish for a replacement would be ridiculous. Jcb (talk) 15:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think you just can't take no for an answer, you really should not care about this so much. I'm going with keep based on readings of policy as raised by others above along with good faith. Try the role of adult like the community expects administrators to be, rather than always being rude and abrupt with newbies that cross your path; Commons is not all about you. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The file was taken from en:File:GillinghamSchool.jpg, Obviously the image has been cropped and then uploaded here under "Own work" ..... although it's come from EN I would still consider this a copyvio and it should still be deleted regardless of replacements (or lack of). –Davey2010Talk 21:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)@Davey2010: That accusation is simply untrue. I ask you to inspect the two deer and apologise profusely.Bellezzasolo (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)- My apologies, They are indeed 2 different deer, –Davey2010Talk 23:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thankyou. I was careful to avoid being a COPYVIO - the only thing I did copy was the colour. I can see how you would make that mistake though.
(Sorry for the IP edit, this is me though)Bellezzasolo (talk) 12:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thankyou. I was careful to avoid being a COPYVIO - the only thing I did copy was the colour. I can see how you would make that mistake though.
- My apologies, They are indeed 2 different deer, –Davey2010Talk 23:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think you just can't take no for an answer, you really should not care about this so much. I'm going with keep based on readings of policy as raised by others above along with good faith. Try the role of adult like the community expects administrators to be, rather than always being rude and abrupt with newbies that cross your path; Commons is not all about you. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's either copyvio or fake. In cases of copyvio, waiting for a replacement is not a valid reason to keep. In case of a fake logo, the wish for a replacement would be ridiculous. Jcb (talk) 15:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This file has been sitting in attempt to get more consensus and it has not thus far. I don't see it getting further consensus so I am closing it as this time; file is out of scope. ~riley (talk) 05:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by हिंदुस्थान वासी as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not published on the internet prior to upload here, no evidence of copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
