Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 16th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ras67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickr license "BY-NC-ND", and it is not OK for commons.

B dash (talk) 08:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 10:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ras67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appeal,  Keep! These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012.

Ras67 (talk) 11:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is quite clearly third party boxart for a video-game. I am unware of Capcom releasing such under a free license. Equivaalennt media at English Wikipedia is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer wish to have this file available in the public domain MD Cooks 12:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situaion. Jcb (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "BY-NC-SA", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "CC BY-NC-SA", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong  Keep, dear IP, your doing is violently! CC licences are irrevocably, you can't remove a valid {{flickrreview|File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)|2012-05-16}} and apply a new {{Flickrreview}} which now fails. For this situation we have the tag {{Flickr-change-of-license}}! --Ras67 (talk) 12:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "CC BY-NC-ND", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "All Rights Reserved", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "All Rights Reserved", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "All Rights Reserved", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "All Rights Reserved", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "All Rights Reserved", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Train2104 (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, clearly album cover-art, Euivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Snakehips feat Zayn - Cruel (Official single cover).jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image unused SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source site is a free site, but I did not find the image in source site. Taivo (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I corrected the source link and passed the license review. Guanaco (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, now I see. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, this is clearly album cover-art, English Wikipedia equivalent w:File:Myworld2.jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nick: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: as before, non-free cover, no fair use on Commons

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate copy of an existing file. I didn't know the same image was uploaded earlier under a different name. Syfuel (talk) 02:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Barcex (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, poor quality Batholith (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, poor quality Batholith (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bloomshouse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free Photo from this Website. Batholith (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free Photo from this Website. Batholith (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to be an image captured from animation. G I Chandor (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pikachu is a copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 01:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. G I Chandor (talk) 01:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo contains non-simple geometric shape. G I Chandor (talk) 01:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emieltje1999 I don't think that's a good reason. 10:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reupload of previous deletion with only minor changes. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cover. G I Chandor (talk) 01:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image was taken by me and the content of the image is owned by me. There is no copyright issues.~SKsiddhartthan


Deleted: per nomination and COM:TOYS. --Hystrix (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 01:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free material in Japan. Batholith (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file Kate Collins (talk) 03:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file Kate Collins (talk) 03:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. G I Chandor (talk) 01:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That may be, but everything in the image has a copyright. The tezt of DM is if you can remove the problematic item without it being noticed by the average observer. If you removed all of the copyrighted items here, there would be nothing left. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos contains copyrighted characters.

G I Chandor (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contains a copyrighted photo. G I Chandor (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement. G I Chandor (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement. G I Chandor (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement. G I Chandor (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 02:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 02:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. G I Chandor (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 02:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. G I Chandor (talk) 02:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

should not have uploaded; did not realize the extent of rights being given for re-use Tscerbak (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted trophy Kate Collins (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board (Japan) Batholith (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Kate Collins (talk) 03:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated by file creator, errots in filename and category. The file has been replaced with the identical image in the correct category John.B.Codrington (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User: John.B.Codrington, this DR is a waste of human and computer resources -- changing file names and categories is trivial and does not require a deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumitaro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free photo from official website's top page[2] --Batholith (talk) 03:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo from official page[3] Batholith (talk) 04:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board of Tokyo Batholith (talk) 04:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free cover of Japanese magazine Batholith (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free material in Japan and not own work. Batholith (talk) 04:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, poor quality Batholith (talk) 04:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free map in Japan. Batholith (talk) 04:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan Batholith (talk) 04:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE SHURAM1212 (talk) 04:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan Batholith (talk) 04:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

collage missing sources SHURAM1212 (talk) 04:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no apparent educational value SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" claim seems questionable SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used - can be replaced with a wikitable SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image & likely copyvio SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free CD artkwork Batholith (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free CD artkwork Batholith (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work Eurodyne (talk) 05:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 05:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image SHURAM1212 (talk) 05:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability, there is no article about "Luis Livingstone" Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mythic Arts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, small sizes without EXIFs + derivative work issues

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, small/middle size without EXIFs+ "FBMD" in the metadatas Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo? symbol? icon? of questionable utility : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the image is in scope then it lacks of OTRS permission of the artist Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable utility : out of scope. Maybe above ToO too Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable utility : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photo of an unidentified man. Likely out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 22:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 'cause he is wearing sunglasses. Chesdovi (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of http://amannews.in/uploads/thumbs_80_80/20160623121534-576b858e5da79-anurag.jpg 117.192.171.166 19:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twice deleted before. Why not a third time? 141.196.207.56 06:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not the same image, but still out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

well four deletion requests already but still out of scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today again speedily deleted as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NafeesaAli459 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. No educationnal use, out of scope

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 06:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

batch 2

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal timeline of the uploader's education history.

HyperGaruda (talk) 06:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait for postulation to deletion. Personal photo 141.196.207.56 07:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. (BTW, I may be mistaken, but seem to remember that this file has already been deleted once before; Also note that OR+TRS tag was not added by OTRS volunteer but by file uploader). Randykitty (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne suis qu'un simple utilisateur des COMMONS et pas un spécialiste. ne comprends pas bien cette histoire d'OTRS. Veuillez expliquer un peu mieux.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 08:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Emails to OTRS are supposed to be vetted and checked by dedicated volunteers. It is highly unusual that an uploader adds such a template themselves. See COMMONS:OTRS for a complete description (and given that you've gone through this system in the past, I'm surprised you're not more familiar with it). --Randykitty (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Je viens de relire en détail les règles OTRS que vous citez. Guy Lebègue n'est pas "Utilisateur" de Wikipédia. Il publie de nombreuses photos depuis plusieurs années, selon ces règles, via un Utilisateur inscrit (Kasos_fr) membre de la même association CASP, sous une licence OTRS dûment enregistrée et signalée dans la présente photo : Une autorisation pour utiliser ce fichier via la licence "(les) licence(s) ci-dessous a été vérifiée et archivée dans le système OTRS ; elle est disponible sous le numéro de ticket #2009122010013963" . Pourquoi y-a-t-il aujourd'hui un problème ? --Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 11:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The OTRS issue is secundary as it can perhaps be sorted out. (But it seems strange that this is marked as "own work" with Lebègue as author, even though this clearly is not a selfie). In any case, the main problem is that this is out of scope. --Randykitty (talk) 12:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
En 1986 on ne faisait pas de selfie. On prenait des photos avec un appareil argentique vissé sur un trépied et on lançait un retardateur de 10 secondes, le temps de se placer devant ! Et comme dit dans la légende, cette photo a été scannée dans les années 2000, pour créer un fichier numérique.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
His last paragraph in French above explains the photo is a self-portrait. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's a self-portrait made by Guy Lebègue and uploaded on his behalf by Kasos fr. Nowhere is it stated that Kasos and Lebègue are one and the same person and unless Kasos would reveal their real-life identity (which they are not at all required to do in any case), we have to assume that they are different persons. "Il publie de nombreuses photos depuis plusieurs années, selon ces règles, via un Utilisateur inscrit (Kasos_fr)" is pretty clear about this (via!) --Randykitty (talk) 11:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK I lost interest now. Too much drama for a 300px selfie. Ariadacapo (talk) 11:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • AFAIAC neither GL nor I are experts on identity, we are not spies. The relation between the two (GL-Kasos) is open enough (he told us how he took this picture, remember?) and maybe the issue is he cannot know how to reach you. BTW the deletion spree is slowly turning into a harassment, IMHO of course. Please do not drag me into this or any other witch hunts. I gave my opinion already. --E4024 (talk) 08:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you read again what Kasos fr has written above, you'll see that they state that they upload photos on behalf of Guy Lebègue and also say that "Guy Lebègue n'est pas "Utilisateur" de Wikipédia". So Kasos fr and Lebègue are different persons. As for the "deletion spree", I'm not really sure what you mean. Look in my contribution history and you'll find that I propose many files that are promotional or otherwise irrelevant for deletion. This is just part of it. Please comment on the arguments, not the person. --Randykitty (talk) 08:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - needs a licens from the actual photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, articles deleted on fr and en WP. Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 08:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It was deleted for some OTRS reason and now I see that OTRS template on the file. --E4024 (talk) 08:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • My nom has nothing to do with the presence or absence of OTRS permission. Fact is that this person is not notable and that this image is not used on any project. The nom is based on this being out of scope. Or is Commons now a collection of personal images? --Randykitty (talk) 08:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep OTRS permission received, photo of photographer who authored images used on several dozen WP articles. Needless drama over a selfie. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Ariadacapo, I decided to spare a witty sentence I was preparing. Let's all work to try to prevent Commons from converting into a collection of personal images; I can propose you categories where to find unnecessary personal files... --E4024 (talk) 08:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - out of scope, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Lebègue and fr:Discussion:Guy_Lebègue/Suppression. The fact that OTRS has been sorted out in the meantime does not make the person notable. Jcb (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Comment. It is quite obvious this is a vanity upload. The guy and his friend authored/uploaded a bunch of useful files and want to have their 300 pixel picture on Commons. I am surprised how much energy is being dedicated to this single harmless verified upload while in the time it takes to write a sentence a whole bunch of dung has been uploaded that needs cleaning up already. Kasos_fr learned how WP-en, WP-fr, and Commons:L work the hard way. Please in the spirit of COM:SELFIE (one vanity pic for useful contributor) let them keep the file, and if not, next time don’t require them to follow an OTRS procedure only to launch a deletion request the minute they provide permission. Thank you. Ariadacapo (talk) 11:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you look above, you'll see that I previously nominated this for the exact same reason as now, namely for being out of scope. The remark about the OTRS status was only on the side. It got deleted because of the OTRS thing, but I don't think it is justified to say that I "required them to go through OTRS only to nominate it for deletion again". My previous concern (out of scope) has not been addressed so that I would nominate it again for the same reason was to be expected. Also, this photo has not just been uploaded for use on Commons only. The moment this photo was restored, it was added to the French WP because an article written by Guy Lebègue on CASPWiki, a site maintained by the association of which he is president, claims that he "invented" the name "Spacebus". Apparently the French wiki accepts this kind of sourcing so that this trivial tidbit stays in the article, but even there it was thought that adding a photo was a bit much. Add to this the bios that were created and both deleted after community discussions (linked to above by Jcb (and note that in the French discussion, Kasos claims to be Lebègue). --Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: while it's true the image is unused and that the person does not have an article, the user is an active contributor since a long time and in several project. We can be a little tolerant. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr license "CC BY-NC-ND", and it is not OK for commons. 219.79.97.65 08:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal inbox screenshot that has been partially censored. HyperGaruda (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be copyleft. Yes, it's claimed here in Commons that "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license." However, the source that's specified is this page, at the foot of which we're told "(C) 2017 Swarup Chatterjee. All rights reserved worldwide." (My emphasis.) Hoary (talk) 08:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have personally checked with the owner of the website, he has no problems in Wikimedia using this photo. There's no need to delete it.—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.245.188.146 (talk) 04:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Requires a free license for any use -- not just Wikipedia -- via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Officialjuniorjnr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused COM:SELFIE. Does not appear to be someone who would ever get his own wikipage, according to en:w:User:Officialjuniorjnr/sandbox.

HyperGaruda (talk) 08:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement image is not the editors own work as stated but taken from a website without the owners authority Dan arndt (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, Poor quality for camera shake. Categorizing (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be PD, but it's certainly not MicrowaveDanger's own work and they do not own the copyright Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 1878 image, therefore PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (personal photo of a minor). Also, the uploader is depicted and is unlikely to be the photographer (copyright is owned by photographer). GermanJoe (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki (and probably copyviol). Melquíades (msg) 10:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki (and probably copyviol). Melquíades (msg) 10:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Not own work, rather COM:DW (placing a red dot doesn't mean you are the copyright holder of the base map). Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Not own work, rather COM:DW (placing a red dot doesn't mean you are the copyright holder of the base map). Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Was originally at English Wikipedia, Transfer in good faith, but concur with nominator.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JuanUG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JuanUG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files claim to come from Flickr, yet no links have been provided to verify permission. Google image searches generally find Flickr images, yet none of these images have hits which further calls the sourcing into question. FWIW, user has uploaded only copyvios thus far (see talk/deleted contribs)

Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JuanUG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Potential flickr washing. These 4 images have been sourced from a Flickr profile [4] which has only those 4 images, unaccompanied by EXIF data and the profile has no icon. The images are of political subjects in Colombia and are from different time periods, meaning it is highly unlikely that one photographer "Martin Rojas" took all of them.

seb26 (talk) 12:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source don't have CC 4.0 MisterXS (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright doubt: given that (a) the metadata of this file indicates it is from Facebook (or Instagram), and (b) that the nature of the photograph, being taken on the football field with players facing the camera, it is unlikely that this is the own work of the uploader. Uploader has copyvio history. seb26 (talk) 12:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevinq17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication that this sports club logo is available under a free license, is complex enough to be considered copyrightable (COM:TOO)

seb26 (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some of my images are being stolen as a result of this creative commons license. I would like to delete all my images from here. It is not good for my business as a Photographer. Juliet220 (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some of my images are being stolen as a result of this creative commons license. I would like to delete all my images from here. It is not good for my business as a Photographer. Juliet220 (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some of my images are being stolen as a result of this creative commons license. I would like to delete all my images from here. It is not good for my business as a Photographer. Juliet220 (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that Chris Jackson/Getty Images Europe has released the image with this license at the source given. DrKay (talk) 14:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that Chris Jackson/Getty Images Europe has released the image under this license at the source given. DrKay (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivitive Work COM:DW Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 03:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itspgk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.vishwajeetkadam.com/SiteData/PhotoGalleryData/Personal/Vishwajeet%20Kadam%20inviting%20Hon%20President%20Smt%20Pratibha%20Devisingh%20Patil%20at%20Sangli%20Residence.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/VTegMkk8fDY/mqdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video clip. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Duplicates w:en:Help:Table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cmano-db.com/images/DB3000/facility_586.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- 1887 work. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pankim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from exams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ifejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ifejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Auto promotion, out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ifejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Limon Orofa Lekhon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Unused personal images.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Limon Orofa Lekhon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal images,and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Limon Orofa Lekhon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Scope, personal photo

Afifa Afrin (talk) 05:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bischöfliches Palais (Rottenburg)

[edit]

In my perception these pictures not taken from public ground violate the architect's copyrights. Deletion box was only inserted at File:Bischöfliches Ordinariat der Diözese Rottenburg-Stuttgart 18.jpg --Flominator (talk) 18:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your viligance. I did not intend to infringe the copyright of the architect, and recommend to assess the situation carefully case by case. However, deleting all of my photographs might be a bit overzealous. Personally, I think, the photographs are fit to be shown in an encyclopedia, but some of them should not be reproduced commercially for non-educative purposes. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just noted: Some of the photographs are marked with "unsure" by the applicant, which endorses the need for a case by case decision. Some entries are marked with "also personality rights", which suppports my interpretation of being overzealous, because more than 3 people are shown during a guided tour.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 09:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Since we're obliged to free licenses, we cannot restrict usage to "non-educative purposes" --Flominator (talk) 11:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - German FOP requires that that the photographer is standing outdoors on a public way -- none of these seem to qualify. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jetimworks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional, apparently; out of the project scope. See w:Kunle Remi.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have this question if this file is free or not. Although it is properly licensed, the background subjects are two album covers en:Almendra (Almendra album) (1969) and a modified version of en:Artaud (album) (1973). Artaud is not a problem as it is not complete and it seems mere color, but Almendra's is complete. {{PD-AR-Photo}} applies to photographs alone, and {{FoP-Argentina/en}} is solely for buildings. De minimis also cannot apply as the cover is the size of that male. Tbhotch 00:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload error by me. An identical version with other description is available. Hasenläufer 23:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 12:24, 24 September 2017 UTC: No license since 16 September 2017 --Krdbot 18:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/A/Arufa/20160402/20160402160939.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. It's easy to make a better photo. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Mạc Anh Tổ" is totally a hoax, it is not mentioned in any history records. He have no template name. El caballero de los Leones (talk) 09:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty cat. --Achim (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Oost-VlaanderenGemeenten.png. Multichill (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I agree. Jcb (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 04:51, 30 September 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by WikiRaja --Krdbot 06:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mazinger Z is a copyrighted character.

G I Chandor (talk) 01:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi G I Chandor, in Spain, statues placed permanently on a public place don't have copyright, you can see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Spain. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Elisardojm. Ruthven (msg) 13:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character Mazinger Z. According to Christian Ferrer (an administrator), "FoP could apply if it was the first publication/creation, however the person who made the graffiti made a DW of a copyrighted character, the owner of the former character still have rights on it" from Com:Deletion_requests/File:Mazinger_Z_Sabadell.jpg.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yuraily Lic, FoP perhaps couldn't be applied to an anonymous art-work, as a graffiti if it's a DW, but if a known sculptor create a DW he has to manage the original copyrights, and then, the sculpture is in FoP. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Elisardojm and COM:FOP Spain - "Works permanently located in parks, streets, squares or other public places may be freely reproduced, distributed and communicated by means of paintings, drawings, photographs and audiovisual processes". --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictional list of mayors of the fictional location "Purgalândia". HyperGaruda (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res distorted version of File:MALIK LAL KHAN OF SARKALAN-WANHAR TEHSIL KALLAR KAHAR DISTT CHAKWAL.jpg. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file. Replaced by File:Lord Nelson. Engraved in Italy in 1799.jpg Mutter Erde (talk) 07:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Rather than corrupt, it was a crop. To automatically upload the whole book plate simply add Category:Internet Archive (uncrop needed) to the file. The whole plate should be kept as the archive version, and I note that the original is significantly higher resolution than the new file created. -- (talk) 08:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a good solution. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 08:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fæ. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright infringement - image doesn't appear to be editors own work as stated. Image is taken from Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me failry out of scope. JuTa 11:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 11:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 11:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 11:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, made a mistake in writing the source. the correct source is the SHIFT inc. Annual Report 2016. I have to upload this image with the correct source. SFTWR0902 (talk) 12:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The source can be modified by editing the page. Ruthven (msg) 13:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 12:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in upload (had some duplication in file names and metadata). I assisted User:Roxane IHM-CHUV with this upload. Spinster (talk) 13:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in upload (had some duplication in file names and metadata). I assisted User:Roxane IHM-CHUV with this upload. Spinster (talk) 13:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in upload (had some duplication in file names and metadata). I assisted User:Roxane IHM-CHUV with this upload. Spinster (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this

Generalitat de Catalunya permet la reutilització dels continguts i de les dades sempre que se citi la font i la data d'actualització, que no es desnaturalitzi la informació i que no es contradigui amb una llicència específica

no es desnaturalitzi la informació" = do not "alter"? information = not a free license. Extra-requirements wrt "data d'actualització" (modification date) are probably an issue, too.

Strakhov (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source is not www.ref1oct.eu. Original source is www.referendum.cat Updated license properly. Please remove Deletion request. Nico 1984 (talk) 16:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License has been updated to "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International". Could you remove deletion nomination?Nico 1984 (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment No, I won't. Where has the license been updated to "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International"? In your imagination? Could you stop ...filibustering this deletion request and accepting facts? Linking a non-functional webpage does not help your cause. That one said exactly the same. Strakhov (talk) 09:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The Generalitat does not allow derivatives (so this cannot be published here as the possibility of making derivative works is a must in Commons) and explicitly claims against the addition of other specific licenses as was made here. Qoan (dis-me!) 10:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"citar la fuente, no alteración ni desnaturalización de la información"
do not alter nor distort
I think this whole "Generalitat-freelicense-template" issue is kind of wishful thinking. IMO "do not alter information" does not pass as "moral rights", sorry (it's nearer to "do not make derivative works"). Generalitat only explicitly allows "reutilización de los contenidos" not their "modification". Strakhov (talk) 09:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please, don't change the actual source of the image. Although it might seem to be obvious, a proper source for license verification is needed.
On the other hand, the actual wording of the notice in the Generalitat web pages seem to be right. Although the supporting article in the Spanish law is definitely not compatible with Commons (see here: Que el contenido de la información, incluyendo sus metadatos, no sea alterado / Que el contingut de la informació no sigui alterat), the Generalitat seem to have dropped such item and left only the following one ( Que no se desnaturalice el sentido de la información / Que no es desnaturalitzi el sentit de la informació). This one is usually thought to mean what @KRLS: has mentioned: moral rights. Thus, IMHO,  Keep --Discasto talk 15:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per V.Riullop. Ruthven (msg) 13:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In the source page I read: Las investigaciones de Memoria Chilena, Biblioteca Nacional de Chile (DIBAM) están bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 3.0 Unported, a excepción de sus objetos digitales. Ruthven (msg) 13:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boskipo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded the wrong image! Perpetersson (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 13:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thedeutza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Does not appear to have been used on any project since being uploaded in April 2016. Commons is not a web host and out of project scope.

xplicit 16:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 13:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 16:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio : screenshot from a recent movie Pippobuono (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong licence, derivative (cropped) from copyrighted material Pippobuono (talk) 16:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:St_Ambroise,_75011_Paris,_France_-_panoramio.jpg Fmvh (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Fmvh: Use {{Duplicate}} next time. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 14:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Need permission from Manyara_Kinoti. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AramXinGeR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images

IKW-CV70 (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: look like copyvio to me. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken from Twitter Maartenschrijft (talk) 22:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not in the public domain. It is a private image for which I own the copyright. 2A00:23C4:E301:1B00:A1C9:1336:F766:E317 22:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Appears to belong to a Magazine, but used in a UP used as personal website. Ruthven (msg) 14:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Habertix (talk) 23:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder Ivan Erick Menezes is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 14:01, 30 September 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kristanna Loken.jpg --Krdbot 18:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic graphic containing trivial text and a photograph of unstated provenance — unlikely {{own work}}. -- Tuválkin 22:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the picture doesn't seem to be "own work" - see the result of Tiny-eye web crawling. In addition - it seems to be a montage - the difference between internet files and this one is the "wi-fi" sign in the left lower corner. Oo91 (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ibaexpansivity (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

已有SVG格式檔案 TW_THWhc41.svg 可供取代 Kibinsky (talk) 08:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 219.79.97.65 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: TW_THWhc41.svg
The border is diffrent. Sanandros (talk) 21:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced by the svg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced by the svg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rivaldo Downey

[edit]
Português: Fora do escopo do projeto: fotos privadas.
English: Out of project scope: private photos.
--Francisco (talk) 13:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sol Aguiar placed her photograph here and never came back. Personal item 141.196.207.56 15:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license is invalid; not in use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahulgzp69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host. Please see project scope!

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saifulprank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host. Please see project scope!

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I add a copy for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Saifulprank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saifulprank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal files, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saifulprank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies. Commons is not a webhost.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation: cover of the book 109.172.98.69 23:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 18:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope - the same as other uploads Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, not in COM:SCOPE. Previous use was for an autobiography on enwiki (now deleted). Kusma (talk) 20:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Muhammed Usman Shabbir visits cities (File:Muhammad-usman-shabbir-visited-abu-dhabi-sheikh-zayed-mosque-in-2015.jpg) and instead of putting the photos in Facebook or Instagram uses Commons pages as his travel album. 141.196.207.56 12:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by P199 at 16:21, 6 Oktober 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mohammad Usman Shabbir --Krdbot 18:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sílvia Gomes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent (multiple) EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sílvia Gomes (with similar copyvios). Also per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook. Multiple authors involved. Examples:

Unlikely own works are also event poster like:

Ignoring works taken with a Canon PowerShot SX510 HS and a Vodafone VFD 600 (probadly own works). Further details and multiple permissions needed.

The uploader has answered at DR talk page:Todos os ficheiros proposto para eliminação foram-me cedidos pela Companhia Vidas de A a Z, daí que as mesmas imagens apareçam no facebook e na página oficial da mesma, tal como noutros sítios da internet. Algumas fotografias foram tiradas por mim nomeadamente e outras os direitos foram cedidos à companhia que me autorizou a usá-las, sendo que poderei reencaminhar-vos o email com a cedência de direitos das imagens a mim por parte da Companhia em causa.
@Sílvia Gomes: If that is indeed the case, please send an email in this form to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (COM:OTRS) and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holders (Companhia Vidas de A a Z, but also "Eduardo Sousa", "António Camilo", "João Serra de Almeida", "Sílvia Raposo", "figueiras photography" and probadly some other) have given permission to publish the file under a free license. If everything checks out, they will also restore the file, if deleted in the meantime. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license.Gunnex (talk) 15:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gunnex: Muito obrigada. Já enviei email a explicar a situação e reencaminhei também o email que comprova a cedência dos direitos. Sílvia Gomes (talk)

Gunnex (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, doubtful own work. An OTRS ticket is probably needed. Ruthven (msg) 21:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by رضا بو دبوس (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - small/no EXIF - many are watermarked

IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the photographer of this 3D object. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE: attempt at spam is unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph 141.196.207.56 15:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Same person as File:SexyJenJen Shooting.jpg, some sort of minor porn starlet one assumes. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was blanked in May 2012 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 16:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused scanned file, potentially copyright issues ? Roland zh (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly not own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user did not provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo; as it could be copyrighted. Kingofcruiserweight (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Could well be a screenshot, no metadata and low resolution. Precautionary principle. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo showing a little girl, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image depicts Bolton Priory Yessoos (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate of File:Priory of St Mary, north and north-west façades, Bolton Abbey.jpg. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file is copyrighted by myself for use by the party and was uploaded here in error while trying to edit he correct logo into the party wikipedia page. thank you Ukvandppmerch (talk) 20:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work, watermarked Eurodyne (talk) 22:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


DR merged into Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Photokora -mattbuck (Talk) 20:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:IDENT Pippobuono (talk) 08:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to use the image on a page elsewhere but the link ends up redirecting to a different file of the same name. No use for this one since I can't change the name. Pahjario (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Side lights on English history; (1900) (14782851582).jpg Replaced by File:Oliver Cromwell. Engraved by François Mazot.png Mutter Erde (talk) 07:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is the original scanned page. To automatically upload the whole book plate simply add Category:Internet Archive (uncrop needed) to the file. The whole plate should be kept as the archive version, and I note that the original is significantly higher resolution than the new PNG file created. I suggest the PNG is re-created at the full resolution available, along with some digital adjustment to get a better outcome. -- (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fæ. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 10:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: permission from Ava Kiaie needed; please write mail at OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; all rights reserved. Ruthven (msg) 08:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The background is a copyrighted work. Mhhossein talk 11:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong motive, and poor quality. OnWikiNo (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: good enough. Ruthven (msg) 08:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Kkairri (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright by KANAGAWA-SR association All rights reserved 2009 神奈川県社会保険労務士会. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Kkairri (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Copyright by KANAGAWA-SR association All rights reserved 2009 神奈川県社会保険労務士会. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of the author g. balaxaZe 18:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded in April 2017 + in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of the author g. balaxaZe 18:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use and uploaded several months ago. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Saudi_Arabia IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Saudi_Arabia IKW-CV70 (talk) 21:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Kkairri (talk) 17:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Kkairri (talk) 17:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Copyright by KANAGAWA-SR association All rights reserved 2009 神奈川県社会保険労務士会. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Kkairri (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: can be own work. No copies fount on the Net. Ruthven (msg) 08:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia has this as w:File:Tatanagar Hudco lake.jpg with a different uploader claiming own work, which one actually made this? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After going through Bivashmaji's uploads, I'd trust their authorship claims about as far as I could throw them. The English Wikipedia upload predates the Commons upload by more than seven years, the photo is clearly watermarked "Alok", which matches the English Wikipedia uploader's username (User:Alokprasad), and the metadata matches that of Alokprasad's other uploads. It's fairly obvious that Alokprasad's authorship claims are genuine and Bivashmaji's are false. LX (talk, contribs) 11:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, english file can be moved to Commons. --Basvb (talk) 08:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reasonable rationale that the author is the owner of such work Hakken (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I'm unable to overwrite it to the official wikimedia page. AppleOrangeGrapes (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive uploaded as his own modern work by a member of a family of one of the depicted persons. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Samoa.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicaet of File:ADNSU.jpg with a drawn circle Pibwl (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a painting by the italian Baroque painter Carlo Maratta. This is a contemporary painting done in the 20th century by an unknown artist. 176.63.30.183 16:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Any source for that? --Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep "Natività (San Giuseppe dei Falegnami, Roma)" source of info https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Maratta "Carlo Maratta, talvolta menzionato anche come Carlo Maratti (Camerano, 15 maggio 1625 – Roma, 15 dicembre 1713), è stato un pittore e restauratore italiano." It's from the Church in the Roman Forum and is newly restored. Here's a non wiki source of information: http://oneyearonepaintingaday.blogspot.com/2012/12/carlo-maratta-and-holy-night.html which also confirms it to be by Carlo Maratta. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 13:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark does not match username Elisfkc (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

>Name of uploader is same as company and employer of photographer. All rights secured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Art Complex (talk • contribs) 05:24, 19 September 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions how to send a permission. --Hystrix (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{subst:nad}}. Данная фотография впервые была опубликована в инстаграме фотографа Татьяны Кучерук 27 мая 2017 года https://www.instagram.com/p/BUlt8EHATCp/?taken-by=tatuana_kucheruk. Затем уменьшенная копия была размещена в статье журнала Космополитен 1 июня 2017 года https://www.cosmo.ru/stars/news/01-06-2017/eks-uchastnicu-shou-dom-2-viktoriyu-romanec-podozrevayut-v-beremennosti/ . Есть подозрение, что загружающий User:Ptychnik‎ выдает работу за свою. Artem Ponomarenko (talk) 18:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Bild steht unter Urheberrecht. Elz2610 (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC) Dieses Bild darf nicht verwendet werden, da der Urheber das nicht möchte. Elz2610 (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. --Hystrix (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No URL provided. There is no evidence that this is released under the claimed license. Whpq (talk) 22:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Humberto.chaves.pintor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wikipedia borró mi artículo relacionado con estas imágenes que se referían a la vida de un pintor colombiano y aporté resultados inéditos de mi investigación. Si el artículo no va, entonces tampoco las imágenes..

Humberto.chaves.pintor (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ein altes Foto, Scans oder Fotos aus alten Büchern, von Illustrationen und Kunstwerken. Alle Dateien ohne Angabe des Fotografen oder Künstlers (own work) oder widersprüchliche Angaben in der Dateibeschreibung und im Dateinamen. Eine Genehmigung per OTRS ist nicht zu erwarten, da der Hochlader die Löschung beantragt hat. --Hystrix (talk) 12:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information is given about the copyright status of the (with iPhone photographed) work. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wat is je probleem? Het betreft een door mij gemaakt screenshot (van een krantenknipsel uit 1919), welke ik heb vervolgens eerst zelf heb bewerkt, en vervolgens ook nog zelf heb gefotografeerd, welke foto vervolgens ook nog eens door mijzelf bewerkt is. Dat is voorzover mij bekend volgens de Auteurswet in de huidige vorm "own work". De screenshot komt van deze website: https://ilibrariana.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/beeld-van-hella-haase-in-bibliotheek-amsterdam/ Wil je dat er soms nog bij?? FranchoijsEdit (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Das mit der Lizenz stimmt zwar so nicht, aber {{PD-Art|PD-old-auto|deathyear=1925}} sollte passen. Auch eine Angabe des Künstlers und wann und wo es veröffentlicht wurde, wären hilfreich. Hystrix (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: dit is geen 'own work', maar afgeleid werk. We zullen moeten weten wie de fotograaf is van de oude foto die in de screenshot zichtbaar is. In Nederland verloopt het auteursrecht 70 jaar na overlijden van de fotograaf en dan per eerstvolgende 1 januari. --Jcb (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe original uploader Florian Adler can help? - Themightyquill (talk) 10:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist unwahrscheinlich: Florian Adler ist seit 2012 nicht mehr aktiv gewesen und hat dieses Foto 2005 auf der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia hochgeladen. Hystrix (talk) 13:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]