Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/23

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive August 23^rd, 2017

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Explorers from Tauwan

Spelling mistake.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I marked it as empty for speedy deletion. No need to bring these cases here. Please some admin close this discussion. --E4024 (talk) 09:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Taivo. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sample Bubble Map of the Store in a Mall.png

Deleted by Storkk: Copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Insignia of the Swiss Air Force

Badges by the Swiss army aren't free from copyright restriction. it's irrelevant that some of these have been painted on vehicles: paintings on vehicles aren't free from copyright restrictions.

Not own work

these are graphics by the swiss army. they are not your work when you photograph them.

graphics on side of vehicles

see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Vehicles

too complicated for pd-ineligible

Vera ^(talk) 18:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP all of them.

Most of this pictures are sections of legal uplodet photos of monuments, aircraft,helicopters and so one. Upolading selfmade pictures is not illegal.. so it is impossibel that just an section of a legal photo is illegal. Also the statement "Badges by the Swiss army aren't free from copyright restriction" is not right. Because: {{PD-Switzerland-official}} 1Veertje is ignoring Jcb decission. FFA P-16 (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also she is now for deletion of this one who she once have the {{PD-ineligible}} ??? [1] Looks to me to an overkill against the: Category:Insignia of the Swiss Air Force .FFA P-16 (talk) 18:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This request for deletion is based on bad intentions. We have several pictures in connection with the Swiss military. Uploaded by several people who actively serve/are part of the Swiss military or had served in the past inthe Swiss military. And we have 1 girl from Holland, with zero knowleg about the Swiss Military who trigger a mass deletion of this picture with an assertion without any proof.FFA P-16 (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1Veertje is 100% wrong. You can put stikers of badges of Swiss Military units on all four sides of your private car and drive around, no one would complain. Not the civil police nor the military police. You can take pictures of it an upload it everywhere in the internet.. So her justification is not according to the facts. But more important is for wikipedia commons :{{PD-Coa-Switzerland}}. Also I interpret Anidaats editing [2], which unfortunately has not been expressed himself on this page, as clear KEEP.

I myself also speak for keeping all the affected images, and an immediate closing of this deletion request. Hornet Driver (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

don't patronize me by calling me a girl, boy. If we only would let people contribute when they are from the geographic are they're editing about then we would violate a lot of privacy and be very unproductive. Knowing about copyright restrictions is not a requirement for joining the military. That no one would complain has never been an argument for breaking copyright restrictions. This is not everywhere on the internet. This is a free media database that actually tries to stick to copyright restriction. Ignoring copyright is not worth the risk of being shut down. These aren't coats of arms. See derivative work explanation for why you can't publish something and that it is very well possible that a section of a legal work is a violation. --Vera ^(talk) 17:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. If not for PD-Switzerland-official, the following reasons do apply for at least these selected images:

These are permanently mounted on the outside wall of a publicly accessible building. {{FoP-Switzerland}}:

Too simple for copyright:

De728631 (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FOP applies to works that are in their context in a public space. It's totally unclear in what context these are. Read the template: "it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original". Maybe you should also actually read {{PD-Switzerland-official}}, its scope is very limited. I disagree that those are too simple for copyright protection. Vera ^(talk) 21:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1Veertje.. And you should not decide about pictures you don't knew something.. and just if you would had have a better look you would knew that the are made at public spaces... User:De728631 named a few... the FlSt16 is from a MirageIIIS (File:Mirage III MG 1484.jpg) who is in the center of an traffic circle,BFK Badge is also outside between two Buildings of the Air Force Museum, FlSt24 is n an Hawker Hunter on the public airfield Ulrichen, FlSt20 on a Hawk Hunter at Mollis Airfiel (also a public airfild with no fenc around) LT2 and a few other are on an Alouette III OUTSIDE of Alpnach AFB ..public place.. Also I agree to User:De728631 about the ones who are Too simple for copyright.. You self declared some time ago FlSt12new.jpg as too simple for copyrigh! Sorry but without any knowleg about swiss Military and the rouls of Swiss Military you are acting here wrong. .. These inappropriate claims and false claims from you endanger wikipedia article.

FFA P-16 (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And here something other, shows thatis no need to delet air Sqadron badges [3].FFA P-16 (talk) 13:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read the FOP tag: "it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original". Wikipedia is more in danger if there are people like you that want only people like themselves to contribute and when copyright goes ignored. If something isn't Swiss but from the US army then this should be clearly stated in the files description with references. I've changed my mind about that one being too simple. You are the one being inappropriate here. Vera ^(talk) 16:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vera, please be careful what you say. I don't know if you are aware, but it may be understood as a personal attack. On the bottom, Swiss FOP is very broad, so these should be acceptable. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

they're the ones being patronizing AF by calling me "a girl from Holland with no knowledge of the Swiss army". There is no distinction between actually making a copy of those badges and the photographs that we see here. It's only in the description that you can manage to deduce that these are on display somewhere outside. This is not what FOP is meant for, and there is text to that affect in the Swiss law. Vera ^(talk) 17:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We do not patronizing the Air Force, but your reaction shows that it is true.. you don't know about the swiss military and you are making things up here. Saying that here the ones here do or had done service in the swiss military (nearly every healt swiss man does his duty in the Swiss Military) and knew the rules for swiss military insigneas and badges.. and you are droping in and act as if you know more about the Swiss army... a girl (if you prefer a woman/ ro just someone) from Holland. This is in no way an offense, or unfriendly. It is simply a clarification of the facts. Again most pictures are outcuts (with the official {{extracted from}) from legal uplodet pictures.. It is impossibel that a whole picture can be legal but just an outcut of it illegal. Also most of them are on public places.. LT3 Lt4 LTDB are all next to the Bussstation " Flugsicherungsstrasse" a Busstation who everyone can walk out of the Bus and touch this LT3, Lt4 LTDB,.. The same is for the AlouetteIII in Alpnach with the LT2 and BFK on it, the FlSt 17 who is from the retired MirageIIIS who is on diplay in Payerne, and so one. Sorry but you are twisting the rules just like it fit best for your "erasing mission". Also just a look at LT2 or BFK,FlSt16, FlSt17.. they all have such a low picture quality , just too simple for copyright. Aha all we say to show that a deletion of this pictures is wrong, you ignore, not a single inch of you to trie to understand this..But on the other hand you just "changed our mind" and we have to swallow your change of the PD-ineligible of FlSt12new.jpg.... sorry but that is being inappropriate. Two other people, who are not uploder of the pictures you like to delet, droped in here and as i see it they doesent agree with you..I think no one is interested to have a conflict against you, we just say our point of view.FFA P-16 (talk) 20:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, knowing about copyright regulations isn't a requirement for being in military service. Vera ^(talk) 00:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And again you are showing your lack of knowleg and disrespect about Swiss Military.. because people who did the duty there knew the rules which apply to badges/insignias. You obviously not. You did know nothing about requirement for being in Swiss military service and what this personshave to knew about uniforms, unit badges and so one. even if you was in the Netherlands Military.. it is not the same.. we are not part of NATO .. You are just twisting and turning something to force your idea to get swiss military insignias deleted.. and you ignore the fac that now not only I have tld you that you are wrong. I bet that you also don't knew that some of the Swiss Air Force squadron badges exist in many differnd versions. BTW. "You Expert" if you would have just checked the coordinates from File:Embleme LSMD.jpg...47° 24′ 28,62″ N, 8° 38′ 15,84″ O yu see that it is taken from a public place.. the bussstop FFA P-16 (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I won't contribute to a useless discussion of arbitrariness. Furtherː it is not possible to find the artist and moreover it was created for one only reason - which isː to be public. Furtherː Is this really exactly the meaning that people thought of, when they made the rules? I'd rather decide upon the quality of the pictures. I refuse to discuss - I don't see how we could ever agree that this is simple while a fish with a digit 8 is not. For me both is a valuable piece of information and may contribute to knowledge that can be found either on Wikipedia or elsewhere.--Anidaat (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

just because you don't know the artist doesn't mean it's not protected by copyright. That logo you linked to is indeed too complicated and I've nominated it for deletion. You may not like copyright rules, but if we ignore them then we become the pirates and put the entire project in jeopardy. Big business really likes making copyright bigger and bigger making it draconian compared to what copyright was intended for initially. Vera ^(talk) 13:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1Veertje. There is no artist who "own" it the logos/Badges exist in all this years (some about nearly 100years) in differend versions, sometimes just a detail is differend .. like the eye of the bird of FlSt1 sometimes it is with or without text like FlSt20, sometimes the collors are differend (FlSt24) or the shape (FlSt5, 11, 16).Also it is a mean trick if Anidaat gave the Logo_Mech_Div_1 as an an example, that you let delet it. But still many of the Pictures here are for copyright BFK, LT3 LT2, or the 19 Sqn Swiss Air Force....Your assertion that these are not simple enough is unbelievable, if we look for eg at an worldwide known logo of an private ownde, profit toymaker... File:LEGO logo.svg with the remark: "Dieses Bild oder darin enthaltener Text besteht nur aus einfachen geometrischen Formen und Text. Sie erreichen keine Schöpfungshöhe (spezifischere Beschreibung auf Englisch), die für urheberrechtlichen Schutz nötig ist, und sind daher gemeinfrei." FFA P-16 (talk) 11:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it's not mean to enforce copyright rules. It's mean to think you're above the law and should have final say of who can and cannot contribute to Wikipedia because of their gender or place of origin. I didn't delete that badge, I nominated it for deletion and another administrator agreed with me that it was a straightforward case of an image that was too complicated to be free from copyright restrictions. The Swiss army owns these graphics. As a member of an organization you don't get to change that on your own. Without endorsement of copyright rules we're no better than the likes of piratebay Vera ^(talk) 13:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No 1Veertje, You are trying fanatically to delete any Swiss military badge. No I don't think I am above the law. YOU are the one who is acting mean and YOU are the one who is thinking YOU are above the rules of Swiss military and its You who is acting like you would knew the rules better as everione who was in the Swiss Military. No it is not about gender.. don't try to accuse me. I have already explained it, as you have (intentionally) misunderstood it. It is the fact that you are not Swiss citizen. Therefore, it is presumptuous of you to assert you would know the rules better the Swiss citizen. The rules of the Swiss military, of which you were never part. That is fact. And no, by many badges the Swiss Military dont own the graphics.. Just of some.. with this you show again that you don't knew a pice of this... school badges, missionbadges, unitbadges, Sqadron, Flighthours it is not all the same. And again you are ignoring the ones who are too simple for copyright. I am not the only one who told you that you are wrong. The only "piracy" is your violent attempt to erase everything that has to do with the Swiss military.FFA P-16 (talk) 16:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've had this discussion before with Hornet Driver and his sock puppet accounts and what was true then is still true now: the burden of proof is on YOU that anything other than tradition copyright applies. Vera ^(talk) 21:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And again 1Veertje tries to distract because she has no answer to the ones who are too simple for copyright, nothing to the discrepancy of this to the LEGO file..nothing to this that I showed the exact location where the LTDB LT3 etc phots wehere taken..next to a public busstop. She has no knowledge of the rules of Swiss military signs. She tries to determine with her assertion everything about Swiss military signs. This is, however, in the very special of Fighter and Lufttransport Squadrons wrong. We can see now this: An ideological unreasonable long therm mission of her to delete everything that affects Swiss military badge. She is the only one woh startet this case because of her mass deleting request, she is the only one here who fight for deletion, and she is ignoring everything all the others here told her..she has brought not a single proof of her assertion to the Squadrons. For her, everyone in the Swiss military is an idiot, just to push her opinion. The discussion does not provide a solution because 1Veertje ignores the opinions and facts of all other people here.FFA P-16 (talk) 23:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is way past a useful discussion. Switzerland has extensive FOP, and ToO comparable to Germany, so these should be OK. --Yann (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Insignia of the Swiss Air Force

FOP in Switserland is limited to representations of works that are on display in public space: it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original. These photographs are indistinguishable from direct reproductions of these badges and therefore not free to use.

Vera ^(talk) 11:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Insignia of the Swiss Air Force

Complex drawings on the side of vehicles are not free from copyright restrictions, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Vehicles

Vera ^(talk) 11:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1Veertje stop this missuse of massdeleting NOW! Yann had Adding {{Kept}}) to this files. Also you are ignoring the fact of works that are on display in public space I have shown you again and again that LTDB etc are in public space. Yann had closed this deleting request and you ignore this. Your hatred campaign against swiss military sings is enough..This is a very evil revenge action from youFFA P-16 (talk) 12:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you're the one being abusive and swinging mud. You claim that we have to take you at your word for knowing more about how Swiss military badges are supposedly exampt from standard copyright regulations. You, like Hornet Driver and his sock puppets in the past, have provided no documentation at all to back up this claim. Enforcement of copyright on Wikimedia Commons isn't malicious, it's necessary. Backing up claims of exceptional circumstances is necessary. Letting people who are not from the same background as you are edit in the Wikimedia is necessary. Yann closed the discussion not because of a settled argument but because you had completely derailed it. Vera ^(talk) 13:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The one who is swinging mud are you.. who think you are better as everyone who was in Swiss Military service.. This people know about the Badges not you. You are just making things up. You are ignoring that LT3 and so one are made on public places, this shows clrea that your only goal is to get deletet everything here. Fact is that Yann cloed this discussion and you ignoring this.. and more he changed the Files with "keep". If because of you some will be deleted i will recomond everyone next time in military to re uplode such pictures.. it is enough! So I wote Again for KEEP all.FFA P-16 (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Previous keep decision was taken after comprehensive discussion. After reading the discussion and verifying the validity of the arguments, my conclusion is that the previous closure was correct. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rembt Tobias Hugo Pieter Liebrecht Alexander van Boneval Faure (cropped).jpg

Please do not upload this Uncropped image can do already. 180.190.54.124 12:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep file is used at NL-wiki. Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IU after shooting "Producer", 21 April 2015 03.jpg

هذه جيدة جميلة 129.45.118.217 14:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Borted.jpg

He is not author of this file. This is clipping from television program. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxkris2001 (talk · contribs)

Dubious claim of own work on these glamour and pageant pictures.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obviously copyvio, small size photos without EXIF, this photos also uploaded before in many websites --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 06:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxkris2001 (talk · contribs)

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: known user from ar.wiki. expect him to have a few hidden sockpuppets. --Tarawneh (talk) 18:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gibraltar BW 2015-10-26 14-07-28.jpg

Not longer necessary. Berthold Werner (talk) 13:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: an redirect to renamed File:Gibraltar Barbary Macaques BW 2015-10-26 14-07-28.jpg. --Ju Ta 00:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RAMSWROOP BIJARNIYA 1.png

They forgot it. 141.196.210.216 19:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: broken redirect. --Ju Ta 19:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tina S.png

This image is a screenshot from a YouTube video which is not freely licensed. It is therefore a copyright violation. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied by Nick—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krista Keltahaf.jpg

Request of the uploader on behalf of the artist Vetrarrefur (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Very small, no EXIF. --Yann (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charity Gala.jpg

File similar to other files of the uploader that were deleted. With watermark etc. Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charity event 2015.jpg. E4024 (talk) 15:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per the EXIF, image is originally by Glenn Francis. I checked with him and it is not one that he's chosen to contribute to Wikipedia. So it's a copyvio at this point. --Tabercil (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TiaLiYuFen 2017.jpg

Copyrighted material from the World Journal Matthew hk (talk) 00:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --Ju Ta 06:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Mountaineers from Tauwan

Spelling mistake.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 16:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ersad Alam.jpg

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Ersad Alam (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotion in en.wiki, where he got blocked for that, and Commons. This personal photo is his last remaining contribution. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ñchan.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 23:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag Pontevedra.JPG

Unofficial flag and poor quality file. Pontevedra78 (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hyperborea 2016 Ice sculpture in Petrozavodsk

Derivative of contemporary artwork. No permission.

A.Savin 00:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Х-55СМ.jpg

Incorrect license. The license has a 2017 date and an anonymous authorship. The bottom right corner of the drawing identifies the actual author and the year 2004 as a date. Викидим (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pacxo през 2015.jpg

Looks to me fairly out of scope. Ju Ta 23:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:His Majesty, the King of Belgium (Elizabeth J. O'Connor)

Who is Elizabeth J. O'Connor? Wrong named — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolus (talk • contribs) 12:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See also the related discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Carolus. De728631 (talk) 12:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as empty category. I have read the related discussion and agree that the category name is a bit confusing. If recreated, it should probably be Category:His Majesty, the King of Belgium (by Elizabeth J. O'Connor) (but on the other hand, the photographer may not be notable enough for her own category)... P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mapa de Villa Nueva Guatemala.jpg

Appears to be a photograph of a copyrighted map. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bo7alw (talk · contribs)

profile photos not used

Jessy Walters (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:35, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:رابطة القصة الومضة.jpg

Extremely low quality. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:35, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abraham N George.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abrar hussain ah.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abrarjhfjhj.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 00:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kathleenkaren (talk · contribs)

profile photos not used

Jessy Walters (talk) 00:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Acetune.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 00:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hhibrabrunet (talk · contribs)

very small without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work

File:Hermanas hosp.png

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vu-0001 (talk · contribs)

Not sure these are really own work, looks to me like they're screenshots from a computer program which has elements you can put together, making it a derivative.

-mattbuck (Talk) 06:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:SS, unless the program they used can be proven to be freely licensed software. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vu-0001 (talk · contribs)

Pretty clearly not own work.

-mattbuck (Talk) 06:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Twickto header.jpg

Teken from http://www.twickto.nl/over-twickto/zo-werkt-het/ with © Twickto 2017 Rode raaf (talk) 07:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stephanie.jpg

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stephanie.jpg

Presumably an unused photo of the uploader, which does not appear to have been used on any project. Out of project scope. ℯ xplicit 07:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:কামাল হোসেন বিশ্বাস.jpg

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ornaturin (talk · contribs)

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prakasbehera (talk · contribs)

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jiam Momin(G.M) (talk · contribs)

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jiam Momin(G.M) (talk · contribs)

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 09:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo Geloof (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entries speedy deleted. User locally indef blocked. Sock of Bel Col Cosméticos, locally indef blocked. Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bel Col - Laboratórios Bel Química.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 08:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vila Pereira (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per * grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 08:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Estevão Goes (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entries (and user space) speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 08:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:אירינה שייק.jpg

Obvious copyvio. The pic is obviously from an ELLE magazine photo session. A quick google search will confirm this/ DGtal (talk) 08:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aeislalvaro (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entries +10x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AXEL & BORIS .jpg

spam, out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:臺北大學法律學院.jpg

Delete. Re-upload of file which was previously deleted for copyright violation. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. A Copy of Commons:Deletion requests/File:北大法學院.jpg. Btooombtooom (talk) 08:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MyAcico icon.gif

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Terebikko system.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.kamisama.com.br/system.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Solid Rock Logo.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:D947f257939632e60021a236f975e897 crop north.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://media.minutemediacdn.com/process?url=http%3A%2F%2F90min-images-original.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fproduction%2F5901f39dabb6483b4d000001.jpg&filters%5Bcrop%5D%5Bw%5D=0.989953314659197&filters%5Bcrop%5D%5Bh%5D=0.9942857142857143&filters%5Bcrop%5D%5Bo_x%5D=0.010667600373482727&filters%5Bcrop%5D%5Bo_y%5D=0.0&filters%5Bquality%5D%5Btarget%5D=80&type=.jpg&filters%5Bresize%5D%5Bw%5D=630&filters%5Bresize%5D%5Bh%5D=472. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by فن بیان (talk · contribs)

Promo photos and song. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by فن بیان (talk · contribs)

Song and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by فن بیان (talk · contribs)

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

File:Sadrshajareh.png

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Libro Mi vida todo un arte.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haplotype estimation.gif

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GST-Final-Puneet.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gnb12.png

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 14:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kenanhuseynli97.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My Name Sarang.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Factorial HR logotipo.png

self-promotion NippurdeLagash (talk) 16:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not used. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TimonWloka.jpg

Derivative work of content deleted on copyright grounds. FDMS 4 16:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:كندرة علوش.jpg

obviously copyvio, small size photos without EXIF, this photos also uploaded before in many websites --Alaa :)..! 16:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also the name of the photo is violation against the woman! --Alaa :)..! 16:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Acqualina Condos.png

avertising Jessy Walters (talk) 16:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 14:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SBPIS MELAKA 1.jpg

Derivative work of the students' constructions. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:تكريم دورة غسان كنفاني.jpg

Extremely low quality photograph integrated with a poster of some sort. Not quite sure what it is, but it's certainly out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CEHAO-2012-Barra-superior.jpg

Unlikely to be own work. Unless the components of this logo are in the public domain, the copyright likely rests with the university. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Well, I assure you I did the logo for the university. Regards, Fahrenheitfourfiveone[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and promotional - out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abudarda71 (talk · contribs)

profile photos not used

Jessy Walters (talk) 00:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abudarda71 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope. Unused personal images.

Érico (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abubakar 2014.jpeg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 00:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Achtsamkeit und Meditation (35287164334).jpg

Vacation photo with no apparent education value Jessy Walters (talk) 00:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luis Cardenas with Bundi.jpg

Album cover. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La Défense 2011-12-30 (7491444074).jpg

No FOP in France for architectural works. The Arche is the most prominent building in the image. 67.84.96.111 01:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ภาพประกอบการอธิบาย.jpg

Unclear if all constituent works are free. Also, image is out of scope and metadata indicates copyright which does not match uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexander & Radio mc.jpg

Personal photograph of non-notable individuals. Out of scope. Note that the description is full of self-aggrandizing nonsense. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A view of the temple entrance.jpg

Image seems to be partially corrupted. There is not enough remaining content in the image to be worth keeping. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Murid-murid SKPLS.jpg

Photograph of identifiable minors with no encyclopedic value. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: suitable addition to Category:Children of Malaysia and Category:Schools in Malaysia. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sambutan Merdeka SKPLS.jpg

Photograph of identifiable minors with no encyclopedic value. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Majlis Pelancaran Bulan Kemerdekaan 2017.jpg

Photograph of identifiable minors with no encyclopedic value. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope, suitable categories added. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:People Counter Flow.jpg

Flickr laundering. Image was originally uploaded on www.footfallcam.com site (http://www.footfallcam.com/Content/img/ffcam/report-set/Zone_Analytic_Report2.jpg) and is marked "All rights reserved". DAJF (talk) 03:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not falsely advertise your product. The link is enters nothing more than footfallcam home page. I am simply only trying to improve the people counter page. Please work together to improve the quality of the page and not sabotage each other's work. Technodudes (talk) 06:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:LL. Image is clearly taken from a proprietary report. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cinema Productora.jpg

Porque me equivoqué de archivo. No corresponde Cproductora (talk) 03:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:CLAUDIA ELISA GUIDOBONO

This artist (it:Clemen Parrocchetti) died in 2016, so her art work is still copyrighted (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Italy). Note this is only the first 50 or so files, there are many more. I'll nominate the rest if these are deleted. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SA Word Logo.jpg

Unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Science4you (talk · contribs)

unused personal image / no quite notable person : out of scope

File:Miguel-pina-martins.jpg

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThunderGodCid (talk · contribs)

Unused personal image : out of scope

File:SabotaJe1.jpg

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RobbCilek (talk · contribs)

not an own work, description says "PICTURE COURTESY OF: IDAHO STATESMAN"

File:James Webb III.jpg

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I gave credit to the Idaho Statesman in the description. is that not good enough? RobbCilek (talk) 02:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, the copyright holder must send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antonow An-28 by Rob Vogelaar (1991).jpg

Taken from ES:WP, as source. Fair use? E4024 (talk) 08:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - File is used all over the world now. All of what I find is after 2010 (upload on es.wiki), so very good chance this is really from Rob Vogelaar. Benefit of the doubt. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate of File:Antonow An-28 by Rob Vogelaar 1991.jpg. The strange thing is that the earlier version has a different source, but and the uploader at es:wp and de:wp is not Rob Vogelaar. I don't see where Rob Vogelaar originally uploaded this... P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Préchac-sur-Adour Bureaux mairie.JPG

Bonjour, Je ne pense pas que cela soit à Préchac sur Adour. Vous avez déjà publié une photo de la mairie et elle n'est pas comme cela. Habitant Préchac, si vous me dites le nom de la rue ou la géolocalisation j'irai voir. Merci d'avance. Stase-x Stase-x (talk) 08:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep S'il y a erreur de village (j'en doute), cela ne justifie pas une suppression, surtout avant vérification. On peut, éventuellement,modifier, après vérification, mais pas supprimer ! -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 11:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

J'habite ce village depuis 35 ans et je n'ai jamais vu ce bâtiment. Le village n'étant pas très grand j'ai fait un tour et n'ai toujours pas vu o^cela se trouvais. Peut-être pourriez vous me l'indiquer ? --Stase-x (talk) 10:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If description and/or filename is disputed, use {{Fact disputed}}. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I finaly find the right village. This photo is from Goux and you have already publish this. So I submit a duplicate. --Stase-x (talk) 13:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wald - panoramio (8).jpg

Unused image of unidentified section of an unidentified forest. GPS ccordinates are misleading. Zinnmann (talk) 08:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Wald", the forest is somewhere in Mitteleuropa. The pic is nice. We could make an effort to save the image. --E4024 (talk) 09:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --Insider (talk) 10:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's now used in two Wiktionary projects, added by Insider - maybe to prove a point, but well, apparently it's usable at least to illustrate the Russian word "валежник", which according to online dictionaries means something like "deadwood", so even if the location is not known, I suppose we can keep it. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think that's ok. I withdraw the deletion request. --Zinnmann (talk) 07:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jungs aus Zürich.jpg

Out of scope. Zinnmann (talk) 09:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gruppenbild von Sondame Stuttgart.jpg

Out of scope. Zinnmann (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - to dark, etc.. photograph will not be used, I think - out of scope - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sondame Zürich gruppenfoto.jpg

Out of scope. Zinnmann (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The image is so dark, it would not serve even if it were in scope. --E4024 (talk) 13:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sondame Stuttgart.jpg

Out of scope. Zinnmann (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grppenbild.jpg

Out of scope. Zinnmann (talk) 09:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If for any reason the file is kept, please correct the name as "Gruppenbild". --E4024 (talk) 13:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fischer&rechsteiner-mi.png

copyrighted logo no OTRS Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Not declared under COM:TOO, which may always not apply, and no trademark notice. --Lucas (msg) 01:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fischer&rechsteiner-mi.png

New logo in wikipedia with correct copyright RrValmafer (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plaisance (Gers) Banque et pharmacie.JPG

La banque et la pharmacie ont fermé. Stase-x (talk) 10:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Oui, et ? --Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Thibault — Racconish^☎ 10:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep La fermeture de commerces ne justifie pas la suppression de la photo, qui illustre également la place. Le cliché peut gardé un coté historique, qui peut être utile pour la localité. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 11:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:47203569 oqfi3h0qqy W665.jpg

also redirect file:47203569 oqfi3h0qqy W665 - копия.jpg
MarinaAVG (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in Commons and ru.wiki and uploading a photo about herself, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Troypurroy.jpg

WikiCommons is not a place for private images placed in random categories. 83.26.155.58 10:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Troypurroy (Romántico y Erótico).jpg

WikiCommons is not a place for private images placed in random categories. No page links to it (even a user page) 83.26.155.58 10:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Predalien Film Legends Museum.jpg

copyrighted Alien vs. Predator artwork. Mrs. Stumblestone (talk) 11:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sondame Zürich.jpg

Delete. The pic is so dark that it will not serve anything. E4024 (talk) 13:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scarborough, New Zealand (Unsplash AmPRUnRb6N0).jpg

No encyclopaeodic info about Scarborough, New Zealand, IMHO. Kalbbes (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The scope of this project is beyond images for Wikipedia. This has illustrative use, Keep. Fæ (talk) 19:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Fae (although I don't see any use...). P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vintage love.jpg

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Acosta3577.jpg

personal photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OmidNikjeh (talk · contribs)

Self advertising

Jessy Walters (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adal.jpeg.jpg

No apparent education use Jessy Walters (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adam Friedman Casual .jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adam Firestone.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adamedelmurzaevfoto.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adamnkandu (talk · contribs)

profile photos not used

Jessy Walters (talk) 17:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adelaide James Headshot.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 17:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RealEstate Properties in Palakkad.jpg

(obviously) advertisements, see 2nd-'sourced' http://sahomes.in/projects/icon/, and pre-categorized Category:Realestate Properties in Palakkad, hence, hopefully out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
btw: see also related distributions, Roland zh (talk) 17:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: all commercial info has been removed, acceptable now. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adem Atbas.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gauravslokhande (talk · contribs)

profile photos not used

Jessy Walters (talk) 18:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pulga..,.jpg

Photo from the web, you can found this in Google images 186.129.22.36 00:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nsuns4 beautyshot it JPG 0x0 q85.jpg

Copyrighted material. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naruto-shippuden-ultimate-ninja-storm-4-bundle-ps4.jpg

Copyrighted material. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clear copyvio. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:38, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taiwan Lottery Golden Avenue 20160201.jpg

Photo of presumably copyrighted artwork. Gapfall (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lost Christmas.jpg

There is no proof that this film poster is the ownership of the uploader. Propsal to delete from WikiCommons. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Godzilla-1.jpg

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2016-366-2 Godzilla Eats The Gnomes (23513467494).jpg

COM:TOYS. G I Chandor (talk) 14:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Godzilla Resurgence World Premiere Red Carpet- Advertising Truck (27987762254).jpg

Copyrighted advertisement. G I Chandor (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juhi-rustagi-.jpg

The same image is in several internet sites. It should be demonstrated to be an own work. E4024 (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raica123 (talk · contribs)

Doesn't look like own work. All pictures looks part of some professional photo shoot.

Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 15:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sick-Puppies.jpg

Studio photo of a very popular band, very unlikely own work from a single-file, single-purpose en.wiki editor Ariadacapo (talk) 16:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo domo.ro.png

Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yiyi72 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yiyi72 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yiyi72 (talk · contribs)

No permission that the images are of own work. No exif available. Some seems to be taken from Facebook

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antoniomirandafilho (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. For the official symbols: claim that these official symbols (coat of arms / brasão + flag / bandeira) of Brazilian municipalities were published or commissioned by a Brazilian government prior to 1983 ({{PD-BrazilGov}}) or are in CC-whatever (as indicated) is not supported.

Gunnex (talk) 10:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fischer&rechsteiner-logoufficiale.png

Copyright violation of Fischer & Rechsteiner's logo. ([4]) Not-PD logo Ferdi2005 _(Posta) 11:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Violazione di copyright del logo della Fischer & Rechsteiner, link: [5] logo non in pubblico dominio.--Ferdi2005 _(Posta) 11:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Fischer&rechsteiner-logoufficiale.png

new logo in wikipedia with correct copyright RrValmafer (talk) 10:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kazprose (talk · contribs)

Small sizes, no EXIFs, unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khjungk (talk · contribs)

Eberhard Linke is born in 1937. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Izzet325 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:23 year old men ejaculation.gif

— Racconish^☎ 13:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and COM:PENIS. — Jeff G. ツ 21:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- but Keep the 1st & 3rd files above (fleshlight) per Fæ. — Jeff G. ツ 14:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing useful here. TimothyJosephWood 17:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Fleshlight gifs, these appear to be the only ones on Commons, and the invention has made significant impact on sexual practices. For these reasons, COM:NUDITY does not apply. --Fæ (talk) 08:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fæ, which of these files do you advocate keeping ? — Racconish^☎ 09:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fleshlight gifs. --Fæ (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the 1st and 3rd of the above files ? — Racconish^☎ 13:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: you have been pinged. — Jeff G. ツ 14:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Fæ (talk) 07:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination for those two. — Racconish^☎ 13:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept two per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Izzet325 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"What is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials?" EXHIBITIONISM. His own organs are missing. --E4024 (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @E4024: Is that a !vote? — Jeff G. ツ 03:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I'm implying that we should delete the said files. We cannot have everybody's genital organs pictured and kept. We should only keep the better images. --E4024 (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the fleshlight photos, this includes the two GIFs listed, along with File:A male penis penetration with his toy.jpg and File:A male penis ready to enter this toy.jpg for precisely the same reasons. Two of the listed files were kept in the last DR which was closed less than two weeks ago. @EugeneZelenko: as a Bureaucrat on this project, I am sure you can advise the community on interpretation of existing policies and guidelines and there is no need for me to explain which policies apply here. Could you explain why you have put the same files up for a second deletion in such a short time? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the fleshlight photos per Fæ, Delete the rest (File:Male masturbation video.ogg, File:A errected human penis in a condom.jpg, and File:Errected human penis in a condom.jpg) per COM:PENIS. — Jeff G. ツ 03:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as for me I would delete the whole, even the 'fleshlight'-ones, as there must be some trademark around the name 'fleshlight'...and if the name is copyrighted, no one should use it in the name of a file on commons ;-) Pippobuono (talk) 20:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pippobuono: Trademark is an insufficient reason for deletion, we have {{Trademarked}} for that. Also it differs from copyright. — Jeff G. ツ 01:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fæ. Ruthven (msg) 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Izzet325 (talk · contribs)

Commons is not your personal free web host. See here.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 22:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the toy and fleshlight photos per Fæ. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the rest per COM:PENIS and the above DRs. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am afraid Ruthven misinterpreted Fæ's !vote of 14:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC). — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 02:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here are my views on each listed image, forcing me to spend time on screwing around in a disruptive DR raised by a disposable disruptive accounts, rather than my GLAM related projects.

File:Male ejaculation with a toy.ogg Keep as before, illustrative of fleshlight use, good quality for this subject. The related category has just 9 files of which this is the only video.
File:Male ejaculation video.ogg Keep straightforward masterbation with circumsized penis and ejaculation video, okay quality to illustrate both subjects and the model's own release is perfectly okay.
File:Erkek penis.jpg Keep illustrative for circumcised penises, there's no particular urgent need to delete this, it's probably one of our better erection photos.
File:Male ejaculation gif.gif Delete the gif is a bit jerky, though gifs of ejaculation could be useful for educational purposes, I think we have significantly better.
File:Errected human penis with a cock ring.jpg Keep It turns out this is the only black rubber cock ring in use that we have a close up for. @Izzet325: If you release more of these, it would be good to ensure nothing else is in the background, a simple black or white background work best.
File:Erected human penis in a condom.jpg Keep nicely framed for educational use to illustrate a penis sheathed in a condom.
File:Male masturbation video.ogg (and its redirect target File:Male masturbation video.ogv) Keep Clip of probably the most common way to masterbate for men with a circumcised cock, lubed hand moving with a slight twisting motion. The clip is short but precisely illustrative and of likely educational value.
File:A male penis penetration with his toy.jpg Keep as per the last, recent, DR.
File:A male penis ready to enter this toy.jpg Keep as per the last, recent, DR.
File:A errected human penis in a condom.jpg Keep well framed, good focus, clear educational value to illustrate condom use.
File:Errected human penis in a condom.jpg Keep goes with the previous image, in this one it is clearer that the penis has no foreskin.
File:A male masturbation fleshlight 02.gif Keep as per the last, recent, DR.
File:A male masturbation fleshlight 01.gif Keep as per the last, recent, DR.

--Fæ (talk) 09:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- User:Dyolf77 is an admin and I guess they know what vandalism is or not. Would you mind not attacking people? We are all volunteers here. --E4024 (talk) 09:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Their actions by raising this DR puts their status at risk, maybe they think it's worth it. Someone with sysop rights who is keen to keep on re-raising "porn" images in a third DR within a matter of weeks is disrupting the project and they should carefully reconsider why they are here. I am quite happy to call out any user for actions which provably disrupt the project regardless of what "bits" they happen to have. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination @Fæ: Sorry for wasting your valuable volunteer time. By the way your comment stating that "Dyolf77 (talk · contribs) is not here for the good of this project" seems to be false. Regards. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 09:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jeff G. and E4024: for your comments and votes.— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 09:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for withdrawing. If you created this DR because the previous DRs were hard to see based on the tools or backlogs you were using, you may want to raise that as an improvement request. --Fæ (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep per Fae, minus File:Male ejaculation gif.gif per Fae. ~riley (talk) 05:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kd2328 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:نمونه صدا.ogg

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DavidRittenhousePorter.jpg

No authorship information or date here or on source website. Gamaliel (talk) 14:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: old enough anyway to be out of copyright. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ksenia0577 (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Huge GN w arrow.jpg

I have the arrow in the incorrect spot and will not be using this image Greg L (talk) 22:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the uploaderrequested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Denia agalianu .jpg

IMDB image. Can we keep this? E4024 (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dorin52 (talk · contribs)

Set of historical photos of different years, made by dozen different cameras in different places on Earth and even beyond its limits - there are some made at the space station - all claimed to be the uploader's own works.

Sealle (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adhiraj2013 (talk · contribs)

profile photos not used

Jessy Walters (talk) 18:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Media needing categories as of 23 August 2017

He is not autor of files (pictuers). Copyvio

Zoranzoki21 (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club (500)

Files from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be COM:NOTUSED referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from March 2017 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his on his user talk page.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Thanks for the hard work, I had wanted to list these a while back but never put in the effort. Truly painful collection of pix. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With VisualFileChange it's not that difficult to set up the DR. It's still much but I can't imagine having done that by hand. Will do the DRs in multiple stages and look how many of the ~11000 pictures of the category are left in the end. --Steinfeld-feld (talk) 08:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club 501-1000

[[Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club| First part of the mass DR].] The nominated files are from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be COM:NOTUSED referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from March 2017 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his user talk page.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club (1001-1500)

Files from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be COM:NOTUSED referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from March 2017 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his user talk page archive 2017. This is my 3rd session of nominating the the (totally) unusable ones of this batch. Previous mass DRs of files in this category.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club (1501-3000)

Files from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be not educational usable, COM:NOTUSED, referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from March 2017 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his user talk page archive 2017. I estimate 3000-4000 files to be keepable in this category, but I hope that there are more.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 16:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: non-notable event, personal photos. Bot uploads should be more selective. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club (3001-4000)

Files from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be not educational usable, COM:NOTUSED, referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from February 2017 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his user talk page archive 2017. I estimate 3000-4000 files to be keepable in this category, but I hope that there are more.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 18:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club (4001-5000)

Files from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be not educational usable, COM:NOTUSED, referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from March 2017 and some from Dec 2016 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his user talk page archive 2017. I estimate 3000-5000 files to be keepable in this category, but I hope that there are more.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photographs by Isles Yacht Club (5001-6190)

Files from a batch upload by User: Fae of a yacht clubs Flickr page, mostly from internal events. I suspect many of this files to be not educational usable, COM:NOTUSED, referencing to of the page COM:PS. They are files in a Media needing categories from March 2017 and some from Dec 2016 too. I already contacted User: Fae before. The conversation can be found on his user talk page archive 2017. Final mass DR out of this category for now (I hope), we started out with ~11,017 files. At the moment we're down to 6,017 files and after this DR there are ~4,827 primarily categorisable pictures left. Some are still of small size or questionable number of the same subject but the rest could be usable in some way.

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BelMuzTV.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Serhio Magpie as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Should be compared with threshold of originality. Maybe the logo is considered simple. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:БЕЛМУЗТВ (2015).png

This file was initially tagged by Serhio Magpie as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Should be compared with threshold of originality. Maybe the logo is considered simple. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets (cropped).jpg

The uploader did not provide any real source of rights for this photo, it can be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Family photo. You already nominated File:Molly_Holly_with_Paul_Billets.jpg twice. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets (cropped).jpg

Cropped from File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets.jpg which is a low quality fan picture with a professional wrestler. Wikipedia and the Commons is not a personal photo hosting site. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 09:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject of image is notable, and this is one of the highest quality images we have. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most importantly, this image has been used in articles since December 2016 so it should be kept per COM:INUSE. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Lewis Hulbert. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Czochralskiesp.jpg

unused, low-quality jpg illustration; is out of scope. Mrs. Stumblestone (talk) 11:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope; Spanish version of File:Czochralski Process.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FlSt12new.jpg

Originally nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hornet Driver. Split into indivudal DR for independent discussion, if applicable. FastilyClone (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a perfectly good photo, well in scope. The only reason to delete it was a serious concern to assume bad faith from the uploader, based on the notion that the disparity of cameras and scanners reported in the EXIF data of his/her uploads implies copyright violation of third parties. That kind of concern cannot be evaluated in separate, isolated DRs such as this one, and indeed, upon exemplary (if seldom) questioning, the uploader proven to satisfaction personal authorship of most (if not all) uploads. No concievable reason to even file a separate DR for this one. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn -FastilyClone (talk) 03:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FlSt12new.jpg

this file is not uncomplicated enough to be free from copyright restrictions Vera ^(talk) 11:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep This has recently been kept in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Insignia of the Swiss Air Force where Vera used the same argument. De728631 (talk) 15:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per De728631. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Airplane photography.djvu

Incorrect license , PD-old 70 implies author died before 1946, author died in 1953 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Updated license to reflect PD-US-1923 Situation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:7739395656a4.jpg

unused pie chart in wrong format (JPEG): out of scope. Tatmadav (talk) 11:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:7739395656a5.jpg

unused pie chart in wrong format (JPEG): out of scope. Tatmadav (talk) 11:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:桃園客家文化館 (31604220703).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://travel.ettoday.net/article/851836.htm Solomon203 (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be a relatively clear cut case of Flickrwashing... but Solomon203 please don't replace the stated source with the ultimate source, it makes it a little more prone to confusion. Storkk (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seehausen Petri Portal.jpg

This file shows a person in the lower right corner. There is an alternative version for this file (Seehausen Petri Portal1), which is better suitable. Heiner Martin (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That can be cut off. (Please don't ask me how that is done. :-) --E4024 (talk) 14:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guy lebegue.jpg

Personal picture, out of scope. Also invalid OTRS ticket: permission from depicted person instead of permission from photographer. Jcb (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Randykitty (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi supprimer cette photo prise en mode automatique avec mon appareil photo ?--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a random collection of pictures. See project scope. --Randykitty (talk) 09:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I understand there is an article about this person in FR:WP. Therefore should be in scope. No idea on OTRS/permission issues. --E4024 (talk) 09:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an article or not? I don't open the pages of FR:WP. (...) --E4024 (talk) 09:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If there's an article, it would be listed on the file description page. Biographies of Guy Lebègue were deleted after community discussion on both the French (2007) and English (2012) wikis. --Randykitty (talk) 09:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I still have another confusion: Is the person in the image Guy Lebègue himself? As he is the photographer, can he have taken his own pic, with those time-interval whatsoever cameras that you set up and then run to pose? --E4024 (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I guess that's possible and also seems to be what Kasos claims above. But even if the author/OTRS would be correct, this still is out of scope. --Randykitty (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je confirme, Guy Lebègue, ingénieur retraité de l'industrie spatiale habitant Cannes, a fait un auto-portrait avec son appareil posé sur un pied avec déclenchement au bout de 10 secondes. Ce serait maintenant, il aurait fait un selfy avec son smartphone.--Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 12:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. This seems to be cut out from a larger (group?) picture. It does not have the typical appearance of an analogue picture, not as the whole picture at least. It would also be very weird to use an autotimer for this kind of pictures in the pre-digital era (1994), that doesn't make sense. If you want to have such a picture, you simply ask somebody. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

En 1984 il n'y avait pas encore le numérique. C'est donc une photo argentique, diapo ou négatif, qui a été tirée pour faire une photo de badge pour les exposants sur un stand aerospatiale, d'où le pins de la société au revers de la veste. Elle a été numérisée par scan plus récemment. --Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guy lebegue 2011.JPG

Out of project scope. OTRS permission should be checked (another similar image had permission from subject, but not photographer Randykitty (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mail d'autorisation de publication par l'auteur Françoise Lebègue envoyé ce jour à <permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org> --Cordialement, Kasos_Fr, (talk) 07:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated also at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guy lebegue.jpg, the permission issue is secondary. The main issue here is that this is out of scope, Commons is not a repository for private pics. --Randykitty (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adicto a las letras.jpg

profile photo not used Jessy Walters (talk) 18:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Vekariya in surat.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Vekariya.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brett walker.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brian Gichana @classique hostels.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1 Dulan Sonowal.jpg

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1 drthapa.jpg

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Last gas station before crossing over into Botswana.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gms.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Golam Maola.jpg

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercedes Cacho Anthony Jakobs.jpg

Please remove this photo immediately, I made a mistake by uploading this and I also did not receive approval from the subject. Sweden Rocks hard (talk) 19:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AnthonyJakobs2016.jpeg

I made a mistake by uploading this photo last year and really need it to be taken down immediately. Thank you. Sweden Rocks hard (talk) 19:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ModelAnthonyJakobsIn2015.JPG

I made a mistake by uploading this photo last year and really need it to be taken down immediately. Thank you. Sweden Rocks hard (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vista del paramo Merida Venezuela.jpg

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is too blurry to be useful. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SamanthaRobertsonAnthonyJakobs.jpg

Please remove this photo immediately, I made a mistake by uploading this and I also did not receive approval from the subject. Sweden Rocks hard (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo fotoexpedice.jpg

In my opinion this is logo of non-notable event, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sagar Davis.jpg

This media file does not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, should be considered to be out of scope. gildemax (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ramswroop Bijarniya 1.jpg

Another group selfie 141.196.210.216 20:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Own Selfie.jpg

Selfie and edited photo Moajjem Hossain 21:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BODY.svg

Non-functional Iangriffin (talk) 22:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ig ub poster.pdf

Non-functional Iangriffin (talk) 22:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iangriffin wikimg tumblr notice.png

Non-functional for Wikipedia Iangriffin (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lago fernando lona em ubaitaba.jpg

Unclear copyright status and probadly a license review fail. {{PD-BrazilGov}} fails here because it is obviously a post-1982 work. Available is only a direct link to the image which reveals (per url http://www.ubaitaba.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2014-05-21-16.10.24.jpg = last modified: 05.2015) a publication in 2015. Per waybacks before and after 05.2015 we have for the main site "© 2013 - 2015 Portal Oficial Prefeitura de Ubaitaba - Todos os direitos reservados" = all rights reserved. And we have (published 3 years earlier) http://www.panoramio.com/photo/73827144 (2012, © All Rights Reserved by Emílio Paulo Freitas).

Pinging @Yann: (added the request for license review) and @INeverCry: (the license reviewer) for eventual further details. Gunnex (talk) 20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...
Nominating also (same constellation per above – and same uploader):

File:Ponte Sobre o Rio de Contas em Ubaitaba na Bahia (Ba33217).jpg

taken/published (as indicated) in 1957, license review failing {{PD-Brazil-media}} (+70 years disclosure) = copyrighted till the end of 2027...

Gunnex (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Btw: Yes, I am aware of the drama around user INeverCry (Commons insider know the details) and I'll stay neutral in this case, just doing – as usual – my business here (currently checking "gov.br"-sourced files --> the above files showed up coincidentally). Gunnex (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Gunnex above. Good analysis. Yann (talk) 11:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SetonArmorialRobertBruceAndElizabethDeBurgh.jpg

Not from the Seton armorial, misleading title Brobra694 (talk) 20:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If you think this filename is incorrect, then prove it and suggest a new name. Requesting deletion is totally exaggerated. --Voyager (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2017-8-23 SMG radar.jpg

Both licenses {{PD-PRC-exempt}} {{PD-MacaoGov-text}} are wrong. This image is not any of the items listed in {{PD-PRC-exempt}} to be exempted from copyright protection. {{PD-MacaoGov-text}} specified that it is for text only. Wcam (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete，see[6]: "All the information and products on this homepage are not available for any commercial purposes unless the user got the written approval by SMG."--shizhao (talk) 01:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license was changed to {{PD-MacaoGov}}. If this is still wrong, start DR again. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alan H. Friedman.jpg

Does not appear to be from 2017. Looks to be a scan of an old photo. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alan Howard Friedman.jpg

Does not appear to be from 2017. Looks to be a scan of an old photo. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Macron-LePoint.jpg

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 17:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and because that LePoint cover is probably still under copyright. — Jeff G. ツ 00:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wendell Ruan (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. File:Wendell Ruan vence em 3°Lugar no Marreta Cup 2017.jpg (see also watermark) per exif copyrighted by "MATHEUS CARVALHO". May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 08:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Per Yngve Ohlin (Dead).jpg

No authorization given. The proclaimed author is dead since 1991, he couldn't have given his approval for this picture to be released under CC-BY-SA 4.0. —‏הגות‎⁴¹⁴ 11:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Furthermore this looks like a scan from a book or magazine, so on top of this it is probably a violation of the copyrights of the respective publisher. —‏הגות‎⁴¹⁴ 11:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

A colored version of this picture can be seen on the back cover of A tribute to the black emperors (bootleg, split with Morbid). Maybe in turn it's taken from a magazine, who knows? Od1n (talk) 19:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it can be found in a lot of places, but that doesn't mean it was ever released under a license suitable for this project, or that the details given by the uploader are even correct. —‏הגות‎⁴¹⁴ 20:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Indeed. I was just providing some additional info, though not really helpful. Od1n (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atlas-logo.png

Not "own work" but logo of Club A. Atlas (Argentina), far above the TOO. See logo on Club official Facebook page, Official Twitter pic - Fma12 (talk) 11:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added the former Atlas logo, copyrighted as well. - Fma12 (talk) 23:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hypr Nalu SUP.jpg

Unlikely to be own work : very small size, the EXIFs contains this adress "www.vivantvie.com" that lead to http://sarahlee.photo/ Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Médaille. Graveur Max Leognany (1913-1994) (1).JPG

Max Leognany died in 1994. Copyright violation. 83.204.144.39 13:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lenin nehru park viplove.jpg

Poorly doctored photo with no truthful educational purpose. Take a look at the edge of the statue - it's clear that this statue was cut and pasted onto the background. Guanaco (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Commons:Freedom of panorama#India. --Y.haruo (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noble Partner 2017 (36322591521).jpg

Georgia has no FOP for modern monuments or sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only a small fragment of the monument is seen and details thereof are indiscernible. I'm not sure that the image fails FOP.--Kober (talk) 11:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 14:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unasul 20.jpg

so blurry, enough alternatives in Category:Evo Morales in 2008. Alexander Hug (talk) 18:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: actually in use. Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camera cafe 6.jpg

copyviol (non CC file). Danyele (talk) 21:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ганман.jpg

Sourced to EN:WP. No fair use here. E4024 (talk) 08:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Klassenzeichen Contender.PNG

duplicate of the svg and is (no longer) in use Petteflet (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nyackseal--white.jpg

No indication that the uploader has any right to release the seal under any sort of free license. Esrever ^(klaT) 22:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: OTRS ticket needed. Ruthven (msg) 21:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Potassium formate3D.png

Bizarre half-bond off the anionic oxygen. "Formate" is symmetric about the two C–O areas, and even if you declare one to be the O–, it would not have any sort of specific "bond" to the K+. This image is obviously photoshopped from other sources that are not cited, and thus fails source/licensing policy. DMacks (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file is based on Commons and is a free file. So,you must not say ... thus fails source/licensing policy. Your observations must be made on facts and not on assumptions. Such files abound in Wikipedia and Commons. Bizarre is only a matter of view. Try to be reasonable in your evaluations. Eyes that see only faults, don't see quality. Hands that do not work, should not destroy. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 14:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A new configuration is created and substituted the old one. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 15:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"File X is based on File X" makes no sense. But it sounds like the image isn't really and completey your "own work" from scratch, merely your edits using someone else's original? Regardless of how someone lets you use something they made, you can't honestly say that instead you made it. See Commons:Essential_information#Source for more information.

There are thousands of bad files on commons, which doesn't give anyone a free pass to keep or upload move of them. It's not polite to readers to mislead them by using images that are so factually flawed, which is why I choose this area to browse. Your repeated failure to follows Commons:Assume good faith policy has been noted. DMacks (talk) 16:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so gentle. Life will teach you being a good man.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 19:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Concerns raised in the nomination have been addressed in the new version,. Ed (Edgar181) 23:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Potassium formate3D.png

Graphical composite of uncited originals (license fail). File:Sodium-formate-3D-balls.png isn't the exact original, but it's a suitable replacement. There is zero indication in the nom'd file that it is potassium rather than sodium. DMacks (talk) 18:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Salt depicted as cation + anion instead of a real crystal structure. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 04:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Juan Paullier.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted sign. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ruthven at 10:09, 20 September 2017: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juan Paullier.jpg --Krdbot 12:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luis Cardenas Touch of Paradise.jpg

No EXIF data, user has extensive history of copyright violations. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GMC AC 454 holzvergaser schema.jpg

Notice in a museum with contemporary graphics, derivative work Vera ^(talk) 01:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not important enough for deleting. .This is a very evil revenge action from 1Veertje, because Yann decided to keep other files from me who she had tried a mass deletion. FFA P-16 (talk) 12:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

what do mean "not important enough"? I'll you mean to say "not complicated enough". How can a graphic both not be complicated and explain the inner workings of smelting oven. You really should familiarize yourself with copyright rules and why we stick to them. See com:casebook Vera ^(talk) 13:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

don't you see how dishonorable it is for you to claim that what is depicted in this photograph is entirely your own work and that anyone can use this as long as they credit you as the author? You took a picture of a graphic somebody else made, you are not the person to give it a free license. Vera ^(talk) 15:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made this photo with my own mobilephone. it is a museeum who is free, so it is correct the photo is my own work. not important enough/not complicated enough it is just a simple graphic, very basic. Too simple for copyright. And btw it is NOT a smelting oven.. again you are nominating things without knowing what it is. You are dishonorable stop stalking/wikihounding me and stop your revenge action.16:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

it's irrelevant if the access to the museum was free or not. You didn't create this graphic, you can't take credit for creating it and you can't license it. See com:dw for our rules on this. Vera ^(talk) 18:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But i create the photo.. there is no credit for such a simple graphic, it not art its just to show how it works. Don't talk about rules you haven't ignored Yann's decision, provcating an editwar. You ignoring that one of pictures taken in a public space.. and so one. I see you are so fanatic.. if it's make you happy then delet File:GMC AC 454 holzvergaser schema.jpg.. and stop your wikihounding against me.19:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)~

You're acting like I nominated all your photographs for deletion. I didn't. I nominated the once that contained derivative work and can thus not be freely used. I do think most of your contributions have been productive but we really can't have such works on Wikimedia Commons. If a work is complex when it shows that it is the work of human intelligence and if it is probable if no two persons can come up with an identical work independently. Somebody created this graphic and by publishing it here under a Creative Commons license you are telling people this is entirely your work and that they need to credit you if they want to use it. It's not your work and not for you to license. Vera ^(talk) 23:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are acting like a maniac, you did not know a shit about rules in the swiss Military about insigneas and Badges. You ignoring thata lot of pictures where taken in a public space..= free for use. The fact that even company logos are considered too simplistic for protection. Very very bad: You started an editwar against Yann. You ignored the decisions of people, De728631,Yann, (These People did not upload the pictures in question). So .... dishonorable?

The photograph Is my own work..and this is clear i don't tell anyone I mad the drawing.. Imade the photo so it is correct declared. This "Drawing" is not complex,and it so no art, it is just to show very very basic how somethings work, EVERYONE can do this, to explain how a Holzvergaser works. But how ever I am sick of you.. go one please delet File:GMC AC 454 holzvergaser schema.jpg finde your peace after the deletion of GMC AC 454 holzvergaser schema and stop wikihounding me.19:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)~

your understanding of what is complex and what isn't is highly flawed. 90% of this picture is the graphic. That makes it a copy rather than a unique photograph. As the introductory graphic at the upload wizard explains, not everything you capture with your camera is your work. Art is complex, but graphics don't need to be art to get copyright protection. We need to keep Wikimedia Commons free from copyright violations so people can trust it as a source of free content. Vera ^(talk) 21:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fox Sports Premium.png

Fox Sports logo is above the threshold of originality. It is also extremely unlikely to be CC-SA 4.0. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Originally the logo used for Fox Sports Premium of Argentina and is the original logo. Thx Gorgonzola233 23:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC-3)

Deleted: per {{Logo}}. Ruthven (msg) 20:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beim Königsberger Dom, März 2009.JPG

einige der abgebildeten Personen sind nicht mit der Veröffentlichung des Bildes einverstanden Mehlauge (talk) 07:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:São Domingos do Cariri regarding official symbols

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:São Domingos do Cariri emancipated in 1994 (see also http://www.saodomingosdocariri.pb.gov.br/site/?p=1672), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}, where File:Bandeira São Domingos do Cariri-PB.jpg may be borderline. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Essigsäure Synthesen 1.png

Orphaned/replaced by File:Essigsäure Synthesen.png on request by uploader. Leyo 07:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete, no problem.~~ Keep. --ZdBdLaLaLa (talk) 17:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info: ZdBdLaLaLa requested in the Grafic Lab of the German Wikipedia to superseed her/his picture Essigsäure Synthesen.png, — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Leyo and ZdBdLaLaLa: but she/he didn't directly request a deletion as far as i know? — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I did not request a deletion. I also follow your recommendation to keep the original (and changed my first vote). --ZdBdLaLaLa (talk) 18:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Please do not delete originals; {{Original}} — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The request is to delete one png in preference to another png, not comparable to that concern where the replacement would be in an alt format. DMacks (talk) 13:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: The PNG was uploaded, because User:Volker-Morath-SVG-Version didn't work[7]. Therefore she/he converted the SVG to PNG. I don't see a difference if you convert SVG to PNG using Inkscape or if you convert SVG to PNG using Wiki-SVG-Parser. I would say in the second case you have (by default) multiple (sharp) resolutions in following 9 resolutions and is preferable if the Wiki-SVG-Parser parses correctly as in this case.

Size of this PNG preview of this SVG file: 512 × 436 pixels. Other resolutions: 282 × 240 pixels | 564 × 480 pixels | 705 × 600 pixels | 902 × 768 pixels | 1,203 × 1,024 pixels.
This image rendered as PNG in other widths: 200px, 500px, 1000px, 2000px.)

Therefore uploading a SVG is IHMO the same as uploading 9 PNGs, therefore if you upload a SVG, which supersedes a PNG, you have to compare the PNG-version of the SVG with the superseded PNG. And in most cases the highest PNG-resolution (which is created by default) of the SVG is better than that of the PNG.

Therfore IHMO a SVG supersedes a PNG is (at least) in the same way a PNG supersedes a PNG, or supersedes even better, due to the fact that it a SVG supersedes the PNG in the same format and (in this case) in a better resolution and onto that the source code of the PNG is available and offers a edit on the PNG-Version as well as on the Vektor-Version.

Coming back to my original statement:

The Point is that this file is the source of File:Essigsäuresynthesen.svg and due to {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} I would keep the original file, because it has a different author.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{neutral}~~— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Generally the file is in my opionion below the Commons:Threshold_of_originality, and the newer version is better, therefore deleting originals makes sence here. I just didn't like the simplified delete request, which sounded to me like the uploader requested the deletion. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 05:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per Johannes. Ruthven (msg) 20:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sandra Grätsch.jpg

The file has two problems. At first, depicted person is only once mentioned in de.wiki as unsuccessful (1,7%) candidate on elections, probably out of project scope. At second, this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, copyright violation is possible. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:St Aloysius College.jpg

Poor quality slide scanned at low res, too much tilt, better version is File:(1)St_Aloysius_College_Kirribilli-1.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1 St Aloysius College.jpg

Poor quality slide scanned at low res, too much tilt, better version is File:(1)St_Aloysius_College_Kirribilli-1.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Icons for railway descriptions/experimental/stations and stops

Duplicates of File:BSicon KZOLLaq.svg and File:BSicon KZOLLeq.svg. Nominated per consensus here. Please delete and redirect (CommonsDelinker cannot delink the files since their uses are all in templates which automatically add File:BSicon .svg).

File:BSicon HGRENZEl.svg should be deleted and redirected to File:BSicon KZOLLeq.svg
File:BSicon HGRENZEr.svg should be deleted and redirected to File:BSicon KZOLLaq.svg

Jc86035 (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom & previous discussion. Useddenim (talk) 10:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- C₂₁H₂₂N₂O₂ /talk/lab/de/en 13:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3X1A1352.JPG

There's freedom of panorama in India for 3-dimensional, but not for 2-dimensional art. The photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Max hist soc dom.jpg

"protected by the law" ? Maybe the author doesn't know about the licences here Daehan (talk) 10:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anna Skrzek.jpg

It doesn't seem that this photo was released under a CC license. http://awf.wroc.pl/pl/news/item/0/4931/2016/Komunikat_Komisji_Wyborczej_Wydzialu_Fizjoterapii/ Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:France 5 Franc 1989.JPG

Joaquin Jimenez is born in 1956. Copyright violation. 83.204.144.39 12:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AUH Flag.png

Duplicate of File:Flag of Abu Dhabi.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adele at Roger's Arena (28378396652).jpg

might be a derivative of the screen as thats all that can be seen and is the focus of the photo Jessy Walters (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adele Live 2017 - inside WEMBLEY Stadium when the singer appearing - LONDON (night 2).jpg

The top looks like a derivative issue. Maybe that could be cropped out? Jessy Walters (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I saw some pictures which shot the screen very clearly such as File:Madonna - Rebel Heart Tour 2015 - Paris 2 (23492601193).jpg or File:Where the Streets Have No Name during Joshua Tree Tour 2017 in Pasadena 5-21-17.jpg are still OK on Commons. The top of this pic, which shows Adele's eyes, is not too clear. Phamthuathienvan (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: de minimis, the stage is central here. Ruthven (msg) 21:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets.jpg

The uploader did not provide too many information about this file, this could be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets.jpg

The uploader did not provide any real source ofr the use of this photo as it may be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Clearly a family photo. Nominated by the same user by the same reason. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 08:49, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets.jpg

Low quality fan picture with a professional wrestler. Wikipedia and the Commons is not a personal photo hosting site. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 09:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Molly Holly with Paul Billets.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 09:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NTVMD.png

This file was initially tagged by Serhio Magpie as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Should be compared with threshold of originality. Maybe the logo is considered simple. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: nope. Ruthven (msg) 09:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beret33.jpg

Originally nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hornet Driver. Split into indivudal DR for independent discussion, if applicable. FastilyClone (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a perfectly good photo, well in scope. The only reason to delete it was a serious concern to assume bad faith from the uploader, based on the notion that the disparity of cameras and scanners reported in the EXIF data of his/her uploads implies copyright violation of third parties. That kind of concern cannot be evaluated in separate, isolated DRs such as this one, and indeed, upon exemplary (if seldom) questioning, the uploader proven to satisfaction personal authorship of most (if not all) uploads. No concievable reason to even file a separate DR for this one. -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn -FastilyClone (talk) 03:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beret33.jpg

this file is not uncomplicated enough to be free from copyright restrictions Vera ^(talk) 11:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Insignia of the Swiss Air Force: belolw ToO. Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:QCM question mark logo.jpg

Old file and used in other project, however IMO the symbol is above ToO and google has previous catch in the web https://www.google.fr/search?source=lnt&tbs=sbi%3AAMhZZit_156hxBANmHTCN9FMqHOGkQ4nJ8ynswCS62iSsfa7grEX3xrSSzdRXTCvLLO94H5giugoyv3_1xloackgnfhDY8xbqKseendrIbPrWiU5ZT0anarRkblXKRGsI3r15a_1Uj9-uvBaHmMwHut6g0W8mpeYaP7nCjgdo6iUi-zzCA6rxQsYXKuvpVVuHkko4JEEJHQiIF0f6YkpqJDXK_1Pj4vmkW1w_19f8sApwwsQ0wJnejIqSEvmR4xcwgZD8Fj7h31oc9D1I7o-jf2my9B41JPOyO10oQ6ZNn5-d1zpgnwamqt8c74-c1Nun7g7_1hMwLH9LZPQHdwp7oDzibCJgJcTsNA6OfdQ%2Ccdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F9%2F2013&tbm= Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Queen logo.png

old file, and used. However when I try to go to the adress of the quoted source "www.wdc-mare.org" I come to https://www.pangaea.de/ where I don't see the logo nor a free licensing Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

logo of a research project, used on lemma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_Environment_of_the_Eurasian_North. the logo was designed by me and cc-by license given. the wdc-mare address as source was removed. the wdc system war reorganized some years ago and thus the name had to be changed to pangaea. A search for queen data in pangaea will bring up all datasets related to this project. Hannes Grobe (talk) 10:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Hannes Grobe, educational usage. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erregte Vulwa.jpg

Out of scope: low quality genitalia. Alexander Hug (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~currently~~ was in use at Clitoris. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- modified --Alexander Hug (talk) 18:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Node.js logo.svg

Not below threshold of originality, not available under a free license at source given. 2001:2003:54FA:2F79:0:0:0:1 07:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Arguably I find the original upload in version history could've been below the threshold of originality, but I can't really say for certain about the newer uploads. This file was overwritten (should maybe be split too). 2001:2003:54FA:2F79:0:0:0:1 07:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Permissions field updated. File is free for non-commercial use. Refael Ackermann 23:10, 28 August 2017 (EDT)
- Right, there's also File:Node.js logo 2015.svg and ongoing deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Node.js logo 2015.svg. I think you may have confused these two deletion requests.
  
  Regardless, the trademark permission is different: This deletion request concerns with copyright and threshold of originality. Old logos should be kept if they are educationally useful and free. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 01:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's below the TOO in the US. It consists of a text-logo and two simple green gradient. They were similar cases in the US like File:Best Western logo.svg for example. We cannot determine the TOO of a work by amount of its elements but rather by the uniqueness of its elements. --Rezonansowy (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Rezonansowy. Ruthven (msg) 11:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Acetylcysteinamide3D.png

Incorrect geometry on the alpha carbon. It's tetrahedral (not trigonal–planar as this image appears). Not a trivial detail or ignorable: this atom is chiral, and the chirality is highly relevant to biochemical contexts. DMacks (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my friend. Again I've checked the structure and it does imply no one modification. The alfa carbon is tetragonal but the structure does not show hydrogen atoms. The file purpose is not to show the chirality of the molecule. The file must be kept or Pubchem is not a serious company, as you are saying, because the file belongs to it. Let's be at least reasonable. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 13:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Claudio Pistilli. Ruthven (msg) 11:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bill Elvis Paul.jpg

This file was initially tagged by FlightTime as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.ebay.com/sch/sis.html?_itemId=281376644156&_nkw=1972+Elvis+Presley+TYPE+1+Original+Photo&_trksid=p2047675.m4099.l9146 ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The real question is whether or not the {{PD-Pre1978}} license is valid. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- This may help clarify: https://copyright.cornell.edu/publicdomain. Published without copyright mark, then the work is in the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities. 13:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Kept: per IP. Ruthven (msg) 11:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marie windsor.jpg

Very obvious and bold lie 94.221.80.128 21:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No real source and author. This and the license needs to be examined. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Флаг Севастополя.jpg

Duplicate of File:Flag of Sevastopol.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Флаг Севастополя is not Duplicate! I did the exact (# b00000) HTML-color of the flag, it was wrong before (# d40000). Help me, do not leave the wrong flag. Please accept my edit. ~~

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2015 Nokia 105 - 01.jpg

Isn't it copyrighted screenshot? Taivo (talk) 07:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Zabelê (Paraíba) regarding official symbols

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Zabelê (Paraíba) emancipated in 1994, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Riachão do Bacamarte regarding official symbols

Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Riachão do Bacamarte emancipated in 1994, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

File:Brasão Riachão do Bacamarte-PB.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 07:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:São José de Espinharas regarding official symbols

Unclear copyright status. Claim that these official symbols (coat of arms / brasão + flag / bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:São José de Espinharas were published or commissioned by a Brazilian government prior to 1983 ({{PD-BrazilGov}}) is not supported. Taken randomly from Internet. No trivial text/shape logos, failing also {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established individually by municipal law (mostly some years after official federal constitution, often citing the original designers), as also further redesigns of the symbols which [often] are completely different to the historic ones (see also this case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols only 81 years after emancipation: in 2014). Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government. In this case (see also the "2008" in the coat) the symbols were established only in 2008, following http://www.patosonline.com/post.php?codigo=3973. The author is "Erivaldo Alves".

Gunnex (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Vieirópolis regarding official symbols

Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Vieirópolis emancipated in 1994 (probadly officially installed only in 1996), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

File:Brasão Vieirópolis-PB.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 08:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Aisha follows the prophet.png

Insults Muslim people. It also doesn't respect the freedom of people to believe in anything they need. I think Wikimedia shouldn't be anyway abused to force any kind of personal or movements' thoughts and should be only used to document knowelege with proper references. 197.195.90.230 08:59, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Your DR, and so a blunt censorship attempt, is the one that doesnt respect the freedom of people to believe in anything they want, as if this maybe insult some muslims, there are some people (incluiding several muslims) that want their freedom of thought, freedom to make parodies of any religion, etc. Basicaly the right of thought and free expession. Also, and more importantly, Commons is not censored and this image is clearly in scope of criticism to Islam and Everybody Draw Mohammed Day. This last one has articles in the wikipdias in Deutsch, Englih, Español, فارسی (Farsi, and the irony, spoken mainly by muslims), Français, Suomi, Svenska and Türkçe language (the same situation as Farsi). Tm (talk) 11:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tm. INeverCry 00:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Aisha follows the prophet.png

hate message based on argument of age that is not authenticated true 168.187.143.194 09:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy kept, flagrant attempt of censorship. The cartoon is part of a notable event and must be kept here, independently of it's truthiness (cartoons are seldom "true", or else they wpuldn't be funny) or intrinsic value (not much, IMHO).-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 10:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Aisha follows the prophet.png

Racist cartoon. Does this have any value in any Article? Do we really need more hatred speech under the cover of freedom of speech? باسم (talk) 08:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like some people do. For me, we would delete everything like this about any religion. --E4024 (talk) 08:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this file was created by a User:Towel42 reddit, whose only two edits are the two versions of the file; either a "single-purpose" user or some other user who -at least- felt ashamed to make hate speech and concealed their identity under this red name. I hate to speak "on users" but this case reminds me of people who add their own pic to Commons and disappear (I mean "unused personal files")... --E4024 (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In use (albeit a talkpage) and in scope of Everybody Draw Mohammed Day. Same arguments as the two previous deletion requests. If some muslim users feel bad about this cartoon there is the option of not looking at them, instead of trying to censor it.

Also what racism? Muslims are from several "races" and ethnicities, not a "race" or ethnicity.

Religious criticism is one of the tennents of free speach and democracy, like Piss Christ and this cartoon by Carlos Latuff about the Israeli occupation of Palestine and anti-semitism, depicting a stereotyped jew. Not hatred speech, like some seen on extreme religious channels be it Muslim, Christian, Jewish or Buddhist, where the "preacher" appeals to the faithfulls to kill, behead, burn, explode with the unfaithfull.

Hate speech is not being able to be a christian in the Middle East because you can be killed for it, the same with muslims and christians in India, being rammed by a car on a mosque on france just for being a muslim, be stabbed for being a christian woman in Finland, etc. That is what is hate speech, to appeal to the physical destruction of others, not a cristicism about the possible age of Aisha when she married Muhammad. Tm (talk) 14:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it made fun of darker complexioned people (as such) it'd be racist, and even then it might have a purpose in WC. Though this makes fun of a religion for which where may be a lot of blacks and browns observing it, the same is true with Christianity and Hinduism. Further, while I'm no Trump fan, this objection has been raised during recent Confederate protests. At least keep until things cool down.2607:FEA8:239F:F18F:1C07:E3AD:AA44:3325 19:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, Muhammad is looking pretty white in this cartoon.2607:FEA8:239F:F18F:1C07:E3AD:AA44:3325 19:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It doesn't serve any purpose if the purpose is not racism/Islamofobia. If it doen't serve anything other than segregation, it's well OoS. "Not censured" doesn't mean censuring people's sensibilities. Censure those who try to disseminate hatred, this has nothing against being a free place. --E4024 (talk) 12:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My sensibilities are hurted and offended by the attempts of censorship like this. If someone is offended so be it. Do you know the difference between hate speech and freedom of expression? This image is an expression of free speech. Hate speech is Muslims calling to the death of "unfaithfuls", the decapitation and stoning of people, the butchering of yazidis and rohingyas only for their religion. Trying to censor this image, claiming that it hurts people's sensibilities (i.e. redical and conservative muslims), is by itself an hate speech, as this is someone claiming to be the sole representative of one religion trying to censor other peoples free speech. Do you get offended by this stereotyped depiction of a jew? Also this cartoon is not racist as there is black, white, latins, nordic, indian, rtc muslims. Or are you saying that only arabs or turks are muslims? Tm (talk) 13:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will say one thing to you and will not respond again: If I were in your shoes and succeeded to improve my knowledge and understanding about the absurdities I wrote above one day, I would be very ashamed of having written them. I hope you manage to do that. --E4024 (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of project scope. Libertybison (talk) 03:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: (A) This image appears all over the web without a free license. (B) It is not at all clear that the base image (people and camel) is the work of the uploader. (C) We do not keep personal art, offensive or not, from non-notable artists -- we would not keep this even if the subject matter were completely neutral. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]