User talk:Heiner Martin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Heiner Martin!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts

[edit]

Hallo Heiner Martin, vielleicht hast du's schon bemerkt, mein Hauptaccount ist der auf Wikimedia Commons, weil ich mich im Frühling vor allem deswegen angemeldet habe um meine unzähligen Bilder hochzuladen und den auf Wikipedia nur nutze um die Denkmäler-Listen mit weitere Bilder zu bestücken sowie nur alle 3(/4) Wochen von ausgewählten Bauwerken/Örtchen/Künstler eigene Artikel anzufertigen.--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 15:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gut, ich weiß Bescheid. VG --Heiner Martin (talk) 16:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder

[edit]

Jetzt sind alle Bilder von Kirchweidach, Feichten und Oberbuch hochgeladen. Gruß Ricarda --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Theater Putbus Innenraum.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Theater Putbus Innenraum.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jauernische Straße

[edit]

Hallo Heiner, den Straßennamen habe ich leider falsch abgelesen in die Dateibezeichnungen eingefügt, richtig heisst sie Jauernicker Straße. Sorry, dass du dir eine Mühe zu viel gemacht hast. Grüße Ricarda --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis - gibt es noch mehr derartige Fälle? Gruß--Heiner Martin (talk) 10:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nein das ist der einzige.--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Und es heißt wirklich Villa Epharim und nicht Ephraim? --Heiner Martin (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Achso das von mir war auf falsche Straßennamen gemünzt, ja die Villa müsste Ephraim lauten, das hier war ein Tippfehler. --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dorfkirche Röpersdorf

[edit]

Ich hatte den Eindruck, dass Du gerne Artikel zu kleinen Dorfkirchen schreibst (und war´da nicht irgendwo eine To-Do-Liste?). Die Dorfkirche Röpersdorf würde sich sicher auch noch über einen expliziten Eintrag freuen, vielleicht kommst Du ja mal dazu. Habe gerade einige (Orgel-)Fotos hochgeladen, ein Eintrag beim organindex kommt auch noch (ebenso Fotos zu Sternhagen). edit: sorry, jetzt hatte ich irrtümlicherweise auf Wikimedia geschrieben, sollte nat. zu Wikipedia... Grüße, --Subbass1 (talk) 18:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Subbass1, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Du hast recht, es gibt eine ToDo-Liste, ich denke, die Dorfkirche Röpersdorf kommt auch noch drauf. Momentan gibt es gerade eine gewisse Flaute, aber demnächst werde ich wohl wieder Fahrt aufnehmen. Gruß--Heiner Martin (talk) 18:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Heiner, danke, sehr schön! Zu Sternhagen kommt auch noch ein Eintrag beim organindex, könnte aber noch etwas dauern. Wenn auch natürlich keine neue Fakten zu erwarten sind, so kann man doch einige Infos bündeln (zB Kurzfilm, DVD, 2 CDs und vielleicht gibt es noch weiteres in der Festschrift) und diese schöne, verlassene Gegend irgendwie zu dokumentieren lohnt immer. (Ein bisschen weh tut mir ja, die Pläne auf wagnerorgel-sternhagen.de zu lesen und dann zu sehen, was (zurzeit) draus geworden ist.) Ich würde übrigens anregen, öfter den Begriff "Rekonstruktion" zum geläufigen "Restaurierung" zu verwenden. Auch in Sternhagen war ersteres deutlich gefordert... Grüße, --Subbass1 (talk) 08:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obacht!

[edit]

[1], [2], [3]. ;-) Gruß - Bwag (talk) 09:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis und bitte um Entschuldigung, falls ich hier Unfug angestellt habe, es war nicht beabsichtigt. Heiner Martin (talk) 10:34, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, passt schon! Wollte nur leicht darauf hinweisen, habe aber Verständnis, denn das Ganze ist ja hier nicht so einfach für einen, der nur ab und zu „mitwerkelt“. Gruß Bwag (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Pfarrhaus Reinshagen.JPG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pfarrhaus Reinshagen.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gemeine Rosskastanie Am Güterbahnhof Rostock.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gemeine Rosskastanie Am Güterbahnhof Rostock.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]