Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily closed as copyvio- also elsewhere on net. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted YT video [1], Google search result (searching "Ампроп"), no evidence of authorship or permission GermanJoe (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -
Lack of realistic educational value 176.239.9.47 15:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
It's not an educational image. It seems not to be uploader's own work given the caption in the image. 203.128.216.214 15:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contributions on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
Lack of realistic educational value/File uploaded for the purpose of vandalism(See this user's contribution on kowiki) Bluemersen (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Obvious copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. -
This photograph was taken from Pinterest 176.239.99.229 12:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "own work" statement suspect when it's on Getty - see http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/event/nicki-minaj-fragrance-may-2014-574701865. --Tabercil (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well, it is a PNG-Version of the
File, done with IrfanView. It looks like, if the Source of this JPG is: http://www.mapn.ro/fotodb/060406_insemneh/3_S_M_G. *SGR* (talk) 18:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, that will do. Jcb (talk) 20:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_insignia_(US_Navy).png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_screenshot.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(14).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_ballistice_missile_Pukguksong-2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep A Google image search gave immediate credibility. Fewer key presses and less effort than this DR took to create. --Fæ (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- ... none of these "sources" leading to a US federal government organization of course. Jcb (talk) 20:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Source was added. Cobatfor (talk) 09:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, this one is fine then. Jcb (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_insignia_(US_Navy).png){kind=link}
_insignia_(US_Navy).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
_insignia_(US_Navy).png){kind=link}
- Source added. Insignia was originally approved by the United States Navy Chief of Naval Operations on 28 October 1946. Cobatfor (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, this one is fine then. Jcb (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
_insignia_(US_Navy).png){kind=link}
out of scope Uziel302 (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 14:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrectly named, replaced by Category:Coasts of Taoyuan.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio (talk | contribs). — Jeff G. ツ 17:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Lacks a license for home country. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: License added. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Anonymous does not mean "I failed to properly research the author." We'll need something more specific. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)- Comment: Published in the US in 1915, photographer not identified [2]. January (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn per January. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations Cynko (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://www.lechpoznan.pl/ Cynko (talk) 15:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://www.termalica.brukbet.com/nowa/ Cynko (talk) 15:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://pogonszczecin.pl/ Cynko (talk) 15:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://www.arka.gdynia.pl/ Cynko (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Cynko: please use {{copyvio}} template next time. Yarl 💭 19:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations Cynko (talk) 15:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations Cynko (talk) 15:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://www.krupamarcin.pl/resources/Marcin_Krupa_04.jpg Cynko (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://www.portalsamorzadowy.pl/ocen-radnych/osoba/andrzej-dziuba,93.html Cynko (talk) 15:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations http://tspodbeskidzie.pl/ Cynko (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭 19:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Need source for background map Ronhjones (Talk) 23:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 16:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Source is clearly Google Maps. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://img3.kuwo.cn/star/userhead/79/43/1502426570618_329072479.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since). I found this online at http://travelranger87508.blogspot.com/2011/10/ and there is no evidence of permission. Guanaco (talk) 01:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
private information, no relation to the subject(his family), misupload 최광모 (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
A photo of the uploader, not "own work", needs to credit the photographer and obtain permission to distribute the image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Fictitious flag of a non-existent country, see deleted article en:Hybera/sandbox Mike Rosoft (talk) 01:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saisumanth532 (talk · contribs)
[edit]DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions
- File:View of dindi river.jpg
- File:Aerial view of cochin.jpg
- File:Nilakal.jpg
- File:View of dal lake 02.jpg
- File:View of dal lake 01.jpg
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 01:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Fictitious flag of a non-existent country, unused Mike Rosoft (talk) 01:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Fictitious flag of a non-existent country, unused Mike Rosoft (talk) 01:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah.
- File:Kabah is main location of muslims 2014-07-10 17-42.jpeg
- File:Makka.jpeg
- File:Makkah Clock.jpg
- File:MeccaTower01.JPG
- File:MeccaTower02.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No FoP in Saudi Arabia and de minimis does not apply to these particular photographs, where the building is the most prominent if not the only subject.
- File:Clock Tower Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:Mohamad shrine 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Mohamad shrine 3 - panoramio.jpg
- File:برج الساعه بالسعودية.jpg
- File:Ajyad, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Al Abraj al Bait ZamZam Tawer hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Al Hajlah, Mecca Saudi Arabia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Al Haram, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Al Haram, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Clock Tawer Hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Kaba - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Makkah towers - panoramio.jpg
- File:Oh nice image - panoramio.jpg
- File:Saudi arabia makkah - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Saudi arabia makkah - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:V.amazing image - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HyperGaruda (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No FoP in Saudi Arabia, while this building was only completed in 2011, i.e. too new for PD.
- File:Kaaba and tower behind.jpg
- File:Kakbah dan Menara Mekkah.jpg
- File:Makkah clock tower with Abraj Al Bait Towers.jpg
- File:Makkah clock tower.jpg
HyperGaruda (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the previous DRs above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia, the copyright belongs to Dar Al-Handasah.
- File:Abraj Al-Bait.jpg
- File:Ajyad, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Makkah clock tower.jpg
- File:ساعة البرج من مكة.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the previous DRs above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Not PD-Textlogo. Copyrgiht violation property of CD Bilbao Basket Berri Brgesto (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
No source given for this file. Invalid licence. The user also claims this as his "own work", which is not. Sabbatino (talk) 10:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: this version is below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 20:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work. Jcb (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 16:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Igor Mitoraj
[edit]Copyrighted photos since artist died in 2014. No Freedom of Panorama in Italy.
- File:Boboli gardens in Florence 02.jpg
- File:Firenze visage geant romano.jpg
- File:Florence (3365226617).jpg
- File:Florence (3366040968).jpg
- File:Florence. (29369963).jpg
- File:Florenz Skulptur Boboli-Garten.JPG
- File:ITA2012-143.JPG
- File:ITA2012-145.JPG
- File:Boboli IMG 4745.JPG
- File:La nascita di Venere. Igor Mitoraj.jpg
- File:Mitoraj,Firenze Cassa di Risparmio.jpg
- File:Palazzo Branciforte. Palermo7.jpg
- File:Tivoli Mitoraj a piazza Trento e Trieste 1100715.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Contradiction: Against deletion.
[edit]It seems to me that all these sculptures are exposed in public areas, visible for free. I'm absolutely sure that this conceren mine (all beginning with ITA2012-xxx). All of them seem to me to be of high quality representing high quality of art. In Germany many other sculpteres of Mitoraj exposed in public areas are visible and not deleted in WIKIMEDIA. May be that Italy has strange Copyright laws ununderstandable to normal users. So: Why delete them? NoX (talk)
- Germany's laws are different than Italy's laws, and these photos were taken in Italy. If sculptures were in Germany, the photographs would be fine. - Themightyquill (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Please read Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italy. Italy is very protective of images of its sculptures as cultural heritage assets. — Jeff G. ツ 16:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Like Jeff G: Delete --Hermetiker (talk) 22:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Igor Mitoraj Themightyquill (talk) 23:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Please read Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italy. Italy is very protective of images of its sculptures as cultural heritage assets. — Jeff G. ツ 16:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Igor Mitoraj in Pompeii
[edit]Copyrighted photos since artist died in 2014. No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Igor Mitoraj
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 01.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 02.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 03.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 04.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 05.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 06.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 07.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 08.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 09.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 10.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 11.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 12.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 13.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 14.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 15.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 16.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 17.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 18.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj exposition in Pompeii 19.jpg
- File:Igor Mitoraj sculpture Pompeii.jpg
Themightyquill (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Please read Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italy. Italy is very protective of images of its sculptures as cultural heritage assets. — Jeff G. ツ 16:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- I can't say more, I didn't think about freedom of panorama.--Codas (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Igor Mitoraj
Themightyquill (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Please read Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italy. Italy is very protective of images of its sculptures as cultural heritage assets. — Jeff G. ツ 16:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
deleted before Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bomjon.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 17:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Sealle. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted three dimensional art, no applicable freedom of panorama in U.S Ronhjones (Talk) 23:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Eligible for Fair Use on enwp. — Jeff G. ツ 17:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Petición del creador Mikelelgediento (talk) 00:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep in use by four Wikipedia articles. — Jeff G. ツ 05:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My mistake Leonprimer (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Non-free map from museum in Japan. Batholith (talk) 01:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 01:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 01:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 01:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 01:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 01:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no source (No source since). It has a source, but the image is not presently displaying at the source. It likely was present in 2013. However I can find no evidence of permission. Guanaco (talk) 01:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Comment: This is the problem. It was either no source or no permission. I tagged it as no source as I cannot read Cyrillic...and to assume good faith. But anyway there are supposedly other images of this person with OTRS permission tickets. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)- Delete No evidence of permission.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 1989. [3] Y.haruo (talk) 01:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio, lack of source info. ed g2s • talk 01:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Copyvio of http://wallpaperpulse.com/wallpaper/366592 . — Jeff G. ツ 05:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Lack of source info, user has one other upload which looks like a copyvio ed g2s • talk 01:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Google Images says it's a copyvio of http://www.zhangyoubao.com/dota2/bbs/3070103293735185407 . — Jeff G. ツ 05:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
quiero volver a subirlo Antonio de Pumarín (talk) 02:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saman hakimi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saman hakimi (talk · contribs)
[edit]- Dubious own work claims.
- Black and white photos with {{PD-Iran}} claim, but no date. No verification possible.
- File:Farhad blackcats.png
- File:Jashne.emza.png
- File:Farhad.90.jpg
- File:Farhad.32.jpg
- File:Farhad.31.jpg
- File:Farhad.22.jpg
- File:Farhad 30.jpg
- File:Farhad 29.jpg
- File:Farhad 28.jpg
- File:Farhad.25.jpg
- File:Farhad-Introduction.ogg
- File:Farhad.24.jpg
- File:Farhad.23.jpg
- File:Farhad.20.jpg
- File:Farhad.19.JPG
- File:Farhad.18.jpg
- File:Farhad.17.jpg
- File:Farhad.16.jpg
- File:Farhad.14.jpg
- File:Farhad.13.jpg
- File:Farhad.12.jpg
- File:Farhad.11.jpg
- File:Farhad's signature.png
- File:Farhad.9.jpg
- File:Farhad.8.jpg
- File:Farhad.7.jpg
- File:Farhad.6.jpg
- File:Farhad.5.jpg
- File:Farhad.4.JPG
- File:Farhad.3.jpg
- File:Farhad.2.jpg
- File:Farhad.1.jpg
- File:Music-my-only-drug.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
The threshold of originality is low in the Netherlands. Non-free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:Kindernet 1988 logo.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 00:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 05:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Redundant image to File:La Fémis logo.svg Malayy (talk) 04:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uiopjsjdjxbcbcjsi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images.
--ghouston (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 06:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Dancer selfie 176.239.91.144 05:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unused personal photo. — Jeff G. ツ 06:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
extremeley blurry: no honest educational use possible David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
extremeley blurry: no honest educational use possible David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. It should be kept until more clear version were uploaded, because it is a carefully prepared zoomed version of an only en:Zendrum photograph on Wikimedia Commons. --Clusternote (talk) 01:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 09:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
watermarked, hence no COM:EDUSE possible David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. I'll remove the watermark soon. It is very easy. Materialscientist (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist: You should upload as recently as you've done it. https://watermark-cvpr17.github.io/ looks nice ...--David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: watermark removed in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
logo, no permissions BDaniel (talk) 06:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Latest photo in the internet 176.239.95.19 07:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
non free image for living person --Alaa :)..! 07:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
non free image for living person (see here) --Alaa :)..! 07:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Non trival logo design ( right) by third party, Equivalent at English Wikipeda w:File:2017 MYWHC.png is Non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 23:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Non trival logo , by third party, Equivalanet at English Wikipedia non-free w:File:Brussels Airlines logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 23:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Jcb (talk) 09:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Brussels Airlines.svg, usages of this file in wiki-projects will have to be migrated before deletion Nw520 (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Replace and then Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work in the non-trivial design for album cover-art , equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Now 51.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 00:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Clearly not own work in non-trivial design for album cover art , equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 00:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of an explicit permission on the listed source, ( but I will note it seems to be a press/PR kit page) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:Official Logo of Sygic.png Ronhjones (Talk) 00:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work, Non-trivial Album cover-art, equivalent at English Wikipedia non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 00:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_screenshot.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_screenshot.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work, image is clearly watermarked vevo, equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
_screenshot.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 00:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
_screenshot.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work, Cat outline with shadow effect is above UK threshold of originality w:File:Whiskas logo.png, also this would seem to be a trademarked logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 00:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ron. — Jeff G. ツ 06:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Request from original author and uploader, the image is very bad. Editor-1 (talk) 08:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 09:58, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
It's probably an Copyvio, see Exif-Data: Copyright Markus Grenz Sänger (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate. Replaced by larger size photo. AndyScott (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
The image has a copyright-tag in the upper left-hand corner, claiming copyright for the uploader, and thus isn't under a free license. Thomas.W talk 09:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: uploader specified a valid license on upload. The watermark could be removed. --Jcb (talk) 10:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope and possible copyright violation. Storkk (talk) 09:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 06:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 06:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal photograph 176.239.99.229 10:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 06:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 10:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- I see it is useful to show sea view from the hotel ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Such a low quality it is unlikeky to be useful. — Racconish ☎ 10:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Quality is high and the length is sitable for the target view ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- We barely see the sea... — Racconish ☎ 11:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Quality is high and the length is sitable for the target view ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
The video:
- describes the shape of hotel rooms
- says the hotel overlooking the sea
Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:WEBHOST. — Jeff G. ツ 06:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment At least it can be kept as a personal video of a user who loves Wikipedia and traveled to a distant city to take pictures for Wikipedia (Can be added to Category:Wikipediholism) ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rohini as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This is my photo. There was no provision to indicate that one did not want to be photographed or videographed at this conference. Hence, almost all photos were shot without permission or consent. I would like this photo to be removed.. Probably permission from subject is not needed, but maybe the photo is still out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- It is a practice at every Wikimedia conference, including Wikimania, that people who do not want to be photographed and videographed wear a differently coloured lanyard or a similar marker. There was no such provision at this event. In that case, wouldn't it make sense to take permission? -- Rohini (talk) 10:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, anyway there's no reason for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete User has asked for deletion due to photograph being taken without permission. As far as media concerning individuals is concerned, I think it should be deleted if the person has not consented to their photograph being taken. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete A photo taken without permission (is Lohini in this photo) is a violation of privacy and for that needs a speedy deletion, especially when the photo is out of scope too (is a lunch, not even a talk). --Camelia (talk) 08:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, when dealing with photographs of people, we are required to consider the legal rights and the ethics. The person has rights that legally restrict certain re-uses.In the photo Rohini is not wearing a red ribbon which means that she did not give her consent. She is not in a session or giving a public speach. Editors cannot violate anyone's right of publicity and privacy and we must delete any violative content. Where the photograph shows an identifiable person, the subject's consent is always required as described at Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. The burden of proof lies on the uploader to demonstrate that the file is in the public domain and that the required consent of the identifiable person has been obtained. In this case the photo is not in the public domain and the identifiable person did not give her consent. Nothing in Wikimedia can violate any person's personality rights or right of publicity, nor laws governing privacy or the right of publicity. It is not only that her face is shown, the photo, also includes in the title her name and surname to identify her. The right of publicity applies to any person, including Rohini. A person's full name is a likeness and using her name without her consent it is a violation of our policies and guidelines. --Jalu (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Here's some misunderstanding. Usually subject's consent is not needed. There are some exceptions, but I repeat: usually consent is not needed. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: consent not needed - out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Springbok as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: false author and license, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Russian photos from 1940-s are generally protected with copyright.
Российские фотографии от 1940-х обыкновенно защищены авторскими правами. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
no common use Uziel302 (talk) 10:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no permission (No permission since) Converting to DR since it's possible footage and stills from unattended cameras are not eligible for copyright. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:ThePavilionAtOleMissConstruction.PNG, and the w:Monkey selfie case is unresolved as far as I'm aware. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting case, but the camera was set up, owned, and operated by a person. Just because someone steps away from a video camera for a second does not mean they lose the copyright status over it. No other being operated it in between. Elisfkc (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can't find any relevant case outside of the Ole Miss Pavilion DR that I linked above. I only reference the monkey selfie because the equipments owner appears not to automatically be the copyright owner. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - years ago we accepted CCTV footage as being PD. At some point we abandoned that point of view. I can't find the involved discussion, it's a long time ago. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no permission (No permission since)
Open to debate whether unattended camera footage is eligible for copyright. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:CSU Stadium construction cam2.jpg Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - years ago we accepted CCTV footage as being PD. At some point we abandoned that point of view. I can't find the involved discussion, it's a long time ago. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francescosaverio50 (talk · contribs)
[edit]First published in the USA and likely to be still copyrighted there. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Loy-myrna whipsaw 1936.jpg; Commons:Deletion requests/File:Young-loretta ramona 1936.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jolson-al 1934.jpg.
- File:Marian-marsh 1935.jpg
- File:Murder-Fleet1935 parker+Byron.jpg
- File:MurderFleet1935 Taylor+Parker.jpg
- File:Murder Flett1935 picture.jpg
- File:Ginger-rogers1935 fashion.jpg
- File:Knight-june 1935.jpg
- File:Irenehervey 1935.jpg
- File:Eleanor-powell-in-water 1935.jpg
- File:Eleanor-powell 1934.jpg
- File:Davisbette tennis1936.jpg
- File:Colbert sotto2bandiere936.jpg
- File:Carlisle1935 sport.jpg
- File:Crawford-joan 1935.jpg
- File:Bruce-virginia 1935.jpg
- File:Brigitte-horney 1935.jpg
- File:Way down east 1935 hudson+ fonda.jpg
- File:Our little girl ames+temple+mccrea 1935.jpg
- File:Rochelle hudson 1935 + ball.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 11:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Non c'è alcuna prova che le immagini - tutte degli anni 1934 - 36 (82 anni fa !!!) - siano ancora coperte da copyright Esse sono caricate con il tag di copyright not renewed. Tu puoi dimostrare il contrario ?? No, infatti scrivi likely = forse, may be. Non capisco questo accanimento a contestare il lavoro altrui. Non è la prima volta. Non cancellare per non impoverire Commons.--Francescosaverio50 (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- For example File:Crawford-joan 1935.jpg is a crop of a still of Joan Crawford in No more ladies [4], wearing a bathing suit designed by Adrian. How exactly did you check MGM's copyright had not been renewed in the USA ? — Racconish ☎ 18:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
![[4]](http://imgs.inkfrog.com/pix/rohmere2/photosai90068.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francescosaverio50 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unsustained claim of anonymity, based on the sole fact a cropped uncredited version was published by an Italian magazine. Publicity stills of Brigitte Helm, such as this one or this one were notoriously photographed by Emil Otto Hoppé who died in 1972.
— Racconish ☎ 12:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francescosaverio50 (talk · contribs)
[edit]La Kermesse héroïque is a French film, not PD in France since not 70 years pma after the death of the director, Jacques Feyder.
- File:Kermesse duca+cornelia.jpg
- File:Kermesse arrivo-spagnoli.jpg
- File:Kermesse rosay+donne.jpg
- File:Kermesse portale Boom.jpg
- File:Kermesse municipio.jpg
- File:Kermesse canale+chiesa.jpg
- File:Kermesse banchetto.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 16:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wientmulder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Isometrie Kortenaerplein.pdf
- File:Kortenaerplein formeel-informeel.pdf
- File:Kortenaerplein boog.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vedovato Fortuna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.globalnoticias.pt/storage/JN/2015/big/ng4862564.JPG.
- File:Diego Vedovato Fortuna.jpg
- File:Livro - Um Lugar para Morar - O Mistério de Jean-Paul Anzavour.jpg
- File:Autor Diego Vedovato Fortuna.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tayis Toparlak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Владимир Нимчевић (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, books, documents, paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:1747 Subotica Kaysser A4.jpg
- File:1697 Suboticka tvrdjava 3-3-2-0 A3.jpg
- File:Razglednica iz 1907.tif
- File:Vojnic Tunic Ivan kao sokol.tif
- File:Vojnic Tunic Ivan maturant 1904.tif
- File:Ivan Vojnic Tunić.jpg
- File:Slikovnica.tif
- File:F-179-I-8-1741.jpg
- File:Questionnaire for Gaspar Ulmer.jpg
- File:Gaspar Ulmer 228 177.jpg
- File:Ulmer Gaspar.jpg
- File:Glasnik 33-34.pdf
- File:Glasnik 31-32.pdf
- File:Gospodar Vučić.jpg
- File:Vojvoda Knićanin.png
- File:Prince Mihailo Obrenović of Serbia.png
- File:Prince Mihailo of Serbia in the Serbian national costume.png
- File:Miloš Obrenović with a fez.jpg
- File:Srpska freska.jpg
- File:Aztecs and Spanish conquistadors.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
You ask for informations that cannot be provided. Who would possibly know anything about those 18th-century maps, 19th-century postcard, or pre-1940s photos... I've uploaded? The files are from Historical Archives and Municipal Museum of Subotica. What else you need to know? Besides, Wikimedia of Serbia has a permission to publish all of those files placed in Category:Wikipedian in Residence Historical Archives of Subotica. You don't need to make this any harder.--Владимир Нимчевић (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Given the copyright symbol and the description presumably this is copyrighted... - probably {{PD-textlogo}}, but is it in scope? Jcb (talk) 10:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: pd-textlogo would be ok - but unused commercial logo -> out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete this please, the poster is an artwork and must have a copright holder. 176.239.99.229 11:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
The poster contains a painting by Francisco de Zurbaran, the Agnus Dei. Pictures of art this old are free to use. I designed this poster, so I can use is were I want.--Lucebert (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC) If the community decides it should be removed, I won't protest however. --Lucebert (talk) 12:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Francisco de Zurbarán died 1664, so the artwork is PD. Beside the artwork some simple text, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
If I don't assume that User:Be.valya is the AEGEE there is no permission for this logo. Jungle fan (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused company logo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fictitious logo, does not belong to a club or other notable team. - Fma12 (talk) 13:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, +copyvio (not a simple textlogo). --Wdwd (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
The image depicts no notable feature. Milad2017 (talk) 14:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The file cannot be deleted due to this reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
There is an issue of privacy and copyright regarding the holder of the ID card. This is not a sample ID card. Milad2017 (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Here is no issue of privacy, because all private information is removed. The file is used in multiple projects, so it's in scope too. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --Wdwd (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Due to the privacy issues. This is a real person's ID not a sample. Milad2017 (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. Why did you upload it if there was a privacy issue? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I really don't see the privacy issue in this version as all personal data has been removed/pixelated. There was an earlier version with some parts not pixelated, I deleted that one now. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Holiday pictures at the Prophet's Mosque
[edit]Too much COM:SELFIE to be of educational use. There are enough more useful photos in Category:Al-Masjid al-Nabawi.
- File:محمد - panoramio - محمدشيخون (8).jpg
- File:محمد - panoramio - محمدشيخون (7).jpg
- File:محمد - panoramio - محمدشيخون (3).jpg
- File:محمد - panoramio - محمدشيخون (1).jpg
- File:محمد - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HyperGaruda (talk) 13:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical maps and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
The image is low-quality and retouched. Milad2017 (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Normal quality. Taivo (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality. Milad2017 (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The file cannot be deleted due to this reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This image is duplicate of Prov DS Location.png Milad2017 (talk) 14:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The file cannot be deleted due to this reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
This image is heavily retouched and low quality. Milad2017 (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The file cannot be deleted due to this reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
- File:Могила полковника Івана Богуна 02111.jpg
- File:Иван Богун памятник.pdf
- File:2015-07-04 Памятник Б.Хмельницкому в Н-Северском.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thebattlebeast (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GERENCIA360 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vlad Kozlov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Sayonaraboycover.png
- File:Sayonaraboycover.jpg
- File:Sayonaraboy2.jpg
- File:Sayonaraboy1.png
- File:Sayonaraboy.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Peterantalmanagement
[edit]- File:Dj Peter Antal.jpg
- File:Dj Peter Antal L.A.jpg
- File:Peter Antal front.jpg
- File:Peter Antal Brand.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal between us.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal brand.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal facebook.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal producer.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal superhero loredo 2.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal superhero loredo.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal waste compaction.jpg
- File:Dj peter antal profile.png
- File:Dj peter antal walk profile 2.png
- File:Dj peter antal walk wall.png
Personal photos and artwork uploaded for self-promotional purposes. No educational value. The files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in the US, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States.
Wcam (talk) 12:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think COM:GRAFFITI and Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Non-free graffiti may be of interest. Summary: " it would appear that artwork created on a medium without the owner's consent cannot qualify for copyright". // Liftarn (talk) 13:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - as argued above :) Lx 121 (talk) 07:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: See User:Josve05a/GRAFFITI. The non free grafity template doesn't overwrite com:PCP. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-used redirection with mistake. Красный wanna talk? 12:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-used redirection with mistake. Красный wanna talk? 12:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-used redirection with mistake. Красный wanna talk? 12:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-used redirection with mistake. Красный wanna talk? 12:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- As this is being used at English Wikisource, then it automatically falls within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the speech is from a significant event kindly uploaded to Commons its was in use in the incubator, where you cant upload material, which put it in scope even before the speech was added to Wikisource. Gnangarra 12:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File is in use. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. It's certainly not out of project scope, but the quality issues with this diagram have been fixed in File:Claisen Catalyst.png by the same uploader. Ed (Edgar181) 16:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Edgar. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The background mural is not simple graffiti, but has to be considered an artwork. I think it best that FOP-related deletions have a DR so they can get tagged as such and potentially undeleted if/when the situation changes (cf Belgium last year)... but like Fae says, in the UK, 2D graphic works (murals) are not likely covered by UK Freedom of Panorama laws at this time. Storkk (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDKVCSJXoAAiwC3.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Habertix (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elvin ameth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mh-MuejR-b0/Ulls7v9IlgI/AAAAAAAAAAY/NgJQKh1DZjY/s1600/PLAZA-19-DE-OCTUBRE-4.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: Photographer Imeda Tetradze, Copyright holder: Imeda Tetradze." This doesn't appear to be the uploader, and there is no evidence of permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Is this an own work? How do you understand? 176.239.9.47 15:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is a derivative work of the cover of Hopeajärven aarre (original title: Der Schatz im Silbersee), a novel by Karl May (Wikidata:Q22714), published in Finnish by WSOY (Wikidata:Q3564797). The most likely the cover is still under copyright. ––Apalsola t • c 21:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Has the watermark of this nightclub, which was apparently advertising this performer. The uploader needs to provide evidence that this ad is free to license and distribute. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The metadata states the name of the author and copyright holder. The uploader should provide evidence via Commons:OTRS that he is the copyright holder and can license the photo for distribution. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (if nothing changes) - Without permission (via OTRS) this should be deleted soon. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Montage of images - need source and author and permsiion for each one, seems to be mutiple authors according to file page - will need OTRS to sort out permission. Ronhjones (Talk) 15:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The uploader states the photo is "authorized for use", but all I see at the link provided is "Rodrigo Teaser © 2015 - Platform." That means copyrighted. Maybe I'm missing the authorization. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Not representative of no specific idea, hence no usage. Milad2017 (talk) 05:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I also speedied it as G7. — Jeff G. ツ 06:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. The file cannot be deleted due to this reason, because it is used in fa.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not any more. — Jeff G. ツ 15:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- You removed it, and that action can be considered a violation of WP:POV (rermoving contents from Wikipedia to keep a point, in this case, one of the valid reasons for deletion). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't believe it added to that article. I can't tell whether the hills in the foreground or background are the foothills in the title, and some 75% of the photo is sky. I also have an aversion to portraits of any landscape. — Jeff G. ツ 00:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- You removed it, and that action can be considered a violation of WP:POV (rermoving contents from Wikipedia to keep a point, in this case, one of the valid reasons for deletion). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not any more. — Jeff G. ツ 15:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - it's not the task of Commons people to tell fa wiki which pictures they should use. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The image represents nothing of importance, is low quality and retouched. Milad2017 (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I don't believe it added to that article. I can't tell whether the hills in the foreground or background are the foothills in the title, and some 75% of the photo is sky. I also have an aversion to portraits of any landscape. In addition, the uploader dodged my question as to the source of the image. — Jeff G. ツ 17:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Normal quality. Sky can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Taivo: I get lambasted for cropping. :( — Jeff G. ツ 03:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Per Jcb. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrectly named, replaced by Category:Coasts of Taitung.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
LAPD is not USGov, and the date has also been questioned. — Jeff G. ツ 17:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Appears to be a copyvio of deleted es:Sol García Basulto. — Jeff G. ツ 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrectly named, replaced by Category:Coasts of Hualien.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep and cat redirect. — Jeff G. ツ 12:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Can you talk about why you agree to delete Category:Coasts in Taoyuan? See here.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no proof of permission for CC BY 3.0 license. Very low threshold of originality in Australia, thus unlikely to be {{PD-textlogo}}. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 17:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No information of where the image was first published and who really created it. — Jeff G. ツ 12:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Disputed own work. — Jeff G. ツ 12:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Civiljean140 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
advertisements, hence, out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullaha Khan Lahori (talk · contribs)
[edit]all are possible copyvios. the newbie uploaded few copyvios. these photos are low in size, no meta data.
- File:Andleeb Abbas with Senator Christopher Bateman and Senator Raymond Lesniak.jpg
- File:Andleeb Abbas facilitating leadership workshop.jpg
- File:Andleeb Abbas.png
Saqib (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
It doesn't appear this was ever free. Just taken from the internet and given a free license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Definitely u can find fron the Internet becuz this pic was upload 11 years ago (2006). Delete this is not respect to the author although it seem like copy from Internet.*angys* (talk)
- @*angys*: I mean it was a copyright violation even when it was first uploaded. The uploader has a history of copyright violations and nothing on the creator's website says it's free, as far as I can tell: https://web.archive.org/web/20060614075015/http://labis.idesa.net.my/. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Is it real? I just saw English Wikipedia can retain this picture without copyright. Maybe you can go to delete the English Wiki one.*angys* (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This appears to be a photo of a printout from an inkjet printer. — Jeff G. ツ 12:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of Rayo Vallecano http://www.rayovallecano.es/ Brgesto (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
This is the blogger logo, but might be ineligible for copyright. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, I'd say {{PD-textlogo}}. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Kept as {{PD-textlogo}}MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Originally marked no source (no source since) by Magog the Ogre. These logos have been held to be ineligible for copyright, so we don't need precise source information. It could however use information on the correct dates when it was used. Guanaco (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this file was unsourced. Even if it is ineligible to be copyrighted, I have no patience for uploaders claiming they created something they didn't create; that would be a copyright violation except by accident of law. Nor should Commons. If you or someone else wants to be correct information on the file, as well as to categorize and verify it isn't already uploaded somewhere else, feel free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Was previously deleted as File:Logo Blogger.png in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CarlitoscarlosRonhjones (Talk) 23:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 13:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with Magog. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No description, no good categories. Out of project scope due to missing educational value? Taivo (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Looks like a close-up of the congregational mosque of Yazd, e.g. from the pillar on the left in File:Jameh mosque.jpg. --HyperGaruda (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is "Detail of the tiling of the right ceiling of the big arch of the Jame Mosque of Yazd in Masjed-e Jomeh, Yazd, from the base of the left column supporting that arch, looking up". I have marked and categorized it as such. That would be a long name, though. — Jeff G. ツ 13:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: File has a cat now. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Extremely low quality screenshot Guanaco (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This appears to be a blurry photo, a copyvio of tet:Pájina Mahuluk, rendered for an anonymous IP address by MediaWiki, displayed by Safari or Google Chrome, on Apple MacOS, all without acknowledgement of any rights or attribution. — Jeff G. ツ 16:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
aspect ratio, watermark Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as an example for Category:CMOS rolling shutter (see en:Rolling shutter). --Sitacuisses (talk) 11:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Hadn't heard about CMOS rolling shutter before but it seems that we don't have much examples of this. Therefor kept. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
aspect ratio, watermark Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Don't seems to be an own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Original source: http://web.archive.org/web/20141024082855/http://www.cnmv.es:80/PORTAL/AlDia/Galeria.aspx?tImagen=1 IngenieroLoco (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused (+low quality) personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 16:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Visit google searched images. Out of commons scope. Uploaded from web content. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 07:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Genymotion appears to be non-free software, and this is a screenshot of it. Guanaco (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 16:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorenabuchaibe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern paintings : the painter must send a permission to OTRS, and for the 3d photos, then the photographer also has to send a permission
- File:CLARO DE LUNA. HOMENAJE A BEETHOVEN 22.34.05.jpg
- File:Lorena Fernandez Abuchaibe.jpg
- File:SAN FRANCISCO 1mtx1MT.jpg
- File:Lorena-Fernandez-Lorena-Fernandez.jpg
- File:VIOLENTA COLUMNA DE VIENTO OLEO LIENZO.jpg
- File:OLEADA DE CALOR.jpg
- File:ESTOCADA DE UN SOL INVERNAL.jpg
- File:ESTOCADA AMBIENTAL.jpg
- File:Derrumbe obra.jpg
- File:Lorena Ferandez Abuchaibe.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 16:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrong upload! Gabyxgabyx (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 16:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio_(14).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(14).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free map in Japan. Batholith (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio_(14).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio_(14).jpg){kind=link}
"All rights reserved" mark inside the PDF, we need a permission via OTRS like the other ones from Peaksel D.D.O. Nis!
- File:Alphabet Coloring Pages, Printable Coloring Pages, Free Coloring Book for Adults.pdf
- File:Dinosaur Coloring Pages For Adults - Free Printable Coloring Book.pdf
Ras67 (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No encyclopaedic value, IMO Kalbbes (talk) 23:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 17:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_ballistice_missile_Pukguksong-2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_ballistice_missile_Pukguksong-2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A quick search here determined that the original source is a Scandinavian stock photography agency (see this attribution). It appears that ermaleksandr uploaded it to Flickr and with an incorrect license (Public Domain Mark). Jarould [talk] 23:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
_ballistice_missile_Pukguksong-2.jpg){kind=link}
- Thank you for your better due diligence. I apologize for the erroneous upload. I understand that in this case it may need to be deleted Thank you. (talk) user:Al83tito 00:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 17:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
_ballistice_missile_Pukguksong-2.jpg){kind=link}
Personal artwork, not in use, no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Copyvio of http://bdmusic25.fun/oye-hoye-jawaani-official-video-song-2016-by-esho-hd.html (beware the NSFW and new window ads). — Jeff G. ツ 17:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
A photo of the uploader, needs to credit the photographer and have permission to license and distribute the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 17:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
There is no such name as "Hu stele", at least that is not the official name of the stele. I've renamed it to Category:Tiger Inscription.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Why not leave it as a redirect? — Jeff G. ツ 17:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Do you mean using {{Bad name}} instead of {{Category redirect}}?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 16:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Pas de références permettant de certifier l'existence de ce blason pour la famille concernée Adri08 (talk) 12:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
The image should be removed because it depicts the coat of arms of the Breton family Du Bahuno, not the Italian family Basciano, as verified by reliable heraldic sources. You can find the Bahuno's arms here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armorial_des_familles_de_Bretagne . Indeed the the wikipedia article in which the Basciano arms was integrated has been flagged as a fake, and thus supressed. You can find the discussions here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Famille_Basciano/Admissibilit%C3%A9 CaveCanem290 (talk) 11:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @CaveCanem290: Vous ne pouviez pas attendre la fin de l'autre procédure ?? Je vous ai dit que je m'occuperai des renommages. Il n'y aucune raison de supprimer celui-ci qu'il suffit de renommer ; la seule différence est qu'à présent que vous avez fait une demande de suppression, nous allons être obligés de conserver une redirection Basciano… --Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Autant pour moi, il me semblait que vous aviez mentionné la suppression de cette image ET le fait de renommer la première. Votre commentaire était le suivant : "@CaveCanem29: ok, so the file File:Basciano.jpg should be nominated for deletion instead…
- I'll handle the correction of file names once the current deletion request is closed. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 12:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Désolé de ma mauvaise compréhension. CaveCanem290 (talk) 11:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Basciano.jpg is not Blason des Basciano.jpg. et file names était bien au pluriel. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Anyway, this file could be deleted for it's been superseded by svg, and even when it's renamed to Bahuno's it won't be an exact CoA as the wolf should be armed gules (red-clawed). --Kontributor 2K (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
copy this photo - [5] Erasd (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ilfeld,_Harzquerbahn_1989_(2934222396).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. @Erasd: use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 11:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Denys Corley Smith - very clearly states that this is the authors collection. It is a copy of a photograph in that collection. The original photographer is unknown as is the country of creation and date the photo was taken. It might have been taken by my grandfather but I don't know.
Frank Toovey Lake: this again clearly states that this is a photograph that I took of an entry of a ships log written in 1868 in the UK. Hence the image is my copyright. It is exasperating to have to have go through this when I clearly know more about copyright law than Eugene. Delete them if you like and deny people the opportunity to use or view them and then I will make an official complaint.
Kept: kept the logbook; next time please categorize correctly the image and use the original date. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : DR started to verify claimed 'own work' since there are no EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially copyright issues ? Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC) -- Response from Prasanna Kumar Mamidala: @Roland Zh - This is my own work and attaching EXIF details here..
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: potentially profiling, see also en:R.J.Pradip. Roland zh (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
mervyn Bradley 2A02:C7D:4D9E:E700:6086:D42B:5AE8:F2A8 20:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Photo of the theatre, not especially of the poster. --Kürschner (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Kürschner. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted photograph Theroadislong (talk) 21:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 22:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: de minimIS lol. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Almost duplicate of this file, unused. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: "almost" is not "duplicate". Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Сергей 19831983 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs, promo photos, album covers and non-trivial logo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Фрагмент композиции "Пацифистский чай".ogg
- File:Фрагмент песни "За пределы звёзд".ogg
- File:Группа "Серый кит" во время исполнения трека "Я - бомба" в московском клубе "Алиби" (2017 год).jpg
- File:Обложка сингла "Global warming" рок-группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Обложка альбома "Летим на Марс" группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Обложка сингла "Лунный заяц" группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Обложка сингла "Я - бомба" группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Логотип группы "Серый кит.jpg
- File:Обложка сингла "Путь наркомана" группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Обложка сингла "Пацифистский чай" группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Обложка сингла "За пределы звёзд" группы "Серый кит".jpg
- File:Группа "Серый кит".jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Файлы загружены заранее, сейчас активно редактируется статья в личном пространстве, см. w:ru:Участник:U-leo/Серый кит (группа), для последующего переноса в основное пространство. Все изображения загружены автором этих файлов и оформлены соответствующей лицензией. В чём проблемы? --U-leo (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Я, Сергей Гарифуллин, участник музыкальной группы, к которым относятся удаляемые файлы, являюсь автором этих изображений и музыкальных отрывков и публикую их по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International для дальнейшего свободного использования в целях оформления статей, посвящённых деятельности группы. Какие проблемы возникли при публикации файлов? —Сергей 19831983 (talk) 18:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - evidence of permission can be sent to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Replaced it with variant with more precise place location and clearer text: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sossolid.gif Minnekon (talk) 20:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 06:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.110.215.216 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image copied from the official webpage of Odense Light Rail, https://www.odenseletbane.dk/nyheder/historiedetektiv-afslorer-letbanens-stationer-har-byttet-navn/ (image located 1/3 down the page). If the map is PD, it is unlikely this DW is copyrighted. That the map appears to be from 1940 might make it PD, in any case, I don't think this is quite blatant enough to speedy Storkk (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. No update to source, author, and license in a month-and-a-half. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source. E.g. no information on the photographer of this 3D object. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Source added. Cobatfor (talk) 08:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Who made the picture of this 3D object? The photographer has a separate copyright. Jcb (talk) 11:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb: You don't think it was en:User:Wilsbadkarma? — Jeff G. ツ 16:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- At least I see no reason to assume such a thing. The file is very low res, there is no EXIF and there is no own work claim. Jcb (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- The insignia is public domain due to its creation by the U.S. Navy and the image is a photograph of a uniform patch of said insignia with nothing else in the image. The insignia is basically 2-dimensional, save a raised border/edge. I do not believe the image is substantially transformative from the public domain insignia to have generated a new copyright for the photographer under U.S. law. Libertybison (talk) 03:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb, Cobatfor, Libertybison, and Wilsbadkarma~commonswiki: Does File:Attack Squadron 145 (US Navy) insignia c1974.png have the same flaw? What about the strictly 2D black and white image in the top left corner of p. 209 of this PDF file? — Jeff G. ツ 04:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- That is just the public domain insignia while this image is a photograph of a patch (that would presumably be sown onto a uniform or such) of the insignia. Libertybison (talk) 06:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb, Cobatfor, Libertybison, and Wilsbadkarma~commonswiki: Does File:Attack Squadron 145 (US Navy) insignia c1974.png have the same flaw? What about the strictly 2D black and white image in the top left corner of p. 209 of this PDF file? — Jeff G. ツ 04:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- The insignia is public domain due to its creation by the U.S. Navy and the image is a photograph of a uniform patch of said insignia with nothing else in the image. The insignia is basically 2-dimensional, save a raised border/edge. I do not believe the image is substantially transformative from the public domain insignia to have generated a new copyright for the photographer under U.S. law. Libertybison (talk) 03:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- At least I see no reason to assume such a thing. The file is very low res, there is no EXIF and there is no own work claim. Jcb (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb: You don't think it was en:User:Wilsbadkarma? — Jeff G. ツ 16:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Who made the picture of this 3D object? The photographer has a separate copyright. Jcb (talk) 11:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
_insignia_c1974.png){kind=link}
- Keep per Libertybison. — Jeff G. ツ 04:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Libertybison is wrong with their assumption that "I do not believe the image is substantially transformative from the public domain insignia to have generated a new copyright for the photographer under U.S. law.". In fact taking a picture of a 3D object does generate new copyright, under US law as much as under any other copyright law. Jcb (talk) 14:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Of course a photograph of a 3D object usually creates a copyright, as in say a photograph of a public domain statue in a gallery. My point is that this image is basically 2D. That any slightly raised border on the patch isn't visible enough that it would add any original elements for the photographer to claim a copyright, as a 3D frame of a public domain painting would generate for the photographer. Libertybison (talk) 06:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- If you read the above mentioned Dictionary of American Naval Aviation Squadrons Volume 1: The History of VA, VAH, VAK, VAL, VAP and VFA Squadrons, which is an official U.S. Nav publication, you will find many shoulder patches ("3D objects") instead of drawn insignias ("2D objects"). I assume that the reason for this is that there are just no other versions available in the U.S. Navy files. However, I am no expert in copyright law. Cobatfor (talk) 07:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Of course a photograph of a 3D object usually creates a copyright, as in say a photograph of a public domain statue in a gallery. My point is that this image is basically 2D. That any slightly raised border on the patch isn't visible enough that it would add any original elements for the photographer to claim a copyright, as a 3D frame of a public domain painting would generate for the photographer. Libertybison (talk) 06:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: agree with Libertybison: it's essentially a 2D work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Original uploader provides no statement that the author is unknown. How do we know this? Was the uploader too lazy to copy the information, or did the book fail to attribute? This is quite relevant. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Author is unknown. If you know him, let me know.Linhart (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Linhart: can you please be more specific? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Verifiable source information is required by policy. What is "History of Yugoslav Cycling"? A book? A film? Google has "History+of+Yugoslav+Cycling" no hits for the phrase except for this file and en:File:KarelLavrih.png. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- It looks like a book scan. I imagine it's probably in a local language, so you wouldn't see the results. We'll need someone with access to the book to take a look and verify that they provided no author. It was more common than not among English-language books to provide the author; I don't know about other languages. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- If the book was published before 1970, photographer doesn't really matter (before 1973 per {{PD-Serbia}}, before 1974 per {{PD-Croatia}} or before 1970 per {{PD-Slovenia}}, depends on where it was published). --Sporti (talk) 07:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's this book. http://www.bolha.com/knjige-revije-stripi/strokovna-literatura-prirocniki/hobi-in-prosti-cas/kolesartsvo-na-slovenskem-drago-stepisnik-1292189005.html There is definetly no author mentioned there.Linhart (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- If the book was published before 1970, photographer doesn't really matter (before 1973 per {{PD-Serbia}}, before 1974 per {{PD-Croatia}} or before 1970 per {{PD-Slovenia}}, depends on where it was published). --Sporti (talk) 07:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- It looks like a book scan. I imagine it's probably in a local language, so you wouldn't see the results. We'll need someone with access to the book to take a look and verify that they provided no author. It was more common than not among English-language books to provide the author; I don't know about other languages. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
