User talk:*SGR*

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons,
  • SGR*!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, *SGR*!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:100B0320.JPG

[edit]

Hi, thanks for uploading "File:100B0320.JPG". Can you please identify where the photograph was taken and what it shows? Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee talk 16:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:100B0320.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee talk 17:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STOP edit warring

[edit]
You must stop edit warring and reverting images. You must discuss on the file talk page first and gain a consensus for your change. If you revert again, you will be reported for edit warring. Fry1989 eh? 18:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I started the discussion as you can see easiely (File talk:Armoiries Luxembourg Bourbon avec ornements.svg#Silver not White) at 06:22, 22 August 2013. I made the first change to the svg-file at 13:46, 20. Mai 2014 and still got no reaction except your revert without any comment. I can accept the change you made at 18:24, 22 May 2014, but I'm not sure who was starting edit warring... *SGR* (talk) 19:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have started a discussion, but continuing to revert the file is not proper. You should seek a consensus on the discussion page first. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't think you can speak about a consensus, if you only talk to yourself ... but there was no one since August 2013 speaking against me. Maybe I should have have given the Link to the Talk-Page with my first or second edit (who doesn't make any mistakes?), but normaly I look at this page, before I undo an edit (at the german wikipedia). It came to my mind for the first time, that not everyone is doing so, when I read your "Please use the discussion page" and I have to apologize for that. But what else could I do (still no reaction on the talk page!), if not change for another time, give a link to the talk page and leave you a comment on your talk page. *SGR* (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I found an other way ... So I have to say, you were right I shouldn't have changed it for a third time. *SGR* (talk) 09:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luxemburger Wappen

[edit]

Hallo - nachdem Fry1989 durch Schweigen seine Zustimmung gegeben hat, habe ich alle Wappen auf "gold and silver" revertiert. Was jetzt noch zu verbessern ist, ist den hinteren Löwen auf "single tailed" zu stutzen. Willst du das erledigen? -  Maxxl² - talk 18:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ach ja ... Im Moment habe ich von dem Thema irgendwie etwas die Nase voll. Das kann sich aber schnell wieder ändern und ein Brief/ Mail an die Pressestelle des Großherzogtums, welche Variante sie den gerne in der Wiki hätten, wäre wohl mein nächster Schritt (hier habe ich ein bisschen vorgegriffen - siehe meinen P.S.-Nachtrag)... Klar, weiß/gelb ist technisch richtig aber so wie ich es sehe, nicht die Variante die der Großherzog verwendet. Das die weiß/gold-Variante, wie sie jetzt online ist vollkommen daneben ist, sollte eigentlich jeder nachvollziehen können - somit ist es wohl einer dieser fiesen/bösen Wikischerze, das jetzt ausgerechnet die Variante geschützt ist... Anyway, danke für deine Mühe und sorry für den Ärger, den es dir eingebracht hat. *SGR* (talk) 07:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Wobei dieser zweite Schritt (welche der beiden richtigen Wappenversionen wir wo verwenden) ja zunächst einmal vorausgesetzt hätte, überhaupt erst mal beide Varianten zur Auswahl zu haben... *SGR* (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Brigados zemaitija tarnybos zenklas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insignia of the Lithuanian Grand Duke Butigeidis Dragoon Battalion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insignia of the Lithuanian Grand Duchess Birutė uhlan Battalion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insignia of the Lithuanian King Mindaugas hussar Battalion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Ivo Mogiļnijs.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Ivo Mogiļnijs.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allright, "Noncommercial" was new for me ... --*SGR* (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Statul Major General.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crown of Luxembourg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.245.18.140 21:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kjp emblema.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crown of Luxembourg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.214.73.17 11:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gen ltn valdemaras rupšys.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]