Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 12th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded JaFaint (talk) 04:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Converted to request for speedy deletion.    FDMS  4    15:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely over the COM:TOO, no evidence of permission. Storkk (talk) 08:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Say NO to Bottled Water.jpg: Likely over the COM:TOO, no evidence of permission.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop, poor quality Categorizing (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop, poor quality Categorizing (talk) 08:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong file. This file is already on Wikipedia. MrOerni (talk) 16:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file (speedy). --Wdwd (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False "own work", previously published at http://zeenews.india.com/india/justice-dipak-misra-to-be-next-chief-justice-of-india-know-more-about-him-and-the-key-verdicts-he-penned-2031304.html including the black block on sides and other places without them. Seems to be originally a color image from copyrighted governmental website (it shows the photo in ellipse but it is actually rectangular) Tatewaki (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 13:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://jadechkif.book.fr/galeries/intro/240868. Copyright holder : Stefano Berca. Already deleted on 15 April. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found several uses of this file at larger size, see http://www.pnrasha.com/fa/articles/item/15-cat-sample-article for one example. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bottom portion is blacked out: should be cropped or deleted. Cosal (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover art (albiet online) - Duplicate media at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Gorillaz iTunes Session.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover-art, Duplicate media w:File:HumanzGorillaz.png is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted video cover. No evidence of permission or authorship. GermanJoe (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siirski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various sources given without evidence of permission, from repeat copyvio uploader

Ariadacapo (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a non-notable subject. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private photo. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This photo was used for an article at en:wp which was deleted as the person was not considered notable. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; private photo. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This photo was used for an article at en:wp which was deleted as the person was not considered notable. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naveedlb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims, as it appears the uploader is the subject rather than the author of the photos.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Absqsr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing camera metadata, metadata indicating that files were grabbed from social media, metadata indicating files were grabbed from news agencies, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GTDharmasena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GTDharmasena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lahouari Miloudi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look like rephotographs, not original images. Notice the floral background and the black backgrounds behind the images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lahouari Miloudi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not linked to an encyclopaedic project. Personal file without interest other than author's promotion. VateGV taper la discut’ 10:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Out of scope. Jarould [talk] 02:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, small personal image which seems to have been run through a filter of some sort which renders it even blurrier. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettohop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarked images and video screenshots with no evidence of permission and/or authorship (low res, no EXIF). Unused personal image collection.

GermanJoe (talk) 07:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikifire42 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If these photos were made by NASA, source should be specified and proper license tag be used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hidden: two previous discussions concerning a meanwhile deleted file of the same name
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Tuvalkin Alan (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Uploading user is inactive since nearly five years. AFBorchert (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just notice that this has been nominated & kept before. Please consider the uploader wrote “pacar” in the description field. Google translate understands this as “girlfriend”. This is confirmed by the corresponding Wiktionary entry. Hence, this is apparently not a selfie. This has been photographed in a private setting, the uploader's name appears to be a real name, the title of the photo could be the given name of the depicted person. All this is very problematic in regard to COM:PEOPLE and the inexperienced uploader (this was the very only edit in all our projects) was very likely not familiar with free licenses and personality rights. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • It would be problematic if this photo were, per se, anyway problematic. But without a recognizable background, any EXIF or other metadata with spoofable information, and lacking an unflattering or compromising pose — we have nothing. What this photo shows is that she was smiling while taking a photo, and that’s a very low bar for being problematic.
That leads to the second argument: Is this a selfie, or was the photo taken by someone else and is therefore a copyvio? I’d say that the depicted scene shows, as much as it could, a typical arm outstretch indicative of a selfie by phone; the text description "pacar" is not evidence enough; interpreting it to mean "this is my girlfriend" is an unsbstantiated leap: "pacar" can be used to refer to oneself and does not imply necessarily a standing romantic relationship.
Even so, both the filename (suspected person name) and the description can be edited and expunged without incurring in the loss of this image from Commons — please read my argument for its value in this other, parallel DR.
-- Tuválkin 09:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality personal image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am renominating this file as the last DR was closed with delete but subsequently restored on base of this discussion outside the DR. In my opinion neither the closure nor the restoration addressed the point that this picture is not a selfie as the uploader's description designates the depicted person as “pacar”, i.e. as girl-friend. This is problematic as this photo has been taken in a private setting and we have no proof that this photo was published with the consent of the depicted person, see COM:PEOPLE#The right of privacy. This is a serious problem, most legislations protect the right of privacy. AFBorchert (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: It is a selfie: Her arm is outstretched, holding the camera. As said in the previous discussion, I think you’re overinterpreting a single word in a language you do not master, used in a context you do not know. COM:AGF would have us accept that this is a selfie uploaded by the photographer, who called herself a sweetheart in the description. -- Tuválkin 17:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment As the subject depicted is from Indonesia, I think Crisco 1492 can add something on country specific requirements. Jee 03:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The pose is clearly a selfie, and the fact that the uploader labeled the image "Pacar" does not mean the uploader took the photograph or owns the copyright to the image. If this image was uploaded without a release from the photographer (the subject), then it is a copyright violation.
Even if this were not a selfie, it is still clearly out of scope. It is not an image of an editor, nor is it used on a user page. It is not an image of a notable person. It is of poor quality, rendering it much less suited than other selfies for use illustrating the concept.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The uploader uses the name "Jasman-amatiran" ("Jasman the amateur"); Jasman is a male name, while the subject is clearly female. The one-word pacar would most likely mean pacarku (my girlfriend/boyfriend). In other words, there is no doubt in my mind that the uploader is not the subject. Barring a release from the photographer herself (you already said it's clearly a selfie) the licensing is doubtful at best.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Low quality personal image of a person who is neither notable nor a user of WM projects. Whatever the result of this discussion is, please do not overrun community decision that will be reached, without opening a new DR (in the case of keep) or an Undeletion request (in the case of delete). As a user I expect my vote to be respected. --E4024 (talk) 07:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You voted for deletion, above, upon a second DR. How was that respecting community decisions? Lets be honest and admit that you’re voting to persue a deletionist agenda, or maybe just to spite people you have grudges against (unless the real reason is something even worse). -- Tuválkin 12:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Jkadavoor, you would never vote for keep in a DR about such a low res photo of a trivial subject. Your vision of Commons has no place for this kind of images, and that’s why there will always be a conflict: We (people who think Commons has a wider goal) do approve of your work and keep away of your discussions and contests, while you (people who think Commons has room only for selected instances of high quality photography) see us as a nuisance, at best. This is a sorrow state of affairs and I see no practical solution. -- Tuválkin 12:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tuválkin, I rarely vote on a DR unless saw it in some other places. Here I saw it the acting admin's talk. I pinged Chris first to know more about country specific requirements. Later I'm convinced by his explanation on possible permission issues that he more explained now as a reply to you. I don't consider low resolution as an issue if no better image(s) available. I'm not seeing you as a nuisance. Jee 15:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons proje kapsamında olmayan kişisel fotoğraf. E4024 (talk) 09:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • AFBorchert, thanks for your explanation of what Commons’ laguage policy is; you have however wasted your time, as I am quite aware of it, and I do not question User:E4024’s right to express himself in the language of his choice. I however have the right to criticize that choice. This is not a case of User:E4024 exercising his right to use the language he prefers: User:E4024 user is proficient in English and the image subjected to this DR has an English language description, therefore chosing Turkish to compose this DR is either a copy&paste blunder (that should be corrected) or an attempt to confuse and hostilize the uploader.
As for the meaning of the sentence, well, I can use Google Translater too (not to mention that I share lodgings with a native speaker of a Turkic language), and I knew what that sentence means; it’s a lie, regardless of the language it is conveyed in.
-- Tuválkin 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This is another photograph by another user which is not related to the previous deletion requests. But this (and the other uploads of the same user) appear to be personal photos which are unused. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: clearly a personal photo, but User:Tuvalkin wants to keep it. P 1 9 9   18:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was discussed before and deleted/kept in various occasions. (If there was another file with this same name sorry about that.) The last time the closing admin, P 1 9 9, said: "Kept: clearly a personal photo, but User:Tuvalkin wants to keep it." I am sure no individual user would like to impose an own preference on others, but let us leave it apart. This is a small file without camera EXIF and which means it is a dubious "own work". We do delete many files everyday for only this "precaution". (Personally I see no educational use, or scope, in the image, but that is not so important now. For some reason the image is not used.) E4024 (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, obviously: I have nothing more to add to the previous DR, other than correcting my typo *"studend" with "student". (Please note, as said, that a different file with the same filename was similarly the target three DRs; this DR is the second affecting the current file). The amount of bad faith being heaped on here is staggering, but its motivation is transparent. -- Tuválkin 18:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: There’s nothing dubious about the own-work claims in Kigona (talk · contribs)’s uploads. The lack of metadata might not be due to a copyright pirate’s devious machinations, as the OP implies, but merely to the use of a cheap feature phone (such as post-Microsoft pseudo-Nokias made by HMD Global). -- Tuválkin 19:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @E4024: Why is your argument in support of your precaution claim directed to the closing admin? Isn’t it passible of general discussion? I’d say it is: So the four Bioshar photos by this user were taken with an iPhone 6s, as per their metadata, while this one has no metadata therefore you conclude it was not the same uploader’s work? You can see it is the same person (which we assume is User:Kigona, per COM:AGF), and the photo has same exact pixel count. That suggests that this is also from an iPhone 6s (so I was wrong about it being a cheap feature phone) and the lack of metadata might be due to its loss caused by the use of subpar software for axis rotation or contrast correction or some such. The one photo from this uploader that is not obviously a selfie, File:Bioshar 01.jpg, seems to show intact metadata and might have been taken with timer and tripod. I frankly cannot see any good reason to chose COM:PRP over COM:AGF concerning this photo. -- Tuválkin 20:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to suspect copyvio: clearly a selfie in the same resolution as File:Bioshar 03.jpg. When some users see value in this photo and explain why, I will need to put aside my opinion and consider it in scope. --P 1 9 9   20:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on instagram at https://scontent-sjc2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/19534972_478516179169357_5690357519990390784_n.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mani9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own work claims on this fan gallery of soccer/football players, logos, advertisements, and etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already have similar images, i see no educational purpose in this photo. Iojhug (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author requested deletion of recently uploaded file. While this is used (and quite widely), it was placed in each usage by the author himself around the time of uploading (and also of creation of deletion request), and thus the editorial choices of the sister projects are not being infringed by deletion. --Storkk (talk) 13:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover, equivalent media at English Wikipedia non-free w:File:DrakeMoreLifeofficial.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong licence : probably not own work ! Pippobuono (talk) 07:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete If this had been a clearly (or probably) free image- albeit mistagged- I'd have said you should have used {{Wrong license}} or {{Disputed}}.
However, this appears to be a copy (i.e. barely even a derivative work) of something by Charles Avery a living artist born in 1973. Since no clear permission, background information and/or ownership that would let us use it has been shown so far- something that is the responsibility of the uploader- we must assume this is a derivative copyvio. Ubcule (talk) 13:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom/Ubcule. --Storkk (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tokada22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright statut, proper date/author/countries should be provided in order to determine the copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, identity of photographer and date of publication needed to ascertain copyright status. --Storkk (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication why this album cover has the license it's been given on upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

moved from discussion page Hi, You can move it- I didn't know where to place it. I actually scanned 4 images (2 of his albums, front & back covers) and I don't know where the other 3 are?

I just wanted to do something for Richard Dimples Fields as I was a fan. The albums (photo) was self made and Mr. Fields has passed away so I don't know anything about copy write or what it should be categorized as. I meant no harm. Feel free to help out. Thanks, Radley — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustRadley (talk • contribs) 03:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Copyright does not expire with the expiration of the copyright holder. See COM:Copyright rules by territory for more information. --Storkk (talk) 19:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A couple of problems here, author is given as Christa Moffatt, but that's not the uploader. It contains photographs without attribution. And the image is not in use, and not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright problems and potential scope issues. Copyright holder of the cover should confirm license via OTRS. If that barrier is cleared, we can discuss whether the file is in scope or not. --Storkk (talk) 19:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERTISING Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scope and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor photo, bottom half is blacked out. Cosal (talk) 09:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, corrupt JPEG not usable in its current form. Please re-upload. --Storkk (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atiqnagra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere. The user's only other upload was a photo grabbed from Google with made-up licensing claims.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyright almost always rests with the photographer, not the subject or the owner of a copy of the photo. The photographers should confirm the license by following the instructions at OTRS to have the photos undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, facebook sized, notice derivative image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of source of image on cover of book, not in use, probably out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused book cover without any indication of why it is licensed as it is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the uploader has the rights to license the image on the cover of this book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable entity, no indication of own work on logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, claimed to be CD album cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sweetone77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality personal images of dogs, no foreseeable use due to poor quality

Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Pippobuono (talk) 08:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Pippobuono (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Pippobuono (talk) 08:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims, as the uploader appears to be the subject rather than the author of the photograph. Also: possible unauthorised derivative of the background image. LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 16:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 16:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Mhhossein talk 14:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Countess Nordin Cutelli 08.12.2017.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. It's out of scope. Mhhossein talk 14:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

These photos are out of scope.

Mhhossein talk 14:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

These are low-resolution screenshots of copyrighted content. While the text is hard to read due to low resolution, the site layout, images, browser software, etc. are still generally eligible for copyright. If only a small part of the screenshot were non-free, we could claim de minimis, but that isn't the case here.

Note that on Wikipedia, low resolutions are used to improve a claim of fair use, but fair use claims are explicitly rejected here. On Commons, lower resolution simply means lower quality.

Guanaco (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete , Aside from the quality issue, a number of these image contain logo elements to which something like PD-textlogo would be clearly inapplicable.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

 Delete None of these image are so simple to comply with the {{Pd-text}} and {{Pd-shape}} that have been added by the uploader. They are all more complex designs with graded backgrounds and/or shadowed text plus various button with highlights that certainly make then exceed COM:TOO and required some creative design decisions. They also have no evidence any were released into the public domain or under a free license by the Huckabee campaign. I've excluded those that consist only of simple text and/or shapes against plain backgrounds.

Ww2censor (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can certainly see the argument to discuss a number of these. However many of these are overkill. For instance, graphics like File:Huckabee DoorHanger.pdf, File:I like mike button1.png, File:Banner forpresidentblue.png, File:Banner forpresidentred.png are pretty certainly BENEATH the threshold of originality. SecretName101 (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll grant you that File:Huckabee DoorHanger.pdf may be ok. The others have graduated highlights that I think keeps them above the threshold of originality because they are not just simple text on a plain background. Ww2censor (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Users should provide separate nominations for works that have different attributes.

--Closeapple (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most deleted, some kept per Closeapple, although I disagreed on the graded background buttons. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

The YouTube uploader is neither the copyright holder of this nor the original author. As of right now these are license laundered by MyTake.org

Majora (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How is it out of scope?? SecretName101 (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

These are all images of individuals posing with this two dimensional work, the poster of Warren, which represents a proportionately large and thematically central role in the images. We would need evidence that this other image, of which these are derivative, is itself freely licensed.

GMGtalk 18:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poster of Warren is created by Edward Kimmel utilizing a photo he took. He has released this work into the public domain. See File:Warren Banner w Attri2 (33674856728).jpg. @GreenMeansGo: , the proof we would need exists there. SecretName101 (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough.  I withdraw my nomination GMGtalk 12:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Mhhossein talk 11:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

COM:COPYVIOs PART ONE: All images from Flickr, passed mechanical review. However each file is from a political candidate's flickr page, and each flickr page credits a different photographer for the images. Therefore, the flickr page does not have rights, and the mechanical review is incorrect. There will be a second nomination, I got to too many files and have to do this in two parts.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is it not possible that the campaign hired multiple photographers? SecretName101 (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

COM:COPYVIOs PART TWO: All images from Flickr, passed mechanical review. However each file is from a political candidate's flickr page, and each flickr page credits a different photographer for the images. Therefore, the flickr page does not have rights, and the mechanical review is incorrect. The remainder of the uploads by this user also need review. I did several hundred, and have run out of time.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: These are all from the Flickr account of Olivia Chow? Then  Delete and we should add the account to the bad accounts list. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Srittau: As far as I can tell, they are all from the Olivia Chow flickr account. The uniformity of file names, etc. The actual "author" is sometimes credited by the Chow account, sometimes not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The following DR may be relevant - Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Charles, Prince of Wales in 2018 - the NIO flickr account licensed them as free when they had no right to do so. I would be inclined to say delete unless Olivia Chow can prove that they have permission Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from video projection, presentations, posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The DIG14657... pictures are from the LBJ Presidential Library, which is operated by the National Archives and Records Administration, which is an independent agency of the United States government. They're almost all easily cropped to remove the presentation screens, but it's arguable that the images depicted on those screens are themselves public domain as works of the LBJ library. I also cropped out the offending content on the other two photos. clpo13(talk) 05:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now cropped, old versions deleted. Sealle (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

impossible to review. impossible to determine if this video was shot for voa or in his personal capacity.

RZuo (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Easy review. He was attending as a press personal credentialed with/by VOA to cover the Super Bowl, therefore media of of the game they captured was as part of that assignment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretName101 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 16:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. It's an used personal photo. Mhhossein talk 14:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal images, out of com:SCOPE Pippobuono (talk) 14:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 16:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a much higher quality image of the painting at File:Scuola di fontainebleau, presunti ritratti di gabrielle d'estrées sua sorella la duchessa di villars, 1594 ca. 06.jpg, and it's unlikely this version is own work plus it's much smaller and lower quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support: Delete it Ginson Lim (talk) 04:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a much higher quality image of this File:Jean Cousin (I) - Eva Prima Pandora - WGA05537.jpg, and of course this one is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient authorship information. When did Hildebrandt die? Jcb (talk) 01:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 01:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no permission from author "Joan Baker" attached to this file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication why this file, with author "Punjab Police" is given the "own work" license as it has. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image of non-free packaging, not de minimis as per guidelines.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept two as below com:TOO, deleted one. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deficient photo: bottom quarter is blacked out. Cosal (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by InfoShare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for artwork in Italy. This photograph is of the artwork as evidenced by the filename, and lack of any other potential subject in the image, so it is not de minimis. Storkk (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course. I made a mistake--Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"All the illustration on the front cover and inside of the book was done by Edinaldo do Espirito Santo". but we have no permission from them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am Edinaldo do Espirito Santo and I am not sure how I go to give my permission for it to be used, apart from that I published it in here. I can be reached on 07855 287 835 or through my websites: http://london-portugueselessons.co.uk or http://londonlessons.org or email tuition@londonlessons.org or tuition@london-portugueselessons.co.uk. You can also read by biography on my websites http://london-portugueselessons.co.uk I can also be reached on Linkedin, facebook, twitter through my websites.

 CommentBraziluk2 Since your account here is anonymous, please fill out the simple form at COM:OTRS where trusted volunteers will work with you on this situation. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a pro-shot, but at very low resolution, perhaps from Facebook... in any case, not in use, and out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio image Greenbörg (talk) 05:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube. Maybe the other photos also from Youtube. 141.196.192.90 05:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo design for a public institution (school in Colombia).Unlikely "own work" claim, no evidence of permission. GermanJoe (talk) 06:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Search result. Photo from [1] published at [2]. Panoramio photos are "under the copyright of their owners", no evidence of authorship / permission. GermanJoe (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: https://www.panoramio.com/photo/31889657 ARR. --Yann (talk) 14:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:JCMA Gunnex (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a copyrighted game (Minecraft). Probably grabbed via image search or from a YT video (filename). GermanJoe (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1. Has no purpose. Violates COM:SCOPE.
  2. Dubious origin. The image does not seem to be the author's own work, because it is too low-res and has no EXIF data.

Codename Lisa (talk) 08:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But it has a purpose, exposing a musical group. Look at the other photographs, they are all musicians. --176.239.6.130 08:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know that? (Are you just assuming?) These are some people who are holding guitars. And a description of them is nonexistent.
I am not saying there is no other remedy than deleting the image. But at the time, I am not seeing that other remedy. For me, right now, this image is as good as gibberish. —Codename Lisa (talk) 05:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Promo image, please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How did he take his own photography which is not a selfie? This person has placed many pictures some of which are problematic. Examine them please 176.239.6.130 08:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Selfie. --Yann (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality of photo is not good Eprc.asia (talk) 08:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Broken file. --Yann (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor photo: bottom half is blacked out. Cosal (talk) 09:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no license, apparently a self-portrait going by the names BethNaught (talk) 09:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Petebethune (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Neither of these looks like a selfie, so it is unlikely that the subject is actually the photographer as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Georgia Robin (http://www.juliendelmaire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/JD_1.jpg) incompatible with CC unless identity of the user Georgiarobin has been verified via OTRS ticket (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:OTRS). Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfocused, superior quality images of same subject exist Poliocretes (talk) 13:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable image, superior quality images of same subject exist Poliocretes (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dovevo caricarla su disposizione fonica mi sono sbagliato Bolognesi Nikolas (talk) 14:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, poor quality, user request. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicate of File:Firefox 54 macOS Sierra.png. Also missing source information for depicted elements (which I hardly find to be de minimis). 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 14:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. --Yann (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Countess Nordin Cutelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjE1NTI0NzY0M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDAzMjc5OTE@._V1_SX333_CR0,0,333,499_AL_.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work which photograph? All? Or all are scanned OK already? 176.239.99.153 15:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source. --Yann (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low rez duplicate NiD.29 (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low rez duplicate NiD.29 (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from deleted photo Vituzzu (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Not below TOO. Jcb (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: pre-1987 Spanish stamps are copyright for 80 years per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Spain - this 1980 stamp falls into the public domain in 2061. Ww2censor (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaqib Khero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused, personal pictures, COM:ADVERT

Steinfeld-feld (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 16:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of this file that is replaced with File:Missile balistique 19.png|thumb|Missile balistique 19 Vega&Altaïr (talk) 16:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of this file that is replaced with File:Missile balistique 20.png|thumb|Longueur du trajet atmosphérique. Vega&Altaïr (talk) 16:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user decided to upload a higher resolution version of File:Amphipyra_alpheraci.JPG instead; this dupe is no longer needed MZMcBride (talk) 16:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the flickr user is able to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image de mauvaise qualité Indilo (talk) 17:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image de mauvaise qualité Indilo (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Uzzal Miah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User images only - out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Uzzal Miah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Uzzal Miah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal photos, user was already warned before.

- [Tycho] talk 00:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a poster from 1987, not own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not appear to be own work of uploader, looks more like a display. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is my screenshot from a part of my one work (a travel report). --Charly1234 (talk) 00:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not appear to be own work of uploader, contains derivative and unsourced images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is my screenshot from a part of my one work (the source is a travel report). --Charly1234 (talk) 00:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to have been taken from "www.Stalinbahn-Trilogie.de" due to that being marked in lower right corner of image, also affected File:Stadtplan Jermakowo 2015-02-11 komp.png. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, it´s made by me, a member of the "www.Stalinbahn-Trilogie.de". We have given the rights with a e-mail to 'permissions-de@wikimedia.org' from 19.08.2017, 03:43, to Wikipedia. --Charly1234 (talk) 01:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS, then the file can be restored. --Yann (talk) 15:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HIAS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these file link to a vague disclaimer, which suggests one could use the files. However ever page clearly has "All Rights Reserved" on it, which makes deciding on the usability more difficult - therefore bring to a discussion to formally resolve.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ISPR is the Official Public Relation Wing of Pakistan Army. Any Progress of an Operation or the Press Release by Pakistan Army is done through ISPR. The Pictures which I uploaded was Officially released by Pakistan Army for Public. This is the Picture Gallery of all the Operations and the Wars released for public and they allow the reuse of these material if properly attributed per this disclaimer. I request you to please search about ISPR Pakistan on Google. This material will be really helpful to describe the position of Forces in Historical Warfare and Operations. Others are Welcome to share their opinion. HIAS (talk) 12:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just keep in mind what the disclaimer mention "You can copy the content from Inter Services Public Relations Directorate (Pakistan) Web site and use it "ANYWHERE" until you give credit to the source or provide a back link to the copied data". HIAS (talk) 06:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This license is unacceptable because it isn't irrevocable. They could choose to revoke the license at any time, requiring everyone who is using the content to stop doing so. Commons requires licenses to be irrevocable. ~ Rob13Talk 07:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok,let it go HIAS (talk) 08:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) at source Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only file. If this were ever needed easy to do in text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res crop of image http://www.dhakatribune.com/entertainment/2014/jul/04/azad-abul-kalam-collective-effort-needed-improve-tv-industry on a Bangladesh newspaper website where it is attributed to Prajna Tasnuva Rubayet, unlikely to be uploader's work as claimed Worldbruce (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-uploaded copyright violation. GeorgHHtalk   17:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Slastu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work, no EXIF, one has extremely low resolution and indicaties a museum as source.

Jcb (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He is a singer and composer but I could't find any article or even news in internet on J. Pepi 176.239.99.153 18:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georges Contaux died in 1984. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded by long-term abuser Fouadadan per evidence at w:wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fouadadan. 99.109.85.105 21:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used in anywhere. Out of project scope Aftabuzzaman (talk) 22:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC) also:[reply]

File:Sadequr Rahnan.png

--Aftabuzzaman (talk) 22:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.bliblinews.com/news/abhishek-verma-and-aditi-bhatia-real-age 176.239.99.153 22:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably out of scope, wrong format anyway. --Yann (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.india-forums.com/tellybuzz/wassup/39891-when-abhishek-verma-aka-adi-from-yeh-hai-mohabbatein-was-left-pl.htm 176.239.99.153 22:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Franz Stassen died in 1949. To be undeleted in 2020. Jcb (talk) 23:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Franz Stassen died in 1949. To be undeleted in 2020. Jcb (talk) 23:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified logo. Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 23:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1965. The painting is probably located inside a museum. Gumruch (talk) 23:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free illustration Batholith (talk) 23:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toursorissa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work, on these small images which were uploaded to promote a tourism company (see description). All the ones I searched by this uploader were COM:COPYVIOs, I have no reason to believe these are not also. No metadata, small size, promotional copy, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on any of these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from discussion page: All the pictures were taken by me. They are not copyright violation. With thanks- ஜுபைர் அக்மல் (talk) 16:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - DW at best. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georges Contaux died in 1984. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyright violations. Undelete in 2055. --Storkk (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a person whose article at EN has been deleted for not satisfying a notability or sourceability criterion; no potential for reuse exists in another article. Bearcat (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and also unclear copyright status. --Storkk (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata. Is it really an own work ? S. Plaine (talk) 12:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: consistent with other uploads by same uploader. Found on internet, but with dates after upload at Commons and usually very low resolution. P 1 9 9   17:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Mhhossein talk 14:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected:

These photos were all Keep. These photos it just cleary told the swimsuit for the child which have worn. That was a new kind of siamese version. Here I can say, this siamese body-skin swimsuit NOT to be confused with burqini. --PQ77wd (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Instead, you need to say why the photos are within our scope? --Mhhossein talk 06:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. File:A boy wearing siamese body-skin swimsuit in SaiGaau Swimming Pool.jpg:  Keep, This kind of swimsuit just in the scope. Because I have seen this siamesed-version swimsuit worned by many of the children at Swimming Ground and swimming trainning school in Guangzhou. That swimsuit can be bought in online-shop([3][4]). So this just within scope.
  2. File:One-piece Swimsuit for YINGFA & Few.jpg, File:3 girls have invited for 2017 Cross-Pearl River Swimming Contest.jpg, File:Girl wearing one-piece swimsuit in GZ3MS Swimming Pool.jpg:  Keep, These are the one-piece competitive swimsuit for Few (Chinese name: 飘牌) or YINGFA (Chinese: 英发), there are famous swimming brands in China (It can be seen many of the big shopping malls and swimwear monopole stores). Also there have authorised in some of the swimming contests. You can found that brands in any swimming ground scenes. (You can search for "YINGFA" and "Few飘牌" in Google or Bing). And also, Cross-Pearl River Swimming Contest (Cantonese: 横渡珠江) is a very famous sport activities in Guangzhou at every late July or early August. I have taken these photos for telling a permission about holding the Cross-Pearl River Swimming Contest on 2017.
  3. File:A girl wearing siamesed body-skin swimsuit in YXQMFC.jpg:  Keep, This is a branch for long-sleeved bodyskin swimsuit (with skirts) for female. This kind of swimsuit (related series) can be seen in the online-shop ([5][6][7][8], There were so closely like of this long-sleeved bodyskin swimsuit and also can be seen in the swimming ground). Also this swimsuit have listed in 全身游水裝 at Cantonese wikipedia.
  4. File:A boy wearing siamesed-version for bodyskin.jpg and File:Young woman wearing long-sleeved bikini.jpg:  Keep, The same of File:A boy wearing siamese body-skin swimsuit in SaiGaau Swimming Pool.jpg's reason. Permission: [9][10]. It can be found on the online shop.
  5. File:Details for the school uniform about GZNSPE (shirt only).jpg:  Keep, This is a school uniform for short-sleeve shirt about Guangzhou Normal School of Pre-school Education. I just told the details because rare of the website can tell the school uniform for which school. However, it can survey the student for which school comes form. This is very popular in China due to the Secondary schools have chosen in camouflage uniform.
  6. File:Woman wearing facekini.jpg:  Keep, This is a new fresh thing. Because facekini who have worn in a swimming pool instead of swim caps. Facekini can be seen for swim cap in swimming pool. I have found like of this wearing by old woman in swimming ground.
  7. File:Old woman & girl wearing one-piece swimsuit.jpg, File:A woman wearing one-piece swimsuit in GZ3MS Swimming Pool.jpg, File:Woman wearing one-piece swimsuit in GZ3MS Swimming Pool.jpg:  Delete, because these photos were bad qualities. It have got blur and moir. I have taken a good quality photo for like this. Keep, These photo just likely the case about Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/22#File:Guangxi Expwy S13 sign with name.svg.

Therefore the deletion request should be closed.--PQ77wd (talk) 17:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, the way I see it, since @Mhhossein: is the one demanding for deletion, it is he who should specify why these photos are "out of scope" in his/her opinions. Does the term "burden of proof" ring a bell? On the other hand, @PQ77wd: if you wish to delete your own file, you should make a separate request. CÉDRIC 06:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, the uploader needs to tell us why the project should keep his photographs? This is while we have not talked about personality rights. See SCOPE. --Mhhossein talk 13:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see of above. These photos were NOT contain only excluded educational. And NOT advertising or self-promotion. And also Both of them are already using in Cantonese Wikipedia.--PQ77wd (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly (already) deleted, remainder kept as in use. -- P 1 9 9   17:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went at the Cathedral and I took this picture. I can't understand what is the problem with this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parishen (talk • contribs) 11:46, 12 August 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: undue suspicion, not found elsewhere on the internet. Typical low resolution phone camera quality. P 1 9 9   17:54, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: questionable source and author. P 1 9 9   17:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation. Jcb (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no author and source to verify status. P 1 9 9   18:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ginson Lim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PRP nomination. Other images uploaded by this uploader were taken from websites, blogs, and unacknowledged sources. There is no indication of own work in any of these images, with the possible exception of the iPhone photo of the Petraus Towers in Kuala Lumpur.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Discussion page titled Dealing Okay let's make a deal. I have to admit that I had made a huge mistake that I uploaded some photos that violate copyright laws. This is because I used to think that it was just uploading with labelling it as my own work, then it should be done. But just now one user messaged me for this and I knew that I made it wrong before. Hence, Kuala Lumpur Petronas Twin Towers uploaded by today is originally my own work! Just to inform, thank you Ginson Lim (talk) 17:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Received talk page correspondence Moving here for clarity "I am sincerely hoping that you can leave the picture File:吉隆坡双峰塔.jpg and File:Penang airport view.jpg in the Wikipedia Commons because these are my original photographs. I have snapped these two, making Wikipedia could have such pictures as reference. Other pictures are free to be deleted, as it is against copyright laws. However, it is somehow confused that just because of my previous mistakes, the ORIGINAL works have been neglected and rejected. Thank you and please. Ginson Lim (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Given that several images were taken without permission from other websites, I think it would be a good idea - for those two images you say you actually took, if you would upload larger and higher quality versions with accurate metadata. Please refrain from oversharpening. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment How is it done to upload a larger and higher quality versions? Any tutorials? Ginson Lim (talk) 06:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ginson Lim: check the "File History" Section 燃灯 (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@燃灯: and then? How is it? Sorry I'm not experienced in this Ginson Lim (talk) 07:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ginson Lim: click "Upload a new version of this file" in the "File History" section to upload and overwrite a new version. --P 1 9 9   18:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: two, and kept two, as per claim by uploader. P 1 9 9   18:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: Why can't this picture for my personal use only? I need appropriate and reasonable reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginson Lim (talk • contribs) 00:55, 13 August 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: for personal use as requested by uploader. And no nasi lemak in art yet on Commons. P 1 9 9   18:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified logo. Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even assuming the uploader did take this photo, it is a derivative work of the text and images depicted on the certificate, which have no indication and no presumption of free licensing. BethNaught (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Text depicted is a proclamation of an award which has been publicly made in a huge gathering of people in congregation , so there is no question of it being under any copyright and image depicted is illustrative of the person being honoured publicly for outstanding achievements, so derivative work is that of text and figure that is already in public domain, I strongly object to deletion proposal merely on presumption that that work may not be free licensing .If fact is not narrated in description of file that this text of award was read in public then I will check file and add this narration now, but certainly file should not be deleted as this has been used in illustrating an article on Suneet Sing Tuli.Guglani (talk) 05:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may also see more references about Suneet Singh Tuli in punjabi wiki article Suneet Singh TuliGuglani (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In terms of copyright, public domain does not mean what it seems you think it means. Written works and photographs are copyrighted by default and it falls to you to explain why this text and photograph are either not copyrighted or under a free license. Being publicly read to large numbers of people does not put a written work in the public domain—if you assert that, then you assert Harry Potter and the Cursed Child to be PD. BethNaught (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree in strict legal sense text and image is not in Public domain, however , text is not any poem, story , novel or extract from similar creation , but merely a commentary about person who has been publicly honoured and complete article (i.e.) text and inset picture has been publicly put on display refer link link showing text and inset picture on dispaly in a mammoth gathering as well as read in announcement of commentary about achievements of person being honoured. Derivative work by me in form of snap shot has been used to illustrate article about the same as per Economic times eminent person at Punjabi wiki , and I intend to use it in an article on enwiki which I intend to write . In that sense it is fair use of non-free content . Used Image should be allowed to be placed under fair use policy.I do not exactly know in wiki policy what such a license be called, any wiki user including BethNaught may suggest how to use such image , which is important to illustrate the article and no free image is available to illustrate article on person who otherwise is eminent (refer earlier provided references ).--Guglani (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)--Guglani (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. A text does not have to be literature in order to be copyrightable. This is clearly copyrighted, and the author(s) would need to confirm the license via OTRS. Note that fair use is not allowed on Commons, and in any case the usage on user pages would not adhere to any fair use policy on sister projects. --Storkk (talk) 09:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poson06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This series of images includes portraits, building photos and a printed page. While the uploader may have taken the photos of the photos, or scanned them, he/she did not create these images and thus they are incorrectly licensed.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Pour certaines photos je peux encore comprendre mais pour l'image Estignard.jpg il n'y a aucun motif serieux de votre part. Toute les informations sont donnés !


De plus toute les photos mentionnant Paul Saint-Guily (et comme il est sur les photos) lui appartiennent:

1.parcequ'il les a achete (elles etaient dans ses affaires)

2.en vertu du droit à l'image français En conclusion, en tant qu'héritier unique il m appartien de faire ce que je veux de ces photos. Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poson06 (talk • contribs)

Sorry, but owning a copy of an image doesn't make your friend the owner of the copyright! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je vous ai mis une explication sur ma page de discussion. Je précise juste ici que toute image publié par moi sur wikipedia est 1. Tirée de mes archives familliaux 2. Représente un membre de ma famille — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poson06 (talk • contribs)

Vous pouvez expliquer tout ce que vous voulez, les règles des communes disent que vous ne pouvez pas télécharger les images d'autres personnes et les réclamer comme votre propre, au lieu de cela vous avez besoin d'une autorisation, ce qui se fait via COM: OTRS. You can explain all you want, the rules of Commons say that you can't upload other people's images and claim them as your own, instead you need permission, which is done via COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bon alors comment puis-je faire pour publier une photo de mon grand père ? Si vous voulez j'ai un arbre généalogique en ligne pour prouver ma filiation. Sinon comment faire pour publier des photos QUI ONT ETE PRISE EN 1900 ??? Mes grand père Gauthier et Saint-Guily sur qui j'écris sont tous les deux mort respectivement en 1992 et 1985. Mes parents sont les héritiers légitimes des droits.

Plusieurs de ces images ont été publié avant le 1er Janvier 1923: File:Alexandre GAUTHIER (1914 ).jpg, File:Aup 2.jpg, File:Maison 12.jpg, File:Paul saint guily.jpg et File:Estignard.jpg. Elles sont donc utilisable librement par quiconque le désire. Merci d'avance Poson06 (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Ce document est dans le domaine public. Ceci s'applique aux travaux où le copyright a expiré, souvent parce que sa première publication s'est produite avant le 1er janvier 1923."


Deleted: 1923 n'est pertinent que pour les droits d'auteur aux États-Unis. Tous les fichiers sur Commons doivent être libres des droits aux États-Unis et leurs pays d'origine. En France, les droits d'auteur expirent 70 ans après le décès du créateur. Dans ces cas, Alberic de Truchis de Varennes semble être mort en 1944, afin que nous puissions garder Image:Estignard.jpg. Les photographes des autres fichiers ne semble pas être inconnaissables après la recherche, et leurs dates de mort ne semble pas particulièrement probable d'être avant fin 1946. --Storkk (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist of this painting died in 1951, but it's not "own work" of uploader. If it's in the public domain, it needs a different license, and of course a source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is user Lea who is the photographer? This isn't a selfie (own work). 176.239.99.153 18:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, the copyright holder of a photograph is usually the photographer, not the subject. The photographer should confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Being used on Wikipedia for personal promotional only [User:Acro Ply Pvt Ltd] Maile66 (talk) 18:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:SCOPE and copyright concerns. Only used on one user page of blocked user. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures of toys: derivative work Discasto talk 22:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination / COM:TOYS. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the info says, this image seems to come from https://kelthuz.bandcamp.com/album/the-pessimist, but I can't find any information suggesting it is released on CC license. On the contrary, the page says "all rights reserved". Katafrakt (talk) 00:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False "own work" claim, likely grabbed from islamdag.ru (nav element still visible). While the underlying photo is possibly PD, the file is also redundant: a better version is available at File:Ömer Ziyaüddin.jpg (more plausible source and license info). GermanJoe (talk) 06:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is plastered all over the web as one of the few extant for this species, but the plant in the image is an entirely unrelated one! It's clearly a Euphorbia (note the district fruit capsules at some stem tips), and Adenia subsessilifolia doesn't look like anything remotely close to this, apart from not having many leaves. Yes, there is a placard for "Adenia subsessilifolia" at the base of the plant, but botanic gardens aren't perfect and make mistakes, usually quite often for a less-known species like this. Either someone made a huge mistake with their identification, or the existing A. subsessilifolia died, because there aren't any in the photo.

Removal would be appreciated (A. subsessilifolia is very endangered, eventually when a picture is uploaded people will be able to see what it looks like, and know not to trample or destroy them. But this image is misleading and has no relevance. I'll even post an image of a cultivated one if no one else does in the next year or so.) 69.181.158.36 02:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I'm sorry that I have mis-identified whatever plant is in the photo; as you might imagine, I am not a botanist and copied the name from the botanical label that seemed to identify the plant. And I'm even sorrier that the image is "plastered all over the web" if it's incorrect. However, I think that deleting the photo is not the right course of action here. My suggestion would be to edit the text to make it clear that the plant is mis-identified, and then move the photo the the "Misidentified plants" category in hopes that someone can correctly identify it. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown source, authorship, and permission. The scan artefacts in full resolution makes it likely to be a derivative work from a book or a postcard. A.Savin 13:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Whispyhistory (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep all images. The first two should be {{PD-UK-unknown}} as they were clearly stamped in 1912 (and anonymous corporate publications) and the last one should be {{PD-Zimbabwe}}, as duration is 50 years for photographic works. Given the history of Terence English's life, he spent one year in Southern Rhodesia circa 1949. I assume that Zimbabwe copyright law presumably applies for works made in South Rhodesia. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. Ruthven (msg) 10:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lewismr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

^Above 3 files were for a draft article under review. Please delete if it is inappropriate to upload a scan (or small screenshot thereof) provided by a reference librarian in archives. If so I will typescript of letter to serve article until I can get photos from archives. Lewismr (talk) 02:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see below.Lewismr (talk) 02:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^Please delete this one, my mistake. I believe it is my photo of a page from a book pub 1940. I will replace with my photo of original from 1697. Lewismr (talk) 02:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC) I'd like to replace that file with this photo I took of 1697 edition with permission at MHS in Boston, MA USA: File:Cotton Mather's anonymous Life of Phips.jpg[reply]

^These 4 are all my photos from centuries old materials in the archives. The Knepp one is my photo of a hand copy made in the 19th century.Lewismr (talk) 02:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC) All my photos taken in USA on date/time in metadata. Lewismr (talk) 02:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my typescript of Oct 20 letter. I could do same for Sept 2 1692 letter but would prefer to keep older typescript as it has some historical value, discussed in my Sept 2 1692 (draft) article. File:October 20 1692 Cotton Mather letter.pdf Lewismr (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: all but one are PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 10:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMERSON ORLANDO DE SOUZA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information on the photographer of this 3D object. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parishen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution. I can`t understand what is the problem whit this photographies if I took them and the original ones are part of my patrimony.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion the PD-old files. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He is a businessman but with no article. Maybe an article in Cyrillic languages that I can't find. 176.239.99.153 15:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the author died in 1991, so copyright has not yet expired. Jcb (talk) 21:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. No indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 15:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use, from October 2016 at http://www.plovdivtime.bg/news.php?id=169&lang=en, which page is marked (C) Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art gallery photo shows art, please see COM:DW. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Storkk. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of people with gallery art, previously considered deminimus, but without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Asclepias. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly credited to Lim Soo Peng 2011 at source https://lspeng1951.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image in use as publicity photo long before upload here, see http://www.ragusanews.com/articolo/59491/alessandro-quasimodo-casa-cimeli-pi%C3%B9-importanti-nobel for one example. I think this requires COM:OTRS for permission due to the prior publications and the uncertainty about who created it. The version uploaded to Commons is of very low quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With author "unknown" the currently provided license (term is author's life...) cannot be used. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: @Ellin Beltz: feel free to correct a template put there by mistake. Ruthven (msg) 10:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was previously kept, but there is no information that this image is 19th Century other than the statement of the uploader, who was unable to provide a source, or an author. COM:PRP. It is also not in use. It's not up to me to fix a template for license when I do not believe this is properly licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another version of this photograph is found here. That webpage lists the photograph's date as "before 1900". However, the source being listed in this image's summary as just an old 19th century publication does not seem acceptable. I'm going to fix the template in regards to the missing needed US pd tag which doesn't seem to be in doubt but that doesn't resolve whether the photo is in the Swiss public domain. Libertybison (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that it is free in the USA or in Switzerland. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this looks like a cd cover or something, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Roger Lester Jcb (talk) 17:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screencap from video in the source. Not free content Holy Goo (talk) 23:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Negative. Is CC FREE. Check out [12]. Jackgba (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm you seem to be correct. My bad. Holy Goo (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonfree licensing. This may be relevant, however [13] ~nmaia d 18:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof provided that the copyright on this was not registered and renewed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:Herbert Morrison announcer.jpg Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given CC license is incorrect. Is the a valid license tempalte for it? JuTa 22:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: @JuTa: , the correct template in this case is {{pd-old-auto|deathdate=1936}}. Ruthven (msg) 10:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Not below TOO. Jcb (talk) 22:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Below TOO imho: circles and writings. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 23:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like it's been a poor name causing a bad assignment. Reported at OTRS 2017080610011565. It appears that this image has been used in lots of articles for Fernande Olivier. However the OTRS poster points out that it's actualy Fernande Barrey (see File:Fernande vintage nude photo 8.jpg. Looking at the faces, I can see his point. My suggestion is that both images need to be properly named and File:Agelou21.jpg needs not to be re-linked in the renaming process - both linked web sites are long dead, and no archive - or we just delete as not enough data to verify identity. Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update - this link shows what the true Fernande Olivier looks like - http://www.pablo-ruiz-picasso.net/theme-fernandeolivier.php Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In use, so no reason for deletion. Rename if needed. Yann (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann. Ruthven (msg) 10:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruff tuff cream puff as no permission (No permission since). This file has been up for 3 years, since it's not impossible that it's freely licensed, I think it should have a full DR. Storkk (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, sorry, I tagged it as needing permission because the Marine Conservation Institute is a nonprofit organization, not a US government agency. While their licensing info is sort of hard to find on their website, most of these diagrams and maps come from their atlas project, and at the bottom of that page it says "© Marine Conservation Institute", indicating that they copyright some or all of their work. Also we may need more specific permission if the author is listed by name. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be a compilation of this image (https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/c0.83.720.720/20478473_258231151336391_1333603765067972608_n.jpg signed Morius) and some letters. I don't think its fully own work of uploader since I found the Morius image all over the internet prior to this upload which makes the figurative part of this image a COM:COPYVIO. In no search did I find anything about this musical band. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carles raurell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These three images are stated to be "own work" but they are apparently older images, only one of which has a date outside this century!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: They need some more updating on licenses, I updated dates and they are all pre-1900. Very likely PD so go for trying to fix instead of deletion please, also since they are in use. --Basvb (talk) 11:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{subst:dd}} Фотография скачана с вот этого сайта и выдаётся за собственную работу. http://yakonkurent.com/lisa-rulit-elena-lisovskaya-biografiya-i-skolko-zarabatyivaet-na-youtube/ Artem Ponomarenko (talk) 07:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011 in metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from discussion page: This picture was taken by me. It is not copyright violation. With thanks- ஜுபைர் அக்மல் (talk) 16:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
ஜுபைர்_அக்மல் Please file with COM:OTRS to explain how the metadata says "copyright, Spreadtrum, 2011" but it is yours. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ticket:2017081310000251 --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was taken that picture on 27 May 2016 that huwai camera bought on 2011. i think that meta data says camera model and quality and copy right of camera model. Thats all i know. With thanks. ஜுபைர் அக்மல் (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As en:Spreadtrum is not doing pictures but instead producing electronic chips they obviously done something wrong with the exif.--Sanandros (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Sanandros. Green Giant (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, historic photograph. Needs source, author and proper date to assist with licensing, but it's not "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although published under Creative Commons license on Flickr, it's scooped from PBS doc promo "We Shall Remain, Wounded Knee" and may not be under compatible license. Florn (talk) 22:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by アイソン as no permission (No permission since). Possibly below the COM:TOO? Storkk (talk) 09:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The author of this work is 酒鬼薔薇聖斗. But the uploader wrote "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:". The uploader may not be 酒鬼薔薇聖斗. I cannot judge about COM:TOO. アイソン (talk) 10:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, for me it seems too simple for copyright. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source to support that this would be a picture taken by an employee of the federal government as a part of their official duties. Jcb (talk) 22:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I didn't find the image in a quick look through the book mentioned for source by the uploader but I could have missed it. Someone else could have a look: [14]. The image could be a press agency photo from 1972. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, can be also taken by South Vietnamese soldier. Taivo (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was found on a webpage with an up-to-date copyright notice. Yoninah (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the copyright is for the page not for the photo. Note that the photo IS NOT marked as copyrighted and the university gives also a download link for an high quality image. the image is date 1910-1934 and with no copyright notice, therefore is under the PD-no notice domain, as rightly stated in the licence. On the website there is the notice:
Online Photo Galleries, Electronic Theses, Dissertations, Proceedings, and Publications MSU Library Digital Online Full Object Retrieval collections are downloadable .jpg file format historic photos and documents. http://www.lib.montana.edu/digital/full-object.html
"Downloadable" =/= "not copyrighted", nor does it mean "permission is given to republish", it simply means that the material can be downloaded for the personal use of the downloader. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Page has copyright notice, no mention of the image being PD in its description, as would be usual. Previous commenter has it backwards: copyright is assumed unless otherwise specified. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment very possibly keepable if there were any information about its first publication. Storkk (talk) 10:00, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having been "used and also published by the college" (an assumption - no evidence is presented) has no bearing on its copyright status. The page it was taken from is copyrighted, and that copyright cover the entire page. In any case, on Commons, copyright is assumed, so it is incumbent on the person claiming PD to show the necessary evidence of such. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the photo can be restored, if you give evidence, that the portrait was really published in her lifetime. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:BSicon dBHF-M.svg. No longer in use in articles. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
07:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - history merged as requested. --Jcb (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:BSicon uSKRZ-Bo.svg. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ad.Rejha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These pictures are rephotographs of paintings. Please supply artist's names, dates of work, place of display and so on. At present they are licensed as own work which they aren't.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentUpload is based on Freedom of panoram in the Czech Republic (painting on wall in train station building) {{FoP-Czech Republic}}. The original instalation of artworks is seen for example there: File:Turnov, nádražní hala.jpg. Author of painting is Karel Vik (died 1964). On Commons, we have some cases about czech 2D works (in favor of FoP - still "thin ice"), but now I see, that there are also problems with train stations (interior) as "public space" (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karviná hlavní nádraží, pokladny.jpg). I don't know. --Ad.Rejha (talk) 18:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - I don't think FoP applies here. --Jcb (talk) 20:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has a (C) symbol on legend. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the (c) is deleted and I have given all rights with a e-mail to 'permissions-de@wikimedia.org' from 19.08.2017, 03:43, to Wikipedia. --Charly1234 (talk) 01:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ticket:2017081910000731 exists, but has not yet been handled. Storkk (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this map as it has a (C) statement in the legend. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not "dubious" at all. Charly1234 = the man on the left on this picture: http://www.stalinbahn-trilogie.de/impressum.htm Those guys visited the railroad and published a German book on it, and they run the website where the pics are from. Just not too experienced in copyright stuff. Don't hurry to delete as some other pics. The pics are here for 8 years or so, no sense at all in deleting them in a couple of hours (or even weeks). Let's wait what he says, Druschba4 already left a (German) message on his user page. --Amga (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your words, Amga. The (c) is deleted and I have given all rights with a e-mail to 'permissions-de@wikimedia.org' from 19.08.2017, 03:43, to Wikipedia. By the way: On the picture http://www.stalinbahn-trilogie.de/impressum.htm I´m the second from right. --Charly1234 (talk) 02:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Something odd is going on with this upload and its licensing.

  • Initially uploaded to en:File:OpenXcom XPiratez 097D.jpg, with author stated as en:User:IrrtNie. Tagged as CC0 public domain dedication. Not in use.
  • Moved to Commons by User:WeissEtwas, but now WTFPL2 and change of author to who else but the uploader (User:WeissEtwas). The date remains the same. In use at German Wikipedia.
  • OpenXcom seems to be a free engine under GPLv3 only.[1] OpenXcom, of course, requires UFO: Enemy Unknown graphics.
  • UFO: Enemy Unknown is probably still under copyright (non-free), if relevant.
  • XPiratez seems to be mod by user Dioxine on OpenXcom forums. The copyright of this is unclear, but it distributes a binary and source of OpenXcom OpenXcom Extended and may be under GPLv3.
    • The RAR archive file (Dioxine_XPiratez_099_G5.rar) is taking an extraordinarily long time to extract with unrar-1:5.5.5-1 unrar-free-1:0.0.1+cvs20140707-1+b2 on Debian GNU/Linux. As I finished writing this nomination and doing investigation, I'm still in process of unextracting the archive file.

I expect the uploader to provide a reasonable explanation for the file, or if they're not the author of OpenXcom, OpenXcom Extended, XPiratez, UFO:EU or the screenshot, Commons:OTRS permission to verify the license and permission from copyright holders. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 19:51, 12 August 2017 (UTC); edited 20:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC); edited 21:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC); edited 21:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC); edited 22:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. See LICENSE.txt of the source code repository. There are no copyright headers in few files I checked, so or (at your option) any later version seems unlikely.

 Info: Not a great start into this venture. Some quotes from the partially extracted archive file (smear words included):

A short credits list in thanks to various people whose artistic work I've stolen [sic] and often redesigned, in alphabetical order. Precise contributions are hard or impossible to track since there is hardly anything I've left unchanged or used as intended.

— XPiratez readme/Credits.txt

The mod is using graphic works of many authors, downloaded from Interntet [sic], for backgrounds and Pedia screens.

— XPiratez readme/Credits.txt

But also:

DISCLAIMER:

The contents are public domain, credit would be nice, just don't distribute the full mod under your name. Non-commercial. If you ask money for any of these files, I hope your whole family dies of cancer :P [sic]

Any background art contained belongs to its authors and I take no credit for it. Only pixel art is mine, unless otherwise stated.

— XPiratez readme/XPiratez_readme.txt

The engine mentioned in credits also seems to be OpenXcom Extended, a derivative work by Yankes. There's also an extensive list of authors in the credits file. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 20:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: I gave up on attempting to extract the full archive. I don't know why it's taking so long, but I think I've gathered sufficient information. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 20:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Finally, neither IrrtNie or WeissEtwas appear in XPiratez readme/Credits.txt of the Dioxine_XPiratez_099_G5.rar archive file. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 20:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Almost forgot about the following piecemeal.

If someone feels like my mod is using their works in an inappropriate fashion, let me know and it will be replaced. Everything else is my own work and can be used freely as long as credit is given. Same with any modifications of this mod, just don't brand it with my name as official version (but I might include any changes sent or proposed IN the official version).

— XPiratez readme/Credits.txt

2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 20:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: The source code of OpenXcom is not apparently distributed (from what I can tell from unrar -t Dioxine_XPiratez_099_G5.rar output) unlike previously stated, but LICENSE.txt and README.md of GPLv3 / OpenXcom 1.0 is included in the root of the archive file. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 20:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Yankes' OpenXcom Extended engine source code is free software, hosted on GitHub and licensed under GPLv3.[1] This is what XPiratez uses (version 3.7 of the engine). The source code of OpenXcom Extended is offered written (a plain link to the source code repository), though quite hidden in both XPiratez file hierarchy and OpenXcom Extended README. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 21:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Obstsorte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination, kept one with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Obstsorte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspapers/magazines and diagrams are not "own work" of uploader. The licenses here range from CCO to "self" and with no sources other than "own work" it's impossible to help fix this.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course these are not my works. This is easy to see. Are you aware of how demotivating your fire extinguishing applications are? Would not it be better if you tell me what I clicked wrong? I've invested a lot of work.--Obstsorte (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Obstsorte "The licenses here range from CCO to "self" and with no sources other than "own work" it's impossible to help fix this." What is needed are actual sources where the materials came from, correct dates, and your best efforts to put a license on them which is not "own work" license. Some of these may be old enough to be kept, others may not be. There are also other fine points of licensing which you may find helpful at COM:HIRTLE as well as COM:L. It's not a matter of motivating or demotivating; the Commons servers are in the United States and materials have to be free of copyright to be hosted here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Titelkopf Volkszeitung 29.11.1891.jpg is TOO as it's just the title which is not copyrightable. de:Theodor Wolff died in 1943 so File:Berliner Tageblatt, letzter Artikel von Theodor Wolf vom 5. März 1933.jpg is PD.

These Files are also TOO.
File:Anzeige Elb-Kaviar in Kreuzzeitung vom 23 12 1857.jpg is not copyrighted. Then I cropped File:Deutsche Tageszeitung vom 9. Dezember 1915 (cropped).jpg so this is now TOO. File:Auszug Amberger Tagblatt vom 3. Oktober 1867.jpg is from 1867 so it's pretty old eventually we can also keep that.--Sanandros (talk) 23:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination, kept some from before 1897. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]