Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![153 File:A dog "chimera" running.jpg](#File:A_dog_"chimera"_running.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_станція,_локомотив_-_тепловоз_М62.jpg){kind=link}
_-_станція,_локомотив_-_тепловоз_М62.jpg){kind=link}
_-_станція,_поїзд_(_D1_).jpg){kind=link}
_-_станція,_поїзд_(D1).jpg){kind=link}
,_житло.jpg){kind=link}
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
_,_church.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_station_of_the_regional_trains.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_церква.jpg){kind=link}
,_святий_Ян_Непомуцький.jpg){kind=link}
,_хрест.jpg){kind=link}
,_цвинтар.jpg){kind=link}
,_церква_св._Духа.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Montage of actor photos. Probably 3 copyright violations. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Book cover of magazine. Written publication date: April 2015. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 03:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: book cover, no permission. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
A bookcover which would be the property of the publisher. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -
Advertising. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Also non-trivial corporate logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrongly named cat, has to be deleted. There is no affluent Ohrenbach to the river Kocher, what was intended is Category:Ohrenbach (Deubach) just created. Single file sub old cat transferred to there. Please delete now. --Silvicola (talk) 08:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: dupe & empty cat. --Achim (talk) 17:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
A small, low quality, and unused image. B dash (talk) 02:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC) File:Roke 2017-07-22 0800Z.png is much bigger and better. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)}}
{{speedy|Better Color No B&W}} 위키광역시 (talk) 05:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - previously deleted. --Guanaco (talk) 06:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Low-re image + Missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Scan of a newspaper : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that this image of Mao Tse-Tung dates from 2017 or is "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
From the Cars movies... not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Band photo with source "Another Century" unlikely to be own work and more likely a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This pic should not have to be deleted. It has been on the page for months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravin9976 (talk • contribs)
Deleted: Copyvio: https://tineye.com/search/1b97e33a4852b08b78bd4d4de97faa6b7d571301/?sort=size&order=desc. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
All rights reserved at Flickr since 2009 for this image https://www.flickr.com/photos/shanecasey51/4778392946 Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This image in tin-eye search leads to "The Irish Times" from 2016, my connection was too slow for google search. Unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Irish Times Feb 2016. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
The red border at the bottom and the little floating watermarks woudl suggest this was photographed from a screen, tv or computer, and is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: logos clearly visible, screenshot w/o permission. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
That ghostly little "You Tube" logo in upper left corner suggests this is a screenshot, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata shows this was in and out of Facebook before being here Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
FBMD in meta shows this was swiped from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
No free of rights. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No free of use. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Missing informations + No free of use. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No free of use. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
low quality image of com:PENIS, and com:IDENT Pippobuono (talk) 07:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also third upload, was File:Small penis.jpg.File:Micro -penis.jpg. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a CD cover, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also reupload of File:Diego moreno.png. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
It's unlikely that the uploader is "Richard K. Lublin" and more likely they don't have the right to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - reuploaded File:Acting Section-Lublin and Mendelsohn on filming set of "Land of Steady Habits".png. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
No proof this was published 30 years ago. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Subject died 14 April 1978, photograph old ernough to be PD in Iran. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous discussion was improperly closed prior to seven days. In any case, no one provided proof of publication, only proof of creation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- True that, my bad. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Background of this logo is not too simple for copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment What the hell does that even mean? Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 08:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:Joe FM logo.png Ronhjones (Talk) 00:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Quite blurry, seems difficult to use. I could not understand which city this is. E4024 (talk) 07:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Tourist snapshot, out of scope. Bot upload Pugilist (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Tourist snapshot in bad quality; out of scope. there are several better pictures of the artefact in the picture Pugilist (talk) 16:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
personal photo showing an identifiable lady, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
personal photo showing identifiable little children, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
personal photo showing identifiable young ladies, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, as well as claimed 'own work' but missing EXIF data etc to verify, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nonetjustchance (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – files uploaded by a WP0 abuser, three of them contain embedded data. --jdx Re: 14:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manhattantailor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images from https://www.pinterest.pt/gee2559/anz%C3%BCge/ etc.
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (20).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (19).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (18).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (17).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (15).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (16).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (14).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (10).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (13).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (9).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (8).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (7).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (6).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (5).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (4).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (2).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (3).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor custom tailor hong kong (1).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (18).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (17).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (15).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (16).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (14).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (12).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (13).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (11).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (9).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (10).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (8).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (6).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (7).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (5).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (4).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (2).png
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (3).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (1).png
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong (2).jpg
- File:Manhattan Tailor Best custom tailors in hong kong.jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (18).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (17).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (16).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (15).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (14).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (13).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (11).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (10).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (9).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (8).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (7).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (6).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (5).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (2).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (3).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (4).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (1).jpg
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong (1).png
- File:Best Custom Shirts Tailor in Hong Kong.gif
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4ing (talk) 08:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —RP88 (talk) 00:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Image used solely on promotional user pages. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Linked in photography 176.239.99.241 14:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Linked in photography Tylck (talk) 05:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
The Walt Disney Company Copyvio; Copyrighted fictional characters Hume42 (talk) 06:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please speedy close this deletion request. The file meets the speedy deletion criteria, and I Unintentionally nomination for deletion because is the first time that I´m doing this. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Hume42 (talk) 06:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 9 August 2017 Daphne Lantier (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Maxresdefau55.jpg (Copyright violation,. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. This problem was discussed in a previous DR but it looks like the uploader uploaded another set of images since this image was uploaded after the April 13 DR. Leoboudv (talk) 05:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Joaryep81
[edit]
Unused personal logos; self-promotion by a YouTuber. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 20:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
LOw-re image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep: In use. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)- Keep In use. Obviously higher resolution would be much better, but that is not sufficient reason for deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 15:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep In use. In addition, better than nothing. --Benoît Prieur (d) 17:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Obvious advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 21:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Onewayministrie
[edit]
Self-promotion by a single-purpose account; the first file is a personal logo, the second is a photo with a copyright watermark, probably the property of a professional photographer. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 21:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal political protest artwork. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Add the following (unused personal political statements):
- File:Marcial Molanes futuro alcalde de marin en el 2015 dice claramente no a la corrupción, ni al paro, ni al enchufismo.jpg
- File:Partido Bloque Social con su nueva cachiporra anticorrupción el terror de los corruptos.jpg
- File:Partido bloque social anuncia su candidatura a las municipales del año que viene.png
- File:Bloque social.jpg
- File:Marcial entregando las propuestas del pueblo.jpg
- File:Contra el paro, a favor del trabajo,.jpg
-Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 21:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rivera.m.e (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work on this collection of glam shots and composites. Various sizes, only four have meta data, etc.
- File:Rb-divas-1024.jpg
- File:RBDivasATL3.jpg
- File:Black-ink-crew-chicago.jpg
- File:Bic-massive.jpg
- File:Black-ink-crew-5.jpg
- File:Black ink crew season 3.jpg
- File:Blkcrew.jpg
- File:Basketball-wives-la-season-4.jpg
- File:Bbwla-season-3.jpg
- File:Basketballwivesla2.jpg
- File:VH1 Basketball Wives LA.jpg
- File:Bbwla-massive.jpg
- File:Basketball-wives-season-5.jpg
- File:Basketball wives season 4.jpg
- File:Basketball wives season 3.jpg
- File:BBWMIS2.jpg
- File:BBWMIS1.jpg
- File:Bbw6-massive.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}}s. The uploader doesn't actually claim that this is his or her own work, but openly acknowledges that the photos have been grabbed from Google. The licensing claims are obviously completely made up. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tsewang tharchin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Tsewang tharchin 6.jpg
- File:Tsewang tharchin 5.jpg
- File:Tsewang tharchin 4.jpg
- File:Tsewang tharchin 3.jpg
- File:Tsewang tharchin 1.jpg
- File:Tsewang tharchin.jpg
- File:Tsewang tharchin 2.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image with additional difficulty of photographic tee shirt. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope
Didym (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, just deleted the only page using one of these. Kusma (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:21, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Paul Chenvey.jpg
- File:Paul in the sauna.JPG
- File:My tied cock and balls - Paul Chenevy.jpg
- File:Paul's pierced penis.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey enjoying the sauna.jpg
- File:Erect Paul 01.jpg
- File:Erect Paul 03.jpg
- File:Erect Paul 02.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey vintage 5.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey vintage 4.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey vintage 1.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey vintage 3.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey vintage 2.jpg
- File:Paul on Sanibel.jpg
- File:Paul on the beach.JPG
- File:Paul ready to perform an outdoor violin recital.jpg
- File:Violinist Paul Chenevey.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey playing the harpsichord 04.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey playing the harpsichord 05.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey playing the harpsichord 03.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey playing the harpsichord 02.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey playing the harpsichord 01.JPG
- File:Paul Chenevey posing in the park.jpg
- File:Paul CHENEVEY ENJOYING THE BEACH.jpg
- File:Paul Chenevey on Sanibel.jpg
Ies (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No educational purpose PierreSelim (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope, as per COM:NUDE.
- File:Paul CHenevey posing nude and erect.jpg
- File:Symphony Conductor Paul.jpg
- File:Nude Paul Chenevey.jpg
- File:Paul erect on the beach.jpg
- File:Paul is "Sitting on the Front Porch, Watching All the Cars Drive By".jpg
- File:Angles of Paul.JPG
- File:Nude working.jpg
- File:Sanibel island with Nudepaul.JPG
- File:Aul enjoying the beach.jpg
- File:Young Paul Posing.jpg
- File:Paul and his Violin.jpg
- File:Nude Harpist Paul.jpg
- File:Nude Violist.jpg
- File:Paul enjoying the Beach.JPG
- File:Paul at the pool.jpg
- File:Tumblr m7gp9d4wap1qdevubo1 1280 (1).jpg
- File:NudePaul enjoying thesun.jpg
- File:Nudepaul - a study of angles.JPG
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 14.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 13.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 11.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 10.JPG
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 09.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 07.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 08.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 06.JPG
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 05.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 02.jpg
- File:Pierced Penis - Paul Chenevey 03.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Comment - What's our current stock of naked old men? I'd imagine we mostly have younger specimens, and honestly I don't want to go and check. This does seem like an account which needs a bit of a smack though. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)- Delete - Born to be deleted. --E4024 (talk) 14:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete It is based on COM:NOT. Wikipedia is not an amateur porn site nor a photo hosting site. Plus no educational value has been found. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 20:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Боец Ромашка (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images from video game "City Battle", not own work.
- File:CityBattle 01 logo.jpg
- File:CityBattle RU.png
- File:CityBattle 3Phantoms.png
- File:12 logo.jpg
- File:CityBattle avatar.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
per source, copied from 2017 book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alegallega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader has not demonstrated that they are indeed the creator of all these logos for futbol groups.
- File:Veterinaria rugby escudo.png
- File:Vaimaca rugby escudo.png
- File:Toros.png
- File:Trebol rugby escudo.png
- File:Sanjavier rugby.png
- File:Escudo Saltorugby.png
- File:Escudo Sacramento rugby.png
- File:Escudo Robles rugby.png
- File:Escudo RBRC.png
- File:Escudo Olla rugby.png
- File:Escudo Lobos rugby.png
- File:Escudo Lanceros rugby.png
- File:Escudo Juventud rugby.png
- File:Joaquin suarez rugby.png
- File:Escudo Jaguares rugby.png
- File:Escudo Indios rugby.png
- File:Escudo Furias Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Dolores Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Cimarrones Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Chui Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Cardos Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Caranchos Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Canarios Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Bufalos Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Artigas Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Auxiliadora Rugby.png
- File:Escudo Arlequines RC.png
- File:Escudo Cardenales HD.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
No source of basemap, looks kinda like google. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Book covers are not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Obvious screenshot from internet, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
advertisement, out of com:SCOPE Pippobuono (talk) 09:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
CD or music cover, dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
CD or Music cover, dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
CD or Music cover, dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guarda Municipal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:ROMU Braçal.png
- File:ROMU.png
- File:CANIL.gif
- File:ROMO.png
- File:Defesa Civil.png
- File:Gepar.png
- File:Protetor e Amigo.jpg
- File:Willian Newman.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guarda Municipal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guarda Municipal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:GCM Braga.jpg
- File:Salathiel.jpg
- File:Diógenes.jpg
- File:Viatura ROMU.jpg
- File:Viatura operacional.jpg
- File:GM Falcão.jpg
- File:GM Santos.jpg
- File:GM Sapatim.jpg
- File:GM Oliveira.jpg
- File:GM Abranches.jpg
- File:Viatura da ROMU 5.jpg
- File:Comissão do Estatuto Juridico.jpg
- File:Estatuto Aprovado na Camara.jpg
- File:Viatura Operacional 5.jpg
- File:Estatuto Sindicato.jpg
- File:Viatura da ROMU 4.jpg
- File:GM Fábio 8.jpg
- File:Gepar - Dia do Transito.jpg
- File:Estatuto da GM (18).jpg
- File:Estatuto 002.jpg
- File:Estatuto 003.jpg
- File:Viatura da ROMU Daster 2.jpg
- File:Viatura da ROMU Daster.jpg
- File:Viatura Operacional.jpg
- File:Antiguera 3.jpg
- File:Antiguera.jpg
- File:Antiguera 1.jpg
- File:Viatura de ROMU.jpg
- File:Choque da GM.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
single use selfie, no edits Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete It is not a selfie. Wikimedia is not a photo hosting site. There are photo hosting sites, Facebook, Instagram, etc. for uploading photos. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 04:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality. Looks like a scan of a magazine cover. User has history of copyright violations. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:51, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
artworks by presumably living or recent artist (one was dated 2010). Needs COM:OTRS from actual artist to be retained, also for the image of the man and the painting, would also need permission from photographer.
- File:فريد فاضل - Farid Fadel. (2).jpg
- File:فريد فاضل - Farid Fadel. 1.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان فريد فاضل.jpg
- File:صورة الفنان فريد فاضل.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
If you take a look at his Charlie H. Wright's IMDB page, you'll see the picture there. BHMotoClub is claiming this as his own work. Considering it is on IMDB, I would say it is not his own work. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 00:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license by following the instructions at OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This photo does not relate to any pages of the wikipedia Nbmusic098 (talk) 01:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Graphic of a non-notable rapper. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - no realistic educational use. --Storkk (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
maria camila royero 191.102.114.192 01:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright doubt: we can't host these artworks unless the artist provides a free license release via OTRS. All creative works are assumed to be copyrighted with all rights restricted unless the artist writes to us to explain that they are available under a free license.
To the uploader Samsignal, please read the instructions at Commons:OTRS about how to provide a release. Note that the artist would need to email this themselves and it should come from an email address professionally associated/associated with the artist's online presence. If you are the artist yourself, sorry, we need more information, we can't just accept accounts or usernames that contain the artist's name.
- File:018L06EN Lilies in Love.jpg
- File:106S05NGF Mother Earth.jpg
- File:109S05NGF Mother Nature.png
- File:108S05NG Trinity.png
- File:107S05NGF Life.jpg
- File:105S05NGF Unveiling.jpg
- File:104S05NGF Abundance.jpg
- File:102S05NG Creation.jpg
- File:029S05NG Mother Nature.jpg
- File:028S05NG Oneness.jpg
- File:030S05NG Trinity.jpg
- File:066L13WW Ascension.jpg
- File:046L04EN Island of Love.jpg
- File:045L04EN Oceanic Heaven.jpg
- File:048L13WW Creation.jpg
- File:043L13WW Freedom.jpg
- File:039L13WW Freedom.jpg
- File:041L04EN Tapestry with Pink Flowers.jpg
- File:034L13WW In the Beginning.jpg
- File:033L11NG As Above so Bellow.jpg
- File:030L03EN Color of Love.jpg
- File:028L04EN Order.jpg
- File:027L04EN Mithra.jpg
- File:026L04EN Love at the Beginning.jpg
- File:025L03EN Am I a Drop or the Ocean?.jpg
- File:024L11NG Fluidity.jpg
- File:023L04EN Dawn's Breez.jpg
- File:024L05NG Tree of Life. Jpg.jpg
- File:024L03EN Creation.jpg
- File:021L03EN The Way.jpg
seb26 (talk) 01:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Christian Ferrer earlier. --Storkk (talk) 10:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Definitely not own work 188.23.165.172 01:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: likely PD-textlogo. --Storkk (talk) 10:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely date, but not likely to be old enough to be in the public domain in South Korea. No evidence of permission. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Trying to translate and can't find anything related to a date on the article. Uploader could be the author of the article, but no evidence of permission. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Looks to be someone's old term paper. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Japanese characters at lower right make it appear that this may be a scan from a magazine. No EXIF data, user has history of copyright violations. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality scan of book cover, not likely to be own work. While I am not sure there is anything copyrightable here, there does not seem to be any educational purpose to the extremely low-quality book cover. Out of scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Likely below COM:TOO#Japan, and file is in use (ja:抗てんかん薬), therefore in scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Advertising Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lythronaxargestes (talk · contribs)
[edit]I did not find anything in the sources of these files, or at http://www.nature.com/reprints/index.html which would show that these are considered to be free of copyright, or licensed as shown here. There are other diagrams, maps, etc. by same uploader. These are all illustrations related to the Jianianhualong dinosaur discovery which is totally excellent and educational, but I don't find that the uploader has rights to these images.
- File:Jianianhualong4a.png
- File:Jianianhualong3a.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong3b.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong4.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong5.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong3.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong7.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong2.jpg
- File:Jianianhualong1.jpg
- File:Alligatorellus-1.jpg
- File:Knoetschke-6.png
- File:Knoetschke-11.png
- File:Knoetschke-10.png
- File:Knoetschke-5.png
- File:Knoetschke-3b.png
- File:Knoetschke-3a.png
- File:Knoetschke-7.png
- File:Knoetschke-2.png
- File:Xingxiulong-6.jpg
- File:Xingxiulong-3.jpg
- File:Xingxiulong-1.jpg
- File:Douzhanopterus-2.jpg
- File:Liaodactylus-1.jpg
- File:Liaodactylus-2.jpg
- File:Euchambersia-10.png
- File:Euchambersia-13.png
- File:Euchambersia-4.png
- File:Euchambersia-9.png
- File:Dinocephalosaurus-embryo-3.jpg
- File:Bulbasaurus-4.jpg
- File:Bulbasaurus-13.jpg
- File:Bulbasaurus-5.jpg
- File:Bulbasaurus-7.jpg
- File:Bulbasaurus-1.jpg
- File:Bulbasaurus-6.jpg
- File:Yehuecauhceratops-4.png
- File:Yehuecauhceratops-5.png
- File:Yehuecauhceratops-2.png
- File:Yehuecauhceratops-3.png
- File:Yehuecauhceratops-1.png
- File:Keilhauia-9.png
- File:Keilhauia-4.png
- File:Keilhauia-8.png
- File:Keilhauia-3.png
- File:Keilhauia-1.png
- File:Eurazhdarcho-1.png
- File:Gargano fauna.jpg
- File:Hatzegopteryx-5.jpg
- File:Garganornis-3.jpg
- File:Garganornis-1.jpg
- File:Brancasaurus map.jpg
- File:Limusaurus-arm.png
- File:Limusaurus forelimb 2.png
- File:Brancasaurus-15.jpg
- File:Tingmiatornis-3.jpg
- File:Tongtianlong-4-horizontal.jpg.png
- File:Tongtianlong-2.jpg
- File:Tongtianlong-5.jpg
- File:Tongtianlong-4.jpg
- File:Wiehenvenator albati by Midiaou.jpg
- File:Troodon-inequalis-by-Midiaou.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ellin Beltz, if you scroll down on the linked sources for the Nature Communications articles, you can CLEARLY SEE THE TEXT THAT SAYS THE FOLLOWING:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Lythronaxargestes (talk) 03:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I can also confirm that these images are all properly copyrighted for usage here and on wikipedia. All are published under acceptable licenses, as can be confirmed by searching into the licenses of journal such as PLOS, Nature Communications, PeerJ, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica etc. The artwork by Midiaou can also be confirmed by a visit to the listed websites in their descriptions. IJReid (talk) 03:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I have also confirmed that Live birth in an archosauromorph reptile also contains the correct Creative Commons license 4.0 Share alike license for the Dinocephalosaurus image. Ellin Beltz, it seems that you need to do due diligence here. Would you please go to each of the sources, search for
Creative Commons, then immediately take any article off this nomination for deletion where you have found the proper license? Peaceray (talk) 05:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - most of these are from CC-licensed journals, the last couple are user-created. Mass-delete under no circumstances. Check the journals before nominating next time. FunkMonk (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your comments. I did check the Journal links. I didn't find the licenses before. Thank you again for your help. Deletion nominations are a process not a judgement, there's no reason to be upset about them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz:
Thank you! Sorry if it felt like we were beating up on you. Like you, I think that we are passionate lot, & in this case we just wanted to keep properly licensed images in place. I, for one, appreciate your efforts to keep things copacetic. Peaceray (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- No hard feelings, of course, but we have to be cautious; I've seen at least one artist stop donating his images to Commons because they kept being deleted by admins because he had also uploaded them on his own website with a different license (even though dual licenses are allowed), which is very unfortunate. FunkMonk (talk) 21:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- None on my end. By nominating all of them, when they are Kept, no one else will make this error of nominating them because the little warning box "read previous discussion" will come up and they can see the answer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- No hard feelings, of course, but we have to be cautious; I've seen at least one artist stop donating his images to Commons because they kept being deleted by admins because he had also uploaded them on his own website with a different license (even though dual licenses are allowed), which is very unfortunate. FunkMonk (talk) 21:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz:
Kept: Withdrawn: CC-by 4.0. --Storkk (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Post cards are not own work of uploader. For collages to be included in Commons, each image has to be uploaded and licensed properly. Also notice this is self-promotional. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: each image must be correctly sourced and licensed. --Storkk (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Magazine or newspaper from 1939. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Text apparently by the Michoacan government. Mexican government works have a copyright term of 100 years-- I am not sure this applies to state government works, but will mark it for undeletion in 2039 2040 in case. --Storkk (talk) 10:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Image depicts an item not made by the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Even though the it wasn't made by the uploader, it could be the university student ID of the uploader. Regardless, Wikipedia is not a place to upload such a things. It serves no purpose to any article or project. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 20:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader unlikely to own the copyright to the ID card design. In use, therefore in scope, however. --Storkk (talk) 10:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Claimed to be by Adnan Safnar on Pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/ab_4all/p-a-k-i-s-t-a-n-%D9%BE%D8%A7%DA%A9%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86/?lp=true Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Bogus copyright claim; these are obviously screen shots of a television program. Bri (talk) 02:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Bogus copyright claim; this is obvious screen shot of a television program. Bri (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Bri: please use {{Copyvio}} for obvious cases next time. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of image on billboard, even assuming billboard photo was taken by uploader which is doubtful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Storkk (talk) 10:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The book depicted has copyright as do the images in the picture. It's most likely a stock photo image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Both copyright holders (book's and photo's) must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Nominating based on COM:PRP. All the other images by this uploader were taken from internet with or without additional modification. Based on the title and description, I think this is one more of same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thehotgirl555 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of self, and pictures taken from internet, or photographed from screens or other sources are not part of the COM:SCOPE and goals of the project. This group is two pictures of dubious copyright, and two selfies, both of which are smaller than Facebook sized.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
1969 publication is not own work of this uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. UK publication, copyright term is 70 pma. --Storkk (talk) 10:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
1969 publication is not own work of this uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. UK publication, copyright term is 70 pma. --Storkk (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
No indication of own work on these older, black and white/ halftoned/ pictures.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, original photographers must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image with strange caption on image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Archivo con autorización de derechos expresada por el dueño de la autoría, quién es el conductor oficial del documental citado en ésa página wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esperanza Vargas (talk • contribs)
- Please have the actual creator give their permission at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Scope and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: vandalism. --Storkk (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esperanza Vargas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work on these three photos of same logo.
- File:Logo Invisible Killer Wikipedia.png
- File:Logo verde invisible killer II.png
- File:Logo verde invisible killer.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, additional probable scope issues. --Storkk (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Cropped from an image found at http://www.sindbancarios.org.br/index.php/quem-somos/diretoria/ , this gent seems to be a bank director, but doesn't seem to have copyright on the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this tiny, low quality file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Original photographer must confirm license via OTRS, or it should be explained why this photo has fallen into the public domain. --Storkk (talk) 10:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
In metadata "Copyright holder ©mariabirba2013|birbafotografia.com" not uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. mariabirba should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image at Facebook size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata shows this image has been in and out of Facebook before coming here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Size of this image, and quality suggests it was in and out of Facebook first. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Obviously not a selfie, but claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scope and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Advertising. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, but probably taken by professional photographer. Out of scope for personal image, and probably COM:COPYVIO too. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It doesn't appear that the photographer created the objects in the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW of the sculpture. --Storkk (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING... Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Beer labels are not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PACKAGING. --Storkk (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Carl Hiaasen pictures
[edit]Probably copyright violations. File:Hiaasen2016.jpg and File:Carl Hiaasen author photo.jpg are identical pictures (aside from size) both derived the subject's website, which says that Quinn Hiaasen (presumably a relative) took the picture. Unless the uploader is in fact Quinn (which I highly doubt), the claims of own work are false. SNUGGUMS (talk) 03:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Quinn Hiaasen should confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
ya no lo quiero publicar JoibenR (talk) 03:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused file. --Storkk (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Clear copyvio of French sports apparel manufacturer - Fma12 (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
No educational value at all MF-W 04:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete It is a screenshot of a Google search. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 21:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miss Professor KG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fan gallery of images about various Hip/Hop or Rap performers. At least one album cover, a pair of duplicates, and only two images have metadata, the others are very small, all leading to the conclusion that these were harvested not own work.
- File:CharlesInCharge.jpg
- File:Producer Like in Los Angeles.jpg
- File:Skhye Hutch.jpg
- File:Skhye Hutch performing at the True Sounds Producers Award, 2012.jpg
- File:Skhye Hutch in a Los Angeles Recording Studio.jpg
- File:DAE ONE in a Los Angeles recording studio.jpg
- File:DAE ONE at Record Plant Studios in Hollywood, CA.jpg
- File:DAE ONE & DoggyStyle Records owner Snoop Dogg.jpg
- File:DAE ONE & Kendrick Lamar.jpg
- File:DAE ONE working in his studio.jpg
- File:DAE ONE at SXSW in 2014.jpg
- File:DAE ONE & Rapper Big Pooh.jpg
- File:DAE ONE, Schoolboy Q, Mac Lucci & Casey Veggies.jpg
- File:DAE ONE working on his NORD keyboard.jpg
- File:DAE ONE at the LNS Ent Studio in Hawthorne, CA.jpg
- File:Trak D in Trak D Studios.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
appears to be from an advert or catalog rather than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Ellin, This is my work I own ISBI my email is John@isbi.us Please contact me. Thanks John Murphy (blindajes)
- As previous, please contact COM:OTRS to resolve. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
appears to be copied from ISBI Armoring company, see mark upper left. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Ellin, This is my work I own ISBI my email is John@isbi.us Please contact me. Thanks John Murphy User:blindajes — Preceding unsigned comment added by blindajes (talk • contribs) .
- Actually, please contact COM:OTRS to resolve this. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Painting without permission from creator. Please use COM:OTRS to get permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this municipal logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Non notable logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Collabr is not notable. It is a place where you go to do work, rent conference rooms, and rent screening room/networking zones. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 07:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The overprinting on this image suggests that it's not own work of uploader but copied from another source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, but might be old enough to be kept if there was any information attached to these files.
- File:Hulasa honour.png
- File:P- Hulasa Ram Dutta 2014-05-25 15-32.jpg
- File:Title of Rais Chauntra 2014-05-25 13-53.jpg
- File:P- Hulasa Ram Dutta Raise Chauntra, -Mandi State 2014-05-25 13-52.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: These are apparently from around 1940, so it is unlikely they are out of copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: No description, no cats, not useful. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal image with additional difficulty of the depicted artwork at right. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
If the template is correct, this image is credited to someone not the uploader, who also appears to be the subject of the image. More likely it's a promotional image uploaded here without actual permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
CD or Music Cover, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LukasMuriel (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality ilages of com:PENIS, there is enough of this stuff in Category:Human penis
- File:Semen 2.jpg
- File:Demihairy penis .jpg
- File:Male masturbation gif.gif
- File:Trendy penis.jpg
- File:Curved brown penis.jpg
- File:Shy penis.jpg
- File:Lazy penis.jpg
- File:A cute brown penis.jpg
- File:Grabbing my penis.jpg
- File:Brown penis glans.jpg
- File:Little bent brown penis.jpg
- File:Shaved brown-coloured human penis.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Almost everytime I and a few others say "delete, got enough of this stuff", others come and try to prove, no, we haven't got enough ps. Therefore my opinion/vote, which would begin with a "d" I prefer to keep to myself. That's it. --E4024 (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality images which Commons already has no shortage of. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LukasMuriel (talk · contribs)
[edit]There doesn't seem to be anything added to our collection of COM:PENIS in these images.
- File:Demi-hairy penis II.jpg
- File:My penis is a little bent.jpg
- File:A photo of my penis.jpg
- File:Semi-erect brown penis.jpg
- File:Shaved frontal view penis.jpg
- File:Frontal view of my brown penis.jpg
- File:Male human penis liquid.jpg
- File:Brown-coloured erect penis.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
RuhaniKusari786 at Instagram 141.196.193.196 21:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 11:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Uploader asserts they have written permission for the stated licence but there is no proof. The permission needs to be provided to OTRS. Whpq (talk) 23:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission. Ruthven (msg) 11:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This is not a simple photograph, it is a drawing or an artistic depiction. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment That makes it deletion worthy? Your reasoning is flawed. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 04:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep actually is a posterization of a photograph. I am careful about copyright laws and wouldn't have uploaded a drawing. At least we can discuss whether the post-treatment of the photograph is an artistic addition per se but the original photograph is in PD per 1941 Italian copyright act, plus the rest of the sleeve has not artistic originality being only text. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The short term copyright in Italian law applies only to photographs. This is an album cover that happens to contain a photograph. Colorization is sufficiently creative to add a copyright, so I think posterization also probably does. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FoP is only for buildings in Japan. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep {{PD-text}} for the sign, and COM:UA for the bench. I'm not sure I see anything copyrightable here. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Storkk. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This taken in a museum, first nothing say it is permanently displayed, nor if it is in public domain for another reason. I don't think FoP can apply here without further informations. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: It's probably PD-Old, but there is no information about location so it is useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It seems to be taken in a shop, therefore the artwork is not permanently displayed, and nothing say if it is in PD for another reason Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - also useless without description. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. There is no evidence that this is a US government image. Leoboudv (talk) 05:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. The uploader only has 3 images on Commons and may not be familiar with licenses. . Leoboudv (talk) 05:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. The uploader only has 3 images on Commons and may not be familiar with licenses. Leoboudv (talk) 05:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. Leoboudv (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: The flickrbot passed this image where the flickr license was CC0. That PD license is OK for Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. A license change to one of the three licenses mentioned is needed here. Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Qwertyuiopasdfghjklxcvbnm,. 207.6.16.183 05:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![05:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/08/09#c-207.6.16.183-2017-08-09T05:41:00.000Z-File:A_dog_"chimera"_running.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
![11:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/08/09#c-Jameslwoodward-2017-08-16T11:55:00.000Z-File:A_dog_"chimera"_running.jpg){kind=link}
non-encyclopedic image, outside project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I created this file by mistake. I meant to replace File:Robert Altman Cannes crop.jpg. WikiPedant (talk) 06:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non trival logo design - Equivalent media at English Wikipedia w:File:CEBL LOGO.jpg under a non-free license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 00:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment How is it non-free if it is on another Wikipedia project? Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FB, YT on the file. Own work? E4024 (talk) 06:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
bad joke, no educational purpose Avron (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Quite out of place. E4024 (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio -- copyright is held by the author. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The uploader is not the owner of this private residence and he has not the permission to upload this picture. BR, 141.90.9.62 07:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Das Foto habe ich gemacht von einem öffentlichen Wanderweg aus, der von Großbuchholz nach Westen über den Damm der ehemaligen Schlammteiche der Grube Lüderich nach Grube Grünewald führt. Dabei habe ich an keiner Stelle Privatgelände betreten. Vielmehr habe ich das Haus mit dem Objektiv meiner Kamera herangezogen, was erlaubt ist. --Pingsjong (talk) 08:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Siehe Panoramafreiheit. --Janclas (talk) 08:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- The RfD is not based on facts. The picture was taken in accordance with freedom of panorama in fully respect of the german and most international copyright laws. Morty (talk) 07:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - It may violate German privacy laws, but that is not a reason to delete it here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
What's this, please? E4024 (talk) 07:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment What, the fact they are using Windows XP still? They are using the Spanish language Wikipedia. What it comes down to is it is useless. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 10:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, cannot understand what this is and what it will serve (scope). If it is a work of art, any permission? E4024 (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
contains watermark Janick Entremont (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader's request 5 months after uploading, while uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after uploading. Janick changed file license into non-free, but this is not valid, because free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Please remove this file! I don' t want do share it online anymore. Janick Entremont (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Too late. Once it's published, the license cannot be revoked anymore. --Voyager (talk) 21:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept, no new arguments here. Free licenses are irrevocable. Once in public domain, you cannot prohibit using and distributing the file, there's nothing you can do here. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I think this is personal file and not used. E4024 (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copiright violation? At source http://nepalisamajuk.com/news/1420-youngest-girl-in-the-world-to-climb-mount-everest.html "All rights reserved". No evidence that this 21-st century photo is public domain. Alexander Roumega (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copiright violation? At source http://www.viralindiandiary.com/malavath-purna/ copirught is. No evidence that this 21-st century photo is in public domain. Alexander Roumega (talk) 08:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Caselle in pittari.jpg
Small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Uploader is always himself depicted. Real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
COM:COIN#Important points: non-free photo of PD 3d-object from external source with no indication of free license. Photographer's permission needed. Sealle (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of 3d-artwork without author's permission. Sealle (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Oeuvre d'art récent , pas de FOP in France Havang(nl) (talk) 10:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
-2017-08-09T10:33:00.000Z-File:Voncq-FR-08-Semelles_de_Vent-a1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Oeuvre d'art récent, pas de FOP in France Havang(nl) (talk) 10:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
-2017-08-09T10:34:00.000Z-File:Gare_de_Voncq,_sculpture_Rimbaud.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
All files seemed to come from http://www.alestis.aero/ and were uploaded as User:Comunicacionalestis. No evidence of permission sent to COM:OTRS for re-licensing those as CC-by-sa.
- File:A350 XWB BF Structure (I).jpg
- File:A350 XWB BF Structure.jpg
- File:Planta de Puerto Real (PRE).jpg
- File:A320 Joint HTP.jpg
- File:AFP S19.1 A350 XWB.jpg
- File:Planta de Puerto Real.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ariadacapo (talk) 10:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep A campaign button is not a coin and does not have the 3-dimensional texture necessary to allow creative input to the photograph. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is as ordinary a campaign button as you can imagine - name, position, red white and blue - and the photograph of it seems just as ordinary. (Note I am the original uploader of the image, which at the time I was doing under my Wikipedia username rather than the Commons account I use now for images.) Jonathan Schilling (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete Bridgeman applies only to works that are truly flat. This button has rounded edges which, in fact, do show up in the image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Jim. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chess.com
[edit]http://wayback.archive.org/web/20160310185939/https://www.chess.com/download/view/chesscom---high-res-logo-pack2 does not specify a specific free license. It does not state if derivatives are allowed to be made or not, It does not state if it is allowed to use it commerically or not. A explicit release under a free license is needed, not just "feel free to use it for e.g. themes, club flyers etc." (paraphrased).
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
personal image TheSandeepRaje (talk) 04:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Please delete this file because our article was rejected by wikipedia due to relevance and we do not want logos etc. of our association on this page Borussia1960 (talk) 07:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Ok. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Please delete this file because our article was rejected by wikipedia due to relevance and we do not want logos etc. of our association on this page Borussia1960 (talk) 07:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Ok. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 神戸市企画調整局創造都市推進部 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is needed to submit application to Kobe city government to use this logo. Likely below the COM:TOO#Japan, and any need to get Kobe's permission would likely be a non-copyright restriction. Storkk (talk) 07:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I myself submitted the deletion request and totally agree. 企画調整局創造都市推進部07:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Below com:TOO. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 神戸市企画調整局創造都市推進部 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is needed to submit application to Kobe city government to use this logo Likely below the COM:TOO#Japan, and any need to get Kobe's permission would likely be a non-copyright restriction. Storkk (talk) 07:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I myself submitted the deletion request and totally agree. 企画調整局創造都市推進部07:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Below com:TOO. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
http://bostonriver.com.uy/mediocampistas-2016/agustin-nadruz Tarawa 07:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
I doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, and the subject.
BrightRaven (talk) 08:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Requirement of the author Laterne (talk) 09:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please Delete both pictures. This doesn't look serious. --E4024 (talk) 09:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio image Greenbörg (talk) 09:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only work of uploader, probably extracted from a newspaper Bugmenot1992 (talk) 09:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Good bike picture. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Was kept before, but I concur with the previous proposer: Unused personal file. Bike is secondary. E4024 (talk) 09:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - not a "good bike picture". --Jcb (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Own the image, please delete... thanks. 75.133.0.128 11:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well I have no problem with you asking for deletion of a page of deletion request, but I think you should contribute on this one : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Small-penis.jpg, Hello Pippobuono (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. We don't delete'em. (I think the key word here is "small". :-) --E4024 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing to do here. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope/ No educational value/ personal image - hako9 09:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deleted by admin User:Sealle - hako9 16:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This is a picture of myself, which I used in my profile page in the German Wikipedia. I don't need it any more and want it removed. MauriceKA (talk) 11:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a problem. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING the image needs OTRS-permission from producing company representative. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The file is in category Userpage images but I don't see any user page with this pic. E4024 (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
http://www.iitbbs.ac.in/photo-catagory.php?catagory=campus says: Photo by Souryadipta Ghosh. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The subject of the photo en:Venniyil Govinda Panicker died in 1972. The photo is unlikely to be the uploader's own work as stated. Diannaa (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Advert of moving company. E4024 (talk) 12:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears at higher res elsewhere, likely copyrighted: https://www.alqiyady.com/site-images/sites/default/files/alqiyady-prod/article/a/d/220873/338a4785e8c68ee3d12ed51ac319214cbf8320c8-191016100657.jpg?preset=inner-img4 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Highliker23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from the subject's Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/mariohochgerner/
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be screenshot of copyrighted broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
The other (similar) files of the uploader may be categorized to nature pages and used, I'm not sure, but in this one she is the focus of the image and therefore I consider it a pic for her personal album, not Commons. E4024 (talk) 13:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Fake license. This logo can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio image. Downloaded from web. Greenbörg (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright doubt: this image appears on a large number of other places online, all with the text overlay in white that reads "Fundación de Investigación Arquealogicas Nacionales, Banco de la República", which is a government cultural institution in Colombia which reserves all rights seb26 (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't sound to me as a notable artist but not sure. Please discuss here. E4024 (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- https://www.beatport.com/artist/hammad/223219 - however I would be more concerned about copyright. Verification is needed as this photograph has been taken from a website profile and is not the original. --Fæ (talk) 12:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Delete per Fae. It's good to coincide in supporting the deletion of a male pic. --E4024 (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Scope: advertising logos with no encyclopedic use. User es:Usuario:Lipet was blocked on Spanish Wikipedia for being a single purpose advertising account
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
seb26 (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos and movie screenshot. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright doubt: appears at least two online sources [1][2] dated two years prior to upload, unclear who the real author is seb26 (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
wrong filename Ermell (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
A new logo has been released DipuDexBrown (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: The image was uploaded with an error
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Apparently uploaded solely in support of promotional content at en:User:Ostrichmedia entertainment The Anome (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Greg Toumpel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used or used for vanity Wikidata item.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ElkinPavaG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Elkin MPavaGómez Actividad32 HerramientasColaborativas.pdf
- File:Elkin PavaGómez Actividad32 HerramientasColaborativas.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-I3RXrQy3IDw/UijAZTQ-TSI/AAAAAAAAAB0/FcKXJrEBC_8/s1600/aduana.JPG.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billybarba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; not useful, self promotion. Images used originally on a page on a Dutch Wikipedia, deleted.as self-promotion. See nl:Overleg gebruiker:Billybarba
Henxter (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.koyou-onesd.co.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/03.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose Joel Leonardo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Triamgulo Leonard-Pascal Variable J = 2 binomio.jpg
- File:Triamgulo Leonard-Pascal.jpg
- File:Las Posiciones de un Trianguko Leonard-Pascal.jpg
- File:Las Partes de un Triamgulo Leonard-Pascal.jpg
- File:Gran Tetraedro Leonardiano.jpg
- File:Tetraedro Estrellado Davinciano.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose Joel Leonardo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: bizarre, unused drawings about geometry, an invented board game, and the "speed of thought".
- File:Velocidad de Pensamiento.jpg
- File:Nivel de la Fusión.jpg
- File:El Nobel.jpg
- File:El Gandhi.jpg
- File:Nivel Newtoniano del Leonard-Tvz.jpg
- File:Kepler.jpg
- File:El Newton.jpg
- File:Ultraluz.jpg
- File:Segundo nivel Leonard-Tvz.jpg
- File:Supercarro.jpg
- File:El Einstein.jpg
- File:El elemento Leonard.jpg
- File:Duarteán.jpg
- File:Estelaciones del octaedro.jpg
- File:Sistema de notación del Leonard-Tvz.jpg
- File:Gran Tetraedro Leonardiano.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 03:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (and File:Gran Tetraedro Leonardiano.jpg should have already been deleted as per the result of the 2017 deletion nomination). Veverve (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like it was reuploaded some time after deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 16:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reggalbflow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://http2.mlstatic.com/polo-mordekai-2014-red-bull-batalla-de-los-gallos-peru-D_NQ_NP_235515-MPE25249425397_122016-F.jpg.
- File:La Raza (Banda).jpg
- File:Mordekai Rap Perú.jpg
- File:Codigo Civil Peru Abril 2016.jpg
- File:Verbena Geografica Unmsm.jpg
- File:Salim Vera (Libido).jpg
- File:Huelga de Hambre - Centro de Lima.jpg
- File:Huelga de Hambre.jpg
- File:Jhovan Tomasevich.jpg
- File:MALI - Arte Contemporaneo.jpg
- File:FUSM - AGE.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Very low quality picture, blurred subject. LamBoet (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Very low quality picture, blurred subject. LamBoet (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused tiny and modified image, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Not the uploader's work, the image can be found here https://www.basketnews.lt/paveikslelis-107665-crop509x509.jpg DaHuzyBru (talk) 15:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out od project scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Out od project scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This HD photo probably comes from press materials of Newag, so "source - own work" and "author - Agaanna" is not enough to be sure that photo has been published under proper license by Newag employee or that Newag knew about this upload. Moreover in EXIF data we can find an author and it is not "Agaanna". In my opinion OTRS is needed. Muri (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This HD photo probably comes from press materials of Newag, so "source - own work" and "author - Agaanna" is not enough to be sure that photo has been published under proper license by Newag employee or that Newag knew about this upload. Moreover in EXIF data we can find an author and it is not "Agaanna". In my opinion OTRS is needed. Muri (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This HD photo probably comes from press materials of Newag, so "source - own work" and "author - Agaanna" is not enough to be sure that photo has been published under proper license by Newag employee or that Newag knew about this upload. Moreover in EXIF data we can find an author and it is not "Agaanna". In my opinion OTRS is needed. Muri (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This HD photo probably comes from press materials of Newag, so "source - own work" and "author - Agaanna" is not enough to be sure that photo has been published under proper license by Newag employee or that Newag knew about this upload. Moreover in EXIF data we can find an author and it is not "Agaanna". In my opinion OTRS is needed. Muri (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This HD photo probably comes from press materials of Newag, so "source - own work" and "author - Agaanna" is not enough to be sure that photo has been published under proper license by Newag employee or that Newag knew about this upload. Moreover in EXIF data we can find an author and it is not "Agaanna". In my opinion OTRS is needed. Muri (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely own work by repeat copyvio uploader
- File:Windhoek skyline.jpg
- File:Windhoek june 2017.jpg
- File:HKIA apron June 10 2017.jpg
- File:Qatar Airways 788 HKIA 28 November, 2016.jpg
- File:HKIA apron November 2016.jpg
- File:HKIA apron, May 2, 2017.jpg
- File:O.R. Tambo International Airport.jpg
- File:Hardap Dam Namibia 6 May 2017.jpg
- File:Spitzkoppe September 2012.jpg
- File:Puros Lodge Apr 2017 2.jpg
- File:Puros Lodge Apr 2017 1.jpg
- File:Puros Lodge Apr 2017 3.jpg
- File:East Wind Namibia 2016.jpg
- File:Elephant Herd, Ugab River bed Damaraland, Namibia.jpg
- File:Hosea Kutako International Airport Apron March 13, 2017.jpg
- File:SW703 Tues 25 11 2014.jpg
- File:Klm inaug 21 okt 16.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CesarRincon (talk · contribs)
[edit]This gallery of images all pertains to Arts, Artists and Artworks. However, they do not appear to be own work of this uploader, due to the various cameras, styles, sizes, and so on of the images. Many of the images show the artist and the artist's work, but there are no COM:OTRS permissions for the artworks, and it is dubious that the uploader created the photos. Many of these are smal enough to have been inside Facebook prior to being uploaded here. The outdoor artworks may be on display in Colombia, but that is not directly stated.
- File:Miguel Dario Polania Rodriguez.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos Artista Español.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon Pentagrama Musical Monumento en Neiva.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon escultor de monumenos en bronce.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon esculturas de lavanderas.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon Escultor.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon Escultor Colombiano.jpg
- File:Festival Internacional de Arte Sin Fronteras Por La Paz de Colombia.jpg
- File:MACH en Neiva imagen nocturna.jpg
- File:Panorámica del Museo de Arte Contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Logo de la Biblioteca Departamental Olegario Rivera.jpg
- File:Raúl Rivera Cortés.jpg
- File:Biblioteca Departamental Olegario Rivera.jpg
- File:Logo Institucional Museo de Arte Contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Eivar Moya Pintor Colombiano.jpg
- File:Mural en Mosaico por Ernesto Rios Rocha.jpg
- File:Mural Agua de Vida, Ernesto Rios Rocha.jpg
- File:Los Hoyos en el desierto La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Reina del Festival del Bambuco.jpg
- File:Presentación del baile el Sanjuanero.jpg
- File:Baile del Sanjuanero.jpg
- File:Exposición pictórica internacional en el MACH.jpg
- File:Museo de Arte Contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción de Neiva.jpg
- File:Mirador el Mohan, Malecón Río Magdalena.jpg
- File:Centro Comercial Metropolitano, en el centro de la Ciudad.jpg
- File:Recreacion pictorica de labores de Fundautrahuilca.jpg
- File:Dario Ortiz Robledo Pintor Colombiano.jpg
- File:"Historia, Deporte, Cultura y Recreación”, obra de Ernesto Ríos Rocha.jpg
- File:Mural de Ernesto Rios Rocha en proceso.jpg
- File:Museo de Arte Contemporáneo del Huila - MACH -, Colombia.jpg
- File:Mural Histórico Neiva 400 Años.jpg
- File:Auditorio Universidad Surcolombiana Neiva Huila Colombia, mural ernesto rios Rocha.jpg
- File:Mural de Ernesto Ríos Rocha en la Universidad Surcolombiana de Neiva.jpg
- File:Lugar turistico en Mazatlan.jpg
- File:Mural "Ateneo sinaloense", un sitio turístico en Mocorito Sinaloa México.jpg
- File:En Mazatlan se encuetra el mural mas grande del mundo Ernesto Rios Rocha.jpg
- File:Yael Garaviño Rodríguez.jpg
- File:Yael Garavino Rodríguez director Fundacion Utrahuilca.jpg
- File:Entrada Auditorio Universidad Surcolombiana, mural de Ernesto Ríos Rocha.jpg
- File:FUNDAUTRAHUILCA.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CesarRincon (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images are paintings from different painters and claimed as own work by uploader.
- File:Hanoi Martinez Leon.jpg
- File:Hanoi Martinez Leon pintor.jpg
- File:Hanoi Martinez Leon pintor de Cuba.jpg
- File:Hanoi Martinez Leon pintor cubano.jpg
- File:Hanoi Martínez León pintor cubano de paisajes.jpg
- File:EIVAR MOYA PINTOR DE COLOMBIA.jpg
- File:RAUL TORRES AGUILAR PINTOR.jpg
- File:RAUL TORRES AGUILAR.jpg
- File:Obra de Raúl Torres Aguilar, dibujante y pintor de México.jpg
- File:EIVAR MOYA PINTOR COLOMBIANO.jpg
- File:Dibujo de Eivar Moya.jpg
- File:Andrea Garcia, obra de la pintora argentina.jpg
- File:Pintor Olaff Crown obra.jpg
- File:Dolores Martina Meral.jpg
- File:Vladimir Iglesias Geraldo.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown.jpg
Migebert (talk) 08:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CesarRincon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken with about 15 different cameras, so unlikely to be own work.
- File:Juan Jose Arango Escobar escritor y medico colombiano.tif
- File:Arnulfo Gasca Trujillo.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila Retrato Hiperrealista.jpg
- File:Milton Morales Grillo Artista y gestor cultural colombia.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown artista plastico venezolano.jpg
- File:Guillermo Martín Moreno.jpg
- File:Pyrocephalus obscurus en el nido foto por Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Pyrocephalus obscurus autor Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Denis Nuñez Rodriguez pintor.jpg
- File:Denis Núñez Rodríguez pintor de Cuba.jpg
- File:Denis Núñez Rodríguez pintor cubano.jpg
- File:Syrigma sibillatrix Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Sarcoramphus papa, imagen por Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Rupornis magnirostris, Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Pitangus sulphuratus fotos de aves Colombia por Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Phimosus infucatus.jpg
- File:Opisthocomus hoazin, fotografo de aves Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Aves popular en los campos del Huila, es un Vanellus chilensis.jpg
- File:Milvago chimachima por Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Aves del Huila Trogon curucui.jpg
- File:Aramides cajaneus, de la serie aves del Huila por el fotógrafo Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Ara macao, Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez fotos de aves del Caqueta.jpg
- File:Museo de Arte Contemporaneo del Huila panoramica exterior.jpg
- File:MACH MUSEO DE ARTE CONTEMPORANEO DEL HUILA.jpg
- File:BIBLIOTECA DEPARTAMENTAL OLEGARIO RIVERA.jpg
- File:Arte sin fronteras por la paz logo oficial.jpg
- File:OLAFF CROWN PINTOR MURALISTA ARTE VENEZOLANO.jpg
- File:Pajarero colombiano.jpg
- File:Hanoi Martinez León pintor habanero.jpg
- File:Erosión en el Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Campylorhynchus griseus, aves del Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Fotografía de cactus desértico en Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Fotos del Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa desierto Colombiana.jpg
- File:Panorámica de Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa, desierto en Colombia.jpg
- File:Paisaje del Parque Natural Regional Desierto La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa, desierto en el Huila.jpg
- File:Montañas en el Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa.jpg
- File:Parque Natural Regional La Tatacoa en el Huila.jpg
- File:Asociación Ornitológica del Huila.jpg
- File:Parque temático San Agustín malecon rio Magdalena Neiva.jpg
- File:Paseo Parque temático San Agustín.jpg
- File:Parque temático San Agustín malecon rio Magdalena.jpg
- File:Parque temático San Agustín.jpg
- File:Reinel LLanos Murcia Artista Visual de Colombia.jpg
- File:Avistamiento de aves en Neiva, departamento del Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Reinel LLanos Murcia.jpg
- File:Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez gestor cultural y abogado colombiano.jpg
- File:Cesar Augusto Rincon Gonzalez gestor cultural.jpg
- File:ASOCIACION AIRES DE CORDOBA.jpg
- File:Monumento en Oporapa del artista José Milton Morales Grillo.jpg
- File:Mural en Pitalito realizado por Milton Morales Grillo.jpg
- File:Monumento en Pitalito Milton Morales Grillo.jpg
- File:Milton Morales Grillo pintor y escultor.jpg
- File:FIRMA ERNESTO RIOS ROCHA.png
- File:Organización Mundial de Artistas Integrados OMAI.png
- File:Jorge Luis Hurtado Reyes artista y gestor cultural.jpg
- File:Diana Marcela Molina Argote, gestor cultural.jpg
- File:Diana Marcela Molina Argote gestor cultural del Huila.jpg
- File:Dina Marcela Molina Argote.jpg
- File:Diana Marcela Molina Argote.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzón Correa trabajando.jpg
- File:Galería de arte Frida Kahlo de la UAS.png
- File:Parque de la Música maestro Jorge Villamil Cordovez Neiva.jpg
- File:Parque de la Música Neiva.jpg
- File:Busto del maestro “Jorge Villamil Cordovez” en el parque de la música de Neiva.jpg
- File:Entrada del Parque de la Música busto del maestro “Jorge Villamil Cordovez” de Neiva.jpg
- File:Biblioteca del Parque de la Música “Jorge Villamil Cordovez” de Neiva.jpg
- File:Parque de la Música de la ciudad de Neiva.jpg
- File:Fotos del Parque de la Música “Jorge Villamil Cordovez”.jpg
- File:Parque de la Música de Neiva Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Parque de la Música “Jorge Villamil Cordovez” de la ciudad de Neiva.jpg
- File:Parque de la Música “Jorge Villamil Cordovez”.jpg
- File:Arte sin fronteras por la Paz logo.png
- File:Plazoleta universidad surcolombiana usco en Neiva Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Bloque cultural universidad surcolombiana usco en Neiva Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Auditorio universidad surcolombiana usco en Neiva Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Entrada a la Universidad Surcolombiana "USCO" ,en Neiva Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Casa de la cultura de la Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa.jpg
- File:Raul Rivera Cortes es un músico y abogado huilense.jpg
- File:Interior museo de arte contemporáneo del Huila en neiva Colombia.jpg
- File:Arquitectura del interior del museo de arte contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Entrada al museo de arte contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Interior del museo de arte contemporáneo del Huila -MACH-.jpg
- File:Museo MACH del Huila.jpg
- File:Exposición de fotografía en el museo de arte contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Interior del museo de arte contemporáneo del Huila.jpg
- File:Interior de la casa cultura de la UAS en Culiacán Sinaloa.jpg
- File:Arte colombiano en la casa cultura de la UAS 2006.jpg
- File:Exposición casa cultura Universidad Autonoma Sinaloa UAS, Culiacán México.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown "XXX años entre papeles y otras pieles" 2018.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown recibe mención de honor en el MACH.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown en Neiva Huila.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown durante la exposición en el MACH.jpg
- File:Imagen reciente de Olaff Crown.jpg
- File:Olaff Crown pintor venezolano.jpg
- File:Raul Rivera Cortes gestor cultural.jpg
- File:Raul Rivera Cortes durante la condecoración en el Congreso de la República.jpg
- File:58 Festival Folclórico y Reinado Nacional del Bambuco en Huila Colombia.jpg
- File:Desfile infantil Festival Nacional del Bambuco Neiva Huila 2018.jpg
- File:58 Festival Folclórico y Reinado Nacional del Bambuco.jpg
- File:Festival Folclórico y Reinado Nacional del Bambuco, Desfile infantil Neiva Huila 2018.jpg
- File:Festival Folclórico y Reinado Nacional del Bambuco 2018.jpg
- File:Desfile infantil Festival Folclórico y Reinado Nacional del Bambuco Neiva Huila 2018.jpg
- File:Alejandro Mojica Díaz artista mexicano.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos crítico de arte de España.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos pintor cordobés.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos pintor y escritor.jpg
- File:"Los Pies", dibujo de Eivar Moya.jpg
- File:Denis Nuñez Rodriguez.jpg
- File:Maqueta de La Cafetera, obra de Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:La Cafetera obra de Emiro garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon, Obra en bronce con tema de mujer del escultor.jpg
- File:La Cafetera, maqueta en bronce de Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Cafetera obra de Emiro Garzon.jpg
- File:Cafetera escultura de Emiro garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Lavandera obra en broince de Emiro Garzon 30x16x18-.jpg
- File:La Lavandera, escultura De Emiro Garzon.jpg
- File:Escultura de Emiro garzon, obra del escultor colombiano.jpg
- File:Emiro garzon correa escultor colombiano.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon escultor colombia.jpg
- File:Libro Fernando Bermudez Ardila El Dorado III.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila Libro 444 Reflexiones de vida.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila Libro 555 Reflexiones de vida.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila, autor de la obra "Propuesta de Paz".jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila 333 Reflexiones de Vida.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila, autor del libro 222 reflexiones de vida.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila autor de Santos Héroes y Sátiros escritor colombiano.jpg
- File:El fin del Fin Fernando Bermudez Ardila obra del escritor colombiano.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila Libro 111 reflexiones de vida.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila en el auditorio del Hotel Berdez.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila-4542x3070.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila 4163x2696.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila ex-político.jpg
- File:Obra de Ernesto Ríos Rocha.jpg
- File:La Caminante, Monumento 6 metros, Ron Point, Via Garzon Neiva 3.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon, monumento Los Garzones, 8 metros, Ront Point, via Florencia, Municipio Garzón Huila.jpg
- File:Clara Pechansky Pintora de Brasil.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila escritor de Colombia IMG 4237.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila IMG 4225.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila IMG 4213.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila jpg 4200.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila IMG 4155.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila IMG 4151.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila IMG 4113.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila IMG 4129.jpg
- File:Imagen de alta resolución de Fernando Bermúdez Ardila.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila en alocución en "Ayudame".png
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila en Bogotá.jpg
- File:IMAGEN FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 1.jpg
- File:Firma del libro Propuesta de paz por Fernando Bermúdez Ardila.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 044.jpg
- File:FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 037.jpg
- File:CONDECORACIÓN A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 032.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 024.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 030.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 004.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 019.jpg
- File:CONDECORACION A FERNANDO BERMUDEZ ARDILA 005.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila1609X1512.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila 1824X1820.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermúdez Ardila escritor "cuyabro".jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila Escritor de Armenia Colombia.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila animalista.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila colombiano.jpg
- File:Fernando Bermudez Ardila Escritor.jpg
- File:Niña del columpio.jpg
- File:Cristo de Peño Redondo, Monumento de Emiro Garzon.jpg
- File:Diosa de la Sabiduria.jpg
- File:La Negra 5.80 metros, Hotel Berdez, Neiva 2017 Emiro Garzon.jpg
- File:La Caminante, 6 metros, Granito y bronce a la cera perdida, Ron Point, Via Garzon Neiva, Garzon Huila.jpg
- File:Los Garzones, 8 metros, Ront Point, via Florencia, Garzon Huila.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon, Monumento La Diosa del Chaira, Florencia.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon, Monumento en Florencia Caqueta.jpg
- File:José Emiro Garzón Correa escultor.jpg
- File:El Mohan, Emiro Garzón Correa.jpg
- File:Torre el Mohan Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Monumento Trabajador de la Construcción Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Monumento cristo Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:La Lavandera, monumento de Emiro Garzon en Neiva.jpg
- File:Nina tomando vuelo, monumento en el paseo peatonal de la Quinta, obra de Emiro Garzon.jpg
- File:Relieve Cruzando el rios, monumento en bronce de Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Pentagrama Musical, obra de Emiro Garzon Correa, serie de monumentos en Neiva Colombia.jpg
- File:Los Leones monumento en bronce de Emiro Garzon Correa, escultor de Colombia.jpg
- File:"El Cortejo", Emiro Garzon Escultor Colombiano.jpg
- File:Relieve en homenaje a La Familia, escultura de Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Emiro Garzon Correa, homenaje al trabajador de la construcción, monumento en Neiva Colombia.jpg
- File:Monumento de Emiro Garzon, "Pentagrama musical".jpg
- File:Monumento en Homenaje al "Vendedor Informal", Obra pública de Emiro Garzon Correa.jpg
- File:Alejandro mojica diaz.jpg
- File:Miguel Dario Polania artista de Colombia.jpg
- File:Biblioteca Departamental Olegario Rivera.jpg
- File:Festival internacional arte sin fronteras por la paz de colombia.jpg
- File:Avelina Lesper.jpg
- File:Museo de arte contemporaneo del huila mach.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos pintor, escultor y poeta de España.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos pintor español.jpg
- File:Francisco Arroyo Ceballos Escultor de España.jpg
Didym (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PuppyPatcha (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Unused personal drawings and sketches, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Woman.png
- File:TraditionalNorthIndianWoman.png
- File:FeminineFlower.png
- File:Reema 11.png
- File:Reema 12.png
- File:Reema 10.png
- File:Reema 7.png
- File:Reema 9.png
- File:Sliding Over the Rainbow.png
- File:Print Ready for Shirt.png
- File:Reema 6.png
- File:Reema 5.png
- File:Reema 4.png
- File:Reema 3.png
- File:Reema 2.png
- File:Reema 1.png
- File:It's Flowery Season.png
- File:Bright and Colourful Flower Pot.png
- File:Colourful Flower Pot.png
- File:Flowers 2 You.png
- File:A Pot of Flowers 1.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Unused personal drawings and sketches drawn in a lifetime were handed over as a gift for improvisation. The drawings capture many moods and subtle expressions. Wikimedia Commons is not a training medium. Images are self-explanatory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuppyPatcha (talk • contribs) 09:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PuppyPatcha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by non-notable artist/s are outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:FestiveTraditionalIndianWoman.png
- File:WomanFlowerBird.png
- File:InnerSanctuary.png
- File:IndianVillageWoman.png
- File:Idhayam - Heart.gif
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Uploader has admitted (at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barbara Lupton.jpg) not "own work", but family photos David Biddulph (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- rather than suggestion deletion, it would be useful if you would clarify correct label as other editors have done in the past. it is my photo of the original photo. Fivebills (talk) 22:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Family photos require a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Uploader is not the copyright holder David Biddulph (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
There was another Joseph Lupton photo - now seen on this page: http://www.thepeerage.com/p57031.htm - which had been a photo of a family photo by Fivebills and was on the Lupton family page for a while. This photo was deleted from the Lupton family page in May 2016.
This new photo of Joseph Lupton that I have added to Commons is different and is already in the public domain - read below from another editor
This file photo is different. As this editor says - "Somebody thinks your CC license is invalid, since there's no license from the original author of the picture. However, it's probably in the public domain, since even if it was unpublished until recently, it's an anonymous work created in the US before 1897. --ghouston (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)"
- Keep License fixed + cosmetics. Should be fine now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Hedwig. --Storkk (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted to TV One Ytoyoda (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 16:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Extremely low resolution, no EXIF, etc, etc indicates this is photo taken from the net Solarbrisk (talk) 15:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: https://cdn4.static.ovimg.com/m/02x18m_/?width=1200&mode=thumb. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused low quality image, with little educational value or use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, though borderline. --Storkk (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Obviously false PD rationale. This is obviously a recent photograph. According to hy:Թորգոմ արքեպիսկոպոս Մանուկյան, the subject was born in 1919. For the photographer to have died more than 70 years ago (before 1947), the subject would have to be no more than 27 years old in this photograph. That's obviously not the case. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- ...and to have been published prior to 1923 in the United States, the subject would have to be a small child. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused advertising/promotional image and no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Not the uploader's work, this image can be found at getty images https://www.google.com.au/search?q=nathan+jawai+regal&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjIt9mfvcrVAhXGoZQKHWUiCFkQ_AUICigB&biw=1280&bih=618#imgrc=De4DWHn-EPxmtM: DaHuzyBru (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographer must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 17:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright infringement, no freedom of panorama in Denmark Pugilist (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
screenshot of a film of 2012, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 17:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This is apparently a screen shot from a football clubs YouTube page. There is no indication of any permission to use. In addition subject is still alive and thus a free to use image could be obtained. Egghead06 (talk) 16:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unusable tiny image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a photo hosting site for random pictures of a job. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused low quality poster, little educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Any educational value to this? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text-only image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused text-only file, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Is a logo and trademark and does not belong on Commons. Kb.au (talk) 17:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No context to make this educational, unused. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2_-_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B7_%D0%9C62.jpg){kind=link}
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2_-_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B7_%D0%9C62.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2_-_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B7_%D0%9C62.jpg){kind=link}
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2_-_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B7_%D0%9C62.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%97%D0%B7%D0%B4_(_D1_).jpg){kind=link}
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%97%D0%B7%D0%B4_(_D1_).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%97%D0%B7%D0%B4_(D1).jpg){kind=link}
_-_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%97%D0%B7%D0%B4_(D1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_%D0%B6%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%BE.jpg){kind=link}
,_%D0%B6%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%BE.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_житло.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, very simple house, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_житло.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no FOP issue. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Georges Crouzat died in 1977. Copyright violation. 90.43.39.194 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Geo Sergio Fotografo (talk · contribs)
[edit]The artwork depicted is not own work of the photographer. Please provide dates of creation, artist/s names and dates so that the images may be correctly licensed for the artwork.
- File:Madonna in Trono con Bambino (Paolo da Visso, Terni, originariamente nella chiesa Santa Maria dellOro di Terni, ora si trova al Musèe du Petit Palais di Avignone).jpg
- File:Sposalizio mistico di Santa Caterina d'Alessandria (Benozzo Gozzoli, 1466, Pinacoteca comunale di Terni).jpg
- File:Madonna con Bambino in trono, San Pietro, San Silvestro I papa (Maestro della Dormitio di Terni).jpg
- File:Madonna col Bambino in trono e Angeli (Maestro della Dormitio di Terni).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
,_mural.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
_,_mural.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
_,_mural.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
,_mural.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_mural.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
_,_church.jpg){kind=link}
_,_church.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
_,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_,_church.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
,_church.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, old. --Yann (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect license - Romania is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution photo, no Exif information. Appears to be promotional photo, almost certianly copyright and not "own work" as claimed. Optimist on the run (talk) 18:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused poor-quality personal image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
susheelwalia Susheelwalia (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 17:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
I own this work. Here is the link to my Google Drive, you will find similar photos with the same format and size: https://drive.google.com/drive/my-drive
Deleted: Small size, poor qualty, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Tdc333.jpg
[edit]
Copiright violation? At source http://blog.goo.ne.jp/ryuw-1/e/bba92bfe8f8ae34ea2bf70160e07c9b6/?cid=eb80a4853d9d3b98383b9f309f6fd693&st=0 says: Photo by Munyu (ryuw-1) at 24/02/1985. --Katsura Roen (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)/
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : sourced "Chennai heritage", rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
potentially copyright issues, sourced http://www.bengalurufc.com/, Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : thumbnail format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also very small, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This image has been in use on the internet prior to this upload, see here for one example. The other problem is that it shows the artworks without permission of the painter who would appear to be still alive. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
If this photo was taken by Joe Blair, we need COM:OTRS permission from Mr. Blair to retain it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
First "by students" would require their permission, second this image is not educational being a student daub of commercially packaged items. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission from artist(s). --Yann (talk) 17:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
She has photographies in Twitter and Linked in with the same blouse-jacket 141.196.193.196 20:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful copyright. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
personality and copyright issues, quotation "When I became president I published website http://ksgheasso.blogspot.in/", but also advertisments as per tag, hence, out of scope? Roland zh (talk) 21:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to have educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to have educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to have educational utility, nor source of basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to have educational utility, and also no source of basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope. --Yann (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The watermark and the file name cast doubt on the "own work" claim Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 22:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
In response to deletion request of the image; The picture is from a Sweet Leaf News letter, I asked for permission to use a copy from the company. If this isn't allowed, I'm more than happy to delete it and use another.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
... also for other uploaded Friedman pictures by User:Volteurismo: Doesn't seem very likely that he took the photos. Tolanor 22:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Scan + Missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 23:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Tentative Keep Being a scan is not a problem. License probably should be changed to {{PD-ineligible}}, does anyone see a problem with that? - Jmabel ! talk 15:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
same asː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Elephant_On_The_River_Edge.jpg (DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content). Picture send to WLE-India, but disseminates also in 2012 atː http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/04/20/tiger-takes-a-swim-at-six-flags-discovery-kingdom-zoo-san-francisco_n_1439870.html as "Tiger Takes A Swim At Six Flags Discovery Kingdom Zoo, San Francisco" Oo91 (talk) 22:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obviously not from India. --Yann (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
A book cover which is the property of the publisher unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unofficial flag of a podcast. No real status at all, even at the podcast itself. Being used on en Wikipedia for disruption related to an idiotic "flag rebelion" by a small clan of Hello Internet fans who are well aware that this is vandalism. DanielRigal (talk) 22:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Reason for the nomination: same asː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Elephant_On_The_River_Edge.jpg (DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content). The very same picture appears on many internet pages. Oo91 (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Date, source, author and license are incorrect Albinfo (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Date, source, author and license are incorrect Albinfo (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Date, source, author and license are incorrect Albinfo (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- According to https://www.slavorum.org/stunning-old-photos-of-yugoslavia-from-the-1920s/ , this photo is from de:Kurt Hielscher who died in 1948, thus the photo is still copyright protected. --Albinfo (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Múcio Aguiar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web like File:Nova sede da AIP.jpg = grabbed from http://www2.sad.pe.gov.br/web/sad/obras-concluidas = http://www2.sad.pe.gov.br/image/journal/article?img_id=100660&t=1302266649017 (last modified: 2011, identical exif).
Gunnex (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused image, no idea if the man is notable or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Clearly marked (c) at https://routes.tips/blog/world_s_largest_sundial_sesto which was in use prior to this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
PeakVisor (talk) The photo was made by me and used by my friend in a blog post with my permission. I'll follow the rights transfer procedure for this picture. If that would be faster and easier, I could attribute this picture in a blog post as used from Wikimedia Commons and put a link to this page as the main source. Will it be easier?
- @Ellin Beltz: As per Commons:OTRS, the section "The image was first published on my website, or on my own space of a shared website.", and according to the Marking your work with a CC license wiki I made the required changes on the original page:
- "adopt the free culture" using the CC BY license (which is properly stated on the page) - Proof of the license statement Blog post with CC BY license attribution
- "Use the Internet Archive's "Save Page Now" feature to store proof of your license statement" - Proof of the license statement
- Please let me know if that solves the issue.
- Peakvisor (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Now we wait for the closing admin. Thanks for clearing up the confusion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Peakvisor. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
not photo work first published before 1960. Pitpisit (talk) 22:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: license is CC-by-sa, then Hoàng Mặt Sắt wrongly added PD-Vietnam. Ruthven (msg) 06:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
PDF of something, is this an advertisement with phone numbers and links? Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scope and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, PNG format, hence, also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious copyright status. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, PNG format, hence, also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious copyright status. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
LOw-re image + Missing Informations. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Tentative Keep Obviously higher resolution would be much better, but that is not sufficient reason for deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 14:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: What required information are you saying it lacks? - Jmabel ! talk 14:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: "Archives cantonales" of what ? What "autorités de Drancy" ? No indication that the uploader is the so-called "Archives cantonales" or "autorités de Drancy" or writes on behalf of the successor of the occupation forces in France. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- That is much more specific, and should have been spelled out in the original nomination. @Nattes à chat: can you address the question of what cantonal archives? And can you clarify the basis on which this is in the public domain? Are you saying (1) that this is inherently public domain, (2) that this has fallen into the public domain for some specific reason, (3) that this has been placed in the public domain by a rights-holder (whom?), (4) that you represent the rights-holder and are placing it in the public domain? If it's 1 or 2, the license tag is wrong. If it's 3, we probably need to know how to verify that it was placed in the public domain. If it's 4, we are fine, but just need a clarification of your rolw. If it's none of the above, then we may indeed have a problem here. - Jmabel ! talk 23:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: "Archives cantonales" of what ? What "autorités de Drancy" ? No indication that the uploader is the so-called "Archives cantonales" or "autorités de Drancy" or writes on behalf of the successor of the occupation forces in France. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep +1 Jmabel. --Benoît Prieur (d) 17:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It seems signed, so it's inherently not anonymous. I think the strongest argument for keep would be {{PD-ineligible}}, if it's just a receipt with a number... but I can't quite make it out. I can't think of why it would be PD otherwise, unfortunately. Storkk (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: such low quality as to make the writing illegible and DM. In use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of random rock and shrubs, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Angola's FOP has a major 'if'; "...on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected." None of the conditions mentioned are OK here. Mhhossein talk 14:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I suggest you find out the name of the "author" and just add it to the description page. Seems more reasonable than deleting the file. --Magnus (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think that way is more reasonable. Although that would be great if someone could add the name and hence keep the file, this deletion protects the rights of the author himself.--Mhhossein talk 11:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Two seconds of googling have revealed the architect's name: Sung-Ho Hang. I've added that to the file. Can we close as keep? - Themightyquill (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for putting your seconds on it. I think we can close the discussion now. Can you take care of other files in this category? --Mhhossein talk 11:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 16:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Almiro died in 1977 ([3]). Who did take the picture? 37.10.135.50 17:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Currently it says own work and the user name suggests that this is a relative of the guy. --Sanandros (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"provided that it is reproduced accurately" is limiting derivative work and doesn't seem to be compatible with Wikimedia Commons policy. AntonierCH (d) 17:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: It's from 2005 and to reproduce accurately is fine. Also I'd keep it as grandfather case. --Sanandros (talk) 16:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
The "license" restricts modification in a way that this file can't be kept on Wikimedia Commons. AntonierCH (d) 17:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: "Visual identity guidelines are followed" is not a copyright restrictipon rather a tradmark restriction simmilar for logos of companies. --Sanandros (talk) 16:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
---- Deleted Despite request for OTRS verification that he is the original photographer and copyright holder, the uploader has not replied. To make certain that he was aware of this AfD and OTRS request, notification was also made on the uploader's talk page. His only response was to remove the file from the article where it was used, see this diff. Given the lack of response and history of other copyvios, and the length of time this has already received, deletion as an obvious copyright violation is warranted. JGHowes talk - 18:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pkbwcgs as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from [4].
See discussion page, give it more time: Please send permission via COM:OTRS. Wdwd (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![[4]](http://tourismapp.s3.amazonaws.com/14724556657.png){kind=link}
- It's not clear that Sayandaswiki (talk · contribs) is aware that this is pending OTRS permission, so I just placed a notice on his talk page as well as the file page, assuming his good faith. JGHowes talk - 02:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Sayandaswiki: , could you please upload the original image, which you had capture with proper metadata?.Jayantanth (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's not clear that Sayandaswiki (talk · contribs) is aware that this is pending OTRS permission, so I just placed a notice on his talk page as well as the file page, assuming his good faith. JGHowes talk - 02:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- This image, along with others uploaded by Sayandaswiki, also appear on howlingpixel.com/wiki which mirrors en-Wikipedia images and states, "Content from Wikipedia". Others are:
- On the other hand, some of his other uploads have already been deleted as clearcut copyvios, such as File:Super Speciality Hospital, Purulia.jpg and File:District Court, Purulia.jpg. JGHowes talk - 20:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- The image cited as original in the deletion nomination is a cropped version of the one here. Compare the margins: Right: right-hand building is visible beyond the solar light; Left: writing on the left-hand building is visible slightly beyond the last letter; Lower: legs of the three persons visible. Therefore, for the copyvio allegation to stick, a better source should be provided. Hrishikes (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- On the other hand, some of his other uploads have already been deleted as clearcut copyvios, such as File:Super Speciality Hospital, Purulia.jpg and File:District Court, Purulia.jpg. JGHowes talk - 20:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Same image, in 2016 https://www.mundomarketing.com/momentos-felices-la-nueva-imagen-de-portones-shopping/ , also affected File:Portones.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by File:-2013Paul Viaccoz-Vidéo4’44’’Encore une nuit de pleine lune.jpg. BrightRaven (talk) 08:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Re-bonjour,
- Pour votre information, voici le courriel envoyé hier à Yann pour ma demande de suppression de fichiers images, car l'auteur n'est pas Anne-Marie Viaccoz mais Paul Viaccoz
- Bonjour Yann, Je reviens vers vous, car je me rends compte des nombreuses erreurs que j'ai faites dans Commons. En effet je vois que tous les fichiers que j'ai téléversé en date du 27 juin 2017, 14:49 jusqu'au 29 juin 2017, 14:21 sont à supprimer, car comme auteur, j'ai mis Anne-Marie Viaccoz à la place de Paul Viaccoz qui lui-même a fait une demande à permission OTRS, "[Ticket#2017073010006974]"
- Ces fichiers à supprimer du 27 juin 2017, 14:49 jusqu'au 29 juin 2017, 14:21 se trouvent à l'adresse suivante: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/VIACCOZ_Anne-Marie&dir=prev&target=VIACCOZ+Anne-Marie Actuellement les bons fichiers concernant Paul Viaccoz à conserver sont en attente d'une autorisation définitive. Désolée pour ces erreurs. Pourriez-vous, SVP faire ces suppressions . Avec mes sincères remerciements et cordiales salutations. AM. ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (d) 17:19, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je vous confirme que ce fichier est bien à supprimer.
- Dans la case auteur, j'ai mis Anne-Marie Viaccoz à la place de Paul Viaccoz qui lui-même a fait une demande à permission OTRS, "[Ticket#2017073010006974]"
- Merci et meilleures salutations. AM ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (talk) 12:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je vous confirme que ce fichier est bien à supprimer.
- Dans la case auteur, j'ai mis Anne-Marie Viaccoz à la place de Paul Viaccoz qui lui-même a fait une demande à permission OTRS, "[Ticket#2017073010006974]"
- Merci et meilleures salutations. AM ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (talk) 12:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Si vous vous êtes trompée dans la case "auteur", ce n'est pas nécessaire de supprimer le fichier pour le réuploader à nouveau. Il suffit de cliquer sur "modifier" en haut à droite et de renseigner l'auteur correct. Ma demande de suppression ici n'a rien à voir avec cette erreur. Le problème c'est qu'il y a plusieurs images identiques dont celle-ci qui est au format TIF, qui n'est pas un format d'affichage, mais d'archivage. Dans la mesure où nous avons une image identique dans un meilleur format, je propose de supprimer celle-ci. De manière générale, il faut éviter d'uploader des images qui font doublon avec des images déjà présentes sur Commons. BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by File:-2014PaulViaccoz-Vidéo3’’44’’La lune rouge.jpg. BrightRaven (talk) 08:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je vous confirme que ce fichier est bien à supprimer.
- Dans la case auteur, j'ai mis Anne-Marie Viaccoz à la place de Paul Viaccoz qui lui-même a fait une demande à permission OTRS, "[Ticket#2017073010006974]"
- Merci et meilleures salutations. AM ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Si vous vous êtes trompée dans la case "auteur", ce n'est pas nécessaire de supprimer le fichier pour le réuploader à nouveau. Il suffit de cliquer sur "modifier" en haut à droite et de renseigner l'auteur correct. Ma demande de suppression ici n'a rien à voir avec cette erreur. Le problème c'est qu'il y a plusieurs images identiques dont celle-ci qui est au format TIF, qui n'est pas un format d'affichage, mais d'archivage. Dans la mesure où nous avons une image identique dans un meilleur format, je propose de supprimer celle-ci. De manière générale, il faut éviter d'uploader des images qui font doublon avec des images déjà présentes sur Commons. BrightRaven (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by file:Le Pilote de guerre et les Paysages-Peintures et Vidéo 13’35’’-PaulViaccoz, 2009-2012.jpg BrightRaven (talk) 08:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je vous confirme que ce fichier est bien à supprimer.
- Dans la case auteur, j'ai mis Anne-Marie Viaccoz à la place de Paul Viaccoz qui lui-même a fait une demande à permission OTRS, "[Ticket#2017073010006974]"
- Merci et meilleures salutations. AM ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Si vous vous êtes trompée dans la case "auteur", ce n'est pas nécessaire de supprimer le fichier pour le réuploader à nouveau. Il suffit de cliquer sur "modifier" en haut à droite et de renseigner l'auteur correct. Ma demande de suppression ici n'a rien à voir avec cette erreur. Le problème c'est qu'il y a plusieurs images identiques dont celle-ci qui est au format TIF, qui n'est pas un format d'affichage, mais d'archivage. Dans la mesure où nous avons une image identique dans un meilleur format, je propose de supprimer celle-ci. De manière générale, il faut éviter d'uploader des images qui font doublon avec des images déjà présentes sur Commons. BrightRaven (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
superseded by File:-2009Paul Viaccoz-Vidéo24’41’’Feux d’artifices à la poudrerie fédérale.jpg BrightRaven (talk) 08:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je vous confirme que ce fichier est bien à supprimer.
- Dans la case auteur, j'ai mis Anne-Marie Viaccoz à la place de Paul Viaccoz qui lui-même a fait une demande à permission OTRS, "[Ticket#2017073010006974]"
- Merci et meilleures salutations. AM ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Si vous vous êtes trompée dans la case "auteur", ce n'est pas nécessaire de supprimer le fichier pour le réuploader à nouveau. Il suffit de cliquer sur "modifier" en haut à droite et de renseigner l'auteur correct. Ma demande de suppression ici n'a rien à voir avec cette erreur. Le problème c'est qu'il y a plusieurs images identiques dont celle-ci qui est au format TIF, qui n'est pas un format d'affichage, mais d'archivage. Dans la mesure où nous avons une image identique dans un meilleur format, je propose de supprimer celle-ci. De manière générale, il faut éviter d'uploader des images qui font doublon avec des images déjà présentes sur Commons. BrightRaven (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Questions
- Bonjour BrightRaven. Merci pour votre message et désolée pour mes erreurs . Je suis d'accord que vous supprimiez tous les formats TIF. Quant aux fichiers restant JPG, j'ai effectivement uploader plusieurs fichiers à double à des différentes dtaes. Je comprends bien que l'on peut modifier un fichier, mais avant de le faire moi-même, que va-t-il se passer avec tous les fichiers pour lesquels j'ai demandé hier une suppression (voir le message suivant "Ces fichiers à supprimer du 27 juin 2017, 14:49 jusqu'au 29 juin 2017, 14:21 se trouvent à l'adresse suivante: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/VIACCOZ_Anne-Marie&dir=prev&target=VIACCOZ+Anne-Marie )" . Est-ce que cela veut dire que cette demande est annulée et dans ce cas-là, que je peux faire les corrections?? Serait-il possible de supprimer les fichiers JPG en double?
- Merci et cordiales salutations. AM ViaccozVIACCOZ Anne-Marie (talk)
- Bonjour. Je vous confirme que, parmi les fichiers que vous avez uploadés, les 4 seuls fichiers qui font actuellement l'objet d'une demande de suppression sont les 4 fichiers au format TIF (c'est moi qui ai initié ces demandes de suppression). Vous n'avez fait aucune demande de suppression de vos fichiers. (Pour ce faire, il faut cliquer sur "Proposer la suppression" dans la colonne de gauche de la page du fichier.) BrightRaven (talk) 09:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Si vous vous êtes trompée dans la case "auteur", ce n'est pas nécessaire de supprimer le fichier pour le réuploader à nouveau. Il suffit de cliquer sur "modifier" en haut à droite et de renseigner l'auteur correct. Ma demande de suppression ici n'a rien à voir avec cette erreur. Le problème c'est qu'il y a plusieurs images identiques dont celle-ci qui est au format TIF, qui n'est pas un format d'affichage, mais d'archivage. Dans la mesure où nous avons une image identique dans un meilleur format, je propose de supprimer celle-ci. De manière générale, il faut éviter d'uploader des images qui font doublon avec des images déjà présentes sur Commons. BrightRaven (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Files seem to be uploaded as a sick joke or, worst, as a racist, xenophobe attempt of a joke. Files were in use in en:Americans, before being removed, by someone else.
- Also affected:
- File:Diversity.png
- File:I'm german.png
- File:La creatura.png
- File:Lá aberración.png
- File:Negative faces.jpg
Tm (talk) 21:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: All speedy-deleted, as they were obviously not own work (many hits found). --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reachamanmittal (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is nothing in any of these files or templates which support the "own work" assertion of the licenses. Very small, low quality images, several copies of IRTS logo, etc. No useful metadata.
- File:IRTS-Logo-IndianRailways-India.jpg
- File:IRTS-Logo-IndianRailways.png
- File:31IN THSRI VINAY MITTAL.jpg
- File:Ajay shukla.jpg
- File:Railwayprobations calling on the president of india.jpg
- File:Ghosh.png
- File:V.N Mathur.png
- File:IRITM logo.png
- File:Logo for IRTS.png
- File:Indian Railway Institute of Transport Management.jpg
- File:Member Traffic MD Jamshed.jpg
- File:A-K-Mittal-Chairman-Railway-Board.jpg
- File:IRTSlogo.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Some of the logos that were previously uploaded are mere iterations to reach the final design.I want the previous iterations deleted as the latest one is final. please help me regarding that.
As far as some other photos are concerned, many of them are historical in nature and are available only in small sizes.
How do i solve the issue of "no useful metadata" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reachamanmittal (talk • contribs)
- It is required COM:EVID that the uploader provide useful information about the images in the template. Such as true author name, real date, real source and so on. These images have "own work" and that's obviously not correct. You may find this discussion [5] about metadata helpful, it's certainly too long to type over again here! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Legal issues with file: Suspected but not clear copyright violation. (nowhere in the source does it say that the image is in the public domain) Zhangj1079 (T|C|U) 15:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say this is TOO.--Sanandros (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
License restricts usage and modification in a way that is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons AntonierCH (d) 18:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm tending to keep as I don't understand what is wrong with this pic. The unloader states own work and I couldn't find it any where else on the web which could doubt that this is not own work.--Sanandros (talk) 16:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
this photo is from the subject's nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. As such it is not a free-use image and cannot be uploaded to the Commons without the copyright holders permission. Farragutful (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient expanation how this would be a copyright violation. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
,_station_of_the_regional_trains.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_station_of_the_regional_trains.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_station_of_the_regional_trains.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_station_of_the_regional_trains.jpg){kind=link}
Georges Crouzat died in 1977. Copyright violation. 90.43.39.194 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Belgium may have FOP now (so depicted work is alright), but the media file file still has no valid license as it clearly requests a notification. AntonierCH (d) 17:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Probably invalid license tag. It is unclear why unknown photographer (Author) died more than 70 years ago. Also, no evidence provided that this is PD in US for another reason (date of first publication not provided). Ankry (talk) 19:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flag of Costa Rica (state).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flag of Costa Rica (state).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_%D1%81%D0%B2%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%AF%D0%BD_%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%86%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%81%D0%B2%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%AF%D0%BD_%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%86%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_%D1%85%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%85%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_%D1%86%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%86%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B2._%D0%94%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B2._%D0%94%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_church.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
,_church.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect license - Ukraine is not FOP friendly Stanislav Dusík (talk) 17:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate "own work" on these sepia toned images. They look more like they were copied from an archive somewhere.
- File:Predicaat koninklijk.jpg
- File:Showroom marktplein.jpg
- File:Pepersteeg.jpg
- File:Doppenmachine.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ellin,
It's true that these images are copies from an archive, because they are copies from our archive. These photos were made by a photographer, hired by our company back then.
Is there something that I can do to prove that these images are ours?
- First it would be helpful if you logged in to edit, so we know to whom to reply. There is the process COM:OTRS for situations like this. I hope you come back to look to see how to proceed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- I'll do my best. Thank you! Berend22
- OTRS-permission has been received. Basvb (talk) 10:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the OTRS is invalid, positive outcome is improbable, but I will sent a follow up message. --Jcb (talk) 23:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Date, source, author and license are incorrect Albinfo (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- i did some updates of information, so your request has wrong arguments! PowerlockeDurim (talk) 12:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Why deletion?
Was zum.... Wieso wird versucht jedes albanische Dokument zu zerstören oder zu löschen? Was habe ich Falsches getan? Es sind Bilder die wichtig sind sie Zeigen die Verwendung des Klosters in Decan von den Anwohnern. Es sind bloß Bilder? machen sie dir Angst AlbInfo? Nirgendwo steht es obwohl alle Bewohner genau erzählen können was da alles passiert ist aber im Internet wird alles zensiert und dann kommt auch noch einer der meine Bilder löschen will ??? WAS IST DENN HIER LOS ?? ICH WILL EINE BEGRÜNDUNG DAFÜR HABEN ? WIESO WIRD ES OHNE GRUND zum löschen vorgeschlagen? :(
When you think that there is something wrong with title autor and whatelse then correct it and dont delete it!!!! How do you know that there is something wrong and when you know it that please correct it! When you just want it to be deleted i know what kind of motivation you have...
Deleted: the issues in the nomination have not been solved. Stating "Ask Top Channel Albania" is not sufficient. The uploader has to provide this information, and if unknown we can not keep the file. --Basvb (talk) 10:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
this rework of an artwork (Original: File:Nikosthenic amphora Louvre F99.jpg) is now more a fake than a corrected version. I can't see any educational use for such a terrible rework. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know how to add my opinion correctly, sorry. - I am AishaAbdel and I want to register my complaint against this request for deletion. I edited this image from a public domain photograph on Wikimedia Commons. I edited for my purposes only, but I uploaded my edited version in case anyone else might like a cleaner view of the content depicted on this ancient Greek amphora. This is well within my right according to public domain use of a file.
The Public Domain designation specifically states: I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
Who are you to censor anyone's right to edit a work in the public domain? If every image in Wikimedia Commons was subject to arbitrary opinions of 'terrible' work, practically every photograph here would be deemed 'terrible' simply because it was unprofessionally photographed under less than ideal circumstances and especially poor lighting. Uploading content to Wikimedia Commons is a voluntary service to humanity and we must be thankful for the content that everyone contributes, for whatever reason and in whatever degree of quality. If you don't like it, don't use it. But you have no right to censor anything in the public domain. AishaAbdel 15:03, 10 Aug 2017
- You change the work in a way, that it not loger shows the original work - but you act like it would be the original. You delete shadows in a way, that the complete meaning, the complete structure, the image of such in artwork is gone. This now is simply a fake, not longer an original work. No one can use this - because of it not longer shows the original work. Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Aisha the licensing under PD is not of question here. As for the reason to keeping the file: The file might be usable educationally and the description of the file can (and does to some extend) explain what is depicted (inluding edits). --Basvb (talk) 10:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- You're descission is a bad joke. People who use THIS image use a faked image now. The retouches are creating a new thing, thtat's not the vase is should be. But it seems you know more of this than me - I only have studied this. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
License restricts usage and modification in a way that is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons AntonierCH (d) 18:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete but for a different reason. Although the uploader Alan1245 used {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} for some reason, Ticket:2014041110013735 contains a CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL license. However, it was not addressed from the original photographer and did not clarify the transfer of rights from photographer > person. This was discussed at COM:OTRSN here and I suggested the ticket should not have been accepted at the time. A follow up email was sent to the person asking about it to try save the photo, but no response has been received. Assume non-free. @Sphilbrick: for his reference. seb26 (talk) 19:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the person sending in the permission not only use the exact wording as suggested by us but made a point of saying so and was surprised that it was taken down. I focused on making sure that the wording did match our requested wording, and failed to follow up on the fact that the person supplying the permission was the subject of the photo and we should of asked how the copyright was transferred. I did send an email asking for for the clarification in July, but as of this date we have not received a response.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per seb26. Guanaco (talk) 00:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. If a reply is received which clears up the issues restoring is of course fine. --Basvb (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused (low quality) duplicate. --Basvb (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Book covers are not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- I can produce email evidence that the book cover's photo, which I made, is owned by the authors of the book, who consent to the public use of the picture. Would that be alright? --1l2l3k (talk) 22:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- The process for permissions is via COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- I instructed the owner to send an email to OTRS. 1l2l3k (talk) 14:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- It seems like this was resolved as permission was granted.1l2l3k (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- It can take several days for a closing administrator to finish the process. Be patient. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- It seems like this was resolved as permission was granted.1l2l3k (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- I instructed the owner to send an email to OTRS. 1l2l3k (talk) 14:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: permission now received. Ellin feel free to keep-close your own nominations if they have been resolved and nobody supports a delete. --Basvb (talk) 10:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Clearly marked (c) at https://routes.tips/blog/world_s_largest_sundial_sesto which was in use prior to this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
PeakVisor (talk) The photo was made by me and used by my friend in a blog post with my permission. I'll follow the rights transfer procedure for this picture. If that would be faster and easier, I could attribute this picture in a blog post as used from Wikimedia Commons and put a link to this page as the main source. Will it be easier?
- @Ellin Beltz: As per Commons:OTRS, the section "The image was first published on my website, or on my own space of a shared website.", and according to the Marking your work with a CC license wiki I made the required changes on the original page:
- "adopt the free culture" using the CC BY license (which is properly stated on the page) - Proof of the license statement Blog post with CC BY license attribution
- "Use the Internet Archive's "Save Page Now" feature to store proof of your license statement" - Proof of the license statement
- Please let me know if that solves the issue.
- Peakvisor (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Now we wait for the closing admin. Thanks for clearing up the confusion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Basvb (talk) 10:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
他人の著作物の無断加工、二次流用のため Toyotacoronaexsaloon (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide some evidence or explanation why this would be a copyvio, it's not so clear cut to me. --Basvb (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
他人の著作物の無断加工、二次流用のため Toyotacoronaexsaloon (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide some evidence or explanation why this would be a copyvio, it's not so clear cut to me. --Basvb (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
This image is in use, but due to small size, and low quality, it's dubious own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Found in use in 2012 at http://www.tiranaobserver.al/skifter-kellici-ja-pse-ma-hoqi-te-drejten-e-transmetimit-ramiz-alia/, but smaller than this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, this photo was provided to me by Skifter Kellici who owns the rights. I can produce evidence (email) by him in person if you would deem it appropriate. This photo is the original, that's why it is bigger than the one that Mr. Kellici has given to Tirana Observer in their 2012 article. My upload includes conversion into a file. Mr. Kellici consents to public use. --1l2l3k (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- The way to resolve this is via the process at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- I instructed the owner to send an email to OTRS. 1l2l3k (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- @1l2l3k: do you know whether an email was send to OTRS? Basvb (talk) 10:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the owner of the photo told me that he sent an email to OTRS. --1l2l3k (talk) 11:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - can be undeleted if proper permission is processed. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)