Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/04/22
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Bulo, Fraude, el personaje no existe. imagen tomada de webs de publicidad http://weheartit.com/entry/229549586/in-set/103809361-gorgeous-gals?context_user=mary_narry Antur (talk) 06:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Closed and speedy deleted as obvious copyright infringement. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio: imagenes subidas para crear bulos. Antur (talk) 06:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Closed and speedy deleted as obvious copyright infringement. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Falso trabajo propio: imagenes subidas para creacion de bulos Antur (talk) 06:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Closed and speedy deleted as obvious copyright infringement. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aquaprouae (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional content. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope (though I don't see why it would be), verified licensing permission will be required.
- File:Aquapro Water treatment System.jpg
- File:Aquapro - Aquaprouae.png
- File:Best Water Purifier UAE.jpg
- File:Aquapro Water Filtration Solution - Dubai UAE.jpg
- File:Water Purifier - Aquapro UAE.png
- File:Water Filter - Aquapro.jpg
- File:Aquapro Water Purification Solution UAE.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- And since the uploader continues to spam instead of discuss:
- —LX (talk, contribs) 13:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- And:
- User refuses to communicate. Block requested. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Abuse of Commons for product presentation. --Achim (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. MKFI (talk) 08:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
{{Duplicate}} Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
{{Duplicate}} Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
Files uploaded by MyRadioJavan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:DJ RAMiNR2' Podcasts My Download Music to WebSite SoundCloud.Com Official 'DJ RAMiNR2' DJ and Rapper Iranian My Date of birth 14,Sep.1998 Singer DJ.jpg
- File:DJ RAMiNR2' Podcasts My Download Music to WebSite SoundCloud.Com Official 'DJ RAMiNR2' DJ and Rapper Iranian My Date of birth 14.Sep.1998 Singer DJ.jpg
- File:DJ RAMiNR2' Podcasts My Download Music to WebSite SoundCloud.Com - Official 'DJ RAMiNR2' DJ and Rapper Iranian My Date of birth 14,Sep,1998 Singer DJ.jpg
- File:'DJ RAMiNR2' Podcasts My Download Music to WebSite Beatport.Com Official 'DJ RAMiNR2' DJ and Rapper Iranian My Date of birth 14,Sep,1998 Singer DJ.jpg
- File:DjRaminR2 Parti.jpg
- File:Dj RaminR2 (2).jpg
- File:Dj RaminR2 JanJaliRemix (PowerMusic).jpg
- File:DJ RAMiNR2 - Lite Mix(ww.MiMP3s.Uno).jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - to speedy delete all the 10 pics he uploaded. Self-promotional spam. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: after your warning he uploaded the File:DJ RAMiNR2 - Lite Mix8.jpg and the File:Dj RaminR2 (2)5.png. And the article DJ RAMiNR2. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: spamming. --Daphne Lantier 06:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshot. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshot. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
COM:Screenshots, apparently of EverQuest.
- File:GuildCamps4.png
- File:GuildCampsExample.jpg
- File:GuildCamps2.png
- File:GuildCamps3.png
- File:GuildCamps1.png
- File:Skeleton Ice Mask.png
- File:West Ro.png
- File:PinnacleCavern.png
- File:Miragul Chamber.png
- File:Frog Ear.png
- File:Skelly helm.png
- File:Cactus cloak.png
- File:Bunny Island Amulet.png
- Reventtalk 18:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
The cover of a book which is the property of the publisher (copyrighted). Also uploaded for the purpose of advertising/self-promotion. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios need to be speedied. Green Giant (talk) 14:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Saadbl (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Abuse of DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the four previous discussions at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Debbie Does Dallas.ogg. Nothing fundamental has changed since then. Betty Logan (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Well, but it's under copyright -- or anyway, it might be under copyright. It's apparently quite complicated -- here is an article that describes the situation (it's from 2011, so maybe things have changed since then, but not that I know of). There was a legal agreement where a company called Arrow has agreed to be permanently enjoined from manufacturing, copying, or reproducing Debbie Does Dallas in favor of a company called V.C.X. -- which in doing so they are acknowledging the validity of V.C.X.s copyright in a legal document, if I understand it. Now, it's complicated -- there was apparently a 1987 case that held that it was in the public domain. Whether this later agreement supersedes that and re-establishes a copyright I don't know, and even a lawyer skilled in this area possibly could not say with 100% confidence.
- So what I get from all this is "some people believe it is in the public domain and some don't", and it hinges on interpretation of technical minutae I think. Since it is unclear we should err on the side of caution -- I don't think "Well, it might be in the public domain, depending on who you talk to" is up to our standards for hosting material -- everything we host is supposed to be backed by our full faith and credit that it is free to use.
- And besides that, this is a full-length feature film which obviously V.C.X. is trying to make a living off this and has successfully engaged lawyers to prevent Arrow from distributing the film. I don't know about here, but at the English Wikipedia we have a rule "respect for commercial opportunity" where we are extra careful not to impinge if its going to cost somebody actual financial distress. This is different from 99+% of cases where it's purely a technical question of some no-value photo from 1923. So if we continue to host this (probable, or anyway possible) copyvio we are putting the actual copyright holder in a bad spot, as well as putting anybody who in good faith distributes the film (figuring its on Commons so its free) in the position of getting sued, and actually losing. Let's not do this. Herostratus (talk) 06:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- It is not under copyright in the United States and if you take the time to read the two documents linked at File:Debbie_Does_Dallas.ogv#Summary then you would know why: namely a court judgment ruled that Debbie Does Dallas has been “irretrievably injected into the [U.S.] public domain” because a copyright notice was not attached upon its original release. Law Law land Blog summarise DDD's copyright status here:
In 1987, the Eastern District of Michigan specifically ruled, at VCX’s urging, that Debbie Does Dallas had been “irretrievably injected into the public domain” because it was — you guessed it — distributed without proper copyright notices. (Try not to snicker at the court’s choice of words.) In other words, while VCX may have been peeved about Arrow competing with it in distributing Debbie Does Dallas, there was virtually nothing VCX could do to stop Arrow. Which means that Arrow gave up the right to do something it was definitely legally entitled to do (because Debbie is in the public domain), and gave up its lawsuit against VCX for doing something VCX was likely not entitled to do (because Deep Throat probably is not in the public domain), in exchange for VCX’s acknowledgement that VCX wasn’t allowed to do it and its promise to stop. Wow. Now that’s what I call a deal.
- As for the subpoenas sent to the ISPs, this was part of a copyright trolling shakedown, where a copyright troll—Evan Stone in this instance—would target porn sharers/downloaders and threaten to humiliate the defendent with a court case if they didn't pay a "settlement fee". Stone was behind the DDD subpoenas (https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100902/11385710880.shtml) but they were ruled illegal and Stone was fined. A brief overview is given at https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110911/01030715892/copyright-troll-evan-stone-sanctioned-more-than-10k-sending-subpoenas-when-court-said-to-wait.shtml. If you google the case it suddenly dies in early 2012 i.e. no court cases, no judgments, no fines etc. Betty Logan (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I get it. But all this comes down to "In my personal opinion it is not under copyright". "My interpretation of the situation is that it is not under copyright". "My take is that the people claiming copyright are trolls and are wrong". You might be right, but the operative clause here is "might be". Who knows? I don't, and you don't. My understanding -- I'm not a regular here -- is that we have a pretty strict interpretation of copyright. Maybe I'm wrong, and maybe the operative rule de facto is "we have a strict interpretation of copyright, except when we don't feel like it", and if that is the rule, then of course that's different. Herostratus (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think you do get it. This doesn't come down to my personal opinion at all. It comes down to a court ruling that explicitly ruled that that the film was in public domain. A lawyer illegally sent subpeonas to thousands of people filesharing adult moves and was find by a judge for contempt of court. That's not my opinion, again that is a court judgment. Exactly under what interpretation of a law does a court ruling not stand, unless it is overturned by another court ruling? Betty Logan (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I get it. But all this comes down to "In my personal opinion it is not under copyright". "My interpretation of the situation is that it is not under copyright". "My take is that the people claiming copyright are trolls and are wrong". You might be right, but the operative clause here is "might be". Who knows? I don't, and you don't. My understanding -- I'm not a regular here -- is that we have a pretty strict interpretation of copyright. Maybe I'm wrong, and maybe the operative rule de facto is "we have a strict interpretation of copyright, except when we don't feel like it", and if that is the rule, then of course that's different. Herostratus (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- As for the subpoenas sent to the ISPs, this was part of a copyright trolling shakedown, where a copyright troll—Evan Stone in this instance—would target porn sharers/downloaders and threaten to humiliate the defendent with a court case if they didn't pay a "settlement fee". Stone was behind the DDD subpoenas (https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100902/11385710880.shtml) but they were ruled illegal and Stone was fined. A brief overview is given at https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110911/01030715892/copyright-troll-evan-stone-sanctioned-more-than-10k-sending-subpoenas-when-court-said-to-wait.shtml. If you google the case it suddenly dies in early 2012 i.e. no court cases, no judgments, no fines etc. Betty Logan (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated in this and all other previous DR. Deletion requester is a new user that seems to be on a morale crusade. Tm (talk) 16:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be yet another copyright issue with this film: see "The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held therefore that the Appellant violated the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders' trademark and that the injunction was proper." (Irenebrination, March 2017) Vysotsky (talk) 18:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, right. That's a different angle -- not that the film is under copyright, but that the film itself violated someone else's copyright. According to that article, the Dallas Cowboys were given injunctive relief against the film being shown. What the status is of that injuction I don't know... if it is still in force, that would be a second reason that we can't host this media. Here is the legal mumbo-jumbo. So hmmm. Herostratus (talk) 21:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sigh...according to that document the injunction was against trademark infringement, not violation of copyright. To quote the relevant text: "The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held therefore that the Appellant violated the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders' trademark and that the injunction was proper ... Whle the "Debbie" case was mainly linked with trademarks, in the Star/Varsity dispute we are dealing with copyrights.". The case you cite was a trademark issue, not a copyright issue and the Commons hosts hundreds of trademarks. It is allowed to because the Commons dos not intrude on the commerical use of the trademark per Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law. Betty Logan (talk) 09:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, right. That's a different angle -- not that the film is under copyright, but that the film itself violated someone else's copyright. According to that article, the Dallas Cowboys were given injunctive relief against the film being shown. What the status is of that injuction I don't know... if it is still in force, that would be a second reason that we can't host this media. Here is the legal mumbo-jumbo. So hmmm. Herostratus (talk) 21:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The various arguments so far:
- This file has been nominated four times for deletion under its previous title (see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Debbie_Does_Dallas.ogg) and survived on all four occasions. The same arguments keep coming up but nothing substantive has changed in the interim.
- The argument that the file is not educational is inconsistent with the presence of other files. The fact remains the film is a classic of its genre (possibly the most famous adult movie ever made) and it isn't inherently less "educational" than File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm for example, which has never been nominated for deletion.
- As explained at Debbie_Does_Dallas#Copyright, DDD was exhibited without a copyright notice. After the producers failed to fix the problem a court ruling in 1987 found that the ommission of the copyright notice 'resulted in the film being irretrievably injected into the public domain "several months" later'. No court ruling since then has overturned this judgment. There is a legal interpretation of the ruling at Law Law land Blog.
- In 2011 Arrow (the distributor of Deep Throat) sued VCX (the distributor of DDD) for distributing Deep Throat. Arrow and VCX settled and acknowledge each others' "copyright claim" to stop the case going to court. This does not revoke the earlier court ruling. As Law Law Land Blog explains, the copyright over Deep Throat is unclear. The blog explains that Arrow have a very good argument that Deep Throat is still under copyright, and thus the settlement was not a good one for them because Arrow had the legal right to distribute DDD; the reason they settled was because they did not want to risk the judgment over Deep Throat going against them, so they acknowledged VCX's bogus copyright claim to DDD.
- Wikimedia does not have a moral duty to protect VCX's revenue stream from the film. They acquired exclusive rights to the film but VCX was the plaintiff in the 1987 case and instrumental in having the film ruled in the public domain so they would not have to pay royalties. They can't have it both ways i.e. have their revenue stream protected by copyright law while at the same time claiming it is in the public domain to get out of paying royalties.
- In 2010, a lawyer (Evan Stone) subpoenad the identities of 113 John Does who had been filesharing DDD ([1]). This was a classic copyright trolling case. It works like this: the lawyer identifies the filesharers (usually for porn) and offers them a settlement (usually a couple of thousand bucks). The ruse is highly effective (about 50% of the targets pay up) because the filesharers fear being publicly humiliated in a court case. In this case the court did not give permission for the subpeonas and the judge fined Stone $10,000 (see [2]). Unsurprisingly the filesharing case did not progress and it died in 2012 along with Stone's legal career.
- The latest ploy by those determined to get the file deleted is that the film is protected by derivative copyright due to the cheerleader outfits which is wrong and misrepresents the facts. In 1979 the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders successfully obtained an injunction against the Pussycat Theater to prevent them from promoting the film, on the basis that the cheerleader costumes constituted trademark infringment. Trademark infringement is not the same as copyright infringement. Trademarks protect commercial opportunities, and since Wikipedia does not interfere in those commericial opportunities it is permitted to host them per Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law.
- The simple fact is that there are very few files on here that are explicitly backed up by a court ruling that the work is in the public domain. Even if that ruling were to be legally challenged and overturned at some point (doubtful considering the law is clear cut about copyright notices) then Wikimedia has a legitimate defence against claim for damages in that a court had ruled the film was in the public comain. Even though the film does not show up under the file usage section it is infact COM:INUSE because a direct link is provided in the external links setion at the Debbie Does Dallas article. The file is linked in this manner in accordance with the consensus over the placement of the video, since it was deemed necessary that viewing the video should require a proactive decision by the user, since embedded videos can be started automatically or accidentally. There is a clear agenda at play here to get this file deleted, using spurious copyright arguments that do not hold up. The repeated attempts to delete the file are nothing more than an attempt to COM:CENSOR Commons by the backdoor, and is anyone really fooled by the ploy? I am getting tired of having to make repeated vists here to regurgitate the same arguments over and over. The film is in the public domain by virtue of a court judgment and its use and educational value is consistent with that of other full-length films hosted here. If you really want to get rid of the file I suggest you either change the rules to i) prohibit hosting feature-length films or ii) ban pornographic material and be honest to your convictions. Betty Logan (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Debbie Does Dallas.ogg // do not nominate for deletion again
please contact wikimedia legal. There is nothing we can do for you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Restoring closure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
this page cotains a video of sexuality content Very good wiki (talk) 09:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep SPA, blocked for WP0 abuse. Keep per all the previous DR. I find always funny to see someone opening a page marked as having a pornographic movie and them demand its deletion for it being a "video of sexuality content". Tm (talk) 11:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy keept – no need to loose time for a DR created by a WP0 abuser. --jdx Re: 12:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Full movie and non encyclopedic Elie Hague (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing has changed since previous nominations. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
This is pure porn, Luce333eeee (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep And????? Per previous times Tm (talk) 03:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing has changed since previous nominations. --Achim55 (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a porn 194.233.96.65 06:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:*HB Arif.jpg
- File:*HB-Arif.jpg
- File:*HB Arif*.jpg
- File:*HB-Arif*.jpg
- File:HB-Arif.jpg
- File:HB Arif.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:HB Arif.jpg
- File:HB-Arif (7).jpg
- File:HB-Arif.jpg
- File:HB-Arif (5).jpg
- File:HB-Arif (4).jpg
- File:HB-Arif (4) - Copy.jpg
- File:HB-Arif (2) - Copy.jpg
- File:HB-Arif (2).jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leonardo Loved (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a selfie repository
- File:Suzana Castro 5.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 4.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 3.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 2.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 1.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 456.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leonardo Loved (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. User has been notified before and yet uploading pictures out of scope
- File:Suzana Castro 19.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 18.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 17.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 16.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 15.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 14.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 13.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 12.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 11.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 10.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 9.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 8.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 7.jpg
- File:Suzana Castro 6.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Drscope100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret im Wohnzimmer des Anwesens der Familie.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret im Bowling Center.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret mit Alexa + Versace.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret in Rotenburg.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret mit Alexa + CK.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret in Hamburg.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret im Jump House.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret nach dem Frisör.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret im Block House.jpg
- File:CD Cover der Limitierten Weihnachts CD des FZB.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret auf dem Anwesen der Familie.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret in einem Raum des Anwesens der Familie.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret im Ramster.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret.jpg
- File:Gerwin Michels oder Alan Garret in Walsrode.png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful (private party photo/photo of friends). Morphdog (talk) 03:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alinex2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Babymoon321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are from a fan page possibilities of copyvios
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong Calendars (3).jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 17.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 16.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 15.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 14.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong Calendars (7).jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong Calendars (5).jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong Calendars (4).jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong Calendars (2).jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 13.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 12.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 11.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 9.png
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 8.png
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 10.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 7.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 6.png
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 4.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 5.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 2.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 3.jpg
- File:Captain Chonlathorn Kongyingyong 1.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Thierry G
[edit]- File:Virginie Efira & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Victoria Abril & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Thierry garcia et.jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia 4.jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia (3).jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia (4).jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia - ELITE MODEL LOOK MAROC.jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia - Michel Fuguain.jpg
- File:Thierry Garcia (2).jpg
- File:Thierry G.jpg
- File:Thierry Frémaux, Délégué Général du Festival de Cannes & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:TARA MCDONALD et Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:TABOO - The Black Eyed Peas & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Oum El Ghaït Benessahraoui - Laurent & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Nicole Garcia et Thierry garcia.jpg
- File:Mathilda May, Bernard Montiel, Thierry Garcia & Natacha Amal.jpg
- File:Marouane Chamakh - Thierry Garcia - Adel Taarabt.jpg
- File:Massimo Gargia, Thierry Garcia & Pietro Murania.jpg
- File:Kenza Farah et Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Karim Benzema & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Kamel Ouali & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Jay - Thierry Garcia - Vigon - Bamy.jpg
- File:Jérémy Menez (PSG) & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Dany Brillant - Thierry Garcia - Pascal Chestier - Vincent Niclo.jpg
- File:Christian Audigier & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Dounia Batma & Thierry Garcia.jpg
- File:Alexandra Stan & Thierry Garcia.jpg
The user has uploaded several photos of himself, and himself with other people, which cannot be "own work" as claimed and do not credit any photographers or give evidence of permission to license and distribute the photos. Most lack metadata, but some have copyright claims in the metadata, and at least one is watermarked with a logo of a photographer. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
artwork by Scarlet Raven, a living artist. obvious copyright violation. See : https://www.castlegalleries.com/art/the-first-and-the-last-boxed-canvas Roseohioresident (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Picture is apparently from https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20150810181840/http://alfatv.fi/astu-tarinaan-keskusteluohjelman-vieraana-uutisankkuri-ja-kirjailija-keijo-leppanen-%E2%80%95-perjantaina-27-3-klo-20-00/ (archive copy) where it is marked as "© 2015 AlfaTV". Yet the uploader claims it is in PD, without any evidence. Jmk (talk) 11:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from Parkour roll tutorial / паркур ролл обучение (21,800 views, Standard YouTube License) Dispenser (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality COM:PENIS, not in scope. No scale reference to justify description. - Reventtalk 18:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Per {{Nopenis}} --D-Kuru (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- The filename is also wrong. Should may be renamed to Small penis.
- A more serious though: Leave a placeholder image so people can no longer upload under this filename without replacing the image
- --D-Kuru (talk) 08:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
request of uploader Deror avi (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Request of uploader Deror avi (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character illustration, not own work. Sasuke88 (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover, not own work. Sasuke88 (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
unused logo, no indication why this is in scope
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Private image/File apparently uploaded for the purpose of vandalism. Not used. All other contributions by uploader has been reverted. DavidIvar (talk) 20:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
file already published at: https://www.linkedin.com/start/view-full-profile?_ed=0_ljTnnXq7-oteU6ucm4Ow033i9LlIbI0aVAjGmsFmpR-twbtPMYWlZFS6qYzLjIGd&trk=public_profile_tc-view Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Description, date and source all nonsense. Probably 1980s or later Vysotsky (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
image not in project scope DS (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Self-created "artwork" without obvious educational use. Not used. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 22:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. No useful contributions by uploader. DavidIvar (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Triplecaña (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pintu Garhewal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:Pintu Garhewal 12.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 13.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 14.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 10.jpg
- File:Pimtu Garhewal 11.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 9.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 8.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 5.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 6.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 7.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal 4.jpg
- File:Pintu.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal3.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal2.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal1.jpg
- File:Pintu Garhewal.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Pagina 1/39 (page 3 of the PDF) Copyright notice doesn't seem compatible with CC BY-SA 4.0 as it can't be entirely reproduced of remixed (like translated). Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: the copyright notice requests the source to be named. I modified the license accordingly. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
"autoriza su reproducción [...] sin ánimo de lucro" ("authorizing its reproduction, as long as [...] made non-profit.") is not compatible with the "even commercially" part of CC BY-SA 4.0 Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Useless selfie Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Domrey sar (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication at all of user's own work on these photos and derivative works of publications.
- File:Khun Srun.jpg
- File:SP Family.jpg
- File:Last Nokor Thom.jpg
- File:Chivit-et-ney1 republished.jpg
- File:Original cover of The Adventurer With No Goal (1969).jpg
- File:Did Soth Polin leave the country forever ? July 1974 Mohachun Khmer Newspaper.jpg
- File:Nokorthom - The Moon Festival 600.jpg
- File:Cover Dead Heart.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Have received talk page correspondence which acknowledges none of this was created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Domrey sar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers are not own work, these are under copyright in Cambodia. As stated on a recent COM:UNDEL to same uploader Copyright in Cambodia lasts for the lifetime of the creator of a work plus 50 years, and for anonymous works it expires 75 years after the first publication. Since Dead Heart was first published in 1966, the graphical artist who created this cover would have had to die that same year or shortly after for the image to be out of copyright. So there is a high chance that this is still copyrighted and non-free. De728631. These books are in the same situation.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete both per nomination. De728631 (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 11:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
wrong licensing / no source / I am not believe souce's own work. Pitpisit (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Media missing permission as of 16 April 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
Title suggests this is from facebook not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 11:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
"FBMD" in meta shows this was in and out of Facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 11:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata shows this was uploaded to Facebook prior to being uploaded here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 11:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused book of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete There is nothing to discuss – "standard" e-book without any author/licence information uploaded by one of WP Zero abusers. --jdx Re: 14:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. MKFI (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, not in use. The user's only contribution. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
inappropriate content Saadbl (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Abuse of DR. See previous attempt. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated in this and all other previous DR. Deletion requester is a new user that seems to be on a morale crusade. Tm (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: censorship or not is not the issue here. This file is not useful for education purposes --> out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
This is pornography!!!! Where can I buy the video, bitches?!?! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused and outdated logo. Likely out of scope. Ankry (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
image has already been published here: http://drsanjoymukerji.co.in/about-dr-sanjoy-mukerji/ Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://afgotb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Steve.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I work for Steven Hartov. I followed the link that you provided and investigated the website. The photograph clearly states that it is courtesy of Steven Hartov. He actually took that picture himself, so there should be no issue there. I request that this photo not be deleted.
- You could ask him to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:1975 - Opel 36m Sprung.jpg
- File:1970 - BMW 2002 Alpina 24 h.jpg
- File:TdEurope84-2.jpg
- File:1978 - RS2000 PITY.tif
- File:1985 - 190E - Deutschland 1.jpg
- File:450 SLC - Wolfsburg-Berlin.jpg
- File:1980 - Polen Time control.jpg
- File:VolvoDTMDiepholz.jpg
- File:Peugeot 505 Dyck.jpg
- File:1967 BMW 1800ti.jpg
- File:Bohne Pokal.jpg
- File:1980 Mercedes 280 CE Monte Carlo.jpg
- File:500 SL - 1982 - Tour d Europe.jpg
- File:Ferrari 308 Ausschnitt.tif
- File:Siegerfoto.pdf
- File:Golf Hessen Fly Top.jpg
- File:Rethem81-action6.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipeida article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lahbabi.ma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aguapurita (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arlenechristina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope spam. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused private photo of identifiable individual, possibly uploaded without consent. No useful contributions by uploader. DavidIvar (talk) 01:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Artwork without permission from artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 02:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unknown copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused image extracted from a photo by "Author Myr Muratet" whose photos were uploaded by another account, see the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pro patria semper, as this image was created by Myr Muratet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. The photograph was already kept, and, as said, "attribution was resolved": don't beat a dead horse. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC).
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Notice the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cérémonie de remise des diplômes d'archiviste paléographe (2016).jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Nomen ad hoc. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
extracted from a delete Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:C%C3%A9r%C3%A9monie_de_remise_des_dipl%C3%B4mes_d%27archiviste_pal%C3%A9ographe_(2016).jpg
- Keep immediately: the photograph was already kept: no valid reason to delete. Futhermore, "extracted from a delete" makes no sense. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused image extracted from a photo by "Author Myr Muratet" whose photos were uploaded by another account, see the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pro patria semper, as this image was created by Myr Muratet, neither Pro patria semper nor this uploader has rights to it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. The photograph was already kept, and, as said, "attribution was resolved": don't beat a dead horse. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC).
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Notice the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cérémonie de remise des diplômes d'archiviste paléographe (2016).jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Nomen ad hoc. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
extract from a delete - Nomen ad hoc (ex Pro Patria Semper) spoke a lot about "authorization" but nothing true exists -- see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:C%C3%A9r%C3%A9monie_de_remise_des_dipl%C3%B4mes_d%27archiviste_pal%C3%A9ographe_(2016).jpg Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. The photograph was already kept. There's no valid reason for deleting it. Futhermore, I think "extract from a delete" makes no sense in English. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 08:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE, the stadium's construction finished in 1979. Canopus Grandiflora 05:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE, the stadium's construction finished in 1979. Canopus Grandiflora 05:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE, the stadium's construction finished in 1979. Canopus Grandiflora 05:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE, the construction of the stadium finished in 1979. Canopus Grandiflora 05:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2011. Canopus Grandiflora 05:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2011. Canopus Grandiflora 05:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Reopened. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated: see COM:FOP Italy for full information. Architect Cesar Pelli died in 2019, still within 70 years of his posthumous copyright. See also the latest successful DR on an Italian architectural work by dead architects, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tomba Brion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 05:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 05:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 05:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 05:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 05:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2010. Canopus Grandiflora 05:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 05:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 1990. Canopus Grandiflora 06:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 1995. Canopus Grandiflora 06:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy, building was constructed in 2012. Canopus Grandiflora 06:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
not own work. Scan or photo of photo ShinePhantom (talk) 12:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a selfie repository ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Alonabar (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in he.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
non-free logo Trivialist (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
This user page is not being used. Angrylala (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
wahrscheinlich URV von https://www.theaterwuerzburg.de/index.php?option=com_mftensemble&view=crew&Itemid=144&id=978 SFfmL (talk) 15:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
no permission for given license from author and/or copyright holder. See EXIF data. Wdwd (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building after 2000. Mykola Vasylechko 16:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of video with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder www.sktdigital.com.ph has no other license than "© 2017 SKT Digital Productions". In addition, the photo is published in Facebook. Under such circumstances OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Useless receipt Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused selfie Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- It's now in use at [3]. --ghouston (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the page where it's in use has been last edited way before upload of this file, so must be a different file with the same name. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified dirt Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified doors Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unidentified settlement Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 02:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use, the notable person. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 06:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
COM:SCREENSHOT, possible promotion eurodyne (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused portrait of the uploader. No educational value. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, photograph by Dirk Hasskarl. OTRS permission from Dirk Hasskarl needed. MKFI (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Offending derivative work. Achim (talk) 08:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted to the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, which is not part of the US Federal Government Hchc2009 (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality selfie, not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE. Though not the primary focus, significant amount of copyrighted material (building eat. 1997) is depicted in the photo. Canopus Grandiflora 07:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Iraq, building established in 2007. Canopus Grandiflora 07:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE, building est. twenty years ago. Canopus Grandiflora 07:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be 'own work' as claimed MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work by Argia.eus. Small size, no metadata. The images in the source cannot be taken by one author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Recent cover of the book in my mind, not the original. No date found for this cover, but surely recent so not in public domain. Olivier LPB (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Bad hand-written image, no educational use 2001:A61:12D5:8701:A86B:FACD:7C0E:A154 12:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Watermarked with VIDEO-CONVERTER.RU. Dispenser (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Can't be "public domain 70 years after the death of the creator" because taken 2011 Aulis Eskola (talk) 13:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio, image is not PD due to it's authors death or first publication, this image was published for instance in 2013 in here. The site is copyrighted. Htm (talk) 13:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 17:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
poor quality (reflections) Joschi71 (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's no evidence this was published pre-1923, and there's no author listed at the source either, which means this isn't public domain as-is. The image itself moreover doesn't look like a scan from something, it looks more like an original. Seattle (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
the photo can not have been taken in 2007, and Goldbach is unlikely to be author. This photo is prevalent across the net. Mixmasta blong Jesus Craes (talk) 01:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
c'est flou Vatadoshu (talk) 06:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 06:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy, the building is not complete, but it is in a state where copyright can be established, and, and it well above TOO. Canopus Grandiflora 06:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy. Canopus Grandiflora 06:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in South Africa. Canopus Grandiflora 06:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in South Africa. Canopus Grandiflora 06:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in South Africa. Canopus Grandiflora 06:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unnecessary photo. Philip J Fry (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ginger beer
[edit]Likely copyright violations due to COM:DW and COM:PACKAGING.
- File:Amoureux 50cl.JPG
- File:Crabbiesgingerbeer.gif
- File:Frankie's root and ginger beer bottles.jpg
- File:Ginger Beer NaturFrisk Ørbæk Brewery.jpg
- File:GoslingsDnS1.jpg
- File:Ingefærøl 1L.png
- File:Japanese ginger ale (2583298342).jpg
- File:MoNdi Beer Ginger Orange.JPG
- File:Old Jamaica Ginger Beer front.jpg
- File:OLDTYME.jpg
- File:Roma Ingefærøl 0,5L.png
Яй (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:Japanese ginger ale (2583298342).jpg, which I have cropped to remove the packaging. Delete the others. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete It pains me to say it but yes they should not live on Commons. I would encourage people to find a fair use argument for them though so they can be used on specific pages on some different language versions of Wikipedia (like English). I would encourage the deletor or the nominator of deleting the pages to notify the authors/uploaders of the images to seek out a fair use application for these images such as when referring to the design of the packaging and its noteworthiness. -Discott (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Discott: What about File:Japanese ginger ale (2583298342).jpg, now that the bottle has been cropped out? —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: , thanks for pointing that one out. The cropped photograph of the Japanese ginger ale should be fine as the section showing the company trade mark has been cropped out. Will just need to some how remove the original version of the image uploaded on the 11 February 2015. I have no experience about that so I cant give any feedback on it.--Discott (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, for File:Japanese ginger ale (2583298342).jpg only the first version. --Jcb (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hand-written image, no educational use 2001:A61:12D5:8701:A86B:FACD:7C0E:A154 11:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Bad hand-written image, no educational use 2001:A61:12D5:8701:A86B:FACD:7C0E:A154 11:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hardy visible hand-written image, no educational use 2001:A61:12D5:8701:A86B:FACD:7C0E:A154 12:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Bad hand-written image, no educational use 2001:A61:12D5:8701:A86B:FACD:7C0E:A154 12:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio: this is a clear scan from a text book (and not a good one), see background. So not "own work". 2001:A61:12D5:8701:A86B:FACD:7C0E:A154 12:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, watermarked derivative of File:Zakaria Zerouali.jpg. Not in use, not needed. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright de http://www.programme-television.org/news-tv/Top-Gear-France-RMC-decouverte-Qui-est-Yann-Larret-alias-Le-Tone-4393208 Factory (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Self-promotional nonsense Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 14:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 15:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 15:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 15:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 15:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 15:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Useless selfie Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not the right OTRS - ticket Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Poorly lit photo Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 17:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt (1).png
[edit]not under free license - most of the artists is still alive Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete Pretty obvious copyright violation.Can it be speedied, as it has probably been deleted before. A file with the same name except a (1) has been deleted twice [4]. Sjö (talk) 05:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy of non free image from en:File:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: external source, no license, no permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Dark picture Tore Danielsson (Riksutställningar) (talk) 20:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Private image/File apparently uploaded for the purpose of vandalism. Not used. All other contributions by uploader has been reverted. DavidIvar (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Private image. No useful contributions from uploader. DavidIvar (talk) 21:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
This image is of such low quality, I don't believe it can be of use. Fry1989 eh? 18:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Pas un travail personnel, livre à préciser peut être atteinte aux droits d'auteurs / Not own work Shev123 (talk) 19:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
bdaly edited or damaged picture - no educational value – uploaded by bot Albinfo (talk) 22:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
I do not think the Quran is 'own work' of the uploader. Proper source would be needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader indefinitely blocked for uploading a file with an embedded archive. - Reventtalk 00:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
The Quran is most likely not the own work of the uploader, nor the decorative rim. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader indefinitely blocked for uploading a file with an embedded archive. - Reventtalk 00:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo, not in use. Uploaded for self-promotion and advertising of a book. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Brochures are not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Uploader didn't create the flyers in the picture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Uploader did not create the flyers shown in the photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Ukraine - was deleted 4 years ago Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to Bereginia in Kiev as File:Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Kiev).jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 01:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
The original text is not official document for the Russian copyright law. It is not document of state government agency (TASS is state organization, it is not a government body)and it is not materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character. The term "news reports on events and facts" in the last point of template means that no one can copyright news as fact (even if reporter of specific news agency was sole on event place), but concrete non-trivial text about event is copyrightable. The neighbouring rights have expired (the sound work was protected Yuri Levitan's lifetime or 50(54) years from publication at least), but copyright of TASS on the original text will expired only on Jan.1, 2032. Alex Spade (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
The uploader claims the photo has been released into PD, but no evidence of this is found. Same uploader seems to have uploaded other photos also with questionable licensing. Jmk (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Not a creator, not in use on any file Multichill (talk) 13:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Batalaan 4, Best
[edit]Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed in ticket:2017042110008717 request for deletion of theese images as they present interiors or private area not visible prom public places. The images were not intended for publication and were published by mistake. None of them is used and at least one image of the object remains after deletion. I support a curtessy deletion here.
- File:Interieur, overzicht gang - Best - 20001800 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur, overzicht trap - Best - 20001801 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur, overzicht woonkamer - Best - 20001799 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht achtergevel - Best - 20001796 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht achtergevel - Best - 20001797 - RCE.jpg
Ankry (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Batalaan 5, Best
[edit]Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed in ticket:2017042110008717 request for deletion of theese images as they present interiors or private area not visible prom public places. The images were not intended for publication and were published by mistake. None of them is used and at least one image of the object remains after deletion. I support a curtessy deletion here.
- File:Exterieur overzicht achtergevel en rechter zijgevel - Best - 20324593 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur overzicht woonkamer - Best - 20324594 - RCE.jpg
Ankry (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Welvaartstraat 12, Best
[edit]Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed in ticket:2017042110008717 request for deletion of theese images as they present identifiable people or private area not visible prom public places. The images were not intended for publication and were published by mistake. None of them is used and at least one image of the object remains after deletion. I support a curtessy deletion here.
- File:Exterieur achtergevel met zijaanzicht balkon van nummer 10 - Best - 20324623 - RCE.jpg
- File:Exterieur achtergevel, zijaanzicht balkon van nummer 10 - Best - 20324620 - RCE.jpg
- File:Exterieur overzicht achtergevel - Best - 20324615 - RCE.jpg
Ankry (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Schoenmakersstraat 15, Best
[edit]Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed in ticket:2017042110008717 request for deletion of theese images as they present interiors, identifiable people or private area not visible prom public places. The images were not intended for publication and were published by mistake. None of them is used and at least one image of the object remains after deletion. I support a curtessy deletion here.
- File:Exterieur achtergevel - Best - 20324600 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur hal met trap - Best - 20324603 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur woonkamer met zicht op gang - Best - 20324602 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur woonkamer met zicht op keuken - Best - 20324601 - RCE.jpg
Ankry (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
It appears that the uploader did not understand the image database fields, nor copyright. This photograph appears, from the subject's age, to have been taken around 1945. It does not appear to have been taken on 13 April 2017. The description indicates that it might be held by the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Is Rosechiango claiming he/she took the original photograph back then? Or did Rosechiango take a photograph of the photograph at the Philadelphia Museum of Art? Or scan a brochure? There may well be a copyright issue here. Notice of these issues was left on the uploader's talk page on 17 April 2017, Bejnar (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
there is a newer, better copy here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fish-Breeding_Kurdany,_Haifa_Bay.png Huldra (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
fake image created in vandalism purposes Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chevrolet model cars
[edit]- File:(1-18) 1948 Chevrolet Woody (4332017747).jpg
- File:(1-18) 1948 Chevrolet Woody (4332758230).jpg
- File:1-18 Chevrolet Caprice NYC Taxi (6762523171).jpg
- File:1-24 Scale.jpg
- File:Chevrolet Bel Air 1957 (Kinsmart) model.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Caprice 1.41.jpg
- File:Chevrolet Corvette 1957 model car.jpg
- File:Chevrolet Corvette and military vehicle.jpg
- File:Chevrolet Fleetmaster (Woody) model car.jpg
- File:Chevrolet from 1950-1980.jpg
- File:Chevrolet Nomad 1955 (Kinsmart) model.JPG
- File:Edocarchevroletexpressvan.jpg
- File:Ertl1939chevroletmasterdeluxe.jpg
- File:Hot-Wheels Chevy 1962 Custom.JPG
- File:Jeff Gordon Expressway Dedication - Die Cast Fans.jpg
- File:Johnnylightningchevroletbelairbuffythevampireslayer.JPG
- File:Kurt Busch 41 car diecast.jpg
- File:Majorette Chevrolet Caprice Police.jpg
- File:Micro Machines Comparacion.jpg
- File:Model automobiles. Matchbox 011.JPG
- File:Model automobiles. Matchbox 022.JPG
- File:Modelauto7 003.jpg
- File:OPEL CORSA CHEVY.jpg
- File:Revellchevrolet.jpg
- File:S10rmtcntrl.jpg
- File:ストックカー2.jpg
- File:ナスカー1.jpg
- File:ナスカー100.jpg
- File:ナスカー2.jpg
- File:ナスカー22.jpg
- File:ナスカー333.jpg
- File:ナスカー88.jpg
- File:ナスカー黒バック.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Request at Ticket:2017040810011845 from junior carneiro, the author of the document. He states he did not upload the PDF into commons. He states it was originally on https://pt.slideshare.net, and has been copied here. He has since removed that item. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
According to caption where used, this image is from 1989, which makes it unlikely users own work and more likely collected from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused false color image of a stream somewhere. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
3D object depicted was not created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
With author unknown, it's impossible to know if this license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Great photo, but uploader did not create the medal. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
This is exactly the same as another item you've tagged of mine (the Benny Award). The original Grand Master medallion was created by a member of the not-for-profit incorporated society who presented and gifted it to same for its use. It has been reproduced and presented for decades. The intellectual property is held by the incorporated society, who own the original photograph and uploaded it to Wikipedia. The photograph in question is also used on the website of the organisation : www.bam.net.nz. It is being used here with full permission. Thanks for the opportunity to clarify, feel free to contact the BAM if you need any further clarification. Phantomwiki (talk) 23/4/17
- Phantomwiki Same situation, please have the rights holder fill in the form at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
"личное фото" is "personal photo". Apparently an image of Andrey Bilanov, a Russian actor...and one who is apparently not even notable enough for an ruwiki article. Derivatives of the image (which is unfortunately, as a tiff, hard to search for) appear widely, however, in DWs that appear to be posters for some TV show he was in. This was the only upload, ever, by this editor, and is almost certainly both a professional portrait and a copyvio. - Reventtalk 23:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
The person who painted this sign has the copyright, not the flickr uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
This trophy is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
You're saying the trophy ITSELF is not the work of the photographer who took it? The original trophy was sculpted by a member of the incorporated society and donated to same, it has been cast and presented every year since 1969. The photograph was taken by the incorporated society. Rights of such matters are inclusive in the club's intellectual property. Thanks for allowing me to clarify, if you need more information feel free to contact the Variety Artists Club of New Zealand directly. www.vac.org.nz Phantomwiki (talk)
- Phantomwiki Actually it works that the uploader contact the copyright holder and ask that the simple permission at COM:OTRS be completed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
wrong source Pitpisit (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. DR needs to be better motivated. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Badzil as no permission (No permission since): but it appears to have permission if "own work" is accepted. I do not see any reason given why it was not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- This image exists on an event page for "15 April 2016", which now says "Sorry this event has been and gone". Assuming that the image was added to the event page before the event took place (as an invitation/advertisment image), it existed as a NET-IMAGE before upload to Commons. Also, the Commons image is missing camera-EXIF Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Josve is convinsing. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Boat Race 1932-1933
[edit]- File:1932 Boat Race - 01.jpg
- File:1932 Boat Race - 02.jpg
- File:1932 Boat Race - 03.jpg
- File:1933 University Boat Race - Entraînement Oxford - 01.jpg
- File:1933 University Boat Race - Entraînement Oxford - 02.jpg
Toutes ces images ont été téléversées par moi, et je pense qu'elles devraient être supprimées car elles ne sont pas dans le domaine aux USA (mais DP en France). Pour info, discussion sur le wiki en anglais sur le sujet. A restaurer dans une dizaine d'années, il me semble Shev123 (talk) 11:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Pre-1937 anon France = public domain 58 years and 120 days after publication. Published in 1932 = public domain since 1991. Published in 1933 = public domain since 1992. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Good news if it is in the public domain. Notifications to @Clpo13 and The Rambling Man: because we talked about these images on the english wiki. --Shev123 (talk) 07:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: I'd love it if these photos were public domain, but where did you get these copyright terms? clpo13(talk) 20:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Going by the information at en:List of countries' copyright lengths and fr:Droit d'auteur en France, I'm guessing it's from the pre-1997 fifty year term plus the 8 year 120 day wartime extension. A later law changed the copyright term to 70 years effective 1997, but was this retroactive for works that were already public domain? I know some countries, such as Russia, have pulled works out of the public domain with later laws. It sounds like COM:CRTFR is missing some information. clpo13(talk) 21:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I simplified, in order to address the aspect relevant to the URAA, as that is the only question for this nomination. A longer story is not really necessary for this nomination. But if you want to explore the matter, you can find the term of 50 years (pma for works of known authors and post publication for anonymous works) in the copyright law of 1957. Details about the wartime extension of 8,3 years can be found in Wikipedia. Thus, for example, works whose authors died in 1932 and anonymous works published in 1932 entered the public domain in France in 1991. They were in the public domain on 1 January 1966 and their US copyright was not restored by the URAA. Their copyright in France may have been retroactively restored and extended per section 16, subsection III (the Spanish effect), of the modificative law of 1997. If so, they entered the public domain for a second time in 2011. But, in any case, past discussions on Commons have come to the conclusion that a French law passed in 1997 could not retroactively revoke their public domain status under the U.S. copyright Act in the U.S. On Commons, this is integrated into Template:URAA artist and Template:France wartime extensions URAA. Considering pma or post pub, as the case requires, the quick rule of thumb is: 1936 or before: not restored by URAA. 1937 or later: restored by URAA. The principle is the same for anonymous works, only you replace pma with post pub. On Commons, common occurrences of such works are photographs from the agencies Meurisse, Rol and Mondial and postcards from anonymous authors. For such works, applicable templates often are PD-anon-70-EU + PD-1996. (If someone wanted to complexify the issues, they could raise the URAA paradox. That is to say, the fact that perhaps such simple photographs of actuality may not have been copyrighted in France to start with. Consequently, if they never had a copyright in France at all, they did not have a copyright that had "expired" by 1996 in France. And consequently, did not meet the wording of the URAA to have their copyright not restored in the U.S. And consequently, works that were less protected in their country of origin are more protected by the URAA, while works that were more protected in their country of origin are less protected by the URAA. But that's a level of discussion that is probably not appropriate for an isolated deletion request.) -- Asclepias (talk) 16:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Read the information here:https://www.tampapix.com/bartoncomparison.htm, The photos themselves offer the best evidence that this is NOT Clara Barton on the left. אילילה (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- while we usually keep images of this sort -- unidentified people -- hoping to get IDs, the cited discussion makes it clear that is unlikely. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear Sirs, I am representing Kriss Sheridan, the copyright holder and owner of this picture. The picture has been uploaded to Wikipedia without his permission. It also refers to a Wikipedia article about Kriss Sheridan that does NOT exist. This is our URGENT REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE REMOVAL !!! Kind regards, Jessica McBride 194.33.77.26 23:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Someone obviously sent an OTRS permission for this file. So what's wrong now? While this file is not in use, there is a version cropped from it: File:Helmut Dietl (2012 - cropped).jpg, and this one is in use on more than 20 pages. It's the only photograph we have of en:Helmut Dietl, who died in 2015, so it should be kept. Also, I don't really believe that it was uploaded without Sheridan's permission. This is a typical PR shot (it shows Sheridan together with a famous director), who else should upload this if not Sheridan himself or his PR managers? Somebody also tried to create an article for him at de.wp, which got deleted. --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Kriss Sheridan did not have a manager before. The picture file has been here for over 3 years. Uploaded without Sheridan's permission !!! Kriss Sheridan was against this upload, but he did not know how to remove it. He does not know how to create, edit or remove content from Wikipedia. There are many other pictures from Helmut Dietl on the Internet. If you wanna keep this one, then only a cut of Helmut Dietl, like you already did in Wikimedia. But without Kriss Sheridan's face ! This is a copyrighted content of Kriss Sheridan. If you violate against his will and his copyright rights, I am gonna file a lawsuit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.33.77.26 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 23. Apr. 2017 (UTC)
- You talk about filing a lawsuit and at the same time you ask us to illegally steal images from the internet. That doesn't make sense. I repeat that there is a permission to use this file, and again I ask you what's wrong with that. Ask OTRS personnel for verification. On the other hand, while the permission is documented, you are just an anonymous IP and we don't even know if you are the one you pretend to be. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
@Sitacuisses -> Write me an email to jessica@kriss-sheridan.com or contact@kriss-sheridan.com (official email addresses that are on Kriss Sheridan official facebook fanpage) and you will get the same response. Kriss Sheridan never allowed this copyrighted picture to get uploaded on Wikipedia and we would like to get it removed. If you want to, we can agree to upload some other picture of him in future when the article exists. And regarding Helmut Dietl, you are allowed to crop just the Helmut Dietl (which you actually already did in his article). Regards, Jessica McBride
- This is not about me, since I don't decide deletion requests and I'm not a member of the OTRS team either. I'm just asking questions and trying to point you to the relevant aspects. There is a permission, and somebody must have sent it. --Sitacuisses (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
@Sitacuisses -> How to get to the OTRS team ? Or will our discussion be seen by them or automatically forwarded to them? I am just his manager trying to help my artist. Thank you in advance for your help.
- I posted the link above and it's also on the file's description page. --Sitacuisses (talk) 04:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: We do not take images down at the request of anonymous IP users. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Jessica McBride, Kriss Sheridan's manager is urgently requesting to remove this file from Wikimedia. The copyright holder Kriss Sheridan has never allowed to upload this picture to wikimedia. The picture is unattractive. This file stucks since 5 years already and we are struggling with his deletion. The last time was unsuccessful because I was requesting from an "anonymous" IP address. Well, now I have an account. To confirm identity you can write me anytime at jessica@kriss-sheridan,com, the official email-address on the artist's official facebook. If the deletion process will still be unsuccessful, our next step will be a lawsuite file !!! And last, but not least: There are hundreds of better and more current photos of this artist I was offering for upload, and those are the pictures with our copyrights. Sincerely Jessica McBride -Manager- jessica@kriss-sheridan.com JessMcBride (talk) 23:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission. Moving this dispute to COM:OTRS/N. --Guanaco (talk) 09:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since); converting to Deletion Nomination to ask for consensus if this is a PD-USGov because DIA is an external agency of the U.S. Government.[5]. Also file is in use, and needs a category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-USGov-DIA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)