Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 9th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, source and purpose of data unclear. Not enough information to be useful in any project. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da wir die Besitzer dieses privaten Wohnhauses sind fordern wir Sie umgehend auf das Bild zu entfernen 95.88.210.61 08:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This IP apparently takes offence at my having uploaded a photo of a building they claim to own, yet without specifying which photo they refer to. The deletion request was instead put on my user page from where I removed it. I'm ready to discuss any reasonable issue that might arise with photos I upload here, yet I have to suspect that this person is simply unfamilar with the concept of freedom of panorama and with the legal situation on such issues in Germany. --Jörg Zägel (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload for obviously personal use showing identficable indivuduals, hence, personality rights isusses, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong PD, Mossa died 1971 Goesseln (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for mistake --Sailko (talk) 06:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Raymond 07:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been deleted previously, this is Perry's portrait as Governor, a creation of the Texas government, and is not in the public domain. The portrait existed before Perry had even been nominated for the position, so no it is not his Energy Secretary portrait. -Gage (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been deleted previously, this is Perry's portrait as Governor, a creation of the Texas government, and is not in the public domain. The portrait existed before Perry had even been nominated for the position, so no it is not his Energy Secretary portrait. -Gage (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gage: Can you provide a link please? Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 21:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Rick_Perry_official_Transition_portrait.jpg Gage (talk) 23:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 00:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos contain copyrighted images.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 13:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills fromù unfree videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

RQ-LABO.JP videos are copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bject (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of non free content. We need a permission from the copyright holder of the poster.

Yann (talk) 09:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work MB298 (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 13:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the respective article, died in 1961, so clearly not an "own work in 2017" Tatewaki (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 13:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not a free img Barbarian (talk) 07:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: The picture can be found on many websites, like this one: https://www.mobilegeeks.de/artikel/vw-arteon-der-cc-nachfolger-ist-ein-gran-turismo/

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vague source, disparaging title to unidentified subject, used by uploader to vandalize Wikipedia.[1] PrimeHunter (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: filename and use are both pure vandalism. --DMacks (talk) 07:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused gif logo. Superseded by svg: File:TSV Gnarrenburg Logo.svg. XXN, 19:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows XP screenshot, some parts of the screenshot are maybe non-free copyrighted. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Already deleted by Jcb, clearly copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apilstrs jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; not a selfie repository

TJH2018talk 16:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Apilstrs jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Apilstrs jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploading pictures that are out of the scope for personal advertisement some of them are like film cover or may be edited for personal use. Commons is not a social media site.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apilstr tgdb Jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE no educational use (COM:EDUSE)

Mifter (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apilstr tgdb Jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As before -- out of scope personal images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apilstr tgdb Jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As with previous uploads by the same user, this is just a batch of private vanity photos serving no educational purpose. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 09:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apilstr tgdb Jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - commons is not a photo album nor facebook

Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alikhan04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both very small, no EXIF. Only uploads from this user.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by edgar Devon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no metadata, picture certainly found on the web.

Cjp24 (talk) 11:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/26._Februar_2014#Michael_Tfirst_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29 Castillo blanco (talk) 11:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, no used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files were uploaded by Atwngirl (talk · contribs) (who is active) and Connor7617 (talk · contribs) (who is not) under the claim of {{PD-US-no notice}}. They are mostly from an unidentified slide collection of unknown heritage. They fail both of the provisions of the claimed license template: there is no evidence that they were actually published in the United States between 1923 and 1977, and because the scans are cropped to just the images themselves, there is no proof that publication was actually without copyright marks. Because these are scanned slides, it is in fact extremely likely that their first publication was when they were uploaded to Commons, and they are thus still under copyright. Some files, like File:1952 - Lehigh Valley Transit Liberty Bell 1030 Shipping Out After Sale.jpg, are known to be published in books; this publication is unambiguously copyrighted.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brandon Holden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless image with enormous border Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mnadirm06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope; the file isn't realistically useful for an educational purpose. Msaynevirta (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope; the file isn't realistically useful for an educational purpose. Msaynevirta (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:FranSmith990

[edit]

Unused personal snapshots, out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 05:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snay0r (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted non-trivial logos.

XXN, 19:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 05:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}} tag; there is captured also a part of background picture, which is copyrighted. XXN, 19:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These cuts have no copyrighted value. --Kürschner (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Even parts of copyrighted works are copyrighted, unless below COM:TOO, or COM:DM, which these images are not. (tJosve05a (c) 05:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio screen shot Sakhalinio (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value TJH2018talk 21:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal collage, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ritesh s kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; promotional photos; no educational value

TJH2018talk 22:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure and blatant vandalism, and totally out of scope TJH2018talk 22:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Feroz.khan 007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Com:CRT#Pakistan "Copyright in a Government work shall, where Government is the first owner of the copyright therein, subsist until fifty years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work is first published." Chapter 5.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Personality rights. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photograph, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC) la bebé de la foto es mi hija, se respeta la opinión de los demás pero al ser mi hija puedo subir fotos de ella dentro de los parámetros sociales[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small format, potentially copy rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use and not educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was previously published on Facebook without a statement of CC licensing. It can be seen on Facebook at this location. LadyofShalott (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value TJH2018talk 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; possible copyvio; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 16:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, it can be found in the web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. XXN, 16:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination,; above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marquisdesid88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Internet images, low resolution, no EXIF

Wcam (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private a bit blurred photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally useful. The cat is dark and blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PalmiraCuarto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be from http://meritxellmargaritcast.blogspot.com/p/meritxell.html

Ytoyoda (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PalmiraCuarto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted poster

Ytoyoda (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal sketch by uploader. Out of scope. G I Chandor (talk) 07:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 07:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission given from the artist Dispenser (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An OTRS Permission was recieved. Ticket#2017030910012013. It is better in such cases to add a "No permission" alert than to open a Deletion request. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission given from the artist Dispenser (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An OTRS Permission was recieved. Ticket#2017030910012013. It is better in such cases to add a "No permission" alert than to open a Deletion request. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 16:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission given from the artist Dispenser (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An OTRS Permission was recieved. Ticket#2017030910012013. It is better in such cases to add a "No permission" alert than to open a Deletion request. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 16:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loser100101 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: fictions flags of questionable notability. Used on draft of questionable credibility.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination https://www.klinikum-oldenburg.de/de/patienten/klinik_fuer_anaesthesiologie/notfallmedizin.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://waves98.com/about/
No speedy deletion; We need permission via COM:OTRS Wdwd (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image was found at other website, uploaded here as "own work". This situation routinely is handled through speedy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, currently a copyvio, it will be restored if a permission is sent or compatible license added into the source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a selfie repository; out of scope

TJH2018talk 22:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of scope images; one seems like a program and other is a chemistry formulas but equating atoms with girls and boys. Pure vandalism!

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol (scrrenshot copyrighted, not a free Creative Commons image). Danyele (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol (screenshot copyrighted, not a free Creative Commons image). Danyele (talk) 00:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nombre incorrecto Agrotelecom (talk) 00:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisements are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 00:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative works of copyrighted characters. [2] G I Chandor (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If all of the store windows were blank, then the image would be of one of a million small stores around the world and therefore out of scope. The only reason the image is interesting is the many copyrighted characters shown. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative works of a copyrighted object. G I Chandor (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

写真撮影可能な場で撮影。映画公開後もプロレスなどに出場している怪獣である。可能な範囲での出典といえるのではないでしょうか。--Bject (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The sculpture is copyrighted. The fact that it is in public does not matter. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from the subject's website, no evidence to help verify the uploader's claim: http://www.andonicanela.com/tablet/index.html Ytoyoda (talk) 01:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Flickr user's photos appear to come from all over ("flickrwashing"). I mailed the user to check their copyright status, but until then, I think it's unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder instead of a re-uploader. czar 04:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Found with the same publication date as Flickr at http://www.hawarnews.com/%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%B4%D9%86%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%84/ (with intact metadata) and http://www.ozgurlukcusol.com/ozgurlestirilen-sengalden-ilk-kareler/ (much higher resolution). LX (talk, contribs) 07:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JHORDAN MASTER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A google image search listed 100's of similar files Google

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 05:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mechenyj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images, some from books, poster and others "no author".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meta data = "FBMD" showing this was in and out of facebook before coming here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artistic shot of a lampshade; while it is pretty, it's unclear what educational use it has. JesseW (talk) 07:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As per deletion requester, this is a good image of an lampshade so this image has educational use on the kind of illumination the lampshade does. Tm (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I think it's out of scope, but also, the Flickr username does not match the EXIF. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These posters (or food menus) contain copyrighted photos.

G I Chandor (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those images from flicker, I have no objection --Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 11:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Outdated}} 193.170.197.1 08:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is not a reason for deletion. --Leyo 22:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmitri 152 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are out of project scope: they are only used to advance non-notable conspiracy theories of Dimitri Khalezov concerning alleged controlled demolition of skyscrapers, including the WTC towers, with nuclear weapons. There is no possible educational use for this kind of media. Similar files by the same uploader have also been deleted before.--Msaynevirta (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files are needed for an article that I am working on. This user has a tendency for marking my uploaded graphics. Please ignore him.--Dmitri 152 (talk) 10:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Entirely aside from the question of whether we should be supporting crazy conspiracy theories (we should not), these images appear elsewhere without free licenses. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't find the original, but this looks a lot like a staged, commercial photo lifted from the web (oddly curved border and drop shadow intact). From the description, the uploader was here to advertise a secret shopper website - this upload was their only edit. McGeddon (talk) 12:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from imgur (5,844 views) Dispenser (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from imgur (32,240 views) Dispenser (talk) 12:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hacard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Russian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in May 2016 for being non-notable. Out of project scope.

xplicit 02:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, source and purpose of data unclear. Not enough information to be useful in any project. ~ Rob13Talk 04:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

supersededby File:Goudy Text.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Goudy Trajan.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any use; we have over 100 images of this species, see Category:Actias luna. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IZHAM NAYAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/21/44/df/2144dfe45efddf2618766f05d3ac1da7.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Where is the indication, that isn't the work of uploader? --Quedel (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Larger versions in several places on the web, no EXIF. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Estonia Elisfkc (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's still a street view and doesn't directly depict details of the surrounding buildings. Flying Saucer (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Building on the right is the main subject. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete This 3D work of art was erected in 2008, after 1989 (thus automatically copyrighted) and stands on sovereign territory of the Republic of Korea (South Korea). Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Korea_.28South.29, such copyrighted works of art on public display may be reproduced except for commercial purposes, thus making this photograph non-compatible with Commons licensing requirements. Even if we claimed rights from a United States perspective, claiming that since the image was taken from U.S. sovereign ground, 3D works of art on public display are likewise protected in the U.S., again making this image incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

migrate to english as fair use. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 10:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is well established that the copyright law that applies to works on the grounds of embassies is that of the host country. South Korean law is not relevant here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jjillij1435 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from various sources - family album, yearbooks and a corporate event photo. I have a difficult time believing one uploader can own copyrights to all.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cesar D. Fermin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wrong pdf format, all the nominated images have been replaced by better formats

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, the photo it is in public domain because taken 25 years ago but the artwork not, the artist is live. Ezarateesteban 20:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And also:


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not evidente that the source be free and the uploader is the author, OTRS is required Ezarateesteban 20:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

  1. File:Argentina Trophy 1.jpg
  2. File:Argentina Trophy 3.jpg
  3. File:Argentina Trophy 4.jpg
  4. File:Argentina Trophy 5.jpg
  5. File:Argentina Trophy 6.jpg
  6. File:Argentina Trophy 8.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in USA for posters. (But the book is one of my favourites!) Taivo (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If you cropped the posters, you have only a photo of the top of his head. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concept art Elisfkc (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concept art, no proof of license Elisfkc (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concept art, no proof of license Elisfkc (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concept art, no proof of license Elisfkc (talk) 21:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concept art, no proof of license Elisfkc (talk) 21:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is not a contributor, his only activity is a user page at EN wiki several years ago. Also no permission from the photographer. Jcb (talk) 21:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nailirus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Argentine for sculptures.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nailirus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bad quality unused images without EXIF. Out of scope. Images with usable quality are kept

/St1995 22:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aly4gany (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope/dubious copyright status

/St1995 22:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken, unfinished, not used. Atlasowa (talk) 09:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Google translates file description "Copy of a mountain or a drawer". Taivo (talk) 11:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Mostly because this has no educational value without a description detailing the geographic location. If we knew where this was taken, it could be in scope for use in an article. ~ Rob13Talk 06:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally valuable. Dark and blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9   15:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, maybe not notable persons. Superseded by better staightened image without people File:Treptower Park (7658630072).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally valuable. A bit dark. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally valuable. Not focused. Object is unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple sheet with drawings, no usage.--Bigbossfarin (talk) 15:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no longer in use, but 3 keep votes. P 1 9 9   15:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Facebook page. E4024 (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt that every single one of these images were taken by the uploader Elisfkc (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found it elsewhere: http://www.disneyanafanclub.org/node/114 Elisfkc (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope TJH2018talk 22:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The subject may or may not be in scope, probably not, but the image is a copyvio as it is not a selfie and there is no license from the photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work containing a copyrighted logo. XXN, 22:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Logos are designed for publication, aren't they ? --Angband (talk) 05:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yes, but so are books -- most published works have a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work, other copyvio deleted. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark upper left corner, can't quite make it out. Own work not very likely. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is actually of Neville Francis Fitzgerald Chamberlain and a similar image has been uploaded in that name. see File:Colonel Sir Neville Chamberlain.jpg Dormskirk (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licensed as cc-by-nc-sa on flickrDudek1337 (talk) 23:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A.Ferretti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeffz34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diploma of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LosAngelesFinest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dp271219989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos of unclear notability. The second one is clearly non-trivial and probably is copyrighted.

XXN, 19:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo with identifiable individuals, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: one-file upload, and file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Amitie. P 1 9 9   15:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from tour bout etc, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, many alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9   15:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, no equivalent, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use and not notable people so out of scope Ezarateesteban 20:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, no equivalent, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, no equivalent, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use and I can't see any educational purpose of this picture Ezarateesteban 20:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower dupe of File:Muelligen-blason.svg, uploader is not the author. -- User: Perhelion 22:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This one is actually older, but the other one is widely used. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SF Chronicle credited here: http://www.sfgate.com/technology/article/GoDaddy-hires-Blake-Irving-as-CEO-4110094.php Ytoyoda (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a copyrighted image AlleinStein (talk) 04:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright: http://www.bpk.go.id/page/executive_board/7 202.67.40.1 04:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(copyright violation) This is a request because of a very important legal reason, it is an illegal copy (of a painting in Iran country) that published in internet space Inka.arhaom (talk) 09:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(copyright laws violation) This is a request because of a so important legal reason, it is an illegal copy (of a painting) that published in internet space. Inka.arhaom (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Frze > talk 10:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by better straightened image: File:Shikotar mata Temple at Vadgam 2.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from imgur (4 views), attributed source gives license "Lithornis commission by Dylan Bajda. For use in the wikis", not CC-By-SA. Dispenser (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted without warning, without checking the link. This issue reminds of the Ichthyconodon pics debates last year, which had to result in the artist making an account here. There's incompetent, and there's demented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falconfly (talk • contribs) 13:49, 2 April 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Falconfly: The problem is museums and many other organizations would like to only license to Wikipedia. We need a license to allow anyone to reproduce it even for profit on a T-shirt. So the artist must be a little more explicit. —Dispenser (talk) 16:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I grant all permission The lithornis illustration is in the public domain. ~ Dylan Bajda (Sheatherius)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from imgur (23 views). Attributed source is Facebook, no evidence of licensing. Dispenser (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr account seems to be Flickr Washing (https://tineye.com/search/4cc3d9cfa0a011626ea2dbfbe2f1707509442db3/?sort=size&order=desc) Elisfkc (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo - copyrighted. XXN, 19:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. XXN, 19:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author information, small resolution. Unclear that this is free media. Badzil (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. Small size, no exif. May be a screen shot. Jcb (talk) 21:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 11:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its a Infografic about how to write a Pressrelease - done by myself with canva.com so no SVG Possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrizoo (talk • contribs) 16:31, 9 March 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.fotolog.com/karol__dance/40484436/ This account appears to belong to Karol "Dance" Lucero (a relevant chilean radio and television personality) and matches the Fotolog user account (notice that, according to the ToS, the copyright for the contents submited to Fotolog belongs to the user), and this is clearly a self-portrait. If this account actually belongs to Karol Dance, OTRS permission may be needed. Also, Karol Dance is a relevant person, and this file is in use. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - permission can be sent to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourced as artesteves.blogspot.com, no indication it's free, 90.184.162.163 01:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

作者已經逝世50年--Pillow lin (talk) 11:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Who is it then? It states "Author: 未知上傳者". 90.184.162.163 08:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PuneNewsPhotographer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The subject does not have a WP article and appears not to be particularly notable -- fourth tier executive in a large corporation. None of the images have EXIF and most are a little fuzzy. The last of them infringes on the copyright for the trophy.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyright violation as the author indicated in the photograph ("Raveen Samoedj") does not correspond with the uploader ("Ashna km") Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copyrighted http://durdybayramov.ca/career-highlights/ Theroadislong (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image may be copyrighted. see http://www.navysite.de which suggest that all material on the site is subject to copyright. Trappist the monk (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge it's an official badge, and therefore cannot be copyrighted. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Editor Iazyges asserts that the badge is 'official' and, as uploader, that the image is the work of the US Government without showing evidence in support of these claims. Editor Amitie 10g makes a similar claim about the badge; also without evidence. Both, I think miss my point. It is not the copyright status of the badge itself that is the issue, it is the copyright status of the photographic image which has been, according to Editor Iazyges, lifted from http://www.navysite.de. If navysite.de can claim copyright on the photographic image, then it does not belong on WikiMedia servers except as permitted by 'fair-use' or some other such allowances in copyright law.
Trappist the monk (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - taking a picture of a 3D object generates copyright. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image published on the company's website, probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see website address upside Pippobuono (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing stereocenter, replaced by File:Latrunculin C structure.svg, see also talk page. Nothingserious (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Empty category. --Achim (talk) 14:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed that subject=author=uploader. Since this does not look like a selfie, we need a free lciense from the actual photographer using OTRS. Also, tis person has no WP article and no Google hits except promo, so probably out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright statut without more informations Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Iliac as side view.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Isoquant isocost graph.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Knowledge Visualization Model by Remo Burkhard.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not taken stated date and publsihed erarlier with another photogafer stated http://www.trelleborgsallehanda.se/kultur-noje/alexandra-fann-den-dolda-kvinnomakten/ Yger (talk) 09:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 09:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced with svg File:Transcriptomics technique publications over time.svg T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 10:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What little information I can find about Harald Pickert suggests he died in 1983. That would make these images subject to copyright for many years to come.

Themightyquill (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


  • Diese Abbildung bzw. Datei wurde 1925 im Der getreue Eckart veröffentlicht.
If he had published in 1923 or sooner, it would be in the public domain. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 20:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raising this DR in order to create a test case, or at least to confirm copyright status of scans of Harmon Foundation works. The collection is of works by potentially otherwise unknown 'negro artists', with dates of creation as late as 1967. It is likely that some of the collected artists are only relatively recently deceased and possible that some may still be living.

The license chosen is PD-USGov, however in the master record at NARA, I cannot see why this would be a correct license. It may be that I'm missing some historic background on the collection. @Dominic: as original upload bot operator. The image and license came to my attention as part of a current diffusion project for PD-USGov. (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@: I know this collection has been questioned in the past, and actually I found some other DRs where images were actually deleted while looking for that thread. I don't think I ever got an answer back then from NARA's general counsel, but that was 5 years ago now (!), so I have sent an email to our still pictures unit, which is responsible for the "use unrestricted" statement that these were uploaded under to see if they have any information—perhaps there is some internal institutional knowledge about these works being either produced by government workers or having their rights donated.
PD-USGov is likely technically not right. It had been decided when we did that bot upload to upload all under a PD-USGov license, since we knew they were all (supposed to be) PD, rather than try to automatically determine a suitable template. It wouldn't have been possible with so many agency- or situation-specific templates, while the rights statements in the catalog do not give reasoning. So you ended up with a few records like these that look off, because they were a donated collection that didn't quite fit the template. Dominic (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link to the previous discussion. It's very much like accepting 'No copyright known' licenses. Though we do this for Flickr and a few other sites, without a specific template it's likely that this collection will remain under risk of deletion due to uncertainty. I do not have a strong view on either delete or keep in this situation. -- (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The problem here is that without more information, we can't know the work's actual status. If it was published before March 1, 1989, including being exhibited, without a copyright notice then it is PD. Otherwise -- if it was in a private collection or held by the artist's family until then, then it will be under copyright until at least 1/1/2048. Unfortunately, that uncertainty calls for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Jim. --Daphne Lantier 20:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with current amount of information. Who is this Michael Wood? Castillo blanco (talk) 13:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Owner of Elite Audio Systems, a renowned San Francisco establishment of a hybrid audio store/coffee bar. All of Chris' San Francisco culture photographs would be useful for anyone writing about cafe culture in SFO. Monfulta (talk) 23:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Daphne Lantier 20:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with current amount of information. Who is this Michael Wood? Castillo blanco (talk) 13:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Owner of Elite Audio Systems, a renowned San Francisco establishment of a hybrid audio store/coffee bar. All of Chris' San Francisco culture photographs would be useful for anyone writing about cafe culture in SFO. Monfulta (talk) 23:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Daphne Lantier 20:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by the bigger image without black borders: File:Fowler Museum Construction stg extracted.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Kit body fcc1617h.png IagoQnsi (talk) 14:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Since I made this deletion request, I have made modifications to File:Kit body fcc1617h.png, so they are no longer exactly the same, but all I did was fix some missing details -- there's no need to have this lesser version of the same image. -IagoQnsi (talk) 19:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake PD-RU-exempt license. The "Federation Control of Trafficking Sports Phamaceutical" is a non-governmental organization and its flag is copyrighted. Olivye (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a tricky one. The uploader cited Filipino law as to why the image should be free. However, there's a (better-quality) version of the image on enwiki (en:File:Ph seal abra sallapadan.png), which cites the same bit of Filipino law to clam that it's *not* free. If it's ambiguous, then doesn't the precautionary principle indicate that the image is nonfree? DS (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteWhile we ignore non-copyright restrictions, the restriction here is in the middle of the copyright law, so I argue that it is, in effect, a copyright restriction. It certainly means that any commercial use -- and that is almost any use, including, possibly, Commons itself -- is forbidden.
There is also the problem that the law reads:
"SEC. 176. Works of the Government. – 176.1. No copyright shall subsist in any work of the Government of the Philippines."
This is not a work of the national government, so I think the situation is similar to that in the USA -- Federal government works are free, but those of states (except AR, CA, FL) and municipalities are not. So I think this file is not OK for two different reasons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While we are on the subject, I encourage you to comment on my proposal to change the template to conform with my reading of the law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data (dated 1990) to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Author mentioned as S.Easwara Varma - Which is invalid since its not a selfie ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 09:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. imho rather thumbnail format and missing exif, as well one file upload whicht is not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small format (HD720), one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Professional Camera is used for capturing the image, it will have exif, Looks like not own work, unless its proved by uploader (by considering the uploading pattern of user and assuming good faith) = ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 09:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized one-file-upload, potentially copyright rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the used base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Fake license, a high school is not software of course. Jcb (talk) 21:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Current license is only valid if this would be an official representation of the CoA. Jcb (talk) 22:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Must be universally replaced by another version (the svg, for instance), but it is true that the file is missing basic information and that it is too small to be useful. Kathisma (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the usage. Jcb (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see no remaining oppositions to delete it. Kathisma (talk) 21:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Données EXIF : @2016 jacques nadeau, autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oeuvre d'un artiste, Jean-Claude Novaro, mort en 2014, donc sous droits d'auteurs, l'autorisation des ayants droits est nécessaire Shev123 (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by HWT File:American Chromatic.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: please give the superseding png file -- this current title is a redlink. --Daphne Lantier 19:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo with identifiable individual, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
 Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prof. Alikkutty Musliyar with Pinarayi Vijayan.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Roland zh He is a well known Muslim public figure in Kerala. He is the current president of Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama Usamuba (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, as commented, from my side in principal not disputed, but found no entry at EN-WP or ML-WP, hence, argued 'personality rights' and asked here for other opinions, regards, Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment: now, there seems to be one ;-) Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Roland zh, Hi, there are entries already about this person on both ML-WP and EN-WK. As an outstanding public figure like him whose photo may allowed to publish in the wiki please! Usamuba (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Public figure photographed in a public setting; used several times. (Nominating a picture 40min after upload because it is "unidentified" and "unused" is a bit hasty.)---Jahobr (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use on 2 wikis. --Daphne Lantier 19:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Frze > talk 03:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:02, 8 March 2017‎ AndreasBThom

Hello, thanks for the information. Pictures from the Oberwolfach Foto Collection are frequently used on Wikipedia. I presume this goes without explicit permission. The picture above comes from https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=18042 and on this page there is a link to the copyright policy

https://opc.mfo.de/ There, it is written: The Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (MFO) owns the copyright to most of the images used on this website. Those images labelled with "Copyright: MFO" can be used on the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany. We cannot guarantee that there may not be outstanding copyright problems. We also cannot guarantee that there is no invasion of personal privacy. However, liability claims against the MFO in respect of the content of this website are in principle ruled out provided that there is no provable culpable intent or gross negligence on the MFO's part. In case you have information on rights of any third party, we kindly ask you to contact us.

The picture above is labelled with "Copyright: MFO", so that everything should be fine.

The sentence that is highlighted in the above statement only refers to photos that the Oberwolfach Photo Collection aquired from third parties (like private collections of visitors etc.) If "Copyright: MFO" applies then "Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0" applies. 90.44.54.207 18:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wohl kein eigenes Werk, sondern Buchdeckel mit Grafiken von Schöpfungshöhe. Dem unteren Gebäude nach keine 100 Jahre alt. Jbergner (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mass uploading of out of scope files with bad quality, mostly without EXIF, proper cats, descr. All unused.


Deleted: the only file tagged and notified. Use VFC for mass deletions - you cannot simply say "all files of this user". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jameslwoodward: I cannot use VFC in this case because if i did it, the DR will be displayed in Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking. I tagged all files and add link to this DR in uploader's talk page. You may delete this DR and I add this files here manually /St1995 14:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand the problem you state -- why is display in DR/mobile tracking a problem? VFC makes it much easier for both the nominator and the closing Admin. Working off the contributions page would take 35 page loads and separate deletions.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wilsoncol805 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mass uploading of out of scope files with bad quality, mostly without EXIF, proper cats, descr. All unused.

/St1995 14:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No categories does not equate to "out of scope". I've gone through them all, I think the following are worth keeping:

/--Mjrmtg (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also serious doubts about copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YarikUkraine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation of licensing. No item is suitable. Public/non-state organizations.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 01:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10 (d): symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations --YarikUkraine (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
...of {{PD-UA-exempt}}. --XXN, 17:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Section (d) appears to apply to me. Fry1989 eh? 18:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I agree with Fry. If the law isn't meant for logo's off public organisations: please start a general discussion and find consensus too change the license. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]