Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 27th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per above...TJH2018talk 02:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blantant copyvio DHN (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM is not for selfies TJH2018talk 07:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Polarlys: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely copyrighted. As explained by ESO, material from scientific papers is not covered by the Creative Commons license. This figure appears in a paper published by Nature in 2017. This is informationindicated under the figure at on ESO web page. Robert.Allen (talk) 06:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I realize now this figure is not identical to the one reproduced the paper. My apologies! --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove this request. Thanks Quantanew (talk) 07:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies! --Robert.Allen (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Misunderstanding by nominator. Huntster (t @ c) 16:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably Flickrwash. --XXN, 16:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. --XXN, 16:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per ticket:2017011610006627. Yann (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope; no educational value TJH2018talk 07:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme: Out of project scope: promotional content - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, but also personality rights isusses, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful; better photos already available Ijon (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Botha vs. Parker.jpg Kidsoljah (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty page Mr Democracy (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of project; used on promotional page on COM TJH2018talk 01:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also no evidence of permission(s). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:09:01‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Subject request deletion. Per Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Removal_requests. (see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Megan Wacha 090712.jpg). --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of project; used on promotional page on COM TJH2018talk 01:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: advertisement - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of project; used on promotional page on COM TJH2018talk 01:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: advertisement - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of project; used on promotional page on COM TJH2018talk 02:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: advertisement - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of project; used on promotional page on COM TJH2018talk 02:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: advertisement - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No good result of quality Samuel Long BRD (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of the picture Samuel Long BRD (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no use for Samuel Long BRD (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no use for Samuel Long BRD (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wrong quality of picture Samuel Long BRD (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

must be replaced and deleted soon to place a better version of Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   23:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Model and me the copyright owner want to use their legal rights and now wish the deletion. Thanks to all, Samuel Long BRD (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Long BRD: you can use COM:OTRS to do a formal request. XXN, 11:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Kept in 6 previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Im Nachgang machen das Fotomodel und der Fotograph vom geltenden Recht gebrauch, ein Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Tm (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modell und Fotograph möchten die Löschung des Bildes bzw. der Varianten, da Fragen zu den umfänglichen Rechten offen sind und deshalb eine vorsorgliche Löschung optimal wäre. Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-admin closure): No new arguments brought after 7 previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Van forrása, engedélye, szerzője. Miért kellene törölni? Tambo (talk) 10:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mondjuk ha elolvastad volna a törlési allapot, amit behivatkoztam, akkor nem kérdeznél ilyeneket: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nagy László fortepan 107214.jpg. Árva mű, nincs engedély a felhasználásra, ugyanis a szerzője nem hunyt el 70 évnél régebben. Komolyan mondom: egyáltalán nem kéne szerzői jogi kérdésekkel foglalkoznod. Nagyon, de nagyon nem vagy képben, viszont a zavarkeltésed ezzel fordítottan arányosan hat. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Szerencsére Te nagyon képben vagy! Viszont nem tudod megkülönböztetni Nagy Lászlót Medveczky Ilonától. Ha valaki a saját képét fel akarja tölteni, annak meg kell várni a saját halála után további 70 évet? Tambo (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Te annyira értetlen vagy, hogy az már fáj. Nem kevertem össze senkit senkivel. Mind a két képnek ugyanaz a szerzője, Hunyady József, aki 1983-ban hunyt el. Nem a saját képét töltötte fel, hanem olyan adományozta a képet a Fortepannak, aki arra nem volt jogosult, így jogsértő, mivel még nem közkincs. Nem az a lényeg, hogy a képen ki szerepel, hanem az, hogy ki a szerzője, mert a képeivel egyformán kell eljárni. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
De mindez szépen le van írva magyarul is, mivel te nem tudsz angolul (sem). A cikk is magyarul van leírva. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nagy László fortepan 107214.jpg. The photo can be undeleted in 2054 (70+1 years from photographer's death). Taivo (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is an SVG version: File:Aztec_sample_Polish.svg Mik (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: on author and uploader request. Mik (talk) 12:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dependent on deleted page Kayser Ahmad (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Orphaned & empty tp. --Achim (talk) 17:44, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file uses an organization's copyrighted logo in an unapproved and inflammatory way. Sardill (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per copyvio. Possible non-free logo. (tJosve05a (c) 22:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reyes caballero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reyes caballero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of scope.

--XXN, 00:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like screenshot from television, probably copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is an old test of mine. I can delete it if you want. --Thierry613 (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AccidentProne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Panoramio-bot, Florida batch

[edit]

Panoramio Bot recently dumped several hundred images into Category:Florida. I have recategorized most of them. These are the ones that are not worth keeping (in my opinion), and are out of Project scope. They include random snapshots of nothing, images with no potential educational value, blurry and low-quality images of things like sunsets, flowers, and cats: bad photos of subjects that are already very well covered by higher quality images on Commons. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to request that File:Under the Sea - panoramio.jpg be kept. It's reasonably good quality, and surprisingly, we have few photos like this. - Themightyquill (talk) 23:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept one, per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 01:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spunlady (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Useless with current amount of information.

Castillo blanco (talk) 13:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizan ul hassan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Sajid Talk 13:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnillescas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Sajid Talk 13:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NaldyHaw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Sajid Talk 13:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NaldyHaw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Sajid Talk 13:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardo Aguilar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Sajid Talk 13:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:SirOtaku

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:SirOtaku. All of them were taken from Google Street View. --Felviper (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FYouGuySF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yco1975 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yco1975 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unclear notability. --XXN, 00:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Screenshot; source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwU1iX6I6wM - copyrighted. --XXN, 00:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo - out of scope. --XXN, 00:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; mass selfie spam TJH2018talk 02:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication whatsoever that the image has been released under the stated license. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

license not OK MartinKonzett (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Seems like photo of photo. The file is not speedily deleted, because it has been in Commons more than 5 years and it is heavily used. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of project; used on promotional page on COM TJH2018talk 02:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM is not for selfies TJH2018talk 07:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM is not for selfies TJH2018talk 07:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM is not for selfies TJH2018talk 07:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM is not for selfies TJH2018talk 07:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for Commercial Closet Association (http://www.commercialcloset.org). Source given as website (I can't see it on there) and author "Impax Marketing, Philadelphia". Yet licensed with a GDFL-self license. Incorrect licensing & website is copyrighted. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm not sure it passes the threshold of originality in the U.S. It's a rather trivial design. –Tryphon 13:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Words and short phrases such as names, titles, and slogans; familiar symbols or designs; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering or coloring; ...typeface as typeface; are not subject to copyright. Also see Image_casebook Trademarks. I changed the licenses. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 16:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, does not meet the threshold of originality. Kameraad Pjotr 18:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With all due respect to the previous DR, I'm not convinced this logo is PD-simple. There are quite a lot of design choices in the various colour bars, I'm pretty sure we've deleted simpler stuff. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO, although this one might be borderline. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P Mallikarjuna Reddy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM is not a selfie repository

TJH2018talk 07:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keiber Fernandez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM is not a selfie repository

TJH2018talk 07:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keiber Fernandez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Jyothiooisolutions

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art work - out of scope. --XXN, 00:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyrighted, probably out of scope. --XXN, 00:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 00:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 00:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 01:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality version... redundant to the copy at File:USS Ellet (DD-398) - 19-N-20352.jpg. This is a low-resolution scan of a printed copy of the image, with quite apparent artifacts and poor contrast. If someone wants this exact crop, it would be better to create a new version from the TIFF at File:USS Ellet (DD-398) - 19-N-20352.tiff without the artifacts. - Reventtalk 02:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, looking close, I'm not so sure about this... there are indeed areas in the shadows where the low-res has more detail. - Reventtalk 02:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not really an improvment, if it is needed I can photoshop the tif version and create a new version recovering some details in the shadow without giving an overexposition to the whole photo (and with a better resolution than the file nominated). Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope of project; no educational value TJH2018talk 02:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of the project's scope; no educational value TJH2018talk 02:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used on promotional userpage on enwiki and COM; may not fit COM:NUDE TJH2018talk 02:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm super sorry if I did something wrong - and in an unintended way Wildone.dk


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used on promotional userpage on enwiki and COM; may not fit COM:NUDE TJH2018talk 02:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm super sorry if I did something wrong - and in an unintended way Wildone.dk


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Arguablefool (talk) 02:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sakasaiseinenbu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted character. [1]

G I Chandor (talk) 06:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sakasaiseinenbu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted character. [2]

G I Chandor (talk) 03:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [3] G I Chandor (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan.

G I Chandor (talk) 03:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 03:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran Elisfkc (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. The architect, en:Hossein Amanat, is still living. Sorry for the large nomination, but this only really makes sense handled together. I de-selected anything that didn't prominently show the tower, and the few remaining can be handled individually.

~ Rob13Talk 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Iran and architect living. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran

Elisfkc (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Azadi Tower in Tehran Iran was built in the early 1970's by the architect Hossein Amanat who is still alive. Since Iran has no FOP it would appear that the hundreds of images in this category should be deleted.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran. Architect was Hossein Amanat, who is still alive.

Lukas Beck (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L. Beck Have you read previous discussions such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azadi tower 9.jpg? Hanooz 10:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Amanat's work for hire is owned by the government of Iran (a legal entity) and more than 30 years has passed since public display. PD-Iran applies. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azadi tower 9.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan useless redirect Teoamez (talk) 22:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and stretched, better alternatives in Category:UEFA Champions League trophy Teoamez (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image that is not really useful for educational purposes. There are many more images in Category:Astoria (ship, 1948) so we don't need this one. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 23:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project's scope; COM is not a place for selfies TJH2018talk 02:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Arguablefool (talk) 02:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per nom. The packagings are clearly copyrightable since they are obviously above COM:TOO. -- Poké95 11:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. kovox90      04:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license, probably a copyrighted logo and a re-upload of previous deleted files. Here, here, and here are previous deletions. Edjoerv (talk) 04:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with pink background for no apparent reason. Other versions available in Category:Trophy of UEFA Super Cup Teoamez (talk) 22:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keerthi kunju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Sajid Talk 13:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Youssef elmossaid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Sajid Talk 13:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. --XXN, 16:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Govinsanthosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos of unclear notability, probably out of scope:

Unused personal photo - out of scope:

--XXN, 16:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maust Co Official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some personal user logos/symbols; unused - out of scope.

--XXN, 16:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows a face with an insult on it. Looks like a personal revenge. Irrelevant. 188.86.11.165 20:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree. --jdx Re: 09:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:07:58‎ (UTC)

???? What policy? --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete per com:personality rights Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
N.B.: The uploader commented on that page. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:09:38‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:10:06‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:10:39‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:11:05‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete it is customary to delete upon photographer and subject request, especially when not in use. see also Commons:Personality rights

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2016-01-22T21:11:36‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC) please delete per megs and geraldshields11 Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not give my consent to post this photo. Megs (talk) 20:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As author, I do not object to deletion. Jim.henderson (talk) 03:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anywhere and no educational value — just some random man's portrait with a somewhat offensive description. I think this is outside of the project's scope. Mieczeslaw (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cih6BFrCoBo Triplecaña (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sylvain De Weerdt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation de copyright

Habertix (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Arguablefool (talk) 02:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already on commons: File:Karwan-E-Hayat.jpg MelAntipam (talk) 08:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe a derivative work (COM:DW): book cover and art is quite prominent Daphne Lantier 00:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The cover has been deleted as a copyvio. This may be a selfie, but if not, it is also a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm pretty sure this is neither in the public domain nor the vintage ad it so often believed to be. It is an ad for a 2011 perfume scent from a community that mixes satire, history, fantasy, role play, fake news, and commerce. The only place any any of the companies or personalities mentioned in the ad seem to exist is in the extended universe of this community.

Here is the image in its original ad:

http://blackphoenixchemlab.com/beavermoon.html

Here are some links to the extended community:

https://blackphoenixtradingpost.com/woocommerce-search/keyword/beaver+moon/search-in/product/cat-in/all/search-other/product,p_cat,p_tag

http://blackphoenixchemlab.com/welcome.html

https://blackphoenixalchemylab.com/shop/ The-coy-truth (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is no "Dunwich, MA" so this is fictional. It is low res and poor quality and the source does not have a free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems that there is an OTRS permission confirmed, but I think picture lacks COM:EDUSE... --XXN, 00:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: THe OTRS is for a specific image, not this one. It also covers only use on WP and is not a general free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used on promotional userpage on enwiki; no educational value TJH2018talk 01:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains numerous copyrighted logos, and definitely doesn't just consist of simple geometric shapes TJH2018talk 02:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project's scope; no selfies TJH2018talk 03:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1992. [4] G I Chandor (talk) 03:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was created by 藤野天光 (Fujino Tenko) (1903-1974). [5] G I Chandor (talk) 03:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [6] G I Chandor (talk) 03:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 03:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not the uploader's work, and there is no evidence provided that the image is free to use - the image can be found here http://fastphillysports.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/jahlil-okafor-nerlens-noel-getty-ftr-081715_1dyk3w5ut6dhi1kz8mbpgn48rm.jpg DaHuzyBru (talk) 04:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unidentified person. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright information doesn't appear to be correct as image is identical to that found on the subject's LinkedIn profile ElKevbo (talk) 04:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright info may not be correct as image is identical to that found at http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.pn.2017.2b24 ElKevbo (talk) 04:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright to this organization's logo ElKevbo (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright to this organization's logo ElKevbo (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an artwork not authored by the upload. Its copyright is unclear. czar 05:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely promo photo with no usage details, obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely promo photo with no usage details, obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Ukraine Leoboudv (talk) 06:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we can apply Commons:De minimis because the main object of photography is Ambassador Yovanovitch and her visit to Mariupol. Copyrighted object is placed whith angle which doesn't allow consider it enough --Butko (talk) 10:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Doesn't come close to DM -- the whole reason for the photo is her visting the memorial. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruvnvalar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ruvnvalar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/0c/af/1d/3f/catedral-sagrado-corazon.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Avjgroup

[edit]

Advertising. The files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Dialforproperty

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Also lacks credit to and evidence of permission from the photographer. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Also lacks credit to and permission from the photographer. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded only for the purpose of advertising; the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistakely Ainul.Axom (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, taken from Google Maps. P 1 9 9   14:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ekaterina-SCH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations. Zvyagin died in 2002, Andronikov - in 1990, Dorman - in 1988. But the images date - 19-20 February 2017.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ekaterina-SCH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reloading files. Previous deletion request. The dates are probably now real. Metadata indicates an electronic archive. No permission OTRS.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please help to solve the problem and recover deleted files. Pics added at the request of the relatives of those people who are articles. All rights real. Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekaterina-SCH (talk • contribs) 21:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete They are derivative works of photographs by unknown authors from family archives. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, do not remove! Found the right owner. The Requesting copyright permission will soon be sent to OTRS. --Ekaterina-SCH

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising spam, image beyond the threshold of originality without credit, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded only for the purpose of advertising by a single-purpose account; the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope; no educational value; pure promotional material

TJH2018talk 07:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Herbythyme, closed by. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE, COM:Personality rights, Daughters Day is a one day event allowing girls to get in touch with professional context (labour context). The images show people with readable name badges and do not have encyclopaedic value.

Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BSicon redirects

[edit]

Redirects which are no longer in use except for in some largely-abandoned user pages, where file links are generated by catalogue templates like w:en:WP:RDT/BSa7. These are to be deleted per consensus on Talk:BSicon/Renaming so that e.g. File:BSicon tSTRlf.svg can be moved to File:BSicon tSTRl.svg.

Jc86035 (talk) 11:32, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish ... 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:75D4:74B6:FE1F:F286 08:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very poor quality. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rubbish ... 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:75D4:74B6:FE1F:F286 08:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion depicted person is out of project scope. He is mentioned only once in en.wiki and nl.wiki, because he was for a year a VJ in music television channel. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Maybe out of scope, maybe not -- but user claims to be photographer and subject and it doesn't look like a selfie. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 09:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: net copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 09:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama in Spain requires the work to be situadas permanentemente en parques, calles, plazas u otras vías públicas (that is, permanently exhibited in parks, streets, squares or other public ways). This is not the case Discasto talk 09:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found no other copyright message on source site than "© Dominique Forma". He must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement and outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person ; unidentified location ; unidentified plant ; no use ; no encyclopedic value ; this photo is the only upload of the user Tangopaso (talk) 09:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo (I want to stop contributing) Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 12:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   14:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted as copyvio (File:Philip Röhe .jpg) тнояsтеn 13:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted as copyvio (File:Brüggemeyer, Philip.jpg) тнояsтеn 13:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted as copyvio (File:Mannschaftsfoto des FC Eintracht Rheine.jpg) тнояsтеn 13:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted as copyvio (File:Vr bank stadion Rheine.jpg) тнояsтеn 13:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable photo of rubbish Malcolma (talk) 14:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak  Keep: the description, geolocation & date add some context; not every slice of reality needs to be notable in itself to be worth documenting. That said, deletion would certainly be no great tragedy.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. I would have kept it as per User:Odysseus if it wasn't such poor quality, unusable. P 1 9 9   14:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Respeto mucho la opinion del bibliotecario que solicito el borrado de este archivo. Sin embargo, le solicito muy humildemente me retroalimente con argumentos concretos que me permitan mejorar.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amokk.zgz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely promotional as well. P 1 9 9   14:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. +COM:DW. --XXN, 16:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster. --XXN, 16:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Screenshot. Also is unused and probably out of scope. --XXN, 16:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no educational value. P 1 9 9   14:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "Attribution-NonCommercial License", NC license not allowed on Commons Ytoyoda (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, found original on Flickr. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   14:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM is not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 16:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snp041 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads, unused - out of project scope.

--XXN, 16:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. P 1 9 9   14:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope; promotional photo TJH2018talk 16:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Completely out of focus. Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 13:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of toy cars, please see COM:TOYS. The cars were not created by the uploader, so cannot be licensed by them for Commons.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jualve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   17:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cute girl, but these pictures are out of scope (non-notable person).

--XXN, 17:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

badly out of focus Malcolma (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed; nothing usefully recognizable.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvin K. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo of unclear notability - out of scope; +possibly is copyrighted.

--XXN, 17:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope; no educational value TJH2018talk 18:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, watermarked and rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   14:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   14:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, low quality, unclear picture - no COM:EDUSE. Possibly contains copyrighted content. --XXN, 20:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable, no COM:EDUSE. --XXN, 20:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, several better alternatives in Category:Tetrachloroethylene. Leyo 21:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

19th and 20th century work from Quai Branly

[edit]

The Quai Branly museum has many works on display without any indication of authorship at all — this is not "anonymous", we do not even know whether these works are anonymous or not. This entails that works dated "19th century" or "20th century" can easily be copyrighted: a 20-year old commissioning a work in 1890 and dying at 80 will have died in 1950, their work is still copyrighted until 2021; if they died at 100, it would be until 2041, etc. (work dated "first half of the 19th century" or "early 19th century", and earlier is tolerable).

I have removed my own files that I had mistakenly uploaded before noticing the issue (something I did not do lightly considering the time I spent labelling and detouring them), but I think that other contributors should also be made safe from potential copyright claims stemming from these works. Note also that this request only lists works from the Quai Branly collections on display in the Pavillon des Sessions in the Louvre, and that a check of our images of the Quai Branly itself might be warranted. --Rama (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Apparently, the contributors have not been notified of these deletion requests on their talk pages. IMO, this discussion should not be closed unless they are notified and unless seven days have passed after their notification. (I.e. at least not closed as delete. I suppose it could be closed as keep without notification.) -- Asclepias (talk) 14:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for noticing this oversight, I will notify the uploaders. Rama (talk) 14:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If a museum can't find an author name, the work is definitely anonymous. Quai Brainly has also non-anonymous works (it is false they do not place the name at all), that I did not upload for copyright issue (i.g. Aboriginal art). Anonymous and collective works lose its copyright after 70 years after they were done. So anything made before 1946 is surely OK for Commons. This seems to me a clear case of meta:Copyright paranoia. --Sailko (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PLEASE RESTORE ALL MY FILES!! THANK YOU --Sailko (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As noted on my talk page and in the image histories, at the time the SHOUTED comment above was made, I had caught my error and restored about a third of the files. Before editors start SHOUTING at Admins, they should at least get their facts right. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As noted, the uploaders were not notified so this request is invalid. Given that these works come from colonial locations, I think that all of them must be be treated as anonymous/unknown authors. In some countries that gives copyright 70 years from creation, which elminates all of those from the 19th century and most from the first half of the twentieth. In other countires, it is 70 years from publication, which is probably the date they were put on display in the museum. That will be much later. In any case, any recreation of this DR must be divided by country of origin. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete This is a derivative photo of a postcard whose copyright status is unknown. PCP applies without more details. Ww2censor (talk) 10:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the postcard is more than 70 years old, then we would have no issues? --Jordiferrer (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially you are correct, though the country may alter the copyright period. We really need to know the location, date and country of publication and the author or publisher to decide further. Do you know these details? If not the copyright status is unknown. I've searched for this location or even a similar image of the archway but can't even find it though it looks like India to me. Ww2censor (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is an old image of the Arc de Triomf located in Barcelona. The year is unknown.--Jordiferrer (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the location identity. I cannot find another copy of this postcard online but Spanish copyright law is 70 years pma and based on the vehicles in the image I doubt the postcard is more than 70 years old. I think I can see a white VW on the left is not a split screen version, so it is likely from the 1950s or 60s at the earliest. It's a pity the image is not of better quality to see the details better. Ww2censor (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Note that Spanish law at that time was 80 years, not 70 and this is certainly post WWII. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo publiée ailleurs sur Internet, autorisation nécessaire du photographe, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photo; see en:File:Fatima Massaquoi.png //  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 27 February 2017 12:01 (UTC) 12:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use regulations apply, same as on enwiki. Kipala (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No fair use on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A duplicate of File:Charlotte WrestleMania Axxess 2014.jpg Russian Rocky (talk) 12:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A duplicate of File:Charlotte as the WWE Women's Champion Raw April 2016.jpg Russian Rocky (talk) 12:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created for use with en:Hakeem Mehir Muhammad Yasin (deleted English wikipedia article). It seems this image may also have been deleted before, unless another image with the same name was uploaded. I'm not necessarily opposed to keeping it, if we can find any information about the person or where the image was taken, but uncategorized, it's not much use. Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it is deleted, someone should delete the category it is in as well. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is soully belong to Dr.Chandra Bhanu Satpathy. This can be used for his own WIki profile


Deleted: by Jcb, closed by. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could you please remove the picture as no source information is provided? Discasto talk 13:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Picture? Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, I was looking at the source. LOL
 Comment DR withdrawn by nominator. --Discasto talk 10:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The source is a page at The Washington Post, which is not free. There is no evidence that the recording is from a federal employee. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Skimel (talk) 13:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Tonga is not listed in COM:STAMPS. Was a British protected state - so might have inherited UK copyright = not allowed. May be it should be moved back to Tonga Wikipedia Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did some research and added Tongan legislation to the list. It seems works published 50 years ago are in the public domain, which is not the case for this stamp issued in 1986.Skimel (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Same as Crown Copyright in UK then, so Delete Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Tumblr (https://www.tumblr.com/search/petri%20walli), no information given about copyright issues. Jmk (talk) 14:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By a quick google search, the same picture appears in Helsingin Sanomat http://www.hs.fi/ihmiset/art-2000002684437.html where the picture is attributed to "Jukka Kyrömies HS". Seems clear that the photographer has not been given due credit here, nor is there any evidence that he has given permission to distribute. --Jmk (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "ZUMA press All Rights Reserved http://www.zumapress.com" Ytoyoda (talk) 15:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Murra651 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElHer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I am the owner of no:carrier's production company - all these photos are my property and therefor permitted. ElHer (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Requires a free license from an authorized official of the organization via [[OTRS}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Foto martínez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.esacademic.com/pictures/eswiki/69/Espigas2010.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josepicols123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josepicols123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims and Flickrwashing. File:Rectoraucvv.jpg, which has very low resolution and no metadata was transferred here from https://www.flickr.com/photos/148090415@N06/33060301261 on the same day it was uploaded there. That Flickr account has one other upload, https://www.flickr.com/photos/148090415@N06/32383362953, which is a copyright violation from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/33419312, and which the uploader tried to upload as File:Parque de la aviacion militar.jpg. File:Rectora de la ucv.jpg is just a photo of a screen displaying the same image, which the uploader also tried with the other one; see File:Parque aeronautico 01.jpg and File:Parque aeronautico 02.jpg. The uploader has a long history of uploading copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josepicols123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license no permission no evidence that is dated before 1976 (for PD-Italy and URAA). Pierpao.lo (listening) 15:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; the subject in this media is Indian currency, which is considered as government work and thus, copyrighted. (Previously, it was discussed that orientation and inclination of coins does not change the copyright status) Canopus Grandiflora 15:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster. --XXN, 16:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using official movies poster for spreading information comes under "fair use" policy, I have also mention the site where I get the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilesh shukla (talk • contribs)
@Nilesh shukla: on Wikimedia Commons is not accepted non-free content; fair-use policy is for local projects only. As this file is used currently on hi.wikipedia.org, you may to want to consider uploading it on that project with fair-use if it is allowed on that wiki. --XXN, 14:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster. --XXN, 16:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content, no permission. --XXN, 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship: low resolution, missing EXIF data. --XXN, 16:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP shouldn't apply for photographs of 2D art Ytoyoda (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silnet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission / copyvios.

--XXN, 16:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Portia Elizabeth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Re-uploaded after successful DR; files contain watermarks; not suitable for COM

TJH2018talk 01:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the files with an OTRS ticket, deleted the rest. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No inidication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a family photo taken by the family of Josef Lochmatter. The photo is owned by the family of Lochmatter / Imboden and was previously published only in the monthly magazine 'Valais - Wallis', March 1996, No. 3 on page 38 (Drei Zaniglaser bei der Erstbesteigung des Aconcagua 1896 / 97: DAS WAR SPITZE ...(p. 36 - 41)), Mengis Druck und Verlag, CH-3930 Visp. Christian Imboden (Diskussion|talk) 9:45, 1. March 2017 (UTC)
Please ask them to contact OTRS to provide evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy to repeat, please see User talk:Christian Imboden#Frage zur Urheberschaft des Fotos Albert Gos (1852-1942) beim Malen im Nikolaital unterhalb der Riffelalp.jpg: Also this original photo, including the other pictures and documents, are from the private archive of the family Lochmatter / Imboden, which goes back over five generations. This is the private archive Christian Imboden (Privat-Archiv Christian Imboden). Christian Imboden is also the author of the above article. Christian Imboden has uploaded these pictures and documents to Wikipedia Commons. Ergo the respective permissions were always present. Consequently, actions as File:Hotel Lochmatter St. Niklaus VS.jpg are not comprehensible. Christian Imboden (Diskussion|talk) 09:00, 2. March 2017 (UTC)
I am happy to repeat the instruction: Ask them to contact OTRS. Jcb (talk) 16:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Owning a family photograph does not give you the right to freely license it here. That right almost always belongs to the photographer or his heirs. In order to restore this, the actual photographer or his heirs must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meisonbiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work by uploader. Copyrighted content.

--XXN, 17:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusably low quality and unlikely authorship claims. Looks like a photo of a pre-existing work. LX (talk, contribs) 17:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted book covers: COM:DW. --XXN, 18:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there any point to this photo? Out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by БИБЛИОТЕКАРЬ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives, no FoP in Russia for non-architectural works.

Sealle (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Почему вы хотите удалить мои фотографии? Я лично сама фотографировала. Это мои собственные работы. — Preceding unsigned comment added by БИБЛИОТЕКАРЬ (talk • contribs) 18:46, 27 February 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за информацию. Мне будет очень жаль, если мои фото будут удалены. Потрачено время... В таком случае не нужно фотографировать памятники. Если вы считаете удалить мои фото, значит так надо.


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't need this version with a huge amount of whitespace. I've uploaded it too in the file history of the cropped variant. Ras67 (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a copyrighted game score card, replicated squarely and clearly enough that it could be printed and used in the original's place. No suggestion of permission. McGeddon (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marishka6941 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives, no FoP in Russia for non-architectural works.

Sealle (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ugly JPEG artifacts, superseded by File:Canal News logo.svg. Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A duplicate of File:Chad Gable NXT Takeover Dallas 2016.jpg Russian Rocky (talk) 11:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted album cover. --XXN, 17:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless and superseded! Ras67 (talk) 19:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Idaho State University wm.svg. P 1 9 9   17:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, several better alternatives in Category:Isopentane. Leyo 21:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.--Pạtạfisik 14:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:1-chlorobutane. Leyo 21:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:1,1,2,2-tetrabromoethane. Leyo 21:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Hydroquinone. Leyo 21:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Phthalic anhydride. Leyo 22:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, many better alternatives in Category:Indole. Leyo 22:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, several alternatives in Category:Citric acid. Leyo 22:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with blue background for no apparent reason. Other versions available in Category:Trophy of UEFA Super Cup Teoamez (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is being claimed to be below the threshold of originality for copyright, however, the logo design is much more complex than some simple geometric shapes Whpq (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreazapparoli91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos.

--XXN, 17:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2013 AMPL Optimization inc. All rights reserved. --XXN, 17:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Desiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logo.

--XXN, 17:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. --XXN, 17:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe above Commons:TOO Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 20:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the text and image on this sign is CC licensed, even if the photograph may be. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Germany, {{FoP-Germany}} added. Holger1959 (talk) 06:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 DeleteI have read the Google translation of the article at Otto-Leege-Pfad, where this object is located, and it is not clear to me whether the path qualifies as "public" within the meaning of § 59 UrhG. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward: the pictured sign together with the singing bowl (a permanent installation, as part of the Otto-Leege-Pfad) is located at a 24/7 freely accessible public footpath through the dunes on the German island of Juist (see path photo, bowl location in the background). In addition, these dunes are part of the Lower Saxon Wadden Sea National Park ("free landscape"). FoP is clearly applicable. Holger1959 (talk) 03:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
see also complete location image: Holger1959 (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep IMO the path is public. No fee, no fences, all objects permanent. The whole path is an artwork (in german "Gesamtkunstwerk"). But I am not sure. See [8] --XRay talk 07:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Public path. No gates, no fences, no fees, not private ground, BTST. The sign is permanently installed, so {{FoP-Germany}} is applicable. --Smial (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Seems to be a clear case of {{FoP-Germany}}. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Definitely {{FoP-Germany}}. NNW 10:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- Thank you to Holger1959. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issues. Unknown when I uploaded it. Xaris333 (talk) 03:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 15:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The boundaries of the wards are incorrect. The shapes you see here are the boundaries used after 2000. Mr.Election (talk) 03:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il file non rientra nella categoria indicata Paola Domina (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Paola Domina: cambia la categoria in quella relativa alla pianta. Ruthven (msg) 15:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/832394591093420032/2hAPAGqE.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from her Twitter account. Ruthven (msg) 15:51, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fujimon76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File:Lemonfood2015-50.jpg was kept because not having copyrightable elements or COM:DM. Ruthven (msg) 15:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 22:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Fae: they aren't photos of the single package. Ruthven (msg) 15:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They don't. There are no "photographs of photographs" here. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above, DM. The individual images on the packaging are miniscule and not reusable. P 1 9 9   16:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, not own work. kovox90      18:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo Emelec.svg. Ruthven (msg) 22:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free content kovox90      23:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kovox90: Again you with this DR? Beside this DR, you have started in last months Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo Emelec.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emelec sem fundo.png (2 times). Per overall Emelec's logo was kept 4 times since 21 December 2016. Why you keep re-nominating this again for deletion if there is some kind of consensus that this is covered by {{PD-textlogo}}?
To closing admin, see file history and this edit - it was correctly licensed at some point in time... XXN, 23:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Es un logo con derechos de autor, el usuario que lo subió se está atribuye la creación, lo cual es falso ya que es un logo de un equipo de futbol ecuatoriano. Es decir que si yo vectorizo un logo con derechos de autor y lo subo a commons entonces soy el propietario de este?? no lo soy verdad. Debe eliminarse ya que incumple las politicas de commons por no ser un logo de libres derechos.--kovox90      15:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Una cosa es que tenga Derechos de autor, y otra muy distinta es que esté protegido por la Ley de Derechos de Autor. Por las diceisiones, han asumido que el logo está debajo del Umbral de originalidad (no sé si Ecuador tenga TOO también), y esa es la razón por la cual existe {{PD-textlogo}}. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the file's description, this file seems to be non-free. Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: first appeareance on the net on Commons (for Google images), however, we need an authorization sent to COM:OTRS by Vinh Phan. Ruthven (msg) 22:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [9]

G I Chandor (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio, please see: http://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Fjelltrone/4778 Djadjko (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of : http://www.agglo-pau.fr/d%C3%A9couvrir-l-agglo/une-agglo-31-communes.html Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 23:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:59, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 22:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:円蔵院船寄せのマツ跡地 - Panoramio 50982376.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Happolati as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: File:Aabel jeppe 2.jpg

Different file type, needs a DR per COM:Dupe. - Reventtalk 04:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license Kubaj98 (talk) 10:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kubaj98: Can you please be more specific? What license do you want to put? --Ruthven (msg) 15:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused diagram of no apparent notability. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Taivo: Actually they are local TV channels; maybe it's the reason they aren't on it.wiki, as not relevant enough. You reckon that this holds for Commons as well? --Ruthven (msg) 15:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think, that if the TV-channels are not mentioned, then they are non-notable. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Both http://f1.dziel-pasje.pl and RBR's site claim copyright on their content. Also see File:Presentatie Red Bull RB13.jpg. Maartenschrijft (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like digbza2f4g9qo.cloudfront.net/~/media/IndyCar/News/Other/2016/07/07-22-Zachary-Claman-De-Melo-MidOhioTest.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems unlikely that all of the copyrights for this work -- music, arrangement, lyrics, artists, and production are all "own work". It is also not celar that it is in scope -- no categories, no useful description or title. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used on vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pikman.aa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.smpracing.ru/upload/resize_cache/iblock/63f/149_99_2/63fc001a2575f523e58346590ab5ac6d.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии, Alexander Buchman (1911–2003) was an American, см. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Buchman Dogad75 (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Думал {pd-old}. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 21:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Метаданные отсутствуют, низкое разрешение фотографий.

Dogad75 (talk) 19:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день! Все фото из моего личного архива. Зачем вы решили их удалить?

 Delete The images are out of scope. It's a millionaire.ru promotion contetnt. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking at the complex design at the periphery of the image, I believe this image passes the threshold of originality and thus is protectable by copyright. Mifter (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also nominated:

These files have been replaced by others in the category Maps of Essex County, New Jersey, which are similar but more updated. They have different file names but the ones nominated on this page are unused so may be deleted to avoid confusion. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted design, no proof of release Strainu (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author died in 1967 es:Ramón Martín Durbán Bielsa Description mentons that it belongs to the subject's heirs. Converting to a normal DR to leave chance to request permission to OTRS. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivtorov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works. 1940s - 1980s photos, maybe a scanned family album. Also nominated 1920s - 1930s images stated as own work.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


All of this photos made by me or belonds to me, I have original films or prints. (Подтверждаю оригинальность этих фотографий) --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Who's owning the physical film is irrelevant. Did you personally take this photo of Alexander Markin in 1930 and and this of Lev Bondarev in 1969? jonkerz ♠talk 00:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivtorov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото разных годов, сделаны на разные фотоаппараты. Необходимо пояснение в OTRS

Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • подскажите, пожалуйста, какое пояснение к моим фотографиям нужно? Я гарантирую что это мои фото, которые я сделал на плёнку, и цифровые камеры. Могу негативы показать. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:OTRS/ru для фоновых картин вчера отправил автор (для File:1998-BogatovEA.jpg, File:2000-BogatovEA.jpg, File:2015-Bogatov-Exhibition.jpg) для других они не требуются. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Теперь всё. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep Пришло разрешение в OTRS и от автора фото и от художника (хотя вопрос был именно к фотографу). Ticket#2017030310014862. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked by nominator - verified via OTRS in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivtorov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of non-free content. No permission.

VLu (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019-NatanS-BookPaper.jpg & File:2019-SimonNatan-INHIGEO.jpg — Photos from Book: S. Natan. Flying high. the Photography of Lloyd Homer, 2019. It is noted in the book: This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, and review as permitted under the Copyright Act. Images from the book for Russian WikiNews only (https://ru.wikinews.org/?curid=515524). --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:2019-MiningSchool-SPb6.jpg — {PD-text} citation --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Fair use is not allowed on Commons. PD-text claim unlikely. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivtorov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random PD tags. If you can't name the author you can't claim that he or she could have died 70 or more years ago. Also, the first publication date is needed to determine copyright status as per COM:Russia.

Quick1984 (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото разных годов, сделаны на разные фотоаппараты. Необходимо пояснение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 20:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • просьба не сомневаться. Какие нужны доказательства? --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ivtorov, такая фотография — производная работа, и нужно или кадрировать так, чтобы картин не было видно, или отправить в OTRS разрешение их автора/авторов. Sealle (talk) 01:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Попал сюда из письма ОТРС (Ticket:2017022810006139). Коллеги Dogad75 и Sealle, похоже мы тут пытаемся быть святее самых строгих законов и правил. При этом требуем от авторов сверх необходимого (передачи в свободный доступ произведений там где это не нужно). Судя по переписке автор может это сделать, но, на мой взгляд, в этом нет необходимости, по крайней мере не нужно примерять этот подход по таким же фото в будущем для аналогичных случаев. И вот почему. Очевидно, что эта фотография называется "Художник на фоне собственных работ". Центром композиции является художник и наличие полотен на заднем плане лишь подчёркивает профессию изображённого лица. Подобные характеризующие лицо фото наиболее востребованы, например, для Википедии. Являются ли наличие этих самых произведений обязательным для подобной композиции? - Да. Могут ли они быть исключены без потери замысла композиции? - Нет. Однако, с другой стороны, каждая отдельная картина не является важной для композиции, а главное - имеет настолько низкую детализацию и чёткость, настолько искажена бликами и другими подобными дефектами при съёмке, что она не может привести к утрате коммерческой ценности этой картины даже если её вырезать из фото для отдельной демонстрации, не говоря уже об обсуждаемом комплексном произведении. Поэтому в таком виде наличие картин достаточно чисто подпадает под правило Commons:De minimis. Об этом же гласит правило Commons:Derivative works, что не каждое изображение Винни-Пуха в руках ребёнка является нарушением авторских прав Диснея, а лишь то, которое, например, было сознательно сделано для обхода этих прав, либо может служить для иллюстрации предмета и так далее. В данном случае мы ничего подобного не наблюдаем. Даже относительно последнего, если эти фото и могут попасть в статью о картине, то лишь в виде "смотрите, кто эту картину сделал", но никак не в качестве демонстрации этой самой картины, в силу описанной выше полной утраты художественных качеств и, как следствие, коммерческой ценности по отношению к отдельным картинам при такой композиции и съёмке. Т.е. права художника это фото не нарушает. Предлагаю учесть эти обстоятельства, не требовать от художника большего, чем требуется, и вне зависимости от его ответа оставить эту и аналогичные фотографии. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

→ Спасибо за ценную информацию. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: verified via OTRS in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 01:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo Triplecaña (talk) 23:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe above Commons:TOO Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 21:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [10] G I Chandor (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image is used on http://www.mod.go.jp/gsdf/fan/photo/cooperation/index.html with a link to the copy on Picasa. Since they say (according to a bad translation of the Japanese) that any of the images there can be freely used as long as they are attributed, I think this is fine. - Reventtalk 11:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Daphne Lantier 18:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademarked logo Triplecaña (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logo above COM:TOO. --Daphne Lantier 18:47, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Firmen-Logo ist veraltet. Wir, die OTTO Office GmbH & Co KG, bitten daher um Löschung der Datei aus dem Medienarchiv. 212.12.58.126 13:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 18:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Captainofhope as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No Freedom of Panora in UAE Didym (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Excuse me, but camels don't play a role in terms of FoP and the buildings in the background, the area is called Al Bastakiya as you can read here, are part of the historic district (partially renovated). The buildings are approx. 130 years old and the only ones really old in Dubai. Captainofhope, please, inform yourself before you bomb with speedy (!!) templates images like this, used in 18 wikipedias, quality and valued image in Commons. Didym, please, don't start systematically a DR when removing spurious speedy deletion requests of non-regular users, otherwise I'll just have to invest my time in this kind of discussions instead of contributing with quality material. Poco2 18:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The building is 130 Years old, I cannot find adequate links in the wikipedia article says that its 130 years old. This building is a result of a restoration by municipality on 2005 and thus it is copyright protected. Further unless its proved that this is on PD, it still violates COM:FOP - A DR will still stand, See the old discussions [11] here --- ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat myself, the main subject here is the camel, does it count for FOP? I guess not.
So you expect in the article to find something like "the architect of this building died in 1930 and therefore it applies FOP". That is ridiculous! If you believe that something should be deleted although there is enough information to believe otherwise, you should make your research and don't expect that others do it for you. I will not do it, but if this pictures is deleted I'll give up. No joke.
You go further, according to your logic a renovation makes a building new?! Ok, go ahead and place your templates for example here. 2500 years old, renovated due to an earthquake in the last 10 years. According to your logic new and in Iran there is no FOP. Delete. Good luck. Poco2 20:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a link to show that this building is built before 100's of years and the architect/creator died before 100's of years. We talk evidences to over rule the FOP situation, And if we consider camel as main subject, The architecture in the background will not come in to the COM:DM...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 06:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The major object here is the camel, the secondary object is the tent. I don't think it is older than 130 years, though. The neighborhood dates back to the 1890s. Guys, get this file deleted and I will refrain from uploading new material to Commons. --Poco2 12:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Issue here is FOP for the building on the picture. So if you prefer to show the camel, it can be cropped and renamed. Unless the FOP is not cleared, this image is not free---...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 18:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To make clear what is obvious, I've renamed the file with the prefix "Camel and tent", the buildings in the back are secondary. This is a clear example of de minimis. Poco2 10:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Renaming a file wont make it De Minimis, It must be cropped to clear the copyrighted subject in picture. To keep the picture in commons following questions must be answered with evidences
  • 1. Who is the architect of the construction...?
  • 2. Did the architect release this work to public domain....?
  • 3. If the architecture is a 10000 year old building, Is there any evidence for the same, stating that the building was built on ______Date and by considering the death of copyright holder, it can be in PD..??-...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 08:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've cropped it. It is a de minimis case. Poco2 11:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If the architecture is covering a minimum of the image, it can be considered as de minimis, in this case 90% of this image is architecture and there are many camel photograph available in commons to portray in Wikipedia for educational purpose. Unless the evidence is provided the image wont be considered as free, due to limited FOP and image shows architectural elements which is subject to copyright....Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please, be objective! 90% architecture? are we looking at the same image? is a plain wall protected by FOP?
I don't really know what is wrong with you. Whatever I do or write here you have a problem with it. Get this picture deleted and I'll not upload anything else in this project. I'm fed up. Poco2 21:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We are not looking at a wall here, The architecture is having its own identity and its design and features are protected by the copyright. Since commons is standing for free images, How a copyright protected architecture will be free. If the camel is the subject, it can be cropped tight, As an example This file was kept on De Mnimis since the architecture is not covering the entire image and its minimal. I do support your claim to keep the image on commons if its proved to be old enough....Captain......Tälk tö me.. 15:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the discussion has been now open for a month. If Commons gets evidence, that the building is old, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the records, and as I announced above this guy just gave up uploading new material to Commons. @Taivo and Didym: with special thanks to @Captainofhope: Poco2 17:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]