Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 6th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam. jdx Re: 00:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MilosHaran as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not free image. 189.105.186.220 10:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Getty image which is obviously NOT fair use. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are nothing in this category. 186.247.60.223 17:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like to delete it Gentrit56 (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Copyvio from webpage www.xxxxxxx.com

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image watermarked interstar.ua. Vuongtrang26011995 has already been blocked from Wikipedia for copyright violation. Shritwod (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image sourced from manufacturer. Vuongtrang26011995 has already been blocked from Wikipedia for copyright violation. Shritwod (talk) 09:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, image sourced from manufacturer. Vuongtrang26011995 has already been blocked from Wikipedia for copyright violation. Shritwod (talk) 09:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See deleting: File:Ю́рій Дама́зійович Кафа́рський.jpg Mykola Vasylechko 19:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: previously deleted content. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of obviously personal interest (even 'photo'-tagged), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onenonlycrazyboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these celebrity portraits, far more likely they're taken from the web.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All these files were grabbed from the Web. Speedy deleted. --jdx Re: 05:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Copyright Museum Arno Breker/MARCO-VG, Bonn Toestemming publicatie" is copyfraud. Arno Breker died in 1991. The photo shows one of his works which is not in {{FOP}} Autumn Windfalls (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment There's an OTRS ticket for this image. I don't know who it's from, but since it's been checked, presumably we can validly host this image? Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does a non valid ticket matter? --Autumn Windfalls (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:Autumn Windfalls: How do you know it's a non valid ticket? You don't seem to have OTRS access. For all I know it contains full permission by the heirs of Arno Breker to use this image.
It's not very nice to nominate an image that has been validated by OTRS and even worse to accuse people of copyfraud. Please don't do that. If you think a permission needs verification you can go to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard and politely ask an OTRS volunteer to check it.
I asked one of the Dutch speaking volunteers to check it. Judging from Wikipedia:Te verwijderen afbeeldingen/Toegevoegd 20070222 this from the first days of OTRS. I really doubt the permission will stand up to the scrutiny of today. Multichill (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The image is released under CC-BY-SA-2.5 according to the ticket. I don't see any need to delete this file. Ciell (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS is valid. --Ciell (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyfraud:  "Copyright Museum Arno Breker/MARCO-VG, Bonn, Photographer Joe F. Bodenstein. Schr. toestemming aan Jos43 tot publicatie in Wikipedia. Zie OTRS 2007021410011212" According to de:Arno Breker the photo was taken in 1972. When did Joe F. Bodenstein die? Is he nl-User Jos43? See also File:Arno Breker, Albert Speer (1940).jpg. Autumn Windfalls (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: File has valid OTRS permission. See aslo this DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyfraud: "Copyright Museum Arno Breker/MARCO-VG, Bonn Op 13.02.07 schrift. aan Jos43 toestemming verleend tot publicatie in Wikipedia." Arno Breker died in 1991, the sculpture is not FoP. Autumn Windfalls (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]


Speedy kept: File has valid OTRS permission. See also this DR --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work. Edjoerv (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Natuur12: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, legal info exists: "Todos los derechos reservados 2017. El Telégrafo". This means "All rights reserved". Taivo (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another speedy I included now into this DR: File:Marcel van Hattem.jpg. The reasoning by 189.105.191.240 was Facebook's image.. --JuTa 08:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion by sockpuppeteer Cabayi (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted, by known sockmaster. --Achim (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion by sockpuppeteer Cabayi (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted, by known sockmaster. --Achim (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dijaina guru art (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW? If not, then personal art, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dijaina guru art (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private anime art, no usage

Daphne Lantier 01:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amer moghrabi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sudhanshukumarparashar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private vanity photos of non-notable individual. Outside project scope and better suited to Facebook.

DAJF (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaoersi-china (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - adverts.

--ghouston (talk) 09:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaoersi-china (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Based on the watermark, unlikely to be own work. No permission

Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaoersi-china (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but based on watermark they are from a corporate website. No permission and likely to be used for advertising only

Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable photo, extreme low quality, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hengki ibnu Hamdani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nblelloch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alain Fonseca Pérez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal pics not in use

Daphne Lantier 01:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 01:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gokochan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal pics not in use

Daphne Lantier 01:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raster image that is inferior to File:Lansimetro.svg. De728631 (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hosting file. Copyrighted by DevianArt ← Alex Great talkrus? 02:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 1990. [1] G I Chandor (talk) 03:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 1995. G I Chandor (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Japanese wp now hosts low-res ver of this image under FoP EDP as ja:File:Statue of female shell divers in Chikuzen-Kanezaki.jpg. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The text on the monument was written by Ryōtarō Shiba (1923-1996). G I Chandor (talk) 04:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 04:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The photo on the ticket is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educational Elisfkc (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 04:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful "own work" and too cmplicated to pass COM:TOO anyways to be copyright free. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination https://www.flickr.com/photos/riyastali33/4862492962/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 09:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 09:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, copied from Internet (cf. Google picture search, e.g., [2]) Michał Sobkowski (talk) 09:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Premium Omega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused spam images; two of them containing what look like stock photos of people, the other two COM:PACKAGING.

McGeddon (talk) 10:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisalvarezdelarosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:SCOPE: self-created artwork.

Takeaway (talk) 09:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not a free image. 191.43.41.9 20:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1958 image. Cannot be free before 2028. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not free image. 189.105.186.220 09:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 1920 image. Was PD in 1990. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. Família paixão (talk) 01:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Não será usada em nenhum verbete da Wikipédia. Not in use. Família paixão (talk) 23:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - if you nominate this again, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe uma foto na Wikipédia muito mais nítida e que mostra como era o edifício no início do século XX. Família paixão (talk) 16:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   18:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Google. 189.105.186.220 09:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 1898 image. PD since 1968. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe uma foto na Wikipédia muito mais nítida e que mostra como era o edifício no início do século XX. Família paixão (talk) 16:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   18:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Google. 189.105.186.220 09:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1940 image. PD in Brazil in 2010, but URAA makes it unfree in USA. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. My attention was drawn by this comment which shows that the middle image appeared at financialexpress.com. Uploading account has no other contributions. Jmabel ! talk 00:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from the airline's Facebook page, as the uploader states. Also note that the uploader received a final warning for copyvios in August 2015. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 00:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from the airline's Facebook page, as uploader states. Note that uploader received a final warning regarding copyvios in August 2015. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 00:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality unused raster image that was upscaled after cropping and is now totally pixelated. De728631 (talk) 03:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP. Sculptor died in 1971 (link). Unfree in home country until 2042 (link). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 50 years is correct, but that is still five years from now. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آزادسرو (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep These are of course preferred in SVG, and I will work with the user to create SVG files (he has some issues with the software he is using), but they are necessary diagrams that will be used in relevant pages on FA WP in the next week or two. We have a Wikiproject focused on traditional Persian music and these diagrams describe the anatomy of various genres of this music. Huji (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Huji. Please use the correct templates when you'll have the svg version available. Ruthven (msg) 10:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آزادسرو (talk · contribs)

[edit]

An audio recording retains its own copyright. So even if the song is old, the performer and the audio recorder both retain copyrights on these songs.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: The copyright law that applies to these recordings (Iran's copyright law) specifies that a file is in public domain if either the creator has deceased more than 50 years ago, or the creator died more than 30 years before 22 August 2010 (see Template:PD-Iran). The creator of these was fa:نورعلی برومند who died on Jan 19th, 1977; that is 33 years before 22 August 2010, therefore these recordings are in public domain. Huji (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huji: did نورعلی برومند create this specific recording? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre: I belive he recorded on vinyl records and cassette tapes. This specific record is of course in OGG format, so cannot be created by him as OGG didn't even exist then. But the MP3 file form which this OGG is created is claimed to be an identical copy of the original work, only digitized. My interpretation of the copyright law is that "digitizing" a vinyl/tape to MP3 format in-and-of-itself does not qualify as "creative work" and is not covered by copyright. It is hard work, for sure, but it involves no creative art. Huji (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huji: No, it usually does not unless it was remastered (subject to jurisdiction and interpretation). I won't fight on the grounds of remastering, though, as it doesn't seem likely. Nonetheless, it sounded suspiciously high quality for a record, like it was someone else singing the song. Are you sure this is the same original recording? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure. They were probably passed through a noise reduction filter of sorts. I would still not consider them "derivative work" because I believe a "derivative work" is a work that is based on a copyrighted work, but contains new material that is original in the copyright sense. So even if a simple noise reduction filter was used, it would not qualify the work as derivative, IMHO. Huji (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huji: I'm not worried about that part. I just want to make sure this is the version originally sung by the guy you listed above, not someone else. You are infinitely more knowledgeable of Persian culture than I, so if you say you think it is, I will withdraw. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I misunderstood the question. Yes, this is that same person. I don't want to age myself, but I know the voice from his cassettes. Huji (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per nom. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آزادسرو (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sounds to be modern sound recordings. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are recordings by Noor Ali Boroomand, deceased in 1977, so they are at least from 41 years ago. They are recorded in Iran and are subject to Iran's copyright laws which state that copyright only lasts for 30 years past the author is death if the date of death + 30 years is earlier than 22 August 2010 (in this case, 1977 + 30 = 2007); see en:Template:PD-Iran for more information. Huji (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I am finding it annoying that we keep having the same discussion again and again (see above in this same page). Can we please find a way to avoid this in the future? (e.g. can we agree on a piece of text in English to be added to these files' description so that the next person who gets tempted to nominate them for deletion would know better?) Huji (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Huji: I added {{Copyright notes|Iran}}. Don't know if it'll help. - Alexis Jazz 00:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per this and previous discussions. Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear context or educational value ASchedulingError (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality passport photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 06:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality vanity photo (ID card?) of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 06:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted work published by Tokyo Metropolitan Office Darklanlan (talk) 06:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Google Street View (there is a watermark on this image). https://goo.gl/maps/gXgd722gLt22 Gz260 (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own work. Its not used anywhere and I don't want this old piece up. Blackey1234 (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own work. Its not used anywhere and I don't want this old picture up. Blackey1234 (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own work. Its not used anywhere and I don't want this old piece up. Blackey1234 (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is watermarked "Steve McCurry Photography", so the uploader will have to provide evidence that they are the copyright owner or have permission to upload to Commons. DAJF (talk) 10:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete EXIF says: author and copyright holder SK. This does not match uploader's name. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality private snap photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 10:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Oyetayo. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Oyetayo. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Oyetayo. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Oyetayo. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Oyetayo. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In-image caption says "For Educational Use Only" but uploader asserts own-work cc-by-sa-4.0. Need uploader to clarify if it's indeed own, in which case it's free (per tag) with futile attempt at other restriction, or gotten from elsewhere with the tag, in which case not allowed here. DMacks (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader put the following on UnDR today:

"I am having discussions with your Teahouse colleagues about permissions for using this file. Questions are being put to me about "ownership" and "legal permissions" over the use of the picture. Jean Jepson, before she died, distributed several copies of this and other photos to many of her students, including me. Over the years we have shared these photos freely and widely and they are posted in many dance studios and websites. This is how Jean wanted us to remember her and we use all such memorabilia to honor and remember her. I have added this photo to the article so that interested parties can get an immediate snapshot. This would be very convenient for readers. If you are not able to use it then that is fine. This same photo is available online and readers will be able to see it somewhere else. Do I own it? I own the copy that Jean gave me. Do I have permission to use it? She gave it to me and other students so that she would not be forgotten. That is what we are doing. Introducing her to new generations and making sure that she is not forgotten. We have been doing it for a long while and we will keep on doing it as long as people are interested in learning her story. CableHut (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)"

Since the right to freely license an image almost always rests with the photographer or his or her heirs, this is a case where neither the subject nor the uploader had the right to freely license the image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb Closed by. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo pic, not CC Marc Lacoste (talk) 11:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-notable company (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Juan Viale Rigo is not mentioned neither in en.wiki, nor in es.wiki. Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a screenshot from a movie, so probably not free Bulgu (talk) 11:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extracted from a most likely non-free image as described on its deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yılmaz Güney Ve Mehmet Büyükgüngör.png Bulgu (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weisse Rössl wurde 2016 abgerissen ! 194.177.159.4 11:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- such requests by IP users are perfectly valid. Most actions on Commons are anonymous -- few of us use our real names. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{BadGIF}}. Category:Trioxidane has higher quality in this and other styles DMacks (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{BadGIF}}. Have same style in Category:Cyanogen chloride DMacks (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image. Violates copyright of the pictured toy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That covers the copyright for the photograph. Unfortunately it does not ocover the sculptor's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Small size, no EXIF. This uploader does not have a great record. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. A simple reverse image search shows that the file only exists on Wikipedia (and on one other website that just used the image). It is most likely just a picture taken by the uploader. Holy Goo (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info. May also effect derived work: File:Marcel van hattem.jpg. (see history - some IP vandalism and no specific statement why this and the nominated image should be a copyvio)--Wdwd (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The named author is one of the subjects, so unless it is a selfie, which must be proven, he does not have the right to freely license the image -- that right belongs to the photographer. The uploader is not the named author, but claims copyright. There is no evidence whatever that the actual photographer, whoever he or she may be, has authorized the uploader to freely license this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: FFS, aren't you able to do a simple reverse image search? The image was first uploaded on wikipedia. How on Earth did said subject get that picture from if it didn't exist anywhere else? Holy Goo (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And why does the name of the uploader matter. I could created an account called "Hattem" or "rodrigo" or whatever. The uploader most likely cited one of the subjects as the author just for the sake of it. nobody has time for all these bullshit details Holy Goo (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest that you lay off remarks such as "aren't you able to do a simple reverse image search" until you have a few more edits here under your belt. I have used Google image search and Tineye tens of thousands of times over the course of more than 400,000 actions on Commons. Not finding an image elsewhere on the Web is suggestive, but nowhere near definitive. The image could have been e-mailed or found on a site with the NOINDEX tag set, among other ways.
We take the "bullshit" details seriously on Commons, and if you do not do so, then there is no place for you here. As I noted above, the image has several problems. The uploader is not the author -- If he were, then why didn't he just say so? Yet the uploader claims to own the copyright, as evidenced by the license tag he used. So there is no reason at all to believe that the uploader has the right to freely license the image. We agree that the subject is probably not actually the author, but we don't know who is and only the author can license the use of the image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just never expected the rules to be so strict to the point where not knowing if it was a selfie or not matters. I didn't see how may edits you had. by the way. Well, nvm. Holy Goo (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Denmark.. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is FOP in Belgium, but only for permanent installations. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused apparent older version of File:Nanoprofessional table2.png. I don't see any content differences, just slight layout DMacks (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty, broken file دونالد ترامب (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a map. (Might be PD if made by e.g. the national park services...) (tJosve05a (c) 18:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Probably an NPS map, see https://eventseeker.com/venue/375752-antelope-canyon-tours-page. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not "own work", but copied from somewhere; without source, neither subject nor copyright status can be verified Constantine 18:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Summary description limits free use to "promotion and review". NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially copyright protected content: Book cover in Telugu language? Roland zh (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is the cover of a Telugu book under copyright protection. I didn't realise the cover photo was a copyright violation. Can you please delete this. Sorry for the trouble.__Chaduvari (talk) 07:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zvonok2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably old enough, but no source, wrong author, wrong license. Please correct or the files might be deleted.

Yann (talk) 19:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work" it is a sculpture of Lenin. Need to know who made it and when they died to see if it is PD. There is not usually FoP in former Russian states. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It may well be old enough to be PD, but that needs to be proven. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Samll size, no EXIF, unused personal image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No EXIF, small size, unused personal image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission given by a person with no authority to do it. Photographer's permission needed.

Sealle (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also message is forwarded from hot mail -- authenticity doubtfull. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.forbes.com/pictures/mkl45eljdk/candice-galek-29/#86e9e3047d97 Ytoyoda (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Withdrawing nomination Ytoyoda (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears in several places on the web at higher resolution and with copyright notices. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Henry2430 has uploaded several images that are probably not own work. No FOP in Denmark, and most files seem to be blatant copyright violations. Previous uploads have also been deleted for copyright violations. No tickets received. Pugilist (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the copyright owner, and he has send a permission under the Creative Commons license. He says that he is waiting an answer from permissions-commons. He has posted this on his webpage: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ Henry2430 16:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo taken in April 1947 and belonged to Colonel Margo - photo in the public domain at this stage, but rights secured from Margo family for this Wikipedia posting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobBotJNB (talk • contribs) 05:51, 7 February 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted:

First, a 1947 photo cannot be PD in the UK. Even if the photographer died the next day, it would be under copyright until next year. It could well be under copyright until the next century.
Second,the subject's family probably does not have the right to freely license the image. That right belongs to the photographer or his heirs.
Third, "for this Wikipedia posting" is not acceptable. Commons and WP require that images be free for all use by anyone anywhere.
Fourth, we do not allow PDFs of images.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.chimbotenlinea.com/sites/default/files/styles/grande/public/field/image/frank_cerna.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.foro-minerales.com/forum/files/foto_marc_color_226.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reina Paletti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reina Paletti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Royal Arms of the Kingdom of Scotland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

simple table without any usage, can easily be reproduced with wiki markup دونالد ترامب (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You mean we should create a page with the table in wiki markup? I don't see the benefit of that. An image is easy to use. Or do you mean we should just delete the image and leave it that? If so, the information becomes less accessible. --Jonund (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "You mean we should create a page with the table in wiki markup?" -- it's policy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol: the uploader is not the author - no OTRS Bramfab (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol: the uploader is not the author - no OTRS Bramfab (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol: the uploader is not the author - no OTRS Bramfab (talk) 18:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by El cóndor andino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos from Wikia. Some may be simple or old enough, but wrong license, check needed.

Yann (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. None of these fall below the threshold of originality and non of them is old enough to be out of copyright. on this occasion I would also nominate File:2808 audi logo nuevo th 2.jpg. It may look simple but the 3-d effects lift it above a simple geometrical form. De728631 (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For the Volkswagen logo, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Volkswagen.png. De728631 (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of date. Five new communes have joined: https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/politique/cinq-communes-de-l-eurometropole-de-strasbourg-s-agrandit-1483386704. If the map is not updated, it should be deleted. Edelseider (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. In use. Even if it weren't in use, "out of date" wouldn't be a reason for deletion. The image illustrates the area as it was during that period. Historical maps can be useful. The image could be updated, but given that this image in its present form can be used for historical and comparative purposes, any update should probably be uploaded as a separate file. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep:
    • As long as there is no more actual map available, this is the best one.
    • As soon as a more actual map will be available, this map will be a document of the history of Strasbourg Communauté.--Ulamm (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As noted, we keep historical maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anywhere. I uploaded it several years ago, and it's no longer needed. MykReeve (talk) 00:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed. Not used anywhere. MykReeve (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

profile pic not in use Daphne Lantier 01:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking any metadata about where it was taken, along with the lack of a clear focus to the image, makes me consider it as lacking any educational value. JesseW (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Examining the full resolution image shows that it's barely possible to make out a title on the information board that says something about "Columbia North". I don't think that's enough info to make this worth keeping. JesseW (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
After further clarification from Fæ, below, I'm happy to withdraw the nomination. JesseW (talk) 02:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The article of this actor was deleted as a "blatant hoax" (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rawson). No possible usage outside this. King Rk (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The article of this actor was deleted as a "blatant hoax" (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rawson). No possible usage outside this. King Rk (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The article of this actor was deleted as a "blatant hoax" (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rawson). No possible usage outside this. King Rk (talk) 10:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The article of this actor was deleted as a "blatant hoax" (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Rawson). No possible usage outside this. King Rk (talk) 10:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not of free use. The rights of the original one belongs to Mauricio Anton, as is seen in the scientific description of Siamogale melilutra: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2016.1267666?scroll=top&needAccess=true Rextron (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not of free use. The rights of the original one belongs to Xiaoming Wang et al., as is seen in this article about Siamogale melilutra: http://www.sci-news.com/paleontology/siamogale-melilutra-giant-otter-04557.html Rextron (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. The depicted person died in 1941. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gilmar Martinelli Junior (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF images found elsewhere in the web

Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gilmar Martinelli Junior (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Re-upload of previously deleted files Obviously copyvios.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mary crespo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, missing EXIF.

kovox90      23:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio/DW. artist Julia Theek is still alive Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio/DW, artist Julia Theek is still alive Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist Paul August supposedly died in 1980, not 70 years pma Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely, unknown author/source. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, medium resolution, own work doubtful, considering the uploader's other uploads. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mansoor1212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own works

/St1995 23:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 01:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative of another work Mhhossein talk 13:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Wikimedia Commons is not a webhost for personal images. Takeaway (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader here, and I disagree. The photo is illustrative of the jumbo slice phenomenon, and is now in use on enWP. WWB (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Per Commons:Project_scope#Examples: Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere.. Alternative image (also a clearer image of the pizza slice) for the jumbo slice phenomenon but without the selfie-aspect -> File:Adams Morgan Jumbo Slice.jpg. - Takeaway (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - The photo is (was) being used in an article, and not gratuitously. The policy statement above doesn't fit the photo in question - it is not a selfie, it is not a "private party," and it actually accomplishes several things as mentioned in the article. The photo shows the scale of the pizza slice next to an actual person, and it is at the Adams Morgan location of the shops. I'm not sure why this particular photo is being cherry picked as being in violation of the "educational purpose" clause in the policy. -- Fuzheado (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The alternative image is much clearer in showing the size of the pizza as there is a standard can of pepsi directly next to it. The DR image is not as clear about the size of the slice. The alternative image is also a much better photo of the pizza slice itself, without the blown-out highlights of the DR image. - Takeaway (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually the photo with the Pepsi can is not very good because the point of the slice is folded over, thereby giving a poor representation of the true size of the slice, which is the point of such a photo. Your comment also does not address the issue that the photo that was nominated is not in violation of the criteria you describe. While the image quality is not studio perfect or as sharp as the one that exists now, that doesn't mean the photo should be deleted. -- Fuzheado (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Trying to figure out the size of the pizza from the DR image is a problem. As it's a wide angle image, everything nearer to the camera gets distorted in size relative to what is further away from the camera. Not being able to clearly judge the distance between the person (of unknown size) and the overblown pizza makes it impossible to know how large it is. I can make a similar image as the DR image with a normal size pizza slice, and make it look equally large on the photo. As for the deletion of this image: seeing how useless it is an illustration for the article "jumbo slice" per the aforementioned reason, all that remains is that it is an image of someone in Adams Morgan that seems to fit the definition of a personal image as mentioned in Commons:Project_scope#Examples. - Takeaway (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I find this "distorted" argument unconvincing, as this could be said of nearly all photos in commons that are not snapped with a 50mm lens, front on. The photo with the Pepsi can suffers from this, probably more, because the can looks so small in comparison, which is not he case in-person. Both photos are now included in the article, which is not just a compromise, but adds to the article by giving more context. At this point, the consensus is to overwhelmingly keep, so let's agree to co-exist with these different viewpoints. -- Fuzheado (talk) 14:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It has to do with the distance between the slice and the object to which it is compared. The can is directly next to the slice, whereas one can only guess how far the person is from the slice in their hand. - Takeaway (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


  • Seeing how some people seem to like this badly exposed photograph that shows a slice of pizza of unknowable dimensions held by an unknown person who we can only assume has given their permission to have their photograph put onto Wikipedia, I hereby retract this deletion request. - Takeaway (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   20:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ــــا as Speedy (SpeedyDelete) and the most recent rationale was: i do not know the owner of the photo Taivo (talk) 12:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, i took the photo from saudi site, and i do not know the owner of the photo but he is from saudi arabia (1), while i me not from saudi arabia --ــــا (talk) 04:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a newer version with much better resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Keep per COM:Redundant. Image is still in use. Thuresson (talk) 11:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Thuresson. P 1 9 9   20:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   20:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. This person has done nothing for Wikipedia apart from writing a user page about himself in 2014. Castillo blanco (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused flag of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No value to the project. Purports to describe a micronation, but article on Wikipedia was deleted as A11 (made up by author and non-notable). I don't know the policy on derivative works of maps so I can't tell if the image is a copyvio, but the underlying map is copyrighted. Sjö (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No value to the project. Purports to be a micronation's flag, but article on Wikipedia was deleted as A11 (made up by author and non-notable). Sjö (talk) 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor and pointless image of a squirrel, numerous better ones in Category:Sciuridae. دونالد ترامب (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor and pointless image of a squirrel, numerous better ones in Category:Sciuridae. دونالد ترامب (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3) of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3) of rather poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate picture of bridge, in scope. P 1 9 9   22:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), small-sized and of rather poor quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: streetscene, in scope. P 1 9 9   22:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), small-sized and of very bad quality, obviously randomly taken from car/bus etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, blurry, unusable. P 1 9 9   22:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit blurred private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear graffiti in Paris (Violeur=Raper). Who ? Why ? Where ? Image without encyclopaedic or photographic value. Tangopaso (talk) 21:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of Chechnya war in Grozny. No evidence of licence by the photographer. Presence of private phone number. Tangopaso (talk) 21:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, derivative. P 1 9 9   22:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong photo of a very well known painting : Category:La Liberté guidant le peuple (RF 129) by Eugène Delacroix. There are already 50 photos of this painting and this one is partial (not the whole painting) and taken from right side (not from the front). Tangopaso (talk) 21:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сopyright violation: word-to-word translation of https://studfile.net/preview/2928181 Yuriz (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by РоманГера (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and charts of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, deleted by JuTa, Yann and me. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality image, replacements like File:Огнеметный танк ОТ-130.jpg available. Denniss (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. AmBu (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for vandalism in Spanish Wikipedia Fixertool (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated, small size, and no indication of user's own work, looks like it was borrowed from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture but would like it deleted as it is personal Gr678537 (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: One off the best pics in it's category. We have no replacement and therefor I decline this request. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file but want to delete it as it is personal and also is a duplicate Gr678537 (talk) 02:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicate of File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, inferior quality. A.Savin 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a duplicate and has some differences. I would like to object the deletion of this image unless it is causing a harm.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg is clearly better and is about the same; the very minor change of the camera position does not provide any additional information in this case. Please do not push up your upload count by uploading (near-)duplicates, this is discouraged here on Commons. --A.Savin 12:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The image just became a quality image. I guess we should not delete it.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 05:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A duplicate remains a duplicate, regardless if with seal or without. Why do you consider it necessary to make dulicates? --A.Savin 16:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I agree with A. Savin. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicate of File:White-thorated Kingfisher in Ludhiana district, Punjab 03.jpg, inferior quality. A.Savin 04:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a near duplicate. I understand this but the question is why to delete it ?--Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. McGeddon (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, complex artwork. McGeddon (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer Sean Higgins is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS-permission from myself, photographer Sean Higgins, has been emailed permissions-commons@wikimedia via offical email address.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matable (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I came across a few that were obvious copyvios (claimed as own but available elsewhere, and with valid source and self-consistent non-free tagging on en.wp) and deleted them outright. But every other one seem in same style and subject. Commons:Precautionary principle.

DMacks (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no FoP in Ukraine. Sealle (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE fail. I can't find this as being a current or former flag of the (or some of the) en:Cayman Islands. "Las Tortugas" as a name of them seems only historical (prior to 1586), no evidence would have had own flag. Unused and no evidence of any educational value or real-world context. DMacks (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adrikkkss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is improbable that Adrikkkss is the copyrightholder, it is rather from here, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation (example from internet). And there is not CC BY-SA 4.0 and not a compatible license on the source site. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission details on Korean Wikipedia do not exist at https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%ED%8C%8C%EC%9D%BC:Volcano_step_introduce.png . Therefore, copyright status is unknown. GeoWriter (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unused and unusable fuzzy picture of sky, nothing to see, zero educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, ugly JPEG compression artefacts, superseded by File:TV5Monde Logo.svg Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, seems unlikely that the uploader really does own the copyright to the design. McGeddon (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from subject's Facebook profile: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152113040146064&set=t.675191063&type=3&theater Ytoyoda (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused fictional coat of arms. Looks nothing like the 1339 map nor any of the armorials. Zoupan (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 191.43.41.9 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: It's not a free image. Yann (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work, as claimed. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The PD tagging on this image doesn't appear to be correct. It is tagged as PD-US because it was published before 1923, but it is taken from a book published in the UK, which has different standards. The creator is Edward Gordon Craig, who died in 1966, so the UK requirement of life+70 hasn't been reached yet. RL0919 (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reluctantly, delete per nom. As best I can tell it is PD in the US because it was published before 1923, but not PD in the country of origin (UK) because the creator died in 1966 and the copyright term in the UK is life+70 (so in copyright in the UK until 2036), and AIUI Commons policy is that images must be PD both in the US and the country of origin. --Xover (talk) 12:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file upload Romandia Sergio (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear provenance; appears to be copy of older image Andy Mabbett (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No release from original photographer, who is unlikely to have been the uploader. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Renewal (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:53, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:53, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 20:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of this image, I actually have NO permission from its author to upload this image to Wikipedia to date. Though I stated that it's my own work when I uploaded it, but I am not the original author. Renewal (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. My usename was the same as Renewal when I uploaded this file on Chinese Wikipedia. Afterwards, I changed my username to my current one. --TestDaF (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending. (Ticket:2017020410008959) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final result: according to the Ticket:2017020410008959, original uploader said he cannot get the permission of the original copyrights holder. Therefore, I sadly suggest that this image should be deleted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version Updated Moajjem 00:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: superseded by File:Seal of PSc and HRD.png. P 1 9 9   00:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New logo updated Moajjem 00:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: superseded by File:Seal of PSc and HRD.png. P 1 9 9   00:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a newer version with much better resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 12:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A.S. Hillersborg. Yes, that is a much better version. Unfortunately you have uploaded the new version without all the information and without the categories from the old version, so if you do not copy-paste those, they will be lost, and Commons will suffer, so please do that. In the future, it might be smarter to use the option "upload a new version of this file" (which is found in "File history"). I can see that you are a new user here, so therefore I don't think you will mind a little advice ... Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As the new version has now been updated with artwork information, there are no problems deleting this - now redundant - version. --Rsteen (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. P 1 9 9   00:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a newer version with much better resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A.S. Hillersborg. Yes, that is a much better version. Unfortunately you have uploaded the new version without all the information and without the categories from the old version, so if you do not copy-paste those, they will be lost, and Commons will suffer, so please do that. In the future, it might be smarter to use the option "upload a new version of this file" (which is found in "File history"). I can see that you are a new user here, so therefore I don't think you will mind a little advice ... Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As the artwork information has now been provided in the new version, I see no problems with a deletion of this - now redundant - file. --Rsteen (talk) 16:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. P 1 9 9   00:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload, wrong version, bad resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. superseded by File:Constantin Hansen, Kunstnerens søstre Signe og Henriette læsende i en bog, 1826, KMS3004, SMK.jpg. P 1 9 9   00:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload, wrong version, bad resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Constantin Hansen, Tre unge piger. Kunstnerens tre søstre Alvilde, Ida, Henriette, 1827, KMS125, SMK.jpg. P 1 9 9   00:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload, wrong version, bad resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Constantin Hansen, Ægirs gæstebud, 1857, KMS939, SMK.jpg. P 1 9 9   00:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my file and the location data gives away personal information. Josh5678 (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. File page has no personal data: no name, no photo, no home or workplace address. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Taivo. P 1 9 9   00:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file data contains personal information that puts me, the uploader at risk (location) Josh5678 (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I do not understand, which kind of risk. File page has no personal data: no name, no photo, no home or workplace address. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The location data found in metadata


Kept: per User:Taivo. P 1 9 9   00:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has data (location) that puts me, the uploader, at risk. Josh5678 (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I do not understand, which kind of risk. File page has no personal data: no name, no photo, no home or workplace address. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Taivo. P 1 9 9   00:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No good result of quality Samuel Long BRD (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of the picture Samuel Long BRD (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no use for Samuel Long BRD (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no use for Samuel Long BRD (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wrong quality of picture Samuel Long BRD (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

must be replaced and deleted soon to place a better version of Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   23:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Model and me the copyright owner want to use their legal rights and now wish the deletion. Thanks to all, Samuel Long BRD (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Long BRD: you can use COM:OTRS to do a formal request. XXN, 11:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Kept in 6 previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Im Nachgang machen das Fotomodel und der Fotograph vom geltenden Recht gebrauch, ein Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Tm (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modell und Fotograph möchten die Löschung des Bildes bzw. der Varianten, da Fragen zu den umfänglichen Rechten offen sind und deshalb eine vorsorgliche Löschung optimal wäre. Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-admin closure): No new arguments brought after 7 previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published on several other websites, like this one. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée sur d'autres sites web non libres de droit. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable low quality image, many better alternatives at Category:Skyline of Toronto P 1 9 9   16:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unused and unusable grainy image with watermark, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the logo is de minimis in this case. The main subject of the photography is the bottle, and the main aspect of the bottle, to identity it from other bottles in the etiquette with the logo. Composition is centred on the bottle and the logo. Dereckson (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zu farblos, ersetzt durch File:Kartenausschnitt Richterswil Schindellegi Zweiter Villmerger Krieg 1712 farbig.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 19:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio, considering the user's upload history. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a better photo of the singer's signature and as that one has clearly been created on 'Paint' it is not clear how valid it is. ArturSik (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image previously kept as in use. However it's no longer in use a better image has replaced it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a newer version with much better resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 12:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded a newer version with much better resolution A.S. Hillersborg (talk) 12:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate (File:Metro-Madrid2.JPG), the other photo should be renamed to this name — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from http://federerfan07.com/2015/10/31/federer-tops-sock-to-reach-10th-swiss-indoors-final/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same as File:El Lissitzky I02517.jpg but bad angle. Carl Ha (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same as File:El Lissitzky I84356.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated Sky xe (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Conflicting statements. No indication that the author would have died before 1954, per permission field, or before 1947, per license template. Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication for publication without a copyright notice. Jcb (talk) 21:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication for publication without a copyright notice. Jcb (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Einordnung Hcalub (talk) 10:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think we have a de minimis like situation here. The cameraman points towards the logo. This photo is clearly associated with the logo. The logo itself is a fair use image on enwiki and other local wikis. If we can consider it below the threshold of originality, it should be fine with a trademark notice. w:en:File:Brainiac Science Abuse logo.svg Bulgu (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And the photographer points towards the cameraman. // Liftarn (talk) 12:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: de-minimis to me. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fixing/completing the DR process of User:책읽는달팽 who noted "Copyright Violation" DMacks (talk) 12:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think that this file, which was uploaded ten years ago, is not own work? The author is given, a license is indicated. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's very improbable that a user would have created this from scratch. A base map will have been used and now we do not know which base map has been used, we cannot determine its copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have users that create beautiful maps from scratch, see Category:Kartenwerkstatt for example. And we have no reason to believe that this is copyright violation. After all, the uploader wrote that he is the author, and nobody has complained since 2005 or 2007.  Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The map must be based on something. Typically this is a base map. Now the uploader did not provide proper source information, we do not know the copyright situation of this base map, so that we cannot determine the copyright situation of this derivative work either. Jcb (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kırıkkale Turkey Provinces locator.jpg for an almost identical file by the same uploader that has been deleted in the meantime for the same reason. Jcb (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice that deletion request. Why do you request these deletions on a one-by-one basis instead of creating one deletion requests for all files concerned by your allegations? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
They both appeared in a huge (46.000+) maintenance category. It impossible to group them by comparable files in such a large category. Jcb (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be a US government work. The file is stated to come from a (German) non-USgov website. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by almost similar picture, which is clearer. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:213.127.253.207 says the photos in Category:Spiegelhuis by Sonia Mangiapane are hers and that she didn't agree to the free license.

These pictures were transfered from the Flickr account of the Bond van Nederlandse Architecten. I'm nominating all the pro photographs from this Flickr account here because the license of all of them is in doubt because of that.

I'm still fairly sure the pictures in Category:BNA Beste Gebouw van het Jaar 2014 are OK since it is fairly likely that they did directly hire the photographer of that event. The Flickr account isn't giving all of its photographs a free license, only 128 of the 505 files, so some thought must have gone into giving these files that license.

I'd like to ask Mangiapane if she's sure she didn't sell the copyright license to the BNA and some verification of identity would also be prudent. See Commons:Username_policy#Usernames_requiring_identification.

Vera (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the files by Sonia Mangiapane, since the license on her photos was changed on the source site. Kept all other files, since they are still CC licensed. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Добрый день!

Данный логотип является официальным логотипом Издательского дома "Капитал". Статья, к которой прилагается логотоп, находится в Инкубаторе и в ближайшее время будет подана на восстановление. WrighterLafa (talk) 06:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep Пришло разрешение в OTRS от правообладателя на публикацию данного логотипа под свободной лицензией, Ticket#2017021410009046. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The document is more relevant as a scan rather than the content of the text itself. Wiki-text would not be useful for its current usage at ja:日本教育書道連盟. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor and pointless image of a squirrel, numerous better ones in Category:Sciuridae. P 1 9 9   15:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No good images in that category. If you mean there are such in the subdirectories, please point to the relevant ones. I suppose the good ones are not sparsely spread out on numerous categories (in that case one or two good examples would have gone a long way. Citing the top category could hint on your just guessing, but let us assume good faith.
I did not quickly find good images on a black fox squirrels. If it is one, then a better search is needed before deletion. If it is an eastern grey squirrel, then there indeed are at least some good images in Category:Melanism in sciurus carolinensis.
--LPfi (talk) 08:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So is the squirrel in this image an eastern grey squirrel? --LPfi (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no focus, new image uploaded by Gage Skidmore Bart ryker (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and uploader. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque tiene una licencia equivocada, además infringe los derechos de autor El cóndor andino (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: changed license to PD-textlogo. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Quest Kodiak 100 AN2150438.jpg with a watermark Marc Lacoste (talk) 20:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by User:JarrahTree. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sillamanagement ist wohl kein Mensch (Fotograf), daher vermutete URV. Jbergner (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promo photo, we would need OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лиценщзии. Изображённый на фото и автор-одно и тоже лицо Dogad75 (talk) 22:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Да, это автор фото, доктор географических наук, профессор, член Русского географического общества Алексей Николаевич Рудой. Наберите Heljqfy в русской раскладке. Помимо прочего, это ещё и автор двух Избранных статей в Русской Википедии.--Soul Train (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Он себя сам сфотографировал? Вы были свидетелем? С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
А вы были свидетелем того, что я сфотографировал стадион Парк Сарольди в Монтевидео? Это довольно странный вопрос. Или нужно указывать автором фотографии разработчика технологии 10-секундной задержки? Или изобретателя «себяшки»?--Soul Train (talk) 08:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This looks like a potential selfie, indeed. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

não é mais útil Mikhael Cezar (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tagged with PD-old-70 but no author is given lNeverCry 22:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating File:M (1931).ogv, File:Metropolis (1927).webm, File:Non Stop New York.ogv, File:The House of Rothschild.ogv, uploaded by the same user. Rodrigolopes (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The directors died in 2002, 1976, 1976, 1986, and 1975, respectively. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(in italian) lo scatto appare molto "professionale", l'utenza Flickr da cui proviene è stata nel frattempo chiusa... forti dubbi di copyviol. Danyele (talk) 23:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info & vanity, self promotion Fixertool (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK Government Crown copyright. Cloudbound (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: pre 2010, so not OGL. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]