Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
![1 File:مامزاده روستای خواجه آباد(" شاهزاده عبدالجلیل").jpg](#File:مامزاده_روستای_خواجه_آباد("_شاهزاده_عبدالجلیل").jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Azoren_2016_04.JPG){kind=link}
,_Azoren_2016_03.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/31973680 Thatonewikiguy (talk) 04:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problems Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 08:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Test page. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MisterXS as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 09:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The UK has the PMA+70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep it comes from the Bain collection File:Ruben Warnes in 1911 (Middleweight).jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Resolved. --Jcb (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
copyright 1 , 2 Florence (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: 1 , 2
advertisements, see also en:Draft:Kenzon since July 2016, but also potentially copyright rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
advertisements as per File:Kenzon.png et al, see also since July 2016, and en:Shamil Salam (deleted), but also potentially personality rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- speedied, to discourage the use of Commons as a free web host.--KTo288 (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
advertisements as per File:Kenzon.png et al, for instance, see also since July 2016, but also potentially copyright rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- speedied.--KTo288 (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
advertisements as per File:Kenzon.png et al, see also since July 2016, but also potentially copyright rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- speedied.--KTo288 (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Doit être mise à jour 209.217.73.96 21:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
no correct license. Deletion necessary because of "Abzockerbande" Austriantraveler (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Die Lizenzen sind korrekt, kein Löschgrund gegeben. --Ralf Roleček 23:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Valid license (artlibre) given. The author of the deletion request should be warned or blocked due to com:point and personal attack. --smial 23:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep of course. I think Austriantraveler do not know this here: Commons:Licensing#Multi-licensing. Now you can revert all your nonsese and not valid deletion requests. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Info the most of my images has the free license {{FAL}} and additional perhaps for all private users the {{User:Alchemist-hp/CC-BY-NC-ND}} license. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Disruptive DR. --Leyo 00:07, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
see: [1]. The document shown in this image (you can read it) is a copyvio. Austriantraveler (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Frau_Prof._Dr._Thisbe_Lindhorst_Dr._Felix-Raoul_Fischer_HP_22764.JPG#File%3AFrau_Prof._Dr._Thisbe_Lindhorst_Dr._Felix-Raoul_Fischer_HP_22764.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep no protectable design, no creative work, simple text logo. --smial 20:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Smial. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Again a disruptive DR. Document is DM anyways. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation and misattribution - This photo is a preview of the official photo of President Michel Temer, taken by professional photographer Orlando Brito and not yet officially released (as per http://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/apos-polemica-fotografo-divulga-foto-oficial-de-temer-20825786, http://veja.abril.com.br/brasil/temer-define-retrato-oficial-e-e-alvo-de-piadas-na-internet/ and many other news sources in Brasil over the last few days. It certainly is not the uploader's own work. Fbergo (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The photo is not big and it has no camera data. There is nothing irreplaceable on the photo. The uploader is blocked for 6 months and this is his last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
paisagem 2 Sequeira Francisco (talk) 00:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- keep, this image is of an unidentified location and is well within the scope. MB298 (talk) 02:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate of File:Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg. --JuTa 14:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bild 33 V 3, Verkehrsverbot für Fahrzeuge über ein bestimmtes Gesamtgewicht, TGL 10629, Blatt 3, S. 20.pdf
[edit]Please kill this file, it is wrong (=PDF!). The correct file is here:Bild 33 V 3, Verkehrsverbot für Fahrzeuge über ein bestimmtes Gesamtgewicht, TGL 10629, Blatt 3, S. 20.svg Mediatus (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Poor picture repeatedly uploaded by editor using multiple sock puppets for self-promotion Ravensfire (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this image of a figure skater, user's other uploads were all of the same man and all found on other websites. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Junior nationals antony.jpg: Dubious claim of own work on this image of a figure skater, user's other uploads were all of the same man and all found on other websites.
Probably copyright violation. Here photo credit: РБК-Украина, --sasha (krassotkin) 15:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- See also discussion with uploader (in Russian): User talk:Krassotkin#Запрос по удалению! --sasha (krassotkin) 15:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; obvious copyvio. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Invalid page Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems to be created erroneously. --Achim (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 13:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Getty Images #461309204, a non-free photo by Gareth Copley. —RP88 (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per RP88. Speedy as copyvio. (t) Josve05a (c) 03:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Getty Images #463711988, a non-free photo by Shaun Botterill. —RP88 (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per RP88. Speedy as copyvio. (t) Josve05a (c) 03:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - user have copyvios history - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Getty Images #630935904, a non-free photo by Brett Hemmings. —RP88 (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 03:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Low quality personal picture Lymantria (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Normally, I'm very "inclusionist", but it's hard to imagine a good reason to have this image on Commons. Yes, it's probably legally defensible (taken in a more or less public place), but the person who is the main subject does not look happy to have it taken, and it doesn't seem to be of much educational use. Jmabel ! talk 19:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.
DW rather than own work. No information on the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. MCMLXXXIX 00:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. MCMLXXXIX 00:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Thanks for the info above. I have requested speedy deletion per uploader requesting deletion. Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete Obviously an honest mistake made by the uploader, and apparently an honest mistake by the owner of the image. Quoting from here, "CC0 is intended for use only by authors or holders of copyright and related or neighboring rights (including sui generis database rights), in connection with works that are still subject to those rights in one or more jurisdictions. PDM, on the other hand, can be used by anyone, and is intended for use with works that are already free of known copyright restrictions throughout the world." Therefore, what the author of the image did doesn't make any sense to me. I suggest that an attempt be made to contact the image owner and ask him to change from PDM to CC0, from this menu. If he takes more than a week to respond, the image can be undeleted later. In the worst of the cases, it should be easy to get a new decent picture of an angel cake; they are very easy to make. Dontreader (talk) 02:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining, won't happen again. Triplecaña (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vencomatic Group (talk · contribs)
[edit]May not be own work. COM:DW [2]
- File:Vencogroep Asia.jpg
- File:Vencomatic Asia Building.jpg
- File:2013 08 15 Building Venco China.jpg
- File:Vencomatic Iberica 1.jpg
- File:Fachada Editada.jpg
MCMLXXXIX 00:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TGM SOMADINA TGM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images / advertisements / self-promotion.
- File:TGM SOMADINA 10.png
- File:TGM SOMADINA 07.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 09.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 08.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 06.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 05.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 04.png
- File:TGM SOMADINA 01.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 02.jpg
- File:TGM SOMADINA 03.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikielite360 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I tagged a few images as copyvios, but rather than find sources for each and every one of them I think it's safe to say that all these are webgrabs and unless proof of ownership of rights and the correct release is provided, these should all be deleted.
- File:Charlie Horton 1.jpg
- File:Phillym.jpg
- File:Yogrishi.jpg
- File:Jaivin Karnani main.jpg
- File:Dr. Arani Photo.jpg
- File:Adam Afara 2.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 04:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikielite360 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Al shaheen group.jpg
- File:Ebuzztoday logo.png
- File:Spotcam logo 300dpi.jpg
- File:Creating opi.jpg
- File:Zakoopi Logo.jpg
- File:Spotcam.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE, bios belong on Wikipedia as articles, not here as PDFs Daphne Lantier 04:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дима-101
[edit]https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0-101 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0-101
could be copyvio since the uploader uploaded did copyvio earlier. no meta data and low quality photos. locations all over ukraine.
- File:АР-2.ЗиЛ.jpg
- File:РеноАРЗСП.jpg
- File:БТР-80 Киев.обл..JPG http://www.kyivobl.mns.gov.ua/news/2908.html
- File:ИВС+ГУ СБУ.jpeg http://tov_tob.livejournal.com/
- File:СИЗО Одесса2.jpg
- File:СИЗО Одесса1.jpg
- File:ПРХЛ Мерефа.JPG
- File:Валдай АЦ-40.jpg http://www.autocentre.ua/news/komavto/18533.html
- File:Присяга Ровно.JPG http://rivne.mns.gov.ua/news/889.html
- File:САРМ-Л.jpg
- File:АРР Николаев.JPG http://www.mns.gov.ua/
- File:АППГ-10 Запорожье.jpg http://www.zp.mns.gov.ua
- File:ТМК-2.jpg
- File:Ватутино-Занятия.jpg
- File:1 СЦШР.jpg
- File:Кс-МАЗ.jpg
- File:СМЗ Парад.jpg http://www.kerch.com.ru/articleview.aspx?id=5657
- File:АРЧ Лоскутовка.jpg http://lisichansk.info/news.php?readmore=2755
- File:АРЧ Лоскутовка2.jpg http://lisichansk.info/news.php?readmore=2755
- File:ПМКрАЗ СМЗ.jpg
- File:АРЧ Лоск.пиротех..jpg http://lisichansk.info/news.php?readmore=2755
- File:АРЧ Лоскутовка ГПР.jpg http://lisichansk.info/news.php?readmore=2755
- File:ИМР-2 Д0050.jpg
- File:ПУ Одесса.jpg
- File:Ап266 ГАЗ.jpg
- File:Бкт ватутино.jpg
- File:БРДМ-2 АРР.JPG
--Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 19:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- If you believe it is copyvio, please provide the links to the source images! If not, there are no reason to delete. They do not look like professional photos, so I do not believe they were downloaded from any other source to be uploaded here. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 07:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- see it! --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- OK, we can delete the files when copyvio is proven. But the rest of them we need to save, at least till the copyvio will be recognised. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 05:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- see it! --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios/COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The remaining contributions of a user with a huge amounts of copyvio notifications at their talk page. Photos of different years, made at different locations and by more than 20 different cameras, mostly low-res and have no metadata.
- File:Ars14D0090.jpg
- File:Mto-atD0090.jpg
- File:Brdm-px.jpg
- File:IMR-2d0090-2.jpg
- File:EOB-d0090.jpg
- File:IMR-d0090-1.jpg
- File:UralD1002.jpg
- File:TMM-3m1-1.jpg
- File:NC-APC-14.JPG
- File:NC-xim. tex.jpg
- File:NC-spas. stand.jpg
- File:NC-patriotic stand.jpg
- File:NC-IMR2.jpg
- File:NC-klub.jpg
- File:SARM-NC.JPG
- File:PM-V KrAZ.jpg
- File:Uch.korp.jpg
- File:NC-fordRX1.jpg
- File:NC-prapor1.jpg
- File:NC-6.08.jpg
- File:NC-brdm2.jpg
- File:NC-spas2.jpg
- File:NC-xim1.jpg
- File:NC-stroy1.jpg
- File:NC-kpp1.jpg
- File:NC-saper1.jpg
- File:NC-spas1.jpg
- File:D0050-4.jpg
- File:D0050-3.jpg
- File:D0050-2.jpg
- File:D0050-1.jpg
- File:ChechotkinM.JPG
- File:САРМ-Л УАЗ.jpg
- File:ПНС-110-1.JPG
- File:Рено-скорая.jpg
- File:ИМР-2НЦ.jpg
- File:АРР-Ко.jpg
- File:НЦ-Мерефа1.jpg
- File:ОПМ+ПМ-В.jpg
- File:МАЗ-ПУ.jpg
- File:РХР-газ.jpg
- File:АЦ40 ГАЗ.jpg
- File:ТМК2Мерефа.jpg
- File:ГАЗ-66 саврм.jpg
- File:ЗиЛ-131 САРМ-В.jpg
- File:ГАЗ-66 сапер-водолаз.jpg
- File:ГАЗ-66кшмР142.jpg
- File:ДДА66.jpg
- File:BRDM-2PX.JPG
- File:Спец. техника ГСЧС.JPG
- File:ГПРЧ ГСЧС Украины.jpg
- File:АРР ГСЧС.jpg
- File:Пожарные ГСЧС-2.jpg
- File:Пожарные ГСЧС.jpg
- File:АРЗ СП, Ужгород.JPG
- File:КрАЗ 1 СЦШР.JPG
- File:АРЗ СП Винница.jpg
- File:НЦ ОРС ЦЗ.jpg
- File:ТММ-3 Дрогобыч.jpg
- File:АРС-14 ЗиЛ.jpg
- File:Автомобиль пиротехнический КрАЗ-63221.jpg
- File:Тягач МАЗ-537.jpg
- File:Станция МДЭС.jpg
- File:Табличка АСО СН.JPG
- File:САРМ (ЗиЛ-131).JPG
- File:БРДМ-2 РХБ ГСЧС.jpg
- File:БАТ-2 во время ликвидации снегопада.jpg
- File:Экскаватор войсковой ЭОВ-4421 ГСЧС Украины.jpg
- File:Плавающий транспортёр ПТС-2.jpg
- File:Государственная пожарно-спасательная часть № 20, Киев.jpg
- File:Пожарная техника на ЧАЭС.jpg
- File:Аварийно-спасательный автомобиль САРМ (131).JPG
- File:Ан-32П на учениях в АР Крым.JPG
- File:Мобильный пункт связи ГСЧС.JPG
- File:Арз сп запорожье 2.JPG
- File:Ми-8МТ авиации ГСЧС.JPG
- File:ИМР-2, часть в пгт. Мирное.JPG
- File:Арз сп запорожье 6.JPG
- File:Техника аварийно-спасательной части пгт. Мирное.JPG
- File:Техника группы пиротехнических работ, часть в пгт. Мирное.JPG
- File:БАТ-2, ПТС-М, ИМР-2 (часть в пгт. Мирное).JPG
- File:ПТС и ИМР-2 часть в пгт. Мирное.JPG
- File:БАТ-2 Учебного центра ГСЧС.JPG
- File:Аварийно-спасательный автомобиль на базе "УАЗ Патриот".jpg
- File:Аварийно-спасательный автомобиль САРМ-В.jpg
- File:Аварийно-спасательный автомобиль САРМ-С.jpg
- File:Пожарный МЧС.jpg
- File:Новобогдановка МЧС.jpg
- File:Закарпатье 1998.jpg
- File:Д0060 (5).jpg
- File:Д0060 (4).JPG
- File:Д0060 (6).jpg
- File:Д0060 (3).jpg
- File:Д0060 (1).jpg
- File:Д0060 (2).jpg
- File:ГАЗ-66 Сапёр.jpg
- File:Бат-2.jpg
- File:Машина "МДК-3".jpg
- File:Машина ДЭ-226.JPG
- File:Р-142 и Р-409 ГСЧС.jpg
- File:Ан-30 ГСЧС Украины.jpg
- File:Авиация ГСЧС.jpg
- File:Ан-32П.jpg
- File:Ми-8 ГСЧС.jpg
- File:Ан-26 ГСЧС.jpg
- File:БРДМ-2 РХ.JPG
- File:БРДМ-2 РХБ ГСЧС Украины.JPG
- File:РХМ-4=05E7721.jpg
- File:УАЗ-469РХ.jpg
- File:МДК-2.JPG
- File:ИМР-2 ГСЧС Украины.jpg
- File:Бульдозер БКТ-2РХ.jpg
- File:ПТС-М.JPG
- File:Камаз аэродромный.jpg
- File:Техника Одесская обл.JPG
- File:АЦ-40 (130) 63Б.jpg
- File:PogTech-(6).jpg
- File:Авиация ГСЧС Ан-32П.jpg
- File:EC-145.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_63%D0%91.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Яй (talk) 10:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion (covers of book authored by the uploader, poster for a meditation event, "order here" buttons). Moreover, some images used might still be under copyright, and I wonder whether the uploader has the permission to publish them under a free licence)
- File:Front-reiki3.jpg
- File:Front-reikiboek.png (DW of [3])
- File:Bestellen2.png
- File:Bestellen.png
- File:Front-energetische.png (DW of [4])
- File:Front-meditatie.png
- File:Front-Gautama.png
- File:Front Bijlage.jpg
- File:Front-Handboek.jpg
- File:Front-werkboek.jpg
- File:Front-boek-tantra.jpg
- File:Front.pdf
- File:Front-Reikiboek.pdf
- File:Front-energetisch.pdf
- File:Vipassana-retraite.jpg
- File:Gautama-de-Boeddha.jpg
- File:Tour-sri-lanka.png
![[3]](http://rejtelyekszigete.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/reiki-1.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](http://osteopathe-cheille.e-monsite.com/medias/images/vetruve.gif){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, texts and diagrams without obvious educational use
- File:Silla4.jpg
- File:Silla-samadhi.jpg
- File:8-voudige pad.jpg
- File:Oog-bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Tong-bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Tastzin-bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Oor-bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Neus-bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Gevoel-bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Ego3.jpg
- File:Ik2.jpg
- File:Overtuiging.jpg
- File:Mijn.jpg
- File:Het ons.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- The articles about 'bewustzijn' (awareness) are about buddhist filosofy and is in Dutch. The articles self is about the 5 Khandas so it has a educational purpose. Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all details of this image, which can be found on the web. They can be kept only if the origin image is in the public domain.
- File:Boeddha.jpg
- File:Hoofd2.jpg
- File:Verlangen.jpg
- File:Bewustzijn.jpg
- File:Hechten.jpg
- File:Zintuigen.jpg
- File:Onwetendheid.jpg
- File:Lijden.jpg
- File:Gevoel2.jpg
- File:Geboorte.jpg
- File:Worden.jpg
- File:Naman-en-rupa.jpg
- File:Karmavorming.jpg
- File:Contact3.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-dieren.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-goden.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-hel.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-mensen.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-yidags.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-centrum-2.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenwiel-centrum-1.jpg
- File:Tibetaans-levenswiel-totaal.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- The original image is a painting more than 100 years old, so there is no copy right. The foto is made by me. Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Can you please provide more information about the original painting? For example: creator, date of production, area of production, technique, present location (museum)... Without any information, it is very difficult to check if this painting is in the public domain or not. BrightRaven (talk) 13:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]I wonder whether these images are in scope: they are unused files, with diagrams and drawings without obvious educational use. Moreover, some of these images can be found on the web (see [5], [6], [7]...). The uploader pretends that he is the creator of these images, but he has a record of copyright violations.
- File:Shanti2.png
- File:Zonar.png
- File:Harth.png
- File:Halu.png
- File:Motor-Zanon.png
- File:Raku-traditional.png
- File:Dai-ko-myo (nieuwe variant).jpg
- File:Raku-vuurdraak.png
- File:Hon-Sha-She-Zo-Nen-2.gif
- File:Sei-He-Ki.jpg
- File:Hon-Sha-She-Zo-Nen.gif
- File:Ch-Ku-Rei-1.png
- File:Ch-Ku-Rei-2.png
- File:Ch-Ku-Rei-3.png
- File:Marmapunten arm.jpg
- File:Marmapunten handen.jpg
- File:Marmapunten billen.jpg
- File:Marmapunten rug.jpg
- File:Marmapunten been achterzijde.jpg
- File:Marmapunten been voorzijde.jpg
- File:Marmapunten romp.jpg
- File:Marmapunten voet.jpg
- File:Marmapunten voet onderkant.jpg
- File:Marmapunten Armen.jpg
- File:Marmapunten Handen.jpg
- File:Marma-hoofd.jpg
- File:Marma-hoofd3.jpg
- File:Marma-hoofd2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
This picture can be found on the web. It is a picture of a wall painting in Sarnath, made in the 1930's by the Japanese Kosetsu Nosu. I could not find the date of death of this artist, so I do not know if his works are in the PD. If they are {{PD-Art}} could apply. BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Nosu Kosetsu (野生司香雪) died in 1973, so the painting is not in the PD in India (60 years pma). BrightRaven (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Another relevant point here is that there is no FOP for paintings in India. BrightRaven (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teestreetx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2h53cFXgAAFpZW.jpg.
- File:Paramount Chief.jpg
- File:Traditional Wedding Bride.jpg
- File:Chief Fetish Priest.jpg
- File:Fetish Priestess Of Asante In Ghana.jpg
- File:Photo Of Adowa.jpg
- File:Asante Executioner.jpg
- File:Vid-01.webm
- File:A Fetish Priest.jpg
- File:Queen Mother.jpg
- File:Funeral Ceremony.jpg
- File:An Asante Fetish Priest.jpg
- File:Asante Culture In Ghna.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The license given is not correct. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal paper; out of scope; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samisamisami92 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very small resolution images, unlikely to be own work.
- File:الجزائر مسجد.jpg
- File:عمارات .jpg
- File:شيراطون عنابة الجمبل الطويل.jpg
- File:جزيرة كاف عمار بشطايبي 2016..jpg
- File:عنابة عنابة ما ادراك ما عنابة.jpg
- File:Images (4)شيراطون بعنابة الرائعة.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (1) عنابة.jpg
- File:Images (5)sami.jpg
- File:Sheratone d'annaba.jpg
- File:Images3333333333333333333336659645555558.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (11)3333333333333333.jpg
- File:Images (14)..............jpg
- File:Téléchargement (10)نلرمممب.jpg
- File:Images (12)ى.jpg
- File:الحجار مركب.jpg
- File:Images (10)ىتىت.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (9)ىىى.jpg
- File:البوني.jpg
- File:سرايدي عنابة جوهرة الشرق.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (6)ةلانىلابنب.jpg
- File:Images (8)...jpg
- File:Images (7)..jpg
- File:Images (6)..jpg
- File:Images (3)................jpg
- File:Téléchargement (10).........jpg
- File:RHD-NJM . ANNABA-ALGERIE 2...jpg
- File:سرايدي..jpg
- File:خليج شطايبي.jpg
- File:خليج عنابة.jpg
- File:Port de chetaibi....jpg
- File:صبري الفندق الجميل.jpg
- File:فندق صبري.jpg
- File:ميناء عنابة.jpg
- File:تليفيريك عنابة.jpg
- File:Telepherique annaba 161376325.jpg
- File:ترامواي عنابة.jpg
%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%86_%D8%A8%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B9%D8%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
sami.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
3333333333333333.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..............jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D9%86%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%85%D9%85%D8%A8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D9%89.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D9%89%D8%AA%D9%89%D8%AA.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D9%89%D9%89%D9%89.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%D8%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%89%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%A8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
...jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
................jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.........jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MKFI (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samisamisami92 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very low resolution images, unlikely to be own work.
- File:Téléchargement (11)ؤيد.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (1) محطة عنابة.jpg
- File:Téléchargement lpù,.jpg
- File:كنيسة عنابة جوهرة المتوسط.jpg
- File:كورنيش عنابة الخلاب.jpg
- File:عنابة عنابة 2015.jpg
- File:ترامواي عنابة الجوهرة.jpg
- File:بلميباخيهتالامنتتلايلتانبب.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (6) منتزه.jpg
- File:الريم الجميل عنابة.jpg
- File:الريم.jpg
- File:فندق عنابة سيبوس.jpg
- File:عدل سيدي عاشور بعنابة جوهرة الشرق.jpg
- File:Téléchargement (5) ابراج 0000000000000000000000.jpg
- File:ابراج عدل عنابة.jpg
- File:Images (16).....jpg
%D8%A4%D9%8A%D8%AF.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B7%D8%A9_%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B2%D9%87.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AC_0000000000000000000000.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.....jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MKFI (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
- File:Caleb in his office, Dobb's Ferry, 6 April 2011 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg
- File:Calvin Klein photo shoot.jpeg
- File:Carlos vazquez zumaya 2.jpg
- File:Carlos vazquez zumaya.jpg
- File:Danations.jpg
- File:Dewesh.jpg
- File:Hamid.jpg
- File:Kenny Lewis.jpg
- File:Meghdad.jpg
- File:Obed Duarte.jpg
- File:Patrickleung.jpg
- File:Pencil D Comedian.jpg
- File:Pkzn.jpg
- File:Pruthvi pinky.jpg
- File:Robertin.jpg
- File:Urione.jpg
- File:فەرەیدون کونجرینی.jpg
- File:ياسير مكوار.jpg
Gauss (talk) 21:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javi valdivia 04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images showing only text.
- File:Diapositiva1111.jpg
- File:Diapositiva1111111.jpg
- File:Diapositiva21.jpg
- File:Diapositiva20.jpg
- File:Diapositiva19.jpg
- File:Diapositiva17.jpg
- File:Diapositiva18.jpg
- File:Diapositiva16.jpg
- File:Diapositiva15.jpg
- File:Diapositiva14.jpg
- File:Diapositiva13.jpg
- File:Diapositiva12.jpg
- File:Diapositiva09.jpg
- File:Diapositiva07.jpg
- File:Diapositiva08.jpg
- File:Diapositiva05.jpg
- File:Diapositiva06.jpg
- File:Diapositiva04.jpg
- File:Diapositiva01.jpg
- File:Diapositiva03.jpg
- File:Diapositiva02.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 22:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
This was not published in the original "Uniformenkunde" of 1890 but as can be seen in the fine print below the drawing, this is from the "Neue Folge" which was first published in 1936-38. Moreover, the artist is not Richard Knötel but Georg Schäfer [8] who was apparently still active in 1964 [9]. de:Georg Schäfer list one painter named Schäfer who died in 1989. So this drawing is apparently not yet out of copyright.. De728631 (talk) 23:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Also nominated are the following images not drawn by Richard Knötel:
- File:Knoe20 18.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe19 05.jpg (drawn by Scharf?)
- File:Knoe19 20.jpg (Johann Andreas Drexler)
- File:Knoe19 34.jpg (Drexler)
- File:Knoe19 55.jpg (Drexler)
- File:Knoe20 11.jpg (Drexler)
- File:Knoe19 02.jpg (Fritz Kredel, d. 1973)
- File:Knoe19 43.jpg (Herbert Knötel aka Knötel d. J., d. 1963)
- File:Knoe19 47.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe20 10.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe20 16.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe20 17.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe18 16.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 23.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe18 45.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe18 11.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe18 24.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe18 37.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe18 53.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 06.jpg (Otto Rubow)
- File:Knoe19 09.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 31.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 38.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 44.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe20 07.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe20 08.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe20 14.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe18 31.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 45.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 54.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe18 23.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe18 51.jpg(Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 35.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 41.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 52.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 19.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe18 39.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 11.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe19 14.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe19 21.jpg (Henri Boisselier, d. 1959)
- File:Knoe19 27.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe19 39.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 40.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 49.jpg (Boisselier)
- File:Knoe20 05.jpg (Boisselier)
- File:Knoe19 30.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 42.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe19 32.jpg (Schäfer)
- File:Knoe20 01.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 01.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 25.jpg (Boisselier)
- File:Knoe19 36.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 29.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 50.jpg
- File:Knoe19 28.jpg (Kredel)
- File:Knoe19 37.jpg (Drexler)
- File:Knoe20 08.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 07.jpg (Knötel Jr.)
- File:Knoe19 15.jpg (Kredel)
De728631 (talk) 00:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucashhembroms (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Bijaya Tirkey,s Love with Lucash Hembrom.jpg
- File:Lucash Hembrom.jpg
- File:Love Story of Lucash Hembrom.jpg
- File:Usha and Lucash Hembrom ( Childhood Photo).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--ghouston (talk) 03:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucashhembroms (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Lucash Hem.jpg
- File:YgPVkPwc.jpg
- File:At Guwahati.jpg
- File:Photo at home.jpg
- File:At Bagan for shoot.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-used poor quality duplicate image of File:USSR-1967-20copecks-CuNi-SovietPower50-b.jpg. Vahe (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 19:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
magazine cover MRSaleem (talk) 20:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Tiny, blurry picture without realistic educational purpose. Gauss (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Focused on copyrighted material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Book cover, copyright issues. Gauss (talk) 21:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No notability or encyclopedic value. Personal picture from Flickr —Hexafluoride (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private image, not in use. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not in use. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Restored per discussion up to 7 December at COM:UDR. Green Giant (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Restored per discussion up to 7 December at COM:UDR. Green Giant (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Restored per discussion up to 7 December at COM:UDR. Green Giant (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The source says "© 2017 Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved." Likely wrong date and wrong author. Is it in the public domain? Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, previously deleted content recreated outside of process. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
EXIF says source is RAI Ytoyoda (talk) 01:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "RAI Radiotelevisione Italiana" and low quality is a sign of non-own work. — regards, Revi 02:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright ownership unclear. – Rhain ☔ 02:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "Austin Hargrave" in EXIF. — regards, Revi 02:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — regards, Revi 02:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably out of scope, doesn't seem to be notable. --ghouston (talk) 04:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused test; no copyright details for lion image. --ghouston (talk) 04:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Seems like a probable copyvio, unless we have some basis to think the painting isn't copyrighted. Jmabel ! talk 05:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Sorry to have to nominate this for deletion, because the signatures are cool, but it's almost certainly got to be a copyright violation of the poster. Jmabel ! talk 05:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I don't see how this can possibly not be a copyvio of the picture on the wall. Jmabel ! talk 05:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Presumably a copyright violation of a work created as a museum exhibit. Jmabel ! talk 05:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Logo of topic deleted from enwp as hoax, no future educational use even if it is PD czar 06:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 14:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — regards, Revi 02:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 26 January 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:13, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image High Contrast (talk) 14:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image High Contrast (talk) 14:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image High Contrast (talk) 14:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image which is in use High Contrast (talk) 14:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:18, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image which is in use High Contrast (talk) 14:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image which is in use High Contrast (talk) 14:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Permission & scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:14, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: User page image High Contrast (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Self-promotional private image of non-notable person, no educational purpose. Not used. A draft of relevant article was rejected several times George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 09:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed. An unused private photo. Ankry (talk) 11:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
These flags and corporate logos are not own work, they need proper licenses and sources to be retained.
- File:Icra.jpg
- File:Stanford.png
- File:Bandiera vaticano.png
- File:Bandiera italia2.png
- File:Bandiera brasile.png
- File:Bandiera armenia.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- The flags are duplicates of SVG files, delete them all. The Stanford University seal is probably too old. That other image, I have no idea what it is, nuke it. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per shizhao (talk) 01:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violations. Several of these are copyrighted book covers. File:ICRANet Headquarter.jpg has been published previously: http://www.lopinionista.it/notizie/la-notte-europea-dei-ricercatori-pescara-tra-cielo-e-terra-gli-appuntamenti-odierni-258593.html.
- File:Ruffini Salam.png
- File:G9U.png
- File:Cover icra 5.jpg
- File:Cover icra 4.jpg
- File:Cover icra 3.jpg
- File:Cover icra 2.jpg
- File:Cover icra 1.jpg
- File:ICRA.png
- File:ICRANet.png
- File:ICRANet Headquarter.jpg
- File:Grafico irap.jpg
MKFI (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers.
- File:Cover5 ICRA black.jpg
- File:Cover4 ICRA.jpg
- File:Cover3 ICRA.jpg
- File:Cover2 ICRA.jpg
- File:Cover1 ICRA.jpg
MKFI (talk) 08:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers.
MKFI (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CaracasBlack (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 14:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is an Agence France-Presse photo (see [10], [11], etc.) by Punit Paranjpe. —RP88 (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Previously published online without free license (see [12], [13], etc.). —RP88 (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Merabi Chakir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Cheb Amine.jpg
- File:Cheb Amine Matlou.jpg
- File:Cheb amine matlou.jpg
- File:Cheb Amine MaTlou.jpg
- File:Chakir MaTlou.jpg
- File:Merabi Chakir.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album and file storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Promo images. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Право на щастя.jpg
- File:Презетація в артпричалі.jpg
- File:Презентація .jpg
- File:Книга "Розлучення. Сповідь адвоката".jpg
- File:Власюк Катерина Петрівна.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (logo, DW, no EXIFS, "FBMD"....). Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by رافت البابلي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by رافت البابلي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haneef Hussain Heramosh Valley (talk · contribs)
[edit]Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized.
- File:Heramosh kutwal valley.jpg
- File:Kutwal Emrald Lake Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg
- File:FB IMG 1431801943890.jpg
- File:Heramosh Kutwal Valley Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately, title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. It's been cut out from the original background, and is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Notice the overprinting which shows this was lifted from the temple's Facebook account. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Title, quality and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
File:FB IMG 1477668951023On a vication to Mexico in 2012. I took a trio to Chichen itze.Thinkink of going beac ther.jpg
[edit]
Title, "FBMD" in metadata and size all suggest this image was previously uploaded to Facebook prior to its upload here. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User:Patel Vikesh. MER-C 02:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
appears to be a photo of a screen or of an older photo Daphne Lantier 04:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Missing OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Paid editor. Needs OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Paid editor. Needs OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Private image, not in use. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Paid editor. Doubt they own the work. Need OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Was uploaded with the intent to be used solely for purposes of personal attacks, also see file name. The image is/was used in a sandbox page, that was a personal attack and I doubt that this image has major significance and is used to only attack, harass. [14] Silraks (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Dit werk is wel degelijk een afbeelding van een werk van Kobe. Ik ben de enige zoon en erfgenaam, maar over de afbeelding heb ik geen auteursrechten. Ze werd gefotografeerd door Frans Lossie uit Heusden. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Dit is een afbeelding van mijn vader zijn atelier, maar ik heb geen auteursrechten over deze afbeelding. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Dit is een werk van Kobe, maar ik heb geen auteursrechten op deze afbeelding. Ze komen toe aan Katoen Natie. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Opnieuw een werk van Kobe, maar helaas heb ik geen auteursrechten op deze afbeelding (afkomstig van The Phoebus Foundation) AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Ik heb geen auteursrechten over deze afbeelding. Werd gefotografeerd door Frans Lossie (Heusden, Nederland) AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Deze afbeelding werd niet door mij genomen, dus heb ik er geen auteursrechten over. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Deze afbeelding werd gefotografeerd door Frans Lossie (Heusden, Nederland) dus heb ik er geen auteursrechten over. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Deze afbeelding is afkomstig van de website van de Nederlandse galerie waarmee ik samenwerk. Ik heb dus geen auteursrechten over deze afbeelding. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Deze afbeelding werd genomen door Frans Lossie (Heusden, Nederland), dus heb ik er geen auteursrechten over. AlbinSaelens (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 14:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claims of own work on these images, all of same person, but all obviously not taken by the same person, or at same time, etc.
- File:JESSE SPENCER (287).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (286).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (209).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (193).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (174).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (190).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (159).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (63).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (25).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER (39).jpg
- File:JESSE SPENCER.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 00:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 00:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
clearly copyrighted as source given is official campaign site; which does not to my knowledge license their images freely MB298 (talk) 02:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to the caption, the source is https://www.flickr.com/photos/malink_ks/8504562955/ with a CC-BY-2.0 license. At the moment, the license at https://www.flickr.com/photos/malink_ks/8504562955/ is All Rights Reserved. Because we do not have proof of the CC-BY-2.0 license, this file should be deleted. The account Global Panorama is on Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images to be added to the Bad Authors list. Elisfkc (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: According to the license review tag, it was CC-BY-2 at the time of upload.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Aha. Now I understand. The file appears in two places on Flickr -- the photographer is malink-ks, where the file is ARR. It also appears at Global Panorma, where the file is credited to malink but licensed CC-BY. Deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
According to the caption, the source is https://www.flickr.com/photos/vegan-baking/7417963458/ with a CC-BY-2.0 license. At the moment, the photo is not available at https://www.flickr.com/photos/vegan-baking/7417963458/. Because we do not have proof of the CC-BY-2.0 license, this file should be deleted. The account Global Panorama is on Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images to be added to the Bad Authors list. Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: According to the license review tag, it was CC-BY-2 at the time of upload. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Aha. Now I understand. The file appears in two places on Flickr -- the photographer is Mattie Hagedorn, where the file license is unknown (404 error). It also appears at Global Panorma, where the file is credited to Mattie Hagedorn but licensed CC-BY. Deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Grygoriy Marchenko
[edit]No evidence of a free license at the source website.
- File:Grygoriy Marchenko (cropped).jpg
- File:MGB.Chernigiv.JPG
- File:MGB.Zaporizzhya1.jpg
- File:MGB.Zaporizzhya2.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Яй (talk) 09:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Jcb. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist is usually out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
There's no article about band Seppuku in en.wiki. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
repeat falg 85.54.245.102 12:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep. This image is not a duplicate; it differs (albeit subtly) from File:Flag of the Soviet Union (1923-1955).svg and File:Flag of the Soviet Union 1980.svg. Alkari (?), 28 January 2017, 06:14 UTC
- Keep. This is the version before the adjustment of red shade in 1980. Details of this adjustment can be found on en:Flag of the Soviet Union. --Ericmetro (talk) 08:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: widely used. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 13:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Getty Images #541693932, a non-free photo by Gareth Copley. —RP88 (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 13:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is an Agence France-Presse photo (see [15], [16], etc.) by Punit Paranjpe. —RP88 (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 13:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is an AP photo (see [17], [18], etc.) by Aijaz Rahi. —RP88 (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 13:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The EXIF data says this is an Associated Press photo by Altaf Qadri (also see [19], etc.). —RP88 (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably out of scope. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is a Press Trust of India of photo. See [20]. —RP88 (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Getty Images #514444852, a non-free photo by Pal Pillai. —RP88 (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is a screengrab from a BBC video. See [21] and [22]. —RP88 (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Getty Images #491749431, a non-free photo by Stephen Pond. —RP88 (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Previously published online without a free license here, so at the very least we'd need permission via COM:OTRS to keep this. However, given that this uploader has used "own work" on photos created by many different photographers, I too doubt the own work claim. —RP88 (talk) 19:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Previously published online without a free license here, so at the very least we'd need permission via COM:OTRS to keep this. However, given that this uploader has used "own work" on photos created by many different photographers, I too doubt the own work claim. —RP88 (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Previously published online without free license here. —RP88 (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 14:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is PA Images #28542979, a non-free photo by David Davies. —RP88 (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is Indo-Asian News Service photo #586278, a non-free photo by Surjeet Yadav. See here. —RP88 (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Previously published online without free license here. —RP88 (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 15:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MelDeMort6669 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablofebreze (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://findingmastery.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/State-of-Finding-Mastery-Banner-1.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This video appears to be out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
PDF version of File:Cage Fighter logo.png Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
While I have no doubt the uploader created this illustration themselves, it incorporates non-free Apple product photography (see, for example, here). Unfortunately, as a derivative work of a non-free work, we can't keep this illustration without permission from the owner of the copyright to the incorporated photos (likely Apple). —RP88 (talk) 06:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete A hatályos magyar törvényben az alábbi áll (1999. évi LXXVI. törvény 31. § (6)-os pont): "A filmalkotás védelmi idejét a következő személyek közül utoljára elhunyt személy halálát követő év első napjától kell számítani, függetlenül attól, hogy azok szerzőtársként fel vannak-e tüntetve: a film rendezője, a forgatókönyvíró, a dialógus szerzője és a kifejezetten a filmalkotás céljára készült zene szerzője." - Jelen esetben ez Székely István, a film rendezője, aki 1979-ben hunyt el. Így a kép engedélyköteles. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ugyanott a (2)-es pontban: A filmalkotás szerzői a film céljára készült irodalmi és zeneművek szerzői, a film rendezője és mindazok, akik a film egészének kialakításához szintén alkotó módon járultak hozzá. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
A mű nyilvánosságra hozatala 10. § (1) A szerző határoz arról, hogy műve nyilvánosságra hozható-e. (2) A mű nyilvánosságra hozatala előtt annak lényeges tartalmáról csak a szerző hozzájárulásával szabad a nyilvánosság számára tájékoztatást adni. (3) A felhasználási szerződés alapján - ellenkező kikötés hiányában - megadottnak kell tekinteni a szerző hozzájárulását ahhoz, hogy a felhasználó a mű tartalmáról a felhasználás céljának megfelelő módon a nyilvánosság számára tájékoztatást adjon. (4) A szerző halála után fellelt művet - ha a szerző vagy jogutódja ellenkező nyilatkozatot nem tett vagy az ellenkezőjét másképp nem bizonyítják - úgy kell tekinteni, hogy a szerző azt nyilvánosságra hozatalra szánta. 11. § A szerző alapos okból, írásban visszavonhatja a mű nyilvánosságra hozatalához adott engedélyét, a már nyilvánosságra hozott művének további felhasználását pedig megtilthatja; köteles azonban a nyilatkozat időpontjáig felmerült kárt megtéríteni. Ez nem érinti a munkáltató jogát a mű felhasználására, továbbá nem akadályozza a vagyoni jogok átruházása esetén a jogszerzőt az átruházott vagyoni jogokon alapuló felhasználásban. Tambo (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Csakhogy nem te vagy a mű szerzője. És nem a szerző halála után történt mű fellelése. A szerző a művét nyilvánosságra hozta, amikor a filmet bemutatták. A Commonsba történő szabad licenc alatti feltöltés nem nyilvánosságra hozatal. És ahhoz nem járult hozzá a szerző, hogy művét Cc-by-sa akárhány licenc alatt megosszák az interneten. A kompetenciád szerzői jogban továbbra is a nullával egyenlő. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 19:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Professional quality promotional photo. I simply doubt the user took the picture themselves. Was done during a photo shoot. Do we require OTRS in such cases to verify at least that they are a professional photographer for this person? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Small size, no EXIF. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
very low resolution and nothing original Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 07:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Director Raymond Bernard died in 1977. Blacklake (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Director Alfred Lind died in 1959. Blacklake (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Screenshot from en:Four Men and a Prayer, no evidence that the film is in public domain. Blacklake (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The film is produced in Great Britain, director Leslie S. Hiscott died in 1968. The file is marked PD-US-no-notice, but no reasoning for it is given. Blacklake (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Ferdinand Zecca died in 1947, the question is whether the image of a lizard is beyond the threshold of originality. Blacklake (talk) 08:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot from en:The Plainsman, no proof the film is in public domain. Blacklake (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Poster en:The Westerner (film), contrary to the licensing template, the copyright mark is clearly visible. Blacklake (talk) 08:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nondescript image of a dog. Unlikely to be used. Takeaway (talk) 08:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 08:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
non free, see photattributuion on pic Yger (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging & copyright infringement. 78.54.158.126 10:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: This is a USA company (LOng Beach, CA) so US rules apply. There is nothing here with a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
low res, redundant, bad quality Triplecaña (talk) 10:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Moin hashmi (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
,_Azoren_2016_04.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Azoren_2016_04.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File got moved to a more fitting Lemma Kritzolina (talk) 12:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
,_Azoren_2016_04.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
,_Azoren_2016_04.JPG){kind=link}
,_Azoren_2016_03.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Azoren_2016_03.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File got moved to a more fitting Lemma Kritzolina (talk) 12:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
,_Azoren_2016_03.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
,_Azoren_2016_03.JPG){kind=link}
No authorship information, no evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 12:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
self created, unlikely to be notable Jklamo (talk) 12:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Used by exactly 1 image, uploaded by User:Bridow, who was active on wikiprojects exactly for 1 day (1 Dec 2009). --Achim (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also too small to be useful. Italian wiki has this version, with a warning to not transfer it to Commons. Jcb (talk) 13:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Russia and the UK have the PMA+70 rule. No inidication that the photographer would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted content. Underlying works do not appear to be free, if they in fact are, attribution or PD status evidence needs to be provided. FDMS 4 14:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Derivative works of copyrighted content (limited FOP in India).
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (10).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (12).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (15).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (17).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (18).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (23).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (48).jpg
- File:WikiConference India 2016 by Vinayaraj (49).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
FDMS 4 14:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. The FOP India permits '3D (architecture and sculptures)' in public places, all the photographs fall under the 'Architecture and Sculpture' of the university buildings.
Please see (i) any artistic work permanently situate in a public place or any premises to which the public has access; -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Gangulybiswarup: Clearly the focus of those photographs does not lie on architecture, but on 2D works, which are not covered by the Indian FOP (removed 5 files where the focus was somewhat ambiguous). FDMS 4 11:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Mural is not a 2D work, previously stated that the (i) any artistic work permanently situate in a public place or any premises to which the public has access; -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment From actually reading the Indian law, the images seem to be fine (and the section of COM:FOP about India is wrong. Section 52 (1) (t) is cited, as the provision of Indian law which allows FOP.... that clause refers to Section 2 (c) (iii), but what is instead cited next is Section 52 (u) (ii).
The correct citation, Section 2 (c) (iii) refers to "any other work of artistic craftsmanship", and would imply that India has freedom of panorama for ALL artistic works "permanently situate[d] in a public place or any premises to which the public has access".
- Thus, Keep and fix COM:FOP#India. - Reventtalk 14:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'll withdraw this DR once the "expected" consensus has been reached at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#FOP in India. FDMS 4 15:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: It is not all artistic works, but only sculpture and works of artistic craftsmanship. These tiles are the latter. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 14:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope (personal artwork, no educational value). FDMS 4 14:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
outdated, I will upload an updated version soon. Massenmensch (talk) 14:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: upload the new version over this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LordRichter26 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Artist H.C. Rylander is stille alive Pugilist (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- I find it pretty reasonable to believe Stina W is w:sv:Stina Wirsén, the creator of File:Vem är brokig?.jpg; I've asked her to contact OTRS to prove this is the case. /Julle (talk) 03:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: In the first case, she is in the image, so a license from both the photographer and the artist is required. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mulagandhakuti
[edit]There is no FOP in India for paintings. These are paintings by Nosu Kosetsu (野生司香雪), who died in 1973.
- File:Buddha leaving his family, a mural at Mulagandhakuty Vihara, Sarnath.jpg
- File:Peinture murale du temple Mulagandhakuti Vihāra (Sârnâth) (8473844591).jpg
- File:SarnathWallPaintings.jpg
- File:SarnathWallPaintings2.jpg
- File:Scenes from Buddhist scriptures, Mulagandhakuti Vihara, Sarnath.jpg
_(8473844591).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The statue was created in 1992 by Isao Tabata, who is a living person. No FoP in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This image formerly had FB IMG in its title, it still has "FBMD" in metadata. It's Facebook sized, and there is no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused composite from images in Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
propably copyright violation Elly (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
meijerinkj: Foto is door mij zelf genomen. Ik ben mij er bewust van dat deze foto inderdaad op internet rondgaat omdat deze foto voor promotie doeleinden bestemd is. Indien gewenst kan ik hiervan een bevestiging opvragen bij de persoon op de foto, te weten; Stijn Brinkhaus.
Deleted: Requires a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This picture formerly had FB IMG in the title, it's Facebook sized, and has FBMD in the meta data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
According to the source the copyrights of the image belong to Ioannis Skarlatos (Δικαιώματα: Σκαρλάτος, Ιωάννης) who is the creator of it. It can also be found in a book published in 1967 (Μαρκεζίνης, Σπύρος, Πολιτική ιστορία της νεωτέρας Ελλάδος: 1828 – 1964, Αθήνα: Πάπυρος, 1967). It is unclear if it is a public domain. Texniths (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Source is given as "Railex Archive", with no claim of own work by the uploader. The image is then presumably copyrighted to the company and not actually free. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment and Question - I see the source, but I hope you're wrong about the uploader. Deleting this will also lead to the deletion of a lot of categories related to the Columbia Basin Railroad. Having said that, this was the only image posted by Mallman64. It's not looking good for this one. Is there any evidence it was published elsewhere? ----DanTD (talk) 13:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Tineye turns up a cropped version - same width, reduced in height - on a page on their website that now 404s. That's not proof that the image was originally theirs, but it certainly hints strongly in that direction. Loss of the file would be unfortunate, but not irreplaceable. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I guess it would be if somebody wants to sneak onto the railyard of a Railex warehouse and take a comparable picture. ----DanTD (talk) 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Tineye turns up a cropped version - same width, reduced in height - on a page on their website that now 404s. That's not proof that the image was originally theirs, but it certainly hints strongly in that direction. Loss of the file would be unfortunate, but not irreplaceable. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Seems to me that the only interest in this photo is the copyrighted art, so not de minimis; delete as copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 17:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The statue was created in 1987. [23] NoFoP in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Also,
Darklanlan (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The statue was created in 1992 by Isao Tabata who is a living person. No FoP in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Aerial views not covered by German freedom of panorama 2003:45:590F:77F2:357B:6AE0:6389:3EC5 19:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused and poor image of chipmunk, many better ones at Category:Tamias. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This image can be found as the avatar of https://www.facebook.com/hochung.yeh and can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHVl7WMGuE&feature=youtu.be&t=7 or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHVl7WMGuE&feature=youtu.be&t=6 ;The uploaded file seems extremely stretched from a smaller image having compression artifacts. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- This image "Ho Chung Yeh.jpg" on a Wikipedia's page about Ho Chung Yeh can be found as the avatar of Ho Chung Yeh's facebook, and Ho Chung Yeh's YouTube page, is it not OK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeh5863 (talk • contribs)
- @Yeh5863:
- No, it's not OK. The image has been published elsewhere but never with a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. By default, all rights are reserved. COM:NETCOPYRIGHT & COM:PRP. You have to prove via COM:OTRS that you're the copyright holder.
- Plus, this is a poor quality image.
- Sincerely, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Lacrymocéphale: Good lord, this makes me dizzy! LOL! Anyways, another photo has replaced this one to avoid any further discussion. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeh5863 (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Uploader is not the author. No indication given at Flickr that the uploader there (the same person as the uploader here) holds the copyright. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Isn't it a copyright violation? Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely "own work". Copyrighted card. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Same doubts with
- Those about 40 years old pictures doesn't seem to fall in the public domain. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- John Brown card and Canberra City programme are both scans from my own collection. They do not contravene any copyright issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burnieman (talk • contribs)
- @Burnieman: You are the one who has scanned the cards. But are you the author of the cards? --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- I own the card and the programme, what is the problem here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burnieman (talk • contribs)
- Scanning an original document doesn't make you the owner of the original document's rights. You're not the owner of the original document rights and there is the problem. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I own the card and the programme, what is the problem here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burnieman (talk • contribs)
- @Burnieman: You are the one who has scanned the cards. But are you the author of the cards? --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- John Brown card and Canberra City programme are both scans from my own collection. They do not contravene any copyright issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burnieman (talk • contribs)
Delete Per original nomination note. Just because you physically own a copy of a movie and it's in your collection, doesn't mean that you own the copyright and have a right to republish it however you want. Same goes for photos and most other items. Elisfkc (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
That is ridiculous, we're talking about a scan of the front cover of a published match programme from the club concerned, and a collectors card from a company that no longer exists. Similar images are widely available on the net. Delete if you think it has potential to cause issues, but its my belief this is over the top. These images enhance the page with no copyright risks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burnieman (talk • contribs) 18:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Burnieman: Your argument is basically Commons:I found it on the Internet. As you said, one is a published match programme (meaning that someone published it, and they own the copyright to it). The second one is a logo, so it is not allowed and could be tagged with Template:Logo above threshold of originality. Elisfkc (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: You surely know that owning a copy of a book does not give you the right to print copies for your friends. The same law applies here. I suggest you read COM:PRP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The photograph belongs to Sony (Camila e Haniel – foto: Divulgação/ Sony Music) as in here. Can't prove that Camila & Haniel (the Flickr account was created in 2017) holds the copyrights. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Can the closing Admin add this account to a list of blacklisted accounts also. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide plate is a copyrighted work. Benzoyl (talk) 23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Someone said, any text of one sentence or more has a copyright as a literary work. --Benzoyl (talk)
- What's the general standard on an interpretative sign in a public place? I guess my question is about not only this, but also signs in front of museum exhibits, NHRP buildings, etc. I agree that it is "published," but these things are often not printed anywhere, it's tough to verify their contents other than by taking a photo of them... just curious as to overall policy so I don't upload another that could be problematic in the future -- and likewise know that some stuff (presumably signs in front of US Federal Government property, which would be PD-US-gov, I think) is OK.. Montanabw (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, this one is in Montana, and Montana as a state can keep some copyright on their state government works, but I'm not precisely sure the details on their interpretive signs. I'll have to ask someone at the historical society, perhaps. Can we let this sit for a week or so while I make inquiries? Montanabw (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- @ask someone at the historical society - I wish you the best of luck, with all my heart. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- The source (summary) of the document is "Montana's State Capitol: The People's House p.82" ?
There may be a reverse (Which is source / reproduction). --Benzoyl (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC) - Comment Retract this deletion request... somehow, I hate (feel) myself as horrible person. Montanabw is sincere. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- My final opinion, there's somewhat possibility, this document is PD-USGov. It should not be pursued. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, this one is in Montana, and Montana as a state can keep some copyright on their state government works, but I'm not precisely sure the details on their interpretive signs. I'll have to ask someone at the historical society, perhaps. Can we let this sit for a week or so while I make inquiries? Montanabw (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see any reason why this work would be a work of the Federal government. It apparently comes from a book which has a clear copyright notice. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The photograph belongs to Sony (Camila e Haniel – foto: Divulgação/ Sony Music) as in here. Can't prove that Camila & Haniel (the Flickr account was created in 2017) holds the copyrights. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Is not used in any wikis and is of horrible quality. LuigiDude16 (talk) 02:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep we keep these for archives. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Same logo in better condition available in the category, no reason to keep poor quality as well. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
It's not being used in any wikis and it isn't an SVG. LuigiDude16 (talk) 03:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep We keep them for archives. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 03:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Obviously not CC-licenced. Possibly Template:PD-Sweden but that's debatable. 46.59.72.207 08:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Above was written by me. /grillo (talk) 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Identical to File:John_Eriksson_DIF.jpg 46.59.72.207 08:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Above was written by me. /grillo (talk) 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Erlenmeyer as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bad file. Correct file is <Escudo de Fuente Carreteros (Córdoba).svg> Yann (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Delete. File:Escudo de Fuente Carreteros (Córdoba).svg is a new and improved version. File:Escudo de E.A.T.I.M. de Fuente Carreteros (Córdoba).svg is unnecessary.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, subject died in 1971, photographer could stll be alive. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, in my opinion the photo has no educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DW rather than own work. No source for the underlying map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 12:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermarks Pippobuono (talk) 12:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I notify the uploader that I uploaded the original one here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baghdad_Workshop_Jan_2017_DSC_1808.jpg Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I notify the uploader that I uploaded the original one here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baghdad_Workshop_Jan_2017_DSC_1838.jpg Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I notify the uploader that I uploaded the original one here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baghdad_Workshop_Jan_2017_DSC_1846.jpg Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
identically to File:Pałac w Sasinie.JPG --Frze > talk 13:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Frze > talk 13:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Not only is this sourced and licensed improperly, it's simply a cropped and reversed version of File:P. B. S. Pinchback - Brady-Handy.jpg. See past discussion of similar mislabeled photos on en:Talk:Homer Plessy. clpo13(talk) 17:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Kamalakant Nayak. The uploader has been identified via OTRS and is not Kamalakant Nayak. Jcb (talk) 18:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leyo as no source (No source since). However, it has a source. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- No, it does not. Also the author is missing.
See belowis nuts. --Leyo 20:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)- I agree. Maybe you should have a word with the bot's creator. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- By “bot”, you are referring to MTC!? --Leyo 21:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- I agree. Maybe you should have a word with the bot's creator. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The book from which it was taken was published in 1949, only 68 years ago, no indication when author passed away. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation, appeared in newspaper dated 21 October 2016: http://www.thedailystar.net/business/new-b2b-service-the-block-1302046 Worldbruce (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader asked for deletastion in his home wiki (https://bn.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%80_%E0%A6%86%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%AA:Aftabuzzaman&curid=304225&diff=2480748&oldid=2474634) Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; certificates like that are out of scope. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
imho rather advertisements, but also potentially copyright rights isusses, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
potentially advertisements as per File:Kenzon.png (et al), see also since July 2016, but also potentially copyright rights isusses, rather doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
no comments... Glabb (talk) 19:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & observed too blurry to use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
duplicate photo Unconventional2 (talk) 20:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Pictured published on other websites like this one (direct link). No OTRS authorization from the author. Titlutin (talk) 20:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Français : Photo déjà publiée sur d'autres sites non libres de droits, comme pierrelagrue-jo.com. Il faudrait un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Alianza Petrolera.svg but with a less verbose name. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:Bucarmanga.svg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Photo already used as a profile pic on this twitter account. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 21:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Français : Photo déjà publiée par le compte Twitter @tlecomte. Or Twitter n'est pas sous licence libre. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation SealMan11 (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Blurred, unusable image, and we have very good pictures about the same object. --Zello (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable poor quality, better alternatives present. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 00:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep At the upload date (Jan 2006) the source information was not required. And if the photo really originates from www.prezydent.pl, the author information might be not necessary; only the attribution "Archiwum Kancelarii Prezydenta RP - www.prezydent.pl" is required. IMO, the file can be grandfathered. Ankry (talk) 11:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I could not find it at www.prezydent.pl (I did search before nominating). If it does not come from that side, then the file isn't 'properly licensed' COM:GOF cannot be applied in this case. Jcb (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Exact link was likely not required in 2006 when Skotos uploaded it to plwiki (I doubt there's any point in notifying about this DR the user who transferred this file to Commons instead of the original uploader). That is why I mentioned GOF (as unsure if it applies to files uploaded initially to other projects and then semi-automatically transferred to Commons). Original link likely cannot be found as the Governement site was rebuild few times since 2006, each time deleting the previous content. Maybe somebody is able to search for it in archives; I cannot.
- I asked a plwiki admin for looking into deleted information about this file there. It contained only a license template with the following content:
- I could not find it at www.prezydent.pl (I did search before nominating). If it does not come from that side, then the file isn't 'properly licensed' COM:GOF cannot be applied in this case. Jcb (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Ta fotografia, zgodnie z notatką o prawach autorskich zamieszczoną w oficjalnym serwisie internetowym Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, jest udostępniona na warunkach licencji GNU Free Documentation License w wersji 1.2, opublikowanej przez Free Software Foundation, ponieważ pierwotnie pochodzi z Archiwum Kancelarii Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej – www.prezydent.pl. Kopia tekstu licencji umieszczona została pod hasłem "GNU Free Documentation License". Dostępne jest również jej polskie tłumaczenie.
- I think that asking (after many years) for information that was not required at the upload time (I mean Jan 2006 here) is a bit disruptive. Ankry (talk) 13:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Ankry. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Possibly copyrighted logo, unlikely to be own work. --ghouston (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
просьба родственников Mskokey (talk) 05:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a photo of Vilma Espín circa 1958. Definitely not "own work". Possibly {{PD-Cuba}}. Kaldari (talk) 05:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Cuba is likely. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The author may be wrong. [24] [25] I'm doubtful it is in the public domain because this page claims the art was created by Yoshihiko Sasama who died in 2005. Tsuruhime is promoted by the local region in Japan, but her story was established by the historical novel "海と女と鎧 瀬戸内のジャンヌ・ダルク" ASIN B000JA9CC8 published in 1966. It is disputed whether Tsuruhime is an actual person because of lack of historical facts. Anyway, we shouldn't keep this unless a reliable source is provided. Darklanlan (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC) corrected: Atsushime->Tsuruhime Darklanlan (talk) 12:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 12:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality (pixelated); several better alternatives available in Category:Furfural. BTW: Occurrences need to be replaced. Leyo 12:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted: Usages have been replaced. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Are these logos really just "simple geometric shapes or text"? I'm bringing them to discussion to make sure that's true. Victor Lopes (talk) 15:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Inferior to File:ХНУПС.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Inferior to File:ХУПС.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The tree/leaf shape can be found on several websites like http://www.greenhomecare.org/ http://www.southport-oakisland.com/custom/domain_1/image_files/sitemgr_photo_4745.png http://www.affno.com/images/go_green_main.jpg http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5005dc6fe4b059c85b97e1c4/t/54178edbe4b018ed2d0cba95/1478707715373/ ; it looks like a uncredited stock illustration. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Weil ich es so will! Stahlzwerg (talk) 17:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Picture taken in Spain, where the PMA+80 rule applies. No indication that the author would have died before 1937. Jcb (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-used duplicate image of File:Soviet Union-1965-Coin-1-20 Years of Victory over Fascist Germany.jpg and File:Soviet Union 1 rouble 1965 WWII victory.jpg. Also it's an image of defected coin. Vahe (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep "Non-used"? Wikimedia Commons is free media file repository, not just hosting for Wikipedia. Furthermore, colors of the image should be close to the original. File:Soviet Union-1965-Coin-1-20 Years of Victory over Fascist Germany.jpg is monochrome picture, which is superimposed filter "Sepia" (imho). File:Soviet Union 1 rouble 1965 WWII victory.jpg - strange bright yellow, although this coin was a silver color. --Ctac (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Ctac. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-used poor quality duplicate image of File:Soviet Union-1965-Coin-1-20 Years of Victory over Fascist Germany.jpg and File:Soviet Union 1 rouble 1965 WWII victory.jpg. Vahe (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: colors are very different, all versions have merit. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hüseynaga RZAYEV.jpg Deniz Gökdeniz (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Kein Artikel verwendet das Foto, Verdacht auf Urheberrechtsverletzung Regi51 (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small, mediocre quality image. We have a number of higher-quality images of the Northeast Regional in Virginia on Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bo jest zły Szopem (talk) 20:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Maybe too unclear. Not educationally useful. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This discussion suggests that this template incites copyright violations, as the concerned Swiss court ruling does not apply worldwide (especially not in the US, where the files are stored). In other words, this is a next to useless template. Based on a decision by the Swiss Supreme Court in one case some people like to argue that e.g. simple press conference shots were PD in Switzerland. Even if that might be so, it is a personal interpretation only, not backed by any reputable legal opinions, and the decision itself was rather heavily criticized. Furthermore, even if such photos might be PD in Switzerland, they'd be PD in Switzerland only. Such images do pass the threshold of originality in many other countries, the EU and the U.S. included. That's not good enough for Wikimedia. We even deleted for that reason the very image this template emerged of, namely Image:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg! Many files which actually use this template can be retained by correcting the license (e.g. pd-old or pd-official, where possible) should be retained, the rest must be deleted. 2A02:1205:504F:8300:2D7E:A32C:369D:46D8 23:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep but apply the template only to reproductions of 2D (or nearly 2D) documents. Basically, you are right. Although Image:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg is in the public domain in Switzerland with absolute certainty (as the Swiss Supreme Court has ruled in that specific case), it's most likely protected in the US, and per Commons policy that images need to be free in their country of origin as well as in the US, the outcome had to be deletion. However, the lack of copyright protection for simple photographs in Switzerland might come in handy for Commons when it comes to 2D reproductions. Unlike e.g. Germany, there is no special protection for simple photographs in Switzerland (Germany's Lichtbildschutz of 50 years after first publication, even if the photo isn't protected by regular copyright) and this makes a case like the (German) Reiss Engelhorn Museum's lawsuit against Wikimedia highly unlikely in Switzerland. As Commons/WMF policy is that reproductions of 2D works, including high-quality photographic reproductions of paintings and the like, are not considered to be protected by copyright based on US view (per Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.), {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} is a good option to affirm this also for Switzerland. I think that the template is useful for photos like File:Bund von 1353 zwischen Bern, Uri, Schwyz und Unterwalden.jpg or File:Pepinquentovicdenier.jpeg. - I do think that the template needs to be handled more restrictively and e.g. photos like File:Madame de Meuron.jpg may need to be deleted (as likely protected in the US), but not outright deleted. There are also some uploaders using the template for their own works such as File:ABe 8-8 23 Locarno 12.01.08.JPG which doesn't make much sense in my opinion, but has a certain logic to it: If you're Swiss and convinced that your own photo isn't creative enough to warrant copyright protection, you might feel inclined to use this template... Gestumblindi (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Wikimedia Commons already permits explicitly the hosting of photographs that carefully reproduce a two-dimensional public domain work, see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs. And if a Swiss feels inclined to use this template instead of an existing license, it's misleading. --2A02:1205:504F:8300:40C:E63F:6B:91FB 22:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm a little wary about this vote. Notice the v6-IP numbers? Both came from Zurich, Switzerland. I wonder whether both are of the same person. --George Ho (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, according to the Whois tool, they're Swisscom IPs; Swisscom is Switzerland's largest ISP (I'm a Swisscom/Bluewin customer, too), but they do look very similar... Gestumblindi (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep +1 Gestumblindi. This template is useful for photos/reproductions of "free" 2D works (free= the original it is enough old). Or for uploaders, to use the template for their own works. --Bobo11 (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: disruptive DR, probably part of the vandalism DR series about a Swiss family. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
There are no files left using this template, succeeded by {{PD-Switzerland-photo-non-individual-50-years}} after the 2020 amendment to the Swiss Copyright Act; for background see this discussion. No future use cases for the old template. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: there are currently two files using this template: File:Lina Baumberger (grayscale).jpg and File:The Most Reverend Bishop Vitus Huonder.jpg. Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Well, such things can happen when the processing of deletion requests takes too long (I don't see what could be the issue here, the case seems pretty clear), so of course there was a risk that the deprecated template was used again by mistake in the meantime. I replaced the template in File:Lina Baumberger (grayscale).jpg and will nominate File:The Most Reverend Bishop Vitus Huonder.jpg for deletion, as PD-Switzerland-photo cannot be used for uploads after April 1, 2020 if the image isn't older than 50 years. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. No use on file pages after deleting The most reverend Bishop. In addition 8 suppages were deleted (translation and documentation). --Ellywa (talk) 21:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Note: Text below is copied from the talk page of the template, which I deleted, but which might be usefull:
It is absurd that the only image that was certified by the Swiss Supreme as lacking protection, was deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg. I have requested undeletion, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Current_requests#File:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg, but discussion is not going anywhere. See also Category:PD Switzerland (Individuality). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Template outdated
[edit]Hi,
The template is outdated. Since April 2020, CopA art. 2 al. 3bis makes an exception for photography of three-dimensional objects, which do not need individual character anymore. It still applies to photography of 2D objects, e.g. photography of a painting though. --Omnilaika02 (talk) 13:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're right. Sadly it seems that we need to deprecate this template and delete files that are otherwise not properly licenced. I'll open a discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland. Sandstein (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
FYI: There were a number of speedy deletion requests for files that relied on this license template. I've converted them into one merged deletion request for better discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/PD-Switzerland-photo Cases. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that any of the reasons for PD-Russia would apply. Jcb (talk) 00:00, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
