Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 23rd, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Fair use image. Regular deletion request is created, because in my opinion the author died in 1976. Country of origin is unclear, but some Arabic countries have short copyright expiration period and maybe the file is in public domain. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: The image is used in an article about a Sudanese novelist, but the artist is unknown.This page says that the date of drawing is 1976.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PD-Sudan says, that 25 years from publication is needed. The drawing is 40 years old, 25 years from publishing is totally possible. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: It is another type of work and more than twenty five years have elapsed since the year of authors death and fifty years have elapsed since the year of publication. --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, yes, my mistake. No author data, no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thwalib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Savhñ 16:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Raymond 16:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published with incorrect copyright information JordanaMakin (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Fair use is not allowed on Commons

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Il solamente tuo Mike Horn.jpg Michelep1971 (talk) 11:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Uploader request) Why do you want this image to be deleted? --Sebari (talk) 00:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's the wrong person, not Mike Horn, it's Michele Pontrandolfo. The original uploader tried already to delete this, this file and person is right: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michele_Pontrandolfo.jpg You can check Youtube, 2011 Michele P. was Solo Crossing of Vatnajökull: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_VdooC7_HA KurtR (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: processed as duplicate. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong scource Samuel Long BRD (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admin please look at prior versions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not longer use Samuel Long BRD (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion the day of upload. - Reventtalk 00:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:EDUSE, out of scope. --XXN, 11:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, originally, when nominated, I saw only the first frame of this gif... Actually it has some usefulness for an educational purpose. Thank you, Adam, for quick feedback - it was crucial for me to review this image again.  I withdraw my nomination --XXN, 11:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --XXN, 11:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, and also, obviously family album orientied, hence, no educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image - out of scope. --XXN, 12:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/789571158786048000/pHEoLTpP.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 16 January 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename indicates it was copied from elsewhere, when "own work" is being claimed. The file is out of scope, and even if it is "own work" in the sense that the user put together the poster, it seems unlikely the underlying photos are theirs. Prosfilaes (talk) 19:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, http://imgur.com/hP9mz0X. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. MKFI (talk) 19:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation: a facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/sudhu.tomari/photos/a.566636313405779.1073741825.566635076739236/566636333405777/?type=1&theater

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yudisina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo/fan photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Derivative scan/photo of non-free content. --De728631 (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. MKFI (talk) 19:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Derivative scan/photo of non-free content. --De728631 (talk) 07:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. MKFI (talk) 19:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Derivative scan/photo of non-free content. --De728631 (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? It's a piece of prose, why is that a problem? TMagen (talk) 11:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As a text only PDF file this is out of scope per Commons:Project scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. --Didym (talk) 13:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
עברית: TMagen, את הטקסט ניתן לכתוב בערך. לצורך כך אין צורך בקובץ מדיה. יש פה גם בעיה של זכויות יוצרים.-- Geagea (talk) 15:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
עברית: Geagea, אין בעיה של זכויות יוצרים מכיוון שהכותבת היא זו שהעלתה את זה ברשיון המתאים. אך הבנתי את העניין של הטקסט הגולמי, תודה-- TMagen (talk) 09:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 09:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [1] MohammadtheEditor (talk) 18:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pleasantview Care Facility Flickr batch

[edit]

Automated batch upload from Flickr of kids dancing at a nursing home. I'm nominating some images in this large batch that are low-quality or awkward snapshots of arms, chairs, the backs of people's heads, people standing around, etc., just the ones that are not useful for any educational purpose or as stock photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Unfortunately this University collection had a lot of low-value images in it which I did not notice. I had much higher expectations. -- (talk) 17:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AnwarHasan80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per FBMD grabbed from facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flowgrey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per FBMD grabbed from facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 06:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside project scope, see COM:SELFIE. Also, the image naming suggests this is a JPG conversion from a PNG that was likely a screenshot of another JPEG. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elololotte672 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per FBMD, grabbed from facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And yet another panoramio photo of a dog. Takeaway (talk) 17:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sm3a (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File format and pixellation suggest these are screenshots of broadcasts, not original photographs. If these are original works, I suggest the uploader provide the original JPEGs (since they work better on Wikipedia anyway).

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sm3a (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File format and pixellation suggest these are screenshots of broadcasts, not original photographs. If these are original works, I suggest the uploader provide the original JPEGs (since they work better on Wikipedia anyway).

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The links to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/br/ (present also in the original Flickr file descriptions) contradict the {{cc-by-2.0}} licensing, and {{noncommercial}} and {{nonderivative}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the author actually intended to release these files under a free license.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@LX: - Thank you for pay attention to my contributions and help me and all the community to a better understanding of the use of CC licences. I do agree with you, it's not clear that the author actually intended to release these files under a free license. But, if the CC licenses are irrevocable, its not clear for me neither if its reasonable for the author to say: "sorry, I applied the wrong licences...". I dont know... What do you think? Regards, Sturm (talk) 19:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sturm! For a couple of weeks now, I've been going through search results for files with conflicting licensing information, including noncommercial and non-derivative restrictions. So far, all of the deletion nominations where the conflicting information was there from the start and the authors haven't come forward have resulted in deletion. Apart from the number of files affected, this case is pretty typical, so unless you can get in touch with the Flickr uploader, this is likely to go the same way.
CC licenses are indeed irrevocable, but that really only matters if the licensor attempts to impose additional restrictions at a later date. If a person makes conflicting statements at the time a license is offered or an agreement is entered, then one cannot just rely on a wishful, selective interpretation of their intent; that would be both morally and legally iffy. That's especially true if the more restrictive license is explicitly entered in the textual description (more deliberate) while the one we would need is specified by means of a couple of clicks in one's preferences (possibly less deliberate). LX (talk, contribs) 21:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was going to claim under fair use - was not aware Commons didn't accept fair use. Sorry! Damperpedal (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 10:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo have watermarked for it's own work. Watermark is at down-right corner of the photo. (Because it have got a rule about the notice for uploading in wikimedia, for DO NOT watermark for its own work).--PQ77wd (talk) 00:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with {{Watermark}}. Although we discourage inclusion of watermarks and we try to remove them, this is not a valid reason for deletion. Tag with {watermark} instead. --Jcb (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible Public Domain Mark (PDM) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 00:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible Public Domain Mark (PDM) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 00:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small and blurred image; Out of scope Hystrix (talk) 00:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leankuroneko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No-FoP Japan: as on source "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.", not free enough to share on commons.

Tokorokoko (talk) 01:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete An artistic work located in public space is prohibited for commercial-use unless its copyright expires. Darklanlan (talk) 03:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, COM:TOYS. Яй (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect this is a copyvio. Roualt lived until 1958. Jmabel ! talk 03:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 delete I hadn't realized that this might very well be still under copyright. It seems that other Rouault images I've found on Wikimedia sites may be in the public domain as they were produced outside the US prior to 1923. This image was produced in 1938. IIRC commons does not recognize fair-use? If that is the case and it is the case that the painting of which this file is a faithful representation was made by an artist that lived until quite recently (making the painting still under copyright) then I believe that this image should be removed. Apologies for not digging into this before upload Thcipriani (talk) 15:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's true Commons does not accept Fair Use. Some Wikipedia versions, inclusing English Wikipedia, accept local uploads of Fair Use. Jcb (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that the image is within scope; name is of no use, and the image looks personal against the uploader "mania lara"  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; no useful name, no useful description, unused  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very likely copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably incorrect/missing license information. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 07:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: apparently a 17th century work. I uploaded a version without ugly watermark over it. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the photographer is unknown and the souvenir card is dated 1953 PD-old(-70) cannot be assumed Magnus (talk) 07:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Turkmenistan.

Яй (talk) 07:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination, kept some where there is no real infringment, e.g. a building somewhere in the background rather than as the main subject of the picture. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very dubious claim of own work. Photo appears professional and old. ~ Rob13Talk 07:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrectly named Mbosanquet (talk) 08:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload, but please be aware you can use {{Rename}} to request renaming. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrectly named Mbosanquet (talk) 08:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload, but please be aware you can use {{Rename}} to request renaming. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrectly named Mbosanquet (talk) 08:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload, but please be aware you can use {{Rename}} to request renaming. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur : Nelson Faria, rien n'indique qu'il ait donné son autorisation Shev123 (talk) 08:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Герб 101-ї окремої бригади охорони.png VileGecko (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Герб 101-ї окремої бригади охорони.png VileGecko (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License non respectée (cf copyright sur page source) CrlNvl (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There seemed to be a bot issue: Many different versions uploaded under the same name. The source given does not match the current picute. Leyo 08:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lékrivin3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Affiche non libre http://www.technologos.fr/textes/annee_2015.php

Habertix (talk) 08:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2 files Restored: ticket:2017033110009781. Yann (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence non respectée, tirée d'une vidéo sous licence Youtube Standard CrlNvl (talk) 08:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: four year old blurry picture with unclear and undocumented subject, uncategorized, unused except for the uploader's user page. Eusebius (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace page in question is part of a draft article here. While- being in userspace- Commons' "in use" technically doesn't apply here, we should be sure that we're definitely okay with effectively killing off the whole draft article, since there's no point in considering the image separate from the parent entity. Ubcule (talk) 14:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for digging further. I have no issues with keeping the picture on these grounds. However, someone familiar with the subject should document and categorize it properly: for the moment, it is pretty much useless to someone visiting Commons for resources. It has been tagged for various issues for years, nobody ever did / was able to do anything about it, uploader has been inactive for four years and the draft article has been left as a draft since 2013. Again, the document might be useful so why not keep the pictures. --Eusebius (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Eusebius: This is why I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, it's part of an article and by removing one image, we'd essentially be damaging- if not destroying- the whole article. On the other hand, there's no sign the article was finished, and it might (probably) never be. Ubcule (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no edits of the user since 2013. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status (derivative work of copyrighted content) / out of scope (personal artwork of non-notable creator).    FDMS  4    09:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: These two half side guys with Richard Stallman (left) and Linus Torvalds (right) have found from original sources (1, 2), but I don't know where evidence published without free/libre licenses (or maybe need OTRS permission)... HarvettFox96 (talk) 22:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC), edited on 22:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The left side (Stallman) indeed appears to be a copyvio of http://eecue.com/p/29655/RMS--Richard-M--Stallman.html, but the right side is not the same photo of Linus (no glasses). Either way, COM:Collages applies, imo. - Reventtalk 08:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mingjunli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of copyrighted content.

   FDMS  4    09:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 09:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 09:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 09:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 09:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a logo (see http://leidykla.vda.lt/en). I highly doubt that the uploader is the author of it, and have put the logo under CC-BY-SA. Powermelon (talk) 09:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: could be PD-simple, but apparently out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The permission is removed by the Author / Contributor with personal reasons. I told him that this could be problematic, because he had giving that Photo with a Public Domain Permission away by himself with all rights. I've only assist him in technical questions / writing and uploading. Lugsciath (talk) 10:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Given license (OTRS ticket from august 2016) is in gerneral irrevocably. Maybe you can give some more details about this "personal reasons"? Optionally via OTRS, if you don't want to discuss this in public. In this case use the ticket number from the image in the subject line of the email)--Wdwd (talk) 20:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: release into a free license cannot be revoked. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These trees are recent artwork in Paris. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 10:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark, uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately this file is not free as ESO is hosting files from DSS that are copyrighted. It sucks but there are more files subject to that. Szczureq (talk) 10:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no source (No source since) (talk) 11:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no indication that the photographer (the person who to the picture of this coin) would have died before 1947. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alte Version von ProfAMuesmannJuli1920v2.jpg, habe irrtümlich eine neue Datei (statt einer Version) erzeugt, die Datei wird m. E. nirgends verwendet. Andreas Lippold (talk) 11:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maurice de Lambert (1873-195?) : not public domain http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb14861018n Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Platanodecanarias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works: contain copyrighted logos.

--XXN, 11:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. --XXN, 11:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no evidence of permission. --XXN, 11:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused userpage image - out of scope. --XXN, 11:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joalpe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant Flickr washing - all four from the same Flickr account (that account's only uploads - account created today), all uploaded to Flickr today (21. December 2016), then uploaded to Commons shortly thereafter. All from elsewhere on the web (e.g. File:Coppieters1.jpg is here; File:Coppieters4.jpg is here; etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 23:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, elcobbola. OK, let's assume good faith; not sure your tone is appropriate. The person who uploaded the pictures is indeed entitled to do so. As you can see on the links you have sent, the credit is "Divulgação", which means in Portuguese that they are from personal file. So, how can we constructively solve this issue: would a message to OTRS solve the issue? Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 23:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have stated only facts and have not failed to assume good faith. Kindly read COM:LL and redact that nonsense. Эlcobbola talk 23:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joalpe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These were uploaded from Flickr where they have the PDM, which is not a license and therefore not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons. The Flickr account has the name of a Brazilian prefecture, which may or may not be true, but in any case there is no reason to believe that the owner of the Flickr account has any right to freely license these B&W images.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jameslwoodward Thank you for your time. I was unaware of the difference between PDM and PD; I have just read resources available on this topic, and I believe you are right. I apologize. I have no further information on this particular set of pictures and unfortunately no other images are available of this great Brazilian urbanist. Too bad and sorry. --Joalpe (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiComunica-t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

6 copyvios detected today --> the rest: unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysterious arsenal of several digicams in use (some with author, like "ANGEL DE CASTRO" in File:Carlos Sanz Hernández.JPG, in the meantime identified as copyvio). File:JAVIER SEGARRA.JPG (uploaded in 2013) previously published at http://www.radiohuesca.com/movil/noticia/473905/No-solo-de-tradiciones-viven-las-fiestas-de-Graus (2012, but without exif).

Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiComunica-t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, remaining user uploads - part of a promotional uploads series. +This logo may be non-free, above COM:TOO.

--XXN, 11:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not a work of the uploader, however maybe someone can find the real source and confirm the licence? Masur (talk) 11:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 11:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M Kachi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

--XXN, 11:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail resolution - Unlikely to be uploader's work. --XXN, 11:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file? --XXN, 11:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 11:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. Has distracting circles all over it, including possibly obscuring of the key parts (metal valves on right part of second box from bottom, no idea whatever else). Category:Ion chromatography has multiple unobscured photographs of comparable complete setups. DMacks (talk) 11:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot with user's autobiography, unused - Out of scope. --XXN, 11:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jassdjmixer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably these aren't uploader's works (see watermarks).

--XXN, 11:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All sorts of distracting borders. Is this taken from a product brochure or something? Have a bunch of Category:Ion chromatography photographs of seemingly comparable setups. DMacks (talk) 11:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works, no evidence of permission from the copyright holder(s):

Very low resolution, unclear unuseful image, no COM:EDUSE:

--XXN, 12:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GauravRK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos.

--XXN, 12:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another mediocre panoramio photo of a dog Takeaway (talk) 12:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another panoramio photo of a dog Takeaway (talk) 12:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, probably unfree. --XXN, 12:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User:Mahmudurbd. MER-C 12:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. --XXN, 12:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a corporate photograph not taken by who uploaded the file. In fact, it is mentioned as author to "MAPFRE S.A." Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uoho13 (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Hi Banfield, sorry for my unexperience. Please, could you tell me how I should do? I´m asking companies for their CEOS photos. It´s ok? Regards[reply]
This information may be useful. Someone in charge in the company should send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Otherwise, it is very likely that the photo will be deleted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 12:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content. --XXN, 12:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SteffanSteiner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works: the magazine covers are copyrighted; no permission to publish them under a free CC license. --XXN, 12:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope 2.136.228.109 18:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 12:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works: the book covers are copyrighted; no permission to publish them under a free CC license. --XXN, 12:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. --XXN, 12:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Partly broken file, with no COM:EDUSE, and possibly containing copyrighted content. --XXN, 12:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. --XXN, 12:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:MNC NE.png VileGecko (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:MNC NE.png VileGecko (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's work, see last page. --XXN, 12:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Black vithrilium (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Video game items - copyrighted content.

--XXN, 12:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT, out of scope. --XXN, 12:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hundred landscape photos taken on the same day by the same user were uploaded and this has bad quality. I suggest to delete it. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 13:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviuos copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 13:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ویکی25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images with no EXIF found elsewhere in the web. Some of these images are reuploads of previous deletion request.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, персона скончалась в 1971 году, см https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Оськин,_Александр_Иванович, дата обнародования фото неизвестно, скорее оцифровано в наше время Dogad75 (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Chernyavsky Viktor Alexandrovich. Jcb (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Chernyavsky Viktor Alexandrovich. Jcb (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person in the photo would rather this not be used freely on sites. Apostlenyc (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Sorry, not a valid reason for deletion. Tabercil (talk) 23:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Not a valid reason to delete. Notorious, public and famous person on a public event. Tm (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, at least derivative work Didym (talk) 14:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, small size, no EXIF. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lesemanants (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pinkmusiclover (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+disc cover. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no tiene licencia Raulredondogarcia (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+scope issue. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdur Rob Yamin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Friendsamin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.editplatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ravish-kumar.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Friendsamin (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These files depict packaging copyrighted by Medlife Essentials; delete per COM:PACKAGING and COM:CSD#G10.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remaining files uploaded by Friendsamin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF consistent with the first DR, COM:ADVERT, and COM:CSD#G10.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maximekaspers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucianamacario (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The caption is wrong. The official police estimate of attendees was 90-100,000. 156.98.210.242 20:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep. No need to delete the image, we can simply update the caption. The caption was pulled directly from the description provided by the Flickr uploader. Whoever they are, they may not have had the most up to date numbers. I'll go edit it. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is under a noncommercial license at the source page. 99of9 (talk) 23:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is under a noncommercial license at the source page. 99of9 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is under a noncommercial license at the source page. 99of9 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is under a noncommercial license at the source page. 99of9 (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+derivative issue. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a copyrighted work (the large prominent banner) Laser brain (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I’m not familiar enough with Wikipedia rules to know whether or not this is genuinely a copyright concern. If is is, how can any non-original images be shown on the Stanley Kubrick page? His self-portrait? The Spartacus poster? The still from Potemkin?

The banner in question was prominently displayed in public on a Frankfurt street, and I did take the photo. If people do believe it’s a copyright violation, then so be it… but I’ll be disappointed; I thought it was a legitimate and interesting addition to the page. Seaboardist (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seaboardist, honestly if you are not familiar with our rules on copyright and fair use, you should not be uploading images. For images to be used on Wikipedia, they have to have appropriate licenses. If they are under copyright (like a movie poster), an appropriate fair use rationale must be used. You simply took a photo of a copyrighted work and are using it as decoration in a Wikipedia article. --Laser brain (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, derivative work of the banner. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, useless name and category, probably intended to promote some business, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down version of image found at http://www.holidaytravel.co/pkg-dtl-kerala_blues Ytoyoda (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The GPL notice is for the Wordpress, not for all content published at Wordpress. This will need proof of permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info This is now being disccused at w:WP:Files for discussion/2017 January 23#File:Ancestry2010.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Software license and content license are two different thing, the best exemples are the wikimedia projects, they run with an open source software while the content published on the web pages is currently under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. If there is no explicit license at a blog coming from Wordpress, we must assume it is "all right reserved". Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndreaJollyClub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission, low resolution, certainly external source.

Cjp24 (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (logos, photomontages, derivative work of photos on wall, "FBMD"....). Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. INeverCry 03:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 13:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; redirect File:Vivek.JPG.jpg included. P 1 9 9   14:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shamarkazün (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One screenshot - non-free content, and two hoax flags - out of scope.

--XXN, 13:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 13:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by similar image with better quality (color balance, straightened). Kulmalukko (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forgot to add a white background behind the globe. Amritpal Singh Mann (talk) 13:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use "Upload a new version of this file". P 1 9 9   15:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded wrong photo Albert Nickolaides (talk) 14:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   15:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/SEO. Unlikely to be own work. jdx Re: 14:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dcanata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    16:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DAVID1234527 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Papers useful for a class, apparently. Commons is not Dropbox.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source web clearly states that it "do[es] not allow you to use any images or video footage from this website. And no matter if it is for print, electronic publication, or other purposes." See http://www.military-today.com/feedback.htm Mossback (talk) 18:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9   15:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Aabdullayev851 (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work. Requesting deletion. Other, higher quality SVGs exist. Azcolvin429 (talk) 22:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use and it is the source file of several derivatives. License is irrevocable. P 1 9 9   15:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work. Requesting deletion. Azcolvin429 (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. License is irrevocable. P 1 9 9   15:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Taken from Macmillan earth science textbook Azcolvin429 (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also very poor quality. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Raivaajat (a.k.a. Pellervo), a 1962-statue by Kalervo Kallio (1909–1969; Wikidata:Q5898122), located in Kuopio, Finland. The statue is not in public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola tc 14:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image doesn't look at all like a badge of the Order of the White Eagle. It looks like a project made by some amateur from kindergarten – totally misleading. Jakub Kaja () 15:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unremarkable greenery, no educational value, many better pictures of forests in Category:Brompton, Quebec. P 1 9 9   17:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tattoo is art work. We need permission from the artist. 88.198.7.18 18:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tattoo is art work. We need permission from the artist. 88.198.7.18 18:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tattoo is art work. We need permission from the artist. 88.198.7.18 18:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tattoo is art work. We need permission from the artist. 88.198.7.18 18:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tattoo is art work. We need permission from the artist. 88.198.7.18 18:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be PD-Russia. Jcb (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Robert Bothner was a German who died in 1967. So no public domain in land of origin. Tekstman (talk) 20:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete it! Not all countries share the same law. I could change copyright tags and revise some use and leave alone using in other sites. Important educational purpose of this photo. Some countries also get a lot of works from conquered Nazi Germany as war reparations and immediately classified this as free works.

Greetings --Tom5551 (talk) 14:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Tom5551, You also replied on my talk page and I will quote this for reference:

"This photograph is in the public domain because according to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland. Maybe not public domain for this photo in Germany but its public domain in Poland. I could change copyright tag. Important photo for educational purposes. Most, near all of photos depicting WW2 in German-occupied Poland in Polish press, books and internet and tv are classified as free. {{PD-Polish}} " The original license (public domain in the United States) was certainly incorrect. Then you claim it is public domain in Poland. As it is not a Polish photographer, it could only be because it were first published in Poland (without copyright notice). Is that so? As the tag says, please provide where and when the image was first published. At the moment you seem to claim that this picture could be classified as war reparation. I'm afraid that is just a guess. Tekstman (talk) 07:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I would love to see this picture preserved, I'm afraid there's little we can do. I couldn't find any info on the publication cited as a source (or even verify its existence). If the picture is indeed by Bothner, then the Life+70 years period has not elapsed yet. In order to use the {{PD-Polish}} we'd have to find a Polish publication using this picture, otherwise it cannot be treated as "published". Halibutt (talk) 23:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category. There was only one picture, so I displace it. Vojtasafr (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason to delete the category. The displaced photo belongs into it, correctly and undoubtedly, and a category with one photo is not an empty category. There was no justified reason to displace the photo.
Even though 1 photo can be considered as too few for a separate category, it should be seen in context of the parent category Category:SOR BN 12 of Arriva Teplice which contain other 9 photos. 10 photos of one bus model of one company is not few for a category, and it is useful and standard way to separate buses under old brand of the company to separate subcategory, even though it is only 1 photo now. --ŠJů (talk) 21:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not allow galleries with single images (with an exception for species), but there are many categories that have only one image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from [3] or [4] Foreign Species (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No authorship information for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source is http://wikitravel.org ; a freely licensed service. Ankry (talk) 08:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jcb's comment is correct. While Wikitravel is freely licensed, there is no source given thre for the base map. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Triplecaña (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, numerous better images in its category. P 1 9 9   15:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No authorship information for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info same copyright status as for File:Kimberley map.png. So same decision required, IMO. Ankry (talk) 08:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jcb's comment is correct. While Wikitravel is freely licensed, there is no source given thre for the base map. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. Small resolution, no exif. Jcb (talk) 21:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as No FOP in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 21:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Belgium has the PMA+70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

literary work. Not freedom of panorama. Darklanlan (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Please remember that "literary" is very broadly defined in copyright law. Software is literary. Any single sentence is a literary work under US law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. An old picture by unknown author in the centre of the picture SealMan11 (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A work cannot be both covered by a copyright license and in the public domain at the same time. The source is clearly marked {{cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}}, not {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. There is no evidence that the author of this photograph has been dead for more than 70 years. LX (talk, contribs) 22:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source clearly specified a non-free {{cc-by-nc-3.0}} license, not a {{cc-by-3.0}} license. There were some statements along the lines of "I don't care if you use these", but the only thing that holds up as an actual license is restricted to {{noncommercial}} use only. LX (talk, contribs) 22:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0" statement contradicts the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} licensing. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. LX (talk, contribs) 23:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} licensing was added by an anonymous user (who may or may not have been the same person as the uploader). The uploader only entered "BY-NC-SA" into the Permission field. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear that the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 23:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "cc-by-nc" statement contradicts the licensing templates, and {{noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear if the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 23:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "cc-by-nc" statement contradicts the licensing templates, and {{noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. It's not clear if the uploader actually intended to publish this under a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 23:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source link is dead and there is no archive.org copy of the particular source page, but the archive copy of the source site's homepage specifies a non-free {{cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} license, not {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. LX (talk, contribs) 23:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tattoo is art work. We need permission from the artist. 88.198.7.18 18:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I painted this portrait of HR Giger as a tribute to him. I am the artist who created this painting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by David M. Carroll Art (talk • contribs) 16:11, 24 January 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
 Keep We might delete photos of tattoos where we have permission from the photographer but no permission from the tattoo artist. That does not appear to be the case with this artwork which is described as "Acrylic and graphite on paper". —RP88 (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I am inclined to delete this and nominate for deletion the rest of this person's work on the grounds that they are out of scope -- we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists. I do not think this is David Carroll (naturalist), and, if not, there is no WP article and no obvious Google hits for this artist. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Jim: out of project scope. --Sealle (talk) 09:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of France.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Mali.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsourced image 47.150.70.205 20:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/624593067824254976/thHOkw20.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image with no EXIF. The same image can be found elsewhere in the web Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Façade of Ramnagar Fort, apparently published to Flickr months in advance of the Commons upload.  Delete czar

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD, grabbed from facebook. Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work in the image is owned by its copyright holder. It requires OTRS permission. Darklanlan (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Guadeloupe (local).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename indicates upload from elsewhere, and only other upload is very different; I'm very skeptical of "own work". This is not in scope and is a hostile non-notable depiction of a living person. Prosfilaes (talk) 19:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & http://www.lisabakerltd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/MAKE-AMERICA-GREAT-AGAIN-ILLMA-GORE-LONDON.pdf, which shows that this is work of living artist, and despite her "free download" she retains copyright. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So small photos ‎(195×138 pixels) are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Could e.g. be a press photo. Jcb (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No clear copyvio evidence. The file might qualify to be granfathered (uploaded to enwiki in 2006), so I doubt that lack of some information can be considered a deletion reason here. Ankry (talk) 07:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is not what granfathered is for. I have unsuccesfully tried to find this picture on a US government website before nominating. At this point we do not know whether this really would come from the US federal government, so we don't know whether the picture is in the Public Domain. Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Since this is a very high level meeting, it is very unlikely that there any photographers present that were not US military with security clearances. Also, it does not appear elsewhere on the Web in this size. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used. Superseded by File:Ridge - Shimla 2014-05-08 1513-1519 Compress.JPG (see COM:FT#TIFF). BrightRaven (talk) 10:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is the 'Archival version' with full information with .tif format, it is not wise to delete! -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid BSicon; wrong file type. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: @Jc86035: do a rename request. Ruthven (msg) 15:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por si el compositor no quiere una fotografía de él en un artículo de Wikipedia Zelpega Universe (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; si el fichero respecta el derecho de autor, pues no hay razón para borrarlo. Ruthven (msg) 15:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material on Commons; the original video didn't have a creative commons tag before it was privated. The video is copyrighted by Nintendo, thus it violates copyright. https://web.archive.org/web/20170125030722/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28IsanbRZQs Yoshiman6464 (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I can only express my agreement about the qualification carried out with regard to the copyright rights of this picture. At the time I uploaded it I did not inform myself enough and therefore I did not act with the required diligence. I apologize to the community and I assume my mistake. Japafe64 (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   18:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsourced image 47.150.70.205 20:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source found, should still be deleted, as it is a logo. Elisfkc ( talk) 21:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I found this logo on flickr as I mentioned it while uploading it. It is "public domain" according to flickr so I thought it was respecting the rules. I added it as I was trying to create a page for the company Crowdyhouse. Are logo not allowed in such a case? Thank you for your help. AmyPetit ( talk) 09:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@AmyPetit: Logos are not usually allowed on Commons, because they are past the point of Commons:Threshold of originality. Also, Commons:PD files sets the guidelines for Public Domain images. Elisfkc (talk) 03:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: Thank you for the explanations! AmyPetit (talk) 10:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per De728631. Ruthven (msg) 15:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same with Commons:Deletion requests/File:山内一豊と妻の像 (岐阜県郡上市八幡町) - panoramio.jpg. It's No FOP in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

منبع غیر رسمی و سایت هرزه‌نگاری Farid69 (talk) 18:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work. Better SVG version exists. Azcolvin429 (talk) 22:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]