Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 7th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 05:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://bangforyourburgerbuck.com/about/ MKFI (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Copyright holder © 2016, Cooking Channel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.". Image has been published previously in http://bangforyourburgerbuck.com/about/. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Per previous discussions (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Twitter bird logo + other).

--XXN, 15:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation. Unlikely own work as claimed Reguyla (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Permission needed anyway. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://dobanarchitecture.com/projects/new-rochelle-model-development-block - Reventtalk 18:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - meant to speedy. - Reventtalk 19:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heart8in (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PRP, assorted probable copyvios uploaded by a Jvolkblum sock. Random cameras and resolutions, tracked a few down to various websites, not worth tracking down every one since they are almost certainly all stolen.

- Reventtalk 18:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Geez, some people have time, with categories and all. What a pity. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, many copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G3 Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by User:Hystrix. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven: Copyvio from http://www.sportmediaset.mediaset.it/foto/sport-people/britney-spears-sexy-concerto-a-las-vegas-le-foto_1012437-2016.shtml?foto=1 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven: Copyvio from http://www.sportmediaset.mediaset.it/foto/sport-people/britney-spears-sexy-concerto-a-las-vegas-le-foto_1012437-2016.shtml?foto=1 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven: Copyvio from http://www.sportmediaset.mediaset.it/foto/sport-people/britney-spears-sexy-concerto-a-las-vegas-le-foto_1012437-2016.shtml?foto=1 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Alexandronikos (talk) 09:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of very bad quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10209963183349559&set=pb.1634286177.-2207520000.1483701121.&type=3&theater yabancım 11:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: yildirimozlem.com/seyfettin-karadayi-artik-veda-etmek-uzereyim-bir-filmde-oynamak-cok-isterim-son-kez/ yabancım 11:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: www.serander.net/roportajlar/822-kemence-ustadi-mehmet-sirri-ozturk-ile-soylesi.html yabancım 11:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gulshadsaif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 00:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajnish Sewalia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope (unused, uncategorized personal images and many better pictures of peacocks available).

Gauss (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joel Mistokles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope. (In addition, one of the four pictures bears a copyright notice which seems to contradict the wording of the license.)

Gauss (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 00:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - severely blurred lNeverCry 00:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - blurry and tilted pic taken from a window lNeverCry 01:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebbb1012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work (promo material for a rapper): small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebbb1012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandyskvr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless empty cat Frze > talk 01:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless empty cat Frze > talk 01:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivarlover420 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless empty cat Frze > talk 01:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless nonsens Frze > talk 03:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ahtsham Khan Qazi). MER-C 12:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myrrhfrankincensegold (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal artworks.

--ghouston (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thanks for deleting this file that contains personal datas. Do not follow (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - Reventtalk 00:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BillBancroft (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aden Adde International Airport and [[:File:Mogadishu fish market.jpg], a Reuters photo uploaded as "own work").

LX (talk, contribs) 09:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Peeked at a few and found all of them online with earlier dates. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DannersBay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some personal photos, unused, no COM:EDUSE.

--XXN, 15:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by SPA for apparently promotional article, and according to the OTRS handler, it has bogus permissions. Brianhe (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: please don't interfere with the OTRS procedure. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - only used for repeated attempts at self-promotion on enwiki. Ed (Edgar181) 19:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikidfan97630wiki2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these uploads. All claimed as "own work".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikidfan97630wiki2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikidfan97630wiki2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Google gives no clear answers to "Kermit Glover", so signature can be deleted as well. Another signature (for ca Arian Meany) is also unused and unidentified

Estopedist1 (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep File:Kermit.glover.1923.jpg is Harlan Randall and the image is PD from the National Photo Company Collection at the LOC. I will move to correct name. The signatures are fake. --RAN (talk) 05:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Connecticut highway shield PNGs

[edit]

These all have new SVG versions at, for example, File:Connecticut Highway 2.svg. Besides being superseded, there are some errors with the PNGs: some use the wrong font, and if you look closely at the border, there is a weird frosting on the edge. (There are a few PNGs left without a SVG, but the SVG will be created shortly and I will either add the PNG here or start another nomination if this closes). --Rschen7754 21:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JuanDavidSon lll (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

lNeverCry 22:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cqwjs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works.

--XXN, 22:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 22:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 22:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AaronLiveChina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, COM:ADVERT, screenshot with non-free content.

--XXN, 22:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siddiquehyder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of scope.

--XXN, 22:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NETCOPYVIO lNeverCry 22:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skillsameh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Picture taken from a computer or some kind of presentation with no information of its sources.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad alqudah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avelino Felix Adelino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 23:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 23:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 23:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garimadas4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 23:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mosub ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    20:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor - look for the 'pixel-cervida' - quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor - look for the '20-pixel-elephant' - quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 20:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free poster. --XXN, 20:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot took without autorisation of a photo 79.81.250.85 21:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Questionable educational purpose. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal files. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cptn n3m019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monosij (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by November kennedy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musiqueart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MhtAbderahim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. --XXN, 22:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emerson.ciccarello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo / COM:ADVERT. --XXN, 22:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 22:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lukeni dos Santos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 06:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kryptonite1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope.

Hystrix (talk) 06:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 06:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 07:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 18:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film screenshot. Non-free content. --XXN, 18:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karthikeyanvirus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 05:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karthikeyanvirus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of scope.

--XXN, 18:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, non-free content. --XXN, 19:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MoisesDan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for vandalism only. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of bad quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameszambranachacon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    20:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Achim (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameszambranachacon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameszambranachacon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    20:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amaitebun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    20:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    20:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basketball unknown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    20:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lulu suarezw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos.

--XXN, 15:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zizopowerdream (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Zizopowerdream (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books and video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AEG.17.wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not using it anymore and it's not on any wikis. LuigiDude16 (talk) 02:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 6 January 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 00:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 00:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, looks like a film screenshot; actress mentioned has written/directed a film of the name "The Temple 2". BethNaught (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears in at least one news article published before the upload date. Also, this article gives credit to Louis Marinelli (the man in the photo) for providing the photograph. Note lack of EXIF data as well. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 01:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo that includes non-geometric shapes. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 01:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from the man's Facebook page. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 01:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brannbamsen Bjornis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derivative work

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hystrix (talk) 08:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, image credited to Iowa Democratic Party: [1]. MKFI (talk) 08:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 08:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: no EXIF, cropped version published in http://www.infodiez.com/conoce-a-los-15-pilotos-bolivianos-que-participan-en-el-dakar-2017/ MKFI (talk) 08:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PHoto published in 2015 at http://www.dutchplanespotters.nl/main/modules.php?name=albumv2&file=netview&id=57683&ac=&al=&lo=&rg=PZ-TCR&pe=&zoek=&idx=13&size=M no evidence of permission Chumsgrove (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational value seems rather weak, maybe the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ARSMUSIS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. The user's only other upload was grabbed from a Google search result. File:Foto etiquetada dave 1.jpg will require evidence that the uploader is Juan Castaneda for the uploader's authorship claims to check out.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisaflores12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-quality photo of a person with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in an article in Spanish Wikipedia, which has been deleted. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also, the "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License" statements contradict the licensing templates, and {{noncommercial}} and {{nonderivative}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. Also: questionable authorship claims based on the extremely low resolution, missing metadata, and drop shadows; the photos have the appearance of having been grabbed from a web site rather than being the uploader's own work.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, bad quality, no educational purposes / out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 11:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 11:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ontcramort (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused content related to an apparent hoax without notability. Apparently uploaded for use in articles in English Wikipedia and Spanish Wikipedia, which have all been deleted. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also, the links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/mx/ (on all files except File:Mapa vestria.png) contradict the licensing templates, and {{noncommercial}} and {{nonderivative}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. Also: the uploader's claims of being the copyright holder are questionable given the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's credibility in general.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Greif~commonswiki. LX (talk, contribs) 13:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smith&Wesson~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. 'Servida' in combination with 'Motion Control Products' gives 0 (zero) Google hits.

Jcb (talk) 14:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, from [2], no OTRS permission from author. Htm (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 15:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/814840590730858498/EizfEPe0.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted as File:Nam Ji-hyun at MBC Awards.jpg --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Uploader may not fully grasp the concept of copyright (link). Thuresson (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heatcharger1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://typeset-beta.imgix.net/rehost%2F2016%2F9%2F13%2Fef80b5d4-4373-4317-8665-998b703db185.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 15:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [3] MCMLXXXIX 16:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cdevlin67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO

INeverCry 23:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted as copyvios. INeverCry 05:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cdevlin67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

May not be own work. COM:DW

MCMLXXXIX 16:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luigi Irauzqui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

May not be own work. COM:DW

MCMLXXXIX 16:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 16:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [4] MCMLXXXIX 16:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 16:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 16:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. --XXN, 16:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 16:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 16:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xavivident (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free book covers. No permission.

--XXN, 16:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 16:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 16:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 16:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 16:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [5] MCMLXXXIX 16:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uptulancingo1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT.

--XXN, 16:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 16:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. MCMLXXXIX 16:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. MCMLXXXIX 16:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 17:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Castanedacarlos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio. See here.

Wikicology (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dinesh Meena92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, +some unused logos - out of scope.

--XXN, 17:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 18:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 18:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gurnam singh dhaliwal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of scope.

--XXN, 18:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, many copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, many copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, many copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AXIS LABEL Artesanos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos of business with apparently no relevance.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable company (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orangenassau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope.

Hystrix (talk) 08:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greif~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused content related to an apparent hoax without notability, obviously perpetrated by the same person as in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ontcramort.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Don't know about the map, but the CoA are fictionnal, not in use and therefore out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 15:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 16:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. MCMLXXXIX 16:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 16:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. MCMLXXXIX 17:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandyk2316 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos/banners; also may be out of scope.

--XXN, 17:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 17:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. --XXN, 17:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused personal photograph, nothing to do with Pubs in London under which it has been categorised Oxyman (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jko respeto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Also probably are mislicensed; I don't see how these are PD-Philippines.

--XXN, 18:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by QAP INT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT.

--XXN, 18:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juancito Andia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal pictures - out of scope.

--XXN, 18:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the image is released under a Creative Commons license, the statue is still copyrighted. FallingGravity (talk) 03:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, artwork from 1978 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_Women_Memorial_Garden. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original Logo comes from https://www.facebook.com/set.tasteoflife/photos/a.428982080606392.1073741829.413461482158452/611651159006149/?type=1&theater , not possible to be own work. Momocalbee (talk) 05:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, no EXIF and permission, uploader's only upload which is not yet deleted. Otherwise, not in use and out of scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could not figure out, how this shot from a 1973 film could have been cc-by-sa-2.1. The source page is just a file stock or something like that. Blacklake (talk) 07:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, looks as a screenshot and license laundering. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. --XXN, 17:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, contains non-free logos. --XXN, 18:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free image for living person --Alaa Najjar :)..! 18:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & FBMD in meta. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arturo3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright.

Yann (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment unlikely to be own work, but the style seems 19th centurysh. some research about the file could be useful. Kathisma (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drtalaljavaid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jordi Feliu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, no permission.

--XXN, 18:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. --XXN, 18:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. --XXN, 18:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Clark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PRP, assorted probable copyvios uploaded by a Jvolkblum sock. Random cameras and resolutions, tracked a few down to various websites, not worth tracking down every one since they are almost certainly all stolen.

- Reventtalk 19:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the trophy and of the photo in background Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see no evidence for CC-license. Source site is down and for sale. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither band Pegaso nor its leader Miguelángel Vásquez isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silvercake3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PRP, assorted probable copyvios uploaded by a Jvolkblum sock. Random cameras and resolutions, tracked a few down to various websites, not worth tracking down every one since they are almost certainly all stolen.

- Reventtalk 20:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright in metadata Ariam (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personality right issues, and or 'family album' content, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Azteca 7 is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Albert Weber is born in 1957. No OTRS. 90.43.158.141 23:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of contemporary painting - derivative work 38.101.239.55 23:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of Empress Michiko. The Terms of Use mentiones that “In some cases, a third party (refers to a party other than the state. Hereinafter referred to as “Third Party”) may hold copyrights or other rights to a part of the Content. For Content where a Third Party holds copyrights or other rights (e.g. portrait rights in a photograph, publicity rights etc.), it is the responsibility of the user to obtain consent for use from the Third Party unless there is explicit indication that the rights have already been cleared.” Kkairri (talk) 23:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because we have another image named Artica Red Planet X (Hercolubus) (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also: Copyright violation: derivative work (i.e. annotation) of a still frame of a video on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovT90wYrVk4 and/or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwWWuttntio which has a non-commercial "Standard YouTube Licence", which is not compatible with derivative works or the licence requirements of Wikimedia Commons. No evidence that uploader is the copyright owner of the original image. source= https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B-zMzkcijSB9flBTQVVyRUtBQlNjT1M3VEdpSXFMeE5BazVEbTNwdFk0elBTQUVRWnJXYjA?usp=sharing}}
GeoWriter (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per GeoWriter. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 13:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 13:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Animated image of a double chest from Minecraft, a video game. Used textures are copyright Mojang (developers of Minecraft). The file is therefore non-free.

The file is either a copy or a derivation of https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/File:Double_Chest.gif (note that the timestamp in the name of the Commons file matches the upload time of the 2015 version of the image from Minecraft Wiki).

This file may satisfy criteria for speedy deletion. AttemptToCallNil (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. The architect, en:Hossein Amanat, is still living. Sorry for the large nomination, but this only really makes sense handled together. I de-selected anything that didn't prominently show the tower, and the few remaining can be handled individually.

~ Rob13Talk 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Iran and architect living. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran

Elisfkc (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Azadi Tower in Tehran Iran was built in the early 1970's by the architect Hossein Amanat who is still alive. Since Iran has no FOP it would appear that the hundreds of images in this category should be deleted.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran. Architect was Hossein Amanat, who is still alive.

Lukas Beck (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L. Beck Have you read previous discussions such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azadi tower 9.jpg? Hanooz 10:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Amanat's work for hire is owned by the government of Iran (a legal entity) and more than 30 years has passed since public display. PD-Iran applies. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azadi tower 9.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & " Garrett Hacking" in meta. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 17:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oztu25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logo, a title screen and a screenshot.

--XXN, 17:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KarateCba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free posters, banners, logos.

--XXN, 17:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the uploader, do not like the quality of this photo, and want it deleted. Markheffron2 (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear to be part of the series based on File:Regionen japans.png. I have taken the liberty of applying that to the source field and suggest  Keep. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0" statement contradicts the licensing template, and {{noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. LX (talk, contribs) 14:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Probably not own work. Jcb (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, lacks of source for each photos, but also infos about the artworks depicted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonathantheeditor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader claims that this version of the coats of arms of King Edward VI College, Stourbridge is licensed under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. As a work perviously published on the web without evidence of a free license, we need permission from the original author via COM:OTRS.

RP88 (talk) 04:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted one file that contained embedded data. (500k instead of 150k). Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Hey, I am a student at this school and I have spoken permission from the creator, Will I need them too go to COM:OTRS.

--Jonathantheeditor (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment without OTRS, this should be deleted. Kathisma (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC){{speedydelete|<did not upload in the right way>}}[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted another file that had been removed from the DR without reason. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Embedded Data Bot with a speedy Embedded data tag and the most recent rationale was: This file contains embedded data: After 12.2KiB (12543 bytes). The file doesn't appear to contain a password protected archive as required by COM:CSD#F9. However, as a work previously published on the web without a free license (see https://thehaystackapp.com ) we need evidence via COM:OTRS that the uploader User:Haystack.wiki is authorized by Haystack Australia Pty Ltd to release this image under a free license. —RP88 (talk) 02:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding embedded data: I can neither confirm or deny the existence of the embedded data. The logic of such detection is that when a png parser/viewer/converter/thumbnailer/etc. does not even look at the part identified as embeddded data (i.e. anything in the embedded data part does not affect the image at all, and truncate out the part does not affect the image at all), we think it is very likely embedded data. A file then goes to MIME detection to know if it's of a known kind. If not, whether it is a part of an archive, or it is useless data there is no way to know, as in this case. For reference, a binary viewer shows the two parts as follows:
Extended content

Valid PNG part:

00000000: 8950 4e47 0d0a 1a0a 0000 000d 4948 4452  .PNG........IHDR
00000010: 0000 0200 0000 0200 0806 0000 00f4 78d4  ..............x.
00000020: fa00 0020 0049 4441 5478 5eed dddf 8f56  ... .IDATx^....V
00000030: d7bd dff1 650c c683 27fc 30c5 218e b175  ....e...'.0.!..u
[...]
000030c0: 800c 1100 0000 c810 0100 0080 0c11 0000  ................
000030d0: 00c8 1001 0000 800c 1100 0000 c810 0100  ................
000030e0: 0080 0c11 0000 00c8 1001 0000 800c 1100  ................
000030f0: 0000 c810 0100 0080 0c11 0000 00c8 d0    ...............

Part identified as embedded data: (0x20 is the ASCII space character)

00000000: ff07 0496 e56d 9c44 8ff8 0000 0000 4945  .....m.D......IE
00000010: 4e44 ae42 6082 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020  ND.B`.          
00000020: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
00000030: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
[...]
000015a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
000015b0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
000015c0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
000015d0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 20                            

--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que ya lo elimino wiki Liukhan (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manque beaucoup d'information Tarik Yaziid1 (talk) 05:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armcartoon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

missing permission

Hystrix (talk) 08:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Upload; the file has half of two different files, only one is in the PD Jasonanaggie (talk) 09:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la photo est copyrhigtée / the picture is under copyright K price (talk) 09:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 10:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Obviously not licenced as CC BY-SA 3.0. Zinnmann (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why Edney photo I uploaded is a copyright violation because it is are under Creative Commons on Flickr with a direct link. User:LegalGeek (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your originally cited source was a myspace-page without any copyright information. Later you changed this source to a just recently created flickr account with no followers to this day. Sorry, I doubt that this account is owned by Edney. Anyway, the true question is: who took the picture and where did he or she licenced it under CC BY-SA 3.0? --Zinnmann (talk) 10:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are defects in the picture, needs correction Mmm-jun (talk) 12:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, fine now. --Yann (talk) 12:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused badly reworked version of another photograph that is widely used. 217.95.102.92 14:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete superfluous, not nice, unused. Away with it


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i think this work does meet the threshold of originality. Andriy.v (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WeiZhangWang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Purchased photo on e-bay" is not a credible license

Avron (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Family register information. Privacy does not exist, but it can not be released freely. Confirm the "戸籍法" in Japan. アルトクール (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • 日本の戸籍法に違反だと主張されていますが、具体的に日本の戸籍法のどの条文に違反だというのですか?戸籍は日本国民についての出生、親子関係、婚姻・離婚、死亡などを「公証」(公に証明)するためものです。戸籍の当事者がそれを公開をするのも正当な権利であり、プライバシー等の問題がなければ何の違法性もありません。 --さかきばらたいら (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I agree with アルトクール. In Japan, people who can duplicate family register cetificate are limited to the following range. "Principal, spouse, direct ancestor and descendant". A proxy letter is necessary for a person outside this range to duplicate family register certificate. --Rienzi (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image is neither the privacy violation nor the copyright violation. However, the Article 10 of the Family Register Act says only a close relative, an employee of a goverment agency or a worker who has a license such as an attoney with a legitimate purpose can request to get a copy of the family register. This is because the family register contains privacy information and it is one of the identity documents. I wonder if we need OTRS permission, or they should be banned as they may have the risk of misuse. Darklanlan (talk) 02:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • There is no reason for deletion. As さかきばらたいら says, Gifu shimbun (2016-07-12) reported that Chiune's son requested a copy of the family register and visited the place of his birth. This family register is significant enough for providing an evidence where he was actually born in. It seems open to dispute over neutral point of view, but we won't concern how the image is used in the article, as Dwy says. Darklanlan (talk) 03:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The claim of illegality is misunderstanding and misunderstanding the law.As Mr. アルトクール said by himself, , there is no copyright or privacy infringement in this case, there is no problem.And in Japan, the Family Register Law is restricted to relatives for those who can request the issuance of a transcript of family register at No. 10, but this article does not prohibit the release of family register.There is no illegality under the Family Register Law and there is no illegality in this case.--さかきばらたいら (talk) 09:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment 戸籍法第十条の請求権に関する条文。アップロード者が「アップロードするための目的」で第三者として入手したならば、入手目的が不適当となる。アップロード者は直系・卑系親族あるいは配偶者または、これらの請求が認められている代理人、公務員であることを証明し、アップロードに際して許諾が得られていることを説明しなければいけません。戸籍は例え死亡していても、だれでも自由に入手することはできません。(戸籍法第十条。If the uploader got it as a third party for "uploading purpose", the purpose of acquisition is inappropriate.)--アルトクール (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment 杉原千畝の戸籍の出生に関する記載をトリミングしたものであり戸籍そのものではありません。したがって本記載がアップロードされていることをもって第三者に戸籍を交付されるわけもなく戸籍法第10条違反はありません。そもそも戸籍法第10条が示すことは,限定された請求資格の請求者の請求によってのみ戸籍が交付されることです。そして,この戸籍は交付の請求者である杉原千畝の親族が、千畝の出生地を公に証明する目的で交付を請求し取得しており,千畝の親族が戸籍を取り寄せた事実は岐阜新聞および中部日本放送によっても広く報道されています。⇒『千畝氏の出生たどる 戸籍記載の美濃市の寺 四男が訪問』. 岐阜新聞 (2016-7-12).この戸籍は報道されている戸籍と同一であり,交付請求者は明治31年に施行され厳格化された戸籍法により「公証」された、千畝の出生地が「上有知町」であり八百津町役場にその出生届が「受附入籍」された事実について広く知られることを望んで公開について承諾しているのです。本削除請求について特別に戸籍法第10条を理由に違法性があると主張するならば、それを主張する側にその違法性の立証責任が発生するというべきです。戸籍法第10条違反ではなく,使用承諾について疑義があるというのであれば,はじめからそのように指摘をすべきです。--さかきばらたいら (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep戸籍法に基づいて八百津町に発行されており、何の違法性もみられません。 --Minowashinosato (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete As stated here and here, Commons is not a repositiory for public records. Public birth records and family registries are generally out of the project scope. --Dwy (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is a record of the details about the famous birth of Sugihara Chiune. This is written written in Mino City. However, until recently there was one that was born in Yaotsu-cho. This is a remarkable content. --126.213.0.100 02:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is a historical official fact about the birth of Sugihara Chiune. It should not be deleted. --Highestever (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  CommentIn Japan, Yaotsu town tells UNESCO that the town is Chigeo Sugihara's birthplace to register his relics in UNESCO Memory of the World , but in reality his birthplace is proved from the description of this family register that the land is not there but Kozuchi Town. It has become a hot topic in Japan, and it has been reported in television and magazines about this. Birthplace to that described in this family register is just as important as Obama's birth records. --さかきばらたいら (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging Whym, Yasu and Miya to look into the situation. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Has historical value, no privacy concerns. If we can keep Obama's birth record, then why not Sugihara's? Yasu (talk) 15:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
>If we can keep Obama's birth record, then why not Sugihara's?
I initially thought it was because whilst there was a notable controversy over Obama's birth place, Sugihara's case was not so notable (for educational purposes, at least) and Commons should not help promote the non-notable minority view.
After some further research, however, the dispute over Sugihara's birthplace appears to have a bit more press coverage than I thought. I also understand that NPOV is not a reason for deletion. I now withdraw my delete vote.--Dwy (talk)

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#Russia for Nazi graffiti. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia for Nazi graffiti. 84.61.143.206 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Are even Buddhists in Buryatia, Kalmykia, and Tuva banned from using the swastika? --84.61.143.206 08:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question And are ethnic Chinese, Japanese people, and Koryo-saram in Russia (unlike those in China, Japan, and (South) Korea) also banned from using the hanzi/kanji/hanja U+534D and U+5350? --84.61.143.206 08:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Even the user, who uploaded this file, is actually from Russia: ru:Участник:1Goldberg. --84.61.143.206 14:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Alexandronikos (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Not PD-ineligible. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a symbol hundreds years old. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This symbol is not hundreds of years old, it's from the 20th century, see en:Khanda (Sikh symbol). Closing admin of previous nomination has been contacted, but he did not revise the closure. We have no indication that the copyright on this image would have expired. Jcb (talk) 22:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep obviously. This is even a UTF-8 symbol (see wikt:☬), so there is certainly no copyright on it. I also think that this nomination is disruptive and ridiculous. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Khanda.svg. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. There is no "author" even for the modern version. It would be anyway PD 60 years after first publication in India if there was a copyright in the first place, which I doubt. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation. Unlikely own work as claimed. Cross wiki TR from EnWP Reguyla (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de choix Gounot Jean (talk) 18:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-free logo (probably is above COM:TOO). --XXN, 19:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2010 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly decent quality image of steps, neither blurry or shaky, nor of something whose pics we have in plenty. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Geocoded. --Yann (talk) 13:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've been cropping the image and adding it in different shapes to try out all possibilities and choose the best one for the article. Now I'm cleaning up and I think there's is no need to keep that one as there are already different versions of that photo in similar forms. ArturSik (talk) 00:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need to keep it as there are two other similar versions, only one should be kept. ArturSik (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate of File:Margaret (Małgorzata Jamroży) By Daniel Åhs Karlsson (edited).jpg. --Yann (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating again after it was kept last time because 'crop might be useful'. I explained that I was testing which cropped version of the original photo would work best for the article that I intended to use it for. As a result, there were multiple very similar versions and after choosing the final one I was simply removing redundant content. Here's the final result of my testing which is very similar to the one I'm nominating. I just don't see the point of keeping two almost identical photos. ArturSik (talk) 11:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Image is in scope and we do not keep files only to attend the needs of one persons or project but of several projects and users. Tm (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While that’s true 1) this file is not being used anywhere 2) as I said there’s another cropped version of the photo (linked above) almost identical with minor differences that could be used if anyone needed to use it. I just don’t see a point of keeping two very similar versions. ArturSik (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The file above File:Margaret (Małgorzata Jamroży) By Daniel Åhs Karlsson (cropped 3).jpg) is a another crop as is File:Margaret (Małgorzata Jamroży) By Daniel Åhs Karlsson (cropped 2).jpg, so in fact you just showed why this image is useful, not duplicates. And by the way File:Margaret (Małgorzata Jamroży) By Daniel Åhs Karlsson (cropped 3).jpg is not in use also. Tm (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just because it’s another crop and not a duplicate doesn’t prove its useful at all. And as you righty pointed out neither are in use so if we delete one of them there would be no harm done. We keep one and it will be available for anyone who wants to use it. I don’t understand the fuss. ArturSik (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We do not delete different crops or on the contrary this would would be against what yourself wrote that an image "could be used if anyone needed to use it". Tm (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would’ve understood that if they looked different but they’re both close-up shots. The whole point of this discussion is that we have two different but very similar crops. So yes if someone wants to use it one of them would be there to use. But why keep two that are only slightly different. Do you honestly not see it? ArturSik (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You just answered yourself, "if someone wants to use it one of them would be there to use", and with deletion no one as any option, except what you think is best. Tm (talk) 11:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever. You're just twisting my words. Not worth my time that is. I've said my piece. It's like talking to a wall. You do what you think is best. That way it'll be fair. ArturSik (talk) 12:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep so that it could be used. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only Rosetta NAVCAM images are freely licensed. Per source, copyright is listed as "Main image and lander inset: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA; context: ESA/Rosetta/NavCam – CC BY-SA IGO 3.0". That CC only applies to the NavCam part, not the OSIRIS part.

For context, see another image, where credit line is given as "CIVA: ESA/Rosetta/Philae/CIVA; NAVCAM: ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM – CC BY-SA IGO 3.0; OSIRIS: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA; ROLIS: ESA/Rosetta/Philae/ROLIS/DLR". Notice that the Creative Commons license is specifically attached to NavCam, not any of the others. Huntster (t @ c) 04:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ESA's terms and conditions page lists the following use cases:
"You may use ESA images or videos for educational or informational purposes. The publicly released ESA images may be reproduced without fee, on the following conditions: Credit ESA as the source of the images.

  • Examples: Photo: ESA; Photo: ESA/Cluster; Image: ESA/NASA - SOHO/LASCO
  • ESA images may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by ESA or any ESA employee of a commercial product, process or service, or used in any other manner that might mislead.
  • If an image includes an identifiable person, using that image for commercial purposes may infringe that person‘s right of privacy, and separate permission should be obtained from the individual.
  • Some images contained in this website have come from other sources, and this is indicated in the Copyright notice. For re-use of non-ESA images contact the designated authority.
  • If ESA images are to be used in advertising or any commercial promotion, layout and copy must be submitted to ESA beforehand for approval to: spaceinimages@esa.int"

That certainly should qualify wikipedia use. --Pulu (talk) 18:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sending a use request email to ESA's usage enquiries contact: spaceinimages@esa.int. Ticket#: 2017010810007829 --Pulu (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pulu, the key words there are "for educational or informational purposes". Commons requires that any file uploaded be freely available for commercial use as well, which, for example, is why a Creative Commons Non-Commercial license is not permitted. ESA images are, by default, not freely licensed, and only specific exceptions exist where the instrument or project scientists decided they wanted a free release, such as with NavCam images. Huntster (t @ c) 21:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

дубль File:(King Kojong and King Sunjong) (4096120300).jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 08:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, although I agree that the other image is of much better quality and should be used. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong word (="Holzkreuz") in file name, file also exist with correct name "Heilig Kreuz Meditationsraum 02092011.JPG" Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 10:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Processed as duplicate. @Urmelbeauftragter: Ich würde in solchen Fällen lieber eine Umbenennung per {{Rename}} empfehlen. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is the subject of the image; admits that they didn't take the photo themselves. Daniel Charms (talk) 10:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an image of a new contributor. His only onther upload was a copyvio. His user page is SPAM. Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. He claims own work on this image of himself and it does not appear to be a selfie, so it may be a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 10:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs about buildings of France have double copyright: of architect and of photographer. It seems to me, that we have permission from architects, but not from photographer Christophe Bourgeois. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: we need COM:OTRS permissions from both. Ruthven (msg) 10:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آزادسرو (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep These are of course preferred in SVG, and I will work with the user to create SVG files (he has some issues with the software he is using), but they are necessary diagrams that will be used in relevant pages on FA WP in the next week or two. We have a Wikiproject focused on traditional Persian music and these diagrams describe the anatomy of various genres of this music. Huji (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Huji. Please use the correct templates when you'll have the svg version available. Ruthven (msg) 10:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آزادسرو (talk · contribs)

[edit]

An audio recording retains its own copyright. So even if the song is old, the performer and the audio recorder both retain copyrights on these songs.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: The copyright law that applies to these recordings (Iran's copyright law) specifies that a file is in public domain if either the creator has deceased more than 50 years ago, or the creator died more than 30 years before 22 August 2010 (see Template:PD-Iran). The creator of these was fa:نورعلی برومند who died on Jan 19th, 1977; that is 33 years before 22 August 2010, therefore these recordings are in public domain. Huji (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huji: did نورعلی برومند create this specific recording? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre: I belive he recorded on vinyl records and cassette tapes. This specific record is of course in OGG format, so cannot be created by him as OGG didn't even exist then. But the MP3 file form which this OGG is created is claimed to be an identical copy of the original work, only digitized. My interpretation of the copyright law is that "digitizing" a vinyl/tape to MP3 format in-and-of-itself does not qualify as "creative work" and is not covered by copyright. It is hard work, for sure, but it involves no creative art. Huji (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huji: No, it usually does not unless it was remastered (subject to jurisdiction and interpretation). I won't fight on the grounds of remastering, though, as it doesn't seem likely. Nonetheless, it sounded suspiciously high quality for a record, like it was someone else singing the song. Are you sure this is the same original recording? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure. They were probably passed through a noise reduction filter of sorts. I would still not consider them "derivative work" because I believe a "derivative work" is a work that is based on a copyrighted work, but contains new material that is original in the copyright sense. So even if a simple noise reduction filter was used, it would not qualify the work as derivative, IMHO. Huji (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Huji: I'm not worried about that part. I just want to make sure this is the version originally sung by the guy you listed above, not someone else. You are infinitely more knowledgeable of Persian culture than I, so if you say you think it is, I will withdraw. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I misunderstood the question. Yes, this is that same person. I don't want to age myself, but I know the voice from his cassettes. Huji (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per nom. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آزادسرو (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sounds to be modern sound recordings. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These are recordings by Noor Ali Boroomand, deceased in 1977, so they are at least from 41 years ago. They are recorded in Iran and are subject to Iran's copyright laws which state that copyright only lasts for 30 years past the author is death if the date of death + 30 years is earlier than 22 August 2010 (in this case, 1977 + 30 = 2007); see en:Template:PD-Iran for more information. Huji (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I am finding it annoying that we keep having the same discussion again and again (see above in this same page). Can we please find a way to avoid this in the future? (e.g. can we agree on a piece of text in English to be added to these files' description so that the next person who gets tempted to nominate them for deletion would know better?) Huji (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Huji: I added {{Copyright notes|Iran}}. Don't know if it'll help. - Alexis Jazz 00:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per this and previous discussions. Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. We need at least to know the author's name. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was moved from en.wikipedia where the uploader had no contributions beyond 3 uploads. I am unsure if this is within project scope also I am unsure how reliable is the copyright claim. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 18:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Keep: IMO in scope, has EXIF, don't think it to be a copyvio. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Achim. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jahantahsil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos.

--XXN, 18:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: files already speedy deleted. Ruthven (msg) 10:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Numerous nearly identical but better images already exist with no light riverberation Desyman (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Description field contains a Fair Use rationale, but we do not allow Fair Use at Wikimedia Commons. Jcb (talk) 23:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: too recent to be kept. Ruthven (msg) 10:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.soulseekqt.net/news/node/681 lets me guess, that the logo is not published under free license. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that any of the reasons at PD-Russia would apply. Jcb (talk) 14:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cjp24 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/lanl-astrophysicist-dimitri-mihalas-dies-at/article_a1c29a93-d2df-51fe-a4aa-929a8f8bcc09.html?mode=image&photo=0
No speedy deletion: Image upload 2010, used on different wikipedia-clones; Uploader not author, so no permission: -> 7 days. Wdwd (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no author's permission. --Sealle (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo that includes non-geometric shapes. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 01:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, transfer to Wikipedia and upload under fair use. MB298 (talk) 04:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noelinraj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Inconsistent sized and file names, no useful EXIF, user has a history of uploading copyright violations.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mylhaine C. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Different images, some old photos, some apparently from old manuals but all stated with uploader as author.

Avron (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

→References have been completed (are they correct ?); two files are useless and can be deleted : File:Fallschirmjäger launching panzerfaust.jpg and File:EMP44.jpg --Mylhaine C. (talk) 17:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mylhaine C., two files are correct now, maybe also GG-P 40.jpg when you've made the photo. But others are still missing sources.--Avron (talk) 18:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot find more information/ref. ; sorry for the works ; I understand better now how to proceed--Mylhaine C. (talk) 10:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The same mirrored images of GG-P 40 is also here: [6]--Avron (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --lNeverCry 21:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image sans intérêt. Légende insultante pour le drapeau français (image without any interest. Text is insulting for the French flag). Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 10:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leider ein Fehler in der Konstruktion und im Dateinamen. Eine Konstruktion mit einer Lemniskate ist nicht sinnvoll. Datei wird auf keiner Seite verwendet und wurde durch File:01-Dreiteilung Winkel-Trisektrix.gif ersetzt! Vorab ein Dankeschön. Petrus3743 (talk) 13:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon avec un autre fichier ALINE COCO 67 (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate with another file :
Gzen92 [discuter] 14:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - It is not the same kind of light and texture. It can't hurt to have both, can it? --Edelseider (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Edelseider. --lNeverCry 21:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering. Wrong creater name and improper licensing. NEXCO西日本 Darklanlan (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NEXCO西日本 was founded in 2005. The copyright will remain at least until 2055. See also Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the uploader, but I have discovered they are still in copyright (the owners gave the closures to the museum but decided to keep their own rights) Carnby (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Carnby: when do these objects were produced? --Ruthven (msg) 10:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mmh I don't know, maybe at the beginning of the 20th century?--Carnby (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work was published in 1967. Its copyright will expire on January 1, 2018. Read PD-Japan license tag. Darklanlan (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 09:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work was published in 1968. Its copyright will expire on January 1, 2019. Please read PD-Japan license tag. Darklanlan (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work was published in 1968. Its copyright will expire on January 1, 2019. Please read PD-Japan license tag. Darklanlan (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another file (MarinesNearTalasea.jpg) has better quality Macesito (talk) 14:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The source, date and licence information on File:MarinesNearTalasea needs to be updated as the licence is incorrect and the source information is indistinct. I will update that now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File 37-52 Battalion soldiers crossing a river in New Britain.jpg has better quality and is indeed complete Macesito (talk) 14:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 16:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A mail to confirm the copyright situation of the image will be sent to the OTRS. 14:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:28 ОНАеМБ.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:28 ОНБ.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, bad-quality file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 rather small-sized panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 rather small-sized panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken in Ecône, Switzerland so it is not PD-Italy. Jaqen (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request Leome323 (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This kind of category should not exist on Commons. First it is not neutral and does not respect the neutrality of point of view. And then it would result in the creation of other categories of this kind ("Turkish (or other countries) terrorism") and endless discussions

And what kind of categories should be added to this pictures (for example / see also)? I think that "Commons" should not be a place of war of opinion, so it is better to stop creating these categories.

Wikimedia Commons is intended to store documents and no to have this kind of discussion.

Moreover these attacks were not claimed by the PKK (see: w:en:February 2016 Ankara bombing and w:en:March 2016 Ankara bombing). So this category must be empty--Ghybu (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: I protected Category:PKK terrorism (2016) fully for 1 week because of edit warring. --Achim (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Ask me what PKK terrorism is. I "still" live (or survive) in Turkey. --E4024 (talk) 07:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That hardly makes your opinion NPOV, E4024. There's no reason for you to be neutral, but there is good reason for commons to be neutral. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral between killers and victims? Don't count on me please. --E4024 (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This category serves as a container for Category:February 2016 Ankara bombing and Category:March 2016 Ankara Bombing. Although their relationship is unclear PKK and TAK are not identical as Ghybu pointed out. Therefore I suggest to keep this cat moving it (without redirect) to Category:TAK terrorism (2016) or similar because the TAK has claimed resposibility for these bombings. --Achim (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a discussion going on: We do not create other categories of this kind without the end of this discussion.
If category should be created, I propose Category:Kurdish-Turkish conflict (2015-present) on the model of English wikipedia. And this category has been renamed to Category:PKK terrorism (2016) (same on wikidata) without discussion!--Ghybu (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I also left a message to Gomada about this discussion and the behavior of this user: See (cross-wiki on Kurdish and Armenian Genocide articles): [8] (es), [9] (en), [10] (fr) and on ca.wikipedia ([11] and [12]). He doesn't want the deletion of this category but he says the same thing as me here?!--Ghybu (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PS2: Should we also create the category "Category:People executed by the Turkish army"? I am sure that the parents of this child are also suffering--Ghybu (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: Per user Ghybu and Themightyquill. There is not an international norm which categorize people/organisations as terrorist, but there are organisations/point of views which categorize/label as terrorist. Since we are creating a neutral platform, we can not accept such categorization. P.S. user:E4024 is blocked on en.Wikipedia because of his nationalistic contributions. It's clear from his contributions how much he is offensive against minorities in turkey such as armenians, kurds etc.--Gomada (talk) 21:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Info:So User:Ghybu called in his or her neutral and objective friend Gomada and we are having an intellectually high level discussion here: Not only about the category but also about user E4024. At present I am watching to see if any administrative action will be taken against this mobilization, lack of assuming goodwill, personal attacks etc. Later I will reply to the questions, claims, and maybe also the personal comments. Now let me continue with some constructive work in Commons. See you. --E4024 (talk) 07:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Mobilization" of one person :) what I reported here. You act on several wiki: so the discussion doesn't stop here. It is useful that others users know this.
In your comments you will not stop talking about yourself and your feelings (cf. Your answers on this and related topics). So don't be surprised that we are starting to take a serious interest in it.--Ghybu (talk) 12:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This kind of category should not exist on Commons. First it is not neutral and does not respect the neutrality of point of view. And then it would result in the creation of other categories of this kind ("Turkish (or other countries) terrorism") and endless discussions

And what kind of categories should be added to this pictures (for example / see also)? I think that Commons should not be a place of war of opinion, so it is better to stop creating these categories.

Wikipedia commons is intended to store documents and no to have this kind of discussion.--Ghybu (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This has just been added to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bluebird-Proteus_CN7&diff=758800934&oldid=758799452 but its an obvious copy from the web. BrewsterBoy (talk) 21:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bluebird-electric.net/bluebird_cn7_jet_powered_land_speed_record_car.htm
http://www.gregwapling.com/hotrod/land-speed-racing-history/land-speed-racing-bluebird-cn7.html

Other uploads from Sheppane have the same problem. They're all claimed as "own work", but obviously not. BrewsterBoy (talk) 21:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:TOO#Australia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue Kehrääjätyttö ("Spinning girl") by finnish sculptor Viljo Savikurki, who died in 1975, so not PD yet. No FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no basic informations about the file. Kathisma (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Image is categorized in Category:History maps by User:Briangotts, so I suppose we have an author. @Briangotts: some clarification please? --Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]