Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 10th, 2016

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Marktbrunnen (Ruhland)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission 47.150.89.223 00:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: No permission since 2 November 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from: http://csl.bas-net.by/anews1.asp?id=28467 , can't be free Vlsergey-at-work (talk) 08:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. I come across this as promotional. Wikicology (talk) 08:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and probably copyright as well.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. I come across this as promotional. Wikicology (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 22:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is what you need, right Jcb? José Luiz disc 20:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks! Jcb (talk) 20:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The author and source is original uploader per File:Yokohama Subway Green Line.JPG. -- (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I updated the author and source field. Jcb (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not self work. Gastón Cuello (talk) 20:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Moresnet-Neutre" était un territoire communal disputé par les Pays-Bas (puis la Belgique à partir de 1831) et la Prusse de 1816 à 1919. Ce n'était pas un état indépendant et il n'en avait ni les attributs ni les symboles (drapeau et hymne). Le projet utopique du mouvement espérantiste est une chose. La réalité historique en est une autre. Le drapeau de Moresnet-Neutre n'a pas (et n'aurait pas pu légalement) existé.

L'origine du "drapeau" n'est même pas claire et reste discutée: voir l'unique article en néerlandais à https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlag_van_Neutraal_Moresnet. Par ailleurs, la seule source de cet article est un site supprimé ou pour le moins inaccessible (www.moresnet.nl). N.B.: L'"hymne" est une création du Mouvement espérantiste.Ailurus~frwiki (talk) 05:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use; the discussion whether or not it is valid/legal should not be held here. P 1 9 9   15:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Moresnet-Neutre" était un territoire, communal, disputé par les Pays-Bas (puis la Belgique à partir de 1831) et la Prusse de 1816 à 1919. Ce n'était pas un état indépendant et il n'en avait ni les attributs ni les symboles (drapeau et hymne). Le projet utopique du mouvement espérantiste est une chose. La réalité historique en est une autre. Le drapeau de Moresnet-Neutre n'a pas (et n'aurait pas pu légalement) existé. L'origine du "drapeau" n'est même pas claire et reste discutée: voir l'unique article en néerlandais à https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlag_van_Neutraal_Moresnet. Par ailleurs, la seule source de cet article est un site supprimé ou pour le moins inaccessible (www.moresnet.nl). N.B.: L'"hymne" est une création du Mouvement espérantiste. AIlurus (talk) 23:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. As per Commons rules, the file is in use, there is no copyright issue, therefore it can be here. Please discuss its use on Wikipedia. --Yann (talk) 23:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.infracert.de/images/Hotels/Ferien_im_Elchpark_GreenSign_Level_2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm really afraid, i worked on my first article on wikipedia and didn't know which pictures to use. I already told Wikipedia to speed delete that picture and also another one. So, i'm happy if you do so! Sorry, again! Thanks for your attentiveness. :) Julietta --JuliettaMagenta (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be used in a project Takeaway (talk) 22:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same photo appears here, predating the upload by 5 years: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/esporte/2011/12/1022929-com-messi-e-neymar-mundial-e-prova-de-que-vale-investir-na-base.shtml?mobile Ytoyoda (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judging by the description and category - bad joke. Halibutt (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quedo mal hecho Cristian27de (talk) 01:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, [1] 太刻薄 (talk) 03:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test picture without using Krochoman (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test screenshot - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test screenshot - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test screenshot - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test screenshot - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

testing photo - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test screenshot - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test image - without using Krochoman (talk) 04:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Thank you! ChemLibrarian (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by کامران آزاد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These are for use in mw:Talk:CX. Do not delete these please. کامران آزاد (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by کامران آزاد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, http://previews.123rf.com/images/rasoulali/rasoulali1505/rasoulali150500235/40053137-Picture-of-the-Castle-prison-Abbasid-Caliph-Harun-Al-Rashid-in-the-Iranian-city-of-Mashhad-its-Brown-Stock-Photo.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all please. کامران آزاد (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --lNeverCry 06:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo likely exceeds COM:TOO. Storkk (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo likely exceeds COM:TOO. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 06:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.seahawks.com/sites/seahawks.com/files/styles/open_graph__large/public/_video_thumbnails/160508_hunt.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.wixstatic.com/media/b76bdb_f0b2e21df0cf428c9a5579cff16628e6.jpg_srz_959_639_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_jpg_srz. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xiaodan2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i13.tinypic.com/4brrvwp.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xiaodan2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, violate COM:ADVERT. Also, while "own work" is claimed, in each case there are two images -- are they both "own work".

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ergos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all copyrighted book covers

Andrei S. Talk 15:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flagrant copyright infingement (see http://www.panoramio.com/photo/15159550) Bestiasonica (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of deleted https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Korn_2009.jpg JD {æ} 18:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: watermark, author credit, and uploader all don't match. P 1 9 9   19:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: watermark, author credit, and uploader all don't match. P 1 9 9   19:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copvio: promotional photo, cropped and distorted, meaning it likely taken from somewhere else, not an original photo. P 1 9 9   19:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wider image with different crop here: http://www.deportivosaprissa.com/index.php/2016/10/05/anllel-porras-nos-enfocamos-en-nuestro-futbol/ No evidence that Flickr user owns this image Ytoyoda (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The main focus of this image is a copyrighted newspaper cover. MB298 (talk) 20:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description says "taken from the music video of 'Bir Dakika'". Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted satellite images. Rapsar (talk) 20:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see the "source" section). Rapsar (talk) 20:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted satellite image. Rapsar (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken in 1971. The uploader can not be the original creator of the file. Rapsar (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (logo) Huji (talk) 20:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of free license MB298 (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of higher quality image found at [2]. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото вырезано, возможно, из этого http://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/acter/w/ros/3500/foto/270914/ или отсюда http://st.baskino.club/uploads/images/2013/118/mvry455.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above the TOO, and should not have been transferred to Commons. Many 'variations' on this design have been previously deleted after DRs. Reventtalk 20:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madansingh athletics (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper / magazine cover. Wrong self-licensed.

GeorgHHtalk   20:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This small robot is out of scope 2003:D2:1BE0:5E44:DE9D:18A2:E660:259E 10:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm french and do not understand the meaning of your sentence, could you explain it ? This image was made for a wikiversity project ( https://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Recherche:Mise_au_point_d%27un_drone_subaquatique ) --Octo-pulse (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't understant what is the problem. The drawing is her own work, proposed with cc-by-sa 4.0 licence, directly by the author. What's wrong ?
What does mean "out of scope" (sorry I'am french too). Four your information Octopus is thee artist's name of Gaïa Lamiot, and she made a new account because she lost his old password. --F. Lamiot (talk) 17:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why should this file be deleted ?? This small robot is NOT out of scope ! And it has been made for a wikimedia project. --Cbyd (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

authorship and copyrignt situation mentionned. Nguyenld (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing. Jcb (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at uploader's request: there is a better version at: File:Jan van der Heyden - An Imaginary View of Nijenrode Castle and the Sacristy of Utrecht Cathedral.jpg 2A02A03F (talk) 02:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 00:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo without using, out of scope Krochoman (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unimportant person, photo without using Krochoman (talk) 04:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait of non notorious person. Stegop (talk) 04:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 08:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal Pic. Mhhossein talk 10:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigman2700 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stareyz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo, unused, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo, unused, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo, unused, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 16:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, personality issues, used in vandalism 4ing (talk) 18:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leeferr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandal uploads. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krdnali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images of non-notable rock band, out of scope. Numerous similar images already on Commons.

P 1 9 9   19:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, non-notable people. Copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 21:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all other uploads (c)vios. Com:PCP. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry: No Freedom of Panorama in Russia for sculptures. A.Savin 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author or source information given, but needed to verify the license Didym (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File was uploaded in it.wikipedia by Pil56, citing that it was taken from de.wikipedia in PD-old, I only transferred it to Commons. --Gce (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion, {{PD-textlogo}} does not apply to this logo (which was transferred from German-language Wikipedia). It's more than "simple geometric shapes", as the quite creative (former) logo of Iceland's Left-Green Movement not only resembles the shape of the first letter of the party's name (Vinstrihreyfingin), but also a "green road" and a flower as well. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo, which was transferred from German-language Wikipedia, might be a borderline case of {{PD-textlogo}}. In my opinion, the combination of several elements (shields, letters, symbol to the right and particular color) as a whole might be considered more than "simple geometric shapes or text". I'm starting this deletion discussion to allow for more opinions. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without a source or author, and dated 2001, it's hard to match this to the license provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) duplicate of File:I-19 (AZ).svg 2) generic name –Fredddie 01:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The bridge is the main subject of the photo. 68.193.210.74 02:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ares antoyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist is alive https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ar%C3%A8s_Antoyan. A permission from the artist must be send to OTRS

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Rafael Parra Barrios (Perfil Curricular).jpg

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified PDF, probably out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P. Corsius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wiki_jazz_broukay_nl.pdf was written by me and the pictures have been given to me by the photographer, Robert Hansenne to be used as long as his name appears. I can't find my article on wikipedia. How is that possible?


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by مهدي رباني (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer from DR talk page by Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC):[reply]

Cómo lector y explorador sobre estos mitológicos personajes. Dedique un perfil ala conquistador Kull. Basado en la descripción de su aventura y centralizado en la última expresión poetica a sus 40 años, donde se detalla su estado contemplativo y filosófico. Es una pena que el artículo detallado este vacío de su imagen. Desde ya gracias. Atte. Danny. Dannyachaius (Diskussion) 16:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

IMHO the drawing has no basis. It is a fictional character and could be drawn in any which way. Long hair, short, big, small, etc pp. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, unused art of non-notable artist is out of scope. Depicted person is en:Kull of Atlantis. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 06:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Queeste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 06:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Queeste (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of original artwork in food packaging

— Racconish💬 14:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. EXIF data says author is "Libre de drioits". Unless there is acompelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same as "Libre de drioits", this image should be deleted per COM:PRP. Evidence of ownership should be sent to our support team using this email template. Wikicology (talk) 08:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. EXIF data says author is "Libre de drioits". Unless there is acompelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same as "Libre de drioits", this image should be deleted per COM:PRP. Evidence of ownership should be sent to our support team using this email template. Wikicology (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. EXIF data says author is "Libre de drioits". Unless there is acompelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same as "Libre de drioits", this image should be deleted per COM:PRP. Evidence of ownership should be sent to our support team using this email template. Wikicology (talk) 08:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 09:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 09:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarkGGN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs: Photographs of men on a sports field, "Taken by hanneys-vans ...Uploaded by de:Benutzer:MarkGGN". Requires COM:OTRS from actual photographer to retain.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evostoryarchive (2)

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Znamya Leyb-gvardii Ieguerski polka 1890.jpg:

1) These files were downloaded from a webforum of alt history [3]. Whereas the history is alternative (and thus the files constitute original research and are out of scope) some of them are used in the articles as if the events were real.

2) Significant doubt regarding the copyright status of the works.

Borodun (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 09:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

During last upload this was not own work of the uploader as now claimed - compare Special:Undelete/File:Inge_van_Nistelrooij.jpg (admin link only). JuTa 09:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source is this image, send by e-mail, from the author/owner ZonMw.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS OTRS-permission from toymaker is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is artis picturis? Google search does not give anything, en.wiki and la.wiki too. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That bird does not look like a simple geometric figure to me. There's been a previous deletion of a file with the same name. If it's the same file, it should be speedily deleted in accordance with Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4 and any objections should be raised through Commons:Undeletion requests rather than unilaterally recreating the content. LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info previous file was the same logo. Deletion because of missing permission, it was not a COM:TOO decision. Currently the file is marked as PD-textlogo.--Wdwd (talk) 13:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So speedy it is then. Whatever the reason for the previous deletion, just recreating deleted content without discussion is not the way to go. LX (talk, contribs) 15:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a simple "recreation of deleted content". This file is part of a batch transfer with more than 100 files from de.wp. Please look at the page history.--Wdwd (talk) 15:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:79 OAeMBr ZSU.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 12:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shreejitswain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sources for each images must be provided to verify the copyright statut.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danick Saulnier isn't mentioned in fr.wiki. Probably he is non-notable, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 13:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 13:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kameyou (talk · contribs) and Lmmnhn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, they were used on People Power's election advertisement.[4]

Cropped versions:

QBear (talk) 14:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Designer still alive as of September 2016 Schlosser67 (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Shev123 (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Designer still alive (as of December 2015) Schlosser67 (talk) 14:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Designer only died in 2008. Schlosser67 (talk) 14:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Designer only died in 2008. Schlosser67 (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Designer only died in 2008. Schlosser67 (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Designer only died in 2008. Schlosser67 (talk) 14:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Parra Barrios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from newspaper and photos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. "Unknown" author claim for a 2015 photo risible. Both versions likely copyright violations, older one is claimed to be from 1980. Storkk (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. "Unknown" author claim for a 2010 photo risible. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer (Jean Robert Huart is credited in information template) should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Spurious "Unknown" author claim for a 1999 photo. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osafoffice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo/news photos and video. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1960s almost certainly not {{PD-Japan}}. Previously speedy kept by Nyttend on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML Storkk (talk) 15:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1959 almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certificate, the copyright to which would be owned by the Association Belge d'Arts Martiaux Japonais", who must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1975 almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 2000 almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo likely exceeds the COM:TOO. Legal representative of organization should confirm they release thier logo under a free license via OTRS Storkk (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1950s almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from 1975 almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader... Uploader may be the subject, but owning a copy of a photograph does not confer its copyright unless that was explicitly bought or otherwise transferred. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1960s almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1950s almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheWikiEditorGuy2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Used in vanity article.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious {{Own work}} claim. Photographer(s) should confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1960s almost certainly not PD, and copyright not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo likely from the 1940s, almost certainly not PD and definitely not CC as claimed. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eleni Labiri, almost certainly not the uploader, must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1960s almost certainly not PD, and copyright not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zgyricky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo likely from from the 1960s or 70s in France, almost certainly not PD, and copyright not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo likely from the 1970s almost certainly not PD, and copyright not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from the 1970s almost certainly not PD, and copyright not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, only used in one blatantly self-promotional page. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to certificate not owned by certificate recipient. Almost certianly passes COM:TOO. Copyright holder should confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to certificate not owned by certificate recipient. Almost certianly passes COM:TOO. Federation Equestre Francaise should confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to a photograph is not usually held by the subject. Documentation regarding transfer of copyright or confirmation of copyright holder is required via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer (possibly a Pierre Tonon) must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright of the certificate not owned by recipient. Copyright holder must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Noelle de Muyser should confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan or photo of a photo. Original photographer must confirm license via OTRS. Unlikely to be PD. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated author is "Georgette Methens-Renard" who is almost certainly not the uploader. Mlle. Methens-Renard must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly over the COM:TOO, highly unlikely to be {{Own work}} of the uploader as claimed. Copyright holder must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Likely studio portrait from the 1980s almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Photo from 1960 almost certainly not PD, and copyright almost certainly not owned by uploader, who claims author is "Unknown". Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer (Eleni Labiri Suzuki?) must confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly PD due to age, but more information concerning date and authorship needed to ascertain status. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owning or appearing in a photograph do not make one the copyright holder or author. Confirmation of who the original photographer was must be sent to OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious {{Own work}} claim, given uploader's other uploads and lack of date/authorship information. Actual photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Previously speedy kept on procedural grounds at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GdML. Storkk (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though the simple text may not be copyrightable, there are many other examples of logos and marketing material where it has been determined that shading and non-simple shapes are copyrightable. This image appears to be above that threshold. (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The prominent label fails to meet COM:TOO. (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal snapshot, the user's only contribution, possibly a personal attack; the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person died in 1977. Uploader has problems with copyright (look his/her contributions). Own work is in doubt, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license for every used image is needed. I did not find neither of images on source site. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was used in ro:Patronica Alexandru. Not notable. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:32 (UTC) 17:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A small file, not in use, and without a source, date or accurate author. Out of scope due to lack of educational utility Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no authorship information. Jcb (talk) 17:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission for this 1999 work. Jcb (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Jaume Casas i Sargatal, not an own work. It was published or painted in 1958. Not in PD in Spain, because is impossible to be expired, at this time, although unknown date of defunction of the original author. Bestiasonica (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own photo; probably scanned from a book. Ankry (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader doesn't match copyright owner, but self-own license is claimed Ytoyoda (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho random mass-upload of 2009 paronamia streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho random mass-upload of 2009 paronamia streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho random mass-upload of 2009 paronamia streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, possibly promotional purpose, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very close duplicate of File:061-Death_of_Hardicanute..png, probably generated due to incorrect naming. Mpaa (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Il y a un autre fichier similaire à celui-ci plus actuelMeteoaccess (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is claimed to be a selfie, but I doubt. Probably not own work, but real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is claimed to be a selfie, but I doubt. Probably not own work, but real photographer's copyright violation. (Depicted person is notable.) Taivo (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Jcb (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Also bad quality, out of scope. Jcb (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: this copyright tag {{PD-SpanishGov}} does not apply to Spanish stamps - see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Spain. Ww2censor (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this 1960 stamp (see colnect webpage) cannot be freely licenced yet as it is only 56 years old - see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Spain - minimum 70 years pma for stamps issued pre 1987 if designer is unknown though I have not researched the designer. Ww2censor (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Jcb (talk) 21:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Where does this map come from? Jcb (talk) 22:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 22:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 22:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juan manuel henao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 22:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 22:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Section author states "all rights reserved": incompatible with Wikimedia Commons licences. Takeaway (talk) 22:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo without permission. Dmitry89 (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 22:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kpjas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 22:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo without permission Dmitry89 (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:DisneyChannel2014.png, which is the same image other than the 'direct' banner. This is above the TOO. Reventtalk 23:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HelenaRus666 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no metadata. Seems like copyvio from web. Filenames mean "screenshot /date-time/", one more argument for copyvio.

Dmitry89 (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alex Riccio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art works are the main object of these photos. No permission from art-author. File:607336 1 w 570.jpg = copyvio from http://s.fraza.ua/images/2016/04/21/penball04_210416.JPG

Dmitry89 (talk) 23:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide too many information about this file, it could of be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 23:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 23:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 09:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, packaging clearly complex/creative enough for protection pretty much anywhere. --Storkk (talk) 09:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for recent monuments. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Gay Liberation Monmument which is part of the Stonewall National Monument, which is on the NRHP and is a National Historic Monument. This overrides any issues of Freedom of Panorama. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The sculpture is copyrighted, and that copyight is not somehow "overridden" by being part of a National Historic Monument. --Storkk (talk) 09:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image needs a permission from David Tulk. Yann (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the datation is correct (1855), I see no problem with this file. Kathisma (talk) 02:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The date is for the object. The issue is the copyright on the photo, not the object.
And according to Davidmadelena who uploaded the file, he is not the photographer, who is the Victoria and Albert Museum. So the permission has to come from them. (See my talk page.) Yann (talk) 21:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Photographs of 3D objects have copyright independent of their subject. This photograph was taken by David Tulk, probably for the V&A museum, and either or both will own the copyright. They must confirm a free license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Recreation Center (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs, notice the (C) statement in each of the file descriptions, and that they credit different people with the photos. Thus we have an uploader who is neither of these two other photographers, and no permission from the photographers.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin Beltz We are the record label from Yelle themself, we are owners of all copyrights on pictures that we are uploading. It's tremendous for us to actualize their wiki page and pictures. Best Recreation Center


Deleted: @Recreation Center: We'd love to keep the photos... please follow the instructions on OTRS to verify that you are the actual copyright holder. Secondly, I see you are editing Wikipedia articles about subjects with which you have a financial relationship, but you have not declared that clearly. Please follow the instructions on w:WP:COI before editing Wikipedia any further, or you will be blocked. --Storkk (talk) 10:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no source and a review of the uploader's contributions found several other photos which were from someone else, but uploaded by uploader. Nominating this one for consensus. Image is only in use on uploader's gallery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Clear subject of the photo is the building, which is obviously still copyrighted anyway... regardless of the photo's copyright status, there is no Freedom of Panorama in France. --Storkk (talk) 10:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, no evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 21:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept after fixing information. --Storkk (talk) 10:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Jcb (talk) 22:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did set it as Public Domain, what you mean by No permission? Konegistiger 03:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Who is Guillermo MacBeath? Jcb (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Credited to Guilermo MacBeath, who must confirm license by following the instructions at OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Section author states "all rights reserved": incompatible with Wikimedia Commons licenses. Takeaway (talk) 22:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info: If you compare the Username with the copyright claiming, you could notice that Cksaad is very similar to Paul Saad. Then, if the uploader is actually the copyright holder, then, the selected license should supersede the copyright claiming. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We have a process for verifying the identity of accounts, located at OTRS. Paul Saad should confirm that he wishes to license his photo under a free license by following the instructions there. --Storkk (talk) 10:16, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , I will change the file to svg. --Brotkiste (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PDF image is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no source (No source since)

Collage of apparent PD photographs. (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Conditional on finding a source for the JFK inaugural address photograph. It can be found in a number of books, but I have yet to confirm any copyright status, such as being a White House publication which would make it PD by default. -- (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JFK image is a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim: It's still there. LX (talk, contribs) 14:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: background design makes this ineligible for PD-text. Journal cover, no evidence that this is not copyrighted, clearly not "own work" Wdwd (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly have more experience than I have. But please note that the image in question was created by me, an editor of the journal "Studia austriaca". Thank you! Germaust (talk) 08:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC) (undo | thank)

If you cannot accept the above declaration, please note that all content on the journal's webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Thank you! Germaust (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Germaust: If you retained copyright to the image, please confirm your identity by following the instructions at OTRS. Note, however, that we cannot accept licenses with NonCommercial or NoDerivs clauses, so your original license choice of {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} will have to suffice. If the image has been deleted in the interim, please still confirm your identity: the OTRS agent who processes the ticket will request the file's undeletion. Storkk (talk) 09:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Journal cover -- needs a free license via OTRS from an authorized official of the journal -- that may be Germaust, but since he is an anonymouse contributor here, we need confirmation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: background design makes this ineligible for PD-text. Journal cover, no evidence that this is not copyrighted, clearly not "own work" Wdwd (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly have more experience than I have. But please note that the image in question was created by me, an editor of the journal "Studia theodisca". Thank you! Germaust (talk) 08:37, 11 November 2016 (UTC) (undo | thank)

If you cannot accept the above declaration, please note that all content on the journal's webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Thank you! Germaust (talk) 08:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Germaust: If you retained copyright to the image, please confirm your identity by following the instructions at OTRS. Note, however, that we cannot accept licenses with NonCommercial or NoDerivs clauses, so your original license choice of {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} will have to suffice. If the image has been deleted in the interim, please still confirm your identity: the OTRS agent who processes the ticket will request the file's undeletion. Storkk (talk) 09:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JOurnal cover -- needs a free license via OTRS from an authorized official of the journal -- that may be Germaust, but since he is an anonymouse contributor here, we need confirmation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image as the exposed signature of the Director General of Dawson put online without his permission. Mydawsoncollege (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: With a few exceptions, signatures do not have a copyright. However, this diploma has a full sentence of text, and that does have a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2014 Disney Channel Logo.svg. This is simply a different file with the same image. It it above the TOO, rather obviously. Reventtalk 20:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. One color (blue) no shades. White letters (typeface) and blue background text-logo.

Is very different from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Disney_Channel_2014.png this one has different colors, shades, logo in high relief. --EEIM (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@EEIM: The DR that I pointed at is not about the same image as is on enwiki... it is identical to the original 'lighter blue' images uploaded under this filename. Also, since the image on enwiki is under there under 'fair use', it's not much of an argument for keeping this. This is not below the TOO... the 'mouse head' is neither a simple geometric shape, nor part of a typeface. It is a creative, and copyrightable design, and that was the consensus at the prior DR. Technically, I could have simply speedied this on the basis of that discussion since it's the 'same thing'. Reventtalk 20:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the image on enwiki you pointed at (with the shading) was deleted on commons after Commons:Deletion requests/File:DisneyChannel2014.png. Reventtalk 20:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the 'mouse head' is neither a simple geometric shape, nor part of a typeface.????. Two points or circles on the i, ï, does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright. Everyone knows the owner is disney, but it's not copyviolo .

this File:Mickey Mouse head and ears.png looks like "mouse head", but in this file ,i is font (fonts have no copyright in the USA) and two points on the top.--EEIM (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yet... the consensus at the previous DR was to delete this same 'work', despite you making essentially the same argument there. This is very close to the TOO, but in my opinion (and apparently, in the opinion of several people at the previous DR) at least slightly above it. All that is required for copyright protection in the US is a single 'feature' that can be pointed at as the result of human creativity, and this 'narrowly' meets that. Reventtalk 21:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions. If you want to use it, you have to ensure that you have the legal right to do so and that you do not infringe any trademark rights. See our general disclaimer. Owner is disney, autor is disney, Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. --EEIM (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There is no copyright on any type face, however complex, in the USA. If Disney chooses to create a type face for this logo that includes the mouse head as the dot on the letter "i", then it must accept the fact that the logo cannot have a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 22:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

just to mention: the uploader (what is me) never stated that he is the copyright owner! Please check again. Thx. ...Sicherlich talk 07:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I informed Wikipedysta:Julo ...Sicherlich talk 07:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It infringes copyrights. L1c2h3 (talk) 04:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All his files are private and non-useful --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Data depicted is out of date and inaccurate. 108.171.130.186 08:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, and edit if any numbers are inaccurate. It's a very interesting chart with a useful perspective that deserves to be seen. Care to say what's wrong with the data? —Patrug (talk) 12:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 09:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The problem here is that the photo infringes on the copyright of the can. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 09:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The depicted work may well be in the public domain, but the photograph is unsourced and appears to be modern. LX (talk, contribs) 11:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a FOP in Belgium. I did the picture in the Pierre Joseph Wincqz street in Soignies (and more than this, the sculptor died more than 70 years ago (1937)).

Deleted: As noted above, the sculpture isPD, but the source of the photograph is clearly wrong and it has no license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nice shot, --Madelgarius (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is a paid editor for the subject (as disclosed at Wikipedia) so unlikely to be "own work". The image was probably provided by the subject or PR agency, who might be willing to release, but then we would need something transparent like an OTRS release.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fuhghettaboutit, Thankyou for the invitation to allow me to reply. I did in fact discuss the CC licence with Todd and asked for assignment of ownership and copyright which he agreed to - I expect to receive the written assignment of ownership and title this week Todd is in China and I am in the Philippines so that takes a few days. (I can get a soft copy of the assignment sent to me at some point today or this evening) Once I receive this should I submit the assignment to you or to the team at permissions-commons AT wikimedia DOT org?Neil Kindness (talk) 02:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC) I am trying to email commons but the address is invalid:[reply]

An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org?>: malformed address: ?> may not follow <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

Please check the message recipient "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org?" and try again

can you please help me - I have the written assignment of ownership and world copyright but cannot comply because your email address does not work.Neil Kindness (talk) 12:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC) Ah OK - I see the issue now - I have added "?" by errror to the address. let me try to resend the assignment03:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC) Ok - I have added pages to Todds site and uploaded images fo the work in question and his written assignment of ownership and copyright to me to try to assist in this matter:[reply]

image in question: http://toddanthonytyler.com/_MG_0305.jpg assignemt of copyright and ownership document: http://toddanthonytyler.com/copyright.jpg Todds email address for any verification that you may need: todd@toddanthonytyler.com

I hope the above helps a bit.Neil Kindness (talk) 04:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The photograph looks like a professional's work and if Mr. Tyler is depicted in the photo he cannot usually be the copyright holder. Owning a copy of his portrait does not automatically make him the copyright holder. Only the original photographer can assign his copyright to you, unless it was previously transferred to Tyler by agreement. If that was the case, we need a copy of this agreement too. De728631 (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De728631Thankyou for taking time to address this issue. I note your concerns and have emailed Todd for clarification. I will post back here shortly.Neil Kindness (talk) 01:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Neil Kindness: in case it wasn't clear, what we need now is documentation of how Mr. Tyler came to own the rights (e.g. a similar contract to the above, but transferring rights from the photographer to him). Storkk (talk) 09:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs a license via OTRS from the photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Goletta as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly a crop from an ads, you can see the watermark "MPL 46" and, in the bottom of the picture, a partial "Balloon" yellow and red Wdwd (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this file. It's being used as a bibliography guide for a city wikiproject. Cornellà de Llobregat hosts the most famous festival of clowns in the world, so this list of books about clowns and about the festival allows wikipedians to improve the articles related with this topic. In the future it will be moved as wiki-text, but it's a is a hard work that will be done by city librarians during the year. Thank you for your understanding! --Xavier D. (Messages) 16:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is a copyrighted work. At the very least we would need a license from the library that created it. If the named authors do not have work for hire agreements with the library, we will need licenses from them as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Missing authorship information, so that copyright situation cannot be determined Jcb (talk) 21:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Postcard, I added 2 sources. --Achim (talk) 12:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately we still don't have the necessary authorship information, which is probably at the backside. Jcb (talk) 12:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Doesn't matter. 1905 is plenty old enuf to be PD. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominating after contacting closing admin. For European works, 1905 is not "plenty old enuf to be PD" of course. Authors name may be at the backsite, as often seen in Europe. Jcb (talk) 16:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 100+ years is plenty old enough -> PD by age in US. Europe is a different problem: Probably made by a German photographer, the © would expire 70 years pma. BUT, the author isn't mentioned and in my experience, the photographer's name often isn't mentioned on the back of the card. Therefore PD-EU-anon is a safe choice. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Without actually seeing the back side of the card, we cannot know whether there is an author mentioned or not. So unless we have the back side available, this should be deleted per COM:PCP. Jcb (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per previously closure. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since) Reventtalk 12:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image appears (see http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dutchstudies/an/SP_LINKS_UCL_POPUP/SPs_english/flemish_movement/catholic.html ) to be a Dutch caricature from 1906. Reventtalk 12:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - no information on the author provided, this is very unlikely to be an anonymous work, suchs works are normally not anonymous in the Netherlands - Jcb (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Might be a copyvio, but it is surely not, nor ever was, a matter of lacking a source. The only rational course of action is to wait for a boffin of Belgian cartoon history (there’s quite a few) to tell us who the author of this cartoon is. Meanwhile, let’s  keep it. -- Tuválkin 21:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1906 -> PD. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominating after contacting closing admin. "1906 -> PD" is not a valid keep rationale of European works of course. E.g. Jameslwoodward uses 1886 as a cutoff. This may be dubious, but 1906 is obviously too young to assume PD. Dutch comics are very rarely published anonymously. The Netherlands and Belgium have been safe countries for at least the past 5 centuries, where you could publish any comic/criticism/whatever without bringing yourself in danger. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy  Keep The artist is unknown. Unless the nominator can provide some evidence that the artist can be determined, or that a legally identifiable person is making a (very odd and probably false) claim of publication rights, then Jim's personal rules of thumb, are not Commons policies, nor IP law. As for creating a new DR two days after the last one closed, this is wasting everyone's time. -- (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete My 1886 rule of thumb is based on a photographer born 1866, taking the photo at age 20, and living to age 80 in 1946. About a third of all people born in the 1860s lived past 1946. By the time you get to 1906, the photographer had to live only another 40 years, so it is certainly easily possible -- way beyond a significant doubt -- that the photographer was living in 1946. And note that Jcb, who is Dutch, points out that "Dutch comics are very rarely published anonymously." .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Jim, your rule of thumb is not Commons policy. If the artist is unknown then this drawing is public domain as per current policies. If you wish to change the policies then that's something to make a proposal for. By the way, I make no presumptions about whether where volunteers happen to reside can indicate their understanding of that country's IP law or that of other countries. I find it better to judge that by their comments and actions on-wiki. Thanks -- (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    This cartoon is likely from Belgium. Not the Netherlands. Which one is more likely? That a Dutch cartoonist created a cartoon about the Archbishop of Mechelen or that a Belgian cartoonist created an cartoon about the Archbishop of Mechelen? I am not sure why Jcb claims that The Netherlands and Belgium have been safe countries for at least the past 5 centuries but we had the Inquisition, Protestants not liking Catholics, the second World War (and the first in Belgium) etc. And don’t forget that Eduard Douwes Dekker wrote one of the most famous Dutch books Max Havelaar using the pseudonym Multatuli because he was afraid that his book would have a negative impact on his career. Jcb’s claims are based on nothing. Natuur12 (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    ('Based on nothing' may be quite far from the truth, I have spent 10 years in university studying Theology.) Which of the temporary problems you name would have been ongoing in 1906? None of them I guess? en:Low Countries has been a save place most of the time. E.g. in the 16th century, most of the European Bible translations have been made in cities like Antwerpen, because in several other European countries you would be killed for translating the Bible. And one thing that may have been misunderstood: with 'Dutch' I meant 'in the Dutch language', not 'from the Netherlands'. Jcb (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I know that you studied theology, you have told me that in the past though it must be years ago by now. My point merely was that your original statement is not true. Your view on Dutch and Belgian history is not as how historians see it but that’s a debate we will have to safe for another time. Natuur12 (talk) 21:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Clear keeper. No author = PD-EU-anon. Maybe it was published naming the author, given the nature of the cartoon and the possible (likey) repercussion I tend towards anonymous publication. Safe is relative. You might not get burned at the stake, but poking fun at a Catholic official wouldn't get you many friends either. Still a troublesome topic, see the 1990 problem getting an abortion law ratified in Belgium. I don't think it would have been better ~ 100 years ago. No judgement, just observation.--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That we do not 'know', from the information that we have, who the author was does not mean the work was either anonymous or pseudonymous. It simply means that we don't 'know'... the lack of knowledge (an unknown author) is not evidence, especially when we don't know any publication details. A public claim of authorship even decades after the original publication means that 70 years pma applies, and we should assume that it does unless there is actual evidence to indicate otherwise. Both {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} and {{PD-anon-70-EU}} make the same point... that we really should have some evidence of actual anonymity. Reventtalk 23:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All anon pics could be argued the same way. Doesn't say who made it, can't keep it. True, we don't know. I didn't say that we do, I am using my sherlockian hat and pipe and deduct from what we have and what I (think I) know. That's all the evidence one can come up with from afar. C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Hedwig in Washington: I think we should make a point out of recognizing the difference between 'unknown' and 'anonymous'... being anonymous was a deliberate choice by the author, and being unknown often just means we've obtained the work from some crap 3rd party source that did not attribute it. To call a work truly 'anonymous' means that you have actual evidence that the author made that choice. Reventtalk 00:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(specifically, that the original publication was either 'unsigned' or specifically attributed to 'anonymous') A cropped version from a third party, with no attribution, is not 'anonymous', it is 'unknown', and different laws apply. Reventtalk 00:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No objection. We often use those term inaccurately. In this case I think anonymous actually is more likely, see my reasoning above, which can be totally wrong. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:19, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per previously closure. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The upload has been kept for 8 years on a reasonable presumption of good faith. The uploader made a correct release declaration and the EXIF on the photograph is entirely credible. There is no evidence that would cause us to have significant doubt as to the release. -- (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader did not make an explicit own work claim, the resolution is very low and their only other edit is vandalism, see here - Jcb (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have you proof to support your «Uploader did not make an explicit own work claim» claiming? Why too sure? --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can verify that claim here - Jcb (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The lack of Own work claiming is not proof of copyvio; Google Image Search by date is, and one of the relevant results contains the image, but actually credited to Commons. Still in doubt? Just Assume Good Faith. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Amitie 10g. --Yann (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this file can shared anymore. It was uploaded here only for the contest. Additionally, this image contains my facial image. Aidar.seralin (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont wish my photo be available anymore. Aidar Seralin 78.124.159.208 23:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this file can shared anymore. It was uploaded here only for the contest. Additionally, this image contains my facial image. 78.124.159.208 23:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fanghong. --Yann (talk) 18:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this file can be shared anymore. It was uploaded here only for the contest. Additionally, this image contains my facial image. Aidar.seralin (talk) 03:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont wish my photo be available anymore 78.124.159.208 23:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this file can shared anymore. It was uploaded here only for the contest. Additionally, this image contains my facial image. Aidar.seralin (talk) 23:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: by Fanghong. --Yann (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo without permission. Dmitry89 (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 18:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not the right one Tren ligero gdl (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What? --Rschen7754 00:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   02:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No indication that it was published before 1923. Jcb (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dated at 1887 at http://www.crawfordcolts.org/class_gallery.cfm?gallery_id=35576 (click the image to see caption). Basvb (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per 1887 image. --Basvb (talk) 19:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo with claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Listed as used in Massa Pneus at the French Wikipedia but not actually used there (I added there right now). The username seems to belong to the company, so, there is 99% that it is Own work. In order to keep or delete this file, the question should be Is this logo bellow or above the TOO in France? --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Likely below TOO, if that is doubted please reraise the issue. --Basvb (talk) 19:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This unused image may not be covered by the license given as the description says it came from Cinema magazine, #116, 1953. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Ellin Beltz: , could you clarify your point? As the description says the photograph comes from a 1953 issue of Cinema, a well-known Italian magazine [5], and depicts the director Alberto Lattuada instructing an actress in the set of the Italian film La spiaggia, so of I am not missing something PD-Italy is apparently met. --Cavarrone (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because "images of people or of aspects, elements and facts of natural or social life, obtained with photographic process or with an analogue one, including reproductions of figurative art and film frames of film stocks "... but we do not know if this is a film frame of a film, since it came from a magazine. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The image is part of a column (Cinema Gira) about films which just started to be shot, and it is just a normal photograph documenting the behind the scenes of a shooting... PD-Italy covers normal photos ("images of people or of aspects, elements and facts of natural or social life, obtained with photographic process"), not just film frames. --Cavarrone (talk) 06:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per above. PD-ITALY in the first place deals with photographs, so the image not being a screenshot of the film in question but being a simple photograph taken in the set during the shootings of that film does not affect its PD status. If the language of PD-ITALY template is not clear enough it could be a good thing to retouch it, but there is little doubt that a simple photograph taken in Italy and published in an Italian magazine in 1953 falls within PD-ITALY territory, not differently from the thousands of PD-Italy photographs listed in Italy-related Category:Images from magazines subcategories. --Cavarrone (talk) 05:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD Italy seems to apply. --Basvb (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no source (No source since)

Converting to DR, as this official portrait is going to be PD if the identification is correct. It appears to be Rama VI (1 January 1880 – 25 November 1925), the sixth monarch of Siam. (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fae, which PD-rationale (which country) applies? Basvb (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
{{PD-Thailand}} applies, though I have never discussed it in a DR before. :-) -- (talk) 11:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fae, also PD in the US, since it was likely taken in 1921 (wedding date). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]