Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/01
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
non-text logo, need OTRS-permisasion, source unclear, uploader removes OTRS-request away Motopark (talk) 02:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
need OTRS-permission, uploader has been removed my OTRS-request Motopark (talk) 08:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete the logo fifth time (4 times yesterday). Taivo (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
need OTRS-permission, uploader has been removed my OTRS-request Motopark (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, sixth time during two days ... Taivo (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Images need sources, it's not enough to claim they're all "PD". Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
just a note to say I've seen this nomination, and will try to make a comprehensive listing of the represented items in a couple of days. Wittylama (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- I've now added names, dates, copyright status and thumbnail of it's file on Commons for every artwork visible in this screenshot. That should be sufficient. See the difference between the documentation as it was when nominated for deletion, and how it is now. Pinging also Husky who made the visualisation tool. Wittylama (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- kept problem solved. Multichill (talk) 21:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork (bookcover) Stolbovsky (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb 1 May 2016. --Achim (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Dieser User scheint immer wieder Dateien ohne entsprechende Rechte hochzuladen Eingangskontrolle (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Erstens ist immer wieder bei 2 Uploads innerhalb der letzten 4 Jahre wohl doch etwas übertrieben (Kioto8 ist anscheinend nur noch auf de:wp aktiv), zwotens geh ich mal davon aus, dass du die Diskussionsseite gar nicht gelöscht haben wolltest. Nix für ungut... --Achim (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: DR created erroneously, no valid reason for deleting a user's talk page. --Achim (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
To Staplegunther: Could you please remove your photo on Price Utah page. It is not very representative of the city since it is taken near the truck route viaduct. And it violates several rules of landscape photography. Numero Uno: too much asphalt! Thank you, former resident of Price, Utah---35 years ago! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.52.182.142 (talk)
- Are you suggesting that a file should be deleted (as the page title suggests), or are you simply suggesting that a file should be removed from a page somewhere? Please clarify what you mean. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info: User:Staplegunther doesn't exist on Commons, see also User:Staplegunther~commonswiki who did by now one single upload in 2009.
- Assuming the requester wants an image to be removed from a page like en:Price, Utah. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of process scope, nothing to do here. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect title. The correct page is Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - May - Birds in their habitat. -- Colin (talk) 10:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: : Bad name, unused, author's request. --Achim (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 10:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: https://twitter.com/pathawale1
I do not want to join this forum. I want to delete my account from here. Aamna Qureshi (talk) 23:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Accounts cannot be terminated as well. ~riley (talk) 01:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Stalking...? Konto na chwilę (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Disruptive. ~riley (talk) 01:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely for vandalism. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:S.S.K Road,Feni.jpeg
Per watermark, small size and missing EXIF data, own work is unlikely and I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader's private request. -- ~ Nahid Talk 16:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture has an author indicated at the bottom, likely a copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Files from this uploader deleted, copyvio uploder. --Martin H. (talk) 02:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion the uploader should prove ownership via COM:OTRS because the image was posted in two articles last year [1] [2]. The uploaded version might have better resolution but perhaps it's from a physical magazine or possibly Google can't find it. Dontreader (talk) 00:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Picture #4: source unattributed/deleted Seb az86556 (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete - If one of the pics that I used off commons has been deleted as unsourced, by all means delete the montage. For some reason, Commons isn't allowing me to sign my posts.
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
If this is own work then I think the uploader should prove it via COM:OTRS. It's here [3] [4] [5]. That third source confirms it's an artist who created the image. The uploader must prove that he or she is the artist. Dontreader (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader didnt provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, very unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal naked photo 89.65.3.175 00:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I think this is a screenshot or a derivative work from a TV program called Giggle and Hoot. Some elements are identical in this short video (WARNING: Aussie accent ahead): [6]. Dontreader (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio from www.fau.mil.uy/fotos/aeronaves/pucara/foto_02b.jpg RA-96104 (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 02:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
tineye and google finds plenty of copies example https://tineye.com/search/e3e3d00e962a0c582cf4dc7ca73e53e88b5496f3/?sort=size&order=desc Motopark (talk) 02:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The source [7] doesn't hav a license posted, and I can't tell if they are the original photographer. Random86 (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, replaced by File:Diazepam-from-xtal-3D-balls.png by same uploader that has geometry verified by cited ref. Image here has no provenance, and is unlikely geometry with the two benzene rings coplanar (VDW collsions) DMacks (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Go ahead and delete, for the reasons DMacks gives. Accelrys DS Visualizer's force field for quick minimization is pretty terrible at this kind of thing. I would have drawn the structure in DSV based on the skeletal formula, so the crystal structure-based image is much better. --Ben (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (talk) 20:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Low quality ({{BadJPG}}). Have File:Neramexane.svg. Only use is in an abandoned Draft-space article (the live variant of that article uses the SVG) DMacks (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Cultural appropriation flyer
[edit]- File:Let's talk about cultural appropriation (23507649926).jpg
- File:Let's talk about cultural appropriation Portland Oregon sign (17285894913).jpg
Copyright violation. Photographs are derivative works of the flyer depicted. The content of the flyer is almost certainly held by the author of the flyer, likely either Roger Peet or the Regional Arts and Culture Council. No evidence of permission from the flyer author is presented. — Ipoellet (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I think this probably passes the threshold of originality such that PD-textlogo doesn't apply. IagoQnsi (talk) 06:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems too complex for PD-textlogo to apply IagoQnsi (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I think, that this is gigantic sculpture and that it was not permanently placed. That case Portuguese freedom of panorama does not apply. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, by definition Christmas ornament are not permanetly displayed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Threemonths (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history (over 30 copyright violations deleted; the uploader's only response was to vandalise deletion discussions and blank out the talk page warnings). One person has already complained that their work is being used with false attribution.
- File:Tobias Jesso Jr at Primavera Sound 2015 CROPPED.jpg
- File:Owen Pallett 2015 CROPPED.jpg
- File:James Blake NOS Alive 2015 CROPPED.jpg
- File:Alan Palomo 2015.jpg
- File:Benjamin Clementine - 2015.jpg
- File:James Blake NOS Alive 2015.jpg
- File:Owen Pallett 2015.jpg
- File:Memphis the xx 2014.jpg
- File:Destroyercommodoreballroom2015.jpg
- File:Tdanbejar930clubphoto2.jpg
- File:Danbejarwashingtondc930.jpg
- File:Destroyer and Dan Bejar in Islington.jpg
- File:DestroyerbejarwebsterhallNYC.jpg
- File:Mount Eerie - Phil Elverum.jpg
- File:Kings of Convenience - Eirik and Erlend.jpg
- File:Eirik Glambek Bøe - 2015.jpg
- File:Erlend Øye - 2015.jpg
- File:Tobias Jesso Jr at Primavera Sound 2015.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and most pictures contain the special instruction FBMD in the metadatas, and went obviously through facebook. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Pippobuono (talk) 08:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
advertising, self promotion Pippobuono (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion, advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, found in http://www.taringa.net/post/imagenes/16935689/Anonymous-Fondos-HD-Wallpapers.html Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal artwork without usage or any educational goals. The only files of user
- File:Structe.jpg
- File:Klir bs.jpg
- File:Historika.jpg
- File:Doktirine2.jpg
- File:Doktirineав.jpg
- File:Book-empty 19-1223412.jpg
Stolbovsky (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also the background is maybe a copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 23:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Self promotion, low quality, out of scope The Photographer (talk) 23:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File:I-10 (LA).svg and is the wrong size. Rschen7754 23:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 09:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Malinion (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. Personal photo, uploaded only for a clearly non notable article. Geraki TLG 04:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused and out of scope. Dontreader (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, and out of scope. No educational value. No description given. Dontreader (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Also there is no freedom of panorama in India for paintings. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Alexander Moroz died in 2009. The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Alexander Moroz died in 2009. The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Alexander Moroz died in 2009. The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test video. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fabs Paris (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Margaretks (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Thatkiddoug1.jpg
- File:Thatkiddoug.jpg
- File:DJI 0055.MP4 snapshot 11.27 (2016.04.26 17.06.14).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruiz Roscigno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manuelcalvino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/30261024.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andile Moeketsi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
2006 photo with no source or author, also not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by شمخي جابر فاضل (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:المسائل والبدائل ، شمخي جابر فاضل.pdf
- File:المذكرات الأليمة ، شمخي جابر فاضل.pdf
- File:الخطط الشيطانية لإبادة الشيعة ، شمخي جابر فاضل.pdf
- File:الاملاء الاستدلالي المقارن ، شمخي جابر فاضل.pdf
- File:الرد الأنيس على الوهابي عثمان الخميس ج 1 لشمخي جابر فاضل.pdf
- File:شمخي جابر فاضل.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. Commons is no private photo album. Achim (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kadammanitta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF and/or out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Ardramay.jpg
- File:Mar Chrysostom.jpg
- File:Prarthana Kelkkaname.jpg
- File:S Tunes.jpg
- File:Thiruvonappulari, Its my love 4 u and Venalmazha by Dr. Sam Kadammanitta.jpg
- File:Dr. Sam Kadammanitta ; IFFK Media Award..jpg
- File:Dr. Sam Kadammanitta.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, appears to be derived from previously published (example) http://fs2.directupload.net/images/150102/tzyuurei.png (last modified: 2015) Gunnex (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF Gunnex (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
copy of File:Verhovazhsky District Morozovskoe.svg, was uploaded by a mistake with wrong name Daryona (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
copy of File:Verhovazhsky District Shelotskoe.svg, was uploaded by a mistake with wrong name --Daryona (talk) 22:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused and I think it's out of the project scope. Dontreader (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Not looklike real source. Give real source and informayion. Sridhar1000 (talk) 12:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC) This picture was taken in 1978, and the copyright expired in Argentina acording to this law (http://infoleg.mecon.gov.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/40000-44999/42755/texact.htm)
Esta imagen es de dominio público porque el copyright de esta fotografía, registrada en la Argentina, ha expirado. (Todas las obras fotográficas de más de 25 años de antigüedad pasan al dominio público luego de 20 años desde su primera publicación, conforme Ley 11.723, Artículo 34 y sus modificaciones, y el Artículo 7 inc. (4) del Convenio de Berna).
Use esta plantilla únicamente para fotos y NO para dibujos u otras obras de arte. Advertencia: debe indicarse la fecha y fuente de una publicación anterior a 20 años de modo que pueda ser verificado por terceros, y darse clara evidencia de que la imagen fue tomada hace más de 25 años.
(ChZeus(talk)) 14:13, 14 October 2011
Deleted: The requirement is that is published that time. Provide a publication. Your own flickr account is not a 1978 publication but is your own, very recent publication (done under violation of the flickr.com terms of service) Martin H. (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I opened a new DR because the photo is still kept here although Martin H. had closed the DR as "delete".
The source is a Chinese website, no proof that it was published in Argentina so {{PD-AR-Photo}} is not accurate. In fact, the photo was taken during the 1982 World Cup (not 1978 as it had been stated in previous DR) that was held in Spain, so it is still copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 01:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This redirect misleadingly implies that episodes 725 and 726 had the same cover. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Out-of-focus picture of miscellaneous, jumbled, unidentifiable objects serves no educational purpose. — Ipoellet (talk) 05:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong chemical for this name (en:HDEP-28 is 2-naphthyl, not 1-naphthyl). I don't see this alternate structure listed at en:List of methylphenidate analogues. It's not in use, and the "(R)" stereochemical designations obscure parts of the structure itself. If it had a use and/or a correct name, could easily recreate in a usable style at correct name. DMacks (talk) 06:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's actually MPH374 (at least structurally), and we already have File:MPH374analog.svg for that use-case. DMacks (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, and not useful for stated purpose of conformational flexibility of the piperidine ring. The conformation illustrated is not reasonable (both the H on the plain bond and the implicit carbon on the dotted bond are mispositioned for a stable en:cyclohexane conformation, and the use of multiple geometric bond stylings at the stereocenter adjacent to the carbonyl is likewise confusing. Have File:FlexedRingD-Threo-Methylphenidate.svg that is drawn in a standard way and reasonable geometry, and File:Dextromethylphenidate-based-on-hydrochloride-xtal-1995-3D-balls.png that has verifiable basis for geometry at all. DMacks (talk) 06:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation, also maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Doubtfully "own work", only contribution of this user. See http://www.uefa.com/womensunder19/photos/photoid=1985382.html Headlocker (talk) 08:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Text-only content is outside of Commons' project scope, specifically Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably-copyrighted book covers. Even if they aren't copyrighted, images of text like this are outside of COM:SCOPE. IagoQnsi (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Marcel Janco died in 1984 Multichill (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes - but the file had a CC0-licens here: http://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/2063601/_2A81B629148F4DE3B3AED49CDF0F9F52.html --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: This file (and it's potential deletion) is the equivalent of this parallel deletion discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait of the poet Ilarie Voronca.jpeg. I suggest that the two be treated the same for the purposes for deletion discussion. Wittylama (talk) 12:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete while the image is freely licenced the French artist died in 1984 so as a derivative work this painting is in copyright until 70 years pma., i.e., until 2055. Unfortunately, ownership of a painting does not confer any rights to the owner which remains with the artist, so the licence on the site is false, probably due to ignorance of copyright law. Ww2censor (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
very low resolution, six much better files: File:Henry Seven England.jpg; File:Henry Tudor of England cropped.jpg; File:Henry7England.jpg; File:King Henry VII.jpg; File:Henry Tudor of England.jpg; File:King Henry VII.png Oursana (talk) 09:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyviolation Ciacho5 (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete, derivative of copyrighted work (by PIXAR/Disney). --C messier (talk) 22:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This is 1903 artwork. License "I, the copyright holder" is in doubt, maybe copyright violation. Can be in public domain due to age, but this is not sure, because Spain demands 80 years from death. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Yanpas (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I have uploaded this file long time ago. I was immature user and thought that retouching of original work would make it copyright-free. The site with original works no longer exists (butovo.com), but non-retouched works are easy to google: "Бомбардировщик M60М" or "Мясищев M60М". Here is site with a lot of bombers [8] Yanpas (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Violation. I have uploaded this file long time ago. I was immature user and thought that retouching of original work would make it copyright-free. The site with original works no longer exists (butovo.com), but non-retouched works are easy to google: "Бомбардировщик M60" or "Мясищев M60". Here is site with a lot of bombers [9] Yanpas (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Violation. I have uploaded this file long time ago. I was immature user and thought that retouching of original work would make it copyright-free. The site with original works no longer exists (butovo.com), but non-retouched works are easy to google: "Бомбардировщик M30" or "Мясищев M30". Here is site with a lot of bombers [10] Yanpas (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo, not own work. Who is the photographer and does (s)he allow to publish the photo under free license? When the photo is done? Taivo (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This cannot be own work dated to January 2015, since it depicts a situation in 1968. A reverse image church shows this image being used well before it was uploaded, e.g. here http://www.scross.co.za/2012/10/how-we-dress-for-mass/ , which leads me to doubt the copyright claims. Tom-L (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tom, sorry for the mislabel. It's my first upload to Wikimedia commons and I obviously did not fill out the information correctly. The picture is pre-1989 and lacks a copyright notice. This means it has fallen into public domain as per http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/public-domain-photos.html. I am not sure how to update it to the correct info to ensure it does not get deleted. mrjgardiner
Deleted: per nomination. The fact that the image itself lacks a copyright notice is not sufficient -- in order to have it on Commons, you must show that it was published in the USA without notice before 1989.
Note that the cite above is from a South African publication. If it is, in fact, a South African image, then it cannot be PD until 2038 at the very earliest.
Also note that your source for copyright information is not entirely good for use on Commons. We have several summary charts -- I like File:PD-US table.svg. Also read COM:L and don't claim "own work" unless you yourself are the actual photographer. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.wixstatic.com/media/3abe73_f728de1e61b94402b785ef886269e404.jpg_srz_500_500_75_22_0.5_1.2_75_png_srz. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://agenda.deriocuarto.com/IMG/antonio-pichi-prez-en-budapest-restobar-id3279_1-w500-h500-m1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn.quotesgram.com/small/52/90/612250666-Photo-of-John-Feehery.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not drawing photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like static.thanhnien.com.vn/uploaded/2014/pictures201406/hien_nhi/xuanphat/xuanphat1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Creatordavid109 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be photos of museum exhibits or something. No evidence of permission from the artist who created these.
- File:Balance.jpg.jpg
- File:Ambition.jpg
- File:Itinerart.jpg
- File:SwAL.jpg
- File:SwP.jpg
- File:SwO.jpg
- File:SwD.jpg
- File:SiB.jpg
- File:SiBL2bis.jpg
- File:SwS.jpg
- File:SwA.jpg
- File:SiBL2.jpg
- File:SiR.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
author: Ghazali Date: May 22nd 1967 Country: Libya
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Kanji Okina (翁観二), the author of the statue, is still alive [11]. Copyright is in effect and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow statues. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Claims to be an own work of the uploader, but it also claims to be taken from another website, which website gives no copyright statements at all, whether in its current version or in a version when this photo was present there. Can't trust that this is indeed a freely licensed image. Nyttend (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion except for those that are undoubtely focused on copyrightable subjects SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 20:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
FOP France and family of deletion request for war memorials. The Douaumont ossuary is an ossuary and monument designed by Léon Azéma (20 January 1888 – 1 March 1978). Will wait to move to images to wikipeida until those images that are likely de minimis are identified.
Labattblueboy (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted all but the one. There is no animosity here, but just simple respect for French law and the work of the architect who died in 1978. If it is not legal to keep an image, then we must not, even though we would like to do so. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Labattblueboy (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete Jeriby. if you crop the four images and upload them over the existing ones before this DR closes next week, then they can be kept, with the current versions deleted. If not, they clearly show the copyrighted architecture and will be deleted, if not by me, then by one of my colleagues. In the case of the latter two images, the De minimis argument is silly -- while it is in the distance, the copyrighted building is the only thing of note in either of them. De minimis implies that the average viewer would not notice the removal or blurring of the problematic element -- these two images are far far from that. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FoP in France, see also Category:Douaumont ossuary
Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As previously noted. Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974). None of the nominated are de minimis or exceptions under Buren v Editions Cellard.
Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Il est impossible d'avoir une vue d'ensemble du cimetière sans avoir le monument en arrière-plan. Or si c'est pour prendre uniquement les tombes, la photographie peut avoir été prise dans n'importe quel cimetière et ne signifie plus grand chose. C'est d'ailleurs ce qu'avaient très bien compris les membres des jurys français et européens lorsqu'ils ont choisi et primé le fichier File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination, except 3, acceptable under the Terreaux jurisprudence. --Yann (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As previously noted. Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974). None of the nominated are de minimis or exceptions under Buren v Editions Cellard.
Labattblueboy (talk) 21:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Still not free, see previous discussions.
Français : Pas encore libre, voir les discussions précédentes.
VIGNERON (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Beyond the images having copyright tag in the description text, FOP France. Non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Labattblueboy (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC) |
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 8
[edit]FOP France. Non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).
Labattblueboy (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Falsche Benamung Unterillertaler (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. Request renaming instead if the file name is wrong. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 20:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Replaced by File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg since i've renamed the Parabola mascot from "Bola cat" to "Bola". Coadde (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and delete the other copy instead (after fixing the attribution of this copy). We should normally delete the most recent copy so that the original history isn't lost. Once the other copy has been deleted, this file can be renamed instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg deleted instead, File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola cat.svg then moved to File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg. ~riley (talk) 20:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey guys, I took this picture for en:Patras Wireless Network. It's not relevant to the network, can you please delete it? Thank you. Project2501a (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. ~riley (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; non-notable individual IagoQnsi (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; non-notable individual IagoQnsi (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. As a school photo, this is unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal touristy photo 106.68.120.156 19:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal touristy photo 106.68.120.156 19:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep We have over 80 photos of Russell and this is the only one of the sundial. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Human adds some information about how big the thing is. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
wrong or misleading authorship claims: reupload of Commons image File:WiddumerWeiher von Sueden.jpg by another user with different name (also note EXIF info and different dates, 2014 vs 2016) Holger1959 (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per FBMD01000a9f0d0000874a0000f9bd000089ce00003ee10000306c0100e74f0200aa5a0200436c0200d17f020058190400
probadly grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
unused logo, ouy of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused. I see no reason to believe he is notable. Out of scope in my opinion. Dontreader (talk) 23:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Largely consists of unnacceptable derivates works of non-free posters, which are the main subjects of the photo. — ξxplicit 23:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of South Vietnam.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Syria-1957.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Facebook is not a source for CC licenced pictures Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
imho potentially non-free content, maybe screenshot (see format), imho also rather bad quality and lots of alternative views of the same subject, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
as per file format imho rather scanned or a screenshot missing sources, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Maybe wrong author and/or licence; https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=966092200124553&set=ecnf.100001713475239&type=3&theater Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation - it's a photo of a poster. Though there's something written at the bottom of the poster it's too small to see. There's no evidence of permission or indication that the artwork has dropped out of coyright. Simonxag (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. Commons is no private photo album. Achim (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion For (;;) (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo used only in deleted English Wikipedia vanity biographies. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
poor quality copy of the original resolution image File:Mirski zamak. Мірскі замак (N. Orda, 1880).jpg Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (talk) 20:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep The file is in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. No consensus for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 23:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete looks like a screenshot of a webpage from the source company, whose site shows a copyright notice, and the uploader probably does not have any rights to the image. PCP applies unless we receive an OTRS verification. Ww2censor (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete professional portrait found by tineye, such as http://www.listal.com/viewimage/7034304h with no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Ww2censor (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Dominika Paleta en Desfilia - Stylized Moon
Una producción de Xtreme Moon y Stylized Moon en Desfilia http://www.tv2e.com
Right. Tv2e, Xtreme Moon, Stylized Moon, http://tequilaaromademujer.com/en/inicio.html (ad?), Lidia Elizarrarás (ad?). What is this? I think Xtreme Moon does things for Tv2e. Leave it to Sol-lol to take screencaps from such confusing videos. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:47, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: With youtube it can be hard to tell a fake and a real account. Pass reverted.--Leoboudv (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted before and seems to have the same problem. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
One of the files is a copyright violation, see for example [12]. The other file contains a watermarked copyright notice which mentions a person who may or may not be the uploader.
Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Bangor University Contemporary Issues in Management Individual contribution to Wikipedia in Globalization and Mobile Phones.pdf
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Bangor University Contemporary Issues in Management in Globalization and Mobile Phones.pdf
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 1 May 2016
他で使われるのは困る」 NANNO (talk) 09:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 02:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The map in this illustration is unsourced. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- This map was drawn by me 9 years ago by drawing on the queue of dozens of vector lines of different colors and filling thus formed fields. If someone has other information on the origin of this map - request evidence. With respect, --Olegzima (talk) 10:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: explanation does not sound plausible. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Only upload by user, obviously not the safe speed UK logo, no educational value. Sebari (talk) 15:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete professional portrait found by tineye 70+ times, is highly unlikely to be the copyright of the uploader. Ww2censor (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a photo of a poster Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Fictitious flag with no historical basis Pikalaka (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Flie widely in use. And there is already concensus for fictional flags. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL EN ASENTAMENTOS HUMANO, UN INSTRUMENTO ESTRATÉGICO PARA EL DESARROLLO.pdf
[edit]Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
manipulated duplicate of file file:Glarus Panorama.jpg, no crrect license, author info not correct Alpöhi (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I could not verify the license. Permission link does not show any permission other than "©Derechos reservados 2015 Ecuavisa". Small photo without metadata, copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Tie-dye print.jpg
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Charlene Asare is needed. In addition, watermark "Mina Evans". Taivo (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
uploaded by new user with no previous uploads, nonsense description, poor quality and close-up framing suggest a screenshot of a video Ringerfan23 (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
no license Mehlauge (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: has OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Author is Michał Sitkiewicz, uploader is Grabazzz. No evidence, that they are same person. OTRS-permission from Michał Sitkiewicz is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
misspelled name Lthomas2 (talk) 18:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ask to have the file renamed instead. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: does not illustrate the car well. Also small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Wegen der Schneezeichnung auf der Motorhaube. Oxtobear (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Wo ist jetzt der Löschgrund? Ich sage nicht, wir müssen es behalten, aber der Löschgrund ergibt ohne weitere Erklärung keinen Sinn. darkweasel94 10:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- There has been no response to my question what the deletion reason is, so Keep for lack of a valid and comprehensible reason for deletion. darkweasel94 11:31, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Oxtobear was bothered by the snow penis, this is no valid reason for a DR. --Ras67 (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope: no educational use. Is this supposed to illustrate penis graffiti? A Ford Focus? Something else? Whatever it is supposed to illustrate, it's also a low-quality (blurry) photo. czar 13:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: well categorised. --Basvb (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Sukkerlyn som optræder sammen med resten af CHEFFrecords I store vega den 27-9 2013-10-01 09-16.jpg
[edit]Unhelpful, blurry and without Metadata ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use -> in scope. --Basvb (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; non-notable individual IagoQnsi (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
This photo was used without permission and should be deleted from the site 2A01:CB00:B4:B400:41EF:38B7:BBFE:B2A9 10:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Author or uploader request deletion. Naughty Jeffrey (talk) 10:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey guys! Can you please delete my picture off wikipedia? Thank you. Project2501a (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: categorized. --Basvb (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://sergiobello.mx/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/sergio_bello_perfil.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Packing two dimensional rectangular elements at orthogonal table in sequence along X axis of table, with horizontal orientation exclusively.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Author's comment on deleting request
I agree with request.
It seems that file really do not comply with all Scope part 1 Rules.
I am sorry for that mistake.
File was uploaded by using file upload wizard that pointed me to Wikimedia project instead to relevant wiki project.
It will be uploaded to relevant wiki project after this deleting process ends.
All the best Perić Željko (talk) 11:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
著作権を侵害しています J-rock777 (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Image said on lower right corner (C) DAITA. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Files by User:Marrovi
[edit]Delete this file, please.
- File:Bandera de Jalisco (propuesta).png
- File:Crop circles de Tlapanaloya, Tequixquiac.png
- File:Documento, Bandera de Hidalgo.JPG
- File:Bandera Edo Mexico.png
- File:EuroMexico.png
- File:Flag of Guadalajara (Mexico).PNG
- File:Stateflag of Quintana Roo.png
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination created on behalf of user because of malformed requests. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept - no deletion reason provided - Jcb (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
TOO concern, Duplicate image at English Wikipedia considerd non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- in my opinion below COM:TOO, Keep.--Wdwd (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the filmmaker DuVernay had this photo taken of her while she was at SiriusXM Studios along with other photos taken of her while there. I have uploaded the photo on behalf of the filmmaker who would appreciate it if the image was not deleted from her Wiki page.
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2015/01/06/06-ava-duvernay.w190.h190.2x.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7zbP0xItA5g/TkCii6JyylI/AAAAAAAAAB0/KzeMEsGfIUc/s1600/Estadio-Atanasio-Girardot-Medellin.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/549903471260880896/FrQ8WDG-_bigger.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
If depicted person was born 1915, then this is probably not 1994 photo, but much older. Small size, only 152×209 pixels. This is the uploader's only contribution. Likely cropped from book cover http://fineprintbooks.com.au/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=80388&osCsid=u47teu36or28hu4fm70rtu8s23 I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. Given author is "WDR" (i.e. "Westdeutscher Rundfunk", a German television institution) and not the uploader, no evidence of permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. Given author is "WDR" (i.e. "Westdeutscher Rundfunk", a German television institution) and not the uploader, no evidence of permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. Given author is "WDR" (i.e. "Westdeutscher Rundfunk", a German television institution) and not the uploader, no evidence of permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. This is part of a group of four uploads by the same user; while the others upload give "WDR" as the author, here "own work" is claimed, but the photo is obviously scanned from some printed source. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Logo with copyright Eingangskontrolle (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Logo does not fall under pd-text. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Found multiple times in Internet, also although not with so big size. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-19/s150x150/12292865_174682689551702_477266961_a.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/600x315/e1/34/bd/e134bd6115d2fca6a55e6de478be79fd.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategoried, very small image which doesn't seem to have anything to do with the mountain of text which is attached to it. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- As uploader, I have no objection to it being deleted. It was part of a batch upload of WWI items that had photographed (Commons:Europeana/Europeana_1914-1918_batch_upload). The large amount of text was associated with all the items that were provided to the digitisation project rather than to this specific item - here's the record for that person's collection (and the 93 images associated with it, of which this item is one): http://www.europeana1914-1918.eu/en/contributions/5350 Only a small proportion of the images collected for that project were batch-uploaded to Commons (for reasons of copyright, and usefulness to Commons in general) but it's probable that some, like this one, were uploaded without much use for Commons. Wittylama (talk) 10:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
This image was first uploaded to Flickr on 16.10.2013. The Flickr page states that this image is copyrighted by John G. Lidstone. Without further information provided by the Wikipedia uploader, I am not convinced that the Wikipedia uploader is the creator of this image. Clithering (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
fictitious flag Pikalaka (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it's a nice flag with a reference.--Io Herodotus (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Indifferent Just uploaded an SVG of a JPG of the same name.--MarsInSVG (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep A good flag with reference Flow234 (talk) 09:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 18:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Football from http://cliparts.co/clipart/2847432 without attribution, not own work as claimed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
If this is 1953 photo, then it cannot be publiched before 1923. Source link is dead. Better license is needed and evidence, that the photo is free. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Public domain as per source. —howcheng {chat} 18:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Page, images and category, like personal vanity images, used originally for the en:Rohit Gaur page on English Wikipedia —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PumpkinSky talk 01:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PumpkinSky talk 01:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely own, false creation date (Verehaeren did not live in 2012); no source proving license validity Ankry (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- See also this DR Ankry (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Of course, I didn't make this photo, I just uploaded it. A thorough search in Google led me now to the Emile Verhaeren museum website where I found a similar photo [13]. This one was made by en:Nicola Perscheid (1864-1930), a German photographer famous for his artistic portrait photography. It is also therefore likely that he made the photo, here proposed for deletion, at about the same time (about 1912 ?) - certainly before the start of WW I in 1914. JoJan (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nicola Perscheid's works are not PD in USA due to URAA unless published (not just created) before 1.1.1923. So publication evidence is required. Ankry (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The Emile Verhaeren museum provided me with the exact information: photographer Fernand Béguin (1878 - ?) made this photo in 1908 and published it in 1920. [14] JoJan (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- So it is PD at least in US. Ankry (talk) 22:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- The Emile Verhaeren museum provided me with the exact information: photographer Fernand Béguin (1878 - ?) made this photo in 1908 and published it in 1920. [14] JoJan (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nicola Perscheid's works are not PD in USA due to URAA unless published (not just created) before 1.1.1923. So publication evidence is required. Ankry (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Of course, I didn't make this photo, I just uploaded it. A thorough search in Google led me now to the Emile Verhaeren museum website where I found a similar photo [13]. This one was made by en:Nicola Perscheid (1864-1930), a German photographer famous for his artistic portrait photography. It is also therefore likely that he made the photo, here proposed for deletion, at about the same time (about 1912 ?) - certainly before the start of WW I in 1914. JoJan (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- keep insteaad of biting the uploader, why not engage with the uploader on their talk page, to fix license, rather than delete? especially when it is an old image. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 16:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Ankry (talk) 13:12, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
The soundtrack uses copyrighted music. Also, on checking the source site I can't see any evidence of a CC licence. Simonxag (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution on Vimeo. Check under 'about'. --Hannolans (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- OK I found the attribution licence. I doubt that will extend to use of the song "Wild Thing". --Simonxag (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- If part of the soundtrack is not under CC-BY, I can remove the that part of the soundtrack. --Hannolans (talk) 13:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission - tv commercial of Dutch insurance company. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Airspace_classes_(United_States).gif Davidfg (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Seems to be "replaced by File:Airspace classes (United States).png missing from the nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/126144800@N02/14644172916/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio per Commons:URAA-restored copyrights Wcam (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: non-USA work. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused uncategorized image of a woman in a dress. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: in any cases, all other upload from the user have been speedy deleted, this unlikely an own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free content. No FoP exemptions due to the MCG not being a public place and the banner is not on permanent display. 106.68.120.156 18:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not covered by fop Australia. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation, metadata shows image was edited with QuickTime and created on 13 October, 2012.--Liji (talk) 08:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://asiandramas.cowblog.fr/27.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think that it can use educational. Out of Scope. Kkairri (talk) 05:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Ce fichier doit être supprimé car il s'agit de Kenny FORAY .Freddy FORAY est son frère jumeau. Eric HOUDAS (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Das Originallogo hat Schöpfungshöhe, es nachzumalen ist URV. Jbergner (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It's a good photo. I do not agree that this is out of scope. Can be used on multiple Wikimedia pages. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
no source given, so this might be also a later made museum photo Avron (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think {{PD-UKGov}} is appropriate. The image have been published there in 2004, at the bottom you can read "This is an extract from the Worcestershire Regiment WW1 history by Captain H. FitzM. Stacke, M.C.". All the infos I found [15] or [16] says it's a 2002 book "Published by Naval & Military Press (2002-09-13)". As there is no evidence of other publications, I will say "delete". Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 12:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation, metadata shows image was edited with Adobe Photoshop and created on 20 August, 2012.--Liji (talk) 08:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Uploader claims they were present at the event. Do you have a link to a source to prove copyvio? —howcheng {chat} 18:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Существует аналогичная SVG-версия Person or Persons Unknown (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Das Bild zeigt keine Musiker des Münchener Kammerorchesters 178.26.19.159 15:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Problem with this Image was the wrong Orchestra-Cat and Description. Corrected qua source of Conductors Timetable: http://www.jxschachtner.com/termine_archiv.html#terminealtanker --Ordercrazy (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Das Bild zeigt keine Musiker des Münchener Kammerorchesters 178.26.19.159 15:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Problem with this Image was the wrong Orchestra-Cat and Description. Corrected qua source of Conductors Timetable: http://www.jxschachtner.com/termine_archiv.html#terminealtanker --Ordercrazy (talk) 21:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have made some feeble attempt to add a licence to the photo. However, feel free to delete the photo. I am sure there are better pictures of the FRI available! :-)
- -- Tor Arne Rysstad
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.163.6 09:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Proof? --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Image should be deleted as it looks either modified and looks plagiarized. First, how did the "author named Torarne" get a close clear picture? The author has no public record of being a professional photographer. The author did take the photo. If he/she did the person should prove a written permission of the same to Wikimedia Commons. Please provide the authentication and official proof of the same. Regards, Thanks, Varghese Jacob
Kept: No reason for significant doubt about authorship given by nominator, who nominated a second time with the same rationale 2 days after the first closure. If it can be shown that the image was first published elsewhere, this would merit more caution. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate file from File:Asambleístas y Prefecto de Manabí defienden el sector de Manga del Cura como territorio manabita (4975292994) (cropped).jpg ✎KOVOX90 05:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Restauré la etiqueta de borrado que el usuario Freddy eduardo eliminó, sigue insistiendo en que no es un duplicado, cuando en realidad lo es ya que el archivo a eliminar es un recorte innecesario del recorte original realizado desde el archivo fuente. El usuario debió de recortar y reemplazar el archivo según lo especifica COM:CROP, más no crear uno nuevo sin razón alguna válida (duplicado).--✎KOVOX90 15:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The cropped version I made was originally different than the cropped from File:Asambleístas y Prefecto de Manabí defienden el sector de Manga del Cura como territorio manabita (4975292994) (cropped).jpg, you can see the original version here [17]. The user changed that file after I upload the other cropped version. --Freddy eduardo (talk) 16:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please first read the article COM:CROP, the changes made by the user User: Freddy eduardo make it unnecessary to create a new file, creating duplicates.--✎KOVOX90 17:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The cropped version I made was originally different than the cropped from File:Asambleístas y Prefecto de Manabí defienden el sector de Manga del Cura como territorio manabita (4975292994) (cropped).jpg, you can see the original version here [17]. The user changed that file after I upload the other cropped version. --Freddy eduardo (talk) 16:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
None of the sources show here works as a source for the image, most point directly to wikipedia, the only webpage is 404 (not available). The uploader is not the photographer, there is no proof this image was published and fits the license applied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Did you look in the book given as source? --тнояsтеn ⇔ 19:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- I am also confused about what is wrong with the sources. You will find the proof that the photograph was published in that book if you go to page 163 of the book, that is what I did. You can verify the date of printing of the book, on-line by looking up the ISBN number. I often scan the pages myself, but this time I did not have to since someone already scanned it and placed it online, and I provided that link as well (now dead, 8 years latter). I never claimed to be "Stanisław Jaworski" who is the photographer, so I am not sure why you think I might be. --Jarekt (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you could remove the extra link to Wikipedia in the source field, perhaps write "From the book..." and remove the dead link, I'd be happy to withdraw the nomination. The confusion arose from the links to Wikipedia for both authors & "Mount Everest" which is just to the mountain, not the book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- I removed link to "Mount Everest", but links to author pages I think are useful as a form of disambiguation and are standard in citation templates. Also the link to "Warsaw" is added by the citation template and can not be removed. Dead links should not be removed either since more savvy users can often find them in Wayback Machine or other tools. I no longer see this photo but most of the page is still there. Using "From the book" also seems pointless since license requires you to specify the book where it was published, and first item in the "Source" is a book citation, so I assumed it was obvious. Adding "From the book..." in English would make the page less readable for people reading this in Polish or other languages. --Jarekt (talk) 04:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Everything seems to be covered, there seems to be a valid source. No open issues. --Basvb (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)