Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 1st, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-text logo, need OTRS-permisasion, source unclear, uploader removes OTRS-request away Motopark (talk) 02:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

need OTRS-permission, uploader has been removed my OTRS-request Motopark (talk) 08:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I delete the logo fifth time (4 times yesterday). Taivo (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

need OTRS-permission, uploader has been removed my OTRS-request Motopark (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, sixth time during two days ... Taivo (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images need sources, it's not enough to claim they're all "PD". Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

just a note to say I've seen this nomination, and will try to make a comprehensive listing of the represented items in a couple of days. Wittylama (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added names, dates, copyright status and thumbnail of it's file on Commons for every artwork visible in this screenshot. That should be sufficient. See the difference between the documentation as it was when nominated for deletion, and how it is now. Pinging also Husky who made the visualisation tool. Wittylama (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork (bookcover) Stolbovsky (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb 1 May 2016. --Achim (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieser User scheint immer wieder Dateien ohne entsprechende Rechte hochzuladen Eingangskontrolle (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erstens ist immer wieder bei 2 Uploads innerhalb der letzten 4 Jahre wohl doch etwas übertrieben (Kioto8 ist anscheinend nur noch auf de:wp aktiv), zwotens geh ich mal davon aus, dass du die Diskussionsseite gar nicht gelöscht haben wolltest. Nix für ungut... --Achim (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR created erroneously, no valid reason for deleting a user's talk page. --Achim (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Staplegunther: Could you please remove your photo on Price Utah page. It is not very representative of the city since it is taken near the truck route viaduct. And it violates several rules of landscape photography. Numero Uno: too much asphalt! Thank you, former resident of Price, Utah---35 years ago! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.52.182.142 (talk)

  • Are you suggesting that a file should be deleted (as the page title suggests), or are you simply suggesting that a file should be removed from a page somewhere? Please clarify what you mean. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: User:Staplegunther doesn't exist on Commons, see also User:Staplegunther~commonswiki who did by now one single upload in 2009.
Assuming the requester wants an image to be removed from a page like en:Price, Utah. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of process scope, nothing to do here. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect title. The correct page is Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - May - Birds in their habitat. -- Colin (talk) 10:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: : Bad name, unused, author's request. --Achim (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 10:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: https://twitter.com/pathawale1

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want to join this forum. I want to delete my account from here. Aamna Qureshi (talk) 23:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Accounts cannot be terminated as well. ~riley (talk) 01:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stalking...? Konto na chwilę (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely for vandalism. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Per uploader's private request. -- ~ Nahid Talk 16:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has an author indicated at the bottom, likely a copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Files from this uploader deleted, copyvio uploder. --Martin H. (talk) 02:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the uploader should prove ownership via COM:OTRS because the image was posted in two articles last year [1] [2]. The uploaded version might have better resolution but perhaps it's from a physical magazine or possibly Google can't find it. Dontreader (talk) 00:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture #4: source unattributed/deleted Seb az86556 (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If one of the pics that I used off commons has been deleted as unsourced, by all means delete the montage. For some reason, Commons isn't allowing me to sign my posts.


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is own work then I think the uploader should prove it via COM:OTRS. It's here [3] [4] [5]. That third source confirms it's an artist who created the image. The uploader must prove that he or she is the artist. Dontreader (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader didnt provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, very unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal naked photo 89.65.3.175 00:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is a screenshot or a derivative work from a TV program called Giggle and Hoot. Some elements are identical in this short video (WARNING: Aussie accent ahead): [6]. Dontreader (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio from www.fau.mil.uy/fotos/aeronaves/pucara/foto_02b.jpg RA-96104 (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 02:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tineye and google finds plenty of copies example https://tineye.com/search/e3e3d00e962a0c582cf4dc7ca73e53e88b5496f3/?sort=size&order=desc Motopark (talk) 02:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source [7] doesn't hav a license posted, and I can't tell if they are the original photographer. Random86 (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, replaced by File:Diazepam-from-xtal-3D-balls.png by same uploader that has geometry verified by cited ref. Image here has no provenance, and is unlikely geometry with the two benzene rings coplanar (VDW collsions) DMacks (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete, for the reasons DMacks gives. Accelrys DS Visualizer's force field for quick minimization is pretty terrible at this kind of thing. I would have drawn the structure in DSV based on the skeletal formula, so the crystal structure-based image is much better. --Ben (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality ({{BadJPG}}). Have File:Neramexane.svg. Only use is in an abandoned Draft-space article (the live variant of that article uses the SVG) DMacks (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cultural appropriation flyer

[edit]

Copyright violation. Photographs are derivative works of the flyer depicted. The content of the flyer is almost certainly held by the author of the flyer, likely either Roger Peet or the Regional Arts and Culture Council. No evidence of permission from the flyer author is presented. — Ipoellet (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this probably passes the threshold of originality such that PD-textlogo doesn't apply. IagoQnsi (talk) 06:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems too complex for PD-textlogo to apply IagoQnsi (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think, that this is gigantic sculpture and that it was not permanently placed. That case Portuguese freedom of panorama does not apply. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, by definition Christmas ornament are not permanetly displayed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Threemonths (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history (over 30 copyright violations deleted; the uploader's only response was to vandalise deletion discussions and blank out the talk page warnings). One person has already complained that their work is being used with false attribution.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and most pictures contain the special instruction FBMD in the metadatas, and went obviously through facebook. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Pippobuono (talk) 08:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, self promotion Pippobuono (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, found in http://www.taringa.net/post/imagenes/16935689/Anonymous-Fondos-HD-Wallpapers.html Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Straox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artwork without usage or any educational goals. The only files of user

Stolbovsky (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also the background is maybe a copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 23:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, low quality, out of scope The Photographer (talk) 23:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:I-10 (LA).svg and is the wrong size. Rschen7754 23:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979  09:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Malinion (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Scope. Personal photo, uploaded only for a clearly non notable article. Geraki TLG 04:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and out of scope. Dontreader (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and out of scope. No educational value. No description given. Dontreader (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Also there is no freedom of panorama in India for paintings. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexander Moroz died in 2009. The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexander Moroz died in 2009. The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexander Moroz died in 2009. The source of this picture is unknown. We neither know the year it was taken. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test video. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabs Paris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Margaretks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cellxz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruiz Roscigno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuelcalvino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/30261024.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andile Moeketsi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2006 photo with no source or author, also not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope. Commons is no private photo album. Achim (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kadammanitta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF and/or out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 20:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, appears to be derived from previously published (example) http://fs2.directupload.net/images/150102/tzyuurei.png (last modified: 2015) Gunnex (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF Gunnex (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:Verhovazhsky District Morozovskoe.svg, was uploaded by a mistake with wrong name Daryona (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:Verhovazhsky District Shelotskoe.svg, was uploaded by a mistake with wrong name --Daryona (talk) 22:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and I think it's out of the project scope. Dontreader (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not looklike real source. Give real source and informayion. Sridhar1000 (talk) 12:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC) This picture was taken in 1978, and the copyright expired in Argentina acording to this law (http://infoleg.mecon.gov.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/40000-44999/42755/texact.htm)[reply]

Esta imagen es de dominio público porque el copyright de esta fotografía, registrada en la Argentina, ha expirado. (Todas las obras fotográficas de más de 25 años de antigüedad pasan al dominio público luego de 20 años desde su primera publicación, conforme Ley 11.723, Artículo 34 y sus modificaciones, y el Artículo 7 inc. (4) del Convenio de Berna).

Use esta plantilla únicamente para fotos y NO para dibujos u otras obras de arte. Advertencia: debe indicarse la fecha y fuente de una publicación anterior a 20 años de modo que pueda ser verificado por terceros, y darse clara evidencia de que la imagen fue tomada hace más de 25 años.

(ChZeus(talk)) 14:13, 14 October 2011


Deleted: The requirement is that is published that time. Provide a publication. Your own flickr account is not a 1978 publication but is your own, very recent publication (done under violation of the flickr.com terms of service) Martin H. (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I opened a new DR because the photo is still kept here although Martin H. had closed the DR as "delete".

The source is a Chinese website, no proof that it was published in Argentina so {{PD-AR-Photo}} is not accurate. In fact, the photo was taken during the 1982 World Cup (not 1978 as it had been stated in previous DR) that was held in Spain, so it is still copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 01:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect misleadingly implies that episodes 725 and 726 had the same cover. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Out-of-focus picture of miscellaneous, jumbled, unidentifiable objects serves no educational purpose. — Ipoellet (talk) 05:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong chemical for this name (en:HDEP-28 is 2-naphthyl, not 1-naphthyl). I don't see this alternate structure listed at en:List of methylphenidate analogues. It's not in use, and the "(R)" stereochemical designations obscure parts of the structure itself. If it had a use and/or a correct name, could easily recreate in a usable style at correct name. DMacks (talk) 06:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually MPH374 (at least structurally), and we already have File:MPH374analog.svg for that use-case. DMacks (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and not useful for stated purpose of conformational flexibility of the piperidine ring. The conformation illustrated is not reasonable (both the H on the plain bond and the implicit carbon on the dotted bond are mispositioned for a stable en:cyclohexane conformation, and the use of multiple geometric bond stylings at the stereocenter adjacent to the carbonyl is likewise confusing. Have File:FlexedRingD-Threo-Methylphenidate.svg that is drawn in a standard way and reasonable geometry, and File:Dextromethylphenidate-based-on-hydrochloride-xtal-1995-3D-balls.png that has verifiable basis for geometry at all. DMacks (talk) 06:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation, also maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully "own work", only contribution of this user. See http://www.uefa.com/womensunder19/photos/photoid=1985382.html Headlocker (talk) 08:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only content is outside of Commons' project scope, specifically Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. LX (talk, contribs) 08:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably-copyrighted book covers. Even if they aren't copyrighted, images of text like this are outside of COM:SCOPE. IagoQnsi (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marcel Janco died in 1984 Multichill (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - but the file had a CC0-licens here: http://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/2063601/_2A81B629148F4DE3B3AED49CDF0F9F52.html --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete while the image is freely licenced the French artist died in 1984 so as a derivative work this painting is in copyright until 70 years pma., i.e., until 2055. Unfortunately, ownership of a painting does not confer any rights to the owner which remains with the artist, so the licence on the site is false, probably due to ignorance of copyright law. Ww2censor (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low resolution, six much better files: File:Henry Seven England.jpg; File:Henry Tudor of England cropped.jpg; File:Henry7England.jpg; File:King Henry VII.jpg; File:Henry Tudor of England.jpg; File:King Henry VII.png Oursana (talk) 09:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviolation Ciacho5 (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, derivative of copyrighted work (by PIXAR/Disney). --C messier (talk) 22:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is 1903 artwork. License "I, the copyright holder" is in doubt, maybe copyright violation. Can be in public domain due to age, but this is not sure, because Spain demands 80 years from death. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Yanpas (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded this file long time ago. I was immature user and thought that retouching of original work would make it copyright-free. The site with original works no longer exists (butovo.com), but non-retouched works are easy to google: "Бомбардировщик M60М" or "Мясищев M60М". Here is site with a lot of bombers [8] Yanpas (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. I have uploaded this file long time ago. I was immature user and thought that retouching of original work would make it copyright-free. The site with original works no longer exists (butovo.com), but non-retouched works are easy to google: "Бомбардировщик M60" or "Мясищев M60". Here is site with a lot of bombers [9] Yanpas (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. I have uploaded this file long time ago. I was immature user and thought that retouching of original work would make it copyright-free. The site with original works no longer exists (butovo.com), but non-retouched works are easy to google: "Бомбардировщик M30" or "Мясищев M30". Here is site with a lot of bombers [10] Yanpas (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, not own work. Who is the photographer and does (s)he allow to publish the photo under free license? When the photo is done? Taivo (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This cannot be own work dated to January 2015, since it depicts a situation in 1968. A reverse image church shows this image being used well before it was uploaded, e.g. here http://www.scross.co.za/2012/10/how-we-dress-for-mass/ , which leads me to doubt the copyright claims. Tom-L (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Tom, sorry for the mislabel. It's my first upload to Wikimedia commons and I obviously did not fill out the information correctly. The picture is pre-1989 and lacks a copyright notice. This means it has fallen into public domain as per http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/public-domain-photos.html. I am not sure how to update it to the correct info to ensure it does not get deleted. mrjgardiner


Deleted: per nomination. The fact that the image itself lacks a copyright notice is not sufficient -- in order to have it on Commons, you must show that it was published in the USA without notice before 1989.

Note that the cite above is from a South African publication. If it is, in fact, a South African image, then it cannot be PD until 2038 at the very earliest.

Also note that your source for copyright information is not entirely good for use on Commons. We have several summary charts -- I like File:PD-US table.svg. Also read COM:L and don't claim "own work" unless you yourself are the actual photographer.      Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.wixstatic.com/media/3abe73_f728de1e61b94402b785ef886269e404.jpg_srz_500_500_75_22_0.5_1.2_75_png_srz. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://agenda.deriocuarto.com/IMG/antonio-pichi-prez-en-budapest-restobar-id3279_1-w500-h500-m1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn.quotesgram.com/small/52/90/612250666-Photo-of-John-Feehery.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not drawing photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like static.thanhnien.com.vn/uploaded/2014/pictures201406/hien_nhi/xuanphat/xuanphat1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Creatordavid109 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be photos of museum exhibits or something. No evidence of permission from the artist who created these.

Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

author: Ghazali Date: May 22nd 1967 Country: Libya


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kanji Okina (翁観二), the author of the statue, is still alive [11]. Copyright is in effect and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow statues. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be an own work of the uploader, but it also claims to be taken from another website, which website gives no copyright statements at all, whether in its current version or in a version when this photo was present there. Can't trust that this is indeed a freely licensed image. Nyttend (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 1

Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).

Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment FYI some of these files have already gone through RfD and were kept by Commons:De minimis : Commons:Deletion requests/File:0 Verdun - Ossuaire de Douaumont (1).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cimetière - Douaumont.JPG, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Douaumont ossuar1y.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Douaumont ossuary during german occupation.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Douaumont ossuary6.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imm011 Douaumont Ossuary.JPG, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Knekelhuis-verdun.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ossuaire Panorama.jpg, etc. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think any of these meets the de minimis guideline. Whether the building is in the background or not is irrelevant. We've just had a comparable case here. Per COM:DM: "So, for example, if the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'." --Eleassar (t/p) 21:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer to keep the pics, but if it's not possible (we'll see which decision will be taken in the end) it would be great that files concerning the cemetery are cropped instead of being completely deleted. Jeriby (talk) 04:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion except for those that are undoubtely focused on copyrightable subjects SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 20:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 2

FOP France and family of deletion request for war memorials. The Douaumont ossuary is an ossuary and monument designed by Léon Azéma (20 January 1888 – 1 March 1978). Will wait to move to images to wikipeida until those images that are likely de minimis are identified.

Labattblueboy (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is starting to be little bit funny, but those images were suggested already twice to be deleted, last time December 2013. How often will they be nominated? Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hadn't noticed the previous request. That being said many are clearly not de minimus. Ex:
  • Beinhaus von Douaumont.JPG
  • Beinhaus von Douaumont (Panorama).jpg
  • File:Douamont, monument israélite.jpg
  • File:Douaumont ossuary during german occupation.jpg
  • File:Imm011 Douaumont Ossuary.jpg
  • File:Knekelhuis-verdun.jpg
  • File:Schankenhaus-Douaumont-w.jpg
  • File:Verdun Beinhaus Innen.JPG
  • likely File:Verdun Beinhaus von Douaumont (1601806154).jpg
Others are questionably de minimis because the cemetery was designed in conjunction with the architectural piece. --Labattblueboy (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For instance, the previous conclusion for File:Douaumont ossuary during german occupation.jpg is clearly incorrect. The memorial is neither incidental, small or trivial element of the image. The intent to show the memorial in full is clearly deliberate which is a key element that voids this de minimis claim. French law requires that the inclusion of the subject not be intentional, and in nearly every image here it clearly is.--Labattblueboy (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per the French exception, artwork must not be intentionally included as an element of the setting: its presence in the picture must be unavoidable. In what capacity do these images fit that description. In every case nominated (not every image was nominated) the memorial is framed in intentionally and the architecture of the building in clear (e.g. Not minor element of image). Just because you can't see the exact carvings in the building doesn't mean the image is free of copyright. The central tower rising from the long building is clearly unique and clearly that is copyrightable (partially covered in scaffolding or not).--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The scaffolding is the "event of the restoration", that's why I think the building is De Minimis. There are other pictures kept because of an event (for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tour de l Europe incendie Mulhouse20100116.JPG the file was kept because the event was a fire on the building).
  •  Delete While in many cases there is a sea of crosses in the foreground, in every image the eye is immediately drawn to the tower of the building which certainly has a copyright. The images would be very different if the tower were not in them. It would have been easy for the photographers to show us the sea of crosses without the tower by pointing the camera out from the tower instead of at it. The fact that the photographer deliberately included the tower when he or she did not need to makes it impossible to accept DM for any of them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete None of the copyrighted work can be considered trivial of any of these, as per both Labattblueboy and Jim the copyright work has been deliberately included and is a significant element of the compassion. LGA talkedits 08:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per the already presented reasons; the previous closure was clearly incorrect. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - For all the reasons they were kept before. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Jeriby has commented specifically on File:Beinhaus Doaumont.jpg. I agree that there is no architecture there, but I'm not sure what there is -- this looks like personal art -- hands rising from a pile of bones? I don't see any educational use of it, so while it is off topic for the rest of the DR, there is no reason to keep it..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's useful to keep this one also, it illustrates bones of WWI soldiers dead at Verdun. It's not art, it's just bones, stored there (this is an ossuary). And it's a pile to illustrate how tragic could be this war. And there is a glass to protect these bones, that's why we can see the photographer. Jeriby (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. Thank you for the explanation. I could argue that because the photographer is so much a part of the image that we should delete it on quality grounds, but it is an unusual image and probably should be kept. So, my opinion is delete all but this one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I just would like to comment that in the case of my upload File:Douaumont ossuary during german occupation.jpg the original picture got lost during an incident (for sure). I luckily found the more or less good scanned image after years on my HDD suffering significant compression artefacts (i did not know/ care about that as teenager). I decided to upload the image to the wikipedia in oder to have the best way digital historical images could be conserved and maintained. Now i see that it is harder than i thought. Ude 21:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment to User:Ude. Actually, you have accomplished your goal here. Commons keeps everything, and the plan is to keep everything forever. On January 1, 2049, when the architect's copyright has expired, these images will be restored to public view. In addition, they will remain available on request for fair use in places other than Commons..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted all but the one. There is no animosity here, but just simple respect for French law and the work of the architect who died in 1978. If it is not legal to keep an image, then we must not, even though we would like to do so. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 3

Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).

Labattblueboy (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per the French exception, artwork must not be intentionally included as an element of the setting: its presence in the picture must be unavoidable. In what capacity do these images fit that description. In every case nominated (not every image in the categoy was nominated) the memorial is framed in intentionally and the architecture of the building in clear (e.g. Not minor element of image). The central tower rising from the long building is clearly unique and clearly that is copyrightable.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Jeriby. if you crop the four images and upload them over the existing ones before this DR closes next week, then they can be kept, with the current versions deleted. If not, they clearly show the copyrighted architecture and will be deleted, if not by me, then by one of my colleagues. In the case of the latter two images, the De minimis argument is silly -- while it is in the distance, the copyrighted building is the only thing of note in either of them. De minimis implies that the average viewer would not notice the removal or blurring of the problematic element -- these two images are far far from that. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
FoP cases in Category:Douaumont ossuary

No FoP in France, see also Category:Douaumont ossuary

Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg compatible with French law (Terreaux court case). Yann (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 4

As previously noted. Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974). None of the nominated are de minimis or exceptions under Buren v Editions Cellard.

Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Car comme le fait très bien remarquer Yann seuls trois fichiers sont acceptables suivant la jurisprudence Terreaux. En effet lorsqu'on prend une photographie panoramique du cimetière le monument apparaît en arrière plan et est donc un élément incontournable (unavoidable element). Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Terreaux principal is that the representation of a work located in a public place is not infringing when it is incidental (e.g. de minimis) to the subject treated (source: AIPPI Trilateral seminar, 2017 Warsaw). Taking pictures of the landscape and cemetery at Douaumont does not necessitate taking pictures of the building; it's easily avoidable as seen in other cemetery photos of this location in the commons and in those nominated it's clearly the subject. This is not at all similar to the Louvre Pyramid or the 72 small fountains decorating Place des Terreaux in Lyon where photographing them is unavoidable. The building is a central fixture in all noted photographs and it's copyright is not disputed. All images should be deleted until 2049.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Il est impossible d'avoir une vue d'ensemble du cimetière sans avoir le monument en arrière-plan. Or si c'est pour prendre uniquement les tombes, la photographie peut avoir été prise dans n'importe quel cimetière et ne signifie plus grand chose. C'est d'ailleurs ce qu'avaient très bien compris les membres des jurys français et européens lorsqu'ils ont choisi et primé le fichier File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except 3, acceptable under the Terreaux jurisprudence. --Yann (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 5

As previously noted. Per COM:FOP#France: non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974). None of the nominated are de minimis or exceptions under Buren v Editions Cellard.

Labattblueboy (talk) 21:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 6
English: Still not free, see previous discussions.
Français : Pas encore libre, voir les discussions précédentes.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The Terreaux exception is only applicable if an image of the protected subject is unavoidable. The monument has been expressly included and thus this is not deminimus. All of the following should be deleted.-Labattblueboy (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Douaumont ossuary 7

Beyond the images having copyright tag in the description text, FOP France. Non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).

Labattblueboy (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP France. Non-free architecture by Léon Azéma (d. 1978), Max Edrei (d. 1972) and Jacques Hardy (d. 1974).

Labattblueboy (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Benamung Unterillertaler (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 20:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Replaced by File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg since i've renamed the Parabola mascot from "Bola cat" to "Bola". Coadde (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep and delete the other copy instead (after fixing the attribution of this copy). We should normally delete the most recent copy so that the original history isn't lost. Once the other copy has been deleted, this file can be renamed instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg deleted instead, File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola cat.svg then moved to File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg. ~riley (talk) 20:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hey guys, I took this picture for en:Patras Wireless Network. It's not relevant to the network, can you please delete it? Thank you. Project2501a (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. ~riley (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; non-notable individual IagoQnsi (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; non-notable individual IagoQnsi (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal photo. As a school photo, this is unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal touristy photo 106.68.120.156 19:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal touristy photo 106.68.120.156 19:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Human adds some information about how big the thing is. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong or misleading authorship claims: reupload of Commons image File:WiddumerWeiher von Sueden.jpg by another user with different name (also note EXIF info and different dates, 2014 vs 2016) Holger1959 (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per FBMD01000a9f0d0000874a0000f9bd000089ce00003ee10000306c0100e74f0200aa5a0200436c0200d17f020058190400 probadly grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, ouy of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. I see no reason to believe he is notable. Out of scope in my opinion. Dontreader (talk) 23:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Largely consists of unnacceptable derivates works of non-free posters, which are the main subjects of the photo. — ξxplicit 23:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of South Vietnam.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Syria-1957.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook is not a source for CC licenced pictures Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho potentially non-free content, maybe screenshot (see format), imho also rather bad quality and lots of alternative views of the same subject, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per file format imho rather scanned or a screenshot missing sources, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Maybe wrong author and/or licence; https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=966092200124553&set=ecnf.100001713475239&type=3&theater Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - it's a photo of a poster. Though there's something written at the bottom of the poster it's too small to see. There's no evidence of permission or indication that the artwork has dropped out of coyright. Simonxag (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope. Commons is no private photo album. Achim (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion For (;;) (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal photo used only in deleted English Wikipedia vanity biographies. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Extremely low quality book cover for a non-notable book. While I don't doubt that this was the author's own work, it is completely unsuited for this project. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality copy of the original resolution image File:Mirski zamak. Мірскі замак (N. Orda, 1880).jpg Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. No consensus for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 23:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete looks like a screenshot of a webpage from the source company, whose site shows a copyright notice, and the uploader probably does not have any rights to the image. PCP applies unless we receive an OTRS verification. Ww2censor (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete professional portrait found by tineye, such as http://www.listal.com/viewimage/7034304h with no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Ww2censor (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Leoboudv: Dominika Paleta en Desfilia - Stylized Moon

Una producción de Xtreme Moon y Stylized Moon en Desfilia http://www.tv2e.com

Right. Tv2e, Xtreme Moon, Stylized Moon, http://tequilaaromademujer.com/en/inicio.html (ad?), Lidia Elizarrarás (ad?). What is this? I think Xtreme Moon does things for Tv2e. Leave it to Sol-lol to take screencaps from such confusing videos. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:47, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, deleted before and seems to have the same problem. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pune 123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One of the files is a copyright violation, see for example [12]. The other file contains a watermarked copyright notice which mentions a person who may or may not be the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley: No license since 1 May 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

他で使われるのは困る」 NANNO (talk) 09:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 02:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map in this illustration is unsourced. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This map was drawn by me 9 years ago by drawing on the queue of dozens of vector lines of different colors and filling thus formed fields. If someone has other information on the origin of this map - request evidence. With respect, --Olegzima (talk) 10:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: explanation does not sound plausible. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only upload by user, obviously not the safe speed UK logo, no educational value. Sebari (talk) 15:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete professional portrait found by tineye 70+ times, is highly unlikely to be the copyright of the uploader. Ww2censor (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a photo of a poster Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious flag with no historical basis Pikalaka (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

manipulated duplicate of file file:Glarus Panorama.jpg, no crrect license, author info not correct Alpöhi (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify the license. Permission link does not show any permission other than "©Derechos reservados 2015 Ecuavisa". Small photo without metadata, copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by new user with no previous uploads, nonsense description, poor quality and close-up framing suggest a screenshot of a video Ringerfan23 (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license Mehlauge (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: has OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Michał Sitkiewicz, uploader is Grabazzz. No evidence, that they are same person. OTRS-permission from Michał Sitkiewicz is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled name Lthomas2 (talk) 18:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ask to have the file renamed instead. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: does not illustrate the car well. Also small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wegen der Schneezeichnung auf der Motorhaube. Oxtobear (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Oxtobear was bothered by the snow penis, this is no valid reason for a DR. --Ras67 (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: well categorised. --Basvb (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unhelpful, blurry and without Metadata ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: in use -> in scope. --Basvb (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; non-notable individual IagoQnsi (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was used without permission and should be deleted from the site 2A01:CB00:B4:B400:41EF:38B7:BBFE:B2A9 10:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author or uploader request deletion. Naughty Jeffrey (talk) 10:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hey guys! Can you please delete my picture off wikipedia? Thank you. Project2501a (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: categorized. --Basvb (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://sergiobello.mx/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/sergio_bello_perfil.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Author's comment on deleting request

I agree with request.

It seems that file really do not comply with all Scope part 1 Rules.

I am sorry for that mistake.

File was uploaded by using file upload wizard that pointed me to Wikimedia project instead to relevant wiki project.

It will be uploaded to relevant wiki project after this deleting process ends.

All the best Perić Željko (talk) 11:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

著作権を侵害しています J-rock777 (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Image said on lower right corner (C) DAITA. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:Marrovi

[edit]

Delete this file, please.


Kept - no deletion reason provided - Jcb (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO concern, Duplicate image at English Wikipedia considerd non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in my opinion below COM:TOO,  Keep.--Wdwd (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, the filmmaker DuVernay had this photo taken of her while she was at SiriusXM Studios along with other photos taken of her while there. I have uploaded the photo on behalf of the filmmaker who would appreciate it if the image was not deleted from her Wiki page.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2015/01/06/06-ava-duvernay.w190.h190.2x.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7zbP0xItA5g/TkCii6JyylI/AAAAAAAAAB0/KzeMEsGfIUc/s1600/Estadio-Atanasio-Girardot-Medellin.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/549903471260880896/FrQ8WDG-_bigger.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If depicted person was born 1915, then this is probably not 1994 photo, but much older. Small size, only 152×209 pixels. This is the uploader's only contribution. Likely cropped from book cover http://fineprintbooks.com.au/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=80388&osCsid=u47teu36or28hu4fm70rtu8s23 I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. Given author is "WDR" (i.e. "Westdeutscher Rundfunk", a German television institution) and not the uploader, no evidence of permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. Given author is "WDR" (i.e. "Westdeutscher Rundfunk", a German television institution) and not the uploader, no evidence of permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. Given author is "WDR" (i.e. "Westdeutscher Rundfunk", a German television institution) and not the uploader, no evidence of permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As another user pointed out on my talk page in German-language Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this is correctly licensed. This is part of a group of four uploads by the same user; while the others upload give "WDR" as the author, here "own work" is claimed, but the photo is obviously scanned from some printed source. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with copyright Eingangskontrolle (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Logo does not fall under pd-text. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found multiple times in Internet, also although not with so big size. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-19/s150x150/12292865_174682689551702_477266961_a.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/600x315/e1/34/bd/e134bd6115d2fca6a55e6de478be79fd.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategoried, very small image which doesn't seem to have anything to do with the mountain of text which is attached to it. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As uploader, I have no objection to it being deleted. It was part of a batch upload of WWI items that had photographed (Commons:Europeana/Europeana_1914-1918_batch_upload). The large amount of text was associated with all the items that were provided to the digitisation project rather than to this specific item - here's the record for that person's collection (and the 93 images associated with it, of which this item is one): http://www.europeana1914-1918.eu/en/contributions/5350 Only a small proportion of the images collected for that project were batch-uploaded to Commons (for reasons of copyright, and usefulness to Commons in general) but it's probable that some, like this one, were uploaded without much use for Commons. Wittylama (talk) 10:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was first uploaded to Flickr on 16.10.2013. The Flickr page states that this image is copyrighted by John G. Lidstone. Without further information provided by the Wikipedia uploader, I am not convinced that the Wikipedia uploader is the creator of this image. Clithering (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictitious flag Pikalaka (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Keep it's a nice flag with a reference.--Io Herodotus (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Template:Indifferent Just uploaded an SVG of a JPG of the same name.--MarsInSVG (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Keep A good flag with reference Flow234 (talk) 09:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 18:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Football from http://cliparts.co/clipart/2847432 without attribution, not own work as claimed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 18:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is 1953 photo, then it cannot be publiched before 1923. Source link is dead. Better license is needed and evidence, that the photo is free. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/s6pI5ptMEUSxdeMcU68AZQ.aspx Scewing (talk) 15:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Public domain as per source. howcheng {chat} 18:22, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page, images and category, like personal vanity images, used originally for the en:Rohit Gaur page on English Wikipedia —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 12:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PumpkinSky talk 01:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PumpkinSky talk 01:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own, false creation date (Verehaeren did not live in 2012); no source proving license validity Ankry (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also this DR Ankry (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, I didn't make this photo, I just uploaded it. A thorough search in Google led me now to the Emile Verhaeren museum website where I found a similar photo [13]. This one was made by en:Nicola Perscheid (1864-1930), a German photographer famous for his artistic portrait photography. It is also therefore likely that he made the photo, here proposed for deletion, at about the same time (about 1912 ?) - certainly before the start of WW I in 1914. JoJan (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nicola Perscheid's works are not PD in USA due to URAA unless published (not just created) before 1.1.1923. So publication evidence is required. Ankry (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Emile Verhaeren museum provided me with the exact information: photographer Fernand Béguin (1878 - ?) made this photo in 1908 and published it in 1920. [14] JoJan (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So it is PD at least in US. Ankry (talk) 22:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Ankry (talk) 13:12, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The soundtrack uses copyrighted music. Also, on checking the source site I can't see any evidence of a CC licence. Simonxag (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution on Vimeo. Check under 'about'. --Hannolans (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK I found the attribution licence. I doubt that will extend to use of the song "Wild Thing". --Simonxag (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If part of the soundtrack is not under CC-BY, I can remove the that part of the soundtrack. --Hannolans (talk) 13:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of permission - tv commercial of Dutch insurance company. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Airspace_classes_(United_States).gif Davidfg (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be "replaced by File:Airspace classes (United States).png missing from the nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/126144800@N02/14644172916/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio per Commons:URAA-restored copyrights Wcam (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non-USA work. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused uncategorized image of a woman in a dress. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in any cases, all other upload from the user have been speedy deleted, this unlikely an own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free content. No FoP exemptions due to the MCG not being a public place and the banner is not on permanent display. 106.68.120.156 18:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not covered by fop Australia. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, metadata shows image was edited with QuickTime and created on 13 October, 2012.--Liji (talk) 08:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio http://asiandramas.cowblog.fr/27.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier doit être supprimé car il s'agit de Kenny FORAY .Freddy FORAY est son frère jumeau. Eric HOUDAS (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Originallogo hat Schöpfungshöhe, es nachzumalen ist URV. Jbergner (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's a good photo. I do not agree that this is out of scope. Can be used on multiple Wikimedia pages. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given, so this might be also a later made museum photo Avron (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I don't think {{PD-UKGov}} is appropriate. The image have been published there in 2004, at the bottom you can read "This is an extract from the Worcestershire Regiment WW1 history by Captain H. FitzM. Stacke, M.C.". All the infos I found [15] or [16] says it's a 2002 book "Published by Naval & Military Press (2002-09-13)". As there is no evidence of other publications, I will say "delete". Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 12:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, metadata shows image was edited with Adobe Photoshop and created on 20 August, 2012.--Liji (talk) 08:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims they were present at the event. Do you have a link to a source to prove copyvio? howcheng {chat} 18:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Существует аналогичная SVG-версия Person or Persons Unknown (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild zeigt keine Musiker des Münchener Kammerorchesters 178.26.19.159 15:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with this Image was the wrong Orchestra-Cat and Description. Corrected qua source of Conductors Timetable: http://www.jxschachtner.com/termine_archiv.html#terminealtanker --Ordercrazy (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild zeigt keine Musiker des Münchener Kammerorchesters 178.26.19.159 15:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with this Image was the wrong Orchestra-Cat and Description. Corrected qua source of Conductors Timetable: http://www.jxschachtner.com/termine_archiv.html#terminealtanker --Ordercrazy (talk) 21:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.105.97 21:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some feeble attempt to add a licence to the photo. However, feel free to delete the photo. I am sure there are better pictures of the FRI available! :-)
-- Tor Arne Rysstad

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has no official verification or authorization from the original photographer for license of the photo. How did a common photographer get a close shot? This photo seems to be either downloaded or copied from other website or a blog. The author who posted the photo should release the license of this photo or this should be deleted as per Wikipedia Rules and Regulations. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.163.6 09:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Proof? --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: Image should be deleted as it looks either modified and looks plagiarized. First, how did the "author named Torarne" get a close clear picture? The author has no public record of being a professional photographer. The author did take the photo. If he/she did the person should prove a written permission of the same to Wikimedia Commons. Please provide the authentication and official proof of the same. Regards, Thanks, Varghese Jacob

Kept: No reason for significant doubt about authorship given by nominator, who nominated a second time with the same rationale 2 days after the first closure. If it can be shown that the image was first published elsewhere, this would merit more caution. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file from File:Asambleístas y Prefecto de Manabí defienden el sector de Manga del Cura como territorio manabita (4975292994) (cropped).jpg KOVOX90     05:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restauré la etiqueta de borrado que el usuario Freddy eduardo eliminó, sigue insistiendo en que no es un duplicado, cuando en realidad lo es ya que el archivo a eliminar es un recorte innecesario del recorte original realizado desde el archivo fuente. El usuario debió de recortar y reemplazar el archivo según lo especifica COM:CROP, más no crear uno nuevo sin razón alguna válida (duplicado).--KOVOX90     15:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The cropped version I made was originally different than the cropped from File:Asambleístas y Prefecto de Manabí defienden el sector de Manga del Cura como territorio manabita (4975292994) (cropped).jpg, you can see the original version here [17]. The user changed that file after I upload the other cropped version. --Freddy eduardo (talk) 16:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please first read the article COM:CROP, the changes made by the user User: Freddy eduardo make it unnecessary to create a new file, creating duplicates.--KOVOX90     17:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of the sources show here works as a source for the image, most point directly to wikipedia, the only webpage is 404 (not available). The uploader is not the photographer, there is no proof this image was published and fits the license applied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look in the book given as source? --тнояsтеn 19:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am also confused about what is wrong with the sources. You will find the proof that the photograph was published in that book if you go to page 163 of the book, that is what I did. You can verify the date of printing of the book, on-line by looking up the ISBN number. I often scan the pages myself, but this time I did not have to since someone already scanned it and placed it online, and I provided that link as well (now dead, 8 years latter). I never claimed to be "Stanisław Jaworski" who is the photographer, so I am not sure why you think I might be. --Jarekt (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you could remove the extra link to Wikipedia in the source field, perhaps write "From the book..." and remove the dead link, I'd be happy to withdraw the nomination. The confusion arose from the links to Wikipedia for both authors & "Mount Everest" which is just to the mountain, not the book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I removed link to "Mount Everest", but links to author pages I think are useful as a form of disambiguation and are standard in citation templates. Also the link to "Warsaw" is added by the citation template and can not be removed. Dead links should not be removed either since more savvy users can often find them in Wayback Machine or other tools. I no longer see this photo but most of the page is still there. Using "From the book" also seems pointless since license requires you to specify the book where it was published, and first item in the "Source" is a book citation, so I assumed it was obvious. Adding "From the book..." in English would make the page less readable for people reading this in Polish or other languages. --Jarekt (talk) 04:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Everything seems to be covered, there seems to be a valid source. No open issues. --Basvb (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]